In Japan, 1.5–2 million people are chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. New direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) offer an unprecedented opportunity to cure HCV. While the price of HCV treatment decreased recently in most countries, it remains one of the highest in Japan. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HCV treatment in patients of different age groups and to estimate the price at which DAAs become cost-saving in Japan. A previously developed microsimulation model was adapted to the Japanese population and updated with Japan-specific health utilities and costs. Our model showed that compared with no treatment, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of DAAs at a price USD 41,046 per treatment was USD 9,080 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained in 60-year-old patients. HCV treatment became cost-effective after 9 years of starting treatment. However, if the price of DAAs is reduced by 55–85% (USD 6,730 to 17,720), HCV treatment would be cost-saving within a 5 to 20-year time horizon, which should serve to increase the uptake of DAA-based HCV treatment. The payers of health care in Japan could examine ways to procure DAAs at a price where they would be cost-saving.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects 71 million people globally1. If untreated, HCV infection can lead to cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver-related death. Directly-acting antivirals (DAAs), a class of HCV treatment available since 2014, offer an unprecedented opportunity to reduce the disease burden. The cure rate (defined by sustained virologic response [SVR])] with these medicines exceeds 95%, irrespective of patients’ prior treatment history, HCV genotype, or fibrosis stage2.
In Japan, the prevalence of HCV infection is 0.6–0.9%; one of the highest among high income countries, with approximately 1.5–2 million chronically infected people3,4. According to the 17th nationwide follow-up survey of primary liver cancer in Japan, HCV infection causes 70% of all liver-related deaths5. In 2014, the Japan Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare approved DAAs for HCV treatment, and the Japan Society of Hepatology guidelines recommended using them for treating HCV infection ever since6,7. Despite their availability in Japan, treatment uptake rates of DAAs have remained low, which is due to the low proportion of infected persons diagnosed resulted by the lack of testing in the population8.
Because HCV infection is a slow progressive disease, benefits of treating HCV infection are accrued several years after the treatment in terms of prevention of liver complications such as end-stage liver disease, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Therefore, the upfront cost of treating a large population can constrain the payers’ limited budget. While in many high-income countries, the prices of DAAs have come down substantially (e.g., USD 25,000 in the United States and USD 12,439 in the United Kingdom), the price of a 12-week regimen of DAAs in Japan ranges between USD 32,480–42,060 in 2019. Furthermore, it is shown that DAAs are cost-saving (i.e., increase QALY but reduce the total cost associated with HCV) in countries such as United States9 and United Kingdom10, but none of the published studies has evaluated if and at what price HCV treatment becomes cost-saving in Japan11,12,13,14,15,16. To fill this gap, the objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of HCV treatment with DAAs becoming cost-saving in Japan.
We utilized a previously developed individual-level state-transition model, the Markov-based Analyses of Treatments for Chronic Hepatitis C (MATCH)17,18, to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HCV treatment in Japanese population. The natural history of our MATCH model has been validated with previously published cost-effectiveness studies19,20,21 and a multicenter follow-up study in the United States of patients with advanced fibrosis. The model was developed using C++ computer programming language, and was designed to follow the principles recommended by a reference group convened by the World Health Organization (WHO) on economic analyses in the field of viral hepatitis22.
Characteristics of base case population
We simulated a total of 150 unique HCV-patient profiles based on five age categories (30, 40, 50, 60 and 70 years), three HCV genotypes that are prevalent in Japan (G1, G2, G4), patient’s sex (male or female) and METAVIR fibrosis score (no fibrosis [F0], portal fibrosis without septa [F1], portal fibrosis with few septa [F2], numerous septa without fibrosis [F3], or cirrhosis [F4])23. The distributions of these HCV-infected patient profiles were estimated based on available data (Supplementary Table S1). The model did not include patients with HIV or hepatitis B virus co-infection as well as special groups at higher risk of HCV reinfection, such as those with hemodialysis, thalassemia, haemophilia or injection drug use. All patients were considered treatment-naïve because the current percentage of treatment-experienced patients in Japan is small.
Treatment regimens and efficacy
We simulated two strategies: no treatment and treatment with available DAAs. The DAA treatment regimens used were determined by individual patient’s HCV genotype and METAVIR fibrosis stage. The treatment efficacy in various scenarios was based on the SVR rate reported in clinical trials of DAAs, and uncertainty in SVR rates was incorporated in sensitivity analysis. Regimen-specific treatment discontinuation rates were also incorporated in the model. Data about the treatment regimens were obtained from recent clinical trials of DAAs in treatment-naïve patients24,25,26, and are provided in Supplementary Table S2.
Natural history of HCV infection
As time progresses, an HCV-infected patient could transition between several Markov health states in the model (Fig. 1). The cycle length of our model was set as one week. Each patient would start in one of the five METAVIR liver fibrosis states (F0–F4). At the end of each cycle, F0–F3 patients could move to a higher fibrosis stage or stay in the same state. F4 patients could progress into decompensated cirrhosis and/or HCC, or could die because of liver-related mortality. Patients in all five liver fibrosis states (F0-F4) could achieve SVR following treatment, but only those in F0-F3 were assumed to be cured. Patients in F4 state who achieved SVR could still progress to more advanced states, although at a slower rate (Table 1)27. Patients who failed to achieve SVR or discontinued treatment continued to progress over time. All states were subject to a background age-specific mortality, which was based on Japan life table28.
Data on the fibrosis progression rates from F0 to F4 were obtained from a meta-regression analysis29, and progression rate from cirrhosis to decompensated cirrhosis and HCC were modeled based on retrospective follow-up studies of HCV-infected patients30. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis or HCC had a higher liver-related mortality than those in early stages of HCV infection31. As the number of liver transplants performed in Japan is very small compared to the total number of HCV-infected persons, we did not consider liver transplant as part of the HCV disease progression or treatment in this model13.
We considered three types of HCV-related costs in the model: the costs for pre-treatment diagnosis and post-treatment monitoring testing, the DAA treatment costs and the disease management costs for each health state over a person’s life-time. All costs are presented in U.S. dollars (USD). For estimation of the cost values, we adopted an ingredients approach where two elements were considered: the unit price of commodities or services used (\(p\)) and the quantity of the required commodities or service (\(q\)). The total cost for a sequela is the product of these two elements as \(p\times q=Cost\). For the cost values presented in this study, we collected the relevant inpatient charges and medical fees from the database of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in Japan32,33,34, and sought expert opinions for the quantities of prescription and services required. We adopted the current price of ledipasvir 90 mg/sofosbuvir 400 mg for the base case treatment cost in the model, which amounts to a cost of 41,046 USD per treatment. The cost of pre-treatment testing for fibrosis staging and HCV genotyping was taken as USD 71 (7,789 JPY), and the testing cost for investigations during and after treatment was taken as USD 40 (4,388 JPY). Data sources and the cost values are summarized in Table 1.
Quality of life weights
We assigned quality-of-life (QoL) weights to each health state in the model. These weights were used to determine quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and were derived from previously-published studies21,35,36 (Table 1). The QoL of patients in F0-F3 who had achieved SVR was assumed to be equivalent to that of the general, non-HCV-infected population; however, for those patients who achieved SVR at F4 stage and above, the QoL of the corresponding advanced liver disease states was used.
We simulated the clinical course of HCV-infected patients in Japan with and without DAA treatment, respectively. For each patient profile, we simulated a cohort of size 10,000 to project the total expected life-years, QALYs and costs during the lifetime horizon. All QALYs and costs were discounted at 2% per year37. Based on the projected costs and QALYs, we estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER; USD per QALY) of DAA-based treatment in comparison with no treatment. Our analysis was conducted from healthcare payer’s perspective. For each patient profile under each horizon, we also projected the cumulative incidence of decompensated cirrhosis and HCC, and liver-related deaths.
To evaluate the impact of DAA medicine price on outcomes, we performed threshold analysis on DAA medicine price and examined the ICERs under different prices. Specifically, we calculated the price at which DAA treatment becomes cost-saving at the end of the next 5 years, 10 years and 20 years, respectively.
We performed one-way sensitivity analyses to evaluate the effects of several model inputs on the cost-effectiveness of HCV treatment. These included state transition probabilities, QoL weights, medical and disease management costs, and discount rate. The ranges of disease management costs cover the reported values in similar studies11,13,15. We also performed a probabilistic sensitivity analysis using 10,000 first-order and 5,000 second-order samples by simultaneously varying all key model inputs using the recommended statistical distributions. To examine the effect of DAA prices more specifically, we conducted these sensitivity analyses using DAA prices identified in the threshold analysis. Life-time horizon was used for the sensitivity analysis. The range of all model inputs used for sensitivity analyses are in Table 1.
Base case cost-effectiveness analysis
Compared with no treatment, the use of DAAs in Japanese patients with HCV infection at a mean age of 60 increased the overall life expectancy by 3.16 years and discounted QALYs by 2.67 years. The no-treatment strategy had a lifetime cost of USD 23,206 per person infected (all spent on managing consequences of HCV infection); the DAA scenario resulted in higher lifetime cost of USD 47,431 per person infected, with 91% spent on DAA treatment, and smaller amounts on testing (1%) and HCV disease management (8%); resulting in an ICER of USD 9,080 per QALY gained. In the baseline scenario, DAA treatment was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of USD 45,960 (JPY ¥5,000,000)38, but not cost saving.
DAA treatment was more cost-effective in younger patients – ICER was USD 1,998/QALY for age 30 versus USD 24,085 per QALY gained for age 70 (Table 2). However, HCV treatment was not cost-saving for any of the age groups at the 2019 price of DAA medicines.
Treating per 10,000 persons without cirrhosis using DAAs could prevent 2,773 cases of decompensated cirrhosis, 1,611 cases of HCC, and 2,994 liver-related deaths, compared with the no-treatment scenario. In 10,000 cirrhotic patients, treatment could prevent 3,172 cases of decompensated cirrhosis, 1,795 cases of HCC and 3,520 liver-related deaths (Supplementary Fig. S1).
Cost-effectiveness over time and impact of price of DAA regimens
At the 2019 cost of DAAs, USD 41,046 per treatment, HCV treatment became cost-effective after 9 years of starting treatment in HCV patients at age 60 (Fig. 2). However, at this cost, DAAs are not cost-saving in Japan.
HCV treatment could become cost-saving within 20 years if the DAA cost was reduces to USD 17,702 per treatment (57% reduction compared with the current listed price); further, it could become cost-saving within 10 years if the cost was reduced to USD 11,198 per treatment (73% reduction), and within 5 years if the cost was reduced to USD 6,730 per treatment (84% reduction) (Fig. 2).These four different DAA costs were used for the cost-effectiveness and sensitivity analyses that follows.
Cost-effectiveness by age and fibrosis stage
With the 2019 baseline cost, DAA treatment was not cost-saving for any of the patient groups, based on the age and fibrosis stage considered (Fig. 3). However, if DAA cost were reduced to USD 16,104 per treatment, treatment would become cost-saving in younger patients and/or in those at early fibrosis stage. Further reducing the DAA cost to USD 11,198 would make HCV treatment cost-saving in more subgroups. If DAA costs were further reduced to USD 6,730 per treatment (84% reduction), HCV treatment would become cost-saving for all age groups and fibrosis stages in an average duration of 5 years.
Figure 4 shows the 10 most sensitive model parameters to ICER results under four DAA costs respectively. For the base case, i.e., using the current DAA cost in Japan, the most influential parameters included cost of managing HCV disease through fibrosis stage F1 to decompensated cirrhosis, disease progression rate in patients with cirrhosis (with or without SVR), and quality of life utility value of cirrhosis and post-SVR status. Many of the above variables remained influential when DAA treatment cost is reduced to lower values. However, at lower DAA cost, the ICER also became sensitive to the disease progression rate in patients with cirrhosis with SVR, and cost of managing HCC.
The probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that DAA treatment was cost-effective but not cost-saving under any circumstance at the 2019 DAA cost. However, under the hypothesis by which the cost was reduced to USD 17,702 per treatment, DAA would become cost-saving in 20 years with the likelihood of 99.03%. If the cost were further reduced to USD 11,198 and USD 6,730, DAA would become cost-saving in 10 years and 5 years, and with 99.72% and 99.93% likelihood, respectively.
The availability of DAAs has profoundly changed the HCV treatment paradigm, bringing hope for elimination of HCV as a public health threat by 203039. Because hepatitis C treatment is expensive in Japan, providing treatment to a large population requires a substantial budget. In such a situation, showing that the treatment can result in cost savings in short time horizon (e.g., 5 years) can encourage the policy makers push for more aggressive treatment plans for the mass HCV infected population, thus increase the HCV uptake rate. Our study showed that HCV treatment in Japan, although cost-effective, was not cost-saving in any of the age groups. Reducing the cost of DAAs by 56%, 76% and 84% of the current market price would make HCV treatment cost-saving in 5, 10, and 20 years, respectively, in Japanese patients.
Previous studies on cost effectiveness of HCV treatment with DAAs have all focused on the patient cohort with one fixed age, usually 50–65 years old, according to average age of Japan’s HCV patient population11,12,13,14,15,16. In these studies, DAA treatment was found to be cost-effective under the current price. However, the discussion regarding the DAAs being cost-saving was lacking in related literature, and our study fills this gap by providing new data which illustrated the cost at which HCV treatment can become cost-saving in the near future. Specifically, our study considered shorter time horizons primarily for budget planning analysis.
While low-cost DAAs have already been introduced in many developing countries such as India, Pakistan and Egypt18,40,41, the prices of these treatments remain high for high-income countries such as Japan where generic DAA medicines are not available. While competition has helped to drive down DAA prices in the public sector in many high-income countries such as the United States42, Japan could also benefit by negotiating price of DAAs as described by the WHO Progress Report on Access to DAAs43.
While DAA treatment can be cost-saving in 5–20 years in Japan, initial investment will be needed to provide timely treatment to all HCV patients. Japan can follow an innovative financing mechanism of subscription-based payment model that has been implemented recently in Australia and is being considered in the United States and United Kingdom44. For instance, in the United States, Louisiana and Washington states have proposed the idea of a subscription payment mechanism, where a medicine manufacturer agrees to provide the state’s Medicaid program with unlimited access to HCV treatment for a fixed amount of money44,45.
Our study had some limitations. First, we did not include patients with HCV genotype 3, as the prevalence is less than 1% in Japan. Second, as with most of the previous published models on HCV treatment, our analysis did not consider the re-treatment of patients who have previously failed DAAs. Some recent DAA medicines can effectively treat patients who had not responded to other DAAs, but they are not routinely available in the Japanese market. Finally, our model excluded liver-transplant as a treatment option for HCV sequalae. However, this should not detract from our conclusions since very few liver-transplants have been performed in Japan.
In conclusion, DAA-based HCV treatment can improve patient outcomes, particularly for younger patients. However, unlike in most other countries, they are not cost-saving in Japan. Reducing the cost of DAA medicines by 55–85% would make the treatment cost-saving. Such reduction in prices would benefit the Japanese society in the long run from a healthy aging and economical perspective.
(Blach et al., (2017); comment>AASLD-IDSA. Recommendations for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C.http://www.hcvguidelines.org(last accessed: April 7, 2017)10.1002/hep.27950; Chung et al., (2010); Okamoto, Mishiro (1994); Ikai et al., (2007); Kumada et al., (2017); Tanaka et al., (2018); comment>Minister of Health Labor and Welfare. Hepatitis Test Acceptance Status Actual Situation Report in Japan (In Japanese)https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/houdou/2r9852000002gd4j.html(last accessed: November 7, 2018) (2012).; AuthGrp>Holt, S. & Hepatitis CDrug News - January, 2019Available fromhttps://www.hepatitiscentral.com/news/hepatitis-c-drugs-in-2019-price-drops-and-generic-pipeline-in-place/Last accessed: 1/10/2020; McEwan et al., (2016); Kaishima et al., (2018); Igarashi et al., (2017); McEwan et al., (2016); Ward et al., (2017); Igarashi et al., (2017); Virabhak et al., (2016); Chhatwal et al., (2015); Aggarwal et al., (2017); Bennett et al., (1997); Chhatwal et al., (2013); Siebert et al., (2003); comment>World Health Organization – Viral Hepatitis Strategic Information and Modelling Reference Group: Meeting report, 14–16 June 2016, WHO headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland. Available fromhttp://www.who.int/hepatitis/publications/strategic-information-modelling-meeting/en/(last accessed: April 14, 2017). (WHO, Geneva, 2016).; Bedossa, Poynard (1996); Afdhal et al., (2014); Nelson et al., (2015); Kohli et al., (2015); Cardoso et al., (2010); comment>World Health Organization, Global health observatory data repository. 2013. Available fromhttps://www.who.int/gho/en/last accessed: May 5, 2018; Thein et al., (2008); Fattovich et al., (1997); Wolfe et al., (2010); comment>Ministry of Health Labor and Welfare in Japan. Medical insurance database. Available fromhttp://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kenkou_iryou/iryouhoken/database/index.html(last accessed: August 8, 2018); comment>Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare in Japan. Statistical information and white paper. 2012. Available fromhttp://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/kanja/11/dl/03.pdf(last accessed August 8, 2018); comment>Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare in Japan. Various Information of Medical Fee. Available fromhttp://www.iryohoken.go.jp/shinryohoshu/(last accessed: August 8, 2018).; Chong et al., (2003); Hanmer et al., (2006); Fukuda et al., (2013); AuthGrp>Hasegawa, M., Komoto, S., Shiroiwa, T. & Fukuda, T.Formal Implementation of Cost-Effectiveness Evaluations in Japan: A Unique Health Technology Assessment SystemValue in Health10.1016/j.jval.2019.10.005; collab>World Health OrganizationGlobal health sector strategy on viral hepatitis 2016–2021. 2016. Available fromhttp://www.who.int/hepatitis/strategy2016-2021/ghss-hep/en/(last accessed: January 3, 2017).; Chhatwal et al., (2019); El Sherbini et al., (2015); AuthGrp>Chhatwal, J. et al.Hepatitis C retreatment in the era of direct-acting antivirals: Projections in the United StatesAlimentary Pharmacology & TherapeuticsIn press (2018).; World Health Organization (2018); Trusheim et al., (2018); Sood et al., (2018); Planas et al., (2004); Davis et al., (2011); McAdam-Marx et al., (2011); Wilson et al., (2007))
Blach, S. et al. Global prevalence and genotype distribution of hepatitis C virus infection in 2015: a modelling study. Lancet Gastroenterology Hepatology 2, 161–176, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30181-9 (2017).
AASLD-IDSA. Recommendations for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C., http://www.hcvguidelines.org. (last accessed: April 7, 2017)., https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.27950.
Chung, H., Ueda, T. & Kudo, M. Changing trends in hepatitis C infection over the past 50 years in Japan. Intervirology 53, 39–43, https://doi.org/10.1159/000252782 (2010).
Okamoto, H. & Mishiro, S. Genetic heterogeneity of hepatitis C virus. Intervirology 37, 68–76, https://doi.org/10.1159/000150360 (1994).
Ikai, I. et al. Report of the 17th Nationwide Follow-up Survey of Primary Liver Cancer in Japan. Hepatol. Res. 37, 676–691, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1872-034X.2007.00119.x (2007).
Kumada, H. et al. The combination of elbasvir and grazoprevir for the treatment of chronic HCV infection in Japanese patients: a randomized phase II/III study. J. gastroenterology 52, 520–533 (2017).
Tanaka, A. et al. The Japanese Society of Hepatology Hepatitis C Treatment Guidelines, https://www.jsh.or.jp/files/uploads/HCV_GL_ver6.2_v1.1.pdf (2018).
Minister of Health Labor and Welfare. Hepatitis Test Acceptance Status Actual Situation Report in Japan (In Japanese)., https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/houdou/2r9852000002gd4j.html. (last accessed: November 7, 2018) (2012).
Holt, S. & Hepatitis C Drug News - January, 2019. Available from, https://www.hepatitiscentral.com/news/hepatitis-c-drugs-in-2019-price-drops-and-generic-pipeline-in-place/. (Last accessed: 1/10/2020).
McEwan, P. et al. The cost-effectiveness of daclatasvir-based regimens for the treatment of hepatitis C virus genotypes 1 and 4 in the UK. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 28, 173–180, https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000000510 (2016).
Kaishima, T. et al. Cost-effectiveness analyses of anti-hepatitis C virus treatments using quality of life scoring among patients with chronic liver disease in Hiroshima prefecture, Japan. Hepatol. Res. 48, 509–520, https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.13053 (2018).
Igarashi, A. et al. Cost-utility analysis of sofosbuvir for the treatment of genotype 2 chronic hepatitis C in Japan. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 33, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2016.1222512 (2017).
McEwan, P. et al. Estimating the cost-effectiveness of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir in difficult to treat Japanese patients chronically infected with hepatitis C genotype 1b. Hepatol. Res. 46, 423–433, https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.12570 (2016).
Ward, T. et al. Assessing the Budget Impact and Economic Outcomes of the Introduction of Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir and Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Japan. Value Health Reg. Issues 12, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2016.10.002 (2017).
Igarashi, A. et al. Cost-utility analysis of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for the treatment of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C in Japan. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 33, 11–21, https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2016.1222513 (2017).
Virabhak, S. et al. Cost-effectiveness of direct-acting antiviral regimen ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients infected with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1b in Japan. J. Med. Econ. 19, 1144–1156, https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2016.1206908 (2016).
Chhatwal, J., Kanwal, F., Roberts, M. S. & Dunn, M. A. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of hepatitis C virus treatment with sofosbuvir and ledipasvir in the United States. Ann. Intern. Med. 162, 397–406 (2015).
Aggarwal, R. et al. Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C treatment using generic direct-acting antivirals available in India. PLoS One 12, e0176503, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176503 (2017).
Bennett, W. et al. Estimates of the cost-effectiveness of a single course of interferon- 2b in patients with histologically mild chronic hepatitis C. Ann. Intern. Med. 127, 855 (1997).
Chhatwal, J. et al. Cost-Effectiveness of boceprevir in patients previously treated for chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 Infection in the United States. Value Health 16, 973–986, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2013.07.006 (2013).
Siebert, U. et al. Cost effectiveness of peginterferon-2b plus ribavirin versus interferon -2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Gut 52, 425 (2003).
World Health Organization – Viral Hepatitis Strategic Information and Modelling Reference Group: Meeting report, 14–16 June 2016, WHO headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland. Available from, http://www.who.int/hepatitis/publications/strategic-information-modelling-meeting/en/ (last accessed: April 14, 2017). (WHO, Geneva, 2016).
Bedossa, P. & Poynard, T. An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 24, 289–293, https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510240201 (1996).
Afdhal, N. et al. Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for untreated HCV genotype 1 infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 1889–1898, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1402454 (2014).
Nelson, D. R. et al. All-oral 12-week treatment with daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 3 infection: ALLY-3 phase III study. Hepatology 61, 1127–1135, https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.27726 (2015).
Kohli, A. et al. Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for hepatitis C genotype 4: a proof-of-concept, single-centre, open-label phase 2a cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 15, 1049–1054, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00157-7 (2015).
Cardoso, A. C. et al. Impact of peginterferon and ribavirin therapy on hepatocellular carcinoma: incidence and survival in hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis. J. Hepatology 52, 652–657 (2010).
World Health Organization, Global health observatory data repository. 2013. Available from, https://www.who.int/gho/en/ (last accessed: May 5, 2018).
Thein, H., Yi, Q., Dore, G. & Krahn, M. Estimation of stage specific fibrosis progression rates in chronic hepatitis C virus infection: A meta analysis and meta regression. Hepatology 48, 418–431 (2008).
Fattovich, G. et al. Morbidity and mortality in compensated cirrhosis type C: a retrospective follow-up study of 384 patients. Gastroenterology 112, 463–472 (1997).
Wolfe, R., Roys, E. & Merion, R. Trends in Organ Donation and Transplantation in the United States, 1999–2008. Am. J. Transplant. 10, 961–972 (2010).
Ministry of Health Labor and Welfare in Japan. Medical insurance database. Available from, http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kenkou_iryou/iryouhoken/database/index.html (last accessed: August 8, 2018).
Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare in Japan. Statistical information and white paper. 2012. Available from, http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/kanja/11/dl/03.pdf (last accessed August 8, 2018).
Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare in Japan. Various Information of Medical Fee. Available from, http://www.iryohoken.go.jp/shinryohoshu/ (last accessed: August 8, 2018).
Chong, C. A. K. Y. et al. Health-state utilities and quality of life in hepatitis C patients. Am. J. Gastroenterology 98, 630–638 (2003).
Hanmer, J., Lawrence, W. F., Anderson, J. P., Kaplan, R. M. & Fryback, D. G. Report of nationally representative values for the noninstitutionalized US adult population for 7 health-related quality-of-life scores. Med. Decis. Mak. 26, 391–400 (2006).
Fukuda, T. et al. Guideline for economic evaluation of healthcare technologies in Japan. J. Natl Inst. Public. Health 62, 625–640 (2013).
Hasegawa, M., Komoto, S., Shiroiwa, T. & Fukuda, T. Formal Implementation of Cost-Effectiveness Evaluations in Japan: A Unique Health Technology Assessment System. Value in Health, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.10.005.
World Health Organization. Global health sector strategy on viral hepatitis 2016–2021. 2016. Available from, http://www.who.int/hepatitis/strategy2016-2021/ghss-hep/en/ (last accessed: January 3, 2017).
Chhatwal, J. et al. Assessment of the Feasibility and Cost of Hepatitis C Elimination in Pakistan. JAMA Netw. Open. 2, e193613, https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3613 (2019).
El Sherbini, A., Mostafa, S. & Ali, E. Systematic review with meta-analysis: comparison between therapeutic regimens for paediatric chronic hepatitis C. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 42, 12–19, https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13221 (2015).
Chhatwal, J. et al. Hepatitis C retreatment in the era of direct-acting antivirals: Projections in the United States. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics In press (2018).
World Health Organization. Guidelines for the care and treatment of persons diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. (2018).
Trusheim, M. R., Cassidy, W. M. & Bach, P. B. Alternative state-level financing for hepatitis c treatment—the “netflix model”. Jama 320, 1977–1978, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.15782 (2018).
Sood, N., Ung, D., Shankar, A. & Strom, B. L. A Novel Strategy for Increasing Access to Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus Infection for Medicaid Beneficiaries. Ann. Intern. Med. 169, 118–119, https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-0186 (2018).
Planas, R. et al. Natural history of decompensated hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. A study of 200 patients. J. Hepatology 40, 823–830 (2004).
Davis, K. L., Mitra, D., Medjedovic, J., Beam, C. & Rustgi, V. Direct economic burden of chronic hepatitis C virus in a United States managed care population. J. Clin. Gastroenterology 45, e17 (2011).
McAdam-Marx, C. et al. All-cause and incremental per patient per year cost associated with chronic hepatitis C virus and associated liver complications in the United States: A managed care perspective. J. Manag. Care Pharm. 17, 531–546 (2011).
Wilson, J. et al. A systematic review and economic evaluation of epoetin alfa, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa in anaemia associated with cancer, especially that attributable to cancer treatment. Health Technol. Assess. 11, 1–202 (2007).
National Science Foundation award 1722665; Kanazawa University, Japan; UNITAID; and US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Dr. Chhatwal has received research grants from Merck and Gilead Sciences, and served on the scientific advisory committee of Gilead Sciences. Dr. Chhatwal declares no non-financial competing interests. Dr. Zhuo, Dr. Hayashi, Dr. Chen, Dr. Aggarwal, and Dr. Hutin declare no potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhuo, Y., Hayashi, T., Chen, Q. et al. Estimating the price at which hepatitis C treatment with direct-acting antivirals would be cost-saving in Japan. Sci Rep 10, 4089 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60986-4
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.