Characteristics of hydrate-bound gas retrieved at the Kedr mud volcano (southern Lake Baikal)

Abstract

We reported the characteristics of hydrate-bound hydrocarbons in lake-bottom sediments at the Kedr mud volcano in Lake Baikal. Twenty hydrate-bearing sediment cores were retrieved, and methane-stable isotopes of hydrate-bound gases (δ13C and δ2H of − 47.8‰ to − 44.0‰ V-PDB and − 280.5‰ to − 272.8‰ V-SMOW, respectively) indicated their thermogenic origin accompanied with secondary microbial methane. Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of the crystals and molecular composition of the hydrate-bound gases suggested that structure II crystals showed a high concentration of ethane (around 14% of hydrate-bound hydrocarbons), whereas structure I crystals showed a relatively low concentration of ethane (2–5% of hydrate-bound hydrocarbons). These different crystallographic structures comprised complicated layers in the sub-lacustrine sediment, suggesting that the gas hydrates partly dissociate, concentrate ethane and form structure II crystals. We concluded that a high concentration of thermogenic ethane primarily controls the crystallographic structure of gas hydrates and that propane, iso-butane (2-methylpropane) and neopentane (2,2-dimethylpropane) are encaged into crystals in the re-crystallisation process.

Introduction

Gas hydrates are crystalline clathrate compounds composed of water and gas molecules that are stable at low temperature and high partial pressure of each gas component1. Natural gas hydrates, which contain methane (C1) as a major component, exist in sea/lake sediment columns and permafrost layers and are considered to be a possible global source of energy2,3. There are different views on the role of gas hydrates on global warming4,5,6. They are of concern as a large reservoir of C1; however, the amount of hydrate-bound gas is smaller than that expected previously, which makes them unlikely to cause global warming by dissociation of C15,6. Moreover, the current understanding of the formation, dissociation and maintenance processes of natural gas hydrates is still incomplete.

Molecular fractionation during formation of gas hydrate crystals occurs according to the size ratio of guest molecules to host cages and the difference in equilibrium pressure of each component of hydrocarbons. Milkov et al.7 reported that gas hydrates retrieved at the southern Hydrate Ridge (offshore Oregon) are rich in ethane (C2) but exclude propane (C3), because the crystal structure I (sI) cannot encage C3. Sassen et al.8 studied the gas hydrates retrieved at the Gulf of Mexico and found that they are high in C2, C3 and butane (C4) but exclude iso-pentane (i-C5, 2-methylbutane), because the crystal structure II (sII) cannot encage such large guest molecules. Therefore, molecular composition of natural gas primarily controls the crystallographic structure of gas hydrates.

Natural gas hydrates have been discovered in sub-lacustrine sediments in Lake Baikal, in association with fluid venting at mud volcanoes, pockmarks and cold seeps9,10. Although the Lake Baikal gas hydrates generally belong to sI, higher concentrations of C2 locally induce the formation of sII as sII gas hydrates form for a particular composition of C1 and C211,12. Co-existence of sI and sII hydrates in the same sediment core, retrieved at the Kukuy K-2 mud volcano (MV) in the central Baikal basin (Fig. 1), was reported by Kida et al.13,14. Some formation models for these ‘double structure’ gas hydrates were proposed by Hachikubo et al.15, Poort et al.16 and Manakov et al.17. The hypothesis shared by the latter two papers is that the sII hydrates are formed by re-crystallisation after dissociation of pre-existing sI hydrates. Because C2 is prone to be encaged in the hydrate phase rather than C1, C2 can be concentrated into the hydrate during the re-crystallisation process with C2-rich sII forming18.

Figure 1
figure1

Bathymetry map of the Kedr mud volcano (MV) at the southern basin of Lake Baikal. The blue, red, green and white points indicate structure I only, structure II only, both structures I and II and no gas hydrate, respectively. This map was created using Kashmir 3D, Version 9.3.1 (https://www.kashmir3d.com/).

C2-rich sII gas hydrates (C2 concentration ca. 14% of volatile hydrocarbons) have been discovered not only at the Kukuy K-2 MV but also at the Kukuy K-4 MV and the Kukuy K-10 gas hydrate mound, located in the central Baikal basin, and at the PosolBank seep, located in the southern Baikal basin (Fig. 1)9,19. Recently, double-structure gas hydrates were also recovered at the Kedr MV, located in the southern Baikal basin, between 2015 and 201710,20. This study focused on the characteristics of molecular and stable isotope compositions of hydrate-bound hydrocarbons retrieved at the Kedr MV area to improve our understanding of the formation process of double-structure gas hydrates.

