Erythropoietin (EPO) haplotype associated with all-cause mortality in a cohort of Italian patients with Type-2 Diabetes

Article metrics

  • 393 Accesses

Abstract

Type-2 Diabetes (T2D), diabetic complications, and their clinical risk factors harbor a substantial genetic component but the genetic factors contributing to overall diabetes mortality remain unknown. Here, we examined the association between genetic variants at 21 T2D-susceptibility loci and all-cause mortality in an elderly cohort of 542 Italian diabetic patients who were followed for an average of 12.08 years. Univariate Cox regression analyses detected age, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), diabetes duration, retinopathy, nephropathy, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and anaemia as predictors of all-cause mortality. When Cox proportional hazards multivariate models adjusted for these factors were run, three erythropoietin (EPO) genetic variants in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with each other (rs1617640-T/G, rs507392-T/C and rs551238-A/C) were significantly (False Discovery Rate < 0.1) associated with mortality. Haplotype multivariate analysis revealed that patients carrying the G-C-C haplotype have an increased probability of survival, while an opposite effect was observed among subjects carrying the T-T-A haplotype. Our findings provide evidence that the EPO gene is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with T2D. Thus, understanding the mechanisms by which the genetic variability of EPO affects the mortality of T2D patients may provide potential targets for therapeutic interventions to improve the survival of these patients.

Introduction

T2D has an estimated prevalence of more than 9% worldwide, with the number of diabetic patients predicted to increase over the next ten years particularly due to the growth of the aging population and the increased incidence of overweight and obesity1. Patients with T2D have an increased risk of developing microvascular and macrovascular complications, which, in turn, are the major cause of cardiovascular deaths in these individuals2. Cancer as well as non-cardiovascular and non-cancer causes have also been reported to increase the risk of mortality in diabetic patients compared to nondiabetic subjects3,4. The underlying root factors of the relationship between diabetes complications and mortality are not fully understood and their identification is vital to improve health outcomes and reduce premature mortality rates of patients. Recently, an observational cohort study reported that modifiable lifestyle habits, such as the quality of food eaten, physical activity, and tobacco and alcohol use, are associated with reduced risk for CKD and mortality in middle-aged individuals with T2D5, suggesting that lifestyle behavior might in part account for this relationship. However, findings from several other observational studies argue for a more complex link between the main determinants of mortality in diabetic patients6,7,8,9. For instance, using data on more than 200,000 adults with T2D and after adjusting for multiple confounding factors, Kontopantelis et al.8 predicted that U-shaped relationships exist between glycated hemoglobin, blood pressure, total cholesterol, and all-cause mortality in diabetic patients. Consistently, a significant association between increased mortality and low levels of the above mentioned biological factors has also been reported in a large population of very old diabetic subjects (≥80 years of age)9.

T2D, diabetic complications, and their clinical risk factors have a strong genetic component10,11, which, in turn, might contribute to a higher risk for mortality. In this regard, previous work showed a significant association of three common genetic variants on 9p21, a chromosomal region linked to T2D and cardiovascular disease, with the mortality rate in Dutch diabetic patients12. Association with all-cause mortality was also reported for a variant at the glutamate-ammonia ligase (GLUL) locus, a marker of increased CHD risk13. Furthermore, a genetic risk score that includes 38 common T2D risk variants was found associated with mortality in an ethnic- and body weight-specific manner14. However, despite these findings, little is still known about the genetic factors that predispose to mortality in T2D patients. To this end, we performed a population-based, prospective cohort analysis to identify genetic risk factors for all-cause mortality in a cohort of central Italian diabetic patients, who were previously tested for genetic associations with T2D and its complications15.

Results

Baseline phenotypic and clinical characteristics of the entire cohort of diabetic patients and stratified by survivors and non-survivors are shown in Table 1. The mean age of all T2D patients was 65.8 years, and 54.8% of them were men. The population had a mean diabetes duration of 15.3 years (SD 11.4 years) and on average an acceptable to good glycemic control (mean HbA1c 7.5%). At the end of an average follow-up duration of 12.08 years, 98 patients had died (18.1%). Patients who died during the follow-up were older and had significantly higher insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), serum levels of glucose, insulin, HbA1c, and average diabetes duration. Moreover, a significantly higher prevalence of nephropathy, diabetic retinopathy, and CKD characterized the patients who died during the follow-up (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of T2D patients stratified according to the occurrence of death during follow-up.

Overall survival rates for diabetic patients with higher values of WHR and HbA1c were worse than the other patients (Table 2). Diabetes duration also significantly influenced patient survival, with patients having a longer diabetes duration living shorter than those with shorter diabetes duration. Furthermore, diabetic patients with neuropathy nephropathy, retinopathy, CKD, and anemia lived less than patients without vascular complications (Table 2).

Table 2 Hazard ratios for all-cause mortality for baseline characteristics.

Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that the overall survival rate of diabetic patients was also correlated with five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in or near three different genes: rs1617640-T/G, rs507392-T/C, and rs551238-A/C in the EPO gene, rs1121980-C/T in the FTO gene, and rs1800849-C/T in the UCP3 gene (see Supplementary Fig. S1 and Table S1). After False Discovery Rate (FDR) correction, association of EPO-variants with survival remained significant (q < 0.10; see Supplementary Table S1). Multivariate Cox proportional models were then fitted using age, WHR, HbA1c, diabetes duration, retinopathy, nephropathy, CKD, and anaemia as covariates. Once again, we found that variants in the EPO gene remained significantly associated with mortality risk at a nominal level of 0.05. As shown in Fig. 1, patients carrying the minor allele of rs1617640-(G) and rs507392-(C) had a significantly increased chance of survival with HR values of 0.63 (95% CI = 0.40–0.98, P-value = 0.039) and 0.58 (95%CI = 0.37–0.92, P-value = 0.020), respectively. There was a trend for a positive association with survival also for carriers of the minor allele of rs551238-(C) (HR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.42–1.03, P-value = 0.065).

Figure 1
figure1

Survival functions of carriers of minor allele (black) vs non carriers (grey) of EPO variants. (A) rs1617640; (B) rs507392; (C) rs551238. Time is expressed in years, where 0 is considered the time of recruitment. The Cox regression was adjusted for age, gender WHR, HbA1c, anaemia, diabetes duration, and diabetes complications. HR value, confidence interval, and p-value from Cox regression analysis are reported inside the figure.

LD analysis showed a high degree of disequilibrium among the three EPO SNPs (r2 > 0.97), meaning that the associations are not independent. As such, haplotype analysis was performed to further explore the relationship between EPO variations and diabetes mortality risk. Out of the eight possible haplotypes, two, T-T-A (major allele combination, 67.0%) and G-C-C (minor allele combination, 32.2%), were the most common in our study samples. As shown in Fig. 2, haplotype multivariate survival analysis corroborated the single-locus analyses. While the presence of the T-T-A haplotype was found to decrease the chance of survival, carriers of the G-C-C haplotype showed a significantly increased survival chance with respect to non-carriers (HR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.41–0.99, P-value = 0.044).

Figure 2
figure2

Survival functions of carriers (black) vs non carriers (grey) of the G-C-C haplotype of EPO. Time is expressed in years, where 0 is considered the time of recruitment. The Cox regression model was adjusted for age, gender WHR, HbA1c, anaemia, diabetes duration, and diabetes complications. HR value, confidence interval and p-value from Cox regression analysis are reported inside the figure.

Discussion

Patients with T2D have higher all-cause mortality risk than matched individuals without diabetes16,17. Epidemiological studies have identified several demographic, socioeconomic, and biological independent predictors of mortality in T2D patients8,18, but only a few of them have evaluated the role of genetic factors. In agreement with the current literature, this study identified age, WHR, HbA1c, diabetes duration, retinopathy, nephropathy, CKD, and anaemia as predictors of all-cause mortality. Additionally, after adjusting for the effects of these risk factors, our results showed that three EPO genetic variants in high LD (rs1617640-T/G, rs507392-T/C and rs551238-A/C) were associated with all-cause mortality risk in both single-SNP and haplotype-based analyses.

The EPO gene encodes erythropoietin, which is a kidney-derived cytokine that plays a major role in promoting erythropoiesis, in particular in response to hypoxic stress19. However, recent evidence shows that EPO is also expressed locally in others tissues and organs, including peripheral endothelial cells, muscle, and insulin-producing cells, where it displays anti-apoptotic, anti-inflammatory, and angiogenic effects due to its ability to activate several transduction signalling pathways20,21,22,23. A growing literature argues for a critical role of EPO in diabetes and its complications24. For example, Fenjves et al. demonstrated that EPO overexpression in human islet cells provides protection from cell death25. Studies in model organisms also suggest that EPO can protect against diabetes through a direct effect on β cells26, and possibly through the modulation of glucose metabolism, glucose tolerance, and insulin sensitivity27. Furthermore, Abhary and colleagues identified three genetic variants in EPO associated with a higher risk to develop diabetic retinopathy28. Although no significant associations between EPO SNPs and T2D or its vascular complications were identified in our earlier analysis15, the findings in this study corroborate the close and complex link between erythropoietin and diabetes status.

A weakness of this study is that the specific causes of death were not determined during follow-up, preventing us from conducting an in-depth evaluation of the association of the investigated SNPs with the mortality risk in diabetic patients. Also, the mechanism through which the EPO TTA haplotype increases mortality in T2D patients is unknown at this time. However, it is important to point out that Tong and colleagues previously found that the EPO rs1617640-T allele is associated with a 25-fold higher promoter activity compared with the G allele, suggesting that this SNP plays a significant functional role in EPO expression29. Taken together with our results this observation suggests that high levels of erythropoietin may have detrimental effects in patients with T2D. This idea is supported by several pieces of evidence. Elevated erythropoietin concentrations have been linked to proliferative diabetic retinopathy, which in turn is associated with excessive vascular growth30. A study by Wagner and colleagues also showed that in diabetic patients with CKD, elevated endogenous EPO levels were predictive of all-cause mortality and related mainly to markers of inflammation independently of kidney function and haemoglobin levels31. Similar results were observed in people aged 85 years and older32 and in patients with heart failure33,34. Given that our analysis did not detect any correlation between the studied EPO SNPs and the presence/absence of anaemia (data not shown), it is plausible that inflammation, a key emerging risk factor for T2D, is a potential mechanism linking EPO and mortality in T2D patients.

It has been shown that EPO acts as a proliferative factor and thereby can promote tumor growth and metastasis35. Ongoing studies indicate that the use of EPO for the treatment of cancer-induced anaemia is related to an increased incidence of cancer progression and reduced survival of patients36. Epidemiologic evidence indicates that diabetes is associated with increased risk of many types of cancer37; therefore, it is also possible that higher levels of EPO might contribute to the increased risk of mortality in diabetic patients because of an increased incidence of cancer. In this regard, it is notable that an EPO polymorphism (rs576236) in LD with those here investigated confers susceptibility to adrenal tumor38.

In conclusion, this study identified an EPO haplotype that increases the risk of mortality among patients with T2D, independently of non-genetic risk factors. Over the last 30 years, it has become clear that erythropoietin possesses several tissue-specific functions that go far beyond the regulation of red cell production; therefore, further studies are needed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms linking EPO and mortality in diabetic patients. The elucidation of the mechanisms underlying the observed genetic associations could not only enhance our understanding of the molecular and genetic basis of the disease but also provide valuable insights into potential targets for therapeutic interventions aimed at increasing the survival of diabetic patients.

Methods

Study population and genetic data

Classification criteria and details of the cohort as well as the genetic data used in this study were previously reported15. Briefly, the sample includes 542 individuals with T2D (mean age 65.8 ± 8.0), collected by the Diabology Unit, INRCA (National Institute on Health and Science on Aging) in Ancona (Italy). Briefly, demographic, anthropometric and clinical data were collected for each individual and recorded in a well-defined questionnaire. The presence/absence of diabetic complications was evidenced as follows: diabetic retinopathy by fundoscopy through dilated pupils and/or fluorescence angiography; incipient nephropathy, defined as an urinary albumin excretion rate > 30 mg/24 h and a normal creatinine clearance; CKD, defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2; neuropathy was established by electromyography.

Ethical approval for this study has been granted by the Ethics Committee of National Institute on Health and Science on Aging (INRCA). All participants gave written informed consent. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

The genetic data includes 40 SNPs located in or near 21 candidate genes. However, nine SNPs were excluded from the analysis because they had either a high proportion of missing genotypes (call rate lower than 90%; rs669173, rs2853669, rs4880, rs13266634, rs7901695, rs8047395) or a minor allele frequency (MAF) lower than 5% (rs3811791, rs16889462, rs2237892). The final dataset included 31 high-quality SNPs that were tested for association with survival (see Supplementary Table S1).

Outcome

The main outcome of our study was all-cause mortality. The average follow-up duration was 12.08 years (range 1.41–13.66 years). At each follow-up visit, information was collected on vital status, functional status, and occurrence of diabetes complications. For patients who died during the follow-up period, information about date and place of death were collected from death certificates provided by relatives or caregivers. City or town registers were consulted to retrieve information about death when death certificates were not provided. After this period 61 men (20.5%) and 37 women (15.1%) died.

Analytic approach

Unpaired t-test and chi-square were performed for continuous and categorical variables, respectively, to compare variables and covariates between dead and survived patients at the end of the follow-up period. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the effect of anthropometric and haematological parameters, anaemia, diabetes duration, and diabetes complications on mortality. The length of survival from baseline visit until death was used as failure time for the models. Survivors were censored on the day of the last follow-up visit. The proportional hazard assumption was checked graphically, plotting the log-minus-log survival function over time. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate survival curves stratified for each SNP. To control for the false-positive rate, the FDR method was used; the cut-off of the FDR adjusted p-value (q-value) was 0.10.

Covariates significantly associated with survival (p < 0.05) in the univariate analyses were included as confounding factors in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. These models were used to identify SNPs/haplotypes significantly associated with all-cause mortality. In all analyses, genetic data were coded using a dominant model (carriers for the minor allele versus non-carriers).

Pairwise measures of LD between the analyzed loci were calculated with the Haploview 4.239. The amount of LD was quantified by Lewontin’s coefficient (D’).

Statistical analyses were performed using the survival package of R v3.4.2 statistical language (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, www.r-project.org).

Data Availability

The dataset analysed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Zheng, Y., Ley, S. H. & Hu, F. B. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 14, 88–98, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2017.151 (2018).

  2. 2.

    Bauduceau, B., Le Floch, J. P., Halimi, S., Verny, C. & Doucet, J. SFD/SFGG Intergroup. Cardiovascular Complications Over 5 Years and Their Association With Survival in the GERODIAB Cohort of Elderly French Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 41, 156–162, https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-1437 (2018).

  3. 3.

    Jiang, Y. et al. Diabetes mellitus and incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur J Epidemiol. 26, 863–876, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-011-9617-y (2011).

  4. 4.

    Baena-Díez, J. M. et al. Risk of cause-specific death in individuals with diabetes: A competing risks analysis. Diabetes Care 39, 1987–1995, https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-0614 (2016).

  5. 5.

    Dunkley, A. et al. Diabetes Prevention in the Real World: Effectiveness of Pragmatic Lifestyle Interventions for the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes and of the Impact of Adherence to Guideline Recommendations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 37, 922–933, https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-2195 (2014).

  6. 6.

    Chiang, H. H. et al. All-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes in association with achieved hemoglobin A1c, systolic blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. PLoS One 9, e109501, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109501 (2014).

  7. 7.

    Arnold, L. W. & Wang, Z. The HbA1c and all-cause mortality relationship in patients with type 2 diabetes is j-shaped: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Rev Diabet Stud. 11, 138–152, https://doi.org/10.1900/RDS.2014.11.138 (2014).

  8. 8.

    Kontopantelis, E. et al. Glucose, blood pressure and cholesterol levels and their relationships to clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study. Diabetologia 58, 505–518, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-014-3473-8 (2014).

  9. 9.

    Hamada, S. & Gulliford, M. C. Mortality in Individuals Aged 80 and Older with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Relation to Glycosylated Hemoglobin, Blood Pressure, and Total Cholesterol. J Am Geriatr Soc. 64, 1425–1431, https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14215 (2016).

  10. 10.

    Ali, O. Genetics of type 2 diabetes. World J Diabetes 4, 114–123, https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v4.i4.114 (2013).

  11. 11.

    Ahlqvist, E., Van Zuydam, N. R., Groop, L. C. & McCarthy, M. I. The genetics of diabetic complications. Nat Rev Nephrol. 11, 277–287, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2015.37 (2015).

  12. 12.

    Landman, G. W. D. et al. Association between 9p21 genetic variants and mortality risk in a prospective cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes (ZODIAC-15). Cardiovasc Diabetol. 11, 138, https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-11-138 (2012).

  13. 13.

    Prudente, S. et al. Genetic Variant at the GLUL locus predicts all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 64, 2658–2663, https://doi.org/10.2337/db14-1653 (2015).

  14. 14.

    Leong, A., Porneala, B., Dupuis, J., Florez, J. C. & Meigs, J. B. Type 2 diabetes genetic predisposition, obesity, and all-cause mortality risk in the U.S.: A multiethnic analysis. Diabetes Care 39, 539–546, https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-2080 (2016).

  15. 15.

    Montesanto, A. et al. Genes associated with Type 2 Diabetes and vascular complications. Aging 10, 178–196, https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.101375 (2018).

  16. 16.

    Tancredi, M. et al. Excess Mortality among Persons with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 373, 1720–1732, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1504347 (2015).

  17. 17.

    Tönnies, T., Hoyer, A. & Brinks, R. Excess mortality for people diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in 2012 – Estimates based on claims data from 70 million Germans. Nutr Met Cardiovasc Dis. 28, 887–891, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2018.05.008 (2018).

  18. 18.

    McEwen, L. N. et al. Predictors of mortality over 8 years in type 2 diabetic patients: Translating research into action for diabetes (TRIAD). Diabetes Care 35, 1301–1309, https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-2281 (2012).

  19. 19.

    Bunn, H. F. Erythropoietin. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 3, a011619–a011619, https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a011619 (2013).

  20. 20.

    Lombardero, M., Kovacs, K. & Scheithauer, B. W. Erythropoietin: A hormone with multiple functions. Pathobiology 78, 41–53, https://doi.org/10.1159/000322975 (2011).

  21. 21.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Erythropoietin action in stress response, tissue maintenance and metabolism. Int J Mol Sci. 15, 10296–10333, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms150610296 (2014).

  22. 22.

    Wang, L., Di, L. & Noguchi, C. T. Erythropoietin, a novel versatile player regulating energy metabolism beyond the erythroid system. Int J Biol Sci. 10, 921–939, https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.9518 (2014).

  23. 23.

    Maiese, K., Chong, Z. Z., Shang, Y. C. & Wang, S. Erythropoietin: New directions for the nervous system. Int J Mol Sci. 13, 11102–11129, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms130911102 (2012).

  24. 24.

    Maiese, K. Erythropoietin and diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes 6, 1259–1273, https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v6.i14.1259 (2015).

  25. 25.

    Fenjves, E. S. et al. Adenoviral gene transfer of erythropoietin confers cytoprotection to isolated pancreatic islets. Transplantation 77, 13–18, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TP.0000110422.27977.26 (2004).

  26. 26.

    Choi, D. et al. Erythropoietin protects against diabetes through direct effects on pancreatic β cells. J Exp Med. 207, 2831–2842, https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20100665 (2010).

  27. 27.

    Chen, L. N. et al. Erythropoietin improves glucose metabolism and pancreatic β-cell damage in experimental diabetic rats. Mol Med Rep. 12, 5391–5398, https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.4006 (2015).

  28. 28.

    Abhary, S. et al. Association between erythropoietin gene polymorphisms and diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 128, 102–106, https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.355 (2010).

  29. 29.

    Tong, Z. et al. Promoter polymorphism of the erythropoietin gene in severe diabetic eye and kidney complications. PNAS 105, 6998–7003, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800454105 (2008).

  30. 30.

    Semeraro, F. et al. Serum and intraocular concentrations of erythropoietin and vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with type 2 diabetes and proliferative retinopathy. Diabetes Metab. 40, 445–451, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2014.04.005 (2014).

  31. 31.

    Wagner, M. et al. Endogenous erythropoietin and the association with inflammation and mortality in diabetic chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 6, 1573–1579, https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.00380111 (2011).

  32. 32.

    Den Elzen, W. P. J. et al. Effect of erythropoietin levels on mortality in old age: The Leiden 85-plus study. CMAJ. 182, 1953–1958, https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.100374 (2010).

  33. 33.

    Belonje, A. M. S. et al. Endogenous erythropoietin and outcome in heart failure. Circulation 121, 245–251, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.844662 (2010).

  34. 34.

    Garimella, P. S. et al. Association of Serum Erythropoietin with Cardiovascular Events, Kidney Function Decline, and Mortality: The Health Aging and Body Composition Study. Circ Heart Fail. 9, e002124, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002124 (2016).

  35. 35.

    Hedley, B. D., Allan, A. L. & Xenocostas, A. The role of erythropoietin and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in tumor progression. Clin Cancer Res. 17, 6373–6380, https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2577 (2011).

  36. 36.

    Cao, Y. Erythropoietin in cancer: A dilemma in risk therapy. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 24, 190–199, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2012.10.007 (2013).

  37. 37.

    Giovannucci, E. et al. Diabetes and cancer: A consensus report. Diabetes Care 33, 1674–1685, https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-0666 (2010).

  38. 38.

    Zhang, C. et al. Association of erythropoietin gene rs576236 polymorphism and risk of adrenal tumors in a Chinese population. J Biomed Res. 28, 456–461, https://doi.org/10.7555/JBR.28.20130126 (2014).

  39. 39.

    Barrett, J. C., Fry, B., Maller, J. & Daly, M. J. Haploview: Analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21, 263–265, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457 (2005).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was partially supported by Ricerca Corrente funding from Italian Ministry of Health to IRCCS INRCA, by “Ricerca scientifica di Ateneo” from UNIVPM to FO and by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (PRIN: Progetti di Ricerca di rilevante Interesse Nazionale – 2015, Prot. 20157ATSLF) to G.R. The work has been made possible by the collaboration with Gruppo Baffa (Sadel Spa, Sadel San Teodoro srl, Sadel CS srl, Casa di Cura Madonna dello Scoglio, AGI srl, Casa di Cura Villa del Rosario srl, Savelli Hospital srl, Casa di Cura Villa Ermelinda).

Author information

F.O., R.T., A.R.B. and G.R. conceived the experiments; E.M., C.P., C.G. and P.G. conduced the experiments; A.M., P.C., and G.R. made statistical analyses; F.O., A.M., M.D.L. and G.R. analysed the data and wrote the manuscript; C.F., F.R., M.D.L. and G.P made critical review. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Giuseppina Rose.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Montesano, A., Bonfigli, A., De Luca, M. et al. Erythropoietin (EPO) haplotype associated with all-cause mortality in a cohort of Italian patients with Type-2 Diabetes. Sci Rep 9, 10395 (2019) doi:10.1038/s41598-019-46894-2

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.