Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A tri-component knee plug for the 3rd generation of autologous chondrocyte implantation


Here, we report a newly designed knee plug to be used in the 3rd generation of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI) in order to heal the damaged knee cartilage. It is composed of three components: The first component (Bone Portion) is a 3D printed hard scaffold with large pores (~ 850 µm), made by hydroxyapatite and β-tricalcium phosphate to accommodate the bony parts underneath the knee cartilage. It is a cylinder with a diameter of 20 mm and height of 7.5 mm, with a slight dome shape on top. The plug also comprises a Cartilage Portion (component 2) which is a 3D printed gelatin/elastin/sodium-hyaluronate soft thick porous membrane with large pores to accommodate chondrocytes. Cartilage Portion is secured on top of the Bone Portion using mechanical interlocking by designing specific knobs in the 3D printed construct of the Cartilage Portion. The third component of the plug (Film) is a stitchable permeable membrane consisting of polycaprolactone (PCL) on top of the Cartilage Portion to facilitate sliding of the knee joint and to hold the entire plug in place while allowing nutrients delivery to the Cartilage Portion. The PCL Film is prepared using a combination of film casting and sacrificial material leaching with a pore size of 10 µm. It is surface modified to have specific affinity with the Cartilage Portion. The detailed design criteria and production process of this plug is presented in this report. Full in vitro analyses have been performed, which indicate the compatibility of the different components of the plug relative to their expected functions.


Bone ends within knee joint is covered with articular cartilage, a tissue which is highly prone to injury. While healthy cartilage is smooth, allowing relaxed sliding of the knee joint, damaged cartilage can be rough—exposing the underlying bone1,2. Articular cartilage injury in knee joints is a challenging medical problem. A growing number of patients are suffering from symptomatic focal knee cartilage lesions, which can be attributed to the limited self-repairing capacity of articular cartilage3,4,5,6,7. Despite development of different medical procedures to provide knee pain relief, there are arguments about the efficacy of current methods in treatment of cartilage defects8,9.

The strategies that address knee cartilage problems include:

  1. (1)

    Palliation: Such as arthroscopic chondroplasty and debridement, which are mostly related to minor and moderate cartilage wear. For example, arthroscopic chondroplasty is an outpatient procedure in which the injured tissue is detached to allow healthy cartilage to be developed in its place. This procedure involves using an arthroscope as a specific video camera to help make tiny incisions on the sides of the knee to ultimately repair a small area of damaged cartilage within the knee10,11,12. In the arthroscopic debridement procedure, a washout or joint lavage eliminates debris around the injured cartilage or bone using specific surgical instruments13,14,15,16.

  2. (2)

    Repair: Such as microfracture drilling, which is an outpatient and minimally-invasive practice, mostly utilized following sports injuries. In this procedure, the surgeon drills small fractures into the bone at the base of the damaged cartilage in the knee joint to repair the injured area by stimulating the growth of healthy "scar" cartilage, called fibrocartilage. Special care at home may be needed for 6–8 weeks after the procedure17,18,19.

  3. (3)

    Restoration: Such as osteochondral autograft or allograft, and autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), which are applied for serious cartilage injuries.

Osteochondral autografts or allografts are often used to treat knee cartilage injuries that uncover the underlying bone to replace the construct of cartilage/bone by either the patient’s tissue (osteochondral autograft) or a donor’s body (osteochondral allograft)20,21,22. Osteochondral autograft is a good option, yet limited to small defects due to the limitation of tissue supply from the patient’s body8,23. Additionally, osteochondral allograft has the risk for immune rejection24,25.

The ACI method, a fairly new and state-of-the-art technique that can be employed for knee cartilage regeneration, is traditionally a two-stage process. In the first-stage, a minor portion of cartilage from the patient’s knee is harvested. The biopsy is then enzymatically treated in the laboratory to extract the chondrocytes (cartilage-producing cells). They are expanded for a few weeks and then returned to the patient’s knee during an open operative procedure that constitutes the second-stage26,27,28,29.

Among all the above approaches, microfracture and ACI are more popular. However, the formation of fibrocartilage microfracture—instead of natural hyaline cartilage—is problematic, as fibrocartilage is not hard enough and can be deteriorated within a few years30. ACI, despite being a more difficult method, replaces the injured cartilage with natural hyaline cartilage, which is a real advantage of this method for severe damages.

ACI has evolved rapidly since its first description in 199431, and has gone through a few generations. In the 1st generation of ACI, cultured chondrocytes were transferred to the injured region as a liquid suspension. Then a strong fibrous tissue, periosteum, was used to cover the area. Due to the use of periosteum, this generation is often called ACI-P, in which ‘P’ refers to periosteum. However, hypertrophy or ossification of the patched periosteum is known to be challenging32. Moreover, harvesting periosteum from the patient is a procedure that has its own complexities and usually causes discomfort for the patients30. In the 2nd generation of ACI, a collagen cover was employed as a replacement for periosteum. This generation is usually called ACI-C, in which C refers to collagen. In the 2nd generation, cells were still employed as liquid suspensions, and the collagen cover was stitched in the area30. Cell retention was a major challenge in the 1st and 2nd generations of ACI, thus a new generation has been developed (3rd generation), in which the cells are delivered, loaded or seeded to the injured area by the use of a 3-dimensional (3D) matrix, including a scaffold or a membrane (such as collagen membranes), known as the matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACT)30,33,34. Basically, this generation aims to use a 3D object/environment in order to accommodate the cultured chondrocytes to protect the cells, distribute them more homogeneously, facilitate their re-differentiation and aide the surgical implantation33,35.

Different scaffolds have been developed for this purpose. Such scaffolds must not only protect the cells, but should also distribute them more homogeneously, help their re-differentiation and make the surgical procedure easier33,35. Here, the scaffolds made for tissue engineering applications, especially the osteochondral scaffolds, have become very useful. Three types of biomaterial-based scaffolds have been used for this purpose36:

  1. (1)

    Monophasic scaffolds, in which one material with homogenous porosity is used.

  2. (2)

    Biphasic scaffolds, in which either two different materials or one material consisting of two parts with different porosities are used.

  3. (3)

    Triphasic or multiphasic scaffolds, are scaffolds with three or more materials, or one material consisting of three or more parts with different porosities are employed36.

Biphasic and multiphasic osteochondral scaffolds are more effective for cartilage regeneration and can be made with both natural and synthetic materials36,37,38,39,40. The materials selected for different phases of the osteochondral constructs depend on the fabrication method of the construct41. The other factor in material selection is the approach for incorporating the cells into the scaffolds41. For example, if the intended approach is encapsulation of cells within the scaffolds during the fabrication, the material selection is different than a scenario in which the cells are seeded into the scaffolds after fabrication41.

One of the approaches in making such bi/multiphasic osteochondral scaffolds is fabricating separate bone and cartilage parts, then connecting them together by different methods, such as press fitting, suturing or using a glue42. For example, in scaffolds made of two phases of fibrin/polycaprolactone (PCL) or PCL/PCL-tricalcium phosphate, fibrin glue was used to connect the phases after seeding them separately in chondrogenic (for cartilage regeneration) and osteogenic (for developing bone) media43,44. There are reports indicating that such methods can result in poor connection between cartilage and bone parts and ultimately lead to dissociation45.

In another biphasic scaffold, agarose gel and decellularized bone were used to make the cartilage and bone parts, respectively44. Agarose provided the good mechanical property for immature chondrocytes44,46, while the decellularized bone was helpful in terms of making osteoinductive construct with mechanical properties and biochemical composition similar to bone44. Agarose layer penetrated into the bone portion and solidified to form an interface between the two cartilage and bone segments. However, the ultimate interfacial tissue after incubation in an osteochondral bioreactor was distinctive from the interfaces of a native tissue44.

Attempting to make multiphasic osteochondral scaffolds, Harley et al. used sequences of collagen type I/glycosaminoglycan/calcium phosphate (CGCaP) in scaffolds fabricated by employing the freeze-drying technique47. In another study by the same research group, they made a specific multiphasic scaffold using a mineralized CGCaP and an unmineralized collagen type II/glycosaminoglycan (CG) suspensions for osteochondral regeneration48. In this scaffold, the interface of the two parts were formed by interdiffusion amongst the suspensions of each layer before freeze-drying48. The authors did not investigate the cell proliferation in the fabricated scaffolds.

The method of interfusion to form an interface between phases of an scaffolds was also used by Wang et al., where they employed articular cartilage ECM (ACECM) for cartilage regeneration and hydroxyapatite (HA) for bone regeneration in a biphasic osteochondral scaffold49. It was evident that the cartilage portion could accommodate the rabbit chondrocytes well, yet not many cells were observed at the interfacial region. The fact that no chondrocytes migrated into the bony portion demonstrated the barrier characteristics of the interface49.

A grouping of β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP) blocks and scaffold-free sheet of mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs) was used by Miyagi et al. for osteochondral applications50. In a similar strategy, centrifuged chondrocyte cell sheets were employed by Niyama et al.51. However, it was found that using such cell-sheet method has some technical difficulties and limitations, which are mostly related to the use of one kind of cell culture medium in a cell-sheet construct to stimulate the differentiation of both osteoblasts and chondrocytes50,51.

3D printing, in combination with other methods, has also been employed for making appropriate scaffold for this purpose. For example, Tuan et al. fabricated a biphasic scaffold, by combination of FDM 3D-printing method and electrospinning, in which the PCL and PCL/TCP were used for the cartilage and bone parts, respectively52. The investigators have implanted this scaffold in pigs and achieved successful cartilage regeneration. However, it was found that not only the scaffold design affected the results, but also the implantation site had considerable influence (e.g., medial condyle against patellar groove)52.

In another similar example, A multiphasic scaffold was produced by Jeon et al., in which one part was composed of 2% alginate and the other part was a biphasic scaffold made of PCL53 and a combination of FDM 3D-printing method and electrospinning was used to fabricate the construct53. The two phases were press-fitted to allow the alginate to infiltrate into the PCL part. The scaffold was implanted in rats, and the histological analysis showed separation of some alginate from PCL, indicating the failure of the interface53.

Focusing on 3D printing method and possibility of mechanical interlocking in this technique, we report a new design of a knee plug composed of three components: two components to accommodate the chondrocytes and the bone cells underneath the cartilage, and one component as a membrane that covers the whole construct.

The novelty of this work is in the manufacturing of a ready-to-use, highly reproducible 3D printed construct for ACI 3rd generation surgery of damaged knee cartilage, with controlled pore size and structure. The construct has the size of the area that is typically removed from the knee for a damaged cartilage treatment and is made of stitchable materials that can accommodate suitable cells. Utilizing a 3D printing approach to develop this plug provides the controllability over the pore size, which is important for the growth of new tissues. Detailed fabrication procedures of this knee plug, along with the mechanical properties and in vitro analyses of different components, are presented in this paper. To the best of our knowledge, such a tri-component 3D printed plug for the knee cartilage repair has not yet been developed.

Materials and methods


As shown in Fig. 1, the designed plug is composed of three separate components that can be fixed either by mechanical interlocking or suturing. The bottom part (Component 1, Bone Portion) is a 3D printed hard scaffold made of TCP and HA that is sintered to yield sufficient mechanical properties. Once positioned within the designated area, bioactive TCP and HA can assist growth of osteoblasts within the bone layer, and growing bone secures the joint plug in place.

Figure 1

A schematic view of the tri-component knee plug.

This scaffold is basically a porous cylinder with a diameter of 20 mm and height of 7.5 mm, with a slight dome shape on top. The size of pores in this 3D printed construct are approximately 850 µm. It is configured for insertion into the opening of the bone layer.

The plug further includes a 3D printed soft scaffold for accommodating chondrocytes. This middle part, (Component 2, Cartilage Portion) is made of gelatin/elastin/sodium hyaluronate. It has a thickness of 2 mm with the approximate pore size of 892 µm and, as shown in the results, is appropriate for the attachment and growth of chondrocytes.

The top part (Component 3, Film) is a porous membrane made of PCL, which allows nutrients to diffuse, yet prevents cells from migrating out of the construct. It is fabricated in a way that is stitchable/suturable. The pore size of this membrane is approximately 10 µm.

It is favorable to have engagement means to attach different components. Such engagement may occur before implanting the plug into the body. Alternatively, it can happen after inserting the plug. To engage the Cartilage and Bone Portions, some knobs are designed in the 3D printed construct of the Cartilage Portion that can interlock these two portions and confine their locations.

The engagement means between the Film and Cartilage Portion can be in the form of suturing and/or by modifying the surface of the Film so it can have specific affinity to the Cartilage Portion. One effective approach that we follow in this paper, is treating one side of the Film with NaOH. It significantly increases the wettability of the side faced to the Cartilage Portion to facilitate the engagement of the Film to this portion. Hydrophobic surface of the other side of the Film prevents the cells to migrate outside of the plug.


TCP, HA, PCL (Mn 80,000), polyethylene glycol (PEG, Mn 2000) and gelatin (Type A, from porcine skin, Gel strength ~ 300 g Bloom) were purchased from Sigma (USA). Carboxymethyle cellulose (CMC), sodium tripolyphosphate (TPP), 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) were purchased from Alfa Aesar (USA). Elastin with a molecular weight of 60 kDa (Elastin-Soluble, No. ES12) was purchased from Elastin Products Company, Inc. Sodium Hyaluronate (Research Grade, 500–749 KDa) was obtained from Lifecore Biomedical. All the solvents were of reagent grade.

3D printing of the bone and cartilage portions

A printable paste composed of TCP, HA, CMC and TPP was used to print the Bone Portion. To prepare the ink, 12 g TCP, 3 g HA, 0.5 g TPP and 0.075 g were added to 5.75 mL water and homogenized at 2000 rpm for 2 min(min) using a centrifugal mixer (Thinky, USA). Supplementary File 1 (SF 1) explains in detail the reason of selecting this composition as the ink for printing the scaffold of Bone Portion.

Finally, the ink was loaded into standard Nordson cartridges, and the Bone Portion was printed using a 3D-BIOPLOTTER system (EnvisionTEC, Germany) by adjusting the printing parameters. The optimized parameters are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Parameters used in 3D printing of the bone portion of the plug.

The resulting constructs were allowed to air-dry overnight before being transferred to a furnace. The samples were heated up to 600 °C at the rate of 3 °C/min and held at this temperature for 2 h (h) to eliminate the organic additives. The temperature was then raised to 1100 °C at the rate of 5 °C/min and kept at this temperature for 4 h to ensure complete sintering of the ceramic scaffolds. Imaging of the scaffolds and measuring their surface roughness were performed using a 3D confocal laser scanning microscope (LEXT, Olympus).

To print the Cartilage Portion, a solution of gelatin/elastin/sodium hyaluronate in deionized (DI) water was prepared and used as the ink. The concentration of gelatin, elastin and sodium hyaluronate was adjusted to 8%, 2% and 0.5% w/v, respectively. The ink was loaded into standard Nordson cartridges and the Cartilage Portion was printed using the parameters listed in Table 2.

Table 2 Applied parameters to 3D print the cartilage portion of the plug.

The printed constructs were then cross-linked using a solution of 6 mg/mL EDC and 0.75 mg/mL NHS in 70% v/v ethanol for 4 h. To remove the residual cross-linker, the constructs were washed carefully through soaking in the large amount of DI water. The prepared constructs were stored in pure ethanol inside a − 20 °C freezer to be used after rehydration.

Fabrication and surface treatment of the film

Porous PCL Film was prepared using the combination of film casting and sacrificial material leaching methods54. Briefly, 1 g PCL was dissolved in 15 mL of 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol, and varying amounts of PEG 2000 g/mol (0, 0.2, 0.4, 1 and 1.5 g) were added to the solution. After complete dissolution, the solution was casted, and the solvent was allowed to evaporate overnight. The obtained membranes were soaked in water to eliminate/sacrifice PEG thereby the porous structures were achieved by sacrificing PEG.

To treat the surface of the Film that faced toward the cells, the prepared membrane was allowed to float on 10% w/v NaOH overnight. The Film was finally rinsed with copious amounts of water to remove residual NaOH.

Characterization and biological evaluation of the bone portion

Mechanical properties

The mechanical properties of the Bone Portion were measured using an Electromechanical Precision Universal Tester (AGS-X 5 kN, Shimadzu, Japan). The samples were tested in compression mode using a 5 kN load cell and crosshead speed of 1 mm/min.

Osteoblast attachment and proliferation

Human osteoblasts (HOB, Cell Applications, USA) were cultured under standard aseptic conditions55. The cells were cultured in standard flasks and nourished with Dulbecco Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% v/v fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin and 0.25 µg/mL amphotericin every 2 days until a confluency of 90% was reached. The cells were trypsinized using TrypLE (Gibco, US) and sub-cultured. The cells of the third passage were used to seed the scaffolds at a density of 2500 cells per mm2 of scaffolds (cells/mm2).

Cell attachment to the scaffolds was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL-JSM6510, Japan)55,56. At certain time intervals (i.e. 3, 7, 14 and 21 days), the constructs were taken out, washed with PBS and fixed using Karnovsky’s fixative (composed of 2% paraformaldehyde; 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7.4) for 2 h. The samples were then fixed using 1% w/v Osmium Tetroxide solution, dehydrated using ascending ethanol series (30, 50, 75, 95 and 100% v/v) and left overnight to air dry at room temperature. After being sputter-coated with gold, the samples were imaged using back-scattering and secondary electron modes at different magnifications.

The capability of the prepared scaffolds to induce cell proliferation was evaluated using prestoblue assay57,58. At certain time intervals (i.e. 3, 7, 14 and 21 days), the cell culture media was replaced with 10% v/v prestoblue reagent (life technologies, USA) in phenol red free DMEM and incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 1.5 h. The fluorescence intensity of the reagent was recorded at the excitation/emission wavelengths of 540/590 nm using a micro-plate reader (Synergy HTX, BioTek, USA)57.

Characterization and biological evaluation of the Cartilage Portion


Sample degradation rate was measured by monitoring the weight of samples over time. Samples were immersed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and kept at 37 °C in a shaker incubator (IKA KS 3000) for 60 days. At certain times, from day 0 to day 60, samples were taken out, weighed and returned to the container. The ratio of the recorded weight to the initial weight at each time point was reported as a function of time.

Chondrocyte attachment and proliferation

Normal human chondrocytes (Cell Applications Inc., USA) were cultured and sub-cultured under standard aseptic conditions. At the confluency of 90%, chondrocytes were trypsinized and resuspended in fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) to be seeded to the scaffolds of the Cartilage Portion. Scaffolds were disinfected using 70% ethanol, washed and seeded with a density of 3 × 105 cells/scaffold in 12-well culture plates and allowed 30 min for the initial attachment. The scaffolds were submerged after 30 min and incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2, using a chondrocyte growth medium (Cell Applications Inc., USA). The media were changed every other day.

Prestoblue assay was used to measure the proliferation rate of chondrocytes on the Cartilage Portion. At certain time intervals (i.e. 4, 7, 14, 21 days), the media of the wells were replaced with 10% v/v prestoblue reagent. The plates were then incubated for 1.5 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The fluorescence intensity was measured at an excitation wavelength of 540 nm and emission wavelength of 590 nm. The same procedure was performed on day 1, after complete attachment of the cells to the scaffolds. The number of cells at each time point (N) to the initial number of the cells (N0) was calculated by dividing the corresponding intensity value by the absorbance value of the first day.

SEM was used to investigate cell attachment. Scaffold-cell complexes were washed using PBS and immersed in Karnovsky’s fixative for 1.5 h. The complexes were then submerged in 1% w/v osmium tetroxide for 1.5 h. Ethanol series (30, 50, 75, 95 and 100% v/v) were used to dehydrate the samples. The samples were then air-dried and sputter-coated with gold. SEM imaging was performed at accelerating voltages between 1 and 5 kV with different magnifications.

At the mentioned intervals considered for proliferation rate measurement (i.e. 7, 14, 21 days), scaffolds were fixed in formalin solution (10%, neutral buffered) for H&E staining. The cells on the scaffold were fixed overnight and stained using Eosin and Hematoxylin. The color was adjusted using 1% v/v acidic alcohol, ethanol and bluing agent, according to standard histology protocols. 3D confocal laser scanning microscopy (LEXT, Olympus) and fluorescence microscopy (Evos Fl, Life Technologies) were employed for monitoring cell growth on the scaffold and extracellular matrix (ECM) secretion by chondrocytes.

Characterization of the film

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

SEM imaging was employed to investigate the morphology of porous PCL film (SEM, JEOL-JSM6510, Japan). Samples were sputter-coated with gold and imaging was carried out at accelerating voltage of 3 kV at various magnifications.

Mechanical properties and suture retention strength

Tensile strength of the films was examined using an Electromechanical Precision Universal Tester. The samples, fixed into a screw flat tensile grip, underwent the tensile test using a 5 kN load cell and crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. To investigate the effect the addition of PEG and the resulting porosity had on tensile strength, dense PCL films were also prepared using the solvent-casting method and tested under the same conditions.

To measure the suture retention strength, a steel wire of 0.15 mm diameter was used, by which the effects of suture materials on force–displacement curves is minimized. The steel wire was passed through a pinhole created in the Film to form a loop and fixed to the tensile testing machine, such that the distance from the grip was 10 mm. The other edge of the Film was fixed to the inferior screw flat tensile grip. The steel wire was pulled at a rate of 1 mm/min until the Film was completely torn.

Wettability and permeability

The wettability of the Film was evaluated through contact angle measurement59. A 5 µL drop of DI water was placed on either side of the samples, and the image was captured using a Dino-lite digital microscope camera. Each image was then processed to determine the contact angle.

Fluorescein sodium salt was selected as the model probe to quantify the permeability of the Film60. The Film (D = 10 mm) was fixed between two reservoirs filled with 4 mg/mL of solution or pure water. The entire system was fixed in a clamp and placed at 37 °C. At certain time intervals, 100 µL of the solution was taken out from the low concentration side, transferred to a 96-well plate and the intensity of fluorescence was documented at the excitation/emission wavelengths of 540/590 nm using a micro-plate reader. The diffusion kinetics were reported as the variation in the ratio of concentration at each specific time to the equilibrium concentration over time. Figure 2 displays the setup used for the experiment.

Figure 2

The experimental setup for monitoring the diffusion of the model probe, i.e. fluorescein sodium salt through the PCL Film.

Results and discussion

The majority of the inorganic component of natural bone is calcium phosphates, which makes this group of materials very populate in bone tissue engineering61,62,63. Among all calcium phosphates, HA (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2) and TCP (Ca3(PO4)2) have been effective elements of many bone substitutes and scaffolds as they are able to effectively facilitate osteogenesis64,65,66,67. TCP is known as a bioceramic with higher degradability compared to other calcium phosphates68,69,70,71. The degradation of TCP-based composites can be regulated and slowed down by inclusion of HA. Moreover, HA is known as a bioceramic that can successfully interact with soft tissues (such as cartilage tissue in our case)72.

Although use of combined TCP and HA, compared to pure TCP and HA, is increasing due to their effectiveness and the tunable degradability73,74,75,76,77,78,79, their ratio in a composition should be selected based on the specific application. In SF 1, we have fully examined four ratios of TCP/HA in terms of their printability, degradability, rheological and mechanical properties and selected TCP/HA 80:20 paste as the most suitable ink to be used for printing the Bone Portion of our plug.

The results of the TCP/HA 80:20 paste rheologic analysis (SF 1, Fig. S2B1,B2) indicates that this ink appears to have a yield flow stress. The shear stress-shear rate curves suggest the Herschel-Bulkley type behavior. Temperature change does not have a significant effect on the rheological properties of the paste. The morphology of the printed and sintered scaffolds is shown in Fig. 3A. The surface roughness of the scaffolds was also measured using the 3D confocal laser scanning microscope. The arithmetic mean height (Sa) and root mean square height (Sq) were found to be 1.73 ± 0.47 µm and 2.23 ± 0.57 µm, respectively.

Figure 3

(A) 3D confocal laser scanning images of a 3D printed hard scaffold (TCP/HA 80:20) to be used for the Bone Portion of the Plug. (B)The proliferation rate of human osteoblasts on the scaffolds, as well as the standard cell culture plate (control group). N0 initial number of the cells, N number of cells at each time point. Statistical significance *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, p-values in Day 3: 0.006, Day 7: 0.011, Day 14: 0.006 and Day 21: 0.023. (CF) The fluorescence images of the attached osteoblasts on the scaffolds after (C) 3, (D) 7, (E) 14 and (F) 21 days.

The porosity of the scaffolds was 25.5 ± 3.8%. The mechanical testing was performed on the scaffolds made with the structure needed in the plug (i.e., 3D printed cylinder with the diameter of 20 mm, height of 7.5 mm and pore size of 850 µm). The values obtained for Young modulus (E), compressive strength (σB) and fracture strain (εR), by four repetitions in four separate samples, include E = 218.12 ± 19.10 MPa, σB = 39.08 ± 11.74 MPa and εR = 16.40 ± 5.66% (n = 4). Although the fracture strain of the scaffold is relatively small, the Young modulus and compressive strength are well above the average values reported for trabecular bone80.

The proliferation rate of osteoblasts on the scaffolds, as well as in the control group (cell culture plate), is shown in Fig. 3B. The results are reported as the variation of N/N0 over time, which is the ratio of the number of cells at each time point (N) to the initial number of the cells (N0). The ratio can be obtained by dividing the corresponding intensity values.

As observed, except for the starting point, the number of cells on the scaffold was higher than the control group at all other time points. Furthermore, the cells in the scaffold had improved growth and proliferation compared to the control group.

Figures 3C–F and 4 display the fluorescence and SEM images of the attached osteoblasts on the scaffolds, respectively. The growing osteoblasts, in the form of adherent plexus, can be seen in the pores of the scaffolds. The cytoskeletal projections, lamellipodia and filopodia of the cells anchored visibly on the surface features, which indicates the bioactive properties of the scaffolds.

Figure 4

SEM images of the attached osteoblasts on the scaffolds of the Bone Portion after (A) 3, (B) 7, (C) 14 and (D) 21 days.

The composition of the scaffold used for cartilage regeneration can have a significant impact on cell behavior. Cartilage Portion in our plug is made of gelatin/elastin/sodium-hyaluronate. Gelatin-based hydrogels have been reported to promote the chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells81. The up-regulation of chondrogenic markers—such as SOX9, collagen type II, aggregan and versican—has been shown for gelatin-based scaffolds82. Addition of hyaluronic acid to gelatin-based scaffolds may even improve their chondrogenic activity. Chondrocyte proliferation, adhesive activity and new hyaluronic acid production have been shown to significantly increase in hyaluronic acid-treated gelatin scaffold, compared to non-treated groups. Furthermore, higher quality of hyaline-like extracellular matrix production and a higher filling of extracellular matrix in the pore of scaffold have been demonstrated for hyaluronic acid-treated gelatin scaffold via immunohistochemistry and SEM, respectively83. Such an effect can be pursued in the mechanism of hyaluronic acid interaction with chondrocytes. Chondrocytes express the glycoprotein CD44 on their cell surface; this has the capacity to function as a hyaluronic acid receptor and, therefore, may be involved in biochemical interactions with chondrocytes84,85. Hyaluronic acid binds to CD44 and acts on intracellular signal transduction via protein kinase C as a result of the transmission of the bound hyaluronic acid to the cytoplasm. Hyaluronic acid increases the synthesis of proteoglycans and collagen by chondrocytes86. On the other hand, incorporation of elastin into the formulation might also influence the chondrogenic activity. According to the study conducted by Betre et al.87, elastin-like polypeptide can promote chondrogenesis for human adipose-derived adult stem cells in the absence of exogenous TGF-β1 and dexamethasone. Significant increases in sulfated glycosaminoglycan (up to 100%) and collagen contents (up to 420%) have been observed by these investigators. Immunolabeling confirms that the matrix formed consists mainly of type II, and not type I, collagen87.

The morphology of the printed gelatin/elastin/sodium hyaluronate scaffold for the Cartilage Portion of the plug is illustrated in Fig. 5A. A knob that has been designed for interlocking the Bone and Cartilage Portions can be seen in the image. The average pore size was found to be 892 ± 62 µm. The degradation rate of the Cartilage Portion is demonstrated in Fig. 5B. The scaffold weight remained almost constant in the first 30 days, implying the stability of the constructs in this timeframe, but decreased drastically between 30 and 60 days. After 60 days, the scaffolds completely collapsed and disappeared.

Figure 5

(A) 3D printed construct of the Cartilage Portion (gelatin/elastin/sodium hyaluronate soft membrane). The knobs on the 3D printed membrane are constructed to mechanically interlock the Cartilage Portion to the Bone one. (B) Degradation kinetics of the Cartilage Portion—the weight of the sample at each time point has been normalized to the initial weight of the sample and exploited as an indicator for degradation magnitude. (CF) Chondrocyte attachment on the gelatin/elastin/sodium-hyaluronate construct one day after seeding. The magnification of SEM images increases from (C) to (F).

The mechanical properties of similar membranes made of same ratio of gelatin, elastin and sodium hyaluronate have been quantitatively characterized in our previously reported studies for membranes with 150–200 µm thickness in terms of suture retention strength (20.4 ± 2.03 g), Young’s modulus (170.2 ± 36.1 kPa–1.95 ± 0.55 Mpa and ultimate strength (95.4 ± 10.1 kPa–1.15 ± 0.33 Mpa)88,89. The appropriate suturability of the membrane allows the possible assembly of the Cartilage Portion with the Bone Portion using sutures. The appropriate mechanical properties of the membrane allows its appropriate surgical handling, which was assessed by a knee surgeon who did not have prior knowledge regarding the make and composition of the Cartilage Portion to avoid the bias in his evaluation. More specifically, the surgeon evaluated the easiness of manipulation and cutting with surgical forceps and scissor, suturability, and firmness in terms of how the Cartilage Portion can lie on the Bone Portion.

By also assured by the objectivity of the surgical handling assessment was ensured by assigning three different surgeons with subspecialty in Cornea and Ocular Surface to conduct the operations. Surgeons did not have any prior knowledge about the make and composition of the scaffolds to mitigate the bias in their evaluations. The assessment comprised of suturability, ease of manipulation and cutting with surgical forceps and scissor, and rigidity in terms of how the scaffold lied on the tissue.

As shown in Fig. 5C–F, after 1 day of cell seeding, chondrocytes attach perfectly to the surface of the gelatin/elastin/sodium-hyaluronate construct.

The proliferation rate of normal human chondrocytes on the scaffolds is illustrated in Fig. 6. The results are reported as the variation of N/N0 over time, which is the ratio of the number of cells at each time point (N) to the initial number of the cells (N0). The ratio can be obtained by dividing the corresponding intensity values.

Figure 6

The proliferation rate of normal human chondrocytes on the cartilage (gelatin/elastin/sodium hyaluronate) constructs. N number of cells at each time point, N0 initial number of the cells.

The number of cells on the scaffold persistently increase from day 1 to day 21. After 21 days, the number of cells was more than five times that of the initial number seeded on the first day.

Both 3D confocal laser scanning microscopy (label-free) and fluorescence microscopy confirm the attachment, growth, proliferation and ECM secretion over 21 days, as shown in Fig. 7.

Figure 7

(A1A3) Chondrocyte attachment, growth and ECM secretion on gelatin/elastin/sodium hyaluronate scaffolds after (A1) 7, (A2) 14 and (A3) 21 days post-seeding. The samples were stained with Eosin/Hematoxylin using standard histology protocols and the images were taken using a 3D confocal laser scanning microscope (label-free). (B1B3) Fluorescence images of the chondrocytes growing on the gelatin/elastin/sodium-hyaluronate construct after (B1) 7, (B2) 14 and (B3) 21 days.

“Fibroblastic” morphology of chondrocytes was observed on our scaffold. This is in agreement with the study by Awad et al.90, in which the authors investigated the chondrogenic differentiation of adipose-derived adult stem cells in scaffolds made of gelatin, alginate and agarose. In this study, the cells in the agarose and alginate scaffolds presented a spherical morphology that persevered during the period of culturing. However, cells grown in scaffolds made of gelatin showed a distinct “fibroblastic” morphology, proliferating and becoming confluent with distinguished cell-to-cell contact. In general, Awad et al. did not find any substantial differences in chondrogenic differentiation capability of scaffolds with different materials, despite alterations in the cell morphology90.

A high proliferation rate of chondrocytes was observed in this study. The chondrocyte cell cycle varies according to species and location. The doubling time of human chondrocytes in monolayer cultures ranges between 1.7 and 3.5 days, according to various studies31,91,92. Our scaffold maintained the typical proliferative activity of the chondrocytes.

For optimization of the permeable PCL membrane to be used as the third component of the knee plug, Film, PCL constructs with various amount of PEG were prepared. Figure 8 illustrates the SEM images of both sides of PCL membrane (top and bottom) made by addition of various amounts of PEG. As shown in this figure, addition of either none or a very small amount of PEG, with the PEG/PCL w/w ratio of 1:5 and 2:5, resulted in none or a very small number of pores per unit of surface area (Fig. 8A–C). Through employing 1:1 PEG/PCL w/w ratio, more pores were observed on one side (Fig. 8D1), however, water is unable to pass through the membrane, even when a high vacuum was applied to the other side as a driving force. A possible explanation for this is the formation of no pore at the other side (Fig. 8D2). While there were adequate pores in one side, they seemed to be close-ended, as the transportation of water molecules was still not possible. However, increasing the ratio to 3:2 w/w resulted in the formation of some pores on the other side, through which the water molecules could instantly permeate by applying a vacuum on our observation. We can see the pore on both sides of membrane in Fig. 8E1,E2. Therefore, this sample was selected as the optimal Film and used for further characterization. As shown in Fig. 8E, the pores on the optimum porous PCL Film were found to be approximately 10 µm. Such pore size allows diffusion of nutrients, like glucose, but prevents cell migration.

Figure 8

SEM images of both sides (top and bottom) of PCL membranes prepared by addition of different amount of PEG. PEG/PCL w/w ratio is 0 (A), 1:5 (B), 2:5 (C), 1:1 (D) and 3:2 (E). Only the ratio of 3:2 PEG/PCL formed pores in both sides, which is selected to be used as the Film in the knee plug. The average size of the formed pores in the Film is 10 µm.

Table 3 represents the mechanical properties and suture retention strength of the prepared Films compared to solid PCL membrane fabricated with addition of no PEG. The porous PCL Film was found to have lower modulus and ultimate strength, but higher elongation at break. Having a porous structure, as well as the plasticizing effect of the residual PEG, might account for lower stiffness and strength, along with more flexibility. The suture retention strength was 9.04 ± 0.92 N for the porous PCL Film, which was about half of the corresponding value for solid membrane, but was still strong enough to be sutured to the surrounding tissues or scaffolds as a means of engagement.

Table 3 The mechanical properties and suture retention strength of porous PCL Film compared to a solid PCL membrane.

The treatment of the surface of the Film with NaOH resulted in improved wettability, as displayed in Fig. 9A. Floating the Film on NaOH solution resulted in a dramatic decrease in the contact angle from 76.7 ± 3.3° to 36.4 ± 3.7°.

Figure 9

(A) The effect of treatment with NaOH on the wettability and contact angle of the PCL Film. (B) The diffusion kinetics of the model probe (i.e. fluorescein sodium salt) through the Film (C concentration, Ceq concentration at equilibrium).

Wettability has been reported to affect protein adsorption and cell adhesion93,94. The number of adhered human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and HeLa cells has been shown to reach a maximum on the surfaces with a water contact angle of 40° and 50°, respectively, and decreases with further increase of water contact angle up to 60–70°93. Having the Film on top of the plug is supposed to help retaining the cells within the plug. Having a Film with one hydrophilic (the side facing the Cartilage Portion) and one hydrophobic side, facilitates such retention as cells avoid the hydrophobic sides and attach the hydrophilic side.

The Film was also found to be permeable to the model probe, as shown in Fig. 9B. The diffusion kinetics were faster at the beginning due to a relatively large concentration gradient, but they then decreased over time and eventually reached a plateau after about 100 h. Figure 9B illustrates the variation of the model probe concentration in the receiver reservoir normalized to the equilibrium concentration.

Effective permeation of extracellular fluids and nutrients has been listed as one of the important features that a biodegradable polymeric membrane should have to be used for tissue regeneration95,96. The permeability of the PCL Film allows the nutrient delivery and waste removal needed for the healthy growth of the cartilage and bone cells. Moreover, considering the size of chondrocytes which is approximately 20 µm97, the small pore size of the Film (10 µm) prevents the possible migration of cells outside of the plug.

The knee plug fabricated in this paper can support both bone and cartilage growth, while keeping favourable cell differentiation between osteoblasts and chondrocytes. One of the functions of this tri-component knee plug is simplifying the surgical procedure employed for the joint repair. Bone and Cartilage Portions may be seeded with cells and then inserted into the designated area of the body jointly as a unit or separately. They can also be inserted into the joint without cells, and then cells seeded into the relevant components after implantation of each component.

This design considers appropriate accommodation of both osteoblasts and chondrocytes involved in the ACI surgery. Having the large pore size in this design facilitates the nutrient delivery and waste removal and thus assists the cell growth, while resolving the issue of cell retention—a challenge of ACI method.


In this paper we presented a new knee plug consisting of three components—namely Bone Portion, Cartilage Portion and Film—to be used in the 3rd generation of ACI surgeries with the following advantages: providing a suitable platform for growth of the relevant cells in the area of knee cartilage, simplifying the surgery, control over the pore size and structure, stitchability, use of synthetic materials, possible low cost and less morbidity of other parts of the body during the surgery. The components of this plug are in the size of the tissue normally removed for ACI surgeries in human and can be engaged to each other. The in vitro analyses revealed that normal human chondrocytes can perfectly attach to this plug with appropriate proliferation rate.


  1. 1.

    Pool, R. Bone and Cartilage (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Y.-C. Fung, Bone and cartilage. in Biomechanics, Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues (500–544). (Springer, 1993).

  3. 3.

    Curl, W. W. et al. Cartilage injuries: A review of 31,516 knee arthroscopies. Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. 13(4), 456–460 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Widuchowski, W., Widuchowski, J. & Trzaska, T. Articular cartilage defects: Study of 25,124 knee arthroscopies. Knee 14(3), 177–182 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Roos, E. M. Joint injury causes knee osteoarthritis in young adults. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 17(2), 195–200 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Vaquero-Picado, A. & Rodríguez-Merchán, E. C. Cartilage Injuries of the Knee, Joint Preservation in the Adult Knee 127–141 (Springer, New York, 2017).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Tuan, R. S. A second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation approach to the treatment of focal articular cartilage defects. Arthritis Res. Therapy 9(5), 109 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Vavken, P. & Samartzis, D. Effectiveness of autologous chondrocyte implantation in cartilage repair of the knee: A systematic review of controlled trials. Osteoarth. Cartil. 18(6), 857–863 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Benthien, J. P., Schwaninger, M. & Behrens, P. We do not have evidence based methods for the treatment of cartilage defects in the knee. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 19(4), 543–552 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kosy, J. D., Schranz, P. J., Toms, A. D., Eyres, K. S. & Mandalia, V. I. The use of radiofrequency energy for arthroscopic chondroplasty in the knee. Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. 27(5), 695–703 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Cetik, O., Cift, H., Comert, B. & Cirpar, M. Risk of osteonecrosis of the femoral condyle after arthroscopic chondroplasty using radiofrequency: A prospective clinical series. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 17(1), 24–29 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    DeFalco, R. A., Ricci, A. R. & Balduini, F. C. Osteonecrosis of the knee after arthroscopic meniscectomy and chondroplasty. Am. J. Sports Med. 31(6), 1013–1016 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Silva, M., Tharani, R. & Schmalzried, T. P. Results of direct exchange or debridement of the infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 404, 125–131 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Dervin, G. F., Stiell, I. G., Rody, K. & Grabowski, J. Effect of arthroscopic debridement for osteoarthritis of the knee on health-related quality of life. JBJS 85(1), 10–19 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Aaron, R. K., Skolnick, A. H., Reinert, S. E. & Ciombor, D. M. Arthroscopic debridement for osteoarthritis of the knee. JBJS 88(5), 936–943 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Sauerland, S., Peinemann, F., Anne, W., Rutjes, S. & Jüni, P. Letter regarding" The effects of arthroscopic joint debridement in the knee osteoarthritis: Results of a meta-analysis". Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 23(4), 1259 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mithoefer, K., McAdams, T., Williams, R. J., Kreuz, P. C. & Mandelbaum, B. R. Clinical efficacy of the microfracture technique for articular cartilage repair in the knee: An evidence-based systematic analysis. Am. J. Sports Med. 37(10), 2053–2063 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gracitelli, G. C., Moraes, V. Y., Franciozi, C. E., Luzo, M. V. & Belloti, J. C. Surgical interventions (microfracture, drilling, mosaicplasty, and allograft transplantation) for treating isolated cartilage defects of the knee in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 9(9), CD010675. (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bert, J. M. Abandoning microfracture of the knee: Has the time come?. Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. 31(3), 501–505 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Krych, A. J., Robertson, C. M., Williams, R. J. III. & C.S. Group. Return to athletic activity after osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee. Am. J. Sports Med. 40(5), 1053–1059 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bentley, G. et al. A prospective, randomised comparison of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for osteochondral defects in the knee. Bone Joint J. 85(2), 223–230 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Horas, U., Pelinkovic, D., Herr, G., Aigner, T. & Schnettler, R. Autologous chondrocyte implantation and osteochondral cylinder transplantation in cartilage repair of the knee joint: a prospective, comparative trial. JBJS 85(2), 185–192 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Intzoglou, K. et al. Synthetic or autologous plugs for the repair of osteochondral rabbit knee defects: a comparative study. J. Exp. Appl. Anim. Sci. 1(2), 229–240 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Bugbee, W., Cavallo, M. & Giannini, S. Osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee. J. Knee Surg. 25(02), 109–116 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Chahal, J. et al. Outcomes of osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee. Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. 29(3), 575–588 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Basad, E., Ishaque, B., Bachmann, G., Stürz, H. & Steinmeyer, J. Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture in the treatment of cartilage defects of the knee: A 2-year randomised study. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 18(4), 519–527 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Peterson, L., Vasiliadis, H. S., Brittberg, M. & Lindahl, A. Autologous chondrocyte implantation: A long-term follow-up. Am. J. Sports Med. 38(6), 1117–1124 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Vasiliadis, H. S. et al. Autologous chondrocyte implantation in cartilage lesions of the knee: Long-term evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging and delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging technique. Am. J. Sports Med. 38(5), 943–949 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Harris, J. D., Siston, R. A., Pan, X. & Flanigan, D. C. Autologous chondrocyte implantation: A systematic review. JBJS 92(12), 2220–2233 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Mistry, H., Connock, M., Pink, J., Shyangdan, D., Clar, C., Royle, P., Court, R., Biant, L. C., Metcalfe, A. & Waugh, N. Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee: Systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol. Assess. 21(6), 1–294. (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Brittberg, M. et al. Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 331(14), 889–895 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kuroda, T. et al. Therapeutic strategy of third-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteoarthritis. Upsala J. Med. Sci. 116(2), 107–114 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kon, E., Roffi, A., Filardo, G., Tesei, G. & Marcacci, M. Scaffold-based cartilage treatments: With or without cells? A systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence. Arthrosc. J. Arthrosc. Relat. Surg. 31(4), 767–775 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Clavé, A. et al. Third-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for knee cartilage injury: 2-year randomized trial. J. Orthop. Res. 34(4), 658–665 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Stoddart, M. J., Grad, S., Eglin, D. & Alini, M. Cells and biomaterials in cartilage tissue engineering. Regen. Med. 4(1), 81–98. (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Longley, R., Ferreira, A. & Gentile, P. Recent approaches to the manufacturing of biomimetic multi-phasic scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19(6), 1755 (2018).

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Benders, K. E. et al. Extracellular matrix scaffolds for cartilage and bone regeneration. Trends Biotechnol. 31(3), 169–176 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Gillette, B. M. et al. Engineering extracellular matrix structure in 3D multiphase tissues. Biomaterials 32(32), 8067–8076 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kim, B.-S. et al. Design of artificial extracellular matrices for tissue engineering. Prog. Polym. Sci. 36(2), 238–268 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Fuentes-Mera, L., Camacho, A., Engel, E., Pérez-Silos, V., Lara-Arias, J., Marino-Martínez, I., Peña-Martínez, V. Therapeutic potential of articular cartilage regeneration using tissue engineering based on multiphase designs, cartilage tissue engineering and regeneration techniques, IntechOpen. (2019).

  41. 41.

    Castro, N. J., Hacking, S. A. & Zhang, L. G. Recent progress in interfacial tissue engineering approaches for osteochondral defects. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40(8), 1628–1640 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Yousefi, A. M., Hoque, M. E., Prasad, R. G. & Uth, N. Current strategies in multiphasic scaffold design for osteochondral tissue engineering: A review. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 103(7), 2460–2481 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Swieszkowski, W., Tuan, B. H. S., Kurzydlowski, K. J. & Hutmacher, D. W. Repair and regeneration of osteochondral defects in the articular joints. Biomol. Eng. 24(5), 489–495 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Grayson, W. L., Bhumiratana, S., Chao, P. G., Hung, C. T. & Vunjak-Novakovic, G. Spatial regulation of human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation in engineered osteochondral constructs: Effects of pre-differentiation, soluble factors and medium perfusion. Osteoarthritis Cartil. 18(5), 714–723 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Lee, M. & Wu, B. M. Recent advances in 3D printing of tissue engineering scaffolds. in Computer-Aided Tissue Engineering. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 868, 257–267. (Springer, 2012).

  46. 46.

    Mauck, R. L. et al. Functional tissue engineering of articular cartilage through dynamic loading of chondrocyte-seeded agarose gels. J. Biomech. Eng. 122(3), 252–260 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Harley, B. A. et al. Design of a multiphase osteochondral scaffold. II. Fabrication of a mineralized collagen–glycosaminoglycan scaffold. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A Off. J. Soc. Biomater. Japan. Soc. Biomater. Aust. Soc. Biomater. Korean Soc. Biomater. 92(3), 1066–1077 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Harley, B. A. et al. Design of a multiphase osteochondral scaffold III: Fabrication of layered scaffolds with continuous interfaces. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A Off. J. Soc. Biomater. Japan. Soc. Biomater. Aust. Soc. Biomater. Korean Soc Biomater. 92(3), 1078–1093 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Wang, Y. et al. Fabrication and in vitro evaluation of an articular cartilage extracellular matrix-hydroxyapatite bilayered scaffold with low permeability for interface tissue engineering. Biomed. Eng. Online 13(1), 80 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Miyagi, S., Takagi, M., Tensho, K. & Wakitani, S. Construction of an osteochondral-like tissue graft combining β-tricalcium phosphate block and scaffold-free mesenchymal stem cell sheet. J. Orthopaedic Sci. 18(3), 471–477 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Niyama, K. et al. Construction of osteochondral-like tissue graft combining β-tricalcium phosphate block and scaffold-free centrifuged chondrocyte cell sheet. J. Orthopaedic Sci. 16(5), 613–621 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Tuan, H. S. Tissue engineering of an osteochondral transplant by using a cell/scaffold construct. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. (2009).

  53. 53.

    Jeon, J. E., Vaquette, C., Theodoropoulos, C., Klein, T. J. & Hutmacher, D. W. Multiphasic construct studied in an ectopic osteochondral defect model. J. R. Soc. Interface 11(95), 20140184 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Nyitray, C. E. et al. Polycaprolactone thin-film micro-and nanoporous cell-encapsulation devices. ACS Nano 9(6), 5675–5682 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Hunter, A., Archer, C., Walker, P. & Blunn, G. Attachment and proliferation of osteoblasts and fibroblasts on biomaterials for orthopaedic use. Biomaterials 16(4), 287–295 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Wang, Y.-W., Wu, Q. & Chen, G.-Q. Attachment, proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts on random biopolyester poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) scaffolds. Biomaterials 25(4), 669–675 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Berrington, D. Viability reagent, prestoblue, in comparison with other available reagents, utilized in cytotoxicity and antimicrobial assays. Int. J. Microbiol. 2013, 420601. (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Sonnaert, M., Papantoniou, I., Luyten, F. P. & Schrooten, J. Quantitative validation of the presto blue metabolic assay for online monitoring of cell proliferation in a 3d perfusion bioreactor system. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 21(6), 519–529 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Srinivasan, S., McKinley, G. H. & Cohen, R. E. Assessing the accuracy of contact angle measurements for sessile drops on liquid-repellent surfaces. Langmuir 27(22), 13582–13589 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Klitzing, R. V. & Möhwald, H. A realistic diffusion model for ultrathin polyelectrolyte films. Macromolecules 29(21), 6901–6906 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Hutmacher, D. W., Schantz, J. T., Lam, C. X. F., Tan, K. C. & Lim, T. C. State of the art and future directions of scaffold-based bone engineering from a biomaterials perspective. J. Tissue Eng. Regenerative Med. 1(4), 245–260 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Jazayeri, H. E. et al. The cross-disciplinary emergence of 3D printed bioceramic scaffolds in Orthopedic bioengineering. Ceram. Int. 44(1), 1–9 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Fahimipour, F. et al. 3D printed TCP-based scaffold incorporating VEGF-loaded PLGA microspheres for craniofacial tissue engineering. Dent. Mater. 33(11), 1205–1216 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Khojasteh, A. et al. Development of PLGA-coated β-TCP scaffolds containing VEGF for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 69, 780–788 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Masaeli, R., Kashi, T., Dinarvand, R., Rakhshan, H., Hooshmand, B. & Abbas, F. Efficacy of calcium phosphate cement enhanced with 3 wt%-nanostrontium-hydroxyapatite, and nanostrontium-CPC-incorporated simvastatin-loaded poly (lactic-co-glycolic-acid) microspheres in bone formation: An explorative multi-phase experimental in-vitro/in-vivo study. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 69, 171–183. (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Heidari, F. et al. Mechanical properties of natural chitosan/hydroxyapatite/magnetite nanocomposites for tissue engineering applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 65, 338–344 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Heidari, F. et al. Evaluation of the mechanical properties, in vitro biodegradability and cytocompatibility of natural chitosan/hydroxyapatite/nano-Fe3O4 composite. Ceram. Int. 44(1), 275–281 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Tas, A. C., Korkusuz, F., Timucin, M. & Akkas, N. An investigation of the chemical synthesis and high-temperature sintering behaviour of calcium hydroxyapatite (HA) and tricalcium phosphate (TCP) bioceramics. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 8(2), 91–96 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Klein, C. P., de Blieck-Hogemrst, J., Wolket, J. & De Groot, K. Studies of the solubility of different calcium phosphate ceramic particles in vitro. Biomaterials 11(7), 509–512 (1990).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Klein, C., Driessen, A. & De Groot, K. Relationship between the degradation behaviour of calcium phosphate ceramics and their physical-chemical characteristics and ultrastructural geometry. Biomaterials 5(3), 157–160 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Jarcho, M. Calcium phosphate ceramics as hard tissue prosthetics. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 157, 259–278 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Zhou, H. & Lee, J. Nanoscale hydroxyapatite particles for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 7(7), 2769–2781 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Kwon, S.-H., Jun, Y.-K., Hong, S.-H. & Kim, H.-E. Synthesis and dissolution behavior of β-TCP and HA/β-TCP composite powders. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 23(7), 1039–1045 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Harada, Y. Experimental studies of healing process on compound blocks of hydroxyapatite (HAP) particles and tricalcium phosphate (TCP) powder implantation in rabbit mandible-comparison of HAP/TCP ratios and plastic methods, Shika gakuho. Dental Sci. Rep. 89(2), 263–297 (1989).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Ryu, H.-S. et al. An improvement in sintering property of β-tricalcium phosphate by addition of calcium pyrophosphate. Biomaterials 23(3), 909–914 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Ramay, H. R. & Zhang, M. Biphasic calcium phosphate nanocomposite porous scaffolds for load-bearing bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 25(21), 5171–5180 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Wang, J. et al. Biological evaluation of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic vertebral laminae. Biomaterials 19(15), 1387–1392 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Bouler, J.-M., Pilet, P., Gauthier, O. & Verron, E. Biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics for bone reconstruction: A review of biological response. Acta Biomater. 53, 1–12 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Miron, R. J. et al. Osteoinductive potential of a novel biphasic calcium phosphate bone graft in comparison with autographs, xenografts, and DFDBA. Clin. Oral Implant Res. 27(6), 668–675 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Brunski, J. B. Mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the human mandible: implications for dental implant treatment planning and surgical placement. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 57(6), 706–708 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Salamon, A. et al. Gelatin-based hydrogels promote chondrogenic differentiation of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. Materials 7(2), 1342–1359 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Focaroli, S. et al. Influence of a biomimetic gelatin porous scaffold in chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Italian J. Anat. Embryol. 119(1), 89 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Pruksakorn, D. et al. Chondrogenic properties of primary human chondrocytes culture in hyaluronic acid treated gelatin scaffold. Med. J. Med. Assoc. Thailand 92(4), 483 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Chow, G., Knudson, C. B., Homandberg, G. & Knudson, W. Increased expression of CD44 in bovine articular chondrocytes by catabolic cellular mediators. J. Biol. Chem. 270(46), 27734–27741 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Knudson, W. et al. Hyaluronan oligosaccharides perturb cartilage matrix homeostasis and induce chondrocytic chondrolysis. Arthritis Rheum. 43(5), 1165–1174 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Aibe, K., Ryu, J. & Sano, S. Effects of hyaluronic acid on cartilage metabolism in free chondrocytes. J. Orthopaedic Sci. 1(4), 268–276 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Betre, H. et al. Chondrocytic differentiation of human adipose-derived adult stem cells in elastin-like polypeptide. Biomaterials 27(1), 91–99 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Dehghani, S. et al. 3D-Printed membrane as an alternative to amniotic membrane for ocular surface/conjunctival defect reconstruction: An in vitro and in vivo study. Biomaterials 174, 95–112 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Tayebi, L. et al. 3D-printed membrane for guided tissue regeneration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 84, 148–158 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Awad, H. A., Wickham, M. Q., Leddy, H. A., Gimble, J. M. & Guilak, F. Chondrogenic differentiation of adipose-derived adult stem cells in agarose, alginate, and gelatin scaffolds. Biomaterials 25(16), 3211–3222 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Jakob, M. et al. Specific growth factors during the expansion and redifferentiation of adult human articular chondrocytes enhance chondrogenesis and cartilaginous tissue formation in vitro. J. Cell. Biochem. 81(2), 368–377 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Jakob, M., Demarteau, O., Suetterlin, R., Heberer, M. & Martin, I. Chondrogenesis of expanded adult human articular chondrocytes is enhanced by specific prostaglandins. Rheumatology 43(7), 852–857 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Arima, Y. & Iwata, H. Effect of wettability and surface functional groups on protein adsorption and cell adhesion using well-defined mixed self-assembled monolayers. Biomaterials 28(20), 3074–3082 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Dowling, D. P., Miller, I. S., Ardhaoui, M. & Gallagher, W. M. Effect of surface wettability and topography on the adhesion of osteosarcoma cells on plasma-modified polystyrene. J. Biomater. Appl. 26(3), 327–347 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Kim, E. J., Yoon, S. J., Yeo, G.-D., Pai, C.-M. & Kang, I.-K. Preparation of biodegradable PLA/PLGA membranes with PGA mesh and their application for periodontal guided tissue regeneration. Biomed. Mater. 4(5), 055001 (2009).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Cho, W., Kim, J., Oh, S., Nam, H., Kim, J., Lee, J.H. PCL electrospun sheet-embedded microporous PLGA membrane for effective guided bone regeneration. in 3rd Kuala Lumpur International Conference on Biomedical Engineering 122–125. Springer (2007).

  97. 97.

    Freitas, R. A. Nanomedicine: Basic Capabilities Vol. 1 (Landes Bioscience, Georgetown, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank the late Professor James Richardson from Institute of Orthopaedics, Robert Jones & Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital (Oswestry, UK) for the active involvement in this research. The work could not be performed without his insight, guidance and great discussions. This work was carried out with support from China Regenerative Medicine International Limited (CRMI).

Author information




L.T. contributes in developing the idea, analyzing the experiments and writing the manuscript. Z.C. contributes in developing the idea and leading the work. H.Y. contributes in developing the idea and leading the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hua Ye.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tayebi, L., Cui, Z. & Ye, H. A tri-component knee plug for the 3rd generation of autologous chondrocyte implantation. Sci Rep 10, 17048 (2020).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing