High pollutant exposure level of the largest European community of bottlenose dolphins in the English Channel

Article metrics

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the levels of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and mercury (T-Hg) in the blubber and skin, respectively, of the free-ranging bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, from the Normanno-Breton Gulf, one of the largest identified coastal population in Europe. Among all the POPs analysed in this study, the ∑NDL-PCBs were the most abundant compounds found in the blubber (mean: 1.33 × 105–0.65 × 105 ng.g−1 lipid weight (lw) for males and females respectively), followed by ∑DDX (1.11 × 104–4.67 × 103 ng.g−1 lw) > ∑DL-PCBs (8.06 × 103–2.62 × 103ng.g−1 lw) > ∑PBDEs (1.95 × 103–0.64 × 103ng.g−1 lw) > dieldrin (1.86 × 103–0.18 × 103 ng.g−1 lw) > ∑endosulfan (405–62 ng.g−1 lw) > HCB (86–52 ng.g−1 lw) > ∑HCHs (47–60 ng.g−1 lw) > ∑chlordane (24–0.97 ng.g−1 lw) > ∑PCDFs (0.3–0.1 ng.g−1 lw) > ∑PCDDs (0.06–0.05 ng.g−1 lw). The T-Hg concentrations were highly variable between individuals (2.45 × 103 ng.g−1 to 21.3 × 103 ng.g−1 dry weight, dw). The reported concentrations are among the highest reported for cetaceans. We strongly recommend that the Normanno-Breton Gulf be a special area of conservation (cSAC) candidate because it contains the last large European population of bottlenose dolphins (rare or threatened within a European context) designated under the EC Habitats Directive.

Introduction

Most organochlorinated contaminants were banned in developed countries in the 1970s and 1980s. However, their persistent chemical properties favour their long-range transport and remanence in water, air and biota, including the deepest ocean fauna1. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are persistent organic pollutants (POPs) that pose a serious environmental threat to wildlife and humans2,3. Very recently, a meta-analysis of stranded and biopsied cetaceans in Europe stressed that the bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus, had markedly elevated PCB concentrations in blubber4. In particular, the “PCB hotspots” included the Strait of Gibraltar, south western Iberia, the Gulf of Cadiz and the Mediterranean Sea. These high PCB concentrations are still a major cause of decline in European cetacean populations2.

The bottlenose dolphin is a relevant species for examining environmental contamination trends in coastal areas5,6: The species is widely distributed in estuarine and nearshore waters7, is a long-lived species with a high trophic position in the marine food web and a thick layer of blubber in which lipophilic pollutants accumulate8. Previous risk assessment investigations on the potential effect of PCB exposure demonstrated their likely effects on offspring survival in bottlenose dolphins9, especially reduced first-year survivorship of calves and a reduced annual population growth10,11.

Approximately 420 coastal bottlenose dolphins inhabit the Normanno-Breton Gulf (NBG) in the English Channel12 (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
figure1

The bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus in the Normanno-Breton Gulf (English Channel). Photo Credit: GECC.

The size of coastal communities of bottlenose dolphins in European waters ranges from approximately 10 to 300 individuals13,14,15,16,17,18. Therefore, the coastal population of bottlenose dolphins from the NBG is one of the largest identified among dolphin communities in Europe12. Previous studies have shown an interannual site fidelity to the NBG and that this population is genetically isolated from neighbouring populations living off the United Kingdom and Ireland12. The bottlenose dolphins of the NBG are a community that remains poorly known. To date, no toxicological data are available on the bottlenose dolphins from the NBG despite their proximity to urban and industrial activities. Quantifying the baseline concentrations and patterns of POPs and total mercury (T-Hg) in bottlenose dolphin populations is critical for risk assessment and long-term management. These organic chemical substances are classified as persistent organic pollutants by the Stockholm Convention (http://www.pops.int) because of their toxicity, lipophilic properties and widespread global distribution. The Minamata Convention (http://www.mercuryconvention.org/Home/tabid/3360/language/en-US/Default.aspx) on Mercury drew attention to this toxic metal that is released to the atmosphere, water and soil from a variety of anthropogenic sources, which leads to its bioaccumulation in biota.

Biopsy samples of skin and blubber were collected from 82 bottlenose dolphins from the NBG in the English Channel to assess the concentrations of a large range of industrial compounds, dioxin-related compounds (DRCs) and organochlorinated pesticides: NDL-PCBs and DL-PCBs (non-dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls, respectively), PBDEs (polybrominated diphenyl ethers), DDXs (dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane and metabolites), HCHs (hexachlorocyclohexanes), HCB (hexachlorobenzene), PCDDs (polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins), PCDFs (polychlorinated dibenzofurans), cis-chlordane, trans-chlordane, α-endosulfan, β-endosulfan, endosulfan-sulfate, and dieldrin, in the blubber. T-Hg (total mercury) was analysed in the skin.

Results

The lipid content in the blubber ranged from 2.4 to 22.8% (Table 1). No differences were observed between the sex classes, age classes and sampling season. The bottlenose dolphins sampled in 2010 showed a slightly higher lipid percentage than those sampled in 2012 (13.6% and 8.5%, respectively; Kruskal-Wallis: p = 0.0477).

Table 1 Lipid percentage (%) and POP concentrations (ng.g−1 lw) in the blubber biopsies of the bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, from the Normanno-Breton Gulf.

All the measured compounds were detected at quantifiable levels (>limit of quantification (LOQ)) with the exception of endosulfan-α (below the LOQ), β-HCH (detected in 5 out of 58 samples), BDE 66 (detected in 7 out of 58 samples), three dioxins (below the LOQ: 2, 3, 7, 8-TetraCDD; 1, 2, 3, 7, 8-PentaCDD; and 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8-HexaCDD) and one furan (detected in 1 out of 12 samples: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9-HeptaCDF).

Among all the persistent organic pollutants analysed in this study (Tables 1 and 2 and Table S2, Supplementary Information), the ∑NDL-PCBs were the most abundant compounds found in the blubber, followed by ∑DDX > ∑DL-PCBs > ∑PBDEs > dieldrin > ∑endosulfan > HCB > ∑HCHs > ∑chlordane > ∑PCDFs > ∑PCDDs.

Table 2 Dioxin-related compounds (DRC, pg.g−1 lw and pg WHO-TEQ.g−1 lw) in the blubber biopsies of bottlenose dolphins from the Normanno-Breton Gulf.

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)

The ∑6 NDL-PCBs were the major contaminant groups found in the blubber of all the dolphins, with the contribution of the total POPs measured as 91% and 92% for the males and females, respectively. The ∑6 NDL-PCB concentrations were significantly higher in the males than in the females (Mann-Whitney: w = 103, p = 0.0014). The adult males had significantly higher ∑6 NDL-PCBs compared to the adult females and sub-adults (Kruskal-Wallis: X2 = 6.98, p = 0.0225; X2 = 11.94, p = 0.0016, respectively). No significant difference was found between the adult females and sub-adults (Kruskal Wallis: X2 = 0.0002, p = 0.9991).

Among the 6 NDL-PCBs, CB 153 was the predominant congener found in the blubber, with contributions of 51% and 49% of the ∑6 NDL-PCBs in the males and females, respectively (Fig. 2), followed by CB 138 (25% and 26% in the males and females, respectively) and CB 180 (16% and 17% in the males and females, respectively). With the exception of CB 28, all 6 NDL-PCB congeners were significantly higher in the males than in the females (Mann-Whitney, p < 0.05).

Figure 2
figure2

Mean concentrations (and standard deviation) of Σ6 NDL-PCBs (ng.g−1 lw) in blubber biopsies of bottlenose dolphins from Normanno-Breton Gulf.

Dioxin-related compounds (DRCs)

The dioxin-like PCB (non-ortho and mono-ortho), PCDD and PCDF concentrations and their respective WHO-TEQ values (pg.g−1, lw) are presented in Tables 2 and S2 (Supplementary Information). The use of toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) to achieve toxic equivalency (TEQ) allows the assessment of the toxic potential of pollutants capable of triggering Aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor-mediated effects, such as DRCs19. The toxic equivalency factor (TEF) expresses the toxicity of dioxins, furans and DL-PCBs in terms of the most toxic form of dioxin, 2, 3, 7, 8-TCDD20.

The DL-PCB concentrations represented only 5% of the total ∑PCB concentrations measured in this study (6 NDL-PCBs plus DL-PCBs) but were nevertheless the predominant groups of DRCs found in the blubber biopsies of the bottlenose dolphins from the NBG (Fig. 3). The PCDD/Fs only contributed 6% of the total TEQ in both the males and females of the population.

Figure 3
figure3

Mean proportions of PCDD/Fs and DL-PCBs (TEQ) in blubber biopsies of bottlenose dolphins from the Normanno-Breton Gulf in males (left) and females (right).

Among the DL-PCBs, PCB 126 and PCB 118 contributed to the majority of the total TEQ, with contributions of 36% and 31% in the males, respectively, and contributions of 45% and 23% in the females, respectively.

Other compounds

The PBDE concentrations represented less than 2% of the total sum of the persistent organic pollutants measured in the blubber biopsies of the bottlenose dolphins from the NBG. BDE 47 was the most predominant congener found in the blubber, with a contribution of 60% of the total ∑PBDEs.

The PBDE concentrations occurred in the following order: BDE 47 > BDE 100 > BDE 154 > BDE 153 > BDE 99 > BDE 85 > BDE 28 > BDE 183 > BDE 66 (Fig. 4).

Figure 4
figure4

Mean concentrations (and standard deviations) of ƩPBDEs (ng.g−1 lw) in blubber biopsies of bottlenose dolphins from the Normanno-Breton Gulf.

The concentrations of the PBDE congeners were higher in the males than in the females (Mann-Whitney U Test, p = 0.0001). Our results suggest an age-dependent accumulation for the PBDEs, with adult males having greater concentrations than sub-adult dolphins (Kruskal-Wallis, X2 = 9.925, p = 0.007). The ∑PBDE concentrations were significantly lower in the adult females than in the sub-adults (Mann-Whitney U Test, p = 0.019). Compared to the adult males, the adult females showed a lower proportion of BDE 47 and a higher proportion of the highly brominated PBDEs, such as BDE 153 and 154.

The ΣDDX compounds were the predominant organochlorine pesticides found in the dolphin blubber, representing between 86% and 99% of the total pesticides. Significantly higher levels of ΣDDXs were detected in the males than in the females (Table 1). The adult males also had significantly greater ΣDDX concentrations than the adult females and sub-adults. The dieldrin and endosulfan levels were significantly higher in the males than in the females.

The total mercury (T-Hg) was detected at quantifiable levels in all of the skin biopsies of the bottlenose dolphins from Normanno-Breton Gulf. The T-Hg concentrations were highly variable between individuals, ranging from 2.45 × 103 to 2.13 × 104 ng.g−1 dw, with no significant difference between the males and females (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.44, Table 3).

Table 3 Total mercury concentrations (ng.g−1 dry weight, dw) in the skin biopsies of the bottlenose dolphins from Normanno-Breton Gulf.

Correlation between the stable isotopes and pollutants

The δ13C values in the skin were correlated with the blubber ∑PBDE concentrations (p = 0.024, R2 = 0.296). The δ13C and δ15N values were correlated with the T-Hg concentrations in the skin (p < 0.0001, R2 = 0.63 and p < 0.0001, R2 = 0.48 for δ13C and δ15N, respectively, (Fig. S1, Supplementary Information). There was no correlation between the stable isotopes and the other POP concentrations.

Discussion

The bottlenose dolphins from the NBG have markedly elevated blubber NDL-PCB concentrations compared to the other concentrations previously described in bottlenose dolphins from European waters4 (Fig. 5).

Figure 5
figure5

Mean PCB concentrations in male bottlenose dolphins from the Normanno-Breton Gulf (NBG, red bar, present study, Σ6 NDL-PCBs) compared to the ΣPCBs from other European locations4.

The NDL-PCBs accounted for more than 91% of all the analysed organic compounds, with concentrations exceeding 393000 ng.g−1 lw in one male dolphin.

Among the NDL-PCBs, the hexachlorobiphenyls (PCB 153 and PCB 138) were the major compounds (ranging from 64 to 80%), followed by the heptachlorobiphenyls (PCB 180). PCB 153, 138 and 180 were the dominant PCBs detected in the marine mammals due to their widespread use, persistence, high lipophilicity and structural resistance to metabolism21,22,23,24. This pattern is very similar to that found by the Seine-Normandy Water Agency in marine biota from the English Channel, with hexachlorobiphenyls representing more than 60% of the NDL-PCB concentrations25.

The PCBs were used mainly as dielectric fluids in industrial capacitors and transformers26. The commercialization and use of PCBs have been prohibited in France since 198727. The Seine is a hotspot for PCBs28,29, and the NBG, which is close to the Seine estuary, is an environment with high industrial, agricultural and urban activities. Indeed, several studies (including those by the International Pellet Watch, Minier and co-authors28) the pollution monitoring conducted by the Seine-Normandy Water Agency and the monitoring network (ROCCH) on mussels and oysters along the French coastline (http://www.ifremer.fr), have shown that the Seine is one of the most polluted rivers in the world for PCBs.

Recently, toxicology thresholds have been used to evaluate the actual impact of PCBs on porpoise and dolphin populations in European waters4,30. A lower PCB toxicity threshold of 17 mg.kg−1 lw (as Aroclor 1254) was used for the onset of reproductive impairment and immune suppression in marine mammals31 and was calculated to be equivalent to 9.0 mg.kg−1 lw (as ΣPCB)4. A higher PCB toxicity threshold of 77 mg.kg−1 lw (as Clophen 50), which causes reproductive failure in Baltic ringed seals32, was calculated to be equivalent to 41 mg.kg−1 lw (as ΣPCB)4. 57 bottlenose dolphins (out of 58) exceeded the lower thresholds, and 51 bottlenose dolphins (out of 58) exceeded this higher threshold.

The toxicity threshold was exceeded in 50% of the common dolphins sampled in the waters off the French coast33. The threshold was exceeded the least in dolphins (9%) and porpoises (25%) off the coast of Ireland. The authors reported an arithmetic mean PCB concentration of 1.37 × 104 ng.g−1 lw in 36 female common dolphins from the French coast of the English Channel and the Atlantic, which is 4 times lower than the concentration measured in the female bottlenose dolphins from the NBG. The high values observed in the bottlenose dolphins from the NBG reflect their higher exposure, which is linked to their coastal habitat, feeding, and larger body size.

The male bottlenose dolphins displayed higher NDL-PCB concentrations than the females. These results are consistent with the general pattern previously reported in which females offloaded a large proportion of PCBs to their young during gestation and more specifically during lactation, while males continue to bioaccumulate PCBs throughout life34,35. The PCB accumulation in a bottlenose dolphin population off Sarasota (US) was associated with a reduced annual growth rate of 3.6%11. A recent study linked the decline of the population of killer wales in Europe with their PCB levels, which were likely responsible for reproductive failure2. Our results indicated the important transfer of PCBs by females to their young, which may raise concern for the population. Indeed, the immune system and metabolic capacities are less developed in foetuses and juveniles, making them more sensitive to the adverse effects of PCBs36. The transfer of PCBs and other organohalogenated compounds is a well-described process in cetaceans. Female harbour porpoises pass approximately 50% of the PCB 153 levels in their blubber on to their offspring. The mother is assumed to provide the same amount of milk and nutrients during each single cycle. Therefore, the concentrations of PCBs will decrease. As a result, the firstborn will be more contaminated than the last born. High PCB contamination of the calves combined with their insufficient metabolism at younger ages leaves this group vulnerable36.

The NDL-PCBs were the most abundant compounds in terms of their concentrations, but they were clearly not the only ones: other toxic organohalogenated compounds were detected in the blubber of bottlenose dolphins from the NBG in the following order: ∑DDX > ∑DL-PCBs > ∑PBDEs > dieldrin > ∑endosulfan > HCB > ∑HCHs > ∑chlordane > ∑PCDFs > ∑PCDDs. The combined effects of this cocktail of pollutants may be more complex than that anticipated using toxicity models.

Similar to the PCBs, the female bottlenose dolphins from the NBG displayed lower concentrations of flame retardants (PBDEs), organochlorinated pesticides (DDX and pp’DDE, HCB, chlordane, dieldrin and endosulfan) and some DRC congeners (PCDFs and mon-ortho PCBs), meaning that all these compounds (1) can reach very high concentrations in older male bottlenose dolphin and that (2) female dolphins offload a significant portion of this cocktail to their offspring during gestation and lactation, placing foetuses and newborns at a higher risk.

DRCs are produced by various processes such as the synthesis of some pesticides and PCBs and paper bleaching as well as the burning of vegetation and waste37. DRCs exert their toxic effects through their interaction with the Ah receptor, an intracellular protein38. Exposure to DRCs has been associated with a multitude of adverse health effects. Reproductive system and immunotoxicity effects appear to be among the most sensitive responses38. The TEQ values result from the concentrations of the different DRCs as well as from the ability of each compound to induce the Ah-receptor-mediated response39.

DL-PCBs in the bottlenose dolphins from the NBG represented the most important contribution (94%) for the toxicity equivalences of the DRCs (expressed as the TEQ). Our results were similar to the results found for Guiana dolphins (Sotalia guianensis) from the highly contaminated Guanabara Bay in Brazil, where the DL-PCBs represented 98.8% of the total TEQ40. The DL-PCBs represented 81% and 65% of the total TEQs analysed in the bottlenose dolphins from the lower Florida Keys and the Florida coastal Everglades, respectively6.

To our knowledge, only one threshold for the immunotoxic effects of DRCs exists for cetaceans, at 255 pg.g−1 WHO-TEQ lw41.

The total TEQ in the NBG bottlenose dolphins samples is easily comparable to the adverse effect levels established for killer whales41, suggesting that the majority of free-ranging bottlenose dolphins in the NBG are at risk for the toxic effects associated with DRCs.

The mercury concentrations in the skin from the NBG bottlenose dolphins are among the highest concentrations observed in this species (Table S3, Supplementary Information) and are very close to the concentrations previously described for the bottlenose dolphins in the Mediterranean Sea42 and from the Florida coastal Everglades6, two sites that are known for their high Hg contamination levels from both anthropogenic and natural origins. Our data suggest a high exposure of the NBG bottlenose dolphins linked to their high trophic position (Fig. S1) and their diet, which is composed of mackerel43.

The bottlenose dolphins in European waters are protected by the Habitats Directive (92/43/22C). Their conservation requires the creation of special areas of conservation (Annex II) and the need for strict protection (Annex IV).

Despite this European directive, human activities are increasing in the Normanno-Breton Gulf; the potential threats include pollutants, noise pollution, particularly construction noise, disturbance by tourism activities and bycatch43. Bottlenose dolphins have declined in the northeast Atlantic44. The historic stranding data in Europe suggest that coastal bottlenose dolphins became locally extinct or depleted in the late 1960s to the mid-1970s, including those in the UK45 and the Dutch coast46. The last member of a resident bottlenose dolphin population in Arcachon, France, died in 200147, and the small resident bottlenose dolphins group in Portugal (Sado Estuary) declined over several decades due to low calf survival over several decades15.

As recently emphasized by Jepson and Law3, there is an urgent need to review the methods of PCB mitigation in the marine environment in Europe; in compliance with the Stockholm Convention, the goal is to drastically reduce the PCB input of the marine environment by 2028. PCB mitigation measures include i.e. a destruction of PCB stocks and PCB-containing equipment/buildings, and a limitation of PCB mobilization in marine sediments4.

We strongly recommend the Normanno-Breton Gulf as a special area of conservation (cSAC) candidate because it contains the last large European population of bottlenose dolphins (rare or threatened within a European context) designated under the EC Habitats Directive.

Methods

A detailed methodology can be found in the supporting information.

Specimens

Biopsy samples from individual bottlenose dolphins were collected during boat surveys in the Normanno-Breton Gulf from 2010 to 2012 (French ministry permit No. 09/115/DEROG) (Fig. 6).

Figure 6
figure6

Sampling location of bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus in the Normanno-Breton Gulf (English Channel).

From a total of 82 bottlenose dolphins biopsied, we obtained 79 blubber biopsies and 69 skin biopsies (Table S1, Supporting Information). The sex of each individual biopsy was determined previously43.

Data presentation

The Σ 6 NDL-PCB congeners (28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180) were chosen as the priority compounds for the POP analysis by the Scientific Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain of EFSA (CONTAM Panel)48. The ΣPBDEs is the sum of the 9 BDE congeners (28, 47, 66, 85, 99, 100, 153, 154 and 183); the ΣHCH is the sum of α-HCH, β-HCH and γ-HCH; the ΣDDXs is the sum of p,p’DDT, o,p’-DDT, p,p’-DDE, o,p’DDE, p,p’-DDD and o,p’DDD. For the stable isotope analysis, the δ13C and δ15N values analysed previously43 were integrated into the present manuscript.

Persistent organic pollutant (POPs) and total mercury (T-Hg)

Blubber samples were analysed for non-dioxin-like (NDL) PCB congeners (28, 52, 101, 138, 153 and 180), dioxin-like (DL) PCB congeners (77, 81, 105, 114, 118, 123, 126, 156, 157, 167, 169 and 189), 17 WHO PCDD/Fs, PBDEs (28, 47, 66, 85, 99, 100, 153, 154 and 183) and organochlorinated pesticides (ΣDDXs, cis-chlordane and trans-chlordane, α-Endosulfan, β-Endosulfan and Endosulfan-sulfate, dieldrin, HCB, α-HCH, β-HCH, γ -HCH and HCH (See Supporting Information Table S1). The quantification of the PCDD/Fs, DL-PCBs, NDL-PCBs, PBDEs, DDXs, HCB and HCHs was performed by the isotope dilution technique using 13C labelled analogues6,49. Twenty-one blubber biopsies were selected for the analysis of the chlorinated pesticides cis-chlordane, trans-chlordane, α-endosulfan, β-endosulfan, endosulfan-sulfate, and dieldrin. The total mercury analysis was performed on the skin samples from 69 bottlenose dolphins, as was previously described6.

Statistical analysis

Non-parametric statistics were used because the assumptions of normality (Shapiro test) and homoscedasticity (Bartlett test) of the data were not met, even after a log-transformation. Significant differences between the contaminant concentrations in the sex and marking levels were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test for the comparison of the two categories, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used when there were more than two categories. If a significant difference was found, a post hoc Nemenyi’s test was performed to identify which group was significantly different. Spearman rank correlation tests were performed to examine the potential linear associations between the contaminants and stable isotopes. A statistical significance level of 0.05 was applied for all the tests. The statistical analyses were conducted with R studio software (version 3.2.3).

References

  1. 1.

    Jamieson, A. J., Malkocs, T., Piertney, S. B., Fujii, T. & Zhang, Z. Bioaccumulation of persistent organic pollutants in the deepest ocean fauna. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 51 (2017).

  2. 2.

    Stuart-Smith, S. J. & Jepson, P. D. Persistent threats need persistent counteraction: Responding to PCB pollution in marine mammals. Mar. Policy 84, 69–75 (2017).

  3. 3.

    Jepson, P. D. & Law, R. J. Persistent pollutants, persistent threats. Science. 352, 1388–1389 (2016).

  4. 4.

    Jepson, P. D. et al. PCB pollution continues to impact populations of orcas and other dolphins in European waters. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–17 (2016).

  5. 5.

    Kucklick, J. et al. Bottlenose dolphins as indicators of persistent organic pollutants in the western north atlantic ocean and northern gulf of mexico. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 4270–4277 (2011).

  6. 6.

    Damseaux, F. et al. Spatial variation in the accumulation of POPs and mercury in bottlenose dolphins of the Lower Florida Keys and the coastal Everglades (South Florida). Environ. Pollut. 220, 577–587 (2017).

  7. 7.

    Wells, R. S. & Scott, M. D. Bottlenose Dolphin: Tursiops truncatus, common Bottlenose Dolphin. Encycl. Mar. Mamm., (Third Ed. 118–125 (2018).

  8. 8.

    Bossart, G. D. Marine Mammals as Sentinel Species for Oceans and Human Health. Vet. Pathol. Online 48, 676–690 (2011).

  9. 9.

    Schwacke, L. H. et al. Probabilistic risk assessment of reproductive effects of polychlorinated biphenyls on bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) from the Southeast United States coast. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 21, 2752–2764 (2002).

  10. 10.

    Reddy, M. L., Dierauf, L. A. & Gulland, F. M. D. Marine mammals as sentinels of ocean health. in Marine Mammal Medicine (eds Dierauf, L. A. & Gulland, F. M. D.) 3–13 (CRC Press, 2001).

  11. 11.

    Hall, A. J. et al. Individual-based model framework to assess population consequences of polychlorinated biphenyl exposure in bottlenose dolphins. Environ. Health Perspect. 114, 60–64 (2006).

  12. 12.

    Louis, M. et al. Social Structure and Abundance of Coastal Bottlenose Dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, in the Normano-Breton Gulf, English Channel. J. Mammal. 96, 481–493 (2015).

  13. 13.

    Liret, C. Domaine vital, utilisation de l’espace et des ressources: les grands dauphins, Tursiops truncatus de l’île de Sein. (University of Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France., 2001).

  14. 14.

    Grellier, K. & Wilson, B. Bottlenose dolphins using the Sound of Barra, Scotland. Aquat. Mamm. 29, 378–382 (2003).

  15. 15.

    Augusto, J. F., Rachinas-Lopes, P. & Dos Santos, M. E. Social structure of the declining resident community of common bottlenose dolphins in the Sado Estuary, Portugal. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. United Kingdom 92, 1773–1782 (2012).

  16. 16.

    Wilson, B., Hammond, P. S. & Thompson, P. M. Estimating size and assessing trends in a coastal bottlenose dolphin population. Ecol. Appl. 9, 288–300 (1999).

  17. 17.

    Cheney, B. et al. Integrating multiple data sources to assess the distribution and abundance of bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus in Scottish waters. Mamm. Rev. 43, 71–88 (2012).

  18. 18.

    Berrow, S. Abundance Estimate of Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the Lower River Shannon candidate Special Area of Conservation, Ireland. Aquat. Mamm. 38, 136–144 (2012).

  19. 19.

    Van den Berg, M. et al. The 2005 World Health Organization reevaluation of human and mammalian toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds. Toxicol. Sci. 93, 223–241 (2006).

  20. 20.

    Sanderson, J. & Van Den Berg, M. Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) and their use in ecological risk assessment: a successful method when used appropriately. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 5, 43–52 (1999).

  21. 21.

    Kamrin, M. A. & Ringer, R. K. PCB residues in mammals: a review. Toxicol Env Chem 41, 63–84 (1994).

  22. 22.

    Law, R. J., Stringer, R. L., Allchin, C. R. & Jones, B. R. Metals and Organochlorines in Sperm Whales (Physeter macrocephalus) Stranded around the North Sea during the 1994/1995 Winter. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 32, 72–77 (1996).

  23. 23.

    Covaci, A. et al. Determination of organohalogenated contaminants in liver of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) stranded on the Belgian North Sea coast. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 44, 1157–1165 (2002).

  24. 24.

    Weijs, L. et al. Inter-species differences for polychlorinated biphenyls and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in marine top predators from the Southern North Sea: Part 2. Biomagnification in harbour seals and harbour porpoises. Environ. Pollut. 157, 445–51 (2009).

  25. 25.

    Abarnou, A. & Duchemin, J. Distribution et devenir de contaminants persistants dans les écosystèmes littoraux. Comparaison Manche Ouest-Manche Est. (2008).

  26. 26.

    Erickson, M. D. & Kaley, R. G. Applications of polychlorinated biphenyls. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 18, 135–151 (2011).

  27. 27.

    Mourier, B. et al. Historical records, sources, and spatial trends of PCBs along the Rhône River (France). Sci. Total Environ. 476–477, 568–576 (2014).

  28. 28.

    Minier, C. et al. A pollution‐monitoring pilot study involving contaminant and biomarker measurements in the Seine Estuary, France, using zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha). Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 25, 112–119 (2006).

  29. 29.

    Schnitzler, J. G., Thomé, J.-P. J. P., Lepage, M. & Das, K. Organochlorine pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls and trace elements in wild European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) off European estuaries. Sci Total Env. 409, 3680–3686 (2011).

  30. 30.

    Desforges, J., Hall, A., Mcconnell, B., Asvid, A. R. & Barber, J. L. Predicting global killer whale population collapse from PCB pollution. Science (80-.). 1376, 1–16 (2018).

  31. 31.

    Kannan, K., Blankenship, A. L., Jones, P. D. & Giesy, J. P. Toxicity Reference Values for Toxic Effects of Polychlorinated Biphenyls to Aquatic Mammals. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 6, 181–201 (2000).

  32. 32.

    Helle, E., Olsson, M. & Jensen, S. PCB levels correlated with pathological changes in seal uteri. Ambio 5, 261–263 (1976).

  33. 33.

    Pierce, G. J. et al. Bioaccumulation of persistent organic pollutants in female common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) and harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) from western European seas: Geographical trends, causal factors and effects on reproduction and mortality. Environ. Pollut. 153, 401–415 (2008).

  34. 34.

    Fair, P. A. et al. Contaminant blubber burdens in Atlantic bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) from two southeastern US estuarine areas: Concentrations and patterns of PCBs, pesticides, PBDEs, PFCs, and PAHs. Sci. Total Environ. 408, 1577–1597 (2010).

  35. 35.

    Weijs, L., Covaci, A., Yang, R. S. H., Das, K. & Blust, R. Computational toxicology: Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models (PBPK) for lifetime exposure and bioaccumulation of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in marine mammals. Environ. Pollut. 163, 134–141 (2012).

  36. 36.

    Weijs, L., Yang, R. S. H., Covaci, A., Das, K. & Blust, R. Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Models for Lifetime Exposure to PCB 153 in Male and Female Harbor Porpoises (Phocoena phocoena): Model Development and Evaluation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 7023–7030 (2010).

  37. 37.

    Schecter, A., Birnbaum, L., Ryan, J. J. & Constable, J. D. Dioxins: An overview. Environ. Res. 101, 419–428 (2006).

  38. 38.

    Birnbaum, L. S. The mechanism of dioxin toxicity: relationship to risk assessment. Environ. Health Perspect. 102, 157–167 (1994).

  39. 39.

    Van den Berg, M. et al. Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs for humans and wildlife. Environ. Health Perspect. 106, 775–792 (1998).

  40. 40.

    Dorneles, P. et al. High accumulation of PCDD, PCDF, and PCB congeners in marine mammals from Brazil: a serious PCB problem. Sci. Total Environ. 463–464, 309–318 (2013).

  41. 41.

    Ross, P. S., Ellis, G. M., Ikonomou, M. G., Barrett-Lennard, L. G. & Addison, R. F. High PCB concentrations in free-ranging Pacific killer whales, Orcinus orca: Effects of age, sex and dietary preference. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 40, 504–515 (2000).

  42. 42.

    Frodello, J. P., Romeo, M. & Viale, D. Distribution of mercury in the organs and tissues of five toothed-whale species of the Mediterranean. Environ. Pollut. 108, 447–452 (2000).

  43. 43.

    Louis, M. et al. Habitat-driven population structure of bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, in the North-East Atlantic. Mol. Ecol. 23, 857–874 (2014).

  44. 44.

    Jepson, P. D., Tregenza, N. & Simmonds, M. P. Disappearing bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) – is there a link to chemical pollution? 16th ASCOBANS Advisory Committee Meeting SC/60/E7 (2009).

  45. 45.

    NHM. UK Cetacean Strandings database (19131989) The Natural History Museum, London, UK.

  46. 46.

    Bakker, J. & Smeenk, C. Time-series analysis of Tursiops truncatus, Delphinus delphis, and Lagenorhynchus albirostris strandings on the Dutch coast. In ECS Newsletter 14–19 (1987).

  47. 47.

    GREMMS. Groupe de Recherche et d’Etude des Mammifères Marins de la SEPANSO 1988–2001. (2001). Available at, http://gremms.pagesperso-orange.fr/ (Accessed: 13th July 2018).

  48. 48.

    European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Results of the monitoring of non dioxin-like PCBs in food and feed. EFSA J. 8(7), 35 (2010).

  49. 49.

    Focant, J. F., Eppe, G., Pirard, C. & De Pauw, E. Fast clean-up for polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans and coplanar polychlorinated biphenyls analysis of high-fat-content biological samples. J. Chromatogr. A 925, 207–221 (2001).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financed by Agence de l’Eau Seine-Normandie and Fondation d’Entreprise Total. KD is a Senior F.R.S.-FNRS Research Associate. The authors are grateful to C. Adam and C. Van Efferden for technical assistance. We are also grateful to GECC volunteers who assisted with the field work. We thank P. Couet for the map generation and the Institut de radioprotection et de sureté nucléaire de Cherbourg-Octeville for the conservation of our samples.

Author information

C.Z. and K.D. conceived of the study. F.G. assisted with the collection of the biopsies and the associated data. C.Z.,  G.S. and G.E. conducted the chemical analysis of the biopsy samples. C.Z. and K.D. drafted the manuscript. K.D., J.P.T., G.E. and G.S. helped with writing and editing the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Krishna Das.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.