Gene editing is a technology based on the capacity to modify a target gene by removing, inserting or substituting DNA. Base-editing (BE) technology has been developed with the aim of inducing local targeted nucleotide substitutions. The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) system is the gene editing tool that currently appears to be the most popular tool due to its efficiency and application to any living organism1. CRISPR/Cas9 acts as molecular scissors with two nuclease domains inducing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). A DSB can be fixed by a nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) during mitosis after the duplication of DNA. Additionally, in the presence of a homologous DNA template containing the desired DNA sequence, such cleavage can be fixed through homology-directed repair (HDR) during the resorption of DSBs, which involves the introduction of the desired sequence through homologous recombination. Both processes result in the formation of abundant indels, rather than substitutions alone, inducing gene knockout, which can be deleterious depending on the gene or the position within it. To improve the efficiency of substitution, a number of BE technologies have been developed.

Some major BE technologies are based on an engineered Cas9 protein fused with a single strand DNA-specific cytidine deaminase (CDA)2,3,4. Another BE technique has been developed based adenosine deaminase (ADA)5 but has only been tested in bacteria. Recently, the CDA and ADA technologies were fused in a single plasmid to form a protein complex that is able to specifically modify nucleotides6. Such technologies have been studied in organisms such as bacteria3,6, animals7,8,9 and plants5,10,11,12, with a variable range of efficiency. Some of these technologies have been reviewed but are still being improved13. Target-AID technology, in which an Arabidopsis thaliana-optimized codon nickase Cas9 (nCas9) fused with a lamprey CDA is used, has been demonstrated as a powerful tool for precise BE in bacteria for multiplexing applications14. However, in plants, only single gene targets in rice and tomato have been reported thus far12.

Tomato is one of the most important commercial horticulture crops grown in the world. The improvement of yield and quality in tomato is a major challenge for breeders, as fruit yield and quality are controlled by several genes acting either independently or in concert. The identification of genes and alleles and their rapid integration in elite cultivars are necessary but time-consuming and expensive processes, as the insertion of a new allelic version in an elite line requires several years and crossing between generations, as observed for the introgression of mutations isolated among mutant collections of the Micro-Tom cultivar15. The recent development of gene editing technologies using programmable nucleases appears to be a promising and efficient approach for both breeding and basic research involving forward and reverse genetics in tomato.

Tomato fruit is known as a good source of lycopene, vitamin C, β-carotene, folate, and potassium16. Carotenoids play an important role in human nutrition because of their pro-vitamin A activity. However, there are other significant health benefits that are attributed to carotenoids, which are thought to be associated with their activity as antioxidants, such as their anticancer potential. Several genes involved in the improvement of carotenoid accumulation have been identified in tomato during the last two decades, such as tomato DNA Damage UV Binding protein 1 (SlDDB1)17,18, deetiolated1 (SlDET1)19 and Lycopene beta cyclase (SlCYC-B)20 for lycopene accumulation or with SlCYC-B20,21,22 and SlCrtISO23 for β-carotene accumulation. Slhp1 and Slhp2 are mutations corresponding to SlDDB1 and SlDET1 genes respectively. These mutants confer the unique characteristics including purple roots resulting from anthocyanin accumulation19,24, dwarfism, dark leaves and dark green fruits17,18,19.

In this study, we tested Target-AID technology for generation of substitution mutations in multiple genes. As a model experiment, we targeted three genes, SlDDB1, SlDET1 and SlCYC-B, which are responsible for carotenoid accumulation, especially that of lycopene in tomato. For this purpose, we used a multiplexing target plasmid carrying three sgRNAs targeting the SlDDB1, SlDET1 and SlCYC-B genes with an nCas9-CDA-UGI (Uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor) protein complex. This approach resulted in the generation of several lines showing substitutions in each target gene simultaneously, demonstrating the usefulness of the Target-AID technology for multiple gene substitutions in tomato.


Target site selection in SlDDB1, SlDET1 and SlCYC-B

As reported previously in tomato, individual mutations in SlDDB117,18, SlDET119 and SlCYC-B20, particularly the Slhp1, Slhp2 and Slog mutations, respectively, result in lines presenting high accumulation of lycopene. Regions close to each original mutation were selected as target site to obtain a new allelic version of each gene (Fig. 1). For SlDDB1, the original Slhp1 mutation is located at nucleotide 8380, where a guanine is substituted by an adenine, resulting in the substitution of an Asp by a Tyr. Because an sgRNA containing this guanine could not be designed, the nucleotide targeted in our construct by using a reverse sgRNA was the guanine located at nucleotide 8383, resulting in the expected substitution of Ala by Pro. For SlDET1, the original Slhp2 mutation, consisting of an AG-to-TG substitution, is located at the junction of intron 10 and exon 11 inducing alternative splicing of the mRNA leading to the deletion of 3 amino acids (Gly, Pro and Glu) of exon 11 within the second Nuclear localization signal (NLS). As the construct could not reproduce the exact substitution, the target region in the exon is expected to produce a nonviable NLS domain, inducing a loss of function resulting in an hp phenotype. For SlCYC-B, the reported mutations involve the deletion of an adenine at nucleotide 111 for the Slogc allele and an insertion around nucleotide 460 for the Slog allele, resulting in a frameshift of the protein in both cases and the production of a nonfunctional enzyme. An expected target site presenting the possibility of introducing a stop codon by cytidine substitution has been selected, resulting in a truncated protein. Based on these assumptions, we expected that a construct inducing only a substitution instead of an indel could produce nonlethal new allelic versions of the gene, with a potential combination of mutated SlDDB1 and SlDET1, inducing a complementary improvement of lycopene accumulation, as synergistic phenotype could be observed on hypocotyl phenotype18. All targets are summarized in Table 1 and schematically represented within the genes in Fig. 1.

Figure 1
figure 1

Representation of SlDDB1, SlDET1 and SlCYC-B target sites. Schematic representation of each candidate gene, (a) SlDDB1, (b) SlDET1 and (c) SlCYC-B, with the previously described mutations and their corresponding annotations with mutation position compared to the first nucleotide of start codon on gene sequence. Black boxes represent exons regions and lines represent introns or UTR regions. Double slashes in introns represent reduction of the intron size. The red triangles represent the site targeted by the Target-AID with their corresponding nucleotides localization on gene.

Table 1 Prediction of SlDDB1, SlDET1 and SlCYC-B off-target sites.

Efficiency of base-editing at the targeted site in the T0 lines

Approximately 13 T0 lines from 9 independent calli resulting from 151 explants infected were regenerated. It represents about 8% of diploid plants that were transformed via the infection of cotyledons. One regenerated line was identified as a positive control because it did not contain the selection marker and was excluded from further analysis, remaining 12 plants as transgenic. The remaining 12 T0 plants (#8, #16, #16-1, #16-2, #16-3 ,#18, #26, #27, #30, #36-2, #43-1, #43-2) showed a typical hp mutant phenotype involving dwarfism, dark leaves and dark green fruits, observable in segregating generation (data not show). The sequencing of each target gene was performed to confirm the presence of a substitution rather of an indel. Results show 11 lines among 12 lines showed simultaneous substitution on 3 targets at the same time (Table 2a), resulting in a ratio of about 91.6% of efficiency of edition. Seven regenerated lines were isolated (#16, #16-1, #16-2, #16-3, #18, #43-1, #43-2), which provided the T1 seeds. As plants in the T0 generation show heterozygotic or chimeric status according to Sanger sequencing, these lines were used to perform amplicon sequencing by NGS to confirm the base-editing efficiency of our construct. Most of the lines showed a high efficiency of cytidine to thymine substitution at the 3′ site of the gRNA for all 3 target genes, with the same pattern of mutation being observed in all independent lines (Fig. 2, Supplementary Tables S1a, S2). Regarding off-target effects, none of the lines presented any significant mutation obtained from the construct, as no substitutions could be observed among the few identified PCR errors (Supplementary Table S1b). Interestingly, no indels for SlDET1 were present in the T0 lines, whereas for SlDDB1 and SlCYC-B, the proportion of total reads showing indels was highly variable, ranging from approximately 12% to more than 90% of the total number of reads (Supplementary Table S1a). The NGS data and the T0 Sanger data are summarized in Supplementary Tables S1, S2, respectively. All of these lines were generated to segregate the mutation pattern in the T1 generation.

Table 2 Mutation type obtained in T0 and T1 generations of edited tomato lines.
Figure 2
figure 2

Logo Fig. of the deep sequencing analysis of on-target sites following Target-AID induction in tomato. Representation of the pattern of mutation induced by Target-AID with the corresponding sgRNA sequence in (a) SlDDB1, (b) SlDET1 and (c) SlCYC-B. Light blue background represents substitution areas, grey background represents PAM sequences. Numbers under the sequence represent the position of nucleotide from the PAM sequence, zero starting from the nucleotide N of NGG PAM sequence.

Characterization of the triple mutations induced in the T1 lines

Seven lines descendances providing fruits and seeds are investigated. The seeds of the 7 T1 lines (#16, #16-1, #16-2, #16-3, #18, #43-1, #43-2) were grown and observed. A minimum of 6 plant per line were observed, and line #16-1 showed few viable seeds. As expected, all lines show substitutions on all targets, resulting from segregation (Table 2b). In line #18, as the T0 generation showed a very high percentage of indels, above 90%, more T1 lines were analyzed. Interestingly, none of the lines showed a homozygous indel in SlDDB1, suggesting a potential lethal effect of the knockout of this gene. This was also confirmed in heterozygous T2 plants from line #18, in which no plants carried a homozygous indel. Only plants showing homozygous or biallelic patterns were used for analysis, which were limited to 2 lines obtained from independent calli. The obtained plants showed the same phenotype as the hp mutant as expected, with purple roots, a dwarf morphology and darker green fruit compared to the WT (Fig. 3a,b, Table 3c, Supplementary Fig. S1a). To analyze the impact on photomorphogenesis, T2 generation was used. We could observe an impact on photomorphogenesis with smaller hypocotyl on T2 mutant lines than WT line, under light and dark conditions (Supplementary Fig. S1b,c), as reported previously on double mutant grown under darkness18. The fruits did not show a significantly darker red epidermal color but tended to show a darker red color of the placenta, especially in line #43-2, more noticeable under light (Fig. 3c). As somatic mutation induced by the presence of the construct remained possible, only null segregant plants that did not show the presence of transgene markers were selected for further experiments. The patterns of mutation observed in all T1 lines analyzed are summarized in Supplementary Table S3. For SlDDB1, Sanger sequencing showed a common pattern of substitution in a homozygous state, where guanine was replaced by adenine at nucleotide 8 383 in lines #16, #16-2, #16-3, #18 and #43-1, resulting in the substitution of Ala by Thr, while in lines #16 and #16-2, a guanine was replaced by a cytidine or thymine at nucleotide 8 377, resulting in the substitution of Asp by His or Tyr, respectively. Interestingly, several plants showed indel in T1 which was not noticed in parental plants. Line #43-2 showed one plant with an indel in SlDDB1 and SlCYC-B, not visible in the parental plant by NGS analysis, and a biallelic state, carrying both substitutions described above in several other plants, not noticed in the parental plant (Table 2b, Fig. 4a). For SlDET1, lines #16 and #16-1 present an indel which was not noticed by NGS sequencing too (Table 2b). It will probably result from a remaining activity of the nCAS9 in plants carrying such substitutions.

Figure 3
figure 3

Plant phenotype of segregant generation. (a) Six-week-old plants in the T1 generation. (b) Fruit size and color at the green mature stage (28 days post-anthesis). (c) Fruit color at the red ripe stage (12 days post-breaker stage). (d) Flower shape and color at the anthesis stage. We noted a similar degree of darkness between the red fruits of the WT and both mutant lines.

Table 3 Carotenoid content in µg g−1FW of T1 and T2 segregant null at red ripe fruits and chlorophyll contents of T2 segregants at green mature fruits.
Figure 4
figure 4

Target AID vectors induce nucleotide and amino acid substitutions in gene-edited tomato plants. Representative substitution spectra and changes in amino acid residues in T1 plants. All figures show target sequences, PAM sequences and DNA modifications are in bold red, bold black, and bold blue font, respectively. Numbers under amino acid sequence represent the residue number position in the protein sequence. (a) Changes in amino acid residues in DDB1-targeted T1 plants; (b) changes in amino acid residues in DET1-targeted T1 plants. (c) Changes in amino acid residues in CYC-B-targeted T1 plants. ‘S’ followed by a number correspond to substitution, with the number of nucleotides substituted. The substitutions in amino acid residues were due to the corresponding DNA substitutions in T1 plants. The marker gene-free plants are highlighted.

In the case of SlDET1, 3 patterns of substitutions in a homozygous state could be observed, all involving the replacement of cytidine with thymine. The double substitution of nucleotides 19,850 and 19,851 resulted in the substitution of Pro by Phe in line 18; a triple substitution at nucleotide 19,857 resulting in the substitution of Asp by Val as the 3rd substitution in lines #16, #16-3, #43-1 and #43-2; and a quadruple substitution resulting in a silent mutation in a codon for Gly at nucleotide 19,861 for line #16-1. Other patterns of mutations were found, but because they were present in a heterozygous form in a single plant, they were excluded from the analysis (Fig. 4b).

Finally, for SlCYC-B, only 2 patterns involving the substitution of guanine by adenine could be observed in a homozygous state. A double substitution led to the formation of a stop codon at nucleotides 353 and 354 and a triple substitution at nucleotides 351, 353 and 354 resulted in the substitution of Met by Ile and the formation of a stop codon immediately thereafter (Fig. 4c). The interesting phenotype reported for mutations in SlCYC-B20 of darker petals could not be observed (Fig. 3d).

Evaluation of carotenoid accumulation in the T1 lines

After selection, only 2 independent callus lines were selected for carotenoid accumulation analysis in the T1 generation on the basis of being triple-substituted mutant lines. Five fruits per plant was harvested. In each independent T1 line selected, only 1 plant showed null segregation and was used for segregant analysis to avoid the somatic mutation effect due to the presence of the transgene in T1 plants (Supplementary Table S4). Other lines, such as line #43-2_7′, were not used due to a premature death before obtaining seeds. Fruits were harvested at 12 days post-breaker stage (DPB), and only the pericarp was retained to prevent bias resulting from the whiter columella color in the WT. The total carotenoid content was measured by HPLC and adjusted to the lycopene standard for calculation. As each of the null segregant lines #16-3_3 T1 and #43-2_2 T1 presented a different mutation in DDB1, with a biallelic version of the gene occurring in #43-2_2 (Fig. 4a), differentiation of the carotenoid composition and accumulation was expected. Line #43-2_2 showed a 2nd SNP at nucleotide 928 only in the heterozygous state, and as plants with no mutation at this position showed a similar phenotype to the heterozygotes (Fig. 3c), this mutation was considered recessive and did not affect the results under biallelic conditions. The results of the analysis in the T1 lines showed an almost two-fold increase in lycopene in lines #43-2_2, whereas #16-3_3 showed an increase of approximately 30% (Table 3a). The accumulation of β-carotene was expected to be reduced compared to that in the WT, resulting in an expected disruption of the CYC-B enzyme. Interestingly, we observed an increase in β-carotene in #16-3_3 of more than two-fold in the T1 generation. In the #43-2_2 line, the β-carotene content remained stable compared to that in the WT. Same tendency of accumulation could be observed in T2 generation, with a total carotenoid, lycopene and β-carotene higher accumulation in mutated lines compare to the WT (Table 3b). However, at the green stage, fruits from line #16-3_3 showed a darker color (Fig. 3c), resulting from a higher content of chlorophyll, suggesting a greater increase in carotenoids compared with line #43-2_2 (Table 3c). Regarding the upstream carotenoid pathway, both mutated lines showed greater accumulation of phytofluene in the T1 line. In the downstream portion of the lycopene pathway, only line #16-3_3 showed an increase in the accumulation of lutein and neoxanthin.


Our results confirm that Target-AID is an efficient tool for inducing multiple-gene cytidine substitutions in tomato, with a substitution ratio higher than 40% of total number of reads without indel in all three targets simultaneously for all lines analyzed in the T0 generation, and no off-targets were detected (visualized in Fig. 2, Supplementary Table S1b). As reported previously, Target-AID tends to produce C to T and G to A substitutions3,12. As tomato is routinely subjected to transformation with standard protocols developed over decades25,26, the ratio of regeneration and transformation is known to follow standard patterns close to 10%. Among the 12 regenerated plants, 11 presented substitutions at all three targets simultaneously, representing about 91.6% of efficiency in regeneration. This ratio was much higher than that obtained in previous studies for multiplex targeting by non-modified Cas9 system. A study on the carotenoid pathway in tomato, showed more variable results depending on the target in the pathway (0 to 95.83% per target, with only 8.33% carrying more than 2 target mutations)27. Same observation was also reported on parthenocarpy trait, using non modified Cas9 system (11 to 65%)28. However, the promoter of the Cas protein or gRNA influences the efficiency of edition28, as observed for codon-optimized versions such as CDA Arabidopsis thaliana-optimized versions12.

The nCas9 protein generates single-strand breaks, and the UGI protein decreases indel formation after replication3, resulting in an indel rate lower than that coming from the use of the conventional Cas9 system. The Cas9 protein is mainly used to generate indels after the fixation of a lesion, and the most high-efficiency edition results in frameshift mutations27,29,30. In the case of Target-AID, the segregation of the generated mutations tends to produce lines carrying substitutions instead of indels in either plant or animal cells9,12. In our study, the ratio of indels varied from more than 90% of total reads resulting from NGS sequencing for SlDDB1 in line #18 to 0% for SlDET1 in all lines, with an average of 15% to 25% (Supplementary Table S1). This was observed upon direct PCR product sequencing in the T0 generation, with very low histogram peaks mix noticed downstream of the indel site on Sanger reads (Supplementary Fig. S2), coming from the presence of few amplificons of the DNA strand carrying indel, resulting in a potential error of interpretation as a noise background. This low amount of indel can also be noticed by the few amounts of heterozygote plants carrying an indel in the next generation (Supplementary Table S3).

The mutations in SlDDB1 and SlDET1 originally described in previous publications regarding hp tomato mutants17,18,19, resulted in SNPs that do not induce total knockout of the gene, probably due to lethal effects in the homozygous condition. As indels were present only in the heterozygous condition for SlDDB1 and SlDET1 (Supplementary Table S3), this could have resulted from a potential deleterious effect of the knockout of these genes. In the case of SlDET1, the original Slhp2 mutation led to alternative splicing, inducing a deletion of three amino acids in exon 11, resulting in a truncated NLS19. However, this mutation was described as an incomplete knock-out mutation, with approximately 10% of the mRNA being correctly spliced. No indel allele mRNA of SlDDB1 has been reported previously. In our case, the absence of homozygous plants for an indel in SlDDB1 or SlDET1 could be explained by the necessity for a small amount of functional protein, as no T2 homozygous indel lines could be obtained from line #18, which showed the highest segregation of indels.

Two alleles of SlDDB1 could be obtained, with greater availability of the single SNP version. For SlDDB1, one mutation was located 4 bp from the original Slhp1 mutation, resulting in the substitution of the subsequent amino acid compared to the original mutation17. The substitution of alanine by threonine was located at a position that is not strongly conserved compared to the previous asparagine to tyrosine substitution in Slhp1 (Supplementary Fig. S3). As each amino acid belong to a different group, exhibiting a hydrophobic side chain or an uncharged polar chain, respectively, these substitutions might induce a change of conformation of the protein. However, the substitution of aspartic acid by histidine at amino acid 315 in line #42-2-2 occurred in a strongly conserved domain, potentially resulting in a strong effect on plant growth, explaining the difficulty of obtaining a homozygote for this position (Supplementary Fig. S3). A potentially stronger effect on carotenoid accumulation compared to line #16-3-3, with a codominant effect, may be considered. The impact of this mutation should be observed in segregating homozygotes in the T2 population.

Impact on photomorphogenesis could be observed with smaller hypocotyl of double mutant grown under light and dar conditions (Supplementary Fig. S1b,c) as reported previously in tomato18. But analysis of impact of each mutation on segregation generation should be performed to confirm if we have an additional effect of both mutations on the plant growth, as reported18.

The generation of a truncated protein is possible by the introduction of a stop codon, as in our example involving SlCYC-B. The original Slogc mutant has been reported to exhibit an insertion resulting in a frameshift, showing the nonlethal effect of knocking out the gene. As the SlCYC-B target resulted in a stop codon and, thus, a predicted truncated protein, the mutant should show a darker orange flower phenotype compared to the WT, as described in Slog mutants20. Interestingly, we could not clearly observe such a phenotype of tawny orange flowers (Fig. 3). The SlCYC-B protein also functions as a neoxanthin synthetase in addition to a chromoplastic lycopene-β-cyclase, which results in the transformation of violaxanthin to neoxanthin31. In our loss of function of SlCYC-B lines, we do not observe a decrease in β-carotene or neoxanthin contents as expected. Interestingly, we can observe an increase in both lutein content, β-carotene and neoxanthin (Table 3a,b). Such observation of no decrease of β-carotene in SlCYC-B defective lines has been already reported in the Micro-Tom background32. This can probably be explained by the Micro-Tom genotype, as 2 different populations, MT Brazil32 and MT Japan, in our case, present a mutation in SlCYC-B without a phenotype of modification in lycopene accumulation.

In conclusion, Target-AID is an efficient tool for inducing multiple-gene substitutions in tomato, which are identified in a mutant population. The conventional Cas9 technique can cause a potential problem regarding the lethal effect of gene knock-out caused by indel mutations, as observed for SlDDB1 and SlDET1. Although the generation of a single target mutation has already been demonstrated in the Sletr1 and Sldella12 genes, this is the first report of the introduction of substitutions among multiple genes in tomato. This technique will be a useful tool for the engineering of breeding traits controlled by multiple genes in elite lines of tomato. It can also be used to create new alleles from spontaneous mutations discovered in other mutant populations, including those obtained through spontaneous, gamma- or X-ray or Ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) mutagenesis, such as the original Sletr133 and Sldella34 mutants. New technologies for targeted replacement in the genomic DNA space and the introduction of new codons are still under development using CRISPR-Cas technology such as Prime Editing35. However, as such technology still shows a very low efficiency, the Target-AID is currently one alternative whereby breeders can introduce allelic variations in multiple targets in a single line and single generation.

Materials and methods

Vector construction

The vector construct used in this study was derived from a previous study12 but was modified by the insertion of the UGI fragment and amplified by PCR from pScI_dCas9-CDA-UL (Addgene #108551)14 using the following primers: kn2052, CTAAGAAGAAACGTAAAGTAgggcCcATGACCAACCTTTCCGAC and kn2053, agctgggaggcctggatcAgGgctatgcaaccagtccTAGCATC. The fragment was then inserted into ApaI-digested pDicAID_nCas9-PmCDA_NptII by Gibson assembly to obtain pDicAID_nCas9-CDA-UGI-LVA_NptII.

The target guide cassette was replaced as described below. Each of the target sgRNA sequences for SlDDB1, SlDET1 and SlCYC-B was individually inserted into pDicAID between the AtU6 promoter and the chimeric sgRNA scaffold (presenting an AscI site in the 5′-terminal region and an MluI site in the 3′-terminal region of the gRNA) by a PCR method and then circularized by Gibson assembly. Each resulting target sgRNA expression unit consisted of the AtU6 promoter with an I-SceI-AscI site in the 5′-terminal region and a target-specific sgRNA with an MluI-SpeI-I-SceI site in the 3′-terminal region. New multiplexing plasmids were generated by double digestion as follows: MluI and SpeI double digestion for target 1(SlDDB1) to open the vector and AscI and SpeI double digestion for target 2(SlDET1) to release the fragment for extraction by gel purification. The products were ligated by recombination at the AscI-digested site with MluI and then transferred into highly competent E. coli. The same process was repeated for target 3(SlCYC-B) using the previous plasmid construct obtained from the ligation of the target 1 and target 2 products. Primer list used for the construction of the plasmid can be found in supplementary data (Supplementary Table S5).

Plant transformation and culture

The tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cv. Micro-Tom Japan was used in this study, which was provided by the NBRP tomato program at the University of Tsukuba. The vector construct was introduced by Agrobacterium transformation with slight modification25,26. Transgenic diploid plants were selected by kanamycin resistance. The plants and their descendants (T1 and T2 lines) were grown in a culture chamber under an LED photosynthetic photon flux of 270 µmol m−2 s−1 light (16 h/8 h) at a constant temperature of 25 °C. About 151 explants were infected and only 13 diploid plants were successfully regenerated and analyzed in further experimentations.

Photomorphogenesis experimentation has been conducted on T2 generation under same light condition as growing plants, or under total darkness, for 7 days. Seeds were treated with a bleach for 15 min followed by 4 washes with autoclaved tap water and transferred on ½ MS medium in Magenta box. Box were transferred for 2 days under darkness, then for 5 days under light for light experiment, or 6 consecutive days in dark followed by one day in light condition. Hypocotyl length were measured using digital caliper (Mitutoyo, Japan).

PCR and sequencing analysis

For PCR amplification, the primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S5. For NGS sequencing, each target locus was amplified using PrimeSTAR GXL (Takara, Japan) following the manufacturer’s protocol, and the second-round PCR products were extracted from 0.8% agarose gels under blue LED light to prevent PCR product degradation. For Sanger sequencing, targets were amplified using KOD FX Neo (Takara, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and the PCR product was directly purified using the FastGene Gel/PCR Extraction kit (Nippon Genetic, Japan).

NGS analysis

The design of the target was conducted as reported in our previous study on the Target-AID system12 using CCTop (, and selection was performed according to the proximity of the original mutation described for SlDDB117,18 and SlDET119 and the potential for the generation of a stop codon in SlCYC-B20. Off-target associations were selected based on their higher scores. Both target and off-target effects were analyzed in 7 independent T0 lines, which were then used for the production of T1 seeds. The fragment containing the target region (1 kb) was firstly isolated by PCR reaction from genomic DNA, using the first primer set. After gel verification, to obtain an adaptor-containing amplicon (~ 0.5 kb), a second round of nested PCR was conducted using the first product as a template and a second pair of primers containing adaptor sequences. Expected products were extracted after separation in 0.8% agarose gels and band extraction using a FastGene Gel/PCR Extraction kit (Nippon Genetic, Japan). The concentration and quality of the samples were determined using the KAPA Library Quantification kit for Illumina (Kapa Biosystems, Roche, CH) on a BioRad CFX96 qPCR system (BioRad, CA, USA). Approximately 50 ng of the product per sample was bulked for analysis. The primers used in this experiment are listed in Supplementary Table S5. The amplicons were labelled using NEBNext Multiplex Oligos for Illumina (Index Primer Set 1 and Dual Index Primer Set 1) (New England BioLabs, MA, USA). Deep sequencing was performed on a MiSeq sequencing system (Illumina, CA, USA), and more than 200 000 paired 300 bp reads per sample were obtained on average. Data analysis was performed using Geneious Prime 2019 (Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand ( The sequence reads were paired and trimmed using the BBDuk Adapter/quality Trimming Version 38.37 plug-in from Brian Bushnell, based on the following settings: Trim Adapter with all libraries, Kmer length: 37; maximum substitutions: 1; maximum substitutions + INDELs: 0; trim low quality: both ends; minimum quality: 30; trim adapters based on paired read overhangs: minimum overlap: 20; discard short reads, minimum length: 200 bp. Paired and trimmed samples were mapped to the reference using Geneious mapper with the following settings: sensitivity: highest sensitivity; find structural variants, short insertions, and deletion of any size; minimum mapping quality: 30; trim paired read overhangs; only map paired reads that map nearby; minimum support for structural variant discovery: 2 read, include insertions in structural variants. Variant calling was performed with the following settings: minimum coverage: 10; minimum variant frequency: 0.05; maximum variant p-value: 10-3: 3 (0.1% to see variant by chance); p-value calculation method: approximate; advanced: merge adjacent variations. Both in- and off-target mutation frequencies were calculated using the numbers of reads with DNA modifications per total reads sequenced, directly obtained by variant calling. The logo Fig. 1 was produced using the Logomaker plug-in, under Python software36 (

Analysis of the mutation spectrum in T0 and descendant transgenic plants by Sanger sequencing

To analyze the mutation spectrum of DNA modifications, in combination with NGS sequencing, target regions were amplified by PCR using specific primers (Supplementary Table S5) and genomic DNA extracted from the leaves of WT and transgenic plants (T0, T1) as templates. For the T0 lines, in the presence of chimeric plants at a high ratio, the amplified PCR fragments were cloned into the pGEM-T easy plasmid (Promega, USA) after Taq treatment at 72 °C for 30 min, which was then cloned into the DH5α strain (Toyobo, Japan) for sequencing on the ABI 3130xl system (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). The bacteria were plated on LB agar plates containing 50 µg ml−1 ampicillin. Approximately 10 colonies for each target were picked using blue/white selection and confirmed by the PCR amplification of the appropriate fragment from each colony. Their insert sequences were determined by the Sanger method using target-specific primers. The T1 and T2 generation were sequenced directly after purification using the FastGene Gel/PCR Extraction kit (Nippon Genetic, Japan).

The conservation scores of the amino acid sequences of SlDDB1 and SlDET1 were determined on the Consurf website server37, using the PBD ID of the protein and maintaining the standard settings.

Carotenoid and chlorophyll analysis

Carotenoid analysis was performed as follows. Five red fruits per plant were harvested at 12 DPB, and the pericarp was frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground to a fine powder using a Multi Beads Shocker (Yasui Kikai, Japan). The powder was stored at − 80 °C for multiple purposes. For T1 experimentation, only 1 plant of edited line could be analyzed as null segregant, divided in 3 individuals technical (n = 3) replicates and 5 plants for WT line (n = 15). For T2 generation, 4 plants for WT line, line #16-3_3 (n = 12) and 3 plants for line #43-2_2 (n = 9) have been used, divided in 3 technical replicates for each plant. To perform carotenoid extraction, 100 mg of powder was used, and extraction was conducted following the petal carotenoid protocol38 with some modifications. Before extraction, the samples were placed in a 2 ml tube with 2 zirconium beads and shaken for 30 s to break up any large powder agglomerates. Then, 30 μl of 1 M Tris–HCl (pH 7.6–8) and 200 μl of acetone was added, followed by mixing by hand. Then, 500 μl of diethyl ether was added, followed by mixing by hand and centrifugation for 1 min at 10,000 rpm using a table centrifuge. The upper organic phase was then transferred to a new tube, and the previous steps were repeated until the total discoloration of the organic phase. Thereafter, 500 μl of 5 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.6–8) and a few drops of saturated saline solution were added to the collected organic phase, followed by mixing by hand and brief centrifugation. The lower aqueous phase was removed by pipetting and discarded, and the previous step was repeated 3 times to remove the remaining acetone and water present in the organic phase. The upper phase was then transferred to a new tube, and half of the volume of 10% KOH–MeOH (W/V) is added, followed by mixing by hand. The mixture was kept for 1 to 2 h in the dark to saponify the ester groups. Then, 1 ml of distilled water was added to the tube, followed by mixing and centrifugation. The lower aqueous phase was then removed, and the previous step was repeated 3 times. The upper phase was transferred to a new tube, and 300 μl of diethyl ether was added to recover as much of the carotenoid extract as possible. In the new tube, 100% EtOH was added to the total organic volume at a rate of 20 to 30%, followed by mixing. The samples were dried under a vacuum desiccator for 1 h at RT, and the pellet was checked to ensure that it was correctly dried. The samples were stored at − 80 °C until analysis. For analysis, each extract was analyzed by means of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (X-LC, JASCO, Tokyo, Japan)39 with a photodiode array detector (X-LC 3110MD, JASCO) under the following conditions: column, YMC Carotenoid (100 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., 3 μm; YMC, Kyoto, Japan); solvent A, methanol (MeOH)/methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)/H2O = 95:1:4 (v/v/v); solvent B, MeOH/MTBE/H2O = 25:71:4; gradient, 0/100, 5/100, 38/0 (min/% A); flow rate, 1.0 ml/min; column temperature, 35 °C; UV–Vis monitoring range, 200–600 nm. The contents were calculated according to the total peak area of the HPLC chromatograms at a wavelength of 450 nm for lycopene, β-carotene, lutein and neoxanthin. Phytoene and phytofluene were measured at 285 nm and 345 nm, respectively. Total carotenoids were expressed as the lycopene equivalents and neoxanthin as lutein equivalent. Lycopene, β-carotene, lutein, phytoene and phytofluene were measured with the corresponding standards. All other carotenoid compounds are expressed as lutein equivalents of the tissue.

The chlorophyll content was analyzed as described by Nagata and Yamashita40. Five green fruits per plant were harvested at 28 DPA, from 3 plants per line, and the pericarp was frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground to a fine powder using a Multi Beads Shocker (Yasui Kikai, Japan). The powder was stored at − 80 °C for multiple purposes. For chlorophyll extraction, 200 mg of powder was used per biological sample, with 3 technical replicates (n = 9), and extraction was performed using 2 ml of acetone-hexane (4:6 v/v) in a 5 ml tube, which was vortexed and then sonicated for 20 s. All samples were kept on ice and protected from light to prevent degradation. The samples were briefly centrifuged, 700 μl of the organic phase was transferred to a quartz cuvette, from which the absorbance at 645 (A645), 663 (A663) and 750 (A750) nm was read on a spectrophotometer (SpectraMax M2, Molecular Devices, USA). The contents of chlorophyll ‘a’ and chlorophyll ‘b’ were calculated using the following equations in μg g−1FW.:

$${\text{Chlorophyll }}{\text{`a'}} = \left( {0.999{\text{A}}_{663} - 0.0989{\text{A}}_{645} } \right) \times 100$$
$${\text{Chlorophyll }}{\text{`b'}} = \left( { - \;0.328{\text{A}}_{663} + 1.77{\text{A}}_{645} } \right) \times 100$$

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics 25 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) via independent-samples T test and a significant difference was considered to occur at p < 0.05.

Hypocotyl size figures (Supplementary Fig. S1b,c) were produced on R software, using R package ggplot 2 version 3.3.241 (