Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Acoustic Manipulation of Droplets under Reduced Gravity

Abstract

Contactless manipulation of matter is essential for studying physical phenomena. Acoustic manipulation of liquid samples using ultrasonic phased arrays provides a novel and attractive solution for mid-air manipulation, such as levitation, transportation, coalescence, mixing, separation, evaporation, and extraction, with a simple and single sequence. Despite the importance of gravity in droplet dynamics, its effect on a levitated droplet with an ultrasonic phased array remains unclear. To disseminate acoustic manipulation, better understanding of the fundamental physics of a droplet manipulated by ultrasonic phased arrays is required. Here, we show contactless levitation, transportation, and coalescence of multiple droplets under both ground and reduced gravity. Under ground gravity, the possible levitation size of the sample is limited to below the half wavelength of sound. Under reduced gravity, however, droplets that are larger than the limit can be successfully levitated, transported, and coalesced. Furthermore, the threshold of sound pressure for droplet levitation and manipulation could be minimised with the suppression of nonlinear acoustic phenomena under reduced gravity. These insights promote the development of contactless manipulation techniques of droplets for future space experiment and inhabitancy.

Introduction

The acoustic levitation method (ALM) of sample manipulation1,2,3,4,5,6 is of great importance and a promising candidate for potential mid-air lab-on-a-drop applications, including the solidification of materials7, chemical analysis8,9, X-ray crystallography10, DNA transfection11, blood analysis12, and microreactors13. ALM has been studied for the contactless handling of matter in air. Because it enables us to achieve container-free processing, ALM can prevent heterogeneous nucleation and contamination from a container wall2. Foresti et al.14,15,16 investigated the transport and coalescence of acoustically levitated droplets with multiple ultrasonic transducers and reflectors. Marzo et al.3 demonstrated an innovative technique for particle and droplet manipulation by forming arbitrary sound potential fields with appropriate phase differences using an ultrasonic phased array. Although ALM enables highly precise manipulation using sound fields irrespective of sample properties1, nonlinear and unsteady phenomena (e.g., interfacial instability and atomisation15 and acoustic streaming17,18) emerge in droplet manipulation. Thus, the characteristics of single acoustic levitator were investigated in the last decades19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27. However, the dynamics of droplet manipulation via ultrasonic phased arrays have not been fully investigated.

To the best of our knowledge, ALM via ultrasonic phased arrays has not been applied under different gravity levels28. Although a droplet can be levitated under the condition of earth’s gravity, a strong acoustic energy is required to overcome it. This strong energy causes the above-mentioned non-linear and dynamic behaviours. In contrast, because the required acoustic energy is much smaller in the lower gravity environment, it is an ideal environment that can minimize the complicated phenomena and enable us to reveal the underlying nature of droplet dynamics. It is of necessity and importance to demonstrate the feasibility study of droplet manipulation under lower gravity to obtain physical insights for the further development of ALM.

This study aims to investigate and better understand contactless liquid manipulation under both ground and reduced gravity. Experiments were conducted under the condition of an airplane in parabolic flight to achieve the following processes: coalescence, mixing, separation, and evaporation. In this paper, we demonstrate a feasibility study and fundamental physics for the levitation, transportation, and coalescence of droplets using an ultrasonic phased array under varying gravity. Our insights could pave the way towards droplet manipulation for lab-in-a-drop applications both on Earth and in space.

Results

Experiments under ground gravity

Prior to the feasibility study under reduced gravity, we conducted preliminary experiments of droplet levitation, transportation, and coalescence under ground gravity. Figure 1a represents the distribution of RMS sound pressure with two focal points. The distance between the focal points was set to 10 mm. The loop and node were formed at both focal points, and then the formation of a pair of acoustic standing waves were confirmed by switching the focal points. In this study, ethanol droplets were used for the experiments. Figure 1b presents a snapshot of the levitation behaviour of a pair of ethanol droplets. The pair of millimetre-sized ethanol droplets were simultaneously and stably levitated at each standing wave.

Figure 1
figure1

Sound pressure distribution and droplet levitation on ground. (a) Sound pressure distribution in the x-z plane. (b) Snapshot of levitation of a pair of water droplets: d = 2.1 mm (left) and d = 1.9 mm (right).

Figure 2 shows the typical pattern of droplet levitation under ground gravity. The droplets can be stably levitated, transported, and coalesced with relatively small droplets and RMS sound pressure (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Video 1) can be implemented on them. With larger sound pressure and droplets, however, the droplets get atomised (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Video 2) or fall (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Video 3) immediately after droplet coalescence. Droplet atomisation can be attributed to the interfacial instability29 on the droplet surface with higher sound pressure. In the case when the droplets fall, larger droplets could not counteract the body force on the droplets under gravity. For stable levitation and manipulation of the droplets, the acoustic radiation force should exceed the gravitational force on the droplet (\(\geqq \)ρVg) while below the surface force to maintain the droplet interface. Here ρ, V, and g are the density and volume of the droplet, and gravitational acceleration, respectively. Precise tuning of droplet size and sound pressure was required under ground gravity.

Figure 2
figure2

Patterns of ethanol droplet manipulation under ground gravity. (a) Successful droplet coalescence. Equivalent diameters of droplets d and applied RMS sound pressure p were 1.8 mm (left), 1.8 mm (right), 2.2 mm after the droplets coalesced, and 1.2 kPa. (b) Droplet atomisation immediately after coalescence: d = 1.9 mm (left), d = 1.7 mm (right), and p = 1.8 kPa. (c) Droplet falling immediately after coalescence: d = 2.1 mm (left), d = 2.2 mm (right), and p = 1.7 kPa. See Supplementary Videos 13 as well.

Experiments under reduced gravity

Experiments in reduced gravity were conducted via parabolic flights using an aircraft (Gulfstream-II, Diamond Air Service Inc., Japan). Figure 3a shows an example of the gravitational acceleration profile during the parabolic flights. Here, 1 G is 9.81 m/s2. After the first 30 s, the gravitational acceleration level reached 10−2 G during 20 s. After the confirmation of formation of the standing wave, two water droplets were injected from a syringe under the reduced gravity condition. The behaviour of the levitated droplet was observed using a high-speed video camera and the results were compared to those of the ground gravity experiment. Figure 3b and Supplementary Video 4 show the comparison results of the levitation and coalescence behaviours of the droplets between the reduced and ground gravity conditions. In the reduced gravity condition, the levitation, transport, and coalescence of large droplets (i.e., larger than the half wavelength of sound) can be successfully performed. Accordingly, we achieved the levitation, transport, and coalescence of acoustically levitated droplets in the reduced gravity conditions. The largest difference between the ground and reduced gravity conditions was observed in the maximum size of droplets and minimum value of sound pressure for manipulating the droplets. Figure 3c shows the evaluation results of the stable levitation condition after coalescence by experimentally determining the relationship between the droplet diameter after coalescence and sound pressure. The black solid line and blue broken line denote the lower limit of sound pressure to maintain the suspended droplet under ground gravity and reduced gravity, respectively, which can be described as Eq. (1)30:

$${p}_{{\rm{\min }}}=\sqrt{\frac{1.6{\rho }_{L}{\rho }_{G}\,g{c}^{2}}{k}},$$
(1)

where, ρ is the density, subscripts L and G represent the liquid phase and gas phase, respectively, g is the gravitational acceleration, c is the speed of sound, and k is the wave number. For the reduced gravity experiment, the lower limit of sound pressure was calculated using g = 0.01 G in Fig. 3c. The broken curve represents the upper limit and is calculated as follows31:

$${p}_{{\rm{\max }}}=\sqrt{\sigma {\rho }_{G}{c}^{2}(\frac{3.2}{d}-\frac{1.3\pi }{\lambda })},$$
(2)

where σ is the surface tension, d is the diameter of the droplet, and λ denotes the wavelength. In the case of ground gravity, the droplet was considered to stably coalesce under the condition between the theoretical lower and upper limits. In the case of reduced gravity, the droplet was found to stably coalesce at sound pressures below the lower limit of the case of ground gravity. This result suggests that the sound pressure required for droplet manipulation can be minimised and the suppression of nonlinear acoustic phenomena was accordingly considered in the reduced gravity experiment. Above the higher limit condition, we demonstrated that the droplet successfully levitated but atomized in some cases. One possible reason for this may be the sensitive coalescence dynamics and complex interfacial instability of the droplets; however, the exact reason remains unclear because when the droplets merge, unsteady interfacial behaviors can be developed (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Video 2). This sensitive behavior is most likely to affect droplet coalescence by generating fluctuations of unsteady flow and pressure fields between the approaching droplets. As a future work, we intend to investigate the instantaneous interfacial motions of droplets and interactions among attracting droplets immediately before coalescence for more stable manipulation.

Figure 3
figure3

Acoustic manipulation under reduced gravity environment. (a) Time history of vertical gravity during parabolic flight. (b) Comparison of manipulated water droplets between ground gravity and reduced gravity. 1 G and μG denote the ground and reduced gravity, respectively. Equivalent diameters of droplets and applied RMS sound pressure were 2.0 mm (1 G, left), 2.0 mm (1 G, right), 1.7 kPa (1 G), 4.4 mm (μG, left), 4.4 mm (μG, right), and 0.9 kPa (μG). See Supplementary Video 4 (top: 1 G, bottom: μG) as well. (c) Comparison of stable levitation condition after coalescence between the ground and reduced gravity conditions. The dashed and solid lines denote the upper and lower (1 G and μG) limits of levitation predicted by Eqs (1) and (2).

Discussion

Through the reduced gravity experiment, stable coalescence of the droplet at sound pressures below the lower limit of under ground gravity can be verified. As shown in Fig. 4, in acoustic levitation using an acoustic standing wave, the sample levitated by tapping at the potential well and the interval of the potential well corresponds to the half wavelength of the sound. Although the theoretical and experimental lower limits of stable levitation under reduced gravity (pmin(μG) in Fig. 3c) can be expanded, the allowable diameter of the sample has been considered to be limited to the half wavelength or less (Fig. 4a). However, the experimental results show that the droplets that are larger than the half wavelength (i.e., larger than 4.25 mm) can be levitated, transported, and coalesced under the reduced gravity environment. To obtain clear insights into the force acting on the levitated sample, we numerically calculated the acoustic potential32 and sound pressure in the vicinity of the levitated solid sphere33 under reduced gravity using the distributed point source method (DPSM)34. For d = λ/4 (in Fig. 4c, left), it is understood that the acoustic radiation pressure acting on the lower surface of the sphere exceeds the value of the spherical upper surface. Therefore, the vertical retention force against gravity enables the solid sphere to suspend in air. For d = λ/ 2 (right), the acoustic radiation pressure of the upper surface is higher than that of the lower surface. This indicates that a holding force in the vertical upward direction is not sufficient to counteract the gravity. In this case, the solid sphere is considered to fall under ground gravity. From this result, there is a condition under which an appropriate radiation pressure acts at a certain height, and by setting the reduced gravity environment, the droplet spontaneously moves to a position that satisfies the condition. Accordingly, it is inferred that the droplets larger than the half wavelength of 4.25 mm (in Fig. 3b) can be suspended.

Figure 4
figure4

Droplet levitation beyond the limit under reduced gravity. A schematic diagram showing a comparison of scale between the acoustic potential and levitated droplet under (a) ground gravity and (b) reduced gravity. (c) Normalised sound pressure distribution with a solid sphere of λ/4 (left) and λ/2 (right). The inset is close-up image near the solid sphere. Sound pressure is normalised using the maximum sound pressure in the distribution.

These experimental results demonstrate the applicability of the potential technology for the further development of contactless manipulation techniques for liquid samples. Additionally, in the reduced gravity environment, the droplets with diameters exceeding the half wavelength of sound can be acoustically manipulated, which was previously considered impossible35,36,37. This enables sample manipulation over a wider range of droplet sizes. The results show that acoustic manipulation using ultrasonic phased array provides a novel solution for noncontact mid-air sample manipulation38 under varying gravity. Our demonstration provides the feasibility of contactless levitation, transportation, and coalescence of droplets as a first step in fluid manipulation for potential applications.

Methods

Experimental setup

Acoustic levitation using an ultrasonic phased array was implemented in this study. By generating sound waves with a controlled phase, the focal point of sound is formed at an arbitrary position. A localised standing wave can then be generated near the focal point by reflecting the focused ultrasound using a reflector. We used a 7 × 7 square transducer array consisting of 49 small ultrasonic transducers. The diameter and frequency of the transducer were 10 mm and 40 kHz, respectively. Phase control of the sound transmitted from each transducer is required to generate an ultrasonic focal point. We realised this control using a field programmable gate array (FPGA) (Altera Co., Cyclone-IV DE0-Nano). The experimental apparatus is shown in Fig. 5. The focal length and the distance from the transducer to the reflector were 45 mm each. Two droplets were successfully levitated by switching two focal points at the frequency of 500 Hz. We therefore selected the switching frequency to be 500 Hz5. The ambient temperature was 25 °C for both the ground and reduced gravity experiments. The relative humidity was approximately 60% and 10% for the ground and reduced gravity, respectively. However, despite the difference between the ground and reduced gravity conditions, both experiments were conducted within a sufficiently short time (~20 s), as compared to the characteristic time of the evaporation of a water droplet (d2/D~O(103) s, D (~10−9 m2/s) is the diffusion coefficient of water39). The RMS sound pressure was tuned between 0.9 and 1.8 kPa to ensure the stable levitation of the droplet. To quantitatively evaluate the sound field, the sound pressure was measured using a probe microphone (Bryel & Kjaer, Type 4138, diameter: 1/8 inch). The microphone was fixed on the traverse device, which could move along the x, y, and z directions. The behaviour of the levitated droplets was observed from the side using a high-speed video camera (Photron Co., Ltd. FASTCAM-Mini UX100) with back-light illumination. Table 1 lists the test fluids and their physical properties40.

Figure 5
figure5

Schematic diagram of experimental apparatus. (a) Concept of focused ultrasound transmitted from an ultrasonic transducer array. (b) Schematic of experimental setup: (1) probe microphone, (2) high-speed video camera). (3) LED light, (4) amplifier, (5) oscilloscope, and (6) computer.

Table 1 Properties of fluids.

Experiments under reduced gravity were conducted via aircraft parabolic flights (Gulfstream-II, Diamond Air Service Inc., Japan), as shown in Fig. 6. We conducted the experiments within 20 s of 10−2 g.

Figure 6
figure6

Schematic diagram of parabolic flight.

Calculation method of sound field

DPSM24,25 was used to model the sound field without computational mesh by distributing the point sources of sound at the boundary. Emitters and reflectors were discretised by point sources to represent the sound field. The sound pressure pm and velocity vm at a distance rmn generated by the sound wave radiated from the point source m are given by

$${p}_{{\rm{m}}}({r}_{{\rm{mn}}})={A}_{{\rm{m}}}\frac{\exp \,i(k{r}_{{\rm{mn}}}-\omega {t}_{{\rm{m}}})}{{r}_{{\rm{mn}}}}={A}_{{\rm{m}}}G({r}_{{\rm{mn}}}),$$
(3)
$${v}_{{\rm{m}}}({r}_{{\rm{mn}}})=\frac{{\boldsymbol{n}}\cdot {{\boldsymbol{r}}}_{{\rm{mn}}}}{i\omega {\rho }_{G}}\frac{\partial p}{\partial r}={A}_{{\rm{m}}}M({r}_{{\rm{mn}}}),$$
(4)

where Am is the strength of the mth point, k = 2π/λ is a wave number, ω is the angular frequency, and ρG is the density of air. For the ultrasonic phased array, sound waves radiated from each transducer were excited after different time intervals Δtm to focus the sound waves. Then, the term tm in Eq. (3) was expressed in terms of phase difference from a reference time t:

$${t}_{{\rm{m}}}=t-\varDelta {t}_{{\rm{m}}}.$$
(5)

If there are N point sources, the total value at point x is given by

$$p(x)=\mathop{\sum }\limits_{{\rm{m}}=1}^{N}{p}_{{\rm{m}}}({r}_{{\rm{mn}}}),$$
(6)
$$v(x)=\mathop{\sum }\limits_{{\rm{m}}=1}^{N}{v}_{{\rm{m}}}({r}_{{\rm{mn}}}).$$
(7)

If there are secondary sound sources such as a reflector, the amplitudes of the sound sources are determined to satisfy the boundary condition. N point sources, for which the amplitude is unknown, are distributed at both primary (e.g., transducers) and secondary sound sources (e.g., reflector). Here, the sound sources are assumed to be a sphere of radius rs and the radiation points are assumed to be located at a position retracted by rs from the boundary. Considering the velocity V0 for the primary sound sources and velocity 0 for the secondary sources, the following equation can be derived:

$$\{{v}_{{\rm{m}}}\}={}^{t}\{{V}_{0},\cdots \,{V}_{0},\,0,\cdots \,0\},$$
(8)
$$\{{A}_{{\rm{m}}}\}={[{M}_{{\rm{mn}}}]}^{-1}\{{v}_{{\rm{m}}}\}.$$
(9)

Because N equations were given for N unknown sound sources, the amplitudes of the unknown sound sources were determined.

Statistical analysis

The uncertainty in droplet diameter is <2% because when d = 1.7 mm (the smallest case in the present study), the standard deviation with three measurements was less than 2 pixels, with a spatial resolution of ~15 μm/pixel. The uncertainty in sound pressure is <6% because when p = 0.9 kPa under reduced gravity, the standard deviation with three measurements was less than 0.05 kPa.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Brandt, E. H. Acoustic Physics: Suspended by sound. Nature 413, 474–475 (2001).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Zang, D. et al. Acoustic levitation of liquid drops: dynamics, manipulation and phase transitions. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 243, 77–85 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Marzo, A. et al. Holographic acoustic elements for manipulation of levitated objects. Nat. Commun. 6, 8661 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hong, Z. Y. et al. Dynamics of levitated objects in acoustic vortex fields. Sci. Rep. 7, 7093 (2017).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Watanabe, A., Hasegawa, K. & Abe, Y. Contactless fluid manipulation in air: Droplet coalescence and active mixing by acoustic levitation. Sci. Rep. 8, 10221 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Andrade, M. A., Camargo, T. S. & Marzo, A. Automatic contactless injection. transportation, merging, and ejection of droplets with a multifocal point acoustic levitator, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 89, 125105 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Xie, W. J., Cao, C. D., Lü, Y. J. & Wei, B. Levitation of iridium and liquid mercury by ultrasound. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 104304 (2002).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Santesson, S. & Nilsson, S. Airborne chemistry: Acoustic levitation in chemical analysis. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 378, 1704–1709 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Priego-Capote, F. & de Castro, L. Ultrasound-assisted levitation: Lab-on-a-drop. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 25, 856–867 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Tsujino, S. & Tomizaki, T. Ultrasonic acoustic levitation for fast frame rate X-ray protein crystallography at room temperature. Sci. Rep. 6, 25558 (2016).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Vasileiou, T., Foresti, D., Bayram, A., Poulikakos, P. & Ferrari, A. Toward contactless biology: Acoustophoretic DNA transfection. Sci. Rep. 6, 20023 (2016).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hosseinzadeh, V. A., Brugnara, C. & Holt, R. G. Shape oscillations of single blood drops: applications to human blood and sickle cell disease. Sci. Rep. 8, 16794 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zang, D. et al. Switchable opening and closing of a liquid marble via ultrasonic levitation. Langmuir 31, 11502–11507 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Foresti, D., Sambatakakis, G., Bottan, S. & Poulikakos, D. Morphing surfaces enable acoustophoretic contactless transport of ultrahigh-density matter in air. Sci. Rep. 3, 3176 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Foresti, D., Nabavi, M., Klingauf, M., Ferrari, A. & Polilalos, D. Acoustophoretic contactless transport and handling of matter in air. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 12549–12554 (2013).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Foresti, D. & Poulikakos, D. Acoustophoretic contactless elevation, orbital transport and spinning of matter in air. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 024301 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kobayashi, K., Goda, A., Hasegawa, K. & Abe, Y. Flow structure and evaporation behavior of an acoustically levitated droplet. Phys. Fluids. 30, 082105 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hasegawa, K., Abe, Y. & Goda, A. Microlayered flow structure around an acoustically levitated droplet under a phase-change process. npj Microgravity 2, 16004 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Andrade, M. A., Pérez, N. & Adamowski, J. C. Review of Progress in Acoustic Levitation. Braz. J. Phys. 48(2), 190 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Yarin, A. L., Pfaffenlehner, M. & Tropea, C. On the acoustic levitation of droplets. J. Fluid. Mech. 356, 65 (1998).

    CAS  ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Yarin, A. L., Brenn, G., Kastner, O., Rensink, D. & Tropea, C. Evaporation of acoustically levitated droplets. J. Fluid. Mech. 399, 151 (1999).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hasegawa, K., Abe, Y., Fujiwara, A., Yamamoto, Y. & Aoki, K. External flow of an acoustically levitated droplet. Microgravity Sci Tec. 20(3–4), 261 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Yamamoto, Y., Abe, Y., Fujiwara, A., Hasegawa, K. & Aoki, K. Internal flow of acoustically levitated droplet. Microgravity Sci Tec. 20(3–4), 277 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hasegawa, K., Abe, Y., Kaneko, A., Yamamoto, Y. & Aoki, K. Visualization measurement of streaming flows associated with a single-acoustic levitator. Microgravity Sci Tec. 21(1), 9 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hasegawa, K., Abe, Y., Kaneko, A. & Aoki, K. PIV Measurement of Internal and External Flow of an Acoustically Levitated Droplet. I. J. Trans. Phenomena 12(3–4), 151 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kawakami, M., Abe, Y., Kaneko, A., Yamamoto, Y. & Hasegawa, K. Effect of temperature change on interfacial behavior of an acoustically levitated droplet. Microgravity Sci Tec. 22(2), 145 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hasegawa, K. & Kono, K. Oscillation characteristics of levitated sample in resonant acoustic field. AIP Adv. 9(3), 035313 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Trinh, E. H. Compact acoustic levitation device for studies in fluid dynamics and material science in the laboratory and microgravity. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 56, 2059–2065 (1985).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Danilov, S. & Mironov, M. Breakup of a droplet in a high-intensity sound fields. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 2747–2755 (1992).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    King, L. V. On the acoustic radiation pressure on spheres. Proc. Soc. Lond. A 147, 212–240 (1934).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Foresti, D., Nabavi, M. & Poulikakos, D. Contactless transport of matter in the first five resonance modes of a line-focused acoustic manipulator. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131(2), 1029–1038 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gor’kov, L. P. On the forces acting on a small particle in an acoustical field in an ideal fluid, Soviet Physics. Doklady 6, 773–775 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Wada, Y., Yuge, K., Nakamura, R., Tanaka, H. & Nakamura, K. Dynamic analysis of ultrasonically levitated droplet with moving particle semi-implicit and distributed point source method. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 54, 07HE04 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ahmad, R., Kundu, T. & Placko, D. Modeling of phased array transducers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 1762–1776 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Andrade, M. A., Bernassau, A. L. & Adamowski, J. C. Acoustic levitation of a large solid sphere. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 044101 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zang, D. et al. Acoustic levitation of soap bubbles in air: Beyond the half-wavelength limit of sound. Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 121602 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zang, D. et al. Inducing drop to bubble transformation via resonance in ultrasound. Nat. Commun.,. 9, 3546 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Marzo, A. & Drinkwater, B. W. Holographic acoustic tweezers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116(1), 84–89 (2019).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Yarin, A. L., Brenn, G. & Rensink, D. Evaporation of acoustically levitated droplets of binary liquid mixtures. Int. J. Heat Fluid Fl. 23, 471–486 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Weast, R. C. (ed.) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 55th ed., (CRC Press, 1974).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant number 15H03925. We thank Prof. Katsuhiro Nishinari, Prof. Tadashi Watanabe, Prof. Yuko Inatomi, Dr. Satoshi Matsumoto, Dr. Hiroyuki Kitahata, Dr. Osamu Kawanami and Dr. Akiko Kaneko for the insightful comments and suggestions. This study was carried out as a part of short period microgravity experiment promoted by ISAS/JAXA. The authors acknowledge the support from Expert Committee for Space Environment Utilization Science, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) and Diamond Air Service Inc. for conducting the reduced gravity experiments by an aircraft.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.A. and K.H. directed the research project. A.Y. designed experimental setup and performed the experiments and analyzed data and all authors interpreted the data. K.H wrote the originalmanuscript and all authors contributed to revise the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koji Hasegawa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hasegawa, K., Watanabe, A. & Abe, Y. Acoustic Manipulation of Droplets under Reduced Gravity. Sci Rep 9, 16603 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53281-4

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing