Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A MultiTEP platform-based epitope vaccine targeting the phosphatase activating domain (PAD) of tau: therapeutic efficacy in PS19 mice


Pathological tau correlates well with cognitive impairments in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and therefore represents a promising target for immunotherapy. Targeting an appropriate B cell epitope in pathological tau could in theory produce an effective reduction of pathology without disrupting the function of normal native tau. Recent data demonstrate that the N-terminal region of tau (aa 2-18), termed the “phosphatase activation domain (PAD)”, is hidden within native Tau in a ‘paperclip’-like conformation. Conversely, PAD is exposed in pathological tau and plays an essential role in the inhibition of fast axonal transport and tau polymerization. Thus, we hypothesized that anti-tau2-18 antibodies may safely and specifically reduce pathological tau and prevent further aggregation, which in turn would neutralize tau toxicity. Therefore, we evaluated the immunogenicity and therapeutic efficacy of our MultiTEP platform-based vaccine targeting tau2-18 formulated with AdvaxCpG adjuvant (AV-1980R/A) in PS19 tau transgenic mice. The AV-1980R/A induced extremely high antibody responses and the resulting sera recognized neurofibrillary tangles and plaque-associated dystrophic neurites in AD brain sections. In addition, under non-denaturing conditions AV-1980R/A sera preferentially recognized AD-associated tau. Importantly, vaccination also prevented age-related motor and cognitive deficits in PS19 mice and significantly reduced insoluble total and phosphorylated tau species. Taken together, these findings suggest that predominantly targeting misfolded tau with AV-1980R/A could represent an effective strategy for AD immunotherapy.


Alzheimer disease (AD) is the leading cause of age-related dementia, affecting 5.7 million people in the United States. Major challenges in AD include the lack of effective treatments, reliable biomarkers, or preventive strategies1,2. Unfortunately, several promising drug candidates have failed in clinical trials3,4 including the recently announced halt of a phase 3 trial of the beta-amyloid-targeting antibody aducanumab5. Hence, there is an urgent need to develop new prophylactic and therapeutic approaches to treat AD.

To develop potential disease-modifying drugs for AD, scientists have focused primarily on amyloid-β pathology6,7. Several active vaccines and monoclonal antibodies targeting Aβ have been tested in patients with mild-to-moderate AD with mediocre outcomes. However, some encouraging data from early phase 1 and 2 trials suggest that Aβ immunotherapy initiated at early stages (stages 2–3) of disease or even in healthy people at risk of AD, may provide some preventative benefits8. If that is the case, immunogenic and safe Aβ active vaccines may offer a promising approach for prophylactic use. On the other hand, new approaches and targets are being investigated and tau pathology is becoming one of the most promising new therapeutic targets9,10. Furthermore, although levels of Aβ oligomers correlate with disease severity11,12,13,14, tau pathology more strongly correlates with the progression of AD9,15. Based on these data, we hypothesize that tau targeting immunotherapy should be applied either simultaneously with anti-Aβ therapy as a prophylactic measure or sequentially in the later stages of AD.

Recently, several active and passive anti-tau immunotherapy strategies have been successfully tested in animal models16,17. Anti-tau active immunotherapy strategies are based on induction of high titers of antibodies capable of clearing pathological tau species that in turn would be expected to improve neuronal function and survival. Therefore, identifying an appropriate B cell epitope in tau is a key factor for a successful immunotherapeutic approach. Hyperphosphorylation has been considered as a strong candidate for inducing tau aggregation and neurofibrillary pathology, therefore, several vaccines targeting phospho-epitopes of tau have been developed and tested in animal models18,19,20,21,22,23. Other studies have examined non-modified peptide-based adjuvanted vaccines, as well as antibodies specific to non-modified linear and conformational tau epitopes as potential anti-tau immunotherapies24,25,26,27,28,29.

Previously we developed a MultiTEP-based protein vaccine targeting the N-terminus of tau, AV-1980R and showed that this approach induces extremely high titers of anti-tau antibodies30. In designing this vaccine, we chose to target amino acids 2–18 of the tau N-terminus as a B cell epitope based on published data showing that this region, comprising phosphatase-activating domain (PAD), is hidden in microtubule bound tau conformations but becomes exposed with tau aggregation31. PAD exposure inhibits anterograde fast axonal transport (FAT), and also promotes the polymerization of tau, contributing to toxicity in human tauopathies32,33,34,35,36,37,38. In this report, we tested for the first time the immunogenicity and therapeutic efficacy of AV-1980R formulated with AdvaxCpG adjuvant (AV-1980R/A) in the PS19 tau transgenic mouse model and demonstrated that the vaccine generated extremely high titers of anti-tau antibodies that recognized pathological tau in human AD brain tissue and reduced the accumulation of total and certain phospho-tau epitopes in the brains of vaccinated PS19 transgenic mice. Importantly, this approach also led to significant improvements in both cognitive and motor function in immunized mice.


Immunogenicity of AV-1980R vaccine in PS19 mice

Tau PS19 mice immunized with AV-1980R (Fig. 1a) formulated with AdvaxCpG adjuvant (AV-1980R/A, Fig. 1b) produced very high concentrations of anti-tau antibodies after just two immunizations (Fig. 2a). After the third and fourth immunizations, mice exhibited slight reductions in antibody titer, although the observed titers remained very high. The resulting antibodies were found to bind equally well to both the tau2-18 peptide and full-length recombinant tau protein by ELISA (Fig. 2b). An isotype analysis revealed that AV-1980R/A induced a mixed type of immune response, producing equally high levels of IgG1, IgG2ab, and IgG2b antibodies, while the level of IgM was negligible (Fig. 2c). The ratio of IgG1/IgG2ab in all vaccinated mice was approximately 1, indirectly suggesting an equal contribution of both Th2 and Th1 cytokines to the immune response, which is consistent with the characteristics of AdvaxCpG30.

Figure 1

Schematic representations of Protein vaccine construct and experimental design in PS19 transgenic mice. (a) Schematic representation of AV-1980 construct encoding 3 copies of tau2-18 fused to MultiTEP, one universal synthetic Th epitope, PADRE and eleven foreign promiscuous Th epitopes from infectious agents. (b) Design of experimental protocol in PS19 transgenic mice vaccinated with AV-1980R/A and injected with AdvaxCpG adjuvant only (control group).

Figure 2

The AV-1980R/A vaccine induced high titers of antibodies in PS19 mice. (a) Concentration of anti-tau antibodies in sera was measured by binding to tau2-18 peptide and to full length recombinant tau protein in ELISA. (b) Isotypes of anti-tau antibodies were analyzed in sera at dilution 1:500 by ELISA. Error bars represent average ± SEM (n = 10 for AdvaxCpG injected group; n = 9 for AV-1980R/A immunized group).

Next, we analyzed the functionality of antibodies generated by AV-1980R/A, analyzing their ability to bind pathological tau in AD brains. As shown in Fig. 3a, immune sera from mice vaccinated with AV-1980R/A bound to both neuropil threads (NTs) and neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) in human brain tissue from two AD cases (Fig. 3a). Of note, only nonspecific background binding to the brain tissue for AD cases were observed when we used sera from control Tg mice injected with adjuvant only. Co-staining of AD brain sections with immune sera and various anti-tau antibodies (total htau, pS199/202 and pS396/404) further demonstrated co-localization of tau recognized by anti-tau2-18 sera and these antibodies within NFTs and dystrophic neurites (Fig. 3b–d). In addition, we utilized Amylo-Glo staining which detects fibrillar β-amyloid and demonstrated the close proximity of AV-1980R/A immunoreactive dystrophic neurites with amyloid plaques (Fig. 3b).

Figure 3

AV-1980R/A vaccine induced functional antibodies recognizing human pathological tau. (a) Immune sera, but not sera from adjuvant injected mice bound to the 50 µm brain sections of cortical tissues from two AD cases (scale = 10 µm). (b–d) Co-staining of AD brain sections with immune sera and total htau and Amylo-Glo (b, scale = 20 µm), pS199/202 (c, scale = 40 µm, merge-40x = 10 µm) and pS396/404 (d, scale = 50 µm, merge-40x = 10 µm) demonstrated co-localization of tau recognized by anti-tau2-18 sera and these antibodies. (e) Immune sera, but not sera from adjuvant injected mice also bound to different forms of tau in soluble extracts from four AD cases detected by Western blot. Sera were used at dilution 1:1000. Sera bound full-length recombinant tau, but not tau lacking aa 2-18. Lane 1- Recombinant tau 2N4R; Lane 2 – Recombinant tau 2N4R with deleted aa2-18 (ΔTau2-18); Lane 3-severe AD, tangle stage 6; Lane 4- moderate AD, tangle stage 5; Lane 5-mild AD tangle stage 5, Lane 6 – MCI, tangle stage 2; Lane 7-Control non-AD, stage 2. (f) Using non-denaturing Dot Blots, AV-1980R immunized sera as well as commercial TNT-1 mAb specific to N-terminus of Tau (epitope aa 7–12) preferentially bound to soluble tau in AD brain lysates but showed minimal immunoreactivity in controls. Of note, the HT7 Ab which detects total tau, recognized non-denatured tau in both control and AD brains.

Although both soluble and fibrillar tau may contribute to neuronal and synaptic dysfunction and loss, growing evidence suggests that soluble tau oligomers are the more toxic form and the accumulation of oligomers at the synapse may be critical for neurodegeneration39,40,41. Therefore, binding to different species of tau was shown in soluble fractions of brain homogenates from AD cases at different tau tangle stages. Immune sera, but not control sera bound various monomeric and oligomeric forms of tau in brain extracts from non-AD control (tangle stage 2), MCI (tangle stage 1), mild (tangle stage 4), moderate (tangle stage 5) and severe (tangle stage 6) AD cases detected by western blot (Fig. 3e). In addition, as expected, antibodies bound to full-length recombinant tau, but not to tau that lacks the tau2-18 region. Under non-denaturing conditions (dot blot), AV-1980R/A immune serum showed increased selectively for the soluble fraction of AD brain extracts (Fig. 3f) indicating that PAD is likely more exposed and accessible in AD than control brains when techniques that preserve protein conformation are used.

Motor and cognitive changes in PS19 mice after immunization with AV-1980R

PS19 mice display age-associated motor deficits that progress to paralysis beginning at 10 months of age42. The rotarod test is one of the most widely used tests for measuring motor coordination and balance in mouse models. Therefore, PS19 mice were examined for their ability to run on a rotarod, and two tests, fixed and accelerated, were performed at 8 months of age. As shown in Fig. 4a, although, wildtype mice ran longer on a fixed rotarod, then adjuvant injected control PS19 mice, this difference was not significant. However, we did observe a significant impairment of motor function in the acceleration test in PS19 mice that were injected with adjuvant, compared to wildtype control littermates, and importantly, vaccination significantly improved the motor performance of these mice (p < 0.05, Fig. 4b).

Figure 4

Vaccination with AV-1980R/A improved both motor and cognitive function in PS19 mice. Motor skills of mice were tested in Fixed rotarod (a) and accelerated speed rotarod (b). Cognitive functions of mice were tested in Y maze alternation test (c) and in novel object recognition (d) and novel place recognition (e) test. Error bars represent average ± SEM (n = 10 for AdvaxCpG injected group; n = 9 for AV-1980R/A immunized group and n = 8 for non-injected littermate). Statistical significances were calculated using ANOVA test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ****P < 0.0001).

Alternation tasks measure the disposition of rodents to explore new environments and are used to evaluate the spatial working memory and exploratory behavior43. The Y-maze test was used for analyzing alternation. The percentage of time spent in the novel arm was significantly higher for vaccinated mice compared with age-matched control mice injected with adjuvant (28,68% ± 7.22 vs. 17.38% ± 9.93; p < 0.05, Fig. 4c).

To study how the immunization with AV-1980R/A affects cognition, PS19 mice were also tested in novel object recognition (NOR) and novel place recognition (NPR) paradigms, which rely on cortical and hippocampal function respectively, both areas strongly affected by AD pathology44,45,46. This analysis demonstrated that vaccination of PS19 mice with AV-1980R/A resulted in a significant increase in the exploration of a non-familiar object as indicated by the increased discrimination index compared with mice injected with adjuvant only (p < 0.01; Fig. 4d). Similar significant improvements were detected during NPR task performance (p < 0.05; Fig. 4e).

Changes of tau pathology in PS19 mice after immunization with AV-1980R

PS19 mice begin to develop NFT-like tau pathology within specific brain regions by six months of age. To understand the impact of immunization on tau pathology and the relationship between this pathology and behavioral improvement in vaccinated mice, we next analyzed soluble and insoluble brain homogenates using a sensitive and human tau-specific ELISA. As shown in Fig. 5 we detected significant decreases in insoluble total tau (Fig. 5e) and tau phosphorylated at position pS396 (41% reduction) (Fig. 5f) in brain homogenates of AV-1980R vaccinated mice compared with control animals. We also observed a trend toward reduction of insoluble tau, phosphorylated at positions pS199 (36% reduction) (Fig. 5g) and pT231(22% reduction) (Fig. 5h), but this trend did not reach statistical significance. In contrast, no reduction was detected in analyzed species of tau in soluble fraction of brain homogenates (Fig. 5a–d).

Figure 5

Effect of AV-1980R/A vaccination on tau proteins in PS19 mice. Levels of human total tau protein (a,e) and several phosphorylated tau species (bd,fh) in brain soluble (a–d) and insoluble (e–h) extracts were analyzed by ELISA. Error bars represent average ± SEM (n = 9 for both groups).

To assess the effect of AV-1980R/A vaccination on the inflammatory milieu, we next measured the expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), Ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 (IBA-1) and CD45 in brain extracts of vaccinated and control mice. In parallel, using a humanized mAb specific to tau4-8, we also demonstrated a significant decrease of PAD-exposed Tau in the brains of vaccinated mice. Interestingly, whereas control vaccinated PS19 mice exhibit a significant increase in GFAP expression versus wild-type controls, indicative of a heightened astrocytic activation state, AV-1980R/A vaccinated PS19 mice exhibited a significant reduction in GFAP. These data suggest that AV-1980R/A mediated reduction in pathological tau likely leads to a corresponding diminution of astrocyte activation. In contrast, no differences were detected in the expression of IBA-1 or CD45 between wild-type and control-vaccinated PS19 mice, although AV-1980R/A vaccinated PS19 mice did exhibit increased IBA-1 levels in comparison to wild-type mice. Taken together, these data suggest that tau pathology primarily promotes an astrocytic response in 9-month old female PS19 mice and that vaccination can in turn reduce this response. However, AV-1980R/A vaccination can also modulate the microglial response to pathology, potentially via Fc-mediated microglial signaling (Fig. 6).

Figure 6

Vaccination with AV-1980R/A significantly decreased PAD-positive Tau and astrogliosis in brains of PS19 mice. The levels of PAD-positive tau protein, GFAP, IBA-1 and CD45 proteins in the soluble fraction of the brain extracts were analyzed by Western blotting and quantitatively determined by densitometric analysis with normalization against β-actin. The relative protein level in the brains of vaccinated mice is presented as a percentage of the protein level in the brains of mice injected with AdvaxCpG. Error bars represent average ± SEM of (n = 9 for both groups).


Over the past two decades immunotherapy for the treatment of AD has been actively pursued as a promising approach to promote the clearance of pathological proteins. Since the late nineties, when the “amyloid cascade hypothesis” was initially proposed, immunotherapy studies were primarily directed at the reduction of Aβ pathology. Despite recent clinical failures, this strategy may still offer some promise as a potential preventive approach to block the accumulation of oligomeric forms of Aβ if it is initiated in early prodromal stages of AD. In fact, data are accumulating that support Aβ-targeting therapeutic intervention at very early stages of the disease (Thal amyloid phase 0–1), when patients still do not have significant cortical NFT pathology, or even in healthy people at risk of developing AD47. Importantly, many studies have now shown that tau pathology correlates more closely than Aβ pathology with progression of neurodegeneration in AD, and suggested that the accumulation of NFT mediates some of the effects of amyloid-β pathology on cognitive decline9,47,48,49. However, the development of immunotherapy approaches that target tau is challenging due to the enormous diversity of the pool of physiological and pathological tau molecules and the substantial overlap between these pools. Another challenge is the primarily intracellular localization of tau, although recent reports have provided evidence of a small extracellular pool of tau that likely mediates propagation from cell to cell50,51,52,53. Remarkably, pre-clinical anti-tau immunotherapy studies have demonstrated that various antibodies reduced tau-like pathology in animal models. These data have provided support for several passive and two active vaccination clinical trials in the USA and EU54,55,56. Several mechanisms have been implicated for antibody mediated reduction of pathological tau. Firstly, anti-tau antibodies within the periphery could sequestrate tau proteins from the CNS57. Secondly, a small fraction of antibodies may pass the BBB and bind to extracellular aggregates triggering microglia-mediated removal of tau from the CNS57,58. Antibody-mediated clearance of extracellular tau may then promote secretion of intracellular tau through a shift in equilibrium, thus indirectly clearing the intracellular tau aggregates59. Binding of antibodies to extracellular tau may change the pathological conformation to impair propagation60 or protect cells by blocking the internalization of tau61. In addition, it is likely that endosomal-lysosomal pathway is also involved in antibody-mediated clearance of intracellular tau aggregates58. Regardless of the exact mechanism of action of anti-tau antibodies, pre-clinical studies have shown that active and passive vaccines targeting different phosphorylated or unmodified tau peptides can initiate the removal of tau aggregates from the central nervous system, reduce or eliminate the spread of tau pathology through the brain, and improve cognitive function in various tau/Tg mouse models54. However, these studies have showed that antibody-mediated reduction of pathological tau is more complicated than removal of Aβ and that choosing the right epitopes, and generating high concentrations of antibodies, are also more critical24,54.

We previously reported that a DNA-based AV-1980D vaccine composed of three copies of the N-terminal peptide (2–18aa) of tau fused to string of 12 foreign Th epitopes (MultiTEP) induced anti-tau antibodies in the THY-Tau22 transgenic mouse model, which in turn significantly reduced both soluble and insoluble total tau and certain species of phosphorylated tau in the brains of vaccinated mice62. Of note, we reported earlier that the same vaccine based on recombinant protein was significantly more immunogenic in wildtype mice when formulated in AdvaxCpG30. Thus, we sought to test this adjuvanted protein counterpart of our DNA vaccine in an aggressive mouse model of tauopathy, PS19 mice. These mice expressing a tau transgene with the P301S mutation, which causes frontotemporal dementia in human patients63,64,65, develop progressive tau pathology and neurodegeneration with early synaptic deficits, as well as neuroinflammation42.

In this strain of transgenic mice of H-2b immune haplotype, AV-1980R/A induced extremely high titers of antibodies, that in some animals exceeded the mg/ml level (5086 µg/ml) and were not lower than 276 µg/ml. This was expected, since at least 6 Th epitopes in the MultiTEP platform are recognized by H-2b MHC class II molecules, inducing strong T cell responses that provide help to tau-specific B cells30. In addition, AV-1980R was formulated with delta-inulin based adjuvant AdvaxCpG, which, as we showed previously, was superior to any other adjuvant approved for human use or tested in clinical trials30.

The generated IgG antibodies had mixed isotypes with an IgG1/IgG2ab ratio of about 1, which indirectly indicates that the vaccine induced a balanced Th1/Th2 type immune response. This was expected given that the delta inulin is a Th2 adjuvant, and by adding low concentration of CpG (0.1%) in the formulation significantly enhances the immune responses while simultaneously shifting it towards the Th1 type. It should be noted that acute pro-inflammatory responses (IFN-γ + SFC) generated by AV-1980R/A are anticipated to be safe, since Th epitopes in this platform are all foreign and are not expressed in the brain. Moreover, it could be beneficial for AD treatment as well, since the effectiveness of TLR4 agonist MPLA has been shown in AD and PD mouse models. MPLA reduced Aβ load in the brain of APP/Tg mice and enhanced cognitive function66, as well as increased the uptake of α-syn by microglia in α-Syn/Tg mice, reduced intracellular α-syn aggregation and reduced motor deficits67.

Earlier, we developed monoclonal antibodies specific for the tau4-8 epitope and showed that it binds to both oligomeric tau and NFT in AD brain29. The AV-1980R/A vaccine-induced polyclonal antibodies may be specific for different epitopes in tau2-18 and, therefore, bind to the pathological tau differently than MoAb. In addition, it was shown that PAD-exposure is an early event in AD progression, which disappears in later stages of tangle evolution38. To characterize the polyclonal antibodies from this point we analyzed binding with tau tangles in brain sections from AD cases, as well as binding to soluble tau in brain extracts from AD cases at different tangle stages. We showed that immune sera bound to NFTs and NTs in brain sections, as well as various forms of tau, monomeric and oligomeric, in the soluble fraction of brain homogenates from AD patients similarly as MoAb.

PS19 mice model several aspects of human tauopathy and have been reported to exhibit behavioral impairments including sensorimotor deficits and deficits in spatial learning and memory68,69,70. To ensure that PAD-specific antibodies can reduce these behavioral deficits we tested PS19 mice in various behavioral tasks.

Importantly, we observed significant improvement of both sensorimotor and cognitive functions in vaccinated mice compared with age-matched controls. Cognitive function was tested in Y maze alternation test and NOR/NPR tests. It is believed that many parts of the brain, including the hippocampus, septum, basal forebrain, and prefrontal cortex, are involved in alternation task. NPR primarily evaluates spatial learning, which mainly relies on hippocampal activity, while NOR test evaluates non-spatial learning of object identity, which relies on multiple brain regions71,72,73. Therefore, our data suggest that antibodies generated by AV-1980R/A were able to modulate tau pathology and improve corresponding functional impairments within several brain regions. Behavioral improvement was associated with significant decrease of insoluble tau phosphorylated at position S396. We also observed a trend towards decreased insoluble tau phosphorylated at positions S199 (36% reduction) and T231 (22% reduction). Interestingly, we previously showed that antibodies generated by DNA based vaccination in THY-Tau-22 mice decreased both soluble and insoluble total, and certain species of phosphorylated tau62. In PS19 mice we detected the reduction of insoluble tau only. This data coincides with data shown by Yanamandra et al. after passive administration of monoclonal antibodies specific to tau25–30 in PS19 mice24. Such differences may reflect the characteristics of pathology in mouse models expressing hTau carrying one (P301S in PS19 mice)42 or two mutations (G272V and P301S in THY-Tau22 mice)74. In any case, these data indicate the ability of anti-tau2-18 antibodies to reduce various types of phosphorylated pathological tau, probably depending on differences in the state and magnitude of pathology. Taken together, these results provide further support for the potential translation of this promising vaccine toward human clinical trials.

In summary, our pre-clinical data reveal a very robust antibody response coupled with therapeutic efficacy and significant reductions in insoluble tau. These findings suggest that the AV-1980R vaccine, which is based on the MultiTEP platform and formulated in a safe and strong adjuvant AdvaxCpG, could potentially be used to induce strong immune responses in a broad population of vaccinated subjects with high MHC class II genes polymorphisms.



In this study we used female PS19 mice expressing the P301S mutant form of human microtubule-associated protein Tau (MAPT), under the control of the mouse prion protein promoter (Prnp)42. These mice display tau seeding activity first detected at 1.5 months of age. They progressively develop neurofibrillary tangles in the hippocampus, neocortex, amygdala, brain stem and spinal cord beginning at about six months of age42. All animals were housed in a temperature and light cycle-controlled facility, and their care was under the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health and an approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocol at University of California, Irvine.

Epitope vaccine and purification of protein

To prepare a recombinant protein, minigene encoding 3Tau2-18-MultiTEP was cloned into the E. coli expression vector pET24a (for AV-1980R; Novagen, MA) in frame with 6xHis-Tag at the C-terminus (Fig. 1a). DNA sequencing was performed to confirm that the generated plasmid contained the correct sequences. Recombinant protein was purified from E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells transformed with pET24a/3Tau2-18-MultiTEP plasmid as described30,75. The final recombinant protein was analysed in 10% Bis-Tris gel electrophoresis (NuPAGE Novex Gel, Invitrogen, CA). Proteins were visualized by Coomassie dye and specificity of bands confirmed by Western Blot (WB) using anti-Tau2-18 1C9 monoclonal antibody30. Endotoxin levels were measured using E-TOXATE kits, as recommended by the manufacturer (Sigma, St Louis, MO).


Female, 1.5-month-old PS19 mice were immunized with AV-1980R (Fig. 1) (20 µg/per mouse/per injection; n = 10) formulated with AdvaxCpG adjuvant (1 mg/mouse/injection) as previously described30. The control group of PS19 mice were injected with AdvaxCpG adjuvant only (n = 9). All mice were injected four times, intramuscularly. Littermate mice (n = 8) were used during the behavior testing. Sera were collected 14 days after second, third and fourth immunizations, and anti-tau antibody responses were analyzed. At age of 8-month behavior tests were performed. Mice were terminated at age of 9-month-old and brains were collected for biochemical analysis.

Detection of tau-specific antibodies and isotyping

The concentrations of anti-tau antibodies in serum were quantified by ELISA, as previously described30. Briefly, to measure anti-tau antibody concentration plates were coated with 1 µg/per well tau2-18 peptide (GenScript, NJ) or full-length recombinant tau and it was calculated using a calibration curve generated with polyclonal anti-tau2-18 antibodies purified from AV-1980R/A vaccinated mouse sera (The Institute for Molecular Medicine, Huntington Beach, CA). HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, ME) was used as a secondary antibody. HRP-conjugated anti-IgG1, IgG2ab, IgG2b and IgM specific antibodies (Bethyl Laboratories, Inc., TX) were used to characterize the isotype profiles of anti-tau antibodies in individual sera at 1:500 dilutions.

Detection of tau tangles and β-amyloid plaques in human brain tissues by IHC and confocal microscopy

Sera from mice immunized with AV-1980R/A, as well as injected with AdvaxCpG were screened for the ability to bind to human tau tangles using 40 µm brain sections of formalin-fixed cortical tissues from severe AD cases (generously provided by the UC Irvine Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC) Tissue Repository) using immunohistochemistry as described previously62. In addition, AD brain sections were stained with several commercial antibodies: anti-human tau (Agilent, CA), anti-phospho tau [pS199; pS202; pS396; pS404] (all from Abcam, UK) and Amylo-Glo (Biosensis, Australia). Sections were imaged using an Olympus FX1200 confocal microscope.

Preparation of brain homogenates from AD cases and controls, Western blot and Dot blot analysis

Preparation of brain homogenates, Western blot (WB) and Dot blot (DB) analysis were performed as previously described30,62. Briefly, 0.2 g of brain tissue from four different AD cases were homogenized in 0.4 ml TBS buffer with Halt™ Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail (100X, Thermo Scientific, CA), then centrifuged at 6400xg for 15 minutes at +4 °C. Supernatants (soluble fractions) were collected and stored at −80 °C for further analysis. For WB soluble fractions applied to electrophoresis on NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-Tris gel in MES buffer under reducing conditions (Invitrogen, CA) and electrotransferred onto nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare, NJ). Tau were visualized by incubating with sera (dilution at 1:1000) from mice immunized with AV-1980R/A and injected with AdvaxCpG only followed by HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA). For DB assay the same extracts were applied to membrane (1 μg). Proteins were detected using sera from mice immunized with AV-1980R/A and control mice injected with AdvaxCpG only, TNT-1 (Millipore, MA), HT7 (Life Technology, CA) antibodies. All primary antibodies were used at concentration of 1 μg/ml, serum was used at dilution 1:2500. Bovine anti-mouse HRP-conjugated secondary antibody was used (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA).

Behavior tests

All behavioral experiments were run by an investigator who was blinded to genotype and treatment. Results were then de-coded during statistical analysis by a second independent investigator.

Rotarod test

The rotarod is an automated apparatus with a 3–7 cm diameter “grooved rod”, speed controls, and a lever that triggers the timer to stop, once the timer is stopped the mouse falls from the rod. For fixation rotarod test the mice were trained for three days in raw at 12 rpm to stay on the fixed speed rotarod for 2 min. If animals fall off, they were placed back onto the spinning rod, so as to learn the task. Twenty-four hours later after the last training session, mice were tested for 4 consecutive trials at 12 rpm for 2 min and latency to fall off of the rotating rod is measured and data was presented as average of four trials. For acceleration test rotarod speed increased in rpm (from 4 to 40) over the entire testing trial (5 minutes).


The experimental apparatus consisted of a Y-maze made of clear Plexiglas as described previously76 with some modifications. The apparatus is a three-arm horizontal maze in which the arms are arranged at 120° angles to each other. Two arms (B and C) are 15 cm in length and one arm (A) is 20 cm long. All arms are 5 cm in width, and the walls are 12 cm high. The maze walls and floor are made opaque with 0.5 cm thick poster board. The poster board is attached to the outside walls of the maze and a separate piece is placed under the maze base making the floor opaque as well. Mice were habituated to the room for 1 h prior to the test, in the dark phase. The maze was placed in a dimly lit room. Mice are initially placed in the long arm (A) with their head facing the maze arms. The animals were then given 7 minutes to explore the maze, while an overhead video camera tracks their behavior. An alternation is defined as consecutive entries into all three arms (i.e., ABC, CAB, or BCA, but not BAB).

Novel object and novel place recognition tests

Novel object and novel place recognition tests were used to evaluate cognition as previously described46,77. All combinations of locations and objects were balanced across trials to eliminate bias. Training and testing trials were videotaped and analyzed by individuals blind to the treatment condition. A mouse was scored as exploring an object when its head was oriented toward the object and within a distance of 1 cm, or when its nose was touching the object. The relative exploration time was recorded and expressed by a discrimination index (DI = (tnovel − tfamiliar)/(tnovel + tfamiliar) × 100%).

Biochemical analyses

Right hemispheres of mouse brain, previously frozen on dry ice and stored at −80 °C, were crushed on dry ice using mortar and pestle, then homogenized in solution of T-PER (Thermo Scientific, MA) and phosphatase and protease inhibitor mixtures (Thermo Scientific, MA and Roche, CA) and processed as previously described62,78,79. Concentrations of human total and phosphorylated Tau in samples (soluble and insoluble brain extracts) were determined by Tau (total) Human ELISA kit, Tau [pS396] Human ELISA Kit, Tau [pS199] Human ELISA Kit, and Tau [pT231] Human ELISA Kit (all from ThermoFisher Scientific, MA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Soluble SDS-PAGE WB was performed following standard protocols as previously described62,78,79. Primary antibodies used for WB analysis included the following: Armanezumab (1:2000; Institute for Molecular Medicine, Huntington Beach, CA), anti-GFAP (1:400; Millipore-Sigma, MO), IBA-1 (1:200; FUJIFILM Wako Chemicals U.S.A. Corp, VA) and anti-CD45 (1:400; Bio-Rad, CA). All blot membranes were also labeled with anti-β-actin antibodies (1:1000; Millipore-Sigma, MO) as loading control.

Statistical analysis

Statistical parameters (mean, standard deviation (SD), standard errors (SE), significant difference, etc.) were calculated using the Prism 6 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA). Statistically significant differences were examined using a two-tailed t-test or ordinary one-way ANOVA Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (a P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant).


  1. 1.

    Berk, C., Paul, G. & Sabbagh, M. Investigational drugs in Alzheimer’s disease: current progress. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 23, 837–846 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wang, J., Gu, B. J., Masters, C. L. & Wang, Y. J. A systemic view of Alzheimer disease - insights from amyloid-beta metabolism beyond the brain. Nat Rev Neurol 13, 703 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Golde, T. E., Schneider, L. S. & Koo, E. H. Anti-abeta therapeutics in Alzheimer’s disease: the need for a paradigm shift. Neuron 69, 203–213 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Folch, J. et al. Current Research Therapeutic Strategies for Alzheimer’s Disease Treatment. Neural Plast 2016, 8501693 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Selkoe, D. J. Alzheimer disease and aducanumab: adjusting our approach. Nat Rev Neurol 15, 365–366 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hardy, J. & Allsop, D. Amyloid deposition as the central event in the aetiology of Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Pharmacol Sci 12, 383–388 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Schneider, L. S. et al. Clinical trials and late-stage drug development for Alzheimer’s disease: an appraisal from 1984 to 2014. J Intern Med 275, 251–283 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Selkoe, D. J. Light at the End of the Amyloid TunnelPublished as part of the Biochemistry series “Biochemistry to Bedside”. Biochemistry 57, 5921–5922 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Nelson, P. T. et al. Correlation of Alzheimer disease neuropathologic changes with cognitive status: a review of the literature. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 71, 362–381 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wischik, C. M., Harrington, C. R. & Storey, J. M. Tau-aggregation inhibitor therapy for Alzheimer’s disease. Biochem Pharmacol 88, 529–539 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Savage, M. J. et al. A sensitive abeta oligomer assay discriminates Alzheimer’s and aged control cerebrospinal fluid. J Neurosci 34, 2884–2897 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    McLean, C. A. et al. Soluble pool of Abeta amyloid as a determinant of severity of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol 46, 860–866 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lue, L. F. et al. Soluble amyloid beta peptide concentration as a predictor of synaptic change in Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Pathol 155, 853–862 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Tomic, J. L., Pensalfini, A., Head, E. & Glabe, C. G. Soluble fibrillar oligomer levels are elevated in Alzheimer’s disease brain and correlate with cognitive dysfunction. Neurobiol Dis 35, 352–358 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zilka, N. et al. Who fans the flames of Alzheimer’s disease brains? Misfolded tau on the crossroad of neurodegenerative and inflammatory pathways. J Neuroinflammation 9, 47 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Pedersen, J. T. & Sigurdsson, E. M. Tau immunotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Mol Med 21, 394–402 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Medina, M. An Overview on the Clinical Development of Tau-Based Therapeutics. Int J Mol Sci 19 (2018).

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Asuni, A. A., Boutajangout, A., Quartermain, D. & Sigurdsson, E. M. Immunotherapy targeting pathological tau conformers in a tangle mouse model reduces brain pathology with associated functional improvements. J Neurosci 27, 9115–9129 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Boutajangout, A., Quartermain, D. & Sigurdsson, E. M. Immunotherapy targeting pathological tau prevents cognitive decline in a new tangle mouse model. J Neurosci 30, 16559–16566 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Bi, M., Ittner, A., Ke, Y. D., Gotz, J. & Ittner, L. M. Tau-targeted immunization impedes progression of neurofibrillary histopathology in aged P301L tau transgenic mice. PLoS One 6, e26860 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Troquier, L. et al. Targeting phospho-Ser422 by active Tau Immunotherapy in the THYTau22 mouse model: a suitable therapeutic approach. Curr Alzheimer Res 9, 397–405 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Goni, F. et al. Immunomodulation targeting of both Abeta and tau pathological conformers ameliorates Alzheimer’s disease pathology in TgSwDI and 3xTg mouse models. J Neuroinflammation 10, 150 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Theunis, C. et al. Efficacy and safety of a liposome-based vaccine against protein Tau, assessed in tau.P301L mice that model tauopathy. PLoS One 8, e72301 (2013).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yanamandra, K. et al. Anti-tau antibody reduces insoluble tau and decreases brain atrophy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2, 278–288 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Novak, P., Zilka, N., Kontsekova, E., Ondrus, M. & Novak, M. In Alzheimer’s Association International Conference (2016).

  26. 26.

    Rasool, S., Martinez-Coria, H., Wu, J. W., LaFerla, F. & Glabe, C. G. Systemic vaccination with anti-oligomeric monoclonal antibodies improves cognitive function by reducing Abeta deposition and tau pathology in 3xTg-AD mice. J Neurochem 126, 473–482 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Dai, C. L., Tung, Y. C., Liu, F., Gong, C. X. & Iqbal, K. Tau passive immunization inhibits not only tau but also Abeta pathology. Alzheimers Res Ther 9, 1 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Castillo-Carranza, D. L. et al. Specific targeting of tau oligomers in Htau mice prevents cognitive impairment and tau toxicity following injection with brain-derived tau oligomeric seeds. J Alzheimers Dis 40(Suppl 1), S97–S111 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Agadjanyan, M. G. et al. Humanized monoclonal antibody armanezumab specific to N-terminus of pathological tau: characterization and therapeutic potency. Mol Neurodegener 12, 33 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Davtyan, H. et al. Alzheimer’s disease Advax(CpG)- adjuvanted MultiTEP-based dual and single vaccines induce high-titer antibodies against various forms of tau and Abeta pathological molecules. Sci Rep 6, 28912 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jeganathan, S., von Bergen, M., Brutlach, H., Steinhoff, H. J. & Mandelkow, E. Global hairpin folding of tau in solution. Biochemistry 45, 2283–2293 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ward, S. M., Himmelstein, D. S., Lancia, J. K. & Binder, L. I. Tau oligomers and tau toxicity in neurodegenerative disease. Biochem Soc Trans 40, 667–671 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Morfini, G. A. et al. Axonal transport defects in neurodegenerative diseases. J Neurosci 29, 12776–12786 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Horowitz, P. M. et al. Early N-terminal changes and caspase-6 cleavage of tau in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci 24, 7895–7902 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Gamblin, T. C., Berry, R. W. & Binder, L. I. Modeling tau polymerization in vitro: a review and synthesis. Biochemistry 42, 15009–15017 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kanaan, N. M. et al. Phosphorylation in the amino terminus of tau prevents inhibition of anterograde axonal transport. Neurobiol Aging 33(826), e815–830 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kanaan, N. M. et al. Pathogenic forms of tau inhibit kinesin-dependent axonal transport through a mechanism involving activation of axonal phosphotransferases. J Neurosci 31, 9858–9868 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Combs, B., Hamel, C. & Kanaan, N. M. Pathological conformations involving the amino terminus of tau occur early in Alzheimer’s disease and are differentially detected by monoclonal antibodies. Neurobiol Dis 94, 18–31 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kopeikina, K. J., Hyman, B. T. & Spires-Jones, T. L. Soluble forms of tau are toxic in Alzheimer’s disease. Transl Neurosci 3, 223–233 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Guerrero-Munoz, M. J., Gerson, J. & Castillo-Carranza, D. L. Tau Oligomers: The Toxic Player at Synapses in Alzheimer’s Disease. Front Cell Neurosci 9, 464 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Shafiei, S. S., Guerrero-Munoz, M. J. & Castillo-Carranza, D. L. Tau Oligomers: Cytotoxicity, Propagation, and Mitochondrial Damage. Front Aging Neurosci 9, 83 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Yoshiyama, Y. et al. Synapse loss and microglial activation precede tangles in a P301S tauopathy mouse model. Neuron 53, 337–351 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Deacon, R. M. & Rawlins, J. N. T-maze alternation in the rodent. Nat Protoc 1, 7–12 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Cohen, S. J. & Stackman, R. W. Jr. Assessing rodent hippocampal involvement in the novel object recognition task. A review. Behav Brain Res 285, 105–117 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Guzman-Ramos, K. et al. Restoration of dopamine release deficits during object recognition memory acquisition attenuates cognitive impairment in a triple transgenic mice model of Alzheimer’s disease. Learn Mem 19, 453–460 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Petrushina, I. et al. Comparison of Efficacy of Preventive and Therapeutic Vaccines Targeting the N Terminus of beta-Amyloid in an Animal Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Mol Ther 25, 153–164 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Murray, M. E. et al. Clinicopathologic and 11C-Pittsburgh compound B implications of Thal amyloid phase across the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum. Brain 138, 1370–1381 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Bennett, D. A., Schneider, J. A., Wilson, R. S., Bienias, J. L. & Arnold, S. E. Neurofibrillary tangles mediate the association of amyloid load with clinical Alzheimer disease and level of cognitive function. Arch Neurol 61, 378–384 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Giannakopoulos, P. et al. Tangle and neuron numbers, but not amyloid load, predict cognitive status in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 60, 1495–1500 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Gerson, J. E. & Kayed, R. Formation and propagation of tau oligomeric seeds. Front Neurol 4, 93 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Clavaguera, F. et al. “Prion-like” templated misfolding in tauopathies. Brain Pathol 23, 342–349 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Yanamandra, K. et al. Anti-tau antibodies that block tau aggregate seeding in vitro markedly decrease pathology and improve cognition in vivo. Neuron 80, 402–414 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Frost, B. & Diamond, M. I. Prion-like mechanisms in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Rev Neurosci 11, 155–159 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Novak, P., Kontsekova, E., Zilka, N. & Novak, M. Ten Years of Tau-Targeted Immunotherapy: The Path Walked and the Roads Ahead. Front Neurosci 12, 798 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Novak, P. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of the tau vaccine AADvac1 in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial. Lancet Neurol 16, 123–134 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    West, T. et al. Preclinical and Clinical Development of ABBV-8E12, a Humanized Anti-Tau Antibody, for Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Tauopathies. J Prev Alzheimers Dis 4, 236–241 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Gu, J., Congdon, E. E. & Sigurdsson, E. M. Two novel tau antibodies targeting the 396/404 region are primarily taken up by neurons and reduce tau pathology. J Biol Chem (2013).

  58. 58.

    Krishnamurthy, P. K., Deng, Y. & Sigurdsson, E. M. Mechanistic Studies of Antibody-Mediated Clearance of Tau Aggregates Using an ex vivo Brain Slice Model. Front Psychiatry 2, 59 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Sigurdsson, E. M. Tau-focused immunotherapy for Alzheimer’s disease and related tauopathies. Curr Alzheimer Res 6, 446–450 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Sarkar, M., Kuret, J. & Lee, G. Two motifs within the tau microtubule-binding domain mediate its association with the hsc70 molecular chaperone. J Neurosci Res 86, 2763–2773 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Evans, L. D. et al. Extracellular Monomeric and Aggregated Tau Efficiently Enter Human Neurons through Overlapping but Distinct Pathways. Cell Rep 22, 3612–3624 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Davtyan, H. et al. MultiTEP platform-based DNA epitope vaccine targeting N-terminus of tau induces strong immune responses and reduces tau pathology in THY-Tau22 mice. Vaccine 35, 2015–2024 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Baba, Y. et al. Clinical and genetic features of families with frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 with a P301S tau mutation. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 114, 947–950 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Lossos, A. et al. Frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism with the P301S tau gene mutation in a Jewish family. J Neurol 250, 733–740 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Morris, H. R. et al. The genetic and pathological classification of familial frontotemporal dementia. Arch Neurol 58, 1813–1816 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Michaud, J. P. et al. Toll-like receptor 4 stimulation with the detoxified ligand monophosphoryl lipid A improves Alzheimer’s disease-related pathology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 1941–1946 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Venezia, S. et al. Toll-like receptor 4 stimulation with monophosphoryl lipid A ameliorates motor deficits and nigral neurodegeneration triggered by extraneuronal alpha-synucleinopathy. Mol Neurodegener 12, 52, (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Takeuchi, H. et al. P301S mutant human tau transgenic mice manifest early symptoms of human tauopathies with dementia and altered sensorimotor gating. PLoS One 6, e21050 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Min, S. W. et al. Critical role of acetylation in tau-mediated neurodegeneration and cognitive deficits. Nat Med (2015).

  70. 70.

    Lasagna-Reeves, C. A. et al. Reduction of Nuak1 Decreases Tau and Reverses Phenotypes in a Tauopathy Mouse Model. Neuron 92, 407–418 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Denninger, J. K., Smith, B. M. & Kirby, E. D. Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget. J Vis Exp (2018).

  72. 72.

    Balderas, I. et al. The consolidation of object and context recognition memory involve different regions of the temporal lobe. Learn Mem 15, 618–624 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Dere, E., Huston, J. P. & De Souza Silva, M. A. The pharmacology, neuroanatomy and neurogenetics of one-trial object recognition in rodents. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 31, 673–704 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Schindowski, K. et al. Alzheimer’s disease-like tau neuropathology leads to memory deficits and loss of functional synapses in a novel mutated tau transgenic mouse without any motor deficits. Am J Pathol 169, 599–616 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Davtyan, H. et al. DNA prime-protein boost increased the titer, avidity and persistence of anti-Abeta antibodies in wild-type mice. Gene Ther 17, 261–271 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Senechal, Y., Kelly, P. H. & Dev, K. K. Amyloid precursor protein knockout mice show age-dependent deficits in passive avoidance learning. Behav Brain Res 186, 126–132 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Passos, G. F. et al. The bradykinin B1 receptor regulates Abeta deposition and neuroinflammation in Tg-SwDI mice. Am J Pathol 182, 1740–1749 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Blurton-Jones, M. et al. Neural stem cells improve cognition via BDNF in a transgenic model of Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 13594–13599 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Marsh, S. E. et al. The adaptive immune system restrains Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis by modulating microglial function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113, E1316–1325 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by funding from NIH (R01-NS050895, R01-AG020241, U01-AG060965, R21 NS101504, R01-AG061895, RF1-AG048099, R01-AG055524, R01-AG056303, P50-AG016573). Development of AdvaxCpG adjuvant was supported by funding from NIAID/NIH (Contract No. HHS-N272201400053C, HHS-N272200800039C and U01-AI061142). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Author information




A.H., O.S., N.P., D.H.C., M.G.A., A.G. and H.D. conceived the experimental design. T.A., S.K.S., G.C., K.Z. and W.C.-J. undertook data collection. M.A.C., I.P. and J.P.C. analyzed the data. A.H., A.G. and H.D. prepared the first draft of the manuscript, which was then further revised by M.G.A., A.G. and H.D. All authors discussed the research and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Anahit Ghochikyan or Hayk Davtyan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M.G.A. and A.G. are co-founders of Capo Therapeutics that licensed MultiTEP vaccine platform technology from the Institute for Molecular Medicine. The remaining authors declare no financial, commercial and non-financial conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hovakimyan, A., Antonyan, T., Shabestari, S.K. et al. A MultiTEP platform-based epitope vaccine targeting the phosphatase activating domain (PAD) of tau: therapeutic efficacy in PS19 mice. Sci Rep 9, 15455 (2019).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing