Emplacement of large volumes of (sub)volcanic rocks during the main pulse of the Siberian Traps occurred within <1 m.y., coinciding with the end-Permian mass extinction. Volcanics from outside the main Siberian Traps, e.g. Taimyr and West Siberia, have since long been correlated, but existing geochronological data cannot resolve at a precision better than ~5 m.y. whether (sub)volcanic activity in these areas actually occurred during the main pulse or later. We report the first high precision U-Pb zircon geochronology from two alkaline ultramafic-felsic layered intrusive complexes from Taimyr, showing synchronicity between these and the main Siberian Traps (sub)volcanic pulse, and the presence of a second Dinerian-Smithian pulse. This is the first documentation of felsic intrusive magmatism occurring during the main pulse, testifying to the Siberian Trap’s compositional diversity. Furthermore, the intrusions cut basal basalts of the Taimyr lava stratigraphy hence providing a minimum age of these basalts of 251.64 ± 0.11 Ma. Synchronicity of (sub)volcanic activity between Taimyr and the Siberian Traps imply that the total area of the Siberian Traps main pulse should include a ~300 000 km2 area north of Norilsk. The vast aerial extent of the (sub)volcanic activity during the Siberian Traps main pulse may explain the severe environmental consequences.
The Siberian Traps is one of the largest known large igneous provinces (LIPs) on Earth. It has been suggested to cover an area of up to 5 million km2 based on the extent of outcropping, seismically imaged and drilled basalts and dolerites in the Tunguska and West Siberia basins, north to the Taimyr Peninsula and into the Kara and Laptev Seas1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14. It is arguably one of the most important LIPs due to its potential role in the end-Permian extinction event at around 252Ma2,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22. A key to understanding the impact of the Siberian Traps rests on the best constraints on the true volume of the event, the extent of subvolcanic intrusions, and on the key timing/duration of the main volcanic pulse (or pulses) that formed it. Synchronicity between the well-studied and well-dated main outcrop sequence of the Siberian Traps in the Tunguska basin2,3,14,17,21 and those in the surrounding areas was suggested by several workers1,8,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31 and demonstrated at the ~5 m.y. level10,11, reflecting the uncertainty and accuracy in the geochronological data. However, this potential spread in ages is well outside the recently proposed time frame for the main pulse of Siberian Traps volcanic and subvolcanic activity at ca. 252.3–251.3 Ma21. Also, available data cannot resolve if subvolcanic and volcanic activity across the greater Siberia region (Fig. 1) was synchronous or not at the 0.1 Ma level, or if there are some specific geographical or compositional age trends.
The size and type of magmatic activity across a LIP is of great importance in understanding its formation and evolution, in particular when considering the environmental impacts of the subvolcanic and volcanic activity and the role of the sedimentary basins hosting the LIP32. One of the areas included in the greater region attributed to the Siberian LIP lies within the Taimyr Fold Belt on the Taimyr Peninsula (Fig. 1) and contains basaltic flows that have been stratigraphically, geochemically, and geochronologically (Ar-Ar), correlated to lava flows in the central part of the LIP10,11,27,28,31. It also contains numerous alkaline (ultra)mafic to felsic intrusive complexes in the form of layered intrusives, plutons, sills and dykes. Two of these alkaline layered intrusions, some doleritic sills and several smaller syenitic plutons have previously been dated to between ca. 249 to 230 Ma33,34,35,36, tentatively interpreted as a tailing stage of the Siberian LIP after the main pulse recorded in the Tunguska Basin between ca. 252.3 and 251.3 Ma21. However, as none of these rocks have been dated by high precision U-Pb geochronology, but rather Ar-Ar and U-Pb secondary ion mass spectrometry, age spread and uncertainties are large and the accuracy of the data is difficult to properly evaluate.
In order to test whether subvolcanic intrusives of more evolved compositions on the Taimyr Peninsula and in the vicinity of the Yenisei-Khatanga Trough are younger than the main pulse or can be related directly to it, we have sampled intrusions from boreholes from the Taimyr Peninsula for high precision U-Pb zircon geochronology. The samples come from different units within the Dumtalei and Dikarabigai ultramafic to felsic alkaline layered intrusive complexes (Figs. 1 and 2). As these intrusives cut the lower effusive volcanic pile at their locations, their ages may also provide a minimum age of the Taimyr volcanism. We, furthermore, investigate whether known alkaline rocks elsewhere in the Siberian Traps (i.e. in the Maymecha-Kotuy area) can be correlated with the Taimyr alkaline rocks based on geochemical data. In addition we evaluate the role of contact metamorphic devolatilisation, as the intrusions are emplaced within a sedimentary basin cf.18. An account of the geological setting of the Taimyr Peninsula and the Yenisei-Khatanga trough, as well as a summary of previous geochronology and other occurrences of alkaline magmatism potentially associated with the Siberian Traps can be found in Supplementary Material A.
Petrology and geochemistry
Photos of rock slabs from four medium to coarse grained intrusive samples are presented in Fig. 3, ranging in composition from syenite (TP-42-1, TP-55), monzosyenite (TP-42-2) of the Dikarabigai intrusive complex to monzonite (TP-43) of the Dumtalei intrusive complex (Fig. 2; see Supplementary Material B for details of the setting and petrography of the Dumtalei and Dikarabigai intrusive complexes). There are modal and compositional variations within closely spaced samples (e.g. TP-42) as well as between intrusions themselves. The geochemistry of the analysed samples is presented in Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Fig. S1, along with additional reference to samples previously published by Vernikovsky et al.33, Arndt et al.37 and Fedorenko and Czamanske38. The incompatible trace elements (IE) of the three dated syenites are shown in Fig. 4a normalized to primitive mantle39. Zirconium values are the highest in syenite TP-55, and lowest in the monzosyenitic part of the TP-42 rocks. All four rocks share Ti negative anomalies, possibly reflecting early fractionation of Fe-Ti oxides. The monzonite sample TP-43 is the least enriched in the most IE and most enriched in the least IE, in accordance with its slightly more primitive character if compared with the syenites. The syenite TP-55 is the only rock showing a positive Pb anomaly, as opposed to the negative Pb anomalies shown by the other rocks. Potassium marks a negative through in all rocks except syeneite TP-55. Different amounts of fractionation and accumulation of K-feldspar can account for these differences. The pink colour of TP-55 (Fig. 3) is indeed indicative of K-feldspar accumulation in this sample. The three syenitic rocks show a negative P anomaly, not observed for the monzonite, probably reflecting early fractionation of apatite.
Previously, syenites and granosyenites from northern Taimyr were reported by Vernikovsky et al.33 to have characteristic features of A-type granitoids e.g.40. The IE of these rocks (Fig. 4a) show high Ba, Rb, Th and K, and a positive Pb spike, along with low Ta and Nb, which are typically retained as crustal signatures. Accordingly, Vernikovsky et al.33 reported that there was evidence of a considerable role for crustal assimilation, based also on high Ce and Sm abundances. Our samples follow quite well the IE patterns described by the syenites studied by Vernikovsky et al.33, except for the K positive anomaly and Nb-Ta negative anomaly, which are not observed in our samples.
Chondrite normalised41 REE data is plotted in Fig. 4b for comparison with Vernikovsky et al.33, Arndt et al.37 and Fedorenko and Czamanske38. The trends in REE pattern are remarkably similar for the syenite and monzosyenite samples, and deviate as expected for the more mafic monzonite (TP-43) (Fig. 4a). The lower REE abundances in the more evolved samples with respect to the least evolved one can be reconciled with the fractionation of REE-rich minerals (e.g. allanite) or phases in which REE can be less incompatible (e.g. amphiboles) during the evolution of these magmas. Notably, these phases were observed by Vernikovsky et al.33 in their samples. The negative Eu anomaly (0.69; calculated as Eu/Eu* = Eu/√(Sm × Gd)) shown by sample TP-55 again suggests an early fractionation of plagioclase from its precursor magma. Using these comparisons it seems plausible that the subalkaline examples from this study and those previously reported by Vernikovsky et al.33, share the same petro-genetic origin from a rather primitive mantle source, and a plausible crustal overprint. Estimates of the temperatures of the intrusions are relatively high in the range of 915–1080 (liquidus temperatures from whole rock data using the KWare MAGMA software; https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.lanl.gov_orgs_ees_geodynamics_Wohletz_KWare_Index.htm&d=DwIGaQ&c=vh6FgFnduejNhPPD0fl_yRaSfZy8CWbWnIf4XJhSqx8&r=W8RE-88OJ6HkLx5-vnSwGMbECZfnybKmwCXImBggWgpae5ASEwQeYcLKZnw2tz-i&m=31hZODtiHJvaUHOw_lUorTrBzoDxYvrGFlfGhKQPlsE&s=L7Og7cYLRwif3W_Tx4bKFg5IIocVbFBNpzgKr9Phboc&e).
The mean ages reported below are presented with uncertainties as ±x/y/z, where x includes the analytical uncertainties, y includes the analytical and tracer calibration uncertainties and z includes the analytical uncertainties, tracer uncertainties and uncertainty in the decay constant.
Four high aspect ratio zircon prisms and seven zircon fragments from the syenite in drill core TP-55 were analysed by CA-ID-TIMS (Fig. 5; Table S2). The analyses are concordant to slightly discordant and overlapping, and give a weighted mean 206Pb/238U-age of 251.64 ± 0.11/0.16/0.31 Ma (2σ; MSWD = 1.13), which is considered to represent emplacement and crystallisation of the syenite. A total of seven single zircon fragments CA-ID-TIMS analyses from the syenite TP-42-1 and 2 are also equivalent within error (Fig. 3; Table S1), yielding a weighted mean 206Pb/238U-age of 251.46 ± 0.13/0.18/0.32 Ma (2σ; MSWD = 0.47). The two samples represent the medium and coarse grained phases of syenite layer, respectively and the calculated mean 206Pb/238U-age is considered to date the emplacement and crystallisation of the syenite layer. The age span recorded from the different phases of the Dikarabigai intrusive complex show that there was a prolonged evolution of emplacement and crystallization of the intrusive complex.
One euhedral, clear, slightly pinkish prismatic zircon, one euhedral, equant pyramidal and eight zircon fragments with some crystal faces were analysed by CA-ID-TIMS from the monzonite of drill core TP-43. All analyses are concordant but there is a significant spread in 206Pb/238U-ages (Fig. 5; Table S2). The oldest zircon gives a 206Pb/238U-age of 251.67 ± 0.41/0.43/0.51 Ma (2σ) interpreted to represent initial crystallisation in the magma system and probably emplacement of an early pulse of magma. The spread towards younger ages is interpreted to reflect a complex and long-lived crystallisation history of the layered intrusion and the five youngest equivalent (within uncertainties) zircons with a weighted average 206Pb/238U-age of 250.60 ± 0.22/0.25/0.36 Ma, are interpreted to represent the final emplacement and crystallisation of the monzonite-diorite horizon. The oldest and youngest zircons do not overlap in age supporting the interpretation of two (or more) magmatic crystallisation events (magma pulses) in the Dumtalei layered intrusive complex. Whether the older zircon ages represent antecrystic material from a long-lived magma chamber or xenocrysts from surrounding early phase magmatic rocks from the Dumtalei layered intrusive complex that was subsequently replenished by a second magma pulse is not immediately clear from the data. CL imaging reveals no visible xenocrystic cores in the CL-imaged grains (18 grains). There are, however, textural differences between the grains, ranging from magmatically zoned to faintly zoned to unzoned (Fig. 5). Some grains also show resorption textures, but the resorbed zones are generally minor (Fig. 5). This may indicate that older zircons were incorporated from a (partly) crystallised (mush) previous magma pulse during emplacement. This interpretation is supported by a rough estimate of the zircon saturation temperature based on the whole-rock composition and the zircon saturation model of ref. 42, giving a zircon saturation temperature (Tzirc) of ca. 670 °C. Given the low Tzirc, there should be no zircon antecrysts formed and preserved during the magma evolution. The most likely interpretation of the data is thus that the older zircons represent xenocrysts picked up from surrounding, previously emplaced, magmatic rocks of the Dumtalei intrusive complex, during emplacement. Alternatively, the spread towards younger ages could reflect late/post magmatic fluid assisted alteration/recrystallization of the zircons. There are, however, no indications of substantial alterations in thin section or in the zircons themselves, rendering such an interpretation unlikely. Nevertheless, the zircon data show that parts of the Dumtalei and Dikarabigai layered intrusions were emplaced synchronously within error and that final emplacement of the monzonite occurred at 250.60 ± 0.22 Ma.
This is the first high precision geochronological study from the Taimyr Peninsula that unequivocally shows that the alkaline (ultra)mafic to felsic layered intrusives are synchronous with the main pulse of volcanic and subvolcanic activity in the Siberian Traps21. The oldest dated syenite is slightly younger than the onset of the end-Permian mass extinction at 251.941 ± 0.03722 (not including tracer calibration uncertainties), but is identical to the average age of the main pulse of subvolcanic activity in the Tunguska basin21 (Figs. 5 and 6). This confirms previous suggestions e.g.10,11,27,28,31 that the main pulse of subvolcanic and volcanic activity of the Siberian LIP covered a significantly larger area than could be documented with existing data, but also show that it includes significant volumes of more chemically evolved magmas. The presence of alkaline intermediate to felsic rocks intruded during the main pulse of the Siberian LIP also calls into question the interpreted ages of the syenitic plutons dated by Vernikovsky et al.33, ranging from ca. 250–240 Ma. In fact the data used to calculate those ages show a lot of scatter and clearly display Pb-loss, rendering the assumption of concordance, and hence accuracy of the calculated ages, questionable. Moreover, their oldest dated sample at 249 ± 5 Ma, showing little sign of Pb loss, overlaps our data, an indication that at least some, if not all, of the other syenites in Taimyr and on islands in the Kara Sea were emplaced synchronously with the layered intrusives dated here and the main pulse of the Siberian Traps. This inference is supported by the geochemical overlap of the syenite samples studied here and those from the study of Vernikovsky et al.33, suggesting similarities in the petrogenesis between the samples (Figs. 4 and S1).
The intrusive nature of the alkaline layered intrusions into the lowermost volcanic pile combined with the new age data show that these volcanics were no younger than 251.64 ± 0.11 Ma and thus probably of the same age as the lower lavas from the Tunguska Basin. This confirms the previous suggestion by Reichow et al.10,11 based on Ar-Ar data that the Taimyr and Tunguska volcanics erupted synchronously. There are also indications in the geochronological data that the magmatic system feeding the Dumtalei layered intrusion was long-lived (Fig. 3). This could imply that there are also younger (<251 Ma) intrusives present within the Siberian Traps as has previously been indicated from a baddeleyite date from the Guli ultramafic-alkaline intrusive complex in the Maymecha-Kotuy area just south of the Yenisei-Khatanga Basin that yielded a weighted mean 206Pb/238U baddeleyite age of 250.2 ± 0.3 Ma17. The data are, however, discordant (the 207Pb/206Pb age is 278 ± 4) so potential residual Pb-loss, possibly giving a too young age, cannot be excluded; nevertheless it is overlapping with our youngest age indicated for the Dumtalei intrusion.
Tholeiitic magmatism dominates the Siberian Traps event in volume and areal extent. However, an important, localized phase of alkaline magmatism for this LIP was recognized in the Maymecha-Kotuy area, at the NE margin of the Siberian Traps province37,43. These magmas have been suggested to have a very deep mantle source and follow independent paths from the tholeiitic magmatism, reaching rapidly the surface without ponding in deep crustal magma chambers and escaping large interaction with the crust36. The latter authors put forward large volatile contents of the alkaline melts as possible explanation for this different behaviour, and this has been recently supported by Black et al.19 with data from volatile rich melt inclusions. In Maymecha-Kotuy, the Guli massif, a large ultramafic-alkaline intrusion43,44,45 is considered co-magmatic with some of the alkaline lavas38. We here compare data from our layered intrusive complexes from Taimyr, and syenite-granites of Vernikovsky et al.33, with the classical alkaline series in Maymecha-Kotuy.
For syenite–granite intrusive bodies in Taimyr Vernikovsky et al.33 invoked a hybrid mantle-crustal origin, on the basis of trace element geochemistry and Sr-Nd isotopes. We see a general overlap in trace element patterns between our rocks and those analysed by Vernikovsky et al.33 (2003), taking it as suggestive of similar origin for these evolved alkaline intrusive rocks. Isotopic data are not available for our samples, but given the similar provenance, petrography and major and trace element chemistry, net of some amount of crustal assimilation we can assign a similar origin to our rocks and those from Vernikovsky et al.33. It is important to note that any attempt of correlating our intrusive rocks with alkaline lavas on the basis of trace elements has to be considered cautiously. Indeed, as seen from the IE and REE patterns, the Taimyr intrusive rocks suffer of some accumulation/fractionation effect.
Fedorenko and Czamanske38 and Arndt et al.37 present a petrogenetic and volcanostratigraphic study on the tholeiitic (lower part) to alkaline (upper part) lava pile cropping out along the Maymecha River basin. They observe a large spread of geochemical compositions in the alkaline rocks compared to the tholeiitic sequence. The latter was described in the Noril’sk region by classical contributions e.g.46,47, defining 12 geochemically distinct lava units. Fedorenko and Czamanske38 correlate the lower part of the Maymecha with the main Noril’sk volcanic sequence, pointing out that the main tholeiitic series is stratigraphically lower than the alkaline one described in Maymecha. This is in agreement with the observation from the alkaline complexes cutting through lava piles in Taimyr. In the Maymecha Kotuy alkaline series, Delkansky is the only bimodal lava unit, showing rocks (trachydacites) with evolved compositions (SiO2 > 60 wt.%) comparable with those observed for our syenites and the syenites analysed by Vernikovsky et al.33. Also on the basis of REE concentrations and ratios comparisons, the Dikarabigai complex and the syenites described by Vernikovsky et al.33 can be correlated with the Delkansky formation as described by Fedorenko and Czamanske38 and Arndt et al.37. Interestingly, a trachyte tuff and a trachyrhyodacite tuff from the Delkansky formation were dated to 251.904 ± 0.061 Ma and 251.483 ± 0.088 Ma (not including tracer calibration uncertainties), respectively21 (black bars in Fig. 6). Burgess and Bowring21 suggested that there is a hiatus in the Delkansky formation between the two samples that are separated by ca. 135 m in the stratigraphy. Given the ages of Burgess and Bowring21 it is clear that the Taimyr intrusives were emplaced synchronously with the Delkansky formation and probably during the proposed hiatus in this lava stratigraphy.
Also the quartz-syenites and granite samples analysed by Kogarko et al.45,48 from the Guli complex are evolved. Major and trace element compositions for these rocks are not reported in the contribution, thus it is impossible to compare their REE and IE patterns with those of the Taimyr rocks and with the geochemical parameters defining the alkaline formations described by Arndt et al.37. However, on the basis of field relations, Kogarko and Zartman45 recognize six phases of magmatism building up the Guli Massif, and the evolved rocks are only present in a late phase (V out of VI phases, where the VI is the youngest), in agreement with the late (but not final) emplacement of the Delkanski lava suite in Maymecha Kotuy.
Radiogenic isotope data are available from the contributions of Arndt et al.37, Kogarko and Zartman45, Kogarko et al.48, Vernikovsky et al.33, and Malitch et al.36. Except from two outliers, the Sr-Nd isotope data show a growing crustal contribution from the juvenile component of ultramafic to mafic rocks from the Dumtalei layered intrusive36 (87Sr/86Sr250Ma = 0.70454–0.70494 and 143Nd/144Nd250Ma = 0.51250–51257) and the Delkansky rocks37 (87Sr/86Sr250Ma = 0.7036–0.7046 and 143Nd/144Nd251Ma = 0.5124–0.5125), to the Taimyr intrusions analysed by Vernikovski et al.33 (87Sr/86Sr251Ma = 0.7047–0.7064; Nd/144Nd251Ma ~ 0.5120), to the quartz-syenites and granites of the Guli complex48 (87Sr/86Sr250Ma = 0.706–0.717 and 143Nd/144Nd250Ma = 0.5116–0.5120). Interpreting these data, Arndt et al.37 suggest that the alkaline lavas were emplaced rapidly and virtually without interaction with the crust, Vernikovsky et al.33 recognize a hybrid mantle-crust origin for the Taimyr rocks, and Kogarko and Zartman45 call for a strong crustal contamination or even for an anatectic origin. As reported by Vernikovski et al.33, Taimyr intrusive bodies intruded the crust at shallow level. This is in agreement with fractionation paths calculated by Arndt et al.37, arguing for low pressure crystallization. Intrusive magma bodies are more prone to crustal assimilation and different contaminants or degrees of contamination might explain the differences in REE and IE patterns observed between the Dumtalei and the Dikarabigai layered intrusive complexes. For the Dumtalei intrusive complex this is supported by juvenile isotope signatures of the mafic components of the complex36.
The maximum areal extent of the Siberian Traps has been estimated to ca. 5 million km2, including Taimyr and the West Siberian basin where broadly coeval basalts and sills are present9,10,11,12,27,28,31 (Fig. 1). Our new data from Taimyr lend support to this estimate by documenting synchronicity between subvolcanic activity in Taimyr and the Tunguska Basin within a 100 ka uncertainty (Figs. 5 and 6). Although similar high precision data do not exist from the West Siberian basin, the results presented here show that the flood basalts in Taimyr were erupted prior to 251.64 ± 0.11 Ma and thus are not younger than those of the main Siberian Traps21. The fact that subvolcanic intrusives were emplaced at the same time as the main stage of volcanism in the Tunguska Basin (Fig. 6) corroborates a firm correlation with the main pulse of igneous activity in the Siberian Traps in its central part with that of the Taimyr. Hence, our data requires an upscaling of the volume of the main pulse of the Siberian Traps as previously suggested by e.g. Reichow et al.10.
In Taimyr, Permian coal bearing terrestrial sediments correlative with those in the Tunguska Basin, as well as early Paleozoic and older49,50,51,52,53,54 sedimentary rocks (shales, limestones, marls) are present. These probably have high organic carbon contents comparable to what has been documented from the Tunguska Basin55. Although not studied in the same detail, the general Neoproterozoic to Carboniferous stratigraphy of southern Taimyr, and the Yenisei-Khatanga basin, sitting between the Tunguska Basin and the Taimyr Peninsula, is very similar to that of the well-studied Tunguska basin. These areas to the north of Tunguska represented the passive continental margin to the Siberian platform from at least the upper Neoproterozoic to the early Carboniferous49,51,52,53,56.
Svensen et al.18 estimated that more than 100 000 Gt of CO2 could have been generated as a result of contact metamorphism of organic rich and petroleum bearing sediments around sill intrusions, based on an estimate of outcropping sill intrusions of 1.6 million km2 in the Tunguska basin. Assuming that the area containing the Taimyr traps and the Yenisei-Khatanga trough (Fig. 1) is also characterised by similar volumes of subvolcanic intrusions as the Tunguska Basin, this estimate may have to be scaled up by ca. 20%. The indications that the alkaline intrusions in Taimyr and the parent magmas to the Delkansky lavas were emplaced and assimilated and fractionated at a shallow crustal level in Permian organic rich sediments may actually have been an extra favourable situation for assimilation and mobilisation of organic carbon from the surrounding sediments, further adding to the carbon degassing budget.
Prolonged magmatism and CO2 degassing has been proposed as a mechanism for Early Triassic δ13C negative isotope excursions57,58,59. The indications in the geochronological data from the Dumtalei intrusive complex that magmatism was prolonged and that final emplacement of the studied monzodiorite occurred as late as at 250.60 ± 0.22 Ma shows that magmatic activity associated with the Siberian LIP continued into the Dinerian and possibly the Smithian. This assertion is also supported by the apparently overlapping ages of the Guli complex at the NE margin of the Siberian Platform17. The main uncertainty with this correlation is the yet unresolved ages for the Griensbachian-Dinerian and Dinerian-Smithian boundaries. Galfetti et al.60 reported a U-Pb zircon age for an ash bed just above the Dinerian-Smithian boundary of 251.22 ± 0.20 Ma, indicating that the age of the boundary was slightly older than our age. This age was in accordance with an existing ash bed age of 250.55 ± 0.51 Ma from the Early Spathian61. Li et al.62 on the other hand, recently estimated an age of 249.9 ± 0.1 Ma for the same boundary based on cyclostratigraphy tied to the precise Permian-Triassic boundary age of Burgess et al.22. However, this age estimate required large extrapolations from the nearest absolute anchor age, and its accuracy may be questionable. The presence of Dinerian to Smithian aged large intrusive complexes that intrude Paleozoic organic rich sedimentary rocks associated with the Siberian LIP and thus potentially causing thermogenic CO2 degassing, could provide an explanation for the δ13C negative isotope excursions57,58,59 observed in the Early Triassic. A possible relationship between intrusive activity and metamorphic carbon degassing associated with the Siberian LIP and the global environmental perturbations of e.g. the Smithian58,59,63,64,65,66 could be further explored through more high precision dating of intrusive complexes in Taimyr and elsewhere within the Siberian LIP if the uncertainties of the boundary ages in the Early Triassic are resolved.
Samples and Methods
One sample from the TP-43 borehole of the Dumtalei layered intrusion (Fig. 2), monzonite sample TP43 (410 m below the surface, mbs; Fig. 3d), and two samples from the TP-42 borehole (Fig. 2), syenite sample TP-42-1 and monzosyenite TP-42-2 (957 mbs; Fig. 3a,b), and one sample from the TP-55 borehole (Fig. 2), syenite sample TP-55 (946 mbs; Fig. 3c), from the Dikarabigai intrusive complex were analysed for whole-rock major and trace element geochemistry (ICP MS/OES) and processed for zircon U-Pb chemical abrasion isotope dilution thermal ionization mass spectrometry (CA-ID-TIMS) geochronology.
The samples were crushed, pulverised and reduced on a Wilfley table before separation of heavy minerals through standard magnetic and heavy liquid techniques at the University of Oslo. The zircons were selected under an optical microscope, annealed for ca. 72 hours at ca. 900 °C and chemically abraded with HF (+HNO3) at ca. 195 °C for 14 hours67,68. The zircons grains chosen for analyses were spiked with a mixed 202Pb-205Pb-235U tracer that has been calibrated to the EARTHTIME (ET) 100 Ma solution69 by measurement with the exact same instrument procedures as the unknown samples (giving a weighted mean age of 100.209 ± 0.038 Ma; 2σ, MSWD = 0.72, n = 12). This intercalibration allows direct comparison of dates generated with our in-house tracer with dates generated by the ET tracers (making sure that tracer calibration uncertainties are included in the ages when compared). After spiking, the zircons were dissolved in HF (+HNO3) at ca. 210 °C for >48 hrs in Teflon micro capsules enclosed in a Parr type Teflon bomb. The solutions were subsequently chemically separated through column chemistry (separating U and Pb from REE’s and other ionisation inhibiting elements). The solutions were loaded on zone refined Re filaments and measured on a Finnigan MAT262 thermal ionisation mass spectrometer (TIMS). For all samples Pb was measured in dynamic mode on a Masscom secondary electron multiplier and U in static mode on Faraday cups. Corrections for Pb fractionation were made using the measured 202Pb/205Pb-ratios for each Pb analysis relative to the 202Pb/205Pb-ratio of the tracer of 2.2702 (±0.006%, 2σ). The long-time average U-fractionation determined from measurements of the U500 standard solution (0.07%/a.m.u. ± 0.04%, 2σ) was used to correct for sample U-fractionation. Pb blanks are generally ≤1 pg (with composition: 206Pb/204Pb = 18.04 ± 0.40%; 207Pb/204Pb = 15.22 ± 0.30%; 208Pb/204Pb = 35.67 ± 0.50; 1σ), and in general all common Pb is considered to represent Pb blank, also for analyses no. 4 and 6 from TP-43 where additional common Pb was present. The raw data were reduced using Tripoli70 and analytical errors and corrections (including tracer uncertainties and Th-corrections, assuming Th/U in the magma of 3) were incorporated and propagated using an Excel macro based on published algorithms71. Weighted mean dates were calculated using ISOPLOT72 with specified decay constants73 and are presented in Table S2.
Zonenshain, L. P., Kuzmin, M. I. & Natapov, L. M. Geology of the USSR: A Plate Tectonic Synthesis (ed. Page, B. M.), Geodyn. Ser. 21. AGU, Washington, D.C. (1990)
Renne, P. R. & Basu, A. R. Rapid eruption of the Siberian Traps flood basalts at the Permo–Triassic Boundary. Science 253, 176–179 (1991).
Campbell, I. H., Czamanske, G. K., Fedorenko, V. A., Hill, R. I. & Stepanov, V. Synchronism of the Siberian Traps and the Permian-Triassic boundary. Science 258(5089), 1760–1763 (1992).
Bogdanov, N. A. et al. Tectonic Map of the Kara and Laptev Seas and North Siberia (scale 1:2,500,000). Explanatory note. Moscow, Institute of Lithosphere of Marginal and Inner Seas RAS, 127 pp (1998).
Vasiljev, Y. R., Zolotukhin, V. V., Feoktistov, G. D. & Prusskaya, S. N. Volume estimation and genesis of Permian-Triassic trap magmatism from Siberian platform. Russian Geology and Geophysics 41, 1696–1705 (2000).
Dobretsov, N. L. & Vernikovsky, V. A. Mantle plumes and their geological manifestations. International Geology Review 43, 771–787 (2001).
Vyssotski, A. V., Vyssotski, V. N. & Nezhdanov, A. A. Evolution of the West Siberian basin. In Regional Geology and Tectonics Phanerozoic Passive Margins, Cratonic Basins and Global Tectonic Maps, 754–801 (2012).
Kuzmichev, A. B. & Pease, V. L. Siberian trap magmatism on the New Siberian Islands: constraints for Arctic Mesozoic plate tectonic reconstructions. Journal of the Geological Society 164(5), 959–968 (2007).
Reichow, M. K., Saunders, A. D., White, R. V., Al’Mukhamedov, A. I. & Medvedev, A. Y. Geochemistry and petrogenesis of basalts from the West Siberian Basin: an extension of the Permo–Triassic Siberian Traps, Russia. Lithos 79(3), 425–452 (2005).
Reichow, M. K. et al. The timing and extent of the eruption of the Siberian Traps large igneous province: Implications for the end-Permian environmental crisis. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 277(1–2), 9–20 (2009).
Reichow, M. K. et al. Petrogenesis and timing of mafic magmatism, South Taimyr, Arctic Siberia: A northerly continuation of the Siberian Traps? Lithos 248, 382–401 (2016).
Saunders, A. D., England, R. W., Reichow, M. K. & White, R. V. A mantle plume origin for the Siberian traps: uplift and extension in the West Siberian Basin, Russia. Lithos 79(3–4), 407–424 (2005).
Dobretsov, N. L., Vernikovsky, V. A., Karyakin, Y. V., Korago, E. A. & Simonov, V. A. Mesozoic–Cenozoic volcanism and geodynamic events in the Central and Eastern Arctic. Russian Geology and Geophysics 54(8), 874–887 (2013).
Svensen, H. H. et al. Thinking about LIPs: A brief history of ideas in Large igneous province research. Tectonophysics 760, 229–251, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2018.12.008 (2019).
Wignall, P. B. Large igneous provinces and mass extinctions. Earth-science reviews 53(1), 1–33 (2001).
Kamo, S. L., Czamanske, G. K. & Krough, T. E. A minimum U–Pb age for Siberian flood-basalt volcanism. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 60, 3505–3511 (1996).
Kamo, S. L. et al. 2003. Rapid eruption of Siberian flood-volcanic rocks and evidence for coincidence with the Permian–Triassic boundary and mass extinction at 251 Ma. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 214(1–2), 75–91 (1996).
Svensen, H. et al. Siberian gas venting and the end-Permian environmental crisis. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 277(3–4), 490–500 (2009).
Black, B. A., Elkins-Tanton, L. T., Rowe, M. C. & Peate, I. U. Magnitude and consequences of volatile release from the Siberian Traps. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 317, 363–373 (2012).
Bond, D. P. & Wignall, P. B. Large igneous provinces and mass extinctions: an update. Volcanism, Impacts, and Mass Extinctions: Causes and Effects 505, 29–55 (2014).
Burgess, S. D. & Bowring, S. A. High-precision geochronology confirms voluminous magmatism before, during, and after Earth’s most severe extinction. Science Advances 1(7), p.e1500470 (2015).
Burgess, S. D., Bowring, S. & Shen, S. Z. High-precision timeline for Earth’s most severe extinction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(9), p.201317692 (2014).
Milanovskiy, Y. Y. Rift zones of the geological past and their associated formations. Int. Geol. Rev. 18(6), 619–639 (1976).
Makarenko, G. F. The epoch of Triassic trap magmatism in Siberia. Int.Geol.Rev. 19(9), 1089–1100 (1976).
Zhuravlev, E. G. Trap formation of West Siberian Basin. Isvestiya Vuzov. Ser. Geologycheskaya 7, 26–32 (In Russian; 1986).
Zolotukhin, V.V. & Al’mukhamedov A.I. Traps of the Siberian platform, In: Continental Flood Basalts (ed. Macdougall, J. D.). Kluwer Academic, Norwell, Mass., 273–310 (1988).
Zolotukhin, V. V. et al. Magnesian basites of west of the Siberian platform and questions of nickel-plating. (ed. Sobolev V. S.). Novosibirsk: Science, 225pp. (1984; In Russian)
Gurevitch, E. et al. Paleomagnetism and magnetostratigraphy of the traps from Western Taimyr (northern Siberia) and the Permo-Triassic crisis. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 136(3–4), 461–473 (1995).
Dobretsov, N. L. Permian-Triassic magmatism and sedimentation in Eurasia as a result of a superplume. Doklady Rus. Acad. Sci. 354(2), 216–219 (1997).
Bogdanov, N. A. et al. Tectonic Map of the Kara and Laptev Seas and North Siberia (scale 1:2,500,000). Explanatory note. Moscow, Institute of Lithosphere of Marginal and Inner Seas RAS, 127 pp (1998).
Salmanov, A. P. Basaltic komatieits of the southwestern Taimyr//Izv. AN SSSR. Ser. geol. 11, 132–136 (In Russian; 1987)
Svensen, H. H. et al. Gondwana Large Igneous Provinces: plate reconstructions, volcanic basins and sill volumes. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 463(1), 17–40 (2018).
Vernikovsky, V. A. et al. First report of early Triassic A-type granite and syenite intrusions from Taimyr: product of the northern Eurasian superplume? Lithos 66(1-2), 23–36 (2003).
Walderhaug, H. J., Eide, E. A., Scott, R. A., Inger, S. & Golionko, E. G. Palaeomagnetism and 40Ar/39Ar geochronology from the South Taimyr igneous complex, Arctic Russia: a Middle-Late Triassic magmatic pulse after Siberian flood-basalt volcanism. Geophysical Journal International 163(2), 501–517 (2005).
Badanina, I. Y., Malitch, K. N. & Romanov, A. P. Isotopic-geochemical characteristics of the ore-bearing ultramafic-mafic intrusions of western Taimyr, Russia. Doklady Earth Sciences 458(1), 1165–1167 (2014).
Malitch, K. N., Badanina, I. Y., Romanov, A. P. & Slusjenkin, S. F. U-Pb age and Hf-Nd-Sr-Cu-S isotope systematics of the Binyuda and Dyumtaley ore-bearing intrusions (Taimyr, Russia). Lithosphere 1, 107–128 (in Russian; 2016).
Arndt, N., Chauvel, C., Czamanske, G. & Fedorenko, V. Two mantle sources, two plumbing systems: tholeiitic and alkaline magmatism of the Maymecha River basin, Siberian flood volcanic province. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 133(3), 297–313 (1998).
Fedorenko, V. & Czamanske, G. Results of new field and geochemical studies of the volcanic and intrusive rocks of the Maymecha-Kotuy area, Siberian flood-basalt province, Russia. International Geology Review 39(6), 479–531 (1997).
Sun, S. S. & McDonough, W. F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 42(1), 313–345 (1989).
Collins, W. J., Beams, S. D., White, A. J. R. & Chappell, B. W. Nature and origin of A-type granites with particular reference to southeastern Australia. Contributions to mineralogy and petrology 80(2), 189–200 (1982).
McDonough, W. F. & Sun, S. S. The composition of the Earth. Chemical geology 120(3–4), 223–253 (1995).
Gervasoni, F., Klemme, S., Rocha-Júnior, E.R. and Berndt, J. Zircon saturation in silicate melts: a new and improved model for aluminous and alkaline melts. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 171(3), 21 (2016).
Sobolev, A. V., Sobolev, S. V., Kuzmin, D. V., Malitch, K. N. & Petrunin, A. G. Siberian meimechites: origin and relation to flood basalts and kimberlites. Russian Geology and Geophysics 50(12), 999–1033 (2009).
Egorov, L. S. Ijolite– Carbonatite Plutonism (by Example of the Maimecha–Kotui Complex of Polar Siberia), Leningrad: Nedra (in Russian; 1991).
Kogarko, L. N. & Zartman, R. E. A Pb isotope investigation of the Guli massif, Maymecha-Kotuy alkaline-ultramafic complex, Siberian flood basalt province, Polar Siberia. Mineralogy and petrology 89(1-2), 113–132.45 (2007).
Wooden, J. L. et al. Isotopic and trace-element constraints on mantle and crustal contributions to Siberian continental flood basalts, Noril’sk area, Siberia. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 57(15), 3677–3704 (1993).
Fedorenko, V. A. et al. Petrogenesis of the Siberian Flood Basalt sequence at Noril’sk. Int. Geol. Rev. 38, 99–135 (1996).
Kogarko, L. N., Henderson, M. & Foland, K. The Guli ultrabasic alkaline massif in polar Siberia: evolution and isotope sources. Doklady Earth Sciences, 3648890 (1999).
Khain, V. E. Tectonics of continents and oceans (year 2000). Moscow, Scientific World, 606 pp. (2001).
Proskurnin, V. F. (Ed.) State Geological Map of the Russian Federation [in Russian], Scale 1:1,000,000 (Third Generation). Sheet S-48, Lake Taimyr (Eastern Part). Explanatory Note. Kartfabrika VSEGEI, St.Petersburg (2009).
Nikishin, A. M., Sobornov, K. O., Prokopiev, A. V. & Frolov, S. V. Tectonic evolution of the Siberian Platform during the Vendian and Phanerozoic. Moscow University Geology Bulletin 65(1), 1–16 (2010).
Afanasenkov, A. P. et al. The tectonics and stages of the geological history of the Yenisei–Khatanga Basin and the conjugate Taimyr Orogen. Geotectonics 50(2), 161–178 (2016).
Priyatkina, N. et al. The Proterozoic evolution of northern Siberian Craton margin: a comparison of U–Pb–Hf signatures from sedimentary units of the Taimyr orogenic belt and the Siberian platform. International Geology Review 59(13), 1632–1656, https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2017.1289341 (2017).
Vernikovsky, V. et al. Geodynamics and Oil and Gas Potential of the Yenisei-Khatanga Basin (Polar Siberia). Minerals 8, 510, https://doi.org/10.3390/min8110510 (2018).
Frolov, S. V. et al. Riphean basins of the central and western Siberian Platform. Marine and Petroleum Geology 28(4), 906–920 (2011).
Pisarevsky, S. A., Natapov, L. M., Donskaya, T. V., Gladkochub, D. P. & Vernikovsky, V. A. Proterozoic Siberia: a promontory of Rodinia. Precambrian Res. 160, 66–76 (2008).
Payne, J. L. & Kump, L. R. Evidence for recurrent Early Triassic massive volcanism from quantitative interpretation of carbon isotope fluctuations. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 256(1-2), 264–277 (2007).
Grasby, S. E., Beauchamp, B., Embry, A. & Sanei, H. Recurrent Early Triassic ocean anoxia. Geology 41(2), 175–178 (2013).
Song, H. et al. Large vertical δ13CDIC gradients in Early Triassic seas of the South China craton: Implications for oceanographic changes related to Siberian Traps volcanism. Global and Planetary Change 105, 7–20 (2013).
Galfetti, T. et al. Timing of the Early Triassic carbon cycle perturbations inferred from new U–Pb ages and ammonoid biochronozones. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 258(3–4), 593–604 (2007).
Ovtcharova, M. et al. New Early to Middle Triassic U–Pb ages from South China: calibration with ammonoid biochronozones and implications for the timing of the Triassic biotic recovery. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 243(3–4), 463–475 (2006).
Li, M. et al. Astronomical tuning of the end-Permian extinction and the Early Triassic Epoch of South China and Germany. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 441, 10–25 (2016).
Payne, J. L. et al. Large perturbations of the carbon cycle during recovery from the end-Permian extinction. Science 305(5683), 506–509 (2004).
Clarkson, M. O. et al. A new high-resolution δ13C record for the Early Triassic: insights from the Arabian Platform. Gondwana Research 24(1), 233–242 (2013).
Metcalfe, I., Nicoll, R. S., Willink, R., Ladjavadi, M. & Grice, K. Early Triassic (Induan–Olenekian) conodont biostratigraphy, global anoxia, carbon isotope excursions and environmental perturbations: New data from Western Australian Gondwana. Gondwana Research 23(3), 1136–1150 (2013).
Meyer, K. M., Yu, M., Lehrmann, D., Van de Schootbrugge, B. & Payne, J. L. Constraints on Early Triassic carbon cycle dynamics from paired organic and inorganic carbon isotope records. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 361, 429–435 (2013).
Huyskens, M. H., Zink, S. & Amelin, Y. Evaluation of temperature-time conditions for the chemical abrasion treatment of single zircons for U–Pb geochronology. Chemical Geology 438, 25–35 (2016).
Mattinson, J. M. Zircon U–Pb chemical abrasion (“CA-TIMS”) method: combined annealing and multi-step partial dissolution analysis for improved precision and accuracy of zircon ages. Chemical Geology 220(1–2), 47–66 (2005).
Ballo, E. G., Augland, L. E., Hammer, Ø. & Svensen, H. H. A new age model for the Ordovician (Sandbian) K-bentonites in Oslo, Norway. Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology and Paleoecology 520, 203–213 (2019).
Bowring, J. F., McLean, N. M. & Bowring, S. A. Engineering cyber infrastructure for U‐Pb geochronology: Tripoli and U‐Pb_Redux. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 12(6), https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GC003479 (2011).
Schmitz, M. D. & Schoene, B. Derivation of isotope ratios, errors, and error correlations for U‐Pb geochronology using 205Pb‐235U‐(233U)‐spiked isotope dilution thermal ionization mass spectrometric data. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 8(8) (2007).
Ludwig, K. R. User’s manual for isoplot 3.00, a geochronlogical toolkit for microsoft excel. Berkeley Geochronl. Cent. Spec. Publ. 4, 25–32 (2003).
Jaffey, A. H., Flynn, K. F., Glendenin, L. E., Bentley, W. T. & Essling, A. M. Precision measurement of half-lives and specific activities of U 235 and U 238. Physical Review C 4(5), 1889 (1971).
Ershova, V. B. et al. Trans-Siberian Permian rivers: A key to understanding Arctic sedimentary provenance. Tectonophysics 691, 220–233 (2016).
Ershova, V. B., Prokopiev, A. V. & Khudoley, A. K. Devonian–Permian sedimentary basins and paleogeography of the Eastern Russian Arctic: an overview. Tectonophysics 691, 234–255 (2016).
Cao, C. et al. Biogeochemical evidence for euxinic oceans and ecological disturbance presaging the end-Permian mass extinction event. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 281(3-4), 188–201 (2009).
We acknowledge support from the Research Council of Norway to CEED through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme, project 223272. AGP work was partially funded by RFBR grant 18-05-70073. This work was financially supported by grants from the RSF (project No. 19-17-0091), the RFBR (projects 18-05-70035). Gunborg B. Fjeld is thanked for crushing and mineral separation of the samples. Constructive reviews by R. Ernst, J.F. Wotzlaw and J. Davies and the swift editorial handling of the manuscript are appreciated.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Augland, L.E., Ryabov, V.V., Vernikovsky, V.A. et al. The main pulse of the Siberian Traps expanded in size and composition. Sci Rep 9, 18723 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54023-2
Evolution of the Kolyvan-Tomsk granitoid magmatism (Central Siberia): Insights into the tectonic transition from post-collision to intraplate settings in the northwestern part of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt
Gondwana Research (2021)
Geochemical changes across a marginal marine Permo-Triassic boundary section on the Adria carbonate platform at Brsnina, Slovenia
International Journal of Earth Sciences (2021)
Linking Siberian Traps LIP Emplacement and End-Permian Mass Extinction: Evidence from Magnetic Stratigraphy of the Maymecha-Kotuy Volcanic Section
Late Paleozoic–Early Mesozoic Granite Magmatism on the Arctic Margin of the Siberian Craton during the Kara-Siberia Oblique Collision and Plume Events
Economic Geology (2020)