Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The composition of the perinatal intestinal microbiota in horse

Abstract

The establishment of the intestinal microbiota is critical for the digestive and immune systems. We studied the early development of the rectal microbiota in horse, a hindgut fermenter, from birth until 7 days of age, by qPCR and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. To evaluate initial sources of the foal microbiota, we characterised dam fecal, vaginal and oral microbiotas. We utilised an amplicon sequence variant (ASV) pipeline to maximise resolution and reproducibility. Stringent ASV filtering based on prevalence and abundance in samples and controls purged contaminants while preserving intestinal taxa. Sampled within 20 minutes after birth, rectal meconium contained small amounts of diverse bacterial DNA, with a profile closer to mare feces than mouth. 24 hours after birth, rectum was colonised by Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, some foals dominated by single genera. At day 7, the rectal genera were still different from adult feces. The mare vaginal microbiota contributed to 24 h and 7 day microbiotas. It contained few lactobacilli, with Corynebacterium, Porphyromonas, Campylobacter and Helcococcus as the most abundant genera. In the oral mucosa, Gemella was extremely abundant. Our observations indicate that bacteria or bacterial components are present in the intestine immediately after birth, but the newborn microbiota changes rapidly.

Introduction

Intestinal microbiota is required for the development and function of the digestive and immune systems. The first microbes are obtained from the mother early in life1,2,3. The maternal microbiota affects the development of the intestinal immune system already in the fetal period4. This is mediated at least partially by circulating microbial metabolites4. It is still unclear whether small numbers of microbial cells also translocate to the fetus via placenta5,6,7. The major microbial colonisation occurs at birth. Postnatally, the intestinal microbiota goes through a rapid development, with changing bacterial composition, diversity and abundances, before reaching adulthood where the microbiota is relatively stable8,9,10. Early exposure to a diverse microbiota promotes the maturation of an immune system which effectively protects from infections while tolerating commensal microbes11,12,13.

Gut microbiota is especially important to herbivores, as they rely on bacterial fermentation to digest plant fibres to volatile fatty acids, which are their major energy source. In horse (Equus ferus caballus), the microbial fermentation occurs in the enlarged hindgut: colon and caecum14,15. These compartments harbour extremely abundant and diverse microbiotas, the compositions of which are critical to the equine health16. Horses are susceptible to gastrointestinal complications induced by dietary changes, antimicrobials and infections, such as colic and colitis15,17,18.

The foal’s first week of life post-partum is considered a critical period, with increased morbidity and mortality in respiratory diseases, enteritis and sepsis19,20,21. Mild noninfectious “foal heat diarrhea” is common in neonatal foals during the first weeks19. It is probably associated with the ongoing microbial colonisation of the gut and hypersecretion of the small intestinal mucosa. More serious enteritis and enterocolitis is caused by bacterial or viral infections or mucosal injury19. Septicaemia is typically associated with a failure of the transfer of colostral immunoglobulins22. Understanding the origins and development of the equine intestinal microbiota at early age may offer insight into the mechanisms of gastrointestinal diseases and offer new solutions for prevention of foal morbidity and mortality19. The development of the equine intestinal microbiota has been previously investigated by sequencing23,24,25. However, these studies did not include meconium samples collected immediately at birth, or did not utilise negative controls recommended in the analysis of low-biomass microbiota samples26.

In this study, we aimed to investigate the early development of the foal intestinal microbiota over the first postnatal week, starting at birth. We compared the foal rectal microbiota to the fecal, vaginal and oral microbiotas of their dams. These locations have been regarded as potential initial sources of the early microbiota9,27,28. We used 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and quantitative PCR to characterise the composition and abundance of the various microbiotas. We utilised a bioinformatics pipeline which has been shown to improve the resolution and reproducibility of amplicon sequencing29,30. This enabled stringent data filtering to efficiently remove potentially contaminating sequences, based on their prevalence and relative abundance in samples and several types of negative controls.

Results

Quantification of 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in foals and negative controls

To estimate the bacterial loads in the foals and negative controls, we analysed the 16S rRNA gene copy numbers using qPCR. In rectal samples collected immediately after birth there were on average 7.8 × 104 copies (SD = 1.2 × 105) of 16S rRNA genes per sampling swab (0 h data in Fig. 1). This was significantly more (P = 0.006) than in the field controls (sampling instrument exposed to farm air + extraction kit; 4.3 × 103 copies per swab; SD = 7.6 × 102). Instrument controls (sampling instrument + extraction kit) contained 3.6 × 103 copies per swab (SD = 7.2 × 102) and no-template PCR controls 9.7 × 102 copies per sample (SD = 3.4 × 102).

Figure 1
figure1

16S rRNA gene copy numbers per sample. Blue colour indicates the negative controls and green the foal rectal samples. The boxes represent the interquartile ranges (IQR) containing 50% of samples. The horizontal line in a box indicates the median. Whiskers show maxima and minima within 1.5 × IQR. The circle indicates an outlier.

Already 24 h after birth, there was a five-log increase in the bacterial load (7.4 × 109 copies per swab, SD = 2.3 × 1010). There was a further increase in the samples collected 7 days after birth, to a mean of 4.2 × 1010 copies (SD = 6.2 × 1010; Fig. 1).

Bacterial loads in the mare fecal, vaginal and oral samples are reported in Supplementary Fig. 1.

Sequencing controls and decontamination of 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing data

We used a commercial microbial community composition standard to control the entire analytical pipeline from DNA extraction to bioinformatics. The observed composition and abundances matched the expected composition provided by the manufacturer (Supplementary Fig. 2). Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes and Lactobacillus fermentum were correctly classified to species level, with an exception of 16% Staphylococcus reads classified to the genus level. The other bacteria were correctly classified to the genus level.

We utilised several types of negative controls in the 16S rRNA gene sequencing to minimise the risk of false positive observations: PCR controls, DNA extraction controls, instrument controls and field controls26. Stringent filtering of the 16S rRNA gene sequencing data was performed to remove amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) potentially originating from contaminants. The filtering was based on comparison of the prevalence and relative abundance of each ASV in samples and negative controls, as described in the Methods section. On average, the decontamination procedure removed 99.9% (SD = 0.186) of sequence reads from the negative controls, 84.0% (SD = 24.3) from 0 h rectal samples, 10.2% (SD = 27.1) from 24 h samples, 4.36% (SD = 3.09) from 7 d samples and 1.98% (SD = 6.50) from the various dam samples (Fig. 2). Most of the removed ASVs were classified as Ralstonia, a common reagent contaminant26. Across all animal samples, 99.8% of Ralstonia reads were removed. In contrast, for ASVs classified as typical intestinal genera, which are less likely reagent contaminants, only 0.179% of reads were removed across all samples, and 3.89% in the 0 h samples (for details, see Supplementary Materials).

Figure 2
figure2

Accepted and rejected 16S rRNA gene sequence reads per sample. Accepted reads are indicated as blue. Deleted reads are indicated as yellow-orange, with reads classified as Ralstonia in orange. Seven 0 h samples and two 24 h samples were excluded from further analysis due to low quality (red bars). Negative control data processed with the 0 h foal data is shown.

After the data decontamination, seven 0 h samples were excluded from further microbiota composition analyses due to small number of accepted reads (<1500; Fig. 2). In two of these, the total DNA concentrations were below Qubit detection limit. This suggests inadequate sampling, as in most cases the samples contain measurable host DNA from the intestinal mucosa. Two 24 h samples were also excluded due to low quality (small number of accepted reads and unusual microbiota composition). Also in these cases, the total DNA concentration was low or undetectable.

An overview of the raw and decontaminated data is shown in Table 1. All further analyses were performed using the decontaminated data.

Table 1 Overview of the 16S rRNA gene sequencing data before and after decontamination.

Characterisation of the foal rectal microbiota at birth

Immediately after birth, the rectal microbiota consisted primarily of Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes (Fig. 3 and Table 2). The most prevalent bacterial genera in the 0 h samples are shown in Supplementary Table 1. These included typical animal-associated taxa such as Staphylococcus, Lactobacillus, Bacillus, Streptococcus, Corynebacterium and Sphingomonas. Staphylococcus was very abundant in some of the foals (up to 39% of all reads). The representative sequences of the most common staphylococcal, streptococcal and Lactobacillus ASVs were 100% identical to equine-associated species (Staphylococcus equorum, Streptococcus equinus, Lactobacillus equi and Lactobacillus equigenerosi). Some of the genera observed at birth, such as Ralstonia and Methylobacterium, may represent remaining reagent contaminants.

Figure 3
figure3

Average microbiota compositions of foal rectal samples and mare fecal, vaginal and oral samples. Main colours indicate bacterial phyla. Within phyla, shades indicate individual genera. The lightest shades of each phylum show the combined abundance of the least abundant genera (<0.5% of total).

Table 2 Relative abundances of the major bacterial phyla and Shannon diversity indices in foal rectal samples and mare fecal, vaginal and oral samples (mean values and standard deviations).

The microbial diversity in 0 h rectal samples was relatively high (Table 2 and Fig. 4). The Shannon diversity index was significantly different between foal rectal samples collected at different time points (χ2 = 19.7, df = 2, P = 5.2 × 10−5), and significantly higher at 0 h compared to 24 h after birth (P = 0.00024).

Figure 4
figure4

Shannon diversity indices of foal rectal samples and mare fecal, vaginal and oral samples. Boxplot as in Fig. 1.

Postnatal development of the foal rectal microbiota

The rectal microbiota samples collected 24 hours after birth were dominated by the genus Escherichia/Shigella and various typical intestinal Firmicutes, especially Clostridium spp. (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table 2). Members of the Bacteroides genus were also already detected in most of the foals at this time point. In two animals, the rectal microbiota consisted almost completely of a single genus: in one of Escherichia/Shigella and in the other of Streptococcus, with a 100% sequence match to the species S. equinus. The microbial diversity in the 24 h rectum was significantly lower than in the 0 h samples (Table 2 and Fig. 4).

One week after birth, Firmicutes was the most abundant phylum, while Proteobacteria were replaced with Bacteroidetes and Fusobacteria (Fig. 3, Table 2 and Supplementary Table 3). The genera were still different from adult feces. Bacteroides was the most abundant genus. Fusobacterium, Tyzzerella, Streptococcus and Lactobacillus were also observed in all foals, and their mean relative abundance was >5%. Akkermansia was detected in a majority of animals. The microbial diversity had increased in comparison to the 24 h samples (P = 0.0016) but was still clearly below the diversity of adult feces (Fig. 4).

Mare fecal, vaginal and oral microbiota

The highly diverse mare fecal microbiota (Table 2 and Fig. 4) consisted mostly of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, accompanied by single genera of Kiritimatiellaeota, Spirochaetes (Treponema) and Fibrobacteres with mean relative abundances of 2–4% (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table 4). At the genus level, unclassified Lachnospiraceae, Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group and several genera of Ruminococcaceae were most abundant (4–8% mean relative abundance).

In mare vagina, five major phyla were present in relatively equal ratios (Fig. 3). At genus level (Supplementary Table 5), the vaginal microbiota was much less diverse than the fecal microbiota (Table 2 and Fig. 4), but there were major differences between individual animals. The Firmicutes were primarily represented by six genera: Helcococcus, Streptococcus, Peptoniphilus, Globicatella, Peptostreptococcus, and Murdochiella (mean relative abundances 1–9%). In two mares, Aneorococcus was highly abundant (12% and 21%). Bacteroidetes consisted mostly of the Porphyromonas genus (with relative abundance varying between 0.01% and 37%), Actinobacteria of Corynebacterium (0.6–49%) and Epsilonbacteraeota of the more equally abundant Campylobacter.

The mare oral microbiota was strongly dominated by a single genus, Gemella from the Firmicutes phylum, which was very abundant in all animals (mean relative abundance 74%; Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table 6). The genera Streptococcus, Moraxella, Enterococcus and unclassified Pasteurellaceae were also detected in all mares, but their relative abundances varied between animals.

Comparison of foal and mare microbiota compositions

We examined the differences between 0 h foal and mare microbiotas by using principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of unweighted UniFrac distances (Fig. 5a). All four sample types clustered separately (P < 0.001), indicating that their microbial profiles were significantly different. The 0 h foals clustered closest to the mare vaginal microbiota. In order to compare the overall microbiota compositions in the 0 h foals and specifically to the fecal, vaginal and oral microbiotas of their own dams, we also calculated Spearman rank correlations between these. Correlation coefficients (ρ) for all three comparisons between the 0 h foal and mare microbiotas were between −0.002 and 0.009 (not significant).

Figure 5
figure5

Comparison of 0 h foal and mare microbiotas. (A) PCoA on unweighted UniFrac distances of 0 h rectal microbiota and mare fecal, oral and vaginal microbiotas from the ASV data. Colours and shapes indicate the sample types. (B) ASVs shared between 0 h foal rectal microbiota samples and various mare microbiota samples. ASVs detected in at least two animals per sample group are included.

To investigate potential similarities in the microbiotas of 0 h foals and their own dams, we also calculated the percentages of newborn ASVs that were detected in the dam microbiotas. An individual 0 h foal shared an average of 8.7% (SD = 6.9) of its ASVs with the feces of its own dam, 3.9% (SD = 3.7) with dam vagina and 0.23% (SD = 0.33) with dam mouth. These proportions of shared ASVs were significantly different (N = 8, χ2 = 9.9, df = 2, P = 0.0073). The 0 h foals shared significantly more ASVs with dam feces than with dam mouth (P = 0.011). The sharing with dam vagina was not significantly different from sharing with dam feces or dam mouth.

A Venn diagram of ASVs detected in 0 h foals and mares as groups is shown in Fig. 5b. The most common ASVs shared between 0 h foals and mare feces were classified as the genera Streptococcus (sequence match to S. equinus), Ruminococcus, Ruminococcaceae NK4A214 group, Clostridium sensu stricto 1, two different genera of Lachnospiraceae, Bacteroidales RF16 group and a genus of Paludibacteraceae. ASVs shared between 0 h foals and mare vagina included Bacillus, Sphingomonas, Campylobacter and Oceanivirga. The 0 h foals shared the most abundant Bacillus ASV only with mare vagina and not with mare fecal or oral microbiotas. Sphingomonas was shared between 0 h foals and mare mouth. Of all the ASVs detected in any of the 0 h foals, 38% were found in some of the mare microbiotas. On average, these comprised 42% (SD = 19) of sequence reads in the individual 0 h foals.

At 24 hours, the foal rectal microbiota clustered separately from all mare microbiotas in PCoA (not shown), and no significant correlations between the 24 h foal and mare microbiotas were observed. On average, the 24 h foal samples shared 5.2% (SD = 4.7) of their ASVs with the vagina of their own dam, 1.7% (SD = 2.3) with dam feces and 1.5% (SD = 2.5) with dam mouth. These differences were significant (N = 12, χ2 = 8.4, df = 2, P = 0.015). The 24 h foals shared significantly more ASVs with the vagina of their own dam than with the dam mouth (P = 0.0495). The proportion of ASVs shared with dam feces did not differ significantly from the proportions shared with dam vagina or dam mouth.

A Venn diagram of ASVs observed in the 24 h foals and mare microbiotas is shown in Supplementary Fig. 4a. The foals shared abundant ASVs classified as Clostridium sensu stricto 1, Bacteroides, Terrisporobacter and Fusobacterium exclusively with vagina. Of all the ASVs detected in any 24 h foal, 29% were observed in some of the mare microbiotas. On average, these comprised 47% (SD = 24) of sequence reads in the individual foals.

The 7-day rectal microbiota still clustered separately from all mare microbiotas (not shown), with no significant correlations between different mare microbiotas. Some of the adult phyla were still not detected in any or most foals (Kiritimatiellaeota, Spirochaetes, Fibrobacteres and several low-abundance phyla such as Patescibacteria, Lentisphaerae and Cyanobacteria; Fig. 3 and Table 2). At family level, the day 7 microbiota clustered close to the adult fecal microbiota in PCoA (Supplementary Fig. 5).

The 7 d foals shared an average of 3.3% (SD = 2.8) of their ASVs with the feces of their own dams, 2.8% (SD = 2.0) with dam vagina and 1.3% (SD = 1.7) with dam mouth. The differences in proportions of shared ASVs were significant (N = 14, χ2 = 6.5, df = 2, P = 0.039). The 7 d foals shared significantly more ASVs with dam feces than with dam mouth (P = 0.037). The sharing with dam vagina did not differ significantly from the sharing with the other dam microbiotas. A Venn diagram of ASVs detected in 7 d foals and mare microbiotas is shown in Supplementary Fig. 4b. The foals shared Bacteroides and Fusobacterium ASVs exclusively with mare vagina. Out of all detected ASVs in the 7 d foals, 28% were observed in some of the dam microbiotas. These comprised an average of 38% (SD = 13) of reads in the individual foals.

The change of rectal microbiota composition over time

The fecal microbiota of all four age groups (0 h foals, 24 h foals, 7 d foals and adult mares) clustered separately from each other in PCoA (Fig. 6a), indicating that the microbiota compositions were significantly different (P < 0.001).

Figure 6
figure6

Comparison of horse fecal microbiotas at various ages. (A) PCoA on unweighted UniFrac of rectal microbiota in the 0 h, 24 h and 7 d old foals and adult mares from ASV data. Colours and shapes indicate the sample types. (B) ASVs shared between rectal microbiota samples at various ages. All ASVs detected in any animal are included. Therefore, the numbers are larger than the mean ASV counts presented in Table 1.

The 0 h rectal samples grouped closest to the 24 h fecal samples in PCoA. However, no significant correlation was observed between the 0 h and 24 h samples from the same foals (N = 6, average ρ = 0.03, SD = 0.04, P = 1), confirming that the overall microbiota compositions were different. An average of 2.9% (SD = 4.1) of ASVs observed immediately after birth was detected at 24 hours in the same foal. A Venn diagram of ASVs observed in each age group is shown in Fig. 6b. The ASVs shared between 0 h and 24 h foals as groups were classified to the genera Escherichia/Shigella, Epulopiscium, Fusobacterium, Streptococcus and Butyricicoccus.

A significant correlation was observed between the rectal microbiota compositions in 24 h foals and in the same foals at day 7 (N = 12, average ρ = 0.21, SD = 0.11, P = 0.001). Of the ASVs observed at 24 hours, an average of 31% (SD = 12) was detected in the same foals at day 7. The most common of these included ASVs classified to the genera Tyzzerella 4, Faecalitalea, Clostridium sensu stricto 1, Fournierella and Erysipelatoclostridium. The phyla Actinobacteria and Verrucomicrobiota were not yet detected in most foals at 24 h, although they were present in all or most of them at day 7. Of the relatively common ASVs, only one classified as Streptococcus equinus was found in the rectal microbiota at all ages, from birth to adults. The average relative abundance of this ASV was 0.17% (SD = 1.2) at 0 h, 8.1% (27) at 24 h, 0.13% (0.30) at 7 d and 0.43% (1.0) in adult mare feces. At all ages, it was the most abundant ASV classified as S. equinus.

Discussion

In this study, we observed the early development of the equine rectal microbiota over the first week of postnatal life, starting from the moment of birth. In order to determine the potential origins of the foal microbiota, we characterised the vaginal and oral mucosal microbiota of the mares, which have not been previously investigated by whole microbiota sequencing, as well as the mare fecal microbiota.

In order to maximise the reliability of the microbiota analyses, we applied several types of negative controls and performed a stringent filtering of the sequencing data to remove potential contaminants. Our data decontamination protocol was based on a previously published logic, comparing the prevalence and relative abundance of each taxon in samples and negative controls27,31,32. We performed the filtering on the amplicon sequence variants, which provides maximum resolution of the 16S rRNA gene sequencing data29,30. This is important, as filtering at a too coarse taxonomic level causes false negatives by deleting related but different taxa observed in samples and controls. We set stringent criteria for ASV acceptance to minimise false positive observations. Experimenting with varying filtering thresholds had little effect to the proportion of discarded ASVs, indicating that this did not cause a large number of false negatives. ASVs classified as typical intestinal genera, which are unlikely reagent contaminants, were well preserved, while known reagent contaminants such as Ralstonia were efficiently removed. The abundance of likely contaminants in the unfiltered raw data underlines the importance of careful controls and data decontamination in the analysis of sensitive microbiota samples.

In majority of the foals, the rectum contained a small amount of bacterial DNA immediately after birth. This was detectable with quantitative PCR and distinguishable from negative controls by sequencing. Bacterial DNA was also detected in a recently published study of foal meconium, but the protocol did not include negative controls or quantification, which are necessary for reliable analyses of low-abundance microbiotas24. Almost all of the Firmicutes genera which we observed immediately after birth, as well as the most prevalent genera of other phyla, represented typical mucosal taxa and were shared with the core vaginal and/or fecal microbiota of the mares. Several of these genera were reported in the previous analysis of newborn foal microbiota and many were also observed by us in newborn calf rectum24,27. The prevalent ASVs with species-level classification by our analysis pipeline showed sequence matches to equine-associated species. Rectal colonisation during the equine parturition is unlikely. The foals were sampled 10–20 minutes after birth and the outer chorioallantoic membrane typically ruptures only 10–30 minutes before the foal is born. The inner amniotic membrane covers the newborn completely or at least from neck to rump and was usually removed at the time of sampling.

Previous studies in calves27, mice28 and humans33,34 have suggested that the fetus may be seeded with microbes from the mouth or proximal digestive tract of the mother. In our foals, the rectal microbiota sampled immediately after birth was more similar to the dam fecal microbiota than to the dam oral microbiota; the similarity to the dam vaginal microbiota was not significantly different. This may reflect species differences in the digestive physiology. In ruminants, the forestomach harbours the microbiota essential for forage fermentation; in horses, it resides in the large intestine. Of all the ASVs detected in any newborn, 62% were not detected in any of the three mare microbiotas analysed, suggesting that they originated from other sources: the parts of the mare digestive tract which we did not study, other mare microbiotas or the environment.

At 24 hours, the rectal microbiota contained a large proportion of Escherichia/Shigella, as previously observed in calves27. In contrast to the 24 hour old calves, most foals were already also colonised by Bacteroides and several genera of the Firmicutes, which are common in intestinal microbiota. The foals shared most ASVs with dam vagina, and several abundant ASVs were shared exclusively with vagina. This suggests that microbial colonisation during birth is significant, although the resolution of the 16S rRNA gene sequencing is not sufficient to prove direct microbial transfer. Interestingly, one of the most prevalent Firmicutes in the 24 hour samples was classified as the genus Epulopiscium, previously known from a giant bacteria of the surgeonfish gut35. These ASVs probably represent an uncharacterised member of mammalian Lachnospiraceaea, as identical 16S rRNA sequences are present in a human ileal metagenome36.

Previous studies have reported different compositions for 24 h old foal rectal microbiota. Costa et al. reported a larger proportion of Firmicutes and less Proteobacteria; their foals had much less E. coli and more Ruminococcaceae, Lachnospiraceaea and Lactobacillus25. In the study by De La Torre et al., first-day foal microbiota was mostly composed of Acinetobacter and other Moraxellaceae, which were rare in our 24 h foals23. This difference may be due to the exact timing of sampling of the rapidly changing early microbiota: De La Torre et al. sampled the foals at variable times during the first postnatal day. The early microbiota is probably also affected by the environment. In our study, the foals were allowed in outdoor paddocks from the beginning, whereas in the study by De La Torre and colleagues the foals were first kept in stalls for a minimum of three days.

Several genera commonly observed as cause for neonatal foal sepsis were prevalent in the 24 h rectal samples, including Escherichia/Shigella, Streptococcus, Enterococcus and Klebsiella37,38. The rectal microbiota of one foal consisted almost completely of Escherichia/Shigella, and that of another foal of ASVs classified as Streptococcus equinus. No obvious adverse effects were observed in these foals, and at day 7 their rectal microbiota was similar to the other foals. A dominance of these bacteria in the gut at 24 hours of age is not necessarily problematic to the host.

At day 7, more than 30% of ASVs observed in the same foal at 24 hours were still detectable, but the overall composition was markedly different. The day 7 rectal microbiota already clustered close to adult feces at the family level. However, the core genera were largely distinct, and only 3% of ASVs in the day 7 rectum were detectable in the feces of the foal’s own dam. Only an ASV classified as Streptococcus equinus was common in the rectum at all ages. Foals typically eat their dam’s manure39, but colonisation is probably restricted by differences in diet and intestinal environment. Similar observations were recently reported by De La Torre et al.: the foal microbiota was very different from the adults at day 7, and developing towards the adult composition at day 2823. Their day 7 gut microbiota was similar with our observations at the family level. The most abundant genus in our 7 d foals, Bacteroides, was found almost exclusively in the vaginal microbiota in the mares. Thus, the microbial contribution of the birth canal appears to be quite stable in the young foals. Vagina was recently reported as a source of physiologically important rumen microbes in calves9.

We could detect 28–29% of all ASVs observed in 24 h and 7 d foals in some of the three mare microbiotas analysed. The shared ASVs comprised 38-48% of sequence reads in the foals and were mostly classified as typical intestinal species, including obligate anaerobes. Thus, they were likely obtained from the dams rather than the shared environment, although the resolution of 16S amplicon sequencing does not allow actual tracing of bacterial clones. The results suggest that the foals obtained a majority of their microbiota from sources other than mare fecal, vaginal or oral microbiota. Some of the foal microbes could be present at undetectably low relative abundances in the mare samples, even though we performed relatively deep sequencing. Milk and dam skin microbiotas are obvious contributors which we did not analyse. In the previous study by Quercia et al.24, the foal intestinal microbiota at 0–3 days after birth was found to resemble the dam milk microbiota.

In our mares, the composition of the fecal microbiota was largely similar to that recently reported for pregnant horses23. The relative abundances of the Lachnospiraceae and Rumonicoccaceae families and the order Bacteroidales were similar, but in our mares, Prevotellaceae were much more abundant and various Clostridiales less abundant. In contrast, the fecal microbiota composition in non-pregnant horses was different even at the phylum level: fecal Firmicutes were less abundant and Bacteroidetes more abundant40,41. This may be due to the supplemented feed of pregnant mares, or other effects of pregnancy. Kirimatiellaeota were not previously reported in equine feces, probably because this novel phylum was not included in the taxonomical databases used in those studies. The most abundant streptococci (classified as sp. 27284-01) in mare feces were different from the dominant species in the vaginal and foal rectal microbiotas.

To our knowledge, the healthy vaginal microbiota of pregnant mares has not been previously characterised by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Compared to cows, the vaginal microbiota in our mares was more distinct from the fecal microbiota, as the mare vagina is typically less contaminated with feces27. Corynebacterium, Porphyromonas, Helcococcus and Campylobacter were the most abundant genera. Most of these have been previously observed in the bovine vaginal microbiota, where the abundance of Helcococcus is associated with metritis42,43. Interindividual differences were greater for the vaginal than the fecal microbiota. In contrast to humans, very few lactobacilli were detected in the mare vagina, as observed previously in a culture based study44. This is probably associated with the higher pH of the mare vagina.

The microbiota of the oral vestibular mucosa in horses has also not been previously investigated. In our mares, the phylum-level composition was more similar to human buccal microbiota than to bovine oral microbiota, which is affected by rumination45,46. However, Bacteroidetes were less abundant in the horses than in the human. At the genus level, the mare oral microbiota was strongly dominated by Gemella, whereas in human mouth streptococci are typically most abundant. Pasteurellaceae, Neisseria and Porphyromonas are found in both species. Gemella and the less frequently observed Actinobacillus have previously been associated with good dental health in equine subgingival samples47.

In conclusion, bacterial DNA was detected in foal rectum immediately after birth, and the observed microbial profile was closer to mare fecal microbiota than mare oral microbiota. The rectal microbiota changed rapidly, but the impact of the mare vaginal microbiota was still detectable at day 7, and the bacterial genera were different from adult feces. The pregnant mare fecal microbiota was different from previously studied nonpregnant horses, due to feeding or other effects of pregnancy. The mare vagina contained few lactobacilli, and the oral mucosal microbiota was dominated by Gemella rather than streptococci.

Methods

Animals and sample collection

Microbiota samples were collected from fourteen standardbred mare-foal pairs and four additional foals in the spring foaling seasons 2016–2017. Two mares were included in both seasons of the study. Mares were 6 to 16 years old with a parity of 1 to 6. Foals came from 15 different sires. There were 10 fillies and 8 colts.

Ultrasonographic monitoring of fetal-placental wellbeing was performed one month before foaling and all mares were diagnosed as clinically normal. The mares received an influenza and tetanus vaccination one month before parturition. They were not treated with antibiotics or other medications during the last three months of the pregnancy. All mares lived in same barn with 32 stalls. The barn was cleaned, washed and disinfected between breeding seasons. Mares were housed in separate wide straw-bedded stalls, fed analysed high quality haylage ad libitum and 2 litres of Krafft Groov protein concentrate (Lantmännen Krafft Ab, Sweden; digestible raw protein 115 g/kg) twice per day.

Parturitions took place between March and June. Every mare had a Birth Alarm foaling belt (Birth Alarm, UK) and a camera in their stall to alert at the start of parturition. Before parturition, mares were kept outside during the day in groups of four. One or two days after parturition, mare-foal pairs were kept short time periods every day in small individual paddocks. The mean length of the pregnancy was 333 ± 8 d (normal gestation period 340 d) and all the parturitions were uneventful.

All foals were assessed clinically healthy by a veterinarian and received colostrum within first 1.5 hours. The concentration of blood IgG was measured using a quantitative immunoassay when the foals were 24–36 hours old. All foals had adequate IgG concentrations.

Sample collection was performed by the same veterinarian for all the animals. Foal samples were collected from within the rectum (5–10 cm from anus) using sterile double sheathed Minitube uterine culture swabs (Minitüb, Germany) while wearing sterile gloves, as described previously27. Newborn samples were collected 10 to 20 minutes after birth. Mares were not allowed to lick the foals before sample collection. The foal sampling was repeated 24 h after birth and 7 d after birth. Field controls were collected by exposing Minitube swabs to air in the sampling environment. Mare samples were collected before foaling with sterile cotton sticks from feces (from the inside of fecal balls retrieved from rectum), labial part of the lower vestibulum oris (behind the lower lip) and ventral side of the vaginal vestibulum before foaling. Samples were kept at −25 °C for a short period of time, before storing at −80 °C.

The experimental protocols were reviewed and approved by the University of Helsinki Viikki Campus Research Ethics Committee. The sampling was carried out in accordance with animal welfare guidelines and regulations.

DNA extraction

DNA from the sampling swabs was extracted using the ZymoBIOMICS™ DNA Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with minor modifications to the bead beating process, as described here. The bead beating was done using a FastPrep® 24 Instrument (MP Biomedicals, Inc., USA) in two successive rounds at 5.5 m/s for 3 minutes. In order to prevent excessive shearing of DNA, the lysate fraction following the first round bead beating was collected and additional 200 µl ZymoBIOMICS™ Lysis Solution was added before performing the second round. The lysate produced in the second bead beating round was pooled with the previous lysate prior to continuing the procedure according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Unopened (instrument controls, N = 6) and opened (field controls, N = 6) empty uterine culture swabs were used as negative controls and processed in the same batch with the newborn samples. The other, higher-biomass samples were processed separately to avoid cross-contamination to the newborn samples. ZymoBIOMICS™ Microbial Community Standard was processed with the high-biomass samples. No-template-controls were included in every batch. The phases involving opening the tubes were performed in laminar flow cabinet, and the workplace, instruments and pipettes were cleaned routinely with 10% bleach. Certified DNA, RNase, DNase and PCR inhibitor free tubes (STARLAB International, Germany) and Nuclease-free Water (Ambion™, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) were used for DNA extraction and downstream analyses. Extracted DNA was stored at −80 °C.

Quantitative PCR

The absolute 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in the DNA extracted from the foal rectal samples and the controls was determined using quantitative PCR as described previously27 and in Supplementary Methods. Universal eubacteria probe and primers were used in the amplification.

Library preparation and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing

The hypervariable region V3-V4 of 16S rRNA gene was sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform in the DNA core facility of the University of Helsinki, as described previously48 and in detail in the Supplementary Methods.

To compensate for different quantities of 16S rRNA gene copies in the samples the newborn meconium samples, instrument controls and field controls were preamplified with 21 PCR cycles, mare mouth and vaginal samples with 18 cycles, 24 h foal rectal samples with 16 cycles and 7 d old foal rectal samples and mare fecal samples with 14 cycles. ZymoBIOMICS™ Microbial Community Standard (Zymo Research, USA) was preamplified with 12 cycles.

Bioinformatics

The detailed bioinformatics pipeline is reported in the Supplementary Methods. Briefly, remaining primer and spacer sequences were first removed with Cutadapt v.1.1049. The paired reads were imported into QIIME2 v2018.850. The sequences were truncated to remove low quality regions. The DADA2 pipeline plugin in QIIME2 was used to model and recognise the amplicon sequencing errors in the Illumina sequencing data and to infer the exact sample sequences30. This resulted in an amplicon sequence variant (ASV) table. For the taxonomic analysis, curated taxonomy was extracted from the SILVA v132 QIIME release 97% database and a naïve Bayes classifier was trained based on it51. The classification was completed with the q2-feature-classifier plugin using scikit-learn52.

ASVs that could not be assigned a taxonomic classification based on the SILVA database, unclassified bacteria (mostly mitochondrial sequences), chloroplasts and the ASVs which were detected less than 10 times in the entire dataset were removed. The data was then filtered to remove ASVs which represented probable contaminants. An ASV was removed if its prevalence in actual samples was ≤2× its prevalence in instrument controls or its prevalence in field controls, and its mean relative abundance in actual samples was ≤10× its mean abundance in instrument controls or its mean abundance in field controls. The filtering was performed for each sample group separately.

Statistics

Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess the statistical significance of the difference between qPCR measurements in newborns and field controls using IBM SPSS Statistics 23. Shannon diversity indices were calculated for ASV data with the R package phyloseq.53. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was used to compare Shannon diversities between newborn, 24 h and 7 d foal samples with base R54. Pairwise post-hoc comparisons were then performed with Nemenyi’s all-pairs test with χ2 approximation, using the R package PMCMRplus55.The PCoA figures were plotted using ASV data and unweighted UniFrac distances with the R package phyloseq.53. Permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) and multivariate homogeneity of groups dispersions (betadisper) were calculated using the R package vegan56 and pairwise PERMANOVAs with FDR correction using the package RVAideMemoire57.

The percentages of shared ASVs were compared between sample groups using Friedman rank sum test with unreplicated blocked data using R. Pairwise comparisons were performed using Nemenyi’s all-pairs comparison test for unreplicated blocked data using the R package PMCMRplus. The Venn diagrams were generated using Venny58.

Spearman rank correlations were calculated to compare newborn foals and their own dams, as well as each foal at different time points, using the R package vegan and the P values were Bonferroni corrected for multiple testing56.

Data availability

The raw 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing dataset is available in the European Nucleotide Archive with the ENA accession number PRJEB32017.

References

  1. 1.

    Gensollen, T., Iyer, S. S., Kasper, D. L. & Blumberg, R. S. How colonization by microbiota in early life shapes the immune system. Science 352, 539–544, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad9378 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Cummings, J. H. & Macfarlane, G. T. The control and consequences of bacterial fermentation in the human colon. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 70, 443–459, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1991.tb02739.x (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Funkhouser, L. J. & Bordenstein, S. R. Mom knows best: the universality of maternal microbial transmission. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001631, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001631 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gomez de Agüero, M. et al. The maternal microbiota drives early postnatal innate immune development. Science 351, 1296, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2571 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Perez-Munoz, M. E., Arrieta, M. C., Ramer-Tait, A. E. & Walter, J. A critical assessment of the “sterile womb” and “in utero colonization” hypotheses: implications for research on the pioneer infant microbiome. Microbiome 5, 48, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0268-4 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Theis, K. R. et al. Does the human placenta delivered at term have a microbiota? Results of cultivation, quantitative real-time PCR, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and metagenomics. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 220, 267.e261–267.e239, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.018 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Seferovic, M. D. et al. Visualization of microbes by 16S in situ hybridization in term and preterm placentae without intraamniotic infection. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 221, 146 e141–146 e123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.036 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Dias, J. et al. Bacterial community dynamics across the gastrointestinal tracts of dairy calves during preweaning development. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84, https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02675-17 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Yeoman, C. J. et al. Biogeographical differences in the influence of maternal microbial sources on the early successional development of the bovine neonatal gastrointestinal tract. Sci. Rep. 8, 3197, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21440-8 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Korpela, K. & de Vos, W. M. Early life colonization of the human gut: microbes matter everywhere. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 44, 70–78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2018.06.003 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lazar, V. et al. Aspects of gut microbiota and immune system interactions in infectious diseases, immunopathology, and cancer. Front. Immunol. 9, 1830, https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01830 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Skelly, A. N., Sato, Y., Kearney, S. & Honda, K. Mining the microbiota for microbial and metabolite-based immunotherapies. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 19, 305–323, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-019-0144-5 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Pabst, O., Cerovic, V. & Hornef, M. Secretory IgA in the coordination of establishment and maintenance of the microbiota. Trends Immunol. 37, 287–296, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2016.03.002 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Santos, A. S., Rodrigues, M. A., Bessa, R. J., Ferreira, L. M. & Martin-Rosset, W. Understanding the equine cecum-colon ecosystem: current knowledge and future perspectives. Animal 5, 48–56, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731110001588 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Al Jassim, R. A. & Andrews, F. M. The bacterial community of the horse gastrointestinal tract and its relation to fermentative acidosis, laminitis, colic, and stomach ulcers. Vet. Clin. North Am. Equine Pract. 25, 199–215, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2009.04.005 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Fliegerova, K., Mura, E., Mrázek, J. & Moniello, G. A comparison of microbial profiles of different regions of the equine hindgut. Livestock Science 190, 16–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.05.015 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Chapman, A. M. Acute diarrhea in hospitalized horses. Vet. Clin. North Am. Equine Pract. 25, 363–380, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2009.05.001 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Baverud, V., Gustafsson, A., Franklin, A., Lindholm, A. & Gunnarsson, A. Clostridium difficile associated with acute colitis in mature horses treated with antibiotics. Equine Vet. J. 29, 279–284 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Magdesian, K. G. Neonatal foal diarrhea. Vet. Clin. North Am. Equine Pract. 21, 295–312, vi, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2005.04.009 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kuhl, J. et al. Changes in faecal bacteria and metabolic parameters in foals during the first six weeks of life. Vet. Microbiol. 151, 321–328, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.03.017 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Cohen, N. D. Causes of and farm management factors associated with disease and death in foals. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 204, 1644–1651 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Koterba, A. M., Brewer, B. D. & Tarplee, F. A. Clinical and clinicopathological characteristics of the septicaemic neonatal foal: review of 38 cases. Equine Vet. J. 16, 376–382 (1984).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    De La Torre, U. et al. Utilizing the fecal microbiota to understand foal gut transitions from birth to weaning. PLoS One 14, e0216211, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216211 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Quercia, S. et al. Early colonisation and temporal dynamics of the gut microbial ecosystem in Standardbred foals. Equine Vet. J, https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12983 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Costa, M. C., Stampfli, H. R., Allen-Vercoe, E. & Weese, J. S. Development of the faecal microbiota in foals. Equine Vet. J. 48, 681–688, https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12532 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Eisenhofer, R. et al. Contamination in low microbial biomass microbiome studies: issues and recommendations. Trends Microbiol. 27, 105–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2018.11.003 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Alipour, M. J. et al. The composition of the perinatal intestinal microbiota in cattle. Sci. Rep. 8, 10437, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28733-y (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jimenez, E. et al. Is meconium from healthy newborns actually sterile? Res. Microbiol. 159, 187–193, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2007.12.007 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Callahan, B. J., McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. P. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis. ISME J 11, 2639–2643, https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.119 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lukasik, P. et al. The structured diversity of specialized gut symbionts of the New World army ants. Mol. Ecol. 26, 3808–3825, https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14140 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Davis, N. M., Proctor, D. M., Holmes, S. P., Relman, D. A. & Callahan, B. J. J. M. Simple statistical identification and removal of contaminant sequences in marker-gene and metagenomics data. Microbiome 6, 226, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0605-2 (2018).

  33. 33.

    Collado, M. C., Rautava, S., Aakko, J., Isolauri, E. & Salminen, S. Human gut colonisation may be initiated in utero by distinct microbial communities in the placenta and amniotic fluid. Sci. Rep. 6, 23129, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23129 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Aagaard, K. et al. The placenta harbors a unique microbiome. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 237ra265, https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3008599 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Miyake, S., Ngugi, D. K. & Stingl, U. Phylogenetic diversity, distribution, and cophylogeny of giant bacteria (Epulopiscium) with their surgeonfish hosts in the Red Sea. Front. Microbiol. 7, 285, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00285 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Li, E. et al. Inflammatory bowel diseases phenotype, C. difficile and NOD2 genotype are associated with shifts in human ileum associated microbial composition. PLoS One 7, e26284, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026284 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Taylor, S. A review of equine sepsis. Equine Veterinary Education 27, 99–109, https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.12290 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Theelen, M. J., Wilson, W. D., Edman, J. M., Magdesian, K. G. & Kass, P. H. Temporal trends in prevalence of bacteria isolated from foals with sepsis: 1979–2010. Equine Vet. J. 46, 169–173, https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12131 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Crowell-Davis, S. L. & Houpt, K. A. Coprophagy by foals: effect of age and possible functions. Equine Vet. J. 17, 17–19 (1985).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Salem, S. E. et al. Variation in faecal microbiota in a group of horses managed at pasture over a 12-month period. Sci. Rep. 8, 8510, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26930-3 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Stewart, H. L. et al. Characterization of the fecal microbiota of healthy horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. 79, 811–819, https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.79.8.811 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Clemmons, B. A. et al. Vaginal and uterine bacterial communities in postpartum lactating cows. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1047, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01047 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Cunha, F. et al. Quantifying known and emerging uterine pathogens, and evaluating their association with metritis and fever in dairy cows. Theriogenology 114, 25–33, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.03.016 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Fraga, M., Perelmuter, K., Delucchi, L., Cidade, E. & Zunino, P. Vaginal lactic acid bacteria in the mare: evaluation of the probiotic potential of native Lactobacillus spp. and Enterococcus spp. strains. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 93, 71–78, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-007-9180-4 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Tapio, I. et al. Oral samples as non-invasive proxies for assessing the composition of the rumen microbial community. PLoS One 11, e0151220, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151220 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Segata, N. et al. Composition of the adult digestive tract bacterial microbiome based on seven mouth surfaces, tonsils, throat and stool samples. Genome Biol. 13, R42, https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2012-13-6-r42 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Kennedy, R. et al. The microbiome associated with equine periodontitis and oral health. Vet. Res. 47, 49, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-016-0333-1 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Pereira, P. A. B. et al. Oral and nasal microbiota in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 38, 61–67, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.02.026 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.journal 17, https://doi.org/10.14806/ej.17.1.200 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Bolyen, E. et al. QIIME 2: Reproducible, interactive, scalable, and extensible microbiome data science. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857, e27295v27292, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41, D590–596, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Bokulich, N. A. et al. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 6, 90, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0470-z (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8, e61217, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. URL, https://www.R-project.org/ (2019).

  55. 55.

    Pohlert, T. PMCMRplus: Calculate Pairwise Multiple Comparisons of Mean Rank Sums Extended. URL, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PMCMRplus (2018).

  56. 56.

    Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: community ecology package. URL, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (2019).

  57. 57.

    Hervé, M. RVAideMemoire: testing and plotting procedures for biostatistics v. 0.9-73 URL, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RVAideMemoire (2019).

  58. 58.

    Olivieros, J. C. Venny: an interactive tool for comparing lists with Venn’s diagrams. URL, http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Kirsi Lahti, Santeri Suokas and Oskari Mäenpää for expert technical assistance, and Anna Mykkänen for commenting the manuscript. The study was funded by University of Helsinki and the Finnish Veterinary Foundation. J.J. was supported by a fellowship from the Academy of Finland (Grant No. 0313471-7).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.H. performed the PCR amplification for sequencing, organised the amplicon sequencing, processed and analysed the data and drafted the manuscript; J.J. participated in the data analysis and interpretation of results; M.J.A. performed most of the DNA extractions; P.H. participated in study design and collected the samples; M.K. participated in study design; A.I. and T.P.M. participated in study design and data analysis; M.N. conceived, designed and organised the study and participated in data processing and analysis. All authors participated in manuscript preparation and approved the final draft.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. Iivanainen or M. Niku.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

P.H. is an owner of Sahara stud.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Husso, A., Jalanka, J., Alipour, M.J. et al. The composition of the perinatal intestinal microbiota in horse. Sci Rep 10, 441 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57003-8

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing