Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Anti-PDHA1 antibody is detected in a subset of patients with schizophrenia


Autoantibodies have been implicated in schizophrenia aetiology. Here, novel autoantibodies were isolated from patients with schizophrenia. Autoantibody candidates were searched using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and western blotting with rat brain proteins as antigens and two sera pools (25 schizophrenia patients versus 25 controls) as antibodies. Immunoreactive antigens were identified by mass spectrometry. Antibody prevalence were evaluated by western blotting using human recombinant proteins. Furthermore, brain magnetic resonance imaging data (regional brain volumes and diffusion tensor imaging measures) were compared. Two proteins of the mitochondrial respiration pathway were identified as candidate antigens. Three patients with schizophrenia, but no controls, expressed antibodies targeting one of the candidate antigens, i.e., pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component subunit alpha, somatic form, mitochondrial (PDHA1, EC, which is related to mitochondrial energy production. Anti-PDHA1 antibody-positive patients (n = 3) had increased volumes in the left occipital fusiform gyrus compared to both controls (n = 23, p = 0.017) and antibody-negative patients (n = 16, p = 0.009), as well as in the left cuneus compared to antibody-negative patients (n = 16, p = 0.018). This is the first report of an anti-PDHA1 antibody in patients with schizophrenia. Compatible with recent findings of mitochondrial dysfunction in schizophrenia, this antibody may be involved in the pathogenesis of a specific subgroup of schizophrenia.


Schizophrenia is a mental disorder characterised by hallucinations, delusions, and cognitive dysfunction. Schizophrenia typically develops in early adulthood1; the first episode of psychosis is often preceded by prodromal symptoms such as cognitive dysfunction1. The lifetime prevalence of schizophrenia is approximately 1% worldwide2. The diagnosis of schizophrenia is mainly based on subjective psychiatric symptoms and lacks any objective signs including diagnostic markers.

The pathophysiology of schizophrenia is heterogeneous, and various underlying mechanisms have been reported1. One of the most promising mechanisms is immune dysfunction. This assumption is supported by genetic, epidemiological, and post-mortem brain studies1,2,3,4. It is also corroborated by research investigating the effects of antipsychotic agents. Studies have indicated that antipsychotic agents can modulate the immune system in addition to the nervous system2.

Anti-neuronal antibodies have attracted considerable attention in research related to immune dysfunction in schizophrenia. In 2007, an antibody targeting N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, one of the glutamate receptors, was reported to cause autoimmune encephalitis manifesting with schizophrenia-like symptoms5,6. Despite their similarities in psychotic symptoms, the treatment strategy of anti-NMDA-receptor antibody encephalitis differs from that of schizophrenia. The former can be cured by immunotherapy (e.g., glucocorticoids and plasma exchange) and/or tumour removal (in paraneoplastic syndromes), whereas the latter can only be treated symptomatically with psychotropic agents1,6. Although it is important to assess the presence of anti-NMDA antibodies in patients with schizophrenia from the perspective of therapeutic strategy, recent studies have demonstrated the absence or minimal prevalence of anti-NMDA-receptor antibody-positive cases in patients with schizophrenia7,8.

Considering the numerous studies supporting an immune dysfunction in schizophrenia, anti-NMDA-receptor antibodies may not be the only antibodies providing an association between schizophrenia and autoimmune dysfunction2,3,4. The possibility remains that other, unidentified antibodies can also induce psychotic symptoms in people currently diagnosed with schizophrenia. However, the evaluation of a wide spectrum of known autoantibodies did not reveal antibodies related to schizophrenia9. Thus, unknown or novel antibodies should be identified using a comprehensive proteomic analysis. In the current study, we searched for novel autoantibodies against brain tissue in sera of patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis-based proteomic analysis10. We then evaluated the prevalence of the detected antibodies and assessed their characteristics using psychiatric tests and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. The general approach of this study is shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1

Flow chart of the experimental method. BACS, Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia; CAT, Computational Anatomy Toolbox; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; GAF, Global Assessment of Functioning scales; SPM, Statistical Parametric Mapping Software.


Study participants

Table 1 shows the demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants. Consistent with previous studies11,12, the schizophrenia patient group showed significantly lower scores in estimated premorbid intelligence quotient (IQ) and Global Assessment of Functioning scales (GAF), as well as in several domains of the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) and quality of life (QOL)-26.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants.

Identification of target proteins

Figure 2 and Supplementary Fig. S1 show two-dimensional western blots of rat brain proteins. Consistently, two protein spots demonstrated an exclusive reaction with sera obtained from patients with schizophrenia and were subsequently analysed using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF/TOF).

Figure 2

Two-dimensional western blotting of rat brain proteins. Representative images showing the two-dimensional gel electrophoresis followed by western blot in duplicate experiments. Two pools of sera from patients with schizophrenia (n = 25, 100 μg rat brain protein, a) and healthy controls (n = 25, 100 μg rat brain protein, b) were used at 1:1,600 dilution. As the secondary antibody, a peroxidase-labelled antibody against human IgA + IgG + IgM was used at 1:400,000 dilution. (a) The four arrows indicate the protein spots that reacted with pooled sera from 25 patients with schizophrenia. Among these spots, numbers 1 and 2 indicate protein spots that reacted with sera from patients with schizophrenia but not with those from healthy controls. (b) The two arrows (spot numbers 3′and 4′) indicate protein spots that reacted with both pools, i.e., sera from patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls. kDa, kilodalton; pI, isoelectric point.

Table 2 shows the identity of these proteins: dihydrolipoyllysine-residue acetyltransferase component of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, mitochondrial (DLAT, EC; gi number 78365255) and pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component subunit alpha, somatic form, mitochondrial (PDHA1, EC; gi number 124430510). Both candidate antigens were proteins related to the mitochondrial respiration pathway. Based on these findings, we tested additionally the presence of anti-mitochondrial antibodies used in the diagnosis of primary biliary cholangitis with a sensitivity of 90.5% and a specificity of 94.0%13; however, primary biliary cholangitis was not concomitant in all the participants.

Table 2 Proteins in the two-dimensional gel (Fig. 2) identified by mass spectrometry and database searches.

One-dimensional western blot analysis using human recombinant protein and individual sera

The one-dimensional western blot analysis using PDHA1 exhibited specific positive signals in 3 of 25 patients with schizophrenia (named Sc4, Sc5, and Sc6 in Fig. 3). These positive signals that were not found in any of the 25 healthy controls differed in strength (i.e., Sc4 > Sc6 > Sc5; see Fig. 3) and were reproducible. These differences in immunoreactivity may be attributable to individual levels of antibody titres. The corresponding DLAT analysis revealed no positive signals among patients with schizophrenia or healthy controls.

Figure 3

One-dimensional western blotting of human recombinant protein using individual sera. Results of one-dimensional gel electrophoresis using the human recombinant protein PDHA1 (42 kDa,300 ng per lane) followed by western blotting are shown. Individual sera were used at 1:200 dilution, and a peroxidase-labelled secondary antibody against human IgA + IgG + IgM was used at 1:30,000 dilution. Three patients with schizophrenia (Sc4-Sc6) had specific positive signals (black rectangle). As examples of negative signals, images of both healthy controls (HC1-HC3) and patients with schizophrenia without specific signals (Sc1-Sc3) are included. The full original blots are shown in Supplementary Fig. S2.

Clinical characteristics of the identified antibody-positive patients

Table 3 shows the clinical data of the antibody-positive cases. Their average age was 43.0 years compared to 44.3 and 45.0 years in healthy controls and antibody-negative schizophrenia, respectively. The average disease duration in antibody-positive schizophrenia was 18.7 years, whereas that in antibody-negative schizophrenia was 18.6 years. Thus, in the following analysis, corrections for age and disease duration were not employed. Compared to the data in Table 1, no unique, distinguishing characteristic was found in antibody-positive cases, although a definitive conclusion is precluded because of the small number (n = 3). Differences in western blot reactivity (i.e., Sc4 > Sc6 > Sc5; Fig. 3) were not obvious, either.

Table 3 Demographic and clinical characteristics of anti-PDHA1 antibody-positive patients with schizophrenia.

Brain imaging characteristics of the antibody-positive patients

All available MRI data, except for the data from three patients who underwent MRI scans using a different machine, were used in our analysis including 23 healthy controls, 16 antibody-negative patients, and 3 antibody-positive patients. Anti-PDHA1 antibody-positive patients with schizophrenia had increased volumes of the left occipital fusiform gyrus compared to both healthy controls (p = 0.017) and antibody-negative patients (p = 0.009; Fig. 4). We also found increased volumes of the left cuneus in antibody-positive patients compared to antibody-negative patients (p = 0.018; Fig. 4).

Figure 4

MRI brain volumes displaying significant differences in antibody-positive patients with schizophrenia. Regional brain volumes are compared between healthy controls (HC), antibody-negative patients with schizophrenia (Sc), and antibody-positive patients with schizophrenia (Ab+). Only regions with statistical differences in Ab + are shown in these dot plot graphs. Statistical significance was determined at p-values < 0.01 (**) and <0.05 (*) using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s post hoc test.

Antibody-negative patients with schizophrenia showed compared to healthy controls increased volumes in the putamen (left, p = 0.003; right, p = 0.007) and right pallidum (p = 0.007), as well as decreased volumes in the left amygdala (p = 0.011), medial frontal cerebrum (left, p = 0.003; right, p = 0.004), and left occipital pole (p = 0.032; Fig. 5), which is compatible with previous reports14,15,16.

Figure 5

Significantly different brain volumes in antibody-negative patients with schizophrenia. Regional brain volumes are compared between healthy controls (HC), antibody-negative patients with schizophrenia (Sc), and antibody-positive patients with schizophrenia (Ab+). Only regions with statistical differences between HC and Sc are shown below. Significance was determined at p-values < 0.01 (**) and <0.05 (*) using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s post hoc test.

Diffusion MRI measurements (i.e., fractional anisotropy [FA], mean diffusivity [MD], radial diffusivity [RD], and axial diffusivity [AD]) revealed no significant features in antibody-positive patients (Fig. 6). By contrast, antibody-negative patients with schizophrenia showed decreased FA (p = 0.002) and increased RD (p = 0.003; Fig. 6) values compared to healthy controls in line with previous studies17,18.

Figure 6

Diffusion parameters derived from diffusion tensor imaging. Fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), radial diffusivity (RD), and axial diffusivity (AD) values are compared between healthy controls (HC), antibody-negative patients with schizophrenia (Sc), and antibody-positive patients with schizophrenia (Ab+). Statistical significance was determined at p-value < 0.01 (**) using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s post hoc test.

The relationship between brain imaging characteristics and western blot reactivity in Fig. 3 (Sc4 > Sc6 > Sc5) was not obvious according to the Supplementary Figs. S3S5, in which IDs (i.e., Sc4, Sc5, and Sc6) were labelled on the Figs. 46.


We isolated two proteins that reacted with pooled sera from patients with schizophrenia, but not with those from healthy controls, by using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and western blotting. The proteins were identified by mass spectrometry as PDHA1 and DLAT. Both are components of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDH) in mitochondria. In our population, 3 out of 25 patients with schizophrenia presented immunoreactivity against the human recombinant PDHA1, whereas no participant showed an immunological reaction against human recombinant DLAT. The brain features of patients with schizophrenia whose sera reacted against PDHA1 differed from those without an immunological reaction. These findings suggest that the antibody targeting PDHA1, a component of the PDH in mitochondria, may be involved in the pathogenesis of a specific subgroup of schizophrenia.

The main function of mitochondria is to generate through oxidative phosphorylation energy for cells in the form of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). The brain uses more than 20% of the total body ATP, which is approximately 2% of the body mass19. As ATP is crucial to maintain and regulate the complex systems of the brain, mitochondrial dysfunction has been linked to several neuropsychiatric disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and autism20,21,22. Furthermore, the relationship between schizophrenia and mitochondrial dysfunction is supported by several lines of research. For instance, post-mortem studies have revealed structural and functional abnormalities in the mitochondria of patients with schizophrenia23. In addition, a genetic study has shown associations between nuclear-encoded mitochondrial variants and schizophrenia24. Thus, mitochondrial dysfunction is considered as one of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of schizophrenia.

PDH plays an important role in mitochondrial energy production, linking glycolysis to the tricarboxylic acid cycle and subsequent oxidative phosphorylation by catalysing the oxidative decarboxylation of pyruvate to generate acetyl-CoA25. The PDH complex is composed of enzymes including DLAT and PDHA1. Among the component enzymes, PDHA1 is a key to PDH functions. Alterations in PDHA1 and subsequent mitochondrial dysfunctions have been found in several neuropsychiatric disorders. For instance, accumulation of PDHA1 is reported in brainstem-type Lewy bodies of patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies26;these patients can develop psychotic symptoms. PDHA1 deficiency was first associated with schizophrenia in a report published in 201727, which described a patient with a mitochondrial disease due to a mutation in the PDHA1 gene who developed schizophrenia-like symptoms. These findings, along with our results, imply that antibodies targeting PDHA1, the key enzyme of mitochondrial energy production, may cause psychiatric symptoms in a specific subgroup of schizophrenia.

In the present study, MRI data revealed brain features in anti-PDHA1 antibody-positive patients that were different from those seen in ‘conventional’ schizophrenia. Typically, schizophrenia patients exhibit decreased volumes in the fusiform gyrus28,29. The fusiform gyrus has various neural functions related to recognition, such as face perception, object recognition, and reading30. A reduced volume of the fusiform gyrus, as well as the dysfunction of this brain region in schizophrenia, is considered as one of the pathophysiological mechanisms of impaired recognition, especially facial recognition28,29. However, in contrast to ‘conventional’ schizophrenia, the anti-PDHA1 antibody-positive patients showed increased volumes in the fusiform gyrus; this aberrant pattern in regional brain volumes was also evident in the cuneus. Increased volumes of the fusiform gyrus have been reported in individuals with synesthesia31. The involvement of the fusiform gyrus in synesthesia is supported by functional MRI and electroencephalography, in addition to brain anatomical, studies32. In synesthesia, the stimulation of a sensory modality triggers abnormal additional perceptions, which can result in hallucinations, or an abnormal perception in the absence of the corresponding external stimulus33. These findings suggest that people with synesthesia and the antibody-positive patients in our sample might share a common mechanism of hallucination. Further research is required to reveal the pathophysiology in the subgroup of schizophrenia with anti-PDHA1 antibodies.

The association between mitochondrial dysfunction and increased grey matter volume can be explained by the hypothesis of altered grey matter volume in autism. In healthy individuals, the grey matter volume decreases with age after reaching a maximum at 10 years of age34. In individuals with autism, early overgrowth, later slow growth, and subsequently increased grey matter volume have been reported35,36. This abnormal grey matter trajectory in autism is, at least in part, hypothesised as a result of oxidative stress36. Similar to autism, anti-PDHA1 antibody-positive cases can have excessive oxidative stress induced by mitochondrial dysfunction37 causing brain enlargement. Its trajectory – whether the observed brain enlargement is caused by developmental and/or ageing abnormalities – cannot be addressed due to our study design. Further studies in anti-PDHA1 antibody-positive cases to reveal molecular processes and longitudinal brain volume changes are required.

Regarding the identified DLAT protein, no patient serum showed an immunological reaction against human recombinant DLAT. This unexpected finding might be attributable to epitopic differences between the native protein found in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and the human recombinant protein. For example, glycosylated DLAT may form an epitope. In this case, human recombinant DLAT without glycosylation would not be recognised by antibodies in the patient serum.

We should also note some limitations to be considered as follows: (1) The sample size was small and might not be representative, although brain MRI data in healthy controls and antibody-negative patients were compatible with those of previous reports. (2) The effects of the immune system in individual participants were not fully examined. For example, the wide spectrum of known autoantibodies9 was not evaluated in healthy controls. Besides, people with allergy were not excluded from the healthy control group. (3) The effects and mechanisms of anti-PDHA1 antibody on psychotic symptoms are undetermined. For example, whether the antibody is a cause or result of schizophrenia is unknown. (4) Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was not used in this study due to difficulties in sampling and preparation. The presence of the antibody in the CSF should be evaluated in future research. (5) To identify potential relationships as an exploratory analysis for a novel identified antibody, Bonferroni correction was not applied in the analysis of the brain data. Caution is needed in the interpretation of these results.

In this study, we detected anti-PDHA1 antibody in sera from a subgroup of patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is considered a syndrome with various underlying mechanisms. The detected antibody could be useful in identifying a subgroup with specific schizophrenia pathophysiology.



We recruited 25 patients with schizophrenia who had been diagnosed with the patient edition of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID). Age- and sex-matched healthy participants for each of the 25 patients were also recruited. Healthy participants had no history of psychiatric diseases based on the non-patient edition of the SCID. Individuals with a history of head trauma, neurological disorder, substance abuse, or serious medical or surgical disorders such as malignant tumours and autoimmune disorders were excluded from this study. Participants were recruited through posters, word of mouth, direct approach, and an agency.

Assessments and analyses of psychiatric symptoms

Symptom severity of schizophrenia was measured with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)38. The Global Assessment of Functioning scales both for symptoms (GAF-S) and functioning (GAF-F) were also used to evaluate the severity of symptoms and the level of functioning on a scale of 1 to 100 where higher scores indicate a better state39. In addition, the BACS was conducted to measure cognitive functions among patients with schizophrenia40. The premorbid IQ was estimated using the Japanese Adult Reading Test, which was utilised as an alternative to the National Adult Reading Test41. Quality of life in five domains (physical domain, psychological domain, social relationships, environment, and general health) was evaluated using the WHOQOL-2642.

Psychiatric measurements and demographic data were compared between healthy controls and patients with schizophrenia. Categorical data were analysed using Fisher’s exact test. Continuous data were analysed using the two-tailed independent sample t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test based on the results of the Shapiro–Wilk test. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS statistics 24.0.

Antibody detection

  1. 1)

    Preparation of tissue proteins

    Two brains of Wister rats (Rattus norvegicus, 58 days old, one male and one female) were freeze-dried and powdered to extract and purify protein using either a “ProteoExtract” or a protein extraction kit (Calbiochem/EMD, Darmstadt, Germany) with the “2-D Clean-Up Kit” (GE Healthcare UK, Ltd., Buckinghamshire, England).

  2. 2)

    Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE)

    The purified protein of the rat brains was applied overnight to Immobiline Drystrip (pI 3–10, 18 cm; GE Healthcare)43,44. Then, the rehydrated strips were dried using a filter paper. Isoelectric focusing was performed in a Pharmacia Hoefer Multiphor II electrophoresis chamber (GE Healthcare). Subsequently, SDS-PAGE was performed in 9–18% acrylamide gradient gels in an IsoDalt electrophoresis chamber as the second dimension. The two-dimensional gels were stained with SYPRO Ruby (Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) protocols45. The SYPRO Ruby-stained protein spots were detected using a Molecular Imager FX (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). After imaging, all gels were also stained with silver and dried46,47.

  3. 3)

    Two-dimensional western blot analysis

    Proteins from the gels were subjected to a western blot analysis after being transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond ECL nitrocellulose membrane, RPN203D; Amersham/GE Healthcare)48. Two pools of sera obtained from 25 patients with schizophrenia and from 25 healthy controls, respectively, were prepared as a solution containing primary antibodies. The signals were detected by ECL Prime reagents and visualised on Hyperfilm ECL (GE Healthcare) using a peroxidase-labelled secondary antibody to human IgA + IgG + IgM (Code KPL5220-0331; Milford, MA, USA).

  4. 4)

    In-gel digestion and mass spectrometric identification of proteins

    Immunopositive protein spots were excised from the dried silver-stained two-dimensional gels and rehydrated for 20 min in 100 mM NH4HCO3. The gel spots were then destained for 20 min in a solution of 15 mM potassium ferricyanide and 50 mM thiosulfate, rinsed twice in ultrapure water, and finally dehydrated in 100% acetonitrile until they turned opaque white. The gel pieces were then dried in a vacuum centrifuge and subsequently rehydrated in a digestion solution consisting of 50 mM NH4HCO3 and 0.01 µg/µL modified sequence-grade trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). After overnight incubation at 37 °C, the digestion was terminated in 5% trifluoroacetic acid for 20 min. Peptides were extracted three times (20 min each) with 5% trifluoroacetic acid in 50% acetonitrile, and the extracted peptides were pooled and dried in a vacuum centrifuge46,47. The peptides were purified with ZipTip (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and analysed using an Ultraflextreme time-of-flight/time-of-flight (TOF/TOF; Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) MALDI mass spectrometer and MASCOT database software (Matrix Science Inc., Boston, MA, USA).

One-dimensional western blot analysis using human recombinant protein and individual sera

Based on the protein identification using mass spectrometry, we employed two human recombinant proteins. One was PDHA1 with an N-terminal His Tag (Aviva Systems Biology Corporation, USA; molecular weight, 42 kDa). The other was DLAT, whose cDNA is the coding component E2 of the multi-enzyme pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, fused to a hexahistidine purification tag (Prospec-Tany Technogene, Ltd., Israel; molecular weight, 60.63 kDa). These human recombinant proteins were subjected to one-dimensional gel electrophoresis using individual sera according to the following process. A total of 300 ng of each human recombinant protein was prepared by addition of dithiothreitol and NuPAGE LDS Sample Buffer, incubated at 70 °C for 10 min, and applied to wells of 4–12% Bis-Tris Protein Gels (Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher Scientific). PAGE was performed at 150 V for 45 min following the manufacturer’s instructions. The separated proteins were then transferred to polyvinylidene di-fluoride membranes (Hybond PVDF blotting membrane, 10600029; Amersham/GE Healthcare). The blots were reacted with individual sera as primary antibodies, which were detected by a peroxidase-labelled secondary antibody against human IgA + IgG + IgM (Code KPL5220-0331; Milford). Magic Mark XP Western Protein Standard molecular weight marker (Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for molecular weight determination. The presence or absence of a visible chemiluminescent signal at the same molecular size of the applied recombinant protein was used to define “positive” or “negative”, respectively.

MRI acquisition and preprocessing

Patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls underwent MRI in a 3 T whole-body scanner equipped with a receiver-only 32-channel phased-array head coil (Tim Trio; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The scanning parameters of the T1-weighted 3-dimensional magnetisation-prepared rapid gradient-echo (3D-MPRAGE) sequence were as follows: repetition time, 2,000 ms; echo time, 3.4 ms; inversion time, 990 ms; field of view, 225 × 240 mm2; matrix, 240 × 256; slice thickness, 1.00 mm without gaps; number of slices, 208; and resolution, 0.9375 × 0.9375 × 1.0 mm3. The scanning parameters of the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) sequence were as follows: repetition time, 5,640 ms; echo time, 106 ms; field of view, 192 × 192 mm2; imaging matrix, 96 × 96; 70 contiguous axial slices of 2 mm thickness. DTIs were acquired in 64 non-collinear directions of diffusion sensitisation (b = 1,500 s/mm2) and 5 non-diffusion-weighted images (b = 0 s/mm2).

To obtain individual regional grey matter volumes, the 3D-MPRAGE data were processed using the Computational Anatomy Toolbox 12 (CAT12; via the Statistical Parametric Mapping software 12 (SPM12; Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, London, UK) running in MATLAB software R2016b (The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA). The CAT12 toolbox incorporated the following processes: (1) spatial registration to a reference brain (template), (2) tissue classification (segmentation) into grey and white matter and CSF, (3) bias correction of intensity non-uniformities, and (4) segmentation. The regional brain volume in each of the 142 regions of interest was obtained using maximum probability tissue labels derived from the Neuromorphometric atlas (Neuromorphometrics, Inc.; Obtained regional brain volumes were corrected for individual total intracranial volume, which was calculated as the sum of total grey matter, white matter, and CSF volumes. Adjusted regional brain volumes were used for further analyses.

DTI data were preprocessed as follows: (1) Denoising via the ‘dwidenoise’ command in MRtrix3 ( and (2) Subsequent preprocessing via dti_preprocess ( and FSL 6.0.1 ( to correct eddy current distortion, head motion by registering each data point to the first b = 0 image with affine transformation, and image distortion caused by magnetic susceptibility artefacts by B0 unwarping. Subsequently, the FSL diffusion tensor fitting programme DTIFIT was run to produce maps of FA, MD, RD, and AD using the preprocessed data. The maps were analysed for diffusivity parameters using the Tract-Based Spatial Statistics tool (version 1.2) available in FSL49. This process is composed of the following steps: (1) A mean FA image was created by averaging all spatially normalised FA data using the FNIRT tool available in FSL50; (2) An original mean FA skeleton representing only the centres of white matter tracts common to all subjects was created by thinning the mean FA image; (3) A mean FA skeleton mask was generated with an FA threshold of 0.2 from the original mean FA skeleton; (4)The individual local maxima along the perpendicular direction of the voxel value in the normalised FA map were projected onto the mean FA skeleton; (5) Using the same projection vectors for FA, MD, RD, and AD, maps were projected onto the skeleton; and (6) The mean FA, MD, RD, and AD values were obtained based on the calculation within the skeleton.

Analyses of brain imaging measures

Brain MRI data were analysed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s post hoc test to compare results between three groups (i.e., healthy controls, antibody-negative schizophrenia, and antibody-positive schizophrenia). The Kruskal–Wallis test, which requires at least three groups with a minimum sample size of three in each group, was selected51, whereas the one-way analysis of variance was not used due to the small sample size. A significance level of p < 0.05 was set for all statistical analyses on all available data using IBM SPSS statistics 24.0.

Ethical approval

The study was conducted according to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethics approval was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of Kyoto University, Graduate School and Faculty of Medicine (R0027). All animal experiments were performed in accordance with institutional guidelines. All participants were aged over 18 years and provided written informed consent.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Owen, M. J., Sawa, A. & Mortensen, P. B. Schizophrenia. Lancet 388, 86–97 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Goldsmith, C.-A. W. & Rogers, D. P. The case for autoimmunity in the etiology of schizophrenia. Pharmacotherapy 28, 730–741 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Cullen, A. E. et al. Associations between non-neurological autoimmune disorders and psychosis: A meta-analysis. Biol. Psychiatry 85, 35–48 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    van Kesteren, C. F. M. G. et al. Immune involvement in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia: a meta-analysis on postmortem brain studies. Transl. Psychiatry 7, e1075 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Dalmau, J. et al. Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies. Lancet Neurol. 7, 1091–1098 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Dalmau, J. et al. Paraneoplastic anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis associated with ovarian teratoma. Ann. Neurol. 61, 25–36 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Nakagami, Y., Sugihara, G., Ikeda, A. & Murai, T. Is the prevalence of anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antibodies in schizophrenia overestimated? Schizophr. Res. 197, 591–592 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Chen, C.-H. et al. Seroprevalence survey of selective anti-neuronal autoantibodies in patients with first-episode schizophrenia and chronic schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 190, 28–31 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sidhom, O. et al. Spectrum of autoantibodies in Tunisian psychiatric inpatients. Immunol. Invest. 41, 538–549 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kimura, A. et al. Antibodies in patients with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Neurology 74, 1372–1379 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Akiyama, K. et al. Predictive value of premorbid IQ, negative symptoms, and age for cognitive and social functions in Japanese patients with schizophrenia: A study using the Japanese version of the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 246, 663–671 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hosseini, S.-H. & Karkhaneh Yousefi, M. Quality of life and GAF in schizophrenia correlation between quality of life and global functioning in schizophrenia. Iran. J. Psychiatry Behav. Sci. 5, 120–125 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kanamori, E., Takeda, S., Nobuoka, M. & Ito, Y. Clinical significance of anti-mitochondrial antibody determination in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Japanese Journal of Medical Technology 50, 1197–1202 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Frascarelli, M. et al. Medial frontal gyrus alterations in schizophrenia: Relationship with duration of illness and executive dysfunction. Psychiatry Res. 231, 103–110 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Tohid, H., Faizan, M. & Faizan, U. Alterations of the occipital lobe in schizophrenia. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 20, 213–224 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    van Erp, T. G. M. et al. Subcortical brain volume abnormalities in 2028 individuals with schizophrenia and 2540 healthy controls via the ENIGMA consortium. Mol. Psychiatry 21, 547–553 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Squarcina, L. et al. Similar white matter changes in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: A tract-based spatial statistics study. PLoS One 12, e0178089 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kelly, S. et al. Widespread white matter microstructural differences in schizophrenia across 4322 individuals: results from the ENIGMA Schizophrenia DTI Working Group. Mol. Psychiatry 23, 1261–1269 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Herculano-Houzel, S. Scaling of Brain Metabolism with a Fixed Energy Budget per Neuron: Implications for Neuronal Activity, Plasticity and Evolution. PLoS One 6, e17514 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hollis, F., Kanellopoulos, A. K. & Bagni, C. Mitochondrial dysfunction in Autism Spectrum Disorder: clinical features and perspectives. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 45, 178–187 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Perez Ortiz, J. M. & Swerdlow, R. H. Mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease: Role in pathogenesis and novel therapeutic opportunities. Br. J. Pharmacol. 176, 3489–3507 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Rango, M. & Bresolin, N. Brain mitochondria, aging, and Parkinson’s disease. Genes 9, 250 (2018).

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Roberts, R. C. Postmortem studies on mitochondria in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 187, 17–25 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Schulmann, A. et al. Novel complex interactions between mitochondrial and nuclear DNA in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Mol. Neuropsychiatry 5, 13–27 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ozden, O. et al. SIRT3 deacetylates and increases pyruvate dehydrogenase activity in cancer cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 76, 163–172 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Miki, Y. et al. Alteration of mitochondrial protein PDHA1 in Lewy body disease and PARK14. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 489, 439–444 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Satogami, K., Takahashi, S., Kose, A. & Shinosaki, K. Schizophrenia-like symptoms in a patient with Leigh syndrome. Asian J. Psychiatr. 25, 249–250 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lee, C. U. et al. Fusiform gyrus volume reduction in first-episode schizophrenia: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 59, 775–781 (2002).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Onitsuka, T. et al. Fusiform gyrus volume reduction and facial recognition in chronic schizophrenia. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 60, 349–355 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Weiner, K. S. & Zilles, K. The anatomical and functional specialization of the fusiform gyrus. Neuropsychologia 83, 48–62 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Weiss, P. H. & Fink, G. R. Grapheme-colour synaesthetes show increased grey matter volumes of parietal and fusiform cortex. Brain 132, 65–70 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Hupé, J.-M. & Dojat, M. A critical review of the neuroimaging literature on synesthesia. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 103 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Bouvet, L., Barbier, J. E., Cason, N., Bakchine, S. & Ehrlé, N. When synesthesia and savant abilities are mistaken for hallucinations and delusions: contribution of a cognitive approach for their differential diagnosis. Clin. Neuropsychol. 31, 1459–1473 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lenroot, R. K. et al. Sexual dimorphism of brain developmental trajectories during childhood and adolescence. Neuroimage 36, 1065–1073 (2007).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Anagnostou, E. & Taylor, M. J. Review of neuroimaging in autism spectrum disorders: what have we learned and where we go from here. Mol. Autism 2, 4 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kern, J. K. & Jones, A. M. Evidence of toxicity, oxidative stress, and neuronal insult in autism. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B Crit. Rev. 9, 485–499 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Morris, G. & Berk, M. The many roads to mitochondrial dysfunction in neuroimmune and neuropsychiatric disorders. BMC Med. 13, 68 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A. & Opler, L. A. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 13, 261–276 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Pedersen, G., Hagtvet, K. A. & Karterud, S. Generalizability studies of the Global Assessment of Functioning-Split version. Compr. Psychiatry 48, 88–94 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Keefe, R. S. et al. The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia: reliability, sensitivity, and comparison with a standard neurocognitive battery. Schizophr. Res. 68, 283–297 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Matsuoka, K., Uno, M., Kasai, K., Koyama, K. & Kim, Y. Estimation of premorbid IQ in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease using Japanese ideographic script (Kanji) compound words: Japanese version of National Adult Reading Test. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 60, 332–339 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Tazaki, M.&Nakane, Y. WHO QOL 26 Japanese Version (in Japanese). (Kaneko Shobo (1997).

  43. 43.

    Rabilloud, T., Valette, C. & Lawrence, J. J. Sample application by in-gel rehydration improves the resolution of two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients in the first dimension. Electrophoresis 15, 1552–1558 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Sanchez, J. C. et al. Improved and simplified in-gel sample application using reswelling of dry immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 18, 324–327 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Towbin, H., Staehelin, T. & Gordon, J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 4350–4354 (1979).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Gharahdaghi, F., Weinberg, C. R., Meagher, D. A., Imai, B. S. & Mische, S. M. Mass spectrometric identification of proteins from silver-stained polyacrylamide gel: a method for the removal of silver ions to enhance sensitivity. Electrophoresis 20, 601–605 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Kristensen, D. B., Imamura, K., Miyamoto, Y. & Yoshizato, K. Mass spectrometric approaches for the characterization of proteins on a hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer. Electrophoresis 21, 430–439 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Lopez, M. F. et al. A comparison of silver stain and SYPRO Ruby Protein Gel Stain with respect to protein detection in two-dimensional gels and identification by peptide mass profiling. Electrophoresis 21, 3673–3683 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Smith, S. M. et al. Tract-based spatial statistics: Voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage 31, 1487–1505 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Andersson, J. L., Jenkinson, M.&Smith, S. Non-Linear Registration aka Spatial Normalisation. FMRIB Technical Report TR07JA2.(FMRIB Analysis Group of the University of Oxford (2007).

  51. 51.

    McBean, E. A.Risk Assessment: Procedures and Protocols. (John Wiley& Sons (2018).

Download references


The authors would like to thank the help given by IDEA Consultants, Inc. Laboratory of Foods and Life Sciences in conducting two-dimensional western blotting and subsequent protein identification. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows (17J00953 and 19J40275), Grants-in-Aid for Young Scientists (16K19763 and 19K17061), Daiwa Securities Health Foundation, and the Shimizu Foundation for Immunology and Neuroscience Grant for 2016.

Author information




Y.N. and K.M. were responsible for the study design. Y.N., S.M. and K.M. carried out the experiments. G.S. and S.S. contributed to brain MRI analyses. N.N., M.H., R.M., T.M. and A.I. had an equal share in designing the study methodology, overseeing the experiments, and interpreting the results. Y.N. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. G.S., N.N., M.H., S.S., S.M., R.M., T.M., A.I. and K.M. have contributed to the manuscript and have approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yukako Nakagami.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakagami, Y., Sugihara, G., Nakashima, N. et al. Anti-PDHA1 antibody is detected in a subset of patients with schizophrenia. Sci Rep 10, 7906 (2020).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing