Article | Open | Published:

Inter-amphibian predation in the Early Cretaceous of China

Abstract

For most fossil taxa, dietary inference relies primarily on indirect evidence from jaw morphology and the dentition. In rare cases, however, preserved gut contents provide direct evidence of feeding strategy and species interaction. This is important in the reconstruction of food webs and energy flow through ancient ecosystems. The Early Cretaceous Chinese Jehol Biota has yielded several such examples, with lizards, birds, small dinosaurs, and mammals as both predator and prey. Here we describe an Early Cretaceous fossil frog specimen, genus Genibatrachus, that contains an adult salamander within its body cavity. The salamander is attributed to the hynobiid-like genus Nuominerpeton. The salamander skeleton is complete and articulated, suggesting it was caught and swallowed shortly before the frog itself died and was buried.

Introduction

Assessing the diet of fossil organisms is important in understanding how they related to their environment and to other organisms within that environment, for example in reconstructing food-webs and energy flow within an ecosystem1,2. However, dietary inference in extinct organisms must usually be based on dentition and jaw architecture, by comparison with living relatives with known feeding strategies. This can be challenging, especially for reptiles and amphibians with relatively simple dentitions. Gut contents provide the best direct evidence of diet in fossil taxa, and can yield surprises. Thus, for example, the simple conical teeth of the Early Cretaceous Chinese lizard Yabeinosaurus suggested insectivory1, but gut contents show it to have been a frequent piscivore3, indicating a rather different set of ecological interactions. Nonetheless, preserved and identifiable gut contents are relatively rare, especially in small tetrapods.

Invertebrate remains (insects, conchostracans) have been recorded in the guts of fossil salamanders from the Jurassic of China4,5, and indeterminate gut contents were noted in a salamander from the Early Cretaceous Spanish locality of Las Hoyas6. In fossil frogs, the record of gut contents is also most confined to fragmentary remains of insects, sponge or snail shell fragments, and plants7,8,9. Fossil evidence of amphibian predation on vertebrates is much rarer. The only example we are aware of in a salamander is that of a 40–35 myr (Eocene) specimen of Phosphotriton sigei from France that contains frog remains10. In frogs, recorded vertebrate remains include fish bones in an Oligocene palaeobatrachid from Germany11, indeterminate reptile bones in an Eocene frog from Messel, Germany12, and vertebrae of a larval frog in a specimen of the semi-aquatic Miocene Rana pueyoi from Spain8. Here we add to the record for frogs, with a specimen from the Early Cretaceous of China that has a complete adult salamander in its gut.

Results

Locality and horizon

The specimen, Yingliang Stone Nature History Museum (YLSNHM), YLSNHM01088, is represented by a part and counterpart block recovered from the Pigeon Hill locality, near Taipingqiao Village, Baoshan Town, Morin Dawa Daur Autonomous Banner of Hulunbuir City, Inner Mongolia, China (Fig. 1). The deposits from which it was found are those of the Guanghua Formation that has been dated at 120–125 Ma13, and are thus stratigraphically and chronologically equivalent to the main fossil bearing beds of Yixian Formation in western Liaoning Province (Ar40/Ar39 dating14).

Figure 1
figure1

Map of China showing the position of the Early Cretaceous Pigeon Hill locality in Inner Mongolia.

Description and interpretation

Specimen YLSNHM01088 preserves the skeleton of a medium-sized frog (Snout-Pelvis length [SPL] = 73.6 mm, skull length 24 mm) in dorsal view (main block) with the soft tissue outline of the body clearly visible (Fig. 2a,b). The frog skeleton matches the description given of Genibatrachus baoshanensis15, a pipanuran frog previously recorded from the Pigeon Hill locality, in the presence of unsculptured skull bones, eight presacral vertebrae, procoelous vertebral centra, free ribs on presacral vertebrae 2–4, short, slender, fused ribs on presacrals 5–8, unexpanded sacral diapophyses, sickle-shaped clavicle with a lateral spike, coracoid with expanded proximal and distal ends, relatively short forelimbs (40% of hind limb length), a tibiofibula that is longer (115%) than the femur, and slender, unfused tibiale and fibulare of which the latter is slightly longer. The skull is broad, and each maxilla carries around 50 small closely spaced teeth (40 in the holotype15). The holotype specimen is also described15 as showing a stout robust body outline. This is consistent with specimen YLSNHM01088 where the well-preserved soft tissue outlines portray a heavily built frog with a broad body and thick, presumably strongly muscled, thighs and crura.

Figure 2
figure2

Specimen YLSNHM01088, a frog of the species Genibatrachus baoshanensis containing the skeleton of a salamander, cf. Nuominerpeton, in the body cavity. (a) Main part, skeleton in dorsal view, and (b) counterpart block. The majority of the salamander skeleton is on the counterpart block (b).

The holotype of G. baoshanensis was recorded as having an SPL of 70 mm and a skull length of 23 mm15. Specimen YLSNHM01088 is slightly larger. However, it appears to be less skeletally mature than the holotype, in that the ends of the long bones are unfinished and lack ossified articular surfaces. In extant frogs, individuals of one gender (usually female) are often larger than the other so it is possible that whereas the holotype was skeletally mature, specimen YLSNHM01088 was of a different gender and still growing.

The salamander skeleton in the frog’s gut is most clearly visible on the counterpart block, where the skull, vertebral column, and some parts of the fore- and hindlimbs are preserved (Fig. 3a). More of the limb elements are preserved on the main block (Fig. 3b). The salamander skeleton extends from under the frog’s anatomical left shoulder girdle (skull), along the frog’s left flank (forelimbs and anterior spine), and across the frog’s pelvic region ventral to the ilia and urostyle. The salamander’s tail curls up along the right side of the frog’s abdomen but the distal end is missing. The head is twisted in relation to the vertebral column so that the salamander skull, in ventral view, lies at roughly 90 degrees to the vertebral axis with the jaw symphysis close to the frog’s 5th and 6th presacral vertebrae (Fig. 2b).

Figure 3
figure3

Specimen YLSNHM01088. (a) The skeleton of the salamander cf. Nuominerpeton, in ventral aspect, extracted from the counterpart block. (b) As (a), but with limb and jaw elements from the main block superimposed in red. Abbreviations: Ca.V, caudal vertebrae; Fe, femur; H, humerus; Ma, manus; Md.s, mandibular symphysis; Mx, maxilla; P, parietal; Pe, pelvis; Ps.V, presacral vertebrae; R/U, radius and ulna; Ta, tarsus; T/F, tibia and fibula.

The only salamander currently known from the Pigeon Hill locality is Nuominerpeton aquilonaris16, a hynobiid-like species. We are unable to confirm any of the diagnostic characters listed for Nuominerpeton aquilonaris16, but the unsculptured skull bones, body proportions (axial length/limbs), vertebral shape, and visible limb morphology (e.g. humerus wider distally than proximally; well ossified carpal and tarsal elements) of the ‘gut salamander’ are consistent with Nuominerpeton, and we provisionally refer it to that taxon. The nine specimens of Nuominerpeton previously recovered from Pigeon Hill16 included four larvae (SPL 33.9–43.8 mm), one post-metamorphic juvenile (SPL 47 mm), and four adults (SPL 77.7–79.8 mm). The adults have extensive limb ossification compared to the juveniles, with a fully ossified carpus and tarsus. The ‘gut salamander’ is somewhat telescoped and twisted, but it has an SPL of around 78 mm, which would correspond closely to adults of Nuominerpeton. Adult status is supported by the fully ossified carpus and tarsus.

Discussion

The Jurassic and Early Cretaceous deposits of north eastern China have yielded an exceptionally rich and diverse assemblages of plants, invertebrates, and vertebrates, many of which show exquisite preservation of hard and/or soft tissues. As a consequence of this fine preservation, these deposits have also yielded a significant number of specimens with gut contents. These include seeds in some birds (Jeholornis, Sapeornis17), insects and conchostracans in salamanders4,5, and several examples of vertebrate predation. As reviewed18, the predators (and their gut contents) include the mammal Repenomamus (juvenile psittacosaur); the birds Confuciusornis and Jianchangornis (fish); the non-avian dinosaurs Sinosauropteryx (mammal), Sinocalliopteryx (Confuciusornis, Sinornithosaurus, indet. ornithischian dinosaur), and Microraptor (enantiornithine bird); the choristodere Hyphalosaurus (fish); and the lizard Yabeinosaurus (fish). Previous authors17,19,20,21 inferred that the Jehol amphibians fed predominantly on insects and worms, and this would be a reasonable inference for Genibatrachus, given the many small, closely packed, teeth. However, frogs are opportunist feeders that take a range of foods, as demonstrated by YLSNHM01088.

Extant terrestrial salamanders are eaten by a variety of predators including snakes, birds, small mammals, turtles, frogs, and other salamanders22,23, and they can represent a significant prey biomass in some environments23. Defence mechanisms include aposematic colouring, posturing, and unpleasant or toxic skin secretions24, but whether these were used by early salamanders is conjectural. The salamander skeleton within YLSNHM01088 is largely intact with its bones in association. This suggests it had been caught and swallowed whole, apparently tail first given the position of the skeleton (with the head lying proximally in the gut) and presumably still alive, not long before the frog died and was buried. Predator and prey were of comparable size (Fig. 4), and although the salamander was more gracile in its build, there must have been a struggle.

Figure 4
figure4

Reconstruction of the frog and salamander, roughly to scale, in silhouette. The frog image is based on the extant Alytes, and the salamander image on the extant Hynobius.

Methods

The specimen was collected from the Pigeon Hill locality and is accessioned in the collections of the Yingliang Stone Nature History Museum (YLSNHM), Nan’an, China. The specimen was digitally imaged at high resolution; the images of the part and counterpart blocks (Fig. 2) were then imported into Photoshop to digitally dissect the salamander skeleton from the background (Fig. 3a,b); and the bones from the two blocks were superimposed to form the composite (Fig. 3c).

The map in Fig. 1 was created with Surfer™, Version 725 and ArcGIS™, Version 9.226.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Matsukawa, M., Shibata, K., Sato, K., Xu, X. & Lockley, M. G. The Early Cretaceous terrestrial ecosystems of the Jehol Biota based on food-web and energy-flow models. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 113, 836–853 (2014).

  2. 2.

    Buscalioni, A. D. et al. The wetlands of Las Hoyas in Las Hoyas: a Cretaceous Wetland (eds Poyato-Ariza, F. J. & Buscalioni, A. D.) 238–253 (Verlag Dr Friedrich Pfeil, 2016).

  3. 3.

    Evans, S. E. & Wang, Y. New material of the Early Cretaceous lizard Yabeinosaurus from China. Cretac. Res. 34, 48–60 (2012).

  4. 4.

    Gao, K. Q. & Shubin, N. H. Earliest known crown-group salamanders. Nature 422, 424–428 (2003).

  5. 5.

    Dong, L. P., Huang, D. Y. & Wang, Y. Two Jurassic salamanders with stomach contents from Inner Mongolia, China. Chin. Sci. Bull. 57, 72–76 (2012).

  6. 6.

    Evans, S. E. Urodela in Las Hoyas: a Cretaceous Wetland (eds Poyato-Ariza, F. J. & Buscalioni, A. D.) 138–142 (Verlag Dr Friedrich Pfeil, 2016).

  7. 7.

    Leal, M., Brito, P. & Martill, D. Anurans of the Crato Formation in The Crato Fossil Beds of Brazil: Window into an Ancient World (eds Martill, D., Bechly, G. & Loveridge, B.) 444–451 (Cambridge University Press, 2007).

  8. 8.

    McNamara, M. E. et al. Soft-tissue preservation in Miocene frogs from Libros, Spain: insights into the genesis of decay microenvironments. Palaios 24, 104–117 (2009).

  9. 9.

    McNamara, M. E. et al. Exceptionally preserved tadpoles from the Miocene of Libros, Spain: ecomorphological reconstruction and the impact of ontogeny upon taphonomy. Lethaia 43, 290–306 (2010).

  10. 10.

    Tissier, J., Rage, J.-C. & Laurin, M. Exceptional soft tissues preservation in a mummified frog-eating Eocene salamander. PeerJ 5, 3861, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3861 (2017).

  11. 11.

    Wuttke, W. & Poschmann, M. First finding of fish in the diet of a water-dwelling extinct frog Palaeobatrachus from the Upper Oligocene Fossil-Lagerstatte Enspel (Westerwald Mountains, Western Germany). Palaeobio. Palaeoenv. 90, 59–64 (2010).

  12. 12.

    Keller, T. & Wuttke, M. Ein Messeler Frosch mit Beutetier (Grube Messel, Mittel-Eozän, Hessen, BRD). Cour. Forsch-Inst. Senckenberg 201, 237–242 (1997).

  13. 13.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Fossil assemblage and survival timing of Jehol Biota in the Longjiang Basin, middle of Da Hinggan Mountains: new evidence from biostratigraphy and chronostratigraphy. Acta Geol Sin-Engl. 92, 197–214 (2018).

  14. 14.

    Chang, S.-C., Gao, K.-Q., Zhou, C.-F. & Jourdan, F. New chronostratigraphic constraints on the Yixian Formation with implications for the Jehol Biota. Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl. 487, 399–406 (2017).

  15. 15.

    Gao, K.-Q. & Chen, J.-Y. A new crown-group frog (Amphibia: Anura) from the Early Cretaceous of Northeastern Inner Mongolia, China. Amer. Mus. Novit. 3876, 1–39 (2017).

  16. 16.

    Jia, J. & Gao, K.-Q. A new hynobiid-like salamander (Amphibia, Urodela) from Inner Mongolia, China, provides a rare case study of developmental features in an Early Cretaceous fossil urodele. PeerJ 4, 2499, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2499 (2016).

  17. 17.

    Zhou, Z. H. & Wang, Y. Vertebrate diversity of the Jehol Biota as compared with other lagerstȁtten. Sci. China Earth Sci. 53, 1894–1907 (2010).

  18. 18.

    Xing, L. D. et al. Abdominal contents from two large Early Cretaceous compsognathids (Dinosauria: Theropoda) demonstrate feeding on confuciusornithids and dromaeosaurids. PLOS ONE 7, 44012, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044012 (2012).

  19. 19.

    Xu, X., Zhou, Z. H., Sullivan, C. & Wang, Y. The Yanliao Biota: a trove of exceptionally preserved Middle-Late Jurassic terrestrial life forms in Terrestrial Conservation Lagerstatten: Windows into the Evolution of Life on Land (eds Fraser, N. C. & Sues, H.-D.). 131–167. (Dunedin Academic Press, 2017).

  20. 20.

    Zhou, Z. H. & Wang, Y. Vertebrate assemblages of the Jurassic Yanliao Biota and the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota: comparisons and implications. Palaeoworld 26, 241–252 (2017).

  21. 21.

    Zhou, Z. H., Wang, Y., Xu, X. & Ren, D. The Jehol Biota: an exceptional window into the Early Cretaceous terrestrial ecosystem in Terrestrial Conservation Lagerstatten: Windows into the Evolution of Life on Land (eds Fraser, N. C. & Sues, H.-D.). 169–214. (Dunedin Academic Press, 2017).

  22. 22.

    Solki, V. A. On the ecology of the salamander Onychodactylus fischen (Boulenger, 1886) (Caudata: Hynobiidae). Herpetozoa 6, 29–36 (1993).

  23. 23.

    Davic, R. D. & Welsh, H. H. Jr. On the ecological roles of salamanders. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 405–34 (2004).

  24. 24.

    Brodie, E. D. Salamander antipredator postures. Copeia 1977, 523–635 (1977).

  25. 25.

    Surfer™, Version 7, http://www.goldensoftware.com/products/surfer.

  26. 26.

    ArcGIS™, Version 9.2, http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/arcgis-for-desktop.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos 41790455, 41772008); the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2652017215).

Author information

L.X. and S.E. planned the research; K.N. collected the fossils, supervised technical preparation and conservation; L.X., K.N. and S.E. carried out the research; L.X. and S.E. wrote the paper.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Correspondence to Susan E. Evans.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.