Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Driving the polar spin reorientation transition of ultrathin ferromagnets with antiferromagnetic–ferromagnetic phase transition of nearby FeRh alloy film

Abstract

We show that in-plane to out-of-plane magnetization switching of a ferromagnetic layer can be driven by antiferromagnetic–ferromagnetic phase transition in a nearby FeRh system. For FeRh/Au/FeAu trilayers, the impact of the magnetic phase transition of FeRh onto the perpendicular magnetization of monoatomic FeAu superlattices is transferred across the Au spacer layer via interlayer magnetic coupling. The polar spin reorientation process of the FeAu spins driven by the magnetic phase transition in the FeRh reveals its major features; namely it is reversible and displays hysteresis.

Introduction

Control of the spin orientation in magnetic materials is a key issue in modern spintronics1. Materials with a large perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) are notably important from both the application and theoretical points of view, because a large PMA provides magnetization with a high thermal stability, which is necessary for high density magnetic memories2,3,4,5,6,7. An example of such material are monoatomic FeAu superlattices. The layer-by-layer growth by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) stabilizes L10-type ordered phase that does not exist in Fe–Au phase diagram. The super-lattices possess intriguing magnetic properties like perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, large magnetic moments combined with a high Curie temperature8. In ultrathin ferromagnetic films, the direction of magnetization is routinely controlled through the spin reorientation transition (SRT) arising from the competition between various contributions to the effective magnetic anisotropy, including the shape, surface, magnetocrystalline and magnetoelastic anisotropies9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19. The magnetization direction can also be controlled by magnetic coupling with another magnetic film as described in the literature20,21. Recently, we showed that the in-plane SRT process of ultrathin Co film magnetization can be induced by the proximity of the epitaxial FeRh layer, as a result of the evolution of direct exchange coupling between the FeRh and Co spin systems accompanying the temperature-driven AFM FM magneto-structural phase transition in the FeRh layer22.

In this paper we show an effective way to control the PMA of an ultrathin magnetic layer via indirect exchange coupling to the FeRh layer mediated through a thin Au spacer. For the PMA system we used Fe–Au monoatomic superlattices that are known to exhibit a square magnetic hysteresis loop and large Fe magnetic moment8,23,24. In our experiment, structural matching of the FeRh(001) and Au(001) surfaces allowed fully epitaxial FeRh/Au/FeAu trilayers to be grown on an MgO substrate. At low temperature, when the FeRh film is in the AFM state (denoted here as FeRhAFM), the interlayer magnetic coupling (IMC) between FeRh and the superlattices is weak and the FeAu stack exhibits an out-of-plane magnetization due to its intrinsic PMA. However, for the FM state of FeRh (FeRhFM) that can be induced by heating across the AFM FM phase transition the FeAu and FeRhFM layers are ferromagnetically coupled with in-plane magnetizations. The polar SRT process of the FeAu spins displays the major features of a magnetic phase transition in the FeRh; namely, it is reversible and hysteretic22,25. The phenomenon reported here goes beyond the heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR) concept consisting of temperature modulation of the coercivity26,27. In HAMR technology such thermally induced modulation of coercive field allows to write the information bit by external magnetic field generated by read–write head of the HDD. A single example of utilization of FM AFM phase transition in FeRh in classical HAMR technology concerns FeRh/FePt system28,29. In our experiment we obtained a switching of the magnetization direction of FeAu that is driven purely by temperature change and without the external magnetic field. The temperature of each memory bits can be changed locally by laser heating or an electrical current flow30.

Results and discussion

Growth and structural characterization

The preparation process (described in details in the “Methods” section) leads to the creation of two sample areas, FeRh/Au(11 Å)/FeAu and FeRh/Au(50 Å)/FeAu, differing only in Au spacer thickness as shown schematically in Fig. 1d. We chose the above Au thicknesses due to the following reason. Our systematic studies of the IMC in FeRh/Au/FeAu (see Supplemental Material 3) show that while for the spacer thickness of 11 Å a strong ferromagnetic interlayer magnetic coupling can be observed between FeRh and FeAu, for the Au thickness of 50 Å the IMC is negligible. Thus with a use of these two spacer thicknesses we were able to compare the magnetic properties of coupled and non-coupled layers. The sequence of the FeAu monolayers, which was repeated three times, was further denoted as the FeAu stack. The sample growth was monitored by low energy electron diffraction (LEED) at each preparation step. The diffraction patterns for the MgO(001) substrate, the FeRh layer and the Au spacer are shown in Fig. 1a–c respectively. The quality of the diffraction pattern observed for the MgO(001) substrate was low owing to the electric charging effect. The FeRh pattern is characterized by sharp diffraction spots and a low background, indicating the high structural quality of the FeRh system. Comparison of the LEED patterns of the MgO(001) substrate and the FeRh alloy indicates a 45° in-plane rotation of the MgO(001) and B2 FeRh(001) surface unit cells. Similar rotational relations were found between the fcc Au(001) and FeRh(001) surfaces. It has to be noted that despite of slight (4%) misfit between the in plane lattice parameters of FeRh(001) (aFeRh = 3.00 Å) and fcc-Au(001) (aAu = 2.88 Å) the epitaxial growth is preserved25. The diffraction pattern of the Au(001) spacer surface was weak, although traces of a typical Au(001) 5 × 1 reconstruction can be seen31. Finally, the similarity of the LEED patterns for the both discussed Au(001) spacers (see Supplemental Material 1), as well as for the FeAu stack grown on the two sample halves indicates homogenous structural properties of our FeAu system. The details of structural and magnetic properties of monoatomic FeAu superlattices grown on 5 × 1 reconstructed Au(001) can be found in23,24.

Figure 1
figure1

Low energy electron diffraction patterns collected for an 80-eV electron beam for (a) the MgO(001) substrate, (b) the FeRh layer and (c) the Au spacer. The sample architecture is schematically shown for each preparation step together with the corresponding LEED patterns. The final layer structure of the sample is shown in (d).

Magnetic properties

The magnetic properties were studied ex situ with the polar (PMOKE) and longitudinal (LMOKE) magneto-optic Kerr32 effects in the temperature range between 150 and 340 K. The PMOKE and LMOKE hysteresis loops were collected during the heating and cooling processes. The exemplary PMOKE magnetic hysteresis loops measured for FeRh/(11 Å) Au/FeAu are shown in Fig. 2. The loops are normalized to the Kerr rotation at saturation determined for the loop measured at 340 K where the saturation Kerr signal has maximum value. The PMOKE loop collected at 340 K (shown in Fig. 2a) is characterized by zero remanence and a high saturation field, which in combination with a rectangular loop measured at the same temperature in the longitudinal geometry (see inset in Fig. 2a), indicates an in-plane easy magnetization direction. Figure 2b shows the temperature evolution of the PMOKE magnetic hysteresis loops collected during cooling from 340 to 200 K. The Kerr rotation at saturation (denoted here as ROTSAT) decreases with decreasing temperature, as shown in Fig. 2c. ROTSAT(T), normalized to a saturation value at 340 K, reveals the presence of the FM AFM transition and is characterized by a typical thermal hysteresis. Remarkably, along with the FM AFM transition manifested by a gradual decrease of the ROTSAT signal with decreasing temperature, a progressive increase in the PMOKE remanence signal can be observed in the measured PMOKE loops (see Fig. 2b). Consequently, a hysteresis loop measured at 200 K in a narrower range of the external magnetic field (low-field loop), shown in Fig. 2d, is fully rectangular and corresponds to the magnetization reversal of the FeAu stack, which is in agreement with our previous observations23. Note that the Kerr rotation at saturation extracted from the low-field hysteresis loop measured for 200 K (see Fig. 2d) is lower than the corresponding ROTSAT value determined from the loops shown in Fig. 2b. Such buildup of the saturation Kerr signal at temperatures below the FM AFM phase transition that can be seen in Fig. 2c originates from a residual FM FeRh phase located near the FeRh/MgO interface33, which contributes to the ROTSAT signal when the external magnetic field is high enough. A detailed discussion of the existence and origin of a residual magnetic phase in gold-capped FeRh thin films deposited on MgO is reported in our separate contribution34.

Figure 2
figure2

The PMOKE exemplary magnetic hysteresis loops measured for FeRh/(11 Å) Au/FeAu. (a) Loops measured at 340 K for polar and longitudinal (inset) geometries. (b) The temperature evolution of the PMOKE magnetic hysteresis loops collected during the cooling process across the FM AFM transition. (c) The temperature dependence of PMOKE Kerr rotation at saturation (ROTSAT). Blue and red arrows indicate the cooling and heating branches respectively. (d) The magnetic hysteresis loop collected at 200 K in a narrower range of the external magnetic field.

Figure 3a shows the evolution of the polar Kerr rotation at remanence (ROTREM) during the temperature cycle 150 K 340 K. It is clear that at low temperatures when the FeRh alloy is in its AFM phase, the orientation of the FeRh/Au/FeAu trilayers magnetization (dominated by the contribution of the FeAu stack) is along the surface normal, while at elevated temperatures, for FeRh in the ferromagnetic state, the whole FeRh/Au/FeAu system is in-plane magnetized. It has to be noted that above analysis of the PMOKE data based on the thermal evolution of the ROTSAT and ROTREM parameters allows to separate MOKE contributions corresponding to the FeAu and FeRh systems. Whereas the ROTSAT predominantly senses the AFM FM phase transition in the FeRh layer, the ROTREM is related only to the perpendicular magnetization component of the FeAu stacks as the PMOKE loops of Au/FeRh/MgO system do not display remanence in the 220–340 K temperature range and are characterized by high values of saturation magnetic field (~ 0.5 T) indicating that FeRh system possess intrinsically strong in-plane magnetic anisotropy in agreement with literature data34,35,36.

Figure 3
figure3

(a) Temperature dependence of the Kerr rotation at remanence for FeRh/(11 Å) Au/FeAu and FeRh/(50 Å) Au/FeAu. Arrows indicate heating and cooling branches (red and blue respectively). (b) The PMOKE loops collected for FeRh/(11 Å)Au/FeAu trilayers at 280 K during cooling (blue curve) and heating (red curve) process. The inset shows the LMOKE loop collected at 280 K during cooling process. (c) Dependence of the Kerr rotation at remanence as a function of the Kerr rotation at saturation with a linear fit marked by the dotted line. (d) The magnetic hysteresis loops collected for polar geometry at 300 K for FeRh/(11 Å) Au/FeAu and FeRh/(50 Å) Au/FeAu are shown. Insets show the zoomed central sections of these loops.

The straightforward interpretation of the polar SRT process of the FeAu stack involves interlayer magnetic coupling between the FeRh and FeAu spin systems mediated across the Au spacer. The IMC is negligible when the FeRh layer is in its AFM state and the FeAu stack displays out-of-plane magnetization originating from its intrinsic perpendicular magnetic anisotropy23. When the in-plane magnetized FM phase nucleates with increasing temperature, IMC forces the rotation of the FeAu stack magnetization to the film plane. The progressive decrease of the perpendicular magnetization component is connected to the gradual increase of the FM FeRh phase along with the transition from the AFM to FM state. The thermal evolution of the ROTREM signal, which is a measure of the magnetization component perpendicular to the film plane, displays a hysteresis corresponding to the hysteresis of the FM AFM transition in the FeRh film. Accordingly, the magnetization states of the FeAu with different spin orientations can be stabilized near room temperature depending on the thermal history of the sample. This can be directly seen from comparison of PMOKE loops collected for the FeRh/(11 Å)Au/FeAu trilayers at 280 K during cooling (blue curve) and heating (red curve) process. The hysteresis curves are clearly characterized by a significantly different values of ROTREM (0.08 and 0.02 for heating and cooling, respectively) as shown in Fig. 3b. Moreover, the LMOKE loop collected at 280 K during cooling process (see inset in Fig. 3b) confirms in-plane magnetization direction of the FeRh/Au/FeAu trilayers. The slight lowering of the Kerr rotation at remanence well corresponds with the non-zero remanence in the PMOKE loop (blue loop in Fig. 3b).

Although it is not clear whether intermediate values of ROTREM reflect a canted magnetization state or coexistence of magnetic domains with in-plane and out-of-plane spin orientation, an increase in ROTREM is equivalent to a significant (four times) enhancement of the perpendicular magnetization component. In Fig. 3c, the dependence of the ROTREM signal is plotted as a function of ROTSAT for FeRh/(11 Å)Au/FeAu trilayer. The ROTREM(ROTSAT) plot was obtained from a combination of the thermal dependences of the ROTSAT and ROTREM parameters shown in Figs. 2c and 3a, respectively. The lack of hysteresis in ROTREM(ROTSAT) dependence indicates that the SRT of the FeAu is predominantly driven by the AFM FM phase transition, and other magnetic phenomena, such as the temperature dependence of the magnetic anisotropy of the FeAu stack, can be neglected. These conclusions are drawn from the fact that a given fraction of the FeRh ferromagnetic phase is found across the AFM FM phase transition at the different temperatures, Tcool and Theat, but the amount of the perpendicular magnetization component corresponding to Tcool and Theat is identical in the ROTREM (ROTSAT) plot. Finally, the linearity of the ROTREM (ROTSAT) dependence indicates that the FeAu perpendicular magnetization component is proportional to the volume of the FM FeRh fraction. That in turn suggests that the interlayer magnetic coupling between the FeRhFM and FeAu apparently depends linearly on the fraction of the FM phase. The nature of the effective IMC between FeAu and FeRh systems is complex and involves oscillatory RKKY-like contribution and dipolar magnetic coupling originating from stray fields generated by FeRh system. The detailed analysis of effective IMC can be found in Supplemental material 3.

The above picture of SRT in the FeAu stack suggests that in the case of the FeRh/Au/FeAu trilayer with a much thicker Au spacer, the magnetic properties of the Fe–Au superlattices should be weakly dependent on the AFM FM phase transition in the FeRh film. PMOKE hysteresis loops measured at 300 K (on cooling from high temperature) for the FeRh/(11 Å)Au/FeAu and FeRh/(50 Å)Au/FeAu trilayers are shown in Fig. 3d. It can be seen from the insets, showing the zoomed central sections of the PMOKE loops, that the Kerr rotation at remanence is almost zero in the case of the thin Au spacer (dAu = 11 Å) and becomes significant for the trilayers with the thick Au interlayer (dAu = 50 Å), confirming the above interpretation that associates the SRT of the FeAu stack with IMC to the FeRh layer. Moreover, the thermal evolution of ROTREM for the FeRh/(50 Å)Au/FeAu trilayers (grey curve shown in Fig. 3a) should be discussed. The ROTREM value is constant over the large temperature range 80–320 K (low field loops are always rectangular in that temperature range) and drops to zero at 340 K. We believe that such behavior reveals the out-of-plane to in-plane spin reorientation transition (SRT) of FeAu stack grown on 50 Å thick Au(001) spacer on temperature increase. The exemplary PMOKE loops and discussion of its shape evolution as a function of temperature can be found in the Supplemental Material 2. We note a lack of temperature hysteresis of the transition from out-of-plane to in-plane magnetization direction of the FeAu system. Such SRT, is probably induced by a thermal weakening of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy of FeAu system (magnetic surface anisotropy), however it can be also driven by a combined effect of weaker perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and residual magnetic coupling with in-plane magnetized FeRh system.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that the magnetization orientation of a ferromagnetic film can be switched between the in-plane and out-of-plane directions by the AFM FM phase transition in a nearby FeRh system. In the case of the FeRh/Au/FeAu trilayers, the impact of the FeRh magnetic state on the magnetization of the FeAu superlattices is transferred via interlayer magnetic coupling across the Au spacer layer. The reported phenomenon provides a mechanism for writing information purely by the temperature change. The dependence of IMC on the spacer thickness is an additional factor that enabled control of the magnetization state in the studied system. Our observations can be important from the point of view of heat-assisted magnetic recording.

