Engineering dual-glycan responsive expression systems for tunable production of heterologous proteins in Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron

Abstract

Genetically engineering intestinal bacteria, such as Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (B. theta), holds potential for creating new classes of biological devices, such as diagnostics or therapeutic delivery systems. Here, we have developed a series of B. theta strains that produce functional transgenic enzymes in response to dextran and arabinogalactan, two chemically distinct glycans. Expression systems for single glycan induction, and a novel “dual-glycan” expression system, requiring the presence of both dextran and arabinogalactan, have been developed. In addition, we have created two different chromosomal integration systems and one episomal vector system, compatible with engineered recipient strains, to improve the throughput and flexibility of gene cloning, integration, and expression in B. theta. To monitor activity, we have demonstrated the functionality of two different transgenic enzymes: NanoLuc, a luciferase, and BuGH16C, an agarase from the human intestinal bacterium, Bacteroides uniforms NP1. Together this expression platform provides a new collection of glycan-responsive tools to improve the strength and fidelity of transgene expression in B. theta and provides proof-of-concept for engineering more complex multi-glycan expression systems.

Introduction

The lower digestive tract of mammals contains diverse and abundant bacterial species, collectively referred to as the distal gut microbiota (DGM)1. The total collection of genes encoded within the DGM greatly outnumbers the host genome, and encode essential functions, such as digestion of dietary fiber and the synthesis of vitamins and amino acids2. In recent years, public and scientific interest in the DGM has intensified as mechanistic relationships between the DGM and host health have begun to be defined3. The DGM is required for intestinal and immune system development and function4 and can reduce pathogen colonization by competitive exclusion5. Imbalances in community structure, termed dysbiosis6, have been linked with chronic health conditions such as diabetes7, obesity8, and inflammatory bowel disease9. These issues have been exacerbated by Western diets, which are low in dietary fiber10; and the prophylactic and therapeutic use of broad spectrum antibiotics11.

Bacteroides thetaiotamicron (B. theta) is a prominent member of the human DGM. It is detectable in nearly half of healthy Western fecal microbiomes12 and is one of the most studied members of Bacteroidetes13. Members of this phylum are known for their ability to saccharify a wide variety of chemically complex polysaccharides from diverse biological sources, including terrestrial plants2, seaweed14, bacteria15, fungi16, and animals17. Glycan metabolism in Bacteroidetes is genetically encoded within polysaccharide utilization loci (PULs)18, which are clusters of co-regulated genes typically comprised of TonB-dependent SusC/SusD-like transporter systems, regulatory proteins, and carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZymes) specific for the consumption of discrete substrates. PULs are activated by one of three classes of regulators, including SusR-like, AraC hybrid two-component systems (HTCSs), and extracytoplasmic function (ECF) σ/anti- σ systems19,20. Although these regulatory proteins operate through different mechanisms they serve an analogous function within the cell, which is to detect products enzymatically released from a substrate and induce PUL expression.

Augmenting the metabolism of intestinal bacteria, such as B. theta, with transgenic enzymes and transporters is a promising approach for establishing and reprogramming established DGM structure. The introduction of enzymes with new functions or that operate at faster rates can release more fermentable sugars21, reduce complications associated with slow transit of ingesta22,23, and provide a selective advantage in a nutrient competitive ecosystem. Previously, the transfer of a fructan specific SusC/SusD-like transporter endowed the recipient B. theta strain with the ability to metabolize a chemically distinct glycan24. Recently, Bacteroides stercoris and B. theta were engineered to utilize porphyran, a structural polysaccharide found in the cell walls of red algae25. This transfer provided access to a “privileged” nutrient, and selective feeding on porphyran enabled engraftment of the engineered strain into an established microbiota. Such engineering strategies could usher in a new era of personalized medicine and microbiome engineering.

Despite these advances, genetic elements for tunable and tightly controlled expression of heterologous proteins in bacterial strains adapted for long-term host colonization are still required. Bacteroides spp. have unique regulatory and conjugation elements25,26,27,28, and genetic tools developed for other organisms generally are not tractable in B. theta. In this regard, several Bacteroides-specific tools have been developed. The pExchange plasmid for homologous recombination has existed since 199129. Using this counter-selectable system, unmarked chromosomal deletions and insertions can be made with single base pair resolution30,31. Alternatively, pNBU2, a plasmid containing a mobilizable transposon element32 facilitates integration of the entire plasmid indiscriminately into one of two tRNASER sites30. More recently, constitutive promoter elements and ribosome binding sites (RBS) have been screened and ranked to provide a wide-range of expression levels for heterologous proteins31,33. Episomal and chromosomal inducible gene expression systems also exist, and they can be regulated by anhydrotetracycline, a synthetic chemical inducer31, or the polysaccharide α-mannan34. Activation of each of these systems requires the addition of a single inducer for transgene expression.

To increase the fidelity of glycan responsive episomal and chromosomal expression systems in B. theta we have altered the natural regulatory mechanisms of PULs by placing them behind dextran (DX)35 and arabinogalactan (AG)20 responsive promoters. In addition, we have engineered a first in-in-class dual-glycan expression platform that is dependent upon the presence of two chemically distinct glycans that induce a minor diauxic growth phenotype in B. theta36. This dual-glycan expression system provided improved regulatory control of transgene expression in B. theta and enhanced the level of activity of two different reporter enzymes (e.g. a luciferase and agarase) from two different genomic loci and an expression plasmid. Importantly, most of these genetic modifications were not deleterious to bacterial fitness in vitro. This study provides unique insights into promoter engineering for improved control of gene expression in B. theta, and presents a platform for the future development of other multi-glycan responsive expression systems.

