Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Testing algal-based pCO2 proxies at a modern CO2 seep (Vulcano, Italy)

Abstract

Understanding long-term trends in atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide (pCO2) has become increasingly relevant as modern concentrations surpass recent historic trends. One method for estimating past pCO2, the stable carbon isotopic fractionation associated with photosynthesis (Ɛp) has shown promise over the past several decades, in particular using species-specific biomarker lipids such as alkenones. Recently, the Ɛp of more general biomarker lipids, organic compounds derived from a multitude of species, have been applied to generate longer-spanning, more ubiquitous records than those of alkenones but the sensitivity of this proxy to changes in pCO2 has not been constrained in modern settings. Here, we test Ɛp using a variety of general biomarkers along a transect taken from a naturally occurring marine CO2 seep in Levante Bay of the Aeolian island of Vulcano in Italy. The studied general biomarkers, loliolide, cholesterol, and phytol, all show increasing depletion in 13C over the transect from the control site towards the seep, suggesting that CO2 exerts a strong control on isotopic fractionation in natural phytoplankton communities. The strongest shift in fractionation was seen in phytol, and pCO2 estimates derived from phytol confirm the utility of this biomarker as a proxy for pCO2 reconstruction.

Introduction

The concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide (pCO2, expressed in partial pressure µatm), as directly measured from air trapped in ice cores, has had a major influence on climate over the past 800 thousand years (ka)1. During this period, pCO2 and temperature oscillated together between stable bounds every 100 ka2. In the past two centuries, the rise of pCO2 has broken those bounds from the pre-industrial values, previously only ranging between ca. 180 to 280 µatm, to the 410 µatm of today3. This rapid rise in pCO2 causes concern that climate, particularly temperature, will accordingly change. In order to better understand how changes may occur, reconstructing longer trends in pCO2 over the geologic record could offer context for evaluating the direction and magnitude of climate change.

Many proxies have been developed for reconstructing past pCO2 and applied with mixed success over the past several decades4. One method for studying past pCO2 makes use of the stable carbon isotopic fractionation due to CO2-fixation (Ɛp), where biomass of photoautotrophs becomes increasingly depleted in 13C as pCO2 increases due to kinetic discrimination by the CO2-fixing enzyme Rubisco5,6,7. Ɛp can be derived from the δ13C of photoautotrophic biomass, recorded in sedimentary organic matter, and the δ13C of inorganic CO2 derived from the carbonate in the shells of planktonic foraminifera8.

Although pCO2 has been shown to be one of the dominant physiological control on the δ13C of photoautotrophic biomass9, studies on Ɛp in algae have shown that other factors may influence this value, primarily growth rate10 and cell size and shape11, as well as minor influences such as light, and temperature12,13,14,15. These additional influencing factors on Ɛp are considered in pCO2 reconstructions via the catchall term b16, described in the equation17 as:

$$ {\text{CO}}_{{{2}[{\text{aq}}]}} = b/ \, (\upepsilon_{{\text{f}}} - \upepsilon_{{\text{p}}} ) $$
(1)

where Ɛf is the maximum isotopic fractionation due to CO2-fixation via the enzyme Rubisco, which has shown a sum range from 25 to 28‰17,18,19. It should be noted that the very few in vivo Rubisco fractionation studies have much lower values20,21, which Wilkes and Pearson22 suggest there may be due to multiple stages of fractionation instead of the singular Rubisco fractionation step. Several other studies have expanded on Eq. (1) for specific consideration, particularly in calculating b, e.g. instantaneous cell growth rate accounting for differences in photoperiod23,24 and CO2 fixation rate25.

Using the knowledge obtain from culture studies26,27, the measurement of Ɛp in algal biomarkers preserved in the geologic record can be used to reconstruct past pCO2. These biomarkers are almost exclusively alkenones, long-chain unsaturated methyl and ethyl n-ketones produced by haptophytes8,28,29. Although this proxy has generated a large number of pCO2 records30,31,32, there are several limitations, such as the exceptionally low Ɛf recorded for the alkenone-producer Emiliania huxleyi of 11‰20, a potential insensitivity of this proxy at low CO2 levels24,33, and difficulties in constraining the b factor over time34. One other limitation is the fact that alkenones first commonly appeared in the geologic record ca. 45 million years (Ma) ago35, prohibiting pCO2 reconstructions prior to this time.

As an alternative, the isotopic fractionation of general phytoplankton biomarkers, compounds that are produced by a multitude of species, may offer some solutions to the limitations of the alkenone pCO2 proxy such as more spatial ubiquity and temporal longevity. This general biomarker approach has been poorly explored; however, though there are some examples of this being applied to phytane, a diagenetic product of omnipresent chlorophyll-a, for periods extending beyond the alkenone record, i.e. in the Cretaceous36,37,38 and in a Phanerozoic compilation39. However, this general biomarker approach has not been extensively tested in laboratory cultures or present-day environments.

For modern studies of the general biomarker approach, naturally-occurring phytoplankton communities are necessary to mimic the widespread contributors to general phytoplankton biomarkers, as opposed to the typical single-species approach of laboratory cultures. Mesocosm experiments may offer more natural environmental conditions and communities, though none have been conducted on general phytoplankton biomarkers for pCO2 reconstructions. Alkenones and particulate organic carbon (POC) have been explored in one mesocosm experiment using natural communities, i.e. under three pCO2 conditions in a contained area for ca. 21 days40. These authors suggested the minor changes they observed in δ13C values for alkenones and POC indicate that fractionation is not primarily controlled by CO2 concentrations but instead by algal growth rate and carbon-uptake mechanisms. However, these experiments are inherently difficult to set-up, reproduce, and control.

Here we expand this new approach to testing pCO2 response in natural phytoplankton communities, by analyzing the response of isotopic fractionation in general phytoplankton biomarkers across a CO2 gradient at a naturally occurring CO2 seep. CO2 seeps, which consistently bubble CO2 into the surrounding environment and thus have very high CO2 concentrations near the seep, have hardly been explored for biological studies due to the assumed high sulfide concentrations, toxic to many organisms, typically associated with volcanic degassing41. However, Hall-Spencer et al.42 used these extremely high pCO2 environments for ocean acidification experiments, which lead to studies at other seep sites, i.e. Italy43, Papua-New-Guinea44, New Zealand45, and Japan46. The new approach was initially tested with a 3-point transect (high, mid, and control pCO2) of a marine CO2 seep site on Shikine Island, Japan, covering a range of CO2 concentrations that offer an analogue for past oceans39. However, this specific site proved to have confounding factors where the imprint of CO2 on Ɛp measured in general biomarkers of surface sediment was masked by extreme weather events (i.e. typhoons) that caused sediment transport.

Here, we more thoroughly explore this new approach at a different marine CO2 seep system approximately 30 m into Levante Bay at Vulcano Island, Italy, a location with much more stable weather conditions than Japan. We collected surface sediments in a high-resolution 16-point transect from high CO2 towards ambient CO2 values. Here, we analyzed the Ɛp of several general phytoplankton biomarkers, compounds that have been virtually unstudied in modern phytoplankton communities, deposited in surface sediments and tested their response to the CO2 gradient at sixteen sites throughout the bay.

Results

For this study, we collected surface sediments in May and October from close to the seep site (ca. 3 m distance) to a control site unaffected by the seep47 at a constant depth of ca. 1.5 m at the time of sampling (Fig. 1). The δ13C of DIC measured in seawater collected in May from the bay does not show notable change over the gradient of CO2 (Table S1), which confirms that lack of change noted in the literature48. For this reason, we averaged the δ13C of DIC measured in our study with that of Cornwall et al.49 across all sites (0.7‰ ± 0.4‰ s.d.) and assumed this to be representative for the bay region.

Figure 1
figure1

Map of sites in Levante Bay. Sampling sites along the transect from the CO2 seep (star, Site 1) to the ambient control (Site 16) on Vulcano Island, Italy (Google Maps). White symbols indicate the additional sampling sites in May 2017.

Analysis of the polar fractions of the lipid extracts obtained from the surface sediments showed the same biomarker lipids in similar distributions throughout the transect from the CO2 seep to the control sites (e.g. biomarker distributions at Site 5, near the CO2 seep, and the control site, Site 16, are shown in Fig. 2). These biomarker lipids include: loliolide, phytol, even carbon numbered C10-C16 fatty alcohols, C30 alkane-1,15-diol, C32-17β(H),21β-hopanol, and sterols, such as cholesta-5,22E-dien-3β-ol, cholesterol, 23-methylcholesta-5,22dienol, campesterol, stigmasterol, and β-sitosterol (Fig. 2). Consistently, the most abundant among these compounds were loliolide, cholesterol, and phytol, as were also observed at the CO2 seep site in Japan50.

Figure 2
figure2

Chromatogram of silylated polar fraction of extract of surface sediments with (A) control site with ambient CO2 concentrations and (B) Site 5 near CO2 vent. Major compounds are loliolide (Lol, closed triangle), phytol (Ph, closed circle), cholesterol (Ch, closed square), as well as fatty alcohols (chain-lengths shown), C30 alkane-1,15-diol (Diol), C32-17β(H),21β-hopanol (Hop), and sterols (squares).

All three biomarkers show a steady increase in δ13C values over the transect from the CO2 seep towards the control site (Fig. 3; Table S2). The exceptions are the more depleted δ13C values at Site 2 and Site 9, where we observed some minor gas bubbling in the sediment, suggesting the release of small amounts of CO2 at these sites. Over the transect from Site 1 (the seep) to Site 16 (the control), the δ13C of loliolide ranges from − 27.4 to − 21.6‰ (Fig. 3A). From the seep to around Site 10, the δ13C of loliolide fluctuates between ca. − 27 and − 25‰, followed by a prominent increase from ca. − 25 to − 22.5‰. For the sites sampled in both May and October, there appears to be consistency between the two seasons, i.e. in Site 5 (− 25.2‰ for both seasons) and the control site (− 22.3‰ in May and − 22.6‰ in October), though Site 14 shows a spread of 2‰ between seasons. The δ13C of cholesterol shows a smaller but more consistent shift over the transect, ranging from − 26.3 to − 21.2‰ with a 1‰ difference between the two seasons (Fig. 3B). Phytol shows the largest shift, ranging from − 28.4‰ at the seep site to − 20.4‰ at the control site (Fig. 3C). There is a relatively consistent increase in the δ13C of phytol over the entire transect, except for a small decrease at Site 9, where we observed minor additional gas bubbling in the sediment. The δ13C of phytol shows minor variation between seasons (ca. 0.5%), except for the control site which showed a difference of 1.4‰.

Figure 3
figure3

The δ13C of general phytoplankton biomarkers in surface sediments from Levante Bay, Italy. Loliolide (red triangle), cholesterol (blue square), and phytol (green circle) from CO2 seep (S) to control site (Site 16) sediment collected in May (light colors) and October (darker colors). Diamonds mark sites where there was minor additional bubbling of gas observed.

Discussion

The three most abundant biomarkers, loliolide, cholesterol, and phytol, are all derived from phytoplankton and represent broad phytoplankton groups51,52,53. Composition of the diatom assemblages and cyanobacteria in this bay are further described in Johnson et al.43 All become increasingly enriched in 13C over the transect from high CO2 concentrations near the seep to the control Mediterranean values. The observed isotopic depletion that occurs with increasing CO2 concentrations matches theory5,6,54. Furthermore, this pattern closely follows the results observed at Shikine Island, i.e. a consistent depletion δ13C of the same biomarkers with increasing proximity to the CO2 seep50, but here offered in a 16-point transect instead of the 3-points at the Japan site. Given that CO2 was the major variable over the transect in Italy, as well as Shikine Island, this strongly suggests that CO2 concentrations indeed have a strong impact on isotopic fractionation of general phytoplankton biomarkers, suggesting their potential as a pCO2 proxy.

Although the general trends between the two CO2 seep sites are similar, there is a difference in the magnitude and consistency in isotopic changes between the two sites. In the Shikine Island study, loliolide showed the largest isotopic shift over the transect (− 7.9‰) as compared with phytol (− 5.2‰) and cholesterol (− 5.2‰). However, in the Vulcano Island surface sediments, phytol had the most pronounced isotopic shift (− 8.0‰) as compared with loliolide (− 5.8‰) and cholesterol (− 5.1‰). Furthermore, the changes in loliolide over the Vulcano Island transect are more variable compared with the consistent trends in isotopic values observed in phytol and cholesterol. Here, we will explore these differences.

The δ13C profile of loliolide at Vulcano Island (Fig. 3A) has the least consistent trend among the three biomarkers, fluctuating between − 27.4 and − 25.0‰ from Site 1 (the seep) to Site 13. Loliolide is derived from the major xanthophyll fucoxanthin and is considered a biomarker for diatoms, especially in the absence of haptophyte algae51,55, based on its predominance at sites with substantial diatom communities, although some other non-diatom species also produce fucoxanthin56. Light microscopy analysis of selected sediments across the transect showed that Site 2 contains nearly no diatom frustules, Site 5 had abundant centric diatoms as well as some pennate diatoms, while Site 9 is characterized by a great diversity especially among pennate diatoms though with relatively low overall abundance, and Site 13 and Site 16 (control site) had both high abundance and high diversity of both centric and pennate diatoms (Stoll H. and Mejía Ramírez L. M., personal communications). Decreased diversity in increased proximity to the seep has previously been observed in periphytic diatom assemblages at this site43, though with a drastic increase abundance in chlorophyll-a by ca. fivefold from Site 6 to 16. Johnson et al. suggest that the increase abundance but decreased diversity is due to some diatoms benefitting from increasing CO2 through a reduction in the energetic costs of their CCMs43. The different composition of diatoms at each site, particularly between centric and pennate diatoms, may explain why we observe a high δ13C variability in loliolide. Different species may have slightly different isotopic fractionation due to e.g. different cell geometry and morphologies11 or different bicarbonate pumping strategies that has been observed in diatom species57,58,59. This concept may be further supported by the stronger increase in δ13C values observed between sites 13 and 16, where the higher diversity of species may yield a more robust overall δ13C signal through averaging biosynthetic differences among species. This complexity in the signal of loliolide may weaken the potential of this biomarker for past pCO2 reconstructions.

The δ13C profile of cholesterol (Fig. 3B) showed a more consistent decline over the transect than loliolide, though with a smaller difference in absolute values than phytol and loliolide from the seep towards the control. Because cholesterol is produced by all eukaryotes, such as phytoplankton or by heterotrophs, which modify ingested sterols52,60, terrestrial input, in addition to the algal input, can potentially dilute the autochthonous isotopic signal. However, the lack of terrestrial triterpenoids and long-chain (> C22) even carbon number fatty alcohols (Fig. 2) suggest minimal input of terrestrial biomarkers in the bay. Another explanation for the smaller isotopic change is that the cholesterol has contributions from heterotrophs, which produce cholesterol by modifying ingested phytoplanktonic sterols. Although this does not yield large isotopic fractionation61, the zooplankton often have stronger mobility than their photoautotroph counterparts; they may consume phytoplankton from various locations (and consequently various CO2[aq] concentrations) throughout the bay. This idea is supported by the notable δ13C differences in cholesterol between the two seasons, where the offsets are not consistently in one direction. Based on these observations the δ13C of cholesterol must be considered carefully when used in reconstructing past CO2 concentrations.

The δ13C profile of phytol had the most robust trend across the transect (Fig. 3C) with an δ13C enrichment of ca. 8‰ from the seep to the control. Phytol, derived from chlorophyll-a, is found in all oxygenic photoautotrophs53. Terrestrial input may affect the signal of phytol but, as discussed above, there is no evidence for this here. Based on these results, phytol shows the greatest sensitivity to the CO2 gradient, and thus the most promise for reconstructing past pCO2. The phytol results from Shikine, Japan50 likewise show great promise for reconstructing past pCO2.

To test the validity of using the δ13C of the general biomarkers to estimate past pCO2, we used phytol, the most promising of the various general phytoplankton biomarkers explored here with the most consistent trend and the strongest δ13C shift over the gradient. We calculated the stable carbon isotopic photosynthetic fractionation (Ɛp) using the δ13C of phytoplankton biomass (δp) and the δ13C of CO2d):

$$ \upepsilon_{{\text{p}}} = 1000 \, \cdot \, \left[ { \, \left( {\delta_{{\text{d}}} + 1000} \right) \, / \, \left( {\delta_{{\text{p}}} + 1000} \right) \, {-}{ 1}} \right] $$
(2)

The δp is calculated from the offset between phytol and biomass, which is 3.5‰ ± 1.3 standard deviation based on the average of 23 representative marine phytoplankton species grown in cultures39. The δd is calculated from the δ13C of DIC (0.7‰ ± 0.4‰ s.d.) correcting for temperature and pH (Table S1). The mean annual sea surface temperature for Vulcano Island (20.2 ºC ± 0.5 °C s.d.; https://www.seatemperature.info) was used to calculate the temperature-dependent carbon isotopic fractionation of CO2[aq] with respect to HCO362. The pH gradient, ranging from 5.5 pH near the vent to 8.2 pH in the control63, was used to define the relative contribution of different inorganic carbon species to the measured DIC64 (Table S1). Uncertainty was calculated using Monte Carlo simulations which consider the culmination of each individual parameter with its associated uncertainty, as described by Witkowski et al.39, here including δ13C of phytol ± 0.5‰ s.d., offset between biomass and phytol ± 1.3‰ s.d., δd ± 0.4‰ s.d., and T °C ± 0.5 °C (Table S2). This uncertainty has an equal effect on the final uncertainties in calculated εp, i.e. 0.1‰ error in the δd will lead to a 0.1‰ error in εp39.

Phytol-derived Ɛp ranges from 22.2 to 8.2‰ ± 1.4‰ s.d. (Fig. 4A) and shows a consistent decline in fractionation from the seep towards the control site. This includes Site 2 where measured δ13C values are higher than at Site 1, but Ɛp now shows the expected trend of more fractionation closer to the vent. This is attributed to the strong shift in pH between these two sites (5.5 pH at the vent and 6.25 pH at Site 263) which we have here corrected for. The highest Ɛp value of 22.2‰ near the seep is approaching maximum isotopic fractionation due to CO2-fixation (Ɛf), which has been shown to range between 25 and 28‰ in laboratory cultures18, but still does not quite reach full expression of Ɛf. This is somewhat unexpected given the constant bubbling of CO2 at this site and thus very high CO2 concentrations, i.e. up to ca. 3× modern CO2[aq]43.

Figure 4
figure4

Ɛp, CO2[aq], and reconstructed pCO2 from phytol in surface sediments. (A) Ɛp of phytol, (B) CO2[aq] based on Ɛp of phytol, and (C) pCO2 based on the δ13C of phytol from surface sediments collected in May (light colors) and October (dark colors), ranging from Site 1 (S) to Site 16 (control). Stars indicated CO2 concentrations43. Open orange diamonds mark regions where there was minor additional bubbling of gas.

Several possibilities may explain why the full expression of Ɛf has not been reached. For one, given the relatively small area of the bay, it is possible that surface sediment has moved around the bay over time due to tidal actions and bottom water currents, which dampens the overall signal by allochthonous organic matter transported from area’s outside of the bay, as also inferred for Shikine Island50. Furthermore, algae are unlikely to grow and deposit in precisely same location and given that the impact of the CO2 seep noticeably changes over tens of meters43, this likely leads to some mixed signal among sites, resulting in a suppressed signal. Another alternative is that the calculated Ɛf of the phytoplankton community in Levante Bay may be lower than that inferred from the many culture studies11,17,65. Indeed, several recent studies show that Ɛf of the different Rubisco types may be lower than previously assumed66.

In order to see how well Ɛp of phytol can reconstruct CO2[aq], we estimated CO2[aq] and pCO2 from the δ13C of phytol using the equation adapted from the high plant model5 for algae7, and described in Eq. (1)17, where b reflects species carbon demand per supply8 and Ɛf reflects the maximum isotopic fractionation due to CO2-fixation. The value of b is a complicated catchall for factors influencing isotopic fractionation such growth rate and cell-size67, light intensity and membrane leakiness24,68, further complicated due to the multitude of sources for general phytoplankton biomarkers. Studies have suggested an empirical average 170‰ kg µM−1 ± 43 kg µM−1 s.d. for b based on a compilation of δ13C values of bulk organic matter in marine surface sediments, as well as some limited phytol studies39,50. Furthermore, we use an average Ɛf for phytoplankton species of 26.5‰ ± 1.5‰ uniform distribution39 based on the 25 to 28‰ range observed in laboratory cultures69. As described above, uncertainty was calculated using Monte Carlo simulations, considering each individual parameter with its associated uncertainty, as described by Witkowski et al.39. Here, we include the uncertainties associated with Ɛp plus the new additional uncertainties associated with b ± 43 kg µM−1 s.d., Ɛf ± 1.5‰ uniform distribution, T °C ± 0.5 °C s.d., and sea surface salinity ± 1‰ s.d.

The resulting phytol-based CO2[aq] values range from 9.3 to 39.4 µM (Fig. 4B). The highest value of 39.2 µM (+ 20.6/− 11.0 µM) is near the vent at Site 1, dropping to 23.7 µM (+ 7.1/− 5.2 µM) at Site 2, then to 14.3 µM (+ 3.0/− 2.7 µM) at Site 3, before gently declining to 9.6 µM (± 1.8 µM) at the control Site 16. If we calculate the pCO2 from CO2[aq] using Henry’s Law constant K0, which considers salinity and temperature70, the resulting pCO2 reconstruction range from 280 to 1,182 µatm (Fig. 4C). The highest pCO2 values were reconstructed for the sites closest to the seep, Site 1 at 1,200 µatm (+ 636/− 333 µatm) and Site 2 at 728 µatm (+ 222/− 158 µatm), while the remainder of the transect showed fairly ambient values from Site 3 at 438 µatm (+ 95/− 80 µatm) to the Site 16 control at 294 (+ 56/− 50 µatm).

Comparison of CO2[aq] estimates with those reported for sites63 equivalent of our Site 2, 9, and 16 (30 µM ± 7, 14 µM ± 1, and 12 µM ± 1, respectively; Fig. 4B), show that these estimates agree within uncertainty, suggesting that our approach yields reasonable estimates. Only at the control site there is a slight underestimation of CO2 concentrations. One possible explanation is an incorrect assumption for the b value. However, this seems unlikely given that (i) b values would need to be increased beyond any known b value thus observed to account for this underestimation, and (ii) this would lead to even higher past pCO2 estimations which are based on b values compiled from laboratory cultures and natural experiments39. A more likely explanation is the change in phytoplankton community over the bay, where the control community is dominated by high affinity CCM species as observed for macroalgae49. Given that these species actively pump bicarbonate under low CO2 conditions, this may explain the lessened Ɛp, yielding lower CO2 estimations. This effect has also been observed in the mesocosm experiments with different CO2 concentrations40, especially if there is limited carbon dioxide leakage from cells. Recent studies have shown lower sensitivity of Ɛp to CO2 in laboratory cultures and in glacial-interglacial reconstructions caused by the upregulation of phytoplankton CCMs24,33, which suggest using this Ɛp based proxy with caution in reconstructing low-CO2 worlds. In contrast, the proxy seems to do well in estimating pCO2 concentrations similar to some of the higher concentrations that have been reconstructed over the past 455 Myr39, suggesting it may be applicable for past greenhouse worlds.

Conclusion

We tested three general phytoplankton biomarkers in surface sediments in a transect from a naturally occurring CO2 seep located in Levante bay, Vulcano Island, Italy, towards the open Tyrrhenian Sea. The δ13C of the biomarkers showed a distinct increase with increasing distance from the CO2 seep, in agreement with the idea that CO2 concentrations have a strong control on isotopic fractionation. In particular, the δ13C of phytol yielded a strong and consistent trend throughout the transect, and the agreement between estimated and measured CO2 concentrations demonstrates the promise of this biomarker for paleo pCO2 reconstructions. Our results show that CO2 seep environments may prove a useful testing ground for new CO2 proxies.

Materials and methods

Sample site

Levante Bay (Fig. 1) is located on the northeast of Vulcano Island, an Aeolian Island north of Sicily. Volcanic activity on the island started in the upper Pliocene71, where the cooling of magmatic and hydrothermal fluid mixing into the crater fumeroles is believed to have created the pocket of CO2, which outgasses into the bay72. Located at ca. 1 m depth at 38.41694° N 14.96° E, the main underwater venting gas field outputs ca. 3.6 tons of gas per day73. This gas is composed of 97–98% CO2 and ca. 2% H2S63. The sea water temperature63 of ca. 19.7 °C and salinity43 of ca. 38‰ is homogenous throughout the small bay. Currents are mostly wind-driven, with minimal tidal range (< 40 cm) and depths throughout the entire bay, and thus all sample sites, ranged between 1 and 2 m. Precipitation varies throughout the year, with the dry months (May–August) averaging 16 mm/month and the wet months (October–January) averaging 87 mm/month. The input of CO2 gas intensely influences the geochemical composition of the bay’s waters, as seen by the strong pH gradient starting at the seep to across the bay from pH 5.5 to 8.2 in April and from pH 6 to 8 in September. For more details on the geochemistry, see Boatta et al.63.

Materials

Samples were collected in 23–24 May and 16–17 October of 2017. A preliminary study was conducted in May using one site with a high CO2 concentration, two sites with a middle CO2 concentration, and one control site (i.e. not affected by the CO2 seep) as defined in Johnson et al.43, where seawater was collected for the δ13C of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and surface sediments were collected for the δ13C of biomarker lipids. Seawater for DIC analysis was collected by overfilling glass vials and adding mercury chloride (0.5%) before sealing the vials closed with Apiezon M grease and securing the stopper with rubber bands. Surface sediments were collected by diving, scooped into geochemical bags, and immediately frozen; once back in the lab, these sediments were freeze-dried and kept refrigerated. All surface sediments were collected in triplicate at each site within a square of 2 by 2 m. The same sediment sampling method was used again in October, when a higher-resolution transect of sixteen sites was collected (Fig. 1). Given that the results of the δ13C of DIC collected in May was homogenous throughout the bay (see Table S1), as also revealed by another study in this region48, seawater samples were not collected in October.

Methods

The δ13C of DIC of seawater collected in May was measured on a gas bench coupled to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS) in duplicate. Samples were prepared using 100 µL of 85% H3PO4 then flushed with He. Seawater (500 µL) was injected to each vial, left to react for 1 h, and then the headspace was measured. Standards prepared with 0.3 mg of Na2CO3 and 0.4 mg of Ca2CO3 were flushed with He, injected with 100 µL of 85% H3PO4, and reacted for 1 h. The standards were run at the start and end of each sequence, as well as every six runs.

Sediments were freeze-dried and homogenized using a mortar and pestle. Sediments were then extracted using a Dionex 250 accelerated solvent extractor at 7.6 × 106 Pa at 100 °C using dichloromethane (DCM): MeOH (9:1 v/v). Extracts were transferred to centrifuge tubes to be refluxed with 1 N KOH in MeOH and the resulting base hydrolyzed extracts were neutralized to pH 5 using 2 N HCl in MeOH. The hydrolyzed extract was separated into apolar (hexane: DCM, 9:1 v/v), ketone (DCM), and polar (DCM: MeOH, 1:1 v/v) fractions, respectively, over an alumina column. Polar fractions were silylated with pyridine: N,O-Bis(trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide (1:1 v/v) and heated for 1 h at 60 °C. The δ13C values of loliolide, cholesterol, and phytol were corrected for the addition of three C atoms in the trimethylsilyl group using the known δ13C value of BSTFA (− 32.2‰).

Silylated polar fractions were then injected on gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID) to determine relative abundances and general quality of chromatography before analyzing it on a gas chromatography–mass spectrometer (GC–MS) to identify compounds and on gas chromatography-isotope ratio-mass spectrometer (GC-IRMS) to measure the isotopic composition of specific compounds. GC-FID, GC–MS, and IRMS instrumentation all had starting oven temperatures of 70 ºC ramped at 20 ºC/min to 130 ºC and then ramped at 4 ºC/min to 320 ºC for 10 min. Separation was accomplished using a CP-Sil 5 column (25 m × 0.32 mm; df 0.12 μm) with He carrier gas. System performance on all three instruments was conducted daily using the same in-house mixture of n-alkanes and fatty acids. Additional standards were run on the IRMS using perdeuterated n-alkanes (C20 and C24) with known δ13C values (− 32.7 and − 27.0‰, respectively) and were limited to uncertainty within the standard of ± 0.5‰; if outside this range, the machine was conditioned until it was within this limit. The IRMS was also oxidized regularly, with a daily oxidation of 10 min, backflushed with He for 10 min, and purged for 5 min; a shorter version of this sequence was conducted in post-sample seed oxidation, which includes 2 min oxidation, 2 min He backflush, and 2 min purge conditioning line and a longer version of this sequence was conducted at the end of each week with 1 h oxidation, 1 h He backflush, and 10 min purge conditioning line.

Data availability

All data are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials.

References

  1. 1.

    Caillon, N. et al. Timing of atmospheric CO2 and Antarctic temperature changes across termination III. Science 299, 1728–1731. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078758 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Petit, J. R. et al. Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica. Nature 399, 429–436 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Betts, R. A., Jones, C. D., Knight, J. R., Keeling, R. F. & El Kennedy, J. J. Niño and a record CO2 rise. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 806–810 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hollis, C. J. et al. The DeepMIP contribution to PMIP4: methodologies for selection, compilation and analysis of latest Paleocene and early Eocene climate proxy data, incorporating version 0.1 of the DeepMIP database. Geosci. Model Dev. 12, 3149–3206. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3149-2019 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Farquhar, G. D., Oleary, M. H. & Berry, J. A. On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the inter-cellular carbon-dioxide concentration in leaves. Aust. J. Plant. Physiol. 9, 121–137 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hayes, J. M., Freeman, K. H., Popp, B. N. & Hoham, C. H. Compound-specific isotopic analyses—a novel tool for reconstruction of ancient biogeochemical processes. Org. Geochem. 16, 1115–1128 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Popp, B. N., Takigiku, R., Hayes, J. M., Louda, J. W. & Baker, E. W. The post-paleozoic chronology and mechanism of C-13 depletion in primary marine organic-matter. Am. J. Sci. 289, 436–454 (1989).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jasper, J. P., Hayes, J. M., Mix, A. C. & Prahl, F. G. Photosynthetic fractionation of C-13 and concentrations of dissolved CO2 in the central equatorial pacific during the last 255,000 years. Paleoceanography 9, 781–798 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Young, J. N., Rickaby, R. E. M., Kapralov, M. V. & Filatov, D. A. Adaptive signals in algal Rubisco reveal a history of ancient atmospheric carbon dioxide. Philos. Trans. R Soc. B 367, 483–492 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Laws, E. A., Thompson, P. A., Popp, B. N. & Bidigare, R. R. Sources of inorganic carbon for marine microalgal photosynthesis: A reassessment of delta C-13 data from batch culture studies of Thalassiosira pseudonana and Emiliania huxleyi. Limnol. Oceanogr. 43, 136–142 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Popp, B. N. et al. Effect of phytoplankton cell geometry on carbon isotopic fractionation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 62, 69–77 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Degens, E. T., Guillard, R. R., Sackett, W. M. & Hellebus, J. A. Metabolic fractionation of carbon isotopes in marine plankton: I. Temperature and respiration experiments. Deep-Sea Res. 15, 1–000. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(68)90024-7 (1968).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Francois, R. et al. Changes in the delta-C-13 of surface-water particulate organic-matter across the subtropical convergence in the SW Indian-Ocean. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 7, 627–644 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Laws, E. A., Popp, B. N., Bidigare, R. R., Kennicutt, M. C. & Macko, S. A. Dependence of phytoplankton carbon isotopic composition on growth-rate and [CO2](Aq)—theoretical considerations and experimental results. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 59, 1131–1138 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Nimer, N. A. & Merrett, M. J. Calcification rate in emiliania-huxleyi lohmann in response to light, nitrate and availability of inorganic carbon. New Phytol. 123, 673–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03776.x (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Rau, G. H., Riebesell, U. & WolfGladrow, D. CO2[aq]-dependent photosynthetic C-13 fractionation in the ocean: A model versus measurements. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 11, 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1029/97gb00328 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bidigare, R. R. et al. Consistent fractionation of C-13 in nature and in the laboratory: Growth-rate effects in some haptophyte algae. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 11, 279–292 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Goericke, R., Montoya, J. P., & Fry, B. In Stable Isotope in Ecology (eds Lajtha, K. & Michener, B.) 187–221 (Blackwell, 1994).

  19. 19.

    Wilkes, E. B., Carter, S. J. & Pearson, A. CO2-dependent carbon isotope fractionation in the dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarense. Geochim.. Cosmochim. Acta 212, 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2017.05.037 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Boller, A. J., Thomas, P. J., Cavanaugh, C. M. & Scott, K. M. Low stable carbon isotope fractionation by coccolithophore RubisCO. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 7200–7207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2011.08.031 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Scott, K. M. et al. Kinetic isotope effect and biochemical characterization of form IA RubisCO from the marine cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus marinus MIT9313. Limnol. Oceanogr. 52, 2199–2204. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2007.52.5.2199 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wilkes, E. B. & Pearson, A. A general model for carbon isotopes in red-lineage phytoplankton: Interplay between unidirectional processes and fractionation by RubisCO. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 265, 163–181 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Rau, G. H., Riebesell, U. & WolfGladrow, D. A model of photosynthetic C-13 fractionation by marine phytoplankton based on diffusive molecular CO2 uptake. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 133, 275–285 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Stoll, H. M. et al. Upregulation of phytoplankton carbon concentrating mechanisms during low CO2 glacial periods and implications for the phytoplankton pCO2 proxy. Quat. Sci. Rev. 208, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.01.012 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Holtz, L. M., Wolf-Gladrow, D. & Thoms, S. Simulating the effects of light intensity and carbonate system composition on particulate organic and inorganic carbon production in Emiliania huxleyi. J. Theor. Biol. 372, 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.02.024 (2015).

    MathSciNet  CAS  Article  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Laws, E. A., Popp, B. N., Bidigare, R. R., Riebesell, U. & Burkhardt, S. Controls on the molecular distribution and carbon isotopic composition of alkenones in certain haptophyte algae. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000gc000057 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Popp, B. N. et al. A new method for estimating growth rates of alkenone-producing haptophytes. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 4, 114–129. https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2006.4.114 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jasper, J. P. & Hayes, J. M. A carbon isotope record of CO2 levels during the late quaternary. Nature 347, 462–464 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Pagani, M., Arthur, M. A. & Freeman, K. H. Miocene evolution of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Paleoceanography 14, 273–292 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Badger, M. P. S. et al. CO2 drawdown following the middle Miocene expansion of the Antarctic Ice Sheet. Paleoceanography https://doi.org/10.1002/palo.20015 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Pagani, M., Zachos, J. C., Freeman, K. H., Tipple, B. & Bohaty, S. Marked decline in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations during the Paleogene. Science 309, 600–603 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zhang, Y. G., Pagani, M., Liu, Z. H., Bohaty, S. M. & DeConto, R. A 40-million-year history of atmospheric CO2. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 371, 20130096 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Badger, M. P. S. et al. Insensitivity of alkenone carbon isotopes to atmospheric CO2 at low to moderate CO2 levels. Clim. Past 15, 539–554. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-539-2019 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zhang, Y. G. et al. Refining the alkenone-pCO2 method I: Lessons from the quaternary glacial cycles. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 260, 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2019.06.032 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Brassell, S. C. Climatic influences on the Paleogene evolution of alkenones. Paleoceanography 29, 255–272 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Bice, K. L. et al. A multiple proxy and model study of Cretaceous upper ocean temperatures and atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Paleoceanography 21, PA2002 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Sinninghe Damsté, J. S., Kuypers, M. M. M., Pancost, R. D. & Schouten, S. The carbon isotopic response of algae, (cyano)bacteria, archaea and higher plants to the late Cenomanian perturbation of the global carbon cycle: Insights from biomarkers in black shales from the Cape Verde Basin (DSDP Site 367). Org. Geochem. 39, 1703–1718 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Naafs, B. D. A. et al. Gradual and sustained carbon dioxide release during Aptian Oceanic Anoxic Event 1a. Nat. Geosci. 9, 135 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Witkowski, C. R., Weijers, J. W. H., Blais, B., Schouten, S. & Sinninghe Damsté, J. S. Molecular fossils from phytoplankton reveal secular PCO2 trend over the Phanerozoic. Sci Adv. 4, eaat4556. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat4556 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Benthien, A. et al. Carbon isotopic fractionation during a mesocosm bloom experiment dominated by Emiliania huxleyi: Effects of CO2 concentration and primary production. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 71, 1528–1541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2006.12.015 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Dando, P. R., Stuben, D. & Varnavas, S. P. Hydrothermalism in the Mediterranean sea. Prog. Oceanogr. 44, 333–367 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Hall-Spencer, J. M. et al. Volcanic carbon dioxide vents show ecosystem effects of ocean acidification. Nature 454, 96–99 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Johnson, V. R. et al. Responses of marine benthic microalgae to elevated CO2. Mar. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-011-1840-2 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Fabricius, K. E. et al. Losers and winners in coral reefs acclimatized to elevated carbon dioxide concentrations. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 165–169 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Brinkman, T. J. & Smith, A. M. Effect of climate change on crustose coralline algae at a temperate vent site, White Island, New Zealand. Mar. Freshw. Res. 66, 360–370 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Agostini, S. et al. Geochemistry of two shallow CO2 seeps in Shikine Island (Japan) and their potential for ocean acidification research. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2, 45–53 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Urbarova, I. et al. Ocean acidification at a coastal CO2 vent induces expression of stress-related transcripts and transposable elements in the sea anemone Anemonia viridis. PLoS ONE 14, e0210358. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218009 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Horwitz, R., Borell, E. M., Yam, R., Shemesh, A. & Fine, M. Natural high pCO2 increases autotrophy in Anemonia viridis (Anthozoa) as revealed from stable isotope (C, N) analysis. Sci. Rep. 5, 8779. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08779 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Cornwall, C. E. et al. Inorganic carbon physiology underpins macroalgal responses to elevated CO2. Sci. Rep. 7, 46297 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Witkowski, C. R. et al. Validation of carbon isotope fractionation in algal lipids as a PCO2 proxy using a natural CO2 seep (Shikine Island, Japan). Biogeosciences 16, 4451–4461. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-4451-2019 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Castañeda, I. S., Werne, J. P. & Johnson, T. C. Influence of climate change on algal community structure and primary productivity of Lake Malawi (East Africa) from the last glacial maximum to present. Limnol. Oceanogr. 54, 2431–2447 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Martin-Creuzburg, D. & von Elert, E. Good food versus bad food: the role of sterols and polyunsaturated fatty acids in determining growth and reproduction of Daphnia magna. Aquat. Ecol. 43, 943–950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-009-9239-6 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    McCarthy, E. D. & Calvin, M. Organic geochemical studies. I. Molecular criteria for hydrocarbon genesis. Nature 216, 642. https://doi.org/10.1038/216642a0 (1967).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Farquhar, G. D., Ehleringer, J. R. & Hubick, K. T. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant. Phys. 40, 503–537 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Klok, J., Cox, H. C., Deleeuw, J. W. & Schenck, P. A. Loliolides and dihydroactinidiolide in a recent marine sediment probably indicate a major transformation pathway of carotenoids. Tetrahedron Lett. 25, 5577–5580 (1984).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Wright, S. W. & Jeffrey, S. Fucoxanthin pigment markers of marine phytoplankton analysed by HPLC and HPTLC. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 38, 259–266 (1987).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Burkhardt, S., Amoroso, G., Riebesell, U. & Sultemeyer, D. CO2 and HCO3 uptake in marine diatoms acclimated to different CO2 concentrations. Limnol. Oceanogr. 46, 1378–1391. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2001.46.6.1378 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Pancost, R. D., Freeman, K. H., Wakeham, S. G. & Robertson, C. Y. Controls on carbon isotope fractionation by diatoms in the Peru upwelling region. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 61, 4983–4991. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00351-7 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Young, J. N. & Hopkinson, B. M. The potential for co-evolution of CO2-concentrating mechanisms and Rubisco in diatoms. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 3751–3762. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx130 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Volkman, J. K. Sterols in microorganisms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 60, 495–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-002-1172-8 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Grice, K. et al. Effects of zooplankton herbivory on biomarker proxy records. Paleoceanography 13, 686–693. https://doi.org/10.1029/98pa01871 (1998).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Mook, W. G., Bommerson, J. C. & Staverman, W. H. Carbon isotope fractionation between dissolved bicarbonate and gaseous carbon-dioxide. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 22, 169–176 (1974).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Boatta, F. et al. Geochemical survey of Levante Bay, Vulcano Island (Italy), a natural laboratory for the study of ocean acidification. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 73, 485–494 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Madigan, M. T., Takigiku, R., Lee, R. G., Gest, H. & Hayes, J. M. Carbon isotope fractionation by thermophilic phototrophic sulfur bacteria—evidence for autotrophic growth in natural-populations. Appl. Environ. Microb. 55, 639–644 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Laws, E. A., Bidigare, R. R. & Popp, B. N. Effect of growth rate and CO2 concentration on carbon isotopic fractionation by the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Limnol. Oceanogr. 42, 1552–1560 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Thomas, P. J. et al. Isotope discrimination by form IC RubisCO from Ralstonia eutropha and Rhodobacter sphaeroides, metabolically versatile members of ‘Proteobacteria’ from aquatic and soil habitats. Environ. Microbiol. 21, 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14423 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Popp, B. N., Kenig, F., Wakeham, S. G., Laws, E. A. & Bidigare, R. R. Does growth rate affect ketone unsaturation and intracellular carbon isotopic variability in Emiliania huxleyi?. Paleoceanography 13, 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1029/97pa02594 (1998).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Hoins, M. et al. CO2-dependent carbon isotope fractionation in dinoflagellates relates to their inorganic carbon fluxes. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 481, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2016.04.001 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Goericke, R. & Fry, B. Variations of marine plankton delta-C-13 with latitude, temperature, and dissolved CO2 in the world ocean. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 8, 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1029/93gb03272 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Weiss, R. F. Carbon dioxide in water and seawater: The solubility of a non-deal gas. Mar. Chem. 2, 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(74)90015-2 (1974).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Frazzetta, G., La Volpe, L. & Sheridan, M. F. Evolution of the Fossa cone, Vulcano. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 17, 139–360 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Chiodini, G., Cioni, R. & Marini, L. Reactions governing the chemistry of crater fumaroles from Vulcano-Island, Italy, and implications for volcanic surveillance. Appl. Geochem. 8, 357–371 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Inguaggiato, S. et al. Total CO2 output from Vulcano Island (Aeolian Islands, Italy). Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GC003920 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Linda Dämmer, Gabriele Turco, James Scott, and Marco Milazzo for their help in sample collection and site permissions. We also thank Jort Ossebaar and Ronald van Bommel at the NIOZ for technical support, as well as Heather Stoll and Luz María Mejía Ramírez for their help in light microscopy. This study received funding from the Netherlands Earth System Science Center (NESSC) through a gravitation grant (024.002.001) to JSSD and SS from the Dutch Ministry for Education, Culture and Science.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.R.W., S.S., and J.S.S.D. designed the study. C.R.W. and N.T.S. collected field samples. C.R.W. analyzed samples and wrote the manuscript. C.R.W., M.T.J.vdM., J.S.S.D., and S.S. interpreted the data. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caitlyn R. Witkowski.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Witkowski, C.R., van der Meer, M.T.J., Smit, N.T. et al. Testing algal-based pCO2 proxies at a modern CO2 seep (Vulcano, Italy). Sci Rep 10, 10508 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67483-8

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing