# Improved Non-Grignard Electrolyte Based on Magnesium Borate Trichloride for Rechargeable Magnesium Batteries

## Abstract

The high anodic stability of electrolytes for rechargeable magnesium batteries enables the use of new positive electrodes, which can contribute to an increase in energy density. In this study, novel Ph3COMgCl-, Ph3SiOMgCl-, and B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes were prepared with AlCl3 in triglyme. The Ph3COMgCl-based electrolyte showed anodic stability over 3.0 V vs. Mg but was chemically unstable, whereas the Ph3SiOMgCl-based electrolyte was chemically stable but featured lower anodic stability than the Ph3COMgCl-based electrolyte. Advantageously, the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte showed both anodic stability over 3.0 V vs. Mg (possibly due to the Lewis acidic nature of B in B(OMgCl)3) and chemical stability (possibly due to the hard acid character of B(OMgCl)3). B(OMgCl)3, which was prepared by reacting boric acid with a Grignard reagent, was characterized by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). The above analyses showed that B(OMgCl)3 has a complex structure featuring coordinated tetrahydrofuran molecules. 27Al NMR spectroscopy and Al K-edge XAS showed that when B(OMgCl)3 was present in the electrolyte, AlCl3 and AlCl2+ species were converted to AlCl4. Mg K-edge XAS showed that the Mg species in B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes are electrochemically positive. As a rechargeable magnesium battery, the full cell using the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte and a Mo6S8 Chevrel phase cathode showed stable charge-discharge cycles. Thus, B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes, the anodic stability of which can be increased to ~3 V by the use of appropriate battery materials, are well suited for the development of practical Mg battery cathodes.

## Introduction

Rechargeable magnesium batteries are promising alternatives to lithium-ion batteries, featuring high theoretical volumetric capacity (3832 mAh/cm3), high safety derived from the nondendritic behavior of deposited magnesium, and the high abundance of magnesium metal compared with that of lithium1. However, the advantages of magnesium batteries are only possible if appropriate electrolytes and cathodes are used with magnesium metal. Although various electrolytes have been developed for magnesium batteries by several pioneering researchers, they require further improvement for practical application2.

Early studies have shown that plating/stripping of magnesium does not occur in the electrolytes of simple magnesium salts, such as Mg(ClO4)2, in conventional organic solvents owing to the passivating surface/blocking layer of magnesium2,3. Aurbach et al. reported a prototype magnesium battery comprising Mg metal anodes and a Chevrel phase cathode4. The “dichloro complex” or “all-phenyl complex” electrolyte, which is a complex solution composed of organomagnesium compounds or organomagnesium halide with a Lewis acid such as AlCl3, was used for their prototype batteries4,5,6,7. Non-Grignard magnesium-based electrolytes, such as amide-8,9, phenolate-10,11, and alkoxide-based12,13,14,15 ones, have also been developed to be used in combination with active materials such as sulfur and to decrease sensitivity to air/moisture.

For example, Kim et al. developed [Mg2(μ-Cl)3·6THF][HMDSAlCl3] (THF = tetrahydrofuran, HMDS = hexamethyldisilazane) and used it in a Mg/S battery9. Doe et al. reported a magnesium aluminum chloride complex (MACC) and showed that this electrolyte, comprising fully inorganic salts, can be used in a magnesium battery16,17. In recent years, it has also been reported that even an electrolyte without a Lewis acid causes magnesium plating/stripping. For example, Mg(TFSI)2/triglyme (TFSI = bistriflimide) showed high electrochemical stability toward oxidation and can cause reversible magnesium plating/stripping18,19,20. A carborane-based electrolyte without a Lewis acid was also reported to exhibit high Coulombic efficiency and high anodic stability for SUS and Al electrodes21,22,23,24.

Magnesium is easily corroded by AlCl3 solution in thionyl chloride, although this corrosion can be suppressed by a solution of Mg(AlCl4)2 in thionyl chloride25. The Coulombic efficiency of magnesium plating/stripping can be improved by conditioning of the MACC electrolyte in THF26,27. Moreover, magnesium plating/stripping occurs even in the monoglyme-MACC electrolyte, the Coulombic efficiency and open circuit potential (OCP) of which differ from those of the same electrolyte in THF17,27. The addition of MgCl2 to Mg(TFSI)2 in 1,2-dimethoxyethane significantly improved the electrochemical performance in terms of reversible magnesium deposition28. In this case, PF6 anions passivate the Mg anodes, although reversible Mg deposition/dissolution commence via the addition of either MgCl2 or LiCl29. However, it is not yet known which of these electrolytes affect the deposition/dissolution of magnesium and anodic stability.

The development of magnesium batteries requires magnesium electrolytes to show high anodic stability, be safe and easy to handle, and allow reversible magnesium plating and stripping. From the viewpoint of safety, it is desirable for the magnesium electrolyte to contain species that impart low flammability, low reactivity with ambient air, and other such properties30. In addition, previous reports suggest that electrolytes containing an inorganic anion show higher anodic stability than those containing alkyl or alkoxide anions23,24,30. Therefore, this study examined magnesium salts with an inorganic anion, borate, as magnesium electrolytes. Three novel magnesium salts, Ph3COMgCl, Ph3SiOMgCl, and B(OMgCl)3, in triglyme and AlCl3 solvents were synthesized and investigated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and linear sweep voltammetry (LSV). In addition to electrochemical performance, chemical stability was discussed on the basis of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements. The B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte, which showed high anodic stability, was further studied by NMR spectroscopy, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS).

## Experimental Section

### Preparation of electrolytes

The magnesium salts, Ph3COMgCl, Ph3SiOMgCl, and B(OMgCl)3, were prepared by reacting benzophenone, triphenylsilanol, and boric acid, respectively, with a Grignard reagent. The schematic synthetic routes of the magnesium salts used in this study are shown in Fig. 1. The detailed procedures are described in the Supporting Information. 1H NMR measurements confirmed the disappearance of the O–H proton of the reactant. Titration indicated that the ratio of magnesium and chlorine coordinated to THF was Mg:Cl = 1:1 for all magnesium salts. In an argon-filled glove box, each magnesium salt in triglyme was heated at 40 °C. Aluminum chloride was added, and the reaction mixture was stirred and then cooled to room temperature. The preparation conditions are shown in Table S1.

### Characterization

1H, 11B, and 27Al NMR spectra were recorded on a Fourier-transform NMR spectrometer (400 MHz, JMN-ECS400, JEOL). The 1H NMR spectrum of B(OMgCl)3 was measured using a filtered solution of the sample in DMSO-d6. The 27Al NMR spectra of AlCl3/triglyme, B(OMgCl)3-AlCl3/triglyme, AlCl3/triglyme-THF, and B(OMgCl)3-AlCl3/triglyme-THF were measured using neat samples. The 11B NMR spectra of B(OH)3 and B(OMgCl)3 were measured using samples dissolved in CD3OD/CD3CO3D mixed solvent (50/50 vol%). The 11B NMR spectrum of B(OMgCl)3-AlCl3/triglyme was measured using a sample diluted with THF-d8. Attenuated total reflection FTIR spectroscopy was performed using a Fourier-transform infrared spectrometer (Nicolet 380, Thermo Scientific). Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were measured in the range of 2θ = 5–50 ° using a powder X-ray diffractometer (Miniflex 600, Rigaku) operated at a 40 kV voltage and 15 mA current using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). XAS measurements of the liquid electrolyte were performed at beamline BL-10 of the SR Center of Ritsumeikan University (Japan). A home-made measurement cell, where the electrolytes are separated from vacuum by a silicon nitride window, was used31. Mg and Al K-edge XAS spectra were measured in fluorescence mode using a silicon drift detector.

### Electrochemical measurements

CV and LSV were performed in an argon-filled glovebox (<0.1 ppm each of water and oxygen) using an electrochemical measurement system (VMP3, Bio-Logic Science Instruments). CV measurements were conducted within the potential range of −1.0 to 3.5 V vs. Mg at a scan rate of 5 mV/s using a three-electrode cell. This cell has Pt (diameter (φ): 3.0 mm, disk, BAS Co., Ltd.), Mg (φ: 1.6 mm, rod, 99.95%, Nilaco Co., Ltd.), and Mg (φ: 1.6 mm, rod, 99.95%, Nilaco Co., Ltd.) as the working, reference, and counter electrodes, respectively, immersed in 2 mL of electrolyte. LSV measurements were conducted within the potential range of OCP to 3.5 V vs. Mg at a scan rate of 5 mV/s using the same cell, but with various working electrodes. These working electrodes include Pt (φ: 3.0 mm, disk, BAS Co., Ltd.), glassy carbon (GC; φ: 3.0 mm, disk, BAS Co., Ltd.), Al (thickness: 0.1 mm, plate, 99.999%, Nilaco Co., Ltd.), SUS304 (thickness: 0.2 mm, plate, Nilaco Co., Ltd.), and Mo (φ: 1.5 mm, rod, 99.95%, Nilaco Co., Ltd.).

The galvanostatic deposition of magnesium was carried out in a three-electrode cell under a current density of 1 mA/cm2 applied to the Pt working electrode for 50 h. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed using a field emission scanning electron microscope (S-4800, Hitachi, Ltd.) to observe the precipitate on the electrode. Synchrotron XRD measurements of plated magnesium were performed at beamline BL5S2 of the Aichi Synchrotron Radiation Center (Japan). A glass capillary with an outer diameter of 0.3 mm was filled with the sample and sealed by a resin in an argon-filled glove box. XRD data were collected using a Debye-Scherrer optical system with a two-dimensional semiconductor detector (PILATUS 100 K, Dectris). The wavelength of the X-ray was calibrated to λ = 0.6995 Å.

### Battery testing

Cu2Mo6S7.8 was purchased from Nippon Inorganic Colour & Chemical Co., Ltd. Hydrochloric acid and ultrapure water were purchased from FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation and used as received. Mo6S8 Chevrel phase, the active material, was prepared by chemical leaching of Cu2Mo6S7.8 in HCl/H2O with oxygen bubbling. The electrode slurry consisted of 80 wt% active material, 10 wt% acetylene black (DENKA BLACK, Denka Co., Ltd.), and 10 wt% polyvinylidene fluoride (KF Polymer L#7305, Kureha Corporation) dissolved in 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone using a planetary ball mill. The slurry was coated onto carbon paper, which served as the current collector, and dried under vacuum at 80 °C for 1 h and subsequently at 120 °C for 5 h. It was reported that carbon electrode is stable during magnesium charge-discharge32. The resulting sheet, along with those of AZ31 (thickness: 0.5 mm, Izumi Metal Corporation) and glass fiber filter (GA100, Advantec), were cut into disks 16 mm in diameter to form the cathode, anode, and separator, respectively. The test cell was prepared by laminating the cathode, separator, and AZ31 anode on a CR2032 coin-type cell (Hohsen Corp.), which was then filled with electrolyte. Galvanostatic charge-discharge tests were carried out at a constant current of C/50 rate and temperature of 25 °C using a charge/discharge unit (ABE 1024-05R1, Electrofield). The experimental conditions were based on the theoretical capacity of Mo6S8 (128 mAh/g) in the range of 0.5–1.9 V vs. Mg at 25 °C.

## Results and Discussion

We first examined the electrochemical behaviors of the Ph3COMgCl-, Ph3SiOMgCl-, and B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes. Figure 2(a) displays the cyclic voltammograms of the electrolytes, prepared by mixing a magnesium salt with AlCl3 in triglyme, at the 100th cycle. They show reversible cathodic and anodic currents with Mg plating and stripping at 0 V vs. Mg. The B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte shows the highest reversible current density for Mg plating and stripping. The cyclic voltammograms of the Ph3COMgCl- and Ph3SiOMgCl-based electrolytes, consisting of magnesium salts of similar structure, exhibit similar shapes with almost the same current densities. The Coulombic efficiencies are 75.7%, 81.5%, and 64.0% for the Ph3COMgCl-, Ph3SiOMgCl-, and B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes, respectively. The three electrolytes have different anodic stabilities. Figure 2(b) displays the linear sweep voltammograms of the electrolytes. The linear sweep voltammogram of the Ph3COMgCl-based electrolyte shows anodic stability close to approximately 3.0 V vs. Mg. On the other hand, for the Ph3SiOMgCl-based electrolyte, a weak oxidation current is observed at 2.6 V, and the anodic current increases at about 3.0 V, which is close to the decomposition potential of the Ph3COMgCl-based electrolyte. Comparison of the linear sweep voltammograms of the Ph3COMgCl- and Ph3SiOMgCl-based electrolytes shows that the central element influences anodic stability. Among these electrolytes, the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte shows the highest anodic stability over 3.0 V. The B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte also exhibits long-term stability. Figure 2(c) shows the cyclic voltammograms of the Ph3COMgCl- and Ph3SiOMgCl-based electrolytes measured three weeks after the first measurement in the presence of 0.1 ppm each of H2O and O2 in an argon-filled glove box. The Ph3COMgCl-based electrolyte shows no current associated with magnesium plating/striping, while the Ph3SiOMgCl-based electrolyte shows almost the same CV curve even after three weeks.

The difference in stability is related to the chemical structures of the electrolytes. Figure 2(d) shows the 1H NMR spectra of the Ph3COMgCl- and Ph3SiOMgCl-based electrolytes as prepared and after three weeks. The 1H NMR spectrum of the Ph3COMgCl-based electrolyte from 7.20 to 7.35 ppm changes between after preparation (blue) and after three weeks (red), which suggests the structural change of the Ph3CO anion during preservation in the glove box. This chemical instability is hypothesized to be the cause of the change in the cyclic voltammogram of the Ph3COMgCl-based electrolyte in Fig. 2(c). On the other hand, the Ph3SiOMgCl-based electrolyte shows almost the same 1H NMR spectrum as prepared (green) and after three weeks (purple), which indicates that the initial structure of the Ph3SiO anion is maintained. Although the difference between the magnesium salts used in the electrolytes is only a single element, the Ph3SiOMgCl-based electrolyte shows lower anodic stability and higher chemical stability compared with the Ph3COMgCl-based electrolyte. The shape of the CV curve of the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte is nearly the same even after three weeks, which suggests the chemical stability of the BO33− anion structure (Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). Chemical stability may be related to the strengths of the Si–O, B–O, and C–O bonds.

Density functional theory calculations suggest that chemical stability is related to the strength of C–O, Si–O, and B–O bonds of anions determined using the hard and soft acids and bases principle (Supporting Information), further implying that the C–O bond of Ph3COMgCl-based electrolytes can be weakened by Ph substitution (Supporting Information). Moreover, according to previous reports, the Lewis acidic character of B(OMgCl)3 may enhance the anodic stability of the electrolyte7,15,33,34. Interestingly, elemental differences in the structure can change electrolyte properties, such as anodic stability and chemical stability. The B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte shows both excellent anodic stability and chemical stability despite its low Coulombic efficiency. Therefore, we will discuss this electrolyte in more detail.

The cyclic voltammograms of the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte in triglyme and triglyme-THF are shown in Fig. 3(a,b), respectively. Cathodic and anodic currents around 0 V vs. Mg appear repeatedly in each cycle, which suggests that magnesium metal reversibly plates and strips on Pt within the CV measurement range. The B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte in triglyme shows an overpotential of approximately 570 mV at 1.0 mA/cm2. Coulombic efficiency improves from 38.2% at the first cycle to 57.6% at the 30th cycle. However, it is 64.0% even at the 100th cycle, which indicates that the Coulombic efficiency of the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte in triglyme is not improved by the conditioning process as previously reported19,20. As shown in Fig. 3(b), the use of a triglyme-THF mixed solvent results in improved current density, probably because THF has a lower viscosity than triglyme35,36. The overpotential of the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte in triglyme-THF is approximately 490 mV at 1.0 mA/cm2. The conductivity of the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte at 27 °C improves from 2.15 mS/cm without THF to 3.8 mS/cm with THF. Thus, the current density is enhanced by adding THF. The Coulombic efficiency of the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte increases from 43.4% at the first cycle to 62.8% at the 30th cycle. The cycle dependency of Coulombic efficiency is illustrated in Figure S2 in the Supporting Information. The origin of the insufficient overvoltage and Coulombic efficiency will be discussed after the characterization of the electrolyte.

Figure 3(c,d) show the linear sweep voltammograms of the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte in triglyme and triglyme-THF, respectively. The B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte in triglyme shows anodic stability over 3.0 V vs. Mg using Pt and GC. However, its anodic stability decreases to 1.6 V using Al and 2.0 V using SUS. This behavior is also observed in the B(OMgCl)3/triglyme-THF electrolyte. The trend in the anodic stability of the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte is Al < SUS < Pt, GC regardless of the solvent. The same trend is observed in bisamide- and dialkoxide-based electrolytes, which indicates that Cl has an oxidatively unfavorable effect on Al and SUS8,13. Using Mo, the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte in triglyme shows an anodic stability of about 3.0 V, while the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte in triglyme-THF shows a weak decomposition current from 2.0 V and increased current at about 3.0 V vs. Mg. Pt and GC can be used as current collectors with the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte up to 3.0 V vs. Mg, and SUS up to about 2.0 V vs. Mg. Mo can be used with the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte in triglyme up to approximately 3.0 V vs. Mg.

We confirmed that the plated product is Mg metal without dendritic formation. SEM images of plated magnesium from the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte in triglyme and triglyme-THF on Pt are shown in Fig. 4(a,b), respectively. The SEM images show that the magnesium from the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes in different solvents appears to co-exist with a few grain-like particles and flat surface. The products from either electrolyte do not show dendritic morphology. The magnesium deposited from both electrolytes does not have a well-defined crystal morphology, and its grain size appears to be smaller than 2 μm. The crystalline edges are not clear, probably caused by the long-term reduction during sample preparation. Density functional theory calculations revealed the cathodic instability of Mg-coordinated glyme electrolytes37. The long-term reduction causes partial decomposition of the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte, resulting in the mossy structure observed in the SEM images. Synchrotron radiation XRD measurement confirmed that the precipitate is magnesium, as shown in Fig. 4(c). Both XRD patterns for the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes with/without THF show the peaks at the same position as those of the reference for Mg, although the scattering pattern in the (002) plane at 2θ = 15.4° is slightly smaller. Previous reports suggest that a small reflection of the (002) plane for magnesium represents a small grain size29,38,39,40. Plated magnesium can become polycrystalline depending on the precipitation conditions, and the change appears in the (002) plane, which is the close-packed surface of the magnesium crystal39. The small grain size of plated magnesium from the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes is considered to be caused by the influence of such polycrystallization.

Although Mg plating and stripping with high anodic stability is observed, the Coulombic efficiency is approximately 60% at the 100th cycle. We will discuss the possibility of this Coulombic efficiency considering the chemical structure of the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes inferred from FTIR, NMR, and X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) analyses. First, we rule out the possibility of residual B(OH)3. FTIR measurements of the B(OMgCl)3 product, B(OH)3 reactant, and THF solvent are shown in Fig. 5(a). While the absorption related to the γO–H peak of B(OH)3 (red) at about 3200 cm−1 is not observed in the spectrum of B(OMgCl)3, absorptions with similar shape to those of THF (green) are observed in the range of 800–1100 and 2800–3100 cm−1. The absorption at the latter is attributed to the νC–H of THF and those at 877 and 1026 cm−1 are attributed to the red-shifts of δC–C–O (905 cm–1) and γC–O (1065 cm−1) of THF, respectively41,42. These results imply the consumption of the B(OH)3 reactant, which is also supported by the absence of the associated peak in the XRD pattern of the synthesized B(OMgCl)3 shown in Fig. 5(b). The absence of diffraction peaks suggests that the B(OMgCl)3 salt has a disordered molecular arrangement and no other magnesium salt such as MgCl2 is formed. The 1H NMR spectra of B(OMgCl)3 and B(OH)3 dissolved in DMSO-d6 are shown in Fig. 5(c). The broad O–H peak at 5.8 ppm detected in B(OH)3 is not observed in B(OMgCl)3, which further proves that B(OH)3 is completely consumed in the reaction, as implied by the FTIR and XRD results. The new peaks observed at 1.76 and 3.59 ppm indicate that THF remains in the synthesized magnesium salt43, which is also consistent with the FTIR results showing the coordination of THF to the magnesium salt.

Although the B(OH)3 itself no longer remains, the presence of the BO33− unit is confirmed by the 11B NMR spectra of B(OH)3 and B(OMgCl)3, which were both dissolved in CD3OD/CD3CO2D (50/50 vol%) (Fig. 5(d)). The main peak in the 11B NMR spectrum of B(OMgCl)3 is located at around 19 ppm, which is almost the same as that of B(OH)344. The presence of this peak indicates that the BO33− unit remains in the structure of B(OMgCl)3. The origin of the other peaks (around 2 and 32.4 ppm) are unknown at present. However, these peaks are unrelated to the solvents used for the measurement (CD3OD and CD3CO2D) because they are also detected in the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes described later.

B(OH)3 is not detected in the FTIR, XRD, and 1H NMR measurements, and the BO33− unit remains in the B(OMgCl)3 salt according to the 11B NMR measurement. Moreover, the molar ratio of B(OMgCl)3, measured by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy and Cl titration, is B:Mg:Cl = 1:3:3. These results indicate that the Grignard reagent mainly reacts with B(OH)3 as a Brønsted acid to form B(OMgCl)3. B(OMgCl)3 does not show the ordered arrangement and disproportionated structures observed in the XRD measurement. In addition, the FTIR and 1H NMR spectra suggest that THF is coordinated to B(OMgCl)3. Based on these results, the synthesized B(OMgCl)3 salt has the structure shown in Fig. 6(a), in which THF is coordinated to B(OMgCl)3, and a more complicated structure with a disordered network (Fig. 6(b)).

Subsequently, we investigated the Al-coordinated state in B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes by 27Al and 11B NMR spectroscopy. Figure 7(a) shows the 27Al NMR spectra of AlCl3/triglyme, B(OMgCl)3-AlCl3/triglyme, AlCl3/triglyme-THF, and B(OMgCl)3-AlCl3/triglyme-THF measured as neat samples. The peaks in the 27Al NMR spectra of both AlCl3/triglyme (blue) and AlCl3/triglyme-THF (green) without B(OMgCl)3 are observed at approximately 106, 62–68, and 27 ppm. On the basis of literature data, the peak at 106 ppm is assigned to the tetrahedral Al species including AlCl4- and that at 62–68 ppm to the ether-coordinated AlCl3 species26,45,46. The peak at approximately 27 ppm is assigned to a positive species, such as glyme-coordinated AlCl2+46,47. AlCl3 ionization is expected to occur in triglyme because the dissociation of AlCl3 in glyme solvents has been observed, as shown in Eq. (1)46:

$$2{{\rm{A}}{\rm{l}}{\rm{C}}{\rm{l}}}_{3}\leftrightarrows {{\rm{A}}{\rm{l}}{\rm{C}}{\rm{l}}}_{2}^{+}+{{\rm{A}}{\rm{l}}{\rm{C}}{\rm{l}}}_{4}^{-}.$$
(1)

In addition, AlCl3 is known to dissociate easily in glyme, but not in THF46. Equation (1) is deduced to shift to the left to form AlCl3 species (62–68 ppm) in triglyme-THF and to the right to form AlCl2+ species (27 ppm) in triglyme solution without THF. On the other hand, approximately one peak at about 106 ppm is observed for both B(OMgCl)3-AlCl3/triglyme and B(OMgCl)3-AlCl3/triglyme-THF, which are electrolytes containing magnesium salt. The reduced peaks of pentacoordinated AlCl3 (62–68 ppm) and AlCl2+ (27 ppm) in the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte suggest that these species are bound to the borate anion.

Figure 7(b) displays the 11B NMR spectra of a B(OMgCl)3-AlCl3/triglyme sample diluted with THF-d8 and B(OMgCl)3 sample dissolved in CD3OD/CD3CO2D (50:50 vol%). The 11B NMR spectrum of the B(OMgCl)3-AlCl3/triglyme electrolyte shows an increase in the intensity of the broad peak at around 6 ppm with a decrease in the intensity of the peak at approximately 19 ppm compared with those in the 11B NMR spectrum of B(OMgCl)3. This suggests that the former peak is due to the BO33– species. Furthermore, these changes in the peak intensities suggest the possibility of rapid exchange of coordination of the borate anion to solvents, Cl, and Al species, among others.

The B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes were further characterized in terms of electronic and local structures. Figure 8(a) shows the Mg K-edge X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectra of the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes in triglyme and triglyme-THF. The two main peaks are observed at ~1309 and ~1312 eV with a shoulder at around 1315 eV. The peak at approximately 1309 eV is attributed to either [Mg2(μ-Cl)2]2+ 48 or [Mg2(μ-Cl)3]+ species49. The position of the main edge at 1312–1315 eV is related to the hexacoordinated solvated structure48,50. Figure 8(b) shows the Fourier transform of the Mg K-edge extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) oscillation of the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte in triglyme. The Fourier transform for this electrolyte is closest to those for Mg(ClO4)2/H2O48 and [Mg2(μ-Cl)3·6(THF)]+ under applied voltage on the Mg electrode49. The peak at around 1.8 Å is expected to contain information about the Mg–O pair. On the other hand, it is unclear whether the peak at 2.6 Å is the scattering peak of the Mg–Mg pair or the peak due to the Mg–Cl pair weakened by triglyme. However, the main edge at 1312–1315 eV in the XANES spectrum and the large peak at 2.6 Å in the EXAFS spectrum indicate that the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes include more electrochemically positive Mg ion than [Mg2(μ-Cl)3]+.

Figure 8(c) represents the Al K-edge XANES spectra of the four electrolytes, which are AlCl3 with or without B(OMgCl)3 dissolved in triglyme or triglyme-THF. Both AlCl3 electrolytes without B(OMgCl)3 in triglyme (blue) and triglyme-THF (pink) show two edges located at 1565 (with a shoulder at around 1566 eV) and 1568 eV. The shoulder at 1566 eV is smaller and the peak at 1568 eV is larger for AlCl3/triglyme compared with those for AlCl3/triglyme-THF. These results are consistent with those of 27Al NMR showing a smaller peak at 62–68 ppm (due to AlCl3 species) and larger peak at 27 ppm (due to AlCl2+ species) for AlCl3/triglyme compared with those for AlCl3/triglyme-THF. The Al K-edge XANES spectra of the AlCl3 electrolytes with B(OMgCl)3 show distinctly different absorption curves from those of the AlCl3 electrolytes without B(OMgCl)3 in both triglyme and triglyme-THF. The increase of the edge at 1565 eV with the decrease of both the shoulder at around 1566 eV and edge at 1568 eV are consistent with the increase of the amount of AlCl4 and decrease of the amounts of both AlCl3 and AlCl2+ observed in the 27Al-NMR measurement. The edge at 1565 eV, shoulder at around 1566 eV, and edge at 1568 eV in the Al K-edge XANES spectra are deduced to be related to AlCl4, AlCl3, and AlCl2+, respectively.

The B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes are expected to not cause the corrosive behavior. According to a previous study using MgCl2/AlCl3 electrolytes, the AlCl2+ species cause Mg corrosion with Al cementation51. However, our 27Al NMR analysis (Fig. 7(a)) indicated that the B(OMgCl)3 electrolytes do not contain AlCl2+. Other detected species were solvated [Mg2(μ-Cl)3]+, glyme-solvated Mg2+, and AlCl4, which reportedly do not cause corrosions.

The results above provide information on the chemical species in the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes, which can explain the origin of the low Coulombic efficiency. In the case of MACC electrolytes, Mg corrosion with Al cementation caused by AlCl2+ reduces the Coulombic efficiency51. The Coulombic efficiency gradually improves during the CV cycles, which is related to the presence of Al species27. However, due to the absence of AlCl2+ and no improvement in Coulombic efficiency upon CV cycling in the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes, we conclude that the low Coulombic efficiency observed herein is originated by a different mechanism. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopic analysis of the plated Mg in this study also detected the presence of Al, which can disturb the Mg stripping. The enlarged CV profiles from Fig. 3(a) are provided as Figure S3 in the supporting information, in which the oxidation peaks are not related to Mg stripping but Al stripping. Based on the results of XAFS and NMR, the main species in the electrolytes are solvated [Mg2(μ-Cl)3]+, glyme-solvated Mg2+, and AlCl4. The presence of AlCl4 potentially leads to the following chemical equilibrium52:

$$2{{\rm{A}}{\rm{l}}{\rm{C}}{\rm{l}}}_{4}^{-}\leftrightarrows {{\rm{A}}{\rm{l}}}_{2}{{\rm{C}}{\rm{l}}}_{7}^{-}+{{\rm{C}}{\rm{l}}}^{-}$$
(2)

Compared with conventional MACC electrolytes, the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes contain excess AlCl3 during preparation (Table S1), which drives the equilibrium to the right, resulting in Al plating on the electrode53:

$$4{{\rm{Al}}}_{2}{{\rm{Cl}}}_{7}^{-}+3{{\rm{e}}}^{-}\to {\rm{Al}}+7{{\rm{AlCl}}}_{4}^{-}$$
(3)

This trend is supported by the local structural change observed by Al K-edge EXAFS, as shown in Figure S4. The first neighbor shell of Al in the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes is expanded compared with that of AlCl4, which shows good agreement with the literature52. However, the 27Al NMR analysis of the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes does not clearly detect the Al2Cl7 species, which should be observed at 92 ppm. This result implies the low concentration of Al2Cl7 despite the influence of Al plating. AlCl3 concentration must be optimized to improve Coulombic efficiency.

We have confirmed the high chemical and long-term stability of the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes and have characterized these electrolytes. Finally, the application of these electrolytes to magnesium rechargeable battery was examined. Figure 9(a,b) represent the galvanostatic charge-discharge profiles of the Mo6S8/AZ31 coin-type cells with B(OMgCl)3-AlCl3/triglyme and B(OMgCl)3-AlCl3/triglyme-THF. Both profiles show plateaus at ~1.05 and ~1.20 V and reversible charge/discharge cycles at a capacity of approximately 80 mAh/g for 30 cycles. The profile of the cell with the B(OMgCl)3-AlCl3/triglyme-THF electrolyte shows a slightly smaller gap between the charge-discharge plateaus compared with that of the cell with the B(OMgCl)3-AlCl3/triglyme electrolyte. These results verify that, with B(OMgCl)3-based electrolytes, the charge-discharge cycles are repeated on cells with a Chevrel phase cathode and magnesium anode. This indicates that Mg2+ insertion/de-insertion into/from the Chevrel phase with Mg plating/stripping proceeds repeatedly. In addition, it also confirms that SUS can be used with a B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte up to 1.9 V vs. Mg. The B(OMgCl)3-AlCl3/triglyme electrolyte can be used in higher-voltage cathodes (up to 2.1 V vs. Mg)54, implying that this electrolyte is useful for the development of novel cathode materials.

## Conclusions

In this study, three novel electrolytes based on Ph3COMgCl, Ph3SiOMgCl, and B(OMgCl)3 were successfully prepared, and the electrochemical properties were investigated. The Ph3COMgCl-based electrolyte showed higher anodic stability than the Ph3SiOMgCl-based electrolyte, and the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte showed the highest anodic stability among the three electrolytes. Moreover, the latter was chemically stable, which was ascribed to the Lewis acidic character of boron in B(OMgCl)3. Analyses of B(OMgCl)3 showed that the Grignard reagent mainly reacted with B(OH)3 as a Brønsted acid and revealed that the BO33− unit derived from B(OH)3 remained in B(OMgCl)3. In addition, the electrochemically positive Mg2+ ion is the main species present. Charge-discharge measurements performed for the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte, a Mo6S8 Chevrel phase cathode, and an AZ31 anode were indicative of a reversible charge-discharge capacity, suggesting that hardly any side reaction occurred inside SUS cells with the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte at 1.9 V. Although the B(OMgCl)3-based electrolyte did not show high Coulombic efficiency, it showed high anodic stability and can therefore be used in the development of positive electrodes for magnesium batteries.

## References

1. 1.

Muldoon, J., Bucur, C. B. & Gregory, T. Quest for Nonaqueous Multivalent Secondary Batteries: Magnesium and Beyond. Chem. Rev. 114, 11683–11720, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500049y (2014).

2. 2.

Song, J., Sahadeo, E., Noked, M. & Lee, S. B. Mapping the Challenges of Magnesium Battery. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 1736–1749, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00384 (2016).

3. 3.

Saha, P. et al. Rechargeable magnesium battery: Current status and key challenges for the future. Prog. Mater Sci. 66, 1–86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.04.001 (2014).

4. 4.

Aurbach, D. et al. Prototype systems for rechargeable magnesium batteries. Nature 407, 724–727, https://doi.org/10.1038/35037553 (2000).

5. 5.

Pour, N., Gofer, Y., Major, D. T. & Aurbach, D. Structural Analysis of Electrolyte Solutions for Rechargeable Mg Batteries by Stereoscopic Means and DFT Calculations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 6270–6278, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja1098512 (2011).

6. 6.

Mizrahi, O. et al. Electrolyte Solutions with a Wide Electrochemical Window for Rechargeable Magnesium Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 155, A103–A109, https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2806175 (2008).

7. 7.

Aurbach, D., Weissman, I., Gofer, Y. & Levi, E. Nonaqueous magnesium electrochemistry and its application in secondary batteries. The Chemical Record 3, 61–73, https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.10051 (2003).

8. 8.

Wall, C., Zhao-Karger, Z. & Fichtner, M. Corrosion Resistance of Current Collector Materials in Bisamide Based Electrolyte for Magnesium Batteries. ECS Electrochemistry Letters 4, C8–C10, https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0111501eel (2015).

9. 9.

Kim, H. S. et al. Structure and compatibility of a magnesium electrolyte with a sulphur cathode. Nature Commun. 2, 427, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1435 (2011).

10. 10.

Nelson, E. G., Kampf, J. W. & Bartlett, B. M. Enhanced oxidative stability of non-Grignard magnesium electrolytes through ligand modification. Chem. Commun. 50, 5193–5195, https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CC47277A (2014).

11. 11.

Wang, F.-f., Guo, Y.-s., Yang, J., Nuli, Y. & Hirano, S.-i. A novel electrolyte system without a Grignard reagent for rechargeable magnesium batteries. Chem. Commun. 48, 10763–10765, https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CC35857C (2012).

12. 12.

Nist-Lund, C. A., Herb, J. T. & Arnold, C. B. Improving halide-containing magnesium-ion electrolyte performance via sterically hindered alkoxide ligands. J. Power Sources 362, 308–314, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.07.045 (2017).

13. 13.

Herb, J. T., Nist-Lund, C. A. & Arnold, C. B. A fluorinated dialkoxide-based magnesium-ion electrolyte. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 7801–7805, https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA01578J (2017).

14. 14.

Herb, J. T., Nist-Lund, C., Schwartz, J. & Arnold, C. B. Structural Effects of Magnesium Dialkoxides as Precursors for Magnesium-Ion Electrolytes. ECS Electrochemistry Letters 4, A49–A52, https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0031506eel (2015).

15. 15.

Liao, C. et al. Highly soluble alkoxide magnesium salts for rechargeable magnesium batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 581–584, https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta13691d (2014).

16. 16.

Liu, T. B. et al. A facile approach using MgCl2 to formulate high performance Mg2+ electrolytes for rechargeable Mg batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 3430–3438, https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta14825d (2014).

17. 17.

Doe, R. E. et al. Novel, electrolyte solutions comprising fully inorganic salts with high anodic stability for rechargeable magnesium batteries. Chem. Commun. 50, 243–245, https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cc47896c (2014).

18. 18.

Orikasa, Y. et al. High energy density rechargeable magnesium battery using earth-abundant and non-toxic elements. Sci. Rep. 4, 5622, https://doi.org/10.1038/Srep05622 (2014).

19. 19.

Ha, S.-Y. et al. Magnesium(II) Bis(trifluoromethane sulfonyl) Imide-Based Electrolytes with Wide Electrochemical Windows for Rechargeable Magnesium Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 4063–4073, https://doi.org/10.1021/am405619v (2014).

20. 20.

Fukutsuka, T. et al. New Magnesium-ion Conductive Electrolyte Solution Based on Triglyme for Reversible Magnesium Metal Deposition and Dissolution at Ambient Temperature. Chem. Lett. 43, 1788–1790, https://doi.org/10.1246/cl.140704 (2014).

21. 21.

Carter, T. J. et al. Boron Clusters as Highly Stable Magnesium-Battery Electrolytes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 3173–3177, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201310317 (2014).

22. 22.

McArthur, S. G., Geng, L., Guo, J. & Lavallo, V. Cation reduction and comproportionation as novel strategies to produce high voltage, halide free, carborane based electrolytes for rechargeable Mg batteries. Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers 2, 1101–1104, https://doi.org/10.1039/C5QI00171D (2015).

23. 23.

McArthur, S. G., Jay, R., Geng, L., Guo, J. & Lavallo, V. Below the 12-vertex: 10-vertex carborane anions as non-corrosive, halide free, electrolytes for rechargeable Mg batteries. Chem. Commun. 53, 4453–4456, https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CC01570D (2017).

24. 24.

Jay, R. et al. Comparative Study of Mg(CB11H12)2 and Mg(TFSI)2 at the Magnesium/Electrolyte Interface. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 11414–11420, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b00037 (2019).

25. 25.

Peled, E. & Straze, H. The Kinetics of the Magnesium Electrode in Thionyl Chloride Solutions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 124, 1030–1035, https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2133474 (1977).

26. 26.

See, K. A. et al. The Interplay of Al and Mg Speciation in Advanced Mg Battery Electrolyte Solutions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 328–337, https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b10987 (2016).

27. 27.

Barile, C. J., Barile, E. C., Zavadil, K. R., Nuzzo, R. G. & Gewirth, A. A. Electrolytic Conditioning of a Magnesium Aluminum Chloride Complex for Reversible Magnesium Deposition. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 27623–27630, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp506951b (2014).

28. 28.

Shterenberg, I. et al. Evaluation of (CF3SO2)2N- (TFSI) Based Electrolyte Solutions for Mg Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A7118–A7128, https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0161513jes (2015).

29. 29.

Shterenberg, I., Salama, M., Gofer, Y. & Aurbach, D. Hexafluorophosphate-Based Solutions for Mg Batteries and the Importance of Chlorides. Langmuir 33, 9472–9478, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b01609 (2017).

30. 30.

Mohtadi, R. & Mizuno, F. Magnesium batteries: Current state of the art, issues and future perspectives. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 5, 1291–1311, https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.5.143 (2014).

31. 31.

Nakanishi, K. et al. Novel spectro-electrochemical cell for in situ/operando observation of common composite electrode with liquid electrolyte by X-ray absorption spectroscopy in the tender X-ray region. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 084103, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4891036 (2014).

32. 32.

Prabakar, S. J. R., Park, C., Ikhe, A. B., Sohn, K.-S. & Pyo, M. Simultaneous Suppression of Metal Corrosion and Electrolyte Decomposition by Graphene Oxide Protective Coating in Magnesium-Ion Batteries: Toward a 4-V-Wide Potential Window. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 43767–43773, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b16103 (2017).

33. 33.

Guo, Y.-s et al. Boron-based electrolyte solutions with wide electrochemical windows for rechargeable magnesium batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 9100–9106, https://doi.org/10.1039/C2EE22509C (2012).

34. 34.

Aurbach, D. et al. Electrolyte Solutions for Rechargeable Magnesium Batteries Based on Organomagnesium Chloroaluminate Complexes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 149, A115–A121, https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1429925 (2002).

35. 35.

Jache, B., Binder, J. O., Abe, T. & Adelhelm, P. A comparative study on the impact of different glymes and their derivatives as electrolyte solvents for graphite co-intercalation electrodes in lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 14299–14316, https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP00651E (2016).

36. 36.

Das, B., Roy, M. N. & Hazra, D. K. Densities and viscosities of the binary aqueous mixtures of tetrahydrofuran and 1,2-dimethoxyethane at 298, 308 and 318 K. Indian J. Chem. Technol. 1, 93–97 (1994).

37. 37.

Seguin, T. J., Hahn, N. T., Zavadil, K. R. & Persson, K. A. Elucidating Non-aqueous Solvent Stability and Associated Decomposition Mechanisms for Mg Energy Storage Applications From First-Principles. Frontiers in Chemistry 7, https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00175 (2019).

38. 38.

Kitada, A. et al. Room Temperature Magnesium Electrodeposition from Glyme-Coordinated Ammonium Amide Electrolytes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, D389–D396, https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0731508jes (2015).

39. 39.

Esbenshade, J. L. et al. Improving Electrodeposition of Mg through an Open Circuit Potential Hold. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 23366–23372, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b07825 (2015).

40. 40.

Gummow, R. J. & He, Y. Morphology and Preferred Orientation of Pulse Electrodeposited Magnesium. J. Electrochem. Soc. 157, E45–E49, https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3298883 (2010).

41. 41.

Kim, I. T. et al. Characteristics of tetrahydrofuran-based electrolytes with magnesium alkoxide additives for rechargeable magnesium batteries. J. Power Sources 323, 51–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.05.045 (2016).

42. 42.

Aurbach, D., Turgeman, R., Chusid, O. & Gofer, Y. Spectroelectrochemical studies of magnesium deposition by in situ FTIR spectroscopy. Electrochem. Commun. 3, 252–261, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2481(01)00148-5 (2001).

43. 43.

Fulmer, G. R. et al. NMR Chemical Shifts of Trace Impurities: Common Laboratory Solvents, Organics, and Gases in Deuterated Solvents Relevant to the Organometallic Chemist. Organometallics 29, 2176–2179, https://doi.org/10.1021/om100106e (2010).

44. 44.

Dewar, M. J. S. & Jones, R. New heteroaromatic compounds. XXV. Studies of salt formation in boron oxyacids by boron-11 nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 89, 2408–2410, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00986a029 (1967).

45. 45.

See, K. A., Liu, Y.-M., Ha, Y., Barile, C. J. & Gewirth, A. A. Effect of Concentration on the Electrochemistry and Speciation of the Magnesium Aluminum Chloride Complex Electrolyte Solution. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 35729–35739, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b08088 (2017).

46. 46.

Merrill, L. C. & Schaefer, J. L. Electrochemical Properties and Speciation in Mg(HMDS)2-Based Electrolytes for Magnesium Batteries as a Function of Ethereal Solvent Type and Temperature. Langmuir 33, 9426–9433, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b01111 (2017).

47. 47.

Kitada, A., Nakamura, K., Fukami, K. & Murase, K. Electrochemically active species in aluminum electrodeposition baths of AlCl3/glyme solutions. Electrochim. Acta 211, 561–567, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.063 (2016).

48. 48.

Nakayama, Y. et al. Complex Structures and Electrochemical Properties of Magnesium Electrolytes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 155, A754–A759, https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2956022 (2008).

49. 49.

Benmayza, A. et al. Effect of Electrolytic Properties of a Magnesium Organohaloaluminate Electrolyte on Magnesium Deposition. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 26881–26888, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp4077068 (2013).

50. 50.

Hattori, M. et al. Role of Coordination Structure of Magnesium Ions on Charge and Discharge Behavior of Magnesium Alloy Electrode. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 25204–25210, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b08558 (2018).

51. 51.

Bieker, G. et al. The Power of Stoichiometry: Conditioning and Speciation of MgCl2/AlCl3 in Tetraethylene Glycol Dimethyl Ether-Based Electrolytes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 24057–24066, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b05307 (2019).

52. 52.

Nakayama, Y. et al. Sulfone-based electrolytes for aluminium rechargeable batteries. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 5758–5766, https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP02183E (2015).

53. 53.

Stafford, G. R., Tsuda, T. & Hussey, C. L. The Structure of Electrodeposited Aluminum Alloys from Chloroaluminate Ionic Liquids: Let’s Not Ignore the Temperature. ECS Transactions 64, 535–547, https://doi.org/10.1149/06404.0535ecst (2014).

54. 54.

Sato, K., Mizuta, H. & Okamoto, K. Positive Electrode Active Material For Magnesium Batteries. WO2020/027079A1 (2020).

## Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by Kansai Research Foundation for technology promotion.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

K.S., K.O. and Y.O. designed the research. K.S. performed the electrochemical measurements and DFT calculation and analyzed FTIR, NMR data. G.M. and T.K. prepared the electrolytes. T.Y., K.N. and T.O. performed X-ray absorption spectroscopy measurements. Y.O. analyzed X-ray diffraction and X-ray absorption spectra. All authors discussed and commented on the manuscript.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuki Orikasa.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Sato, K., Mori, G., Kiyosu, T. et al. Improved Non-Grignard Electrolyte Based on Magnesium Borate Trichloride for Rechargeable Magnesium Batteries. Sci Rep 10, 7362 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64085-2

• Accepted:

• Published:

• ### Improving electrochemical performance of rechargeable magnesium batteries with conditioning-free Mg-Cl complex electrolyte

• Yaqi Li
• , Pengjian Zuo
• , Ningbo Zhang
• , Xucai Yin
• , Ruinan Li
• , Mengxue He
• , Hua Huo
• , Yulin Ma
• , Chunyu Du
• , YunZhi Gao
•  & Geping Yin

Chemical Engineering Journal (2021)

• ### Solubility determination and thermodynamic modeling of solid−liquid equilibria in the LiBO2−Li2B4O7−H2O system at 298.15 K and 323.15 K

• Lan Yang
• , Lele Chen
• , Tao Zhang
• , Dan Li
• , Lingzong Meng
• , Tianlong Deng
•  & Yafei Guo

Fluid Phase Equilibria (2020)