Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Detection and imaging of gadolinium accumulation in human bone tissue by micro- and submicro-XRF

Abstract

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are frequently used in patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. In GBCAs gadolinium (Gd) is present in a bound chelated form. Gadolinium is a rare-earth element, which is normally not present in human body. Though the blood elimination half-life of contrast agents is about 90 minutes, recent studies demonstrated that some tissues retain gadolinium, which might further pose a health threat due to toxic effects of free gadolinium. It is known that the bone tissue can serve as a gadolinium depot, but so far only bulk measurements were performed. Here we present a summary of experiments in which for the first time we mapped gadolinium in bone biopsy from a male patient with idiopathic osteoporosis (without indication of renal impairment), who received MRI 8 months prior to biopsy. In our studies performed by means of synchrotron radiation induced micro- and submicro-X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (SR-XRF), gadolinium was detected in human cortical bone tissue. The distribution of gadolinium displays a specific accumulation pattern. Correlation of elemental maps obtained at ANKA synchrotron with qBEI images (quantitative backscattered electron imaging) allowed assignment of Gd structures to the histological bone structures. Follow-up beamtimes at ESRF and Diamond Light Source using submicro-SR-XRF allowed resolving thin Gd structures in cortical bone, as well as correlating them with calcium and zinc.

Introduction

The method of contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) dates to 1988, when the first gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agent (GBCA), gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist, Bayer), was approved for clinical use. CE-MRI is a useful imaging tool nowadays, with approximately 30 million procedures done each year worldwide, and more than 300 million procedures already performed to date1. Estimates show that the GBCAs are administered in 25–35% of all MRI examinations1,2.

According to the data available, most of the administered dose of GBCAs (regardless of an agent used), should be cleared in less than 2 and >95% by 24 hours3. Recent findings, however, demonstrate that the GBCAs are not fully excreted and the accumulation of Gd in, e.g. neuronal tissues and organs such as brain takes place4.

The GBCAs are considered to be rather safe, yet there is a number of papers reporting nephrotoxic, hematotoxic, hepatotoxic and neurotoxic effects observed in animals and humans5. One of the most serious adverse reactions associated with the use of GBCAs is nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), which had been observed in patients with renal insufficiency6. NSF is a rare, but serious disease characterized by widespread tissue hardening (primarily skin is affected) with fibrotic nodules and plaques. First described in 1997, it was finally linked to the use of GBCAs in patients with kidney dysfunction in 20066,7. The pathophysiological mechanism involved remains unclear, though the dissociation of Gd from GBCA is usually indicated as the causative factor3,8. Due to renal insufficiency, the elimination of GBCA will be reduced, more of the dissociated Gd will be available, leading to tissue accumulation and further manifestation of Gd toxicity. The linear GBCAs due to their lower thermodynamic and kinetic stability (compared to macrocyclic GBCAs) are now considered as high-risk agents in patients with severe renal disease9.

The analysis by secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) techniques of skin biopsies from patients suffering from NSF after GBCA intake revealed Gd accumulations, which were inhomogeneous and co-localized with calcium10 and phosphorus11. In 2010 application of synchrotron radiation induced X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (SR-XRF) for investigation of skin samples of NSF patients independently by High et al. and George et al. also confirmed depositions of Gd coinciding with other elements12,13. Multiorgan Gd depositions in NSF patient, involving skin, liver, lungs, intestinal wall (ileum), kidney, lymph node, skeletal muscle, dura mater and cerebellum, were reported by Sanyal et al. by performing scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis14.

There is a growing body of research devoted to the investigation of possible GBCAs adverse effects in patients with normal renal function and, specifically, the retention of Gd. It would not be an overstatement to say, that a main focus lies on the retention of Gd by brain tissues. A recent study by Flood et al. connects increased signal intensity in children with repeated exposure to linear GBCAs15. Again, the use of less stable linear GBCAs is more likely to result in the deposition, however studies demonstrate, that the macrocyclic agents might be retained as well4,16. In view of this, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) issued recommendations for the restriction of linear GBCAs in body scans9.

Recently, accumulation of Gd in bone tissue received deserved attention, especially given the fact that bone tissue retains Gd from GBCAs to a greater degree (23 times higher levels) compared to brain16. Darrah et al. used ICP-MS to measure Gd content (bulk) in bone tissue in osteoporotic and osteoarthritic (previously exposed to Gd) and osteoarthritic (non-exposed, used as controls) patients, and concluded that Gd can be retained for longer than 8 years after the exposure17. Series of in vivo experiments by M. Lord et al. contributed substantially to the current knowledge about Gd retention. The group developed an in vivo XRF device and obtained quantitative data on Gd content in the bone tissue of exposed patients in comparison with control subjects18,19.

However, very little is known about the distribution of Gd in bone on the microscopic level. Our group has already employed the method of synchrotron radiation induced micro-X-ray fluorescence (SR-micro-XRF) for the characterization of distribution of trace elements, such as lead (Pb), zinc (Zn) and strontium (Sr) in healthy and diseased bone and cartilage samples20,21,22. Within this project we applied SR-micro- and submicro-XRF for the detection and mapping of Gd distribution within bone tissue. To the best of our knowledge these measurements are the first attempt to image Gd accumulations in the bone.

Materials and methods

Patient and bone samples preparation

Patient - male individual, 54 y, diagnosed with male idiopathic osteoporosis, multiple vertebral fractures and low bone mineral density, without indication of renal impairment. A transiliac crest biopsy was harvested from the patient for diagnostic reasons. All study-related procedures were approved and supervised by the local ethical committee of the St. Vincent Hospital Vienna, Austria, an academic teaching hospital of the Medical University of Vienna following the Declaration of Helsinki (DoH). The patient provided written consent for anonymized outcomes to be further used in scientific examinations.

It is known that the patient received MRI eight months prior to biopsy. Unfortunately, up to date we were not able to confirm whether and which contrast agent was used. No other sources of Gd intake are known.

The biopsy was dehydrated and fixed in ethanol and embedded in polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). In order to avoid contaminations, only fresh and clean solutions of pro analysis quality were used during sample preparation. Typical contamination originating from the polishing procedure and consisting of Cr-Mn-Fe-Ni was identified in only one sample area and routinely excluded in the data analysis (sample demonstrated in supplementary material). The thick PMMA block was trimmed using a low-speed diamond saw (Buehler Isomet, Lake Pluff, USA), and further sandpapered with decreasing grit size and finally polished by silk cloths loaded with diamond grains (3 μm and 1 μm) using a precision polishing device (PM5; Logitech Ltd., Glasgow, UK). This ensured the block having a smooth and flat surface, which is necessary for both quantitative backscattered electron imaging (qBEI) and SR-micro-XRF measurements (ANKA).

A 3 µm-thin cut was prepared out of the PMMA block for the measurements on two high-resolution SR-submicro-XRF beamlines (ESRF and Diamond Light Source synchrotrons), using a microtome (LEICA SM2500; Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). The cutting was performed as close as possible to the original surface – we estimate the offset to less than 15 µm. The resultant cut was sandwiched between two 8 µm Kapton foils and fastened to a plexiglass frame.

Quantitative backscattered electron imaging (qBEI)

qBEI was used to determine the degree of tissue mineralization. Making use of the dependency of the backscatter electron coefficient on the local electron density (average atomic number) of the target material, this method allows to derive the degree of mineralization of bone and further to evaluate the calcium concentration (weight percent, wt% Ca). Hence, bright areas in the grey scale qBEI images refer to higher, and the dark ones to lower mineralized matrix (higher vs. lower Ca content). This method requires flat polished surface in order to derive quantitative information, therefore is only possible for bone samples as PMMA embedded blocks. The measurements were preformed using a digital scanning electron microscope equipped with a four quadrant semiconductor backscattered electron detector (DSM 962; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), operated at 20 keV beam energy. Areas were scanned with ×200 nominal magnification (pixel resolution 1 μm). The information depth of qBEI depends on the mineralization and is in the range of 1–1.5 μm. The details on the technique can be found in ref. 23

SR-XRF measurements and data processing

ANKA

The measurements on the PMMA block sample were performed at the confocal FLUO beamline at ANKA (KIT, Karlsruhe, Germany). For the first beamtime (two areas on the surface of the block, Fig. 1) beam size was defined at Ti-Ka (4.51 keV) as 27 μm × 18 μm × 24.5 µm (hor. × vert. × dep.), with the excitation energy of 9.2 keV (the energy optimized for the detection of manganese due to the original purpose of the experiment). The step size was 25 µm × 15 µm. For the second beamtime (another two areas, supplementary material Fig. S1) the beam size was defined at Ti-Ka as 28 μm × 19.5 μm × 35 µm (hor. × vert. × dep.), the step size was 25 µm × 17 µm, same excitation energy 9.2 keV. In both measurement sessions the setup included W-Si multilayer monochromator, 2 polycapillary half-lenses, 20 µm Al detector-filter, Vortex 50 mm2 silicon-drift detector, and XIA Mercury digital pulse processor. The angle between source and detector was 90°. The acquisition time was 15–17 seconds per spot (pixel) depending on the area.

ESRF

Measurements on the thin section with submicrometer resolution were performed at the ID13 microfocus beamline at ESRF (Grenoble, France); beam size 50 nm, defined using Siemens star standard. The excitation energy was set to 12.7 keV (corresponds to highest flux available at the beamline). The beamline was equipped with multilayer Laue lens optics, Vortex-EM silicon drift detector (Hitachi, USA), positioned on the rear side, “behind” the sample (i.e. the angle between source and detector is more than 90°). The step size was 500 nm with 20 s acquisition time per spot.

Diamond Light Source

Measurements on the same slice as analysed at the ESRF were also conducted at submicro-X-ray fluorescence setup on the B16 beamline at Diamond Light Source (Didcot, UK). The excitation energy was set to 12.7 keV to match that used at ESRF. The beam size (FWHM at 12.7 keV) was determined as about 500 nm × 610 nm (V × H) – taking into account the overlap in 45° geometry – using a 50 µm-diameter Au wire knife edge. The setup included a RuB4C multilayer monochromator, 150 µm pinhole and a single-element 90 Ex Vortex detector (50 mm2), positioned at 90° to the beam. The step size was 500 nm with an acquisition time 15 s per spot. Additional information on the setup we used for the experiment can be found in ref. 24

Data processing

For the ANKA dataset, the spectra were processed using AXIL software25. Spectra recorded at ESRF and Diamond Light Source were processed with PyMCA26. The quality of fitting was further validated and text images for each element of interest were obtained using in-house software LP-map27. Finally, ImageJ28 was used to process the text images and to produce the elemental maps and overlays. Elemental maps are presented in counts per second (cps).

Results

The SR-micro-XRF measurements in the cortical region of the human iliac crest biopsy revealed highly localized accumulations of Gd. This observation was done at the ANKA synchrotron during the beamtime dedicated to the detection of manganese. The two scans recorded during this first beamtime are presented in Fig. 1. During the follow-up beamtime we scanned two additional areas, but as the setup was adjusted differently, it was less sensitive to Gd. For illustrative purposes those two additional areas are demonstrated in supplementary material (Fig. S1).

Figure 1 shows Gd and Ca elemental maps as well as a composite image, where qBEI is superimposed on the Ca map (marked as qBEI/Ca). On the Gd map all the pixels above a certain threshold (in the range of 1–3 counts per second (cps), selected individually for each map) are selected and marked via mask (green lines). The exact same mask is applied to the Ca map and, finally, the Ca map with the mask is superimposed on the qBEI, creating the qBEI/Ca composite image. The resolution of qBEI images is higher than that of the elemental maps and facilitates assignment of the Gd structures. Indeed, it can be seen, that Gd accumulation happens within the specific restricted compartments: (i) in cement lines separating two bone packets (signified with black arrows on Fig. 1), and (ii) at the interface between mineralized matrix and vascular canals, corresponding to the walls of Haversian and Volkmann’s canals (marked with red asterisks).

Figure 1
figure1

Elemental maps of Gd and Ca (in cps) obtained at ANKA, composite qBEI/Ca overlay and corresponding qBEIs of two areas. The area size for maps of 21 × 41 pixels corresponds to 500 × 600 µm2; for qBEIs 450 × 570 µm2. The black arrows (composite image and qBEI) point at cement lines; red asterisk – canals.

The alleged cement line Gd structures are mainly 1-pixel thick (elemental maps), however the correct estimation of their thickness is not possible based on these maps only. As can be seen from the qBEI image, cement lines have a thickness <5 µm. Hence, the confocal system at ANKA with the resolution of ~20 µm can be used for locating the Gd accumulation, but gives an overestimation of the sizes of those structures, while underestimating the relative elemental content.

Therefore, as a next step, we aimed to resolve the thin structures within the mineralized bone tissue in higher resolution. These scans were performed at ESRF and Diamond Light Source synchrotrons at beamlines featuring submicrometer beam sizes. The non-confocal setups on both synchrotrons call for thin samples, therefore a slice of 3 µm thickness was prepared out of the original PMMA block as close as possible to the qBEI-measured surface (see Materials and Methods). As the excitation energy was higher compared to the ANKA synchrotron, we detected a broader range of elements including zinc (Zn), which is also known to accumulate in cement lines22. Therefore, correlating Gd and Zn distributions provided additional information.

Figure 2 shows the elemental maps of Ca, Gd and Zn obtained at ESRF. The Ca map confirms that the entire field of view was positioned within the mineralized matrix. It can be seen, that Gd is only found in a restricted region, roughly the horizontal width of this structure can be estimated as 10–15 µm. Gd shows a unique distribution, and remarkably, it is exclusively detected in the area, where also Zn is present in high content. As reliable qBEI imaging cannot be performed on thin sections, here the composite image is prepared by overlaying Ca (red) and Gd (green) elemental maps. Due to the high intensity of the beam at ESRF, the area mapped there was subject to radiation damage and can be recognised by darker colour compared to the surrounding tissue – the respective area is marked on the light microscopy.

Figure 2
figure2

Elemental maps (in cps), composite image obtained at ESRF and light microscopy. Area size is 61 × 41 pixels corresponding to 30 × 20 µm2.

The very same sample which we have measured at ESRF, although a different area of it, was later investigated during the beamtime at Diamond Light Source. Figure 3 shows the elemental maps of Ca, Gd and Zn obtained at the Diamond Light Source and the composite image of Ca (red) and Gd (green) overlay. The horizontal width of this Gd structure is around 10 µm. In this experiment Gd found to be located within the calcified area as well – and again Zn and Gd locally correlate, supporting the previous observations based on the ESRF measurements.

Figure 3
figure3

Elemental maps (in cps) and composite image obtained at Diamond Light Source. Area size is 33 × 36 pixels corresponding to 16 × 17.5 µm2.

It should be noted that we also detected cobalt (Co) in both regions measured at ESRF and Diamond Light Source – exhibiting a similar local distribution as Ca, though its origin remains unknown.

The exemplary spectra from ANKA and ESRF synchrotrons, Co maps (ESRF and Diamond Light Source), as well as additional composite images of Zn and Gd overlays (ESRF and Diamond Light Source) are included in the supplementary material (Figs. S2, S3, and S4 respectively).

Discussion and Conclusion

Sources of exposure

In the present paper we demonstrated the distribution of Gd within cortical bone tissue, and its correlation with the other detected elements. It is known from the patient’s history, that MRI was carried out 8 months prior to the biopsy, but it remains unknown whether a contrast agent was used. Hence, we cannot assert that the Gd signal originates from retention from this single exposure event. It is fair to note, that other than CE-MRI sources of exposure to Gd are possible29,30.

Rare-earth elements (REE) mining and processing can be mentioned in this respect, although the reports on the occupational exposure associated with negative health outcomes other than pneumoconiosis are sporadic. Li et al. found higher urinary levels of La, Nd, Ce and Gd in exposed workers dealing with Ce and La oxides ultrafine particles and nanoparticles compared to non-exposed31, however the next paper from the group (presumably on the same subjects), on creatinine adjusted urinary levels of REEs, did not show significant difference in gadolinium levels32. We were unable to find reports on deposition of gadolinium in occupationally exposed subjects.

In the recent years the anthropogenic Gd pollution, especially in aquatic systems, became a topic of extensive research33,34,35. However, we doubt that the low concentrations of Gd in tap water could lead to the found accumulation in bone tissue; and given the likely subject’s occupational history, the likelihood of presumable occupational exposure to elevated concentrations of gadolinium is remote.

Our hypothesis is that the observations made in this study could be generally characteristic for the Gd uptake by bone, regardless of the source. Imaging experiments on larger number of biopsies from patients with known history of Gd exposure are required to systematically determine Gd accumulation/retention with respect to the source and are planned to be done after this pioneer study.

Analysis ex vivo, localization within bone

To date the Gd retention in bone was investigated in bulk, and in many cases ICP-based techniques were employed for the analysis16,17,36,37. Research undertaken by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) and ICP-MS compared linear GBCA (Omniscan) to macrocyclic (ProHanse) and revealed higher levels of retention in bone in case of linear contrast agent36,37. One investigation employing SEM-EDS for the analysis reported that no Gd was detected in the bone. That might be due to the detection limits of the chosen method or due to the preceding sample preparation, as the sample had been decalcified14. While the detection limits of EDS are typically around 0.5 wt%, SR-XRF spectrometry (as employed in the present study) features a much higher sensitivity down to sub-ppm24, thus making this method more suitable for the local analysis of trace elements like Gd. Indeed, the anticipated Gd concentrations in bone after exposure to GBCA are within few ppm, which is supported by the bulk measurements (up to 1.77 µg Gd/g bone37) and in vivo experiments (mean 1.19 µg Gd/g bone19).

Since the concentration of gadolinium in the detected structures is of considerable interest, we attempted the quantification of local Gd content - and obtained the maximum values in the range of 70–270 µg/g (locally detected maximum concentration, indicative, not to be confused with bulk values mentioned above!) – the detailed procedure is described in supplementary material. This correlates well with the results obtained in a comparable elemental imaging experiment using skin biopsy, where the hot spot concentrations in Gd maps exceed 100 μg/g38.

By correlating elemental maps obtained at ANKA synchrotron and qBEI images, we were able to assign the histological structures, which seem to be prone to Gd accumulation, namely (i) cement lines and (ii) vascular pore walls (interface to Haversian/Volkmann’s canals). Conceivably, deposition within the walls of canals is due to the direct vicinity to the blood vessels which feature the main delivery pathway of Gd after exposure. The cement lines are marking the osteon boundaries, they are mineral-rich and collagen deficient (compared to the mineralized matrix of the osteon), and also contain non-collagenous proteins, such as osteopontin, glycosaminoglycans, osteocalcin, and bone sialoprotein39. The cement lines are laid down at the reversal phase of osteon formation (i.e. before the formation of the new sequential lamellae)40. Supposing that the transient Gd exposure occurred at this phase of osteon formation, it is plausible, that Gd may be included in the composition of the cement line and adjacent lamellas.

Correlation with other elements, possible mechanisms of retention

The correlation of Gd with other elements can shed light on the chemical environment of Gd within the accumulations and on the mechanism of retention. Data available on Gd depositions in skin suggest a colocalization with such elements as Ca, P and Zn. Abraham et al. observed Gd in association with Ca by SIMS10. Birka et al. used LA-ICP-MS and concluded, that matching Gd and P distributions suggest the presence of insoluble deposits of GdPO4 in the tissue section; and the Gd and Ca correlation could suggest that Gd causes calcium-containing depositions, which trigger calcification11. George et al. investigated Gd accumulation in skin affected by NSF using SR-XRF, and found clear correlation between Gd, Ca and P distributions, and the use of extended absorption fine structure spectroscopy (EXAFS) further allowed to assume Gd presence in form of GdPO4-like structures13. An inhomogeneous Zn distribution was also found throughout the Gd and Ca deposits, though it was concluded that Zn does not show a simple correlation with those elements in skin. At the same time, High et al. also with the use of SR-XRF observed colocalization of Gd, Ca and Zn in skin tissue and hypothesized that Ca and Zn facilitate displacement of Gd from the chelating agent12. Interesting results were obtained by Clases et al., who investigated not only skin, but also brain depositions, using LA-ICP-MS. In skin elemental distribution of Gd, P, Ca and Zn correlated in location and shape, pointing to the abundance of insoluble phosphate species, while in brain correlations and co-localisation of Gd with P, Ca, Zn, as well as Fe was observed38.

However, despite of all the ongoing research, the mechanism of the Gd incorporation in bone remains undetermined, and the form, in which it is deposited, is not known. The investigation of spatial distribution of Gd within bone can be instrumental in understanding that, and such studies are called for41. Although skin deposition mechanism might differ from the accumulation in bone, we also found Gd in calcified regions. Darrah et al. suggested, that ionic Gd3+ released from Gd-chelates is subsequently incorporated into the carbonated calcium hydroxyapatite mineral phase of bone17. Such a process, so-called “transmetallation”, in which the molecule of GBCA supposedly undergoes in in vivo environment, refers to the competition between endogenous cations (Fe3+, Zn2+, Mg2+, Ca2+, etc.) and Gd3+, as well as between endogenous anions (carbonate, hydroxide, phosphate, etc.) and the ligand. The Ca-transmetallation is supported by Gd similarity to Ca, the ionic radii of the ions are 107.8 pm for Gd and 114 pm for calcium. In this context, we would like to mention our previous study on Sr incorporation into bone, as Sr is also chemically similar to Ca. In patients who received Sr ranelate for treatment of osteoporosis, Sr was predominantly found in the newly formed bone matrix (formed in the period of increased Sr serum levels) and it was incorporated into the hydroxyapatite crystals changing/increasing the crystal lattice constant42,43. Therefore, we could hypothesise, that Gd retention is of the same nature, which can be further assessed by speciation analysis.

The other possible transmetallation competitor is Zn, which was already suggested by some of the ex vivo measurements of skin depositions discussed above. In 2010, S. Greenberg published a case report on a patient with chronic Zn poisoning, pointing at possible Gd retention due to Gd-Zn transmetallation44. With our measurements performed at Diamond Light Source and ESRF synchrotrons with submicrometer beams we focused on the Gd structures within mineralized bone. These imaging experiments revealed a local overlapping of Gd and Zn. Although their distribution patterns are not the same, Gd appears to be present only in the areas of high Zn content. The previous investigations by our group demonstrated high content of Zn, Pb and Sr in the cement lines22. Present findings showing interdependencies between Gd and Zn, might support the Gd-Zn transmetallation as mechanism of Gd retention.

Significance and possible toxicity

Gadolinium belongs to the group of rare-earth elements, it is normally not found in living organisms, and it is highly toxic in its free ionic Gd3+ form3. Bone tissue is metabolically active, and continually undergoes remodelling. Therefore, slow endogenous Gd release into the bloodstream is likely to occur, and the risk is even higher in subjects with increased bone resorption (pregnancy, lactation, during menopause; in osteoporotic patients)17,45. Increase in safety concerns regarding the use of GBCAs triggered animal research, investigating Gd retention by various tissues, under single or repeated administration of GBCAs in healthy animals, as well as in induced disease models. Jost et al. compared linear and macrocyclic GBCAs with regard to brain deposition in rats after 2 weeks of repeated administration using LA-ICP-MS46. Previously unknown site of Gd accumulation was identified by Delfino et al., who observed Gd deposition in the periodontal tissues in murine model with induced renal disease, using SR-XRF and LA-ICP-MS47. Interesting results showing differential accumulation of Gd by different bone tissues – cortical, trabecular bone and bone marrow in juvenile and adult rats by ICP-MS were published by Fretellier et al.48. An interesting line of research – usage of GBCAs in pregnancy and potential effect of Gd on foetus, were investigated by Prola-Netto et al. in rhesus macaques, and although only extremely low levels of Gd were found in juvenile tissues after in utero exposure, femur was identified as a site of consistent Gd retention in all the animals49. Until now, however, the studies allowing elucidation of mechanisms of Gd incorporation into bone, as well as its further fate, were not undertaken, therefore, animal models and studies involving human biopsies are called for50.

The knowledge about deposition of Gd from GBCAs in bone is of importance, especially in the view of recently gained evidence of its accumulation behaviour in brain tissue, and possible risks associated with toxicity of free Gd. To the best of our knowledge these measurements are the first attempt of imaging Gd accumulations in the bone tissue, which is of exceptional value for understanding the mechanisms of Gd retention and, further, for predictions regarding the safety of GBCAs.

Outlook

Summarizing the key questions for the further research we suggest to focus on: (i) systematic analysis of biopsies from patients with known history of GBCA intake in comparison with controls without clinical Gd exposure, (ii) animal studies comparing Gd supplemented and control animals to distinguish accumulation patterns for continuous, as well as short time exposure events, (iii) quantification of Gd within bone which can be achieved using matrix-matched standards (the other elemental imaging methods, such as LA-ICP-MS and SIMS could be applied as well); (iv) the speciation of the deposited Gd has to be performed, e.g. by XANES and EXAFS to gain knowledge about the specific chemical form, which is essential in predicting the possible health hazard (toxicity).

References

  1. 1.

    Lohrke, J. et al. 25 Years of Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Developments, Current Challenges and Future Perspectives. Adv. Ther. 33, 1–28 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Fraum, T. J., Ludwig, D. R., Bashir, M. R. & Fowler, K. J. Gadolinium-based contrast agents: A comprehensive risk assessment. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 46, 338–353 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ramalho, J. et al. Gadolinium-based contrast agent accumulation and toxicity: An update. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 37, 1192–1198 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Guo, B. J., Yang, Z. L. & Zhang, L. J. Gadolinium Deposition in Brain: Current Scientific Evidence and Future Perspectives. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 11, 1–12 (2018).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Rogosnitzky, M. & Branch, S. Gadolinium-based contrast agent toxicity: a review of known and proposed mechanisms. BioMetals 29, 365–376 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Grobner, T. Gadolinium - a specific trigger for the development of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 21, 1745–1745 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Marckmann, P. Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis: Suspected Causative Role of Gadodiamide Used for Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 17, 2359–2362 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Idée, J.-M., Fretellier, N., Robic, C. & Corot, C. The role of gadolinium chelates in the mechanism of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: A critical update. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 44, 895–913 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    EMA. European Medicines Agency - Human medicines - Gadolinium-containing contrast agents. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/referrals/gadolinium-containing-contrast-agents (2017).

  10. 10.

    Abraham, J. L., Chandra, S., Thakral, C. & Abraham, J. M. SIMS imaging of gadolinium isotopes in tissue from Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis patients: Release of free Gd from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents. Appl. Surf. Sci. 255, 1181–1184 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Birka, M. et al. Diagnosis of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis by means of Elemental Bioimaging and Speciation Analysis. Anal. Chem. 87, 3321–3328 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    High, W. A. et al. Gadolinium deposition in nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: An examination of tissue using synchrotron x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 62, 38–44 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    George, S. J., Webb, S. M., Abraham, J. L. & Cramer, S. P. Synchrotron X-ray analyses demonstrate phosphate-bound gadolinium in skin in nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Br. J. Dermatol. 163, 1077–1081 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sanyal, S., Marckmann, P., Scherer, S. & Abraham, J. L. Multiorgan gadolinium (Gd) deposition and fibrosis in a patient with nephrogenic systemic fibrosis - An autopsy-based review. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 26, 3616–3626 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Flood, T. F., Stence, N. V., Maloney, J. A. & Mirsky, D. M. Pediatric Brain: Repeated Exposure to Linear Gadolinium-based Contrast Material Is Associated with Increased Signal Intensity at Unenhanced T1-weighted MR Imaging. Radiology 277, 160356 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Murata, N. et al. Macrocyclic and Other Non–Group 1 Gadolinium Contrast Agents Deposit Low Levels of Gadolinium in Brain and Bone Tissue. Invest. Radiol. 51, 447–453 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Darrah, T. H. et al. Incorporation of excess gadolinium into human bone from medical contrast agents. Metallomics 1, 479–88 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lord, M. L. et al. Confirming improved detection of gadolinium in bone using in vivo XRF. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 120, 111–118 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lord, M. L., Chettle, D. R., Gräfe, J. L., Noseworthy, M. D. & McNeill, F. E. Observed Deposition of Gadolinium in Bone Using a New Noninvasive in Vivo Biomedical Device: Results of a Small Pilot Feasibility Study. Radiology 000, 171161 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Roschger, A. et al. Differential accumulation of lead and zinc in double-tidemarks of articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 21, 1707–15 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Rauwolf, M. et al. Increased zinc accumulation in mineralized osteosarcoma tissue measured by confocal synchrotron radiation micro X-ray fluorescence analysis. X-Ray Spectrom. 46, 56–62 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Pemmer, B. et al. Spatial distribution of the trace elements zinc, strontium and lead in human bone tissue. Bone 57, 184–193 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Roschger, P., Fratzl, P., Eschberger, J. & Klaushofer, K. Validation of quantitative backscattered electron imaging for the measurement of mineral density distribution in human bone biopsies. Bone 23, 319–326 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Rauwolf, M. et al. Characterization of a submicro-X-ray fluorescence setup on the B16 beamline at Diamond Light Source. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 25, 1189–1195 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    van Espen, P., Janssens, K. & Nobels, J. AXIL-PC, software for the analysis of complex X-ray spectra. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 1, 109–114 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Solé, V. A. A., Papillon, E., Cotte, M., Walter, P. & Susini, J. A multiplatform code for the analysis of energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectra. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 62, 63–68 (2007).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Perneczky, L. Implementation of a confocal synchrotron radiation induced micro X-ray fluorescence system for bone analysis at the X-ray fluorescence beamline of ELETTRA synchrotron., http://repositum.tuwien.ac.at/obvutwhs/content/titleinfo/2582079. (TU Wien, 2018)

  28. 28.

    Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gwenzi, W. et al. Sources, behaviour, and environmental and human health risks of high-technology rare earth elements as emerging contaminants. Sci. Total Environ. 636, 299–313 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Pagano, G., Thomas, P. J., Di Nunzio, A. & Trifuoggi, M. Human exposures to rare earth elements: Present knowledge and research prospects. Environ. Res. 171, 493–500 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Li, Y. et al. Direct quantification of rare earth elements concentrations in urine of workers manufacturing cerium, lanthanum oxide ultrafine and nanoparticles by a developed and validated ICP-MS. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 13, 1–10 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Li, Y., Yu, H., Li, P. & Bian, Y. Assessment the Exposure Level of Rare Earth Elements in Workers Producing Cerium, Lanthanum Oxide Ultrafine and Nanoparticles. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 175, 298–305 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Rogowska, J., Olkowska, E., Ratajczyk, W. & Wolska, L. Gadolinium as a new emerging contaminant of aquatic environments. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 37, 1523–1534 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lingott, J. et al. Gadolinium-uptake by aquatic and terrestrial organisms-distribution determined by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 18, 200–207 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Lindner, U. et al. Analysis of Gadolinium-based contrast agents in tap water with a new hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ZIC-cHILIC) hyphenated with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 407, 2415–2422 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Gibby, W. A., Gibby, K. A. & Gibby, W. A. Comparison of Gd DTPA-BMA (Omniscan) versus Gd HP-DO3A (ProHance) retention in human bone tissue by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy. Invest. Radiol. 39, 138–42 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    White, G. W., Gibby, W. A. & Tweedle, M. F. Comparison of Gd(DTPA-BMA) (Omniscan) Versus Gd(HP-DO3A) (ProHance) Relative to Gadolinium Retention in Human Bone Tissue by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectroscopy. Invest Radiol. 41, 272–278 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Clases, D. et al. LA-ICP-MS/MS improves limits of detection in elemental bioimaging of gadolinium deposition originating from MRI contrast agents in skin and brain tissues. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 51, 212–218 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Milovanovic, P. et al. Bone tissue aging affects mineralization of cement lines. Bone 110, 187–193 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Skedros, J. G., Clark, G. C., Sorenson, S. M., Taylor, K. W. & Qiu, S. Analysis of the Effect of Osteon Diameter on the Potential Relationship of Osteocyte Lacuna Density and Osteon Wall Thickness. Anat. Rec. Adv. Integr. Anat. Evol. Biol. 294, 1472–1485 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Gräfe, J. L. & McNeill, F. E. Measurement of gadolinium retention: current status and review from an applied radiation physics perspective. Physiol. Meas. 39, 06TR01, (2018).

  42. 42.

    Roschger, P. et al. Bone material quality in transiliac bone biopsies of postmenopausal osteoporotic women after 3 years of strontium ranelate treatment. J. Bone Miner. Res. 25, 891–900 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Li, C. et al. Strontium is incorporated into mineral crystals only in newly formed bone during strontium ranelate treatment. J. Bone Miner. Res. 25, 968–975 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Greenberg, S. A. Zinc Transmetallation and Gadolinium Retention after MR Imaging: Case Report. Radiology 257, 670–673 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Swaminathan, S. Gadolinium Toxicity: Iron and Ferroportin as Central Targets. Magn. Reson. Imaging 8–11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2016.08.016 (2016).

  46. 46.

    Gregor Jost et al. Long-term Excretion of Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents: Linear versus Macrocyclic Agents in an Experimental Rat Model. Radiology https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018180135 (2018).

  47. 47.

    Delfino, R. et al. Gadolinium tissue deposition in the periodontal ligament of mice with reduced renal function exposed to Gd-based contrast agents. Toxicol. Lett. 301, 157–167 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Fretellier, N. et al. Does Age Interfere With Gadolinium Toxicity and Presence in Brain and Bone Tissues? Invest. Radiol. 54, 61–71 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Prola-Netto, J. et al. Gadolinium Chelate Safety in Pregnancy: Barely Detectable Gadolinium Levels in the Juvenile Nonhuman Primate after in Utero Exposure. Radiology 286, 122–128 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kanal, E. & Tweedle, M. F. Residual or Retained Gadolinium: Practical Implications for Radiologists and Our Patients. Radiology 275, 630–634 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the Synchrotron Light Source ANKA for provision of instruments at the FLUO beamline. Part of the submicro-XRF imaging experiments were performed on beamline ID13 at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), Grenoble, France. We thank Tilman A. Grünewald for introduction to PyMCA. We acknowledge Diamond Light Source for time on Beamline B16 under Proposal MT16260-1. We thank Igor Dolbnya for invaluable help in getting the beam at Diamond Light Source even more brilliant and Ian Pape for supporting the measurements at the Diamond Light Source. The research leading to this result has been supported by the project CALIPSOplus under the Grant Agreement 730872 from the EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation HORIZON2020. The research leading to these results has received funding from Austrian Science Fund (FWF, project number: P27715), the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant agreement n.312284.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.T., M.R., C.S., P.W. designed experiments. A.R., P.R. prepared samples, performed qBEI. R.S., M.B., O.F., K.S. provided support on the synchrotron beamlines. A.T., M.R., V.P., C.S. performed synchrotron measurements. A.T. analysed data. A.T., M.R., C.S., A.R., P.R.; J.H. interpreted the data. C.S., P.W., A.R., P.R.; J.H. provided scientific support. A.T. drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Turyanskaya.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supporting information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turyanskaya, A., Rauwolf, M., Pichler, V. et al. Detection and imaging of gadolinium accumulation in human bone tissue by micro- and submicro-XRF. Sci Rep 10, 6301 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63325-9

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing