Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Chiroptical property enhancement of chiral Eu(III) complex upon association with DNA-CTMA

Abstract

DNA-based materials have attracted much attention due to their unique photo-functional properties and potential applications in various fields such as luminescent and biological systems, nanodevices, etc. In this study, the photophysical properties of a chiral Eu(III) complex, namely (Eu(D-facam)3), within DNA films were extensively investigated. The enhancement of photoluminescence (more than 25-folds increase of luminescence quantum yield) and degree of circularly polarization in luminescence (glum = − 0.6) was observed upon interaction with DNA. Various photophysical analyses suggested that the emission enhancement was mainly due to an increase of the sensitization efficiency (high ηsens) from the ligands to Eu(III) and suppression of the vibrational deactivation upon immobilization onto the DNA molecule. From CD and VCD measurements, it was suggested that the coordination structure of Eu(D-facam)3 was affected by the interaction with DNA, suggesting that the structural change of Eu(D-facam)3 contributed to the improvement of its luminescent properties.

Introduction

In recent years, biopolymer-based materials have attracted much attention for their unique properties and potential applications as photo-functional materials due to their highly ordered structures1,2,3. In particular, DNA possesses the unique ability to incorporate various types of functional materials like metal complexes4,5, organic dyes6,7, and conductive polymers8, thus leading to an enhancement of their photo-functional properties. This ability can be mainly attributed to the electrostatic properties of the phosphate group, selective affinity for small molecules by intercalation and binding of specific molecules into its grooves9,10,11. A solid matrix made of DNA and cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTMA) was widely investigated as a polar, organic solvent soluble complex since natural DNA can be solubilized only in water12,13,14,15. To date, various optoelectronic devices that utilize this DNA-surfactant complex such as optical amplifiers16,17,18,19, organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs)20, photodetectors21 and organic transistors22 have been reported. We also described DNA-based transistor memories, color tunable OLEDs and electrochemiluminescent devices exploiting the unique features of DNA-based functional materials23,24,25,26,27.

Aiming to develop improved DNA-based photo-functional materials, this study focuses on DNA/Eu(III) complexes in view of their characteristic optical properties. In fact, Eu(III) complexes are promising candidates for such purpose since they are strong luminophores with high color purities and long emission lifetimes28. In addition, chiral Eu(III) complexes exhibit chiral optical properties like circular dichroism (CD) and circularly polarized luminescence (CPL)29,30. CPL, which corresponds to the luminescence generated in response to electromagnetic waves with different rotation, provides advanced information based on the rotation of light. The CPL is expected to not only improve the precise sensing of chiral molecules and biomolecules as well as structural analyses of biopolymers but also lead to the development of multifunctional displays, security paints and optical communication31,32,33. Currently, CPL is obtained by using optical devices such as a combination of linear polarizer and quarter wave retarder34. However, the reduction in emission intensity remains an intrinsic shortcoming. Luminescent materials that do not require additional optical apparatuses to generate CPL are therefore in demand. Typically, chiral organic luminophores and transition metal complexes display a strong luminescence; however, the degree of polarization of the luminescence is considerably lower than that of chiral Eu(III) complexes. The parameter glum is generally used as a dissymmetry ratio of the emission and is defined as glum = 2(IL − IR)/(IL + IR), where IL (IR) is the intensity of left (right) circularly polarized luminescence. Theoretically, glum can be defined as glum = 4 (|m|/|μ|)·cos τ, where m and μ are the magnetic and electric dipole transition moments, respectively and τ is the angle between them35. For organic luminophores, a large |μ| owing to the allowed ππ* transition may lead to a high luminescence quantum yield, while maintaining a low glum. In contrast, the luminescence deriving from Eu(III) complexes can be attributed to the forbidden f–f transitions and their low |μ| results in a high glum. Therefore, the simultaneous achievement of a strong emission intensity and high glum seems challenging. On the other hand, the emission enhancement of luminophores due to their association with DNA was widely reported36,37,38,39. In our previous study, emission enhancement and induced CPL were achieved by associating an achiral Eu(III) complex with DNA-CTMA40. Therefore, a more distinctive enhancement of the optical properties can be expected by adding chiral sites to the Eu(III) complex, which interacts with DNA.

In this study, we investigated the luminescence properties of a chiral Eu(III) complex within a DNA film. To this aim, we selected Eu(D-facam)3 (europium tris[3-(trifluoromethylhydroxymethylene)-(+)-camphorate]) as chiral Eu(III) complex, which is known for its use as NMR-shift reagent and biological sensing probe41,42. Interestingly, a higher luminescence intensity and |glum| of CPL were achieved from Eu(D-facam)3 compared with the conventional polymer upon interaction with DNA.

Results and discussion

Interaction between the chiral Eu(III) complex and DNA-CTMA

First, we introduced Eu(D-facam)3 into DNA backbone to observe their optical properties. Since DNA is soluble only in water whereas Eu(D-facam)3 is insoluble in water, DNA is modified with CTMA, which is one of the most typical surfactants utilized for biomolecules. By utilizing DNA-CTMA, we successfully fabricated DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 films. The absorption and CD spectra of the DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 films at various Eu(D-facam)3:DNA-CTMA molar ratios are shown in Fig. 1. For comparison, the optical analysis of a PMMA/Eu(D-facam)3 film was also conducted; PMMA has no chirality in its structure, while DNA has a well-known axisymmetric helical structure43. In the PMMA/Eu(D-facam)3 film, an absorption band assignable to the π–π* transition of the β-diketonate44 in the D-facam was observed around 305 nm. On the other hand, the absorption peaks of the DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 films were red-shifted by about 10 nm compared to that of the PMMA/Eu(D-facam)3 film, suggesting an interaction between DNA and Eu(D-facam)3. It is possible that Eu(D-facam)3 electrostatically approach the anionic phosphate groups in the DNA backbone, and such absorption change suggests the intercalation or semi-intercalation between base pairs subsequent by electrostatic interaction45,46. The CD spectrum indicates ellipticity at each wavelength29. Ellipticity is proportional to the difference of absorbance against the left-handed and right-handed circularly polarized light, thus a change in ellipticity indicates the structural chirality of the molecules corresponding to its absorption. In the PMMA/Eu(D-facam)3 film, a positive Cotton effect corresponding to the absorption band of D-facam was observed. This was attributed to the fact that the D-facam ligand of Eu(D-facam)3 possesses a chiral structure. For the DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 films, typical exciton-splitting CD signals with positive (330 nm) and negative (300 nm) Cotton effects centered at the absorption peak of the ligand were observed. This indicated that the exciton coupling of the D-facam ligands in Eu(D-facam)3 occurred upon interaction with DNA. In addition, the signal intensity of the exciton coupling increased relative to the increase of the DNA ratio, strongly indicating that the structural chirality of Eu(D-facam)3 was enhanced.

Figure 1
figure1

Absorption (bottom) and circular dichroism (CD, top) spectra of DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 films at various Eu(D-facam)3:DNA-CTMA molar ratios and PMMA/Eu(D-facam)3 film.

Vibrational circular dichroism (VCD) spectroscopy experiments were carried out to determine more detailed structural change of Eu(D-facam)3 in the presence of DNA. Figure 2 shows the infrared absorption (IR) and VCD spectra of the Eu(D-facam)3 powder and DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 film [Eu(D-facam)3:DNA-CTMA molar ratio was 1:1]. In the IR spectra (bottom), the absorption peaks corresponding to the C=O stretching vibration (around 1650 cm−1) and C=C stretching vibration (around 1500–1600 cm−1) of the D-facam ligand were observed for both the Eu(D-facam)3 powder and DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 film47. In the VCD spectra (top), although no significant signal was observed in the case of the Eu(D-facam)3 powder, the VCD signals corresponding to the absorption bands of D-facam were observed for the DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 film. Especially, the absorption band assignable to the stretching vibration of the C=O group that was in vicinity to the central Eu(III) ion showed a significant exciton splitting pattern, indicating that the coordination symmetry of the ligand field of Eu(III) might be affected. In view of the results of the CD and VCD measurements, it was suggested that the structure of Eu(D-facam)3 was distorted by the interaction with DNA, thus potentially affecting the luminescent properties of Eu(D-facam)3.

Figure 2
figure2

Infrared absorption (bottom) and vibrational circular dichroism (VCD, top) spectra of the Eu(D-facam)3 powder and DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 film [Eu(D-facam)3:DNA-CTMA = 1:1].

Emission properties of the DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 film

In order to discuss the influence of the interaction between Eu(D-facam)3 and DNA-CTMA on the luminescent properties, the emission spectra of the PMMA/Eu(D-facam)3 and DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 films were examined (Fig. 3). For all films, a red emission with sharp peaks due to the f–f transition of the Eu(III) ion was observed upon ligand excitation (330 nm). In the case of the PMMA/Eu(D-facam)3 film, emission peaks were observed at 579, 585–600 and 613 nm; they are assignable to the 5D0 → 7F0, 5D0 → 7F1 and 5D0 → 7F2 transition of Eu(III) ions, respectively48. Interestingly, for the DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 film, the emission peak assignable to the 5D0 → 7F1 transition split into two peaks (586 and 595 nm). This change of the emission peak obviously indicated that the interaction with DNA affected the crystal field around the Eu(III) ion (Fig. 3b inset). In comparison to the PMMA/Eu(D-facam)3 film, the DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 films showed a stronger emission. Their emission intensity was enhanced with increasing ratios of DNA-CTMA, suggesting that a non-radiative deactivation caused by a molecular vibration was suppressed due to the immobilization onto the DNA backbone49,50.

Figure 3
figure3

Emission spectra of DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 films at various Eu(D-facam)3:DNA-CTMA molar ratios and PMMA/Eu(D-facam)3 film upon excitation at 330 nm, as shown by the original emission intensities (a) and normalized intensities (b). Photograph of the DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 films and PMMA/Eu(D-facam)3 film (c).

In regard to luminescence intensity of each emission band, radiative rate of the emission band is mainly determined by electric dipole transition which is sensitive to the ligand field (i.e. electric field around Eu(III) ion). Because the emission peaks assignable to the 5D0 → 7F1 transition derives from mainly magnetic dipole (MD) transition, its radiative rate is not considerably affected by the ligand field. Therefore, the symmetry of Eu(D-facam)3 can be discussed based on the ratio of the emission intensities obtained from the MD moment (IMD) and ED moment (IED)51. The emission ratio (Irel = IED/IMD) of the PMMA/Eu(D-facam)3 and DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 films are shown in Table 1. IMD and IED were calculated by integrating the emission intensities at 582–600 nm and 605–630 nm, respectively. Since the values of Irel for the DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 films (5.14–5.60) were lower than that of the PMMA/Eu(D-facam)3 film (7.64), it was estimated that the coordination structure around the Eu(III) ion in Eu(D-facam)3 changed to a higher symmetric structure in the presence of DNA. The changes in the structure of Eu(D-facam)3 were also confirmed by CD and VCD measurements. These results clearly supported that Eu(D-facam)3 and DNA interacted with each other and led to a stronger emission, as shown in Fig. 3.

Table 1 Ratio of the emission intensity of the MD and ED moment (Irel), luminescence lifetime (τ), radiative rate (kr), non-radiative rate (knr), intrinsic quantum yield of Eu(III) ion (ΦLn), total quantum yield (Φtot), and efficiency of sensitization (ηsens) of the DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 and PMMA/Eu(D-facam)3 films.

Detailed analyses of photophysical parameters of the DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 films

Generally, Eu(III) ions with a highly symmetrical structure hardly show any strong emission since the high symmetry of the Eu(III) ion results in a low radiative rate52. Therefore, we determined the factors that contributed to the emission enhancement of Eu(D-facam)3 in DNA-CTMA films. The total quantum yield (Φtot) and luminescence lifetime (τ) of the PMMA/Eu(D-facam)3 and DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 films were obtained (Table 1). The luminescent quantum yield was 0.5 and 11.9–13.7% for the PMMA/Eu(D-facam)3 and DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 films, respectively; the luminescent quantum yield of Eu(D-facam)3 was significantly increased in the case of DNA-CTMA compared to PMMA. The radiative rate constants of Eu(III) ions (kr) was also calculated using the relation:

$$k_{{\text{r}}} = A_{{{\text{MD}},0}} \times n^{{3}} \times \left( {\frac{{I_{{{\text{tot}}}} }}{{I_{{{\text{MD}}}} }}} \right)$$

where AMD,0 is the spontaneous emission coefficient of the 5D0 → 7F1 transition (= 14.65 s−1), n is the refractive index of the medium and Itot/IMD is the ratio of the integrated radiation corresponding to the 5D0 → 7Fj transition (j = 0–6) to the peak area corresponding to the 5D0 → 7F1 transition51,53. Here, the value of n was determined to be 1.52 and 1.49 for the DNA-CTMA54 and PMMA solid film55, respectively. The non-radiative rate constant (knr) can be calculated from the relations:

$$\tau = \frac{1}{{k_{{\text{r}}} + k_{{{\text{nr}}}} }},\quad k_{{{\text{nr}}}} = \frac{1}{\tau } - k_{{\text{r}}}$$

while the intrinsic quantum yield (ΦLn) and efficiency of sensitization of the lanthanide luminescence by the ligand (ηsens) can be calculated from the relations56:

$$\Phi_{{{\text{Ln}}}} = \frac{{k_{{\text{r}}} }}{{k_{{\text{r}}} + k_{{{\text{nr}}}} }},\quad \eta_{{{\text{sens}}}} = { }\frac{{\Phi_{{{\text{tot}}}} }}{{\Phi_{{{\text{Ln}}}} }}$$

These photophysical parameters are listed in Table 1. It was evident that the kr value of Eu(D-facam)3 for the DNA-CTMA films (316–340 s−1) was lower than that of the PMMA film (419 s−1). This implies that the probability of light emission from the excited state decreased in the presence of DNA, which is consistent with the structural change around the Eu(III) ion towards a higher symmetry structure, as discussed above. On the other hand, knr decreased and ηsens increased for the DNA-CTMA films compared to the PMMA film. The knr value of PMMA was approximately 8400 s−1; it decreased to 1300 s−1 upon mixing with DNA. It is known that the molecular vibration can be suppressed when the molecules are immobilized on a DNA structure49,50. Therefore, the decrease in knr clearly indicated a suppressed vibrational deactivation of the excited states of the Eu(III) ion due to the immobilization on a DNA molecule. The decreased knr contributed to improving the intrinsic quantum yield (ΦLn); the calculated ΦLn increased from 4.77% (in PMMA) to 20.5% (in DNA-CTMA). In addition, the ηsens value of Eu(D-facam)3 was significantly improved upon interaction with DNA; it was almost 6 times higher compared to that of PMMA. This improvement of ηsens is believed to contribute to the emission enhancement of Eu(D-facam)3.

It is known that the ηsens value of lanthanide complexes significantly depends on the relationship between the T1 level of the ligands and the accepting 4f level of the central metal ion56. An adequate energy gap between the T1 and 4f levels facilitates the energy transfer from the ligands to the metal ion. However, a close match between the T1 and 4f levels should be avoided as it induces back energy transfer from the metal ion to the ligands. To investigate the change of the T1 level of the D-facam ligand in the different polymers, the phosphorescence of Gd(D-facam)3 of the PMMA and DNA-CTMA film was measured at 77 K (Fig. 4)57. It is known that the first excitation energy of Gd(III) is much higher than the triplet energy of general complex ligands58. Thus, the energy transfer from ligands to the Gd(III) ion hardly occur. Only the phosphorescence from the ligands should be observed. The T1 level can be calculated from the onset wavelength of the phosphorescence spectrum. Broad phosphorescence bands of D-facam were observed around 460–650 nm for both films. The onset wavelength of the phosphorescence spectrum of each film almost matched (462 nm), indicating that the T1 level of D-facam was unperturbed (calculated as ca. 21,600 cm−1). Thus, the improvement of ηsens was caused by factors other than the change in the T1 level of the ligands. Therefore, the changes of the distance between Eu(III) and ligands as well as the angle between them, as evidenced by the CD and VCD spectra and Irel values, contributed to the significant improvement of ηsens. In addition, the decrease of knr discussed above obviously indicates that Eu(D-facam)3 was tightly immobilized onto the DNA structure. The immobilization of these molecules might suppress the vibrational deactivation of the T1 states, and allow to improve ηsens, which represents the energy transfer efficiency from the ligands to the central metal ion.

Figure 4
figure4

Phosphorescence spectra of the DNA-CTMA/Gd(D-facam)3 and PMMA/Gd(D-facam)3 films at 77 K.

Circularly polarized luminescence induced by DNA-CTMA

As discussed above, it was demonstrated that the structural chirality of Eu(D-facam)3 significantly changed upon its interaction with DNA-CTMA. Therefore, it was assumed that CPL, which reflects the chiral luminescence, might also be greatly enhanced59. Therefore, we measured the CPL spectra of the PMMA/Eu(D-facam)3 and DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 films and their glum values are shown in Fig. 5. An emission dissymmetry factor [glum = 2(IL − IR)/(IL + IR)] was utilized to quantitatively evaluate the magnitude of CPL, where IL and IR represent the emission intensity of left-handed and right-handed circular polarized luminescence, respectively35. For the PMMA/Eu(D-facam)3 film, the CPL intensity was very weak, and the glum was calculated to be − 0.02 at 5D0 → 7F1 (598 nm, MD transition). On the other hand, in the case of the DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 films, clear CPL signals were observed at 5D0 → 7F1 (598 nm, MD transition) and 5D0 → 7F2 (615 nm, ED transition). The glum at 5D0 → 7F1 (598 nm) was determined to be − 0.62, which resulted approximately 30 times enhanced compared to the PMMA/Eu(D-facam)3 film. Such chirality enhancement of the luminescence was supposed to be due to the change of the ligand field of Eu(D-facam)3 caused by the interaction with DNA-CTMA.

Figure 5
figure5

CPL spectra of the DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 films at various Eu(D-facam)3:DNA-CTMA molar ratios and PMMA/Eu(D-facam)3 film upon excitation at 330 nm.

Conclusion

In summary, the change of the photophysical properties of Eu(D-facam)3 in the DNA films was investigated in detail. An emission enhancement and higher dissymmetry factor (− 0.6) were observed upon interaction with DNA. Various photophysical analyses suggested that the emission enhancement was mainly due to the increase of the sensitization efficiency (high ηsens) from the ligands to Eu(III) as well as suppression of the vibrational deactivation upon immobilization onto the DNA molecule. These phenomena were primarily driven by the transformation of the coordination structure of Eu(D-facam)3 upon association with DNA. It can be assumed that such enhancement of the optical properties of Eu(III) complexes with DNA can contribute to the development of not only luminescent devices, nanodevices and catalysts but also applications related to biological fields and DNA engineering.

Methods

Reagents

All chemicals were commercially available and used as received. Europium tris[3-(trifluoromethylhydroxymethylene)-(+)-camphorate] (Eu(D-facam)3), (+)-3-(trifluoroacetyl)camphor, and poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA, Mw: ~ 350,000) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Gadolinium(III) acetate hydrate was purchased from FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation (Japan). The sodium salts of DNA (base pairs: ca. 10,000) were provided by Nippon Chemical Feed Co., Ltd. (Japan). These were marine-based salts that were first isolated from frozen salmon milt through a homogenization process followed by removal of proteins and impurities. Cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTMA, 98% purity) and 1-butanol were purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd (Japan).

Preparation of the DNA-CTMA complex

DNA-CTMA was prepared by precipitating DNA with a cationic surfactant complex of CTMA in water through an ion exchange reaction that replaced the sodium cations of the DNA. The DNA complex with CTMA (DNA-CTMA) was prepared by the addition of a 10 mM aqueous solution of DNA (based on the concentration of the phosphate groups) to a 10 mM CTMA solution. The precipitate was filtered and thoroughly washed with ultrapure water and then dried in vacuo. The resulting DNA-CTMA was more water insoluble and more mechanically stable than the DNA itself due to the long alkyl chain of the CTMA. Through the formation of the CTMA complex, DNA-CTMA was soluble in solvents more compatible with device fabrication, such as chloroform, ethanol, methanol, butanol, or a chloroform/alcohol blend.

Preparation of DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 films

DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 solutions were prepared by dissolving DNA-CTMA and Eu(D-facam)3 in 1-butanol. The concentration of DNA-CTMA and Eu(D-facam)3 were set to 0.1–1.0 mmol/L and 0.1 mmol/L, respectively. The concentration ratio of DNA-CTMA to Eu(D-facam)3 was varied by changing the DNA-CTMA concentration (based on the concentration of the phosphate groups) in solution. The DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 films were prepared by casting 200 μL of these solutions onto quartz substrates (2 × 2 cm2). The weight percentages of Eu(D-facam)3 in the DNA-CTMA films ranged between 12 and 58 wt%. A PMMA film containing Eu(D-facam)3 (12 wt%) was also prepared for comparison.

Measurements of the optical properties

The absorbance and CD spectra of the DNA-CTMA/Eu(D-facam)3 and PMMA/Eu(D-facam)3 films were acquired using a photonic multichannel analyzer (J-1100, JASCO Corporation, Japan). The emission spectra were acquired using a spectrofluorometer (FP-6600, JASCO Corporation, Japan). The emission quantum yields were calculated from the data obtained from an absolute PL quantum yield spectrometer (Quantaurus-QY C11347-01, Hamamatsu photonics K. K., Japan). The emission lifetimes were determined using a time-resolved fluorescence spectrometer (Quantaurus-Tau C11367-21, Hamamatsu photonics K. K., Japan). CPL measurements were conducted using a previously reported system40,60, which consisted of the following components: 375 nm LED (M365L2, Thorlabs Japan Inc., Japan), LED driver (DC2100, Thorlabs Japan Inc., Japan), photoelastic modulator (PEM-90, Hinds instruments, Inc. United States), photomultiplier tube (H7732-10, Hamamatsu photonics K. K., Japan), linearly polarized cubic prism (200,000:1), photomultiplier tube (H7732-10, Hamamatsu photonics K. K., Japan), and dual phase DSP lock-in amplifier (7265, Signal Recovery Ltd., United Kingdom). The appropriate detection wavelength of the monochromator and PEM was controlled by a PC.

References

  1. 1.

    Pinto, R. J. B., Carlos, L. D., Marques, P. A. A. P., Silvestre, A. J. D. & Freire, C. S. R. An overview of luminescent bio-based composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 131, 41169 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ramdzan, N. S. M., Fen, Y. W., Anas, N. A. A., Omar, N. A. S. & Saleviter, S. Development of biopolymer and conducting polymer-based optical sensors for heavy metal ion detection. Molecules 25, 2548 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kato, M., Ito, H., Hasegawa, M. & Ishii, K. Soft crystals: flexible response systems with high structural order. Chem. A Eur. J. 25, 5105–5112 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Pages, B. J., Ang, D. L., Wright, E. P. & Aldrich-Wright, J. R. Metal complex interactions with DNA. Dalton Trans. 44, 3505–3526 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lin, S. et al. Interaction of an iridium(III) complex with G-quadruplex DNA and its application in luminescent switch-on detection of siglec-5. Anal. Chem. 88, 10290–10295 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kahn, J. S., Freage, L., Enkin, N., Garcia, M. A. A. & Willner, I. Stimuli-responsive DNA-functionalized metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). Adv. Mater. 29, 1–6 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mukae, M., Ihara, T., Tabara, M. & Jyo, A. Anthracene-DNA conjugates as building blocks of designed DNA structures constructed by photochemical reactions. Org. Biomol. Chem. 7, 1349–1354 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Mondal, P. C., Fontanesi, C., Waldeck, D. H. & Naaman, R. Spin-dependent transport through chiral molecules studied by spin-dependent electrochemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 2560–2568 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Matulis, D., Rouzina, I. & Bloomfield, V. A. Thermodynamics of DNA binding and condensation: isothermal titration calorimetry and electrostatic mechanism. J. Mol. Biol. 296, 1053–1063 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Long, E. C. & Barton, J. K. On demonstrating DNA intercalation. Acc. Chem. Res. 23, 271–273 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Krowicki, K., Balzarini, J., De Clercq, E., Newman, R. A. & William Lown, J. Novel DNA groove binding alkylators: design, synthesis, and biological evaluation. J. Med. Chem. 31, 341–345 (1988).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Tanaka, K. & Okahata, Y. A DNA-lipid complex in organic media and formation of an aligned cast film. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 10679–10683 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Steckl, A. J. DNA—a new material for photonics?. Nat. Photonics 1, 3–5 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Grote, J. G. et al. DNA photonics [deoxyribonucleic acid]. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 426, 3–17 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Liu, K., Zheng, L., Ma, C., Göstl, R. & Herrmann, A. DNA-surfactant complexes: self-assembly properties and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 5147–5172 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Mysliwiec, J., Sznitko, L., Sobolewska, A., Bartkiewicz, S. & Miniewicz, A. Lasing effect in a hybrid dye-doped biopolymer and photochromic polymer system. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 94–97 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kawabe, Y., Wang, L., Horinouchi, S. & Ogata, N. Amplified spontaneous emission from fluorescent-dye-doped DNA-surfactant complex films. Adv. Mater. 12, 1281–1283 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Massin, J., Parola, S., Andraud, C., Kajzar, F. & Rau, I. Enhanced fluorescence of isophorone derivatives in DNA based materials. Opt. Mater. (Amst) 35, 1810–1816 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Suzuki, T. & Kawabe, Y. Light amplification in DNA-surfactant complex films stained by hemicyanine dye with immersion method. Opt. Mater. Express 4, 1411 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hagen, J. A., Li, W., Steckl, A. J. & Grote, J. G. Enhanced emission efficiency in organic light-emitting diodes using deoxyribonucleic acid complex as an electron blocking layer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 1–4 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Steckl, A. J., Spaeth, H., You, H., Gomez, E. & Grote, J. DNA as an optical material. Opt. Photonics News 22, 34–39 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Yumusak, C., Singh, T. B., Sariciftci, N. S. & Grote, J. G. Bio-organic field effect transistors based on crosslinked deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) gate dielectric. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 341 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Nakamura, K., Ishikawa, T., Nishioka, D., Ushikubo, T. & Kobayashi, N. Color-tunable multilayer organic light emitting diode composed of DNA complex and tris(8-hydroxyquinolinato)aluminum. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 2008–2011 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kobayashi, N., Uemura, S., Kusabuka, K., Nakahira, T. & Takahashi, H. An organic red-emitting diode with a water-soluble DNA-polyaniline complex containing Ru(bpy)32+. J. Mater. Chem. 11, 1766–1768 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Yukimoto, T., Uemura, S., Kamata, T., Nakamura, K. & Kobayashi, N. Non-volatile transistor memory fabricated using DNA and eliminating influence of mobile ions on electric properties. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 15575–15579 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tsuneyasu, S., Takahashi, R., Minami, H., Nakamura, K. & Kobayashi, N. Ultrafast response in AC-driven electrochemiluminescent cell using electrochemically active DNA/Ru(bpy)32+ hybrid film with mesoscopic structures. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–7 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Liang, L. et al. Temperature dependence of transfer characteristics of OTFT memory based on DNA-CTMA gate dielectric. Org. Electron. 28, 294–298 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Eliseeva, S. V. & Bünzli, J. C. G. Lanthanide luminescence for functional materials and bio-sciences. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 189–227 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kotova, O. et al. The application of chiroptical spectroscopy (circular dichroism) in quantifying binding events in lanthanide directed synthesis of chiral luminescent self-assembly structures. Chem. Sci. 6, 457–471 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Iwamura, M., Kimura, Y., Miyamoto, R. & Nozaki, K. Chiral sensing using an achiral europium(III) complex by induced circularly polarized luminescence. Inorg. Chem. 51, 4094–4098 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kitagawa, Y., Tsurui, M. & Hasegawa, Y. Steric and electronic control of chiral Eu(III) complexes for effective circularly polarized luminescence. ACS Omega 5, 3786–3791 (2020).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Chen, C. et al. Circularly polarized light detection using chiral hybrid perovskite. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–7 (2019).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Karimi, E. et al. Generating optical orbital angular momentum at visible wavelengths using a plasmonic metasurface. Light Sci. Appl. 3, 1–4 (2014).

    MathSciNet  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sang, Y., Han, J., Zhao, T., Duan, P. & Liu, M. Circularly polarized luminescence in nanoassemblies: generation, amplification, and application. Adv. Mater. 1900110, 1–33 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Richardson, F. S. Selection rules for lanthanide optical activity. Inorg. Chem. 19, 2806–2812 (1980).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Friedman, A. E. et al. Molecular “light switch” for DNA: Ru(bpy)2(dppz)2+. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 4960–4962 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Fu, P. K. L. & Turro, C. Energy transfer from nucleic acids to Tb(III): selective emission enhancement by single DNA mismatches. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 1–7 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Paulo, P. M. R. et al. Enhanced fluorescence of a dye on DNA-assembled gold nanodimers discriminated by lifetime correlation spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 10971–10980 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Nakazato, R. et al. Factors for the emission enhancement of dimidium in specific media such as in DNA and on a clay surface. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 22732–22739 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Nakamura, K., Minami, H., Sagara, A., Itamoto, N. & Kobayashi, N. Enhanced red emissions of europium(iii) chelates in DNA-CTMA complexes. J. Mater. Chem. C 6, 4516–4522 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Shinoda, S., Miyake, H. & Tsukube, H., in Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths, Vol. 35 (eds. Gschneidner, K. A., Bunzli, J. C. & Pecharsky, V.) 273–335 (Elsevier B.V., 2005).

  42. 42.

    Werts, M. H. V., Duin, M. A., Hofstraat, J. W. & Verhoeven, J. W. Bathochromicity of Michler’s ketone upon coordination with lanthanide(III) β-diketonates enables efficient sensitisation of Eu3+ for luminescence under visible light excitation. Chem. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1039/a902035g (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Watson, J. & Crick, F. Molecular structure of nucleic acids. Nature 171, 737–738 (1953).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Tsukube, H., Onimaru, A. & Shinoda, S. Anion sensing with luminescent tris(β-diketonato)europium(III) complexes and naked-eye detection of fluoride anion. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 79, 725–730 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Aslanoglu, M. Electrochemical and spectroscopic studies of the interaction of proflavine with DNA. Anal. Sci. 22, 439–443 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Annaraj, J., Srinivasan, S., Ponvel, K. M. & Athappan, P. R. Mixed ligand copper(II) complexes of phenanthroline/bipyridyl and curcumin diketimines as DNA intercalators and their electrochemical behavior under Nafion® and clay modified electrodes. J. Inorg. Biochem. 99, 669–676 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Binnemans, K. in Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths, Vol. 35 (eds. Gschneidner, K. A., Bunzli, J. C. & Pecharsky, V.) 161 (Elsevier B.V., 2005).

  48. 48.

    Moore, E. G., Samuel, A. P. S. & Raymond, K. N. From antenna to assay: lessons learned in lanthanide luminescence. Acc. Chem. Res. 42, 542–552 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Ouyang, X. et al. DNA nanoribbon-templated self-assembly of ultrasmall fluorescent copper nanoclusters with enhanced luminescence. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 11836–11844 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Minami, H., Nakamura, K. & Kobayashi, N. Enantioselective luminescence enhancement of chiral Ru(phen)32+ complexes by interaction with deoxyribonucleic acid. J. Nanophotonics 12, 033005. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JNP.12.033005 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Tanner, P. A. Some misconceptions concerning the electronic spectra of tri-positive europium and cerium. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 5090–5101 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hasegawa, Y. et al. Luminescent polymer containing the Eu(III) complex having fast radiation rate and high emission quantum efficiency. J. Phys. Chem. A 107, 1697–1702 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Chauvin, A. S., Gumy, F., Imbert, D. & Bünzli, J. C. G. Europium and terbium tris(dipicolinates) as secondary standards for quantum yield determination. Spectrosc. Lett. 37, 517–532 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Jung, W. et al. Cationic lipid binding control in DNA based biopolymer and its impacts on optical and thermo-optic properties of thin solid films. Opt. Mater. Express 7, 3796 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Song, J., Kim, J. & Suh, K. Poly (methyl methacrylate) toughening with refractive index-controlled core-shell composite particles. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 71, 1607–1614 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Binnemans, K. Lanthanide-based luminescent hybrid materials. Chem. Rev. 109, 4283–4374 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Ogata, S. et al. Water-soluble lanthanide complexes with a helical ligand modified for strong luminescence in a wide pH region. New J. Chem. 41, 6385–6394 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Suisalu, A. P., Zakharov, V. N., Kamyshny, A. L. & Aslanov, L. A. Effect of the paramagnetic ion Gd(lll) on the molecular triplet state of the organic ligand in complexes. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 98, 1330–1335 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Harada, T. et al. Circularly polarized luminescence of Eu(III) complexes with point- and axis-chiral ligands dependent on coordination structures. Inorg. Chem. 48, 11242–11250 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Tsumatori, H., Nakashima, T. & Kawai, T. Observation of chiral aggregate growth of perylene derivative in opaque solution by circularly polarized luminescence. Org. Lett. 12, 2362–2365 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Naoya Ogata materials Lab. for providing the salmon milt DNA sample. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 17H06377, 16H00955 and 20K05641. H.M. gratefully acknowledges the financial support from a French Government Scholarships and the FUTABA Foundation.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N.K. and K.N. conceived and designed the project. H.M., N.I., W.W., and Z.L. fabricated the films and performed the optical measurements. H.M., K.N., and N.K. contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norihisa Kobayashi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Minami, H., Itamoto, N., Watanabe, W. et al. Chiroptical property enhancement of chiral Eu(III) complex upon association with DNA-CTMA. Sci Rep 10, 18917 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75808-w

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing