# Shaping Electromagnetic Waves with Flexible and Continuous Control of the Beam Directions Using Holography and Convolution Theorem

• 656 Accesses

## Abstract

In this article, several versatile electromagnetic (EM) waves are presented with predefined shapes and directions based on the holography and convolution theorem. Inspiring the holography theory, a reflective interferogram is characterized by interfering the near field distributions of the object and reference waves. In this regard, the interference pattern on the hologram could be viewed as the inverse Fourier transform of the object and reference waves. Therefore, the capability of steering the EM shaped beam is realized using the convolution theorem (as an interesting property of the Fourier transform), which makes a link between the hologram impedance-pattern and far-field pattern domains. The main advantage of incorporating the holography concept and convolution theorem is realizing arbitrary shaped-beam EM waves with the possibility of flexible manipulation of the beam directions without employing any optimization algorithm and mathematical computation. It is demonstrated that the method could implement a combination of simple beams (such as collimated beams) and complex beams (such as cosecant squared, flat top, isoflux beams, etc.) with each beam possessing arbitrary direction by the same design topology. To experimentally verify the concept, a prototype of the hologram with three separate beams including two tilted cosecant squared shaped beam and one broadside pencil beam is fabricated and measured. The measured results show a significant agreement between theoretical findings.

## Introduction

In modern technology, design of devices with the capability of shaping the electromagnetic (EM) waves is rapidly progressing. Understandably, as far as the far field is concerned, metasurface structures are good candidates for manipulating the EM features of the waves, due to having desirable capabilities for engineering the amplitude and phase of the waves1,2,3. Therefore, it is more convenient for metasurfaces to create versatile radiation beams. In general, metasurfaces, which are the planar version of bulky 3D metamaterials, are divided into two categories including periodic and quasi-periodic structures. The first category is widely used in radar cross section reduction4 by developing perfect absorbers5, polarization rotators6,7,8, frequency selective structures9, polarization converters10 and artificial magnetic conductors. Meanwhile, the quasi-periodic metasurface has become more attractive for scientists, by virtue of providing more design freedom to perform inhomogeneous surfaces. More recently, many novel EM functions like beam steering11, beam shaping12 and focusing13,14,15, anomalous reflection and refraction governed by the generalized Snell’s law16, space wave to surface wave converters and vice versa have been introduced17,18. The metasurface in reflection and transmission mode, which is the case in this article, is one of the best solutions to fully control space waves from the aspect of wave front shape19, spin20 and orbital angular momentums21, etc. Many rapidly evolving devices like reflectarray22,23,24,25,26, and transmitarray27, which their design equations being formulated by the generalized Snell’s law, are some of the most important planar metasurfaces working in transmission and reflection modes. For metasurfaces with reflectarray operation, the surface should be impenetrable and the reflection phase can be characterized by the impedance surface dyadic, which is generated by a dense grid of metallic particles over a grounded dielectric surface28.

Up to the authors’ knowledge, the most reliable method of shaping EM waves is based on optimization techniques including local and global search algorithms with iterative nature. This is done by locally adjusting the phase of reflection and transmission waves in a quasi-periodic metasurface-based structure. This common method is known as the phase only synthesis method29,30. Apparently, in this mode, both induced electric and magnetic averaged surface currents should simultaneously exist to fully control the reflection phase of waves.

The emergence of the holography concept, which was demonstrated as a two-step imaging process, in the microwave domain, opened a new insight into wave phenomena, specifically for wave propagation leading to development of a new class of antenna named holographic antenna31. In most cases, the metasurface-based holographic radiators in the microwave regime are implemented practically with artificial impedance surfaces which are usually constructed with multiple wavelength long structures. To provide a more insightful interpretation of how holographic metasurface-base radiators work, it is necessary to explain the two-step imaging process, including the hologram formation and wave front reconstruction steps, in the microwave regime. In this fashion, some terminologies such as reference and object waves are now common. The reference wave illuminates the hologram and is coherent with the wave scattered from the object, which is called object wave. At the hologram formation step, a reference wave and an object wave interact with each other on a certain plane in such a way that the phase and amplitude of the field scattered from the object could be detected. At the reconstruction step, a reference wave coherent with that of the scattered wave from the object is needed. The bothersome shortcoming in the holography method is the practical implementation of the hologram, especially when the polarization of the waves becomes prominent leading to generation of dyadic impedance surfaces. Several efforts have been reported until now about using the holography concept in the microwave regime, including planar and compact metasurface-based designs and reflector-based holography designs31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40.

In this article, combining the holographic principle and convolution theorem, we present a reflector-based metasurface with the capability of generating multiple predefined shaped beams at any directions. Recently, the concept of the convolution operation and its functionality for directing EM waves have been described in coding metasurfaces, in which the beam direction is limited by the periodicity of a gradient coding sequence20,41. In reflector-based metasurfaces corresponding to the holography theory, the interferogram is generated based on the near field data relevant to object and reference waves, which are the desired far-field radiation patterns and illuminated wave from a certain source, respectively. Therefore, one can conveniently make a link between the hologram impedance-pattern and far-field pattern domains using the Fourier transform, and consequently control the beam direction with a famous theorem named convolution. Given that the hologram can be realized by a continuous impedance profile, the scattered field direction can be determined at will. Several shaped beams like flat top, isoflux, squared cosecant and a combination of shaped and pencil beams are demonstrated. A prototype of a multiple beam radiator with two tilted squared cosecant beams and one broadside beam is fabricated as a proof of concept.

## Results

### The holography concept concept and convolution theorem

The conceptual scheme of the holographic-based method for shaping the EM waves is presented in Fig. 1. According to the theory of holography in the microwave regime, the hologram surface can be fully characterized with an impedance profile defined based on reference and object waves as

$$Z(x,y)=j[X+(M/n\,){\rm{Re}}(\mathop{\sum }\limits_{i=1}^{n}\,{\psi }_{rad}^{i}){\psi }_{ref}^{\ast }]$$
(1)

The quantities $${\psi }_{rad}^{i}$$ and ψref are the near field distributions of the ith object and reference waves on the hologram surface, respectively33, and n is the number of object beams. By definition, the parameters X and M are the average impedance and modulation depth, respectively. Note that in reflector-based holograms, Z(x, y) accommodates with the input impedance concept, which is the ratio of tangential electric field to tangential magnetic field of the space wave near the reflecting surface. This is why, as opposed to conventional holographic structures, we treat a space wave instead of a surface wave in reflector-based holograms39. Specifically, as expressed in leaky wave structures, if object waves are of pencil beam type, the relevant near field distribution of the waves will be in form of rect function with a uniform profile, and hence, the hologram for multiple object beams is characterized with the superposition of the corresponding rect functions. This fact can further be confirmed by the Fourier transform operation. For general-shape patterns as object waves, one can plainly determine the functions $${\psi }_{rad}^{i}$$ by applying an inverse Fourier transform operation and consequently benefiting from the convolution theorem as an interesting feature of the Fourier transform in the design process42,44. For more explanation, the following equivalence can be established between the far-field pattern domain defined in the (u, v) plane and the hologram pattern domain as follows

$$f({x}_{\lambda },{y}_{\lambda })g({x}_{\lambda },{y}_{\lambda })\mathop{\iff }\limits^{fft}F(u,v)\ast G(u,v)$$
(2)

In (2), u = sinθ cosφ and v = sinθ sinφ are defined in an angular coordinate system, the functions f and g are defined in the hologram coordinate system and the functions F and G are the spectral domain representation of the original functions f and g. In addition, xλ = x/λ and yλ = y/λare the electrical lengths. Let the function g be a special function with uniform amplitude and gradient phase along the x and y directions. Therefore, by evoking the convolution theorem, the relation (2) could be rewritten as follows

$$f({x}_{\lambda },{y}_{\lambda }){e}^{j({x}_{\lambda }{u}_{0}+{y}_{\lambda }{v}_{0})}\mathop{\iff }\limits^{fft}F(u,v)\ast \delta (u-{u}_{0},v-{v}_{0})=F(u-{u}_{0},v-{v}_{0})$$
(3)

where δ(.) is the kronecker delta function and (u0, v0) = (sinθ0 cosϕ0, sinθ0 sinϕ0). Comparing the relations (3) and (1), we can deduce that if the illustrative function of the hologram impedance profile is multiplied by the well-behaved function $${e}^{j({x}_{\lambda }{u}_{0}+{y}_{\lambda }{v}_{0})}$$, the spectral counterpart of the descriptive function will be tilted by (u0, v0) in the (u, v) plane. This interesting property allows manipulating the far-field radiated wave in arbitrary direction with continuous values. In general, the function ψi can be extracted from

$${\psi }^{i}(x,y)={\rm{ifftshift}}\langle {\rm{IFFT}}2[\frac{{f}_{0}(r){E}_{copol}^{far\,field}(u,v){f}_{1}(u,v)}{{f}_{2}(u,v)}]\rangle$$
(4)

In (4), $${E}_{copol}^{farfield}(u,v)$$ is the co-pol component of the electric field defined in the (u, v) plane that can have horizontal or vertical polarization depending on the antenna design requirement. IFFT2 is the 2D inverse Fourier transform operator. Since in the pattern calculation the zero frequency point, existed in FFT routine, should represent the center point of the (u, v) plane, we have to select odd number of observation points in the (u, v) plane to satisfy this condition. In addition, Matlab’s 2D-IFFT command swaps the coordinates so that the zero frequency point is located at the lower left corner. After the 2D-IFFT command (IFFT2) is executed, it is necessary to correct the obtained results by using the ifftshift command, which corrects the quadrants so that the center of the (u, v) plane is placed in the center of the matrix43. Constituent functions of (4) are defined as follows44

$${f}_{0}(r)=\frac{2\pi r}{j{k}_{0}{e}^{-j{k}_{0}r}}$$
(5)
$${\rm{X}} \mbox{-} {\rm{Pol}}:\,{f}_{1}(u,v)=\frac{{u}^{2}+{v}^{2}}{[{u}^{2}+{v}^{2}\sqrt{1-{u}^{2}-{v}^{2}}]},\,{\rm{Y}} \mbox{-} {\rm{Pol}}:\,{f}_{1}(u,v)=\frac{{u}^{2}+{v}^{2}}{[{v}^{2}+{u}^{2}\sqrt{1-{u}^{2}-{v}^{2}}]}$$
(6)

The relation (6) determines the value of f1(u, v) depending on the polarization type of the desired object wave. Moreover, f2(u, v) = NxNyϒ(u, v)ϒ′(u, v), where the quantities ϒ(u, v) and ϒ′(u, v) are read as

$$\Upsilon (u,v)={p}_{x}{p}_{y}\,\sin \,c(\frac{{k}_{0}u{p}_{x}}{2})\sin \,c(\frac{{k}_{0}v{p}_{y}}{2}),\,\Upsilon ^{\prime} (u,v)={e}^{-j\frac{{k}_{0}}{2}[u({N}_{x}-1){p}_{x}+v({N}_{y}-1){p}_{y}]}$$
(7)

In the above relations, the parameters u, v, and the mesh grid center points are defined as follows

$$u=\frac{2\pi }{{N}_{x}{p}_{x}{k}_{0}}p,\,v=\frac{2\pi }{{N}_{y}{p}_{y}{k}_{0}}q$$
(8)
$$p=-\,\frac{{N}_{x}}{2},-\,\frac{{N}_{x}}{2}+1,\,\ldots ,+\,\frac{{N}_{x}}{2}-1,\,q=-\,\frac{{N}_{y}}{2},-\,\frac{{N}_{y}}{2}+1,\,\ldots ,+\,\frac{{N}_{y}}{2}-1$$
(9)
$$\begin{array}{rcl}({x}_{m},{y}_{n}) & = & (-\frac{{N}_{x}{p}_{x}}{2}+(m+1/2{p}_{x}),-\frac{{N}_{y}{p}_{y}}{2}+(n+1/2{p}_{y})),\\ m & = & 0,1,\,\ldots ,{N}_{x}-1,\\ n & = & 0,1,2,\,\ldots ,{N}_{y}-1\end{array}$$
(10)

where Nx and Ny are the number of cells in the x and y directions on the hologram plane. Moreover, px and py are the period of cells in the x and y directions, respectively. It is worthwhile to underline that the number of unit cells in the (x, y) plane and observation points defined in the (u, v) plane should be equal. Therefore, as an effective remedy, one can extend the hologram grid and make a virtual mesh grid so that the number of observation points, which are usually considered 2n with n = 7 or 8, is equal to mesh grid cells. In this state, the amplitude of ψi should be set to zero for the cells outside the hologram plane. This issue causes some errors; however, it is a necessary condition for implementing a Fourier transform operation with high resolution in the far-field domain.

### Implementation of the shaped-beam radiation pattern

Here, we aim to realize diverse radiation patterns based on the aforementioned holographic method. In all cases, the design frequency is considered 10 GHz and the hologram dimensions are 30 cm × 3 cm. The parameters px and py are selected to be 15 mm, which are equal to λ0/2 where λ0 is the free space wavelength. As a result, the hologram is divided into 400 equispace unit cells. A standard X-band pyramidal horn antenna with vertical polarization is applied as a point source emitting the reference waves. As a result, the quantity ψref can be simply described as $${{\rm{\Psi }}}_{ref}=B{e}^{-j{k}_{0}r}$$, where B is the amplitude of the spherical wave in the hologram plane, k0 is the free space wave number, and r = [(x − xf)2 + (y − yf)2 + (H)2]0.5 is the radial distance between the phase center of the horn and every point on the hologram, where (xf, yf, H) is the phase center coordinate of the horn. We placed the feed horn along the z-axis, i.e. (xf, yf) = (0, 0). The parameter H should be determined according to the efficiency considerations dictated by the focal-to-diameter ratio (f/D) parameter43. As such, for a horn with q = 10, H is equal to be 30.9 cm. It is worthwhile to point out that one can use the full wave simulation results of the near field components of the radiated electric fields of the horn on the hologram plane which leads to obtaining more precise data for ψref. The number of observation points in the spectral domain is selected 28 × 28. In order to realize the impedance profile characterized by (1), we used a combination of bowtie and circular ring metallic patches placed on a single layer of standard RT5870 high frequency laminate with the dielectric constant and thickness of 2.33 and 0.79 mm, respectively. The periodicity of the unit cell is selected to be 15 mm, which is equal to the mesh periodicity of the hologram defined above. The substrate layer is separated with a gap distance equal to 3 mm from the ground plane. Figure 2 shows the unit cell and simulated input impedance obtained in CST software by assuming periodic boundary condition. The design parameters are chosen so that no resonance point occurs in the impedance behavior of the element and consequently the parameter X is correctly valued. It is observed from Fig. 2 that the input impedance varies from −340 Ω to 175 Ω when r3 varies from 3.1 mm to 5.5 mm. Therefore, by selecting X = −82 Ω, and M = 257 Ω, the hologram surface is properly modulated. It is worth mentioning that when the desired far-field pattern is specified in each design, the quantity $${E}_{copol}^{farfield}(u,v)$$ is determined. By introducing $${E}_{copol}^{farfield}(u,v)$$ into (4), $${\psi }_{rad}^{i}$$ will be obtained. On the other hand, ψref is extracted from near field data of the horn in the center point of each cell on the hologram plane. Therefore, the amplitude and phase of the overall tangential electric field in the hologram plane, i.e, |Ψref. Ψref| and $$\measuredangle ({{\rm{\Psi }}}_{ref}.{{\rm{\Psi }}}_{ref})$$, and finally the impedance distribution of the hologram will be extracted from (1). This routine should be done accurately for each following example to implement the metasurface.

#### Flat top beam

Initially, we perform a simple flat top pattern with the corresponding gain profile described in the spectral domain as $${G}_{copol}^{farfield(Y)}=15[{\bf{rect}}(u/{u}_{0},v/{v}_{0})]$$, where u0 = v0 = 0.7. Figure 3a shows the desired object wave in the (u, v) plane. Following the extraction process of the impedance distribution outlined in the previous part, the requirements for the hologram implementation are provided. Figure 3b up to 3d present the overall tangential electric field distribution along with impedance distribution of the hologram. By mapping the obtained impedance distribution of the hologram onto the input impedance characteristic of the element shown in Fig. 2b, the element arrangement of the hologram surface is obtained.

In order to predict the object wave profile when the hologram is illuminated by the reference wave at the reconstruction step as well as to gain more insight from the radiation performance of the hologram, we analytically extract the object wave. This is done by applying the FFT routine to the overall tangential electric field of the hologram. Figure 4a,b demonstrate the resulted object wave. In order to numerically evaluate the capability of the hologram to generate the predefined object wave, we employ the CST software and calculate the far-field wave when the hologram is fed by the X-band standard pyramidal horn with 15 dBi gain. The full wave simulation of the far-field pattern along with the gain profile in two principal planes of the hologram (u = 0 and v = 0) are shown in Fig. 4c,d. As can be observed, very good results are achieved and the object wave is rebuilt with a high accuracy. The reason behind the non-symmetric object wave in the simulation results is that the horn antenna provides a non-symmetric pattern.

#### Tilted squared cosecant

In this part, we aim to present an example which better clarifies the advantage of using the convolution theorem. In doing so, we expect that the metasurface radiates a tilted squared cosecant in the far-field region. Being inspired by the convolution theorem, we can define a non-tilted object wave in the form of squared cosecant and then multiply the impedance profile of the hologram with a proper function, as described in (3). Therefore, we can define

$${G}_{copol}^{far\,field(Y)}=[{\bf{rect}}(u/{u}_{0},v/{v}_{0})]\times [10\,\mathrm{log}(|\csc (\arcsin (u^{\prime} )){|}^{2}\,/{\rm{\max }}(|\csc (\arcsin (u^{\prime} )){|}^{2}))+25]$$
(11)
$$u^{\prime} =u\times {\bf{rect}}\frac{u-{u}_{1}}{{u}_{0}-{u}_{1}},\,{u}_{1}=0.05,$$
(12)
$$Z=j[X+M\,{\rm{Re}}({\psi }_{rad}(x,y)\,{\psi }_{ref}^{\ast }(x,y){e}^{j{k}_{0}(x\sin {\theta }_{0}\cos {\phi }_{0}+y\sin {\theta }_{0}\sin {\phi }_{0}})]$$
(13)

where v0 = 0.07, u0 = 0.42 and $$({\theta }_{0},{\phi }_{0})=({20}^{\circ },{0}^{\circ })$$. The desired object wave is depictedin Fig. 5a. Similar to the previous part, the amplitude and phase of the overall tangential electric field in the hologram plane as well as the corresponding impedance distribution is calculated and plotted in Fig. 5b up to 5d.

Theoretical and simulated far-filed patterns for this case are shown in Fig. 6. It is clear that using the convolution theorem and applying an exponential function with uniform amplitude and linear phase variation to the hologram impedance profile lead to converting a non-tilted objective wave to a tilted object wave without doing any extra computational cost, which is usually observed in the classical synthesis method by virtue of aligning the main principal axis of the original problem to the beam direction and solving a more complicated problem.

#### Wide angle isoflux beam

To further verify the proposed method, we implement a well-known pattern named isoflux which is widely used in satellite systems. In the following, the corresponding object wave is introduced.

$${G}_{copol}^{far\,field(Y)}=[6\,{\bf{rect}}(u/{u}_{0},v/{v}_{0})-5]\times [\mathrm{log}(\zeta /{\rm{\max }}(\zeta ))+18]$$
(14)
$$\zeta =\sigma |\cos (\arcsin (v))|-v\sqrt{1-{\sigma }^{2}},\,\sigma =1+h/{R}_{e},\,{R}_{e}=6371\,km,\,h=2000\,km$$
(15)

The co-pol gain for the type of the isoflux beam presented here is defined in accordance with the one expressed in recently reported research45. In (15), the parameters Re and h are assigned to the earth radius and satellite altitude, respectively. We consider the boundary of the isoflux beam by defining v0 = 0.75 and u0 = 0.05, showing that the beam has a wide covered area around 97.2° in the u = 0 plane (or equivalently the yz-plane). The desired object wave is depicted in Fig. 7a. Again, the requirements for the hologram implementation are provided by following the extraction process of the impedance distribution outlined in the previous. The amplitude and phase of the overall tangential electric field in the hologram plane as well as the corresponding impedance distribution is plotted in Fig. 7b up to 7d.

Theoretical and simulation far-filed patterns for this case are shown in Fig. 8. We observe a significant agreement between the final radiated pattern and expected one.

#### Combination of two squared cosecant and pencil beam patterns

As a final example, we develop a more complicated pattern including two tilted squared cosecant beams and one ordinary pencil beam radiated in (θ0, φ0) = (0°, 0°). As before, it is enough to choose a non-tilted cosecant beam as the object wave and then use the superposition theory and convolution to specify the hologram impedance distribution. The non-tilted squared cosecant as the part of the desired object wave is depicted in Fig. 9a. In this regard, we can define

$${G}_{copol}^{far\,field(Y)}=[{\bf{rect}}(u/{u}_{0},v/{v}_{0})]\times$$
(16)
$$[10\,\mathrm{log}({|\csc (\arcsin (v^{\prime} ))|}^{2}/{\rm{\max }}({|\csc (\arcsin (v\text{'}))|}^{2}))+25]$$
(17)
$$v^{\prime} =u\times {\bf{rect}}\frac{v-{v}_{1}}{{v}_{0}-{v}_{1}},\,{v}_{1}=0.05\,,$$
(18)

And the impedance distribution is defined as follows

$$Z=j[X+\frac{M}{3}{\rm{Re}}({\psi }_{ref}^{\ast }[{\psi }_{rad}({e}^{j{k}_{0}(x\sin {\theta }_{1}\cos {\phi }_{1}+y\sin {\theta }_{1}\cos {\phi }_{1})}+{e}^{j{k}_{0}(x\sin {\theta }_{2}\cos {\phi }_{2}+y\sin {\theta }_{2}\cos {\phi }_{2})})+1])]$$
(19)

where u0 = 0.07, v0 = 0.42, $${\theta }_{1}={20}^{\circ },{\phi }_{1}={0}^{\circ }$$, and $${\theta }_{2}={20}^{\circ },{\phi }_{2}={180}^{\circ }$$. It is observed that the pencil beam direction is aligned with the z-axis. The amplitude and phase of the overall tangential electric field in the hologram plane as well as the corresponding impedance distribution is plotted in Fig. 9b up to 9d.

Theoretical and simulation far-filed patterns for this case are shown in Fig. 10. It is evident that the overall shape of the far-field pattern (the reconstructed object wave) agrees with the desired waves defined as the object waves. Close examination shows that the main beam directions and peak gain of the reconstructed object waves are in accordance with the theoretical results.

### Fabrication and measurement

In order to experimentally validate the accuracy of the proposed method, the hologram designed and implemented in the last example was fabricated and the far-field radiation patterns were measured in the two principal planes and then compared with simulation results. Again, the hologram is composed of 400 unit cells with the capability of producing two tilted beams in the form of squared cosecant and one broadside pencil beam. Figure 11 demonstrates the fabricated hologram along with the measurement setup and reference wave emitter. Some plastic screw was employed to fix the applied 3 mm long spacers embedded between ground and dielectric layers. The experimental results were compared with simulation ones in the both principal planes as shown in Fig. 12. As can be observed in Fig. 12, there is a good agreement between the simulation and measurement results, specifically in the shaped region, verifying the proposed design method. The peak gain of simulation and measurement results are 20.77 dBi and 20 dBi.

The antenna efficiency, including the aperture efficiency and element loss, can be calculated from the far-field radiation pattern of antenna43. In summary, the following relation is employed to determine the antenna efficiency.

$$e=\frac{G(\theta ,\varphi )}{D(\theta ,\varphi )}=\frac{{P}_{rad}}{{P}_{feedHorn}}=\frac{{\int }_{0}^{2\pi }\,{\int }_{0}^{\pi }\frac{1}{2\eta }{|{E}_{rad}(\theta ,\varphi )|}^{2}\,\sin \,\theta \,d\theta \,d\varphi }{\frac{\pi {|{A}_{0}|}^{2}}{\eta }\frac{2}{2q+1}}$$
(20)

In (20), G(θ, ϕ) and D(θ, ϕ) are the gain and directivity of the antenna, respectively. The quantity Erad(θ, ϕ) is the radiated electric field in far zone, which is determined with CST MWS for all spherical angles of (θ, ϕ). In denominator of relation (20), η is the intrinsic impedance of the free space, q and A0 describe the analytical model of the pattern of the feed as (A0 cosqθ), which can be computed with CST MWS by comparing that analytical model with the radiated far-field pattern of the feed. In light of the above discussion, the antenna efficiency described in the last example will be obtained 55.89 %.

## Conclusion

A systematic method is presented to design a shaped-beam emitter reflector-based metasurface. The method combines the holography concept and convolution theorem together and introduces a novel synthesis method for shaping EM waves with flexible and continuous control of the beam direction without using any optimization algorithm and extra computational cost. Using the holography and convolution theorem gives the designer a new insight for implementing versatile radiation patterns from a new point of view. It is shown that the method is independent of the object shape and also the object number. Furthermore, the method has the potential to be used in such structures with simultaneous demonstration of several functionalities for the beam direction and beam shaping. This may be done by incorporating active devices as the realization approach of the hologram impedance profile.

## References

1. 1.

Landy, N. I., Sajuyigbe, S., Mock, J. J., Smith, D. R. & Padilla, W. Perfect metamaterial absorber. Phys. review letters 100, 207402 (2008).

2. 2.

Sievenpiper, D., Zhang, L., Broas, R. F., Alexopolous, N. G. & Yablonovitch, E. High-impedance electromagnetic surfaces with a forbidden frequency band. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech. 47, 2059–2074 (1999).

3. 3.

Minatti, G. et al. Modulated metasurface antennas for space: Synthesis analysis and realizations. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 63, 1288–1300 (2015).

4. 4.

Pazokian, M., Komjani, N. & Karimipour, M. Broadband RCS reduction of microstrip antenna using coding frequency selective surface. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 17, 1382–1385 (2018).

5. 5.

Chen, W., Balanis, C. A. & Birtcher, C. R. Checkerboard EBG surfaces for wideband radar cross section reduction. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 63, 2636–2645 (2015).

6. 6.

Grady, N. K. et al. Terahertz metamaterials for linear polarization conversion and anomalous refraction. Science 1235399 (2013).

7. 7.

Pfeiffer, C. & Grbic, A. Bianisotropic metasurfaces for optimal polarization control: Analysis and synthesis. Phys. Rev. Appl 2, 044011 (2014).

8. 8.

Tremain, B., Rance, H. J., Hibbins, A. P. & Sambles, J. R. Polarization conversion from a thin cavity array in the microwave regime. Sci. reports 5, 9366 (2015).

9. 9.

Wang, S.-Y., Liu, W. & Geyi, W. Dual-band transmission polarization converter based on planar-dipole pair frequency selective surface. Sci. reports 8, 3791 (2018).

10. 10.

Zheng, Y. et al. Ultra-wideband polarization conversion metasurface and its application cases for antenna radiation enhancement and scattering suppression. Sci. reports 7, 16137 (2017).

11. 11.

Guo, W. et al. Ultra-thin anisotropic metasurface for polarized beam splitting and reflected beam steering applications. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys 49, 425305 (2016).

12. 12.

Tierney, B. B. & Grbic, A. Arbitrary beam shaping using 1-d impedance surfaces supporting leaky waves. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 63, 2439–2448 (2015).

13. 13.

Cai, T., Wang, G.-M., Xu, H.-X., Tang, S.-W. & Liang, J.-G. Polarization-independent broadband meta-surface for bifunctional antenna. Opt. Express 24, 22606–22615 (2016).

14. 14.

Arbabi, A., Horie, Y., Ball, A. J., Bagheri, M. & Faraon, A. Subwavelength-thick lenses with high numerical apertures and large efficiency based on high-contrast transmitarrays. Nat. communications 6, 7069 (2015).

15. 15.

Wang, X. et al. Simultaneous realization of anomalous reflection and transmission at two frequencies using bi-functional metasurfaces. Sci. reports 8, 1876 (2018).

16. 16.

Díaz-Rubio, A., Asadchy, V. S., Elsakka, A. & Tretyakov, S. A. From the generalized reflection law to the realization of perfect anomalous reflectors. Sci. advances 3, e1602714 (2017).

17. 17.

Sun, S. et al. Gradient-index meta-surfaces as a bridge linking propagating waves and surface waves. Nat. materials 11, 426 (2012).

18. 18.

Wan, X., Li, Y. B., Cai, B. G. & Cui, T. J. Simultaneous controls of surface waves and propagating waves by metasurfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett 105, 121603 (2014).

19. 19.

Karimipour, M., Pirhadi, A. & Ebrahimi, N. Accurate method for synthesis of shaped-beam non-uniform reflectarray antenna. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propag. 7, 1247–1253 (2013).

20. 20.

Zhang, L., Liu, S., Li, L. & Cui, T. J. Spin-controlled multiple pencil beams and vortex beams with different polarizations generated by pancharatnam-berry coding metasurfaces. ACS applied materials & interfaces 9, 36447–36455 (2017).

21. 21.

Tang, S. et al. High-efficiency dual-modes vortex beam generator with polarization-dependent transmission and reflection properties. Sci. reports 8, 6422 (2018).

22. 22.

Deng, R., Xu, S., Yang, F. & Li, M. An FSS-backed ku/ka quad-band reflectarray antenna for satellite communications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 66, 4353–4358 (2018).

23. 23.

Yang, F., Deng, R., Xu, S. & Li, M. Design and experiment of a near-zero-thickness high-gain transmit-reflect-array antenna using anisotropic metasurface. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 66, 2853–2861 (2018).

24. 24.

Nayeri, P., Yang, F. & Elsherbeni, A. Z. Design and experiment of a single-feed quad-beam reflectarray antenna. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 60, 1166–1171 (2012).

25. 25.

Zhou, M. et al. Direct optimization of printed reflectarrays for contoured beam satellite antenna applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 61, 1995–2004 (2013).

26. 26.

Karimipour, M., Komjani, N., Abdolali, A. & Abbaszade, S. Optimum design of dual band shaped-beam circularly polarized reflectarray antenna based on physical optic method. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Eng. 26, 690–702 (2016).

27. 27.

Abdelrahman, A. H., Yang, F., Elsherbeni, A. Z. & Nayeri, P. Analysis and design of transmitarray antennas. Synth. Lect. on Antennas 6, 1–175 (2017).

28. 28.

Shaker, J., Chaharmir, M. R. & Ethier, J. Reflectarray antennas: analysis, design, fabrication, and measurement (Boston, Artech House, 2013).

29. 29.

Zhang, Q. et al. Shaping electromagnetic waves using software-automatically-designed metasurfaces. Sci. reports 7, 3588 (2017).

30. 30.

Yang, H. et al. A programmable metasurface with dynamic polarization, scattering and focusing control. Sci. reports 6, 35692 (2016).

31. 31.

Liu, D., Cheng, B., Pan, X. & Qiao, L. A horn-fed frequency scanning holographic antenna based on generalized law of reflection. Sci. reports 6, 31338 (2016).

32. 32.

Li, Y. B., Li, L. L., Cai, B. G., Cheng, Q. & Cui, T. J. Holographic leaky-wave metasurfaces for dual-sensor imaging. Sci. reports 5, 18170 (2015).

33. 33.

Fong, B. H., Colburn, J. S., Ottusch, J. J., Visher, J. L. & Sievenpiper, D. F. Scalar and tensor holographic artificial impedance surfaces. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 58, 3212–3221 (2010).

34. 34.

Gómez-Tornero, J. L., Blanco, D., Rajo-Iglesias, E. & Llombart, N. Holographic surface leaky-wave lenses with circularlypolarized focused near-fields—part I: Concept, design and analysis theory. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 61, 3475–3485 (2013).

35. 35.

Martinez-Ros, A. J., Gómez-Tornero, J. L. & Goussetis, G. Holographic pattern synthesis with modulated substrate integrated waveguide line-source leaky-wave antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 61, 3466–3474 (2013).

36. 36.

Li, Y. B., Wan, X., Cai, B. G., Cheng, Q. & Cui, T. J. Frequency-controls of electromagnetic multi-beam scanning by metasurfaces. Sci. reports 4, 6921 (2014).

37. 37.

Liu, Y., Hao, Y., Li, K. & Gong, S. Wideband and polarization-independent radar cross section reduction using holographic metasurface. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 15, 1028–1031 (2016).

38. 38.

Karimipour, M. & Komjani, N. Realization of multiple concurrent beams with independent circular polarizations by holographic reflectarray. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 66, 4627–4640 (2018).

39. 39.

Karimipour, M. & Komjani, N. Holographic-inspired multibeam reflectarray with linear polarization. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 66, 2870–2882 (2018).

40. 40.

Wan, X. et al. Manipulations of dual beams with dual polarizations by full-tensor metasurfaces. Adv. Opt. Mater. 4, 1567–1572 (2016).

41. 41.

Liu, S. et al. Convolution operations on coding metasurface to reach flexible and continuous controls of terahertz beams. Adv. Sci. 3, 1600156 (2016).

42. 42.

Nayeri, P., Yang, F. & Elsherbeni, A. Z. Design of single-feed reflectarray antennas with asymmetric multiple beams using the particle swarm optimization method. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 61, 4598–4605 (2013).

43. 43.

Nayeri, P., Yang, F. & Elsherbeni, A. Z. Reflectarray antennas: theory, designs, and applications (John Wiley & Sons, 2018).

44. 44.

Huang, J. Reflectarray Antenna. In Encyclopedia of RF and Microwave Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1002/0471654507.eme515 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005).

45. 45.

Minatti, G., Maci, S., De Vita, P., Freni, A. & Sabbadini, M. A circularly-polarized isoflux antenna based on anisotropic metasurface. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 60, 4998–5009 (2012).

## Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the Iran Telecommunication Research Center (ITRC) for financially supporting this project and providing the substrate layer, horn antenna and experimental results. Moreover, I would like to express my gratitude to everyone who supported me throughout this project.

## Author information

This project was done under the guidance of Prof. Komjani as the supervisor. He conceived of the presented idea. Dr. Karimipour as the main author developed the theory and performed the computations. In doing so, he developed a Matlab code for preparing the requirement of synthesis method. At last, he wrote the main manuscript text. Dr. Aryanian discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript by editing it. He also made very good suggestions for fabricating and testing the hologram.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions