Partial rpoB Gene Sequencing Identification and Probiotic Potential of Floricoccus penangensis ML061-4 Isolated from Assam Tea (Camellia sinensis var. assamica)

Abstract

Assam tea or Miang is a local name of Camellia sinensis var. assamica in northern Thailand. By the local wisdom, Assam tea leaves are used as the raw material in tea fermentation to produce “Fermented Miang” consumed by people in northern Thailand and the countries nearby. In this study, twenty-eight bacterial isolates were obtained from Assam tea leaf samples collected from Nan province, Thailand. Bacterial isolates were identified within 6 genera including Bacillus, Floricoccus, Kocuria, Lysinibacillus, Micrococcus and Staphylococcus. Among these, the strain ML061-4 shared 100.0 and 99.4% similarity of 16S rRNA and rpoB gene sequence with F. penangensis JCM 31735T, respectively. This is the first discovery of F. penangensis in Thailand. F. penangensis ML061-4 exhibited probiotic characteristics including lactic acid production (9.19 ± 0.10 mg/ml), antibacterial activities (Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and E. coli O157:H7 DMST 12743), acid and bile salt tolerance (71.1 and 54.9%, respectively), autoaggregation (97.0%), coaggregation (66.0% with E. coli O157:H7), cell surface hydrophobicity (90.0%), bacterial adhesion (82.9% with Lactobacillus plantarum FM03-1), competitive inhibition (17.8% with E. coli O157:H7) and competitive exclusion (34.9% with E. coli O157:H7). Overall, the data suggested that F. penangensis ML061-4 had a great potential to be a probiotic.

Introduction

Floricoccus penangensis is a bacterium in the family Streptococcaceae and has been classified as lactic acid bacteria (LAB). The genus was first described by Chuah et al.1 as it was clearly distinguished from the genera Streptococcus and Lactococcus. The sequence similarities of the 16S rRNA gene found closely related to lactococcal and streptococcal relatives, 92–94%. Currently, there is no report about discovery of Floricoccus penangensis in Thailand as well as their property reports.

More than two decades, the 16S rRNA gene sequence has been used to identify microorganisms as well as to decide a novel microbe (less than 97 and 95% sequence similarity for different species and genus, respectively)2. Nevertheless, many scientists have indicated that using of 16S rRNA gene are not applicable to multiple genera in taxonomic analysis. The 16S rRNA gene may not be effectively multiplied due to differential primer affinity and GC content3. Besides, it also demonstrates low resolution among closely related species4. The rpoB gene encodes the beta subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase. Its sequence is more discriminative than the 16S rRNA gene to distinguish various species of bacteria owing to the divergence levels of rpoB gene sequence that is explicitly higher than 16S rRNA gene5. Moreover, the partial rpoB gene sequence exhibits the precise reading frame leading to the easy verification of sequence accuracy. Therefore, the rpoB gene is a strong tool for bacterial identification6.

Camellia sinensis var. assamica or Assam tea or “Miang” is an indigenous perennial plant found in highlands of northern Thailand for a long time7. By local wisdom, fresh Assam tea leaves are fermented to produce a chewing refreshment product called “Fermented Miang”8. Assam tea can generally be found in upper northern Thailand including Chiang Mai, Lampang, Chiang Rai, Phayao, Nan and Phrae provinces9.

Probiotics are defined as live microorganisms that provide health benefits on the host when consumed in adequate amounts10. Probiotics can improve gut microbiota composition especially LAB, which have been suggested for health benefits including defense function as well as the nourishment of gastrointestinal tract in the body11. LAB are non-pathogenic bacteria found in fermentation for preservation, food and vitamins production12, help to improve microbial imbalance in the body caused by many factors including antibiotic treatment13 and are considered as generally recognized as safe (GRAS). Some LAB can produce bacteriocins, proteinaceous compounds with antibacterial activity against closely related strains14. LAB was classified within the phylum Firmicutes, which were divided into 14 genera: Carnobacterium, Enterococcus, Floricoccus, Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Lactosphaera, Leuconostoc, Melissococcus, Streptococcus, Oenococcus, Pediococcus, Tetragonococcus, Vagococcus and Weissella1,15. This study aims to investigate the existence of microbes on Assam tea leaves, to demonstrate the use of partial rpoB gene sequence as a molecular tool for lactic acid bacteria identification and to evaluate probiotic property of the selected lactic acid bacteria found on Assam tea leaves. The results obtained will be useful for elucidating the involvement in tea fermentation process of microorganisms found on Assam tea leaves and will be further used in the food industry in many aspects such as functional ingredient and synbiotic production in the future.

Results

Sampling sites, Assam tea leaf collection and bacterial isolation

In this study, fresh Assam tea leaves were collected between 12 March 2016 and 24 March 2018 from three sampling sites in Pua (Code ML05 and ML06) and Phu Phiang (Code ML09) districts, Nan province, Thailand at an altitude ranging from 243 to 1,278 m above sea level. Meanwhile, fresh Assam tea leaves in Sakat sub district, Pua district (Code ML06) were collected twice on 12 March 2016 and 24 March 2018 (Table 1).

Table 1 Assam tea collecting site in Nan province.

Twenty-eight bacterial isolates with distinct colony morphology were isolated from fourteen fresh Assam tea leaves. The number of bacterial isolates collected from Pua, Sakat and Nam Kian sub districts were 5, 17 and 6 isolates, respectively. The Assam tea leaves collected from Sakat sub-district with the GPS coordinates of 19°15′53.62″N, 101°0′30.22″E (Code ML061) showed a maximum of four morphologically different bacterial colonies and had the highest number of bacterial isolates (Table 1).

Bacterial identification

A total of 28 bacterial isolates obtained from 14 Assam tea plants, 10 isolates were identified as Bacillus siamensis with the 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity related to the type strain B. siamensis KCTC 13613T between 99.7 and 99.9%. Three isolates had the 16S rRNA gene sequence related to Staphylococcus haemolyticus ATCC 29970T, 99.8–100% similarity. The other 15 isolates were identified as B. altitudinis, B. aryabhattai, B. clausii, B. megaterium, B. subtilis subsp. subtilis, F. penangensis, Micrococcus aloeverae, S. cohnii subsp. cohnii, S. hominis subsp. hominis, S. hominis subsp. novobiosepticus, Kocuria halotolerans and Lysinibacillus contaminans, under their 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity between 97.9 and 100.0%. Among these, 2 and 26 isolates were identified within Actinobacteria and Firmicutes phyla, respectively. The largest number of different species was obtained from Sakat sub district (Code ML061), 4 species per leaf, including B. altitudinis, F. penangensis, M. aloeverae and S. haemolyticus (Table 2; Supplementary Fig. S2).

Table 2 Bacterial species obtained from fresh Assam tea leaves, each bacterial isolate was compared with the type strain, the similarity (%), differences of the 16S rRNA gene sequence, and GenBank accession number.

Twenty-seven bacterial isolates showed high similarity of the 16S rRNA gene sequence between 99.6 and 100.0% that demonstrated the nucleotide substitution and frameshift mutation within the 16S rRNA gene sequence less than 6 and 3 positions, respectively. On the other hand, one bacterial isolate (Code ML063-2) had 97.9% similarity of 16S rRNA gene sequence when compared with the type strain Lysinibacillus contaminans DSM 25560T with nucleotide substitution of 29 positions (Table 2).

Strain characterization of Floricoccus penangensis ML061-4

Floricoccus penangensis ML061-4 was a Gram positive coccus, non-motile, non-spore forming, and negative for catalase, oxidase, indole and lysine decarboxylase tests. Their cell arrangement was found mostly in chains or occur as single cell and pairs. Some branching was occasionally observed. The SEM micrographs demonstrated that cell division occurred in one or two planes from a second division, producing diplococci and streptococci arrangement (Fig. 1). The strain ML061-4 produced acid from glucose (without gas), lactose, sucrose, mannitol, maltose and starch. It fermented raffinose to produce weak acid but could not ferment sorbitol. The starch was hydrolyzed but not for esculin. Positive results were obtained in Voges-Proskauer and methyl red tests. The growth temperatures were ranging between 10–40 °C. It could not grow in NaCl with concentration above 3% (w/v). The growth pH was between pH 5–8. Besides, the strain ML061-4 was able to grow in tryptic soy medium but not in MRS and BHI media.

Figure 1
figure1

The SEM micrograph of Floricoccus penangensis ML061-4; (a) the morphological characteristic shows chain arrangement. (b) Arrows indicate cell division that occur diplococci. (c) Arrows indicate ridges on cells that might be due to recent cell division. (d and e) Arrows indicate branching filamentous, one of the two daughter cells undergo a second division that lead to a lateral branch filament formation. (f) Arrow indicates polysaccharide secretion.

The 16S rRNA (1,372 bp, GenBank accession no. MH050697) and rpoB (469 bp, GenBank accession no. MH183163) genes partial nucleotide sequences of strain ML061-4 were performed. Phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA indicated that the strain ML061-4 clustered with F. penangensis, supported by a bootstrap value of 93%. It had 100.0% sequence similarity (99% of query cover) with F. penangensis JCM 31735T and 99.8% similarity (100% of query cover) with F. tropicus JCM 31733T. The rpoB gene sequence of strain ML061-4 had 99.6% sequence similarity with F. tropicus JCM 31733T, supported by a bootstrap value of 85%, and 99.4% similarity with F. penangensis JCM 31735T. The partial rpoB gene sequence of F. penangensis ML061-4 shared 49.5, 74.4 and 76.7% identity with Streptococcus mitis CIP 103335T, Lactococcus plantarum DSM 20686T and Lactococcus chungangensis DSM 22330T rpoB sequence, respectively. The phylogenetic tree of relationships based on the sequences of rpoB gene were analyzed using the 18 aligned sequences, the topology of the phylogenetic tree was supported by bootstrap values 1,000 replications which the main branch explicitly led to three branches of Floricoccus and Lactococcus, and Streptococcus genera (Fig. 2). The results indicated that rpoB gene could clearly distinguish between floricoccal, lactococcal and streptococcal groups. The finding showed that the rpoB gene fragment, 469 bp (positions 33 to 502 of F. penangensis JCM 31735T rpoB gene sequence), contained hypervariable region and appropriated to use for group separation.

Figure 2
figure2

Phylogenetic relationships of the strain ML061-4 (bold), some species of the genus Lactococcus and Floricoccus, and related taxa based on rpoB gene sequence analysis. The branching pattern was generated by the neighbour-joining method. Bootstrap values (expressed as percentages of 1,000 replications). 50% are shown at the branch points. Bar, 0.10 substitutions per nucleotide position. Streptococcus mitis CIP 103335T (GenBank accession no. AF535188) is presented as outgroup sequence.

Lactic acid determination

Lactic acid produced by F. penangensis ML061-4 was analyzed using HPLC. The total lactic acid was 9.19 ± 0.10 mg/ml consisting of 0.54 ± 0.07 mg/ml of D-lactic acid and 8.65 ± 0.03 mg/ml of L-lactic acid. The ratio of D:L was 1:16. The enzymes involved will be further elucidated.

Evaluation of probiotic properties

Antibacterial activity and antibiotic susceptibility

The culture supernatant of F. penangensis ML061-4 could only inhibit growth of E. coli ATCC 25922 and E. coli O157:H7 DMST 12743 with the inhibitory clear zone of 7.0 ± 0.0 mm.

For the susceptibility evaluation, F. penangensis ML061-4 was susceptible to the testing antibiotics with the inhibitory clear zone ranging between 10.3 and 28.5 mm while L. acidophilus TISTR 2365 was susceptible to amoxyclav, ampicillin, ampicillin/sulbactum, cefixime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, cefuroxime axetil, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, gentamicin, meropenem, tetracycline and ticarcillin/clavulanic acid with the inhibitory clear zone of 9.9–49.0 mm but not for amikacin, co-trimoxazole and ofloxacin.

Acid-base tolerance

Survival rate of F. penangensis ML061-4 was higher than 70% after 4 hr of incubation in acidic pH, 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0. At pH 1.0, the survival rate was decreased gradually to 90.4, 79.4, 74.6 and 71.1% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 hr of incubation, respectively (Fig. 3a). Meanwhile, the survival rate of F. penangensis ML061-4 grown in TSB containing 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% (w/v) of bile salt was higher than 50% subsequent to 24 hr of incubation. Once F. penangensis ML061-4 exposed to the mentioned media, the survival rate was decreased and maintained at between 54.9 and 66.9% after 24 hr (Fig. 3b).

Figure 3
figure3

Survival rate of F. penangensis ML061-4 in acid (a) and bile salt (b). Ability of F. penangensis ML061-4 compared with L. acidophilus TISTR 2365 in autoaggregation (c) and coaggregation (d) with E. coli ATCC 25922 and E. coli O157:H7 DMST 12743. The experiments were triplicate conducted.

Autoaggregation, coaggregation and cell surface hydrophobicity

F. penangensis ML061-4 and L. acidophilus TISTR 2365 had percentage of autoaggregation as 70.8 and 15.0% after 2 hr of incubation, respectively, significant (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, at 24 hr of incubation showed 97.0% and 93.2%, respectively, non-significant (p > 0.05) (Fig. 3c). Moreover, the ML061-4 demonstrated coaggregation ability with E. coli ATCC 25922 (64.6%) and E. coli O157:H7 DMST 12743 (66.0%) at 48 hr of incubation (P > 0.05) (Fig. 3d). Cell surface hydrophobicity of L. acidophilus TISTR 2365 was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than that of F. penangensis ML061-4, 27.5 and 90.0%, respectively.

Bacterial adhesion, competition and competitive exclusion

Adhesion ability of F. penangensis ML061-4 was 21.4 and 82.9% when using L. acidophilus TISTR 2365 and L. plantarum FM03-1 as positive controls (100% adhesion), respectively, while E. coli O157:H7 DMST 12743 demonstrated as 5.4 and 20.9%, respectively (Table 3; Fig. 4a–d). In bacterial competition, F. penangensis ML064-1, L. acidophilus TISTR 2365 and L. plantarum FM03-1 inhibited the adhesion of E. coli O157:H7 DMST 12743 by 17.8, 15.1 and 14.4%, respectively, non-significant (p > 0.05) (Table 4; Fig. 4e,f). For competitive exclusion, all LAB strains showed displacement percentage to E. coli O157:H7 DMST 12743 between 34.9 and 38.4% (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, none of LAB strains tested was able to displace adhered E. coli ATCC 25922 (Table 4; Fig. 4g,h).

Table 3 Adherence of strain ML061-4, E. coli ATCC 25922 and E. coli O157:H7 DMST 12743 to epithelial cell as compared with Lactobacillus spp.
Figure 4
figure4

Bacterial adhesion of test bacteria on Vero cells. (a) Vero cells control; (b) F. penangensis ML061-4; (c) E. coli ATCC 25922; (d) E. coli O157:H7 DMST 12743. Bacterial competition on Vero cells (e) between F. penangensis ML061-4 and E. coli ATCC 25922; (f) between F. penangensis ML061-4 and E. coli O157:H7 DMST 12743. Competitive exclusion on Vero cells (g) between F. penangensis ML061-4 and E. coli ATCC 25922; (h) between F. penangensis ML061-4 and E. coli O157:H7 DMST 12743. White arrows indicate F. penangensis ML061-4 and black arrows indicate E. coli strains. Magnification: 400x.

Table 4 Competition between probiotic and pathogenic bacteria and competitive exclusion of pathogenic bacteria by probiotics to Vero cell.

Discussion

Generally, Assam tea or Miang are found in highland forests, hillsides and high resourceful water areas16 at altitude of 450–1,500 m above sea level8. Interestingly, in this study Assam tea trees can grow at the elevation of 243 m above sea level (Phu Phiang district) which is lower than the previous report and also found cultivated within the community in the areas around villages indicating the close relationship between local people and Assam tea. Beyond the altitude above sea level that affects growth of tea, the climate, alkaline and acidic balance, soil nutrient as well as soil ecology also play a vital role in tea plant growth17. The sampling sites were both in the villages and on the mountains (over 1,000 m above sea level) where located far away from the community. Consequently, the existence of microorganisms on Assam tea leaves will bring about the role of microbes on Assam tea leaves in the tea fermentation process, first report in Thailand, especially lactic acid bacteria and their probiotic properties.

All bacterial isolates were member of Actinobacteria and Firmicutes phyla and were classified within 6 genera including Bacillus, Floricoccus, Kocuria, Lysinibacillus, Micrococcus and Staphylococcus. These bacteria have been widely found in nature which can be contaminated onto surface of leaves and stems18,19,20. B. altitudinis. B. subtilis, K. halotolerans and M. aloeverae were reported as endophytic bacteria involving in plant growth promotion and protection21,22,23,24. B. clausii, B. megaterium, B. siamensis and B. subtilis have been reported as probiotic. Bacillus spp. can form endospore and produce a bacteriocin-like substance, which help resisting stomach acidic condition and inhibiting pathogens25,26,27. B. aryabhattai produces vanillin from ferulic acid28, hence, it may involve in aroma and flavor occurred in fermented Miang. However, S. haemolyticus, S. cohnii and S. hominis are normal flora commonly live on human and animal skins29,30,31. Their existence on Assam tea leaves may be due to human activities as Assam tea growing area is located in the community.

