On the unusual amber coloration of nanoporous sol-gel processed Al-doped silica glass: An experimental study

Article metrics

  • 294 Accesses

Abstract

Silica is the most abundant component on the earth’s surface. It plays an important role in many natural processes. Silica is also a critical material for a wide range of technical applications such as in optics and electronics. In this work, we discuss our recent experimental observation of the unusual amber coloration of aluminum doped sol-gel glass that has not been reported in the past. We characterized Al-doped sol-gel glasses, prepared at different sintering temperature, using a plethora of techniques to investigate the origin of this unusual coloration and to understand their structural and chemical properties. We used these experimental results to test a number of possible coloring mechanisms. The results suggested this coloring is likely caused by temperature-dependent aluminum-associated defect centers associated with different amorphous-to-crystalline ratios of the annealed sol-gel silica glass structures.

Introduction

Silica occurs in nature in many forms and is a key component of the earth’s crust and mantle. It plays an important role in many geological1 and biological processes2. In industry, silica is an important material for a wide range of applications3 including optics, electronics, catalysts, sorbents, and as fillers for many products such as paints, rubbers, and roadways. Thus, the properties of silica are of fundamental interest in many areas. Silica can be synthesized via different approaches to produce products in various forms including fused silica4, fumed silica1,5, silica gel6, and aerogels7,8. As demonstrated by several groups, the sol-gel method is a unique technique to produce silica that is difficult to achieve by other processes such as melting9,10,11.

In this study, we report on the discovery of an unusual amber coloration of nanoporous sol-gel based silica glass when doped with Aluminum (Al). In particular, Al-doped silica glass was prepared via a sol-gel method. Surprisingly, the obtained glass exhibited colors ranging from clear, light amber, dark brown, and back to clear again at different thermal annealing temperatures. Aluminum is a known dopant that alters silica properties such as melt rheology12, corrosion resistance13, and molecular diffusivity of oxygen14. The effects of aluminum dopant on density, refractive index, and ultrasonic transmission of silica glasses have been reported in the literature15. However, we could not find reports of this unusual sintering-temperature dependent amber coloration of sol-gel glass in the literature.

Colored glasses find several important applications in art and technology. Early glass coloring techniques trace their origin back to ancient Egypt and Rome16. Nowadays, a variety of techniques with different color producing mechanisms are available to render colors in glass17. For example, the addition of iron oxides or iron polysulfides can produce bluish-green and amber colored glass, respectively18. Green and amber colored glasses are key materials to the manufacturing of food and beverage bottles for maintaining freshness and long-lasting taste19.

Another technique to produce colored glass employs the addition of nanoparticles. Adding small amounts of gold can produce ruby-gold glass, which is arguably the most beautiful and celebrated colored glass. In this case, the intense red color originates from the dispersed plasmonic-resonant gold nanoparticles20. As such, the use of light scattering is an alternative approach to yield color in the glass. Phase separated glasses exhibit an opaque color due to diffuse light scattering caused by the difference in the refractive index of each phase. Tomioka et al.21 investigated the phase separation behavior of multicomponent oxide glasses and observed that the different microstructures of phase separation resulted in a whitish to a bluish color. Another approach is to create three-dimensional photonic structures to render noniridescent structural colors. Schroden et al.22 prepared inverse opal photonic crystals of silica using ordered arrays of uniformly sized polymer spheres infiltrated with silica fluid precursors. The color characteristics, physical and chemical properties, and cost of manufacturing vary significantly between these different approaches. However, many coloring mechanisms are still not well understood. To effectively use the suitable approaches for various applications, it is important to understand their structure and process relationships. To elucidate the origin of this unusual coloration and to understand their structural and chemical properties, we characterized Al-doped sol-gel glasses prepared at different sintering temperature using various techniques. We used these experimental results to test a number of possible coloring mechanisms.

Results and Discussion

Figure 1 depicts the coloration stages of Al-doped and undoped Silica glass along with optical transmittance data ranging from UV to Visible to IR light for various annealing temperatures. For the Al-doped silica materials, the color ranges from clear when there is no annealing and when annealed to 250 °C, to light amber at 350 °C, and to dark amber at 450 °C as shown in Fig. 1. At 800 °C the glass coloration returns to a clear and optically transparent color. There is no such coloration range, nor are there even any color changes observed for the undoped silica glass annealed at the same temperature range. The sample annealed at 800 °C exhibits a negative absorbance in the UV region (Fig. 2) which is due to its photoluminescent emission (S5 & 7, Support Material) and may be attributed to the Al dopant19. This is not observed for the other samples annealed at different temperatures and highlights the potential role that the dopant plays in the coloration process. We cannot obtain monolithic glass from the undoped silica gel as the aluminum is needed to strengthen the glass.

Figure 1
figure1

(Top) Al-doped silica sol-gel glass samples prepared with and without annealing exhibiting temperature-dependent clear and amber coloring. (Bottom) Undoped silica glass is depicted for comparison purposes.

Figure 2
figure2

Absorption spectra of the samples annealed at different temperatures.

In order to understand the uncommon amber coloration, it is important to investigate chemical and structural properties of the prepared sol-gel glass system as plausible causes. An initial approach is to hypothesize that the potential formation of carbon (C), elemental composition differences formed by annealing, and/or contamination of the sol-gel glass with other elements such as Fe and S can render an amber color with temperature dependence23. For this study, we employed X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to test these hypotheses. Figure 3 (left) shows the XPS survey spectra for 250 °C and 450 °C annealed glass, respectively. Presence of Si 2p and O 1s peaks are observed. However, there is a negligible amount of adventitious C detected. Usually, adventitious C contamination is expected to include C-C, C-O-C, and O-C=O components at around 284.8 eV with some C layer formation appearing even at 286 eV for the native oxide of Al24. Figure 3 (right) depicts the atomic percentage change of Al, C, O and Si with annealing temperature. There is very little elemental composition difference found for all elements as annealing temperature increases. In particular, the average atomic percentage of C is found to be below 1% in all cases, as shown by Fig. 3 (right). Therefore, the formation of C or any significant composition differences and contamination by other elements can be excluded as a possible reason for the amber coloration.

Figure 3
figure3

(Left) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy spectra for 250 °C and 450 °C annealed glass. (Right) Average atomic percentage vs. temperature for Al, C, O, and Si elements.

Another plausible cause for the unusual coloration may be the interaction of porous glass microstructures with incident light. This phenomenon of tunable structural coloring can be observed in many biological systems such as in butterfly wings25 and plants26. In this case; we hypothesize that an amorphous array of air pores with short-range order forming in the structure leads to the unusual amber color. In order to test this hypothesis, we conducted porosimetry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) experiments, as shown in Fig. 4. Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH)27 N adsorption measurements (Fig. 5) suggest that formed pores lie in the micro-pore range (i.e., between 0 and 2 nm). Furthermore, the pore size decreased with increased annealing temperature. SEM and TEM measurements further validate the porosimetry data. Such size range clearly does not produce structural color in the visible range28.

Figure 4
figure4

The SEM (ac) and TEM (df) images of the glass samples heated to 250 °C, 450 °C, and 800 °C, respectively.

Figure 5
figure5

a) Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm of the glass samples heated to the different temperatures. The Barrett- Joyner-Halenda (BJH) pore size distribution plot of the glass samples heated to (b) 250 °C, (c) 450 °C, and (d) 800 °C.

To explore the possible structural changes that may be associated with the amber glass coloration, Pair Distribution Function - PDF (Fig. 6a) was conducted on these Al-doped glasses annealed at various temperatures. As shown in Fig. 6a, the PDF spectra shows similar patterns for an amorphous Si glass, suggesting that ensemble-averaged local structures are not responsible for the coloration in amber glasses. However, some differences were found for element-specific XAS spectra. Figure 6b is the Si K-edge XAS around 1848 eV29. It shows that all Al-doped Si glasses are in the same amorphous phase as SiO2, which eliminates the phase transition influence30. In contrast, Al and O XAS spectra in Fig. 6c,d, respectively, exhibit temperature-dependent changes. It is noted that Al doped in amber glasses are mostly in the metallic state as featured by a peak at 1560 eV29,31, and that the metallic Al peak intensity decreases as temperature increases. Interestingly, the Al0 peak (represented by the dashed line in Fig. 6c) intensities of amber glass annealed at 350 °C and 450 °C are the lowest, indicating the existence of aluminum oxide (Al2O3) that may introduce defects in the SiO2 unit cell.

Figure 6
figure6

(a) Pair distribution function (PDF) data and X-ray absorption spectroscopy data at the (b) Si K-edge (c) Al K-edge, and (d) O K-edge for Al-doped Si glass at various annealing temperatures.

Those defects are also suggested in O K-edge XAS (Fig. 6d). Peak B (Fig. 6d) around 534 eV is assigned to the unoccupied O states of SiOx32, which show the similar temperature-dependent trend as that of the metallic Al0 peak in Fig. 6c: a higher peak B (more unoccupied O states) when temperature raises up to 350 °C, and a much lower peak B (less unoccupied O states) when the temperature increases to 800 °C. In addition, peaks C and D (Fig. 6d) represent the existence of single crystalline and amorphous SiOx33. It also shows the same variation trend as that of unoccupied O states and the metallic Al° peak. Therefore, annealing temperature affects the amount of Al atoms doped into the SiO2 unit cell, which results in different oxygen defects and different degrees of amorphous/crystalline ratio due to the various valence state of Al and Si. A considerable amount of studies on point defects in crystalline silica (i.e., quartz) have been conducted due to the important role of quartz in nature and its many technical applications34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48. These point defects are either structural related or impurity related defects, including the [AlO4]°, and [AlO4/H+] centers, oxygen, and oxygen vacancy-related defect centers35,36. The aluminum-associated hole center, [AlO4, is believed to cause the “smoky” coloration of quartz crystals. Griffiths et al. reported the paramagnetic centers with Al hyperfine structure in irradiated and natural “smoky” α-quartz first37. Since then many research groups have investigated the aluminum-associated hole centers in “smoky” quartz crystals38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48. Subjecting synthetic α-quartz to high energy electrons radiation, Koumvakalis introduced an optical absorption in the visible range and attributed it to the aluminum-associated hole center via simultaneous optical absorption and ESR measurements45. Our data suggest that the unusual amber coloration from the aluminum-doped sol-gel silica glass could be associated with the aluminum-associated hole centers.

EPR experiments were performed on glass annealed to 250 °C, 450 °C, and 800 °C, and the results are presented to further study the defects (Fig. 7). Common defects in silica or quartz include oxygen deficiency-related defects and oxygen excess-related defects. Usually, silica with either of these defects have g-values in the range of 1.997 to 2.0835,36,41. The difference between the spectrum of the 450 °C sample from the 250 °C or 800 °C sample are the appearance of a peak around 2.0036 g in the 450 °C sample, the greater intensity of the 2.074–2.075 g peak in the 450 °C sample and the appearance of a peak around 2.0036 g in the 450 °C sample. The amber coloration may be attributed to the defects associated with the peak appearing at 2.0036 g. This peak could be related to the aluminum-associated hole centers, as an Al3+ ion substitutes a Si3+ ion, leaving an unpaired electron at one of the four oxygen atoms next to the Al center39,43. This localized spin gives rise to an ESR signal and is responsible for the smoky coloration in irradiated α-quartz. According to the EPR study of silicon dioxide, the g-value around 2.08 could be due to the non-bridging oxygen hole center35. In our case, the intensity of this hole center varied with different sintering temperatures, which might be due to the thermodynamic preferences of the coordination among silicon, aluminum, and oxygen.

Figure 7
figure7

EPR data of the samples annealed at different temperatures.

In this work, we report for the first-time experimental observations on the unusual amber coloration of sol-gel prepared amber glass annealed at different temperatures up to 800 °C. In order to understand this phenomenon, we employed different fundamental hypotheses from chemical and structural related changes to temperature-related defect center generation. The latter is currently considered to be the most plausible cause of such unusual coloring behavior. This new material has the potential for applications such as porous encapsulation of molecules and cells with UV and blue light blocking capability. Furthermore, the new insight in defect chemistry of aluminum doped sol-gel silica can be utilized in optoelectronics and possibly photocatalysis.

Methods

In our work, the sol-gel approach was applied to fabricate the various-colored glasses. 2.5 molar percentage aluminum nitrate precursor (0.094 grams) was added into a mixture of 2.2 mL tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), 1 mL DI H2O, and 2 mL Ethanol. A small amount (around 0.5 mL) of 1 M hydrochloric acid is also added into the mixture. The resulting solution was then stirred at room temperature for 1 hour to form the sol. The sol is then left to sit at room temperature for a few days, and a cap completely covers the opening to prevent any air from getting into the solution. After a few days, pin holes are made in the cap to allow for flow into the gel, and it is left to sit for another one to two weeks. Finally, the gel is heated at a rate of 0.5 °C to 60 °C and then at a rate of 1 °C to the final curing temperature.

The pore structure of the glass was determined using BET (Tristar II 3020, Surface Area Analyzer), Scanning Electron Microscopy (FEI QUANTA 600 F environmental SEM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (FEI TITAN 80–200 TEM/STEM). The optical property was measured using UV-Vis spectrometer with a 10 mm integrated sphere (JASCO V-670). The elemental composition and chemical bonding were characterized using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (ThermoScientific ESCALAB 250 XPS). The pair distribution function (PDF) experiment was carried out at the 11 ID-C stations of the Advanced Phonon Source (APS), Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). A focused monochromatic X-ray beam about 5 μm in diameter (FWHM) with a wavelength of 0.4066 Å was used for the diffraction experiments. A MAR345 image plate recorded the diffraction data, and then the two-dimensional (2D) images were integrated to one-dimensional (1D) patterns with the Fit2D program. Si, Al and O K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) measurements were conducted at the bending magnet beamline 6.3.1 of the Advanced Light Source (ALS), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) with an electron energy of 1.9 GeV and a current of 500 mA. Total electron yield mode was used. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements were performed by the Bruker Elexsys E 500 spectrometer with a frequency of 100 kHz. The signals of the defects were observed with a microwave power of 10 mW at 77 K.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Conley, D. J. & Carey, J. C. Silica cycling over geologic time: Biogeochemistry. Nature Geoscience 8, 431–432 (2015).

  2. 2.

    Biosilica in evolution, morphogenesis, and nanobiotechnology: case study Lake Baikal. (Springer, 2009).

  3. 3.

    Hyde, E. D. E. R., Seyfaee, A., Neville, F. & Moreno-Atanasio, R. Colloidal Silica Particle Synthesis and Future Industrial Manufacturing Pathways: A Review. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 55, 8891–8913 (2016).

  4. 4.

    Anuszkiewicz, A. et al. Fused silica optical fibers with graded index nanostructured core. Scientific Reports 8 (2018).

  5. 5.

    Liu, C. C. & Maciel, G. E. The Fumed Silica Surface: A Study by NMR. Journal of the American Chemical Society 118, 5103–5119 (1996).

  6. 6.

    Nassif, N. et al. Living bacteria in silica gels. Nature Materials 1, 42–44 (2002).

  7. 7.

    Parale, V. G., Lee, K.-Y. & Park, H.-H. Flexible and Transparent Silica Aerogels: An Overview. Journal of the Korean Ceramic Society 54, 184–199 (2017).

  8. 8.

    Amonette, J. E. & Matyas, J. Functionalized silica aerogels for gas-phase purification, sensing, and catalysis: A review. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 250, 100–119 (2017).

  9. 9.

    Klein, L. C. Sol-Gel Optical Materials. Annual Review of Materials Science 23, 437–452 (1993).

  10. 10.

    Jeong, S. & Moon, J. Fabrication of inorganic–organic hybrid films for optical waveguide. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 351, 3530–3535 (2005).

  11. 11.

    Hsu, S.-H., Chang, Y.-L., Tu, Y.-C., Tsai, C.-M. & Su, W.-F. Omniphobic Low Moisture Permeation Transparent Polyacrylate/Silica Nanocomposite. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 5, 2991–2998 (2013).

  12. 12.

    Le Losq, C., Neuville, D. R., Florian, P., Henderson, G. S. & Massiot, D. The role of Al3+ on rheology and structural changes in sodium silicate and aluminosilicate glasses and melts. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 126, 495–517 (2014).

  13. 13.

    An, L. et al. Silicon aluminum Carbonitride with Anomalously High Resistance to Oxidation and Hot Corrosion. Advanced Engineering Materials 6, 337–340 (2004).

  14. 14.

    Liu, J., Wang, Y. & An, L. Abnormal behavior of silica doped with small amounts of aluminum. Scientific Reports 6 (2016).

  15. 15.

    Liu, X., Gu, Z. & Ouli. Study of the aluminum anomaly in Al-doped silica glasses. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 112, 169–172 (1989).

  16. 16.

    Glass, C. M. & Whitehouse, D. Roman Glass in the Corning Museum of Glass (Hudson Hills, 1997).

  17. 17.

    Shelby, J. E. Introduction to Glass Science and Technology, https://doi.org/10.1039/9781847551160 (2005).

  18. 18.

    Douglas, R. W. & Zaman, M. S. Chromophore in Iron-Sulphur Amber Glasses. Physics and chemistry of glasses 10, 125 (1969).

  19. 19.

    Shackelford, J. F. & Shackelford, P. L. The Glass of Wine: The Science, Technology, and Art of Glassware for Transporting and Enjoying Wine. John Wiley & Sons (2017).

  20. 20.

    Ruivo, A. et al. Gold nanoparticles in ancient and contemporary ruby glass. Journal of Cultural Heritage 9, e134–e137 (2008).

  21. 21.

    Tomioka, Y., Sukenaga, S., Saito, N. & Nakashima, K. Phase Separation Behavior and Coloring of Coating Glasses for Sanitary Ware. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 18, 112021 (2011).

  22. 22.

    Schroden, R. C., Al-Daous, M., Blanford, C. F. & Stein, A. Optical Properties of Inverse Opal Photonic Crystals. Chemistry of Materials 14, 3305–3315 (2002).

  23. 23.

    Muller-Simon, H. Temperature dependence of amber color generation in soda-lime-silica glass. Glass Science and Technology 73, 28–30 (1999).

  24. 24.

    Barr, T. L. & Seal, S. Nature of the use of adventitious carbon as a binding energy standard. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films 13, 1239–1246 (1995).

  25. 25.

    Miyako, E. et al. Self-Assembled Carbon Nanotube Honeycomb Networks Using a Butterfly Wing Template as a Multifunctional Nanobiohybrid. ACS Nano 7, 8736–8742 (2013).

  26. 26.

    Diah, S. Z. M., Karman, S. B. & Gebeshuber, I. C. Nanostructural Colouration in Malaysian Plants: Lessons for Biomimetics and Biomaterials. Journal of Nanomaterials 2014, 1–15 (2014).

  27. 27.

    Barrett, E. P., Joyner, L. G. & Halenda, P. P. The Determination of Pore Volume and Area Distributions in Porous Substances. I. Computations from Nitrogen Isotherms. Journal of the American Chemical Society 73, 373–380 (1951).

  28. 28.

    Lee, G. H., Sim, J. Y. & Kim, S.-H. Polymeric Inverse Glasses for Development of Noniridescent Structural Colors in Full Visible Range. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 8, 12473–12480 (2016).

  29. 29.

    Li, D., Bancroft, G. M., Fleet, M. E. & Feng, X. H. Silicon K-edge XANES spectra of silicate minerals. Phys Chem Minerals 22, 115–122 (1995).

  30. 30.

    Wu, Y. et al. Facile one-pot synthesis of 3D graphite–SiO2 composite foam for negative resistance devices. RSC Advances 7, 41812–41818 (2017).

  31. 31.

    Mogi, M. et al. Theoretical Investigation of Al K-edge X-ray Absorption Spectra of Al, AlN and Al2O3. Materials Transactions 45, 2031–2034 (2004).

  32. 32.

    Kim, D.-K. et al. Controlling the defects and transition layer in SiO2 films grown on 4H-SiC via direct plasma-assisted oxidation. Scientific Reports 6 (2016).

  33. 33.

    Wang, Z., Li, C., Liu, L. & Sham, T.-K. Probing defect emissions in bulk, micro- and nano-sized α-Al2O3 via X-ray excited optical luminescence. The Journal of Chemical Physics 138, 084706 (2013).

  34. 34.

    Rossman, G. R. The colored varieties of the silica minerals. In Silica: physical behavior, geochemistry and materials applications (ed. Heaney, P. J.) 433–468 (Mineralogical Society of America, 1994).

  35. 35.

    Skuja, L. Optically active oxygen-deficiency-related centers in amorphous silicon dioxide. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 239, 16–48 (1998).

  36. 36.

    Usami, T., Toyoda, S., Bahadur, H., Srivastava, A. K. & Nishido, H. Characterization of the E1′ center in quartz: Role of aluminum hole centers and oxygen vacancies. Physica B: Condensed Matter 404, 3819–3823 (2009).

  37. 37.

    Griffiths, J., Owen, J. & Ward, I. Magnetic resonance in irradiated diamond and quartz. Rept Bristol Conf Defects in Crystalline Solids. (The Phys Soc London) 81–87 (1955).

  38. 38.

    O’Brian, M. The structure of the colour centres in smoky quartz. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 231, 404–414 (1955).

  39. 39.

    Mackey, J. H., Boss, J. W. & Wood, D. E. EPR study of substitutional-aluminum-related hole centers in synthetic α–quartz. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 3, 44–54 (1970).

  40. 40.

    Schnadt, R. & Räuber, A. Motional effects in the trapped-hole center in smoky quartz. Solid State Communications 9, 159–161 (1971).

  41. 41.

    Nuttall, R. H. D. & Weil, J. A. The magnetic properties of the oxygen–hole aluminum centers in crystalline SiO2. I. [AlO4]°. Canadian Journal of Physics 59, 1696–1708 (1981).

  42. 42.

    To, J., Sokol, A. A., French, S. A., Kaltsoyannis, N. & Catlow, C. R. A. Hole localization in [AlO4]° defects in silica materials. J. Chem. Phys. 122, 144704 (2005).

  43. 43.

    Gillen, R. & Robertson, J. Hybrid functional calculations of the Al impurity in α quartz: Hole localization and electron paramagnetic resonance parameters. Phys. Rev. B 85, 014117 (2012).

  44. 44.

    Nuttall, R. H. D. & Weil, J. A. The magnetic properties of the oxygen–hole aluminum centers in crystalline SiO2. II. [AlO4/H+]+ and [AlO4/Li+]+. Can. J. Phys. 59, 1709 (1981).

  45. 45.

    Koumvakalis, N. Defects in crystalline SiO2:Optical absorption of the aluminum-associated hole center. Journal of Applied Physics 51, 5528 (1980).

  46. 46.

    King, J. C. B S. Tech. The anelasticity of natural and synthetic quartz at low temperatures. J. 38, 573 (1959).

  47. 47.

    Park, D. S. & Nowick, A. S. Dielectric relaxation of point defects in α-quartz. Phys. status Solidi A 26, 617 (1974).

  48. 48.

    Jain, H. & Nowick, A. S. Electrical conductivity of synthetic and natural quartz crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 53, 477 (1982).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is partially supported by NSF Scalable Nanomanufacturing program under Grant No. CBET-1449383. The TEM is funded by the National Science Foundation via the Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) Program under Grand No. 1040588. A.C. thanks the support from OSU URISC fund. Z.F. thanks the technical support from Alpha N’Diaye at ALS and the Callahan Faculty Scholar Endowment Fund from Oregon State University. The ALS is an Office of Science User Facility operated for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and supported by the DOE under Contract Nos DEAC02-05CH11231. The use of the APS, an Office of Science User Facility operated for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory, was supported by the U.S. DOE under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. K.A.S. acknowledges partial funding from the National Science Foundation (NSF) Awards Nos 1358137 and 1343726.

Author information

A.C. conceived the project. A.C. and Y.H. designed and carried out the experimental plan. A.C. synthesized the samples. Y.H. collected and analyzed the TEM, SEM, UV-Vis and EPR data, A.C. collected and analyzed the TGA and EPR data, MATA collected and analyzed the BET data, Y.R. collected and analyzed the PDF data, M.W. and Z.F. collected and analyzed the XAFS data, Y.H., C.H.C., M.A.T.A. and K.A.S. provided guidance in experimental design and data analysis. All authors contributed to manuscript writings.

Correspondence to Konstantinos A. Sierros.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, A., He, Y., Arango, M.A.T. et al. On the unusual amber coloration of nanoporous sol-gel processed Al-doped silica glass: An experimental study. Sci Rep 9, 12474 (2019) doi:10.1038/s41598-019-48917-4

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.