Methods

Sample preparation

The 100-Å-thick FeRh layer was grown on a polished MgO(001) single crystal by elemental co-deposition at 670 K. Fe was evaporated from a resistively heated BeO crucible, while the evaporation of Rh was achieved by electron bombardment. The pressure during deposition was around 5 × 10–10 mbar. The nominal Rh atomic concentration established by adjustment of the Fe and Rh evaporation rates (both in the range of Å/min) was approximately 54%. The base FeRh layer was post-annealed at 1,000 K for 1 h to promote the formation of the desired B2 structure. Next, Au spacers with two different thicknesses of 11 Å and 50 Å were deposited at room temperature on the substrate halves. The monoatomic superlattices were grown on the top of the Au spacer by alternate deposition of Fe(001) and Au(001) monolayers (ML). The thicknesses of the Fe and Au ML were 1.43 Å and 2.04 Å respectively and the sequence of the Fe–Au monolayers was repeated three times. For ex-situ measurements, the sample was capped with a 20-Å Au protective layer. The thicknesses of the films were determined with using a quartz microbalance cross calibrated with X-ray reflectivity data. The precision of the thickness determination can be estimated to 5% of monolayer.

Structural properties: LEED

The low-energy electron diffraction (LEED) technique was used to investigate the atomic structure of the growing layers at every preparation steps. More detail about growth and structural properties of (FeAu) stacks on Au(001) spacers can be found in Supplemental Material 1.

Magnetic properties: MOKE

The magnetic properties were studied ex situ with the polar (PMOKE) and longitudinal (LMOKE) magneto-optic Kerr effects. The combination of the both PMOKE and LMOKE techniques provides an access to the both in-plane and out-of-plane magnetization component of samples and its thermal evolution. We used a standard lock-in detection setup consisting of an s-polarized laser light source (λ = 635 nm) and a photo-elastic modulator with a modulation frequency of 50 kHz. The second harmonic (2f.) signal measured by the detector is proportional to the Kerr rotation, and was taken as a measure of the magnetization. The MOKE method probes the entire FeRh/Au/FeAu system as shown in34. During measurements the sample was attached to the copper holder inside the flow cryostat placed between magnetic poles. The temperatures were controlled by a resistance heater and flow rate of nitrogen.

References

  1. 1.

    Chappert, C., Fert, A. & Van Dau, F. N. The emergence of spin electronics in data storage. Nat. Mater. 6, 813–823 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tudu, B. & Tiwari, A. Recent developments in perpendicular magnetic anisotropy thin films for data storage applications. Vaccum 146, 329–341 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kent, A. D. Spintronics: perpendicular all the way. Nat. Mater. 9, 699–700 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ikeda, S. et al. A perpendicular-anisotropy CoFeB–MgO magnetic tunnel junction. Nat. Mater. 9, 721–724 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Weller, D. & Moser, A. Thermal effect limits in ultrahigh-density magnetic recording. IEEE Trans. Magn. 35, 4423–4439 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wang, F. & Xu, X.-H. Writability issues in high-anisotropy perpendicular magnetic recording media. Chin. Phys. B 23, 36802 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Nishimura, N. et al. Magnetic tunnel junction device with perpendicular magnetization films for high-density magnetic random access memory. J. Appl. Phys. 91, 5246 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Takanashi, K., Mitani, S., Sano, M. & Fujimori, H. Artificial fabrication of an L10-type ordered FeAu alloy by alternate monatomic deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 1016 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Stupakiewicz, A. et al. Tailoring of the perpendicular magnetization component in ferromagnetic films on a vicinal substrate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 217202 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ślȩzak, M. et al. Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and noncollinear magnetic structure in ultrathin Fe films on W(110). Phys. Rev. B 87, 134411 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jensen, P. J. & Bennemann, K. H. Magnetic structure of films: Dependence on anisotropy and atomic morphology. Surf. Sci. Rep. 61, 129–199 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Oepen, H. P., Speckmann, M., Millev, Y. & Kirschner, J. Unified approach to thickness-driven magnetic reorientation transitions. Phys. Rev. B 55, 2752–2755 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hope, S., Gu, E., Choi, B. & Bland, J. A. C. Spin engineering in ultrathin Cu/Co/Cu (110). Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1750 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wilgocka-Ślȩzak, D. et al. Thickness-driven polar spin reorientation transition in ultrathin Fe/Au(001) films. Phys. Rev. B 81, 64421 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ślęzak, T. et al. Noncollinear magnetization structure at the thickness-driven spin-reorientation transition in epitaxial Fe films on W(110). Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 027206 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Allenspach, R. & Bischof, A. Magnetization direction switching in Fe/Cu(100) epitaxial films: temperature and thickness dependence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3385 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ślȩzak, T. et al. Different scenarios for the in-plane spin reorientation transition in Fe(110) films on W(110). Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter. Mater. Phys. 87, 094423 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Slęzak, M. et al. Giant in-plane magnetic anisotropy in epitaxial bcc Co/Fe (110) bilayers. Phys. Rev. B 94, 014402 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ślęzak, M. et al. X-ray photoemission electron microscopy study of the in-plane spin reorientation transitions in epitaxial Fe films on W(110). J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 348, 101–106 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Taga, A., Nordstrom, L., James, P., Johansson, B. & Eriksson, O. Non-collinear states in magnetic sensors. Nature 406, 280 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wilogocka-Ślęzak, D. et al. Experimental studies of the non-collinear magnetic states in epitaxial FeAu multilayers. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 240, 536–538 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Dróżdż, P. et al. Switching of Co magnetization driven by antiferromagnetic–ferromagnetic phase transition of FeRh alloy in Co/FeRh bilayers. Phys. Rev. Appl. 9, 034030 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Slezak, T., Karaś, W., Spiridis, N. & Korecki, J. Spin engineering with Fe–Au monolayers. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 240, 362–364 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Karas, W. et al. CEMS studies of Au/Fe/Au ultrathin films and monoatomic multilayers. Phys. Status Solidi 189, 287–292 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Dróżdż, P. et al. Temperature controlled Fe/Au/FeRh spin valves. AIP Adv. 8, 101434 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Nam, N. T., Lu, W. & Suzuki, T. Exchange bias of ferromagnetic/antiferromagnetic in FePt/FeRh bilayers. J. Appl. Phys. 105, 07D708 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kryder, M. H. et al. Heat assisted magnetic recording. Proc. IEEE 96, 1810–1835 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Thiele, J.-U., Maat, S. & Fullerton, E. E. FeRh/FePt exchange spring films for thermally assisted magnetic recording media. Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 2859 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Thiele, J., Maat, S., Robertson, J. L. & Fullerton, E. E. Magnetic and structural properties of FePt–FeRh exchange spring films for thermally assisted magnetic recording media. IEEE Trans. Magn. 40, 2537–2542 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ganping, J. et al. Ultrafast generation of ferromagnetic order via a laser-induced phase transformation in FeRh thin films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 197403 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Spiridis, N. & Korecki, J. Influence of Au reconstruction on growth of Fe on Au(100). Appl. Surf. Sci. 141, 313–318 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Vavassori, P. Polarization modulation technique for magneto-optical quantitative vector magnetometry. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 1605 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Odkhuu, D. Interfacial magnetic-phase transition mediated large perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in FeRh/MgO by a heavy transition-metal capping. Sci. Rep. 8, 6900 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Dróżdż, P. et al. Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and residual magnetic phases in gold- capped FeRh film on MgO(001). J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 495, 165804 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Marti, X. et al. Room-temperature antiferromagnetic memory resistor. Nat. Mater. 13, 367–374 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Mancini, E. et al. Magnetic phase transition in iron–rhodium thin films probed by ferromagnetic resonance. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 46, 245302 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Center of Poland under Project No. 2015/19/B/ST3/00543 and partially by the AGH University of Science and Technology statutory task No. 11.11.220.01/6 under a subsidy from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education. J. Korecki thanks the statutory research funds of ICSC PAS for their support.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P.D. prepared the samples, performed the experiment, analysed the data and wrote the original draft of the manuscript. M.Ś., W.J., M.S., H.N. and A.K.-R., D.W.-Ś., K.F. contributed to the samples preparation, measurements of the magnetic properties and preparation of the final version of manuscript. J.K. and T.Ś. evaluated the research and supervised manuscript preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Dróżdż.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dróżdż, P., Ślęzak, M., Janus, W. et al. Driving the polar spin reorientation transition of ultrathin ferromagnets with antiferromagnetic–ferromagnetic phase transition of nearby FeRh alloy film. Sci Rep 10, 14901 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71912-z

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing