Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Evidence in the Japan Sea of microdolomite mineralization within gas hydrate microbiomes


Over the past 15 years, massive gas hydrate deposits have been studied extensively in Joetsu Basin, Japan Sea, where they are associated primarily with active gas chimney structures. Our research documents the discovery of spheroidal microdolomite aggregates found in association with other impurities inside of these massive gas hydrates. The microdolomites are often conjoined and show dark internal cores occasionally hosting saline fluid inclusions. Bacteroidetes sp. are concentrated on the inner rims of microdolomite grains, where they degrade complex petroleum-macromolecules present as an impurity within yellow methane hydrate. These oils show increasing biodegradation with depth which is consistent with the microbial activity of Bacteroidetes. Further investigation of these microdolomites and their contents can potentially yield insight into the dynamics and microbial ecology of other hydrate localities. If microdolomites are indeed found to be ubiquitous in both present and fossil hydrate settings, the materials preserved within may provide valuable insights into an unusual microhabitat which could have once fostered ancient life.


The Umitaka Spur and Joetsu Knoll are well-known gas chimneys and sites of submarine methane seepage, situated on the western margin of the Japan Sea, offshore Niigata in Joetsu Basin (Fig. 1)1,2. The hydrocarbons from both sites are primarily thermogenic and accumulated as a result of the release of fluid overpressure that developed over the past 5 Ma in organic-rich Middle Miocene sediments3,4. In 2004, Umitaka Spur became the first site in the Japan Sea where gas hydrates were recovered and subsequent investigations have focused on: the chemistry of gas hydrates and seep gasses5, the formation of carbonate nodules and concretions (Methane Derived Authigenic Carbonates or MDACs)6,7,8,9 and the influence of gas seeps and gas hydrates on interstitial waters in the surrounding sediments10,11,12,13,14,15. Expeditions to the Joetsu Basin by the R/V Hakurei in 2014 (HR14) and R/V Poseidon in 2015 (PS15) recovered cores, several metres in length, that contained intact massive methane hydrate that was relatively uncontaminated by surrounding sediment (Fig. 2a,b)16. Ongoing research, including U/Th dating of associated MDACs6,7 and other sedimentological considerations8, suggest that these thick hydrate accumulations formed fairly rapidly at shallow sediment depths, and have been subsequently buried over time scales of tens of thousands of years.

Figure 1

Microdolomite-bearing gas hydrate samples were collected by drilling at the crest to anticlinal structures in Joetsu Basin, located offshore Japan’s main island Honshu, between 900 m and 1000 m water depth. The sampling sites are in the general proximity of deep hydrocarbon wells located in Niigata Prefecture (white triangles). The Joetsu Knoll (JK) site is located on the southeastern crest of the knoll while the two Umitaka Spur sites were both located on the margins of giant pock marks in the northeast (UTNE) and central west (UTCW).

Figure 2

Hydrate before and after dissociation. (a) Core UTCW J25R 9 × 1–4 (68–70 mbsf) immediately after splitting the core liner on the ship. (b) Yellow patches within frozen hydrate. (UTCW J25R, 56 mbsf). The sediment-filled fracture is due to hydrate breakage during rotary drilling. The hydrate was broken and the pieces not containing sediment contamination were dissociated. (c) The same hydrate following dissociation and centrifugation, showing oil (top), a partially suspended mix of oil and water(middle) and a fine powder residue of loose dolomite grains (bottom).

Gas hydrates in the Joetsu Basin have been studied for over a decade, but it was not until routine hydrate dissociation experiments during the PS15 cruise that a cloudy residue was noted in the hydrate water (Fig. 2c). This residue was found in hydrates dissociated shipboard and later in archived gas hydrate stored in liquid nitrogen from the same and previous cruises. Using powered X-ray diffraction, the residue was shown to comprise pure microdolomite, in the form of microscopic spheroidal aggregates recoverable without any special separation procedures (Supplementary Fig. S1, Supplementary Table S1). Sampled hydrate sites (Fig. 1) include the margin of a large pock mark in the central western portion of Umitaka Spur (UTCW) and a hydrate-bearing site in the north-eastern portion of Umitaka Spur (UTNE). An archived sample from Joetsu Knoll (JK) cored during HR14 expedition was also included.

Here we show that microdolomites within the gas hydrates in the Joetsu Basin, Japan Sea, can grow by mineralising petrogenic carbon within isolated microhabitats provided by the methane hydrate. This microhabitat is unique in that the carbon is being taken from otherwise recalcitrant phases of carbon present within petroleum, and not via processes found outside the microhabitat such as sulphate reduction or anaerobic oxidation of methane.


Growth, morphology and depth-related changes

The Joetsu Basin dolomitic aggregates are easily distinguished from other minerals by their size, with diameters ranging from ~10 μm to ~150 μm (avg. diam. = 40 μm), and their distinctive morphologies e.g. “dumbbell pairs”, “chains”, or branching “cauliflower growths” (Fig. 3a–d). These distinctive morphologies can be seen to be formed from conjoined microdolomite spheres. Dark-coloured material is present at the cores of the microdolomites, and broken chains reveal interconnected internal porous regions (Fig. 3e,f). Macroscopically, the microdolomite appears as a very fine white or light-yellow powder, as the conjoined growth-patterns rarely exceed several grains and are sufficiently dispersed within the hydrate matrix that spheroidal aggregates do not merge to form crusts, veins, or other larger cemented mineralisations (Fig. 2c).

Figure 3

Mineral aggregates recovered from dissociated hydrate are relatively pure dolomite. (a) Light microscopy of single-grained dolomites showing dark inclusions (UTCW J25R, 53.9 mbsf, Mg/Ca = 0.91). (b) Single and paired “dumbbell” grains, showing layering in the internal dark portions (UTCW J22R, 28.7 mbsf, Mg:Ca = 0.92. (c) Shallow dumbbell grain (UTCW J21R, 12.2 mbsf, Mg:Ca = 0.74). Shallow grains (<20mbsf) show rough surfaces comprised of ~5 μm dolomite rhombs and low Mg/Ca ratios. (d) Deeper grains consist of smooth intergrown dolomite plates ~15 μm. The overall size of the deep grains ranges from 20 μm to > 150 μm and Mg:Ca ratios approaching 1 (UTCW J25R, 57 mbsf, Mg:Ca = 0.97). (e) Broken chain structure (UTCW J25R, 67.4 mbsf) shows smooth intergrowth of dolomite rhombs on the outer surface. (f) Close-up of previous grain showing concentric porous rings on the inside of the broken surface, possibly consisting of organic matter or residual fluid.

Although individual dolomite samples show some variation in the abundance of single grains, dumbbells, or cauliflower-shaped aggregates, the abundance of these morphologies does not change with depth. There is, however, an observable depth-related change in the outer texture and size of the aggregates. Hydrates sampled from <20 metres below seafloor (mbsf) contain aggregates of rough spheroidal angular dolomite rhombs (Fig. 3c). The rhombs are ~5 μm across, and form spheroidal aggregates ~15–20 μm in diameter. There is a transition to smoother surface textures between 20 mbsf and 30 mbsf, such that dolomite rhombs sampled at >30 mbsf have intergrown dolomite surfaces (Fig. 3d), comprising hexagonal plates or shield shapes ~10–15 μm across organized in spheroidal aggregates ranging from ~30–150 μm in diameter.

Non-biogenic microdolomite aggregates with similar spheroidal and dumbbell morphologies have been produced in the laboratory at temperatures of >40 °C through direct precipitation from a gel of magnesium-rich amorphous calcium carbonate (MgACC) which quickly transforms to spheroidal proto-dolomite and eventually undergoes dewatering to produce microdolomite17,18. During this transformation, Mg:Ca ratios increase from 0.65 in pure MgACC to 1.00 in stoichiometric dolomite, where Mg:Ca is the molar ratio of the two corresponding elements in the dolomite. In order to see if the Joetsu Basin dolomites show any systematic change, Mg:Ca was determined through Rietveld refinement of the x-ray diffraction patterns19 and by applying the equation of Turpin et al.20. Grain diameter was determined through microscopy21 (Supplementary Tables S1, S2). In general, both the grain size and average diameter of grains increase with depth (Fig. 4a). The smallest average grain diameter is 19 µm (UTNE at 16mbsf) while the largest average is 114 µm (UTCW at 88mbsf). At 22 µm, the Joetsu Knoll sample (JK at 30mbsf) is also quite small despite being much deeper than other small dolomite aggregates. The lowest Mg:Ca ratio is 0.76 (UTCW 12mbsf), while the highest is 0.99 (UTCW 86mbsf). There are, however some dolomites with Mg:Ca > 0.95 at depths as shallow as 20mbsf.

Figure 4

Depth profiles for recovered dolomite, hydrate gases, and oils found in hydrate. Point size is scaled to mean diameter of microdolomites (smallest at 19 µm and largest at 114 µm). Red = UTCW, blue = UTNE, yellow = JK. (a–c) The Mg:Ca ratios and stable isotopic composition of the dolomite aggregates. For δ18O, black line represents equilibrium values with seawater based on the geotherm. (d) Comparison of stable isotopic composition for Joetsu Basin microdolomites in this study (DOL) versus previously published MDACS from Umitaka Spur (upward triangles: Zhang et al.9; downward triangles:Hiruta et al.8). (e–g) Gas composition and stable isotopic composition for dissociated methane hydrate. The Δ13C values show the difference between dolomite and the hydrate CO2, illustrating the degree of disequilibrium that exists in shallow samples. Equilibrium values (solid line) based on the geotherm. (h–j) Organic chemistry of UTCW hydrate oil showing relative increases in refractory asphaltene and increases in C29 25-norhopane at the expense of C30-hopane due to biodegradation.

Stable isotopic composition

Stable carbon isotope ratios can potentially indicate the carbon source of the microdolomites, particularly in the Joetsu Basin where the primary carbon pools have distinct isotopic compositions. The δ13C values for the microdolomites (Fig. 4b,d) are all positive, which is significantly different from the negative values associated with MDACS in the area8,9. Generally, dolomites which have positive δ13C values are the result of a carbon source related to methanogenesis which has subsequently undergone evaporation22. The Joetsu Basin hydrates have reported δ13C values ranging from −57.1‰ to −43.9‰VPDB in Joetsu Knoll and −36.6‰ to −34.6‰VPDB in Umitaka Spur5, both locations indicating a thermogenic source with some admixture of biogenic methane. Similarly, the δ13C values of methane reported for deep wells within the nearby Niigata gas fields range from −35‰ to −33‰VPDB23,24, overlapping with the range of values from Umitaka Spur. The reported δ13C values for dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) in the interstitial waters of Joetsu Basin sediments range from +18.7‰ to +28.5‰VPDB at Joetsu Knoll and −4.9‰ to +41.4‰ at UTCW15; at both areas, the least positive values are shallow sediments near the sulphate methane transition (SMT), due to anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) whereas the most positive values are in the deeper sediments. Presumably the source of this DIC, which is enriched in 13C relative to 12C, is a deep source of residual organic that has undergone methanogenesis over long periods of time3,4. Porewaters with negative δ13C values for DIC are related to a combination of gas hydrate dissociation and AOM8,24.

During growth gas hydrate incorporates pore fluids resulting in residual porewaters with negative δ18O values12,13,25. The removal of porewater and the resulting dehydration is observed as salinity anomalies within interstitial water throughout surrounding hydrate locales of the Joetsu Basin11,14,15. Japan Sea bottom-waters in the Joetsu Basin are cold at 0.4 °C and the geothermal gradient at Umitaka Spur and Joetsu Knoll is 105 mK/m26. The temperature of the deepest samples at 90 mbsf, which is just above the gas hydrate stability zone (GHSZ) would be expected to be 9.9 °C. The δ18O value for dolomite in equilibrium with seawater down to this depth would range from +6.4‰ to +4.1‰VPDB27 (Supplementary Table S2). The dolomites show δ18O values to the left of equilibrium with seawater plotted as a solid line (Fig. 4c) due to isotopic fractionation between oxygen in the interstitial water and water-bound oxygen in the growing hydrate13,28. Both UTNE and JK dolomites show a greater degree of depletion of 18O than UTCW. If the extent of disequilibrium is taken as an indicator of the rate of growth, then most of the rapid growth of hydrates occurred at depths less than 20 mbsf. As hydrate is buried, the values again approach those of thermal equilibrium with seawater. Unlike the δ13C values, the δ18O values of MDACs in the UTCW area show considerable overlap with those values observed for the microdolomites (Fig. 4d). The larger, deeper microdolomites show less positive values, particularly at UTNE, indicating that hydrate growth at depth continues and in doing so takes up water from the fluid inclusions in which the microdolomites also continue to grow.

Non-hydrocarbon gases incorporated in hydrates

The Joetsu Basin hydrates contain both hydrogen sulphide and carbon dioxide5,7. Significant amounts of H2S (up to 10.8 mL/L-CH4) were found in hydrates between 10 mbsf and 20 mbsf. These depths coincide with the formation of small dolomite grains (Fig. 4e) and it may be that the presence of high sulphide concentrations in the hydrate contributed to the initial stages of microdolomite precipitation29. Carbon dioxide is also present, and the δ13C values for CO2 reach minimum values over the same interval (Fig. 4f) then gradually become more positive with depth as they reach equilibrium with the surrounding DIC-pool. The composition of non-hydrocarbon gases within the hydrate therefore seems to be influenced by AOM and sulphate reduction to some degree5, but only significantly so at depths of less than 20 mbsf. This is not the case for the microdolomites, as the δ13C of the UTNE microdolomites seems only to be influenced by AOM at shallow depths and not at all at UTCW (Fig. 4b). Assuming the aforementioned temperature gradient, we calculated Δ13Cdolomite-CO2 as a function of depth (Supplementary Table S2)30. Calculating the equilibrium values for the microdolomites indicates a high degree of isotopic disequilibrium with the CO2 for the hydrates from both UTNE and UTCW at <20 mbsf (Fig. 4g). Even though AOM may influence the δ13C of CO2 in the hydrate, the primary source of carbon in the microdolomites must be 13C-enriched DIC, which can ultimately only derive from methanogenesis at greater depths or from some form of microbial activity which also produces CO2 within saline fluid inclusions in the gas hydrate.

Oils, brines, and other impurities excluded during hydrate growth

It has been shown that rapid hydrate growth, at least in the case of synthetic hydrates, can lead to the temporary formation of encapsulated pockets of brine or finely dispersed saline fluid inclusions31. The Joetsu Basin hydrates recovered from the UTCW sites have yellow hydrate which, when dissociated, yields yellow oil which is emulsified in the clear hydrate water and microdolomite which settles to the bottom (Fig. 2c). The recognition of distinct insoluble oil and water phases is important because when trapped in pockets and veins, water-in-oil emulsions both stabilize brines providing microbial habitats32 and could potentially serve as a spherical-template for the formation of mineral precipitates such as the spheroidal microdolomites. Evidence for microbial processes can be found in the chemical composition of the oils which exhibit alteration consistent with the subsurface degradation of petroleum33. Specifically, the higher carbon-number n-alkanes and steranes which are generally present in undegraded oil are notably absent, and instead biodegradation-products such as the 25-norhopanes have been formed from regular hopanes, and the oils relatively enriched in recalcitrant components such as asphaltene (Supplementary Fig. S3 and Supplementary Table S4). The proportion of asphaltene, here taken as a more refractory organic component, becomes greater relative to total extractible organic matter (EOM) with depth, indicating that the biodegradation of the labile compounds is ongoing during burial especially in the upper 30mbsf (Fig. 4h) and is generally accompanied by an increase in the diameter of the microdolomite grains. Similarly, C29 25-norhopane, which is formed directly from the biodegradation of C30 hopane increases with depth (Fig. 4i) and the amount of C30 hopane decreases relative to asphaltene.

Internal chemistry of dolomite grains

The majority of the microdolomites show zonation as do other microbial dolomites22; the Joetsu Basin microdolomites have outer rims with high Mg:Ca ratios and are optically clear while the darker central cores have lower Mg:Ca ratios, sometimes approaching Mg:Ca = 0.7 (Fig. 5). This may reflect that hydrate growth is initially rapid in shallow sediments and leads to less-ordered dolomites. However, during hydrate burial the dolomites grow slowly until the overall Mg:Ca ratio approaches 1 (Fig. 4a). Prior to analysis, and during the sample preparation, it was also noticed that some of the grains still contain fluid inside (Supplementary Fig. S2) which, if left to dry, formed secondary minerals on the surfaces of the polished microdolomites. EPMA showed that these grains have high Na and Cl in the cores, presumably trapped saline water.

Figure 5

(a) SEM scan of a composite “cauliflower” (Grain-A) and a single grain dolomite aggregate (Grain-B) from UTCW Site J25R (57.9mbsf) following elemental mapping. Blue line shows where quantitative elemental mapping was carried out at 2 μm intervals using EPMA. (b) EPMA mapping shows that areas high in Mg (green) are concentrated on the transparent outer surface, while areas to the center of the grains are relatively more enriched in Ca (red). (c) Quantitative scanning of Mg:Ca ratios across shows much lower Mg:Ca ratios near the dark cores and internal voids, particularly in the single-grain sample. (d) Transmission light microscopy shows concentric layering around dark core material.

Internal microbial content of dolomite grains

Epifluorescence microscopy of DNA-stained microdolomites indicated high concentrations of microbial DNA in two samples from shallow depths (less than 30 mbsf), and lesser concentrations in two samples beneath 30 mbsf. Despite differences in DNA-concentrations, both shallow and deep microdolomites could yield sufficient extractible DNA for 16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis (Supplementary Table S5). Epifluorescence microscopy showed that DNA lined the inner surfaces and cores of the spheres (Fig. 6), strongly indicating that phylogenetic information for the microdolomites pertains to their internal microhabitat.

Figure 6

(a) Epifluorescence imagery of dolomite grain showing internal presence of microbial DNA. In this case, the dolomite crystals forming the aggregate appear amber-colored while nucleic acid in the microbial material fluoresces due to SYBR-green dye (UTCW J24RB, 12.0 mbsf). (b) Fluorescence of the same sample (white box) showing high density of microbial DNA contained within surrounding microdolomite grains. (c) Pie charts showing the relative abundance of microbial phyla within deep and shallow samples.

It is notable that the microdolomites mostly lack sulphate reducing bacteria and ANME archaea that are associated with gas hydrate mounds and shallow sites of methane seepage34,35,36. A single sample (J20R 18.5 mbsf) had 0.5% archaea and 0.5% δ-proteobacteria (possible sulphate reducing bacteria), but aside from this the interior of the microdolomites appears to be a microhabitat distinct from that typically found at shallow sites of methane seepage. Instead, phylogenetic analysis suggests the microdolomites grew in a microhabitat similar to that hosted by deep gas hydrates37 and by marine oil spills38. For example, Sphingomonadales is present in all samples, and there is a notable predominance of α-proteobacteria in the deepest microdolomites (Rhizobiales makes up 50% of the microbial abundance in J25R 53.91 mbsf, compared to 17.9% for other α-proteobacteria in shallower samples). Both Sphingomonadales and Rhizobiales are reported oil-degraders.

However, there are differences to the communities reported from marine oil spills: β-proteobacteria, including Burkholderiales, which commonly occur in oxic-seawater near oil seep sites38 are absent, while γ-proteobacteria are of low abundance in shallow samples and absent in deeper samples. The low abundance of γ-proteobacteria and greater relative abundance of α-proteobacteria in the deepest samples is consistent with α-proteobacteria supplanting γ-proteobacteria during the later stages of petroleum degradation, after the lighter substrates have been removed39.

From the perspective of the formation of microdolomites, perhaps the most striking difference between the deep and shallow microbial communities is the abundance of Bacteroidetes; in particular Flavobacteriia which is present in the shallower samples (48.3% at 12.04 mbsf and 25.3% at 18.25 mbsf) and completely absent from the deeper samples. Because Flavobacteriia breaks down complex macromolecules including oils39, and produces extracellular polymeric substances that initiate the formation of spherulitic microdolomite40, Flavobacteriia likely plays a key role initiating the formation of microdolomites at shallow depths. Some strains of Flavobacteriia have a light-yellow colour39 and this may account for the yellow colour of some microdolomites and oils. Because both hydrate and sediment in Joetsu Basin samples contain oil, the sediments also contain some similar organotrophs41, as do sediments above deep gas hydrate on the Pacific side of Japan42, yet the formation of authigenic carbonates in the sediments appears to be predominantly a consequence of shallow ANME and SRB.

Of final note is the Phylum Firmicutes, including Class Bacilli, which is present in the shallow microdolomites, but more generally associated with hypersaline anoxic environments37. The Phylum Firmicutes is present at 11.8% in one shallow sample (J20R 18.25 mbsf), but the Class Bacilli is found only in trace amounts in both shallow samples and not at all in the deeper samples. In one of the deeper microdolomite samples (J25R 57.91 mbsf), the Phylum Firmicutes, Class Thermodesufovibrionia makes up 9.8% of the microbial distribution and its presence is most likely associated with the degradation of long-chain alkanes and fatty acids43.


Authigenic carbonates are often associated with gas hydrates and gas chimneys, but the microdolomites in the residue from dissociated Joetsu Basin hydrate differ from MDACs in several respects. The first major difference is mineralogy. The MDACs found at the Umitaka Spur and Joetsu Knoll gas chimneys all comprise aragonite or high-Mg calcites8,9, and occur as concretions or nodules of cemented sediment. To date, microscopic observation of the MDACs in Joetsu Basin has revealed the development of micritic carbonate and carbonitic microspar on sediment surfaces, but until this study had not found spherulitic aggregates of microdolomite. Hydrate Ridge located offshore Oregon is similar the Joetsu Basin Sites in a number of regards, including the presence of yellow oil-containing hydrate44, and is known to host carbonate “clathrites” that developed in very close proximity to massive hydrate and which also consist of high-Mg calcitic and aragonitic sediment cementation25 similar to the Joetsu Basin MDACs8,9. In contrast, the carbonate present inside of the Joetsu Basin hydrates is exclusively microdolomite. The second difference is in the microbial communities associated with the carbonate growth which, in shallow marine sediments, is related to the availability of porewater sulphate. Such settings, which are external to the hydrate surfaces, give rise to a consortium of ANME Archea and SRB as has been documented in Hydrate Ridge35. Given the absence of available sulphate inside of fluid inclusions within the hydrate, the microbial content preserved in the microdolomites is lacking in ANME and SRB. Although methane is available in abundance within the hydrate, the microbial communities inside of the Joetsu Basin microdolomites are primarily organotrophs which rely on complex macromolecules as a metabolic source. Other key differences between conventional MDACs and the microdolomites, such as stable isotopic composition and growth habit, are intimately tied to the first two differences. The effect of anaerobic methane oxidation, for example, does not seem to influence the δ13C of the microdolomites, even though it has produced very negative δ13C values in the nearby MDACs (Fig. 4d). The spheroidal growth habit observed with the microdolomites which appears to be the consequence of extracellular polymeric substances produced by Flavobacteriia, is also not observed in nearby MDACs.

At first glance, the hydrate microdolomite grains seem perhaps similar to oolitic carbonates found in fossil hydrocarbon seep settings in Japan45 and elsewhere46. As with Joetsu Basin MDACs, however, these oolitic growths are related to the production of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) through microbial activity carried out by ANME and SRB and have negative δ13C values. Also, the microdolomites differ significantly in size, not exceeding 200 μm in diameter, whereas the oolitic growths which developed in the aforementioned seep settings are about an order of magnitude larger in diameter and often consist of acicular aragonite which coats pre-existing grains.

By considering the microdolomites as a microhabitat or micro-environment, better analogues can be found based on chemical characteristics, rather than facile comparisons to geological settings. For example, highly evaporative settings may develop saline anoxic lagoons or sabkha environments where carbonate authigenesis is locally mediated by the extracellular polymeric substances produced though microbial activity22,40. Spheroidal microdolomite aggregates of similar size and growth habit have been shown to develop in Lagoa Vermelha and Brejo do Espinho, Brazil47,48. Petroleum seepage sites in Kuwait (Eocene and Quaternary sediments) have been shown to host hydrocarbon-related microdolomites49. Microbially-derived spheroidal microdolomites have also been reported, along with evidence of previous gas hydrate occurrences, in the Tertiary-age seep sites of Monferrato, Italy50. In these settings, the formation of dolomite is favoured at high salinities, petroleum provides the organic substrates, and microbial processes which ensue both oxidise large organic molecules and mediate the formation of dolomite. In the case of Joetsu Basin, a hypersaline micro-environment would be generated by the rapid growth of the surrounding hydrate11,12,15 coupled with the drawdown of water and the formation of saline water inclusions, and with hydrocarbons seeping up from the underlying petroleum system3,4.

Our results suggest the development of a microbiome inside of the saline fluid inclusions that form during rapid growth of massive hydrates within gas chimneys. This rapid hydrate growth has led to the exclusion of oily, saline pockets inside of the hydrate. During the exclusion, a water-in-oil emulsion may form which limits the migration of saline waters out of the hydrate and provides a suitable medium for the biodegradation of oils to occur. The uptake of water by the growing hydrate further concentrates the residual brines, which reach saturation with respect to dolomite, while increasing the concentration of dissolved nutrients available to microorganisms.

Organotrophic microbes, in particular Flavobacteriia, metabolize the oils, producing extracellular polymeric substances that are suitable for the formation of spherulitic microdolomite40,51. In addition, the same organotrophic microbes produce DIC which is enriched in 13C, similar to the DIC which has migrated upward from depth, along with the oils and methane. Dolomite precipitation initiates around extracellular polymeric substances excreted by the microbes and, since the microbial activity was centred around the oil-covered water droplets, saline water becomes trapped inside microdolomites. Although microbial activity appears to be focused at depths less than 30mbsf, the microdolomites continue to grow as they are buried with the hydrate, increasing in diameter over time and developing dolomite coatings with higher Mg:Ca ratios.

Although the presence of microdolomites has only recently been observed in Joetsu Basin, future research will focus on whether or not they are present in other environments, such as shallow permafrost or deep pore-filling hydrates. Given that the conditions leading to shallow hydrate growth are not unique to the Japan Sea, it is also likely that this unusual microbiome is present in other settings, including permafrost hydrate, other offshore hydrate settings, and areas that preserve sedimentological evidence of fossil gas seeps. Given that spheroidal microdolomites can potentially encapsulate seawater and organic matter inside, such grains may potentially preserve valuable information regarding ancient life.


Sample collection

The contents of the clear polycarbonate liners were inspected as soon as the core arrived on deck. Where massive hydrate was observed, 10–20 cm whole-round sections were cut immediately and preserved in liquid nitrogen for on-shore research. Remaining core was cut into 1 m sections for core description, including intervals which also included nearly pure hydrate.

Identical procedures were used to disassociate gas hydrate on-shore and shipboard; the outer hydrate portions removed, 20–30 cc of clean hydrate dissociated in 50 cc syringe (preformed in a fume hood due to hydrogen sulphide), and evolved gases collected in aluminium polymer bags with Teflon stopcocks. The remaining liquid phase was agitated with a vortex stirrer, transferred to a 50 cc tube and centrifuged. A Pasteur pipette was used to collect oil residues from the surface, the liquid phase was decanted and a solid phase at the bottom recovered, rinsed and cleaned. (Residue was centrifuged twice with 18 MΩ deionized water, final rinse with ethanol prior to drying at 40 °C).

X-Ray Diffractometry (XRD)

The hydrate-residue had a grain-size  that was sufficiently fine that it did not need to be ground for powder XRD. XRD was carried out on a Rigaku Ultima IV with the following settings: rotation: 40 RPM, 2θ-range: 5° - 85°, 2θ-step size: 0.02°, scan step speed: 0.8 s, Generator: 40 kV and 30 mA. The stoichiometric ratio of Mg:Ca in the microdolomites was determined from the XRD patterns using the method of Turpin20 (Table S1). Mineralogical abundances were determined through Reitveld Refinement (Table S2) using Profex software19. Of the 39 samples, 28 had >15% dolomite and were taken for further analysis (11 had a high marine clay-content and were not analysed further).


External features of uncoated microdolomites were observed with a Keyence VE-8800 Real Surface-View Scanning Electron Microscope (3 kV to 8 kV). Internal details of the microdolomites were observed using a Keyence Digital Microscopy System and polished resin blocks. Resin blocks were prepared by embedding the microdolomite in Luff Araldite resin (Polysciences), placing the resin under low-vacuum to remove air-bubbles and, once hardened, polishing with plastic lapping film (3M). This procedure was carried out with dry lapping film to avoid dissolution of grain materials. To image the internal presence of microbial DNA, the microdolomite samples were sectioned with a diamond-blade microtome and stained with SYBR green. Confocal epifluorescence microscopy was done with an Olympus BX51 fluorescence microscope equipped with an Olympus DP71 charge-coupled device (CCD) camera.

Elemental mapping and electron probe microanalysis

Elemental mapping was carried out on Pd/Pt-coated polished samples using JEOL Superprobe (XA-8230) with the following instrument parameters; Spot mode, AccV = 15 kV, ProbC = 50 nA, dwell time = 60 msec/pixel. Samples were polished as described above the microscopy of internal details. Elemental mapping provided intensity values that were mapped using ImageJ software52. For quantitative determination of the ratio Mg:Ca, analyses were taken at a 2 μm frequency along linear transects that crossed grain surfaces. The following calibration standards were scanned before and after each transect to correct for instrument drift and permit the calculation of relative intensities: CaSiO3 for calcium and MgO for magnesium.

Stable isotopic composition of microdolomites

The carbon and oxygen stable isotopic the microdolomites was determined using a ThermoFisher GC-MS (MAT 243) equipped with a GasBench system. A small amount of powdered microdolomite (200–300 μg) was digested overnight in 100% H3PO4 at 80 °C. The resultant CO2 gas was then injected into the IRMS automatically for carbon and isotope analysis. The δ13C and δ18O values were calibrated using NBS19. A dolomite acid fractionation factor for δ18O was calculated according to Rosenbaum and Sheppard53.

Hydrate gas composition

The gas from hydrate dissociation was collected in polymer-coated aluminium gas-collection bags (GL Sciences) Gas standards were prepared from 99.9% CH4 (GL Science) and the methane concentration was determined by injecting 0.5 mL of hydrate gas into a GC-FID (Shimadzu GC14B) with an alumina column (60/80, GL Science). A second sample split of 0.5 mL was injected into a GC-FPD (Shimadzu GC-2014S) equipped with a β, β-ODPN 25% Uniport HP 6/80 column in order to determine H2S concentration. Calibration standards were prepared from a 10% H2S gas (Takachiho Chemical Industrial). The results of the two analyses were used to calculate a molar ratio of H2S/CH4. Stable isotopic analysis of the δ13C of CO2 in the dissociated hydrate was carried out by first transferring gas into a vacuum chamber with a Pfeiffer Prisma 200 quadrupole mass spectrometer to analyse gas composition. Samples with less than 10% air contamination (based on O2 content), were then passed through a liquid-nitrogen cold trap in order to separate CO2. Carbon isotopes were then measured for the CO2 using an IsoPrime 100 mass spectrometer.

Oil analysis

Biomarker analysis was carried out on a 6890N Network GC system interfaced to a 5975 inert mass selective detector with a PTV injector. Oil was extracted from aliquots oily hydrate water by liquid-liquid extraction. Extractions were performed by shaking water in the presence of dichloromethane and the products of each stage were combined. A quantitation standard of 5β-cholane was added. Extracts were analysed by GC-MS using the following method: PTV injector (300 °C) operating in splitless mode; GC temperature program was as follows; 60 °C to 120 °C at 20 °C/min then from 120 °C to 290 °C at 4 °C/min. The column was a Greyhound GC-5 (HP-5 equivalent phase; 30 m length, 250 µm ID and 0.25 µm film thickness). The MS was operated in sim mode (less than 20 ions & dwell time less than 40 ms). Compounds were identified by reference to well-characterized samples of biodegraded oil from the Niger Delta54. Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy of asphaltene was done using a BWTek i-Raman Pro fitted with a 532 nm light source and mounted on 20 × video-microscope and employing a gold-coated glass substrate. A small aliquot of extract and asphaltene-quantitation standards dissolved in dichloromethane were absorbed on the gold surface. Surface enhanced Raman spectra were collected by accumulating 1000 spectra over a 300 ms duration in the range 200–2000 cm−1, with the 1200 to 1800 cm−1 region used. Laser spot size was approximately 2–4 μm and laser power was 40–60% (<13 mW delivered to the sample). Quantification was performed using the procedure in Bowden and Taylor55; deconvolution with entire spectra of asphaltene and interfering compounds and quantification of asphaltene.

Microbial content of microdolomites

As previously described56, 0.1 g of crushed microdolomite sample was incubated at 65 °C for 30 min in 150 μL of alkaline solution (pH 13.5, 75 μL of 0.5 N NaOH, and 75 μL of TE buffer including 10 mM Tris-HCl and 1 mM EDTA). Following centrifugation at 5,000 g for 30 s at room temperature, the supernatant was neutralized with 750 μL of TE buffer and 150 μL of 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 6.5). The DNA was concentrated by ethanol precipitation from the DNA-bearing solutions (pH 7.0–7.5) and the DNA precipitate was dissolved in 50 μL of TE buffer (pH 8.0). Sequencing and phylogenic analysis was carried out with an Illumina MiSeq sequencer. Using the primers Uni530F and Uni907R57, including TruSeq adapter sequences and 7-mer index58 16S rRNA gene sequences was amplified by PCR using LA taq polymerase (Takara-Bio, Inc., Japan) for Illumina MiSeq sequencing. Thermal cycling was performed with 35 cycles of denaturation at 96 °C for 20 s, annealing at 58 °C for 45 s, and extension at 72 °C for 120 s. The PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gels and purified using the MinElute Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen). The purified PCR products were mixed and used as templates for sequencing by MiSeq Genome Analyzer using MiSeq Reagent Nano Kit v2 with 500 cycles following the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina, USA). Raw reads were processed using QIIME259 for Phylotype composition analyses, including quality assessment, quality trimming, chimera detection and OTU clustering (97% cut-off). Initial taxonomic assignment was determined using a BLASTn-based similarity search against a nucleotide collection consisting of sequences from GenBank, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ), and Reference Sequence (RefSeq)60.


  1. 1.

    Matsumoto, R., Hiromatsu, M. & Sato, M. Fluid flow and Evolution of gas hydrate mounds of Joetsu Basin, Eastern Margin of Japan Sea: Constraints from high-resolution geophysical survey by AUV. Proc. 7 th Intl. Conference on Gas Hydrates, (2011).

  2. 2.

    Matsumoto, R. et al. Formation and collapse of gas hydrates deposits in high methane flux area of the Joetsu basin, eastern margin of Japan Sea. J. Geogr. 118, 43–71 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Nguyen, B. T. T. et al. Compaction of smectite-rich mudstone and its influence on pore pressure in the deep-water Joetsu Basin, Sea of Japan. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 78, 848–869 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Monzawa, N., Kaneko, M. & Osawa, M. A review of petroleum system in the deep water area of the Toyama Trough to the Sado Island in the Japan Sea, based on the results of the METI Sado Nansei Oki drilling. J. Japan. Assoc. Petrol. Tech. 71, 618–627, (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hachikubo, A., Yanagawa, K., Tomaru, H., Lu, H. & Matsumoto, R. Molecular and isotopic composition of volatiles in gas hydrates and in sediment from the Joetsu Basin, eastern margin of the Japan Sea. Energies 8, 4647–4688 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Watanabe, Y., Nakai, S., Hiruta, A., Matsumoto, R. & Yoshida, K. U–Th dating of carbonate nodules from methane seeps off Joetsu, Eastern Margin of Japan Sea. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 28, 89–96 (2008).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Matsumoto, R. et al. Processes involved in massive gas hydrate formation in the Sea of Japan as inferred from U-Th ages of MDAC and from H2S concentrations of hydrates. Goldschmidt Abstracts 2626, (2017).

  8. 8.

    Hiruta, A., Wang, L.-C., Ishizaki, O. & Matsumoto, R. Last glacial emplacement of methane-derived authigenic carbonates in the Sea of Japan constrained by diatom assemblage, carbon-14, and carbonate content. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 56, 51–62 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zhang, N. et al. Clumped isotope signatures of methane-derived authigenic carbonate presenting equilibrium values of their formation temperatures. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 512, 207–213 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Snyder, G. T. Pore water profiles and authigenic mineralization in shallow marine sediments above the methane-charged system on Umitaka Spur, Japan Sea. Deep-Sea Res. II 11-13, 1216–1239 (2007).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hiruta, A. et al. Methane flux, seafloor gas hydrates, chloride anomalies and sulphate reduction: Joetsu regions, eastern margin of Japan Sea. J. Sed. Soc. Japan 64, 89–93 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hiruta, A., Snyder, G. T., Tomaru, H. & Matsumoto, R. Geochemical constraints for the formation and dissociation of gas hydrate in an area of high methane flux, eastern margin of the Japan Sea. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 279, 326–339 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kano, A. et al. Gas hydrate estimates in muddy sediments from the oxygen isotope of water fraction. Chem. Geol. 470, 107–115 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Tomaru, H. et al. Origin and age of pore waters in an actively venting gas hydrate field near Sado Island, Japan Sea: Interpretation of halogen and 129I distributions. Chem. Geol. 236, 350–366 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Tomaru, H. et al. Geochemistry of pore waters from gas hydrate research in the eastern margin of the Japan Sea (MD179): J. Japan Assoc. Petrol. Tech. 77, 262–267, (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Matsumoto, R. et al. Recovery of thick deposits of massive gas hydrates from gas chimney structures, Eastern margin of Japan Sea: Japan Sea Shallow Gas Hydrate Project. Fire in the Ice, NETL 17, 1–11, (2017).

  17. 17.

    Rodriguez-Blanco, J. D., Shaw, S. & Benning, L. G. A route for the direct crystallization of dolomite. Am. Mineral. 100, 1172–1181 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rodriguez-Blanco, J. D., Sand, K. K. & Benning, L. G. ACC and vaterite as metastable intermediates in the solution based crystallization of CaCO3. New Perspectives on Mineral Nucleation and Growth Ch. 5., (Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2017).

  19. 19.

    Lutterotti, L., Bortolotti, M., Ischia, G., Lonardelli, I. & Wenk, H.-R. Rietveld texture analysis from diffraction images. Z. Kristallogr. Suppl. 26, 125–130 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Turpin, M., Nader, F. H. & Kohler, E. Empirical calibration for dolomite stoichiometry calculation: Application on Triassic Muschelkalk-Lettenkohle Carbonates (French Jura). Pil & Gas Science and Tecnology: Rev. IFP Energies Nouvelles 67, 77–85 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Legland, D., Arganda-Carreras, I. & Andrey, P. MorphoLibJ: integrated library and plugins for mathematical morphology with ImageJ. Bioinformatics, 3532–3534 (2016).

  22. 22.

    Petrash, D. A. et al. Microbially catalyzed dolomite formation: From near-surface to burial. Earth-Sci. Rev. 171, 558–562 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sano, Y. et al. Origin of methane-rich natural gas at the West Pacific convergent plate boundary. Sci. Rep. 7(15646), 10pp (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wen, H.-Y. et al. Helium and methane sources and fluxes of shallow submarine hydrothermal plumes near the Tokara Islands, Southern Japan. Sci. Rep. 6(34126), 9pp (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Teichert, B. M. A., Gussone, N., Eisenhauer, A. & Bohrmann, G. Clathrites: Archives of near-seafloor pore-fluid evolution (δ44/40Ca, δ13C, δ18O) in gas hydrate environments. Geology 33, 213–316 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Machiyama, H. et al. Heat Flow Distribution around the Joetsu Gas Hydrate Field, Western Joetsu Basin, Eastern Margin of the Japan Sea. Journal Geogr. 118, 986–1007 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Vasconcelos, C., McKenzie, J. A., Warthmann, R. & Bernasconi, S. M. Calibration of the δ18O paleothermometer for dolomite precipitated in microbial cultures and natural environments. Geology 33, 317–320 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hesse, R. & Harrison, W. E. Gas hydrates (clathrates) causing pore-water freshening and oxygen isotope fractionation in deep-water sedimentary sections of terrigenous continental margins. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 55, 453–462 (1981).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zhang, F. et al. Dissolved sulphide-catalyzed precipitation of disordered dolomite: Implications for the formation mechanism of sedimentary dolomite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 97, 148–165 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Horita, J. Oxygen and carbon isotope fractionation in the system dolomite-water-CO2 to elevated temperatures. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 129, 111–124 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Nagashima, K., Orihashi, S., Yamamoto, Y. & Takahashi, M. Encapsulation of Saline Solution by Tetrahydrofuran Clathrate Hydrates and Inclusion Migration by Recrystallization. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 10147–10153 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Meckenstock, R. U. et al. Oil Biodegradation: Water droplets in oil are microhabitats for microbial life. Science 345, 673–675 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Bennett, B. et al. The controls on the composition of biodegraded oils in the deep subsurface – Part 3. The impact of microorganism distribution on petroleum geochemical gradients in biodegraded petroleum reservoirs. Organic Geochem. 56, 94–105 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Mills, H. J., Hodges, C., Wilson, K., MacDonald, I. R. & Sobecky, P. A. Microbial diversity in sediments associated with surface-breaching gas hydrate mounds in the Gulf of Mexico. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 46, 39–52 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Boetius, A. et al. A marine microbial consortium apparently mediating anaerobic oxidation of methane. Nature 407, 623–626 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Yu, I. et al. Decoupling between sulphate reduction and the anaerobic oxidation of methane in the shallow methane seep of the Black sea. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 365, (2018).

  37. 37.

    Briggs, B. R. et al. Bacterial dominance in subseafloor sediments characterized by methane hydrates. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 81, 89–98 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Simister, R. K., Antizis, E. W. & White, H. K. Examining the diversity of microbes in a deep-sea coral community impacted by the Deepwater Horizon spill. Deep-Sea Res. II 129, 157–166 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Liu, J. et al. Carbohydrate catabolic capability of a Flavobacteriia bacterium isolated from hadal water. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 42, 263–274 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Krause, S. et al. Microbial nucleation of Mg-rich dolomite in exopolymeric substances under anoxic modern seawater salinity: New insight into an old enigma. Geology. 40, 587–590 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Yanagawa K. et al. Distinct microbial communities thriving in gas hydrate-associated sediments from the eastern Japan Sea, J. Asian Earth Sci. 90, 243–249 407 627–626. (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Reed, D. W. et al. Microbial communities from methane hydrate-bearing deep marine sediments in a forearc basin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 3759–3770.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Liang, B. et al. High frequency of Thermodesulfovibrio spp. And Anaerolineaceae in a long-term incubation of n-Alkanes-degrading methanogenic enrichment culture. Front. Microbiol. 7, (2016).

  44. 44.

    Chapman, R., Pohlman, J., Coffin, R., Changton, J. & Lapham, L. Thermogenic gas hydrates in the Northern Cascadia Margin. EOS Trans. 85, 361–365 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Jenkins, R. G., Hikida, Y., Chikaraishi, Y., Ohkouchi, N. & Tanabe, K. Microbially induced formation of ooid-like coated grains in the Late Cretaceous methane-seep deposits of the Nakagawa area, Hokkaido, northern Japan. Island Arc. 17, 261–269 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Kiel, S. et al. Cretaceous methane-seep deposits from New Zealand and their fauna. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., (2012).

  47. 47.

    Vasconcelos, C. & McKenzie, J. A. Microbial mediation of modern dolomite precipitation and diagenesis under anoxic conditions, Lagoa Vermelha, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Journal of Sedimentary Research 67, 378–390 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Bahniuk, A. et al. Characterization of environmental conditions during microbial Mg-carbonate precipitation and early diagenetic dolomite crust formation: Brejo do Espinho, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Microbial Carbonates in Space and Time: Implications for Global Exploration and Production (Geological Society Special Publication 418, London, 2015).

  49. 49.

    Gunatilaka, A. Spheroidal dolomites – origin by hydrocarbon seepage? Sedimentology 36, 701–710 (1989).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Cavagna, S., Clari, P. & Martire, L. The role of bacteria in the formation of cold seep carbonates: geological evidence from Monferrato (Tertiary, NW Italy). Sedimentary Geology 126, 253–270 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Pollet, T. et al. Prokaryotic community successions and interactions in marine biofilms: the key role of Flavobacteriia. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 94, (2018).

  52. 52.

    Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Rosenbaum, J. & Sheppard, S. M. F. An isotopic study of siderites, dolomites and ankerites at high temperatures. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 50, 1147–1150 (1986).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Lamorde, U. A., Parnell, J. & Bowden, S. A. Constraining the genetic relationships of 25-norhopanes, hopanoic and 25-norhopanoic acids in onshore Niger Delta oils using a temperature-dependent material balance. Org. Geochem. 79, 31–43 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Bowden, S. A. & Taylor, C. W. The application of surface enhanced Raman scattering to the detection of asphaltic petroleum in sediment extracts: deconvolving three component-mixtures using look-up tables of entire surface enhanced Raman spectra. Anal. Methods, (2019).

  56. 56.

    Kouduka, M. et al. A new DNA extraction method by controlled alkaline treatments from consolidated subsurface sediments. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 326, 47–54 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Nunoura, T. et al. Microbial diversity in deep-sea methane seep sediments presented by SSU rRNA gene tag sequencing. Microbes Environ. 27, (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Siddique, A. B. & Unterseher, M. A cost-effective and efficient strategy for Illumina sequencing of fungal communities: a case study of beech endophytes identified elevation as main explanatory factor for diversity and community composition. Fungal Ecol. 20, 175–185 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410, (1990).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was conducted under the commission of AIST (National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Japan) from 2013–2015 as part of the methane hydrate research project funded by METI (the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan). Ongoing work is currently being carried out thanks to a Grant-in-aid provided by the JSPS and MEXT (Kaken Project # 17K05712). The authors also would like to acknowledge laboratory assistance provided by A. Hiruta, T. Oi, N. Ishida, and R. Warabi (GHRL, Meiji University), Y. Kusaba (AORI, University of Tokyo), S. Motai (Kochi Inst. Core Sample Research, JAMSTEC), and Y. Nakajima (Joetsu Environmental Science Centre).

Author information




G.S., R.M., Y. Suzuki, H.T. and T.I. were involved in the shipboard collection of hydrate samples during the HR14 and PS15 cruises in which RM was the lead scientist. G.S., R.M. and Y. Sano and Y. Suzuki were responsible for the land-based experimental design. XRD, SEM and light-microscopy work were carried out by G.S. at G.H.R.L. and A.O.R.I. Both Y.K. and N.Z. carried out the stable isotope analyses for the dolomite at GHRL. Stable isotope analyses for hydrate CO2 were carried out by Y. Sano and N.T. at A.O.R.I. Organic and biomarker geochemical analysis of the oils was carried out by S.B. at U. Aberdeen. Resin embedding and E.P.M.A. mapping was carried out by K.T., G.S. and T.I. at A.O.R.I. Preparation and imaging of dolomite samples by DNA staining and epifluorescence microscopy was carried out by Y. Suzuki and G.S. at U. Tokyo Suzuki Lab. DNA extractions and mRNA phylogenetic analyses were carried out by M.K. and Y. Suzuki. M.K. also analysed the phylogenetic data and made the pie diagrams. G.S. wrote the main manuscript text, and created the figures and tables. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glen T. Snyder.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Snyder, G.T., Matsumoto, R., Suzuki, Y. et al. Evidence in the Japan Sea of microdolomite mineralization within gas hydrate microbiomes. Sci Rep 10, 1876 (2020).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing