Unstable, Super Critical CO2–Water Displacement in Fine Grained Porous Media under Geologic Carbon Sequestration Conditions

Article metrics

  • 579 Accesses

Abstract

In this study we investigated fluid displacement water with supercritical (sc) CO2 in chalk under conditions close to those used for geologic CO2 sequestration (GCS), to answer two main questions: How much volume is available for scCO2 injection? And what is the main mechanism of displacement over a range of temperatures? Characterization of immiscible scCO2 displacement, at the pore scale in the complex microstructure in chalk reservoirs, offers a pathway to better understand the macroscopic processes at the continuum scale. Fluid behavior was simulated by solving the Navier-Stokes equations, using finite-volume methods within a pore network. The pore network was extracted from a high resolution 3D image of chalk, obtained using X-ray nanotomography. Viscous fingering dominates scCO2 infiltration and pores remain only partially saturated. The unstable front, developed with high capillary number, causes filling of pores aligned with the flow direction, reaching a maximum of 70% scCO2 saturation. The saturation rate increases with temperature but the final saturation state is the same for all investigated temperatures. The higher the saturation rate, the higher the dynamic capillary pressure coefficient. A higher dynamic capillary pressure coefficient indicates that scCO2 needs more time to reach capillary equilibrium in the porous medium.

Introduction

There are many cases where detailed information about fluid flow in porous media is necessary for making informed decisions about economical or technical feasibility and for assessing risk. Simulations and predictions for carbon sequestration and contaminated groundwater remediation must all consider unpredictable fluid movement. Geological storage of CO2 in underground reservoirs is recognised as one of the most practical methods to decrease current atmospheric CO2 levels, which is an essential part of the solution for reversing global climate change1,2. In the sequestration process, supercritical CO2 is injected into porous rock formations. A critical criterion is that risk of leakage after sequestration is negligible3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11. Supercritical CO2 is normally considered a nonwetting phase and it is assumed that the aquifer is generally saturated with water, the wetting phase. There are two important questions for effective CO2 injection: i) How much space is available in the formation? And ii) How effective is CO2 migration through the pore network? To answer both of these questions, one must have a clear picture of the volume and connectivity in the pore network, within the formation.

Thermodynamic conditions can vary considerably in natural systems so the state and behaviour of CO2 can also vary. Depending on the environment and the injection procedure, CO2 can form a gas, liquid or supercritical phase. The critical temperature (T) and pressure (P) above which CO2 behaves as a supercritical fluid are 304.25 K and 7.39 MPa. In cold, shallow sedimentary rocks of marine origin, e.g. the Alaska north slope, T is typically 278 K and P is 7 MPa12 so CO2 would be subcritical, whereas for the Halfdan field, a deep chalk reservoir in the Danish North Sea Basin, T is 358 K and P is 40 MPa13,14, which is clearly in the supercritical range. In the shallow, porous basaltic rocks of the Hellisheidi injection site (CarbFix) in Iceland, where T is 300 K and P is 4–8 MPa, CO2 gas is bubbled into water and injected as an aqueous solution15, saturated with gas, where it rapidly reacts with the basalt to form carbonate minerals.

To describe scCO2 displacement in porous media, we need to know about the stability of displacement, fluid flow pathways, saturation rates, the pressure of the phases and capillary pressure. Displacement processes depend on several parameters, such as fluid viscosity, density, interfacial tension between phases and heterogeneity of the porous materials16,17. Two phase displacement is characterized by two dimensionless properties: the capillary number, Ca, which is the ratio of viscous to capillary forces, and the viscosity ratio, M, which represents the viscosity of the invading phase relative to the initial phase18,19. Based on these, the displacement process can generally be categorized into three regimes: viscous fingering, capillary fingering and stable displacement. Viscous fingering occurs at high capillary numbers and low viscosity ratios; capillary fingering happens for low Ca and high M, whereas stable displacement occurs for high Ca and M18.

Investigation of displacement processes can be made using 3D X-ray microtomography images20,21, though other methods, such as confocal microscopy22, have also been used. Krummel et al.22 used confocal microscopy to visualize the flow of two immiscible fluids through packed, hydrophilic glass beads and showed that, as the wetting phase pressure increases, the volume of the initial phase (residual phase) in the porous material decreases. They explained this to be a result of the increase in mobility of the nonwetting phase. Recent advances in X-ray microtomography have made it possible to observe the pore scale processes experimentally7,23,24. A Haines jump25, which is a discontinuous burst in flow that occurs at low capillary number, can be observed at the pore scale, in real time, for flow in sandstone and carbonate rocks23,24.

Herring et al.7 used X-ray microtomography to investigate supercritical scCO2 drainage in a sandstone at 311 K and 8.3 MPa. Their results showed that at M = 0.03 and Ca = 10−8.6, the displacement mechanism is capillary fingering. Yamabe et al.21 predicted the Haines jump for the scCO2–water system in a granular rock model using the lattice Boltzmann (LB) method. They assumed immiscible displacement and performed simulations at 323 K and 13.8 MPa, to emulate real scCO2 conditions. They showed that residual phase saturation increases with decreasing Ca. Zacharoudiou et al.26 also used Lattice Boltzmann to investigate the CO2–water displacement at different capillary numbers. Their results showed that higher viscosity ratio would increase the maximum saturation of CO2. Ramstad et al.27 used a numerical method to predict the relative permeability for sandstones and showed that the nonwetting phase velocity is overestimated because of viscous instabilities in the simulations. Their results were in good agreement with experimental data.

One of the main parameters to describe fluid displacement in the medium is capillary pressure. The measurement of capillary pressure, Pc, depends on the medium. In a capillary tube, the situation is simple and Pc can be determined from the contact angle and the tube radius. In a porous material, where many pores coexist, calculation of Pc is much more complicated. In macroscopic experiments, the capillary pressure is determined from the inlet-outlet pressure difference. However, when using the pore geometry characterised by X-ray tomography, one needs to calculate the phase average pressure over a large number of pores.

The Pc-saturation relationship has been shown to depend on both saturation and rate of saturation, in spite of the traditional view28,29,30, where only the dependence on the saturation is included. The effect of saturation rate on the Pc is known as the dynamic capillary pressure effect31, which establishes the speed at which flow equilibrium between CO2-water is reached. The slope of the capillary pressure-rate of saturation relationship represents the dynamic capillary pressure coefficient. The higher the dynamic capillary pressure coefficient, the slower the equilibrium of phases is found, i.e. longer time is needed to reach equilibrium in the CO2–water system.

The purpose of our work was to determine the pore scale parameters that are associated with scCO2 injection into a water filled porous material at pressures and temperatures relevant for CO2 geologic sequestration. We used X-ray nanotomography to make a 3D image of the microstructure of a sample of chalk from the Danish North Sea Basin and then we used a volume of fluid (VOF) method to investigate displacement in scCO2–water system. We predicted the interfacial tension between the phases, using density functional theory (DFT) with the COSMO-RS implicit solvent model. From this information, we simulated the dynamic displacement for scCO2–water and determined other parameters, such as pressure and saturation rate at 308 < T < 338 K.

Results and Discussion

We investigated two phase flow in a sample of Hod chalk (HC #16). The 3D digital representation of the rock was obtained using X-ray holotomography at the ESRF. Data voxel size was 100 nm. We picked a subvolume within the 3D image with dimensions of 100 voxels in each direction. By subdividing the volume into smaller subvolumes, by shortening the length in the x-direction, we found that porosity changed by less than 3% (Fig. 1). This indicated that the sample was quite homogeneous and that the sampling volume we selected was a good representation of the material. The pore analysis of the sample32 indicated that the pore radii within the volume ranged between 0.2 μm and 1.0 μm and the average pore radius was 0.4 μm. The calculated absolute permeability for the volume, determined using the method described by Gooya et al.32, was 9.06 mD, which is within the range expected for chalk33. Because of the sample’s demonstrated homogeneity and because of computational limitations, we chose to use a 1003 voxel volume, i.e. 103 μm3, for our simulations. The Ca number was from 4.0 × 10−4 to 1.3 × 10−4, M was between to 0.095 to 0.102, and a contact angle of 45°34 for CO2–water was adopted for the simulations.

Figure 1
figure1

Change of porosity, determined from the selected subvolume of the 3D chalk image, as a function of the length of the subvolume in the x direction.

Figure 2 shows the evolution in scCO2 saturation and the pressure difference between water and scCO2 during water displacement by scCO2. The viscosity ratio, M (the viscosity of the advancing phase, scCO2, divided by the viscosity of the initial phase, water), was 0.096 and Ca was 1.8 × 10−4. At high capillary numbers, viscous forces become dominant and the viscosity ratio determines the front stability. For M > 1, the invading fluid is more viscous than the defending fluid and the front remains stable. For M < 1, the invading fluid is the least viscous and viscous forces tend to destabilize the front. For M  1, the front is highly unstable and viscous fingers form. Weakening the viscous forces reduces the dependence on the viscosity ratio and leads to a less stable regime, i.e. more extensive fingering, in the case of M > 1, and to less evident fingers, when M < 1.

Figure 2
figure2

Evolution of scCO2–water displacement in chalk. (a) Saturation (S) of scCO2 and (b) pressure difference (Δπ) between scCO2 and water at the various time steps (τ represents the normalized time). The surrounding images are tomograms showing the pore networks as pale grey; the solid has been made to appear invisible. We see the invasion of CO2 (red) into the chalk as a function of time at 15 MPa and 328 K where M was 0.096 and Ca was 1.8 × 10−4.

At low capillary numbers, capillary forces control the character of the displacement and pore size distribution plays an important role because it has a direct effect on the capillary forces18,35. In our system with high capillary number, the viscosity ratio plays an important role. When M = 0.096, scCO2 displaces the water with an unstable front, in the viscous fingering regime which is in agreement with the drainage displacement patterns predicted in Zacharoudiou et al.26. Figure 2 also shows that during the first time steps, one finger moves in front of the others and after breakthrough, many fingers move toward the outlet.

Figure 2b shows the pressure difference (Δπ) between the scCO2 and water averages. The average pressure is calculated by averaging the specific phase pressure over a large number of pores which is saturated by that phase. It drops suddenly after the first few time steps. The water pressure stays mostly constant during the displacement with some small jumps. The average pressure of the phases is the sum of the capillary pressure in the pores and the contribution from the viscous forces. When the capillary number is very small, the average pressure can be approximated by the capillary pressure so the difference of the average pressures represents capillary pressure under static conditions.

Another important parameter, that affects the average pressure, is the residual water that is trapped in the pores. In high capillary number regimes, where fingering dominates, all of the water cannot be displaced and there are many trapped droplets. The pressure of the trapped water is similar to the surrounding environment, which in this case, is the pressure of scCO2. This is because the small pressure drop across the scCO2–water interface is not high enough compared with the overall pressure drop across the total volume, because of viscous dissipation. Therefore, as scCO2 moves through the volume, the amount of trapped (residual) water increases, which causes a decrease in Δπ. This agrees well with previous 2D investigations by Ferrari et al.35. The small increase in the scCO2 average pressure at the time step, τ = 0.2 results to some extent from Haines jumps25. The Haines jump is a pore filling event that occurs when the nonwetting phase (scCO2) passes from a pore neck into a wider pore body, displacing the wetting phase (water).

The dominance of the viscous fingering mechanism has two effects on the water residual saturation. First, most of the pores oriented along the flow direction are filled by the invading scCO2. Small pores are also filled because of high viscous forces. Figure 3 shows that water residual reaches 0.22 at the final time step. Second, as Fig. 4 shows, most of the residual water remains in dead end pores and pores that transect the flow direction.

Figure 3
figure3

The evolution of water saturation with time at 15 MPa and 328 K where M was 0.096 and Ca was 1.8 × 10−4. Blue represents water; grey, scCO2.

Figure 4
figure4

Residual water in chalk pores at 15 MPa and 328 K where M was 0.096 and Ca was 1.8 × 10−4. Supercritical CO2 displaces water from left to right. Red represents CO2 and blue represents water. The black squares mark examples of areas of trapped fluids. The white dot in the middle is the center of the image. There are many residual water regions in pores that are not parallel to the flow direction.

The evolution with time of scCO2 saturation for several temperatures and 15 MPa is shown in Fig. 5a, the saturation rate of scCO2, in Fig. 5b, water and scCO2 average pressure, in Fig. 5c and the pressure difference between the phases, in Fig. 5d. The scCO2 saturation reaches 0.77 for all temperatures (Fig. 5a). At 308 K, scCO2 approaches breakthrough more slowly and as temperature increases, displacement and breakthrough occur more rapidly. The saturation rate decreases after breakthrough at all temperatures as seen by Zacharoudiou et al.26. At the highest temperature we tested, T = 338 K, the system reaches maximum saturation at τ = 0.7. The most influential parameter for displacement is the ratio of viscosities, M, which increases as temperature rises from 308 to 318 K and then decreases (Table 1). Increasing the temperature also affects the liquid densities. The densities of scCO2 and water decrease by 280 kg/m3 and 14 kg/m3 over a temperature increase from 308 K to 338 K. Interfacial tension decreases gradually as temperature increases (Table 1). Higher temperature decreases the surface forces between scCO2 and water, thus decreasing the interfacial tension. The comparison of the capillary number at the various temperatures (Table 1) demonstrates that Ca decreases as temperature increases.

Figure 5
figure5

The evolution of displacement parameters with simulation time, τ, for four temperatures where M was 0.096 and Ca was 1.8 × 10−4. (a) Supercritical CO2 saturation (breakthrough occurs at the dotted red line), (b) saturation rate at 15 MPa, (c) average pressure, π, in the scCO2 and water phases and (d) pressure difference between scCO2 and water.

Table 1 Physical properties of water and CO2, at 15 MPa for a range of temperatures.

Figure 5b shows that the saturation rate increases with time, from τ = 0 to τ = 0.14, because of the high pressure difference between the two phases, which pushes scCO2 into the chalk. The increase in saturation rate ends with the first breakthrough at τ 0.14. Then it very rapidly decreases until τ = 0.2. After another small increase, it finally decreases gradually towards τ = 1. The saturation rate decreases gradually because the pressure difference between the phases is low.

Comparing the average pressure of scCO2 and water (Fig. 5c) at different temperatures shows that pressure is higher at lower temperature. The viscous dissipation occurs faster at higher temperature because scCO2 moves with higher velocity toward the outlet. The sharp decrease in the average pressure difference for scCO2 and water results mostly from the viscous dissipation and trapped water in the pore volume (Fig. 5d). The pressure difference is higher at lower temperature because of slower dissipation and less residual water in the total pore volume.

Dynamic effects on capillary pressure strongly depend on the rate of saturation (time derivative of saturation), \(\frac{{\rm{d}}S}{{\rm{d}}t}\). This dependence increases for fast displacement at high capillary number. The macroscopic flow equations, known as the Darcy scale, and the experimental results describe the two phase flow properties at equilibrium conditions, where saturation no longer changes. Recent evidence shows that assuming equilibrium is probably not correct because of the dependence of parameters such as pressure on the rate of saturation36,37. Furthermore, saturation is determined using macroscopic data, which averages over the whole core, where there is no access to all points in the volume. Different averaging methods, such as a simple mean, simple phase average and centroid corrected average, produce different results30. At the pore scale, using 3D images, saturation can be determined at each point because the pore geometry is accessible and parameters can be determined for the entire volume. The higher the saturation rate, the higher the dynamic coefficient. A higher dynamic coefficient indicates that the time for reaching capillary equilibrium in the scCO2–water system is higher at higher temperature, which agrees with core scale studies of the dynamic capillary pressure in rocks38.

Conclusions

Chalk reservoirs in the North Sea Basin have been considered for CO2 sequestration and the work presented here contributes to a fundamental understanding of the likely pore scale behavior of injected scCO2 in such very fine grained rocks. Such fine grained sediments are also found in many other geological settings. The results of the simulations show that viscous fingering dominates water displacement at all temperatures. When viscous fingering dominates, pore fluid displacement is not efficient; the available pore volume is only partially filled by CO2. Our modelling predicts that scCO2 fills the small and large pores along the flow direction and traps the initial water phase in dead end pores and in pores that are not aligned with the flow direction. Increasing temperature increases saturation rate but the final saturation state is the same for all temperatures. Faster displacement results from decreased pressure difference between scCO2 and water at higher temperature. When capillary equilibrium is established, CO2 is safely trapped in the geologic medium but at higher temperatures, the dynamic capillary coefficient is higher, which increases the time required for reaching capillary equilibrium. Lower temperatures are therefore an advantage for geologic carbon sequestration projects.

Methods

Tomography and image segmentation

The sample under investigation was Hod chalk (Sample HC#16) taken from a drill core from the Danish North Sea Basin. Details about the sample and the imaging conditions have been presented previously by Müter et al.39. The reconstructed image was segmented using the method described by Müter et al.40. We selected a subvolume that was 100 voxels in each dimension from the 3D image, where the voxel size was 100 nm, to serve as our model pore network for the fluid flow simulations.

Numerical methods

The transient numerical simulation of the capillary flow was made for laminar, incompressible, immiscible, Newtonian fluids. The assumption about immiscibility is reasonable, considering that the simulations are for a short time, covering only the early phase of scCO2 injection and some time is required for water-scCO2 equilibration. The numerical method solves the Navier-Stokes equation and the volume of fluid method (VOF)41,42,43 was used to track the interface. A detailed description of the simulations is presented in the Supporting Information.

The pore volume is filled either by the nonwetting phase, Snw, or by the wetting phase, Sw, where \({S}_{w}=1-{S}_{nw}\). The average pressure in the nonwetting phase is defined as πnw and πw for the wetting phase.

The dimensionless time, τ, is defined as:

$$\tau =\frac{{t}_{n}}{{t}_{total}},$$
(1)

where tn is the current time and ttotal is the total time of the full simulation. The saturation rate is defined as:

$$\frac{{\rm{d}}S}{{\rm{d}}t}{|}_{{t}_{n}}=\frac{S{|}_{n+1}-S{|}_{n}}{{t}_{n+1}-{t}_{n}}\mathrm{.}$$
(2)

The no slip boundary condition was applied at the walls and the wall boundary condition for the volume fraction function was set to zero gradient. The inlet velocity was specified such that the capillary number became 2 × 10−4. The first 0.5 μm of the domain from the inlet was saturated with scCO2 (volume fraction is 1), leading to an overall initial scCO2 saturation of 0.007.

The domain was discretized as an unstructured mesh. More than twice the number of voxels were used for the mesh elements in the domain. Further mesh refinement beyond this did not improve the results. Hence, 1.2 × 106 elements were used for discretizing the pore volume.

Flow properties

The physical properties of water and scCO2 are important characteristics for simulating real sequestration phenomena. The simulations were performed using four temperatures above the critical temperature: 308, 318, 328 and 338 K. The pressure was kept constant at 15 MPa.

The density of supercritical CO2 was obtained by interpolating the experimental results of Chiquet et al.44. For density of water, we used the thermodynamic equations of Hanspal et al.45. The properties are summarized in Table 1. The viscosity of carbon dioxide was obtained using experimental data from Fenghour et al.46 and for water, which is dependent on the temperature, viscosity was calculated using the following equation:

$$\mu =\exp (-24.71+\frac{4209}{T}+0.04527T-3.376\times {10}^{-5}{T}^{2}),$$
(3)

where μ represents liquid water viscosity. The results are summarized in Table 1.

We predicted the interfacial tension between scCO2 and water using a recently developed quantum chemical method47,48 based on density functional theory and the COSMO-RS implicit solvent model. In this method, a virtual surface between scCO2 and water is created and the solvation contribution to the change in free energy for transferring a molecule, from the bulk phase to this interface, is calculated. For each position and orientation, the difference in free energy compared with the bulk phase is calculated as well as the corresponding interfacial area taken up by the molecule. By combining the model with an equation of state, we were able to explore pressure conditions far from atmospheric conditions. More details can been found in Silvestri et al.49.

The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    IPCC 2013. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2013).

  2. 2.

    IPCC. IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage (Cambridge University Press, UK, 2005).

  3. 3.

    Hildenbrand, A., Schlamer, S., Krooss, B. M. & Littke, R. Gas breakthrough experiments on pelitic rocks: comparative study with N2, CO2 and CH4. Geofluids 4, 61–80 (2004).

  4. 4.

    Chalbaud, C. et al. Interfacial tension measurements and wettability evaluation for geological CO2 storage. Advances in Water Resources 32, 98–109 (2009).

  5. 5.

    Suekane, T., Furukawa, N., Tsushima, S., Hirai, S. & Kiyota, M. Application of MRI in the measurement of two-phase flow of supercritical CO2 and water in porous rocks. Journal of Porous Media 12, 143–154 (2009).

  6. 6.

    Iglauer, S., Paluszny, A., Pentland, C. H. & Blunt, M. J. Residual CO2 imaged with X-ray micro-tomography. Geophysical Research Letters 38, 1951–1965 (2011).

  7. 7.

    Herring, A. L., Andersson, L., Newell, D., Carey, J. & Wildenschild, D. Pore-scale observations of supercritical CO2 drainage in Bentheimer sandstone by synchrotron x-ray imaging. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 25, 93–101 (2014).

  8. 8.

    Khudaida, K. J. & Das, D. B. A numerical study of capillary pressure–saturation relationship for supercritical carbon dioxide (CO2) injection in deep saline aquifer. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 92, 3017–3030 (2014).

  9. 9.

    Dai, Z. et al. Probabilistic evaluation of shallow groundwater resources at a hypothetical carbon sequestration site. Scientific Reports 4, 4006 (2014).

  10. 10.

    Zade, H. et al. Simulated leakage of high pCO2 water negatively impacts bivalve dominated infaunal communities from the Western Baltic Sea. Scientific Reports 6, 31447 (2016).

  11. 11.

    Liu, Y., Xu, J. & Peng, S. An experimental investigation of the risk of triggering geological disasters by injection under shear stress. Scientific Reports 6, 38810 (2016).

  12. 12.

    Espinoza, D. N. & Santamarina, J. C. Water-CO2-mineral systems: interfacial tension, contact angle, and diffusion – implications to CO2 geological storage. Water Resources Research 46, 1–10 (2010).

  13. 13.

    Increased oil recovery from Halfdan chalk by flooding with CO2-enriched water: a laboratory experiment; available from, http://www.geus.dk/dk/publications.

  14. 14.

    Oil and gas production in denmark; available from, http://www.ens.dk (2004).

  15. 15.

    Matter, J. M. et al. Rapid carbon mineralization for permanent disposal of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions. Science 352, 1312–1314 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Semprebon, C., Scheel, M., Herminghaus, S., Seemann, R. & Brinkmann, M. Liquid morphologies and capillary forces between three spherical beads. Physical Review E 94, 012907 (2016).

  17. 17.

    Sadjadi, Z., Jung, M., Seemann, R. & Rieger, H. Meniscus arrest during capillary rise in asymmetric microfluidic pore junctions. Langmuir 31, 2600–2608 (2015).

  18. 18.

    Lenormand, R., Touboul, E. & Zarcone, C. Numerical models and experiments on immiscible displacements in porous media. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 189, 37–38 (1988).

  19. 19.

    Zhang, C., Oostrom, M., Wietsma, T. W., Grate, J. W. & Warner, M. G. Influence of viscous and capillary forces on immiscible fluid displacement: pore-scale experimental study in a water-wet micromodel demonstrating viscous and capillary fingering. Energy & Fuels 25, 3493–3505 (2011).

  20. 20.

    Mukherjee, P. P., Kang, Q. & Wang, C.-Y. Pore-scale modeling of two-phase transport in polymer electrolyte fuel cell – progress and perspective. Energy & Environmental Science 4, 346–369 (2011).

  21. 21.

    Yamabe, H., Tsuji, T., Liang, Y. & Matsuoka, T. Lattice boltzmann simulations of supercritical CO2–water drainage displacement in porous media: CO2 saturation and displacement mechanism. Environmental Science & Technology 49, 537–543 (2014).

  22. 22.

    Krummel, A. T., Datta, S. S., Münster, S. & Weitz, D. A. Visualizing multiphase flow and trapped fluid configurations in a model three-dimensional porous medium. AIChE Journal 59, 1022–1029 (2013).

  23. 23.

    Berg, S. et al. Multiphase flow in porous rock imaged under dynamic flow conditions with fast X-ray computed microtomography. Petrophysics 55, 304–312 (2014).

  24. 24.

    Berg, S. et al. Real-time 3D imaging of haines jumps in porous media flow. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 3755–3759 (2013).

  25. 25.

    Haines, W. B. Studies in the physical properties of soil. V. The hysteresis effect in capillary properties, and the modes of moisture distribution associated therewith. The Journal of Agricultural Science 20, 97–116 (1930).

  26. 26.

    Zacharoudiou, I., Boek, E. S., Crawshaw, J. The impact of drainage displacement patterns and Haines jumps on CO2 storage efficiency. Scientific Reports 15561 (2018).

  27. 27.

    Ramstad, T., Idowu, N., Nardi, C. & Øren, P.-E. Relative permeability calculations from two-phase flow simulations directly on digital images of porous rocks. Transport in Porous Media 94, 487–504 (2011).

  28. 28.

    Das, D. B. & Mirzaei, M. Experimental measurement of dynamic effect in capillary pressure relationship for two-phase flow in weakly layered porous media. AIChE Journal 59, 1723–1734 (2013).

  29. 29.

    Lopez, O. et al. Pore-scale modelling of CO2-brine flow properties at In Salah, Algeria. Energy Procedia 4, 3762–3769 (2011).

  30. 30.

    Bottero, S., Hassanizadeh, S. M. & Kleingeld, P. J. From Local Measurements to an Upscaled Capillary Pressure–Saturation Curve. Transport in Porous Media 88, 271–291 (2011).

  31. 31.

    Sakaki, T., O’Carroll, D. M., Illangasekare, T. H. Direct Quantification of Dynamic Effects in Capillary Pressure for Drainage—Wetting Cycles. Vadose Zone Journal 424–437 (2010).

  32. 32.

    Gooya, R. et al. Effect of tomography resolution on the calculated microscopic properties of porous materials: comparison of sandstone and carbonate rocks. Applied Physics Letters 109, 104102 (2016).

  33. 33.

    Vejbæk, O., Frykman, P., Bech, N. & Nielsen, C. The history of hydrocarbon filling of Danish chalk fields. In Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference series, vol. 6, 1331–1345 (Geological Society of London, 2005).

  34. 34.

    Bikkina, P. K. Contact angle measurements of CO2–water–quartz/calcite systems in the perspective of carbon sequestration. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 5, 1259–1271 (2011).

  35. 35.

    Ferrari, A. & Lunati, I. Direct numerical simulations of interface dynamics to link capillary pressure and total surface energy. Advances in Water Resources 57, 19–31 (2013).

  36. 36.

    Camps-Roach, G., O’Carroll, D. M., Newson, T. A., Sakaki, T. & Illangasekare, T. H. Experimental investigation of dynamic effects in capillary pressure: grain size dependency and upscaling. Water Resources Research 46, 1951–1965 (2010).

  37. 37.

    Bottero, S., Hassanizadeh, S., Kleingeld, P. & Heimovaara, T. Nonequilibrium capillarity effects in two-phase flow through porous media at different scales. Water Resources Research 47, 271–291 (2011).

  38. 38.

    Das, D. B., Gill, B. S., Abidoye, L. K. & Khudaida, K. J. A numerical study of dynamic capillary pressure effect for supercritical carbon dioxide-water flow in porous domain. AIChE Journal 60, 4266–4278 (2014).

  39. 39.

    Müter, D. et al. Resolution dependence of petrophysical parameters derived from X-ray tomography of chalk. Applied Physics Letters 105, 33–39 (2014).

  40. 40.

    Müter, D., Pedersen, S., Sørensen, H. O., Feidenhans, R. & Stipp, S. L. S. Improved segmentation of X-ray tomography data from porous rocks using a dual filtering approach. Computers & Geosciences 49, 131–139 (2012).

  41. 41.

    Hirt, C. & Nichols, B. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics 39, 201–225 (1981).

  42. 42.

    Lafaurie, B., Nardone, C., Scardovelli, R., Zaleski, S. & Zanetti, G. Modelling merging and fragmentation in multiphase flows with {SURFER}. Journal of Computational Physics 113, 134–147 (1994).

  43. 43.

    Scardovelli, R. & Zaleski, S. Direct numerical simulation of free-surface and interfacial flow. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 31, 567–603 (1999).

  44. 44.

    Chiquet, P., Daridon, J.-L., Broseta, D. & Thibeau, S. CO2/water interfacial tensions under pressure and temperature conditions of CO2 geological storage. Energy Conversion and Management 48, 736–744 (2007).

  45. 45.

    Hanspal, N. S. & Das, D. B. Dynamic effects on capillary pressure–saturation relationships for two-phase porous flow: implications of temperature. AIChE Journal 58, 1951–1965 (2012).

  46. 46.

    Fenghour, A., Wakeham, W. A. & Vesovic, V. The viscosity of carbon dioxide. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 27, 31–44 (1998).

  47. 47.

    Andersson, M. P., Bennetzen, M., Klamt, A. & Stipp, S. L. S. First-principles prediction of liquid/liquid interfacial tension. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 10, 3401–3408 (2014).

  48. 48.

    Andersson, M. P., Dideriksen, K., Sakuma, H. & Stipp, S. L. S. Modelling how incorporation of divalent cations affects calcite wettability–implications for biomineralisation and oil recovery. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 6, 28854 (2016).

  49. 49.

    Silvestri, A., Stipp, S. L. S. & Andersson, M. P. Predicting CO2–H2O interfacial tension using COSMO-RS. Journal of Chemical Theory and Compution 13, 804–810 (2017).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Kim N. Dalby and Dirk Müter for technical support during beam time and we are grateful for financial support from the Danish Advanced Technology Foundation (HTF, now Innovation Fund Denmark, IFD) and Maersk Oil and Gas A/S (now Total) for the P3 Project and from the Danish Strategic Research Council (now IFD) in the CINEMA Project. Travel to the synchrotron facility was supported by the Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation via Danscatt. RG and AM acknowledge fellowships from the CO2 REACT Project of Seventh Framework Programme of the European Commission, PITNGA-2012-317235.

Author information

H.O.S. conceived the experiment, R.G. conducted the numerical simulations and wrote the main manuscript text, A.S. was responsible for the D.F.T. calculations for the prediction of the interfacial tension, A.M. conducted the pore size distribution simulations. All authors contributed in discussions and to writing the manuscript.

Correspondence to R. Gooya.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gooya, R., Silvestri, A., Moaddel, A. et al. Unstable, Super Critical CO2–Water Displacement in Fine Grained Porous Media under Geologic Carbon Sequestration Conditions. Sci Rep 9, 11272 (2019) doi:10.1038/s41598-019-47437-5

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.