Results

Construction of a chromosomal platform for targeted insertion and expression of transgenes

In developing a recombinant chromosomal expression system, we sought to recommission the genome space of a characterized PUL. B. theta PUL75 (Fig. 1a) is dedicated to the metabolism of homogalacturonan (HG), a pectic glycan comprised of galacturonic acid37. Compared to the wild-type strain (WT), B. theta with a deletion of PUL75 (B. theta-ΔPUL75; base pairs: 5371714…5408988) was severely restricted in its ability to grow on minimal medium (MM) containing HG as sole carbon source (Fig. 1b;37). The vacated genome space in B. theta-ΔPUL75 was targeted for chromosomal integration using a complementary PUL75-5′ flank and PUL75-3′ flank sequence inserted into the pExchange backbone (Fig. 1c). In addition, a multiple cloning site (MCS) flanked by an upstream RBS, downstream terminator, and inducible or constitutive promoters were placed between the PUL75-5′ and PUL75-3′ sequences. This vector series, referred to as pINTEGRATE (pINT), enables precise and unmarked insertion of expression cassettes into the chromosome of B. theta-ΔPUL75. To complement this vector series we developed a pNBU2 plasmid series in parallel that contained an identical MCS and expression elements30. The pNBU2 vectors undergo discriminatory single-cross over integration of the entire plasmid into the B. theta genome at one of two tRNAser genes. This system enables faster evaluation of chromosomal transgene function from a second genome locus, but the modified strain is left with residual plasmid DNA and selectable markers in its genome.

Figure 1
figure1

Target genomic locus and integrative expression vectors. (a) Schematic of B. theta genomic locus PUL75 containing genes required for homogalacturonan (HG) utilization (top). These genes are deleted in the B. theta ΔPUL75 strain (bottom). (b) Growth profiles of wild-type (WT) B. theta (grey) and the ΔPUL75 strain (purple) in MM containing either glucose (GLC) or HG as sole carbon source. Growth was measured by OD600 readings over the course of 16 h. Values represent the average of three biological replicates. Variation is represented by standard error of the mean (s.e.m.) (c) Plasmid maps of the pINT (left) and pNBU2 (right) vectors. The orientation of the DX, AG, and ON, expression cassettes and the sequence of the MCS are indicated.

Validation of B. theta promoters for regulation of transgenes

Three different promoters were selected for insertion into pINT and pNBU2 vectors (Fig. 1c) based upon previous studies. These included a strong constitutive promoter PON (bt1311 promoter and the rpiL* RBS33), and two inducible promoters: the DX responsive “PDX”, which drives expression of the PUL48 susC-like gene bt309035 (Fig. 2a); and the AG responsive “PAG”, which drives expression of the PUL5 susC-like gene bt026833 (Fig. 2b). DX and AG were selected because they induce some of the strongest glycan responsive expression in B. theta, have distinct chemical structures (Fig. 2a,b), are from diverse biological sources (DX is from a bacterial glycan; AG is a plant cell wall glycan), and are induced by distinct regulatory mechanisms; PUL48 uses a SusR-like system (Fig. 2a) and PUL5 uses a HTCS system (Fig. 2b). Despite performing analogous functions in the cell, the SusR-like and HTCS regulators are structurally unrelated19. SusR-like proteins are relatively rare, with only five homologs identified in B. theta, two of which regulate the PULs involved in the metabolism of chemically distinct glucans19. The first SusR protein was discovered in the Sus PUL38 and its mechanism remains undefined. HTCSs are the most abundant PUL regulatory proteins in B. theta19. They are fused integral membrane proteins with a periplasmic exposed carbohydrate binding domain that operate through a “scissor blade-like” mechanism39 and a cytoplasmic AraC DNA-binding domain. Following carbohydrate binding, HTCSs undergo a histidine-aspartate phosphorylation cascade and bind DNA as a dimer36,40,41.

Figure 2
figure2

Inducible expression cassettes generate a dose dependent response in NanoLuc activity in B. theta. (a) Schematic of wild-type regulation by PUL48. PDX is activated by the SusR-like protein SusRDX in the presence of DX. (b) Schematic of wild-type AG regulation. PAG from PUL5 is activated by the HTCS protein HTCSAG in response to the presence of AG. Schematic representations of monomeric glucose (GLC; blue circle) the polymer dextran (DX) composed of a chain of GLC; and arabinogalactan (AG), composed of a galactose (GAL, yellow circle) backbone and arabinose side chains (green star). (c) NanoLuc activity under constitutive expression by the PON promoter is measured post induction with GLC (black bar), DX (blue bar), and AG(yellow bar). Luminescence signal for NanoLuc production under the (d) DX or (e) AG inducible promoters in the presence of increasing concentrations of DX or AG, respectively. Values in (d–f) represent the average and s.e.m. for three biological replicates. Asterisks represent levels of significance (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).

The ability of each promoter to drive transgene expression was determined using NanoLuc, a luciferase, as a reporter gene33. To evaluate proximity effects and differential expression platforms, NanoLuc-pINT and NanoLuc-pNBU2 vectors were conjugated into B. theta. Luciferase activity assays established that although genome location resulted in statistical differences in luciferase activity under some conditions, they were small when compared to glycan-induced expression (Fig. S1, P < 0.05 in 12/40 comparisons). When grown on glucose (GLC), DX, or AG, the PON constructs consistently produced luminescence at levels that were three orders of magnitude (P < 0.01) above the baseline produced by strains without the NanoLuc gene (Fig. 2c), and PDX and PAG constructs responded to DX or AG in a dose dependent fashion, respectively (Fig. 2d). Intriguingly, PAG displayed higher activity in the presence of GLC and AG than with AG alone (Fig. 2e).

Engineering tunable expression of glycan-responsive PUL regulator proteins in B. theta

Next, we attempted to increase the heterologous production of NanoLuc in B. theta, by modifying the induction status of the PUL48 and PUL5 regulatory proteins within the cell. Typically, regulatory proteins, such as HTCS and SusR-like homologs, are constitutively expressed at low levels and are not induced along with CAZymes and transport proteins during glycan metabolism35. We reasoned that placing strong constitutive or inducible promoters upstream of the regulator gene in PUL5 and PUL48 may create feedback loops that result in higher levels of expression. Therefore, B. theta strains with a series of different promoter architectures were generated (Fig. S2). These included: (1) a constitutive promoter, (2) a positive feedback loop (DX → DX; AG → AG), and (3) alternate forms of hybrid-induction (i.e. DG → AG and AG → DX). (1) The DX constitutive strain was created by placing the PON bt1311 promoter33 upstream of bt3091, the PUL48 SusR-like gene (SusRDX), to generate the strain B. theta-PONSusRDX. The AG constitutive strain was created by placing PON upstream of bt0267, the PUL5 HTCS gene (HTCSAG), to generate B. theta-PONHTCSAG. (2) The positive feedback systems were created by placing PDX upstream of SusRDX to create B.theta-PDXSusRDX; and PAG33 upstream of HTCSAG to create B.theta-PAGHTCSAG. (3) The hybrid-induction systems were created by inserting PAG in front of SusRDX and PDX in front of HTCSAG to create B. theta-PAGSusRDX, and B. theta-PDXHTCSAG, respectively. In addition, a third hybrid strain was created, B. theta-PAGSusRDX + PDXHTCSAG, which contained both hybrid regulatory modifications (Fig. S2).

To determine the effect of the modifications to the regulatory proteins of PUL5 and PUL48, the growth profiles of each B. theta strain were determined (Fig. 3a). Strains with constitutive regulation (B. theta-PONSusRDX and B. theta-PONHTCSAG) and positive feedback regulation both performed similar to wild-type. Each hybrid strain displayed a growth defect when cultured solely on the glycan sensed by the regulatory protein (DX for PAGSusRDX, or AG for PDXHTCSAG, Fig. 3a); however, this defect was mitigated when the strains were cultured on a mixture of DX and AG. This phenotype may be a result of the hybrid strains having a lower basal level of expression when regulated by a glycan-responsive promoter. Whereas on the mixture, the promoters are fully activated and lead to sufficient regulatory protein production to effectively activate their PULs preventing a growth defect.

Figure 3
figure3

Engineering regulatory elements alters growth profiles, levels of gene activity, and gene induction requirements. (a) Growth profiles of WT B. theta and engineered regulatory strains on GLC (black), DX (blue), AG (yellow), and a mixture of DX and AG (green). (b) Luminescence detected from DX-responsive NanoLuc in strains with engineered SusRDX when grown on GLC (black), DX (blue), AG (yellow), and the mixture of DX and AG (green). (c) Luminescence detected from AG-responsive NanoLuc in strains with engineered HTCSAG when grown on GLC (black), DX (blue), AG (yellow), and the mixture of DX and AG (green). (d) Luminescence detected from both DX- and AG-responsive NanoLuc in a strain with engineered SusRDX and HTCSAG when grown on GLC (black), DX (blue), AG (yellow), and the mixture of DX and AG (green). Error bars in (a) represent standard deviation (s.d.) and error bars in (b–d) represent s.e.m. for three biological replicates. Asterisks represent levels of significance (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).

To examine the effects of the genetic modifications to the regulation of PUL5 and PUL48 on the expression of a transgene, NanoLuc activity was measured in the engineered B. theta strains. When placed under SusRDX regulation, the PON and PDX promoter increased activity approximately three-fold over wild-type in both the pINT (Fig. 3b) and pNBU2 (Fig. S1) platforms (P < 0.01). The hybrid strain, B.theta-PAGSusRDX, displayed the lowest NanoLuc signal on DX but similar levels on the DX-AG mixture (P < 0.001), which is consistent with what was observed in the growth profiles (Fig. 3a). The AG-responsive systems displayed similar patterns, with a lower increase in NanoLuc activity in the PON and PAG systems (Fig. 3c, P < 0.01).

In contrast to the strains with single modifications, the strain with both hybrid regulator systems (B. theta-PAGSusRDX + PDXHTCSAG) displayed noticeable increases (P < 0.01) in NanoLuc activity (Fig. 3d). This strain produced the highest luminescence values (P < 0.001) for chromosomal NanoLuc in this study when NanoLuc was placed behind PDX and the strain was cultured on mixed sugars. Although it did not reach the same absolute value for reporter activity, NanoLuc positioned behind PAG exhibited the greatest relative difference compared to baseline luminescence on GLC (P < 0.01), owing to the high baseline of PDXNanoLuc. These results suggest that DX responses are preferential over AG responses in B. theta for these systems.

Augmenting transgene expression using a B. theta episomal expression vector

Plasmid-based expression systems hold several advantages over chromosomal expression systems, including efficient transformation, higher gene copy numbers, and shortened timelines due to lack of requirement for double cross-over selection methods. Several expression vectors compatible with Bacteroides spp. have been reported31,34. To compare the potency of the DX and AG regulated expression cassettes developed here with previously described vector expression systems, we created the pEpisomalPromoter (pEP) series of plasmids for B. theta (Fig. 4a). The pEP series contain the mobA and repA genes derived from the Bacteroides plasmid pBI143 DNA41 to allow the vector to persist and replicate independent of the B. theta chromosome. Vectors are maintained by erythromycin selection and are equipped with the PDX, PAG, or PON expression cassettes from pINT to select glycan responsiveness. As a proof of concept, the NanoLuc gene was cloned into a pEP vector under the control of the DX promotor, and expression was induced by culturing the cells with GLC, DX, AG or a mixture of DX/AG. Plasmid-based expression resulted in higher (P < 0.001) luminescence values when compared to chromosomal expression (Fig. 4b). Combining plasmid-based expression with reciprocal modifications to hybrid promoter regulation amplified (P < 0.001) effects for selective expression when compared with chromosomal NanoLuc expression (Fig. 4c). The B.theta-PDXSusRDX and B.theta-PONSusRDX strains transformed with a PDX-pEP vector had similar levels (P < 0.001) of luminescence (60–75 × 106 RLU) on DX and DX-AG mix, suggesting DX levels were sufficient to maximize expression in both systems. In comparison, the B.theta-PAGSusRDX strain only displayed activation to similar levels when grown on a mixture of DX and AG glycans (P < 0.001). This suggests that basal levels of SusRDX when grown on pure DX was not enough to drive plasmid expression; however, this effect was overcome by adding AG to the medium (Fig. 4b). An approximately two-fold amplification (P < 0.001) of NanoLuc activity over the other strains was observed in the B. theta-PAGSusRDX + PDXHTCSAG strain when grown on the AG-DX mix. This suggests that inducing both regulators results in higher levels of expression of heterologous genes using the pEP-plasmid system. B. theta-PAGSusRDX + PDXHTCSAG transformed with PDX-pEP had the highest levels of reporter activity in this study. Use of the plasmid with this strain culminated in an order of magnitude increase over the chromosomal system and a six-order of magnitude increase over the background luminescence of B. theta WT (Fig. 4c).

Figure 4
figure4

Episomal transgene expression results in higher enzyme activity when compared to chromosomal-based expression. (a) Vector map of the extra-chromosomal expression pEP_DX vector. (b) Luminescence signal detected from wild-type (WT), PONSusRDX, PDXSusRDX, PAGSusRDX, and PDXHTCSAG + PAGSusRDX strains containing the NanoLuc under the control of the episomal pEP_DX promotor, in the presence of GLC (black bars), DX (blue bars), AG (yellow bars) or the DX and AG mixture (green bars). (c) Comparison of luminescence from engineered regulatory strains when NanoLuc is encoded in a plasmid or in the chromosome. Error bars represent s.e.m. for three biological replicates. Asterisks represent levels of significance (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).

Heterologous production of an agarase in modified B. theta strains

To determine whether the dual-glycan expression systems developed here can be used to produce a heterologous carbohydrate active enzyme, we used the pINT vector to integrate a family 16 glycoside hydrolase from B. uniformis NP1 (BuGH16) into the B.theta-SusRDX strain series. BuGH16 is an endo-β-agarase that cleaves agarose to produce neoagarotetraose as a terminal product42 (Fig. 5a). Wild-type B. theta does not possess this catalytic activity. BuGH16, fused to a N-terminal outer membrane anchoring tag, was cloned into the pINT- PDX vector and integrated into the B. theta-SusRDX strain. The outer membrane tag enabled whole-cell agarolysis assays to be performed as the enzyme cargo is displayed on the outer surface. For the B. theta-PONSusRDX and B. theta-PDXSusRDX strains, transgenic BuGH16 protein activity was detected and agarose activity was observed in all conditions containing DX (Fig. 5b). Production of BuGH16 in the PAGSusRDX multi-glycan induction strain only displayed BuGH16 activity when the cultures were treated with both DX and AG. This pattern is similar to the NanoLuc activity in the dual-glycan pINT (Fig. 3b) and pEP vector (Fig. 4b) systems. Taken together, these results suggest that engineering HTCS and SusR-like regulator proteins to respond to mixtures of chemically defined glycan inducers in chromosomal and plasmid-based systems can improve the regulatory fidelity of heterologous enzyme production in B. theta.

Figure 5
figure5

The heterologous BuGH16 agarase is enzymatically functional in engineered B. theta strains. (a) Schematic model of BuGH16 endo-agarase activity agarose to generate neoagarooligosaccharides (NAOS). NAOS is a repeating disaccharide of l-3,6-anhydro-galactose (L-3,6) and d-galactose, with L-3,6 at the non-reducing end. (b) pINT integrated hexa-histidine tagged BuGH16 (black arrow) detected by Western blot from induced SusRDX strains. (c) Thin-layer chromatography of culture supernatant from induced engineered strains incubated with agarose shows the presence of NAOS (black bar) generated from agarose by active BuGH16.

Discussion

Engineering intestinal bacteria to express heterologous proteins is a promising approach to improve host health. Previous studies with B. theta have developed expression cassettes that are constitutive33, or respond to common glycans33,34 or synthetic chemicals31. We have expanded upon this palette of genetic parts to develop the pINT, pNBU2, and pEP-based gene expression systems. pINT constructs specifically integrate its genetic cargo into the vacated genome space of B. theta-ΔPUL75. This genome space was selected to prevent large increases to the genome size and to repurpose a decommissioned locus known to be involved in metabolism of a glycan. Each expression platform has been designed for convenient subcloning of target genes, tailoring of promotor selectivity, and if desired, altering the targeted integration site within the genome as each DNA segment is flanked by directional restriction sites (Fig. 1c). Three different validated promoters were inserted into these expression cassettes, including PON (bt1311), a strong constitutive promoter; and PDX (bt3090) and PAG (bt0267) responsive promoters, two selective glycan responsive elements, PAG and PDX, that respond to chemically distinct glycans35 (Figs. 2a,b, S2). Constitutive expression of NanoLuc driven by PON was 1,500 to 2,000-fold greater than baseline auto-luminescence, on three different carbon sources (Fig. 2c). These results are consistent with previous findings33, and underpin that this constitutive promoter operates independent of glycan-specific regulatory networks (Fig. 2c). Surprisingly, DX and AG induction of NanoLuc resulted in different activity profiles. DX displays a conventional dose-dependent relationship when mixed with GLC (Fig. 2d); whereas, the AG-responsive promoter displayed optimal NanoLuc activity at 50:50 (GLC:AG), and there was an inhibitory effect observed at when treated solely with AG (Fig. 2e). The AG-responsive promoter used in this study is from PUL5 and was chosen due to previously determined high levels of expression20 and proven activity33; however, PUL5 is not the sole AG responsive PUL in the B. theta genome as PUL65 has also been shown to be involved in AG utilization20. When the PUL65 HTCS is deleted and the PUL5 HTCS is left intact, the mutant strain grows to a higher density (150%) on AG than the WT in vitro20. This indicates that PUL65 may have a repressive effect on PUL5 that is alleviated by deleting the PUL65 HTCS, a hypothesis that could explain the repression on nanoLuc observed in this study. These relationships may be exploited to tailor expression profiles using the AG-responsive system.

To explore the potential of augmenting glycan responsive expression levels and providing higher fidelity in controlling regulation, the promoter elements of SusRDX and HTCSAG were engineered to be constitutively expressed under control of PON, and in response to DX and AG (Fig. 3). For both SusRDX and HTCSAG, constitutive expression and positive feedback had the largest effect, boosting NanoLuc activity three-fold and two-fold above WT for DX (Fig. 3b) and AG (Fig. 3c), respectively. We believe this may be due to increases in the cellular pool of regulatory protein available to sense sugar and upregulate target genes. Supporting this, it has previously been observed that increasing the copy number of the canonical sus regulatory gene by incorporating it into a plasmid leads to increases in reporter gene activity43. In the case of hybrid-regulation (PAGSusRDX and PDXHTCSAG), both DX and AG were required for maximal expression. These results suggest that the regulators are not induced on the single sugars, and when both DX and AG are supplied, the promoters become activated and lead to higher levels of target gene expression. This hybrid effect was more pronounced when both SusRDX and HTCSAG were introduced into the same strain (B. theta-PAGSusRDX + PDXHTCSAG) and NanoLuc was induced by DX (Fig. 3d). A similar expression profile was not observed with AG induction, however, suggesting that the expression of AG-associated genes may be deprioritized during DX metabolism and that these hybrid systems are glycan specific. Previously, the impact of multiple glycans pairs, including DX and AG, on the growth phenotype of B. theta and HTCS phosphorylation was reported36. Although the diauxic effect varied for individual glycan pairs, a subtle diauxie for DX and AG was observed, supporting that DX is prioritized over AG metabolism35. However, because this growth effect was modest and the growth phenotype on a DX-AG mixture reported here appears to be a blending of the two signal glycan phenotypes rather than a clear diauxic prioritization (Fig. 1a), it suggestions that both DX and AG are digested simultaneously. In this regard, other combinatorial or prioritized glycan metabolic cascades35,36 could be exploited to engineer diverse spectrums of dual-glycan response systems, thereby providing further plasticity in tuning the expression of transgenic enzymes.

In order to determine if the dual-glycan effects are conserved using expression vectors, we built the pEP vector system, cloned NanoLuc behind PDX, and transformed the SusRDX strain (Fig. 4a). B. theta-PAGSusRDX produced an aproximately 20-fold increase on the mixed glycans compared to expression on pure glycans (Fig. 4b). Encouragingly, this effect was further amplified in the B. theta-PAGSusRDX + PDXHTCSAG strain (Fig. 3d). The higher luminescence activity observed using pEP-expression is attributed to the potential for higher copy numbers of the expression cassette within the cell. These vectors replicate within the cell independently of the genome as pBI143, the natural plasmid containing the mobilization and replication genes that were inserted into pEP, has been estimated to be maintained at a copy number of 20 per cell41. Additionally, it may result due to proximal effects of regulation. The SusR-like regulatory proteins are integral membrane proteins, which may require proximity to its target genes to maximally activate their expression. Episomal expression vectors may overcome this obstacle by diffusing to the cytoplasmic DNA-binding domain of transmembrane regulatory proteins.

To demonstrate that the dual-glycan expression system is compatible for a second transgenic enzyme, we replaced NanoLuc with BuGH16, an agarase from B. uniformis NP1. BuGH16 cleaves the β-d-galactose-(1,4)-3,6-anhydro-l-galactose bond in agarose42 (Fig. 5a). We compared BuGH16 activity with the PDX promoter in B. theta strains with modified SusRDX. BuGH16 production (Fig. 5b) and agarase activity (Fig. 5c) was observed when induced by DX, and DX and AG mixtures in the control, PONSusRDX and PDX SusRDX strains. Consistent with NanoLuc, dual-glycan regulation was only observed in the PAG-SusRDX system when BuGH16 was induced by a mixture of DX and AG. The observation that the hybrid-systems require two chemically distinct glycans for expression represents a new engineering solution for regulating transgene expression in B. theta. Other expression systems requiring two unique molecules for induction have been described, including the single chain tetracycline repressor in E. coli that requires both tetracycline and 4-dedimethylamino-anhydrotetracycline44, or the classic lac operon that requires both lactose and cyclic adenosine monophosphate bound catabolite activator protein for full expression45,46. The use of a dual-glycan expression system reported here, however, has the advantage of being regulated by common dietary glycans.

Conclusion

Gene expression systems with unique induction requirements for transgene expression have been created in B. theta by modifying the promoter elements of regulatory genes from two distinct PULs. These systems have been shown to increase expression of two different transgenes spanning a dynamic range of 2,000-fold34 to 100,000-fold31, consistent with other studies. Most significantly, our discovery that engineering regulatory gene promoters to be activated by chemically distant glycans (i.e. DX and AG), resulted in a dual-glycan expression system that is dependent on both glycans to maximize gene expression. This property was reproduced using integration plasmids that target two different genomic loci, and from pEP, an in-house designed episomal expression system. The results from this study sets the stage for engineering more complex glycan-directed regulatory engineering and rationally designed bacterial tools that respond to dietary glycans.

Methods

Vector construction

The recipient strain, B. theta-ΔPUL75, was previously created by counter selectable homologous recombination37. PUL75 (genome base pairs 5371714…5408988) was targeted for chromosomal deletion inserting complementary flank sequences inserted into the pExchange backbone. To generate the complementary pINTEGRATE vectors (pINT_DX) a 750 bp region upstream of PUL75 (PUL75 5′) and the promoter and initiator codon of bt3090 were amplified from B. theta genomic DNA and assembled by overlap PCR to contain a BglII cut site between the two fragments (to facilitate future promoter variants of pINT) with a PstI cut site on the 5′ end of the insert and an NcoI site on the 3′ end. Concurrently, the terminator from pNBU231 was amplified with a 5′ forward primer containing an MCS with 6xHis tag and a 3′ reverse XbaI primer. After digest with PstI/NcoI and NcoI/XbaI respectively, these inserts were ligated into pExchange-tdk (pEX-tdk)31 that were restricted with PstI and XbaI, and transformed into chemically competent S17-1λpir E. coli cells. The amplified construct was then digested with XbaI and ligated to a 750 bp PCR fragment corresponding to the downstream region of PUL75 (PUL75 3′) with an inserted XbaI site on the 5′ end and a NheI (XbaI isocaudomer) site on the 3′ end. The construct was confirmed by restriction digest and Sanger sequencing. pINT_AG and pINT_ON were created by replacing the BglII to NcoI fragment in pINT_DX with the promoter and initiator codon from bt0268 genomic DNA and bt1311 and the rpiL* RBS from pAT59333, respectively.

The single-step integrative vector pNBU2_DX was generated by amplifying the Promoter-MCS fragment from pINT_DX and ligating it into a variant of pNBU2 amplified to create BglII and XbaI cut sites between the R6K origin of replication and the terminator of pNBU233. The promoter and MCS from pINT_AG and pINT_ON were amplified with BglII and XbaI, respectively, and cloned into the reciprocal sites of pNBU2_DX to create pNBU2_AG and pNBU2_ON.

To create the episomal expression constructs pEP_DX, pEP_AG, and pEP_ON, the promoter to terminator fragments from pINT_DX, pINT_AG, and pINT_ON were amplified with NotI and PstI restriction enzyme sites, respectively, and cloned into a variant of pEx-tdk containing the repA and mobA genes (Genbank AAB39963.1 and AAB39964.1, respectively), which allow the plasmid to exist in B.theta extra-chromosomally.

The reporter genes NanoLuc47 and BuGH16 (np1_842) were fused to respective promoters by overlapping PCR and cloned into the BglII/XhoI or NotI/XhoI sites of the respective vectors to create reporter constructs. In order to target BuGH16 to the cell surface and to avoid interference with the translocation of endogenous proteins, the native N-terminal signal peptide of BuGH16 (nucleotides 1–67) was replaced with that of the putative polysaccharide lyase family 6 (PL6) (bt4116; bases 1–63) from PUL75, predicted to be expressed on the surface of B. theta48.

Regulatory gene promoter engineering

pEx-tdk was used to insert one of three promoters in front of the start codon of bt3091 (SusRDX) or bt0267 (HTCSAG). The three promoters were Pbt1311 (promoter from pAT59333), Pbt3090 (the contiguous sequence between the stop codon of bt3091 and the start codon bt3090), or Pbt0268 (promoter from pMM66033) and were denoted as PON, PDX, and PAG respectively. A terminator sequence was appended to the 5′ end of each promoter to reduce context dependence. The insertions were targeted by cloning the 750 bp flanks on either side of the desired insertion site into the pEx-tdk vector.

Bacterial conjugations

Donor cultures of E. coli strain S17-1λpir were grown in 5 mL lysogeny broth (LB)49 with 100 μg/mL ampicillin. Recipient strains of B. theta were routinely grown in 5 mL Tryptone Yeast Extract Glucose (TYG)50 at 37 °C in an anaerobic atmosphere (85% N2, 10% CO2, 5% H2). Donor and recipient cultures were pelleted by centrifugation and resuspended together in 1 mL of TYG and plated on Supplemented Brain Heart Infusion (BHIS)51 agar. To allow cell mating to occur, cultures were grown agar side down at 37 °C overnight under aerobic conditions. During cell mating, the vector is transferred from the donor E. coli and integrated into the chromosome of recipient B. theta through homologous recombination.

After 16–24 h, the resulting biomass was scraped from the plate, suspended in TYG broth and serially diluted. Cell suspensions were plated on BHI agar with 200 μg/mL gentamycin to select against E. coli, and 25 μg/mL erythromycin to select against B. theta that had not received vector. Pure cultures were prepared from arbitrarily-selected resistant colonies.

pNBU2-based conjugations were screened by colony PCR to confirm vector integration. For the double crossover conjugations using pEx-tdk and pINT, eight resistant colonies were arbitrarily chosen and grown in TYG broth. At this stage, a second recombination event may occur excising the vector backbone and selection markers from the chromosome and retaining the sequence of interest. Each cell culture was plated on BHI agar with 200 μg/mL 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FUDR) to select against cells that retained the plasmid in their chromosome. Pure cultures were screened by colony PCR. Positive clones underwent genome extraction for sequence confirmation.

Growth curves

Strains of B. theta were inoculated from a glycerol stock into 5 mL TYG medium and grown for 16–24 h in an anaerobic atmosphere. TYG cultures were diluted 1 in 50 into prewarmed anaerobic 2 × Bacteroides Minimal Medium (MM)52. 100 μL of diluted cells were plated in a transparent 96 well plate containing 100 μL of prewarmed anaerobic 1% (w/v) carbohydrate solution to achieve final concentrations of 1X MM and 0.5% (w/v) sugar. Carbohydrates examined were 0.5% (w/v) glucose (GLC), 0.5% homogalacturonan (HG), 0.5% (w/v) dextran (DX), 0.5% (w/v) arabinogalactan (AG), or a mixture of 0.25% (w/v) DX combined with 0.25% (w/v) AG (mix). Plates were sealed with clear, gas permeable membranes, and turbidity was measured in a BioTek Synergy HT plate reader programmed to read absorbance at 600 nm every 10 m for 48 h. Technical triplicates, each being the average of three observations, were tested for each condition. Negative controls consisted of wells containing 100 μL medium and 100 μL 18 MΩcm−1 ultrapure H2O. The average of the triplicates normalized for media background was plotted with the standard error of the mean.

NanoLuc assays

Dense TYG pre-cultures were created as described above for growth curves. TYG cultures were diluted 100-fold into prewarmed MM with 0.5% carbohydrate solution in borosilicate glass tubes. After 24 h incubation at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions, cells were pelleted by centrifugation and the supernatant was discarded. Cells were lysed by resuspending in 1/10th culture volume of BugBuster® (Millipore Sigma) and incubating at room temperature for 10 min. Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was used to dilute lysate 20 to 200-fold to ensure the signal was within the dynamic range of the luminescence detector. 30 μL samples were added to an opaque 96 well microplate and combined with 30 μL of freshly prepared NanoGlo reagent (Promega). Luminescence was measured using a Synergy HT Multi-detection plate reader. Technical replicates, each being the average of three observations, were tested for each condition. The luminescence of the negative controls (30 μL PBS + 30 μL NanoGlo) was used to normal signal for each replicate. The detected value corrected for the dilution factor and normalized to the density of the original culture as shown in Eq. (1).

$$\frac{(({\rm{luminescent}}\,{\rm{reading}}-{\rm{negative}}\,{\rm{control}})\times {\rm{dilution}}\,{\rm{factor}})}{{{\rm{OD}}}_{600}\,{\rm{of}}\,{\rm{culture}}}$$
(1)

The technical triplicates were then averaged and plotted with the standard error of the mean.

BuGH16 Agarolysis assays

The B.theta-SusRDX-bugh16 strain was culture as described above for the NanoLuc assays; however, cells where not lysed. Whole cells were washed and resuspended in 2X MM before being incubated with an equal volume of 0.8% (w/v) agarose under aerobic conditions at 37 °C for 24 h. The liquid phase was clarified by centrifugation before heat killing at 100 °C for 10 min. Nine μL of the resulting solution was spotted onto a silica thin layer chromatography (TLC) plate. The TLC plate was run in a 2:1:1 (v/v) solution of butanol: acetic acid: 18 MΩcm−1 ultrapure H2O. After drying, the plate was stained with one part 0.2% (w/v ethanol) dihydroxynaphthalene to two parts 3.75:1 ethanol: sulfuric acid solution, and developed by heating at 100 °C for 5 min.

Western blotting

B.theta-SusRDX-bugh16 cells were lysed in 1:45 of the culture volume BugBuster (Millipore). Cell lysate was mixed 1:1 with SDS loading buffer (10 μL of 2 M glycerol, 1.28 M β-mercaptoethanol, 125 mM Tris pH 6.8, 140 mM SDS, 60 μM bromophenol blue) and denatured at 95 °C for 5 min. Samples were run on 15% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gels at 200 V for 1 h in a Novex Mini Cell (Invitrogen). Protein was transferred from gels to a Sequi-Blot polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (BioRad) in an X Cell II Blot Module (Invitrogen) at 30 V for 16 h. Membranes were incubated with blocking buffer (5% (w/v) skim milk powder in a solution of 50 mM tris, 150 mM NaCl and 0.1% (v/v) tween 20 (TBS-T)) for 2 h followed by incubation with a 1:2500 dilution of rabbit anti-6-his IgG conjugated to horse radish peroxidase (Bethyl) in blocking buffer for 6 h. Membranes were washed three times by rinsing in 18 MΩcm−1 ultrapure H2O and rocking in TBS-T for 5 min. An Opti-4CN (BioRad) substrate kit was used to develop the membranes.

Statistical analysis

To examine whether or not changes in NanoLuc activity between strains and conditions were significant, data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 7.00. T-tests were used to make specific comparisons between conditions. Each condition had three biological replicates and tests were performed without assuming a consistent standard deviation. P values of 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 were used to define levels of significance.

Data availability

Activity assay data is available upon request.

References

  1. 1.

    Tropini, C., Earle, K. A., Huang, K. C. & Sonnenburg, J. L. The Gut Microbiome: Connecting Spatial Organization to Function. Cell Host Microbe 21, 433–442, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2017.03.010 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hooper, L. V., Midtvedt, T. & Gordon, J. I. How host-microbial interactions shape the nutrient environment of the mammalian intestine. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 22, 283–307, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.22.011602.092259 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Larsen, O. F. A. & Claassen, E. The mechanistic link between health and gut microbiota diversity. Sci Rep 8, 2183, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20141-6 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Xu, J. & Gordon, J. I. Honor thy symbionts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100, 10452–10459, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1734063100 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Callaway, T. R. et al. Probiotics, prebiotics and competitive exclusion for prophylaxis against bacterial disease. Animal health research reviews 9, 217–225, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1466252308001540 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Frank, D. N., Zhu, W., Sartor, R. B. & Li, E. Investigating the biological and clinical significance of human dysbioses. Trends in microbiology 19, 427–434, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2011.06.005 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Brunkwall, L. & Orho-Melander, M. The gut microbiome as a target for prevention and treatment of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: from current human evidence to future possibilities. Diabetologia 60, 943–951, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-017-4278-3 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Davis, C. D. The Gut Microbiome and Its Role in Obesity. Nutrition today 51, 167–174, https://doi.org/10.1097/NT.0000000000000167 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Qin, J. et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464, 59 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Sonnenburg, E. D. et al. Diet-induced extinctions in the gut microbiota compound over generations. Nature 529, 212–215, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16504 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bartlett, J. G. Clinical practice. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. N Engl J Med 346, 334–339, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp011603 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Human Microbiome Project, C. et al. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207–214, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11234 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wexler, A. G. & Goodman, A. L. An insider’s perspective: Bacteroides as a window into the microbiome. Nature microbiology 2, 17026, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.26 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hehemann, J.-H., Boraston, A. B. & Czjzek, M. A sweet new wave: structures and mechanisms of enzymes that digest polysaccharides from marine algae. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 28, 77–86 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Salazar, N., Gueimonde, M., Hernandez-Barranco, A. M., Ruas-Madiedo, P. & de los Reyes-Gavilan, C. G. Exopolysaccharides produced by intestinal Bifidobacterium strains act as fermentable substrates for human intestinal bacteria. Applied and environmental microbiology 74, 4737–4745, https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00325-08 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Abbott, D. W., Martens, E. C., Gilbert, H. J., Cuskin, F. & Lowe, E. C. Coevolution of yeast mannan digestion: Convergence of the civilized human diet, distal gut microbiome, and host immunity. Gut microbes 6, 334–339, https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2015.1091913 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bjursell, M. K., Martens, E. C. & Gordon, J. I. Functional genomic and metabolic studies of the adaptations of a prominent adult human gut symbiont, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, to the suckling period. The Journal of biological chemistry 281, 36269–36279, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M606509200 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Grondin, J. M., Tamura, K., Dejean, G., Abbott, D. W. & Brumer, H. Polysaccharide Utilization Loci: Fueling Microbial Communities. J Bacteriol 199, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00860-16 (2017).

  19. 19.

    Ravcheev, D. A., Godzik, A., Osterman, A. L. & Rodionov, D. A. Polysaccharides utilization in human gut bacterium Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron: comparative genomics reconstruction of metabolic and regulatory networks. BMC Genomics 14, 873, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-873 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Martens, E. C. et al. Recognition and Degradation of Plant Cell Wall Polysaccharides by Two Human Gut Symbionts. PLoS Biol 9, e1001221, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001221 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wallace, R. J. Ruminal microbiology, biotechnology, and ruminant nutrition: progress and problems. Journal of Animal Science 72, 2992–3003, https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.72112992x (1994).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Choct, M. & Annison, G. Anti-nutritive effect of wheat pentosans in broiler chickens: roles of viscosity and gut microflora. Br Poult Sci 33, 821–834, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669208417524 (1992).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hughes, R. J. Relationship between digesta transit time and apparent metabolisable energy value of wheat in chickens. Br Poult Sci 49, 716–720, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660802449145 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Joglekar, P. et al. Genetic Variation of the SusC/SusD Homologs from a Polysaccharide Utilization Locus Underlies Divergent Fructan Specificities and Functional Adaptation in Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron Strains. mSphere 3, https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphereDirect.00185-18 (2018).

  25. 25.

    Shepherd, E. S., DeLoache, W. C., Pruss, K. M., Whitaker, W. R. & Sonnenburg, J. L. An exclusive metabolic niche enables strain engraftment in the gut microbiota. Nature 557, 434–438, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0092-4 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bayley, D. P., Rocha, E. R. & Smith, C. J. Analysis of cepA and other Bacteroides fragilis genes reveals a unique promoter structure. FEMS Microbiol Lett 193, 149–154, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09417.x (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Vingadassalom, D. et al. An unusual primary sigma factor in the Bacteroidetes phylum. Mol Microbiol 56, 888–902, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04590.x (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Mastropaolo, M. D., Thorson, M. L. & Stevens, A. M. Comparison of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and Escherichia coli 16S rRNA gene expression signals. Microbiology 155, 2683–2693, https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.027748-0 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Smith, C. J., Rogers, M. B. & McKee, M. L. Heterologous gene expression in Bacteroides fragilis. Plasmid 27, 141–154 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Koropatkin, N. M., Martens, E. C., Gordon, J. I. & Smith, T. J. Starch Catabolism by a Prominent Human Gut Symbiont Is Directed by the Recognition of Amylose Helices. Structure 16, 1105–1115 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lim, B., Zimmermann, M., Barry, N. A. & Goodman, A. L. Engineered Regulatory Systems Modulate Gene Expression of Human Commensals in the Gut. Cell 169, 547–558.e515, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.03.045 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wang, J., Shoemaker, N. B., Wang, G. R. & Salyers, A. A. Characterization of a Bacteroides mobilizable transposon, NBU2, which carries a functional lincomycin resistance gene. Journal of Bacteriology 182, 3559–3571, https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.182.12.3559-3571.2000 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Mimee, M., Tucker, A. C., Voigt, C. A. & Lu, T. K. Programming a Human Commensal Bacterium, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, to Sense and Respond to Stimuli in the Murine Gut Microbiota. Cell Systems 1, 62–71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2015.06.001 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Horn, N. et al. A Novel Tightly Regulated Gene Expression System for the Human Intestinal Symbiont Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. Frontiers in Microbiology 7, 1080, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01080 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Rogers, T. E. et al. Dynamic responses of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron during growth on glycan mixtures. Molecular Microbiology 88, 876–890, https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12228 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Schwalm, N. D. III, Townsend, G. E. II & Groisman, E. A. Prioritization of polysaccharide utilization and control of regulator activation in Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. Mol Microbiol 104, 32–45, https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13609 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Luis, A. S. et al. Dietary pectic glycans are degraded by coordinated enzyme pathways in human colonic Bacteroides. Nature microbiology 3, 210–219, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-017-0079-1 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Cho, K. H., Cho, D., Wang, G. R. & Salyers, A. A. New regulatory gene that contributes to control of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron starch utilization genes. J Bacteriol 183, 7198–7205, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.24.7198-7205.2001 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lowe, E. C., Basle, A., Czjzek, M., Firbank, S. J. & Bolam, D. N. A scissor blade-like closing mechanism implicated in transmembrane signaling in a Bacteroides hybrid two-component system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 7298–7303, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200479109 (2012).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Townsend, G. E. 2nd, Raghavan, V., Zwir, I. & Groisman, E. A. Intramolecular arrangement of sensor and regulator overcomes relaxed specificity in hybrid two-component systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, E161–169, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212102110 (2013).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Smith, C. J., Rollins, L. A. & Parker, A. C. Nucleotide sequence determination and genetic analysis of the Bacteroides plasmid, pBI143. Plasmid 34, 211–222, https://doi.org/10.1006/plas.1995.0007 (1995).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Pluvinage, B. et al. Molecular basis of an agarose metabolic pathway acquired by a human intestinal symbiont. Nature communications 9, 1043, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03366-x (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    D'Elia, J. N. & Salyers, A. A. Effect of regulatory protein levels on utilization of starch by Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. J Bacteriol 178, 7180–7186, https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.178.24.7180-7186.1996 (1996).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kamionka, A. et al. Induction of single chain tetracycline repressor requires the binding of two inducers. Nucleic Acids Research 34, 3834–3841, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl316 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Jacob, F. & Monod, J. Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology 3, 318–356 (1961).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Malan, T. P., Kolb, A., Buc, H. & McClure, W. R. Mechanism of CRP-cAMP activation of lac operon transcription initiation activation of the P1 promoter. Journal of Molecular Biology 180, 881–909 (1984).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Hall, M. P. et al. Engineered Luciferase Reporter from a Deep Sea Shrimp Utilizing a Novel Imidazopyrazinone Substrate. ACS Chemical Biology 7, 1848–1857, https://doi.org/10.1021/cb3002478 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Nielsen, H. Predicting Secretory Proteins with SignalP. Methods Mol Biol 1611, 59–73, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7015-5_6 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Bertani, G. Studies On Lysogenesis I.: The Mode of Phage Liberation by Lysogenic Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology 62, 293–300 (1951).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Yokoyama, M. T., Carlson, J. R. & Holdeman, L. V. Isolation and characteristics of a skatole-producing Lactobacillus sp. from the bovine rumen. Applied and environmental microbiology 34, 837–842 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Bacic, M. K. & Smith, C. J. Laboratory Maintenance and Cultivation of Bacteroides Species. Current protocols in microbiology 0(13), 2–24, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780471729259.mc13c01s9 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Martens, E. C., Chiang, H. C. & Gordon, J. I. Mucosal Glycan Foraging Enhances Fitness and Transmission of a Saccharolytic Human Gut Bacterial Symbiont. Cell Host & Microbe 4, 447–457, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2008.09.007 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to that Eric Martens (University of Michigan) for the kind gift of pExchange integration vector, and Jeffery Smith (East Carolina University) for the gift of pBI143, containing the repA and mobA genes. This work is supported by Alberta Innovates (Project ID: BIOFS-12-026) and Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (Project ID: #1679).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.W.A. and G.D.I. secured the funding. D.R.J. designed and engineered expression vectors, interpreted results, generated figures and assisted to write the paper. M.B.S. engineered regulatory elements, performed growth and activity assays, interpreted results, generated figures and assisted to write the paper. D.R.J. and M.B.S. contributed equally to this study. R.M., J.M.G. and C.R.A. helped design constructs and engineer strains. G.D.I. and B.S. contributed to the design of the study and reporter assays, interpretation of results, and writing of the manuscript. D.W.A. conceived of the study, direct research, helped generate figures, and wrote paper. All authors contributed to the editing of final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Wade Abbott.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jones, D.R., Smith, M.B., McLean, R. et al. Engineering dual-glycan responsive expression systems for tunable production of heterologous proteins in Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. Sci Rep 9, 17400 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53726-w

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.