The Kedr MV is located in the southern Baikal basin, at 27 km south of Listvyanka (Fig. 1), and it was separated into two study areas: a complex of mud-volcanic buildings (Kedr-1 area), where mud-volcanic breccia was found20, and a separate hill with gas hydrate in sediment (Kedr-2 area). Multi-beam echosounder data obtained in 2015 revealed that the Kedr MV consists of small mounds and pockmarks, and results of pore water geochemistry suggested the existence of fluid discharge from greater depths20. This part of Lake Baikal is known for the presence of the coal-bearing sediments of the Tankhoy Formation, Oligocene–Miocene age21,22. These deposits would represent an ideal source for upward migrating gas that could lead to the formation of gas hydrates near the lake floor20,22. During expeditions onboard R/V G. Yu. Vereshchagin (VER) in 2015–2017, 42 sediment cores, including 20 hydrate-bearing cores, were sampled at the Kedr MV: samples were taken in August–September 2015 (VER15-03), August 2016 (VER16-03) and August 2017 (VER17-03). Sediment cores were retrieved using gravity corer (length 3.5 or 6.1 m). Coring targets were mainly small mounds and pockmarks, along with five peripheral locations (2016St21, 2016St22, 2016St25, 2016St26 and 2016St27) as references.

Results

Gas hydrate crystals

Gas hydrate crystals in the sediment cores displayed massive, granular, plate-like or vein-like inclusions in the sediments (Fig. 2). Several hydrate-bearing sediment cores had solid granules, suggesting the presence of sII crystals17. PXRD profiles of the gas hydrate samples agreed with the crystal shapes (Fig. 3): the granular shape of 2015St1GC2 and the upper layer of 2017St13GC3 (230 cm below lake floor, cmblf) corresponded to sII, whereas plate-like crystals of the lower layer of 2017St13GC3 (260 cmblf) corresponded to sI. Massive crystals of 2015St1GC8, accompanied with granules, corresponded to sII. All samples included ice Ih in the PXRD profiles, caused by partial dissociation of gas hydrates during the retrieval of the cores and handling onboard.

Figure 2
figure2

Gas hydrates in sediment cores recovered from the Kedr-1 and Kedr-2 areas. Upward core direction is toward the left in each. (a) 2015St1GC2 (Kedr-1, structure II), (b) 2015St1GC8 (Kedr-1, structure II), (c) 2015St1GC11 (Kedr-1, structure I), (d) 2015St1GC19 (Kedr-1, structure I) and € 2017St13GC3 (Kedr-2, upper layer: structure II, lower layer: structure I).

Figure 3
figure3

Powder X-ray diffraction profiles of the gas hydrate samples. 2015St1GC2 (25–35 cmblf), 2015St1GC8 (168–174 cmblf), 2016St19GC1 (163–168 cmblf) and 2017St13GC3 (230 cmblf) belong to structure II, whereas 2017St13GC3 (260 cmblf) belongs to structure I. cmblf, centimetres below lake floor.

Molecular and isotopic compositions of hydrate-bound hydrocarbons

Figure 4 shows the relationship between molecular and isotopic compositions of hydrate- bound hydrocarbons for the different sample sites in Lake Baikal. We obtained 84 samples of hydrate-bound gases from the Kedr-1 area and 12 from the Kedr-2 area. Molecular and isotopic compositions of the hydrocarbons in the hydrate-bound gases are listed in the Supplementary Information and are summarised in Table 1. C1 was the main component of the hydrate-bound hydrocarbons, whereas C2 was the second component. C2 proportions in the hydrocarbons were 2.1–15.6 vol% at Kedr-1 and 4.2–14.1 vol% at Kedr-2. C3 proportions were smaller than C2 and distributed over a wider range at Kedr-1 (0.0003–0.3039 vol%) and Kedr-2 (0.0035–0.0349 vol%). Therefore, C1/(C2 + C3) in Fig. 4a is mainly influenced by C1 and C2. C1/(C2 + C3) and C1 δ13C of the Kedr MV ranged from 5 to 47 and from − 47.8‰ to − 44.0‰, respectively. C1/(C2 + C3) of the Kukuy K-2 MV in the central Baikal basin are clearly separated into two distinct groups responding to the gas hydrate structures: sI (21–80) and sII (~ 6)23. Conversely, there was no clear separation in C1/(C2 + C3) values for Kedr-1, suggesting that some gas hydrate samples contained both sI and sII. The relationship between δ13C and δ2H of C1 is shown in Fig. 4b. C1 δ2H of the Kedr MV was between − 280.5‰ and − 272.8‰, and these values were ~ 30‰ higher than those from other gas hydrate sites. Figure 4c shows an L-shaped distribution between C1 δ13C and C2 δ13C in the hydrate-bound gas at Lake Baikal. C2 δ13C of the Kedr MV ranged from − 27.8‰ to − 25.3‰ and the values were almost the same as Kukuy K-0, Kukuy K-2 and Goloustnoe. Iso-butane (i-C4, 2-methylpropane), n-butane (n-C4), neopentane (neo-C5, 2,2-dimethylpropane) and i-C5 were detected in the hydrate-bound hydrocarbons (Table 1); however, the concentration of n-pentane (n-C5) was under the detection limit of our gas chromatograph. The compositions of C3, i-C4 and neo-C5 detected in the hydrate-bound gases of the sI were smaller than those of sII.

Figure 4
figure4

Diagrams of hydrate-bound gases. (a) C1/(C2 + C3) plotted against C1 δ13C, based on the classification of Milkov and Etiope25; (b) δ13C of C1 plotted against δ2H, based on the classification of Milkov and Etiope25; and (c) δ13C of C2 plotted against δ13C of C1, based on the classification of Milkov28. Malenky, Bolshoy, Malyutka, Peschanka P-2, Kukuy K-0, Kukuy K-2 and Goloustnoe data are from Hachikubo et al.23.

Table 1 Molecular and isotopic compositions of hydrate-bound hydrocarbons at the Kedr mud volcano (MV).

Molecular and isotopic compositions of sediment gases

Figure 5 shows the selected depth profiles of sediment gas in the hydrate-bearing cores obtained using headspace gas method (all data are shown in the Supplementary Information). C1 concentrations of the all sediment cores increased with depth and reached 1–10 mM at a depth of around 50 cm below lake floor (cmblf). The CO2 concentrations of all cores increased slightly with depth. The value of C1/(C2 + C3) generally decreased with depth. Because C3 concentrations in the sediment gases were three orders of magnitude smaller than C2 concentrations (average concentrations of C2 and C3 for all sediment gases are 146 μM and 0.13 μM, respectively), these results indicated that the Kedr MV area with gas hydrates is characterised by a high C2 concentration.

Figure 5
figure5

Depth profiles of C1 and CO2 concentrations, C1/(C2 + C3) values, C1 δ13C, C1 δ2H, C2 δ13C, C2 δ2H and CO2 δ13C in the headspace gas. cmblf, centimetres below lake floor.

C1 δ13C of all cores increased with depth; however, it also increased beneath the lake floor (10–20 cmblf) in 2016St18GC3 and 2017St12GC3 cores, where C1 concentrations were low, suggesting oxidation of C1 and consumption of light C1. C1 δ13C of Kedr-1 and Kedr-2 was around − 45‰ and − 42‰, respectively. C1 δ2H of hydrate-bearing cores was between − 280‰ and − 270‰ although that of 2015St1GC15 was between − 300‰ and − 270‰. C2 δ13C of all cores was almost constant with depth and averaged at around − 26‰, suggesting thermogenic C2. C2 δ2H of hydrate-bearing cores was at around − 210‰; however, that of some sediment cores (2015St1GC14 and 2015St1GC15) was between − 240‰ and − 230‰ at their base. CO2 δ13C of all cores generally increased with depth, reaching + 20‰ (Kedr-1) and + 30‰ (Kedr-2).

Discussion

Origin of hydrate-bound hydrocarbons

A relationship between C1/(C2 + C3) and C1 δ13C has been applied to identify the sources of hydrocarbons in submarine seeps24. Recently, this diagram was revised based on a large dataset25. As shown in Fig. 4a, hydrate-bound hydrocarbons at the Kedr MV have thermogenic and/or secondary microbial origins, whereas those of other gas hydrate sites (Malenky, Bolshoy, Malyutka, Peschanka P-2, Kukuy K-0, Kukuy K-2 and Goloustnoe; Fig. 1) in Lake Baikal demonstrate microbial or early mature thermogenic origins. The hydrate-bound C1 from all locations except those at the Kedr MV were interpreted to be of microbial origin via methyl-type fermentation23 according to Whiticar’s old diagram26; however, the revised diagram25 suggests early mature thermogenic gases (Fig. 4b). Those of the Kedr MV plot at the boundary of the thermogenic and secondary microbial origin zones. Low C1 and C2 δ13C at the Peschanka P-2 MV indicated that C1 and C2 are of microbial origin27,28, whereas Kedr MV shows high C1 and C2 δ13C indicating their thermogenic origin (Fig. 4c). At other sites, C1 and C2 δ13C suggested that gases are mainly of microbial origin (in terms of C1) with some thermogenic component (13C rich and higher concentration in C2).

Stable isotopes in hydrate-bound C1 at the Kedr-1 and Kedr-2 areas suggested its thermogenic origin. However, it is close to the field of secondary microbial C1 in Fig. 4b, and the data are plotted in the overlap between the fields of thermogenic and secondary microbial in Fig. 4a. Milkov29 mentioned that secondary microbial C1 is characterised by C1-rich dry gas, large C1 δ13C (between − 55‰ and − 35‰) and large CO2 δ13C (more than + 2 ‰). Although hydrate-bound and sediment gases in the Kedr MV were not C1 rich and contained 3%–15% of C2, C1 δ13C was around − 45‰, which agrees with the secondary microbial C1. Because some data of secondary microbial gas are plotted outside the field on the original graph25, we could include the gas data in the category of secondary microbial C1 in Fig. 4b.

Figure 6 shows the relationship between C1 δ13C and CO2 δ13C in the sediment gas obtained using headspace gas method. According to the genetic diagram25, gas hydrate cores are plotted at the zones of the thermogenic and secondary microbial origins, whereas the cores at the peripheral area are primary microbial. The headspace gas data of the hydrate-bearing cores in Fig. 6 seem to be plotted in the field of thermogenic gas (low CO2 δ13C), but the effect of light CO2 produced by methane oxidation in the subsurface layer also decreased CO2 δ13C as shown in Fig. 5. These results suggested that secondary microbial C1 mixes into thermogenic gas. Coal-bearing sediments exist around the Kedr area21,22, and secondary microbial C1 can also form from coal beds30. Hydrate-bound C1 of secondary microbial origin has been only reported at the Alaska North Slope31. This study is another case for it.

Figure 6
figure6

A diagram of headspace gases. CO2 δ13C plotted against C1 δ13C, based on the classification of Milkov and Etiope25.

Formation process of the sII gas hydrates

As stated before, the crystallographic structure of gas hydrates at the Kedr MV is mainly due to the composition of thermogenic C2 in the volatile hydrocarbons. The concentration of C3, which is one of the sII-forming components, was two to three orders of magnitude smaller than that of C2, because biodegradation occurs and this preferentially reduces C3−5 of n-alkanes19,32, 33. The concentration of n-C4 was smaller than that of i-C4, whereas that of n-C5 was not detected (Table 1). C3 δ13C was around − 10‰, suggesting that light C3 is consumed by microbial activity. Assuming that sediment gas C3+ can be ignored, sediment gas ratio C1/C2 at the study area was 30 ± 17 (mean and standard deviation), and the concentration of C2 was ~ 3%. Such a composition of thermogenic gas is, therefore, considered to be supplied from a deep sediment layer, forming sI gas hydrates composed of mainly C1 and C211,12 in the lake floor sediment.

In the cases where sI gas hydrates plug and block migration pathways, upward fluid flow becomes more focused in other areas16. Once gas supply stops locally, gas hydrates begin to decompose, with the gas dissolving into gas–poor sediment pore water. In the system of C1 and C2, C2 is prone to be encaged in gas hydrate and decreases the equilibrium pressure of mixed-gas hydrate. Therefore, C2-rich gas hydrate forms in parallel with the decomposition of sI gas hydrate. The Colorado School of Mines Hydrate (CSMHYD) program34 showed that C2-rich sII gas hydrate (C2 concentration 17%) forms from mixed gas composed of C1 and C2 (C2 concentration 3%). The C2 concentration of hydrate-bound gas at the Kedr MV was ~ 14%, agreeing fairly well with the results of the CSMHYD program. Such secondary generation of gas hydrates can produce compositions and crystallographic structures that are different from the original crystals. A calorimetric study of synthetic C1 and C2 mixed-gas hydrate revealed that double peaks of heat flow correspond to the dissociation process of C1 and C2 mixed-gas hydrate, suggesting that C2-rich gas hydrate forms simultaneously from dissociated gas and showed that the second heat flow peak correspond to the dissociation of C2-rich gas hydrate18. The PXRD and solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance techniques demonstrated that C2-rich sI gas hydrate forms in the dissociation process of C1 + C2 sII gas hydrate35.

Among twenty hydrate-bound cores in the Kedr area, four cores contained sI only, seven cores had sII only, and seven cores showed sII at the upper layer and sI at the lower layer, as observed at the Kukuy K-2 MV13,16,17. Furthermore, in the cores 2015St1GC15 and 2016St18GC2, gas hydrate structure had sI at the upper and lower layer, and sII at the middle layer. These results suggested that complex gas hydrate layers are composed of sI and sII in subsurface sediments as shown in the schematic illustration in Poort et al.16.

Depth profiles of C2 δ2H of gas hydrate cores from the Kedr MV are shown in Fig. 7. C2 δ2H of hydrate-bound gases varied between − 227‰ and − 206‰, with a grouping around − 210‰. C2 δ2H of sediment gases was also around − 210‰, indicating that C2 δ2H of the original thermogenic gas is − 210‰. As stated above, C2 δ2H of some cores showed low values at their base. Based on the isotopic fractionation of hydrogen in C2 during the formation of sI C2 hydrate36, δ2H of hydrate-bound C2 was 1.1‰ lower than that of residual C2. However, this is too small to explain the wide distribution in C2 δ2H shown in Fig. 7. On the other hand, Matsuda et al.37 reported that isotopic fractionation of hydrogen in C2 is dependent on the crystallographic structure: 1‰–2‰ for sI and ~ 10‰ for sII. Gas hydrates plotting around − 220‰ in C2 δ2H can be explained as a secondary generation of sII from dissociated gas hydrates, of which C2 δ2H was around − 210‰. However, some sII samples showed high C2 δ2H (around − 210‰), whereas some sI samples showed low C2 δ2H (around − 220‰). These results indicated that formation and dissociation processes of gas hydrates produce complicated isotopic profiles in C2 δ2H under non-equilibrium conditions.

Figure 7
figure7

Depth profiles of C2 δ2H of hydrate-bound and sediment gases. cmblf, centimetres below lake floor.

Characteristics of hydrate-bound gases in sII

C3, i-C4, n-C4 and neo-C5 can be encaged in the larger hexadecahedral cages of sII1. n-C4 and neo-C5 can be encaged using a help gas (e.g. C1) to fill in the smaller dodecahedral cages of sII, because they cannot form pure n-C4 and neo-C5 hydrates, respectively. Figure 8 shows the concentration of C3, i-C4, n-C4, neo-C5 and i-C5 plotted against C2 concentration. The figure illustrates a clear division between sI (3–4%) and sII (14%) C2 concentrations. Data points between C2 concentrations of 5% and 13% were considered to have a mixture of sI and sII. Concentrations of C3, i-C4, n-C4 and neo-C5 had a positive correlation with the concentration of C2, and these concentrations in sII were 1 or 2 orders of magnitude larger than those in sI, suggesting that C3, i-C4, n-C4 and neo-C5 are encaged with C2 in the sII formation process.

Figure 8
figure8

Concentration of C3–5 against C2 concentration in the hydrate-bound gases.

C3 values of 0.001%–0.01%, ~ 0.0001% of n-C4, and 0.0001%–0.01% of neo-C5 were also detected in sI hydrate-bound gas (Fig. 8), despite these hydrocarbons being unable to be encaged in sI. This can be explained by gases being adsorbed with sediments and gas hydrate crystals, which are then trapped in the grain boundary of polycrystalline gas hydrate crystals, and the gases are encaged if a small amount of sII crystals are present. For example, Uchida et al.38 examined natural gas hydrate retrieved at the Mackenzie Delta (onshore Canada) and detected C3 encaged in sII using Raman spectroscopy, although PXRD results suggested that the sample was sI and the major component of hydrate-bound gas was C1 (more than 99%).

neo-C5 is considered to form from the decomposition of gem-dimethylcycloalkanes derived from the terpenes of terrestrial organic matter39. It is easily enriched by preferential diffusion due to the nearly spherical molecules and its diffusion coefficient, which is higher than that of less branched isomers40. The sII hydrates retrieved at the Kukuy K-2 MV (central Baikal basin) contained 0.026–0.064% of neo-C5 in the volatile hydrocarbons13,14, and those at the Kedr MV had a maximum value of 0.054% of neo-C5 (Supplementary Information Table S1). On the contrary, in the case of natural gas hydrates retrieved at the Joetsu Basin (Japan Sea), neo-C5 was excluded and remained in sediment during the formation of sI gas hydrates from C1-rich gas41. The molecular size of i-C5 is considerably large to be encaged in the large cages of sII. Maximum concentration of i-C5 in the hydrate-bound gases was in several parts per million in both the fields of sI and sII (Fig. 8), indicating that i-C5 is not a hydrate-bound hydrocarbon and adsorbed with gas hydrate crystals and/or trapped in their grain boundary.

Conclusion

We reported the molecular and stable isotope compositions of hydrate-bound and sediment gases at the Kedr MV in the southern Baikal basin. The empirical classifications of the molecular and isotopic compositions of hydrate-bound hydrocarbons showed that the gas source is mainly thermogenic, one of the end members of hydrate-bound gases in Lake Baikal. Large CO2 δ13C in the sediment gases suggested that secondary microbial C1 mixes with thermogenic gas. Double-structure gas hydrates composed of sI and sII were observed, likely created by sI crystals partly dissociating and C2-rich sII crystals forming. The C2 δ2H values of hydrate-bound gas revealed that light C2 is preferentially encaged into sII crystals; however, some exceptions indicated that more complicated processes of gas exchange might exist between sI, sII and the dissolved gas in pore water. Because C2 is preferentially concentrated into the gas hydrate phase, high concentration of thermogenic C2 produce sII crystals with C1, and C2 is encaged into the large cages of sII with C3, i-C4, n-C4, and neo-C5 in the re-crystallisation process.

Methods

Gas hydrate crystals were collected onboard R/V G. Yu. Vereshchagin and stored in liquid nitrogen. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) measurements were performed to check the crystallographic structure. Samples for PXRD were finely ground at a temperature of 77 K and then kept at 173 K. The X-ray diffraction patterns were recorded at 2θ = 5 − 35° using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) and a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer equipped with a TTK 450 Anton Paar temperature controlling device. The positions of diffraction peaks corresponding to sI and sII hydrates and hexagonal ice (Ih) were calculated with the use of reference data on space group and unit cell parameters of the respective compounds42.

Hydrate-bound gases were collected using water displacement method and stored in 5 mL glass vials sealed with butyl septum stoppers. To avoid microbial alteration, 0.3 mL of preservative (50 wt% aqueous solution of benzalkonium chloride) was introduced into the vials. Gas sampling was conducted for each layer of gas hydrate in the hydrate-bearing cores. Several vials of samples were taken from a hydrate nodule. Sediment gases were collected using headspace gas method to calculate the depth profiles of each gas component in the sediment cores. To create a 5 mL headspace, 10 mL of sediment and 10 mL of saturated aqueous solution of NaCl were introduced into 25 mL-glass vials. The headspace was flushed with helium, the carrier gas used in the gas chromatography, to reduce air contamination43. The headspace gases were then placed into the 5 mL glass vials to separate them from sediment particles or water and to prevent any microbial activity during storage.

The molecular compositions of the hydrocarbons (from C1 to C5) were determined using a gas chromatograph (GC-2014, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a packed column (Shimadzu Sunpak-S; length 2 m, inner diameter [ID] 3 mm), along with a thermal conductivity detector and flame ionisation detector for detecting high and low concentrations of hydrocarbons respectively. The two detectors were connected in series. The detection limit was 0.5 ppmv (C1–C3) and 5 ppmv (C4–C5). The analytical error estimated by multiple injections of standard gases was < 1.2% for each gas component. Stable carbon and hydrogen isotopic ratios of the hydrocarbons and CO2 were measured using a continuous-flow isotope-ratio mass spectrometer (CF-IRMS, DELTA V, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled with a gas chromatograph (TRACE GC Ultra, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The gas chromatograph was equipped with a Carboxen-1006 PLOT capillary column (length 30 m, ID 0.32 mm, film thickness 15 μm, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). In the case of samples with low C1 concentration, a Sigma-Aldrich Carboxen-1010 PLOT capillary column (length 30 m, ID 0.32 mm, film thickness 15 μm) was also used to separate air components from C1. Stable isotope compositions were reported as δ values (in per-mille):

$$\updelta [\permil ]=\left(\frac{{R}_{sample}-{R}_{standard}}{{R}_{standard}}\right)\times 1000$$
(1)

where R denotes the 13C/12C or 2H/1H ratio. δ13C and δ2H are given with reference to the V-PDB and V-SMOW standards, respectively, determined using NIST RM8544 (NBS19) for δ13C and NIST RM8561 (NGS3) for δ2H. The analytical precision was 0.3‰ for hydrocarbon (C1–C3) δ13C and 1‰ for δ2H.

Data availability

All the gas data are reported in the Supplementary Information.

References

  1. 1.

    Sloan, E. D. & Koh, C. A. Clathrate hydrates of natural gases (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Makogon, Y. F., Holditch, S. A. & Makogon, T. Y. Natural gas-hydrates—a potential energy source for the 21st Century. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 56, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2005.10.009 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Boswell, R. & Collett, T. S. Current perspectives on gas hydrate resources. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 1206–1215. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0EE00203H (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kennedy, M., Mrofka, D. & von der Borch, C. Snowball Earth termination by destabilization of equatorial permafrost methane clathrate. Nature 453, 642–645. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06961 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Milkov, A. V. Global estimates of hydrate-bound gas in marine sediments: how much is really out there?. Earth Sci. Rev. 66, 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2003.11.002 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Milkov, A. V. & Sassen, R. Two-dimensional modeling of gas hydrate decomposition in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico: significance to global change assessment. Glob. Planet Change 36, 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(02)00162-5 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Milkov, A. V. et al. Ethane enrichment and propane depletion in subsurface gases indicate gas hydrate occurrence in marine sediments at southern Hydrate Ridge offshore Oregon. Org. Geochem. 35, 1067–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2004.04.003 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Sassen, R., Sweet, S. T., DeFreitas, D. A. & Milkov, A. V. Exclusion of 2-methylbutane (isopentane) during crystallization of structure II gas hydrate in sea-floor sediment Gulf of Mexico. Org. Geochem. 31, 1257–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6380(00)00144-3 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Khlystov, O. et al. Gas hydrate of lake baikal: discovery and varieties. J. Asian Earth Sci. 62, 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.03.009 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Khlystov, O. M., Khabuev, A. V., Minami, H., Hachikubo, A. & Krylov, A. A. Gas hydrates in Lake Baikal. Limnol. Freshwater Biol. 1, 66–70 https://doi.org/10.31951/2658-3518-2018-A-1-66 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Subramanian, S., Kini, R. A., Dec, S. F. & Sloan, E. D. Jr. Evidence of structure II hydrate formation from methane + ethane mixtures. Chem. Eng. Sci. 55, 1981–1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00389-9 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Subramanian, S., Ballard, A. L., Kini, R. A., Dec, S. F. & Sloan, E. D. Jr. Structural transitions in methane + ethane gas hydrates — part I: upper transition point and applications. Chem. Eng. Sci. 55, 5763–5771. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00162-7 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kida, M. et al. Coexistence of structure I and II gas hydrates in Lake Baikal suggesting gas sources from microbial and thermogenic origin. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L24603. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028296 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kida, M. et al. Natural gas hydrates with locally different cage occupancies and hydration numbers in Lake Baikal. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 10, Q05003. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GC002473 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hachikubo, A. et al. Model of formation of double structure gas hydrates in Lake Baikal based on isotopic data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L18504. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039805 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Poort, J. et al. Thermal anomalies associated with shallow gas hydrates in the K-2 mud volcano Lake Baikal. Geo-Mar. Lett. 32, 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00367-012-0292-0 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Manakov, A. Yu., Khlystov, O. M., Hachikubo, A. & Ogienko, A. G. A physicochemical model for the formation of gas hydrates of different structural types in K-2 mud volcano (Kukui Canyon, Lake Baikal). Rus. Geol. Geophys. 54, 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2013.03.009 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hachikubo, A. et al. Dissociation heat of mixed-gas hydrate composed of methane and ethane. In Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Gas Hydrates, 6–10 July, 2008, Vancouver, Canada (2008). https://hdl.handle.net/2429/2694

  19. 19.

    Kalmychkov, G. V., Pokrovsky, B. G., Hachikubo, A. & Khlystov, O. M. Geochemical characteristics of methane from sediments of the underwater high Posolskaya Bank (Lake Baikal). Lithol. Min. Resour. 52, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0024490217020055 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Minami, H. et al. Hydrogen and oxygen isotopic anomalies in pore waters suggesting clay mineral dehydration at gas hydrate-bearing Kedr mud volcano, southern Lake Baikal Russia. Geo-Mar. Lett. 38, 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00367-018-0542-x (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Rasskazov, S. V. et al. Sediments in the Tertiary Tankhoi field, south Baikal basin: stratigraphy, correlation and structural transformations in the Baikal region (in Russian). Geodyn. Tectonophys. 5, 993–1032. https://doi.org/10.5800/GT-2014-5-4-0165 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Khlystov, O. M. et al. New evidence on the relief of the southern underwater slope in the south Baikal basin. Geogr. Nat. Resour. 39, 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372818010055 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hachikubo, A. et al. Molecular and isotopic characteristics of gas hydrate-bound hydrocarbons in southern and central Lake Baikal. Geo-Mar. Lett. 30, 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00367-010-0203-1 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Bernard, B. B., Brooks, J. M. & Sackett, W. M. Natural gas seepage in the Gulf of Mexico. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 31, 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(76)90095-9 (1976).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Milkov, A. V. & Etiope, G. Revised genetic diagrams for natural gases based on a global dataset of >20,000 samples. Org. Geochem. 125, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.09.002 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Whiticar, M. J. Carbon and hydrogen isotope systematics of bacterial formation and oxidation of methane. Chem. Geol. 161, 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00092-3 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Taylor, S. W., SherwoodLollar, B. & Wassenaar, L. I. Bacteriogenic ethanein near-surface aquifers: Implications for leaking hydrocarbon well bores. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34, 4727–4732. https://doi.org/10.1021/es001066x (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Milkov, A. V. Molecular and stable isotope compositions of natural gas hydrates: a revised global dataset and basic interpretations in the context of geological settings. Org. Geochem. 36, 681–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2005.01.010 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Milkov, A. V. Worldwide distribution and significance of secondary microbial methane formed during petroleum biodegradation in conventional reservoirs. Org. Geochem. 42, 184–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2010.12.003 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Scott, A. R., Kaiser, W. R. & Ayers, W. B. Jr. Thermogenic and secondary biogenic gases, San Juan Basin, Colorado and New Mexico – implications for coalbed gas producibility. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull. 78, 1186–1209. https://doi.org/10.1306/A25FEAA9-171B-11D7-8645000102C1865D (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lorenson, T. D., Collett, T. S. & Hunter, R. B. Gas geochemistry of the Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well, Alaska North Slope: Implications for gas hydrate exploration in the Arctic. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 28, 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.02.007 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    James, A. T. & Burns, B. J. Microbial alteration of subsurface natural gas accumulations. AAPG Bull. 68, 957–960 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Katz, B. J. Microbial processes and natural gas accumulations. Open Geol. J. 5, 75–83. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874262901105010075 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sloan, E. D. Jr. Clathrate hydrates of natural gases (Marcel Dekker, NY, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kida, M., Jin, Y., Takahashi, N., Nagao, J. & Narita, H. Dissociation behavior of methane-ethane mixed gas hydrate coexisting structures I and II. J. Phys. Chem. A 114, 9456–9461. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp1055667 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hachikubo, A. et al. Isotopic fractionation of methane and ethane hydrates between gas and hydrate phases. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L21502. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030557 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Matsuda, J., Hachikubo, A., Ozeki, T. & Takeya, S. Effect of crystallographic structure on hydrogen isotope fractionation of ethane in the system of methane and ethane mixed-gas hydrate (in Japanese). Annu. Rep. on Snow and Ice Studies in Hokkaido 37, 27–30 (2018).

  38. 38.

    Uchida, T. et al. Physical properties of natural gas hydrate and associated gas-hydrate-bearing sediments in the JAPEX/JNOC/GSC et al. Mallik 5L-38 gas hydrate production research well in Scientific Results from the Mallik 2002 Gas Hydrate Production Research Well Program, Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories, Canada (eds. Dallimore, S. R. & Collett, T. S.) (Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 585, 2005).

  39. 39.

    Hunt, J. M. & Whelan, J. K. Dissolved gases in Black Sea sediments. DSDP Initial Rep. 42, 661–665. https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.42-2.125.1978 (1978).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Schaefer, R. G. & Leythaeuser, D. C2–C8 hydrocarbons in sediments from Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 75, holes 530A, Angola Basin, and 532 Walvis Ridge. DSDP Initial Rep. 75, 1055–1067. https://doi.org/10.2973/dsdp.proc.75.137.1984 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Hachikubo, A., Yanagawa, K., Tomaru, H., Lu, H. & Matsumoto, R. Molecular and isotopic composition of volatiles in gas hydrates and in pore water from Joetsu Basin, eastern margin of Japan Sea. Energies 8, 4647–4666. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8064647 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Manakov, A. Y., Kosyakov, V. I. & Solodovnikov, S. F. Structural chemistry of clathrate hydrates and related compounds in Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry II (ed. Atwood, J. L.) 161–206 (Oxford, Elsevier, 2017).

  43. 43.

    Sakagami, H. et al. Molecular and isotopic composition of hydrate-bound and sediment gases in the southern basin of Lake Baikal, based on an improved headspace gas method. Geo-Mar. Lett. 32, 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00367-012-0294-y (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We greatly appreciate the assistance of the shipboard crews of RV G. Yu. Vereshchagin during the Lake Baikal expeditions. We are grateful to Prof. A. Milkov, Dr. G. G. Akhmanov and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments. This work was supported by funding agencies in Japan (Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI 26303021, 16H05760 and 17H03300 and the presidential grant of the Kitami Institute of Technology). The work was also supported by the project of LIN SB RAS (AAAA-A16-116122110064-7), IGC SB RAS # IX.127.1.2. (0350-2019-0004), RSF-19-17-00226 and 01-FPK-19 of the INRTU. X-ray diffraction studies were supported by paragraph V.44.4.9. ‘Development of the scientific foundations of the physical chemistry of clathrate (gas), semi-clathrate and ionic clathrate hydrates’ of the program of basic scientific research ‘Development of the scientific basis of the directed synthesis of new inorganic and coordination compounds and functional materials based on them’.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.H. designed the study, performed gas analysis and drafted the manuscript; H.M., S.Y., A.K. and A.K. conducted the fieldwork and prepared the data; G.K. helped with gas analysis; J.P. conceived the model of gas hydrate formation; M.D. revised and edited the manuscript; A.C. conducted geophysical survey; A.M. did the PXRD analysis and O.K. designed the framework of the cruises. All authors contributed to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akihiro Hachikubo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hachikubo, A., Minami, H., Yamashita, S. et al. Characteristics of hydrate-bound gas retrieved at the Kedr mud volcano (southern Lake Baikal). Sci Rep 10, 14747 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71410-2

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing