# Cortical neurodynamics changes mediate the efficacy of a personalized neuromodulation against multiple sclerosis fatigue

## Abstract

The people with multiple sclerosis (MS) often report that fatigue restricts their life. Nowadays, pharmacological treatments are poorly effective accompanied by relevant side effects. A 5-day transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the somatosensory representation of the whole body (S1) delivered through an electrode personalized based on the brain MRI was efficacious against MS fatigue (FaReMuS treatment). This proof of principle study tested whether possible changes of the functional organization of the primary sensorimotor network induced by FaReMuS partly explained the effected fatigue amelioration. We measured the brain activity at rest through electroencephalography equipped with a Functional Source Separation algorithm and we assessed the neurodynamics state of the primary somatosensory (S1) and motor (M1) cortices via the Fractal Dimension and their functional connectivity via the Mutual Information. The dynamics of the neuronal electric activity, more distorted in S1 than M1 before treatment, as well as the network connectivity, altered maximally between left and right M1 homologs, reverted to normal after FaReMuS. The intervention-related changes explained 48% of variance of fatigue reduction in the regression model. A personalized neuromodulation tuned in on specific anatomo-functional features of the impaired regions can be effective against fatigue.

## Introduction

Fatigue occurs in up to 80% of people with multiple sclerosis (MS), and approximately two-thirds of people with MS report unusually prolonged daily tiredness as their most troubling symptom1. Fatigue can be managed with only minimal relief to date, and all treatments are often burdened with relevant adverse events2. Behind the fatigue in the MS there is not a single etiology, which instead involves functional and structural impairments of the primary sensorimotor networks3.

In two independent groups of people with MS4,5, we successfully tested the efficacy of a transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) intervention against MS fatigue, while bilaterally targeting the whole-body somatosensory areas (S1). To do this, we developed a personalized tDCS electrode, shaped on the individual MRI-derived outline of the central sulcus and properly positioned to selectively target the whole-body S1 representation6. A higher efficacy of this approach with respect to the use of a non-personalized electrode had already been experimentally demonstrated for the whole-body S17, and further confirmed by recent modeling studies8,9. The treatment protocol (called FaReMuS - Fatigue Relief in Multiple Sclerosis) implements a 5-day anodal tDCS through a personalized S1 electrode against an occipital cathode. In support of the appropriateness of the selected target in determining the treatment efficacy against MS fatigue, the negative outcome of two other tDCS trials can be considered, in which every parameter were identical less except for the electrode shape and position10,11. Among the 18 patients enrolled for the present investigation, the overall amelioration after real stimulation (Table 1) was of 30% of the baseline level, with a Cohen’s d coefficient12 equal to 1.1 (difference between the two pairwise means of mFIS before and after treatment divided by the pooled standard deviations). Reference values indicate that a coefficient of 0.2 indicates a small effect size (ES), 0.5 a medium ES and higher than 0.8 large ESs, thus clearly evidencing a large effect, consistent with the further classification by Sawilowsky13, who indicated as very large effects those corresponding to Cohen’s d above 1.2. We need to underline that, despite personalizing the intervention, we observed a relevant variability in the treatment efficacy, with 12 out of 18 people being Responder, defined as ameliorating the fatigue level more than 20% of baseline. Although our sample size does not have enough power to test the main effect Duration, we can say that the mean duration of the effect was more than 2 months for the Responders.

By the present proof of concept study, we tested the working hypothesis that FaReMuS modifies the functional organization of the brain networks involved in MS-related fatigue contributing to its efficacy. In this way, we aim at deepen the understanding of the phenomena subtending fatigue and its relief. We deployed a two-step approach on the electroencephalographic (EEG) signal data, collected before and after Real and Sham stimulations (Fig. 1), answering these questions: 1. Does FaReMuS modulate the dynamics of the neuronal electrical activity, called neurodynamics, of sensorimotor networks? In particular, does it act more on S1’s or on M1’s activity? 2. Is there a correlation between such changes and the extent of amelioration of fatigue symptoms?.

The specific activities of S1 and M1 were disentangled by the Functional Source Separation (FSS) algorithm14,15. In particular, the FSS version herein used identifies the neuronal pools of the hand representations within primary cortical S1 and M116, as we already demonstrated17,18,19,20,21,22,23. Because fatigue is a chronic condition, and its long-lasting amelioration by FaReMuS is achieved independently from specific tasks, we were mainly interested in quantifying the brain effects of FaReMuS in resting state. To this aim, we used the fractal dimension (FD)24 of FSS-identified FSS1 and FSM1 neuronal activities in resting state with open eyes before and after treatment (Fig. 2). FD already proved to be a good candidate for assessing the brain networks state and functionality25,26,27,28 and for typifying cortical districts22,29. To quantify the resting state functional connectivity among the nodes, we calculated the mutual information (MutInf)30 in assessing the S1-M1 communication in each hemisphere, as well as the functional communication between hemispheric homologs31,32. We selected FD for the neuronal pools’ state and, among the multiple relevant approaches33, MutInf for their connectivity, believing that complex-system measures are proper to describe the physiology of neuronal electric activity, whose dynamics display hugely complex temporal structures34,35.

## Material and Methods

### Study design

To assess the effects of FaReMuS on the primary sensorimotor network organization, we investigated the EEG-derived and FSS-identified activities of FSS1 and FSM1 hand representation at rest, before and after FaReMuS. FaReMuS treatment was tested in a clinical setting with a randomized, double-blind, Sham-controlled, crossover design (Fig. 1). The effects on fatigue, as measured on patients by the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (mFIS), were already described in two independent trials4,5. To assess the individual skills in the fine hand motor control we collected the 9-Hole Peg test executed with each hand before and after FaReMuS. According to a pre-defined time schedule, at T0 (pre-FaReMuS, the day of first tDCS application and before the stimulation) and at T1 (post-FaReMuS treatment, 5–7 days after t0, see Fig. 1), each patient, in addition to scoring of the mFIS, underwent the collection of the EEG and EMG (see Figs. 1 and 2).

People were recruited whether diagnosed with relapsing MS according to McDonalds Criteria36 and complying with the eligibility criteria as follows.

#### Inclusion criteria

• absence of clinical or radiological evidence of disease activity (NEDA) for at least 3 months preceding the study;

• low degree of disability as estimated by Extended Disability Scale Score (EDSS, Kurtzke 1983) < 3,5;

• fatigue as estimated by mFIS > 30.

#### Exclusion criteria were

• Current or prior (within less than 12 weeks before enrolment) exposure to psychotropic drug(s) (antidepressant, anxiolytic, antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, myorelaxant drugs);

• Coexistence of other condition(s) potentially associated with fatigue (i.e. anemia, pregnancy);

• Current or prior (within less than 4 weeks before enrolment) exposure to anti-fatigue products;

• History of epilepsy.

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. All experimental protocols were approved by Ethics Committee of the ‘S. Giovanni Calibita’ Fatebenefratelli Hospital in Rome (n. 22/2012). All patients signed the informed consent form before their enrollment.

### Regional personalized electrode (RePE) shaping and tDCS treatment (5-day treatment)

As detailed in4,5 individualized electrode was shaped derived from brain MRI in each patient, positioned and tDCS applied for 15 minutes every day for 5 days.

### Electrophysiological data recordings

EEG signals were recorded using a 64-channel actiCHamp System (Brain Products GmbH, Munich, Germany) with electrodes positioned in the sites of 10–10 EEG International System. Electrode impedances were maintained below 5 kΩ. Surface electromyogram (EMG) of the right and left opponens pollicis muscles was recorded with a belly-tendon montage (2.5 cm inter-electrode distance) by Ag-AgCl cup electrodes. With the same kind of electrodes we collected electrooculogram (EOG) and electrocardiogram (ECG) to control eye blinking and cardiac interferences. We sampled EEG, EOG, ECG and EMG at 5 kHz (pre-sampling analogical bandpass filtering 0.1–2000 Hz) and collected them for off-line processing.

### Experimental procedures for EEG/EMG data collection, application of FSS and identification of left and right S1 and M1 sources

As detailed in22 we applied the FSS algorithm to EEG and EMG (Fig. 2) to enable the study of the S1 and M1 activities in resting state.

### Primary sensorimotor network nodes’ ongoing activity

We calculated the fractal dimension (FD) for each source resting state activity using the algorithm proposed by Tomoyuki Higuchi to calculate fractal dimension directly in the time domain, without transforming the time series to the frequency domain and without embedding data in a phase space24.

### Functional connectivity among primary sensorimotor network nodes

We calculated the Mutual Information (MutInf,30) to assess resting state functional connectivity between the FSs’ activities as:

$$MI(X;Y)=\sum _{y\in Y}\sum _{x\in X}p(x,y)log(\frac{p(x,y)}{p(x)p(y)})$$

where the two discrete random variables X and Y are FSs(t), p(x,y) is the joint probability distribution function of X and Y, and p(x) and p(y) are the marginal probability distribution functions of X and Y respectively. MutInf is equal to zero if and only if X and Y are independent random variables. We have used the Freedman-Diaconis rule to estimate the number of bins used for discretization37. Specifically, we considered the MutInf in each hemisphere between $$F{S}_{S1}$$ and $$F{S}_{M1}$$ and between hemispheric homologs ($$F{S}_{M1}^{L}$$ and $$F{S}_{M1}^{R}$$ and similarly for $$F{S}_{S1}$$).

### Statistical analysis

We checked whether variables’ distribution fitted the Gaussian according to the Shapiro–Wilk statistic. We reported a result for the effect significance p < 0.050 and suggestions for p < 0.100.

We designed ad hoc statistical models to answer whether the improvement of fatigue in MS patients was accompanied by changes in the sensorimotor cortex physiology after FaReMuS.

1. 1.

To investigate whether FaReMuS changed the brain organization, we tested the FaReMuS-related changes of local activity and functional connectivity of primary sensorimotor cortices. For the local activity, the Full Model Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures included FaReMuS Treatment (Pre, Post), Cortical District ($$F{S}_{S1}$$, $$F{S}_{M1}$$) and Hemisphere (Left, Right) as within-subject factors. We focused on FaReMuS Treatment*Cortical District effect to reveal different effects of the intervention upon FSS1 and FSM1. If so, we applied relative Reduced Models to investigate how the two cortical districts changed after FaReMuS.

In the case of FaReMuS effect on the activities of sensorimotor network nodes, we compared the variable values before and after FaReMuS to those in healthy people (not submitted to neuromodulation).

We executed the analysis first on Real FaReMuS data, and we checked what happened in Sham block of those aspects modified by Real stimulation.

Furthermore, we checked whether the whole groups’ effects were confirmed in the two groups of 9 earliest and 9 latest recruited people.

2. 2.

A predictive model tested the extent of brain organization changes explaining part of the fatigue amelioration. The cortical parameters that showed a change following FaReMuS at step 1, underwent a preliminary correlative analysis with mFIS variations.

## Results

Eighteen subjects with MS suffering from fatigue entered the present study (Table 1) and were investigated before and after Real tDCS (18*2 = 36 EEG/EMG recordings). EEG recordings were not available for 5 subjects in Sham treatment, thus we executed the analysis in the cross-over design for 13 of the 18 subjects (13*4 conditions = 52 recordings).

### FaReMuS effects on neuronal dynamics of primary sensorimotor cortex

Shapiro-Wilk test indicated that none of the FDs among the four primary sensorimotor cortical sources ($$F{S}_{S1}^{L}$$, $$F{S}_{S1}^{R},$$ $$F{S}_{M1}^{L}$$, $$F{S}_{M1}^{R}$$) either before or after FaReMuS differed from a Gaussian distribution (p > 0.300 consistently).

We submitted these values to the planned ANOVA. A strong interaction effect FaReMuS Treatment * Cortical District [F(1,17) = 12.066, p = 0.003] indicated that the intervention had a distinct impact on FSS1 and FSM1. After repeating the analysis separately on the two cortical areas, a strong effect was found in FaReMuS Treatment * Hemisphere interaction [F(1,17) = 21.263, p < 0.001] for the S1 cortical district, indicating a diverse effect of FaReMuS in left and right FSS1. The corresponding ANOVAs in the each hemisphere evidenced a strong FaReMuS Treatment [F(1,17) = 11.064, p = 0.004] effect for the left hemispheric S1, corresponding to a FD reduction of left FSS1 activity dynamics after FaReMuS treatment (Fig. 3). A weaker effect was also found in the right FSS1 (FaReMuS Treatment F(1,17) = 5.265, p = 0.035), corresponding to a FD increase of right FSS1 dynamics. The slight bilateral increase of FD in FSM1 only approached significance (FaReMuS Treatment F(1,17) = 4.201, p = 0.056, Table 2).

When the same analysis was executed separately in the two groups of 9 patients each (earliest/latest recruited), the effects seen in the 18 patients sample showed significance for both groups (p < 0.100). No other effects emerged.

We tested the fractal dimension of the left FSS1 neurodynamics after Sham stimulation. The outcome of the within-subject factors ANOVA with FaReMuS Treatment (pre, post) and the RealSham (Real, Sham), suggested a different change of FD with respect to the stimulation delivered (FaReMuS Treatment*RealSham interaction effect [F(1,12) = 4.157, p = 0.064]), which as outlined above was clear after the Real stimulation (FaReMuS Treatment p = 0.004). On the other hand, such an effect was absent with Sham stimulation [F(1,12) = 0.162, p = 0.695]. Finally, no difference emerged when comparing the pre-treatment FD in the two Real/Sham blocks by paired sample t-test (p > 0.500 consistently).

With regard to the direction of changes among patients and healthy controls, the Fractal Dimensions before the treatment were included into a Full Model, together with Cortical District (FSS1, FSM1) and Hemisphere (Left, Right) as within-subject factors, and HealthyFatiguedMS Groups (Healthy, Fatigued MS patients) as between-subjects factor.

The control group consisted of 12 healthy volunteers (9 females, 3 males, mean age 35 ± 8 years and age range 26–49 years), who did not undergo neuromodulation. They were matched for age (independent sample t-test p = 0.654) and gender with the fatigued MS subgroup of 15 people (patients below 50 years old, 11 females, 4 males, age 36 ± 8 years and age range 24–50 years).

The Cortical District*HealthyFatiguedMS Groups effect [F(1,25) = 6.790; p = 0.015] revealed a peculiar difference in the organization of FSS1 with respect to FSM1 networks among fatigued patients and controls. After applying the Reduced Models for the two cortical regions separately, FSS1 FD turned out to be greater in fatigued MS patients than controls and such a difference was more prominent in the left than right hemisphere [F(1,25) = 4.670; p = 0.040]. Conversely, FSM1 FDs did not show a difference in MS patients with respect to controls (p = 0.300). Of note, the left FSS1 FD, mostly changed by FaReMuS, was differed in patients from controls before FaReMuS treatment (Table 2, p = 0.082) and this difference disappeared after the treatment (p = 0.978). Finally, we note that while in healthy control FSS1 FD is smaller than FSM1 FD (Table 2, paired sample t-test t(11) = −7.775, p < 0.001), this differentiation was lost in pre-FaReMuS left hemisphere (p = 0.919) and was regained after FaReMuS (t(14) = −5.304, p < 0.001).

### FaReMuS effects on functional connectivity of the primary sensorimotor cortex

We studied whether the intra- and inter-hemispheric functional connectivity between FSS1 and FSM1 areas changed with the treatment. The former (MutInf between S1left-M1left, and S1right-M1right) was studied by the ANOVA model including FaReMuS Treatment (Pre, Post) and Hemisphere (Left, Right) as within-subject factors. A clear FaReMuS Treatment * Hemisphere effect emerged [F(1,17) = 11.469, p = 0.004]. When investigating such dynamics at each hemisphere separately, we found that in the left hemisphere the S1-M1 mutual information decreased [FaReMuS Treatment F(1,17) = 5.224, p = 0.035; Table 3], and it increased in the right hemisphere [F(1,17) = 7.265, p = 0.015; Table 3].

To study the functional connectivity between the homologous regions of the two hemispheres, the ANOVA model included FaReMuS Treatment (Pre, Post) and Cortical District ($$F{S}_{S1}$$, $$F{S}_{M1}$$) as within-subject factors. The FaReMuS Treatment effect [F(1,17) = 12.402, p = 0.003] indicated that the overall mutual information (MutInf) between left and right FSS1 and between left and right M1 increased after FaReMuS. Although the difference in the response between the two cortical regions was not statistically significant [interaction factor FaReMuS Treatment * Cortical District [F(1,17) = 2.659, p = 0.121], the functional connectivity varied mostly between left and right FSM1 [FaReMuS Treatment effect [F(1,17) = 22.061, p = 0.0002] (Table 3). Instead, the functional connectivity between left and right FSS1 did not change (FaReMuS Treatment effect [F(1,17) = 1.314, p = 0.267], Table 3).

We compared the MutInf between left and right FSM1 after Sham and Real stimulations by the ANOVA with FaReMuS Treatment (Pre, Post) and RealSham (Real, Sham) within-subject factors. A strong difference of the effects of Real and Sham stimulations [FaReMuS Treatment*RealSham interaction effect F(1,11) = 13.235, p = 0.004], corresponded to the above described increase of functional connectivity between left and right FSM1 after Real treatment (p = 0.0002), which was absent after Sham (p = 0.274). The pre-treatment functional connectivity values did not differ between Real and Sham blocks [RealSham factor F(1,11) = 1.822, p = 0.204].

To better understand the direction of the functional connectivity changes, we compared the functional connectivity between homologous FSM1 regions with healthy control values. Fatigued patients had lower pre-treatment values (Table 3 and Fig. 3, independent t-test t(25) = 4.587, p < 0.001), whereas no post-treatment difference was detected between the two groups (Table 3 and Fig. 3, t(25) = 0.412, p = 0.684).

### Relationship of brain factors modified by FaReMuS with its efficacy against fatigue

Those brain features that changed after FaReMuS treatment (p < 0.01, i.e. left FSS1 FD and MutInf between left and right M1) were correlated with the mFIS difference (pre-post) divided by the mFIS pre-treatment to describe the percentage change of fatigue levels.

The percentage ameliorations of fatigue levels correlated with the changes of left FSS1 fractal dimension (Pearson’s rho = 0.613, p = 0.009 with total mFIS) and with the post-treatment FSM1-FSM1 functional connectivity (rho = 0.594, p = 0.009). While they correlated with each other (rho = 0.495, p = 0.037), both variables entered the regression model with mFIS percentage change as dependent variable and $$F{S}_{S1}^{L}$$ FD change and post-FaReMuS FSM1-FSM1 connectivity as independent variables (FSM1-FSM1 MutInf):

$$\begin{array}{rcl}{\rm{mFIS}}\,{\rm{percentage}}\,{\rm{change}} & = & -\,22+940.9\,\ast \,{\rm{FD}}(F{S}_{S1}^{L})\\ & & +469.5\,\ast \,{\rm{MutInf}}\,(F{S}_{M1}^{L},\,F{S}_{M1}^{R}\,)\end{array}$$

In particular, the 48% of mFIS percent change variance was explained by this model (F(2,15) = 6.930, p = 0.007). The coefficients of the model showed that higher values of both variables (i.e. change of $$F{S}_{S1}^{L}$$ FD and post-FaReMuS FSM1-FSM1 functional connectivity) predict higher fatigue amelioration.

### Behavioral effects

We submitted the 9 Hope Peg Test execution times to the ANOVA with Hand (left, right) and FaReMuS (pre, post) within-subject factors. The analysis showed a strong expected dominance effect, with the execution time with the right dominant hand shorter than with the left hand (Table 4; F(1, 14) = 19.365, p = 0.001). Instead, the analysis did not show either the FaReMuS effect or the FaReMuS*Hand interaction (both p > 0.200), thus not supporting the shortened time by FaReMuS, and at a stronger level for the dominant hand, suggested by the average values.

## Discussion

Double is the most relevant finding of our investigation:

1. 1.

FaReMuS reduced the functional imbalance within the primary sensorimotor network, in a way that explains a significant part of its fatigue-relieving potential;

2. 2.

before treatment, S1 shows more severely impaired resting state dynamics than M1 in fatigued people with MS.

### FaReMuS effects on sensorimotor network activity and on fatigue

FaReMuS treatment targeting whole body S1 was able to modify the local neurodynamics more at S1 than at M1 cortex. Overall, the left S1 region, which showed the strongest alteration before treatment, turned out to be the region with the highest change after the neuromodulation, and with the capability to restore values to normal physiology. Moreover, S1 neurodynamics recovered the physiological differentiation from M1 as a consequence of the intervention22.

FaReMuS neuromodulation intervention modified the functional connectivity among the four main nodes within the primary sensorimotor network bilaterally. This was achieved by re-balancing the inter-hemispheric pre-treatment difference between the left and right S1-M1 interplay resulting in a reinforcement of the functional interplay between homologous M1 areas. As assessed by the regression model, the final M1-M1 connectivity contributed to the fatigue symptoms amelioration, underlining the key role played by the continuity of the tonic interplay between cortical homologs.

Of note, although the same stimulation was delivered to homologous hemispheric areas with an equidistant occipital reference, the effects were unexpectedly asymmetric: the fractal dimension of S1 neurodynamics was diminished in the left dominant hemisphere, and not contralaterally. These findings strongly underline that the effects of neuromodulation depends on the state of the target networks, hence caution is mandatory when extrapolating from healthy controls the expected effects in people suffering from a neuronal damage (MS fatigue here). In fact, when healthy people were stimulated bilaterally by the same electrodes, comparable effects were found in both hemispheres7, without differences in the induced local effects between the bilateral38 and the monolateral stimulation39.

Here, we specifically quantified the functional features - neurodynamics and functional connectivity in resting state - of the bilateral primary somatosensory and motor cortices. We are aware that this selective assessment is a limit of the present investigation, which we plan to overcome in future developing other analysis approaches to assess the activity of the complete cortical mantle.

### S1 more than M1 alteration pre-treatment

In the attempt to alleviate fatigue in people with MS, we adapted a tDCS treatment, which improved the endurance to fatigue when applied in healthy people. In physiological condition, tDCS focused onto both M1 and S1 regions40, while in fatigued people with MS we targeted tDCS onto the whole body S1 representation against an occipital electrode6,7. This choice was made according to literature data showing that somatosensory41,42 and parietal regions43,44 display poorer activity and greater atrophy in fatigued MS patients with respect to healthy controls and non-fatigued people with MS. Here we documented a higher resting state pre-treatment impairment of S1 with respect to M1, as compared to control values, providing novel signs of an impoverished local organization of the dominant somatosensory hand representation in MS fatigue. Previously, in MS patients the distortion of the intra-cortical connectivity was specifically observed in the left dominant hemisphere42. Overall, these findings support the notion of a specific role in the fatigue-related mechanisms played by the parietal cortex, with the local impairment more evident in the dominant control regions. Such an involvement strengthens the notion that an altered perception due to functional and structural disconnections in the brain parenchyma because of MS plays a crucial part in the generation of fatigue, thus downgrading the competing hypothesis of a decreased motivational drive behind the perception of fatigue45. The dominance-driven, hemispheric functional damage may be postulated as a further sign of MS as a disconnection syndrome46 that calls into question the more frequently involved networks. The fractal dimension of the local activity is an innovative approach that provides information within a single primary area.

### Fractal dimension to assess resting state activity

In fatigued people with MS, left S1 FD at rest was impaired with respect to healthy controls before the treatment and the difference disappeared after FaReMuS, which modified left S1 FD in a correlated manner with its efficacy against fatigue. Furthermore, the physiological relationship, with a larger FD in M1 than in S1, was lost before FaReMuS, and substantially reverted after the treatment.

Of note, the variability (i.e., irregularity of the spike trains and the spikes counts in invasive recordings and signal fluctuations in non-invasive ones) as well as the irreproducibility of train structures evoked by identical input series, is among the most prominent properties of both spontaneous and evoked neural activity47. The fractal dimension, among the complexity measures, is suitable to quantify the recurrence of specific patterns at different scales. The understanding of brain (dys)functionality will benefit of an integrated framework that links brain connectivity to brain dynamics35: in this context, the fractal dimension of the local activity can offer a measure of relevant functional properties of the cerebral networking organization at the single node level.

Present data confirms FD as a good candidate for assessing the brain networks functionality25,26,27,28 and for typifying cortical districts22,29.

## Conclusions

This proof-of-principle study showed that the sensorimotor networks activity at rest in fatigued MS people was modulated after the personalized FaReMuS 5-day non-pharmacological treatment in a way that partly explained the fatigue symptoms amelioration. The neuronal activity of the primary sensorimotor counterpart was altered more than the motor one before the treatment. The neuromodulation can effectively revert the unbalanced functional connectivity among interconnected target networks involved in the fatigue symptom.

## Data availability

EEG raw data, FSS algorithms, personal and clinical anonymized data will be available upon reasonable request.

## References

1. 1.

Kesselring, J. & Beer, S. Symptomatic therapy and neurorehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 4, 643–652 (2005).

2. 2.

Thompson, A. J. Symptomatic treatment in multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol 11, 305–309 (1998).

3. 3.

Yusuf, A. & Koski, L. A qualitative review of the neurophysiological underpinnings of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Sci. 330, 4–9 (2013).

4. 4.

Tecchio, F. et al. Multiple sclerosis fatigue relief by bilateral somatosensory cortex neuromodulation. J. Neurol. 261 (2014).

5. 5.

Cancelli, A. et al. Personalized bilateral whole body somatosensory cortex stimulation to relieve fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler (2017).

6. 6.

Tecchio, F. et al. Regional personalized electrodes to select transcranial current stimulation target. Front Hum Neurosci 7, 131 (2013).

7. 7.

Cancelli, A., Cottone, C., Di Giorgio, M., Carducci, F. & Tecchio, F. Personalizing the electrode to neuromodulate an extended cortical region. Brain Stim (2015).

8. 8.

Parazzini, M. et al. A computational model of the electric field distribution due to regional personalized or nonpersonalized electrodes to select transcranial electric stimulation target. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 64, 184–195 (2017).

9. 9.

Cancelli, A. et al. MRI-guided regional personalized electrical stimulation in multisession and home treatments. Front. Neurosci. 12 (2018).

10. 10.

Ferrucci, R. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for fatigue in multiple sclerosis. NeuroRehabilitation 34, 121–127 (2014).

11. 11.

Saiote, C. et al. Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Restor Neurol Neurosci 32, 423–436 (2014).

12. 12.

Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analsis of the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, https://doi.org/10.1234/12345678 (1988).

13. 13.

Sawilowsky, S. S. New Effect Size Rules of Thumb. J. Mod. Appl. Stat. Methods, https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100 (2009).

14. 14.

Tecchio, F., Porcaro, C., Barbati, G. & Zappasodi, F. Functional source separation and hand cortical representation for a brain-computer interface feature extraction. J Physiol 580, 703–721 (2007).

15. 15.

Porcaro, C. & Tecchio, F. Semi-blind Functional Source Separation Algorithm from Non-invasive Electrophysiology to Neuroimaging. In Blind Source Separation. (ed. Springer) 521–551 (2014).

16. 16.

Porcaro, C., Barbati, G., Zappasodi, F., Rossini, P. M. & Tecchio, F. Hand sensory-motor cortical network assessed by functional source separation. Hum Brain Mapp 29, 70–81 (2008).

17. 17.

Tecchio, F. et al. High-gamma band activity of primary hand cortical areas: a sensorimotor feedback efficiency index. Neuroimage 40, 256–264 (2008).

18. 18.

Betti, V., Zappasodi, F., Rossini, P. M., Aglioti, S. M. & Tecchio, F. Synchronous with your feelings: sensorimotor {gamma} band and empathy for pain. J Neurosci 29, 12384–12392 (2009).

19. 19.

Melgari, J. M. et al. Movement-induced uncoupling of primary sensory and motor areas in focal task-specific hand dystonia. Neuroscience 250, 434–445 (2013).

20. 20.

Porcaro, C. et al. Multiple frequency functional connectivity in the hand somatosensory network: an EEG study. Clin Neurophysiol 124, 1216–1224 (2013).

21. 21.

Porcaro, C., Cottone, C., Cancelli, A., Salustri, C. & Tecchio, F. Functional Semi-Blind Source Separation Identifies Primary Motor Area Without Active Motor Execution. Int. J. Neural Syst., https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129065717500472 (2017).

22. 22.

Cottone, C. et al. Neuronal electrical ongoing activity as a signature of cortical areas. Brain Struct. Funct. 222, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-016-1328-4 (2017).

23. 23.

Cottone, C. et al. A new, high-efficacy, noninvasive transcranial electric stimulation tuned to local neurodynamics. J. Neurosci. 38 (2018).

24. 24.

Higuchi, T. Approach to an irregular time series on the basis of the fractal theory. Phys. D 31, 6 (1988).

25. 25.

Di Ieva, A., Esteban, F., Grizzi, F., Klonowski, W. & Martín-Landrove, M. Fractals in the neurosciences, Part II: clinical applications and future perspectives. Neuroscientist 21, 30–43 (2015).

26. 26.

Zappasodi, F., Marzetti, L., Olejarczyk, E., Tecchio, F. & Pizzella, V. Age-Related Changes in Electroencephalographic Signal Complexity. PLoS One 10, e0141995 (2015).

27. 27.

Zappasodi, F. et al. Fractal dimension of EEG activity senses neuronal impairment in acute stroke. PLoS One 9 (2014).

28. 28.

Smits, F. M. et al. Electroencephalographic Fractal Dimension in Healthy Ageing and Alzheimer’s Disease. PLoS One 11, e0149587 (2016).

29. 29.

Marino, M. et al. Neuronal dynamics enable the functional differentiation of resting state networks in the human brain. Hum. Brain Mapp., https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24458 (2019).

30. 30.

Pereda, E., Quiroga, R. Q. & Bhattacharya, J. Nonlinear multivariate analysis of neurophysiological signals. Progress in Neurobiology 77, 1–37 (2005).

31. 31.

Buyukturkoglu, K. et al. Simple index of functional connectivity at rest in Multiple Sclerosis fatigue. Clin Neurophysiol 128, 807–813 (2017).

32. 32.

Cogliati Dezza, I. et al. Functional and structural balances of homologous sensorimotor regions in multiple sclerosis fatigue. J. Neurol. 262, 614–622 (2015).

33. 33.

Torabi, A., Daliri, M. R. & Sabzposhan, S. H. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis from EEG signals using nonlinear methods. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med., https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-017-0584-9 (2017).

34. 34.

Engel, A. K., Roelfsema, P. R., Fries, P., Brecht, M. & Singer, W. Role of the temporal domain for response selection and perceptual binding. Cereb. Cortex, https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/7.6.571 (1997).

35. 35.

Kopell, N. J., Gritton, H. J., Whittington, M. A. & Kramer, M. A. Beyond the connectome: The dynome. Neuron 83, 1319–1328 (2014).

36. 36.

McDonald, W. I. et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 50, 121–127 (2001).

37. 37.

Cohen, M. X. Analyzing Neural Time Series Data: Theory and Practice. MIT Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 (2014).

38. 38.

Cancelli, A. et al. Cortical inhibition and excitation by bilateral transcranial alternating current stimulation. Restor Neurol Neurosci, https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-140411 (2015).

39. 39.

Moliadze, V., Atalay, D., Antal, A. & Paulus, W. Close to threshold transcranial electrical stimulation preferentially activates inhibitory networks before switching to excitation with higher intensities. Brain Stimul 5, 505–511 (2012).

40. 40.

Cogiamanian, F., Marceglia, S., Ardolino, G., Barbieri, S. & Priori, A. Improved isometric force endurance after transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortical areas. Eur J Neurosci 26, 242–249 (2007).

41. 41.

Dell’Acqua, M. L. et al. Thalamocortical sensorimotor circuit in multiple sclerosis: an integrated structural and electrophysiological assessment. Hum Brain Mapp 31, 1588–1600 (2010).

42. 42.

Tecchio, F. et al. Intra-cortical connectivity in multiple sclerosis: a neurophysiological approach. Brain 131, 1783–1792 (2008).

43. 43.

Pellicano, C. et al. Relationship of cortical atrophy to fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 67, 447–453 (2010).

44. 44.

Vecchio, F. et al. Electroencephalography-Derived Sensory and Motor Network Topology in Multiple Sclerosis Fatigue. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 31, 56–64 (2017).

45. 45.

de Lange, F. P. et al. Neural correlates of the chronic fatigue syndrome–an fMRI study. Brain 127, 1948–1957 (2004).

46. 46.

Granberg, T. et al. In vivo characterization of cortical and white matter neuroaxonal pathology in early multiple sclerosis. Brain 140, 2912–2926 (2017).

47. 47.

Moutard, C., Dehaene, S. & Malach, R. Spontaneous Fluctuations and Non-linear Ignitions: Two Dynamic Faces of Cortical Recurrent Loops. Neuron 88, 194–206 (2015).

## Acknowledgements

In addition to all people with MS who gave their time and collaboration, the authors wish to thank Maria Maddalena Filippi, Silvana Zannino, Domenico Lupoi, Anna Ghazaryan, Massimiliano Mirabella and Patrizio Pasqualetti for scientific collaboration, Arianna Pizzichino, Daniele Spizzichino, and Massimiliano Marconi for their technical contributions. This work was supported by: (1) FISM–Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla–Cod. 2014/R/22 [FaReMuS CuNeH], (2) PNR-CNR Aging Program 2012–2018.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

C.P. analysed the data and revised the work; C.C. acquired and supported the analysis of the data and revised the work; A.C. acquired the data and revised the work; P.M.R. revised the work; G.Z. revised the figures, contributed in interpreting the data and revised the work; F.T. concepted and designed the study, executed the statistical analysis, drafted and revised the work. All authors approved the submitted version and agreed to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franca Tecchio.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Porcaro, C., Cottone, C., Cancelli, A. et al. Cortical neurodynamics changes mediate the efficacy of a personalized neuromodulation against multiple sclerosis fatigue. Sci Rep 9, 18213 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54595-z

• Accepted:

• Published:

• ### The Potential Role of Neurophysiology in the Management of Multiple Sclerosis-Related Fatigue

• Fioravante Capone
• , Francesco Motolese
• , Emma Falato
• , Mariagrazia Rossi
•  & Vincenzo Di Lazzaro

Frontiers in Neurology (2020)