Neutrophil extracellular traps and monocyte subsets at the culprit lesion site of myocardial infarction patients

Article metrics

Abstract

Neutrophils release their chromatin into the extracellular space upon activation. These web-like structures are called neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and have potent prothrombotic and proinflammatory properties. In ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), NETs correlate with increased infarct size. The interplay of neutrophils and monocytes impacts cardiac remodeling. Monocyte subsets are classified as classical, intermediate and non-classical monocytes. In the present study, in vitro stimulation with NETs led to an increase of intermediate monocytes and reduced expression of CX3CR1 in all subsets. Intermediate monocytes have been associated with poor outcome, while non-classical CX3CR1-positive monocytes could have reparative function after STEMI. We characterized monocyte subsets and NET markers at the culprit lesion site of STEMI patients (n = 91). NET surrogate markers were increased and correlated with larger infarct size and with fewer non-classical monocytes. Intermediate and especially non-classical monocytes were increased at the culprit site compared to the femoral site. Low CX3CR1 expression of monocytes correlated with high NET markers and increased infarct size. In this translational system, causality cannot be proven. However, our data suggest that NETs interfere with monocytic differentiation and receptor expression, presumably promoting a subset shift at the culprit lesion site. Reduced monocyte CX3CR1 expression may compromise myocardial salvage.

Introduction

Myocardial infarction (MI) and subsequent ischemic cardiomyopathy are a major disease burden worldwide1. The pathomechanism of coronary thrombosis, ischemia and myocardial scar formation is incompletely understood. We have previously shown that neutrophils release neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) at the culprit lesion site (culprit site), which might serve as scaffolds for platelets and erythrocytes and could initiate coronary thrombosis2, especially in the setting of superficial plaque erosion3. Coronary NET burden significantly correlated with reduced ST-segment resolution and increased infarct size in ST-elevation MI (STEMI) patients. Degradation of NETs by deoxyribonucleases in circulation is crucial for homeostasis4. High endogenous deoxyribonuclease activity was correlated with reduced infarct size2. Hence, increased NET burden due to impaired degradation appears to be detrimental downstream in the ischemic myocardium, causing microvascular obstruction, inflammation and cardiomyocyte cell death5. NET-releasing neutrophils and monocytes cooperate in inflammation6, thrombus formation7 and cardiac remodeling8. Monocytes can differentiate into macrophages9, which release major proinflammatory mediators like Interleukin-1ß in response to NETs10. Macrophages in turn complement the clearance of NETs11 and are shifted towards an anti-inflammatory phenotype after phagocytosis of neutrophilic proteins12. Monocyte subsets have specific functions in cardiac remodeling after MI13 and are grouped according to their CD14/CD16 expression into classical (CD14++ CD16−), intermediate (CD14++ CD16+) and non-classical (CD14+ CD16++) monocytes14. A recent study has shown that monocyte subsets evolve from classical to intermediate and non-classical monocytes15. Classical monocytes are proinflammatory and produce high levels of cytokines16. Intermediate monocytes are potent antigen-presenting cells, which is reflected by a high HLA-DR expression17. They are proinflammatory18, exhibit a strong phagocytic activity and strongly contribute to oxidative burst. Non-classical monocytes display the highest CX3CR1 (fractalkine receptor) expression, which is an important receptor for adhesion and migration. They have a patrolling function and efficiently invade inflamed tissue. Via CX3CR1, they respond to apoptotic signals to remove cell debris and contribute to tissue repair, thus exerting anti-inflammatory properties19. Classical and intermediate monocytes are increased in the periphery in the course of MI and correlate with increased infarct size and poor cardiac function at follow up20,21, whereas non-classical monocytes were associated with improved recovery of dysfunctional myocardium22.

In the present study, we investigated the impact of NETs on monocyte subsets in vitro and evaluated NET surrogate markers and monocytes subsets in vivo at the culprit site of STEMI patients.

Methods

Patients

STEMI patients (n = 91), who received thrombectomy in the course of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) at the Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Vienna, were consecutively included in the study and monocyte subsets were quantified in femoral and culprit site blood samples. An additional characterization of monocyte expression markers was performed in the last 36 consecutive patients. Inclusion criteria were chest pain at the time of pPCI, ST-elevations of ≥2 mm on >1 chest lead or new ST-elevations of ≥1 mm on >1 limb lead within 20 minutes of pPCI. All patients received 250 mg of acetylsalicylic acid and unfractionated heparin to achieve an activated coagulation time of >300 seconds (4000–10000 IE). Criteria for thrombectomy were a vessel diameter of ≥3 mm, a large intraluminal contrast medium filling defect, suggestive of thrombus within 50 mm of the respective ostium without severe calcification, tortuosity, or difficult vascular access. A total volume of 10 to 20 mL culprit site blood were aspirated using a commercial thrombectomy catheter (Pronto [Vascular Solutions], Export [Medtronic], Diver [Invatec], and Thrombuster [Atrium Medical Corporation]). Femoral whole blood samples were obtained simultaneously from the femoral arterial sheath. All plasma measurements were normalized for femoral whole blood hematocrit as aspiration catheter flushing with 2–4 ml 0.9% sodium chloride leads to dilution of the culprit site blood sample. Exclusion criteria were low culprit site sample volume, intake of immunosuppressants, cardiogenic shock, severe infection, active neoplasia, end stage kidney disease and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa-blocker treatment. Infarct size was estimated by measuring creatine phosphokinase isoform MB area under the curve (CK-MB AUC), which allows an adequate approximation of infarct size (Supplementary Fig. 1).

All study participants gave written informed consent prior to the inclusion under an approval of the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Vienna, Austria (approval reference number 303/2005). All investigations conformed to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Flow cytometry

Blood samples were incubated with fluorochrome-labeled antibodies for 30 minutes in the dark. Cells were stained for human CD11a (PE, Biolegend), CD11b (PE, Biolegend), CD14 (FITC, Biolegend), CD16 (PE-Cy7, Biolegend), CD45 (APC-Cy7, Biolegend), CD56 (APC, Biolegend), CD66b (PerCP-Cy5.5, Biolegend), CD142 (PE, BD Pharmingen) CD192 (PE, Biolegend), toll-like receptor (TLR)2 (PE, Biolegend), TLR4 (PE, Biolegend), CX3CR1 (PE, Biolegend) and HLA-DR (PE, Biolegend). Erythrocyte lysis by BD FACS lysing solution (BD Biosciences) was followed by 3 washing steps with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), then cells were resuspended for the measurements. Per panel, 50000 events were counted and the percentage of positive cells or mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was measured.

Monocyte subsets were gated as depicted in Supplementary Fig. 2. Cells were separated from debris and doublets; CD45+ CD66b− cells were divided from lymphocytes by forward and side scatter gating, then CD56− monocytes were divided into the subsets according to their CD14/CD16 expression profile. In preliminary experiments, viability of cells was assessed using annexin V / propidium iodide FC staining technique (Apoptosis detection kit, BD Biosciences); Viability of gated monocytes was >98% (data not shown).

Isotype-matched antibodies (mouse IgG1, IgG2a and IgM, Biolegend) were added to negative control samples. Cells were analyzed using a BD FACSCanto II and FACSDiva Software (BD Biosciences).

Total monocyte subset numbers were calculated via monocyte numbers measured in femoral and culprit site differential cell counts similar to a published approach23. Culprit site differential blood counts could be obtained from 69 patients.

NET surrogate markers

Citrullinated histone H3 (citH3) was measured as described24, with minor modifications. Streptavidin-coated plates were incubated with anti-histone biotin (Roche) for 120 minutes. Plates were washed and incubated with plasma samples or standard (citH3, Cayman) for 90 minutes. After washing, anti-histone H3 (1:2000 in PBS + 1% bovine serum albumin [BSA], Abcam) was added for 60 minutes. Plates were washed and incubated with goat anti-rabbit HRP conjugate antibody (1:5000 in PBS + 1% BSA, BioRad) for 60 minutes, washed, and developed with BM Blue POD Substrate (Roche) for 20 minutes. The reaction was stopped by addition of 2 M H2SO4 and optical density was measured on a Promega GloMax Discover microplate reader (450 nm, reference 620 nm).

Double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (dsDNA) was quantified using the Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Assay (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer´s instructions. Fluorescence was measured on a GloMax Discover microplate reader (Promega).

CX3CL1 measurements

CX3CL1 was quantified using the Human CX3CL1/Fractalkine Quantikine ELISA Kit (R&D Systems) according to manufacturer’s instructions in the same subset of patients, from whom an expression marker analysis was performed by flow cytometry (FC) (n = 34). Optical density was measured on a Promega GloMax Discover microplate reader (450 nm, reference 620 nm).

Isolation of neutrophil extracellular traps

Neutrophils and NETs were isolated from healthy donors according to recently published protocols with minor modifications25,26. Purity of neutrophils was routinely above 98%. Neutrophils were resuspended in RPMI 1640 (Gibco) + 3% fetal calf serum (FCS, Gibco) and stimulated with 500 nM phorbol-myristate acetate for 4 hours at 37 °C. Supernatant was discarded, and cells were incubated with RPMI containing 3% FCS and 10 U/ml Alu I (Roche) for 30 minutes at 37 °C. Supernatant was collected and centrifuged for 5 minutes, 300 g to remove remaining cellular debris. Concentration of NETs was assessed using PicoGreen as described above. A detailed analysis of NETs produced in vitro can be found in Supplementary Fig. 3.

Stimulation of monocytes with NETs in vitro in whole blood cultures

50 µl of EDTA whole blood drawn from healthy volunteers were stimulated with 500 ng/ml isolated NETs or vehicle control in a polystyrene tube for 1 hour at 37 °C. Blood was washed with 2 ml PBS + 1% FCS. Supernatant was discarded, and the remaining pellet was resuspended in 50 µl PBS. Cells were stained for CD66b (Pacific Blue), CD45 (Pacific Orange), CD142 (Brilliant Violet 711), CD14 (FITC), CX3CR1 (PE), HLA-DR; CD16 (PE-Cy7), CD56 (Alexa Fluor 647), CD11b (Alexa Fluor 700), HLA-DR (APC-Cy7). Cells were lysed using BD FC Lysis Solution for 15 minutes. Samples were washed three times with PBS + 1% FCS and analyzed using an Attune NxT Flow Cytometer (ThermoFisher).

Statistics

Distribution of data was assessed by histograms complemented by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Shapiro-Wilk test. Non-parametric data are given as median and interquartile range [IQR] and analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank test and Spearman rank correlation (rs). Normally distributed data are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and tested using paired Students t-test. Bonferroni-Holm correction was applied in each set of experiments to correct for multiple testing. Boxplots display the 25th–75th percentile, the whiskers cover the 5th–95th percentile. Extreme outliers (<5th or >95th percentile) are not displayed in the figures. A published trapezoidal formula was used to calculate CK-MB AUC27, with at least 5 consecutive values over a period of 3 days after pPCI. A p-value below 0.05 was considered significant. Statistical testing was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0 for Windows.

Results

Patient characteristics

We included 91 patients suffering from STEMI with a TIMI flow 0–1 who underwent pPCI including thrombectomy at the Vienna General Hospital. Mean age was 57.2 ± 13.0 years, 19.8% were women. Detailed patient characteristics are provided in Table 1.

Table 1 Patient characteristics.

Stimulation of monocytes with NETs in vitro shifts classical towards intermediate monocytes and strongly influences receptor expression

Whole blood samples from healthy donors (n = 5) were stimulated with isolated NETs in vitro and monocyte subsets were measured by FC. Stimulation with NETs led to a shift from classical to intermediate monocytes (Fig. 1A). Moreover, an increased expression of CD11b on classical and intermediate monocytes, an increased expression of CD142 only on intermediate monocytes, but a decreased expression of CX3CR1 on all three subsets was detected (Fig. 1B–D). Stimulation of monocytes from a single donor with isolated NETs from 5 different donors showed the same expression pattern (Supplementary Fig. 4).

Figure 1
figure1

Stimulation of monocytes with NETs in vitro. (A) Monocyte subset shift as % of total monoctes, expression of (B) CD11b, (C) CD142 and (D) CX3CR1 of classical, intermediate and non-classical monocytes. Monocyte subsets in percent (%) or mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) levels are displayed. Monocytes were stimulated in whole blood from healthy donors (n = 5) with NETs derived from isolated neutrophils from a healthy donor (n = 1) or vehicle control for 60 minutes. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

NET surrogate markers are increased at the culprit lesion site and correlate with myocardial injury

In line with previous data2,28, dsDNA was significantly increased at the culprit site compared to femoral plasma (Fig. 2A). Citrullinated histone 3 was also substantially increased in culprit site plasma compared to femoral plasma (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, dsDNA (Fig. 2C) and citH3 (Fig. 2D) levels correlated with enzymatic infarct size measured as CK-MB AUC.

Figure 2
figure2

Surrogate markers of neutrophil extracellular traps. (A) Double-stranded DNA (dsDNA, n = 83, femoral 581.7 [519.8–672.7] versus culprit site 692.7 [552.7–888.0] ng/ml) and (B) citrullinated histone 3 levels (citH3, n = 87, femoral 233 [156.5–545.6] versus culprit site 380.5 [173.8–820.3] ng/ml) were significantly increased at the culprit site of STEMI patients. Enzymatic infarct size expressed as the creatine phosphokinase isoform MB area under the curve (CK-MB AUC) correlated with (C) double-stranded DNA (dsDNA, n = 65, rs = 0.409, p < 0.001) and (D) citrullinated histone 3 (citH3, n = 65, rs = 0.315, p < 0.01). Significance ****p < 0.0001.

Monocyte subsets are shifted at the culprit lesion site of STEMI patients

Monocytes subsets were determined in culprit site and femoral whole blood from STEMI patients (n = 91). Monocyte percentage of leukocytes was significantly decreased in culprit site whole blood compared to the femoral site (femoral 3.7 [2.6–5.1] versus culprit site 3.1 [2.3–4.1] %, p < 0.0001), but total monocyte number in differential blood cell counts was not significantly different (femoral 600 [500–800] versus culprit site 600 [400–800] cells/l, p = not significant). Interestingly, classical monocyte percentage was decreased at the culprit site (Fig. 3A), whereas intermediate (Fig. 3B) and non-classical monocyte percentages were increased (Fig. 3C). High culprit site dsDNA correlated with low non-classical monocyte percentage at the culprit site (Fig. 3D). Culprit site citH3 related to non-classical monocyte numbers accordingly, but was not statistically significant.

Figure 3
figure3

Monocyte subsets at the culprit lesion site of STEMI patients. (A) Classical monocytes (femoral 91.4 [85.2–94.0] versus culprit site 89.2 [82.8–92.9] %), (B) intermediate monocytes (femoral 4.5 [2.9–7.9] versus culprit site 5.2 [3.1–8.9] %) and (C) non-classical monocytes (femoral 3.6 [2.0–7.19] versus culprit site 4.9 [2.5–8.2] %) were determined by flow cytometry as % of total monoctes in femoral and culprit site whole blood samples of STEMI patients (n = 91). The gating strategy is depicted in Supplementary Fig. 2. (D) Culprit site dsDNA correlates with non-classical monocyte percentage (n = 63, rs = −0.224, p < 0.05). ****p < 0.0001.

In total cell numbers, intermediate (n = 69, femoral 23 [14–54] versus culprit site 29 [15–50] cells/l, p < 0.05) and non-classical monocytes (n = 69, femoral 22 [10–38] versus culprit site 26 [18–44] cells/l, p < 0.0001) were significantly increased, while classical monocytes were not significantly different (n = 69, femoral 580 [426–739] versus culprit site 547 [394–731] cells/l, p = not significant).

Monocyte subsets display differentially expressed activation markers at the culprit lesion site

We determined surface receptors of monocytes at the culprit site compared to the femoral site by FC in a subset of patients (n = 36). As expected, classical monocytes displayed a constitutively low expression of CX3CR1, while intermediate and especially non-classical monocytes showed distinctly higher levels. The CX3CR1 expression was substantially decreased at the culprit site in all subsets (Fig. 4A).

Figure 4
figure4

Expression markers of monocyte subsets in STEMI patients. Expression markers were determined by flow cytometry in femoral and culprit site whole blood samples (n = 36). (A) CX3CR1, (B) CD11b, (C) CD142 and (D) HLA-DR on classical monocytes, intermediate monocytes and non-classical monocytes. Data are presented as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of monocyte subsets. All expression marker data are listed in Supplementary Table 1. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Soluble CX3CL1 was measured in the same patients and was significantly decreased in culprit site compared to femoral plasma (n = 32, femoral site 620 ± 280 pg/ml versus culprit site 540 ± 300 pg/ml, p < 0.01).

Classical monocytes displayed increased CD11b expression at the culprit site compared to the femoral site (Fig. 4B), CD142 expression of intermediate monocytes was significantly increased at the culprit site (Fig. 4C), while HLA-DR expression was decreased (Fig. 4D). Other measured activation markers (CD11a, CD192, TLR2, TLR4) were not significantly different between the femoral site and the culprit site. All FC data are listed in Supplementary Table 1.

Low monocytic CX3CR1 expression is connected to higher NET burden and increased myocardial injury

Low CX3CR1 expression of non-classical monocytes correlated with high culprit site dsDNA (Fig. 5A) and citH3 levels (Fig. 5B). Interestingly, we detected a strong correlation between increased enzymatic infarct size measured as CK-MB AUC and low expression of CX3CR1 on classical monocytes (n = 30, rs = −0.517, p < 0.05), intermediate monocytes (n = 30, rs = −0.569, p < 0.01) and non-classical monocytes (n = 30, rs = −0.556, p < 0.01, Fig. 5C).

Figure 5
figure5

Correlation of non-classical monocyte CX3CR1 expression with NET surrogate markers and infarct size. Low expression of CX3CR1 on non-classical monocytes correlates with higher (A) double-stranded DNA (dsDNA, n = 31, rs = −0.423, p < 0.05), (B) citrullinated histone 3 (citH3, n = 33, rs = −0.359, p < 0.05) and (C) enzymatic infarct size expressed as the creatine phosphokinase isoform MB area under the curve (CK-MB AUC, n = 30, rs = −0.556, p < 0.01).

Symptom-to-balloon time did not correlate with monocyte frequencies, expression markers or NETs surrogate markers (n = 33).

Discussion

In the present study, we investigated monocyte subsets at the culprit site of STEMI patients. In absence of a suitable model for coronary atherothrombosis and lack of an animal model that approximates human STEMI, the local pattern of immune cells at the culprit site of patients is crucial to unravel the pathophysiology of MI. Percentage of monocytes was decreased in culprit site blood compared to the femoral site, which might be explained by the local accumulation of neutrophils29. Neutrophils and NETs have a detrimental impact on reperfusion and infarct size in STEMI2,30. It has been proposed that NETs are involved in microvascular obstruction and downstream injury5. In line with previous data, we detected increased levels of NET surrogate markers in culprit site plasma, which correlated with higher enzymatic infarct size (Fig. 2)2,28,31. Of note, NETs are not the exclusive possible source of extracellular DNA and histones, thereby it could be very possible that dying cells are another important source of extracellular chromatin in STEMI patients. Although the exact mechanisms of reperfusion injury and adverse remodeling are unknown, one important component might be the interplay between neutrophils and monocytes7. We investigated the influence of NETs on monocyte subsets in vitro and detected a significant shift from classical towards intermediate monocytes. Monocyte subsets most likely evolve from classical over intermediate to non-classical monocytes15. Intermediate monocytes are associated with features of vulnerable plaques32 and were reported to be connected to worse outcome in STEMI21,33. Furthermore, we observed a strongly diminished CX3CR1 expression of intermediate and non-classical monocytes, but increased expression of CD11b and CD142 (tissue factor) on classical and intermediate monocytes in vitro (Fig. 1). These findings underscore reports on the proinflammatory and prothrombotic effects of extracellular chromatin34,35,36.

We measured the same expression markers at the culprit site of STEMI patients and found a very similar pattern. Intermediate and non-classical monocytes (as percentage of monocytes as well as in total numbers) were significantly increased compared to the femoral site, and higher dsDNA correlated with lower non-classical monocyte levels (Fig. 3). In spite of only partial comparability of human and murine monocyte subsets, Nahrendorf et al. proposed an interesting two-step model for myocardial healing after ischemia derived from animal data. An early CCR2-dependent influx of ‘inflammatory’ Ly6c-high monocytes is followed by a CX3CR1-dependent takeover of ‘reparative’ Ly6c-low monocytes37. Indeed, it was shown that human CD16-positive monocytes, which most likely correspond to murine Ly6c-low monocytes, remain increased in peripheral blood up to 12 days after pPCI compared to CD16-negative monocytes, which peak after 3 days20,21. In autopsy studies, the CD16+ monocyte number in the infarct zone peaked in the proliferative phase after MI38. Our data showing non-classical monocyte accumulation at the culprit site indicate that homing to the ischemic myocardium is initiated considerably earlier after coronary occlusion.

High NET surrogate markers correlated with low CX3CR1 expression of non-classical monocytes (Fig. 5) and culprit site CX3CR1 expression was strongly reduced compared to the femoral site (Fig. 4). Yet, high CX3CR1 expression by non-classical monocytes correlated with smaller infarct size (Fig. 5). The CX3CR1 receptor is discussed to enable effective non-classical monocyte trafficking and is critical for resolution of tissue inflammation and healing19. It was shown that repair after arterial injury is compromised in CX3CR1 knockout mice and can be rescued by application of wild type Ly6c-low monocytes39. Similar results were reported from a model of ischemic kidney reperfusion injury40. In contrast, it was shown that CX3CL1 neutralization in a murine myocardial infarction model resulted in improved survival41.

Soluble CX3CL1 (fractalkine), the major ligand of CX3CR1, was reported to be increased during STEMI42. We found decreased levels of CX3CL1 at the culprit site compared to femoral plasma. Hypoxia led to reduced CX3CL1 release of endothelial cells in vitro43. Of note, pulmonary endothelial cells responded differently44. Receptor internalization after ligand binding could be an alternative explanation for reduced CX3CR1 expression and CX3CL1 at the culprit site, however, our in vitro data do not support this hypothesis.

Interestingly, NETs also promote differentiation of monocytes into fibrocytes in vitro. In vivo, fibrocytes are increased at the culprit site, which appears to also favor adverse tissue remodeling31.

Taken together, these data suggest that extracellular chromatin could promote a differentiated monocyte response and lower CX3CR1 expression on monocytes at the culprit site. This possibly leads to decreased transmigration into the ischemic tissue of non-classical monocytes and impaired myocardial healing. Targeting NETs in acute coronary syndrome may be a promising therapeutic strategy.

Limitations

With the present study, we provide information on monocyte subsets in MI. However, sampling from the culprit and femoral site of STEMI patients only yields a snapshot of ongoing processes. In this human system, causality cannot be established and our findings remain observational. The effect size of presented data from the femoral and culprit site is small, however paired comparisons are from the same circulatory system, therefore also small differences might be very meaningful.

Data availability

All data and protocols can be promptly made available.

References

  1. 1.

    WHO. Death estimates for 2015 by cause for WHO Member states, http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates/en/index1.html (2016).

  2. 2.

    Mangold, A. et al. Coronary neutrophil extracellular trap burden and deoxyribonuclease activity in ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome are predictors of ST-segment resolution and infarct size. Circulation research 116, 1182–1192, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.304944 (2015).

  3. 3.

    Franck, G. et al. Flow Perturbation Mediates Neutrophil Recruitment and Potentiates Endothelial Injury via TLR2 in Mice: Implications for Superficial Erosion. Circulation research 121, 31–42, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.310694 (2017).

  4. 4.

    Jimenez-Alcazar, M. et al. Host DNases prevent vascular occlusion by neutrophil extracellular traps. Science 358, 1202–1206, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam8897 (2017).

  5. 5.

    Ge, L. et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps in ischemia-reperfusion injury-induced myocardial no-reflow: therapeutic potential of DNase-based reperfusion strategy. American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology 308, H500–509, https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00381.2014 (2015).

  6. 6.

    Soehnlein, O. & Lindbom, L. Phagocyte partnership during the onset and resolution of inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 10, 427–439, https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2779 (2010).

  7. 7.

    von Bruhl, M. L. et al. Monocytes, neutrophils, and platelets cooperate to initiate and propagate venous thrombosis in mice in vivo. The Journal of experimental medicine 209, 819–835, https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20112322 (2012).

  8. 8.

    Shinagawa, H. & Frantz, S. Cellular immunity and cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction: role of neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages. Curr Heart Fail Rep 12, 247–254, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-015-0255-7 (2015).

  9. 9.

    Nahrendorf, M. & Swirski, F. K. Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity in the heart. Circulation research 112, 1624–1633, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.300890 (2013).

  10. 10.

    Warnatsch, A., Ioannou, M., Wang, Q. & Papayannopoulos, V. Inflammation. Neutrophil extracellular traps license macrophages for cytokine production in atherosclerosis. Science 349, 316–320, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8064 (2015).

  11. 11.

    Farrera, C. & Fadeel, B. Macrophage clearance of neutrophil extracellular traps is a silent process. J Immunol 191, 2647–2656, https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1300436 (2013).

  12. 12.

    Voll, R. E. et al. Immunosuppressive effects of apoptotic cells. Nature 390, 350–351, https://doi.org/10.1038/37022 (1997).

  13. 13.

    Dutta, P. & Nahrendorf, M. Monocytes in myocardial infarction. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology 35, 1066–1070, https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.304652 (2015).

  14. 14.

    Ziegler-Heitbrock, L. et al. Nomenclature of monocytes and dendritic cells in blood. Blood 116, e74–80, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-02-258558 (2010).

  15. 15.

    Patel, A. A. et al. The fate and lifespan of human monocyte subsets in steady state and systemic inflammation. The Journal of experimental medicine 214, 1913–1923, https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20170355 (2017).

  16. 16.

    Franca, C. N. et al. Monocyte subtypes and the CCR2 chemokine receptor in cardiovascular disease. Clin Sci (Lond) 131, 1215–1224, https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20170009 (2017).

  17. 17.

    Zawada, A. M. et al. SuperSAGE evidence for CD14++CD16+ monocytes as a third monocyte subset. Blood 118, e50–61, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-01-326827 (2011).

  18. 18.

    Thaler, B. et al. Differential in vivo activation of monocyte subsets during low-grade inflammation through experimental endotoxemia in humans. Sci Rep 6, 30162, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30162 (2016).

  19. 19.

    Thomas, G., Tacke, R., Hedrick, C. C. & Hanna, R. N. Nonclassical patrolling monocyte function in the vasculature. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology 35, 1306–1316, https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.304650 (2015).

  20. 20.

    Tsujioka, H. et al. Impact of heterogeneity of human peripheral blood monocyte subsets on myocardial salvage in patients with primary acute myocardial infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 54, 130–138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.021 (2009).

  21. 21.

    Tapp, L. D., Shantsila, E., Wrigley, B. J., Pamukcu, B. & Lip, G. Y. The CD14++CD16+ monocyte subset and monocyte-platelet interactions in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis: JTH 10, 1231–1241, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04603.x (2012).

  22. 22.

    van der Laan, A. M. et al. A proinflammatory monocyte response is associated with myocardial injury and impaired functional outcome in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: monocytes and myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 163, 57–65 e52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2011.09.002 (2012).

  23. 23.

    Krychtiuk, K. A. et al. Monocyte subset distribution is associated with mortality in critically ill patients. Thromb Haemost 116, 949–957, https://doi.org/10.1160/TH16-05-0405 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Thalin, C. et al. Validation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the quantification of citrullinated histone H3 as a marker for neutrophil extracellular traps in human plasma. Immunologic research 65, 706–712, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-017-8905-3 (2017).

  25. 25.

    Najmeh, S., Cools-Lartigue, J., Giannias, B., Spicer, J. & Ferri, L. E. Simplified Human Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) Isolation and Handling. J Vis Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/52687 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Silvestre-Roig, C. et al. Externalized histone H4 orchestrates chronic inflammation by inducing lytic cell death. Nature 569, 236–240, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1167-6 (2019).

  27. 27.

    Crimi, G. et al. Remote ischemic post-conditioning of the lower limb during primary percutaneous coronary intervention safely reduces enzymatic infarct size in anterior myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. JACC. Cardiovascular interventions 6, 1055–1063, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.011 (2013).

  28. 28.

    Wang, X. et al. Prognostic value of culprit artery double-stranded DNA in ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction. Sci Rep 8, 9294, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27639-z (2018).

  29. 29.

    Distelmaier, K. et al. Prognostic value of culprit site neutrophils in acute coronary syndrome. European journal of clinical investigation 44, 257–265, https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12228 (2014).

  30. 30.

    Savchenko, A. S. et al. VWF-mediated leukocyte recruitment with chromatin decondensation by PAD4 increases myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice. Blood 123, 141–148, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-07-514992 (2014).

  31. 31.

    Hofbauer, T. M. et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps and fibrocytes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Basic Res Cardiol 114, 33, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-019-0740-3 (2019).

  32. 32.

    Moroni, F., Ammirati, E., Norata, G. D., Magnoni, M. & Camici, P. G. The Role of Monocytes and Macrophages in Human Atherosclerosis, Plaque Neoangiogenesis, and Atherothrombosis. Mediators Inflamm 2019, 7434376, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7434376 (2019).

  33. 33.

    Rogacev, K. S. et al. CD14++CD16+ monocytes independently predict cardiovascular events: a cohort study of 951 patients referred for elective coronary angiography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 60, 1512–1520, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.019 (2012).

  34. 34.

    Luo, L. et al. Proinflammatory role of neutrophil extracellular traps in abdominal sepsis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 307, L586–596, https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00365.2013 (2014).

  35. 35.

    Doring, Y. et al. Auto-antigenic protein-DNA complexes stimulate plasmacytoid dendritic cells to promote atherosclerosis. Circulation 125, 1673–1683, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.046755 (2012).

  36. 36.

    Folco, E. J. et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Induce Endothelial Cell Activation and Tissue Factor Production Through Interleukin-1alpha and Cathepsin G. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology 38, 1901–1912, https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.118.311150 (2018).

  37. 37.

    Nahrendorf, M., Pittet, M. J. & Swirski, F. K. Monocytes: protagonists of infarct inflammation and repair after myocardial infarction. Circulation 121, 2437–2445, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.916346 (2010).

  38. 38.

    van der Laan, A. M. et al. Monocyte subset accumulation in the human heart following acute myocardial infarction and the role of the spleen as monocyte reservoir. European heart journal 35, 376–385, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht331 (2014).

  39. 39.

    Getzin, T. et al. The chemokine receptor CX3CR1 coordinates monocyte recruitment and endothelial regeneration after arterial injury. EMBO molecular medicine 10, 151–159, https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201707502 (2018).

  40. 40.

    Li, L. et al. The chemokine receptors CCR2 and CX3CR1 mediate monocyte/macrophage trafficking in kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury. Kidney international 74, 1526–1537, https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2008.500 (2008).

  41. 41.

    Gu, X., Xu, J., Yang, X. P., Peterson, E. & Harding, P. Fractalkine neutralization improves cardiac function after myocardial infarction. Exp Physiol 100, 805–817, https://doi.org/10.1113/EP085104 (2015).

  42. 42.

    Njerve, I. U. et al. Fractalkine levels are elevated early after PCI-treated ST-elevation myocardial infarction; no influence of autologous bone marrow derived stem cell injection. Cytokine 69, 131–135, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2014.05.022 (2014).

  43. 43.

    Yamashita, K. et al. Effect of hypoxia on the expression of fractalkine in human endothelial cells. Tohoku J Exp Med 200, 187–194 (2003).

  44. 44.

    Zhang, J. et al. Hypoxia-induced endothelial CX3CL1 triggers lung smooth muscle cell phenotypic switching and proliferative expansion. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 303, L912–922, https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00014.2012 (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Medical University of Vienna and by the Austrian Science Fund [SFB-54]. We sincerely thank our team of the cardiac catheterization laboratory and the staff of the emergency department, General Hospital of Vienna. We thank Oliver Soehnlein’s group for methodological support.

Author information

A.M., W.S.P., K.A.K. and I.M.L. planned the study. A.M., T.M.H., A.S.O., T.A. and T.S. recruited patients and performed experiments. A.M., T.M.H., A.S.O., W.S.P., K.A.K., R.S.K. and I.M.L. wrote and reviewed the main manuscript. J.J. produced all figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Correspondence to Irene M. Lang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mangold, A., Hofbauer, T.M., Ondracek, A.S. et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps and monocyte subsets at the culprit lesion site of myocardial infarction patients. Sci Rep 9, 16304 (2019) doi:10.1038/s41598-019-52671-y

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.