Nanoscale Spatially Resolved Mapping of Uranium Enrichment

Article metrics

Abstract

Spatially resolved analysis of uranium (U) isotopes in small volumes of actinide-bearing materials is critical for a variety of technical disciplines, including earth and planetary sciences, environmental monitoring, bioremediation, and the nuclear fuel cycle. However, achieving subnanometer-scale spatial resolution for such isotopic analysis is currently a challenge. By using atom probe tomography—a three-dimensional nanoscale characterisation technique—we demonstrate unprecedented nanoscale mapping of U isotopic enrichment with high sensitivity across various microstructural interfaces within small volumes (~100 nm3) of depleted and low-enriched U alloyed with 10 wt% molybdenum that has different nominal enrichments of 0.20 and 19.75% 235U, respectively. We map enrichment in various morphologies of a U carbide phase, the adjacent γ-UMo matrix, and across interfaces (e.g., carbide/matrix, grain boundary). Results indicate the U carbides were formed during casting, rather than retained from either highly enriched or depleted U feedstock materials. The approach presented here can be applied to study nanoscale variations of isotopic abundances in the broad class of actinide-bearing materials, providing unique insights into their origins and thermomechanical processing routes.

Introduction

Uranium (U) is the heaviest element naturally occurring in the Earth’s crust in significant amounts, and is used in its natural and anthropogenic forms. U isotopes are relevant to a diverse set of scientific disciplines, most notably earth and planetary sciences1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, toxicology, environmental monitoring and bioremediation9,10,11, the nuclear fuel cycle, forensics, and safeguards12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22. Specifically, in nuclear fuel cycle applications, the amount of the fissionable U isotope (235U) relative to the total U (i.e., the enrichment) is a critical parameter in fuel performance, and thus affects economic viability of nuclear power. Enrichment of U beyond its natural abundance of 0.7% is necessary to allow a self-sustaining fission chain reaction to proceed in a nuclear fuel23. The distribution of 235U in a nuclear fuel before irradiation can directly influence the nucleation and distribution of fission products and fission gas bubbles, which affects fuel swelling kinetics24. Fuel swelling is directly related to geometric stability (e.g., bowing, deflection) and robustness of fuel plates under irradiation, contributing to phenomena such as coolant channel closure, or release of fission gas products to the coolant25. These phenomena make it critical to analyse the distribution of 235U in a nuclear fuel at a high spatial resolution to account for 235U enrichment variation across all possible nanoscale heterogeneities in the microstructure. Further, activity ratio (e.g., 234U to 238U or 234U to 235U, where 234U is a decay product of 238U) is another critical measure that can provide key insight into sample age and history. For example, activity ratios in naturally occurring U can help distinguish anthropogenic versus naturally occurring forms of U26,27. The small volume (nanometres to micrometres in diameter) of precipitates or interfacial regions that must be analysed limits the ability of many bulk analysis techniques currently used for quantifying 235U enrichment, introducing a crucial technological gap that prolongs the related knowledge gap. Our work aims to address this gap, and to also demonstrate a methodology by which 235U isotopic abundance can be measured quantitatively with subnanometer-scale spatial resolution to gain uniquely powerful insight into material origin, or processing history.

A primary goal of the United States High Performance Research Reactor Conversion Program is to replace all the highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuel currently used in research reactors to a low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. Development of such a LEU fuel system has significant implications to international nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and health and environmental safety due to the risks associated continued handling of HEU fuels18,25,28,29,30,31,32. Metallic LEU alloyed with 10wt% molybdenum (LEU-10Mo) with less than 20% 235U enrichment is a leading candidate for this effort. As a part of fuel qualification and testing, multiple batches of LEU alloy fuel plates (e.g., U-Mo, U-Si, U-Al) have been fabricated and irradiated in research reactors. The microstructures of these irradiated fuels have also been examined after neutron irradiation in order to improve understanding of material behaviour in a reactor operating environment25,33,34. Microstructural features observed in irradiated fuels via optical and electron microscopy techniques range from large fission gas bubbles to inclusions and elemental segregation. To develop a comprehensive, atomic-level understanding of fuel performance in a reactor operating environment, it is critical to understand distribution of the fissionable 235U isotope in the starting fuel microstructure, at a nanoscale spatial resolution, to determine the isotopic distribution in different phases and across interfaces.

Measurement of U enrichment in small volumes of actinide-bearing materials at nanoscale spatial resolution is also crucial to a variety of other fields beyond nuclear energy. For example, environmental monitoring and bioremediation efforts in the wake of nuclear accidents (such as Fukushima Daiichi, Three Mile Island, or Chernobyl) and detonation of nuclear weapons (for testing or in wartime) depend on detection and mapping of actinide species, particularly U. As part of the environmental monitoring process, measurement of U concentration in geological materials (e.g., soil) or particulate matter (produced from a detonation event) is performed. The measurement of U isotopic abundances can improve understanding of atomic-scale transport of radionuclides in natural materials, the origin of the particles (including age and processing history), how radioactive particles spread, and how harmful they are to the surrounding environment and communities9,10,22. Another scientific area where U isotopic enrichment measurement is critical is in regulating the international transportation of actinide-bearing materials. Isotopic measurements in nuclear materials and comparison to existing models is necessary for understanding sample history and ensuring safe handling14,21,22. High-spatial-resolution analysis of U enrichment of small volumes is essential to this wide variety of scientific areas.

Current capabilities for measurement of U isotopic abundance typically involve mass spectrometry or spectroscopy methods, including the following: inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)35, time-of-flight and nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS)36,37, thermal ionisation mass spectrometry (TIMS)35, and gamma spectroscopy38. These techniques each have their own merits, and all vary in terms of accuracy, resolution (e.g., spatial, depth, mass), cost, sample preparation requirements, analysis time, and complexity of operation39. Each of these considerations is important when selecting the appropriate technique for U isotopic measurements for various purposes. ICP-MS is routinely used due to simple sample preparation, short measurement times, and high sensitivity for even very low U isotopic ratios (e.g., 236U/238U ratios on the order of ~10−7–10−8, or 0.0001–0.00001% 236U)40. However, since the analysis is done in the gas phase for ICP-MS, spatial mapping within the sample is not possible. NanoSIMS does offer the advantage of spatial mapping of isotopic abundances with lateral spatial resolution of 50 nm, but does not have equal sensitivity for different phases36, Further, gamma spectroscopy is a very common, nondestructive method that could provide mapping of isotopic abundances over a large area, but with relatively low spatial resolution (~millimetres). The major gaps existing in techniques currently used for U isotopic abundance measurements are the combination of high spatial and mass resolution, and the ability to probe isotopic abundances in nanoscale volumes and across interfaces. However, these techniques cannot provide the subnanometer-scale spatial resolution required to probe fine-scale microstructural features. Atom probe tomography (APT) is a 3D nanoscale characterisation method uniquely suited to analyse both composition and isotopic abundances in various material systems, with high spatial resolution41,42,43. The high resolution available via APT is increasingly important for many application areas, for example in nuclear forensics, geochronology, and environmental remediation, where analysis of nanoparticles could provide key insights into origin or processing history. Additionally, for new nuclear fuel material design, nanoscale inclusions (i.e., secondary phases) must be analysed within a bulk fuel sample to better design fuel processing and predict material performance in a neutron irradiation environment. The only technique that can probe such nanoscale volumes and still achieve high spatial and mass resolution is APT.

Our work demonstrates an approach for using APT to obtain nanoscale, spatially resolved, quantitative 234U, 235U, and 238U isotopic mapping, which has not been demonstrated before in anthropogenic U-bearing materials. We selected metallic U-10Mo nuclear fuels with two different enrichment values for demonstrating this capability44,45,46.

Results

3D elemental distribution across precipitate-matrix interfaces

In both depleted U-10Mo (DU-10Mo) and LEU-10Mo alloys, the main microstructural features are uranium carbide (UC) inclusions and the surrounding γ-UMo matrix44. Representative images of both DU-10Mo and LEU-10Mo microstructures are shown in Fig. 1. (Example micrographs of other UC morphologies are provided in Fig. S1 of the Supplementary Information). The UC phase is distributed throughout the γ-UMo matrix in both alloys, and was found to have two distinct morphologies in LEU-10Mo: (1) fine, i.e., approximately 500 nm wide, and (2) coarse, approximately 3–5 µm wide. Both UC morphologies, in addition to the γ-UMo matrix phase, were analysed via APT in order to determine U enrichment and elemental distribution in both phases and across γ-UMo matrix/UC interfaces.

Figure 1
figure1

Microstructures of depleted and low-enriched U-10Mo alloys: Backscattered scanning electron microscope images of microstructural features in the nuclear fuel analysed via APT in (a) DU-10Mo and (b) LEU-10Mo. The arrows point towards carbides. Two distinct carbide morphologies are visible in these micrographs: coarse and fine. The scale bar in each micrograph is 20 µm long.

3D distributions of major alloying elements (U, Mo) and impurity elements (Si, C) from DU-10Mo and LEU-10Mo alloys are given in Figs 2 and 3, respectively, with corresponding mass spectra for γ-UMo and UC phases. Mass spectra were normalised to the peak with the maximum number of counts, which corresponds to the 238U3+ peak in all data sets collected as part of this work. Normalised mass spectra were generated using manual ranging criteria. For each phase, U3+ peaks are shown in the portion of the mass spectra between mass-to-charge-state ratios of 76 and 82 Da (daltons). For DU-10Mo, 235U3+ and 238U3+ peaks were detected, and in the LEU-10Mo alloy, the 234U3+ peak was also visible in the spectra; 234U is known to be a decay product of 238U. In depleted U, 234U should account for only approximately 0.001% of all U isotopes (10 ppm), which is approaching the detection limit of APT41. These results highlight the capability of APT to resolve each U isotopic peak individually; the peaks also can be spatially resolved in the 3D reconstruction.

Figure 2
figure2

APT results for a depleted U-10Mo alloy: (af) 3D element distribution maps of all detected ions, U isotopes (235U, 238U), Mo, C, and Si across a DU-10Mo/UC interface, which is indicated by the black arrow in (a). Full mass spectra (0–150 Da) for (g) γ-UMo matrix and (i) UC phase. Specific region of the mass spectra between 76 and 82 Da showing the U3+ peaks used for isotopic abundance calculations for the γ-UMo matrix (h) and UC phases (j). Mass spectra shown in (gj) are for a 0.1 nm fixed bin width.

Figure 3
figure3

APT results for a low-enriched U-10Mo alloy: (ag) 3D element distribution maps of all detected ions, U isotopes (234U, 235U, 238U), Mo, C, and Si across a LEU-10Mo/UC interface, which is indicated by the black arrow in (a). Full mass spectra (0–150 Da) for (h) γ-UMo matrix and (j) UC phase. Specific region of the mass spectra between 76 and 82 Da showing the U3+ peaks used for isotopic abundance calculations for the γ-UMo matrix (i) and UC phases (k). Mass spectra shown in (hk) are for a 0.1 nm fixed bin width.

U and Mo were observed as the major species in both DU-10Mo and LEU-10Mo samples, where 235U and 238U were found to field evaporate as doubly (U2+) and triply (U3+) charged ions. Complex ions composed of U and H (UH, or uranium hydride) were also present in mass spectra of both alloys. UH peaks were detected at approximately 118.18 and 119.66 Da (corresponding to the U2+ charge states for 235U and 238U, respectively) in LEU-10Mo. In DU-10Mo, however, only the peak at 119.66 Da was observed. The mass spectra for U2+ for both alloys analysed are provided in the Supplementary Information, Fig. S2, and show all detected UH peaks.

The changes in concentration of U and Mo and other impurity elements C and Si were quantified using a one-dimensional (1D) concentration profile across the γ-UMo matrix/UC interface (Fig. 4). Peak deconvolution was performed to determine total U, Mo, C, and Si contributions from both elemental and complex peaks present in the mass-to-charge spectrum, a process further detailed in the Materials and Methods section. U and Mo concentrations were consistent with the composition of U alloyed with 10 wt% Mo (approximately 22 at% Mo) for the γ-UMo matrix phase. In the γ-UMo matrix, C and Si impurity elements were also detected at concentrations of less than 3 at%. UC compositions measured by APT were 51–54 at% U and 35–39 at% C. In the UC phase, concentrations of impurity elements (Si, H, O, Ni, Al) account for the balance. Analysis of impurity elements including Si, H, O, Ni, Al was also performed, and concentrations of these elements were plotted across the matrix/carbide interface in DU-10Mo and LEU-10Mo alloys; these are reported in the Supplementary Information, Fig. S3. The concentration of Si was less than 3 at%, and those of O, Ni, and Al were all less than 2 at% in samples analysed, whereas H concentration was more significant, and was found in concentrations of 4–20 at%. The H concentration can be attributed to the formation of UH when U is in the presence of H17. Sources of H leading to the formation of UH could be water used in the bulk metallographic polishing procedure, focused ion beam (FIB) preparation of APT needle specimens, and/or residual H from the APT analysis chamber.

Figure 4
figure4

Compositional and isotopic profiles of DUMo and LEUMo. (a) 3D element distribution map that contains a γ-UMo/UC interface in a DU-10Mo alloy, (b) corresponding compositional profile across the matrix/UC interface, (c) map of 235U% relative to all U isotopes (enrichment) across the γ-UMo/UC interface in the DU-10Mo. Panels (d–f) present the same type of data provided in (ac), but for a LEU-10Mo alloy. Arrows in (a) and (d) point towards the γ-UMo/UC interface. Composition profiles were calculated for a 0.3 nm fixed bin width. Error plotted in (b,c,e,f) is calculated based on point-counting error.

Quantification of U enrichment in individual phases

Uranium isotope abundances in γ-UMo phases and in fine and coarse morphologies of UC were quantified from APT data, and the results are summarised in Table 1. U isotopic enrichment was estimated based on the following equation:

$${U}_{enrichment} \% =\frac{{U}_{i} \% }{{U}_{total} \% }\times 100$$

Where Ui% corresponds to the atomic percentage of a particular U isotope and Utotal% corresponds to the total U atomic percentage estimated from APT results, accounting for all U isotopes present in the spectrum. Sample volumes from which U isotopic abundances were calculated ranged from 8,000 to 250,000 nm3, corresponding to volumes with dimensions of ~20 nm × 20 nm × 20 nm to 50 nm × 50 nm × 100 nm. U ion counts from the U3+ elemental peaks accounted for the majority of U ions collected; thus, isotopic ratios were calculated using this peak count. The percentages of U elemental and U complex species (e.g., UC, UH, UCH) are reported in the Supplementary Information, Table S1, and a comparison of calculated U enrichment from different charge-state peaks are provided in Table S2. From APT results we did not observe any U isotopic bias regarding preferential evaporation as molecular ions, which was more prevalent in the UC phase. Thus, calculating isotopic abundances based on the major elemental peak (U3+) provided the most consistent and accurate approach for analysis.

Table 1 U isotopic abundances measured by APT: Tabulated results are from different phases from both depleted and low-enriched U-10Mo alloys.

In Table 1, percentages of 235U and 238U are reported for DU-10Mo, and percentages of 234U, 235U, and 238U are reported for LEU-10Mo. The percentage of 234U in DU-10Mo is expected to be approximately 0.001%, as previously discussed. No distinct 234U peak in the mass spectra was observed for DU-10Mo samples (as demonstrated in Fig. 2), and thus the amount of 234U present is assumed to be below the detection limit of APT. In all LEU-10Mo samples analysed, there was a clear 234U peak (as previously reported in Fig. 3); measured abundances were much greater than the 0.001% detection limit, and were therefore assumed to be accurate estimates of 234U % even at amounts less than 0.3%.

Analysis of U enrichment across a γ-UMo grain boundary

Grain boundaries in metallic nuclear fuels play an important role in material behaviour in a reactor operating environment. Grain boundaries directly influence recovery from radiation damage and accumulation of defects, such as fission gas bubble nucleation and growth in irradiated fuel plates25. Hence, as a proof-of-principle demonstration, APT was additionally used to analyse variation of isotopic enrichment across the γ-UMo grain boundary in the DU-10Mo alloy. The APT reconstruction across a γ-UMo grain boundary in DU-10Mo is given in Fig. 5 along with the compositional profile showing concentration of major alloying elements (U, Mo), impurity elements (Si, C, Ni, Al, Mn), and 235U enrichment. There is clear solute segregation along the grain boundary, consistent with our prior work44. Interestingly, there is a narrow band of increase in 235U enrichment specifically at the grain boundary (highlighted by the dashed black line in Fig. 3(k)) where locally the enrichment increased to as high as 0.5%, while the overall enrichment in either grain remained consistent with the nominal value of ~0.2% 235U. This result highlights the unique capability of APT to not only accurately probe the compositional segregation across grain boundaries in metallic nuclear fuels, but also obtain accurate information on local variation in 235U enrichment across grain boundaries.

Figure 5
figure5

Compositional and isotopic profiles of a DU-10Mo grain boundary. (ai) 3D element distribution maps for major alloying and impurity elements; (j) corresponding quantitative analysis of composition across the grain boundary (concentration in at% versus distance) via a 1D concentration profile; (k) 235U enrichment across the grain boundary. Error plotted in (j,k) is calculated based on point-counting error. The black arrow in (a) points towards the grain boundary analyzed.

Discussion

Characterisation of UC and γ-UMo matrix phases in DU and LEU alloyed with 10 wt% Mo was performed to demonstrate the capability of APT for quantitative measurement of U isotopes in actinide-bearing materials with varying nominal enrichments. The purpose of this effort was to gain insight into the homogeneity of 235U across different microstructural features, which has implications for fuel swelling and thus stability of nuclear fuel in a reactor operating environment. The high 3D spatial resolution achievable is a unique features of APT that other techniques more routinely used for such analyses (e.g. ICP-MS, gamma spectroscopy, SIMS) do not provide.

Calculated 235U isotopic abundances for both DU-10Mo and LEU-10Mo (summarised in Table 1) indicate that U isotopic abundances are comparable between matrix and carbide phases, with minor fluctuations (of less than 1%) of U enrichment reported. This result suggests that fuel fabrication processes generate a microstructure in which 235U is relatively homogeneously distributed between carbide and matrix phases. The low enrichment of carbides measured by APT indicate that the analysed carbides likely formed during the melting and casting processes and were not retained from the HEU or DU feedstock materials that were melted together and cast to form the LEU-10Mo alloy. The work presented here demonstrates that it is possible to probe U isotope abundances in fine microstructural features and across interfaces in nuclear fuels to establish microstructure-processing relationships. In order to qualify APT for analysing differences of <1% in U enrichment, further detailed investigation of the influence of user-selected APT experimental parameters (e.g., laser-assisted versus voltage pulsing modes, pulse frequency, laser pulse energy, specimen base temperature, detection rate) and difference in field evaporation behaviour between phases is warranted. Our results allowed us to gain insight into the sample processing history; the concept and approach can now be applied to forensics and environmental remediation studies and surpass current understanding based on other mass spectrometry and spectroscopy techniques. Additionally, the result that 235U is nominally homogeneously distributed at the nanoscale between the γ-UMo matrix and UC phases can inform fuel performance modelling.

Impurity elements (C, Si) were measured via APT, and some local increase in Si concentration was observed along the UC/γ-UMo interface in DU-10Mo. A higher concentration of Si was observed in the UC phase of the LEU-10Mo alloy in comparison to UC phase in DU-10Mo alloy. From the U isotope abundances given in Table 1, it is clear that APT can measure not only the major isotopes 235U and 238U, but also 234U. The APT reconstructions shown in Figs 2 and 3 from DU-10Mo and LEU-10Mo, respectively, reveal the ability to spatially resolve the isotope enrichment to a spatial resolution of 0.2 nm in x, y and z directions. APT is also uniquely suited for analysis of enrichment across grain boundaries in nuclear fuels, which is a challenging task for most of the bulk isotopic analysis methods routinely used (e.g., ICP-MS, SIMS, gamma spectroscopy). Given this demonstration, our approach can now be used to analyse small particulates from nuclear accidents or at different stages of the nuclear fuel cycle to help analyse U enrichment and identify material origin, age, or processing history. This study opens opportunities to use APT as a method of choice for a variety of other fields ranging from earth and planetary sciences to bioremediation, toxicology, and environmental monitoring. Further, application of APT to isotopic abundance measurements can be used in combination with other technique(s) to compare results and understand over what length scales isotopes are homogeneously distributed.

In summary, by using site-specific sample preparation and APT analysis, we demonstrate the unique capability to perform spatially resolved nanoscale mapping of isotopic enrichment and impurity elements in U-Mo fuels with two different 235U enrichments. Based on the results reported herein, we believe APT has a strong prospect for use in a wide range of characterisation efforts of actinide-bearing materials (e.g., U) in which isotopic analysis in small volumes (and of specific microstructural features) is crucial. Our work has implications for multiple disciplines that could benefit from precise measurement of U isotope enrichment and fractionation to better understand sample origin or processing history. The methods and experimental protocols using APT presented here translate well to analysis of U enrichment in many other systems (geologic materials, metallic fuels, and glass fabricated as a nuclear waste form, for example). Thus, APT is promising as an effective and versatile tool for measurement of isotopic abundances in actinide-bearing materials, at length scales previously unexplored by other more widely used mass spectrometry and spectroscopy methods.

Materials and Methods

Material fabrication

DU-10Mo and LEU-10Mo fuels analysed in this work were fabricated at the Y12 National Security Complex at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. DU-10Mo samples were fabricated by melting DU with Mo and casting in a graphite mould. The cast DU-10Mo was then homogenised at 900 °C for 48 hours in an inert argon (Ar) gas atmosphere. After the homogenisation anneal, samples were cooled by turning off the furnace and flowing Ar gas into the chamber to help cool the samples. A cooling rate of 25 °C per minute was achieved from 900 °C to 650 °C, then 3 °C per minute from 500 °C to 350 °C. LEU-10Mo samples were homogenised at 900 °C for 144 hours in the same atmosphere and furnace as previously described. The LEU-10Mo alloy was subjected to subsequent thermomechanical processing treatments (hot and cold rolling) to form the final fuel foil. Additional sample fabrication details are reported elsewhere44,45.

FIB-based sample preparation and APT analysis

APT needles were prepared from standard metallographically polished bulk samples47. Site-specific FIB lift-outs and annular milling were performed to shape specimens into needles for APT analysis41.

A CAMECA LEAP 4000X HR APT system equipped with a 355 nm wavelength (UV) laser was used for all APT data collection with the following user-selected parameters: 100 pJ laser energy, 100 kHz pulse frequency, 45 K specimen temperature, and 0.005 atoms/pulse detection rate. Data sets analysed and reported here ranged in size between 1.4 and 34.5 million ions, and either contain a single phase (UC or γ-UMo matrix) or captured a UC/γ-UMo interface. Additionally, a data set from the DU-10Mo alloy contained a grain boundary. All data sets were reconstructed and analysed using the Interactive Visualization and Analysis Software (IVAS), version 3.8.2. For data sets containing a single phase, bulk composition analysis was completed, and for those data sets that contained an interface, composition in each phase was determined using spherical regions of interest (ROIs) with diameters of 20–30 nm.

To examine composition across an interface, a cylindrical ROI with a diameter of 20 nm was positioned perpendicular to the planar interface, and a 1D composition profile along the z-axis with a 0.3 nm bin width was constructed. For all composition analysis, ionic and background-corrected data were used.

In order to quantify Mo and C concentrations accurately from raw data, peak deconvolution was performed48. Peak deconvolution was required to distinguish between 96Mo2+ and C4 species, which both have a mass-to-charge-state ratio of approximately 48 Da, and therefore cannot be ranged separately. The number of 96Mo2+ ions was estimated from the number of 98Mo2+ ions, assuming both 96Mo2+ and 98Mo2+are present in U-Mo at naturally abundant levels, similar to the process reported in work by Taylor et al.48. Equation (1) was used to determine the 96Mo2+ ion count:

$${n}_{{}^{96}M{o}^{2+}}={n}_{{}^{98}M{o}^{2+}}\times \frac{0.1668}{0.2413}$$
(1)

where \({n}_{{}^{96}M{o}^{2+}}\) is the estimated ion count for the 96Mo2+, and \({n}_{{}^{98}M{o}^{+2}}\) is the ion count for the 98Mo2+ peak. The two fractions in equation (1) (0.1668 and 0.2413) are the natural isotopic abundances of 96Mo and 98Mo, respectively. Since the entire 96Mo2+ peak was ranged as a single species but not all counts correspond to 96Mo2+, the calculated value of \({n}_{{}^{96}M{o}^{2+}}\) was subtracted from the total ion counts corresponding to the ranged peak to obtain the ion count for the C4 species.

In order to obtain an accurate estimation of C concentration in the volume analysed, we used the 13C method49. This approach involves multiplying the 13C background-corrected ion count by 92.5 to determine a more accurate value for the 12C ion count. The 92.5 multiplier relies on the assumption that C exists in naturally abundant levels.

Peak deconvolution was performed via methods described above to analyse the total U, Mo, C, and Si concentrations across the interface. Error reported in tables and composition profiles represents propagation of point-counting error, defined as

$${E}_{i}=\sqrt{\frac{{C}_{i}(1-{C}_{i})}{N}}$$
(2)

where Ci is the number of solute ions of element i, N is the total number of ions in a bin, and xi is the count for a specific element. Ci is defined in mathematical form as

$${C}_{i}=\frac{{x}_{i}}{N}$$
(3)

Error reported as a percentage is simply the value calculated from Eq. (2) multiplied by 100. Error associated with U enrichment was calculated with Eqs (4, 5), where ETotal,U (Eq. (4)) is the total error associated with all U isotope counts, and \({E}_{{U}_{enrichment}}\) (Eq. (5)) is the counting error associated with a U isotope enrichment value. In Eq. 5, Ui is the total ion count for a particular isotope, EUi is the point counting error for that isotope, ETotal,U is defined in Eq. 4, and Utotal,conc is the total count for all U isotopes. Eq. 5 represents the propogation of point counting error for enrichment error calculation.

$${E}_{{T}{o}{t}{a}{l},U}=\sqrt{{({E}_{{}^{234}U})}^{2}+{({E}_{{}^{235}U})}^{2}+{({E}_{{}^{238}U})}^{2}}$$
(4)
$${E}_{{U}_{enrichment}}={U}_{i}\times \sqrt{{(\frac{{E}_{{U}_{i}}}{{U}_{i}})}^{2}+{(\frac{{E}_{Total,U}}{{U}_{total,conc}})}^{2}}$$
(5)

References

  1. 1.

    Bargar, J. R. et al. Uranium redox transition pathways in acetate-amended sediments. PNAS 110, 4506–4511, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219198110 (2013).

  2. 2.

    Brennecka, G. A. & Wadhwa, M. Uranium isotope compositions of the basaltic angrite meteorites and the chronological implications for the early Solar System. PNAS 109, 9299–9303, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114043109 (2012).

  3. 3.

    Hiess, J., Condon, D. J., McLean, N. & Noble, S. R. 238U/235U Systematics in Terrestrial Uranium-Bearing Minerals. Science 335, 1610–1614, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215507 (2012).

  4. 4.

    Stirling, C. H. Keeping Time with Earth’s Heaviest Element. Science 335, 1585–1586, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1220333 (2012).

  5. 5.

    Stylo, M. et al. Uranium isotopes fingerprint biotic reduction. PNAS 112, 5619–5624, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1421841112 (2015).

  6. 6.

    Sues, H.-D. Dating the origin of dinosaurs. PNAS 113, 480–481, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1523058113 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Wagner, G. A. et al. Radiometric dating of the type-site for Homo heidelbergensis at Mauer, Germany. PNAS 107, 19726–19730, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1012722107 (2010).

  8. 8.

    Wood, R. E. et al. Radiocarbon dating casts doubt on the late chronology of the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition in southern Iberia. PNAS 110, 2781–2786, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207656110 (2013).

  9. 9.

    Konings, R. J. M., Wiss, T. & Beneš, O. Predicting material release during a nuclear reactor accident (2015).

  10. 10.

    Wang, X. et al. Modeling Early-Stage Processes of U-10 Wt.%Mo Alloy Using Integrated Computational Materials Engineering Concepts. JOM 69, 2532–2537, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2608-z (2017).

  11. 11.

    Radiation Monitoring and Dose Estimation of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident. Editor Sentaro Takahashi (Springer Nature, 2017).

  12. 12.

    Boulyga, S. F. et al. Determination of 236U/238U isotope ratio in contaminated environmental samples using different ICP-MS instruments. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 17, 958–964 (2002).

  13. 13.

    Christensen, J. N., Dresel, P. E., Conrad, M. E., Patton, G. W. & DePaolo, D. J. Isotopic Tracking of Hanford 300 Area Derived Uranium in the Columbia River. Environmental science & technology 44, 8855–8862, https://doi.org/10.1021/es1025799, (2010).

  14. 14.

    Fahey, A. J., Zeissler, C. J., Newbury, D. E., Davis, J. & Lindstrom, R. M. Postdetonation nuclear debris for attribution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 20207–20212, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010631107 (2010).

  15. 15.

    Hanson, S. K. et al. Measurements of extinct fission products in nuclear bomb debris: Determination of the yield of the Trinity nuclear test 70 y later. PNAS 113, 8104–8108, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602792113 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Marin, R. C., Sarkis, J. E. S. & Nascimento, M. R. L. The use of LA-SF-ICP-MS for nuclear forensics purposes: uranium isotope ratio analysis. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 295, 99–104, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-1980-y (2013).

  17. 17.

    Martin, T. L. et al. Atomic-scale Studies of Uranium Oxidation and Corrosion by Water Vapour. Scientific Reports 6, 25618, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25618 (2016).

  18. 18.

    Van den Berghe, S. & Lemoine, P. Review of 15 years of high-density low-enriched UMo dispersion fuel development for research reactors in Europe. Nuclear Engineering and Technology 46, 125–146, https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.07.2014.703 (2014).

  19. 19.

    Vavrek, J. R., Henderson, B. S. & Danagoulian, A. Experimental demonstration of an isotope-sensitive warhead verification technique using nuclear resonance fluorescence. PNAS 115, 4363–4368, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721278115 (2018).

  20. 20.

    Ward, J. D. et al. Identifying anthropogenic uranium compounds using soft X-ray near-edge absorption spectroscopy. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 127, 20–27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2016.11.008 (2017).

  21. 21.

    Conant, A., Erickson, A., Robel, M. & Isselhardt, B. Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of Plutonium and Cesium Isotopes in Modeling of BR3 Reactor Spent Fuel. Nuclear Technology 197, 12–19, https://doi.org/10.13182/NT16-88 (2017).

  22. 22.

    Kuhn, E., Fischer, D. & Ryjinski, M. Environmental sampling for IAEA safeguards: A five year review. Report No. IAEA-SM–367, (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria, 2001).

  23. 23.

    James J. Duderstadt, Louis J. Hamilton. Nuclear Reactor Analysis. (Wiley, 1976).

  24. 24.

    Hu, S. et al. Formation mechanism of gas bubble superlattice in UMo metal fuels: Phase-field modeling investigation. Journal of Nuclear Materials 479, 202–215, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.07.012 (2016).

  25. 25.

    Meyer, M. K. et al. Low-temperature irradiation behavior of uranium–molybdenum alloy dispersion fuel. Journal of Nuclear Materials 304, 221–236, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(02)00850-4 (2002).

  26. 26.

    Apostol, A. I., Pantelica, A., Sima, O. & Fugaru, V. Isotopic composition analysis and age dating of uranium samples by high resolution gamma ray spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 383, 103–108, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2016.06.013 (2016).

  27. 27.

    Karpe, R., Jha, S. & Tripathi, R. In Proceedings of the twelfth DAE-BRNS national symposium on nuclear and radiochemistry (2015).

  28. 28.

    Kim, Y. S. & Hofman, G. Fission product induced swelling of U-Mo alloy fuel. Journal of Nuclear Materials 419, 291–301, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.08.018 (2011).

  29. 29.

    Neogy, S. et al. Microstructural Evolution of the Interdiffusion Zone between U-9 Wt Pct Mo Fuel Alloy and Zr-1 Wt Pct Nb Cladding Alloy Upon Annealing. Metall. and Mat. Trans. A 48, 2819–2833, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-017-4033-x (2017).

  30. 30.

    Snelgrove, J. L., Hofman, G. L., Meyer, M. K., Trybus, C. L. & Wiencek, T. C. Development of very-high-density low-enriched-uranium fuels. Nuclear Engineering and Design 178, 119–126, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(97)00217-3 (1997).

  31. 31.

    Ugajin, M., Itoh, A., Akabori, M., Ooka, N. & Nakakura, Y. Irradiation behavior of high uranium-density alloys in the plate fuels. Journal of Nuclear Materials 254, 78–83, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(97)00347-4 (1998).

  32. 32.

    Research Reactors: Safe Management and Effective Utilization. (IAEA, 2015).

  33. 33.

    Van den Berghe, S., Van Renterghem, W. & Leenaers, A. Transmission electron microscopy investigation of irradiated U–7wt%Mo dispersion fuel. Journal of Nuclear Materials 375, 340–346, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.12.006 (2008).

  34. 34.

    Ryu, H. J., Kim, Y. S. & Hofman, G. L. Amorphization of the interaction products in U–Mo/Al dispersion fuel during irradiation. Journal of Nuclear Materials 385, 623–628, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.306 (2009).

  35. 35.

    Becker, J. S. In Handbook of Radioactivity Analysis (Third Edition) (ed. Michael F. L’Annunziata) 833–870 (Academic Press, 2012).

  36. 36.

    Huang, D. et al. Secondary ion mass spectrometry: The application in the analysis of atmospheric particulate matter. Analytica Chimica Acta 989, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2017.07.042 (2017).

  37. 37.

    Krein, A. et al. Imaging Chemical Patches on Near-surface Atmospheric Dust Particles with NanoSIMS 50 to Identify Material Sources. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus 8, 495–503, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11267-008-9182-x (2008).

  38. 38.

    Nguyen, C. T. & Zsigrai, J. Basic characterization of highly enriched uranium by gamma spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 246, 417–424, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2006.01.011 (2006).

  39. 39.

    Kaspar, T. C., Lavender, C. A. & Dibert, M. W. Evaluation of Uranium-235 Measurement Techniques. Report No. PNNL-26490, (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States), 2017).

  40. 40.

    F. Boulyga, S. & Prohaska, T. Improved abundance sensitivity in MC-ICP-MS for determination of 236U/238U isotope ratios in the 10-7 to 10-8 range. J. Anal. At. Spectrom, 21, 1427–1430, https://doi.org/10.1039/B608983F (2006).

  41. 41.

    Devaraj, A. et al. Three-dimensional nanoscale characterisation of materials by atom probe tomography. International Materials Reviews 63, 68–101, https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2016.1270728 (2018).

  42. 42.

    Piazolo, S. et al. Deformation-induced trace element redistribution in zircon revealed using atom probe tomography. Nature Communications 7, 10490, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10490 (2016).

  43. 43.

    White, L. et al. Atomic-scale age resolution of planetary events. Vol. 8 (2017).

  44. 44.

    Devaraj, A. et al. Grain boundary engineering to control the discontinuous precipitation in multicomponent U10Mo alloy. Acta Materialia 151, 181–190, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.039 (2018).

  45. 45.

    Jana, S. et al. Kinetics of cellular transformation and competing precipitation mechanisms during sub-eutectoid annealing of U10Mo alloys. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 723, 757–771, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.292 (2017).

  46. 46.

    Devaraj, A. et al. Phase transformation of metastable discontinuous precipitation products to equilibrium phases in U10Mo alloys. Scripta Materialia 156, 70–74, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.07.010 (2018).

  47. 47.

    Prabhakaran, R. et al. U-10Mo Sample Preparation and Examination using Optical and Scanning Electron Microscopy. Report No. PNNL-25308, (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States), 2016).

  48. 48.

    Taylor, S. D. et al. Resolving Iron(II) Sorption and Oxidative Growth on Hematite (001) Using Atom Probe Tomography. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 3903–3914, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11989 (2018).

  49. 49.

    Thuvander, M. et al. Quantitative atom probe analysis of carbides. Ultramicroscopy 111, 604–608, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.12.024 (2011).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830. A portion of this research was performed using facilities at the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, a national scientific user facility sponsored by the DOE’s Office of Biological and Environmental Research and located at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). The authors thank Mark Rhodes of PNNL for performing bulk metallographic sample preparation, and all the other staff directly or indirectly associated with producing the results featured in this publication.

Author information

A.D. conceptualised and directed all work presented here. E.K. and A. D. performed site-specific sample preparation for analysis of interfaces and conducted the APT experiments. E.K. analysed all APT data under the mentorship of A.D. C.L. and V.J. coordinated the fabrication and metallographic preparation of DU-10Mo and LEU-10Mo samples used in this work. D.B. contributed to manuscript writing and to discussions about results and their significance to performance of nuclear fuels. All authors contributed to the discussion of results and manuscript preparation.

Correspondence to Arun Devaraj.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.