LAB were known to involve in Assam tea or Miang fermentation7. Recently, Chaikaew et al.32 reported the diversity of LAB in fermented Miang. The prevalent species found were L. plantarum, L. pentosus, L. panthesis and L. fermentum. Furthermore, Leuconostoc, Enterococcus, Pediococcus, Weisella and Lactococcus were found as minor populations in fermented Miang. Interestingly, Floricoccus that has a close relationship with Lactococcus and Streptococcus was never reported. In this study, Floricoccus was found on fresh Assam tea leaves possibly due to some nutrients occurring on Assam tea leaves33 which enhances its survival. The existence of Floricoccus on an Assam tea leaf was not always as it was not found on all samples collected. The finding of LAB on Assam tea leaves could explain their key role in the tea fermentation process. Some reports proposed that the significant differences of bacterial communities in the environment may be related to soil compositions such as nutrients, acid and base conditions at the moment34. Hence, how Floricoccus exists on Assam tea leaves is to be further elucidated.

Reasonably, Floricoccus is not found in fermented Miang may be due to its lower ability to produce lactic acid than lactobacilli35 which is dominated in fermented Miang. Besides, this study also found that Floricoccus penangensis could not grow in MRS medium. These may be the reasons for the absence of Floricoccus species in fermented Miang. Some reports described that the non-growing LAB may associate with the high concentrations of polyunsaturated fatty acids in media which might inhibit growth36.

The rpoB gene has been usually used for identification when the 16S rRNA gene is unclear5. Identification of Afipia, Bosea and Bradyrhizobium spp. using rpoB gene showed the percentage cut-off between different genus ranging between 82 and 83%37. Thus far, there is no report about microorganisms on leaves of Assam tea. This is the first discovery report of F. penangensis in Thailand using the primer pair which is rpoB gene specific to identify bacteria in the genus Floricoccus that clearly separated from genera Lactococcus and Streptococcus.

The antibacterial activity of F. penangensis ML061-4 may lie within the amount of acid produced. Undissociated lactic acid could go through cell membrane and discharge hydrogen ion inside the cell leading to disturbance of important cell functions38,39. Furthermore, some species of LAB can produce bacteriocin or bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance (BLIS) that play a role in formation of bacterial cell membrane pore, inhibition of ATP synthesis and ultimately death of cells40. Notwithstanding, the inhibitory substance of F. penangensis ML061-4 will be further evaluated.

Antibiotic susceptibility is proposed as a vital criterion for potential probiotics to ensure that the antibiotic resistance gene will not be transferred to recipient bacteria in the gut which leads to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria27. Moreover, antibiotic resistance gene transfer also may be related to the change of microbial community in the environment including Assam tea growing area. In this study, F. penangensis ML061-4 was inhibited by all test antibiotics indicating its safety as a potential probiotics while L. acidophilus TISTR 2365 was sensitive to 13 of 16 antibiotics tested.

The acid tolerance of F. penangensis ML061-4 may be based on the histidine decarboxylation pathway, which generates proton motive force resulting in ATP synthesis41,42. Furthermore, the acid tolerance in LAB also related to glutamate decarboxylase system and arginine deiminase pathway43. Additionally, some reports suggested that bile resistance is associated with enzyme activity of bile salt hydrolase (BSH), which leads to the toxicity reduction42. However, the immediately reduction of F. penangensis ML061-4 in base condition at the beginning can be explained as a result of antibacterial activity of bile salt and its bacterial membrane ability44.

The autoaggregation and hydrophobicity assays are used for determination of adhesion ability of probiotics to intestinal mucosa, which is necessary for host gut bacterial colonization, and bacterial coaggregation can prevent pathogenic bacterial infection and colonization45,46,47. In this study, F. penangensis ML061-4 exhibited a higher autoaggregation and hydrophobicity than L. acidophilus TISTR 2365.

Bacterial adhesion onto epithelial cells is a considerable property of probiotic to reduce enteropathogenic adhesion and infection48. Bacterial cell wall components such as proteins, carbohydrates and fatty acids were responsible for the adherence to the intestinal mucosa49. High potential probiotics should demonstrate bacterial competition and competitive exclusion to disturb and interrupt pathogenic infection, colonization and biofilm formation as well as produce polymeric substances such as exopolysaccharides to help probiotic colonization within intestine50,51. In this study, F. penangensis ML061-4 represented the ability of adhesion, competition and displacement similar to L. acidophilus TISTR 2365 and L. plantarum FM03-1 that are considered the great probiotics. These characteristics are harbored by F. penangensis ML061-4 which has high potential to be a good probiotic.

Methods

Assam tea leaf collection

Fresh Assam tea leaves were obtained from Pua and Phu Phiang district, Nan province of Thailand. The source of Assam tea is presented in Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. S1. Each fresh Assam tea leaf surface was swabbed by a sterile cotton swab which was subsequently kept in 10 ml 0.85% (w/v) of NaCl prior to bacterial isolation within 24 hr.

Bacterial isolation

Each sampling swab was serially diluted with 0.85% (w/v) of NaCl and spread on tryptic soy agar (TSA) (Merck™, Germany) prior to incubation at 37 °C for 24–48 hr. All pure bacterial isolates were stored at −20 °C in tryptic soy broth (TSB) (Merck™) containing 20% (v/v) of glycerol.

Genomic DNA extraction and gene amplification

The chromosomal DNA of each strain was extracted by modification of the protocol described by Pitcher et al.52. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using universal bacterial primers, 27F (5′-AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG-3′) and 1492R (5′-TAC GGY TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T-3′)53. The primers used for amplification of the housekeeping gene rpoB were RpoBLac1F (5′-TAC GGK AAA CAC CGT A-3′) and RpoBLac1R (5′-TCA ARC CAW GCT CCA CGG-3′), which were previously designed and reported by Meucci et al.54. The amplification cycles were initially denatured at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 sec, annealing at 56 °C (16S rRNA) or 47.5 °C (rpoB) for 30 sec, extension at 72 °C for 1 min, final extension at 72 °C for 5 min, and kept at 4 °C. The PCR products were electrophoresed on 0.8% (w/v) agarose gel containing 1X nucleic acid staining solution (RedSafe®, iNtRON Biotechnology, Inc., Korea) for 50 min at 95 V 300 mA in 1X Tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE) buffer (40 mM Tris-acetate, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) using electrophoretic gel system (EC320, Minicell Primo, USA) at room temperature. The 1 kb DNA Ladder (RBC Bioscience, Taiwan) was used as a marker. The gels were visualized under ultraviolet light by gel documentation system (SynGene, USA), and gel images were captured using monochrome CCD camera (TM-300, PULNiX, Japan). The amplicons were purified and sequenced by a DNA sequencing services (First BASE Laboratories Sdn Bhd., Malaysia). The 16S rRNA and rpoB gene sequence were performed by comparing with GenBank and EzBioCloud databases. The sequence data was aligned, and phylogenetic tree was analyzed by a neighbor-joining method55 with a MEGA 7 program56.

Bacterial morphological, biochemical and physiological characterization

The strain ML061-4 was investigated its morphological characteristics. Scanning electron microscopy was performed as described by Arroyo et al.57 with slight modifications using the scanning electron microscope (SEM) (EFI Quanta 200 3D, USA). For biochemical characterization, various tests were conducted including carbohydrate fermentation (glucose, lactose, sucrose, mannitol, maltose, raffinose, sorbitol and starch), esculin and starch hydrolysis, indole, lysine decarboxylase, catalase and oxidase production, and Voges-Proskauer and methyl red tests. Various growth conditions were determined including growth in the presence of 3, 4 and 6% (w/v) NaCl, growth at various temperatures and pHs. The media used were de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) and brain heart infusion (BHI) (Merck™).

Lactic acid analysis

The F. penangensis ML061-4 was cultivated in TSB and incubated at 37 °C for 24 hr. The culture broth was centrifuged at 6,000 rpm 4 °C for 5 min and filtered by nylon membrane filter, 0.22 µm. The filtrate was kept at −20 °C before evaluation of lactic acid content. Lactic acid was determined using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (1200 series, Agilent Technologies, Inc., USA), equipped with a UV detector at 254 nm using an Astec CLC-L (150 × 4.60 mm) column (Sigma-Aldrich™, USA) with 0.005 M of CuSO4 as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. The D- and L-lactic acids (Sigma-Aldrich™) were used as standards.

Evaluation of probiotic properties of the strain ML061-4

Antibacterial activity

Agar well diffusion method was carried out according to the method of Bonev et al.58. The culture broth was tested against Bacillus cereus TISTR 687, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, E. coli O157:H7 DMST 12743, methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus DMST 20625, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Salmonella Typhi DMST 22842, Shigella dysenteriae DMST 1511, S. aureus ATCC 25923 and Vibrio cholerae DMST 2873.

Antibiotic susceptibility test

The antibiotic susceptibility test of the strain ML061-4 was examined using antibiotic discs (Himedia®, India) including amikacin (30 µg), amoxyclav (30 µg), ampicillin (10 µg), ampicillin/sulbactum (10 µg/10 µg), cefixime (5 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), cefuroxime (30 µg), cefuroxime axetil (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), co-trimoxazole (25 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), ofloxacin (5 µg), tetracycline (30 µg) and ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (75/10 µg) according to the method described by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)59. L. acidophilus TISTR 2365 was used as a control.

Acid-base tolerance

The F. penangensis ML061-4 was cultured in TSB overnight. The bacterial cell suspension density was adjusted in 1X PBS (approximately 1 × 108 CFU/ml) prior to evaluation of acid and base tolerant. The acid tolerance was performed in media pH 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 while the alkaline resistance was done in media containing 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3% (w/v) of bile salt (Himedia®)60. Survival rate was evaluated by a viable plate count method on TSA following formula:

$${\rm{Survival}}\,{\rm{rate}}\,( \% )=(\log \,\mathrm{CFU}/\mathrm{ml}\,{\rm{of}}\,{\rm{cells}}\,{\rm{survived}}\div\,\log \,\mathrm{CFU}/\mathrm{ml}\,{\rm{of}}\,{\rm{initial}}\,{\rm{cells}}\,{\rm{inoculated}})\times 100.$$

Cellular autoaggregation and coaggregation

Autoaggregation was investigated by modification of the protocol described by Valeriano et al.61. Briefly, the F. penangensis ML061-4 was cultured overnight and harvested by centrifugation at 6,000 rpm 4 °C for 5 min. The cell pellets were resuspended in 1X PBS and adjusted equivalent to 0.1 at OD600 (ODi) and undisturbed at room temperature for 48 hr. The upper suspension fluid was measured the OD600 (ODt) at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hr. L. acidophilus TISTR 2365, a well-known probiotic strain, was used as a control. The autoaggregation percentage was calculated according to the equation:

$${\rm{Autoaggregation}}\,( \% )=[1-({{\rm{OD}}}_{{\rm{t}}}/{{\rm{OD}}}_{{\rm{i}}})]\times 100.$$

The coaggregation against E. coli ATCC 25922 and E. coli O157:H7 DMST 12743 was carried out62. Cell suspensions of F. penangensis ML061-4 and test pathogenic bacteria were prepared to 1 × 109 CFU/ml each. After that, the strain ML064-1 was mixed with each test pathogenic bacteria (1 × 108 CFU/ml final concentration of each). The upper suspension fluid was measured the absorbance at 600 nm. The percentage of coaggregation at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hr was calculated according to the equation:

$${\rm{C}}{\rm{o}}{\rm{a}}{\rm{g}}{\rm{g}}{\rm{r}}{\rm{e}}{\rm{g}}{\rm{a}}{\rm{t}}{\rm{i}}{\rm{o}}{\rm{n}}\,({\rm{ \% }})=\{[({{\rm{A}}}_{{\rm{x}}}+{{\rm{A}}}_{{\rm{y}}}/2)-{\rm{A}}({\rm{x}}+{\rm{y}})]/({{\rm{A}}}_{{\rm{x}}}+{{\rm{A}}}_{{\rm{y}}}/2)\}\times 100.$$

Ax and Ay represented absorbance of each isolate and A(x + y) demonstrated absorbance of mixture.

Cell surface hydrophobicity

Cellular hydrophobicity was determined by measuring the bacterial cell adhesion to hydrocarbon according to the protocol described by Meidong et al.27. In brief, the bacterial cell culture of F. penangensis ML061-4 was incubated overnight, harvested by centrifugation and washed twice by 1X PBS. The cell pellet was resuspended in 1X PBS and adjusted equivalent to 0.1 at OD600 (Aintial). The F. penangensis ML061-4 suspension was mixed with xylene. The mixture was undisturbed for separation of organic and aqueous phases at room temperature for 30 min. Afterwards, the final absorbance of aqueous phase (Afinal) was measured. L. acidophilus TISTR 2365 was used as a control. The percentage of surface hydrophobicity was calculated according to the equation:

$${\rm{Surface}}\,{\rm{hydrophobicity}}\,( \% )=[({{\rm{A}}}_{{\rm{intial}}}-{{\rm{A}}}_{{\rm{final}}})/{{\rm{A}}}_{{\rm{intial}}}]\times 100.$$

Bacterial adhesion, competition and exclusion

The bacterial adherence assay was performed following the method described by Llanco et al.63 with modifications. Briefly, the African green monkey kidney cell line (Vero cell) was grown in Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM) (Gibco®, Life TechnologiesTM, UK) supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin and fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Sigma-Aldrich™) and incubated at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator. The Vero cells were cultivated in 6-well plate and adjusted equivalent approximately 1 × 105 cell/ml in DMEM with FBS, incubated at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator for 18-24 hr and washed three times with 1X PBS afterwards. Subsequently, the suspended ML061-4 cells (1 × 108 CFU/ml) and DMEM were added into each well prior to incubation for 1 hr and washed three times with 1X PBS. The Vero cells were methanol fixed for 3–5 min and stained with Giemsa stain for 10–15 min. L. acidophilus TISTR 2365 and L. plantarum FM03-1 (GenBank accession no. MF599378), known adhesive strains, were used as controls. Morphological alterations were observed under light microscope and percentage of adhesion to cell line was calculated.

Bacterial competition and competitive exclusion of E. coli ATCC 25922 and E. coli O157:H7 DMST 12743 by strain ML061-4 was investigated by the method described by Boudeau et al.64 with modification. In competition experiments, the strain ML064-1 and E. coli strain were added together to the cell monolayer (1 × 108 CFU/ml final concentration of each) and incubated for 1 hr. For competitive exclusion, the Vero cell monolayer was first incubated with E. coli for 1 hr, washed the non-adherent bacteria three times with 1X PBS, added the strain ML064-1 and incubated for 3 hr.

Statistical analysis

Student’s t-test was performed to calculate statistical significance of cellular autoaggregation, coaggregation and cell surface hydrophobicity. The bacterial adhesion, competition and competitive exclusion were statistically evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with SPSS 22.0 and Duncan’s multiple range tests. Significance levels were defined using p < 0.05.

Conclusions

Leaves of Assam tea or Miang (Camellia sinensis var. assamica) contained diverse microorganisms including lactic acid bacteria that might participate in Miang fermentation. F. penangensis ML061-4 isolated from Assam tea leaves, first report in Thailand, exhibited some biological properties indicating the high potential for using as a probiotic. The rpoB gene was first used as a tool for effective identification of bacteria in the genus Floricoccus.

References

  1. 1.

    Chuah, L. O. et al. Floricoccus tropicus gen. nov., sp. nov. and Floricoccus penangensis sp. nov. isolated from fresh flowers of durian tree and hibiscus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67, 4979–4985, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002386 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Beye, M., Fahsi, N., Raoult, D. & Fournier, P. E. Careful use of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity values for the identification of Mycobacterium species. New Microbes New Infect 22, 24–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2017.12.009 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Jo, J. H., Kennedy, E. A. & Kong, H. H. Research techniques made simple: Bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing in cutaneous research. J Investig Dermatol 136, e23–e27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2016.01.005 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Poretsky, R., Rodriguez-R, L. M., Luo, C., Tsementzi, D. & Konstantinidis, K. T. Strengths and limitations of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing in revealing temporal microbial community dynamics. Plos One 9, e93827, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093827 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Drancourt, M., Roux, V., Fournier., P. E. & Raoult, D. rpoB gene sequence-based identification of aerobic Gram-positive cocci of the genera Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Gemella, Abiotrophia, and Granulicatella. J Clin Microbiol 42, 497–504, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.2.497-504.2004 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mollet, C., Drancourt, M. & Raoult, D. rpoB sequence analysis as a novel basis for bacterial identification. Mol Microbiol 26, 1005–1011, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.6382009.x (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Okada, S., Daengsubha, W., Uchimura, T. A. I., Ohara, N. & Kozaki, M. Flora of lactic acid bacteria in miang produced in northern Thailand. J Gen Appl Microbiol 32, 57–65, https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.32.57 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Khanongnuch, C., Unban, K., Kanpiengjai, A. & Saenjum, C. Recent research advances and ethno-botanical history of miang, a traditional fermented tea (Camellia sinensis var. assamica) of northern Thailand. J Ethn Foods 4, 135–144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jef.2017.08.006 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kanpiengjai, A., Chui-Chai, N., Chaikaew, S. & Khanongnuch, C. Distribution of tannin-‘tolerant yeasts isolated from Miang, a traditional fermented tea leaf (Camellia sinensis var. assamica) in northern Thailand. Int J Food Microbiol 238, 121–131, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.08.044 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    FAO/WHO. Report of a Joint Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization (FAO/WHO) expert consultation on guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food, http://www.who.int/foodsafety/fs_management/en/probiotic_guidelines.pdf (2002).

  11. 11.

    Kerry, R. G. et al. Benefaction of probiotics for human health: A review. J Food Drug anal 26, 927–939, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2018.01.002 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Papadimitriou, K., Pot, B. & Tsakalidou, E. How microbes adapt to a diversity of food niches. Curr Opin. Food Sci 2, 29–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2015.01.001 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Klayraung, S., Viernstein, H., Sirithunyalug, J. & Okonogi, S. Probiotic properties of Lactobacilli isolated from Thai traditional food. Sci Pharm 76, 485–503, https://doi.org/10.3797/scipharm.0806-11 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Perez, R. H., Zendo, T. & Sonomoto, K. Novel bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria (LAB): various structures and applications. Microb Cell Fact 13, S3, https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-13-S1-S3 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Stiles, M. E. & Holzapfel, W. H. Lactic acid bacteria of foods and their current taxonomy. Int J Food Microbiol 36, 1–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(96)01233-0 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kawakami, M., Chairote, G. & Kobayashi, A. Flavor constituents of pickled tea, Miang, in Thailand. Agric Biol Chem 51, 1683–1687, https://doi.org/10.1080/00021369.1987.10868262 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Karak, T. et al. Major soil chemical properties of the major tea-growing areas in India. Pedosphere 25, 316–328, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(15)60016-9 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kämpfer, P., Martin, K. & Glaeser, S. P. Lysinibacillus contaminans sp. nov., isolated from surface water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63, 3148–3153, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.049593-0 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Vuuren, S. V., Williams, V. L., Sooka, A., Burger, A. & der Haar, L. V. Microbial contamination of traditional medicinal plants sold at the Faraday muthi market, Johannesburg, South Africa. S Afr J Bot 94, 95–100, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2014.06.002 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Román-Ponce, B. et al. Kocuria arsenatis sp. nov., an arsenic-resistant endophytic actinobacterium associated with Prosopis laegivata grown on high-arsenic-polluted mine tailing. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66, 1027–1033, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.000830 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Prakash, O. et al. Description of Micrococcus aloeverae sp. nov., an endophytic actinobacterium isolated from Aloe vera. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64, 3427–3433, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.063339-0 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sunar, K., Dey, P., Chakraborty, U. & Chakraborty, B. Biocontrol efficacy and plant growth promoting activity of Bacillus altitudinis isolated from Darjeeling hills, India. J Basic Microbiol 55, 91–104, https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201300227 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Evans, R. et al. Defining the functional traits that drive bacterial decomposer community productivity. ISME J 11, 1680–1687, https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.22 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Qiao, J. et al. Addition of plant-growth-promoting Bacillus subtilis PTS-394 on tomato rhizosphere has no durable impact on composition of root microbiome. BMC Microbiol 17, 131, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-017-1039-x (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Jayanthi, N. & Ratna, S. M. Bacillus clausii - The probiotic of choice in the treatment of diarrhoea. J Yoga Phys Ther 5, 211, https://doi.org/10.4172/21577595.1000211 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Elshaghabee, F. M. F., Rokana, N., Gulhane, R. D., Sharma, C. & Panwar, H. Bacillus as potential probiotics: status, concerns, and future perspectives. Front Microbiol 8, 1490, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01490 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Meidong, R. et al. A novel probiotic Bacillus siamensis B44v isolated from Thai pickled vegetables (Phak-dong) for potential use as a feed supplement in aquaculture. J Gen Appl Microbiol 63, 246–253, https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.2016.12.002 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Paz, A., Outeiriño, D., de Souza Oliveira, R. P. & Domínguez, J. M. Fed-batch production of vanillin by Bacillus aryabhattai BA03. New Biotechnol 40, 186–191, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.07.012 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chaves, F., García-Álvarez, M., Sanz, F., Alba, C. & Otero, J. R. Nosocomial spread of a Staphylococcus hominis subsp. novobiosepticus strain causing sepsis in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Clin Microbiol 43, 4877–4879, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.9.4877-4879.2005 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Szewczyk, E. M., Nowak, T., Cieślikowski, T. & Różalska, M. Potential role of Staphylococcus cohnii in a hospital environment. Microb Ecol Health Dis 15, 51–56, https://doi.org/10.1080/08910600310014908 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Barros, E. M., Ceotto, H., Bastos, M. C. F., dos Santos, K. R. N. & de Marval, M. G. Staphylococcus haemolyticus as an important hospital pathogen and carrier of methicillin resistance genes. J Clin Microbiol 50, 166–168, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.05563-11 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Chaikaew, S. et al. Diversity of lactic acid bacteria from Miang, a traditional fermented tea leaf in northern Thailand and their tannin-tolerant ability in tea extract. J Microbiol 55, 720–729, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-017-7195-8 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Gramza-Michałowska, A. et al. Antioxidative potential, nutritional value and sensory profiles of confectionery fortified with green and yellow tea leaves (Camellia sinensis). Food Chem 211, 448–454, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.05.048 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Li, Y. C. et al. Variations of rhizosphere bacterial communities in tea (Camellia sinensis L.) continuous cropping soil by high-throughput pyrosequencing approach. J Appl Microbiol 121, 787–799, https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13225 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Nancib, A., Nancib, N. & Boudrant, J. Production of lactic acid from date juice extract with free cells of single and mixed cultures of Lactobacillus casei and Lactococcus lactis. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25, 1423–1429, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-009-0029-z (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kankaanpää, P. E., Salminen, S. J., Isolauri, E. & Lee, Y. K. The influence of polyunsaturated fatty acids on probiotic growth and adhesion. FEMS Microbiol Lett 194, 149–153, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb09460.x (2001).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Khamis, A., Colson, P., Raoult, D. & Scola, B. L. Usefulness of rpoB gene sequencing for identification of Afipia and Bosea species, including a strategy for choosing discriminative partial sequences. Appl Environ Microbiol 69, 6740–6749, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.11.6740-6749.2003 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Konings, W. N. et al. The role of transport processes in survival of lactic acid bacteria. Energy transduction and multidrug resistance. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 71, 117–128, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000143525601 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Papadimitriou, K. et al. Stress physiology of lactic acid bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 80, 837–890, https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00076-15 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hassan, M., Kjos, M., Nes, I. F., Diep, D. B. & Lotfipour, F. Natural antimicrobial peptides from bacteria: characteristics and potential applications to fight against antibiotic resistance. J Appl Microbiol 113, 723–736, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05338.x (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Trip, H., Mulder, N. L. & Lolkema, J. S. Improved acid stress survival of Lactococcus lactis expressing the histidine decarboxylation pathway of Streptococcus thermophilus CHCC1524. J Biol Chem 287, 11195–11204, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.330704 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Menconi, A. et al. Identification and characterization of lactic acid bacteria in a commercial probiotic culture. Biosci Microb Food Health 33, 25–30, https://doi.org/10.12938/bmfh.33.25 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Teixeira, J. S. et al. Glutamine, glutamate, and arginine-based acid resistance in Lactobacillus reuteri. Food Microbiol 42, 172–180, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.03.015 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Marteau, P., Minekus, M., Havenaar, R. & Huis, J. H. J. Survival of lactic acid bacteria in a dynamic model of the stomach and small intestine: Validation and the effects of bile. J Dairy Sci 80, 1031–1037, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76027-2 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Collado, M. C., Meriluoto, J. & Salminen, S. Adhesion and aggregation properties of probiotic and pathogen strains. Eur Food Res Technol 226, 1065–1073, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-007-0632-x (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Xu, H., Jeong, H. S., Lee, H. Y. & Ahn, J. Assessment of cell surface properties and adhesion potential of selected probiotic strains. Lett Appl Microbiol 49, 434–442, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02684.x (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Silva, M. S. et al. Probiotic properties of Weissella cibaria and Leuconostoc citreum isolated from tejuino - A typical Mexican beverage. LWT - Food Sci Technol 86, 227–232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.08.009 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Sherman, P. M. et al. Probiotics reduce enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7- and enteropathogenic E. coli O127:H6-induced changes in polarized T84 epithelial cell monolayers by reducing bacterial adhesion and cytoskeletal rearrangements. Infect Immun 73, 5183–5188, https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.73.8.5183-5188.2005 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Polak-Berecka, M., Waśko, A., Paduch, R., Skrzypek, T. & Sroka-Bartnicka, A. The effect of cell surface components on adhesion ability of Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 106, 751–762, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-014-0245-x (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kanmani, P. et al. Synthesis and functional characterization of antibiofilm exopolysaccharide produced by Enterococcus faecium MC13 isolated from the gut of fish. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 169, 1001–1015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-012-0074-1 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kumari, A., Angmo, K. & Monika & Bhalla, T. C. Probiotic attributes of indigenous Lactobacillus spp. isolated from traditional fermented foods and beverages of north-western Himalayas using in vitro screening and principal component analysis. J Food Sci Technol 53, 2463–2475, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-016-2231-y (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Pitcher, D. G., Saunders, N. A. & Owen, R. J. Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate. Lett Appl Microbiol 8, 151–156, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.1989.tb00262.x (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Weisburg, W. G., Barns, S. M., Pelletier, D. A. & Lane, D. J. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 173, 697–703, https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Meucci, A. et al. Lactococcus hircilactis sp. nov. and Lactococcus laudensis sp. nov., isolated from milk. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65, 2091–2096, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.000225 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Saitou, N. & Nei, M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4, 406–425, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 (1987).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Kumar, S., Stecher, G. & Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger dataset. Mol Biol Evol 33, 1870–1874, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Arroyo, E., Enríquez, L., Sánchez, A., Ovalle, M. & Olivas, A. Scanning electron microscopy of bacteria Tetrasphaera duodecadis. Scanning 36, 547–550, https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21154 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Bonev, B., Hooper, J. & Parisot, J. Principles of assessing bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics using the agar diffusion method. J Antimicrob Chemo 61, 1295–1301, https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkn090 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards of antimicrobial disc susceptibility tests. CLSI 32, 3 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Fossi, B. T. et al. Probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from fermented sap of palm tree (Elaeis guineensis). J Microbiol Antimicrob 7, 42–52, https://doi.org/10.5897/JMA2014.0353 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Valeriano, V. D., Parungao-Balolong, M. M. & Kang, D. K. In vitro evaluation of the mucin-adhesion ability and probiotic potential of Lactobacillus mucosae LM1. J Appl Microbiol 117, 485–497, https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12539 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Buswell, C. M., Herlihy, Y. M., Marsh, P. D., Keevil, C. W. & Leach, S. A. Coaggregation amongst aquatic biofilm bacteria. J Appl Microbiol 83, 477–484, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1997.00260.x (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Llanco, L. A., Nakano, V., de Moraes, C. T. P., Piazza, R. M. F. & Avila-Campos, M. J. Adhesion and invasion of Clostridium perfringens type A into epithelial cells. Braz J Microbiol 48, 764–768, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.06.002 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Boudeau, J., Glasser, A. L., Julien, S., Colombel, J. F. & Darfeuille-Michaud, A. Inhibitory effect of probiotic Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 on adhesion to and invasion of intestinal epithelial cells by adherent-invasive E. coli strains isolated from patients with Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 18, 45–56, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0269-2813.2003.01638.x (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Gratefully and sincerely thank the Thailand Research Fund (PHD60I0089); Amazing Tea Limited Partnership; Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Center of Excellence in Bioresources for Agriculture, Industry and Medicine, the Teaching Assistant and Research Assistant (TA/RA) Scholarship, the Graduate School, Chiang Mai University for providing financial support and all facilities to carry out this research.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P.R. and N.T. designed the experiments and participated in Assam tea collection, bacterial isolation and identification; A.I. provided information about Assam tea; Y.T. provided the Vero cells for adhesion assay; P.R. and N.T. prepared manuscript and analyzed data; All authors read and edited manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Narumol Thongwai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rungsirivanich, P., Inta, A., Tragoolpua, Y. et al. Partial rpoB Gene Sequencing Identification and Probiotic Potential of Floricoccus penangensis ML061-4 Isolated from Assam Tea (Camellia sinensis var. assamica). Sci Rep 9, 16561 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52979-9

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.