Molecular imaging of oxidative stress using an LED-based photoacoustic imaging system

Article metrics

Abstract

LED-based photoacoustic imaging has practical value in that it is affordable and rugged; however, this technology has largely been confined to anatomic imaging with limited applications into functional or molecular imaging. Here, we report molecular imaging reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) with a near-infrared (NIR) absorbing small molecule (CyBA) and LED-based photoacoustic imaging equipment. CyBA produces increasing photoacoustic signal in response to peroxynitrite (ONOO) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) with photoacoustic signal increases of 3.54 and 4.23-fold at 50 µM of RONS at 700 nm, respectively. CyBA is insensitive to OCl, ˙NO, NO2, NO3, tBuOOH, O2, C4H9O˙, HNO, and ˙OH, but can detect ONOO in whole blood and plasma. CyBA was then used to detect endogenous RONS in macrophage RAW 246.7 cells as well as a rodent model; these results were confirmed with fluorescence microscopy. Importantly, CyB suffers photobleaching under a Nd:YAG laser but the signal decrease is <2% with the low-power LED-based photoacoustic system and the same radiant exposure time. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to describe molecular imaging with an LED-based photoacoustic scanner. This study not only reveals the sensitive photoacoustic detection of RONS but also highlights the utility of LED-based photoacoustic imaging.

Introduction

Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) modulate important functions in living systems. Endogenous RONS facilitate signal transduction1, smooth muscle relaxation, and blood pressure modulation2. Dysregulated RONS can lead to diseases such as cancer3,4,5, and RONS detection is useful in the diagnosis and treatment of infections and disease. There are various fluorescent contrast agent to detect and quantify RONS2,6,7, but their in vivo applications are limited due to the low spatial resolution and limited penetration depth of fluorescence8.

Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) is an alternative imaging approach and combines optical and ultrasound imaging features9,10,11 and offers better penetration with less scatter than fluorescent imaging. Smart activatable photoacoustic probes can produce photoacoustic signal in the presence of specific molecules or events such as RONS12,13. Pu and workers have described several RONS-sensitive molecules with activatable photoacoustic signal8,14,15,16,17 including Cheng et al. who reported CyBA for detection of RONS using fluorescence imaging18.

Regardless of the imaging target, PAI usually uses high energy lasers. Although these lasers offer tunable excitation wavelengths and high power, they are also large and cumbersome and require regular maintenance. In addition, many contrast media are not stable at such high fluences. In one example, the photoacoustic signal of gold nanorods decreased by ~30% after exposure to 120 µs of 9 mJ/cm2 fluence)8 due to a change in the nanorod morphology19. In another example, Onoe et al. developed a symmetrical NIR cyanine dye for cancer imaging utilizing fluorescence and photoacoustic imaging20, but this probe degraded under high-energy laser pulses during imaging21.

Although a more stable probe design is an obvious solution, one exciting alternative is pulse laser diodes (PLDs)22 or light emitting diodes (LEDs)23,24. The LED fluence is on the order of μJ and 1000-fold lower than high energy lasers25. We previously described a commercially available LED-based photoacoustic imaging system and validated it with phantoms and cellular imaging25. Here, we report the use of a near-infrared (NIR) small molecular probe for photoacoustic imaging that is sensitive to various types of RONS18. We first evaluated the probe with both a laser and a LED. The absorption and photoacoustic response of this probe were examined with different RONS in different sample matrices such as PBS/DMSO, plasma, and fresh blood. We then used the probe to measure the endogenous RONS produced stimulated macrophages with the LED-based photoacoustic imaging system along with in vivo imaging of an inflammation model.

Methods and Materials

Chemicals

Aqueous PBS stock solution and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (30 wt%, Cat. #H325) were purchased from Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). We purged PBS with N2 for 1 hour before any dilution and measurement. Peroxynitrite (ONOO) was purchased from EMD Millipore Co. (Cat. #516620, MA, USA). Superoxide (O2), Hypochlorite (OCl), Nitric oxide (˙NO), Tert-butyl hydrogen peroxide (tBuOOH), Tert-butoxy radical (C4H9O˙), Nitrite (NO2), Nitrate (NO3), and Nitroxyl (HNO) were prepared by direct dilution of potassium superoxide (Cat. #278904), sodium hypochlorite (Cat. #239305),Tert-butyl hydroperoxide (Cat. #416665), Tert-butyl peroxide (Cat. #168521), Sodium nitrite (Cat. #237213), Sodium nitrate (Cat. #221341), and angeli’s salt (Cat. #176695). These were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Atlanta, GA, USA). Hydroxyl radicals (˙OH) were generated via the Fenton reaction between H2O2 and iron (II) perchlorate hydrate (Fe(ClO4)2) (Cat. #334081, Sigma-Aldrich, Atlanta, GA, USA). The 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCF-DA) (Cat. #D6883), N-acetylcysteine (NAC), Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) from Escherichia coli, and Zymosan A from Saccharomyces Cerevisiae were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Atlanta, GA, USA). A stock solution of the new synthesized dye was prepared by dissolving in dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Normal pooled human plasma was purchased from Innovative Research Inc. (Novi, MI, USA). Blood was obtained from healthy donors in 3.2% sodium citrate vacutainers (BD life Science) and informed consent was obtained from all subjects. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. All experimental protocols were approved by University of California San Diego.

Probe synthesis and characterization

Cheng et al. first developed and reported the application of CyBA for detection of RONS using fluorescence imaging18. The synthesis was adopted from their study18 and used a mixture of compound CyOH (38 mg, 0.1 mmol) and Cs2CO3 (130 mg, 0.40 mmol) in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (10 mL) in a round-bottom flask was stirred for 20 min at room temperature. The 4-bromomethylphenylboronic acid pinacol ester (60 mg, 0.20 mmol) was then added and the reaction was further stirred overnight at room temperature under N2 atmosphere. The reaction mixture was then washed with water (30 mL) and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 30 mL). The organic layer was dried with anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced vacuum. The pure product CyBA was obtained as a blue solid (45 mg, 75%) after purification by flash column chromatography (CH2Cl2/MeOH = 10:1). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 8.70 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.68 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (m, 2H), 7.50 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.45 (m, 2H), 7.34 (s, 1H), 7.02 (m, 2H), 6.49 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 1H), 5.29 (s, 2H), 3.85 (s, 3H), 2.76 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 2.71 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 1.92 (m, 2H), 1.81 (s, 6H), 1.34 (s, 12H). MS of compound CyBA: calculated for C39H43BNO4, [M+]: 600.39; observed MS: m/z 600.40.

Instrumentation

We used a SpectraMax M5 spectrophotometer for absorbance measurements. An EVOS fluorescence microscope with FITC filter sets (Life Technologies Inc., Ca, USA) was utilized for brightfield and fluorescence microscopy imaging. Photoacoustic images were acquired using an LED-based photoacoustic imaging system from CYBERDYNE Inc. (formerly Prexion)25. The system is equipped with a 128-element linear array ultrasound transducer with a central frequency of 10 MHz and a bandwidth of 80.9% fitted with two 690 nm LED arrays. The repetition rate of these LEDs is tunable between 1, 2, 3, and 4 K Hz. The pulse width can be changed from 50 ns to 150 ns with a 5-ns step size. The transducer can be scanned to generate three-dimensional (3D) data using maximum intensity projection (MIP) algorithm.

Tissue culture

RAW 246.7 cells (ATCC TIB-71) were cultured using Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cells were incubated at 37 °C and media was replaced every 2–3 days. Cells were cultured until 90% confluence and passaged mechanically through scraping.

Probe stability

A Nd:YAG laser with an optical parametric oscillator (Vevo 2100 photoacoustic scanner, Visualsonics) and a LED (LED-based scanner, CYBERDYNE Inc.) at 690 nm were used to evaluate the stability of the new probe. Here, 15 µL of a 0.1 mM solution were placed in polyethylene tubing (OD: 1.27 mm, ID: 0.85 mm) inside the chicken breast to scatter the incident light (at depth of 1 cm) and imaged with the laser or LED to study the stability of the probe. Laser illumination used a pulse width and frame rate of 5 ns and 6 Hz, respectively. A laser pyroelectric energy sensor (PE50BF-C, Ophir LLC, USA) measured the laser fluence. LED illumination used a LED-based scanner (pulse width: 70 ns, frame rate: 6 Hz) with a photodiode sensor (S120C, Thorlabs Inc., USA) to measure the LED fluence. The effective illumination for both is 16 μs (effective illumination = number of laser or LED pulses × the pulse width).

Absorption response of CyBA toward RONS

We first studied the absorption response of the probe toward RONS. We used various concentrations for ONOO (12.5, 25, 50, 75, 100, and 200 µM) to evaluate changes in the probe’s absorption spectrum (400 nm – 800 nm) in the presence of RONS. Next, we tested the effect of OCl, ˙NO, NO2, NO3, tBuOOH, O2, C4H9O˙, HNO, ˙OH, H2O2, and ONOO by monitoring the change in 700 nm absorption using a 80 µM solution of the probe and 50 µM RONS. Three replicates were used.

Photoacoustic response of CyBA in the presence of RONS

CyBA and CyOH (activated form of the probe) were studied at 20, 40, 80, 160, 320, and 640 µM. We also examined the photoacoustic response of CyBA to 50 µM of OCl, ˙NO, NO2, NO3, tBuOOH, O2, C4H9O˙, HNO, ˙OH, H2O2, and ONOO. Various concentrations of ONOO and H2O2 to measure the sensitivity of the probe: 12.5, 25, 37, 50, 75, 100, and 200 µM ONOO; 31, 62, 125, 250, 2500, 5000 µM, and 50 mM H2O2. All samples were placed inside Teflon light wall tubes and scanned with the transducer (the scan size is 10 mm) to generate three-dimensional (3D) data using maximum intensity projection (MIP) algorithm.

Photoacoustic response of the probe towards ONOO in pooled human plasma and blood

We extended the work with ONOO to normal pooled human plasma and whole human blood. First, we evaluated the absorption response of 125 µM probe in the presence of 25, 50, 125, 185, 250, 375, and 500 µM of ONOO in normal human plasma. Next, we used LED-based photoacoustic system to study the response of the probe towards ONOO at 25, 37.5, 50, 75, and 100 µM in normal pooled human plasma and blood. Finally, we calculated a detection limit of ONOO in plasma and blood.

In vitro fluorescence imaging of RONS

RAW 246.7 cells were plated into 6-well plates (50,000 cells/well) and incubated overnight. Cells were washed once with PBS, and 2 mL of media was added; 20 μL of LBS in PBS was added to the respective groups (final concentration: 1 μg/mL), and the plates were incubated for 4 hours. Then, 20 μL of NAC in PBS was added to the respective groups (final concentration: 0.1, 1, or 10 mM) and incubated for 1 hour. Finally, 20 μL of DCF-DA in DMSO was added to all groups (final concentration: 20 μM) and incubated for 20 minutes. Cells were imaged with a fluorescence microscope (EVOS) using a GFP filter.

In vitro photoacoustic imaging of RONS

RAW 246.7 cells were plated into 6-well plates (1 million cells/well) and incubated overnight. Cells were washed once with PBS and 1 mL of media was added. 10 μL of LPS was added to the respective groups (final conc. 10 μg/mL) and incubated for 4 hours. Then, 10 μL of NAC was added to the respective groups (final concentration: 0.1 or 10 mM) and incubated for 1 hour. Next, 400 μL of CyBA was added to the respective groups (final concentration: 125 μM) and incubated for 30 minutes. Cells were mechanically detached, centrifuged at 1000 g for 5 minutes, and the supernatant was removed. All cells were resuspended in 50 μL PBS and imaged at 690 nm using LED scanner. As an additional control, LPS and CyBA were mixed without any cells and imaged.

In vivo photoacoustic imaging evaluation of CyBA

All animal experiments were performed in accordance with NIH guidelines and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of California, San Diego. We utilized CyBA for the in vivo photoacoustic imaging of RONS. Zymosan was applied to induce the acute edema in a murine model. Zymosan (20 mg/ml) was injected intramuscularly into the right biceps femoris muscle of the upper hind limb (n = 3). After 20 minutes incubation, CyBA (160 μM in saline) was injected at same location. We monitored the photoacoustic intensity (690 nm as a wavelength) of the probe at the injection area in 0, 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90 minutes after injection. We also injected only Zymosan and only CyBA at the same location and monitored the photoacoustic intensity as a control.

Statistical analysis

All photoacoustic data were analyzed with ImageJ (Bethesda, MD, USA)26. All raw images were converted to 8-bit images, and then the mean value and standard deviation of the photoacoustic intensity for ten regions of interest (ROI) per tube were calculated. The error bars represent the standard deviation; P values < 0.05 were considered to be significantly different.

Results

CyBA is designed by conjugating a boronic acid-based self-immolative group to CyOH. CyBA is initially in a “caged” state with diminished electron-donating ability of the oxygen atom. Upon treatment with H2O2 or ONOO, CyBA undergoes rapid oxidative cleavage of the borate ester moiety, followed by 1,6-elimination, eventually leading to free CyOH dye (“uncaged” state). The CyOH product has enhanced electron-donating ability from the oxygen atom, which makes its characteristic maximum absorption change in relative to CyBA. Thus, the probe enables photocoustic imaging of RONS (Fig. 1). We used mass spectrometry to show the decomposition of probe under high concentrations of RONS (peroxynitrite) and evaluation of CyBA/CyOH composition stability under our imaging conditions. Mass spectrometry data confirmed the stability of CyBA under LED illumination and confirmed that the reaction product of CyBA in presence of RONS (peroxynitrite) is indeed CyOH (Fig. S1).

Figure 1
figure1

Design and mechanism of the probe (CyBA) for RONS imaging. The RONS species liberates the boronic acid group leading to increased absorbance of the cyanine core leading to increased photoacoustic signal. Adapted from Cheng et al.18.

Probe stability

The probe has a broad absorption peak at 700 nm that increases when activated by the RONS, but we used 690 nm excitation because that equipment was available in our lab. Figure 2A shows the spectral profile of the LED used in the photoacoustic imaging system. It has a peak at 690 nm (range: 625–725 nm); the intensity at 700 nm is ~65% of the maximum. The laser and LED intensity at 690 nm is 12.65 ± 0.65 mJ/cm2 and 5.5 μJ/cm2, respectively, i.e., the laser intensity is ~2000-fold higher than the LED.

Figure 2
figure2

Absorption response of new probe toward RONS. (A) Spectral profile of the LED used for photoacoustic imaging. The spectrum has a peak at 690 nm and includes 700 nm. (B) Photoacoustic intensity of the probe under laser and LED illumination. The photoacoustic intensity decreases 2.6-fold under laser source but <2% with the LED. Therefore, the probe is stable when used with a LED-based photoacoustic imaging system. (C) The absorption spectra of the dye (80 µM) after addition of ONOO 12.5, 25, 50, 75, 100, and 200 µM. The dye has two absorption peaks around 660 and 610 nm. However, in the presence of RONS, the 700 nm peak appears and other peaks vanish. (D) Absorption of CyBA in the presence of 50 µM OCl, ˙NO, NO2, NO3, tBuOOH, O2, C4H9O˙, HNO, ˙OH, H2O2, and ONOO. The control is PBS, and the error bars represent the standard deviation of three replicate measurements. *Indicates p-value < 0.05.

Next, we studied the photoacoustic signal of the probe with Nd:YAG laser and LED in the absence of RONS. Figure 2B shows that the photoacoustic signal degraded 2.6-fold after 16 μs of effective time laser illumination (laser: 3150 pulses (at 20 Hz) × 5 ns pulse width = 16 μs; LED: 240 pulses (at 4000 Hz) × 70 ns = 16 μs). The LED system shows <2% signal loss. Thus, we used the LED-based photoacoustic imaging system to evaluate the probe in all following experiments.

Absorption response of the probe toward RONS

Next, we studied the change in the probe absorption in the presence of RONS. Figure 2C shows the absorption spectra of the dye (80 µM) with and without ONOO. The probe has two absorption peaks at 610 and 660 nm. The probe exhibited a new absorption peak at 700 nm upon addition of 12.5, 25, 50, 75, 100, and 200 μM ONOO (the peaks at 610 and 660 nm decreased). Only the 700 nm peak is seen at 200 μM ONOO. Figure 2D shows the absorption response of the probe in the presence of OCl, ˙NO, NO2, NO3, tBuOOH, O2, C4H9O˙, HNO, ˙OH, H2O2, and ONOO at 700 nm using 80 µM dye and 50 µM RONS. The absorption increased 2.38 and 3.31-fold in the presence of ONOO and H2O2, respectively (p-value < 0.05).

Photoacoustic response of the probe in the presence of RONS

Figure 3A shows the photoacoustic intensity as function of CyBA and CyOH concentration. The insets show the photoacoustic MIP images corresponding to CyBA and CyOH. A linear correlation was observed between the photoacoustic intensity and both CyBA (R2 = 0.99) and CyOH (0.97) concentrations. We used 80 µM to examine the photoacoustic response to OCl, ˙NO, NO2, NO3, tBuOOH, O2, C4H9O˙, HNO, ˙OH, H2O2, and ONOO. This concentration was used because it has relatively low signal in the absence of RONS. Figure 3B shows that the probe is insensitive to OCl, ˙NO, NO2, NO3, tBuOOH, O2, C4H9O˙, HNO, and ˙OH, but the signal increased 3.54 and 4.23-fold with 50 µM H2O2 and ONOO, respectively. Figure 3C,D detail the signal as a function of ONOO and H2O2 concentrations. Higher concentrations lead to more absorption and thus more photoacoustic signal with a detection limit of 12.5 µM ONOO (p-value < 0.05). Similarly, the H2O2 sensitivity is 31 µM.

Figure 3
figure3

Photoacoustic response of the probe in presence of RONS. (A) Photoacoustic intensity as function of different probe concentrations. Linear correlation is observed between photoacoustic intensity and new probe concentration when imaged with the LED system. (B) Photoacoustic signal of 80 µM probe in the presence of 50 µM of OCl, ˙NO, NO2, NO3, tBuOOH, O2, C4H9O˙, HNO, ˙OH, H2O2, and ONOO. The inset shows the MIP photoacoustic image of all the samples. The control is PBS. Dose response curve of probe to ONOO (C) and H2O2 (D); insets are the MIP images. Error bars represent multiple ROIs per tube. *Indicates p-value < 0.05.

Utility of the probe in pooled human plasma and blood

Figure 4A shows a linear correlation (R2 = 0.98) between absorbance at 700 nm and ONOO concentrations in pooled human plasma. Figure 4B shows the photoacoustic response of the probe in the presence of ONOO in pooled human plasma and fresh whole blood. The detection limits of ONOO in plasma and blood were 37.5 and 50 μM, respectively (p-value < 0.05). The detection limit is higher in blood because hemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin increase the background signal.

Figure 4
figure4

Photoacoustic signal as a function of ONOO in normal pooled human plasma and whole blood. (A) Linear absorbance response of 125 µM probe in pooled human plasma at 700 nm with various ONOO concentrations. (B) Photoacoustic response of 125 µM probe in human plasma and fresh human blood to ONOO from 0 to 100 µM. The ONOO detection limits are 37.5 and 50 µM in plasma and blood, respectively. *Indicates p-value < 0.05.

In vitro characterization of endogenous RONS

We next tested the ability of the probe to measure endogenous RONS produced by murine macrophage RAW 264.7 cells27,28,29. Here, we used DCF-DA as an independent measurement of intracellular RONS30. Figure 5A shows the brightfield microscopy image of RAW 264.7 cell line. Figure 5B–E represent fluorescence response of RAW cells, RAW cells treated with DCF-DA, RAW cells treated with LPS, RAW cells treated with both LPS and DCF-DA, respectively. The green signals from Fig. 5E confirm that RONS will be generated by treatment of LPS with RAW 264.7 cells. We used different concentrations of NAC as a free radical scavenger with high membrane permeability31. Figure 5F–H show decrease of green signal by increasing the concentration of NAC (0.1 mM, 1 mM, and 10 mM). Degradation of fluorescence signal is observed suggesting that the RONS are scavenged by the NAC. Figure 5I represents the quantification analysis of fluorescence data in Fig. 5B–H. RAW 264.7 cells treated with LPS and DCF-DA (RONS indicator) have increased fluorescence signal suggesting the generation of endogenous RONS. Figure 5I shows that adding NAC at 10 mM scavenged the RONS and decreased fluorescence.

Figure 5
figure5

In vitro characterization of endogenous RONS. (A) Brightfield microscopy image of RAW 264.7 cells line. (B) Fluorescence microscopy image of RAW 264.7 cells. Fluorescence response of (C) DCF-DA (20 µM) after incubation with RAW cells, (D) LPS (1 μg/mL) after incubation with RAW cells, (E) LPS (1 μg/mL) and DCF-DA (20 µM) after incubation with RAW cells. Green signal indicated the presence of RONS in these cells after incubation with LPS. Fluorescence response of LPS and DCF-DA incubated with RAW cells after treating (F) 0.1 mM NAC, (G) 1 mM NAC, and (H) 10 mM NAC. (I) Quantitative analysis of fluorescence intensity in all samples in (BH). The RONS indicator DCF-DA shows increased fluorescence with LPS stimulation. A NAC RONS scavenger decreases fluorescence. (J) The MIP photoacoustic image of RAW cells, RAW cells with the probe (+CyBA), RAW cells with LPS (+LPS), RAW cells with LPS and CyBA (+CyBA + LPS), and RAW cells incubated with LPS/CyBA and various concentrations of NAC (0.1 and 10 mM). (K) Quantitative analysis shows increased photoacoustic signal in the presence of probe and RAW cells incubated with LPS. This suggests RONS generation after monitoring using LED based photoacoustic imaging. *Indicates p-value < 0.05.

Next, we measured RONS in RAW 264.7 cells with the photoacoustic probe. Here, cells were incubated with LPS as well as the probe (CyBA) with and without NAC (ROS scavenger). Figure 5J shows the MIP photoacoustic image for all six samples. RAW cells (control), RAW cells with the probe (+CyBA), RAW cells with LPS (+LPS), RAW cells with LPS, and CyBA (+CyBA + LPS), and RAW cells incubated with LPS/CyBA and various concentrations of NAC (0.1 and 10 mM) were placed in an agar phantom for photoacoustic imaging (Fig. 5J). There is low signal for RAW cells and RAW cells incubated with LPS but cells incubated with LPS have signal that is ~34-fold higher than the signal from RAW cells only incubated with CyBA; the NAC scavenger with concentrations of 0.1 mM and 10 mM decreased this signal 1.5- and 3.5-fold, respectively. This suggests that NAC scavenges the RONS leading to less photoacoustic signal (Fig. 5K). These results have been confirmed by fluorescence imaging (Fig. 5I).

In vivo photoacoustic imaging evaluation of CyBA

We evaluated the ability of CyBA to measure inflammation in mice. Figure 6A–D demonstrate the ultrasound/photoacoustic image from injection location of probe and Zymosan at 0, 10, 20, and 60 minutes, respectively. These figures show the increase of photoacoustic signal due to tissue diffusion of the probe (CyBA) at edema area (lined yellow circles). Figure 6E represents the quantitative analysis of in vivo photoacoustic imaging evaluation of CyBA. These results revealed that photoacoustic intensity increased gradually and ~3.2-fold increase was observed after 90 minutes of CyBA injection. Figure 6E also shows unchanged photoacoustic intensity of only Zymosan and only dye.

Figure 6
figure6

In vivo photoacoustic evaluation of CyBA. (A) Ultrasound/photoacoustic image at baseline. Ultrasound/photoacoustic image (B) 10, (C) 20, and (D) 60 minutes after CyBA injection. (E) Quantitative analysis of photoacoustic intensity as a function of time post-injection of CyBA. ~3.2-fold increase of photoacoustic intensity after 90 minutes of CyBA injection was observed. Photoacoustic intensity for only Zymosan (+Zymosan −CyBA) and only CyBA (−Zymosan +CyBA) are unchanged. The error bars represent the standard deviation of measurements among 3 mice.

Discussion

Detection of H2O2 and ONOO in biofluids is important to medicine. The concentrations of H2O2 in healthy human urine are between 5 to 100 µM and depend on the age and gender of the subject32. H2O2 concentrations in plasma are as high as 35 µM33. Various levels of H2O2 (in some cases 100 µM or more) have been measured in the aqueous and vitreous humor34. The steady-state biologically concentration of ONOO is in the nanomolar to low micromolar level with a basal production rate of 0.1–1 µM min−135. In an inflammatory microenvironment, the production rate will increase as high as 50–100 µM min−135,36. We report here a sensitivity of 12.5 and 31 μM for ONOO and H2O2, respectively, using a LED-based photoacoustic imaging system (Fig. 3C,D).

LED-based photoacoustic imaging system can monitor RONS in vitro and in vivo using CyBA. LED-based photoacoustic imaging solves many clinical transition issues for photoacoustic imaging; thus, this technique and probe can be used for clinical monitoring of RONS for keloid diagnosis or in drug toxicity37.

Other RONS-sensitive photoacoustic probes with a wide range of sensitivities have been reported. Zhang et al. reported a bulky borane-doped nanoprobe with sensitivity of 0.1 µM to detect ONOO−15. Xie et al. used a self-assembly approach to measure 150 µM H2O214. Kim et al. showed that their gold/silver hybrid nanoparticle could release Ag+ in presence of RONS such as ONOO and H2O2 with a sensitivity of 5 and 0.25 mM, respectively38. These results show that CyBA probe can measure H2O2 under both normal and inflammatory conditions. Although the detection of ONOO in steady state is not feasible using our designed probe and LED based system, we could measure ONOO under inflammatory conditions in vivo.

It is important to mention that most of reported RONS sensors are nanoparticles. One of the advantage of using small molecules sensor is that they can pass the membrane and access to all the cell’s compartments with a simple diffusion technique whereas nanoparticle usually will be trapped in the endosomes39. Therefore, this small molecule probe is more appropriate for in vitro imaging to monitor endogenous RONS in cells (Fig. 5).

The change in absorption spectrum or photoacoustic signal of the probe is a function of oxidation of boronate group to phenolic functionality40. The oxidation of the boronate group is quantitative and fast. Hence, imaging short-lived species such as RONS with chemodosimeters containing boronate-based probes is feasible in biological environments41,42. The hydroxyl functional group that results from oxidation governs the spectroscopic properties of these boronate-functionalized cyanine dyes43,44. The same chemical transformation is possible through direct oxidation in the presence of peroxynitrite45. The oxidation of boronate esters by peroxynitrite is a million times faster than hydrogen peroxide46. Thus, it is possible to detect peroxynitrite in real time inside the cells and to image peroxynitrite in animals47. This oxidation is then manifested via a bathochromic shift in absorption and increased photoacoustic signal to measure reactive oxygen species (Figs 2 and 3).

This probe was validated in buffer, plasma, and whole blood (Fig. 4), and ONOO in blood and plasma have been linked to cardiovascular diseases48. In the vascular compartment, the formation of ONOO is based on the reaction of nitric oxide (˙NO) with superoxide radical (O2)48. The ONOO oxidizes plasmatic components in the intravascular spaces49. In addition, up to 40% of intravascularly-generated ONOO will diffuse and react into the red blood cells (RBC) before plasma49,50. Therefore, overproduction of either ˙NO or O2 can cause intravascular formation of ONOO.

Conclusions

We measured RONS species in clinical samples with LED-based photoacoustic imaging. The LED-based photoacoustic imaging offers a significant reduction in the size and cost of optical components. While one limitation of LEDs is their 1000-fold lower power (leading to a need for higher repetition rates), this lower power is actually an advantage here. The higher power from Nd:YAG lasers photobleaches the dye, but the LED does not. Indeed, this work is the first report of LED-based photoacoustic molecular imaging. Future work will expand this work with LED-based photoacoustic to include higher frequency transducers and a larger portfolio of molecular imaging contrast agents.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Suzuki, Y. J., Forman, H. J. & Sevanian, A. Oxidants as stimulators of signal transduction. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 22, 269–285 (1997).

  2. 2.

    Gomes, A., Fernandes, E. & Lima, J. L. Fluorescence probes used for detection of reactive oxygen species. Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods 65, 45–80 (2005).

  3. 3.

    Nathan, C. & Cunningham-Bussel, A. Beyond oxidative stress: an immunologist’s guide to reactive oxygen species. Nature Reviews Immunology 13, 349 (2013).

  4. 4.

    Carden, D. L. & Granger, D. N. Pathophysiology of ischaemia–reperfusion injury. The Journal of pathology 190, 255–266 (2000).

  5. 5.

    Medzhitov, R. Origin and physiological roles of inflammation. Nature 454, 428 (2008).

  6. 6.

    Soh, N., Katayama, Y. & Maeda, M. A fluorescent probe for monitoring nitric oxide production using a novel detection concept. Analyst 126, 564–566 (2001).

  7. 7.

    Tanaka, K. et al. Rational design of fluorescein-based fluorescence probes. Mechanism-based design of a maximum fluorescence probe for singlet oxygen. Journal of the American Chemical Society 123, 2530–2536 (2001).

  8. 8.

    Pu, K. et al. Semiconducting polymer nanoparticles as photoacoustic molecular imaging probes in living mice. Nature nanotechnology 9, 233 (2014).

  9. 9.

    Wang, L. V. & Hu, S. Photoacoustic tomography: in vivo imaging from organelles to organs. Science 335, 1458–1462 (2012).

  10. 10.

    Xu, M. & Wang, L. V. Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine. Review of scientific instruments 77, 041101 (2006).

  11. 11.

    Hariri, A. et al. Development of low-cost photoacoustic imaging systems using very low-energy pulsed laser diodes. Journal of biomedical optics 22, 075001 (2017).

  12. 12.

    Weber, J., Beard, P. C. & Bohndiek, S. E. Contrast agents for molecular photoacoustic imaging. Nature Methods 13, 639–650 (2016).

  13. 13.

    Jiang, Y. & Pu, K. Advanced photoacoustic imaging applications of near-infrared absorbing organic nanoparticles. Small 13, 1700710 (2017).

  14. 14.

    Xie, C., Zhen, X., Lyu, Y. & Pu, K. Nanoparticle regrowth enhances photoacoustic signals of semiconducting macromolecular probe for in vivo imaging. Advanced Materials 29, 1703693 (2017).

  15. 15.

    Zhang, J. et al. Activatable photoacoustic nanoprobes for in vivo ratiometric imaging of peroxynitrite. Advanced Materials 29, 1604764 (2017).

  16. 16.

    Lyu, Y. & Pu, K. Recent advances of activatable molecular probes based on semiconducting polymer nanoparticles in sensing and imaging. Advanced Science 4, 1600481 (2017).

  17. 17.

    Miao, Q. & Pu, K. Emerging designs of activatable photoacoustic probes for molecular imaging. Bioconjugate chemistry 27, 2808–2823 (2016).

  18. 18.

    Pu, K. et al. Near-infrared Fluorescence Probes Detect Reactive Oxygen Species for Keloid Diagnosis. Chemical Science (2018).

  19. 19.

    Link, S., Burda, C., Nikoobakht, B. & El-Sayed, M. A. Laser-induced shape changes of colloidal gold nanorods using femtosecond and nanosecond laser pulses. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 104, 6152–6163 (2000).

  20. 20.

    Temma, T., Onoe, S., Kanazaki, K., Ono, M. & Saji, H. Preclinical evaluation of a novel cyanine dye for tumor imaging with<italic<in vivo</italic<photoacoustic imaging. Journal of biomedical optics 19, 090501 (2014).

  21. 21.

    Onoe, S., Temma, T., Kanazaki, K., Ono, M. & Saji, H. Development of photostabilized asymmetrical cyanine dyes for in vivo photoacoustic imaging of tumors. Journal of biomedical optics 20, 096006 (2015).

  22. 22.

    Daoudi, K. et al. Handheld probe integrating laser diode and ultrasound transducer array for ultrasound/photoacoustic dual modality imaging. Optics express 22, 26365–26374 (2014).

  23. 23.

    Allen, T. J. & Beard, P. C. High power visible light emitting diodes as pulsed excitation sources for biomedical photoacoustics. Biomedical optics express 7, 1260–1270 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Adachi, Y. & Hoshimiya, T. Photoacoustic imaging with multiple-wavelength light-emitting diodes. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 52, 07HB06 (2013).

  25. 25.

    Hariri, A. et al. The characterization of an economic and portable LED-based photoacoustic imaging system to facilitate molecular imaging. Photoacoustics 9, 10–20 (2018).

  26. 26.

    Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature methods 9, 671 (2012).

  27. 27.

    Bist, G. et al. Inhibition of LPS-stimulated ROS production by fluorinated and hydroxylated chalcones in RAW 264.7 macrophages with structure-activity relationship study. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters 27, 1205–1209 (2017).

  28. 28.

    Choi, S.-Y., Hwang, J.-H., Ko, H.-C., Park, J.-G. & Kim, S.-J. Nobiletin from citrus fruit peel inhibits the DNA-binding activity of NF-κB and ROS production in LPS-activated RAW 264.7 cells. Journal of ethnopharmacology 113, 149–155 (2007).

  29. 29.

    Lee, T.-Y., Lee, K.-C., Chen, S.-Y. & Chang, H.-H. 6-Gingerol inhibits ROS and iNOS through the suppression of PKC-α and NF-κB pathways in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated mouse macrophages. Biochemical and biophysical research communications 382, 134–139 (2009).

  30. 30.

    Eruslanov, E. & Kusmartsev, S. In Advanced protocols in oxidative stress II 57–72 (Springer, 2010).

  31. 31.

    Winterbourn, C. C. & Metodiewa, D. Reactivity of biologically important thiol compounds with superoxide and hydrogen peroxide. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 27, 322–328 (1999).

  32. 32.

    Varma, S. D. & Devamanoharan, P. Excretion of hydrogen peroxide in human urine. Free radical research communications 8, 73–78 (1990).

  33. 33.

    Varma, S. & Devamanoharan, P. Hydrogen peroxide in human blood. Free radical research communications 14, 125–131 (1991).

  34. 34.

    Giblin, F. J., McCready, J. P., Kodama, T. & Reddy, V. N. A direct correlation between the levels of ascorbic acid and H2O2 in aqueous humor. Experimental eye research 38, 87–93 (1984).

  35. 35.

    Liu, P., Xu, B., Quilley, J. & Wong, P. Y.-K. Peroxynitrite attenuates hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology 279, C1970–C1977 (2000).

  36. 36.

    Cheng, P. et al. Near-infrared fluorescence probes to detect reactive oxygen species for keloid diagnosis. Chemical science 9, 6340–6347 (2018).

  37. 37.

    Shuhendler, A. J., Pu, K., Cui, L., Uetrecht, J. P. & Rao, J. Real-time imaging of oxidative and nitrosative stress in the liver of live animals for drug-toxicity testing. Nature biotechnology 32, 373 (2014).

  38. 38.

    Kim, T., Zhang, Q., Li, J., Zhang, L. & Jokerst, J. V. A Gold/Silver Hybrid Nanoparticle for Treatment and Photoacoustic Imaging of Bacterial Infection. ACS nano (2018).

  39. 39.

    Mosquera, J. S., García, I. & Liz-Marzán, L. M. Cellular uptake of nanoparticles versus small molecules: A matter of size. Accounts of chemical research 51, 2305–2313 (2018).

  40. 40.

    Chang, M. C., Pralle, A., Isacoff, E. Y. & Chang, C. J. A selective, cell-permeable optical probe for hydrogen peroxide in living cells. Journal of the American Chemical Society 126, 15392–15393 (2004).

  41. 41.

    Chan, J., Dodani, S. C. & Chang, C. J. Reaction-based small-molecule fluorescent probes for chemoselective bioimaging. Nature chemistry 4, 973 (2012).

  42. 42.

    Lin, V. S., Dickinson, B. C. & Chang, C. J. In Methods in enzymology Vol. 526 19–43 (Elsevier, 2013).

  43. 43.

    Karton-Lifshin, N. et al. A unique paradigm for a Turn-ON near-infrared cyanine-based probe: noninvasive intravital optical imaging of hydrogen peroxide. Journal of the American Chemical Society 133, 10960–10965 (2011).

  44. 44.

    Tang, Y. et al. Development of fluorescent probes based on protection–deprotection of the key functional groups for biological imaging. Chemical Society Reviews 44, 5003–5015 (2015).

  45. 45.

    Sun, X. et al. A water-soluble boronate-based fluorescent probe for the selective detection of peroxynitrite and imaging in living cells. Chemical Science 5, 3368–3373 (2014).

  46. 46.

    Sikora, A., Zielonka, J., Lopez, M., Joseph, J. & Kalyanaraman, B. Direct oxidation of boronates by peroxynitrite: mechanism and implications in fluorescence imaging of peroxynitrite. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 47, 1401–1407 (2009).

  47. 47.

    Zielonka, J. et al. Boronate probes as diagnostic tools for real time monitoring of peroxynitrite and hydroperoxides. Chemical research in toxicology 25, 1793–1799 (2012).

  48. 48.

    Romero, N., Denicola, A. & Radi, R. Red blood cells in the metabolism of nitric oxide‐derived peroxynitrite. IUBMB life 58, 572–580 (2006).

  49. 49.

    Denicola, A., Souza, J. M. & Radi, R. Diffusion of peroxynitrite across erythrocyte membranes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95, 3566–3571 (1998).

  50. 50.

    Romero, N., Denicola, A., Souza, J. M. & Radi, R. Diffusion of peroxynitrite in the presence of carbon dioxide. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics 368, 23–30 (1999).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge funding from DP2 HL 137187 and infrastructure from S10 OD021821.

Author information

A.H. and J.V.J. conceived the study. A.H., A.S.J. and E.Z. conducted the in vitro experiments. A.H. and J.L. performed the in vivo experiment. J.Z. designed the probe. A.H. analyzed the data. A.H. and J.V.J. wrote the manuscript and all authors participated in paper revisions.

Correspondence to Jesse V. Jokerst.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hariri, A., Zhao, E., Jeevarathinam, A.S. et al. Molecular imaging of oxidative stress using an LED-based photoacoustic imaging system. Sci Rep 9, 11378 (2019) doi:10.1038/s41598-019-47599-2

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.