Abstract
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease caused by mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, resulting in chronic bacterial lung infections and tissue damage. CF macrophages exhibit reduced bacterial killing and increased inflammatory signaling. Iron is elevated in the CF lung and is a critical nutrient for bacteria, including the common CF pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa). While macrophages are a key regulatory component of extracellular iron, iron metabolism has yet to be characterized in human CF macrophages. Secreted and total protein levels were analyzed in non-CF and F508del/F508del CF monocyte derived macrophages (MDMs) with and without clinically approved CFTR modulators ivacaftor/lumacaftor. CF macrophage transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) was reduced with ivacaftor/lumacaftor treatment. When activated with LPS, CF macrophage expressed reduced ferroportin (Fpn). After the addition of exogenous iron, total iron was elevated in conditioned media from CF MDMs and reduced in conditioned media from ivacaftor/lumacaftor treated CF MDMs. Pa biofilm formation and viability were elevated in conditioned media from CF MDMs and biofilm formation was reduced in the presence of conditioned media from ivacaftor/lumacaftor treated CF MDMs. Defects in iron metabolism observed in this study may inform host–pathogen interactions between CF macrophages and Pa.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease that afflicts approximately 31,000 people in the United States, with a median predicted survival of 47.4 years for those born in 2018 (CF Foundation Registry Annual Report, 2018). CF is caused by mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, a chloride and bicarbonate channel that regulates epithelial anion transport1. While over 1,800 CFTR mutations have been identified, the F508del mutation is the most prevalent: 44.2% of the population is F508del homozygous (CF Foundation Registry Annual Report, 2018). Defective chloride and bicarbonate secretion, coupled with continued absorption of sodium by the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC), facilitates an accumulation of dehydrated mucous in the airway. Bicarbonate aids in the maintenance of airway pH and facilitates antimicrobial peptide function2, and disruption of bicarbonate contributes to airway acidification and reduced bacterial clearance in CFTR knockout pigs3. Additionally, increased mucin content is associated with neutrophil recruitment and inflammatory markers in the bronchoalveolar lavage of young children with CF4 and CFTR knockout ferrets5. These changes in airway pH, bacterial clearance, and inflammatory milieu facilitate chronic lung disease and bacterial infection over the lifetime of the CF patient6.
One of the most common and deleterious opportunistic pathogens that colonize the adult CF lung is Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa)7,8,9. As of 2018, 45.3% of CF subjects in the United States were reported to have Pa cultured from their sputum and 16.9% of CF subjects with a Pa infection were positive for multidrug-resistant Pa (CF Foundation Registry Annual Report, 2018). As a mechanism for survival in the airways, Pa form surface-attached communities, known as biofilms, in CF lung tissue and sputum10. Over the course of biofilm formation Pa become sessile and develop protective complexes rich in polysaccharides and proteins that allow the bacteria to evade phagocytosis and persist in the presence of antibiotics10.While most bacteria require iron to survive, Pa is an organism with a high requirement for iron whose biofilm formation can be influenced by the presence or absence of iron11,12,13,14. In clinically stable CF subjects, the amount of Pa recovered from the sputum strongly correlates with sputum iron levels15. CF airways have elevated levels of iron due in large part to tissue damage15,16. In addition to the correlations found between Pa recovery and airway iron levels, in vitro models of CF airway epithelium have demonstrated that iron availability is a critical factor in Pa biofilm formation13,17.
Mounting evidence suggests that perturbation of the CF immune response contributes to a vicious cycle of infection, inflammation, and neutrophil recruitment that culminates in airway tissue damage18,19. While there are a multitude of factors that contribute to CF disease progression, lung macrophages play a critical role in maintaining homeostasis in the airway. In addition to being integral phagocytic first responders to airway pathogens such as Pa, lung macrophages regulate and coordinate the inflammatory milieu and neutrophil recruitment20. Both extrinsic (pulmonary microenvironment) and intrinsic (CFTR expression) factors inform the CF macrophage immunophenotype21,22,23. Examples of CF macrophage dysfunction in primary human samples as well as in various CF animal models have been increasingly described throughout the literature. For example, macrophages isolated from CF patients express less CD206 and fail to polarize towards an “alternative” activation state in the presence of interleukin (IL)-13, suggesting defective signaling pathways related to the resolution of inflammatory signaling24. To compound this, CF macrophages exhibit a hyper-inflammatory response to a range of antigens and pathogens23,25,26. In addition to an altered cytokine profile and activation state, CF macrophages exhibit reduced phagocytic and bactericidal capacity27. Finally, CFTR dysfunction perturbs mitochondrial activity, anti-bacterial metabolite production, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation28,29, demonstrating broad implications for CF macrophage dysfunction.
There are several host cells, including hepatocytes, epithelial cells, erythrocytes, and macrophages, that play an important role to balance the uptake, secretion, and storage of iron30,31. In macrophages and other iron-regulatory cell types, there are specific programs of iron-regulation that are implemented during infection and inflammation. Macrophages in particular play an integral role in sensing and regulating iron, and have been increasingly recognized as critical regulators of iron availability in the local microenvironment during infection, inflammation, and wound healing30,31,32. In response to extracellular pathogens and inflammatory cytokines, macrophages and neutrophils secrete lactoferrin and lipocalin 2, proteins that respectively bind free iron and iron-loaded bacterial siderophores to directly scavenge iron from pathogens33. Extracellular iron is imported by transferrin receptor 1, which becomes endocytosed upon binding to iron-bound transferrin36,37. The inflammatory cytokine IL-6 activates production of the antimicrobial hormone hepcidin, which binds to and induces ubiquitination of the iron exporter ferroportin38,39, preventing iron export back into the microenvironment. When not immediately used or exported by ferroportin, intracellular iron is stored in ferritin complexes40,41. The appropriate storage of iron is important because free iron (II) reacts with hydrogen peroxide to produce hydroxyl free radicals in a process known as the Fenton reaction42. Anti-inflammatory anti-oxidants like heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) are upregulated to reduce intracellular oxidative stress and negatively regulate macrophage NfκB signaling via toll-like receptor (TLR)443,44,45,46,47.
The host iron metabolism can influence the course of infection and inflammation in multiple ways. In macrophages, iron is a critical nutrient for intracellular processes, including mitochondrial respiration48 and TLR4 signaling39,49. Dysregulation of iron-regulatory proteins like HO-1 contribute to macrophage hyperinflammation, intracellular oxidative stress, and apoptosis18,45,46. Additionally, elevated iron in the microenvironment can facilitate biofilm formation and growth of Pa13,17. Several publications have shown that perturbation of iron metabolism may impact host–pathogen interactions in the context of CF and Pa specifically, as CFTR mutation in bronchial epithelial cells (CFBEs) has been found to contribute to Pa survival via increased biofilm formation13,17.
While CFTR function in bronchial epithelial cells is well characterized, the precise role played by CFTR in human macrophages is complex and remains the subject of ongoing investigation28. Regardless, the importance of functional CFTR in macrophages has been demonstrated in studies analyzing CFTR modulator-corrected CF macrophage dysfunction27,50. CFTR modulators increase the phagocytic capacity in CF macrophages, alter CF macrophage cytokine production, and alter CF monocyte activation27,50,51. The impact of CFTR mutation, and its resulting host environment, on human macrophage iron metabolism remains unknown. We hypothesized that (1) iron regulatory pathways are dysfunctional in F508del/F508del CF MDMs in a manner relevant to host–pathogen interactions, and (2) ex vivo ivacaftor/lumacaftor treatment corrects iron regulatory pathway dysfunction.
Methods
Human monocyte isolation and differentiation
Non-CF and CF subject between 18 and 45 years of age were enrolled in the study. Non-CF subjects were recruited by flyers posted on the Dartmouth campus. Exclusion criteria for non-CF volunteers: upper respiratory infection (URI) symptoms within 14 days of blood draw, antibiotics within 28 days of blood draw, current smoker, any inhaled medication, chronic steroid use, use of any immunomodulatory drug, pregnancy, any history of respiratory disease, autoimmune condition, cardiac disease, neurologic disease, or other serious medical condition. CF subjects were excluded if they had exacerbation symptoms currently or had been treated with oral or IV antibiotics over the past 28 days or were on prednisone. CF subjects who did not have the F508del/F508del mutation were excluded from the study. In CF subjects, the use of maintenance inhaled antibiotics, pancreatic enzymes, vitamins, or other necessary medications were not exclusion criteria. Following informed consent, subjects underwent phlebotomy. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Dartmouth-Hitchcock, protocol number 22781, and all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. As described previously27, monocytes were isolated from whole blood within one hour of phlebotomy via density gradient centrifugation and negatively enriched by magnetic column (Miltenyi Biotec, cat#130-096-537). Monocytes were seeded in RPMI 1640 Glutamax (Gibco, cat#61870-036) with 50 µg/ml gentamicin (Caisson Laboratories, cat#ABL03-10ML) at 5 × 105 cells/well in 12-well culture plates and incubated for 2 h to adhere. Monocytes were differentiated into monocyte derived macrophages (MDMs) for 7 days in RPMI 1640 Glutamax with 50 µg/ml gentamicin with 10% heat-inactivated FBS (HI-FBS; Genesee Scientific, cat#25-514H) with 100 ng/ml M-CSF (Miltenyi, cat#130-096-489).
Experimental procedure
Experiments were performed in RPMI 1640 Glutamax with 50 µg/ml gentamicin with 10% HI-FBS. MDMs underwent 48-h pretreatment with 0.2% DMSO or combination 30 nM ivacaftor and 3 µM lumacaftor (modulators, Selleckchem, cat#S7059 and S1565). Modulator concentrations were based on CF subject drug plasma concentrations and those used in previously published works27,52,53. For lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and iron experiments, cells were washed after pretreatment and given 1 µg/ml E. coli O111:B4 LPS (Sigma, cat#L3024) for 24 h or 8–30 µM FeCl3 (Sigma, cat#157740) for 48 h, after which time conditioned media was collected and centrifugated 10 min, 13,000×g, 4 °C. Concentrations of FeCl3 were chosen to reflect a range of physiologically relevant iron levels observed in the CF airway: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (mean ~ 25 ug/dL iron or ~ 4.4 µM iron in 10 CF children) or sputum (mean 35.3 µM in 6 CF adults during acute exacerbation)15,16. Vehicle or modulators were maintained in medium throughout as the half-life of lumacaftor is reported at approximately 18 h54 and the half-life of ivacaftor is reported as approximately 12 h by the 2012 “European Medicines Agency Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use assessment report on ivacaftor”. Subjects were recruited for this study over a period of 2 years. Three CF subjects donated blood multiple times over the course of the study and are referred to as “repeat donors” in the text. Not all subjects yielded sufficient cells for all the experimental conditions listed in the manuscript, resulting in variable subject numbers for Figs. 1a–d and 2a–h. For Fig. 3a,b, experiments were performed on newly recruited or repeat donor macrophages (n = 3 per group). For Fig. 4a–d, experiments were performed on supernatant collected from the non-CF cohort in Fig. 3a,b. For Fig. 4a–d, due to supernatant availability, experiments were performed on supernatants from 2 of the CF cohort in Fig. 3a,b and on supernatants collected from 3 CF repeat donors.
Biofilm formation and CFU quantification
Pa clinical isolate strain DH1137 (a generous gift from Dr. Deborah Hogan, previously described as strain NC-AMT0101-255) was cultured in LB broth shaking overnight at 37 °C. Stationary-phase cultures were diluted 1:10 in 0.2% casamino acids, 0.4% l-arginine, 0.2% d-glucose, and 0.02% MgSO4 supplemented M63 biofilm formation media (US Biological, cat#M1015). Bacteria were then cultured to optical density (OD) at λ = 600 nm equal to 0.05 (1 × 108 cells/ml). In vinyl 96-well plates (ThermoFisher Scientific, cat#2101), 75 µl DH1137 was diluted with 25 µl MDM conditioned media and incubated with humidity for 6 h at 37 °C. After incubation, 50 µl supernatant from each well was collected and OD at λ = 600 nm (total bacterial density) was measured in a microplate reader. Additionally, supernatant from each well was diluted 1:1,000 in LB broth and streaked onto agar plates for quantification of viable bacterial colony forming units (CFUs). Biofilm assay plates were washed with water, stained with 125 µl/well 0.1% crystal violet for 10 min, washed, and air dried. Photographs of biofilms were taken prior their quantification. After solubilizing biofilms with 150 µl/well 30% glacial acetic acid in water, absorbance at λ = 550 nm was used to quantitate each sample. Biofilm photographs were cropped (Fig. 4d), photographs of all subjects and conditions tested are available in Supplementary Fig. S6, metrics such as contrast and brightness were not altered for publication.
Immunoblots
Total protein lysates were obtained using 200 µl/well 2 × Laemmli buffer (Bio-Rad, cat#1610737) with 5% β-mercaptoethanol with 1% protease inhibitor (ThermoFisher, cat#78425) and boiling 97 °C, 5 min. Lysates were run on 10% gels (Bio-Rad, cat#5671024, 5671034) and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. Membranes were cut and incubated overnight, 4 °C, in 5% non-fat dried milk in TBS with 0.1% Tween20 (Carnation brand, NFDM, TBST) containing 1:5,000 primary: polyclonal rabbit anti-ferroportin (Novus, cat#NBP1-21502); monoclonal mouse anti-β Actin (abcam, cat#ab8226); monoclonal rabbit anti-heme oxygenase 1 (abcam, cat#ab68477); monoclonal mouse anti-transferrin receptor 1 (Santa Cruz, cat#sc-3227). Membranes were incubated for 1 h, room temperature, with 1:5,000 NFDM TBST mouse IgGκ binding protein (Santa Cruz, cat#sc-516102) or polyclonal goat anti-rabbit IgG (abcam, cat#ab7090) secondary antibodies. After development with Chemiluminescent Substrate (ThermoFisher, cat#34,580). Immunoblots depicted in Fig. 2 were scanned and converted to 8-bit images in ImageJ in order to quantify densitometry in ImageStudioLite v5.2. Different exposure times/blots were not compared to each other. For clarity of presentation, immunoblots in Fig. 2a,b were cropped and rearranged with a margin of white space around the cropped blots to denote that the blots were cropped. Full images of immunoblots prior to 8-bit conversion are in Supplementary Fig. S5a,b.
ELISA
Supernatants were centrifugated 10 min, 13,000×g, 4 °C. ELISAs were performed according to manufacturer’s instruction: human Hepcidin (R&D Systems, cat#DY8307-05), IL-6 (R&D Systems, cat#DY602), TNFα (R&D Systems, cat#DY2010), IL-8 (R&D Systems, cat#DY208), lactoferrin (abcam, cat#ab108882), and transferrin (abcam, cat#ab108902).
Cytotoxicity
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) cytotoxicity assay (ThermoFisher, cat#88,953) was performed on supernatants after centrifugation.
Microscopy
Differential interference contrast (DIC) images were taken using an Olympus IX83 live cell microscope of monocytes seeded on glass-bottomed culture dishes.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.1. Subject sex distribution was analyzed with Fisher’s exact test. Data were analyzed where appropriate using unpaired two-tailed t-test and one-way ANOVAs with Tukey’s post-hoc test. Normality tests Anderson–Darling, D’Agostino–Pearson, Shapiro–Wilk, and Kolmogorov–Smirnov were performed automatically by GraphPad Prism with every analysis to determine whether data fit a Gaussian distribution. If data failed to pass a single normality test, nonparametric statistical tests were employed. The nonparametric test used for comparing two unpaired groups was the Mann–Whitney test, the Wilcoxon test was used for paired analysis within CF subjects, and the nonparametric test used for comparing more than two groups was the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s test for multiple comparisons. All figures except Fig. 3a–d (all male CF subjects) show data from male and female subjects. The lysis buffer employed in this study does not allow for protein quantification. Although monocytes were seeded equally at 5 × 105 cells/well in 12-well culture plates, platelet contamination from the isolation procedure occasionally resulted in a crowding out of the monocytes and a reduced confluence of cells in some wells. We believe this to be the cause of the lower levels of β Actin in certain lanes of the western blots presented in Fig. 2a,b and Supplementary Fig. S5a, b. Densitometry results (Supplementary file 1) were imported into the R statistical programming environment (R version 3.6.0 [2019-04-26] https://www.R-project.org/) with an R script (Supplementary file 2). Briefly, zero values and values that were missing due to high background on the blot were removed. Rare instances where the same patient was measured multiple times were not included in this analysis to simplify the analysis. Ratios for proteins of interest were made to β Actin values in the same lane and log base 2 transformed to improve visualization and achieve normality. Graphs depicting comparisons between CF and non-CF MDMs as well as responses to ivacaftor/lumacaftor were generated using the R package ggplot2_3.256 (https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gplots, Fig. 2c–e). Statistically significant differences between CF and non-CF MDMs not exposed to ivacaftor/lumacaftor were assessed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests, a non-parametric alternative to t tests. Statistically significant differences between CF MDMs exposed to ivacaftor/lumacaftor were assessed by linear models that included factors for CF subject and exposure to ivacaftor/lumacaftor. In Supplementary Fig. S4a, b, heatmaps were produced with the R package gplots57 with the heatmap.2 function (gplots_3.0.1.2).
Results
Subject characteristics
Subject characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Ten cystic fibrosis (CF) subjects homozygous for the F508del CFTR mutation participated in this study. Twelve non-CF subjects participated in this study. Five of the ten CF subjects were taking CFTR modulators at the time of phlebotomy, three subjects were taking combination ivacaftor/lumacaftor, one subject was taking combination ivacaftor/tezacaftor, and one subject was taking combination ivacaftor/tezacaftor/elexacaftor. The use of clinical modulators was considered “in vivo” modulator treatment. Because we began our ex vivo studies on CF MDMs at a time when lumacaftor/ivacaftor was the only FDA approved modulator for F508del homozygous patients, this study was limited to the use of ex vivo pretreatment with lumacaftor/ivacaftor for experiments.
CF MDMs have a hyperinflammatory response to LPS
CF macrophages are well documented to express a hyper-inflammatory phenotype in response to bacterial stimuli including LPS and Burkolderia cenocepacia46,50. Using LPS to induce NFκB signaling and macrophage inflammatory activation, we measured several key cytokines that play an important role in inflammatory signaling and neutrophil recruitment in the CF airway. Compared to non-CF, we found that CF macrophages secreted significantly more IL-6 (P = 0.0102) and IL-8 (P = 0.0382) in response to 24 h exposure to LPS (Fig. 1a,b), but not IL-1β (Fig. 1c) or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) (Fig. 1d). Pretreatment for 48 h with modulators did not alter CF MDM cytokine secretion (Fig. 1a–d, pairwise comparisons within subject). We did not observe gross phenotypic differences in monocytes and MDMs over the course of differentiation (Fig. 1e, Supplementary Fig. S1), or cytotoxicity in response to treatment conditions as measured by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release at 24 h (Supplementary Fig. S2).
Four of the seven CF subjects whose macrophages were used for cytokine studies were taking prescribed CFTR modulator therapy at the time of phlebotomy [lumacaftor/ivacaftor (n = 3) or tezacaftor/ivacaftor (n = 1)]. Within this subset of our cohort, we found no differences in IL-1β, IL-6, or IL-8 secretion between CF subjects who were taking prescribed modulators and CF subjects who were not (Supplementary Fig. S3a–c). Compared to CF patients not on modulators in vivo, TNFα secretion was either trending towards or significantly (P = 0.0080) reduced regardless of pretreatment with modulators (Supplementary Fig. S3d). While the presumable in vivo exposure of monocytes to modulators in circulation may have lowered TNFα secretion (Supplementary Fig. S3d), ex vivo pretreatment with modulators for 48 h prior to LPS stimulation did not significantly alter cytokine secretion between the two CF subpopulations (Fig. 1a–d).
CF MDMs have a different iron-related protein expression profile compared to non-CF MDMs
Iron metabolism is dysregulated in CFBEs, and macrophages found in CF lung explants contain elevated intracellular iron13,16,17. To determine if CF MDMs had differential iron-related protein levels, MDMs were assayed for soluble regulators of iron sequestration21,38,39,58: lactoferrin and transferrin, and the ferroportin (Fpn) regulatory hormone hepcidin. We also measured total protein expression of key iron handling proteins: the iron importer transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1), the iron exporter Fpn, the iron-storage protein ferritin (FTH1), and the anti-inflammatory heme catabolism enzyme, heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1). Comparing protein expression under control conditions between non-CF and CF, we found a trend towards elevated TfR1 (P = 0.1014) in CF MDMs (Fig. 2a,c). Compared to non-CF, CF HO-1 expression was lower (Fig. 2a,c), in agreement with previously published work46. No changes were observed in Fpn or FTH1 (Fig. 2a,c). Using pairwise comparisons to examine the impact of modulators on protein expression within subject, we found that modulator treatment reduced TfR1 levels (Fig. 2a,d). When activated with LPS, we found that CF macrophages expressed less Fpn and trended towards less HO-1 compared to LPS-activated non-CF macrophages (Fig. 2b,c). In the presence of LPS, ex vivo modulators induced a trend (P = 0.07) towards increased Fpn compared to LPS-activated non-CF macrophages (Fig. 2b,e). Across treatment groups, soluble regulators of iron sequestration and hepcidin (Fig. 2f–h) showed no differences between CF and non-CF MDMs. Regardless of ex vivo modulator pretreatment, we found that prescribed modulator use in vivo coincided with a trend in lower hepcidin secretion in LPS-activated CF MDMs compared to LPS-activated CF MDMs from patients who did not use in vivo modulators (Supplementary Fig. S3e). Compared to LPS-activated non-CF MDMs, we found that in vitro modulator-pretreatment in LPS-activated CF MDMs from patients on prescribed modulators had elevated lactoferrin secretion (P = 0.0618, Supplementary Fig. S3f), and significantly lower transferrin (P = 0.0076, Supplementary Fig. S3g). Clinical use of modulators variably impacted expression of Fpn, FTH1, HO-1, and TfR1 (Supplementary Fig. S4a,b). These observations demonstrate that CF may influence expression of certain iron-regulatory proteins, and that both ex vivo modulator pretreatment and in vivo use of prescribed modulators have the potential to differentially influence soluble iron-regulatory protein expression.
Non-CF MDMs deplete more exogenous iron than CF MDMs
Lung damage leads to elevated levels of red blood cells, heme, and iron in the CF airway16. Mean concentrations of iron ranging from 4 to 35 µM have been measured in CF airways and sputum15,16. The ability of macrophages to sequester iron is a key component in preventing both oxidative tissue damage and bacterial iron metabolism. Having found that CF MDMs expressed altered TfR1 and Fpn protein levels (Fig. 2c), both of which are critical for management of iron in the microenvironment, we sought to focus on CF MDM iron handling by examining total iron content of conditioned media after the addition of clinically relevant concentrations of iron15,16. Given that recruited macrophages would be chronically exposed to high levels of iron in the CF airway, we hypothesized that CF MDMs challenged with physiologically relevant concentrations of iron would not sequester and/or retain exogenous iron as effectively as non-CF MDMs. As a surrogate for macrophage iron uptake or sequestration, we measured the depletion of exogenously added iron from the culture medium after 48 h.
In control groups that did not receive exogenous iron, the concentration of total iron was undetectable by our colorimetric assay (Fig. 3a). We found that 8 µM FeCl3 was cleared to levels below the assay detection range by both non-CF and CF MDMs (Fig. 3b). At a higher concentration of exogenous iron (30 µM), conditioned media from CF MDMs contained significantly (P = 0.0044) higher levels of iron than non-CF (Fig. 3b). Additionally, 48-h pretreatment with CFTR modulators ameliorated this effect in CF MDMs (Fig. 3b). These findings imply that CF MDMs sequester and/or withhold less iron than non-CF.
CF MDM conditioned media contributes to Pa biofilm formation and viability
We next hypothesized that elevated iron levels in CF MDM conditioned media may influence the growth of a CF Pa clinical isolate, DH1137. To do this, we collected supernatants from non-CF and CF MDMs that were given exogenous iron, with or without modulator pretreatment (Fig. 3b). We chose to test supernatants from MDMs exposed to 30 µM FeCl3 because we observed significant and measurable changes in the amount of iron present in CF and modulator-pretreated CF MDM supernatants at this concentration (Fig. 3b). We mixed the MDM supernatants with Pa DH1137 and performed a biofilm formation assay. At the endpoint of the biofilm formation assay, we recovered the mixed supernatants to measure Pa density and viability. We found that the optical density (OD) at λ = 600 nm (OD600) of the supernatant recovered from the biofilm formation assay was not altered (Fig. 4a), indicating no change in the density of bacteria in the assay supernatant. However, the OD600 reading does not discern the relative density of live, dead, or dying bacteria. To answer this question, we measured viable bacteria recovered from the biofilm formation assay by measuring the growth of colony forming units (CFUs) recovered from the assay supernatant. We found that CF conditioned media increased recovery of viable bacteria (Fig. 4b, mean: non-CF viable CFU × 106 = 2.133 ± standard deviation (SD) 2.30, CF viable CFU × 106 = 20.60 ± SD 16.9). Additionally, CF conditioned media increased the formation of biofilms, as measured by absorbance at λ = 550 nm (A550) (Supplementary Fig. S6, Fig. 4c,d, mean: non-CF biofilm formation A550 = 0.150 ± SD 0.104, CF biofilm formation A550 = 0.408 ± SD 0.124). Modulator-pretreated CF conditioned media reduced the recovery of viable bacteria (P = 0.0876, Fig. 4b) and significantly reduced biofilm formation (P = 0.0033, Fig. 4c,d).
Discussion
While iron may not be readily available in the non-CF human lung, both CF sputum and airway lavage fluid contain elevated iron15,16,59. Iron is an essential nutrient for the antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation of Pa, one of the most common CF pathogens13,60,61. As manipulation of iron availability has become a therapeutic option of interest for CF lung infections60,61,62, expanding our understanding of iron metabolism in primary CF macrophages could offer insight into airway host–pathogen interactions.
The goal of this study was to test the hypotheses that (1) iron-regulatory proteins are altered in CF MDMs, and (2) ex vivo ivacaftor/lumacaftor corrects expression of iron-regulatory proteins in a manner relevant to host–pathogen interactions. We analyzed samples obtained from a small cohort of CF patients who all had a common and severe CFTR mutation (Class II, F508del/F508del). We exposed primary human MDMs to physiologically relevant concentrations of CFTR modulators27,53,63 and iron15,16, and examined cytokines, iron-carrier proteins, the hormone hepcidin, and cell-expressed proteins. We tested the impact of macrophage conditioned media on biofilm formation and viability of a Pa CF clinical isolate.
We found that CF MDMs produced more IL-6 and IL-8 (Fig. 1a,b) and less of the anti-inflammatory heme catabolism enzyme, HO-1 (Fig. 2c). These findings are in support of extensive works of Bruscia et al. on the characterization of CFTR-dependent HO-1 dysregulation in both murine and human macrophages and the contribution of this dysregulation to CF macrophage hyperinflammation46,47. In the context of infection and inflammation, the transcription of the Fpn-regulatory hormone hepcidin is induced by IL-6-activated JAK/STAT signaling38. While CF MDMs secreted significantly more IL-6 than non-CF MDMs (Fig. 1a, P = 0.0102), there was no difference in hepcidin secretion (Fig. 2f). Though we observed significantly lower Fpn in CF MDMs with LPS activation (P = 0.0015, Fig. 2c), we did not observe changes in hepcidin secretion under these conditions (Fig. 2f). While modulator treatment ex vivo did not impact hepcidin secretion, we did observe trends in reduced hepcidin secretion in subjects taking modulators in vivo (Supplementary Fig. S3e). Though in vivo modulator use induced trends in reduced hepcidin secretion (Supplementary Fig. S3e), we found no increase in Fpn expression with in vivo modulator use (Supplementary Fig. S4a,b), suggesting the observed reduction in hepcidin secretion was not responsible for appreciable changes in Fpn expression. Although we found that in vivo modulator use coincided with significantly lower transferrin (P = 0.0076) in activated, modulator-pretreated CF MDMs (Supplementary Fig. S3g), TfR1 protein expression was not altered in association with patient modulator use under any treatment conditions (Supplementary Fig. S4a,b). These findings demonstrate that clinical use of modulators but not ex vivo modulator treatment can impact inflammatory and iron-related protein secretion (Supplementary Fig. S3d–g). This suggests that acute and chronic modulator exposure differentially impacts monocyte/macrophage iron handling and immunophenotype. This may be addressed in future studies of patients taking the same triple combination therapy.
In addition to lower Fpn in CF MDMs with LPS activation (Fig. 2c), we found that ex vivo modulator pretreatment in LPS-activated MDMs induced a trend towards elevated Fpn without altering IL-6 or hepcidin secretion (Figs. 1a, 2c,f, Supplementary Fig. S3e). While it is known that hepatocytes are the primary producers of hepcidin64, these findings pose interesting questions about hepcidin-independent mechanisms of Fpn regulation as well as potential autocrine dysregulation of the hepcidin-ferroportin regulatory axis. These findings also offer insight into iron-withholding in CF MDMs activated through TLR4. CF MDMs have a proven deficit to phagocytose and kill Pa27, suggesting that lower Fpn in activated CF MDMs does not impart an advantage to the host during direct host–pathogen interactions. Fpn transports iron (II) across the cell membrane and releases iron (II) to be oxidized and finally bound to transferrin as iron (III)65. We observed no change in FTH (Fig. 2c), which plays an important role preventing iron (II)-induced oxidative damage by oxidizing and storing iron (II) as iron (III)66. Although we did not measure intracellular iron content in this study, we can hypothesize that low CF MDM HO-1 and Fpn in conjunction with unchanged ferritin levels may contribute to elevated intracellular iron and oxidative stress (Fig. 2c). Elevated intracellular iron has been described in CFBEs and alveolar macrophages from CF lung explants, though alveolar macrophages in CF lung explants did also express elevated ferritin and ferroportin staining13,16. These questions may be addressed in future studies by measuring activated CF macrophage ROS production and intracellular iron content in response to exogenous iron.
CF MDMs expressed a trend towards elevated basal TfR1 (Fig. 2c) compared to non-CF MDMs, and basal TfR1 levels were significantly (P = 0.0259) reduced with modulator pretreatment (Fig. 2d). These data are intriguing and seemingly contradictory to our finding of elevated extracellular iron in CF MDM conditioned media (Fig. 3b). There are several avenues to consider when interpreting these data. TfR1 protein accumulation, in the absence of iron uptake, may stem from defects in protein internalization. This was found to be the case in a study of PBMCs and lymphocytes from human patients with a mutation in TfR1 gene, TFRC, in which internalization of TfR1 was disrupted, resulting in protein accumulation on the cell surface67. TfR1 mRNA stability is regulated by the zinc-finger protein tristetraprolin (TTP), which is in turn regulated by the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1)68. mTORC1 expression is elevated in CFBEs69 and TTP deficiency has been linked to hypersecretion of IL-8 from IB3-1 CF lung epithelial cells70, providing an additional potential avenue for TfR1 upregulation in CF MDMs.
No differences were found in IL-1β secretion from non-CF and CF LPS-activated macrophages (Fig. 1c). These data suggest similar NLRP3 inflammasome activation, although further studies would need to be done to measure pro-IL-1β and caspase-1 to further characterize inflammasome activity in LPS-activated CF macrophages. Findings in the literature suggest that differences in CF inflammasome activity may be observed in a context-dependent manner: CF airway epithelial cells and CF monocytes have similar IL-1β and caspase-1 activity in response to LPS71, while CF MDMs challenged with Burkholderia cenocepecia secrete significantly more IL-1β than non-CF50, and CFTR knockout mice challenged intranasally with Aspergillus fumigatus conidia or Pa express elevated IL-1β in lung homogenates72.
Except for TNFα, we found that in vivo ivacaftor/lumacaftor and tezacaftor/ivacaftor use largely did not impact LPS induced cytokine secretion (Supplementary Fig. S3a–d). Ex vivo pretreatment with ivacaftor/lumacaftor reduced expression of TfR1 and induced a trend towards elevated Fpn expression (Fig. 2d,e). These findings are in support of a recent publication in which MDMs isolated from CF patients taking clinical ivacaftor had improved B. cenocepecia phagocytosis and CFTR expression compared to MDMs isolated from CF patients who were taking ivacaftor/lumacaftor50. In that study, the genotype of donors on ivacaftor was comprised of ivacaftor-responsive class III/IV/V CFTR mutations50. Indeed, recent findings suggest that the combination of ivacaftor/lumacaftor induces negative effects on phagocytosis in CF MDMs27,50. Although we did not observe a significant detriment to biofilm clearance resulting from ex vivo ivacaftor/lumacaftor treatment, our findings that ex vivo treatment with ivacaftor/lumacaftor did not recover cytokine or soluble protein levels in CF MDMs (Figs. 1a–d, 2f–h) further demonstrate that ivacaftor/lumacaftor may not rescue all aspects of CF macrophage function in patients with more severe mutations. Additionally, the ex vivo tissue culture environment lacks many components such as cytokines, chemokines, elevated iron content, and other cell types that may influence how modulator therapy impacts innate immune cell function in vivo. Our future studies involve investigating macrophage function with an emphasis on iron homeostasis in patients who have consistently taken highly effective modulator therapy for over one year. These studies will allow us to assess the impact of highly effective modulator therapy in vivo on macrophage iron homeostasis.
In addition to reducing basal TfR1 and elevating Fpn in activated CF MDMs, we observed that ex vivo pretreatment with modulators robustly impacted CF MDM iron sequestration and biofilm formation of DH1137 (Figs. 3b, 4c). Elevated extracellular iron and the associated increase in Pa biofilm formation and viability (Fig. 4b–d) suggest that dysfunctional iron metabolism in CF MDMs (1) impacts host–pathogen interactions and (2) may be sensitive to CFTR modulator therapy. These findings are particularly relevant in the context of the CF lung, in which iron content is positively correlated with Pa abundance and in which Pa biofilms have been found10,15. When considering these data, it is important to understand that these studies do not directly test how iron effects Pa, but rather how iron-rich CF conditioned media effects Pa. To help determine if there is a causative rather than an associative relationship between iron levels in CF media and biofilm formation, direct manipulation of iron levels in conditioned media would be necessary.
These data raise several questions that require future studies. The expression of Fpn and TfR1 over a more comprehensive time course and CFTR modulator dose response regime would allow for greater granularity of expression profiles and potentially answer how modulators correct iron sequestration. Peripheral blood monocytes are recruited to the lung during infection and thus, represent a relevant model in which to study CF mononuclear phagocyte function. However, it is important to note that the lung environment shapes macrophage phenotype73. Due to the unique niche they occupy, CF alveolar macrophages may express an iron-regulatory phenotype that is different from that of CF MDMs. The ontogeny and lifecycle of alveolar macrophages are distinct from peripheral blood MDMs in that they are long-lived, self-renewing, tissue-resident cells derived from fetal progenitors74. They play a critical role in regulating the immune responses of the lung, inducing tolerance to innocuous inhaled antigens75 or triggering synchronous inflammatory signaling in response to pathogenic stimuli such as LPS76. Future studies on CF and non-CF alveolar macrophages would allow for greater clarity on potential mechanisms of dysregulated iron-handling in the airways themselves. Additionally, several studies have demonstrated the phenotypic impact of iron levels on inflammation, polarization, differentiation, and cellular metabolism48,77,78,79. We must also consider that elevated iron in the CF lung may impact the differentiation and phenotype of recruited monocytes as well as tissue resident macrophages, and thus modulate their iron-regulatory protein repertoire. Future studies in which CF macrophages are cultured in high-iron media from the time of monocyte isolation to macrophage differentiation may help answer these questions.
We have shown that CF MDMs are hyperinflammatory in phenotype and have altered expression of several iron related proteins that are altered with modulator treatment. CF MDMs have an inability to reduce levels of exogenous extracellular iron, and their iron-rich conditioned media directly facilitates bacterial biofilm formation and viability. We have shown that CFTR modulators correct aspects of dysfunctional iron metabolism in CF MDMs, although future studies are needed to further delineate the mechanisms of these results.
References
Reddy, M. M. & Quinton, P. M. Control of dynamic CFTR selectivity by glutamate and ATP in epithelial cells. Nature 423, 756–760. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01694 (2003).
Dorschner, R. A. et al. The mammalian ionic environment dictates microbial susceptibility to antimicrobial defense peptides. FASEB J 20, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.05-4406com (2006).
Pezzulo, A. A. et al. Reduced airway surface pH impairs bacterial killing in the porcine cystic fibrosis lung. Nature 487, 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11130 (2012).
Esther, C. R. et al. Mucus accumulation in the lungs precedes structural changes and infection in children with cystic fibrosis. Sci Transl Med 11, 1. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aav3488 (2019).
Rosen, B. H. et al. Infection is not required for mucoinflammatory lung disease in CFTR-knockout ferrets. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. Med. 197, 1308–1318. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201708-1616OC (2018).
Ratjen, F. Recent advances in cystic fibrosis. Paediatr. Respir. Rev. 9, 144–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2008.01.004 (2008).
Lipuma, J. J. The changing microbial epidemiology in cystic fibrosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 23, 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00068-09 (2010).
Henry, R. L., Mellis, C. M. & Petrovic, L. Mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a marker of poor survival in cystic fibrosis. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 12, 158–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.1950120306 (1992).
Parkins, M. D., Somayaji, R. & Waters, V. J. Epidemiology, biology, and impact of clonal Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in cystic fibrosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 31, 1. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00019-18 (2018).
Høiby, N. et al. Diagnosis of biofilm infections in cystic fibrosis patients. APMIS 125, 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12689 (2017).
Oglesby-Sherrouse, A. G., Djapgne, L., Nguyen, A. T., Vasil, A. I. & Vasil, M. L. The complex interplay of iron, biofilm formation, and mucoidy affecting antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Pathog. Dis. 70, 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/2049-632X.12132 (2014).
O’May, C. Y., Sanderson, K., Roddam, L. F., Kirov, S. M. & Reid, D. W. Iron-binding compounds impair Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation, especially under anaerobic conditions. J. Med. Microbiol. 58, 765–773. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.004416-0 (2009).
Moreau-Marquis, S. et al. The DeltaF508-CFTR mutation results in increased biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa by increasing iron availability. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 295, L25-37. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00391.2007 (2008).
Nelson, C. E. et al. Proteomic analysis of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa iron starvation response reveals PrrF small regulatory RNA-dependent iron regulation of twitching motility, amino acid metabolism, and zinc homeostasis proteins. J. Bacteriol. 201, 1. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00754-18 (2019).
Reid, D. W., Carroll, V., O’May, C., Champion, A. & Kirov, S. M. Increased airway iron as a potential factor in the persistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J. 30, 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00154006 (2007).
Ghio, A. J. et al. Iron accumulates in the lavage and explanted lungs of cystic fibrosis patients. J. Cyst. Fibros 12, 390–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2012.10.010 (2013).
Hendricks, M. R. et al. Respiratory syncytial virus infection enhances Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm growth through dysregulation of nutritional immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 1642–1647. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516979113 (2016).
Bruscia, E. M. & Bonfield, T. L. Cystic fibrosis lung immunity: the role of the macrophage. J. Innate. Immun. 8, 550–563. https://doi.org/10.1159/000446825 (2016).
Bruscia, E. M. & Bonfield, T. L. Innate and adaptive immunity in cystic fibrosis. Clin. Chest Med. 37, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccm.2015.11.010 (2016).
Kooguchi, K. et al. Role of alveolar macrophages in initiation and regulation of inflammation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Infect. Immun. 66, 3164–3169 (1998).
Bruscia, E. M. et al. Macrophages directly contribute to the exaggerated inflammatory response in cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator-/- mice. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 40, 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2008-0170OC (2009).
Sorio, C. et al. Defective CFTR expression and function are detectable in blood monocytes: development of a new blood test for cystic fibrosis. PLoS ONE 6, e22212. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022212 (2011).
Bessich, J. L., Nymon, A. B., Moulton, L. A., Dorman, D. & Ashare, A. Low levels of insulin-like growth factor-1 contribute to alveolar macrophage dysfunction in cystic fibrosis. J. Immunol. 191, 378–385. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1300221 (2013).
Tarique, A. A. et al. CFTR-dependent defect in alternatively-activated macrophages in cystic fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros. 16, 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2017.03.011 (2017).
Elborn, J. S., Norman, D., Delamere, F. M. & Shale, D. J. In vitro tumor necrosis factor-alpha secretion by monocytes from patients with cystic fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Cell. Mol. Biol. 6, 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1165/ajrcmb/6.2.207 (1992).
Lara-Reyna, S. et al. Metabolic reprograming of cystic fibrosis macrophages via the IRE1α arm of the unfolded protein response results in exacerbated inflammation. Front. Immunol. 10, 1789. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01789 (2019).
Barnaby, R. et al. Lumacaftor (VX-809) restores the ability of CF macrophages to phagocytose and kill Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 314, L432–L438. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00461.2017 (2018).
Riquelme, S. A. et al. CFTR-PTEN-dependent mitochondrial metabolic dysfunction promotes. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, 1. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aav4634 (2019).
Mills, E. L. et al. Itaconate is an anti-inflammatory metabolite that activates Nrf2 via alkylation of KEAP1. Nature 556, 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25986 (2018).
Ganz, T. & Nemeth, E. Iron homeostasis in host defence and inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15, 500–510. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3863 (2015).
Winn, N. C., Volk, K. M. & Hasty, A. H. Regulation of tissue iron homeostasis: the macrophage “ferrostat”. JCI Insight 5, 1. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.132964 (2020).
Soares, M. P. & Hamza, I. Macrophages and iron metabolism. Immunity 44, 492–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.016 (2016).
Clifton, M. C., Corrent, C. & Strong, R. K. Siderocalins: siderophore-binding proteins of the innate immune system. Biometals 22, 557–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-009-9207-6 (2009).
Ambrose, P. G. et al. Apotransferrin in combination with ciprofloxacin slows bacterial replication, prevents resistance amplification, and increases antimicrobial regimen effect. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 63, 1. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00112-19 (2019).
Singh, P. K., Parsek, M. R., Greenberg, E. P. & Welsh, M. J. A component of innate immunity prevents bacterial biofilm development. Nature 417, 552–555. https://doi.org/10.1038/417552a (2002).
Ohgami, R. S. et al. Identification of a ferrireductase required for efficient transferrin-dependent iron uptake in erythroid cells. Nat. Genet 37, 1264–1269. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1658 (2005).
Alford, C. E., King, T. E. & Campbell, P. A. Role of transferrin, transferrin receptors, and iron in macrophage listericidal activity. J. Exp. Med 174, 459–466. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.174.2.459 (1991).
Nemeth, E. et al. IL-6 mediates hypoferremia of inflammation by inducing the synthesis of the iron regulatory hormone hepcidin. J. Clin. Invest 113, 1271–1276. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI20945 (2004).
Peyssonnaux, C. et al. TLR4-dependent hepcidin expression by myeloid cells in response to bacterial pathogens. Blood 107, 3727–3732. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-06-2259 (2006).
Arosio, P., Ingrassia, R. & Cavadini, P. Ferritins: a family of molecules for iron storage, antioxidation and more. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1790, 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2008.09.004 (2009).
Gan, Z. S. et al. Iron reduces M1 macrophage polarization in RAW2647 macrophages associated with inhibition of STAT1. Mediat. Inflamm 2017, 8570818. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8570818 (2017).
Thomas, C., Mackey, M. M., Diaz, A. A. & Cox, D. P. Hydroxyl radical is produced via the Fenton reaction in submitochondrial particles under oxidative stress: implications for diseases associated with iron accumulation. Redox. Rep. 14, 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1179/135100009X392566 (2009).
Bruscia, E. M. et al. Abnormal trafficking and degradation of TLR4 underlie the elevated inflammatory response in cystic fibrosis. J. Immunol. 186, 6990–6998. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1100396 (2011).
Di Pietro, C. et al. Ezrin links CFTR to TLR4 signaling to orchestrate anti-bacterial immune response in macrophages. Sci. Rep. 7, 10882. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11012-7 (2017).
Pachori, A. S. et al. Heme-oxygenase-1-induced protection against hypoxia/reoxygenation is dependent on biliverdin reductase and its interaction with PI3K/Akt pathway. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 43, 580–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2007.08.003 (2007).
Zhang, P. X. et al. Reduced caveolin-1 promotes hyperinflammation due to abnormal heme oxygenase-1 localization in lipopolysaccharide-challenged macrophages with dysfunctional cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator. J. Immunol. 190, 5196–5206. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1201607 (2013).
Zhang, P. X. et al. Pharmacological modulation of the AKT/microRNA-199a-5p/CAV1 pathway ameliorates cystic fibrosis lung hyper-inflammation. Nat. Commun. 6, 6221. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7221 (2015).
Pereira, M. et al. Acute iron deprivation reprograms human macrophage metabolism and reduces inflammation in vivo. Cell. Rep. 28, 498-511.e495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.039 (2019).
Wang, L. et al. Selective modulation of TLR4-activated inflammatory responses by altered iron homeostasis in mice. J. Clin. Invest 119, 3322–3328. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI39939 (2009).
Zhang, S., Shrestha, C. L. & Kopp, B. T. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators have differential effects on cystic fibrosis macrophage function. Sci. Rep 8, 17066. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35151-7 (2018).
Bratcher, P. E. et al. Alterations in blood leukocytes of G551D-bearing cystic fibrosis patients undergoing treatment with ivacaftor. J. Cyst. Fibros 15, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2015.02.010 (2016).
Csanády, L. & Töröcsik, B. Cystic fibrosis drug ivacaftor stimulates CFTR channels at picomolar concentrations. Elife 8, 1. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46450 (2019).
Matthes, E. et al. Low free drug concentration prevents inhibition of F508del CFTR functional expression by the potentiator VX-770 (ivacaftor). Br. J. Pharmacol 173, 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.13365 (2016).
Clancy, J. P. et al. Results of a phase IIa study of VX-809, an investigational CFTR corrector compound, in subjects with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation. Thorax 67, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200393 (2012).
Smith, E. E. et al. Genetic adaptation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the airways of cystic fibrosis patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 8487–8492. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602138103 (2006).
56Wickham, H. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2016).
Gregory & Warnes, R. (ed Ben Bolker). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gplots (2020).
Kanamori, Y. et al. Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) transcriptionally activates hepcidin by inducing CCAAT enhancer-binding protein δ (C/EBPδ) expression in hepatocytes. J. Biol. Chem 292, 10275–10287. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M116.770974 (2017).
Gifford, A. H. et al. Serum iron level is associated with time to antibiotics in cystic fibrosis. Clin. Transl. Sci. 8, 754–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12358 (2015).
Moreau-Marquis, S., O’Toole, G. A. & Stanton, B. A. Tobramycin and FDA-approved iron chelators eliminate Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms on cystic fibrosis cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol 41, 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2008-0299OC (2009).
Moreau-Marquis, S., Coutermarsh, B. & Stanton, B. A. Combination of hypothiocyanite and lactoferrin (ALX-109) enhances the ability of tobramycin and aztreonam to eliminate Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms growing on cystic fibrosis airway epithelial cells. J. Antimicrob. Chemother 70, 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dku357 (2015).
Goss, C. H. et al. Gallium disrupts bacterial iron metabolism and has therapeutic effects in mice and humans with lung infections. Sci. Transl. Med 10, 1. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aat7520 (2018).
Cholon, D. M. et al. Potentiator ivacaftor abrogates pharmacological correction of ΔF508 CFTR in cystic fibrosis. Sci. Transl. Med 6, 246ra296. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3008680 (2014).
Krause, A. et al. LEAP-1, a novel highly disulfide-bonded human peptide, exhibits antimicrobial activity. FEBS Lett. 480, 147–150 (2000).
Ward, D. M. & Kaplan, J. Ferroportin-mediated iron transport: expression and regulation. Biochim Biophys. Acta 1426–1433, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.03.004 (1823).
Mesquita, G. et al. H-Ferritin is essential for macrophages’ capacity to store or detoxify exogenously added iron. Sci. Rep. 10, 3061. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59898-0 (2020).
Jabara, H. H. et al. A missense mutation in TFRC, encoding transferrin receptor 1, causes combined immunodeficiency. Nat. Genet. 48, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3465 (2016).
Bayeva, M. et al. mTOR regulates cellular iron homeostasis through tristetraprolin. Cell Metab 16, 645–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.10.001 (2012).
Reilly, R. et al. Targeting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signalling pathway in Cystic Fibrosis. Sci Rep 7, 7642. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06588-z (2017).
Balakathiresan, N. S. et al. Tristetraprolin regulates IL-8 mRNA stability in cystic fibrosis lung epithelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 296, L1012-1018. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.90601.2008 (2009).
Tang, A. et al. Inflammasome-mediated IL-1β production in humans with cystic fibrosis. PLoS ONE 7, e37689. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037689 (2012).
Iannitti, R. G. et al. IL-1 receptor antagonist ameliorates inflammasome-dependent inflammation in murine and human cystic fibrosis. Nat. Commun. 7, 10791. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10791 (2016).
Svedberg, F. R. et al. The lung environment controls alveolar macrophage metabolism and responsiveness in type 2 inflammation. Nat. Immunol. 20, 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-019-0352-y (2019).
Kopf, M., Schneider, C. & Nobs, S. P. The development and function of lung-resident macrophages and dendritic cells. Nat. Immunol. 16, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3052 (2015).
Soroosh, P. et al. Lung-resident tissue macrophages generate Foxp3+ regulatory T cells and promote airway tolerance. J. Exp. Med. 210, 775–788. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20121849 (2013).
Westphalen, K. et al. Sessile alveolar macrophages communicate with alveolar epithelium to modulate immunity. Nature 506, 503–506. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12902 (2014).
Haldar, M. et al. Heme-mediated SPI-C induction promotes monocyte differentiation into iron-recycling macrophages. Cell 156, 1223–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.069 (2014).
Fell, L. H. et al. Impact of individual intravenous iron preparations on the differentiation of monocytes towards macrophages and dendritic cells. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant 31, 1835–1845. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfw045 (2016).
Agoro, R., Taleb, M., Quesniaux, V. F. J. & Mura, C. Cell iron status influences macrophage polarization. PLoS ONE 13, e0196921. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196921 (2018).
Acknowledgements
A.A. is funded by NIH (R01HL122372 and CFF (ASHARE15A0, ASHARE20P0). H.H. is funded by NIH (T32AI007363). T.H.H. is funded by CFF (STANTO19R0) and NIH (P30DK117469). D.S.A. is funded by CFF (ARIDGI19B0). A.A., D.A.A, D.L.M., J.A.D., and A.B.N. are funded by NIH (P30DK117469) and CFF (STANTO15R0). Sample collection was facilitated by the Translational Research Core which is jointly funded by CFF (STANTO11R0) and NIH (P30GM106394). The Norris Cotton Cancer Center Microscopy Core at Dartmouth College is funded by NIH (S10OD21616) and the Irradiation, Pre-clinical Imaging and Microscopy Shared Resource (IPIMSR) in the Norris Cotton Cancer Center at Dartmouth College with NCI Cancer Center Support Grant (5P30 CA023108-37). The authors thank Ken Orndorff for assistance with microscopy, and the donors in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.F.H., J.A.D., and A.A. conceived and designed research. H.F.H., A.B.N., and D.L.M., performed experiments. H.F.H., T.H.H., and A.A. analyzed data. H.F.H., A.B.N., D.A.A., D.L.M., D.S.A., J.A.D., and A.A. interpreted results of experiments. H.F.H. and T.H.H. prepared figures. H.F.H. drafted the manuscript. All authors edited and revised manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hazlett, H.F., Hampton, T.H., Aridgides, D.S. et al. Altered iron metabolism in cystic fibrosis macrophages: the impact of CFTR modulators and implications for Pseudomonas aeruginosa survival. Sci Rep 10, 10935 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67729-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67729-5
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.