Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62327-x, published online 26 March 2020
This Article contains errors in the Results section.
Under the subheading ‘Systematic Bias’,
“Interestingly, the systematic bias was approximately zero for postures of θH = 120° and θF = 90°, θH = 90° and θF = 60°, and θH = 60° and θF = 30°, i.e., postures under which the difference between the finger and head angles was −30° (θH − θF = −30°).”
should read:
“Interestingly, the systematic bias was approximately zero for postures of θH = 120° and θF = 90°, θH = 90° and θF = 60°, and θH = 60° and θF = 30°, i.e., postures under which the difference between the finger and head angles was −30° (θF − θH = −30°).”
Under the subheading ‘Nonsystematic Bias’,
“However, no correlation was found between any of the three postures and the amplitude of the nonsystematic bias; indicating that the amplitude of the nonsystematic bias is not posture-related (Fig. 6d for [left panel, middle panel, right panel]: slope = [−0.04, −0.06, −0.01], R2 = [0.09, 0.09, 0.004], t = [−1.48, −1.50, 0.30], p = [0.15, 0.15, 0.77], df = 22, data from participant #1.”
should read:
“However, no correlation was found between any of the three postures and the amplitude of the nonsystematic bias; indicating that the amplitude of the nonsystematic bias is not posture-related (Fig. 6d for [left panel, middle panel, right panel]: slope = [−0.04, −0.06, 0.01], R2 = [0.09, 0.09, 0.004], t = [−1.48, −1.50, 0.30], p = [0.15, 0.15, 0.77], df = 22, data from participant #1.”
Under the subheading ‘Systematic vs nonsystematic bias’,
“In particular, the slope is negative for the systematic bias and positive for the phase of the nonsystematic bias given changes in the head posture and finger-head posture. Similarly, the slope is positive for the systematic bias and negative for the phase of the nonsystematic bias given changes in the finger posture (Fig. 7b).”
should read:
“In particular, the slope is negative for the systematic bias and positive for the phase of the nonsystematic bias given changes in the finger posture and finger-head posture. Similarly, the slope is positive for the systematic bias and nonsignificant for the phase of the nonsystematic bias given changes in the head posture (Fig. 7b).”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, YP., Yeh, CI., Lee, TC. et al. Author Correction: Relative posture between head and finger determines perceived tactile direction of motion. Sci Rep 10, 9354 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65967-1
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65967-1
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
