Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Tuning interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions in thin amorphous ferrimagnetic alloys

## Abstract

Skyrmions can be stabilized in magnetic systems with broken inversion symmetry and chiral interactions, such as Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions (DMI). Further, compensation of magnetic moments in ferrimagnetic materials can significantly reduce magnetic dipolar interactions, which tend to favor large skyrmions. Tuning DMI is essential to control skyrmion properties, with symmetry breaking at interfaces offering the greatest flexibility. However, in contrast to the ferromagnet case, few studies have investigated interfacial DMI in ferrimagnets. Here we present a systematic study of DMI in ferrimagnetic CoGd films by Brillouin light scattering. We demonstrate the ability to control DMI by the CoGd cap layer composition, the stack symmetry and the ferrimagnetic layer thickness. The DMI thickness dependence confirms its interfacial nature. In addition, magnetic force microscopy reveals the ability to tune DMI in a range that stabilizes sub-100 nm skyrmions at room temperature in zero field. Our work opens new paths for controlling interfacial DMI in ferrimagnets to nucleate and manipulate skyrmions.

## Introduction

Magnetic skyrmions due to their non-trivial topology have interesting properties1,2,3 that make them attractive for spintronic applications, such as racetrack memory and logic devices4,5,6. A magnetic skyrmion designates a chiral spin texture with a whirling spin configuration7. Skyrmions can be stabilized by broken inversion symmetry and chiral interactions, such as the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions (DMI)8,9, which is an antisymmetric exchange interaction that favors non-collinear neighboring spins. Ultrathin magnetic materials with interfaces to heavy non-magnetic metals with large spin-orbit coupling exhibit interfacial DMI that stabilizes skyrmions and chiral domain walls10,11,12,13. The interfacial DMI and the nucleation of skyrmions have been extensively investigated in ferromagnetic materials10,14,15,16,17,18. Very recently, magnetic skyrmions and chiral domains were reported in ferrimagnetic systems19,20,21. Nearly compensated thin ferrimagnetic films with interfacial DMI are interesting materials due to their low stray fields, reduced sensitivity to external magnetic fields, and fast spin dynamics, which are predicted to lead to ultrasmall and ultrafast skyrmions19,22. Unlike in ferromagnets where fast current-induced motion of chiral textures is impeded by the Walker breakdown and domain wall pinning13,23,24,25, high domain wall velocities––reaching 1000 m s-1––have been observed in ferrimagnetic CoGd films near the angular momentum compensation temperature19. In addition, the large dipolar fields in ferromagnets are obstacles to the formation of ultrasmall skyrmion22. Hence, ferrimagnetic thin films are promising candidates for ultrafast skyrmion-based spintronics.

Recently, bulk DMI was reported in an amorphous ferrimagnetic GdFeCo alloy26. However, the significant advantages of interfacial DMI are that it can be controlled by the nature of the interfaces and widely tuned to stabilize skyrmions. Yet, interfacial DMI has not been studied in this class of materials. The DMI competes with the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and Heisenberg exchange interaction and tuning the DMI in a range that favors small skyrmions can be challenging. Asymmetric domain wall nucleation and motion is commonly used to measure DMI12,27. However, these methods require advanced models of the domain wall dynamics28,29. Another method is Brillouin light scattering (BLS) in the Damon-Eshbach geometry, which relies on the asymmetric spin-wave frequency dispersion in the presence of DMI30; the asymmetry is directly related to the strength of the DMI. Both techniques, domain wall dynamics and BLS, have been found to lead to similar DMI values28,29,31.

Here we present a systematic study of the interfacial DMI in CoGd thin films by BLS as a function of the capping layer composition and magnetic layer thickness. We aim to understand how the DMI in CoGd films depends on the structural symmetry and magnetic properties. The interfaces are studied by cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM). We found that as little as 10% of W in the cap layer in Pt/CoGd/Pt1-xWx thin films is sufficient to induce a DMI of about 0.15 mJ m−2, larger than the bulk DMI found in much thicker films26. We also observed that the DMI is inversely proportional to the magnetic thickness in asymmetric CoGd stacks, confirming the interfacial nature of the DMI. In addition, we were able to tune the DMI in a range that stabilizes sub-100 nm skyrmions at room temperature in zero field, as observed by magnetic force microscopy (MFM). Our findings provide insight into the key parameters that control the DMI in ferrimagnetic films toward achieving ultrasmall and ultrafast skyrmions.

## Results

### Tuning the DMI with the capping layer composition

The ferrimagnetic CoGd thin films were grown by RF magnetron co-sputtering on oxidized silicon wafers in the following sequence: W(3)/Pt(3)/Co78Gd22(t)/Pt1-xWx(3)/Pt(3) (thicknesses in nanometers) [Methods]. The W/Pt seed layer provides good adhesion to the substrate and texture to ensure perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA). The top Pt layer prevents sample oxidation. The DMI of a 5-nm thick CoGd film was studied as a function of the W composition (x) of the cap layer Pt1-xWx. The magnetic properties of the films were measured by vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) and are summarized in Table 1 (Methods). Figure 1(a) and 1(b) show an out-of-plane field room-temperature magnetization hysteresis loop and the temperature (T) dependence of the saturation magnetization (MS) for Pt/CoGd(5 nm)/W, respectively. MS (T) is greatly reduced around 150 K, corresponding to the magnetization compensation temperature (TM).

Spin wave spectroscopy using BLS was performed to measure the DMI in the CoGd films (Methods). The DMI leads to an asymmetric frequency dispersion of the counterpropagating spin waves30. The DMI energy D (mJ m−2) is proportional to the frequency shift (∆f DMI) and given by:

$$|D|=\frac{1}{2}|\frac{h}{g{\mu }_{B}}|\frac{{M}_{S}}{k}\Delta {f}_{DMI},$$
(1)

where g is the spectroscopic splitting factor (we take g = 2), μB the Bohr magneton and h Planck’s constant and k = 16.7 µm−1 is the spin wave vector. Notably, the DMI energy given by BLS measurements is an effective DMI averaged over the film thickness, i.e., a sum of the bottom and top interfacial contributions. An example of BLS spectra is displayed in Fig. 1(c) for Pt/CoGd(5 nm)/W. We fitted the spectra for positive and negative field polarity. The frequency shift was determined for the Stokes and the anti-Stokes peaks separately and then averaged.

The diameter of a skyrmion results from the competition between different energies such as the Heisenberg exchange energy, the magnetic anisotropy energy and the DMI strength. Ultrasmall skyrmions can be nucleated at room temperature only in a narrow range of D32,33,34. For DMI strength larger than a scale set by the magnetic anisotropy, the formation of stripe domains become energetically favorable33,34. Conversely, a weak DMI cannot stabilize a skyrmion. Theoretical work has predicted that ferrimagnetic materials are better candidates than ferromagnets to host ultrasmall and ultrafast skyrmions due to their low saturation magnetization, which causes only small stray fields22. Indeed, in ferrimagnetic materials, the interfacial DMI can dominate over the dipolar interactions and enable the formation of ultrasmall DMI skyrmions, which is difficult to achieve in ferromagnets. Hence, our goal was to provide a new method for controlling the interfacial DMI in thin ferrimagnetic CoGd films, which could allow one to precisely tune the DMI in a range that would enable skyrmion nucleation.

Changing the nature of the CoGd interfaces can be used to engineer the DMI strength. Therefore, the idea is to leave the Pt underlayer at the bottom interface of the CoGd film unchanged and insert a Pt1-xWx alloy at the top interface. Thus, by changing the composition of the Pt1-xWx alloy, the structural symmetry of the film can be gradually broken to induce DMI. Pt is chosen for its strong spin-orbit coupling that gives a large interfacial DMI on Co spins35,36. Theoretical calculations based on Hund’s first rule have shown that, on the contrary, a weaker DMI arises from interactions between W and Co35 and with the same chirality as Pt and Co. In addition, W, due to its giant spin-Hall angle37,38, would serve as a spin current source to enable skyrmion motion induced by spin-orbit torque (SOT).

Figure 2(a) shows the DMI energy as a function of the W composition (x) in Pt/CoGd(5 nm)/Pt1-xWx measured by BLS. A maximum DMI of 0.23 ± 0.02 mJ m−2 is obtained for the asymmetric stack (x = 1). In comparison, a bulk DMI of up to 0.10 mJ m−2 was reported in ferrimagnetic GdFeCo films26. Conversely, the DMI is small for the symmetric film (x = 0). In the Pt/CoGd/Pt film, the top and bottom interfaces induce an interfacial DMI of similar amplitude but opposite sign (as the DMI is a chiral interaction), thus, resulting in a near vanishing effective DMI. In Pt/CoGd/W, since W gives rise to a weaker interfacial DMI, the contributions of the two interfaces are not compensated, leading to a larger effective DMI. As seen in Fig. 2(a), as little as 20% of W introduced in the top layer is enough to significantly break the symmetry and induce a DMI of 0.20 mJ m−2. Yet, for x > 0.2, the DMI is less sensitive to the W content in the top interface. Nevertheless, for 0.1 < x < 1, the DMI increases by 50% to reach the maximum value of 0.23 ± 0.02 mJ m−2. This would indicate that for 0.1 < x < 0.9, the W rather greatly reduces the DMI between the Co spins and the Pt. Indeed, if the W were actively contributing to the interfacial DMI, a stronger dependence of the DMI energy with the alloy composition would have been expected. Additionally, the quality of the interfaces, which has a great impact on the DMI39,40, was assessed by cross-sectional TEM. Figure 2(b) shows a cross-section of the asymmetric Pt/CoGd(5 nm)/W film, while a closer view of the top and bottom interfaces of the CoGd layer is displayed in Fig. 2(c). The CoGd alloy and the W layers are amorphous and the Pt is polycrystalline. Figure 2(c) shows that the Pt/CoGd and the CoGd/W interfaces are smooth.

### Thickness-dependence of the DMI

It is necessary to study the dependence of the DMI on CoGd thickness to establish its nature, i.e. to know whether the DMI is arising from interfacial effects. In our Pt/Co78Gd22(t)/Pt1-xWx films, the W composition (x) was fixed either to 0 or 1 to investigate the DMI in a symmetric (x = 0) and asymmetric (x = 1) stack as a function of the magnetic thickness t. t was increased from 5 nm to 15 nm. The magnetic properties were systematically measured by VSM as a function of thickness. The results are presented in Fig. 3(a) and the DMI is plotted versus the inverse magnetic thickness. In the asymmetric Pt/CoGd/W stack, the DMI is inversely proportional to the magnetic thickness and reaches a minimum of 0.09 ± 0.01 mJ m−2 for 1/t = 0.067 nm−1 (t = 15 nm). The DMI linearly increases with the inverse thickness. This confirms that the strength of the DMI at the interface remains unchanged and underlines its interfacial nature. The slope of the linear fit corresponds to the surface DMI constant DS 1 pJ m−1, which is in the same order of magnitude than the reported surface DMI in ferromagnets41,42. In Fig. 3(b), the saturation magnetization times the magnetic thickness is plotted versus the CoGd thickness. It has a linear dependence on thickness with an x-axis intercept near zero thickness, which indicates that there is no measurable dead layer in the CoGd film. Notably, in Fig. 3(a), the intercept of the linear fit is non-zero for 1/t = 0 (i.e. an infinitely thick film). This indicates that there is a residual DMI of 0.025 mJ m−2, which may result from a change of the magnetization compensation temperature throughout the thickness as evidenced in another rare-earth transition-metal alloy43 that could induce inversion symmetry breaking. Yet, as the thickness decreases, the interfacial effects become more important and the DMI increases as seen in Fig. 3(a). Thus, the interfacial DMI dominates in the entire thickness range we have studied.

On the other hand, for the symmetric Pt/CoGd/Pt film, the DMI remains constant over the studied thickness range at about 0.10 ± 0.01 mJ m−2 as seen in Fig. 3(a) (red data points). This behavior is surprising as the interfacial DMI is expected to be almost zero in symmetric layer structures. This result shows there is a difference in the nature of the top and bottom CoGd interfaces. In order to verify the latter, we performed TEM imaging in the Pt/CoGd(15 nm)/Pt film. The full stack is shown in Fig. 4(a) and a closer view of the top and bottom interfaces in Figs. 4(b) and 4(c), respectively. In Fig. 4(b), a thin layer of intermediate gray contrast (indicated by the white arrows) can be seen at the top CoGd interface and not in the bottom interface. It appears that the Pt from the capping layer has diffused into the amorphous CoGd film. As a result, the bottom and top interfaces have different roughness and intermixing. Hence, the DMI contributions of the top and bottom interfaces are not equal. Thus, due to the chirality of the interaction, they do not cancel out, leading to an increase of the net DMI. Intermixing and roughness effects appear to be also dominant in thicker films as the DMI remains non-zero for larger thicknesses in Pt/CoGd/Pt as seen in Fig. 3(a). This is consistent with previous reports in the literature where the effect of interface roughness and intermixing on the inversion symmetry breaking has been extensively studied. It was reported that the DMI and the domain wall velocity increased with the difference of roughness and intermixing between the top and bottom interface of a magnetic layer39,40,44,45. Finally, as the skyrmion size depends on the magnetic film thickness22,34, it is thus important to understand how the interfacial DMI scales with the thickness.

### Evidence of magnetic skyrmions by MFM

Finally, we aimed to verify whether these thin ferrimagnetic alloy films would indeed host skyrmions. We focused on the asymmetric Pt/CoGd/W stacks as they are more promising for skyrmion motion via spin-orbit torque because of the giant spin-Hall angle of W37,38. In fact, in Pt/CoGd/Pt, the spin-orbit torques from the top and bottom interfaces would tend to cancel each other out. The Pt/CoGd/W films were subject to AC in-plane magnetic field demagnetization and imaged by atomic and magnetic force microscopy (AFM and MFM) at room temperature in zero field. Figure 5 shows images for Pt/CoGd(10 nm)/W. The left column is AFM data [Figs. 5(a) and 5(c)] and right column MFM images [Figs. 5(b) and (d)]. The surface roughness was measured and is on the order of 0.2 nm (rms). Magnetic contrast is indicated by dark areas in the MFM images. By comparing the AFM and MFM images, it is clear that this contrast comes from magnetic textures and is not due to topography. Several skyrmion-like textures can be seen in Fig. 5(b). Figure 5(d) corresponds to a smaller MFM scan performed around of one of them marked by a square box in Fig. 5(b). This skyrmion-like texture is on the order of 100 nm. 50 nm skyrmions were observed in Pt/CoGd(8 nm)/W (see supplemental materials). Arguably, considering the size of these textures, the DMI energy values [see Fig. 3(a)], and the fact that the CoGd films are weakly magnetized (MS ~ 140 – 150 kA m−1, see supplemental materials), it is unlikely that these textures are magnetic bubbles4,7 stabilized by dipolar interactions. Thus, MFM images would rather indicate the presence of skyrmions. However, accurate estimation of the skyrmion size is difficult. Indeed, the MFM tip is sensitive to the dipolar field emerging from the magnetic texture which is spatially spread out. Furthermore, smaller magnetic features may be present in Fig. 5(b), yet they cannot be clearly distinguished due to the background noise and small magnetic contrast.

## Discussion

To summarize, we have demonstrated that by capping the ferrimagnetic CoGd layer with a PtW alloy we could tune the DMI energy over a large range, from almost no DMI to an interfacial DMI energy of 0.23 mJ m−2. The DMI thickness dependence reveals the interfacial nature of the DMI in CoGd thin films. Thus, the DMI strength can be controlled by the interfaces in the thickness range we studied, which is also the range relevant for skyrmion nucleation. Hence, interfacial DMI can not only be tuned by changing the cap layer composition but also by changing the thickness of the CoGd layer. Together they provide a wide range of tunability. However, the experimental results point out that changing the cap layer composition provides a lesser tunability than varying the thickness. Moreover, the DMI was found to be non-zero in thicker symmetric structures emphasizing the role of interface roughness and intermixing. Lastly, we showed evidence that films can have a DMI in a range that allows sub-100 nm skyrmion nucleation at room temperature in zero field. Our experimental results provide insight into the key parameters that control the DMI in ferrimagnetic films toward achieving ultrasmall and ultrafast skyrmion motion for spintronic applications.

## Methods

### Thin film deposition

The thin films were prepared by RF magnetron sputtering and deposited onto Si-SiO2 substrates at room temperature with a base pressure of 2.7×10−5 Pa. The Ar deposition pressures of W, Pt, CoGd, and Pt1-xWx were 0.93 Pa, 0.1 Pa, 0.16 Pa, and 0.16 Pa, respectively. CoGd films were obtained by co-sputtering from the Co and Gd targets. The powers of the Co and Gd sources were tuned to obtain CoGd films with approximately 78 at. % of Co. The Pt1-xWx alloy layer was also deposited by co-sputtering from the Pt and W targets. The alloy composition was varied by changing the deposition rate of the Pt and W targets. The deposition rates were calibrated using x-ray reflectometry.

### Magnetometry

The magnetic properties of the samples were measured by vibrating sample magnetometry. Magnetic hysteresis loops were measured by varying the temperature from 100 K to 300 K with steps of 25 K in order to extract the temperature dependence of the saturation magnetization and the coercive field. Magnetometry was systematically performed prior to BLS experiments.

### Brillouin light scattering

Spin wave spectroscopy using BLS is sensitive to interfacial effects and can be used to measure the DMI strength. The spin waves (SWs) inelastically scatter the monochromatic laser beam that is focused onto the sample surface. The frequency of the scattered photons is shifted by the SWs frequency. The SWs frequency is determined by analyzing the backscattered light with a (3 + 3)-pass tandem Fabry-Pérot interferometer. The counterpropagating Damon-Eshbach SWs have a non-reciprocal frequency dispersion characterized by a frequency shift (noted ∆fDMI). The frequency shift is considered here in absolute value. An in-plane bias magnetic field sufficient to saturate the sample was applied to allow the SW to propagate in-plane (Damon- Eshbach geometry). For a λ = 532 nm laser beam with an incidence of θi = π/4, the SW vector, k defined as k = 4πsin(θi)/λ was set to 16.7 μm−1. Damon-Eshbach SWs are almost plane waves extending throughout the thickness of the magnetic layer with their maximum amplitude reached at the top and bottom interface. For relatively thick layers, the photons may not reach the bottom interface due to the limited penetration depth into the sample structure. Nevertheless, the photons still interact with the SWs extending in the bulk of the layer and the energy transfer is the same and related to the interfacial DMI strength.

## References

1. 1.

Mühlbauer, S. et al. Skyrmion Lattice in a Chiral Magnet. Science 323, 915 (2009).

2. 2.

Nagaosa, N. & Tokura, Y. Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions. Nature Nanotechnology 8, 899–911, https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.243; (2013).

3. 3.

Rohart, S., Miltat, J. & Thiaville, A. Path to collapse for an isolated Neel skyrmion. Physical Review B 93, 214412 (2016).

4. 4.

Fert, A., Cros, V. & Sampaio, J. Skyrmions on the track. Nature Nanotechnology 8, 152–156, https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.29; https://www.nature.com/articles/nnano.2013.29#supplementary-information (2013).

5. 5.

Koshibae, W. et al. Memory functions of magnetic skyrmions. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 54, 053001 (2015).

6. 6.

Zhang, X., Ezawa, M. & Zhou, Y. Magnetic skyrmion logic gates: conversion, duplication and merging of skyrmions. Scientific Reports 5, 9400, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09400; https://www.nature.com/articles/srep09400#supplementary-information (2015).

7. 7.

Fert, A., Reyren, N. & Cros, V. Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications. Nature Reviews Materials 2, 17031, https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2017.31; (2017).

8. 8.

Dzyaloshinskii, I. A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 4, 241–255 (1958).

9. 9.

Moriya, T. Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism. Physical Review 120, 91–98 (1960).

10. 10.

Boulle, O. et al. Room-temperature chiral magnetic skyrmions in ultrathin magnetic nanostructures. Nature Nanotechnology 11, 449–454, https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.315; https://www.nature.com/articles/nnano.2015.315#supplementary-information (2016).

11. 11.

Pizzini, S. et al. Chirality-Induced Asymmetric Magnetic Nucleation in Pt/Co/AlOx Ultrathin Microstructures. Physical Review Letters 113, 047203 (2014).

12. 12.

Ryu, K.-S., Thomas, L., Yang, S.-H. & Parkin, S. Chiral spin torque at magnetic domain walls. Nature Nanotechnology 8, 527–553, https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.102; https://www.nature.com/articles/nnano.2013.102#supplementary-information (2013).

13. 13.

Woo, S. et al. Observation of room-temperature magnetic skyrmions and their current-driven dynamics in ultrathin metallic ferromagnets. Nature Materials 15, 501–506, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4593; https://www.nature.com/articles/nmat4593#supplementary-information (2016).

14. 14.

Belmeguenai, M. et al. Interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in perpendicularly magnetized Pt/Co/AlOx ultrathin films measured by Brillouin light spectroscopy. Physical Review B 91, 180405(R) (2015).

15. 15.

Cho, J. et al. Thickness dependence of the interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in inversion symmetry broken systems. Nature Communications 6, 7635, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8635; https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms8635#supplementary-information (2015).

16. 16.

Lemesh, I. et al. Current-Induced Skyrmion Generation through Morphological Thermal Transitions in Chiral Ferromagnetic Heterostructures. Advanced Materials 30, 1805461, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201805461 (2018).

17. 17.

Tacchi, S. et al. Interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction in Pt/CoFeB Films: Effect of the Heavy-Metal Thickness. Physical Review Letters 118, 147201 (2017).

18. 18.

Woo, S. et al. Spin-orbit torque-driven skyrmion dynamics revealed by time-resolved X-ray microscopy. Nature Communications 8, 15573, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15573; https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15573#supplementary-information (2017).

19. 19.

Caretta, L. et al. Fast current-driven domain walls and small skyrmions in a compensated ferrimagnet. Nature Nanotechnology 13, 1154–1160 (2018).

20. 20.

Streubel, R. et al. Experimental Evidence of Chiral Ferrimagnetism in Amorphous GdCo Films. Advanced Materials 30, 1800199 (2018).

21. 21.

Woo, S. et al. Current-driven dynamics and inhibition of the skyrmion Hall effect of ferrimagnetic skyrmions in GdFeCo films. Nature Communications 9, 959 (2018).

22. 22.

Büttner, F., Lemesh, I. & Beach, G. S. D. Theory of isolated magnetic skyrmions: From fundamentals to room temperature applications. Scientific Reports 8, 4464 (2018).

23. 23.

Hrabec, A. et al. Current-induced skyrmion generation and dynamics in symmetric bilayers. Nature Communications 8, 15765, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15765; https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15765#supplementary-information (2017).

24. 24.

Legrand, W. et al. Room-Temperature Current-Induced Generation and Motion of sub-100 nm Skyrmions. Nano Letters 17, 2703–2712, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00649 (2017).

25. 25.

Metaxas, P. J. et al. Creep and Flow Regimes of Magnetic Domain-Wall Motion in Ultrathin Pt/Co/Pt Films with Perpendicular Anisotropy. Physical Review Letters 99, 217208 (2007).

26. 26.

Kim, D.-H. et al. Bulk Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction in amorphous ferrimagnetic alloys. Nature Materials 18, 685–690 (2019).

27. 27.

Hrabec, A. et al. Measuring and tailoring the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in perpendicularly magnetized thin films. Physical Review B 90, 020402(R) (2014).

28. 28.

Shahbazi, K. et al. Domain-wall motion and interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions in Pt/Co/Ir(tIr)/Ta multilayers. Physical Review B 99, 094409, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.094409 (2019).

29. 29.

Lau, D., Pellegren, J. P., Nembach, H. T., Shaw, J. M. & Sokalski, V. Disentangling factors governing Dzyaloshinskii domain-wall creep in Co/Ni thin films using PtxIr1-x seed layers. Physical Review B 98, 184410, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.184410 (2018).

30. 30.

Nembach, H. T., Shaw, J. M., Weiler, M., Jué, E. & Silva, T. J. Linear relation between Heisenberg exchange and interfacial Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction in metal films. Nature Physics 11, 825–829, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3418; https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys3418#supplementary-information (2015).

31. 31.

Kim, D.-Y. et al. Quantitative accordance of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction between domain-wall and spin-wave dynamics. Physical Review B 100, 224419, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.224419 (2019).

32. 32.

Moreau-Luchaire, C. et al. Additive interfacial chiral interaction in multilayers for stabilization of small individual skyrmions at room temperature. Nature Nanotechnology 11, 444–448, https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.313; https://www.nature.com/articles/nnano.2015.313#supplementary-information (2016).

33. 33.

Wang, X. S., Yuan, H. Y. & Wang, X. R. A theory on skyrmion size. Communications Physics 1, 31 (2018).

34. 34.

Ma, C. T., Xie, Y., Sheng, H., Ghosh, A. W. & Poon, S. J. Robust Formation of Ultrasmall Room-Temperature Neél Skyrmions in Amorphous Ferrimagnets from Atomistic Simulations. Scientific Reports 9, 9964, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46458-4 (2019).

35. 35.

Belabbes, A., Bihlmayer, G., Bechstedt, F., Blügel, S. & Manchon, A. Hund’s Rule-Driven Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction at 3d-5d Interfaces. Physical Review Letters 117, 247202 (2016).

36. 36.

Yang, H., Thiaville, A., Rohart, S., Fert, A. & Chshiev, M. Anatomy of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction at Co/Pt Interfaces. Physical Review Letters 115, 267210 (2015).

37. 37.

Pai, C.-F. et al. Spin transfer torque devices utilizing the giant spin Hall effect of tungsten. Applied Physics Letters 101, 122404, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4753947 (2012).

38. 38.

Hao, Q. & Xiao, G. Giant Spin Hall Effect and Switching Induced by Spin-Transfer Torque in a W/Co40Fe40B20/MgO Structure with Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy. Physical Review Applied 3, 034009, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.3.034009 (2015).

39. 39.

Wells, A. W. J., Shepley, P. M., Marrows, C. H. & Moore, T. A. Effect of interfacial intermixing on the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in Pt/Co/Pt. Physical Review B 95, 054428, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.054428 (2017).

40. 40.

Diez, L. H. et al. Enhancement of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction and domain wall velocity through interface intermixing in Ta/CoFeB/MgO. Physical Review B 99, 054431, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.054431 (2019).

41. 41.

Juge, R. et al. Current-Driven Skyrmion Dynamics and Drive-Dependent Skyrmion Hall Effect in an Ultrathin Film. Physical Review Applied 12, 044007, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.044007 (2019).

42. 42.

Belmeguenai, M. et al. Interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in perpendicularly magnetized ${\text{Pt/Co/AlO}}_{x}$ ultrathin films measured by Brillouin light spectroscopy. Physical Review B 91, 180405, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.180405 (2015).

43. 43.

Ma, C. T., Kirby, B. J., Li, X. & Poon, S. J. Thickness dependence of ferrimagnetic compensation in amorphous rare-earth transition-metal thin films. Applied Physics Letters 113, 172404, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5050626 (2018).

44. 44.

Herrera Diez, L. et al. Nonvolatile Ionic Modification of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya. Interaction. Physical Review Applied 12, 034005, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.034005 (2019).

45. 45.

Zhao, X. et al. Enhancing domain wall velocity through interface intermixing in W-CoFeB-MgO films with perpendicular anisotropy. Applied Physics Letters 115, 122404, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5121357 (2019).

## Acknowledgements

This work was supported by DARPA grants No. D18AP00009 and R186870004 and by the DOE grant No DE-SC0018237.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

A.D.K. and S.J.P. conceived of and supervised the project. Y.Q., H.T N., S.J.P. and A.D.K. planned the experiments. BLS measurements were conducted by G.A.R., J.M.S. and H.T.N. BLS data was analyzed by Y.Q., J-W.X. A.D.K. and H.T.N. Sample fabrication and magnetometry measurements were performed by C.T.M. and W.Z. MFM imaging was done by Y.Q. and J-W.X. All of the authors participated in the discussion and interpretation of the experimental results. Y.Q. and A.D.K. drafted the manuscript and all of the authors contributed to and commented on it.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Quessab.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Quessab, Y., Xu, JW., Ma, C.T. et al. Tuning interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions in thin amorphous ferrimagnetic alloys. Sci Rep 10, 7447 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64427-0

• Accepted:

• Published:

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64427-0

• ### Fabrication and characterization of epitaxial ferrimagnetic Mn3Ga thin films with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy

• Huixin Guo
• Zexin Feng
• Zhiqi Liu

Emergent Materials (2021)