Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Magnetic and electronic properties of magnetite across the high pressure anomaly

Abstract

The magnetite Fe3O4, being anciently known magnetic material to human kind and remaining in leading positions for development of advanced technologies presently, demonstrates a number of puzzling physical phenomena, being at focus of extensive research for more than century. Recently the pressure-induced anomalous behavior of physical properties of magnetite in vicinity of the structural phase transition, occurring at P ~ 25–30 GPa, has attracted particular attention, and its nature remains unclear. Here we study the magnetic and electronic properties of magnetite across high pressure anomaly and in the pressure-induced phase by means of 57Fe synchrotron Moessbauer spectroscopy and neutron diffraction. The hyperfine interaction parameters behavior was systematically analysed over pressure 0–40 GPa and temperature 10–290 K ranges. In the high pressure phase the ferrimagnetic order formation below TNP ~ 420 K was observed and spin arrangement symmetry was deduced. The structural, magnetic and electronic phase diagram of magnetite in the discussed pressure range is established.

Introduction

Magnetite is the most oldest known magnetic mineral, playing important role in natural life and development of technological applications. Starting from the utilization in ancient compasses for navigation about three thousand years ago, now magnetite is used in the development of advanced nanotechnologies for applications in electronic devices, medical diagnostics and treatment, imaging and production of magnetic nanocomposite materials1,2,3,4.

At ambient conditions magnetite crystallizes in the inverse spinel cubic structure (Fig. 1), containing Fe3+ ions in the sites with tetrahedral oxygen coordination (A) and mixture of the Fe3+ and Fe2+ ions in equal proportion in the sites with octahedral oxygen coordination (B). The Fe spins at the A and B sublattices are arranged ferrimagnetically below the Néel temperature, TN = 850 K. A presence of the mixed valence iron ions in such a structure leads to challenging physical phenomena arising in magnetite upon temperature and pressure variation, which nature remains a topic of extensive debates over the last few decades, despite the extensive research. Upon temperature lowering, the Verwey transition in Fe3O4 occurs (TV ≈ 120 K), resulting in the abrupt resistivity increase by about two orders of magnitude5. The nature of this transition is associated with the complex charge and orbital order, involving trimerons formation and Jahn-Teller active distortions, giving rise to magnetic polarons6,7,8,9.

An application of high pressure affects anomalously the behavior of magnetic and electronic properties of magnetite, ultimately leading to a structural phase transition above P ~ 25 GPa10,11,12,13,14,15,16. A number of incompatible models were proposed to explain nature of the observed phenomena. The temperature and pressure - mediated charge redistribution over the sites with tetrahedral and octahedral oxygen coordination via the inverse-to-normal transition in the spinel structure, [Fe3+]A[Fe2+Fe3+]BO4 → [Fe2+]A[Fe3+Fe3+]BO4, was proposed, based on the Moessbauer spectroscopy and powder X-ray diffraction data17,18. Alternatively, a realization of the high spin (HS) to intermediate spin (IS) transition of Fe2+ ions at P ~ 12–16 GPa was assumed in the X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) and photoemission spectroscopy study15. Another mechanism of the enhanced electron delocalization was suggested in the later Moessbauer spectroscopy, single crystal X-ray diffraction and XMCD experiments16,19.

While the latest single crystal X-ray diffraction experiments confirmed the orthorhombic CaTi2O4-type (Bbmm symmetry) crystal structure of the high pressure post-spinel phase of magnetite (Fig. 1)20, the magnetic and electronic properties of this phase remain unclear. The proposed models range from paramagnetic behavior at ambient temperature to a progressive evolution of non-magnetic component upon compression at low temperature within the magnetically ordered structure14,21. In addition, a high spin to low spin (LS) state crossover of Fe3+ ions at pressures around 40 GPa was evidenced20,21.

In order to explore in detail the magnetic and electronic properties of magnetite across the high pressure anomaly and in the pressure- induced phase, we have performed synchrotron Moessbauer spectroscopy and neutron diffraction measurements over the 0–40 GPa pressure and 10–300 K temperature range. Different response of highly correlated lattice, spin and charge degrees of freedom on variation of thermodynamic parameters enabled to distinguish the characteristic temperatures of the structural and magnetic phase transitions and spin crossover and construct the phase diagram of magnetite in the studied pressure and temperature ranges.

Results

Synchrotron Moessbauer source spectroscopy

The synchrotron Moessbauer source (SMS) spectra of single crystalline Fe3O4 sample (57Fe isotope content >90%) measured at selected pressures and temperatures are shown in Fig. 2. The spectra measured at P = 8 GPa in the temperature range 290–100 K can be well fitted with the two sextet components, one corresponding to the Fe3+ ions in HS state (S = 5/2) located in the tetrahedral (A) sites and second one to the mixed Fe3+ and Fe2+ (S = 2) ions in HS state located in the octahedral (B) sites with relative abundance 1:2, respectively. The electronic hopping between the Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions in the octahedral sites22 is characterized by a relaxation time several orders of magnitude less in comparison with the characteristic measurement time of the Moessbauer experiment. This makes them indistinguishable and the relevant iron valence state can be described as an averaged Fe2.5+ one. The obtained values of the hyperfine parameters (Supplementary Table 1), isomer shifts ISA = 0.28(4) and ISB = 0.71(3) mm/s, quadrupole splittings QSA = −0.03(7) and QSB = 0.04(8) mm/s, and hyperfine magnetic fields HhfA = 48.4(2) and HhfB = 47.1(2) T at ambient temperature are comparable with those reported in previous studies19,23. The larger value of the A-site hyperfine field points to prevalence of the A-sublattice magnetization over the B-sublattice one in the ferrimagnetically ordered state, in accordance with the expected spin-only values of the magnetic moments, 5 and 4.5 µB respectively24.

On cooling down to 100 K, a nearly linear increase of the isomer shift values to ISA = 0.41(4) and ISB = 0.76(3) mm/s and hyperfine magnetic fields to HhfA = 49.6(2) and HhfB = 48.4(2) T occur (Supplementary Table 1). Below T = 100K, additional splitting of the absorption lines was observed (Fig. 1), associated with the Verwey transition, which leads to complex charge localization phenomena and structural distortions in magnetite. At ambient pressure below the Verwey transition temperature, the observation of five independent sextet components in the Moessbauer spectra, one corresponding to the tetrahedral sites and four to the octahedral Fe3+/Fe2+ sites with different charge states, was previously reported25. Due to restrictions of the high pressure experiments, we were unable to resolve unambiguously all these components and applied a simplified approach involving three sextets, corresponding to Fe3+ ions in tetrahedral sites and Fe3+ and Fe2+ ions in two octahedral sites. The values of isomer shifts ISA-Fe3+ = 0.29(5), ISB-Fe3+ = 0.38(3), ISB-Fe2+ = 1.03(4) mm/s, quadrupole splittings QSA-Fe3+ = 0.3(1), QSB-Fe3+ = −0.6(1) and QSB-Fe2+ = −0.5(1) mm/s, and hyperfine magnetic fields HhfA-Fe3+ = 50.6(1), HhfB-Fe3+ = 50.5(1) and HhfB-Fe2+ = 50.5(2) T were obtained at T = 10 K, which are comparable with the averaged values for the Fe3+ and Fe2+ ions in relevant groups of sites obtained earlier at ambient pressure25.

At pressures above 8 GPa no signatures, characteristic for the Verwey transition, were observed in the SMS spectra (Fig. 2), confirming its suppression26. The isomer shifts decrease linearly under pressure with more pronounced absolute changes for the tetrahedral A sites. The quadrupole splittings exhibit weak pressure variation within their determination error. The hyperfine magnetic fields also decrease with similar pressure slopes for both the tetrahedral and octahedral sites (Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 1).

At P = 28 GPa and ambient temperature, an appearance of additional broad magnetic sextet components characterizing by the lower hyperfine magnetic field values and paramagnetic doublet is observed (Fig. 2). This observation can be attributed to the onset of the pressure-induced post-spinel phase, which hyperfine parameters are substantially different in comparison to those in the spinel phase, and the spin state crossover.

Upon compression to 33 GPa at T = 290 K the intensity of the new components has grown at the expense of ones corresponding to the spinel phase (Fig. 2). On cooling to T = 10 K, the initial spinel phase was restored, as one can conclude from the obtained IS, QS and Hhf values, close to those corresponding to lower pressures (Fig. 4, Supplementary Table 1). However, on subsequent warming above 50 K, drastic changes in the SMS spectra occur, hence signaling the phase transformation to the post-spinel high pressure modification (Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 1). The spectra obtained in the temperature range 50–250 K, corresponding to the pressure-induced phase, can be successfully described using only two sextet components with relative abundance 1: 2. The hyperfine parameter values ISA = 0.49(4) mm/s, QSA = −0.52(7) mm/s and HhfA = 49.2(2) for the first component and ISB = 0.69(4) mm/s, QSB = 0.57(8) mm/s and HhfB = 48.2(2) T for the second component were obtained at T = 50 K. No paramagnetic doublet was found at temperatures below 290 K. The observed components can be attributed to the Fe3+ ions in the eightfold bicapped trigonal prismatic oxygen coordination (A) and mixed Fe2.5+ state in the octahedral oxygen coordination (B) in the orthorhombic post-spinel phase of the Bbmm symmetry13,20. The modification of the oxygen coordination from tetrahedral to prismatic one at Fe3+ sites leads to increased values of the isomer shift, while the relevant value for the octahedrally coordinated Fe2.5+ sites remains similar to that in the spinel phase. A more pronounced distortion degree of oxygen polyhedra at both Fe3+ and Fe2.5+ sites results in noticeably larger quadrupole splitting parameters with respect to those in the cubic spinel phase (Fig. 3). The obtained hyperfine magnetic fields at the iron sites in the post-spinel phase are comparable with those in the initial spinel one, and the value HhfA exceeds the HhfB one. This implies that the Fe3+ and Fe2+ ions remain in the HS state in the considered temperature range and the resulting magnetic structure is ferrimagnetic. From the fitting of the temperature dependences of the hyperfine magnetic fields with the Brillouin functions corresponding to spin values S = 5/2 for the Fe3+ sites and average of S = 5/2 and S = 2 for the Fe2.5+ sites, the magnetic ordering temperature value TNP = 420(5) K was obtained for the post-spinel phase, (Fig. 4) which is more than twice smaller with respect to TN ≈ 850 K for the spinel phase27.

The observation of the additional paramagnetic doublet at 290 K (Fig. 2) can be associated with the temperature induced spin state crossover of Fe3+ ions from the high spin HS (S = 5/2) to the low spin LS (S = 1/2) state in the octahedral sites of the post-spinel phase. It is characterized by parameters IS = 0.46(7) mm/s and QS ≈ 0.5(1) mm/s at P = 33 GPa, compatible with the LS state of Fe3+ ions20,21.

After cooling the sample to 10 K, we have increased pressure up to 40 GPa. In the temperature range 10–290 K, only sextet components associated to the post-spinel phase were observed in the SMS spectra (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 1, obtained hyperfine interaction parameters at selected temperatures are also presented in Fig. 3). From the fitting of the temperature dependences of the hyperfine magnetic fields it was found that the magnetic ordering temperature increases up to 475 K with a pressure coefficient dTNP/dP ≈ 8 K/GPa. The absence of the doublet component in the data measured at T = 290 K implies that onset of the spin state crossover is shifted to higher temperatures.

Neutron diffraction

The neutron diffraction patterns of powdered magnetite sample, measured at selected pressures and ambient temperature, are shown in Fig. 5. In the pressure range up to 25 GPa, they correspond to the cubic spinel phase. The long range ferrimagnetic order provides the dominant contribution to the intensity of the peak (111) located at d ≈ 4.8 Å, while one from the nuclear scattering to this peak is quite small, as well as partial contribution to the intensity of the peaks (220) at d ≈ 2.95, (222) at d ≈ 2.40 and (400) at d ≈ 2.08 Å (the d-spacing values are given for ambient pressure). The obtained values of ordered Fe magnetic moments at ambient pressure, corresponding to the A- and B- magnetic sublattices, mA = 4.42(7) and mB = 4.33(7) µB, are consistent with results of previous studies27.

At high pressures the ordered magnetic moments were evaluated with a restriction of scaling their ratio with those of the relevant hyperfine magnetic fields, known to be proportional each other in magnetite24. The obtained ordered Fe magnetic moments are reduced weakly upon compression (Fig. 6), reaching values mA = 4.02(8) and mB = 3.97(8) µB at P = 25 GPa, respectively.

At P = 33 GPa, a redistribution of the diffraction peaks intensity in the d-spacing region 2.2–2.4 Å, as well as broadening of the magnetic peak at d ≈ 4.62 Å was observed, pointing to the structural phase transition. Such a behavior is consistent with results of the SMS experiments, if compression at ambient temperature is considered. In the Rietveld refinements of the experimental data (Fig. 5), a model involving coexistence of the initial cubic spinel Fd $$\bar{3}$$ m phase and the pressure-induced post-spinel orthorhombic Bbmm phase was used. The atomic coordinates in the orthorhombic phase (Supplementary Table 2) were fixed to values evaluated from the interpolation of those found in the single crystal and powder X-ray diffraction data at pressures 28 and 41 GPa13,20. The refined lattice parameters of the spinel phase, a = 8.040(5) Å and post-spinel phase, a = 9.246(5), b = 9.278(5) and c = 2.763(3) Å are consistent with previous results13,20. In order to describe magnetic contribution to the experimental data, different possible models of the long range magnetic order in the orthorhombic phase were analysed. Finally, the spin arrangement illustrated in the Fig. 7, was chosen for the fitting of the experimental data. It consists of two antiferromagnetic sublattices formed by the layers of Fe1 and Fe2 ions located in the 4(c) and 8(f) positions with the bicapped trigonal prismatic and octahedral oxygen coordination with the same y coordinate and parallel orientation of the magnetic moments, which are stacked antiparallel along the b-axis. The overall ferrimagnetic character of this structure is caused by the different magnetic moments of Fe1 and Fe2 ions, as evidenced by the distinctive values of the relevant hyperfine magnetic fields in the SMS experiment. Such a magnetic structure provides the major magnetic contribution to the peak (200)/(020), located at d ≈ 4.62 Å and accounts for the observed additional intensity in the given d-spacing region. In comparison, the magnetic structure of the initial spinel phase is much simpler and it consists of two ferromagnetic sublattices with antiparallel orientation of the Fe magnetic moments in the A and B sites. The magnetic unit cell coincides with the crystallographic one and the ordered magnetic moments are oriented along the c-axis. The effective moment values mFe1 = 3.00(9) and mFe2 = 2.98(9) µB were also evaluated with a restriction of scaling their ratio with those of the relevant hyperfine magnetic fields. For the coexisting cubic spinel phase the effective ordered magnetic moment values mA = 3.40(9) and mB = 3.35(7) µB were obtained accordingly. The reduced values of the magnetic moments in the pressure-induced phase are consistent with the spin state crossover detected in the SMS experiments, leading to gradual appearance of the Fe3+ (LS) ions with negligible magnetic moments on the B magnetic sublattice with octahedral oxygen coordination.

Discussion

In the spinel phase, for the temperature (10–290 K) and pressure (8–28 GPa) ranges the HhfA value exceeds the HhfB one and their relative difference is weakly affected by variation of thermodynamic parameters (Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 1). This rules out suggestions about possible inverse to normal spinel transformation17,18 and high spin to intermediate spin state transition of Fe2+ ions15. The first scenario should lead to reversal of the HhfA and HhfB values, while the second one should cause the increased difference of these values above the expected HS - IS spin transition pressure point, assumed to occur at P ~ 12–16 GPa in15 and not observed experimentally in the present study. At the same time, the revealed decreasing trends in pressure behavior of isomer shifts and hyperfine magnetic fields (Fig. 3), as well as ordered magnetic moments (Fig. 6), may be explained by increased hybridization strength between the d-orbitals of Fe and p-orbitals of O atoms, leading to enhanced electronic delocalization16,19. Similar pressure-induced reduction of the ordered magnetic moment was recently also observed in the siderite FeCO3 and underlying mechanism was evidenced by the ab-initio calculations28.

The ab initio calculations have shown that in the post-spinel phase of magnetite the ground state energies corresponding to the ferrimagnetic and antiferromagnetic order have very close values differing by about 0.2 eV only29. This implies highly competitive character of magnetic interactions in this structure, leading to the formation of the complex spin arrangement observed experimentally (Fig. 7).

The structural, magnetic and electronic phase diagram of magnetite, constructed on the base of present data and previous studies26,30,31, is shown in Fig. 8. Our evaluations of the spinel – post-spinel structural phase transition points in the studied pressure and temperature ranges are consistent with those obtained at lower pressures and high temperatures30. In the spinel phase, the Néel temperature was found to increase with a coefficient dTN/dP = 20.5 K/GPa in the pressure range up to 4.5 GPa31. The Verwey transition is suppressed at pressures above 8 GPa26, in agreement with our observations. In the post-spinel phase, the Néel temperature becomes about twice smaller, and it increases with a noticeably reduced rate dTNP/dP ≈ 8 K/GPa. This reduction may be related to a decrease of the leading antiferromagnetic superexchange interaction strength between the A and B sublattices of iron ions via oxygen ions due to a significant reduction of the average value of the Fe(A)-O-Fe(B) bond angle from 123.5° in the spinel phase (P = 0 GPa) to about 114.6° in the post-spinel phase (P = 33 GPa), as evaluated from the present data (Supplementary Table 2) and results20.

The appearance of HS-LS spin state crossover on the magnetic sublattice of Fe3+ ions with octahedral oxygen coordination is detected in the vicinity of ambient temperature under pressure (Fig. 8), and it further evolves at elevated temperatures20,21.

The present results demonstrate that the long range ferrimagnetic order is formed in the pressure-induced post-spinel phase of magnetite with a more complex spin arrangement and the Néel temperature about twice smaller in comparison with those of the initial spinel phase. The hyperfine interaction parameters in the post-spinel phase are characterized by the substantially increased absolute values of the quadrupole splittings and reduced hyperfine magnetic fields, while variation of the isomer shifts is less pronounced. At temperature T ≈ 290 K and pressures above 28 GPa the HS - LS spin state crossover of Fe3+ ions evolves on the magnetic sublattice with the octahedral oxygen coordination, leading to the reduction of the effective ordered moments in the magnetic structure.

The different response of highly correlated lattice, spin and charge degrees of freedom to combined variation of thermodynamic parameters (pressure and temperature) allowed to disentangle behavior of the structural and magnetic phase transitions temperatures and the spin crossover, enabling detailed insight into the phase diagram of magnetite.

Methods

The single crystalline sample of magnetite enriched with the 57Fe isotope (>90%) was synthesized as described in19. The characterization by the X-ray diffraction and Moessbauer spectroscopy methods confirmed the single phase material without any traces of other iron oxides. The evaluated value of the possible oxygen nonstoichiometry was less than 0.001.

Synchrotron Moessbauer source (SMS) spectroscopy measurements with the single crystalline sample were performed at the Nuclear Resonance beamline32 ID18 at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) using the setup described in33. Experiments were carried out from ambient pressure up to 40 GPa, and in the temperature range between 10–290 K. The size of the x-ray beam spot at the sample was about 15 μm in both directions. The BETSA-type membrane diamond anvil cell (DAC) available at ESRF with diamond culets of 250 µm was used. The sample was loaded into the Re gasket indented to about 30 µm thickness with an initial hole of 150 µm diameter. The helium gas was used as a pressure transmitting medium. The pressure was determined by the ruby fluorescence technique using Dewaele calibration scale34. The He flow cryostat was used for low temperature measurements. The SMS data were fitted with the MossA software35 to obtain hyperfine parameters.

The neutron diffraction experiments were performed with the natural Fe abundance powdered sample of magnetite in the pressure range up to 33 GPa using the DN-6 diffractometer36 (IBR-2 pulsed reactor, JINR, Dubna, Russia). The experiments in the pressure range up to 12 GPa were performed using the sapphire anvil high pressure cells and the sample volume of about 2 mm337. The diffraction patterns were collected at the scattering angle of 90° with the resolution Δd/d = 0.015. The experiments in the extended pressure range up to 33 GPa were performed using the diamond anvil cell of Boehler-Almax Plate type. The diamonds with culets of 0.8 mm and aluminium gasket with a hole of 0.4 mm were used. The experimental data were analysed by the Rietveld method using the Fullprof program38.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

References

1. 1.

McKenna, K. P. et al. Atomic-scale structure and properties of highly stable antiphase boundary defects in Fe3O4. Nat. Commun. 5, 5740 (2014).

2. 2.

Xie, J., Xu, C., Kohler, N., Hou, Y. & Sun, S. Controlled PEGylation of Monodisperse Fe3O4Nanoparticles for Reduced Non‐Specific Uptake by Macrophage Cells. Adv. Mater. 19, 3163–3166 (2007).

3. 3.

Seneor, P. et al. Large magnetoresistance in tunnel junctions with an iron oxide electrode. Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 4017–4019 (1999).

4. 4.

Tartaj, P., Morales, M. P., Gonzalez-Carreño, T., Veintemillas-Verdaguer, S. & Serna, C. J. The iron oxides strike back: from biomedical applications to energy storage devices and photoelectrochemical water splitting. Adv. Mater. 23, 5243–5249 (2011).

5. 5.

Verwey, E. J. Electronic Conduction of Magnetite (Fe3O4) and its Transition Point at Low Temperatures. Nature 144, 327–328 (1939).

6. 6.

Wright, J. P., Attfield, J. P. & Radaelli, P. G. Long Range Charge Ordering in Magnetite Below the Verwey Transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 266401 (2001).

7. 7.

Walz, F. The Verwey transition - a topical review. J. Phys.: Condensed Matter 14, R285–R340 (2002).

8. 8.

Senn, M. S., Wright, J. P. & Attfield, J. P. Charge order and three-site distortions in the Verwey structure of magnetite. Nature 481, 173–176 (2012).

9. 9.

Huang, H. Y. et al. Jahn-Teller distortion driven magnetic polarons in magnetite. Nat. Commun. 8, 15929 (2017).

10. 10.

Mao, H. K., Takahashi, T., Basset, W. A., Kinsland, G. L. & Merrill, L. Isothermal compression of magnetite to 320 KB. J. Geophys. Res. 79, 1165–1170 (1974).

11. 11.

Fei, Y., Frost, D. J., Mao, H. K., Prewitt, C. T. & Häusermann, D. In situ structure determination of the high-pressure phase of Fe3O4. Am. Mineral. 84, 203–206 (1999).

12. 12.

Haavik, C., Stølen, S., Fjellvåg, H., Hanfland, M. & Häusermann, D. Equation of state of magnetite and its high-pressure modification: Thermodynamics of the Fe-O system at high pressure. Am. Mineral. 85, 514–523 (2000).

13. 13.

Dubrovinsky, L. S. et al. The structure of the metallic high-pressure Fe3O4 polymorph: experimental and theoretical study. J. Phys.: Condensed Matter 15, 7697–7706 (2003).

14. 14.

Pasternak, M. P., Nasu, S., Wada, K. & Endo, S. High-pressure phase of magnetite. Phys. Rev. B 50, 6446–6449 (1994).

15. 15.

Ding, Y. et al. Novel Pressure-Induced Magnetic Transition in Magnetite (Fe3O4). Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 045508 (2008).

16. 16.

Baudelet, F. et al. Absence of abrupt pressure-induced magnetic transitions in magnetite. Phys. Rev. B 82, 140412 (2010).

17. 17.

Pasternak, M. P. et al. Pressure-induced coordination crossover in magnetite; the breakdown of the Verwey–Mott localization hypothesis. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 265, L107–L112 (2003).

18. 18.

Rozenberg, G. K. et al. Structural characterization of temperature- and pressure-induced inverse↔normal spinel transformation in magnetite. Phys. Rev. B 75, 020102(R) (2007).

19. 19.

Glazyrin, K. et al. Effect of high pressure on the crystal structure and electronic properties of magnetite below 25 GPa. Am. Mineral. 97, 128–133 (2012).

20. 20.

Greenberg, E. et al. High-pressure magnetic, electronic, and structural properties of MFe2O4 (M=Mg,Zn,Fe) ferric spinels. Phys. Rev. B 95, 195150 (2017).

21. 21.

Xu, W. M., Machavariani, G. Y., Rozenberg, G. K. & Pasternak, M. P. Mössbauer and resistivity studies of the magnetic and electronic properties of the high-pressure phase of Fe3O4. Phys. Rev. B 70, 174106 (2004).

22. 22.

Kündig, W. & Hargrove, R. S. Electron hopping in magnetite. Solid State Commun. 7, 223–227 (1969).

23. 23.

Kobayashi, H. et al. Structural properties of magnetite under high pressure studied by Mössbauer spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 73, 104110 (2006).

24. 24.

Van der Woude, F., Sawatzky, G. A. & Morrish, A. H. Relation between the Hyperfine Magnetic Fields and Sublattice Magnetizations in Fe3O4. Phys. Rev. 167, 533 (1968).

25. 25.

Berry, F. J., Skinner, S. & Thomas, M. F. 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopic examination of a single crystal of Fe3O4. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 10, 215–220 (1998).

26. 26.

Mori, N., Todo, S., Takeshita, N., Mori, T. & Akishige, Y. Metallization of magnetite at high pressures. Physica B 312-313, 686–690 (2002).

27. 27.

Klotz, S. et al. Magnetism and the Verwey transition in Fe3O4 under pressure. Phys. Rev. B 77, 012411 (2008).

28. 28.

Golosova, N. O. et al. Magnetic and structural properties of FeCO3 at high pressures. Phys. Rev. B 96, 134405 (2017).

29. 29.

Bengtson, A., Morgan, D. & Becker, U. Spin state of iron in Fe3O4 magnetite and h-Fe3O4. Phys. Rev. B 87, 155141 (2013).

30. 30.

Haavik, C., Stølen, S., Fjellvåg, H., Hanfland, M. & Häusermann, D. Equation of state of magnetite and its high-pressure modification: Thermodynamics of the Fe-O system at high pressure. Am. Mineral. 85, 514–523 (2000).

31. 31.

Samara, G. A. & Giardini, A. A. Effect of Pressure on the Néel Temperature of Magnetite. Phys. Rev. 186, 577–580 (1969).

32. 32.

Rüffer, R. & Chumakov, A. I. Nuclear Resonance Beamline at ESRF. Hyperfine Interactions 97/98, 589–604 (1996).

33. 33.

Potapkin, V. et al. The 57Fe Synchrotron Mössbauer Source at the ESRF. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 19, 559–569 (2012).

34. 34.

Dewaele, A., Torrent, M., Loubeyre, P. & Mezouar, M. Compression curves of transition metals in the Mbar range: Experiments and projector augmented-wave calculations. Phys. Rev. B 78, 104102 (2008).

35. 35.

Prescher, C., McCammon, C. & Dubrovinsky, L. MossA: a program for analyzing energy-domain Mössbauer spectra from conventional and synchrotron sources. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 45, 329–331 (2012).

36. 36.

Kozlenko, D. P., Kichanov, S. E., Lukin, E. V. & Savenko, B. N. The DN-6 Neutron Diffractometer for High-Pressure Research at Half a Megabar Scale. Crystals 8, 331 (2018).

37. 37.

Somenkov, V. A. High pressure neutron scattering over the ages. J. Phys.: Condensed Matter 17, S2991–S3003 (2005).

38. 38.

Rodríguez-Carvajal, J. Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction. Physica B 192, 55–69 (1993).

Acknowledgements

The work has been partially supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant No. 18-02-00359.

Author information

Authors

Contributions

D.P.K. and L.S.D. initiated the research. L.S.D. provided a single crystalline sample for research. V.C. and A.V.C. provided the high pressure experimental SMS set-up and assisted with the SMS experiments. D.P.K., S.E.K. and E.V.L. performed the SMS measurements and data analysis. D.P.K., S.E.K., E.V.L. and B.N.S. performed the neutron diffraction experiments and data analysis. D.P.K. prepared first draft of the manuscript and all the co-authors contribute to the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. P. Kozlenko.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Kozlenko, D.P., Dubrovinsky, L.S., Kichanov, S.E. et al. Magnetic and electronic properties of magnetite across the high pressure anomaly. Sci Rep 9, 4464 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41184-3

• Accepted:

• Published:

• Magnetic sources in the Earth’s mantle

• Eric C. Ferré
• Ilya Kupenko
• Carmen Sanchez-Valle

Nature Reviews Earth & Environment (2021)

• Sub-lattice of Jahn-Teller centers in hexaferrite crystal

• V. V. Gudkov
• M. N. Sarychev
• I. B. Bersuker

Scientific Reports (2020)