Population structure and genetic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Ecuador


Tuberculosis (TB) is a significant public health problem in Ecuador with an incidence of 43 per 100,000 inhabitants and an estimated multidrug-resistant-TB prevalence in all TB cases of 9%. Genotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTBC) is important to understand regional transmission dynamics. This study aims to describe the main MTBC lineages and sublineages circulating in the country. A representative sample of 373 MTBC strains from 22 provinces of Ecuador, with data comprising geographic origin and drug susceptibility, were genotyped using 24 loci-MIRU-VNTR. For strains with an ambiguous sublineage designation, the lineage was confirmed by Regions of Difference analysis or by Whole Genome Sequencing. We show that lineage 4 is predominant in Ecuador (98.3% of the strains). Only 4 strains belong to lineages 2-sublineage Beijing and two strains to lineage 3-sublineage Delhi. Lineage 4 strains included sublineages LAM (45.7%), Haarlem (31.8%), S (13.1%), X (4.6%), Ghana (0.6%) and NEW (0.3%). The LAM sublineage showed the strongest association with antibiotic resistance. The X and S sublineages were found predominantly in the Coastal and the Andean regions respectively and the reason for the high prevalence of these strains in Ecuador should be addressed in future studies. Our database constitutes a tool for MIRU-VNTR pattern comparison of M. tuberculosis isolates for national and international epidemiologic studies and phylogenetic purposes.


Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTBC) is the causative agent of tuberculosis (TB), an infectious disease that remains worldwide the first cause of death related to one single agent. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that 10 million people developed TB in 2017 and about 1.3 million died. Estimated Multi Drug-resistant (MDR) TB cases have increased to about 450,000 in the same year1. In this context, Ecuador (with a population of approximately 17 million), is considered a middle burden country with about 5,800 notified TB cases in 2017 (Incidence 43/100,000), with 480 TB deaths and 249 registered MDR-TB cases2. However, according to the 2018 WHO report, Ecuador may have a significant underdiagnosis problem; as WHO estimate is 7,200 TB cases with approximately 650 TB drug-resistant or MDR cases by year, corresponding to 9% of the country’s total TB cases1.

The ethnic makeup of Ecuador, a middle-income country with an estimated population of 17 million, is highly diverse. The urban population accounts for 60.43% of the total population. The ethnic composition of the population is 71.9% Mestizo, 6.1% European descendants, 6.8% Indigenous, 7.2% Afro-Ecuadorian, and 7.4% Montubian3. Indigenous people present heavy concentrations in the Andean region and the Amazon Basin. Monitoring of the genotypes of MTBC strains helps to understand the transmission dynamics of circulating clones in certain geographic regions or ethnic groups and can help to improve control and prevention programs4. Strain genotypes may play a role in disease outcome, variation in vaccine efficacy and the emergence of drug resistance. Moreover, major MTBC lineages are associated with patients’ country of origin. In the last 25 years, different methodologies have been developed for MTBC genotyping; IS6110-RFLP fingerprinting, spoligotyping and Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Unit Variable Number of Tandem Repeat (MIRU-VNTR) typing. More recently, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has been introduced as the most accurate method for studying molecular epidemiology of MTBC. However, WGS is still a challenging and expensive approach for developing countries like Ecuador. MIRU-VNTR is considered a gold standard for MTBC genotyping, showing an acceptable discriminatory power and reproducibility for studying the genetic diversity and biogeographical structure of MTBC at a local, regional or national level5.

Although the MTBC genetic diversity has been well described for some countries of the Americas, there is an important lack of information for others6, and there is little information on the genetic diversity of M. tuberculosis in Ecuador. Two reports showed a low prevalence of the Beijing family in the country7,8 and another study analyzed strains from the capital Quito showing a high prevalence of lineage 49. Although this latter was a pioneer study in addressing the population structure of MTBC in Ecuador, it has limitations due to the limited sample size (104 isolates), drug resistance profile (all isolates were resistant to isoniazid, rifampicin or both) and location (all strains came from one single hospital in Quito). The present work aimed to study the genotypic diversity of strains of MTBC in Ecuador with a countrywide MTBC strain collection and compare our results with reports from other Latin-American countries.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the ethics committee of University San Francisco de Quito (code 2017-023IN) and Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública e Investigación Leopoldo Izquieta Pérez” (INSPI), both certified by Ministry of Public Health from Ecuador following guidelines from Declaration of Helsinki. All samples were anonymized and no data of the patients were made available.

MTBC isolates

A total of 373 isolates, one per patient, were selected for this study from the strain bank of the “Laboratorio de Referencia de Micobacterias” at the “Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública e Investigacion (INSPI) Leopoldo Izquieta Pérez” in Ecuador. Strains were provided by two public INSPI laboratories in Quito and Guayaquil, the only public laboratories in Ecuador that carry out mycobacterial culture and Guayaquil the only laboratory in Ecuador that performs drug resistance testing for the first- and second-line TB antibiotics. Consequently, MDR samples were usually much more likely to be collected by these laboratories. Strains from all provinces were included with exception of Imbabura and Carchi; no strains were available for these provinces, however, these provinces reported less than one percent of total national TB caseload. Ecuador comprises 4 distinct geographical regions: Andean, Costal, Amazonia and Galapagos Islands. Since we obtained only 1 strain from the Galapagos Islands we will refer to 3 geographical regions henceforth.

The strains included in this study were isolated in the years: 2013 (n = 41), 2014 (n = 121), 2015 (n = 179), and 2016 (n = 32) (Table 1). The sample size for each province was calculated using standard statistical methods8. Briefly, a cluster-randomized sampling method with an error = 0.05 and z = 1.96 was used to obtain a representative sample and in proportion with the number of reported smear-positive cases in 2013 and reported MDR case for each province. See Supplementary Table 1 for details of the strain distribution.

Table 1 Numbers and percentages of the sublineages found in Ecuador for specific geographic regions.

Drug susceptibility testing

Drug susceptibility testing for first-line drugs was performed using the proportion method of Canetti et al. on L–J medium with a minimal inhibitory concentrations of 40 µg/mL for RIF, 0.2 µg/mL for isoniazid, 4 µg/mL for streptomycin, 0.4 mg/mL for ethambutol and 200 µg/mL for pyrazinamide. The MTBC H37Rv strain was used as a control strain for drug susceptibility testing.

DNA extraction

Several colonies from isolates grown in Ogawa-Kudoh medium were resuspended in 500 µl of TE (10 mM Tris pH 8.0 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0), boiled at 95° for 45 minutes, and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 minutes. Supernatants were collected and stored at −80 °C until use.

MIRU-VNTR genotyping

The 24-loci MIRU-VNTR typing was used in this study and a PCR for each of these loci was performed as has been previously described10. Products were analyzed by electrophoresis using 2% agarose gels, long runs of 3–4 hours and using 50 bp ladders as a band size reference. From the gel images, the corresponding MIRU-VNTR bands were interpreted, based on reference table indications, as copy numbers. To ratify the results, about 35% of the strains were analyzed two times.

Regions of difference (RD) PCR genotyping

To confirm lineages and sublineages, especially for strains with an ambiguous MIRU-VNTR result, RD genotyping was performed for the chromosomal regions RD9, TbD1, RD4, RD5, RD10, RD12 RD 750, RD726, RD724, RD 239, RD105, RD702, RD711, IS1561, as previously described by Gagneux et al.11. Sanger sequencing was performed for the detection of the 7 bp deletion in the polyketide synthase locus (pKS1–15 RD) enabling the identification of Euro-American, Indo-Oceanic and Asian lineages12,13,14. The sequence analysis was carried out with the Geneious program (Biomatters); 253 of the 373 isolates (68%) were submitted to RD analysis including 220 strains representing all major and minor branches of the minimal spanning tree and 33 strains with a doubtful or ambiguous sublineage assignation.

Whole genome sequencing (WGS)

WGS was carried out for 8 isolates with an ambiguous result for MIRU-VNTR and DR analysis Also, 3 Beijing strains were sequenced for confirmation and further studies. The Illumina Hiseq 4000 (Macrogen, South Korea) sequencer was used and Fastq files were analyzed using TGS-TB online platform available at https://gph.niid.go.jp/tgs-tb/, obtaining a coverage over 99% in all samples. A maximum-likelihood core genome phylogeny tree analysis was done with RAxML (Randomized Accelerated Maximum Likelihood) with 1000 X bootstrap test15. Whole-genome sequences reported in this study were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers: VBWI00000000, VBWH00000000, VBVE00000000, VBVJ00000000, VBVK00000000, VBVI00000000, VBVD00000000, VBWK00000000, VBVG00000000, VBWJ00000000, VBVH00000000.

Phylogenetic analysis

To analyze the phylogenic relationship between the strains we carried out a minimum spanning tree (MST) analysis using the MIRU-VNTRplus web application available at https://www.miru-vntrplus.org/MIRU/index.faces. We used a categorical algorithm including both MIRU-VNTR and Regions of Difference data; stepwise weighted distance (DSW) measurements were used when only MIRU-VNTR data was available16. The comparison was done with previously reported MIRU types; 186 strains representing all known lineages and sublineages and stored in the same database. Following the algorithm published by Allix-Béguec, the best match analysis with a cut off value of 0.16 and posterior confirmation by tree-based analysis16 was performed using the numerical code MTBCC15-9 based on 15 discriminatory loci and 9 auxiliary loci, for sublineage assignment17.

Clonal complexes (CC) and clusters

Clonal Complexes were defined as strains with a maximum of two MIRU loci difference18. Cluster strains are strains with an identical MIRU-VNTR pattern.


All 373 strains included in this study generated interpretable MIRU-VNTR patterns and these were compared with the database available in the MIRU-VNTR plus platform (www.miru-vntrplus.org). Because of inconclusive results, WGS was carried out in 8 strains showing MTBC sublineages: Haarlem (2 strains), 1 S strain, 5 strains of sublineage X. Also, we confirmed with WGS the three Beijing strains present in our strain collection. The sequenced S strain belonged to sublineage The results of WGS can be found in Supplementary Fig. 1. Mutations associated with drug resistance can be found in Supplementary Table 4.

Our analysis showed that lineage 4 is the most prevalent in Ecuador (n = 367 or 98.4%), and only 6 of 373 strains belonged to lineage 2-sublineage Beijing (n = 4,1.1%) and lineage 3-sublineage Delhi (n = 2/0.6%). The sublineage distribution of lineage 4 included: LAM (n = 170, 45.6%), Haarlem (n = 120, 31.2%) S (n = 49, 13.1%), X (n = 16, 4.3%), Ghana (n = 2, 0.6%), and New (n = 1, 0.3%). See Table 1. Additionally, 9 isolates (2.4%) belong to lineage 4 by MIRU-VNTR and RD analyses could not be associated with any sublineage. These strains were grouped in a minimum spanning tree analysis near the Haarlem (3), X (4) and S (2 strains) sublineages.

We found no statistical difference in the distribution of the TB sublineages LAM and Haarlem (Pearson X2 = 10.242, df = 8, p = 0.248) for Ecuadorian geographical regions. The S lineage, with 49 isolates, was predominantly found in the Andean region, especially in Quito, and in the Amazonia, both regions with twice the prevalence in comparison with the Coastal region. The X sublineage, with 16 isolates, was predominantly found in the Coastal region (13 isolates), especially in Guayaquil, and only 1 and 2 isolates in the Amazonia and the Andean regions respectively (Table 1). The Ghana and Delhi sublineages, both with two strains, were only found in the coastal region. In Fig. 1 we have visualized the distribution of MTBC genotypes for Ecuador and in Table 1 the details of the numbers and prevalence rates for the three main geographic regions of Ecuador are shown.

Figure 1

Distribution of the sublineages in Ecuador by geographic region and in the two principal cities of Ecuador. The map of the country shows the pie charts of the distribution of the major sublineages for the three main geographic regions, the coastal region including Guayaquil, the Andes region including Quito and the Amazon region. Also, in separated pie charts, the distribution of sublineages for the entire country and the two largest cities in Ecuador; Quito and Guayaquil (map was elaborated with sotfware Qgis 3.12; http://qgis.osgeo.org).

The sublineage distribution for the 2 largest cities in Ecuador, (Quito and Guayaquil, with about 2 million and 2.7 million inhabitants respectively) is shown in Table 2 and Fig. 1. There was a statistically significant difference (Pearson X2 = 13.237, df = 4, p = 0.009) in LAM prevalence in Quito and Guayaquil with 31.2% (n = 19) and 53.0% (n = 71) respectively. The prevalence of the S strains in Quito was twice that of Guayaquil, conversely, the prevalence of X strains in Guayaquil was double than that in Quito.

Table 2 MTBC lineages distribution for the two main cities in Ecuador, Quito, and Guayaquil.

Drug resistance profiles and MIRU-VNTR typing

Drug resistance profiles were available for 320 of the 373 MTBC isolates in this study (Table 3). Most of the strains were susceptible for all 4 first-line drugs (n = 171, 53.6%), 78 (24.5%) were MDR-TB, and 3 (0.9%) were polyresistant. Excluding Beijing, Delhi, and New because of the low number of isolates, MDR prevalence among lineages was only statistically different (Pearson X2 = 16.124, df 6, test, p = 0.013) for S strains with 10.3%, compared with LAM with 30.8%, X with 26.66% and Haarlem with 22.5%. For rifampicin resistance there was no statistically significant differences among the sublineages Haarlem (n = 5, 4.9%), LAM (n = 5, 3.4%), X (n = 1, 6.6%) and S (n = 1, 2.6%). A statistically significant differences (Pearson X2 = 16.608, df 9, p = 0.055) was found for isoniazid resistance in the sublineage LAM (n = 33, 22.6%) compared with sublineages Haarlem (n = 14, 13.7%), S (n = 5, 12.8%), and X (n = 2, 13.33%) (Table 3).

Table 3 Drug resistance profiles distribution among MTBC sublineages.

Clonal complexes and clusters

Nineteen Clonal Complexes (CC), defined as strains with a maximum of two MIRU loci difference, were found encompassing 93 (24.9%) of the isolates. See Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 2. Seven CC could be found only in Guayas province, comprising 52 of the 161 (32%) strains obtained from this Province. Other CCs were also found in Los Rios and El Oro provinces comprising 10 of the 44 (23%) isolates and 9 of the 21 isolates (43%) in these Provinces. This in contrast with the most densely populated province Pichincha were only 4 out of 61 strains (7%) formed part of a clonal complex. Moreover, 56 of the 171 LAM strains (33%) and 35 of the 118 Haarlem strains (30%) belonged to a CC, which may suggest no major differences in strain transmissibility. The biggest CC (comprising 22 LAM strains from Guayaquil) and another CC (comprising two S strains from Los Rios province) have been previously reported in Colombia19,20 (supplementary Table 2). Only six clusters (strains with an identical MIRU-VNTR pattern) compromising 16 strains were found, representing 4,3% of the strains (cluster index 2.6%) and an indication of potentially direct transmission. Five of these clusters were located in the Province of Guayas and one in Pichincha Province,

Figure 2

Minimum spanning tree of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates (n = 373) from Ecuador using MIRU-VNTR. The sublineage LAM is represented in blue, Haarlem in brown, S in green, X in red, Beijing in Yellow, Delhi in Violet, Ghana in white and New in Dark green. Nine strains of lineage 4 but without a defined sublineage were excluded. Isolates confirmed by Whole Genome Sequencing are indicated in circles with an asterisk.

Discriminatory power

The 24 MIRU-VNTR loci and their discriminatory power in Ecuador according to the three indexes are presented as Supplementary Table 3. The highest discriminatory power for the typing of the strains was observed in 12 allelic regions: 802(MIRU40), 2,163(Qub11), 424(Mtub02/MIRU42), 2,996(MIRU26), 960(MIRU10), 1,644(MIRU16), 1,955(Mtub21), 2401(Mtub30/MIRU47), 3,192(ETRE/MIRU31), 3,690(Mtub39/MIRU52), 4,052(QUB-26), 4,156 (QUB4156/MIRU53).


This investigation was undertaken to provide a nationwide analysis of the MTBC population structure in Ecuador. Only some countries in Latin America like Paraguay21, Chile22,23,24, Honduras25, Colombia26,27,28,29 and French Guiana30 have reported a nationwide analysis of the distribution of genotypes. Other countries with genotype reports like Peru31,32,33, Bolivia34, Venezuela35,36, Mexico37 and Brazil38,39,40,41 have concentrated their studies in densely populated urban areas, or strains with special characteristics like LAM Rio (Argentina42, Brazil43,44,45,46) and/or isolates with drug resistance (Argentina Peru and an earlier study from Ecuador47,48,49) or isolates from patients at high risk for drug resistance (Bolivia34). Also, most of the previous studies were done with spoligotyping or a combination of spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR. We used a combination of MIRU-VNTR and DR typing. For sublineages difficult to resolve (for example the X sublineage), we used WGS for confirmation.

The Ecuadorian strains we analyzed in this study belonged mostly to lineage 4 which is dominant in all South American countries6 and it has been associated with the European colonization of Americas50. A low prevalence of two other lineages, namely 2 and 3 was found: lineage 2-Beijing has been detected in other countries in South America6,30,33,34,51 and was mostly linked to Chinese immigrants. Beijing has a high prevalence in Peru and Colombia but a low prevalence in Ecuador, which is in agreement with 4 previous reports7,8,9,52.

Sublineages LAM and Haarlem (Lineage 4) are predominant in Ecuador which is similar to the rest of South America53. Distribution of LAM was homogenous in Ecuador except in the Andean region where it has been replaced by sublineage S; in Quito with a prevalence of 24.6% and the rest of the Ecuadorian Andean region with 13%. In South America, the S strains have been detected only in Paraguay (9.5% prevalence), Venezuela, and Brazil (prevalence 2–4%)6. Data from Paraguay showed that the S strain is responsible for outbreaks21. The S strain (or L4.4 lineage), has a moderate global distribution, previously observed in parts of Asia and Africa and it is the most common strain in New Zealand, which accounts for 43% of New Zealand born L4 cases54. Whole-genome sequencing of one Ecuadorian S strain placed this strain into the L4.4.1.1 sublineage clade which is prevalent in indigenous populations of Polynesia and Canada54. It will be interesting to determine if the other Ecuadorian S strains also belong to this sublineage clade and infects preferentially a specific population in Ecuador and this needs further research.

In our hands, the X sublineage did not always resolve well by MIRU-VNTR and DR typing and we confirmed this sublineage by WGS in 6 strains. Lineage 4 sublineage X (L4.1.1) has a 4% prevalence in Ecuador which is higher than that of other South American countries except for Rio Grande in Brazil and Chile22. The L4.1.1 (X) sublineage mainly occurs in the Americas and lower proportions in few countries of southern Africa, Asia, and Europe53. In Chile, the proportion of X lineage has been reported noticeably higher in certain provinces, in Iquique and Concepción (11.7% in both), as compared to Santiago the capital (1.6%)24. This difference in Chile can be explained because of immigration patterns, which have greatly increased in recent years from countries like Peru, Colombia or Ecuador, or a genetic predisposition that makes the population of these cities more susceptible to certain genotypes55. In Ecuador, the Coastal prevalence is twice as high as the Andean one. We also found one strain of the NEW sublineage (Sublineage L4.5); as far as we know this is the first description in South America6. This strain is frequent in China, Vietnam, and the Filipinas and present in Angola and the United States53. The migration of Ecuadorians to and from the United States is a possible explication for the presence of this strain in Ecuador. Only 2 isolates belonged to sublineage Delhi (lineage 3) which is found mainly in East Africa, the Middle East, and India.

Comparison of genotypes with another study from ecuador

A previous study that included 104 isolates from 1 hospital in Quito described six genotypes; LAM (33.7%) and Ghana (30.8%), S sublineage (5.8%), Cameroon (3.8%), Haarlem (3.8%), and Beijing (1.9%)9. Our study shows some discrepancies: they found 3.8% of Haarlem while we showed 37.7%; they found 30.8% of Ghana (mostly MDR), while we found 3.8% prevalence (non MDR); they found 3.8% prevalence of Cameroon sub-lineage which was absent in our study. Important differences among the studied populations can explain these differences. While we include 375 isolates from all over the country with a prevalence of drug-resistant strains of approximately 25%, the other study consisted of 104 strains, all drug-resistant isolates from a single hospital in Quito, Pichincha. This is a private hospital serving a specific population, introducing another, social and economic, bias. Our strains came from the INSPI institute serving the most needed of our population.

Clonal complexes and their distribution in ecuador, colombia and peru

The minimum spanning tree analysis distinguished 19 clonal complexes made up of 2 to 22 strains (Fig. 2 and supplementary Table 2). Regarding the distribution of the clonal complexes (CC), only in 3 out of 18 of the CC were absent in Quito (Pichincha province) or Guayaquil (Guayas province), probably because these cities are important migration centers56 and migration plays an important role in the dissemination of sub-lineages. The largest CC comprised 22 LAM strains and some Colombian strains from Cali, Bogota, and Cauca19,20. The CC comprising 2 S sublineage strains from Los Rios province in Ecuador encompasses strains found in Colombia19,20. We did not find any clustering with Peruvian clonal complexes33,58. These differences may reflect differences in migration patterns. According to the United Nations, during the period that our MTBC strains were collected, approximately 170,000 Colombians were migrating to Ecuador while the number of Peruvian immigrants for the same period was around 15,00057,59. The proportion of clustering (Clonal Complexes) in the study area was 19.1%, and the recent transmission rate (cluster strains) was 2.6%. (Supplementary Table 2) Moreover, spatial analysis of the Ecuadorian strains showed that strains forming larger clusters had the characteristics of regional aggregation. The clustering rate, an indicator of recent TB transmission, in our study was relatively low. For example, a study conducted in London reported that 46% of the strains were clustered and the estimated proportion attributable to the recent transmission was 34%59. In the Netherlands, 46% of strains were found in clusters with identical RFLPs, and 35% were attributed to active transmission60. A low clustering rate has also been found in a previous study, in Quito, Ecuador with only 2 out of 104 isolates grouped to form one cluster9. Perhaps the cases in Ecuador arose mainly from the activation of the previous infection as it also has been suggested to explain the low clustering rate of strains from China61, due to the higher prevalence of latent infection in the Ecuadorian and Chinese population in comparison with the Dutch or English population. However, no data are available that reflect the prevalence of latent infection in Ecuador that can support this hypothesis. The tuberculin tests were only recently (the year 2017), incorporated in the National Tuberculosis Control Program in Ecuador as an auxiliary test, especially for the diagnosis of TB in children and immunosuppressed patients.


This is the most comprehensive overview of the genetic diversity of M. tuberculosis in Ecuador to date and it is the first report of Delhi and New strains in South America. The MTBC population in Ecuador seems to have a limited diversity of sublineages among which LAM, Haarlem, and S are the most prevalent. The S genotype is an important lineage in the Andean and Amazonia regions, which may reflect an adaptation to the local population. Ongoing Venezuelan immigration, more than 4.5 million Venezuelans have left their country in the last 4 years and around 400.000 are living actually in Ecuador62, is likely to have implications for the pattern of tuberculosis genotypes in the future. The current baseline study provides information for future studies and our database constitutes a tool for MIRU-VNTR pattern comparison of M. tuberculosis isolates for national and international epidemiologic studies and phylogenetic purposes.

Limitation of this study

No complementary spoligotyping data of our strains are available to confirm lineages and sublineages in this study though we confirmed the phylogenic status of an important part of our strains using RD and WGS. Our study has a relatively high prevalence of MDR-MTBC isolates (25.7%) which has introduced a bias factor. MDR TB prevalence has been reported to be 9% in Ecuador63. Since MDR is positively associated with LAM genotypes this would let to an overestimation of the presence of LAM in our study. No analysis associating age, sex, HIV status, diabetes and other predisposition factors for tuberculosis with certain genotypes could be established as data of patients were not available respecting patient privacy. S strains were easily identified with MIRU-VNTR typing but because this sublineage is not very common; a single isolate of the S strains (n = 49) was sequenced, indicating that this strain belonged to L4.4.1.1. The other S strains of this study or a part should also be sequenced to confirm this lineage assignment. It is well known that VNTR types are homoplastic and a recent study clearly showed that the many VNTR “clades” were not monophyletic, belonging to several clades when examined by WGS. This demonstrates the unreliable nature of defining a sub-clade based on MIRU-VNTR alone64.

Data availability

Data from this study will be made fully available and without restriction upon request.


  1. 1.

    World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2018. (2018).

  2. 2.

    World Health Organization. Tuberculosis Country profile Ecuador 2018. (2018). Available at: https://extranet.who.int/sree/Reports?op=Replet&name=%2FWHO_HQ_Reports%2FG2%2FPROD%2FEXT%2FTBCountryProfile&ISO2=EC&LAN=EN&outtype=html. (Accessed: 12th June 2019).

  3. 3.

    PAHO. Health in the Americas. (PAHO, 2012).

  4. 4.

    McIvor, A., Koornhof, H. & Kana, B. D. Relapse, re-infection and mixed infections in tuberculosis disease. Pathog. Dis. 75, 1–16 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ali, A. Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Molecular Epidemiology: An Overview. Journal Microbiol. Res. 4, 25–31 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Woodman, M., Haeusler, I. L. & Grandjean, L. Tuberculosis genetic epidemiology: A latin american perspective. Genes (Basel). 10, 2–17 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Garzon-Chavez, D. et al. Prevalence, Drug Resistance, and Genotypic Diversity of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing Family in Ecuador. Microb. Drug. Resist. 25 (2019).

  8. 8.

    Mora-Pinargote, C. et al. Country wide rapid screenig for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing lineage in Ecuador using a SNP-PCR method. Int. J. Mycobacteriology (2019).

  9. 9.

    Zurita, J. et al. Genetic diversity and drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Ecuador. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 23, 166–173 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Supply, P. Multilocus Variable Number Tandem Repeat Genotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. (Institut de Biologie/Institut Pasteur de Lille, 2005).

  11. 11.

    Gagneuxa, S., DeRiemerb, K., Vanb, T., Kato-Maedab, M. & de Jongb, B. C. Variable host–pathogen compatibility in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. 103, 2869–2873 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Gagneux, S., Small, P. M. & Foundation, M. G. Global phylogeography of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and implications for tuberculosis product development. Lancet Infect. Dis. 7, 328–337 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Comas, I., Homolka, S., Niemann, S. & Gagneux, S. Genotyping of genetically monomorphic bacteria: DNA sequencing in Mycobacterium tuberculosis highlights the limitations of current methodologies. PLoS One 4, 1–11 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Constant, P. et al. Role of the pks15/1 Gene in the Biosynthesis of Phenolglycolipids in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Complex. 277, 38148–38158 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sekizuka, T. et al. TGS-TB: Total genotyping solution for Mycobacterium tuberculosis using short-read whole-genome sequencing. PLoS One 10, 1–12 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Allix-Béguec, C., Harmsen, D., Weniger, T., Supply, P. & Niemann, S. Evaluation and strategy for use of MIRU-VNTRplus, a multifunctional database for online analysis of genotyping data and phylogenetic identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46, 2692–2699 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Supply, P. et al. Proposal for Standardization of Optimized Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Unit – Variable-Number Tandem Repeat Typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis†. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44, 4498–4510 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Feil, E. J., Li, B. C., Aanensen, D. M., Hanage, W. P. & Spratt, B. G. eBURST: Inferring Patterns of Evolutionary Descent among Clusters of Related Bacterial Genotypes from Multilocus Sequence Typing. Data. 186, 1518–1530 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Castro, C., Ricardo, A., Zabaleta, A., Llerena, C. & Puerto, G. Caracterización de aislamientos clínicos de Mycobacterium tuberculosis obtenidos de individuos positivos para HIV en Colombia, 2012. Biomedica 37, 86–95 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Garcia, D. F. & Astudillo, M. MIRU-VNTR genotyping of M.tuberculosis in a population of patients from Santiago de Cali, Colombia, 2013–2015. Biomedica 33, 4–10 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Candia, N. et al. First insight into Mycobacterium tuberculosis genetic diversity in Paraguay. BMC Microbiology. 10, 1–10 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Balcells, M. E. et al. A first insight on the population structure of mycobacterium tuberculosis complex as studied by spoligotyping and miru-vntrs in santiago, chile. PLoS One 10, 1–16 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Meza, P., Balcells, M. E., Miranda, C., Cifuentes, M. & Wozniak, A. Presencia del genotipo Beijing entre cepas del complejo Mycobacterium tuberculosis en dos centros de salud de la Region Metropolitana-Chile. Rev. Chil. Infectol. 31, 21–27 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lagos, J. et al. Analysis of mycobacterium tuberculosis genotypic lineage distribution in Chile and neighboring countries. PLoS One 11, 1–17 (2016).

    MathSciNet  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Rosales, S., Pineda-garcía, L., Ghebremichael, S., Rastogi, N. & Hoffner, S. E. Molecular diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from patients with tuberculosis in Honduras. BMC Microbiol. 10, 2–9 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Cerezo, I. et al. A first insight on the population structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex as studied by spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTRs in Bogotá, Colombia. Infect. Genet. Evol. 12, 657–663 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Realpe, T. et al. Population structure among Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Colombia. PLoS One 9, 1–12 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hu, Y. et al. Prevalence and Molecular Characterization of Second-Line Drugs Resistance among Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates in Southwest of China. Biomed Res. Int. 2017, (2017).

  29. 29.

    Puerto, G. et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotypes determined by spoligotyping to be circulating in colombia between 1999 and 2012 and their possible associations with transmission and susceptibility to first-line drugs. PLoS One 10, 1–14 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Guernier, V., Sola, C., Brudey, K., Guégan, F. & Rastogi, N. Use of cluster-graphs from similarities spoligotyping data to study genotype and a comparison of three indices to quantify recent Guiana during a eight year period. BMC Infect. Dis. 11, 1–11 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Taype, C. A. et al. Genetic diversity, population structure and drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Peru. Infect. Genet. Evol. 12, 577–585 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Cáceres, O. et al. Characterization of the genetic diversity of extensively-drug resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Peru. PLoS One 9, 1–22 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Sheen, P. et al. Genetic Diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Peru and Exploration of Phylogenetic Associations with Drug Resistance. PLoS One 8, 1–12 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Monteserin, J. et al. Genotypes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in patients at risk of drug resistance in Bolivia. Infect. Genet. Evol. 17, 195–201 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Abadía, E. et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis ecology in Venezuela: epidemiologic correlates of common spoligotypes and a large clonal cluster defined by MIRU-VNTR-24. BMC Infect. Dis. 12, 1–12 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Maes, M., Kremer, K., van Soolingen, D., Takiff, H. & de Waard, J. H. 24-locus MIRU-VNTR genotyping is a useful tool to study the molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis among Warao Amerindians in Venezuela. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 88, 490–494 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Munro-rojas, D. et al. Genetic diversity of drug and multidrug- resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis circulating in Veracruz, Mexico. PLoS One 13, 1–18 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Oelemann, M. C. et al. The Forest behind the Tree: Phylogenetic Exploration of a Dominant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Strain Lineage from a High Tuberculosis Burden Country. PLoS One 6, 1–10 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Noguti, E. N. et al. Genotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from a low-endemic setting in northwestern state of Paraná in southern Brazil. 105, 779–785 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Gama, N. et al. Genetic diversity and molecular epidemiology of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Minas Gerais. BMC Infect. Dis. 15, 1–11 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Malaspina, A. et al. Usefulness of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Molecular Typing in a Tuberculosis Low-Endemic Agro-Industrial Setting of Brazil. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 61, 231–233 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Carolina, C. et al. Exploring the “Latin American Mediterranean” family and the RD Rio lineage in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Paraguay, Argentina and Venezuela. BMC Microbiol. 19, 1–13 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Soares, R. O., De Macedo, M. B., Von Groll, A. & Eduardo, P. Mycobacterium tuberculosis belonging to family LAM and sublineage RD Rio: common strains in Southern Brazil for over 10 years. Brazilian J. Microbiol. 1255, 1251–1255 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Elis Regina, D. C. et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis of the RD Rio Genotype Is the Predominant Cause of Tuberculosis and Associated with Multidrug Resistance in. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51, 1071–1077 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Araujo, M. I. D. et al. Strain Classification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates in Brazil Based on Genotypes Obtained by Spoligotyping, Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Unit Typing and the Presence of Large Sequence and Single Nucleotide Polymorphism. PLoS One 9, 1–14 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Huber, F. D. et al. Insights into the population structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using spoligotyping and RDRio in a southeastern Brazilian prison unit. Infect. Genet. Evol. 26, 194–202 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Ritacco, V., López, B., Ambroggi, M., Palmero, D. & Salvadores, B. HIV Infection and Geographically Bound Transmission of Drug- Resistant Tuberculosis, Argentina. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 18, 1802–1810 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Machado, L. N. C. et al. First Baseline of Circulating Genotypic Lineages of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Patients from the Brazilian Borders with Argentina and Paraguay. PLoS One 9, 1–9 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Gonzalo, X. et al. Epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Buenos Aires, Argentina. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 17, 528–531 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Brynildsrud, O. B. et al. Global expansion of Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineage 4 shaped by colonial migration and local adaptation. Sci. Adv. 4, 1–12 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Iwamoto, T. et al. Genetic Diversity and Transmission Characteristics of Beijing Family Strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Peru. PLoS One 7, 1–9 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Jiménez, P. et al. Identification of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing lineage in Ecuador. Biomed Res. Int. 37, 233–237 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Stucki, D. et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineage 4 comprises globally distributed and geographically restricted sublineages. Nat. Genet. 48, 1535–1543 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Mulholland, C. V., Shockey, A. C., Aung, H. L., Cursons, R. T. & Ronan, F. Dispersal of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Driven by Historical European Trade in the South Pacific. 10, 1–13 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Comas, I. et al. Out-of-Africa migration and Neolithic coexpansion of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with modern humans. Nat. Genet. 45, 1176–1182 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Loor Valeriano, K. & Zurita Herrera, G. Estadísticas y Distribución Espacial de la Migración en el Ecuador según Censo 2010. (Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral, 2015).

  57. 57.

    Barletta, F. et al. Predominant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Families and High Rates of Recent Transmission among New Cases Are Not Associated with Primary Multidrug Resistance in Lima, Peru. J. Clin. Microbiol. 53, 1854–1863 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    National Institute of Statistics and Censuses. Ecuador Population and Housing Census 2010. INEC web page (2010). Available at: https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/base-de-datos-censo-de-poblacion-y-vivienda/. (Accessed: 17th October 2019).

  59. 59.

    Hamblion, E. L. et al. Recent TB transmission, clustering and predictors of large clusters in London. 2010–2012: results from first 3 years of universal MIRU-VNTR strain typing. 71, 749–756 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Soolingen, D. V. et al. Molecular Epidemiology of Tuberculosis in the Netherlands. A Nationwide Study from 1993 through 1997 180, 726–736 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Xu, G., Mao, X., Wang, J. & Pan, H. Clustering and recent transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a Chinese population. Infect. Drug. Resist. 11, 323–330 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Lopez, E. VENEZUELAN REFUGEES: The Ecuador/Colombia Border. (2018).

  63. 63.

    Pan American Health Organization. Tuberculosis in the Americas 2018. (2018).

  64. 64.

    Grandjean, L. et al. Convergent evolution and topologically disruptive polymorphisms among multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Peru. PLoS One 12, 1–16 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank the staff and personnel of the “Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública e Investigación Leopoldo Izquieta Perez”, and Paul Cardenas and Belen Prado of the “Bioinformation laboratory” of the Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ) for their help in analyzing the data. We also thank Dr. Washington Cardenas from the “Laboratorio para Investigaciones Biomédicas” of the ESPOL, Guayaquil, for logistic support. This study was partially financed by a Medical School Grant (USFQ-11155) of the USFQ University.

Author information




D.G.C., M.A.G.B., C.M.P. M.L.B., G.F.S., J.C.G.P. performed the laboratory work; D.G.C., M.A.G.B., G.T. and J.H.D.W. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Miguel Angel Garcia-Bereguiain or Gabriel Trueba or Jacobus H. de Waard.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garzon-Chavez, D., Garcia-Bereguiain, M.A., Mora-Pinargote, C. et al. Population structure and genetic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Ecuador. Sci Rep 10, 6237 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62824-z

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing