Draft genome of Tanacetum cinerariifolium, the natural source of mosquito coil

Abstract

Pyrethrum (Tanacetum cinerariifolium), which is a perennial Asteraceae plant with white daisy-like flowers, is the original source of mosquito coils and is known for the biosynthesis of the pyrethrin class of natural insecticides. However, the molecular basis of the production of pyrethrins by T. cinerariifolium has yet to be fully elucidated. Here, we present the 7.1-Gb draft genome of T. cinerariifolium, consisting of 2,016,451 scaffolds and 60,080 genes predicted with high confidence. Notably, analyses of transposable elements (TEs) indicated that TEs occupy 33.84% of the genome sequence. Furthermore, TEs of the sire and oryco clades were found to be enriched in the T. cinerariifolium-specific evolutionary lineage, occupying a total of 13% of the genome sequence, a proportion approximately 8-fold higher than that in other plants. InterProScan analysis demonstrated that biodefense-related toxic proteins (e.g., ribosome inactivating proteins), signal transduction-related proteins (e.g., histidine kinases), and metabolic enzymes (e.g., lipoxygenases, acyl-CoA dehydrogenases/oxygenases, and P450s) are also highly enriched in the T. cinerariifolium genome. Molecular phylogenetic analysis detected a variety of enzymes with genus-specific multiplication, including both common enzymes and others that appear to be specific to pyrethrin biosynthesis. Together, these data identify possible novel components of the pyrethrin biosynthesis pathway and provide new insights into the unique genomic features of T. cinerariifolium.

Introduction

Insect-borne infection is one of the most familiar and prevalent diseases worldwide. To date, a wide variety of insecticides and insect repellents have been developed to prevent insect-borne infection. Mosquito coils, which were first commercialized by Dainihon Jochugiku Co., Ltd., in 1902, are the origin of potent insecticides and insect repellents that are harmless to humans. The natural source of the original mosquito coil was the flower head of pyrethrum (Tanacetum cinerariifolium), a perennial Asteraceae plant with a white daisy-like flower (Fig. 1A). The major insecticidal compounds are T. cinerariifolium-specific specialized metabolites designated pyrethrins. These phytochemicals are biosynthesized by esterification of acid moieties (chrysanthemic acid and pyrethric acid) and alcohol moieties (pyrethrolone, jasmolone, and cinerolone)1, yielding a total of six compounds, pyrethrin I and II, jasmolin I and II, and cinerin I and II, by combination of the acid and alcohol moieties1 in T. cinerariifolium. Pyrethrins exhibit highly selective neurotoxicity to insects and are degraded rapidly in the presence of sunlight and oxygen2,3. Characterization of pyrethrins led to the development of pyrethroids, structurally related compounds that are easily synthesized4. Both pyrethrins and pyrethroids have been extensively employed as common insecticides and insect repellents that have provided protection against insect-borne diseases such as malaria and dengue fever in many countries5,6.

Figure 1
figure1

Flower of T. cinerariifolium (A) and biosynthetic pathway of pyrethrins (B). Proposed biosynthetic pathway of pyrethrins. Chrysanthemic acid and pyrethric acid as acid moieties are synthesized from dimethylallyl diphosphates by T. cinerariifolium chrysanthemyl diphosphate synthase (TcCDS), T. cinerariifolium alcohol dehydrogenase 2 (TcADH2), T. cinerariifolium aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (TcALDH1), T. cinerariifolium chrysanthemol 10-hydroxylase (TcCHH), and T. cinerariifolium 10-carboxychrysanthemic acid 10-methyltransferase (TcCCMT). Pyrethrolone, jasmolone, and cinerolone as alcohol moieties are synthesized from linolenic acid by enzymes related to oxylipin pathway, including T. cinerariifolium jasmone hydroxylase (TcJMH), and unknown enzyme(s). Finally, chrysanthemoyl-CoA (the CoA-activated version of chrysanthemic acid) and pyrethrolone are esterified by T. cinerariifolium GDSL (Gly-Asp-Ser-Leu motif) lipase (TcGLIP) to produce pyrethrin I. Compounds and enzymes are indicated by red and blue text, respectively. Unidentified enzymes are indicated as question marks.

To date, some pyrethrin biosynthesis-related enzymes have been identified1,7,8,9,10,11 (Fig. 1B). Regarding the generation of alcohol moieties of pyrethrins, linolenic acid is converted to 13-hydroperoxylinolenic acid by T. cinerariifolium 13-lipoxygenase (TcLOX1) and subsequently converted to jasmone by allene oxide cyclase (AOC), allene oxide synthase (AOS), 3-oxo-2-(2-pentenyl)-cyclopentane-1-octanoic acid reductase 3 (OPR3), and additional unknown enzymes. Jasmone is converted to jasmolone by T. cinerariifolium jasmone hydroxylase (TcJMH). Although pyrethrolone and cinerolone are thought to be derived from jasmolone, the mechanisms and enzymes responsible for this conversion have yet to be elucidated. Regarding the synthesis of the acid moieties of pyrethrins, two molecules of dimethylallyl diphosphate are condensed to chrysanthemyl diphosphate by T. cinerariifolium chrysanthemyl diphosphate synthase (TcCDS); the product subsequently is oxidized to chrysanthemic acid by T. cinerariifolium alcohol dehydrogenase 2 (TcADH2) and T. cinerariifolium aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (TcALDH1). The other acid moiety, pyrethric acid, is generated by T. cinerariifolium chrysanthemol 10-hydroxylase (TcCHH) and T. cinerariifolium 10-carboxychrysanthemic acid 10-methyltransferase (TcCCMT). Finally, CoA-activated chrysanthemic acid (chrysanthemoyl-CoA) and pyrethrolone are esterified to pyrethrin I by T. cinerariifolium GDSL (Gly-Asp-Ser-Leu motif) lipase (TcGLIP). While TcGLIP has been isolated and identified as the enzyme catalyzing the esterification of pyrethrin I, the enzymes that catalyze the synthesis of pyrethrin II, jasmolin I, jasmolin II, cinerin I, and cinerin II have yet to be identified. In this context, elucidation of T. cinerariifolium genome sequence is expected to provide crucial clues for clarification of the whole biosynthetic pathway of the pyrethrins and of the evolutionary processes. The genome sequence also is expected to facilitate the development of molecular tools for the generation of transgenic T. cinerariifolium and other systems for efficient and sustainable production of natural pyrethrins that can be difficult to chemically synthesize.

Genomes of various members of the Asteraceae family, including Chrysanthemum seticuspe12, Artemisia annua13 and Helianthus annuus14, have been reported over the past few years, but no pyrethrin-producing member of the Asteraceae family have been sequenced15. The genome of T. cinerariifolium was estimated to be approximately 7.1 Gb by a flow cytometric method16, indicating a genome that is more than twice the sizes of other Asteraceae genomes (e.g., 2.72 Gb for C. seticuspe, 1.74 Gb for A. annua and 3.6 Gb for H. annuus). Assembling such large genomes still remains challenging due to the presence of highly repetitive sequences, multiplied paralogous genes, and heterozygosity17. Here, we report a draft genome of T. cinerariifolium derived by massively parallel sequencing using Hiseq4000 and X. The repetitive sequence content and multiplied pyrethrin-biosynthetic genes included in the assembled genome sequence also were analyzed.

Result

Sequence assembly and annotation of T. cinerariifolium genome

Paired-end (PE) libraries and mate-pair (MP) libraries (with 3-, 5- and 8-kb insert sizes; MP-3 kb, MP-5 kb, and MP-8 kb, respectively) of the T. cinerariifolium genome were generated and then sequenced using Hiseq X and Hiseq4000 instruments. The total bases of the sequence reads for PE, MP-3 kb, MP-5 kb, and MP-8 kb amounted to 1,497 Gb, 135 Gb, 166 Gb, and 95 Gb, respectively (Table 1). Subsequently, the output reads were subjected to contig assembly and scaffolding steps to estimate the genome sequence (Fig. 2). The 3,892,368 contigs with total length of 7.7 Gb (Table 2) were constructed by assembling PE reads using SOAPdenovo18 and Platanus19 and merging the contigs using SSPACE-Longread20. The assembled contigs then were scaffolded with PE and MP reads using SSPACE21, which concatenates contig sequences with pair information of the reads, and Gapfiller22, which fills the inter-contig unknown bases (‘N’s) in scaffolds with ‘A/T/G/C’ (Fig. 2). The total length of the resultant scaffolds was 7.1 Gb, which corresponded with the flow cytometry-estimated genome size for T. cinerariifolium16. The N50 value of the scaffolds was 14 Kb, and the maximum length of the scaffolds was 1.2 Mb (Table 2). Subsequently, the draft genome was subjected to Augustus23 with ‘intron hints’, which were generated with previous T. cinerariifolium transcriptomes24,25, resulting in the prediction of 935,992 putative genes.

Table 1 Statistics of sequence reads.
Figure 2
figure2

Flowchart of genome assembly and gene prediction. The PE reads were subjected to contig assembly by a four-step process, including “pre-assembly” using PANDAseq, “contig assembly” using SOAPdenovo and Platanus, “clean-up” using BLASTN, and “merging with other assembly result” using SSPACE-longread. Then, the MP reads were subjected to scaffolding by a three-step process, including “read selection” using bowtie2, “scaffolding” using SSPACE-STANDARD, and “gapfilling” using GapFiller. These processes yielded the complete draft genome. The coding sequences in the draft genome then were annotated by a three-step process, including “gene prediction” using Augustus, “transposable elements (TEs) detection” using hmmpfam, and “protein superfamilies prediction” using InterProScan.

Table 2 Statistics of genome assembly.

To evaluate the completeness of the genome, the draft genome sequences were subjected to analysis with BUSCO26, which counts complete (C), fragmented (F), and missing (M) conserved genes in genome sequences. The analysis with 1440 conserved core plant genes showed that 91.8% of conserved genes (82.3% as complete and 9.5% as fragmented) were present in the T. cinerariifolium genome assembly (Table 3). Since these scores indicated quality as high as those of other plant genomes (with reported scores of 83.8% in Cuscuta campestris27, 77.5% in Ruellia speciosa28, 86.9% in Erigeron breviscapus29, and 89.0% in Secale cereal30), we used the T. cinerariifolium draft genome for subsequent analysis.

Table 3 Annotation statistics for draft genome.

To annotate the predicted genes, transposable elements (TEs) were first annotated using hmmpfam31 against the Gypsy database (GyDB)32, revealing the presence of 525,098 TEs occupying 2,397 Mbp (33.84%) of the total genome. Further classification of TEs showed that 1,135 Mbp (16.02%), 907 Mbp (12.81%), 222 Mbp (3.13%), 88 Mbp (1.24%), 18 Mbp (0.25%), and 28 Mbp (0.39%) were occupied by Ty1/Copia, Ty3/Gypsy, Retroviridae, Caulimoviridae, Bel/Pao, and other TEs. Among Ty1/Copia and Ty3/Gypsy, the sire (Ty1/Copia, 11.16%), athila (Ty3/Gypsy, 5.76%), del (Ty3/Gypsy, 4.05%), and oryco (Ty1/Copia, 2.14%) clades were abundant (Table 3). The remaining 410,894 non-TE genes were subjected to InterProScan 5.6–48.033, revealing 60,080 putative genes exhibiting known protein signatures. Thus, a high-quality 7.1-Gb T. cinerariifolium draft genome was assembled and shown to include a total of 525,098 TEs and 60,080 plausible genes based on 1,497 Gb of PE reads and 396 Gb of MP reads.

Inter-genus comparative analysis of TE classification

We compared T. cinerariifolium TE clades with those of other species by predicting the TEs in the genomes of Arabidopsis thaliana, Nicotiana tabacum, and Oryza sativa, revealing the presence in T. cinerariifolium of two TE clades that were enriched by more than 2-fold compared to these other plant genomes (Table 4). In T. cinerariifolium, members of the sire-clade TEs were found to be present at proportions 14.3-, 8.5-, and 8.1-fold higher than in A. thaliana, N. tabacum, and O. sativa, respectively (Table 4). Similarly, members of the oryco-clade TEs were found to be present at proportions 2.2-, 4.6-, and 2.6-fold higher, respectively. These results indicated that sire- and oryco-clade TEs constitute a considerably larger proportion of the T. cinerariifolium genome than is observed in these other plants. Furthermore, a comparison of the proportions of these TEs in T. cinerariifolium to those of these TEs in other Asteraceae (C. seticuspe, A. annua and H. annuus) (Table 5) demonstrated that the sire- and oryco-clade TEs are remarkably enriched in all of these Asteraceae genera. To assess whether sire- and oryco-clade TEs had multiplied in a common ancestor of the Asteraceae or independently in individual genera, we analyzed molecular phylogenetic trees of the reverse transcriptase (RT) domains encoded by the sire and oryco sequences (Supplemental Figs. 1 and 2); specifically, we evaluated the number of co-clustered genes in single-genus clusters, which should reflect the number of genus-specific duplication events (Fig. 3). If these TEs had multiplied in a common ancestor, most TEs would be expected to be positioned in orthologous clusters with bootstrap values greater than 50% (see Fig. 3, example of non-multiplied clusters). Otherwise, most TEs would be expected to be positioned in multiplied clusters (Fig. 3). In fact, 98%, 92%, 93%, and 98% of sire TEs were separately multiplied in T. cinerariifolium (Fig. 3A), C. seticuspe (Fig. 3B), A. annua (Fig. 3C), and H. annuus (Fig. 3D), respectively, indicating that most of the sire TEs had multiplied in the individual genera. Likewise, 85%, 69%, 78%, and 89% of oryco TEs were multiplied in the respective organisms (Fig. 3E–H), indicating that most of the oryco TEs also had multiplied in the individual genera. Moreover, 90% of sire TEs (Fig. 3A) and 49% of oryco TEs (Fig. 3E) clustered with eight or more multiplied genes. Collectively, these results suggest that sire and oryco TEs were multiplied in the individual lineages of the respective Asteraceae genera; in the case of T. cinerariifolium, TEs of these clades occupy approximately 13% of the genome.

Table 4 Abundance score of TEs in other plants of the Asteraceae family.
Table 5 Abundance score of TEs in Asteraceae plants.
Figure 3
figure3

Multiplication analysis of sire-clade (A–D) and oryco-clade (E,F) transposable elements (TEs). Based on molecular phylogenetic trees for sire TEs (Supplemental Fig. 1) and oryco TEs (Supplemental Fig. 2), the number of co-clustered genes in single-genus clusters, which reflects the number of genus-specific duplication events, were counted for each genus. The counted number of co-clustered genes for T. cinerariifolium (A,E), C. seticuspe (B,F), A. annua (C,G), and H. annuus (D,H) are shown in the form of pie charts.

We also analyzed the distribution of TEs in genome scaffolds by counting the number of sire and oryco genes encoded in each 20-Kb region. As shown in Fig. 4, uniform distributions of sire and oryco genes were observed using frequency plots for sire (Fig. 4A) and oryco (Fig. 4B) genes in each 20-Kb interval. Furthermore, no local distribution was detected by frequency plots for any of the TE clades (Fig. 4C). We next analyzed the number of TEs present within 20 Kb of another member of the respective TE clade. As shown in Fig. 4D, 82.35% and 92.65% of sire and oryco genes (respectively) were separated by more than 20 Kb from other TEs of the respective clade. Together, these data indicated that the TEs that multiplied in T. cinerariifolium, are scattered throughout the entire genome.

Figure 4
figure4

The distribution of transposable elements (TEs) in the T. cinerariifolium genome. The distributions of TEs for sire (A), oryco (B) and all clade (C) were shown with the circles. The number of TEs coded in each scaffold regions within each 20 Kb region was plotted on the outer circle and %GC content in each 20 Kb was represented with heatmap on the inner circle. (D) The number of sire, oryco and all clade existing 20 Kb around respective TE was shown with histogram.

Functional annotation of the T. cinerariifolium genes and inter-genus comparative analysis

Next, we investigated multiplication ratios of protein superfamilies in T. cinerariifolium compared with those in other species. This analysis was performed using InterProScan33. Specifically, the protein data sets of C. seticuspe, A. annua, H. annuus, N. tabacum, O. sativa, and A. thaliana were subjected to analysis using InterProScan and the multiplication odds scores were calculated for each combination of superfamily and species (Table 6). A positive value of the multiplication odds score indicates that a genus possesses a higher number of multiplied genes in a given superfamily than do other genera. As shown in Table 6, the highest multiplication odds scores for T. cinerariifolium were observed for the biodefense-, signaling-, and metabolism-related superfamilies.

Table 6 Superfamilies with highest multiplication odds scores in T. cinerariifolium.

For biodefense-related superfamilies, “Ribosome-inactivating protein (RIP)” (IPR036041) and “Ricin B-like lectins” (IPR035992), both of which are categorized as type II RIPs, showed multiplication odds scores of 2.05 and 1.57 in T. cinerariifolium, respectively (Table 6). RIPs, including ricin, show high toxicity to a wide range of species, serving as biodefense molecules for the producing plant. For example, tobacco RIP, isolated and purified from N. tabacum leaves, has been reported to possess strong antibacterial activity against Pseudomonas solanacearum, Erwinia amylovora, and Shigella asonei34. Pokeweed antiviral protein, purified from the extracts of plant leaves of Phytolacca americana35, has been reported to enhance this plant’s systemic resistance to tobacco mosaic virus infection36. Sambucus nigra agglutinin I (SNA-I) has been shown to exhibit insecticidal potency against Hemiptera37. Indeed, a BLASTP search of SNA-I sequence against T. cinerariifolium RIPs detected Tci_399175 with an E-value score of 2.99 × 10−112 and 37.89% identity (Supplemental Fig. 3A). Sequence alignment and BLASTP results revealed that Tci_399175 harbors the well conserved RIP domain and two RICIN domains containing Q-X-W motifs (Supplemental Fig. 3A). In other work, RIP domains have been implicated in the cleavage of rRNA glycosidic bonds, while RICIN domains have been shown to be involved in internalization via binding of target cell glycans38. This sequence analysis suggested that the T. cinerariifolium-enriched RIPs include insecticides similar to SNA-I. These findings indicated that T. cinerariifolium possesses not only low-molecular-weight insecticides such as sesquiterpene lactones39 and pyrethrins2,3 but also a greater number of genes (compared with other plants) encoding native proteins with toxicity against insects.

For signaling-related superfamilies “Signal transduction histidine kinase, dimerization/phosphoacceptor domain” (IPR036097), “Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor domain” (IPR024792), and “HECT, E3 ligase catalytic domain” (IPR035983) showed specific multiplication in T. cinerariifolium, with multiplication scores of 1.39, 1.32, and 1.14, respectively (Table 6). Some plant genera are known to possess histidine kinases (proteins that act as ethylene receptors) as well as non-ethylene-receptor histidine kinases (e.g., cytokinin receptors)40. A BLASTP search using A. thaliana ethylene-response 1 (ETR1)41, an ethylene-activated kinase, as a query detected Tci_144982, a predicted protein that includes a G-X-G motif-containing HATPase_c domain, with an E-value score of 0 and 69.18% identity (Supplemental Fig. 3B). This sequence analysis suggested that T. cinerariifolium-enriched histidine kinases include ethylene-receptor-type histidine kinases similar to ETR1. These T. cinerariifolium-specific multiplications of signaling molecules suggested that T. cinerariifolium has genus-specific enrichment of signal transduction and regulation proteins. While the molecular mechanisms of regulation of the accumulation and composition of pyrethrins are yet to be defined, the products of these enriched signaling-related genes are obvious candidates for regulators of pyrethrin biosynthesis.

The metabolism-related superfamily showed the strongest gene multiplication, with genes encoding “Enolase-like, C-terminal domain” (IPR036849), “Cytochrome c oxidase-like domain” (IPR036909) “Lipoxygenase, C-terminal domain” (IPR036226), “Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase/oxidase N-terminal domain” (IPR037069), and “Metal-dependent hydrolase, composite domain” (IPR011059) exhibiting multiplication scores of 1.28, 1.22, 1.16, 1.13, and 1.11, respectively (Table 6). Since lipoxygenases (e.g., TcLOX1) and acyl-CoA dehydrogenases/oxidases (enzymes catalyzing reactions related to the beta-oxidation of 12-oxo-cis-10,15-phytodienic acid) are known to be involved in the oxylipin pathway leading to the synthesis of pyrethrin alcohol moieties (Fig. 1B), these multiplication scores are compatible with the specific biosynthesis of pyrethrins and jasmonates in T. cinerariifolium. Furthermore, “Cytochrome P450” (IPR036396) was detected with a multiplication score of 0.37, representing a total of more than 745 genes in T. cinerariifolium and making the corresponding loci the most abundant class of genes in this plant. Indeed, TcJMH, a protein that is categorized as a P450, is known to be involved in the biosynthesis of jasmolone (Fig. 1B); thus, the multiplication of P450s is consistent with a role of this protein class in the T. cinerariifolium-specific biosynthesis of jasmonates. The ferritin-like superfamily, members of which are responsible for iron transport, was found to have a multiplication score of 1.42. In A. thaliana, ferritins 1, 3, and 4 have been shown to regulate the expression of multiple genes encoding P450 enzymes42. A BLASTP search with A. thaliana ferritin 1 (AtFer-1) against T. cinerariifolium ferritin-like proteins detected Tci_154278 with an E-value of 5.64 × 10−115 and 69% identity, including a conserved eukaryotic ferritin domain-containing iron ion channel, a ferroxidase diiron center, and a ferrihydrite nucleation center (Supplemental Fig. 3C). In this regard, the multiplied genes encoding ferritin-like proteins in T. cinerariifolium are expected to include proteins that modulate the expression of various P450s, presumably including one or more that affect TcJMH expression. This result is consistent with the duplication of genes encoding metalloenzymes such as metal-dependent hydrolases, cytochrome c, aconitases, lipoxygenases, and P450s (Table 6), and suggests that T. cinerariifolium likely needs to import larger amounts (compared with other plants) of metals for use in various enzyme reactions and their regulation.

The lowest multiplication scores were found with “Expansin, cellulose-binding-like domain” (IPR036749), “Mitochondrial glycoprotein” (IPR036561), and “ArfGAP domain” (IPR038508), which exhibited multiplication scores of −0.53, −0.53, and −0.49, respectively (Table 7). The multiplication scores of these superfamilies in O. sativa, C. seticuspe, A. annua, and H. annuus were as low as the multiplication scores in T. cinerariifolium (Table 6), indicating that the depletion of the genome for members of this superfamily was not unique to T. cinerariifolium among the Asteraceae. In contrast, “Endochitinase-like”, a superfamily that plays a pivotal role in defense against fungal pathogens43, exhibited a T. cinerariifolium-specific low-copy status. The accumulation of RIPs (Table 6) and depletion of endochitinases suggested that the corresponding biodefense strategy has evolved specifically in T. cinerariifolium.

Table 7 Superfamilies with lowest multiplication odds scores in T. cinerariifolium.

Phylogenetic analysis of pyrethrin-related enzymes

One of the most characteristic features of T. cinerariifolium is the presence of the pyrethrin biosynthetic pathway, components of which include TcLOX1 (T. cinerariifolium 13-lipoxygenase), TcJMH (T. cinerariifolium jasmone hydroxylase), TcCDS (T. cinerariifolium chrysanthemyl diphosphate synthase), and TcGLIP (T. cinerariifolium GDSL (Gly-Asp-Ser-Leu motif) lipase). TcLOX1 and TcJMH are related to the lipoxygenase and P450 superfamilies, classes that were shown (by InterProScan analysis) to be enriched in T. cinerariifolium. On the other hand, since TcCDS (unlike typical terpene synthases) has non-head-to-tail cyclase activity with isoprenoid units and TcGLIP (unlike typical GDSL lipases) has acyltransferase activity, there are no corresponding InterProScan superfamilies into which these enzymes can be categorized in terms of function. Therefore, we further analyzed the expansion of genes encoding TcLOX1, TcJMH, TcCDS, and TcGLIP using a BLAST search against the predicted proteomes of 13 different plant species available on public databases, and performed a molecular phylogenetic analysis using a maximum-likelihood tree with 500 bootstraps.

TcLOX1 is a member of a class of widely prevalent plant enzymes; TcLOX1 has been shown to be responsible for production of the alcohol moieties of pyrethrins via conversion of linolenic acid to 13-hydroperoxylinolenic acid7 (Fig. 1B). A BLASTP search using the TcLOX1 sequence as a query detected 134 proteins, including 9 T. cinerariifolium proteins, 29 other Asteraceae proteins, and 96 non-Asteraceae proteins, with 42.03–57.58%, 42.31–95.26%, and 35.09–75.38% identity to TcLOX1, respectively. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of these proteins revealed that TcLOX1 formed an orthologous clade with C. seticuspe, A. annua, and H. annuus proteins (Fig. 5A and Supplemental Fig. 4, clade I). This clade was positioned proximally to another clade consisting only of Asteraceae proteins (Fig. 5A and Supplemental Fig. 4, clade II), indicating that these LOX families were duplicated in Asteraceae. In addition, these clades (Fig. 5A and Supplemental Fig. 4, Clades I and II) belonged to a larger lipoxygenase clade (Fig. 5A and Supplemental Fig. 4, clade III) that included A. thaliana LOX3 and 4, which have the same activity as TcLOX1. This LOX clade was consistent with the report that Asteraceae plants share the linolenic acid lipoxygenase activity7.

Figure 5
figure5

Enlarged view of molecular phylogenetic tree of pyrethrin-related enzymes. Clades I, II, and III for enzymes with similarity to T. cinerariifolium 13-lipoxygenase (TcLOX1) (A), T. cinerariifolium jasmone hydroxylase (TcJMH) (B), T. cinerariifolium chrysanthemyl diphosphate synthase (TcCDS) (C), and T. cinerariifolium GDSL lipase (TcGLIP) (D) are shown based on the results provided in Supplemental Figs. 47, respectively. The nodes for pyrethrin-related enzymes are indicated in blue; T. cineariifolium nodes and edges are indicated in red; other Asteraceae nodes and edges are indicated in orange.

TcJMH catalyzes the conversion of jasmone to jasmolone8 (Fig. 1B), which has been reported only in the pyrethrin-synthesizing genus. A BLASTP search using the TcJMH sequence as a query detected 136 proteins, including 9 T. cinerariifolium proteins, 30 other Asteraceae proteins, and 97 non-Asteraceae proteins with 34.22–81.53%, 37.67–85.01%, and 36.44–58.01% identity to TcJMH, respectively. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of these proteins revealed that TcJMH formed a subclade with one other T. cinerariifolium protein, two A. annua proteins, and one C. seticuspe protein (Fig. 5B and Supplemental Fig. 5, Clade I) within a large clade consisting of two T. cinerariifolium proteins and 18 Asteraceae proteins (Fig. 5B and Supplemental Fig. 5, Clade II). This inclusion within a large clade is in contrast with the fact that the conversion of jasmone to jasmolone has been reported only in the Tanacetum genus8. These results suggested that such non-Tanacetum TcJMH-like protein genes are non-functional or are involved in a pathway for biosynthesis of phytochemicals other than those observed in T. cinerariifolium.

TcCDS participates in the formation of terpenoid acid moieties by conversion of dimethylallyl diphosphate to chrysanthemyl diphosphate9 (Fig. 1B), which also has been reported to be a genus-specific pyrethrin-synthesizing reaction. A BLASTP search using the TcCDS sequence as a query detected 122 proteins, including 9 T. cinerariifolium proteins, 28 other Asteraceae proteins, and 85 non-Asteraceae proteins with 61.27–88.54%, 36.36–93.52%, and 20.21–66.57% identity to TcCDS, respectively. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of these proteins revealed that TcCDS formed a subclade with three A. annua proteins and three other T. cinerariifolium proteins (Fig. 5C and Supplemental Fig. 6, Clade I), within a large cluster consisting of seven T. cinerariifolium proteins and 17 Asteraceae proteins (Fig. 5C and Supplemental Fig. 6, Clade II). The phylogenetic tree for TcCDS-like proteins did not include explicit orthologous clades; this result was consistent with a study demonstrating that the production of genus-specific monoterpenes, including chrysanthemyl diphosphate, has diverged in individual Asteraceae genera44. Previously, A. annua was shown to have a large number of terpene-related loci in its genome; the products of these genes are responsible for the biosynthesis of various genus-specific terpenes13. These findings support the view that these terpene-biosynthesis genes also have multiplied and diverged in T. cinerariifolium, as reported for those of A. annua13.

TcGLIP synthesizes pyrethrin I by esterification of chrysanthemic acid moieties and pyrethrolone moieties in reactions specific to the pyrethrin-synthesizing genus1 (Fig. 1B). A BLASTP search using the TcGLIP sequence as a query detected 135 sequences, including 9 T. cinerariifolium proteins, 30 other Asteraceae proteins, and 96 non-Asteraceae proteins with 48.73–81.78%, 31.87–79.35%, and 30.38–53.35% identity to TcGLIP, respectively. Molecular phylogenetic tree analysis of these proteins revealed that TcGLIP formed a subclade with one A. annua protein, two C. seticuspe proteins, and five other T. cinerariifolium proteins (Fig. 5D and Supplemental Fig. 7, Clade I), within a large cluster consisting of nine T. cinerariifolium proteins and 12 Asteraceae proteins (Fig. 5D and Supplemental Fig. 7, Clade II). This phylogenetic tree demonstrated that T. cinerariifolium has massively multiplied TcGLIP-related proteins.

Distribution analysis of pyrethrin-related enzymes

Recent studies have shown that genes encoding components of a particular metabolic pathway, especially those responsible for specialized plant metabolites, are genomically co-localized and co-regulated as Metabolic Gene Clusters (MGCs)45,46. To find genes co-localized with pyrethrin-related MGCs, we initially subjected the genome sequences to PhytoClust46 with default settings for cluster range and flanking region. However, no MGCs that included loci encoding pyrethrin biosynthesis-related enzymes were detected in the T. cinerariifolium genome. To permit further analysis, the distribution of genes within the scaffolds that included loci encoding TcLOX1, TcJMH, TcCDS and TcGLIP were analyzed using the GenomeJack software program. The TcLOX1-encoding gene was located on scaffold sc00017724 and showed co-localization with one gene encoding a hypothetical protein (Tci_094327) and four TE genes (Fig. 6A). A BLASTP search using the Tci_094327 sequence as a query detected the Artemisia annua squamosa promoter-binding (SPB) transcription factor (PWA57483.1) with an E-value of 2 × 10−35 and 52.35% identity (Supplemental Fig. 8A). Since the A. annua SPB transcription factor regulates the expression of proteins responsible for artemisinin B biosynthesis47, Tci_094327 is a candidate regulator of the oxylipin pathway. The TcJMH-encoding gene was positioned on scaffold sc00012411 and showed co-localization with two genes encoding putative transporters (Tci_072426 and Tci_072429) and three TE genes (Fig. 6B). The TcCDS-encoding gene was positioned on scaffold sc00057709 and exhibited co-localization with the gene encoding Tci_214196 (a protein that lacks apparent homologs by BLASTP) and one TE gene (Fig. 6C). These results indicated that genes encoding other pyrethrin-associated enzymes were not distributed proximal to the loci encoding either TcJMH or TcCDS. In contrast, the gene encoding TcGLIP was positioned on scaffold sc00006304 and co-localized with loci encoding two GDSL family lipases (Tci_043407 and Tci_043410), one glutathione S-transferase (Tci_043405), one hypothetical protein (Tci_043408), and two TE genes (Fig. 6D). Tci_043407 and Tci_043410 showed 50.53% and 41.10% identity to TcGLIP (Supplemental Fig. 8B), respectively, suggesting that these genes had been generated by gene duplication and might encode enzymes with activities similar to that of TcGLIP. Thus, our results collectively indicated that a gene encoding the SPB transcription factor was proximal to the locus encoding TcLOX, and that genes encoding two GDSL lipases lie proximal to the locus encoding TcGLIP, suggesting that these novel genes may be co-regulated with those encoding pyrethrin-related enzymes known to be involved in pyrethrin biosynthesis.

Figure 6
figure6

Scaffolds including loci encoding pyrethrin-related enzymes. The predicted genes on the scaffolds containing genes encoding T. cinerariifolium 13-lipoxygenase (TcLOX1) (A), T. cinerariifolium jasmone hydroxylase (TcJMH) (B), T. cinerariifolium chrysanthemyl diphosphate synthase (TcCDS) (C), and T. cinerariifolium GDSL lipase (TcGLIP) (D) were visualized using GenomeJack. %GC content, transposable element (TE) coding regions, and non-TE coding regions are shown as bar-graphs, blue arrows, and red arrows, respectively. Red and pink boxes on non-TE gene arrows represent exons and protein-coding regions, respectively. Blue and sky-blue boxes on TE gene arrows represent exons and protein-coding regions, respectively.

Discussion

T. cinerariifolium is characterized by species-specific biosynthesis of the pyrethrins, a class of potent natural insecticides that are non-harmful to humans. A wide variety of specialized metabolites, including the pyrethrins, has been found to play defensive roles against several threats such as pests, pathogens, and herbivores2,3,13,48. Furthermore, the markedly larger genome size (7.1 Gb) of T. cinerariifolium, compared with those of other plants of the Asteraceae genera (2.72 Gb for C. seticuspe12, 1.74 Gb for A. annua13, and 3.6 Gb for H. annuus14), suggests the occurrence of T. cinerariifolium-specific evolutionary processes. To address these issues, the present study explored the draft genome sequence of T. cinerariifolium. In general, the assembly of large-sized genomes, such as that of T. cinerariifolium, is frequently hindered or precluded by numerous sequence errors due to inappropriate sequencing methods and the presence of repetitive sequences17. Therefore, we sequenced the T. cinerariifolium genome to high depth, including 211-fold coverage by PE reads (to provide error correction) and 56-fold coverage by MP reads (to permit the assembly of repetitive sequences) (Table 1). Furthermore, PANDAseq (Fig. 2) also has been shown to be effective for large-genome assembly, since this program includes Illumina-optimized error correction and longer-read generation using overlapping paired-end information49. The assembly strategy with high-depth reads used in the present paper eventually elucidated a 7.1-Gb genome sequence with a N50 of 14 Kb and 91.8% completeness as judged by BUSCO analysis (Tables 2 and 3). The resultant genome sequence revealed that TEs and multiple superfamily genes are enriched in the T. cinerariifolium genome.

The sire- and oryco-clade TEs were shown to have accumulated after the divergence of T. cinerariifolium from other Asteraceae (Fig. 3, and Supplemental Figs. 1 and 2), with TEs of these clades occupying 11.16 and 2.14% of the genome sequence, respectively (Table 4). This accumulation of the sire- and oryco-clade TEs contributes to the large size of the T. cinerariifolium genome. Furthermore, TEs have been suggested to be involved in the multiplication of plant disease resistance-related genes in Capsicum50. In this context, the accumulation of the sire- and oryco-clade TEs in T. cinerariifolium also may contribute to the T. cinerariifolium-specific enrichment of signaling-, biodefense-, and biosynthesis-related enzymes, as detected by InterProScan analyses.

The T. cinerariifolium-enriched signaling-related superfamily genes included those encoding histidine kinases (Table 6), a group shown (using a BLASTP search and sequence alignment; Supplemental Fig. 3B) to include ethylene-receptor type histidine kinases similar to A. thaliana ETR1. These results suggested that T. cinerariifolium-enriched histidine kinases include proteins involved in responses to air-borne compounds. Notably, T. cinerariifolium upregulates pyrethrin biosynthesis by emitting a specific combination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) when the plant body has been wounded51,52, suggesting that the upregulation of components of the pyrethrin biosynthetic pathway by wound-induced VOCs may occur via histidine kinase-mediated signal induction. Moreover, genes encoding lipoxygenases, which are known to contribute to the biosynthesis of VOCs53, also were shown to be enriched in a genus-specific fashion in T. cinerariifolium (Table 6). These findings provide crucial clues to the investigation of the VOC-dependent regulation of pyrethrin biosynthesis.

The T. cinerariifolium-enriched biodefense-related superfamily genes included those encoding ribosome inactivating proteins (RIPs) (Table 6), which are toxic to herbivores37. Furthermore, a BLASTP search and sequence alignment also suggested that T. cinerariifolium-enriched RIPs include insecticidal proteins similar to SNA-I (Supplemental Fig. 3A). These results indicated that T. cinerariifolium has the potential to produce such toxic proteins as biodefense factors, in addition to the production of insecticidal phytochemical toxins such as the pyrethrins. In contrast, the T. cinerariifolium genome contains only a single gene encoding a putative endochitinase (Table 7), a class of proteins known to be involved in defense against fungal pathogens43. This observation accords with the low resistance of T. cinerariifolium against serious foliar diseases caused by fungi such as Stagonosporopsis tanaceti and Didymella tanaceti54, leading to the need for care in preventing fungal pathogen infection during the cultivation of T. cinerariifolium. Altogether, the present results support the view that T. cinerariifolium might have been adapted to the dry environment of its area of origin, the Balkans, where fungi are less numerous than in the areas of the plant’s current cultivation. Consequently, this plant is likely to have been endowed with multiple RIPs as potent defenses against herbivores in addition to the acquisition of pyrethrins during the evolutionary processes.

T. cinerariifolium also was found to be enriched for genes encoding members of the lipoxygenase and P450 superfamilies (Table 6), which are involved in the pyrethrin biosynthetic pathway. The existence of unique genes related to pyrethrin biosynthesis is one of the most prominent features of the T. cinerariifolium genome. Molecular phylogenetic analyses of the enzymes for pyrethrin biosynthesis demonstrated that paralogs of TcGLIP, which synthesizes pyrethrin I (Fig. 1B), clustered in a T. cinerariifolium-specific clade (Fig. 5D and Supplemental Fig. 7, clade II), while paralogs of TcJMH and TcCDS, which synthesize jasmolone and chrysanthemyl diphosphate, respectively (Fig. 1B), clustered in Asteraceae-specific clades (Fig. 5B,C and Supplemental Figs. 5 and 6, clade II). In contrast, TcLOX1-related enzymes, which are widely prevalent plant enzymes responsible for the synthesis of 13-hydroperoxylinolenic acid (Fig. 1B), clustered in a clade including non-Asteraceae proteins (Fig. 5A and Supplemental Fig. 4, clade III). In particular, genes encoding TcCDS-related enzymes, which are categorized as terpenoid synthases, were as multiplied and varied in T. cinerariifolium as in A. annua, where this class of proteins is known to biosynthesize various genus-specific terpenes13 (Fig. 5C and Supplemental Fig. 6). Consequently, these multiplied genes encoding terpenoid-biosynthetic enzymes of T. cinerariifolium are consistent with T. cinerariifolium-specific terpenoid synthesis. In contrast, TcJMH, the key enzyme for synthesis of the alcohol moieties of the pyrethrins (Fig. 1B), was shown to be highly conserved in other plants (Fig. 5B and Supplemental Fig. 5), whereas the alcohol moieties of pyrethrins, including jasmolone, pyrethrolone, and cinerolone, have been identified only in members of the Tanacetum genus1,2,3. These results raise the question whether these alcohol moieties have not yet been identified in non-Tanacetum plants, or whether TcJMH-like proteins can act on other substrates.

InterProScan analysis revealed that the T. cinerariifolium genome is enriched for genes encoding members of the ferritin-like superfamily, proteins that are responsible for iron transport. Furthermore, various iron enzymes, including members of the lipoxygenase and P450 superfamily, a class that includes enzymes of the pyrethrin-biosynthesis pathway (including TcLOX1, TcJMH, and a putative P450 for conversion of jasmolone to pyrethrolone55) also were shown to be multiplied (Table 6). Indeed, AtFer-1 is reported to regulate the expression of P450 in A. thaliana42, and T. cinerariifolium is enriched for genes encoding ferritins, included a locus encoding a ferritin similar to AtFer-1 (Supplemental Fig. 3C, Tci_154278). Taken together, these results support the view that the ferritin-like superfamily and pyrethrin-biosynthetic lipoxygenase and P450s might have co-evolved in this lineage, given these proteins’ complementary roles in the uptake and biochemical use of iron. Thus, further work will need to examine the functional correlation of these multiplied ferritin-like superfamily proteins with multiplied genus-specific pyrethrin-biosynthesis enzymes.

Molecular phylogenetic analysis of TcGLIP, which plays a critical role in the esterification reaction that serves as the final step in the biosynthesis of pyrethrin I (Fig. 1B), revealed that genes encoding TcGLIP-related proteins have diverged in the genome of T. cinerariifolium (Fig. 5D and Supplemental Fig. 7). These results suggest that TcGLIP (and potentially other related proteins) acquired a role in esterification of pyrethrins in the specific lineage of this genus. Previously, the catalyzing activity of recombinant TcGLIP for the esterification of pyrethric acid with pyrethrolone was found to be lower than that of pyrethric acid with jasmolone, pyrethric acid with cinerolone, chrysanthemic acid with pyrethrolone, chrysanthemic acid with jasmolone, and chrysanthemic acid with cinerolone1. Combined with those previous findings, the results of the present study suggested that the newly detected TcGLIP-family proteins likely catalyze uncharacterized esterification reactions (Fig. 1B). Collectively, the present genomic and molecular phylogenetic analyses are expected to contribute to the verification of pathways leading to the biosynthesis of unidentified pyrethrins (e.g., the conversion of jasmolone to pyrethrolone) and the underlying regulatory mechanisms. Furthermore, the molecular data obtained in the present study are expected to facilitate the creation of transgenic and genome-edited T. cinerariifolium, paving the way to metabolic engineering for efficient phytochemical production, including that of additional pyrethrins.

The information on the co-localization (within the genome) of loci encoding related metabolic activities also is important, given that genes encoding components of a particular metabolic pathway, especially for specialized plant metabolites, frequently form such Metabolic Gene Clusters (MGCs)45,46. Although no MGCs for the enzymes known to be involved in pyrethrin biosynthesis were detected, a gene encoding a squamosa promoter-binding (SPB) transcription factor-like protein was observed to be co-localized with the gene encoding TcLOX1 (Fig. 6A). The A. annua SPB transcription factor regulates genes encoding proteins involved in the biosynthesis of artemisinin B, an A. annua-specific terpenoid47. Since TcLOX1 is not involved in synthesis of the terpenoid subunit of pyrethrin but rather in the synthesis of the alcohol moieties of pyrethrins (Fig. 1), it will be interesting to see if this co-localized SPB transcription factor-encoding gene is involved in pyrethrin biosynthesis. Similarly, we infer that newly detected TcGLIP-family proteins likely catalyze uncharacterized esterification reactions (Fig. 1B). Genes encoding two GDSL lipases also were found to be co-localized with the locus encoding TcGLIP (Fig. 6D). These newly detected lipases are candidates for uncharacterized esterification reactions involved in the synthesis of cinerin I and II, jasmolin I and II, and/or pyrethrin II (Fig. 1B).

In conclusion, we have elucidated the draft genome of T. cinerariifolum, the natural source of the original mosquito coils. InterProScan and molecular phylogenetic analyses revealed the T. cinerariifolum-specific multiplication of genes encoding toxic proteins, metalloproteins, ferritins, histidine kinases, and pyrethrin biosynthetic enzymes, which are consistent with the unique physiological, ecological, and phytochemical features of these compounds. The draft genome opens new avenues for exploration of unidentified enzymes in pyrethrin biosynthesis and elucidation of the evolutionary processes of T. cinerariifolum, and provides fundamental information for the development of metabolic engineering of further beneficial phytochemicals using transgenic or genome-edited T. cinerariifolum.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and genome sequencing

Wild-type T. cinerariifolium plants were grown and harvested under wild conditions in land surrounding the Onomichi City Museum of Art in Nishitsuchidocho, Onomichi, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. Genomic DNA was extracted from leaves and stems using a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Short-insert PE and MP libraries with three different insert sizes (3, 5 and 8 kb) of the extracted DNA were constructed using a TruSeq DNA PCR-Free kit (Illumina) and a Nextera Mate-Pair Sample Prep Kit (Illumina), respectively. The PE and MP libraries then were subjected to 150 × 2 cycles and 100 × 2 cycles of paired-end sequencing, using HiSeq X and HiSeq 4000 Illumina instruments, respectively.

De novo assembly of genome sequences

The obtained read sequences were cleaned for assembly as described in our previous study56. Adapters derived from the Truseq or Nextera mate-pair Sample Prep Kit, low-quality reads, and short reads (<36 bp in length) were trimmed by using Trimmomatic version 0.3657.

Contig sequences were generated from the PE reads by a four-step process (“pre-assembly”, “SOAPdenovo assembly”, “clean-up”, and “merging with other assembly result”). First, the cleaned PE reads, including overlaps, were detected and pre-assembled by PANDAseq49. Second, these pre-assembled reads and remaining reads were subjected to SOAPdenovo v2.04-r24018 with multi k-mers from 80 to 127 to generate contig sequences. Third, the SOAPdenovo-generated contigs were cleaned by trimming the contigs showing more than 95% sequence identity with other contig sequences. Fourth, PE reads also were subjected to processing using the Platanus assembler 1.2.419 with default parameters, and the generated contigs were merged with SOAPdenovo-constructed contigs using SSPACE-longread v1-120, including setting minimum overlap length to 36 bp, minimum number of links to 1, and maximum link ratio to 0.5.

Scaffold sequences were generated by a three-step process (“read selection”, “scaffolding”, and “gapfilling”). First, PE and MP reads were mapped to contig sequences using bowtie version 2.3.4.358 with the–local option; read pairs mapped discordantly were selected for the following steps. Second, the selected reads and contigs were subjected to scaffolding using SSPACE-STANDARD version 3.021 (BaseClear), including setting the minimum number of links to 3. Third, the positions for which the bases were unknown (e.g., ‘N’) in the scaffolds were filled with ‘A/T/G/C’ by GapFiller v1-1022 (BaseClear) to complete the draft genome, setting. including setting the minimum number of overlaps to 30 and the number of reads to trim off to 50. Furthermore, the completeness of the draft genome was evaluated using BUSCO-v326 with the embryophyta_odb9 protein set.

Gene prediction and annotation

The T. cinerariifolium RNA-Seq data available on NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRR2062279 and SRR206418024, as well as SRR5985187-598519425) were mapped to the assembled genome to generate the ‘intron hints’ for gene prediction. Subsequently, the assembled genome and ‘intron hints’ were subjected to Augustus 3.3.123 trained with available T. cinerariifolium genes in GenBank. TEs in predicted genes were identified by hmmpfam in HMMER 2.3.131 against GyDB 2.032 with an E-value cutoff of 1.0. To identify high-confidence genes, the non-TE genes with known protein signatures were detected using InterProScan 5.6–48.033 and annotated using Blast2GO59.

Comparative analysis of TE content versus that in other plants

The TE content also was estimated for six other genome-elucidated plants, including A. thaliana (TAIR1060), N. tabacum (Ntab-TN9061), O. sativa (assembly Build 4.062), H. annuus (HA412HO_v1.114), A. annua (ASM311234v113), and C. seticuspe (CSE_r1.012). As described for TE detection in T. cinerariifolium, the coding regions of these genomes were estimated using Augustus 3.3.123 with the Arabidopsis model set and the default parameters, and the TEs in these predicted transcriptomes were extracted using hmmpfam31 against GyDB32. According to GyDB32 classifications, the percentage of genomic regions occupied by each clade of TE was calculated as an accumulation score.

Molecular phylogenetic trees for sire- and oryco-clade TEs also were estimated using the ORTHOSCOPE method63 as described in our previous study64. The amino acid sequences of hmmpfam-extracted reverse-transcriptase domains encoded by the TEs in T. cinerariifolium, H. annuus, A. annua, and C. seticuspe were aligned with CLUSTAL W-mpi 0.1365, and maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees based on a JTT matrix-based model66 with 100 bootstraps were created using Fast Tree 2.1.10 (JTT model, CAT approximation)67.

Comparative analysis of protein superfamily content versus that in other plants

We also detected protein signatures using InterProScan33 analysis in six genome-elucidated plants, using methods as described above for the InterProScan analysis of T. cinerariifolium. Having determined the number of genes possessing each superfamily signature, the multiplication odds score for each combination of InterProScan-detected superfamily signature (Sig) and plant genus (Genus) were calculated as follows:

$${\rm{Multiplication}}\,{\rm{odds}}\,{\rm{score}}\,(\mathrm{Genus},\mathrm{Sig})={\log }_{2}\frac{N(Genus,Sig)+PS}{\overline{N(Sig)}+PS}$$

where N (Genus, Sig) represents the number of the plant-genus genes with an InterProScan-detected superfamily signature and PS represents the pseudo-count constant, which was set to 5.00.

In further analysis for functional proteins, we subjected the detected proteins of the superfamily with the highest multiplication odds score in each category to a BLASTP68 search (version 2.7.1). S. nigra agglutinin I (SNA-I, accession No. O22415.1), A. thaliana ethylene-response 1 (ETR1, accession No. AAA70047.1) and A. thaliana ferritin-1 (AtFer-1, accession No. CAA63932.1) were used as queries for ribosome-inactivating proteins, signal transduction histidine kinase proteins and ferritin-like proteins, respectively. The detected protein pairs (SNA-I and Tci_399175, ETR1 and Tci_144982, and AtFer-1 and Tci_154278) were subjected to sequence alignment using CLUSTAL W-MPI 0.1365.

Molecular phylogenetic trees were further estimated for T. cinerariifolium pyrethrin biosynthetic enzymes as described in our previous study63,64. Briefly, TcLOX1-, TcJMH-, TcCDS-, and TcGLIP-related proteins were identified using BLASTP 2.7.168 to search the protein sequences of A. thaliana (TAIR1060), N. tabacum (Ntab-TN9061), O. sativa (assembly Build 4.062), H. annuus (HA412HO_v1.114), A. annua (ASM311234v113), C. seticuspe (CSE_r1.012), Populus trichocarpa (Pop_tri_v369), Medicago truncatula (MedtrA17_4.070), Glycine max (Glycine_max_v2.171), Zea mays (B73_RefGen_v472), Gossypium raimondii (Graimondii2_073), Solanum lycopersicum (SL3.0)74, and Vitis vinifera (12X)75. The BLAST hit sequences were screened using an E-value cut-off of 10−3, and the top ten hits were used for the subsequent phylogenetic analyses. These sequences were aligned using CLUSTAL W-MPI 0.1365, and maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees based on a JTT matrix-based model66 with 500 bootstraps were created using MEGA software76.

Metabolic Gene Clusters (MGCs) were investigated with PhytoClust46; this analysis required definition of variables corresponding to the span of chromosomal region in which genes are clustered (cluster range) and the length of region to be searched for additional marker enzymes (flanking region). We set both variables to 20 Kbp, in accordance with the values used in the previous report46. The genes included in the same scaffolds as those encoding pyrethrin-related enzymes (TcLOX1, TcJMH, TcCDS and TcGLIP) were visualized with the GenomeJack software program (Mitsubishi Space Software, Tokyo, Japan).

Data availability

The draft genome sequences and annotations, along with the raw reads for PE and MP, have been deposited in the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) under the BioProject accession Code PRJDB8358.

References

  1. 1.

    Kikuta, Y. et al. Identification and characterization of a GDSL lipase-like protein that catalyzes the ester-forming reaction for pyrethrin biosynthesis in Tanacetum cinerariifolium- a new target for plant protection. Plant J 71, 183–193, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.04980.x (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Zito, S. W., Zieg, R. G. & Staba, E. J. Distribution of pyrethrins in oil glands and leaf tissue of Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium. Planta Med 47, 205–207, https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-969986 (1983).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    DeMicco, A., Cooper, K. R., Richardson, J. R. & White, L. A. Developmental neurotoxicity of pyrethroid insecticides in zebrafish embryos. Toxicol Sci 113, 177–186, https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfp258 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Casida, J. E. Pyrethrum flowers and pyrethroid insecticides. Environ Health Perspect 34, 189–202, https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8034189 (1980).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kulkarni, M. A. et al. Efficacy of pyrethroid-treated nets against malaria vectors and nuisance-biting mosquitoes in Tanzania in areas with long-term insecticide-treated net use. Trop Med Int Health 12, 1061–1073, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01883.x (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Esu, E., Lenhart, A., Smith, L. & Horstick, O. Effectiveness of peridomestic space spraying with insecticide on dengue transmission; systematic review. Trop Med Int Health 15, 619–631, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02489.x (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ramirez, A. M., Yang, T., Bouwmeester, H. J. & Jongsma, M. A. A trichome-specific linoleate lipoxygenase expressed during pyrethrin biosynthesis in pyrethrum. Lipids 48, 1005–1015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11745-013-3815-1 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Li, W., Zhou, F. & Pichersky, E. Jasmone Hydroxylase, a Key Enzyme in the Synthesis of the Alcohol Moiety of Pyrethrin Insecticides. Plant Physiol 177, 1498–1509, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.18.00748 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Rivera, S. B. et al. Chrysanthemyl diphosphate synthase: isolation of the gene and characterization of the recombinant non-head-to-tail monoterpene synthase from Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 4373–4378, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.071543598 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Xu, H. et al. Coexpression Analysis Identifies Two Oxidoreductases Involved in the Biosynthesis of the Monoterpene Acid Moiety of Natural Pyrethrin Insecticides in Tanacetum cinerariifolium. Plant Physiol 176, 524–537, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.01330 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Xu, H. et al. Pyrethric acid of natural pyrethrin insecticide: complete pathway elucidation and reconstitution in Nicotiana benthamiana. New Phytol, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15821 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hirakawa, H. et al. De novo whole-genome assembly in Chrysanthemum seticuspe, a model species of Chrysanthemums, and its application to genetic and gene discovery analysis. DNA Res, https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsy048 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Shen, Q. et al. The Genome of Artemisia annua Provides Insight into the Evolution of Asteraceae Family and Artemisinin Biosynthesis. Mol Plant 11, 776–788, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2018.03.015 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Badouin, H. et al. The sunflower genome provides insights into oil metabolism, flowering and Asterid evolution. Nature 546, 148–152, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22380 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Katsuda, Y. Progress and future of pyrethroids. Top Curr Chem 314, 1–30, https://doi.org/10.1007/128_2011_252 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bogunic, F., Siljak-Yakovlev, S., Muratovic, E. & Ballian, D. Different karyotype patterns among allopatric Pinus nigra (Pinaceae) populations revealed by molecular cytogenetics. Plant Biol (Stuttg) 13, 194–200, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2010.00326.x (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Michael, T. P. & VanBuren, R. Progress, challenges and the future of crop genomes. Curr Opin Plant Biol 24, 71–81, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2015.02.002 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Luo, R. et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 1, 18, https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-217X-1-18 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kajitani, R. et al. Efficient de novo assembly of highly heterozygous genomes from whole-genome shotgun short reads. Genome Res 24, 1384–1395, https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.170720.113 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Boetzer, M. & Pirovano, W. SSPACE-LongRead: scaffolding bacterial draft genomes using long read sequence information. BMC Bioinformatics 15, 211, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-15-211 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Boetzer, M., Henkel, C. V., Jansen, H. J., Butler, D. & Pirovano, W. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics 27, 578–579, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq683 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Nadalin, F., Vezzi, F. & Policriti, A. GapFiller: a de novo assembly approach to fill the gap within paired reads. BMC Bioinformatics 13(Suppl 14), S8, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-S14-S8 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Stanke, M., Diekhans, M., Baertsch, R. & Haussler, D. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics 24, 637–644, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn013 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Khan, S. et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals candidate genes for the biosynthesis of natural insecticide in Tanacetum cinerariifolium. BMC Genomics 18, 54, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3409-4 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Guo, Y. et al. Identification and functional analysis of a cytochrome P450 gene CYP9AQ2 involved in deltamethrin detoxification from Locusta migratoria. Pestic Biochem Physiol 122, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2015.01.003 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Waterhouse, R. M. et al. BUSCO applications from quality assessments to gene prediction and phylogenomics. Mol Biol Evol, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx319 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Vogel, A. et al. Footprints of parasitism in the genome of the parasitic flowering plant Cuscuta campestris. Nat Commun 9, 2515, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04344-z (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zhuang, Y. & Tripp, E. A. The draft genome of Ruellia speciosa (Beautiful Wild Petunia: Acanthaceae). DNA Res 24, 179–192, https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsw054 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yang, J. et al. Hybrid de novo genome assembly of the Chinese herbal fleabane Erigeron breviscapus. Gigascience 6, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/gix028 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Bauer, E. et al. Towards a whole-genome sequence for rye (Secale cereale L.). Plant J 89, 853–869, https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13436 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Eddy, S. R. Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 14, 755–763 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Llorens, C. et al. The Gypsy Database (GyDB) of mobile genetic elements: release 2.0. Nucleic Acids Res 39, D70–74, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq1061 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Jones, P. et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30, 1236–1240, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sharma, N. et al. Isolation and characterization of an RIP (ribosome-inactivating protein)-like protein from tobacco with dual enzymatic activity. Plant Physiol 134, 171–181, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.030205 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Obrig, T. G., Irvin, J. D. & Hardesty, B. The effect of an antiviral peptide on the ribosomal reactions of the peptide elongation enzymes, EF-I and EF-II. Arch Biochem Biophys 155, 278–289 (1973).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhu, F. et al. Pokeweed antiviral protein (PAP) increases plant systemic resistance to Tobacco mosaic virus infection in Nicotiana benthamiana. European Journal of Plant Pathology 146, 541–549, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-016-0938-2 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Shahidi-Noghabi, S., Van Damme, E. J. & Smagghe, G. Carbohydrate-binding activity of the type-2 ribosome-inactivating protein SNA-I from elderberry (Sambucus nigra) is a determining factor for its insecticidal activity. Phytochemistry 69, 2972–2978, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.09.012 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Walsh, M. J., Dodd, J. E. & Hautbergue, G. M. Ribosome-inactivating proteins: potent poisons and molecular tools. Virulence 4, 774–784, https://doi.org/10.4161/viru.26399 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ramirez, A. M. et al. Biosynthesis of sesquiterpene lactones in pyrethrum (Tanacetum cinerariifolium). PLoS One 8, e65030, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065030 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Sudre, D. et al. Iron-dependent modifications of the flower transcriptome, proteome, metabolome, and hormonal content in an Arabidopsis ferritin mutant. J Exp Bot 64, 2665–2688, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert112 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Chang, C., Kwok, S. F., Bleecker, A. B. & Meyerowitz, E. M. Arabidopsis ethylene-response gene ETR1: similarity of product to two-component regulators. Science 262, 539–544, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8211181 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Briat, J. F. et al. New insights into ferritin synthesis and function highlight a link between iron homeostasis and oxidative stress in plants. Ann Bot 105, 811–822, https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp128 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Kasprzewska, A. Plant chitinases–regulation and function. Cell Mol Biol Lett 8, 809–824 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Liu, P. L., Wan, J. N., Guo, Y. P., Ge, S. & Rao, G. Y. Adaptive evolution of the chrysanthemyl diphosphate synthase gene involved in irregular monoterpene metabolism. BMC Evol Biol 12, 214, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-12-214 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Field, B. & Osbourn, A. E. Metabolic diversification–independent assembly of operon-like gene clusters in different plants. Science 320, 543–547, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154990 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Topfer, N., Fuchs, L. M. & Aharoni, A. The PhytoClust tool for metabolic gene clusters discovery in plant genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 45, 7049–7063, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx404 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Lv, Z. et al. The SPB-Box Transcription Factor AaSPL2 Positively Regulates Artemisinin Biosynthesis in Artemisia annua L. Front Plant Sci 10, 409, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00409 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Singer, A. C., Crowley, D. E. & Thompson, I. P. Secondary plant metabolites in phytoremediation and biotransformation. Trends Biotechnol 21, 123–130, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(02)00041-0 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Masella, A. P., Bartram, A. K., Truszkowski, J. M., Brown, D. G. & Neufeld, J. D. PANDAseq: paired-end assembler for illumina sequences. BMC Bioinformatics 13, 31, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-31 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kim, S. et al. New reference genome sequences of hot pepper reveal the massive evolution of plant disease-resistance genes by retroduplication. Genome Biol 18, 210, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1341-9 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kikuta, Y. et al. Specific regulation of pyrethrin biosynthesis in Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium by a blend of volatiles emitted from artificially damaged conspecific plants. Plant Cell Physiol 52, 588–596, https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcr017 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Ueda, H., Kikuta, Y. & Matsuda, K. Plant communication: mediated by individual or blended VOCs? Plant Signal Behav 7, 222–226, https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.18765 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Scala, A., Allmann, S., Mirabella, R., Haring, M. A. & Schuurink, R. C. Green leaf volatiles: a plant’s multifunctional weapon against herbivores and pathogens. Int J Mol Sci 14, 17781–17811, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140917781 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Scott, J. B. et al. Mycoflora Associated With Pyrethrum Seed and the Integration of Seed Steam Treatment Into Foliar Disease Management Strategies. Plant Dis 101, 1874–1884, https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-17-0309-RE (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Rettie, A. E., Rettenmeier, A. W., Howald, W. N. & Baillie, T. A. Cytochrome P-450–catalyzed formation of delta 4-VPA, a toxic metabolite of valproic acid. Science 235, 890–893 (1987).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Natsume, S. et al. The Draft Genome of Hop (Humulus lupulus), an Essence for Brewing. Plant Cell Physiol 56, 428–441, https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcu169 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Langdon, W. B. Performance of genetic programming optimised Bowtie2 on genome comparison and analytic testing (GCAT) benchmarks. BioData Min 8, 1, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-014-0034-0 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Conesa, A. et al. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21, 3674–3676, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Lamesch, P. et al. The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): improved gene annotation and new tools. Nucleic Acids Res 40, D1202–1210, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1090 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Sierro, N. et al. The tobacco genome sequence and its comparison with those of tomato and potato. Nat Commun 5, 3833, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4833 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Rice Annotation, P. et al. The Rice Annotation Project Database (RAP-DB): 2008 update. Nucleic Acids Res 36, D1028–1033, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm978 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Inoue, J. & Satoh, N. ORTHOSCOPE: an automatic web tool for phylogenetically inferring bilaterian orthogroups with user-selected taxa. Mol Biol Evol, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy226 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Shiraishi, A. et al. Repertoires of G protein-coupled receptors for Ciona-specific neuropeptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116, 7847–7856, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816640116 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Li, K. B. ClustalW-MPI: ClustalW analysis using distributed and parallel computing. Bioinformatics 19, 1585–1586, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg192 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Jones, D. T., Taylor, W. R. & Thornton, J. M. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci 8, 275–282 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2–approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5, e9490, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Altschul, S. F. et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25, 3389–3402, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 (1997).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Tuskan, G. A. et al. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 313, 1596–1604, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128691 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Tang, H. et al. An improved genome release (version Mt4.0) for the model legume Medicago truncatula. BMC Genomics 15, 312, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-312 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Schmutz, J. et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 463, 178–183, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08670 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Jiao, Y. et al. Improved maize reference genome with single-molecule technologies. Nature 546, 524–527, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22971 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Paterson, A. H. et al. Repeated polyploidization of Gossypium genomes and the evolution of spinnable cotton fibres. Nature 492, 423–427, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11798 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Shearer, L. A. et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization and optical mapping to correct scaffold arrangement in the tomato genome. G3 (Bethesda) 4, 1395–1405, https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.114.011197 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Canaguier, A. et al. A new version of the grapevine reference genome assembly (12X.v2) and of its annotation (VCost.v3). Genom Data 14, 56–62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gdata.2017.09.002 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35, 1547–1549, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Forte, Ltd., for English language editing prior to submission and to the Macrogen Japan Corp. (www.macrogen-japan.co.jp) for Illumina platform sequencing.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.S. and K.N. designed the experiments. T.Y., A.S., H.S. and K.N. performed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Honoo Satake or Koji Nakayama.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamashiro, T., Shiraishi, A., Satake, H. et al. Draft genome of Tanacetum cinerariifolium, the natural source of mosquito coil. Sci Rep 9, 18249 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54815-6

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.