Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

## Abstract

The effects of elevated levels of radiation contribute to the instability of pharmaceutical formulations in space compared to those on earth. Existing technologies are ineffective at maintaining the therapeutic efficacies of drugs in space. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop novel space-hardy formulations for preserving the stability and efficacy of drug formulations. This work aims to develop a novel approach for the protection of space pharmaceutical drug molecules from the radiation-induced damage to help extend or at least preserve their structural integrity and potency. To achieve this, free radical scavenging antioxidant, Trolox was conjugated on the surface of poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) nanoparticles for the protection of a candidate drug, melatonin that is used as a sleep aid medication in International Space Station (ISS). Melatonin-PLGA-PLL-Trolox nanoparticle as named as PolyRad was synthesized employing single oil in water (o/w) emulsion solvent evaporation method. PolyRad is spherical in shape and has an average diameter of ~600 nm with a low polydispersity index of 0.2. PolyRad and free melatonin (control) were irradiated by UV light after being exposed to a strong oxidant, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Bare melatonin lost ~80% of the active structure of the drug following irradiation with UV light or treatment with H2O2. In contrast, PolyRad protected >80% of the active structure of melatonin. The ability of PolyRad to protect melatonin structure was also carried out using 0, 1, 5 and 10 Gy gamma radiation. Gamma irradiation showed >98% active structures of melatonin encapsulated in PolyRads. Drug release and effectiveness of melatonin using PolyRad were evaluated on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) in vitro. Non-irradiated PolyRad demonstrated maximum drug release of ~70% after 72 h, while UV-irradiated and H2O2-treated PolyRad showed a maximum drug release of ~85%. Cytotoxicity of melatonin was carried out using both live/dead and MTT assays. Melatonin, non-radiated PolyRad and irradiated PolyRad inhibited the viability of HUVEC in a dose-dependent manner. Cell viability of melatonin, PolyRad alone without melatonin (PolyRad carrier control), non-radiated PolyRad, and irradiated PolyRad were ~98, 87, 75 and 70%, respectively at a concentration $$\sim$$ 0.01 $${mg}/{ml}$$ ($$10\mu g/{ml}$$). Taken together, PolyRad nanoparticle provides an attractive formulation platform for preventing damage to pharmaceutical drugs in potential space mission applications.

## Introduction

As NASA prepares for exploration missions beyond low Earth orbit with no opportunities for resupply, pharmaceutical instability may present significant risk to the crew health due to the loss of efficacy over time. Astronauts suffer from sleep disruption during space flight that can affect their mental and physical health in performing routine work1,2,3,4. Therefore, mitigation against the effects of space radiation on pharmaceutical drugs is necessary for the success of long-term space missions. NASA is primarily concerned with the health risks for astronaut exposure to radiation and other flight infections. NASA estimates that a 30-month mission to Mars would expose astronauts to over 900 millisieverts (mSv) (1000 mSv = 1 gray), far beyond safe or acceptable Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) limits of 50 mSv in the United States5,6. Persistent radiation induces oxidative stress associated with the central nervous system, blood coagulation abnormalities, fibrosis, heart failures, gene expression changes, cancer as long-term effects and other physiological abnormalities7,8,9,10.

High energy radiation and oxidative stress due to UV and gamma radiation induce radiolysis of water generating highly reactive hydrogen (H•) and hydroxyl (OH•) radicals that diffuse to other molecules and react with particular chemical groups resulting in a loss of biochemical activity11. There are three mechanisms of radiation damage caused by OH• in the chemical structure of a compound: the abstraction of $$-H$$ by OH• leaving an unpaired electron on the carbon atom, the formation of a hydroxy derivative by breaking double bonds (e.g., $$-C=C-$$) and the electron transfer from anionic groups (e.g., $${{Cl}}^{-}$$) to OH•11. The production of reactive OH• has been demonstrated by chemical means such as UV photolysis of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and gamma irradiation using colbalt-60 (60Co) or cesium 137 (137Cs)12,13,14,15,16,17. The effects of radiation on a variety of pharmaceutical drug molecules have been studied using either gamma radiation or H2O2 hydrolysis by UV light at different doses that show linear proportionality of the decreasing amount of active substances with the dose of radiation18,19,20,21,22.

One way to countermeasure the adverse effects of radiation is by creating an artificial shield. Numerous experimental investigations and theoretical studies have reported the use of a variety of shielding materials that include concrete, polymer composites, heavy metals such as lead, composites of lead oxide, tungsten and tin, etc. for attenuation and absorption of the undesired radiations23,24,25. However, the materials are heavy and bulky that add unwanted features to most spacecraft applications. Materials with lightweight and low volumes are preferred due to space and maneuverability constraints imposed by the vehicles26. Polymers are preferred for their radiation resistant and neutron shielding capabilities27,28,29,30,31,32, however, their mechanical and thermal stability can be compromised by the heat generated from irradiation27. A combination of metal and polymer microparticles and nanoparticles using radiation-resistant polymer has shown to improve the radiation-resistance properties of the composite material28,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42. Based on the previous studies by others, it is hypothesized that polymer nanoparticles can be designed to minimize the radiation induced damage by scavenging free radicals with the use of antioxidants. Other medical countermeasures including small molecule antioxidants, such as radioprotective agents such as melatonin, Trolox, vitamin C, vitamin E, cysteine and others, have also been used as radioprotective agents43,44,45,46.

The objective of this work is to engineer a self-protected medication using a polymeric nanoparticle assembly of a biocompatible polymer, poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), a free radical scavenger molecule (Trolox) and a linker poly-l-lysine (PLL) (Fig. 1a). Melatonin is used as a model relevant to space flight missions. In this design, melatonin was encapsulated in the core of PLGA polymer nanoparticles using an oil/water single emulsion solvent evaporation method. In a separate reaction, Trolox was conjugated to PLL via EDC/NHS chemistry for conjugating the carboxylates in Trolox with the amines in PLL (Fig. 1b). The residual amine groups on PLL-Trolox were further conjugated on the surface of melatonin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles via the same process of EDC/NHS reaction. It is hypothesized that Trolox conjugation on the surface of nanoparticles (PolyRad) protects the chemical stability of melatonin during spaceflight mimicking conditions that generate excessive radiation-induced free radicals through its potential for antioxidant capacity and free radical scavenging activity. We further hypothesize that the PolyRad approach offers great benefits by increasing the specific surface area and accelerating the dissolution velocities of drug molecules, which ultimately has a beneficial impact on the drug release and associated bioavailability.

## Materials and Methods

### Materials

All reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) unless otherwise specified.

Melatonin-PLGA-PLL-Trolox (PolyRad) nanoparticles were prepared in three steps: entrapment of melatonin in PLGA (melatonin-PLGA), conjugation of Trolox with PLL (PLL-Trolox), and surface conjugation of the PLL-Trolox on melatonin-PLGA nanoparticles (melatonin-PLGA-PLL-Trolox). Melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine) was encapsulated in PLGA polymer using water-in-oil (w/o) emulsion phase separation method (Fig. 1a)47,48,49. Briefly, 1 ml of each 1% (w/v) of melatonin dissolved in DMSO and 5% (w/v) of PLGA polymer dissolved in dichloromethane (DCM) were added to 20 ml of 1% (w/v) polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) solution using a syringe pump. The flow rate of 1 ml/h was maintained under sonication and homogenization. The nanoparticle suspension was stirred (350 rpm) overnight (for about 18 h) to remove DCM by evaporation.

Conjugation of Trolox to PLL was carried out by activation of carboxyl groups in Trolox followed by reaction with the primary amine groups of PLL polymer resulting in the formation of amide bonds (Fig. 1b). Briefly, 4 mg of 1-ethyl-3-3-dimethylaminopropyl-carbodiimide (EDC) was directly added to 1 ml of 10 mg/ml Trolox dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) of pH 7.4. Immediately, 6 mg of N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) was added to the reaction. The reaction solution was mixed gently, maintained at pH 7.4, and left at room temperature (R.T.; 25 °C) to react for 15 min. PLL (11.5 mg) was added to the solution that was incubated at R.T. for 2 h while shaking (450 rpm). The residual primary amine groups of PLL-Trolox were conjugated to the surface of melatonin-PLGA nanoparticles using EDC/NHS chemistry. The final reaction solution was filtered using 100 kDa Amicon Ultra-4 centrifugal filters to remove any excess reagents.

### PolyRad characterization: size, surface charge, and melatonin encapsulation efficiency

The size and surface charge of particles before and after PLL-Trolox conjugation on melatonin encapsulated PLGA nanoparticles were measured using dynamic light scattering (DLS) and zeta potential measurements, respectively using a NanoSeries Zetasizer ZS 90 (Malvern). Samples were prepared in deionized (DI) water. Encapsulation of melatonin in PolyRad nanoparticles was assessed by measuring the absorbance at 300 nm using a microplate reader (BioTek Synergy 2) and a melatonin standard curve (S.I. Figure 1). The percentage of melatonin encapsulation capacity was calculated using the following Eq. 1:

$$\% \,encapsulation\,efficiency=\frac{{M}_{0}-({M}_{u}-{M}_{s})}{{M}_{0}}\times 100$$
(1)

where, M0 = Initial melatonin mass, Mu = Melatonin mass in unwashed suspension and Ms = Melatonin mass in supernatant$$.$$

### Characterization of PLGA-PLL-Trolox formulation using Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Spectroscopy

FTIR spectroscopy was used to confirm the structural changes that occurred after PLL-Trolox conjugation with PLGA nanoparticles. Samples for FT-IR spectroscopy were prepared by mixing and grinding freeze-dried nanoparticles with FT-IR grade potassium bromide (KBr; Alpha Aesar) (w:w ratio of 1:100) to make pulverized pellets. FT-IR absorption spectra were obtained using a Thermo Nicolet NEXUS 470 FTIR instrument in the wavelength range from 4000 to 400 cm−1 at a resolution of 4 cm−1 using 32 scans per sample. The effect of background noise from the ambient air without a sample in place was subtracted from the sample spectra. All spectra were analyzed using EZ OMNIC E.S.P v.5.1 software (Thermo Scientific). The resulting FTIR spectra of PLGA-PLL-Trolox were compared to individual spectra of PLGA, PLL, and Trolox to characterize the conjugation reaction based on the intensity or shift of the vibrational bands.

### Determination of the composition of melatonin-PLGA-PLL-Trolox (PolyRad) nanoparticles using1H-NMR spectroscopy

For 1H-NMR spectroscopy, 10 mg of PolyRad nanoparticles, melatonin alone, PLGA alone, PLL alone, and Trolox alone were dissolved in 750 μl of DMSO-d6 except for PLGA, which was dissolved in d-Chloroform. Each solvent was used as the internal reference to determine chemical shifts (δ) in ppm. 1H-NMR spectra were then recorded using Bruker advanced III 400 MHz Liquid-State NMR instrument at R.T.

### Fluorometric Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging Capacity (HOSC) assay

A fluorometric HOSC assay was applied to determine the mechanisms of highly reactive free radical absorption by PLGA-PLL-Trolox composite and Trolox alone was used as a standard50. OH• radicals were generated using Fe (III)/H2O2 Fenton-like reaction system in a pH 7.4 sodium phosphate buffer51. Assay reactions were carried out in Costar black 96-well polystyrene plates and analyzed using a microplate reader (BioTek Synergy 2) with an excitation wavelength of 485 nm, emission wavelength of 530 nm, and 0.1 s read time for each well with each plate read once per minute for 3 h. The reaction mixture contained 170 μl of 9.28 × 10−8 M fluorescein (FL) prepared in 75 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 30 μl of blank or antioxidant, 40 μl of 0.1990 M H2O2 and 60 μl of 3.43 mM FeCl3 added in that order50. Trolox concentrations of 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 μM were used. Relative fluorescence intensity of each Trolox standard concentrations were calculated by dividing individual fluorescence readings by the initial fluorescence reading at time equal to zero.

To examine the resistance to photochemical degradation of melatonin, 2 mg of PolyRads containing 2.5 μg melatonin were dissolved in 1 ml 40% acetonitrile-60% water (v/v) solvent and spiked with 0.75 mM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) followed by UV radiation at 254 nm and 39 W spectral output for 0, 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h. H2O2 is known to be decomposed into hydroxyl radical (OH•) and superoxide ions ($${O}_{2}^{-{\boldsymbol{.}}}$$) when exposed to UV radiation. Pure melatonin powder was used as a control and were treated with 0.75 mM H2O2 followed by UV irradiation at every 20 min for up to 2 h. The reaction progress was monitored by determination of melatonin concentration and its two degradant products (N1-acetyl-N2-formyl-5-methoxykynuramine, AFMK and 6-hydroxymelatonin) using Agilent 1260 Liquid Chromatography (LC) High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) apparatus equipped with Waters C18 column of 4.6 × 250 mm (particle size 5 μm). The system consisted of a vacuum degasser, a binary pump unit, an autosampler for sample injections, a thermostat column compartment, and a photodiode array detector (DAD) for peak analysis at 304 nm. The mobile phase used was acetonitrile −25 mM ammonium acetate (40:60, v/v). The system was run at ambient temperature (~22 °C) with a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. Sample injections of 30 μl were taken and observed for characteristic peaks over 8 min intervals between injections. Quantification of melatonin and degradation products were carried out using calibration curves obtained by repeated injections of standard solutions of known concentration.

The effects of gamma irradiation on the chemical structure of melatonin were carried out using radioactive cobalt 60 (60Co) isotope of activity 200 mCi. Two sample groups of melatonin alone and PolyRad were prepared in 1 ml of 10 mg/ml aqueous solutions and irradiated at 1, 5 and 10 Gray (Gy) doses. Non-radiated (0 Gy) melatonin and nanoparticles were used as controls. The samples were lyophilized and dissolved in DMSO-d6. The effects of gamma irradiation on the structure of melatonin alone and melatonin in PolyRad nanoparticles were investigated using 1H-NMR spectroscopy (Bruker instrument 400 MHz). The spectra were calibrated and normalized relative to DMSO-d6 at 25 °C (δ = 0 ppm). After 1H-NMR measurements, the relative area under the curves were calculated with respect to non-radiated melatonin standards and plotted as a function of radiation doses.

### In vitrodrug release kinetics

In vitro release of melatonin from non-irradiated and irradiated PolyRad was carried out in PBS at pH 7.4. Each 10 mg of PolyRad and melatonin powder were put in separate 1.5 ml centrifuge tubes and exposed to 0.75 mM H2O2 followed by UV irradiation for 2 h. PolyRad was suspended in 10 ml PBS and kept in a 37 °C water bath. PBS solution of 500 μl was withdrawn at 0, 5, 10, 15 and 30 min and then at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h. The solution was centrifuged at 1000 rcf for 1 min. The supernatant (150 μl) was put in a 96 well assay plate in triplicates. PBS was used as a blank. Melatonin concentrations were measured using absorbance at 300 nm using the microplate reader and melatonin standard curve. The drug release kinetics data were plotted as log cumulative drug release versus log time (Eq. 2).

$$\log ({M}_{(t-\tau )}/{M}_{\infty }-b)=m\,\log (t-\tau )+\,\log \,k$$
(2)

where $${M}_{(t-\tau )}$$ is the cumulative drug release at time $$t$$, $${M}_{\infty }$$ is the cumulative drug release at infinite time, $${M}_{(t-\tau )}/{M}_{\infty }$$ is the fractional drug release at time $$t$$, $$\tau$$ is the lag time, $$b$$ is the fractional drug burst release, $$k$$ is a kinetic constant that measures the drug release rate characteristic of the drug/polymer system, and $$n$$ is the release exponent which characterizes the drug release mechanism52,53,54,55,56,57,58.

### Melatonin cytotoxicity

To determine and compare the cytotoxicity of melatonin on endothelial cells, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were treated with free melatonin, melatonin-loaded PolyRad (carrier control), PolyRad, PolyRad treated with 10 Gy of gamma radiation, and PolyRad treated with 0.75 mM of H2O2 followed by 1 h of UV radiation. HUVEC were seeded in Costar 96 well assay plate (sterile, black, clear-bottom with lid) at a cell density of 10,000 cells/well. The cells were incubated in PromoCell medium with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (10,000 units/ml) at a 37 °C and 5% CO2 incubator. Cells were allowed to grow overnight. The cells were incubated for 72 h with melatonin solution control and PolyRad at melatonin concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, 1 and 10 mg/ml. PBS was used as a negative control. Untreated viable (live) HUVEC were used as a positive control. After 72 h, cells were rinsed with PBS and cellular viability were measured using MTT assay (Invitrogen). The reduction of MTT to formazan by viable HUVEC was quantified measuring absorbance at 570 nm. Absorbance of treated cells were measured and calculated by subtracting the mean background level of wells containing the medium. The % cell viability was calculated as absorbance ratio of treated cells to live cells as shown in Eq. (3):

$$\% \,{\rm{cell}}\,{\rm{viability}}=\frac{{A}_{570{\rm{of}}{\rm{sample}}}-{A}_{570{\rm{of}}{\rm{medium}}}}{{A}_{570{\rm{of}}{\rm{live}}{\rm{cells}}}-{A}_{570{\rm{of}}{\rm{medium}}}}\times 100$$
(3)

To visualize cells under fluorescence microscope, live and dead cells were stained using 2 μM calcein AM and 4 μM of EthD-1, respectively following the manufacturer’s protocol. Images were acquired using a 10X Plan Fluor (NA = 0.3) objective equipped with a Carl Zeiss Axio Observer Z1 microscope at excitation/emissions of 470 ± 40/525 ± 50 and 545 ± 25/605 ± 70, respectively.

## Results

We synthesized melatonin-encapsulated PLGA nanoparticles with an average diameter of 325 ± 21 nm (Fig. 2a), polydispersity index (pDI) of 0.07 ± 0.05, and a zeta potential of about −23 ± 8.5 mV (Fig. 2b) as confirmed by the DLS analysis. The PLL-Trolox shell attributed to the increase in particle size due to the deposition of its complex onto the surface of melatonin-PLGA nanoparticles. The average diameter of PLL-Trolox conjugated PolyRad nanoparticles were approximately 90% larger (622 ± 114 nm; Fig. 2c) than melatonin-PLGA control nanoparticles without PLL-Trolox shell as seen by the shift in the average peak intensity to the right-hand side. The pDI and zeta potential increased to 0.23 ± 0.12 and 29 ± 10 mV (Fig. 2d), respectively, indicating the successful conjugation of positively charged PLL on the surface of nanoparticles. The encapsulation efficiency of melatonin inside nanoparticles was determined as 44 ± 12% (Table 1).

### Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) for the determination of PLL and Trolox conjugation to PLGA nanoparticles

PLL-Trolox conjugation to PLGA nanoparticles was accomplished by reacting amine groups of PLL with carboxyl groups (-COOH) in PLGA. FTIR studies were carried out to characterize the related structural modifications (Fig. 3). PLGA spectra’s absorbance peaks appear strong at 1,765–1,720 cm−1 for ester carbonyl and carboxyl C=O stretch, ether C-O-C stretch absorbance peak at 1,290–1,180 cm−1, and secondary alcohol C-O stretch at 1,124–1,087 cm−1 (Fig. 3a). Broad medium absorbance peak of PLGA alkyl C-H stretch at 3,000–2,840 cm−1 and alcohol O-H at 3,550–3,200 cm−1. PLL’s spectra present strong amide C=O stretch peak at 1,680–1,640 cm−1, a broad, strong primary and secondary N-H stretch peak at 3,500–3,250 cm−1 and 3,350–3,310 cm−1, respectively (Fig. 3b). Also, a broad medium bend of PLL alkyl C-H stretch peak and amine N-H stretch appear correspondingly at 3,000–2,840 cm−1 and 1,650–1,540 cm−1. Trolox spectra shows strong phenol O-H peak at 3,550–3,200 cm−1 and carboxylic C=O stretch peak at 1,720–1,706 cm−1 (Fig. 3c). Numerous ether C-O-C peaks at 1,300–1,000 cm−1 and a broad, medium carboxylic O-H stretch peak at 3,300–2,500 cm−1 were observed. PLGA-PLL-Trolox composite spectrum displays strong secondary N-H, medium alkyl C-H, and amide C=O stretch peaks from PLL and strong phenol O-H, ether C-O-C stretch peaks from Trolox, and ester carbonyl C=O stretch and secondary alcohol C-O stretch peaks from PLGA, confirming the presence of three blocks in the synthesized composite (Fig. 3d).

### Confirmation of the composition of PolyRad nanoparticles using1H NMR Assay

Formation of melatonin-PLGA-PLL-Trolox nanoparticles was evaluated using 1H-NMR (Fig. 4). The NMR results depicted a successful conjugation of PLL-Trolox on melatonin encapsulated PLGA nanoparticles to form PolyRad nanoparticles compared to their independent control NMR peaks (melatonin, PLGA, PLL, and Trolox alone). In Fig. 4, proton peaks at 2.5 and 7.25 ppm represent solvent background signals from DMSO-d6 and d-Chloroform, while the broad peak at 3.25 ppm represents residue water proton peak. Proton peaks from PLL, denoted by a, b, c and d which correspond to -CH-, -NH-, -CH2-, and -NH2 groups occurred at 1.7, 3.5, 4.75 and 5.2 ppm, respectively. Also, melatonin distinctive peaks denoted by letters ‘e-n’ correspond to the -CH3-, the two -CH2-, -CH3O-, the three phenyl -CH-, the cyclic -CH-, and the two -NH- respectively. These peaks were recorded at 1.8, 2.75, 3.25, 3.75, 6.75–7.25, 7.25, 7.8 and 11.6 ppm, respectively. For Trolox, distinctive peaks were lettered ‘o-v’. Trolox 1H-NMR peaks showed propionic acid -CH3- (o) and -OH- (p) protons at 1.5 and 1.75 ppm respectively, cyclic -CH2- (q and r) at 1.9–2.1 ppm, phenyl methane protons (s, t and u) at 2.0–2.2 and 2.6 ppm, and the phenyl -OH- (v) protons at 7.25 ppm. Proton peaks for PLGA were labeled from ‘w-z’ and then ‘#’. PLGA proton peaks displayed lactide -CH3- (w), -CH- (y), and glycolide -CH2- (x) protons at 1.5, 6.2 and 5.5 ppm respectively. However, the lactide end and the glycolide end -OH- protons (z and # respectively) in PLGA were missing probably by being lost to neighboring protons. Comparing with the 1H-NMR of the individual components, 1H-NMR of nanoparticles displayed virtually all the peaks that were shown in the individual components as shown in Fig. 4. However, the chemical shift of protons (b) in PLL formed an amide bond with the lactide end -OH- protons (z) of PLGA, hence we had that this amide bond occurred around 3–3.5 ppm in the NPs’ 1H-NMR. Likewise, proton peak at 5.25 ppm in the NPs’ 1H-NMR corresponds to the -NH- group of the corresponding amide bond (CONH) between primary amino group of PLL (d) and the carboxyl group of Trolox (p).

### Scavenging capacity of Trolox using fluorometric HOSC assay

Trolox serves as a potent scavenger of OH• radicals, efficiently blocks the effects of highly reactive free radicals even at low concentration and therefore, is tested to prevent the photochemical degradation of melatonin in PolyRad nanoparticulate form. Fluorometric Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging Capacity (HOSC) was performed to analyze the OH• scavenging capacity of Trolox in its free solution. Results showed that an increase in Trolox concentration in the HOSC medium increased the free radical scavenging capacity of Trolox. Figure 5 shows the fluorescence decay curve of fluorescein with time in the presence of different Trolox concentrations. In the absence of Trolox (Blank), the fluorescence intensity of fluorescein was quenched rapidly with more than 50% reduction in the relative fluorescence intensity within 10 min, indicating the reaction of fluorescein with OH• radicals caused by the Fenton like Fe3+/H2O2 system. Trolox worked as OH• radical scavenging agent that delayed the decay in fluorescence intensity of fluorescein by diminishing the quenching rate significantly in a dose-dependent manner. As the Trolox concentration was increased from 20 to 100 μM, the capacity for scavenging OH• radicals increased. The ~100% fluorescence intensity retention time were 10, 50, 80, 100 and 120 min using 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 μM Trolox, respectively.

To study the effect of photochemical oxidation on the structure of melatonin in PolyRad formulation, irradiation experiments were performed on PolyRad suspensions using H2O2 in 40% acetonitrile-60% water solvent followed by UV light exposure. Bare melatonin was used as a control. This process relies on the production of OH• through the irradiation of H2O2 with UV radiation: $${H}_{2}{O}_{2}\mathop{\to }\limits^{h\nu }2{\rm{OH}}\bullet$$ that degrades melatonin12,15. The influence of H2O2 and UV on melatonin degradation was analyzed with time using HPLC (Fig. 6a). The melatonin peak did not change by more than ~20% by UV treatment only for 2 h (Fig. 6a; hatched column). UV irradiation in the presence of H2O2 influenced the disappearance of the melatonin peak by ~80% within 2 h (Fig. 6a; filled column). Pure melatonin control showed only one characteristic peak with a retention time of 5.67 min eluted from the HPLC column (Fig. 6b). The photochemical degradation of melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine) formed two major degradant peaks (B and C) at 4.7- and 1.98-min retention times for N1-acetyl-N2-formyl-5-methoxykynuramine (AFMK) and 6-hydroxymelatonin, respectively4,59,60,61. The measured changes of AFMK and 6-hydroxymelatonin concentrations increased as a function of different UV exposure time in the presence of H2O2 (SI Figs. 2–4). Also, a peak at ~ 3.95 min, likely due to the melatonin degradation product, N-acetyl-5-methoxykynuramine (AMK) is seen. The overall reaction followed a first-order reaction: $$-{r}_{{Melatonin}}=k{C}_{{melatonin}}$$, where $$-{r}_{{Melatonin}}$$, $$k$$ and $${C}_{{melatonin}}$$ represent the rate of disappearance of melatonin, reaction rate constant and concentration of melatonin, respectively (SI Fig. 5). The reaction rate constant ($$k$$) is determined as $$(8\times {10}^{-5}){{\min }}^{-1}$$ (SI Fig. 5a). In contrast to bare melatonin (Fig. 6c, hatched column), a remarkable reduction of melatonin degradation was observed using PolyRad nanoparticles (Fig. 6c, filled column). PolyRad protected ~75, 65, 55 and 15% of the active structure of melatonin after UV irradiation only, and 2 h of UV followed by 0.75, 1, and 5 mM of H2O2 exposure, respectively indicating that nanoparticles scavenged H2O2 in a concentration-dependent manner. Encapsulation of melatonin using PolyRad nanoparticles reduced the formation of AFMK by ~50% (SI Fig. 6).

### 1H-NMR spectrometry studies on molecular structure of melatonin after gamma radiation

Based on the 1H NMR spectrum of melatonin as presented in Fig. 7a and Table 2, major melatonin peaks are observed at 1.9 (NHCOCH3), 2.9 (CH2), 3.5 (CH2NH), 3.9 (OCH3) and 6.9–7.4 ppm (benzene aromatic rings and NHCHO). Free melatonin is degraded into other compounds that appear at 3.2, 3.6 and 3.78 ppm and predominantly at 10.6 (OH•) and 10.9 (NHCO) ppm. Melatonin in PolyRad nanoparticles did not show any significant differences between the non-radiated control and gamma irradiated PolyRad samples. The percentage of active melatonin remaining was calculated using the integral ratio of peaks of groups I through V (Table 2) based on the non-radiated melatonin control (Fig. 7b). The structural integrity of melatonin alone was completely degraded to 25.7, 10.8 and 5.5% at 1, 5 and 10 Gy, respectively compared to non-radiated free melatonin. The nanoparticle plays a critical role in the protection of melatonin by >98% most likely by scavenging of free radicals generated from gamma radiation62.

### In vitrodrug release kinetics

The melatonin release kinetics from PolyRad is shown in Fig. 8a before and after radiation. A total of 70% melatonin was released from non-radiated nanoparticles after 72 h at pH 7.4. Notably, more than 50% of the drug was released after only 2 h, suggesting a spontaneous rapid degradation of solid nanoparticles under physiological conditions. Exposure to radiation elicited higher drug release, reaching >90% drug release in 72 h. The drug release profile follows a biphasic pattern, indicating a controlled drug release mechanism. The data from in vitro experiments were fitted to a power-law model to investigate the kinetics of melatonin release (Fig. 8b and Table 3). The cumulative release is linear with respect to time, $$t$$ ($${R}^{2} > 0.97$$) where diffusion exponent $$n$$ varies between 0.1–0.3, indicating a Fickian diffusion profile. The rate constant ($$k$$) varies between 0.3–0.4 suggesting a slow melatonin release from PolyRad.

### Cytotoxicity assay

The effects of melatonin solution, PolyRad without melatonin and PolyRad (with melatonin) on the viability of HUVEC were analyzed using MTT assay and live/dead assay imaging (Fig. 9). As the concentration of melatonin in PolyRad (♦) increases, cell viability decreases from 75% to ~60% at melatonin concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 10 mg/ml. Free melatonin (■) showed ~90% cell viability at 0.01 mg/ml which dropped to ~65% at 10 mg/ml. Independent radiation treatments using gamma (×) and UV irradiation (+) after H2O2 exposure showed similar effects on cell viability as non-radiated PolyRad, indicating radiation did not affect the release of melatonin from the nanoparticles. Melatonin free PolyRad (•) had no significant toxicity at 0.01 and 0.1 mg/ml, the cell viability dropped to ~65% at 10 mg/ml. Results show an increased melatonin cytotoxicity in the order of free melatonin, non-irradiated PolyRad and irradiated PolyRad. We further studied if melatonin and PolyRad interfered with the cell viability of HUVEC. As shown in Fig. 9b, live cells after treated with 0.01 mg/ml each of melatonin and PolyRad fluoresce green as stained with calcein AM. Cells show a slight cytotoxicity as assessed by dead cell staining (red fluorescence) using EthD-1.

## Discussion

Melatonin is an endogenous neurohormone that regulates many biological functions such as sleep, circadian rhythm, immune responses and cardiac functions, among others63,64,65,66. Changes of environment in spaceflight compared to that on Earth disrupt sleep and circadian clock in astronauts’ physiology decreasing the performance1,67,68. Sleep medications such as melatonin are used to improve astronauts’ circadian rhythms and sleep4. Space medication is a challenge because of the instability of active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) in the presence of harsh spaceflight environmental conditions. Altered physical and chemical stability in pharmaceuticals can result in reduced potency which can result in reduced efficacy. It has been tested that the API of melatonin degrades in the adverse environments of space station4,60. The traditional approach to overcome the limitation is to replace medicines from the International Space Station (ISS) before their expiration. However, this is not a practical solution for longer duration missions to planets (e.g., Mars). Hence, it is desired that medicines maintain their shelf-life throughout the duration of the space mission. Contrary to standard dispensing practices on Earth, pharmaceuticals are packed and dispensed in special flight-certified containers and stored inside compactly packed kits. The packaging could affect the active pharmaceutical ingredients and therapeutic efficacy of medications in space60,69. The shielding material should meet the requirement of application in radiotherapy, should be light-weight, flexible, environmental friendly and easily recyclable. According to these requirements, there is a need to provide effective shielding against space medications with materials of appropriate designs that can maintain the stability of space medicines.

Our results show that antioxidant conjugated polymeric nanoparticles (PLGA-PLL-Trolox) can act as an effective and protective shield for pharmaceuticals that are being exposed to high energy radiations in space. Trolox antioxidant effectively acts as a radiation-induced highly reactive OH• scavenger that protects the pharmaceuticals prolongating the shelf-life and thus the potency. Trolox can scavenge free radicals through a variety of reaction mechanisms, as it is the case for many other scavengers62. Four reaction mechanisms have been reported to significantly contribute to the OH• scavenging capacity of Trolox in aqueous solution: hydrogen transfer (HT), radical adduct formation (RAF), single electron transfer (SET) and sequential proton loss electron transfer (SPLET)62. The free radical scavenging capacity of Trolox has been shown to reduce oxidative stress in aqueous systems as well as epithelial cells, hepatic injury and red blood cells in vitro and in vivo70,71,72,73,74. Fluorescein, organic compound used in this assay, has characteristic of high photostability, stability at physiological pH and is highly sensitive to OH• attacks. Accordingly, Trolox protected fluorescein from OH• attacks by scavenging the radicals, prolonging the relative fluorescein intensity. Figure 5 shows that conjugation of Trolox to the surface of drug-loaded PolyRad leads to successful shielding of encapsulated pharmaceuticals from the damaging effects of photochemical degradation. When PolyRads were photochemically degraded using UV light and H2O2, part of their covalent bonds dissociated which in turn protected the active structure of melatonin (Fig. 6c). AFMK and 6-hydroxymelatonin appear to be the two main degradants of pure melatonin which is blocked in PolyRad formulations. The antiradical activity of PolyRad was further detected using gamma radiation and analyzed via 1H NMR showing>98% protection of active melatonin structure in nanoparticles (Fig. 7a,b).

In vitro drug release follows a biphasic kinetics pattern. The in vitro release for non-irradiated PolyRad showed a burst release of ~20% of the encapsulated melatonin (Fig. 8a). The initial burst release decreased after photochemical degradation. The polymer coating began to disintegrate, releasing ~65% and 75% of total melatonin from non-radiated and irradiated PolyRad, respectively after 24 h and ~70% and 85% from non-radiated and irradiated PolyRad, respectively after 72 h. The exponent, n, characteristic of the overall mechanism of drug release increased after photochemical degradation (Fig. 8b). The values of the exponent of time, n, indicating that the release of melatonin (high diffusivity) is at least partially controlled by the scission of the polymer. The in vitro data provide guidance for understanding the fundamentals of melatonin drug release. In vitro cell culture studies indicate that melatonin and PolyRad induce cytotoxicity to HUVEC in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 9a)75,76. Generation of reactive oxygen species has been reported to promote apoptosis in HUVEC while maintaining normal redox homeostasis77,78. It is possible that PolyRad increases ROS production suggesting higher cell death at concentrations above 0.01 mg/ml (10 μg/ml). The ability of PolyRad to release melatonin was not affected after irradiation. PolyRad is as potent as free melatonin in eliciting therapeutic effects in HUVEC growth (Fig. 9b).

## Conclusion

Here, we have described a new technology for protection of pharmaceuticals against radiation induced damages (i.e., free radical exposure), which is likely to occur during space missions. We synthesized PolyRad nanoparticles, 325 ± 21 nm in hydrodynamic diameter, using the emulsion solvent evaporation method by encapsulating melatonin within the nanoparticles to protect APIs from radiation damage. Conjugation of Trolox to the surface of PLGA nanoparticles significantly inhibited the photochemical degradation of active melatonin. Nonetheless, the current results are promising and continue to shed light on the inherent benefits of Trolox as an antioxidant that acts as a free radical scavenger to shield spaceflight pharmaceuticals from the deleterious effects of incident radiation and helps maintain their shelf-life and potency. PolyRad is demonstrated to be particularly useful for shielding space pharmaceuticals from the toxic effects of space radiation as induced by free radicals with the conjugation of antioxidants on the surface of the nanoparticles. Results from this research can be further extended to cancer treatment by reducing oxidative stress and preventing the damage of normal cells caused by high-energy radiation therapy, which is used to shrink tumors and kill cancer cells.

## References

1. 1.

Wu, B. et al. On-orbit sleep problems of astronauts and countermeasures. Military Medical Research 5, 17–12 (2018).

2. 2.

Bevelacqua, J. J. & Mortazavi, S. M. J. Commentary regarding “on-orbit sleep problems of astronauts and countermeasures”. Military Medical Research 5, 38–35 (2018).

3. 3.

Guo, J.-H. et al. Keeping the right time in space: importance of circadian clock and sleep for physiology and performance of astronauts. Military Medical Research 1, 23 (2014).

4. 4.

Wotring, V. E. Medication use by U.S. crewmembers on the International Space Station. The. FASEB Journal 29, 4417–4423 (2015).

5. 5.

Locke, P. A. & Weil, M. M. personalized Cancer risk assessments for space radiation exposures. Frontiers in Oncology 6, 38 (2016).

6. 6.

Cucinotta, F. A. et al. Space radiation risk limits and Earth‐Moon‐Mars environmental models. Space Weather 2010, 8.

7. 7.

Mao, X. W. et al. Simulated Microgravity and Low-Dose/Low-Dose-Rate Radiation Induces Oxidative Damage in the Mouse Brain. Radiation Research 185(647-657), 611 (2016).

8. 8.

Feiock, C. et al. Central Nervous System Injury - A Newly Observed Bystander Effect of Radiation. PLoS One 11, e0163233–e0163233 (2016).

9. 9.

Kennedy, A. R. Biological Effects of Space Radiation and Development of Effective Countermeasures. Life Sci Space Res (Amst) 1, 10–43 (2014).

10. 10.

Yan, X. et al. Cardiovascular risks associated with low dose ionizing particle radiation. PLoS One 9, e110269–e110269 (2014).

11. 11.

Halliwell, B. & Gutteridge, J. M. C. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine. (OUP, Oxford, 2015).

12. 12.

Xu, X.-R., Li, X.-Y., Li, X.-Z. & Li, H.-B. Degradation of melatonin by UV, UV/H2O2, Fe2+/H2O2 and UV/Fe2+/H2O2 processes. Separation and Purification Technology 68, 261–266 (2009).

13. 13.

Su, R., Chai, L., Tang, C., Li, B. & Yang, Z. Comparison of the degradation of molecular and ionic ibuprofen in a UV/H2O2 system. Water Science and Technology 77, 2174–2183 (2018).

14. 14.

Yan, Y. et al. Decomposition of 3,5-dinitrobenzamide in aqueous solution during UV/H2O2 and UV/TiO2 oxidation processes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24, 5360–5369 (2017).

15. 15.

Janjetovic, Z. et al. Melatonin and its metabolites protect human melanocytes against UVB-induced damage: Involvement of NRF2-mediated pathways. Scientific Reports 7, 1274 (2017).

16. 16.

Xie, L.-h. et al. Mechanisms of an increased level of serum iron in gamma-irradiated mice. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 55, 81–88 (2016).

17. 17.

Ritchie, L. E. et al. Space environmental factor impacts upon murine colon microbiota and mucosal homeostasis. PLoS One 10, e0125792 (2015).

18. 18.

Polat, M. & Korkmaz, M. ESR detection and dosimetric properties of irradiated naproxen sodium. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 255, 209–215 (2003).

19. 19.

Köseoǧlu, R., Köseoǧlu, E. & Köksal, F. Electron paramagnetic resonance of some γ-irradiated drugs. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 58, 63–68 (2003).

20. 20.

Nisar, J. et al. Gamma – irradiation induced degradation of diclofenac in aqueous solution: Kinetics, role of reactive species and influence of natural water parameters. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 4, 2573–2584 (2016).

21. 21.

Damian, G. EPR investigation of γ-irradiated anti-emetic drugs. Talanta 60, 923–927 (2003).

22. 22.

Varshney, L. & Dodke, P. B. Radiation effect studies on anticancer drugs, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin for radiation sterilization. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 71, 1103–1111 (2004).

23. 23.

El-Sayed Abdo, A., Ali, M. A. M. & Ismail, M. R. Natural fibre high-density polyethylene and lead oxide composites for radiation shielding. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 66, 185–195 (2003).

24. 24.

Zeitlin, C., Guetersloh, S. B., Heilbronn, L. H. & Miller, J. Measurements of materials shielding properties with 1GeV/nuc 56Fe. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 252, 308–318 (2006).

25. 25.

Stewart, D. Y., Harrison, P. F., Morgan, B. & Ramachers, Y. Radiation shielding for underground low-background experiments. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 571, 651–662 (2007).

26. 26.

Hu, H. et al. Study on Composite Material for Shielding Mixed Neutron and gamma-Rays. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 55, 2376–2384 (2008).

27. 27.

Clayton, L. M., Gerasimov, T. G., Cinke, M., Meyyappan, M. & Harmon, J. P. Dispersion of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in a Non-Polar Polymer, Poly(4-methyl-1-pentene). Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 6, 2520–2524 (2006).

28. 28.

Muisener, P. A. O. R. et al. Effects of gamma radiation on poly(methyl methacrylate)/single-wall nanotube composites. Journal of Materials Research 17, 2507–2513 (2002).

29. 29.

Najafi, E. & Shin, K. Radiation resistant polymer–carbon nanotube nanocomposite thin films. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 257, 333–337 (2005).

30. 30.

Nambiar, S. & Yeow, J. T. W. Polymer-composite materials for radiation protection. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 4, 5717–5726 (2012).

31. 31.

Labouriau, A. et al. Boron filled siloxane polymers for radiation shielding. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 144, 288–294 (2018).

32. 32.

Singleterry, R. C. Materials for Low-Energy Neutron Radiation Shielding, 2000.

33. 33.

Nita, N., Schaeublin, R., Victoria, M. & Valiev, R. Z. Effects of irradiation on the microstructure and mechanical properties of nanostructured materials. Philosophical Magazine 85, 723–735 (2005).

34. 34.

S., S. K., E., F. R., D., G. R. & D., M. J. Effects of ionizing radiation on epoxy, graphite fiber and epoxy/graphite fiber composites. Part I: Surface energy changes. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics 26, 245–255 (1988).

35. 35.

Iqbal, S. et al. A. H. I. Processing and Characterization of Space-Durable High-Performance Polymeric Nanocomposite. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer 25, 87–95 (2011).

36. 36.

Courtney, H. et al. Polyethylene/boron nitride composites for space radiation shielding. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 109, 2529–2538 (2008).

37. 37.

Samaras, M., Derlet, P. M., Van Swygenhoven†, H. & Victoria, M. Radiation damage near grain boundaries. Philosophical Magazine 83, 3599–3607 (2003).

38. 38.

Chimi, Y. et al. Accumulation and recovery of defects in ion-irradiated nanocrystalline gold. Journal of Nuclear Materials 297, 355–357 (2001).

39. 39.

Chimi, Y. et al. Swift heavy ion irradiation effects in nanocrystalline gold. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 245, 171–175 (2006).

40. 40.

Bai, X.-M., Voter, A. F., Hoagland, R. G., Nastasi, M. & Uberuaga, B. P. Efficient Annealing of Radiation Damage Near Grain Boundaries via Interstitial Emission. Science 327, 1631–1634 (2010).

41. 41.

Ackland, G. Controlling Radiation Damage. Science 327, 1587–1588 (2010).

42. 42.

Williams, G., Trask, R. & Bond, I. A self-healing carbon fibre reinforced polymer for aerospace applications. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 38, 1525–1532 (2007).

43. 43.

Weiss, J. F. & Landauer, M. R. Protection against ionizing radiation by antioxidant nutrients and phytochemicals. Toxicology 189, 1–20 (2003).

44. 44.

Russel, J. R., Lucien, C. M. & Dun-Xian, T. Neurotoxins: Free Radical Mechanisms and Melatonin Protection. Current Neuropharmacology 8, 194–210 (2010).

45. 45.

46. 46.

Sarma, L. & Kesavan, P. C. Protective Effects of Vitamins C and E Against γ-ray-induced Chromosomal Damage in Mouse. International Journal of Radiation Biology 63, 759–764 (1993).

47. 47.

Brocker, C., Kim, H., Smith, D. & Barua, S. Heteromer Nanostars by Spontaneous Self-Assembly. Nanomaterials 7, 127 (2017).

48. 48.

Tunyaboon, L. et al. Bioresponsive polymer coated drug nanorods for breast cancer treatment. Nanotechnology 28, 045601 (2017).

49. 49.

Sah, E. & Sah, H. Recent Trends in Preparation of Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) Nanoparticles by Mixing Polymeric Organic Solution with Antisolvent. Journal of Nanomaterials 2015, 22 (2015).

50. 50.

Moore, J., Yin, J.-J. & Yu, L. Novel fluorometric assay for hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity (HOSC) estimation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 54, 617–626 (2006).

51. 51.

De Laat, J. & Gallard, H. Catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by Fe (III) in homogeneous aqueous solution: mechanism and kinetic modeling. Environmental Science & Technology 33, 2726–2732 (1999).

52. 52.

Wilson, N.; Blenner, M.; Guiseppi-Elie, A. Polyplex Formation Influences Release Mechanism of Mono- and Di-Valent Ions from Phosphorylcholine Group Bearing Hydrogels. ResearchGate 2014.

53. 53.

Pandey, S. K., Haldar, C., Vishwas, D. K. & Maiti, P. Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of melatonin entrapped PLA nanoparticles: An oxidative stress and T-cell response using golden hamster. Society for Biomaterials 2015.

54. 54.

Gao, Y. et al. In vitro release kinetics of antituberculosis drugs from nanoparticles assessed using a modified dissolution apparatus. BioMed Research International 2013, 2013.

55. 55.

Dash, S., Murthy, P. N., Nath, L. & Chowdhury, P. Kinetic modeling on drug release from controlled drug delivery systems. Acta Pol Pharm 67, 217–223 (2010).

56. 56.

Korsmeyer, R. W., Gurny, R., Doelker, E., Buri, P. & Peppas, N. A. Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 15, 25–35 (1983).

57. 57.

Peppas, N. Analysis of Fickian and non-Fickian drug release from polymers. 1985.

58. 58.

Zhao, L. et al. Preparation and in Vitro Drug Release Evaluation of Once-Daily Metformin Hydrochloride Sustained-Release Tablets. Pharmacology & Pharmacy 3, 468 (2012).

59. 59.

Fischer, T. W. et al. Constitutive and UV-induced metabolism of melatonin in keratinocytes and cell-free systems. The FASEB Journal 20, 1564–1566 (2006).

60. 60.

Wotring, V. E. Chemical Potency and Degradation Products of Medications Stored Over 550 Earth Days at the International Space Station. The AAPS Journal 18, 210–216 (2016).

61. 61.

Slominski, A. T. et al. Metabolism of melatonin in the skin: Why is it important? Exp Dermatol 26, 563–568 (2017).

62. 62.

Alberto, M. E., Russo, N., Grand, A. & Galano, A. A physicochemical examination of the free radical scavenging activity of Trolox: mechanism, kinetics and influence of the environment. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 15, 4642–4650 (2013).

63. 63.

Lerner, A. B., Case, J. D., Takahashi, Y., Lee, T. H. & Mori, W. Isolation of melatonin, the pineal gland factor that lightens melanocytes1. Journal of the American Chemical Society 80, 2587–2587 (1958).

64. 64.

Comai, S. & Gobbi, G. Unveiling the role of melatonin MT2 receptors in sleep, anxiety and other neuropsychiatric diseases: a novel target in psychopharmacology. J Psychiatry Neurosci 39, 6–21 (2014).

65. 65.

Yin, J. et al. Relationship of Sleep Duration With All&#x2010;Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Dose&#x2010;Response Meta&#x2010;Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. Journal of the American Heart Association 6, e005947 (2017).

66. 66.

Slominski, A. T., Zmijewski, M. A., Plonka, P. M., Szaflarski, J. P. & Paus, R. How UV Light Touches the Brain and Endocrine System Through Skin, and Why. Endocrinology 159, 1992–2007 (2018).

67. 67.

Guo, J.-H. et al. Keeping the right time in space: importance of circadian clock and sleep for physiology and performance of astronauts. Military Medical Research 1, 23–23 (2014).

68. 68.

Chancellor, J. C. et al. Limitations in predicting the space radiation health risk for exploration astronauts. npj Microgravity 4, 8–11 (2018).

69. 69.

Lefevre, P. ICH Q9: Some considerations on medicinal products quality assessment. S.T.P. Pharma Pratiques 18, 457–459 (2008).

70. 70.

Distelmaier, F. et al. The antioxidant Trolox restores mitochondrial membrane potential and Ca2+ -stimulated ATP production in human complex I deficiency. J Mol Med (Berl) 87, 515–522 (2009).

71. 71.

Raspor, P. et al. Prevention of intracellular oxidation in yeast: the role of vitamin E analogue, Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylkroman-2-carboxyl acid). Cell Biology International 29, 57–63 (2005).

72. 72.

Poljšak, B. et al. Role of the vitamin E model compound Trolox in the prevention of Cr(VI)-induced cellular damage. Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry 88, 141–157 (2006).

73. 73.

Cheng, Z., Moore, J. & Yu, L. High-Throughput Relative DPPH Radical Scavenging Capacity Assay. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 54, 7429–7436 (2006).

74. 74.

Antosik, A., Czubak, K., Cichon, N., Nowak, P. & Zbikowska, H. Vitamin E Analogue Protects Red Blood Cells against Storage-Induced Oxidative Damage. Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy 45, 347–354 (2018).

75. 75.

Duan, W. et al. New role of JAK2/STAT3 signaling in endothelial cell oxidative stress injury and protective effect of melatonin. PLoS One 8, e57941–e57941 (2013).

76. 76.

Cheng, J. et al. Melatonin restricts the viability and angiogenesis of vascular endothelial cells by suppressing HIF-1α/ROS/VEGF. Int J Mol Med 43, 945–955 (2019).

77. 77.

Yu, G., Bolon, M., Laird, D. W. & Tyml, K. Hypoxia and reoxygenation-induced oxidant production increase in microvascular endothelial cells depends on connexin40. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 49, 1008–1013 (2010).

78. 78.

Michiels, C., Arnould, T., Houbion, A. & Remacle, J. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells submitted to hypoxia-reoxygenation in vitro: Implication of free radicals, xanthine oxidase, and energy deficiency. Journal of Cellular Physiology 153, 53–61 (1992).

## Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ming Huang for guidance using NMR, and Missouri S&T Environmental Research Center (ERC) for Zetasizer usage. This research was supported by NASA- Missouri Space Grant Consortium (MOSGC) Grant Number NNX15AK38A and the US EPA 83996201 to SB and a National Science Foundation (NSF-CBET 1403860) to KR.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

H.K., Y.T., A.W., and E.M. designed and performed experiments, analyzed data and co-wrote the paper. H.K. synthesized PolyRad nanoparticles, characterized nanoparticles, and ran NMR, FT-IR and HOSC experiments. Y.T., A.W., and E.M. carried out the photochemical degradation, irradiation experiments, drug release studies, and cytotoxicity analysis. MRA helped with cytotoxicity studies and NMR experiments and analyzed data. M.M., S.D., and K.R. provided critical feedback of the manuscript. S.B. supervised the research, designed experiments and co-wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sutapa Barua.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Kim, H., Tse, Y., Webb, A. et al. PolyRad – Protection Against Free Radical Damage. Sci Rep 10, 8335 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65247-y

• Accepted:

• Published: