Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Wireless wide-range pressure sensor based on graphene/PDMS sponge for tactile monitoring

Abstract

We propose a flexible wireless pressure sensor, which uses a graphene/polydimethylsiloxane (GR/PDMS) sponge as the dielectric layer. The sponge is sandwiched between two surfaces of a folded flexible printed circuit with patterned Cu as the antenna and electrode. By adjusting graphene and NH4HCO3 concentrations, a composite with 20% concentration of NH4HCO3 and 2% concentration of graphene as the dielectric layer is obtained, which exhibits high sensitivity (2.2 MHz/kPa), wide operating range (0–500 kPa), rapid response time (~7 ms), low detection limit (5 Pa), and good stability, recoverability, and repeatability. In addition, the sensor is sensitive to finger bending and facial muscle movements for smile and frown, that are transmitted using wireless electromagnetic coupling; therefore, it has potential for a wide range of applications such as intelligent robots, bionic-electronic skin and wearable electronic devices.

Introduction

Flexible pressure sensors have been widely used in applications such as electronic skin, intelligent robots, and wearable devices1,2,3,4,5,6,7. These sensors have high-sensitivity, strong-flexibility, and implantable and wearable characteristics. Previous studies have reported three major conversion mechanisms to transform external pressure signals into electrical signals, namely piezoresistivity8,9,10, capacitance11,12,13,14, and piezoelectricity15,16. In all cases, high-sensitivity, low detection limit, fast response time, and low cost are the most desirable characteristics of flexible pressure sensors.

Sensitivity is one of the most important indicators to measure the working efficiency and measurement accuracy of pressure sensors. Researchers use a variety of methods to increase sensor sensitivity, such as adopting micro-nano structures to increase the contact area, searching for new composites to increase the detection range, and exploring new working principles for the sensor. Adoption of micro-nano structures is the most practical way to improve the sensing performance. Micro-nano structures, such as pyramids17,18, leaf textures19,20, spongy structures21,22,23,24, silk3,25, hollow hemispheres26, micropillar arrays27, and rugged structures28, have been proposed to improve the sensitivity of pressure sensors. New high-sensitivity composite materials are widely used in pressure sensors, such as graphene10,21,24,25, metal nanowire27,29, carbon nanotubes3,11,23, and other novel materials30,31.

However, the above-mentioned sensors require wire connections for data transmission. Wireless and passive sensors will be the trend of the future due to their long-distance transmission and battery-free operation. Inductor-capacitor (LC) technology with its small size, low cost, high stability, and battery-free operation has become the best option for wireless transmission. Hitherto, it has been applied for wireless measurement of pressure32,33,34,35,36,37,38, temperature39,40, humidity41, and specific components in sweat42.

Herein, we propose a wireless flexible pressure sensor based on a graphene/PDMS (GR/PDMS) sponge as a dielectric layer, which is sandwiched between the folded surfaces of a flexible printed circuit with Cu pattern as the antenna and electrode. First, the high-performance GR/PDMS sponge with high sensitivity, large operating range, rapid response time, low detection limit, good stability, recoverability, and repeatability was fabricated by adjusting graphene and NH4HCO3 concentrations. Second, a wireless flexible pressure sensor was fabricated and its working principle was introduced through a series of formulas and equivalent circuit diagram, which clearly explain the wireless operation of the LC sensors. Finally, to confirm the practicality of the fabricated wireless pressure sensor, we measured the capacitance and frequency response curves of our sensor. The fabricated sensor has the potential to be used in highly sensitive wireless detection for a wide range of applications, such as intelligent robots, bionic-electronic skin, and wearable electronic devices.

Results and Discussion

GR/PDMS sponge preparation and characterization

The manufacturing process of the GR/PDMS sponge is shown in Fig. 1(a). The GR/PDMS sponge production steps are as follows: first, graphene was dispersed uniformly in ethanol by ultrasonic dispersion at 30 °C for 8 h to weaken the interaction between the graphene nanoparticles and obtain a good graphene suspension. Second, the PDMS main agent was added to the graphene suspension and heated at 100 °C until the ethanol was completely evaporated. After cooling, NH4HCO3 powder and PDMS curing agent were added to the previous mixture using magnetic stirring to uniformly disperse NH4HCO3 powder. Then, the mixture was poured on glass and heated at 150 °C until the NH3, CO2, and H2O were completely evaporated. According to Eq. (1) below, NH4HCO3 on heating will break down into NH3, CO2, and H2O. The density of the PDMS was simply modified by the gas evaporation, forming a GR/PDMS sponge of high deformation with air microfeatures. Using the above approach, dielectric layers with different concentrations of NH4HCO3 and graphene were fabricated. The fabricated GR/PDMS sponge can be cut into small pieces for use in the dielectric layer. The surface topography of the GR/PDMS sponge was obtained by SEM, and it was found that air holes were evenly spread across the PDMS; further, the graphene particles did not agglomerate and were uniformly distributed in PDMS, as shown in Fig. 1b.

$${{\rm{NH}}}_{{\rm{4}}}{{\rm{HCO}}}_{{\rm{3}}}\triangleq {{\rm{NH}}}_{{\rm{3}}}\uparrow +{{\rm{H}}}_{{\rm{2}}}{\rm{O}}\uparrow +{{\rm{CO}}}_{{\rm{2}}}\uparrow $$
(1)

The Raman spectrum of graphene, PDMS, and GR/PDMS sponge are shown in Fig. 1c. The Raman spectrum of the GR/PDMS sponge shows a D peak at 1344 cm−1, a G peak at 1594 cm−1, and two peaks within 2800 cm−1 to 3000 cm−1, which is the superposition of the Raman spectrum of graphene and PDMS.

Figure 1
figure1

(a) Schematic illustration of the fabrication process of GR/PDMS sponge. (b) SEM image of GR/PDMS sponge. (c) Raman spectrum of graphene, PDMS, and GR/PDMS sponge.

Sensor fabrication and working principle

The flexible pressure sensor was fabricated by folding a flexible substrate with Cu circuitry and using the GR/PDMS sponge placed between the folded surfaces as the dielectric layer43,44, as shown in Fig. S1. The size of the packaged sensor is 9 × 9 × 2 mm, as shown in Fig. 2a. When external pressure is applied to the sensor, the GR/PDMS sponge is compressed, causing the air-holes to shrink. According to Eq. (2) 45, the increase in capacitance of the GR/PDMS sponge is mainly attributed to the decrease in the distance between the two electrode plates. To better explain the pressure sensing mechanism, we assume that both air-holes and graphene distributed in the PDMS play important roles when the sensor is under pressure. The graphene particles are separated by PDMS and the air-holes to form numerous parallel capacitors (C1,C2,C3•••Cn), as depicted in Fig. 2b. The presence of the air-holes makes the sensor more susceptible to deformation when it is under pressure, resulting in a decrease in the space between the graphene particles. The total capacitance increases with the simultaneous increase in the number of parallel capacitors.

$${\rm{\Delta }}{\bf{C}}=\frac{{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}A}{{\rm{\Delta }}{\boldsymbol{d}}}=\frac{{{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}}_{0}{\rm{\Delta }}{{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}}_{{\boldsymbol{r}}}{\boldsymbol{A}}}{{\rm{\Delta }}{\boldsymbol{d}}}={\rm{\Delta }}{{\boldsymbol{C}}}_{1}+{\rm{\Delta }}{{\boldsymbol{C}}}_{2}={\boldsymbol{\delta }}{\bf{h}}\frac{\partial {\boldsymbol{C}}}{\partial {\boldsymbol{h}}}({\boldsymbol{h}},{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }})+{\boldsymbol{\delta }}{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}\frac{\partial {\boldsymbol{C}}}{\partial {\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}}({\boldsymbol{h}},{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }})$$
(2)

The principle of the wireless system is shown in Fig. 2c. The LC tags based on the GR/PDMS sponge can be used for large and subtle human body motion detection, owing to the high sensitivity and wide sensing range. Figure 2d illustrates the working principle of the wireless pressure sensor. The antenna connected to the network analyser can transmit a series of sweep signals, containing the resonant frequency of the sensor. Thus, it can be seen from Fig. 2e, that the resonant frequency of the sensor decreases as the capacitance increases, which is in accordance with Eq. (3). The resonant frequencies of the sensor are wirelessly transmitted to the antenna through signal coupling. The resonant frequencies will be obtained by analysing the S11 parameters, and the relationship between the resonant frequency and the external pressure can be established.

$${\boldsymbol{f}}=\frac{1}{2{\boldsymbol{\pi }}\sqrt{{\boldsymbol{LC}}}}$$
(3)
Figure 2
figure2

Wireless pressure sensor based on GR/PDMS sponge. (a) Photograph of wireless pressure sensor. (b) Schematic showing the configuration of the GR/PDMS sponge under force. (c) Schematic diagram of a wireless system. (d) Conceptual diagram of an LC wireless pressure sensor. (e) The equivalent circuit and resonant frequency variation of the wireless pressure sensor.

Characterization of GR/PDMS sponge

To characterize the performance of the GR/PDMS sponge, we measured the sensor sensitivity, response time, repeatability and detection limits using the platform we built with an impedance analyser (N4990A) and pressure gauge. The capacitance variation ratio ((C-C0)/C0, where C0 and C represent the initial capacitance and the capacitance under applied pressure) was plotted as a function of the applied pressure. The sensitivity is defined as S = δ(∆C/C0)/δP, which is a slope of the measured curve. When the NH4HCO3 concentration is 20% and graphene concentration is 2%, the sensor has the highest sensitivity, as shown in Fig. S2. The sensitivity curves with PDMS and GR/PDMS sponge as a dielectric layer are shown in Fig. 3a. The fabricated sensor could operate over a wide range of 0–500 kPa, which is a large operating range when compared with other reported sensors18,19,24,27,33,34,35. The sensitivity is 0.12 kPa−1 in the low-pressure range of 0–10 kPa, 0.042 kPa−1 for 10–100 kPa, and 0.004 kPa−1 in the high-pressure range of 100–500 kPa. The pressure sensor with GR/PDMS sponge as a dielectric layer shows an improved sensitivity compared with that using PDMS as a dielectric layer. In view of elastic nature of the as-prepared GR/PMDS sponge, according to the theory of mechanics of materials, the deformation of GR/PDMS at 0–100 kPa was proportionally conformed with the pressure applied on the capacitance plate which is known as Hooke Law. Therefore, the variation of capacitance in 0–100 kPa was much more significant and the pressure sensor shows a high sensitivity in 0–100 kPa, as shown in Fig. 3a. As the pressure exceeds 100 kPa, the as-prepared GR/PMDS sponge was in yield stage and at this stage the deformation of GR/PDMS sponge was low, which would then cause a low capacitance change and a low-level sensitivity.

Figure 3
figure3

Capacitance variation characteristics of the GR/PDMS sponge under pressure. (a) Capacitance response curve with PDMS and GR/PDMS sponge as a dielectric layer under pressure of 0–500 kPa (b) Dynamic loading/unloading pressure with different load values. (c) Capacitance response curve of the pressure sensor over 5000 cycles. (d) Capacitance–time curve with loading and unloading of a mung bean. (e) Hitting the sensor with a hammer. (f) The response time and recovery time.

In addition to the sensitivity, the stability, recoverability, and repeatability of a sensor are important parameters to characterise its performance. The sensor exhibits favourable recoverability when pressure is applied and released (Fig. S3). Figure 3b depicts the response curves with different pressure values (10, 50, and 200 kPa) when dynamic loading/unloading pressure is applied on the sensors. The fabricated sensor exhibits a consistent response value during the seven processes of loading/unloading under each pressure. This indicates that the sensor has excellent stability and repeatability. In order to further characterize the repeatability of the sensor, it was subjected to more than 5000 cycles of loading/unloading experiments under the same pressure, as shown in Fig. 3c, which confirm the high robust performance of this pressure sensor.

The parameters of the detection limit and response time were also analysed to further elucidate the performance of the fabricated sensor. A mung bean with a mass of 50 mg was used as the pressure source (~5 Pa) and placed on the surface of the pressure sensor. Figure 3d indicates that the sensor can detect a lightweight object and output a response signal because of the presence of air-holes. An endurance test was performed by hitting the sensor with a hammer. The sensor quickly restored to its initial state after each hit, as shown in Fig. 3e, which further explains that the sensor has good recovery and endurance. More information can be derived from Fig. 3e, as shown in Fig. 3f. The response time is 7 ms and the recovery time is 60 ms, which suggests an instantaneous response when compared with other reported sensors8,13,24,27. The sensor can sensitively detect the bending motion of a finger as shown in Fig. S4.

Characterization of resonant frequency response

From the measured results mentioned above, the GR/PDMS sponge as a dielectric layer exhibits the excellent properties of a wide operating range, rapid response time, low detection limit, good stability, recoverability, and repeatability. For further wireless testing of the practicality of the sensor, we built a wireless test system, as shown in Fig. S5.

Figure 4a shows the corresponding output frequency curves under different external pressures. There is a unique minimum in the pressure range of 0–500 kPa for each curve, which corresponds to the resonant frequency of the sensor. The resonant frequency of the sensor is reduced from 367.67 to 309.19 MHz as the external pressure increases from 0 to 500 kPa. The absolute value of the difference between the initial and deformed resonant frequency points extracted from the curves with different external loading values were plotted against different pressure in Fig. 4b. The sensitivity is 2.2 MHz/kPa in the low-pressure regime (0–10 kPa), 230 kHz/kPa in the middle-pressure regime (10–100 kPa), and 37.5 kHz/kPa in the high-pressure regime (100–500 kPa). The variation trends of the resonant frequency and the capacitance are approximately the same under the same pressure, which establishes the correctness and feasibility of the wireless detection method, as shown in Fig. S6.

Figure 4
figure4

Frequency variation characteristics of the wireless pressure sensor. (a) Frequency curves under different pressures. (b) Measured frequency changes as a function of the applied pressure for the wireless pressure sensors (c) Resonant frequency curves corresponding to the state of the finger bending. Capacitance response curve and frequency response curve for (d) swallow, (e) smile, and (f) frown.

To verify the practicality of the fabricated wireless pressure sensor, it was attached onto a finger to measure the finger bending movements. Each finger movement state corresponds to a resonant curve. When the finger was bent from the horizontal state (0°) to the vertical state (90°) at intervals of approximately 30°, the resonant frequency was changed from 363.91 to 333.89 MHz, as shown in Fig. 4c. That is because the bending of the finger causes an increase in the capacitance of the GR/PDMS sponge, resulting in a decrease in the resonant frequency of the sensor.

To further investigate the benefits of our wireless pressure sensor, we attached our sensors to the throat, face, and centre of the forehead to monitor the swallowing action, facial muscle movements for smile and frown. The demonstrations involved a healthy female volunteer with approval from the institutional review board of the North University of China. In addition, we confirmed that all experiments were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations of the institutional review board. First, the capacitance response curve of the pressure sensor was obtained for repeated swallowing actions. Meanwhile, the resonant frequency curve (Fig. S7) was recorded by extracting the smallest point in the curve during the swallowing process, as shown in Fig. 4d. It can be concluded that there is a corresponding relationship between the capacitance response curve and the frequency response curve from Eq. (3). That is, the capacitance variation can be transformed into frequency variation in the wireless method. The capacitance and frequency response curves of the smile and frown processes were recorded using the previous method, as shown in Fig. 4e, and f. Therefore, our wireless pressure sensor can wirelessly detect finger bending and facial muscle movements, compared to other existing cabled sensors3,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26, which gives it the potential to be used for highly sensitive wireless detection in a wide range of applications such as intelligent robots, bionic-electronic skin and wearable electronic devices.

Conclusions

In summary, we propose a wireless flexible pressure sensor based on a GR/PDMS sponge as a dielectric layer, which is sandwiched by folding the flexible printed circuit with patterned Cu as the antenna and electrode. The GR/PDMS sponge with NH4HCO3 concentration of 20% and graphene concentration of 2% as the dielectric layer exhibits high performance with high sensitivity, wide operating range (0–500 kPa), rapid response time (~7 ms), low detection limit (5 Pa), and good stability, recoverability, and repeatability. The sensitivity is 2.2 MHz/kPa in the low-pressure regime (0–10 kPa), 230 kHz/kPa in the middle-pressure regime (10–100 kPa), and 37.5 kHz/kPa in the high-pressure regime (100–500 kPa). In addition, the practicality of the fabricated wireless pressure sensor was confirmed by capacitance and frequency response curves mapping for finger bending and facial muscle movements for smile and frown. Moreover, the sensor has the advantages of low cost, simple testing, high stability, and battery-free, and is thus suitable for use in highly sensitive wireless detection devices in a wide range of applications such as intelligent robots, bionic-electronic skin and wearable electronic devices.

Methods

The raw materials needed for preparing the GR/PDMS sponge are graphene powder (thickness = 0.55–3.74 nm, diameter = 0.5–3 μm, number of layers ≤ 10, purity ≥ 98%), colloidal PDMS polymers(Sylgard 184, Dow Corning, Midland, MI, USA) PDMS curing agent, and NH4HCO3 power (a food additive).

The topography of the GR/PDMS sponge was characterized by using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Hitachi S-4800). The Raman measurements were taken with InVia Raman Microscope. The Raman spectrum were obtained using a 5 mW, 514.5 nm laster with a 50X objective. The capacitance-characterizations of the GR/PDMS sponge were performed using an impedance analyser (Agilent E4990A.) The frequency-characterizations of the wireless pressure sensor were performed using a vector network analyser (Agilent E5061B).

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article. In this study, the experiments involved a volunteer with approval from the institutional review board of the North University of China. Their rights were protected and all subjects provided written informed consent to participate. The specific consents from the authors and volunteer have been obtained to publish the information in an open-access online publication. The authors confirmed that all experiments were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations of the institutional review board.

References

  1. 1.

    Chortos, A., Liu, J. & Bao, Z. Pursuing prosthetic electronic skin. Nature materials 15(9), 937 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Chou, H.-H. et al. A chameleon-inspired stretchable electronic skin with interactive colour changing controlled by tactile sensing. Nature communications 6, 8011 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Wang, X. et al. Silk‐molded flexible, ultrasensitive, and highly stable electronic skin for monitoring human physiological signals. Advanced materials 26(9), 1336–1342 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ho, D. H. et al. Stretchable and multimodal all graphene electronic skin. Advanced Materials 28(13), 2601–2608 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Haghi, M., Thurow, K. & Stoll, R. Wearable devices in medical internet of things: scientific research and commercially available devices. Healthcare informatics research 23(1), 4–15 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Son, D. et al. Multifunctional wearable devices for diagnosis and therapy of movement disorders. Nature nanotechnology 9(5), 397 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Patel, M. S., David, A. A. & Kevin, G. V. Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change. Jama 313(5), 459–460 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Pan, L. et al. An ultra-sensitive resistive pressure sensor based on hollow-sphere microstructure induced elasticity in conducting polymer film. Nature communications 5, 3002 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wagner, S. et al. Highly sensitive electromechanical piezoresistive pressure sensors based on large-area layered PtSe2 films. Nano letters (2018).

  10. 10.

    Lou, Z. et al. An ultra-sensitive and rapid response speed graphene pressure sensors for electronic skin and health monitoring. Nano Energy 23, 7–14 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Woo, S.-J. et al. A thin all-elastomeric capacitive pressure sensor array based on micro-contact printed elastic conductors. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2(22), 4415–4422 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Chen, S., Zhuo, B. & Guo, X. Large area one-step facile processing of microstructured elastomeric dielectric film for high sensitivity and durable sensing over wide pressure range. ACS applied materials & interfaces 8(31), 20364–20370 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Cho, S. H. et al. Micropatterned pyramidal ionic gels for sensing broad-range pressures with high sensitivity. ACS applied materials & interfaces 9(11), 10128–10135 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lei, Z. et al. A Bioinspired Mineral Hydrogel as a Self‐Healable, Mechanically Adaptable Ionic Skin for Highly Sensitive Pressure Sensing. Advanced Materials 29(22), 1700321 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Dagdeviren, C. et al. Conformable amplified lead zirconate titanate sensors with enhanced piezoelectric response for cutaneous pressure monitoring. Nature communications 5, 4496 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chun, J. et al. Embossed hollow hemisphere‐based piezoelectric nanogenerator and highly responsive pressure sensor. Advanced Functional Materials 24(14), 2038–2043 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mannsfeld, S. C. B. et al. Highly sensitive flexible pressure sensors with microstructured rubber dielectric layers. Nature materials 9(10), 859 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Choong, C. L. et al. Highly stretchable resistive pressure sensors using a conductive elastomeric composite on a micropyramid array. Advanced materials 26(21), 3451–3458 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Jian, M. et al. Flexible and highly sensitive pressure sensors based on bionic hierarchical structures. Advanced Functional Materials 27(9), 1606066 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Nie, P. et al. High-Performance Piezoresistive Electronic Skin with Bionic Hierarchical Microstructure and Microcracks. ACS applied materials & interfaces 9(17), 14911–14919 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Xiao, J. et al. A flyweight and superelastic graphene aerogel as a high-capacity adsorbent and highly sensitive pressure sensor. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 6(19), 9074–9080 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Parida, K. et al. Self-powered pressure sensor for ultra-wide range pressure detection. Nano Research 10(10), 3557–3570 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zhao, S. et al. Covalently bonded nitrogen-doped carbon-nanotube-supported Ag hybrid sponges: Synthesis, structure manipulation, and its application for flexible conductors and strain-gauge sensors. Carbon 86, 225–234 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wan, S. et al. Graphene oxide as high-performance dielectric materials for capacitive pressure sensors. Carbon 114, 209–216 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Liu, Y. et al. Flexible, highly sensitive pressure sensor with a wide range based on graphene-silk network structure. Applied Physics Letters 110(12), 123508 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zhao, M. et al. Hollow MXene Spheres and 3D Macroporous MXene Frameworks for Na‐Ion Storage. Advanced Materials 29(37), 1702410 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Park, H. et al. Stretchable array of highly sensitive pressure sensors consisting of polyaniline nanofibers and Au-coated polydimethylsiloxane micropillars. ACS nano 9(10), 9974–9985 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Shu, Y. et al. Surface-modified piezoresistive nanocomposite flexible pressure sensors with high sensitivity and wide linearity. Nanoscale 7(18), 8636–8644 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    An, B. W. et al. Transparent and flexible fingerprint sensor array with multiplexed detection of tactile pressure and skin temperature. Nature communications 9(1), 2458 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Cai, Y. et al. Stretchable Ti3C2Tx MXene/Carbon Nanotube Composite Based Strain Sensor with Ultrahigh Sensitivity and Tunable Sensing Range. ACS nano 12(1), 56–62 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ma, Y. et al. A highly flexible and sensitive piezoresistive sensor based on MXene with greatly changed interlayer distances. Nature communications 8(1), 1207 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Tang, J. et al. Highly stretchable electrodes on wrinkled polydimethylsiloxane substrates. Scientific reports 5, 16527 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Tai, Y. & Yang, Z. Toward Flexible Wireless Pressure‐Sensing Device via Ionic Hydrogel Microsphere for Continuously Mapping Human‐Skin Signals. Advanced Materials Interfaces 4(20) (2017).

  34. 34.

    Nie, B. et al. A droplet-based passive force sensor for remote tactile sensing applications. Applied Physics Letters 112(3), 031904 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Deng, W. J. et al. LC Wireless Sensitive Pressure Sensors With Microstructured PDMS Dielectric Layers for Wound Monitoring. IEEE Sensors Journal 18(12), 4886–4892 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kou, H. et al. Wireless flexible pressure sensor based on micro-patterned Graphene/PDMS composite. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 277, 150–156 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kim, J. et al. Wearable smart sensor systems integrated on soft contact lenses for wireless ocular diagnostics. Nature communications 8, 14997 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kim, J. et al. Highly Transparent and Stretchable Field‐Effect Transistor Sensors Using Graphene–Nanowire Hybrid Nanostructures. Advanced Materials 27(21), 3292–3297 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Nabipoor, M. & Majlis, B. Y. A new passive telemetry LC pressure and temperature sensor optimized for TPMS. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing 34(1), 770 (2006).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Kairm, H. et al. Concept and model of a metamaterial-based passive wireless temperature sensor for harsh environment applications. IEEE Sens. J 15(3), 1445–1452 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Tan, Q. et al. A LC wireless passive temperature-pressure-humidity (TPH) sensor integrated on LTCC ceramic for harsh monitoring. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 270, 433–442 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Huang, X. et al. Stretchable, wireless sensors and functional substrates for epidermal characterization of sweat. Small 10(15), 3083–3090 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Kim, M. et al. Fully-integrated, bezel-less transistor arrays using reversibly foldable interconnects and stretchable origami substrates. Nanoscale 8(18), 9504–9510 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Shin, S. H. et al. Integrated arrays of air-dielectric graphene transistors as transparent active-matrix pressure sensors for wide pressure ranges. Nature communications 8, 14950 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Tang, J. et al. PHEMA functionalization of gold nanoparticles for vapor sensing: Chemi-resistance, chemi-capacitance and chemi-impedance. Sensors and Actuators B: chemical 170, 129–136 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61471324, No. 51875534, No.U1837209 and No. 51425505), the Outstanding Youth talents Program of Shanxi Province, and Shanxi ‘1331 Project’ Key Subject Construction.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All works with relation to this paper have been accomplished by all authors’ efforts. H.K. and Q.T. performed the measurements, analyzed the data, and wrote the main manuscript text. The experiments of the sensor were completed with the help of L.Z. and G.L. H.D. prepared the samples and performed the SEM measurements. J.X. analysed the data, and W.Z. contributed to the manuscript writing. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiulin Tan.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kou, H., Zhang, L., Tan, Q. et al. Wireless wide-range pressure sensor based on graphene/PDMS sponge for tactile monitoring. Sci Rep 9, 3916 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40828-8

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing