Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

l-Type Amino Acid Transporter 1 (LAT1/Lat1)-Utilizing Prodrugs Can Improve the Delivery of Drugs into Neurons, Astrocytes and Microglia

Abstract

l-Type Amino Acid Transporter 1 (LAT1/Lat1) is responsible for carrying large, neutral l-amino acids as well as several drugs and prodrugs across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). However, the BBB is not the only barrier that hinders drugs acting effectively within the brain; the brain parenchymal cell membranes represent a secondary barrier for the drugs with intracellular target sites. In this study, expression and function of Lat1 was quantified in mouse primary neuron, astrocyte and immortalized microglia (BV2) cultures. Moreover, ability of Lat1 to carry prodrugs inside these brain cells was evaluated. The results showed that Lat1 was localized at the similar level in all studied cells (3.07 ± 0.92–3.77 ± 0.91 fmol/µg protein). The transporter was also functional in all three cell types, astrocytes having the highest transport capacity and affinity for the LAT1/Lat1-substrate, [14C]-l-leucine, followed by neurons and microglia. The designed prodrugs (1-6) were able to utilize Lat1 for their cellular uptake and it was mainly much higher than the one of their parent drugs. Interestingly, improved cellular uptake was also achieved in cells representing Alzheimer’s Disease phenotype. Therefore, improved delivery and intra-brain targeting of drugs can be attained by utilizing LAT1/Lat1 and prodrug approach.

Introduction

Most of central nervous system (CNS) diseases, including neurodegenerative diseases but also neurodevelopmental diseases, lack effective drug therapies. In general, the treatments used against these diseases only diminish symptoms and almost all clinically used drugs have moderate or even severe side effects1,2. In addition, the CNS-drug development has slowed down and pharmaceutical companies have withdrawn from this field due to the failures at the late stages of clinical trials2,3. One main reason for these failures is lack of efficacy and off-target toxicity of novel CNS-drugs, as the compounds are not been able to cross the structural and functional barrier that protects the brain, namely the blood-brain barrier (BBB)4. However, drug brain disposition is highly regulated not only by the BBB, but also by brain cells including neurons and glial cells that serve as a secondary barrier to brain drug exposure5. This has not been appreciated in CNS-drug development, although most of the CNS-proteins that could be targeted to produce curative or even preventative medications, are intracellular proteins6. Furthermore, there has been lack of understanding of carrier-mediated transport mechanisms as major determinants of drug disposition, action and toxicity7,8. Thus, endogenous solute carriers (SLCs) – a family of over 400 proteins – are promising proteins to be utilized to improve drug delivery and targeting to their site of action in the brain.

l-Type amino acid transporter 1 (human ortholog LAT1 and rodent ortholog Lat1) is a transmembrane heterodimeric protein complex, consisting of LAT1 or Lat1 light chain (SLC7A5 or Slc7a5) and CD98 heavy chain (4F2hc; SLC3A2 or Slc3a2). This protein is selectively and highly expressed at the luminal and abluminal sides of the BBB in relation to other normal tissues9. It is a sodium and pH independent transporter and it carries large, neutral, aromatic or branched l-amino acids, such as l-Leu, l-Ile, l-Phe, l-Trp, l-Tyr, l-Met, l-His and l-Val, from systemic circulation across the BBB into the brain. LAT1/Lat1 is an antiporter and as an exchange it transports intracellular amino acids, such as glutamine, with 1:1 stoichiometry across the cell membrane. It has been postulated that the transport rate of LAT1/Lat1 is controlled by the intracellular substrate concentration10,11. LAT1/Lat1 is also over-expressed in several types of cancer, supplying cancer cells with their higher demand of amino acids12,13,14. Although LAT1/Lat1 was found to carry not only amino acids, but also drugs such as l-dopa, gabapentin and melphalan in early 2000s15, there is still relatively little knowledge of LAT1/Lat1’s role in intra-brain drug disposition. It has been reported that murine primary neurons, astrocytes and microglia express Lat1 mRNA16, however, this does not reflect the expression or functionality of the protein on the plasma membrane. This is particularly important to understand, in order to develop intra-brain targeted drugs, i.e., drugs that can in addition of crossing the BBB, also penetrate the secondary barrier of brain parenchymal cell membranes.

Our group has developed LAT1/Lat1-utilizing prodrugs, which can significantly improve the cellular and brain uptake of several parent drugs, such as anti-inflammatory agent ketoprofen17,18,19, anti-epileptic drug valproic acid20,21, anti-parkinsonian prodrug of dopamine22,23, investigational immunosuppressive perforin inhibitors24,25, and natural phenolic antioxidant ferulic acid26. We have also recently reported that neither Alzheimer’s disease (AD) induced alterations of transgenic mice nor lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced neuroinflammation changed the expression or function of Lat1 at the BBB or primary astrocytes27,28. This signifies that LAT1/Lat1 can be utilized for targeted drug delivery not only into the healthy brain but also brain predisposed to pathological changes of brain diseases. However, less is known about LAT1/Lat1 expression or function in other brain cells, like neurons and microglia. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to characterize Lat1 expression and function in mouse primary cortical neurons and immortalized microglia, BV2 cells and compare the results to the ones of primary astrocytes. BV2 cells were chosen for this study as they are accepted alternative for primary microglia since they are more homogenous on target cells than primary populations. Furthermore, it has been reported that the inflammatory response of BV2 cells is, although not identical, very close to the one of primary microglia29,30. In this study, we also explored cellular uptake of structurally diverse LAT1/Lat1-utilizing prodrugs, including drugs that can ameliorate neuroinflammation, such as ketoprofen, perforin inhibitors and ferulic acid. Finally, the effects of AD-specific mutations (in genes encoding amyloid precursor protein, APP and presenilin, PSEN1) on the uptake of these compounds into the primary astrocytes was compared. Thus, the results reported here will increase the current understanding of CNS-drug disposition and highlight the importance of transporters’ role in intra-brain targeted drug delivery that can aid in future CNS-drug development.

Results and Discussion

Characterization of brain cells in terms of Lat1 expression and function

Expression levels of Lat1 and glucose transporter 1 (Glut1) in mouse primary neurons and immortalized microglia (BV2) were determined by a selective/multiple reaction monitoring (SRM/MRM) analysis with a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method31 and compared to the one of primary astrocytes reported earlier28. The expression levels of Lat1 are presented in the Fig. 1a and as shown, all cell types expressed Lat1 within the similar range (3.07 ± 0.92–3.77 ± 0.91 fmol/µg protein). Compared to murine hepatocellular carcinoma cells that are known to overexpress Lat1, the expression level in brain cells was approximately half of that (Lat1 expression in murine hepatocellular carcinoma cells 7.55 ± 0.28 fmol/µg protein)32. In comparison, the expression of Glut1 varied between the cell types, being highest in primary astrocytes (26.93 ± 1.16 fmol/µg protein), followed by immortalized microglia (17.65 ± 0.07 fmol/µg protein) and lowest in primary neurons (1.13 ± 0.22 fmol/µg protein) (Fig. 1b), which was in accordance to the literature. It has been reported that only highly glycosylated isoform of Glut1 (55 kDa) is localized in the endothelial cells of the BBB, whereas the less glycosylated isoform of Glut1 (45 kDa) is expressed in glia cells, mainly in astrocytes and oligodendrocytes33,34,35. Neurons, instead, do not express nearly at all any form of Glut1, since glucose is transported into the neurons mainly via Glut3. In addition, neurons can utilize ketone bodies as a back-up energy, provided by the glia cells and transported into the neurons via other carriers, such as monocarboxylic acid transporters (MCTs).

Figure 1
figure1

(a) Lat1 and b) Glut1 expression levels in mouse primary neurons (PN) and astrocytes (PA)28, as well as in immortalized microglia (BV2) determined from the crude membrane fractions and measured by SMR/MSM analysis. The data is presented as mean ± SD, n = 3 (***P < 0.001, one-way ANOVA, followed by Tuckey’s multiple comparison test).

Function of Lat1 on the cell surface of mouse brain cells was measured with a radiolabeled LAT1/Lat1-probe, [14C]-l-leucine, over a concentration range of 0.76–75 µM during 2.5 min incubation time, which was within the linear range of [14C]-l-Leu uptake in all studied cell types (evaluated within 0–30 min). Neurons, astrocytes and microglia all transported [14C]-l-Leu into the cells with a concentration dependent manner (Fig. 2a). Vmax and Km values of l-Leu uptake in each cell types are collected in the Table 1, showing that astrocytes transported l-Leu most efficiently across the cell membrane (Vmax 2.92 ± 0.36 nmol/min/mg of protein and Km value 65.9 ± 14.3 µM). Contrarily, the uptake of l-Leu into primary cortical neurons and immortalized microglia was less effective (Vmax 0.84–1.90 nmol/min/mg of protein), l-Leu having also lower affinity for Lat1 (Km value 85.8–145.7 µM). Affinity of l-Leu for Lat1 was in all cell types slightly lower than previously reported values (9–52 µM) attained in human LAT1 transfected cells or cancer cells expressing hLAT1 or rodent Lat113,36,37. Relatively high Km values attained in this study may imply that at higher concentrations there is another transport mechanism that start to carry l-Leu into the studied cells in addition to Lat1. However, as expected the transporter’s capacity to carry l-Leu was slightly smaller in the brain cells compared to these overexpressing cells (7–135 pmol/min/mg protein), which in turn indicates that Lat1 is the major carrier of l-Leu into the studied brain cells.

Figure 2
figure2

(a) Cellular uptake of [14C]-L-Leu into the mouse primary neurons ( open circles) and astrocytes (• filled circles), and immortalized microglias ( triangles facing upwards) over a concentration range of 0.76–75 µM. (b) Uptake of 0.76 µM [14C]-L-Leu into neurons, astrocytes and microglia with and without 100 µM LAT1/Lat1-inhibitor38 presented as percentages (%) of [14C]-L-Leu uptake, in which the control (100%) is the uptake without the inhibitor. The data is presented as mean ± SD, n = 9 (***P < 0.001, one-way ANOVA, followed by Tuckey’s multiple comparison test).

Table 1 Michaelis-Menten Kinetic Parameters of [14C]-L-Leu Uptake into Mouse Primary Neurons and Astrocytes, and Immortalized Microglia.

The uptake of [14C]-l-Leu was also demonstrated to be mediated via Lat1, as the selective LAT1/Lat1-inhibitor (KMH-233)38 was able to inhibit its uptake in all cell types (Fig. 2b). As the inhibition was most efficient in neurons and astrocytes (82.53 ± 1.88% and 75.71 ± 4.36%), the primary uptake mechanism of l-Leu into these cells was Lat1. Contrarily, the uptake inhibition was less efficient into the immortalized microglia (50.56 ± 6.48%), which implies that in this cell line l-Leu may also utilize other secondary transport mechanism(s), such as Lat2 (SLC7A8)16,39 or B0AT2 (SBAT1, SLC6A15)40 when Lat1 is occupied. Together with the protein expression data, these results show for the first time that in addition to astrocytes, neurons and microglia also express functional Lat1 on their cell surface.

Transporter-mediated uptake of compounds into cells

For the present study we selected 6 house-made LAT1/Lat1-utilizing prodrugs reported earlier. These prodrugs are an investigational immunosuppressive perforin inhibitor (prodrug 1)25, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ketoprofen (prodrugs 2 and 3)19, and natural anti-oxidant ferulic acid (prodrugs 4–6)26 (Fig. 3). They all have been designed and demonstrated to utilize hLAT1 for cellular uptake into the human breast adenocarcinoma cell line (MCF-7) or human retinal pigment endothelial cells (ARPE-19) and to utilize mLat1 for the brain uptake across the mouse BBB19,24,25,26. In this study we wanted to evaluate if these compounds can also utilize Lat1 for their cellular uptake into mouse primary neurons, astrocytes and immortalized microglia. According to the results presented in Fig. 4a–c, all prodrugs were accumulated into the brain cells comparably and most cases even more effectively than their parent drugs in corresponding concentrations (25, 50, 100 µM). The cell viability was also evaluated with microglial cells at the highest exposure concentration (100 µM) for 24 h. Interestingly, prodrugs 4 and 5 slightly increased the cell proliferation, while the other studied compounds did not have any effect on the cell viability (see Supplementary Fig. S2).

Figure 3
figure3

Molecular structures of studied compounds; LAT1/Lat1-utilizing prodrugs 16 and their maternal drugs 13.

Figure 4
figure4

(ac) Cellular uptake of 25, 50 and 100 µM prodrugs 16 (PD1-6) and their parent drugs 13 (D1-3) into mouse primary neurons and astrocytes, as well as immortalized microglia. The data is presented as mean ± SD, n = 9 and the statistical difference is evaluated only among prodrug uptake into different cell types (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, one-way ANOVA, followed by Tuckey’s multiple comparison test).

Prodrug 1 had 10–17 higher uptake to neurons and microglia than its parent drug 1 (13.98 ± 2.32–71.12 ± 18.42 nmol of PD1/mg protein vs. 1.55 ± 0.64–7.14 ± 2.26 nmol of D1/mg protein). However, the uptake of prodrug 1 into primary astrocytes was overall lower or at the similar range as its parent drug (1.17 ± 0.42–4.88 ± 2.09 nmol of PD1/mg protein vs. 1.93 ± 1.04–8.39 ± 3.85 nmol of D1/mg protein). Thus, prodrug 1 was transported into different cell types in the following order; immortalized microglia > primary cortical neurons > primary astrocytes; the difference being greatest and statistically significant between astrocytes and microglia with all concentrations, and between neurons and astrocytes as well as neurons and microglia only with concentrations higher than 50 and 100 µM, respectively (Fig. 4a). Prodrug 1 has been found to be able to utilize also organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs) for its cellular uptake, when LAT1/Lat1 is inhibited or with competitive situation with higher concentrations of this compound24,25. Therefore, this result may point out that the ability of utilize secondary transport mechanism may drive this compound to microglia with higher concentrations. Prodrug 1 has also highest molecular weight (Mw. 513.56 g/mol), highest clogP value (2.75) and lowest unspecific brain tissue binding (unbound fraction, fu; 1.4%) (Table 2), which may also affect to the accumulation into the microglia. For example, the substrates of Oatps, which are low affinity – high capacity transporters, are relatively lipophilic and big in their size. However, to date there is very little knowledge of localization of functional OATP/Oatp isoforms in neurons and astrocytes, and no published data of OATPs/Oatps in microglia41.

Table 2 Pharmaceutical Properties of Studied Compounds; LAT1/Lat1-Utilizing Prodrugs 16 and Their Maternal Drugs 13.

Prodrug 1 was detected mainly in its parent drug form as it was chemically hydrolyzed in cell lysate (0.1 M NaOH). However, this compound has been reported to be bioconverted both in vitro in brain S9 subcellular fraction, having half-life of approximately 4.7 h, and in vivo with half-life ranging from 75 min (liver) to 84 min (brain) and 94 min (plasma)24. In immortalized microglia and primary astrocytes the half-lives were 237.51 ± 44.28 min (ca. 4 h) and 348.35 ± 24.13 min (ca. 6 h), respectively, corresponding the one reported earlier in brain S9 subcellular fraction24. As the half-life is relatively long, it was concluded that the bioconversion most likely does not affect to selective accumulation of prodrug 1 into the microglia. However, we cannot ignore the possibility of other types of metabolism, which was not followed in this study, as it may also affect to the selective accumulation of prodrug 1 to microglia.

Targeting prodrug 1 into the neurons over other brain cell types would be highly beneficial, since it has been shown that the cytolytic protein, perforin, released by cytotoxic lymphocytes (CTLs) and natural killer (NK) cells, is responsible of mediating the delivery of pro-apoptic serine proteases called granzymes, into the neurons42. This mechanism has been found to precede and thus, to induce the neuronal cell death. However, it has also been reported that reactive astrocytes express perforin in postmortem brains of multiple sclerosis, AD and Huntington’s Disease, all representing of ongoing neuroinflammation43. Therefore, reactive astrocytes may contribute to the neural attack and loss in addition to CTLs and NKs. However, as the detailed mechanisms of perforin protein in neuropathologies that leads to destruction of neural cells is not well understood44, a perforin inhibitor may have a potential role also in microglia.

Prodrug 2 and 3 had similar or little bit higher (1–7-times) uptake into primary cortical neurons and immortalized microglia compared to their parent drug 2, ketoprofen (Fig. 4b). This was mainly due to the fact that the uptake of ketoprofen was relatively high into the neurons (1.12 ± 0.76–3.20 ± 0.33 nmol of D2/mg protein) but also to lesser extent also to microglia (0.41 ± 0.06–1.45 ± 0.20 nmol of D2/mg protein) and astrocytes (0.14 ± 0.03–0.30 ± 0.01 nmol of D2/mg protein). Ketoprofen is known to utilize primarily organic anion transporters (OAT/Oat) 1, 2 and 3, but also monocarboxylate transporters (MCT/Mct) as low affinity transporters for its cellular uptake45,46,47. Oat1 has been reported to be highly expressed in neurons48 but not in microglia or astrocytes, which can explain the higher accumulation of ketoprofen into neurons in this study. However, during neuroinflammation, activated microglia but also astrocytes are the main producers prostaglandin E2 via cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX2)49, which ketoprofen is able to inhibit. Thus, the efficacy of ketoprofen must be impaired if it is not transported effectively into its targets cells, microglia and astrocytes, and it raises also questions of off-target toxicity of ketoprofen in neurons.

The uptake into primary astrocytes was 10–80-times higher with both prodrugs 2 and 3 than the one of ketoprofen (1.27 ± 0.14–3.09 ± 0.35 nmol of PD2/mg protein and 7.22 ± 0.32–39.52 ± 4.08 nmol of PD3/mg protein vs. 0.31 ± 0.02–0.49 ± 0.07 nmol of D2/mg protein). However, the uptake of prodrug 2 was almost equivalent to all cell types, while prodrug 3 was accumulated most effectively to primary astrocytes and to primary cortical neurons, having lowest uptake into immortalized microglia. The difference between astrocytes and neurons as well as between astrocytes and microglia was statistically significant already at the concentration of 25 µM (Fig. 4b), implying that the prodrug 3 has higher selectivity for astrocytes over neurons and microglia. However, the uptake of prodrug 3 between neurons and microglia was also statistically significant at 50 µM concentration, indicating the accumulation of prodrug 3 favors neurons over microglia. Curiously, also prodrug 3 is known to be able to utilize other transport mechanism, such as OATPs50. However, we have not yet been able to identify if prodrugs 1 and 3 have selectivity for certain subforms of OATPs/Oatps, which could explain their cell-type selectivities that favors microglia and astrocytes, respectively. On the other hand, prodrug 3 being an ester prodrug, is also fully converted to ketoprofen mouse brain S9 subcellular fraction quite rapidly (t½ 51.96 ± 2.32 min)50. Contrarily, the corresponding amide prodrug 2 is stable and do not release ketoprofen at all, since the in vitro media lack co-factors, such as metal ions essential to metalloproteases, potential bioconverting enzymes of amide prodrugs. However, this amide prodrug 2 is able to release ketoprofen in vivo situation, as reported earlier (half-life ranging from 16 min (plasma) to 23 min (liver) and 27 min (brain))19. The same phenomenon was also detected in microglia and astrocytes, the prodrug 3 having half-lives of 201.25 ± 13.45 min and 282.73 ± 15.80 min, respectively, while prodrug 2 was completely stable in both cell homogenates. Curiously, the half-lives of prodrug 3 in cell homogenates were higher than in brain S9 subcellular fraction. Nevertheless, the bioconversion ability of prodrug 3 may be the reason why it was accumulated into primary astrocytes more effectively than its corresponding amide prodrug 2. If astrocytes possess higher prodrug hydrolyzing enzyme activity than other brain cell types and since Lat1 facilitates the transport of compounds down to concentration gradient, the uptake of prodrug 3 into the astrocytes may be determined by high bioconversion rate. Another thing that distinguishes the prodrugs 2 and 3 from each other is spatial arrangement; the amide bond of prodrug 3 makes it more rigid than the corresponding ester bond in prodrug 2, which is more flexible over the entire structure. This may influence the binding and translocation of the compound across the plasma membrane via Lat1.

Taken together, although prodrugs 2 and 3 were accumulated with higher amounts into microglia and astrocytes than ketoprofen itself, they were also be transported into neurons, the non-target cells. Therefore, this prodrug structure is needed to be optimize to achieve higher targeting efficacy into the glia cells over neurons. However, compared to ketoprofen itself, which utilizes Oats for it cellular uptake, changing the transport mechanism to Lat1 would be highly beneficial particularly in the case of neurodegenerative diseases, such as AD, since we have recently reported that Oat3 gene expression is reduced in hippocampus as well as in the microvessels of AD-transgenic mice compared to the corresponding wild type controls, while the gene expression of Lat1 was comparable between the groups27. This implies that the delivery of ketoprofen across the BBB and into the target cells may be impaired in AD via Oat3, which could be retained by utilizing LAT1/Lat1- prodrug approach.

The uptake of ferulic acid prodrugs was more complicated, as ferulic acid itself and most likely also the prodrugs 46 were metabolized to unknown metabolites in primary neurons, astrocytes and immortalized microglia, which we were unable to quantify in this study. Furthermore, the amount of ferulic acid in neurons and microglia remained under the detection limit (1.0 nM). However, the prodrug 4 was more effectively accumulated into the primary astrocytes than primary neurons or immortalized microglia with all studied concentrations (4.65 ± 1.05–24.67 ± 0.45 nmol of PD4/mg protein in astrocytes vs. 0.45 ± 0.06–2.80 ± 1.46 nmol of PD4/mg protein in neurons or microglia) while prodrugs 5 and 6 were more equally distributed over all cell types (0.56 ± 0.19–8.40 ± 1.61 nmol of PD5/mg protein and 0.52 ± 0.15–7.89 ± 2.60 nmol of PD6/mg protein), prodrug 5 favoring glial cells over neurons and prodrug 6 favoring neurons over glial cells at higher concentrations (Fig. 4c). All ferulic acid prodrugs are the smallest of the studied compounds (Mw. 370.41, 356.38 and 357.36 g/mol, respectively), but also have the lowest clogP values (ranging from -0.41 to -0.94). Furthermore, the unspecific brain tissue binding, fu,brain was measured to be highest for prodrug 4 (13%). Prodrug 6 is also an ester prodrug, however, its half-life in brain S9 subcellular fraction is much longer than with other ester prodrugs (1 and 3); after 5 h 70% of intact prodrug has been detected26, while the half-lives of prodrugs 1 and 3 in brain S9 subcellular fraction were approximately 5 and 1 h, respectively. The slow bioconversion of prodrug 6 was also detected in microglia and astrocytes, estimated half-lives being over 9 h in both cases, while the amide prodrugs 4 and 5 were stable in these in vitro conditions, as expected. However, the major determinant for the accumulation of prodrugs 46 due to the size, lipophilicity, unspecific protein binding or bioconversion cannot be estimated as the unknown metabolites were not evaluated in this study.

Being an antioxidant and a potential β-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzymes 1 (BACE1) inhibitor that is mainly functioning in neurons and to lesser extent in astrocytes51,52,53, targeting ferulic acid via its prodrug form into neurons is highly desired property in order to decrease the oxidative stress as well as the β-amyloid formation within the neurons, which both are characteristic features in AD. However, due to the antioxidant properties of ferulic acid, the accumulation into the glial cells would also be beneficial, since most of the oxidative radicals, such as reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS and RNS) are produced in activated glial cells54,55,56.

The confirm that the cellular uptake was mediated via Lat1, the uptake of 1–10 µM prodrugs 13 into primary neurons and astrocytes, and immortalized microglia was studied in the absence and the presence of 100 µM LAT1/Lat1-inhibitor (KMH-233)38. 10 µM concentration was used for the prodrugs 46 due to their higher extent of metabolism in these cells, while other prodrugs were studied with 1 µM concentrations. Despite, the prodrug 6, which was fully converted to ferulic acid by NaOH in these samples and since the ferulic acid had much higher limit of detection than its prodrugs, we were not able to quantify prodrug 6 in neurons or microglia. However, as seen in the Fig. 5 the cellular uptake of prodrugs 3 and 4 was inhibited significantly by the LAT1/Lat1-inhibitor. The inhibition of prodrug 4 uptake was highest in all cell types (83.24–85.23%) as it was efficiently accumulated into these cells (Fig. 5d). Similar trend was seen with prodrug 3 in all cell types (47.41–58.32% inhibitions; Fig. 5c). All the other prodrugs were less effectively inhibited, which may imply that prodrugs 1, 2, 5 and 6 may not be able to compete efficiently with the used novel LAT1/Lat1-inhibitor (Fig. 5a,b,e,f). Overall, it needs to keep in mind that in this study, relatively high concentrations of studied compounds were used, which may also explain lower Lat1-inhibition values. At higher concentrations and when Lat1 is inhibited, there is a possibility that these compounds start to utilize secondary transport mechanisms. Therefore, these results need to be interpreted and translated to the in vivo and clinical situations very carefully. Overall, these results are in accordance to our previous studies, in which the LAT1/Lat1-inhibitor has been able to reduce the uptake of the prodrugs in human breast cancer (MCF-7) or retinal pigmented epithelial (ARPE-19) cells by 65–93%19,26,50.

Figure 5
figure5

(af) Cellular uptake of 1–10 µM prodrugs 16 into primary neurons and astrocytes and immortalized microglia in the absence (black bars) and the presence (grey bars) of 100 µM LAT1/Lat1-inhibitor presented as percentages (%) of prodrug uptake, in which the control (100%) is the uptake without the inhibitor. The data is presented as mean ± SD, n = 9 (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, one-way ANOVA, followed by Tuckey’s multiple comparison test).

When comparing the uptake of 50 µM prodrugs 16 into primary astrocytes isolated from the brain of wild type (wt) and AD transgenic mice, no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups and the uptake into AD-astrocytes were only 3.10–14.18% smaller than into the wt-astrocytes (Fig. 6). This indicates that in addition to the cellular uptake of l-leucine, which we have reported to be retained at the same level in wt-, LPS-induced and AD-astrocytes28, the uptake of LAT1/Lat1-utilizing compounds can also be attained regardless of the pathological changes that APP and PS1 gene mutations may cause. This finding is in high importance when developing CNS-prodrugs especially against AD that are attended to act not only as preventative but also as curative medication.

Figure 6
figure6

Cellular uptake of 50 µM prodrugs 16 into primary astrocytes of wild type (wt; black bars) and transgenic AD-astrocytes (grey bars) presented as percentages (%) of prodrug uptake, in which the control (100%) is the uptake without the inhibitor. The data is presented as mean ± SD, n = 9 (no statistically difference, one-way ANOVA, followed by Tuckey’s multiple comparison test).

In conclusion, this is the first report to show that primary neurons and immortalized microglia express functional Lat1 protein in addition to primary astrocytes. Furthermore, Lat1 can be utilized to increase the cellular uptake of drugs into the brain parenchymal cells by using a LAT1/Lat1-prodrug approach. Thus, by this approach it is possible to multiply the exposure of target cells to the drugs with therapeutically relevant concentrations and solve one of the main hurdles in CNS-drug development; lack of efficacy has been the greatest single reason (46%) for CNS-drug failure in clinical trials in the past3. These results also showed that the increased cellular uptake can be achieved in cells representing AD phenotype with APP and PS1 mutations, as the function of Lat1 was not significantly changed in AD-astrocytes. This is a really important aspect to keep in mind, since some of the transporters, such as GLUT1 or Oat3 can be downregulated in such a conditions27,28, which in turn may affect the usefulness of these compounds in clinical situation and thus, impair the CNS-drug development success rate. Moreover, this study shows that by careful prodrug design that takes into account transporter selectivity, brain cell selective drug delivery and targeting between neurons, astrocytes or microglia can be obtained in future, which can lead to improved efficacy and safety of neuroprotective drugs within the brain.

Experimentals

Materials

All reagents and solvents used in analytical studies were commercial and high purity of analytical grade or ultra-gradient HPLC-grade purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA), J.T. Baker (Denventer, The Netherlands), Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), Riedel-de Haën (Seelze, Germany) or Thermo Fisher Scinetific (Waltham, MA, USA). Water was purified using a Milli-Q Gradient system (Millipore, Milford, MA, USA). LAT1/Lat1-utilizing prodrugs 16 selected for this study as well as the used LAT1/Lat1-inhibitor (KMH-233) have been published recently19,25,26,38, and therefore, their syntheses, identification and purities are not reported herein.

Cell cultures

Primary embryonic cortical neurons were isolated as previously described57. Neonatal (P0‐P2, mixed gender) C57BL/6 WT mice were supplied by the Laboratory Animal Center of the University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. The animals were housed in stainless steel cages in controlled environment with 12 h light/dark cycle at an ambient temperature of 22 °C and food and water freely available. The pups were rapidly decapitated, and the brains were dissected and meninges were removed. Brain tissue was dissociated using mechanical shearing and trypsin. The pooled primary cortical neurons were plated (18 × 104/cm2) on a poly-D-lysine coated 24-well plates in serum free Neurobasal medium supplemented with 1 × B27, l-glutamine (2 mM) and 1% penicillin (100 U/mL) and streptomycin (100 U/mL). Half of the medium was refreshed after 4 days before performing the experiments described below. Over 80% of this culture has been previously identified to be neurons (12% of astrocytes and 8% of other cell types)57.

Primary astrocytes from cortex and hippocampi were isolated from 2-days-old wild type and APP/PS1 transgenic mice as previously described58,59. Mice carrying human APP (K595 N and M596 L) and PSEN1dE9 mutations maintained in C57BL/6 J background were used as a mouse model of AD (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME, USA). The animals were housed and treated as described above, and cortices and hippocampi were isolated by suspending the brain tissue into DMEM medium containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum and 100 U/mL penicillin streptomycin. The suspension was triturated ten times and thereafter centrifuged 1500 rpm for 5 min at room temperature. Trypsin-EDTA of 0.25% was added and the suspension was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Fresh culture medium was added and the suspension was centrifugated 1500 rpm for 5 min.

The astrocytes were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium F-12 Nutrient Mixture (DMEM/F2) supplemented with l-glutamine (2 mM), heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (10%), penicillin (50 U/mL) and streptomycin (50 µg/mL). The cells were plated on a poly-D-lysine coated flasks in culture medium and to remove the microglia, the cultures were shaken at 200 rpm for 2 h before the experiments described below were performed. It has been reported earlier that these cultures contain approximately 80% astrocytes (20% microglia)60. For the cell uptake experiments, the astrocytes (passages 7–16) were seeded on 24-well plates with a density of 104 cells/well three days before the experiments. In the LPS-induced experiments, both wt and AD cells were exposed to 100 ng/ml of LPS for 24 hours before the studied compounds were added on the cells.

Immortalized microglia (BV2) were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium containing l-glutamine (2 mM), heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (10%), penicillin (50 U/mL) and streptomycin (50 µg/mL). The cells were seeded at the density of 105 cells/well onto 24-well plates one day before the experiments described below by using the passages of 9–13. The function of Lat1 was followed between the used cell passages (astrocytes and microglia) with a LAT1/Lat1 probe substrate, [14C]-l-leucine, and noticed to be un-altered.

Lat1 and Glut1 protein quantitation from brain cells

Crude membrane fractions of mouse primary neurons and astrocytes, as well as immortalized microglia was prepared, and Lat1 and Glut1 protein amounts were quantified by LC-MS/MS by coupling using an Agilent 1290 Infinity LC (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) system to an Agilent 6495 Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer equipped with an ESI source (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) as previously described28. Data were acquired using the Agilent MassHunter Workstation Acquisition software (Agilent Technologies, Data Acquisition for Triple Quad., version B.03.01) and processed with Skyline software (version 4.2). Example chromatograms for Lat1 and Glut1 from primary neurons and BV2 cells are presented in Supplementary Fig. S1 (see  online). Transporter expression in primary astrocytes was published previously28.

Lat1 functionality and ability of compounds to bind to Lat1

All the uptake studies were done by the same way with each cell type. The cells were carefully washed with pre-warmed HBSS (Hank’s balance salt solution) containing 125 mM choline chloride, 4.8 mM KCl, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 1.3 mM CaCl2, 5.6 mM glucose, and 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.4 adjusted with 1 M NaOH) after removal of the culture medium. Pre-incubation was done with 500 μL of pre-warmed HBSS at 37 °C for 10 min before adding substrates (250 μL in HBSS) for the uptake experiments. The ability of brain cell to carry a known LAT1/Lat1 substrate, the cells were incubated with [14C]-l-leucine at 37 °C for 2.5 min in uptake buffer (HBSS, 250 μL) containing 0.76–75 μM (0.25 mCi/ml) of [14C]-l-leucine (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). After incubation the reaction was stopped by adding 500 µL of ice-cold HBSS and the cells were washed two times with ice-cold HBSS. The cells were then lysed with 500 μL of 0.1 M NaOH (60 min) and the lysate was mixed with 3.5 mL of Emulsifier safe cocktail (Ultima Gold, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The radioactivity in the cells was measured by liquid scintillation counting (MicroBeta2 counter, PerkinElmer Waltham, MA, USA).

The uptake of [14C]-l-leucine (0.76 μM) was also studied in the presence of 100 µM LAT1/Lat1-inhibitor (KMH-233) to confirm the Lat1-mediated uptake. The cells were pre-incubated with LAT1/Lat1 inhibitor for 10 min and the incubation mixture was removed before adding [14C]-l-leucine and LAT1/Lat1-inhibitor on the cells. The competitive uptake (5 min) and analysis was carried out in a manner similar as described. The inhibition was calculated by comparing the counts in the absence and presence of LAT1/Lat1-inhibitor.

Transporter-mediated cell uptake of compounds

Cellular uptake of prodrugs 16 and their parent drugs 13 (investigational immunosuppressive perforin inhibitor, anti-inflammatory ketoprofen and antioxidant ferulic acid, respectively) were studied by adding compounds at the concentration of 25, 50 or 100 μM in pre-warmed HBSS buffer (250 μL) on the cell layer and incubating at 37 °C for 30 min. Subsequently, the cells were washed three times with ice-cold HBSS and lysed with 500 μl of 0.1 M NaOH (60 min). The supernatants were analyzed by the liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) methods described earlier for prodrug 1 and its parent (perforin inhibitor)24, prodrugs 2 and 3 and their parent drug (ketoprofen)19, as well as prodrugs 46 and their parent drug (ferulic acid)26, with an Agilent 1200 Series Rapid Resolution LC System together with an Agilent 6410 Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer equipped with an electro-spray ionization source using a Poroshell 120 EC-C-18 column (50 mm × 2.1 mm, 2.7 μm; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) for the liquid chromatographic separation of the analytes. The cell-associated concentrations of each compound normalized to protein concentration were calculated from the standard curve that was prepared by spiking known amounts of compounds to ACN including the selected internal standard (diclofenac to all compounds, expect ferulic acid for which chloroxazone was used). The protein concentrations on each plate were determined as a mean of three samples by Bio-Rad Protein Assay, based on the Bradford dye-binding method, using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard protein and measuring the absorbance (595 nm) by multiplate reader (EnVision, Perkin Elmer, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).

The competitive uptake in the presence of LAT1/Lat1-inhibitor (KMH-233) was carried out as described above with HBSS buffer solution containing 1–10 µM of the studied compounds. The cells were pre-incubated with 100 µM LAT1/Lat1-inhibitor for 10 min and the incubation mixture was removed before adding the studied prodrug and LAT1/Lat1-inhibitor on the cells. The competitive uptake (30 min) with the inhibitor was then carried out as the normal uptake described above. The amounts of studied compounds were analyzed by the LC-MS method and calculated from the spiked standard curve and normalized with the protein concentrations.

Bioconversion of compounds in immortalized microglia and primary astrocytes

The rates of bioconversion of all studied prodrugs in immortalized BV2 microglia and primary astrocytes homogenates were determined at 37 °C. The cell homogenates were prepared by homogenizing 10 × 106 cells/ml in HBSS (pH 7.4) with SoniPerp 150 Plus disintegrator (MSE Ltd., London, UK) for 2 s × 3. The incubation mixtures were prepared by mixing cell homogenate (final protein concentration 1.0 mg/mL) with HBSS buffer and 10 mM prodrug stock solution in DMSO (the final concentration of prodrugs was 400 µM and the DMSO concentration 2%). The mixture was then incubated for 5 h and the samples (50 µL) were withdrawn at appropriate intervals. The proteins in the samples were precipitated with ice-cold acetonitrile (150 µL) and the samples were centrifuged for 5 min at 12 000 × g at room temperature. The supernatants were collected and analyzed by the LC-MS methods as reported earlier19,24,26. In blank reactions (chemical stability), the cell homogenate was replaced with same volume of buffer. The pseudo-first-order half-lives (t½) for the rates of bioconversion of the prodrugs were calculated from the slope of the linear portion of the plotted logarithm of remaining prodrug concentration versus time.

Data analysis

All the studies were carried out as three biological replicates from the different cell passages as well as three technical replicates from the same cell passage. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v. 5.03 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical differences between groups were tested using one-way ANOVA, followed by a Tukey’s multiple comparison test and presented as mean ± SD, with statistically significant difference denoted by *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. clogP values (Table 2) were calculated by using ChemDraw Professional software (PerkinElmer Informatics, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), and clogD7.4 values by using ChemAxon logD predictor (ChemAxon, Ltd. Budapest, Hungary).

Ethical statement

The experimental procedures involving animals (primary neuron and astrocyte isolation) were made in compliance with the European Commission Directives 2010/63/EU and 86/609, and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of University of Eastern Finland (Animal Usage Plan numbers: EKS‐008‐2016, EKS‐006‐2017 and ESAVI/3347/04.10.07/2015). All efforts were made to minimize the number of animals used and to minimize their suffering.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. 1.

    Pangalos, M. N., Schechter, L. E. & Hurko, O. Drug development for CNS disorders: strategies for balancing risk and reducing attrition. Nat Rev Drug Discov 6, 521–532, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2094 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Pankevich, D. E., Altevogt, B. M., Dunlop, J., Gage, F. H. & Hyman, S. E. Improving and accelerating drug development for nervous system disorders. Neuron 84, 546–553, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.007 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kesselheim, A. S., Hwang, T. J. & Franklin, J. M. Two decades of new drug development for central nervous system disorders. Nat Rev Drug Discov 14, 815–816, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd4793 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Pardridge, W. M. Drug transport across the blood-brain barrier. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 32, 1959–1972, https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2012.126 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lee, G., Dallas, S., Hong, M. & Bendayan, R. Drug transporters in the central nervous system: brain barriers and brain parenchyma considerations. Pharmacol Rev 53, 569–596 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Dragunow, M. The adult human brain in preclinical drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov 7, 659–666, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2617 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Dobson, P. D. & Kell, D. B. Carrier-mediated cellular uptake of pharmaceutical drugs: an exception or the rule? Nat Rev Drug Discov 7, 205–220, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2438 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kell, D. B., Dobson, P. D. & Oliver, S. G. Pharmaceutical drug transport: the issues and the implications that it is essentially carrier-mediated only. Drug Discov Today 16, 704–714, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2011.05.010 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Boado, R. J., Li, J. Y., Nagaya, M., Zhang, C. & Pardridge, W. M. Selective expression of the large neutral amino acid transporter at the blood-brain barrier. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96, 12079–12084 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Meier, C., Ristic, Z., Klauser, S. & Verrey, F. Activation of system L heterodimeric amino acid exchangers by intracellular substrates. Embo j 21, 580–589 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Verrey, F. et al. CATs and HATs: the SLC7 family of amino acid transporters. Pflugers Arch 447, 532–542, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-003-1086-z (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fuchs, B. C. & Bode, B. P. Amino acid transporters ASCT2 and LAT1 in cancer: partners in crime? Semin Cancer Biol 15, 254–266, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2005.04.005 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yanagida, O. et al. Human L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1): characterization of function and expression in tumor cell lines. Biochim Biophys Acta 1514, 291–302 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wang, Q. & Holst, J. L-type amino acid transport and cancer: targeting the mTORC1 pathway to inhibit neoplasia. Am J Cancer Res 5, 1281–1294 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Uchino, H. et al. Transport of amino acid-related compounds mediated by L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1): insights into the mechanisms of substrate recognition. Mol Pharmacol 61, 729–737 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Braun, D. et al. Developmental and cell type-specific expression of thyroid hormone transporters in the mouse brain and in primary brain cells. Glia 59, 463–471, https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.21116 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gynther, M. et al. Large neutral amino acid transporter enables brain drug delivery via prodrugs. J Med Chem 51, 932–936, https://doi.org/10.1021/jm701175d (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gynther, M. et al. Brain uptake of ketoprofen-lysine prodrug in rats. Int J Pharm 399, 121–128, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.08.019 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Puris, E., Gynther, M., Huttunen, J., Petsalo, A. & Huttunen, K. M. L-type amino acid transporter 1 utilizing prodrugs: How to achieve effective brain delivery and low systemic exposure of drugs. J Control Release 261, 93–104, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.06.023 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Peura, L. et al. Large amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) prodrugs of valproic acid: new prodrug design ideas for central nervous system delivery. Mol Pharm 8, 1857–1866, https://doi.org/10.1021/mp2001878 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gynther, M. et al. Amino Acid Promoieties Alter Valproic Acid Pharmacokinetics and Enable Extended Brain Exposure. Neurochem Res 41, 2797–2809, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-016-1996-8 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Peura, L. et al. Design, synthesis and brain uptake of LAT1-targeted amino acid prodrugs of dopamine. Pharm Res 30, 2523–2537 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Thiele, N. A., Karkkainen, J., Sloan, K. B., Rautio, J. & Huttunen, K. M. Secondary carbamate linker can facilitate the sustained release of dopamine from brain-targeted prodrug. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 28, 2856–2860, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2018.07.030 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Gynther, M., Pickering, D. S., Spicer, J. A., Denny, W. A. & Huttunen, K. M. Systemic and Brain Pharmacokinetics of Perforin Inhibitor Prodrugs. Mol Pharm 13, 2484–2491, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b00217 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Huttunen, K. M. et al. L-Type amino acid transporter 1 (lat1)-mediated targeted delivery of perforin inhibitors. Int J Pharm 498, 205–216, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.12.034 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Puris, E., Gynther, M., Huttunen, J., Auriola, S. & Huttunen, K. M. L-type amino acid transporter 1 utilizing prodrugs of ferulic acid revealed structural features supporting the design of prodrugs for brain delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2019.01.002 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Vellonen, K. S. et al. Disease-Induced Alterations in Brain Drug Transporters in Animal Models of Alzheimer’s Disease: Theme: Drug Discovery, Development and Delivery in Alzheimer’s Disease Guest Editor: Davide Brambilla. Pharm Res 34, 2652–2662, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-017-2263-7 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Gynther, M. et al. Alzheimer’s Disease Phenotype or Inflammatory Insult Does Not Alter Function of L-Type Amino Acid Transporter 1 in Mouse Blood-Brain Barrier and Primary Astrocytes. Pharm Res 36, 17, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-018-2546-7 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Henn, A. et al. The suitability of BV2 cells as alternative model system for primary microglia cultures or for animal experiments examining brain inflammation. Altex 26, 83–94 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Stansley, B., Post, J. & Hensley, K. A comparative review of cell culture systems for the study of microglial biology in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuroinflammation 9, 115, https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-9-115 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Uchida, Y. et al. Quantitative targeted absolute proteomics of human blood-brain barrier transporters and receptors. J Neurochem 117, 333–345, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07208.x (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gynther, M. et al. Augmentation of Anticancer Drug Efficacy in Murine Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells by a Peripherally Acting Competitive N-Methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) Receptor Antagonist. J Med Chem 60, 9885–9904, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01624 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Maher, F. Immunolocalization of GLUT1 and GLUT3 glucose transporters in primary cultured neurons and glia. J Neurosci Res 42, 459–469, https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.490420404 (1995).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Vannucci, S. J. et al. Glucose transporter expression in brain: relationship to cerebral glucose utilization. Dev Neurosci 20, 369–379, https://doi.org/10.1159/000017333 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Szablewski, L. Glucose Transporters in Brain: In Health and in Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis 55, 1307–1320, https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-160841 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kim, D. K. et al. System L-amino acid transporters are differently expressed in rat astrocyte and C6 glioma cells. Neurosci Res 50, 437–446, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2004.08.003 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Yamamoto, A., Akanuma, S., Tachikawa, M. & Hosoya, K. Involvement of LAT1 and LAT2 in the high- and low-affinity transport of L-leucine in human retinal pigment epithelial cells (ARPE-19 cells). J Pharm Sci 99, 2475–2482, https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.21991 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Huttunen, K. M. et al. A Selective and Slowly Reversible Inhibitor of l-Type Amino Acid Transporter 1 (LAT1) Potentiates Antiproliferative Drug Efficacy in Cancer Cells. J Med Chem 59, 5740–5751, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00190 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Segawa, H. et al. Identification and functional characterization of a Na+-independent neutral amino acid transporter with broad substrate selectivity. J Biol Chem 274, 19745–19751 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Takanaga, H., Mackenzie, B., Peng, J. B. & Hediger, M. A. Characterization of a branched-chain amino-acid transporter SBAT1 (SLC6A15) that is expressed in human brain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 337, 892–900, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.09.128 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ronaldson, P. T. & Davis, T. P. Targeted drug delivery to treat pain and cerebral hypoxia. Pharmacol Rev 65, 291–314, https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.112.005991 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Meuth, S. G. et al. Cytotoxic CD8+ T cell-neuron interactions: perforin-dependent electrical silencing precedes but is not causally linked to neuronal cell death. J Neurosci 29, 15397–15409, https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4339-09.2009 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Gasque, P., Jones, J., Singhrao, S. K. & Morgan, B. Identification of an astrocyte cell population from human brain that expresses perforin, a cytotoxic protein implicated in immune defense. J Exp Med 187, 451–460 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Lana, E. et al. Perforin Promotes Amyloid Beta Internalisation in Neurons. Mol Neurobiol 54, 874–887, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-016-9685-9 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Yu, C. P. et al. Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the renal excretion of indoxyl sulfate, a nephro-cardiovascular toxin, in rats. Eur J Pharm Sci 101, 66–70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2017.02.007 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Morita, N., Kusuhara, H., Sekine, T., Endou, H. & Sugiyama, Y. Functional characterization of rat organic anion transporter 2 in LLC-PK1 cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 298, 1179–1184 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Fujii, S. et al. Characterization of the carrier-mediated transport of ketoprofen, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, in rabbit corneal epithelium cells. J Pharm Pharmacol 65, 171–180, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.2012.01583.x (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Bahn, A. et al. Murine renal organic anion transporters mOAT1 and mOAT3 facilitate the transport of neuroactive tryptophan metabolites. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 289, C1075–1084, https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00619.2004 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Zhang, D. et al. Prostaglandin E2 released from activated microglia enhances astrocyte proliferation in vitro. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 238, 64–70, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2009.04.015 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Huttunen, K. M. Identification of human, rat and mouse hydrolyzing enzymes bioconverting amino acid ester prodrug of ketoprofen. Bioorg Chem 81, 494–503, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.09.018 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Mori, T., Koyama, N., Guillot-Sestier, M. V., Tan, J. & Town, T. Ferulic acid is a nutraceutical beta-secretase modulator that improves behavioral impairment and alzheimer-like pathology in transgenic mice. PLoS One 8, e55774, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055774 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Das, U. et al. Visualizing APP and BACE-1 approximation in neurons yields insight into the amyloidogenic pathway. Nat Neurosci 19, 55–64, https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4188 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    De Pietri Tonelli, D. et al. Translational regulation of BACE-1 expression in neuronal and non-neuronal cells. Nucleic Acids Res 32, 1808–1817, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh348 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Barnham, K. J., Masters, C. L. & Bush, A. I. Neurodegenerative diseases and oxidative stress. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3, 205–214, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd1330 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Emerit, J., Edeas, M. & Bricaire, F. Neurodegenerative diseases and oxidative stress. Biomed Pharmacother 58, 39–46 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Kempuraj, D. et al. Neuroinflammation Induces Neurodegeneration. J Neurol Neurosurg Spine 1 (2016).

  57. 57.

    Natunen, T. A., Gynther, M., Rostalski, H., Jaako, K. & Jalkanen, A. J. Extracellular prolyl oligopeptidase derived from activated microglia is a potential neuroprotection target. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.13094 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Pihlaja, R. et al. Transplanted astrocytes internalize deposited beta-amyloid peptides in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Glia 56, 154–163, https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.20599 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Jankowsky, J. L. et al. Mutant presenilins specifically elevate the levels of the 42 residue beta-amyloid peptide in vivo: evidence for augmentation of a 42-specific gamma secretase. Hum Mol Genet 13, 159–170, https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddh019 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Liddell, J. R. et al. Pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate activates the Nrf2 pathway in astrocytes. J Neuroinflammation 13, 49, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-016-0515-9 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ms. Lea Pirskanen for technical assistance with the cells, Associate Professor Katja M. Kanninen and Professor Jari Koistinaho for providing wt and AD astrocytes. The study was financially supported by the Academy of Finland (grants 294227, 294229, 307057, 311939 for KMH, 288659 for TN and 307866 for MH), Sigrid Juselius Foundation (for KMH and MH), the Strategic Neuroscience Funding of the University of Eastern Finland (MH), Emil Aaltonen Foundation (MG), The Finnish Cultural Foundation (North Savo Regional Fund) (MG) and the Biocenter Kuopio (SA).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Participated in research design: K.M.H., M.G., M.R., K.-S.V. Conducted experiments: J.H., S.P., M.G. Contributed to new reagents or analytical tools: K.M.H., M.G., T.N., M.H., S.A., K.-S.V. Performed data analysis: K.M.H., M.G., J.H., S.P., K.-S.V., M.R. Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: K.M.H., M.G., K.-S.V., M.R., T.N.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristiina M. Huttunen.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huttunen, J., Peltokangas, S., Gynther, M. et al. l-Type Amino Acid Transporter 1 (LAT1/Lat1)-Utilizing Prodrugs Can Improve the Delivery of Drugs into Neurons, Astrocytes and Microglia. Sci Rep 9, 12860 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49009-z

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing