Association of Dog and Cat Ownership with Incident Frailty among Community-Dwelling Elderly Japanese

Abstract

Accumulating evidence from studies of human–animal interaction highlights the physiological, psychological, and social benefits for older owners of dogs and cats. This longitudinal study examined whether experience of dog/cat ownership protects against incident frailty in a population of community-dwelling older Japanese. Among 7881 non-frail community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older who completed a mail survey in 2016, 6,197 (mean [SD] age, 73.6 [5.3] years; 53.6% women) were reevaluated in a 2018 follow-up survey. Frailty was assessed with the Kaigo-Yobo Checklist. Incident frailty was defined as a score of four or higher in the follow-up survey. Overall, 870 (14.0%) were current dog/cat owners, 1878 (30.3%) were past owners and 3449 (55.7%) were never owners. During the 2-year follow-up period, 918 (14.8%) developed incident frailty. Mixed-effects logistic regression models showed that the odds ratio for incident frailty among dog/cat owners, as compared with never owners, current owners were 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69–1.09) and past owner were 0.84 (0.71–0.98), after controlling for important confounders at baseline. In stratified analysis, the risk of incident frailty was lower for past dog owners than for cat owners. Longer experience of caring for a dog requires physical activity and increases time outdoors spent dog walking and thus may have an important role in maintaining physical and social function and reducing frailty risk among older adults.

Introduction

Accumulating evidence from studies of human–animal interaction (HAI) shows benefits for health outcomes among pet owners of various ages1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15. Among older adults, dog/cat ownership was associated with greater physical activity in Western countries11,12,13, and our previous study of community-dwelling older Japanese showed that dog owners had greater physical function, and that dog and cat owners had better social function, than did never owners, even after adjustment for important sociodemographic and health characteristics16. These findings suggest that dog/cat ownership may have key role for older adults to maintain physically and socially active lifestyle.

Frailty is a growing public health concern worldwide over the last few decades. Physical frailty is a state in which cumulative aging-related deficits decrease reserve across multiple physiological systems17,18 and makes individuals more vulnerable to internal and external stressors and increases risks of adverse health outcomes, such as falls19, fracture20, disability21, hospitalization22, institutionalization23, dementia18, and premature death24,25. Although mechanism for frailty development remains unclear, social frailty (i.e. going out less frequency, rarely visiting friends, feeling less like helping friends or family, living alone and not talking to anyone all day) may precede and lead to the development of physical frailty26. We hypothesized that experience of dog/cat ownership might reduce the risk of incident frailty in later life through physically and socially active lifestyle. However, there are no data at present to confirm such a hypothesis. Furthermore, previous studies reported negative effect for dog/cat owners, for example, current and past dog/cat owners were more likely to have experienced a fall and hospitalized during the past year16 because of their higher physical activity levels. Some pet owners may suffer pet loss11, allergy, and zoonosis.

To increase healthy life expectancy, there is a growing interest in the effects of dog/cat ownership among older adults. This longitudinal study examined whether past or present dog/cat ownership is a protective factor for incident frailty, after controlling for important confounders, in a large sample of community-dwelling older Japanese. It is important to examine the association of dog/cat ownership with subsequent frailty risks among older adults, because some of past or present dog/cat owners may have experienced disadvantages by their pats. Japan has one of the world’s highest life expectancy and is also a super-aged society. The proportion of older adults is the highest in the world, and the number of pets exceed the number of children under the age of 15 with the nation’s declining birth rate. This study of the effects of dog/cat ownership on frailty among older Japanese is likely to yield insights regarding health promotion strategies in super-aging societies worldwide.

Results

Health characteristics

Mean (SD) participant age was 73.6 (5.3) years, 53.6% were women, and 19.1% were living alone. Overall, 870 (14.0%) were current dog/cat owners, 1878 (30.3%) were past owners and 3449 (55.7%) were never owners. Stratified by dog and cat ownership, 554 (8.9%) were current dog owners, 1466 (23.7%) were past dog owners and 4177 (67.4%) were never dog owners. 386 (6.2%) were current cat owners, 693 (11.2%) were past cat owners and 5118 (82.6%) were never cat owners.

Table 1 shows a comparison of baseline demographic and comprehensive health characteristics with experience of dog/cat ownership in 2016. Older adults with current dog/cat ownership were more likely to be younger, living with someone, and married, to have more education and higher equivalent incomes, to have fallen during the past year, and to have a smoking habit, higher motor fitness scale scores, closer interaction with neighbors, and higher frequency of going outdoors.

Table 1 Baseline Demographic and Health Characteristics of 6197 Community-Dwelling Older Japanese With and Without Experience of Dog/Cat Ownership.

Dog/cat ownership with incident frailty

During the 2-year follow-up, 918 (14.8%) out of 6197 participants developed incident frailty. Among dog/cat ownership, 13.2% of current owners, 13.4% of past owners and 16.0% of never owners developed incident frailty (chi-square test, P = 0.015). Corresponding values in current, past and never dog owners were 12.5%, 13.2% and 15.7% (chi-square test, P = 0.016), and corresponding values of cat owners were 14.2%, 13.7% and 15.0% (chi-square test, P = 0.632).

The associations of dog/cat ownership with incident frailty are shown in Table 2. As compared with never dog/cat owners, current dog/cat owners had 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72–1.13) times and past owners had 0.85 (0.71–0.99) times as likely to develop incident frailty after controlling for sex and age at baseline. Even after adjustment for comprehensive sociodemographic and health characteristics at baseline, past dog/cat ownership was associated with a significantly lower odds ratio (OR) of incident frailty, 0.84 (0.71–0.98), and current ownership showed no significance (P = 0.237) but lower OR of 0.87. Estimated values (SE) for incident frailty by mixed-effects logistic regression models were −0.17 (0.08) in past dog/cat owners and −0.10 (0.11) in current owners, as compared with never owners.

Table 2 Independent Associations between Experience of Dog/Cat Ownership and Incident Frailty Among Community-Dwelling Older Japanese.

In stratified analysis, mixed-effects logistic regression models yielded an OR of 0.81 (0.62–1.07) in current dog ownership and 0.82 (0.69–0.99) in past dog ownership for incident frailty, as compared with never owners of dogs, after controlling for important confounders. For cat ownership, current cat owners showed OR of 1.04 (0.76–1.42) and past cat owners showed OR of 0.89 (0.70–1.13), as compared with never cat owners.

Furthermore, we tested the hypothesis that experience of dog ownership may have a key role in maintaining physical and social function and thus might help lower the risk of incident frailty. When physical function (motor fitness scale) and physical activity (exercise habit) were added to the model as potential covariates, ORs were not changed from multivariate-adjusted model, however, 95% confidence interval were wide and there is no significance in the association of experience of dog/cat ownership with incident frailty. When social function (interaction with neighbors) was added to the model, the association of dog/cat ownership with incident frailty was attenuated (OR of current owners was 0.95 and OR of past owners was 0.88).

Discussion

This prospective study of community-dwelling older Japanese showed that, as compared with respondents with no history of dog/cat ownership, those with past ownership had a lower risk and those with current owners had slightly lower risk of incident frailty, even after adjustment for important confounders. In particular, the risk of incident frailty was significantly lower for past dog owners than for cat owners. Our previous cross-sectional study reported that current dog or cat owner tend to be less frailty16.

Specific mechanism between dog/cat ownership and incident frailty remains unclear, because this study does not rule out the pet ownership effect completely (e.g., individuals who are already more physically active tend to have a pet). This study added new finding that past dog ownership reduced the risk of subsequent frailty and raises two mechanisms for this effect. First, as a result of dog walking, dog owners are more likely to have daily physical activity and higher physical function. A meta-analysis showed that dog owners walked more and were more physically active than non-dog owners5. Dall et al. reported that older dog owners spent 22 more minutes walking and walked 2,670 more steps per day than did non-dog owners. This additional activity satisfies guidelines calling for 150 minutes of moderate physical activity per week13. In the present data, past dog/cat owners showed the same high motor fitness scale as current owners. Second, dog ownership might maintain higher social function. Wood et al. suggested that pets affect broader social interactions and perceptions, sense of community, and social capital at the neighborhood level14. In this study, we confirmed higher interaction with neighbors, such as significant relationship in past dog/cat owners than current and never owners. Dog owners might have more opportunities to extend their social network by chatting with neighbors while dog walking. Unfortunately, data on years of dog/cat ownership were not available in the present study, past owners may have longer years of ownership. These findings suggest that longer experience of dog ownership may enhance both of physical and social function for owners.

We used models to investigate the association of experience of dog ownership with incident frailty, after controlling for physical function, physical activity, and social function. The association of experience of dog ownership with incident frailty was attenuated when those functions were included in the statistical model, which supports the study hypothesis. Caring for a dog likely increases the owner’s physical activity and social network and may thus have an important role in maintaining physical and social function in later life. Higher physical and social function through dog ownership might help reduce subsequent frailty risk among older adults.

This study has strengths that warrant mention. First, our large sample of community-dwelling older Japanese revealed an association of experience of dog/cat ownership with frailty in the general population. The present study is a worthful addition to the field of human–animal interaction, as it enrolled a large sample of community-dwelling older adults, which enabled subgroup analysis of experience of dog and cat ownership. Second, important covariates were included in the analysis, thus enabling analysis of the independent association of experience of dog/cat ownership with incident frailty after controlling for important sociodemographic and health characteristics.

Nevertheless, this study has limitations. First, although data on years of dog/cat ownership and frequency of dog walking were important factor to explore the mechanisms between experience of ownership and frailty, these data were not available for analysis. Future study should compare total years of ownership between current and past owners. Second, previous studies reported several health benefits associated with cat ownership14,15; however, the present study showed no positive association between experience of cat ownership and incident frailty. The reason for this absence of an effect is unknown, and we hope that future studies will examine associations between cat ownership and frailty in different countries, such as Western populations. Third, we use the data from older adults to consider disadvantages through their pats, specific information such as pet loss11, allergy, and zoonosis were not included. Future studies should confirm the association of dog ownership with frailty among older adults who had experienced negative effects by pet ownership.

This is the first study to identify an association between experience of dog ownership and incident frailty even after adjustment for important sociodemographic and health characteristics among community-dwelling older adults. Longer experience of caring for a dog likely increases physical activity and time spent outdoors and may therefore have an important role in maintaining physical and social function and reducing frailty risk among older adults. These findings should be helpful in developing health promotion strategies for preventing and reducing frailty among older adults.

Method

Participants

Data for this study were collected as part of a community-wide intervention trial (the Ota Genki Senior Project) in 18 administrative districts of Ota City, Tokyo27. Ota City is the southernmost of the 23 special wards of Tokyo. The population was 716,645 and 162,443 were aged 65 years or older on August in 2016. The proportion of elders to the total population was 22.7%27. In 2016, we mailed a self-administered questionnaire to 15,500 older residents as a baseline survey; 11,925 questionnaires were returned (response rate 76.9%). In 2018, we conducted a mail survey in the same area (response rate 74.2%) and collected 10,837 questionnaires. Mean age and percentage of female were almost the same between responders in 2016 and 2018. To be eligible for the study, individuals had to be non-frail and to complete a questionnaire on their experience of dog/cat ownership in 2016 (n = 7,881). Ultimately, data from 6,197 non-frail community-dwelling adults were followed in 2018. Among participants who were included the study (n = 6,197) and excluded from loss of follow-up (n = 1,684), the differences of dog/cat ownership, sex and age were not significant. All methods according to the Ota Genki Senior Project were carried out in accordance with the relevant guidelines of the Ethical Committee of the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology. We adhered strictly to the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology. A statement attached to the questionnaire explained the purpose of the survey, the voluntary nature of participation, and a promise of anonymity in the analysis. Returning the questionnaire was considered as consent to participate in the study.

Dog/cat ownership

Participants were asked about their experience living with a pet (current, past, or never). Those with current or past pet experience were asked about pet species in the household (dog, cat, or other).

Incident frailty

Frailty was defined as a score of four or higher on the Kaigo-Yobo Check-List 15 (CL15, Supplementary information), which had concurrent and predictive validity, and good reliability as a questionnaire-based scale for screening high-risk Japanese older adults28,29. Kojima et al. compared CL15 to Frailty Index in predicting risks of long-term care insurance certification and/or mortality over 3 years30. Although CL15 includes smaller numbers of items than Frailty Index, CL15 was shown to be highly correlated with Frailty Index, significant predictors of long-term care insurance certification and/or mortality, and compatible to Frailty Index in the risk prediction30.

Other variables

The covariates included frailty-associated sociodemographic and health characteristics, namely, sex, age, household size, marital status, educational attainment, equivalent income, history of chronic diseases, history of hospitalization during the past year, fall during the past year, alcohol drinking, smoking status, food variety, body mass index, exercise habit, interaction with neighbors, frequency of going outdoors, self-rated health, and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)-5 score.

The chronic diseases evaluated included clinically relevant medical conditions, namely, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, heart disease, stroke, diabetes mellitus, and lung respiratory disease. For each of these conditions, participants were asked if they had received a physician diagnosis (yes or no)31,32. Food variety was assessed by a dietary variety score, which was calculated by using the consumption frequencies for 10 food items (meat, fish/shellfish, eggs, milk, soybean products, green/yellow vegetables, potatoes, fruit, seaweed, and fats/oils) during the week. The score ranges from 0 to 10, and higher scores indicate greater food variety33. Participants were classified as having a daily exercise habit if they reported one or more type of daily exercise (i.e., walking, running, weight training, gymnastic exercises, swimming, cycling, yoga, or others). Interaction with neighbors was classified as close relationship, conversation level, exchange of greetings only, and no social contact. GDS-5 is a screening tool to identify symptoms of depression in the older population34 and higher score indicates the presence of depressive symptoms.

Statistical analyses

First, associations of baseline demographic and comprehensive health characteristics with experience of dog/cat ownership were tested by using the chi-square test or t-test. Second, we used mixed-effects logistic regression models to examine independent associations of experience of dog/cat ownership with incident frailty, after controlling for potential confounders. The random effects were the study area. Potential confounders were evaluated for collinearity and chosen; sex, age, household size, equivalent income, history of stroke, food variety, GDS-5, alcohol status, and smoking status. In addition, using mixed-effects logistic regression models after controlling for important confounders, we conducted stratified analysis for experience of dog/cat ownership. Statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS (version 23.0; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) and SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Data availability

The data of a community-wide intervention trial (Ota Genki Senior Project) in Ota City contains sensitive participant information and cannot be released publicly due to ethicolegal restrictions imposed by the Ethics Committee at Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology. The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Long-term storaged data is available upon reasonable request to Yu Taniguchi (yu0717@tmig.or.jp) and Satoshi Seino (seino@tmig.or.jp).

References

  1. 1.

    Bergroth, E. et al. Respiratory tract illnesses during the first year of life: effect of dog and cat contacts. Pediatrics 130, 211–220, https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-2825 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Owen, C. G. et al. Family dog ownership and levels of physical activity in childhood: findings from the Child Heart and Health Study in England. American journal of public health 100, 1669–1671, https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2009.188193 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Heyworth, J. S., Cutt, H. & Glonek, G. Does dog or cat ownership lead to increased gastroenteritis in young children in South Australia? Epidemiology and infection 134, 926–934, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0950268806006078 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Coleman, K. J. et al. Physical activity, weight status, and neighborhood characteristics of dog walkers. Preventive medicine 47, 309–312, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.05.007 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Christian, H. E. et al. Dog ownership and physical activity: a review of the evidence. Journal of physical activity & health 10, 750–759 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Headey, B., Na, N. F. & Zheng., R. P. Dogs Benefit Owners’ Health: A ‘Natural Experiment’ in China. Social Indicators Research 87, 481–193, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9142-2 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mubanga, M. et al. Dog ownership and the risk of cardiovascular disease and death - a nationwide cohort study. Scientific reports 7, 15821, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16118-6 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Qureshi, A. I., Memon, M. Z., Vazquez, G. & Suri, M. F. Cat ownership and the Risk of Fatal Cardiovascular Diseases. Results from the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Study Mortality Follow-up Study. Journal of vascular and interventional neurology 2, 132–135 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Allen, K., Shykoff, B. E. & Izzo, J. L. Jr. Pet ownership, but not ace inhibitor therapy, blunts home blood pressure responses to mental stress. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex.: 1979) 38, 815–820 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Siegel, J. M., Angulo, F. J., Detels, R., Wesch, J. & Mullen, A. AIDS diagnosis and depression in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study: the ameliorating impact of pet ownership. AIDS care 11, 157–170, https://doi.org/10.1080/09540129948054 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mueller, M. K., Gee, N. R. & Bures, R. M. Human-animal interaction as a social determinant of health: descriptive findings from the health and retirement study. BMC public health 18, 305, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5188-0 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Thorpe, R. J. Jr. et al. Dog ownership, walking behavior, and maintained mobility in late life. J Am Geriatr Soc 54, 1419–1424, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00856.x (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Dall, P. M. et al. The influence of dog ownership on objective measures of free-living physical activity and sedentary behaviour in community-dwelling older adults: a longitudinal case-controlled study. BMC public health 17, 496, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4422-5 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wood, L. J., Billie, G., Max, K. & AB., D. More Than a Furry Companion: The Ripple Effect of Companion Animals on Neighborhood Interactions and Sense of Community. Society & Animals 15, 43–56 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Turner, D. C., Rieger, G. & Gygax, L. Spouses and cats and their effects on human mood. A Multidisciplinary. Journal of The Interactions of People & Animals 16, 213–228 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Taniguchi, Y. et al. Physical, social, and psychological characteristics of community-dwelling elderly Japanese dog and cat owners. PloS one 13, e0206399, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206399 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Clegg, A., Young, J., Iliffe, S., Rikkert, M. O. & Rockwood, K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet (London, England) 381, 752–762, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62167-9 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kojima, G., Taniguchi, Y., Iliffe, S. & Walters, K. Frailty as a Predictor of Alzheimer Disease, Vascular Dementia, and All Dementia Among Community-Dwelling Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 17, 881–888, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.05.013 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kojima, G. Frailty as a Predictor of Future Falls Among Community-Dwelling Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 16, 1027–1033, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2015.06.018 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kojima, G. Frailty as a predictor of fractures among community-dwelling older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone 90, 116–122, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2016.06.009 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kojima, G. Frailty as a predictor of disabilities among community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Disability and rehabilitation 39, 1897–1908, https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1212282 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kojima, G. Frailty as a predictor of hospitalisation among community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of epidemiology and community health 70, 722–729, https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-206978 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kojima, G. Prevalence of Frailty in Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 16, 940–945, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2015.06.025 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kojima, G. Frailty Defined by FRAIL Scale as a Predictor of Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 19, 480–483, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2018.04.006 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kojima, G., Iliffe, S. & Walters, K. Frailty index as a predictor of mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing 47, 193–200, https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx162 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Makizako, H. et al. Social Frailty Leads to the Development of Physical Frailty among Physically Non-Frail Adults: A Four-Year Follow-Up Longitudinal Cohort Study. International journal of environmental research and public health 15, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030490 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Seino, S. et al. A community-wide intervention trial for preventing and reducing frailty among older adults living in metropolitan areas: Design and baseline survey for a study integrating participatory action research with cluster trial. J Epidemiol In press (2018).

  28. 28.

    Shinkai, S. et al. Research on screening for frailty: development of “the Kaigo-Yobo Checklist”. [Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health 57, 345–354 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Shinkai, S. et al. Public health approach to preventing frailty in the community and its effect on healthy aging in Japan. Geriatrics & gerontology international 16(Suppl 1), 87–97, https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12726 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kojima, G., Taniguchi, Y., Kitamura, A. & Shinkai, S. Are the Kihon Checklist and the Kaigo-Yobo Checklist Compatible With the Frailty Index? Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2018.05.012 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Taniguchi, Y., Yoshida, H., Fujiwara, Y., Motohashi, Y. & Shinkai, S. A prospective study of gait performance and subsequent cognitive decline in a general population of older Japanese. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 67, 796–803, https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glr243 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Taniguchi, Y. et al. Nutritional biomarkers and subsequent cognitive decline among community-dwelling older Japanese: a prospective study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 69, 1276–1283, https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glt286 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kumagai, S. et al. Effects of dietary variety on declines in high-level functional capacity in elderly people living in a community. Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health 50, 1117–1124 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hoyl, M. T. et al. Development and testing of a five-item version of the Geriatric Depression Scale. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 47, 873–878, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb03848.x (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the residents and staff members of Ota City and for the collaboration of our colleagues on the Research Team for Social Participation and Community Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology (TMIG).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.T., S.S., M.N., Y.T., I.T., Y.Y., T.I., A.K. and S.S. were involved in data interpretation and manuscript preparation. This study was supported by grants from Ota City, Japan Health Promotion & Fitness Foundation, Sugiura Memorial Foundation, The Japan Foundation for Aging and Health, and JSPS KAKEN Grant number 16K16615. S.S. (Satoshi SEINO) had financial support from Japan Health Promotion & Fitness Foundation, Sugiura Memorial Foundation, The Japan Foundation for Aging and Health, and JSPS KAKEN Grant, but was not directly involved in data analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Taniguchi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taniguchi, Y., Seino, S., Nishi, M. et al. Association of Dog and Cat Ownership with Incident Frailty among Community-Dwelling Elderly Japanese. Sci Rep 9, 18604 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54955-9

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing