Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Plausible diagnostic value of urinary isomeric dimethylarginine ratio for diabetic nephropathy

Abstract

Altered circulatory asymmetric and symmetric dimethylarginines have been independently reported in patients with end-stage renal failure suggesting their potential role as mediators and early biomarkers of nephropathy. These alterations can also be reflected in urine. Herein, we aimed to evaluate urinary asymmetric to symmetric dimethylarginine ratio (ASR) for early prediction of diabetic nephropathy (DN). In this cross-sectional study, individuals with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), newly diagnosed diabetes (NDD), diabetic microalbuminuria (MIC), macroalbuminuria (MAC), and normal glucose tolerance (NGT) were recruited from Dr. Mohans’ Diabetes Specialties centre, India. Urinary ASR was measured using a validated high-throughput MALDI-MS/MS method. Significantly lower ASR was observed in MIC (0.909) and MAC (0.741) in comparison to the NGT and NDD groups. On regression models, ASR was associated with MIC [OR: 0.256; 95% CI: 0.158–0.491] and MAC [OR 0.146; 95% CI: 0.071–0.292] controlled for all the available confounding factors. ROC analysis revealed ASR cut-point of 0.95 had C-statistic of 0.691 (95% CI: 0.627-0.755) to discriminate MIC from NDD with 72% sensitivity. Whereas, an ASR cut-point of 0.82 had C-statistic of 0.846 (95% CI: 0.800 - 0.893) had 91% sensitivity for identifying MAC. Our results suggest ASR as a potential early diagnostic biomarker for DN among the Asian Indians.

Introduction

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is among the most significant longer-term complications associated with diabetes mellitus. The risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), resulting premature morbidity and mortality are estimated to increase with diabetes by 12 fold1. A recent epidemiological study reported an increase in mortality rates associated with renal complications in diabetes2. Microalbuminuria (MIC) is an early non-invasive marker of renal disease and its progression. However, it takes several years of diabetes for MIC to occur. Interventions are also much less effective in some patients with MIC who manifest advanced pathological changes3. Development of sensitive and early stage markers along with alternative diagnostic approaches are thus essential for the detection of DN.

Symmetric and asymmetric dimethylarginines (SDMA and ADMA) are structural isomers. They are formed in the protein methylation biosynthetic pathway when methylated protein arginine residues are hydrolyzed and released4. These isomers were originally discovered from urine in a relatively high abundance5,6. ADMA is predominantly metabolized to citrulline and dimethylamine by dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase (DDAH1)7. About 10% of ADMA, however, is eliminated via urinary excretion. The disruption of the DDAH pathway leading to the build up of ADMA has been implicated in its role as an NOS inhibitor8,9. Overexpression of renal DDAH and increased urinary elimination of ADMA reduces renal injury in DN10. Separately, SDMA could induce arginine deficiency in the endothelial cells thereby reducing the production of nitric oxide (NO)11. Increased risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and atherosclerotic cardiovascular events have been shown to be associated with elevated ADMA and SDMA levels12,13. Our earlier studies showed that circulatory ADMA had a causative role in the development of DN14.

ADMA to SDMA ratio (ASR), also known as catabolism index, has been implicated in sepsis, hypertension, malnutrition, and inflammation15,16,17,18,19. A direct correlation between malnutrition, inflammatory markers, and ASR was also established in patients undergoing hemodialysis16. The inverse of ASR (SDMA/ADMA ratio) has been reported to correlate with an atypical renal function that can possibly delineate renal insufficient subjects from healthy controls20. Altered individual ADMA and SDMA levels were found in patients with end-stage renal failure21,22,23,24. Hence, we hypothesize that altered urinary ASR could also be potential early biomarker for DN.

Asian Indians are known to be more prone to insulin resistance25, predisposed to cardio-metabolic diseases, and DN26,27,28. However, there is a lack of data on ASR in relation to nephropathy in this high-risk population. This investigation evaluates the efficiency of ASR as a potential marker for early diagnosis of nephropathy in Asian Indians with varying levels of glucose intolerance as well as in patients with T2DM with or without DN.

Research Design and Methods

Participants for the study were recruited from Dr. Mohans’ Diabetes Specialties Centre, a tertiary diabetes care centre in Chennai, India. In this cross-sectional study, individuals with (a) normal glucose tolerance (NGT; n = 95), (b) impaired glucose tolerance (IGT; n = 80), (c) newly diagnosed diabetes (NDD; n = 120), (d) T2DM with microalbuminuria (MIC; n = 140), and (e) T2DM with macroalbuminuria (MAC; n = 120) were recruited. This study being cross-sectional in nature, no cause and effect relationship or mechanistic conclusions between ASR and NDD, MIC or MAC could be established. Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) approval (from the Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai and National Chemical Laboratory, Pune) was obtained prior to the start of the study; all research methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines/regulations and written informed consent was obtained from all the study participants.

Sample preparation

Urine samples were collected and immediately stored at −80 °C in 100 µL aliquots until further processing. To begin sample processing, the samples were thawed on ice. 400 µL cold methanol was added to an aliquot and the content was thoroughly vortexed. Subsequently, the samples were subjected to centrifugation at 13,200 rpm, 4 °C for 15 minutes before collecting ~250 µL of the supernatant for MALDI MS/MS analysis. The sample processing method was uniformly used for the samples, quality controls, and pooled samples. Pooled samples were used for method standardization, performance evaluation. A subset of samples was used to perform cross-platform validation by LC-MS/MS29,30.

Urinary matrix effects were evaluated using pooled samples spiked with albumin. 100 µL of 5 randomly chosen urine samples were mixed to prepare two pooled urine samples, one each for NGT and MAC category. Effects of the presence of protein on the ASR measurement was evaluated by – pooled NGT spiked with five levels of BSA simulating the conditions of MIC, MAC, and two very high concentrations of BSA. The ASR values in spiked samples were compared against NGT pooled without the protein spike (Supplemental Table 1).

Mass spectrometric estimation of ASR

We previously reported a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI MS) absolute quantification method and demonstrated it for the estimation of ADMA and SDMA concentrations from urine31. For this study, an optimized and validated MALDI MS/MS method32 has been employed to selectively measure ASR using the signature product ion ratio of ADMA and SDMA. The method was thoroughly tested for precision, accuracy, performance, and cross-platform validation (please see Supplemental Fig. 1 to 7 and Supplemental Table 1 to 4 for full details of method standardization and validation).

MALDI-MS/MS was performed on AB Sciex 5800 MALDI TOF/TOF mass spectrometer with collision-induced dissociation (CID) cell. The instrument is equipped with Nd-YAG laser operating at 345 nm, pulse length - 500 ps and repetition rate - 1000 Hz. CID was performed at 1 kV in positive ion mode and the pressure was maintained at 1 × 10e-6 Torr. Optimized laser fluence at 5200 units, delayed extraction (DE) time at 200 ns, 2000 laser shots and a precursor selection window 203.15 ± 0.5 m/z was used for MS/MS analysis. Detector voltage was optimized at 2.69 eV for small molecule analysis. Representative MALDI-MS/MS spectra are showcased in the Supplemental File (Supplemental Fig. 1).

To perform MALDI-MS/MS analysis, the 0.5 µL of supernatant described above was applied on 96-well MALDI target plate pre-spotted with CHCA matrix (10 mg/mL). Subsequently, the 96-well MALDI target plate was dried overnight before analysis. The data was acquired in an automated fashion with a randomized laser fire pattern.

Data analysis was performed using an in house developed data processing tool “MQ” (http://www.ldi-ms.com/services/software). The raw instrumental files (T2D) were converted into a generic ASCII format using a T2D converter (software version 1.0) prior to processing using ‘MQ’. ADMA and SDMA peak intensities were estimated using the characteristic product ions of ADMA and SDMA at m/z 46 and m/z 172, respectively. The observed product ions m/z in MS/MS that selectively confirm the presence of the respective isomers were in agreement with previously reported results31. The mass extraction window (MEW) was set to 50 ppm. ASR was estimated as an accurate mass extracted peak-intensity ratio of the two diagnostic ions (at m/z ~46 and 172 for ADMA and SDMA respectively). The MALDI MS/MS method was optimized to be free of interferences associated with ion suppression or sample matrix. The method was also validated using LC-MS/MS on a subset of samples (Supplemental Figs. 3, 4 and Table 3). Details are available in the Supplemental File.

Results

ASR was measured using MALDI-MS/MS in the 555 urine samples across all the sample groups. ASR was significantly lower in MIC (0.909; p < 0.01) and MAC (0.741; p < 0.01) in comparison to the NGT and NDD groups while there were no significant differences between NGT, IGT and NDD groups (Fig. 1). To examine the influence of gender on the association of ASR with MIC and MAC, study subjects were stratified by gender. There were no significant differences in the ASR by gender in individuals with NDD, MIC, and MAC [Data not shown]. The clinical and biochemical characteristics of the study participants are shown in Table 1. Age, waist circumference, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol and serum triglycerides were significantly higher in patients with MIC (p < 0.05) and MAC (p < 0.05) compared to NDD, IGT, and NGT. Serum creatinine (p < 0.05) was higher and eGFR (p < 0.05) was lower in patients with MIC and MAC compared to NDD or NGT.

Figure 1
figure1

High-throughput analysis of urinary biomarker ADMA/SDMA ratio using MALDI-MS/MS.

Table 1 Clinical and biochemical characterization of study subjects.

ASR was negatively correlated with age (p < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (p < 0.001), fasting plasma glucose (p = 0.004) and glycated hemoglobin (p < 0.001), total cholesterol (p < 0.01), blood urea (p < 0.001), serum creatinine (p < 0.001) and MIC (p < 0.001). ASR showed a positive correlation with HDL cholesterol (p < 0.001) and eGFR (p < 0.001) (Supplemental Table 4).

Standardized polytomous logistic regression analysis was performed with NDD as the dependent variable and ASR as the independent variable (Table 2). Every one standard deviation decrease in ASR was independently associated MIC [odds ratio (OR): 0.307, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.213–0.444; p < 0.01]. This association remained statistically significant even after adjusting for age, gender, blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin, serum cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL and LDL cholesterol, urea, serum creatinine, eGFR, and duration of diabetes [OR: 0.256; 95% CI: 0.158–0.491; p < 0.01]. ASR was independently associated with MAC [OR per standard deviation: 0.138; 95% CI: 0.090–0.211; p < 0.01]. Adjustment for age, gender, blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin, serum cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL and LDL cholesterol, urea, serum creatinine, eGFR and duration of diabetes did not substantially change the association between ASR and MAC [OR per standard deviation: 0.146; 95% CI: 0.071–0.292; p < 0.01] (Table 2).

Table 2 Standardized polytomous logistic regression estimates for the risk of MIC and MAC using NDD as reference.

Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were constructed to derive the cut-point for ASR with the best sensitivity and specificity to identify MIC and MAC. Figure 2 shows the C-statistic for the ASR in predicting MIC and MAC. An ASR cut-point of 0.95 had a C-statistic of 0.691 (95% CI: 0.627-0.755; p < 0.001) indicating the high ability of ASR to discriminate MIC from NDD. The sensitivity and specificity of this ASR cut-off of ≥0.95 were 72% and 60%, respectively, for identifying patients with MIC. The positive predictive value was 60.5%, and the negative predictive value, 71.3%. An ASR cut-point of 0.82 had C statistic of 0.846 (95% CI: 0.800 - 0.893, p < 0.001) had a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 72%, for identifying MAC. The positive predictive and the negative predictive values were 68.5% and 87.6% respectively.

Figure 2
figure2

ROC curves of ASR among individuals with MIC and MAC.

Discussion

Manifestation of albuminuria, overt nephropathy, and an eventual declining glomerular filtration rate (GFR) marks renal insufficiency and characterize progression of DN33. We earlier reported that the prevalence of overt nephropathy and MIC in urban Asian Indians was 2.2 and 26.9%, respectively28. Studies have shown that MIC is a poor predictor of DN34,35,36,37. On the other hand, MAC is a strong predictor of disease progression that only develops at an advanced stage of DN35,38. However, at this stage, little can be done to prevent the development of end-stage kidney failure. Therefore, early diagnosis using a sensitive biomarker is beneficial to detect the onset of DN and to prevent/delay the progression into overt nephropathy. In this context, our study using a novel and validated MALDI MS/MS approach reports the following significant findings: (1) ASR is lower in patients with MIC and MAC compared to NGT or NDD. (2) ASR shows a significant inverse correlation with age, systolic blood pressure, blood urea, serum creatinine, and MIC and positively correlated with HDL cholesterol and eGFR. (3) ASR is independently associated with higher risk of MIC and MAC even after adjusting for other risk variables known to be associated with nephropathy. (4) ASR cut-points of 0.95 and 0.82 had the best sensitivity and specificity for identifying MIC and MAC among Asian Indians respectively. Furthermore, while the ASR cut-points of 0.95 and 0.82 may be useful in South Asians, these cut points may differ in other ethnic groups. This study being cross-sectional in nature, no cause and effect relationship or mechanistic conclusions between ASR and NDD, MIC or MAC could be established.

ADMA and SDMA are important disease markers implicated in clinical findings across a spectrum of diseases that include cardiovascular, renal disorders, hypertension and diabetes39,40,41,42. ADMA and SDMA, having a nominal mass of 203 (C8H18N4O2), are generated from protein methylation biosynthetic pathway subsequent to hydrolysis. Both the isomeric DMAs have been previously investigated and reported as biomarkers for kidney disease43. Unlike ADMA, SDMA is largely excreted through urine and thus is strongly associated with renal function44. Urinary levels of ADMA and SDMA reflect the overall metabolism and might be more reliable markers of pathological states.

DMAs are susceptible to protein binding, which may result in differential recovery for normal and proteinuric urine samples. Therefore, any quantitative estimation of DMA isomer(s) and eventually the comparisons with controls would have to take this into account as urine from patients with micro and macro-albuminuria has significant protein content. However, both the isomers exhibit almost similar binding to proteins45 and hence estimation of their ratio offers a much better and robust alternative to individual quantitative measurements. Additionally, the measurement of ASR would also remain unaffected by hydration levels and urine output of the patient. Estimation of the ASR, measured using MALDI MS/MS in this study, overcomes these inherent challenges of metabolite variations associated with urine samples31,46 and allows for comparisons to be made across normal and proteinuric urine samples. Urinary ADMA to SDMA distribution has been earlier detected from various disease conditions15,16,17,20. In this context, the decreased ASR in patients with MIC and MAC in our study is an important finding. Additionally, our data suggest that an ASR cut-point of 0.95 and 0.82 could be used to correctly identify 72% of MIC and 91% of MAC respectively in this Asian Indian population.

Clinical studies have demonstrated an association of ADMA and SDMA levels with decreasing renal function in CKD after stratification of subjects according to GFR47,48. These studies included both diabetic and non-diabetic CKD subjects. The prognostic value of ADMA in patients with CKD was investigated by Fliser et al.48. They established that the ADMA levels in plasma was an independent predictor of progression of renal disease. These findings were corroborated by Ravani et al.49 who found ADMA to be independently associated with progression to dialysis. Duranton et. al. have investigated the independent profiles of plasma and urinary ADMA and SDMA in CKD50. These studies affirm the potential value of ADMA and SDMA for the prediction of severity of renal disease. In this context, our study finds a negative correlation between ASR and glycemic parameters that include glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting glucose levels. The inverse correlation between ASR with serum creatinine and MIC suggests its potential diagnostic as well as prognostic value. Significantly, the positive correlation of ASR with eGFR also substantiates the role of ASR in assessing diabetic kidney injury. Interestingly, the association of ASR with MIC or MAC is significant even after adjusting the conventional risk factors for DN and emphasizes a potential risk factor role of ASR. Decreased ASR may, therefore, represent a biomarker for MIC and MAC. However, this needs to be confirmed by longitudinal studies. Our work is a proof-of-concept that shows the use of ASR for assessing progressive DN.

To our knowledge, this is the first report that measures the urinary DMA distribution from different stages of diabetes. The strength of the study is that the cases (MIC, MAC/NDD) and IGT and controls (NGT), classified using standard methods, are statistically significant. Direct estimation of the ASR overcomes the inherent challenges of metabolite variations in urine samples and allows for comparisons to be made across disease conditions.

In summary, we report that the ASR profile is lower in MIC and MAC suggesting that it has the potential to be used as an early diagnostic marker. ASR cut-points of 0.95 and 0.82 could be used to correctly identify 72% of MIC and 91% of MAC respectively among Asian Indians, a population that is currently considered the epicenter of worldwide diabetes epidemic. Prospective studies are needed to further understand the mechanisms that govern decreased ASR and the factors that could be beneficially used to neutralize their cellular action. This would be invaluable both from a prevention as well as for novel therapeutic perspective towards better management of DN.

References

  1. 1.

    Brancati, F. L. et al. Risk of end-stage renal disease in diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study of men screened for MRFIT. JAMA 278, 2069–2074 (1997).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gregg, E. W. et al. Trends in cause-specific mortality among adults with and without diagnosed diabetes in the USA: an epidemiological analysis of linked national survey and vital statistics data. Lancet 391, 2430–2440 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Perkins, B. A. et al. Microalbuminuria and the risk for early progressive renal function decline in type 1 diabetes. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 18, 1353–1361 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Paik, W. K. & Kim, S. N(G)-Methylarginines: Biosynthesis, biochemical function and metabolism. Amino Acids 4, 267–86 (1993).

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kakimoto, Y. & Akazawa, S. Isolation and identification of N-G,N-G- and N-G,N′-G-dimethyl-arginine, N-epsilon-mono-, di-, and trimethyllysine, and glucosylgalactosyl- and galactosyl-delta-hydroxylysine from human urine. J. Biol. Chem. 245, 5751–8 (1970).

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Markiw, R. T. Isolation of N-methylated basic amino acids from physiological fluids and protein hydrolysates. Biochem. Med. 13, 23–27 (1975).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zakrzewicz, D. & Eickelberg, O. From arginine methylation to ADMA: A novel mechanism with therapeutic potential in chronic lung diseases. BMC Pulm. Med. 9, 1–7 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tran, C. T. L., Leiper, J. M. & Vallance, P. The DDAH/ADMA/NOS pathway. Atheroscler. Suppl. 4, 33–40 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Davids, M. et al. Role of dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase activity in regulation of tissue and plasma concentrations of asymmetric dimethylarginine in an animal model of prolonged critical illness. Metabolism. 61, 482–90 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Shibata, R. et al. Involvement of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) in tubulointerstitial ischaemia in the early phase of diabetic nephropathy. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 24, 1162–1169 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bode-Böger, S. M. et al. Symmetrical dimethylarginine: a new combined parameter for renal function and extent of coronary artery disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 17, 1128–34 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Schlesinger, S., Sonntag, S. R., Lieb, W. & Maas, R. Asymmetric and symmetric dimethylarginine as risk markers for total mortality and cardiovascular outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Plos One 11, 1–26 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Willeit, P. et al. Asymmetric dimethylarginine and cardiovascular risk: systematic review and meta-analysis of 22 prospective studies. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 4, e001833 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jayachandran, I. et al. Association of circulatory asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) with diabetic nephropathy in Asian Indians and its causative role in renal cell injury. Clin. Biochem. 50, 835–842 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Iapichino, G. et al. Time course of endogenous nitric oxide inhibitors in severe sepsis in humans. Minerva Anestesiol. 76, 325–33 (2010).

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Cupisti, A. et al. Dimethylarginine levels and nutritional status in hemodialysis patients. J. Nephrol 22, 623–629 (2009).

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hsu, C. N., Huang, L. T., Lau, Y. T., Lin, C. Y. & Tain, Y. L. The combined ratios of L-arginine and asymmetric and symmetric dimethylarginine as biomarkers in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Transl. Res. 159, 90–98 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zobel, E. H. et al. Symmetric and asymmetric dimethylarginine as risk markers of cardiovascular disease, all-cause mortality and deterioration in kidney function in persons with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 16, 1–9 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Matsuguma, K. et al. Molecular mechanism for elevation of asymmetric dimethylarginine and its role for hypertension in chronic kidney disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 17, 2176–2183 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jaźwińska-Kozuba, A. et al. Associations between endogenous dimethylarginines and renal function in healthy children and adolescents. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13, 15464–15474 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Busch, M., Fleck, C., Wolf, G. & Stein, G. Asymmetrical (ADMA) and symmetrical dimethylarginine (SDMA) as potential risk factors for cardiovascular and renal outcome in chronic kidney disease - Possible candidates for paradoxical epidemiology? Amino Acids 30, 225–232 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Oner-Iyidogan, Y. et al. Dimethylarginines and inflammation markers in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing dialysis. Clin. Exp. Med. 9, 235–241 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Shafi, T. et al. Serum Asymmetric and Symmetric Dimethylarginine and Morbidity and Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 70, 48–58 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kielstein, J. T., Salpeter, S. R., Bode-Boeger, S. M., Cooke, J. P. & Fliser, D. Symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) as endogenous marker of renal function–a meta-analysis. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant 21, 2446–51 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Anjana, R. M. et al. Prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes (impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance) in urban and rural India: Phase I results of the Indian Council of Medical Research-INdia DIABetes (ICMR-INDIAB) study. Diabetologia 54, 3022–3027 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Unnikrishnan, R., Anjana, R. M. & Mohan, V. Diabetes mellitus and its complications in India. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol 12, 357–70 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Anand, S. et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in two major Indian cities and projections for associated cardiovascular disease. Kidney Int. 88, 178–85 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Unnikrishnan, R. I. et al. Prevalence and risk factors of diabetic nephropathy in an urban South Indian population: the Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study (CURES 45). Diabetes Care 30, 2019–24 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Brown, C. M., Becker, J. O., Wise, P. M. & Hoofnagle, A. N. Simultaneous determination of 6 L-arginine metabolites in human and mouse plasma by using hydrophilic-interaction chromatography and electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Clin. Chem 57, 701–709 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Paglia, G., D’Apolito, O., Tricarico, F., Garofalo, D. & Corso, G. Evaluation of mobile phase, ion pairing, and temperature influence on an HILIC-MS/MS method for L-arginine and its dimethylated derivatives detection. J. Sep. Sci. 31, 2424–2429 (2008).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Bhattacharya, N. et al. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry analysis of dimethyl arginine isomers from urine. Anal. Methods 6, 4602–4609 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Arnold, A. et al. Fast quantitative determination of methylphenidate levels in rat plasma and brain ex vivo by MALDI-MS/MS. J. Mass Spectrom. 50, 963–971 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Chowdhury, T. A., Barnett, A. H. & Bain, S. C. Pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 7, 320–3 (1996).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Risk, N., Caramori, M. L., Fioretto, P. & Mauer, M. The Need for Early Predictors of Diabetic Nephropathy Risk. Diabetes 49, 1399–1408 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Forsblom, C. M., Groop, P. H., Ekstrand, A. & Groop, L. C. Predictive value of microalbuminuria in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes of long duration. Br. Med. J 305, 1051–1053 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Perkins, B. A. et al. Regression of Microalbuminuria in Type 1 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 2285–2293 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Bakris, G. L. & Molitch, M. Microalbuminuria as a risk predictor in diabetes: The continuing saga. Diabetes Care 37, 867–875 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Persson, F. & Rossing, P. Diagnosis of diabetic kidney disease: state of the art and future perspective. Kidney Int. Suppl. 8, 2–7 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Surdacki, A., Kruszelnicka, O., Rakowski, T., Jaźwińska-Kozuba, A. & Dubiel, J. S. Asymmetric dimethylarginine predicts decline of glucose tolerance in men with stable coronary artery disease: a 4.5-year follow-up study. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 12, 64 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Wolf, C. et al. Urinary asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) is a predictor of mortality risk in patients with coronary artery disease. Int. J. Cardiol. 156, 289–94 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ueda, S., Yamagishi, S., Kaida, Y. & Okuda, S. Asymmetric dimethylarginine may be a missing link between cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease. Nephrology (Carlton) 12, 582–90 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Gorenflo, M., Zheng, C., Werle, E., Fiehn, W. & Ulmer, H. E. Plasma levels of asymmetrical dimethyl-L-arginine in patients with congenital heart disease and pulmonary hypertension. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 37, 489–92 (2001).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Fleck, C., Schweitzer, F., Karge, E., Busch, M. & Stein, G. Serum concentrations of asymmetric (ADMA) and symmetric (SDMA) dimethylarginine in patients with chronic kidney diseases. Clin. Chim. Acta. 336, 1–12 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Meinitzer, A. et al. Symmetrical and asymmetrical dimethylarginine as predictors for mortality in patients referred for coronary angiography: The ludwigshafen risk and cardiovascular health study. Clin. Chem 57, 112–121 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Schepers, E., Speer, T., Bode-Böger, S. M., Fliser, D. & Kielstein, J. T. Dimethylarginines ADMA and SDMA: the real water-soluble small toxins? Semin. Nephrol. 34, 97–105 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Bouatra, S. et al. The human urine metabolome. Plos One 8, e73076 (2013).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Tarnow, L., Hovind, P., Teerlink, T., Stehouwer, C. D. A. & Parving, H. H. Elevated plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine as a marker of cardiovascular morbidity in early diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 27, 765–9 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Fliser, D. et al. Asymmetric dimethylarginine and progression of chronic kidney disease: the mild to moderate kidney disease study. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 16, 2456–61 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Ravani, P. et al. Asymmetrical dimethylarginine predicts progression to dialysis and death in patients with chronic kidney disease: a competing risks modeling approach. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 16, 2449–55 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Duranton, F. et al. Plasma and urinary amino acid metabolomic profiling in patients with different levels of kidney function. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 9, 37–45 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was in part funded by Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR-India, TFYP CMET grant CSC0110 and infrastructure grant), Department of Science and Technology India (SERB grant EMR/2016/000167), Department of Biotechnology Ramalingaswami Fellowship (VP), and Indian Council of Medical Research (KG, SK).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

V.P. and K.G. conceptualized the work; V.P., K.G., N.B. and D.P. designed & executed the study methods, analyzed data, interpreted the results and wrote the manuscript. K.G. and V.M. designed the clinical aspects of the work and K.G. and P.P. performed statistical analysis. N.B., D.P., S.K. and S.V. acquired and analyzed MALDI MS/MS data. N.C.R. and P.S. developed and performed the LC-MS validation. V.P. conceptualized and A.G. developed the algorithm used for MALDI and direct MS data processing. G.K.P., P.P., T.A.P. and M.N. were involved in the clinical sample collection and sample preparation. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Gokulakrishnan Kuppan or Venkateswarlu Panchagnula.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

V.P., A.G. and N.B. have patent on mass spectrometry method (Patent No: US9659759B2; V.P., A.G. and N.B. as inventors and CSIR India as applicant; patent granted; aspect covered in patent: MALDI MS analysis of isomers). V.P. has equity in a start-up company, Barefeet Aanalytics Pvt. Ltd. that develops and commercializes mass spectrometry methods of analysis. The rest of the authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parmar, D., Bhattacharya, N., Kannan, S. et al. Plausible diagnostic value of urinary isomeric dimethylarginine ratio for diabetic nephropathy. Sci Rep 10, 2970 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59897-1

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing