Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Global response of diacylglycerol kinase towards substrate binding observed by 2D and 3D MAS NMR

## Abstract

Escherichia coli diacylglycerol kinase (DGK) is an integral membrane protein, which catalyses the ATP-dependent phosphorylation of diacylglycerol (DAG) to phosphatic acid (PA). It is a unique trimeric enzyme, which does not share sequence homology with typical kinases. It exhibits a notable complexity in structure and function despite of its small size. Here, chemical shift assignment of wild-type DGK within lipid bilayers was carried out based on 3D MAS NMR, utilizing manual and automatic analysis protocols. Upon nucleotide binding, extensive chemical shift perturbations could be observed. These data provide evidence for a symmetric DGK trimer with all of its three active sites concurrently occupied. Additionally, we could detect that the nucleotide substrate induces a substantial conformational change, most likely directing DGK into its catalytic active form. Furthermore, functionally relevant interprotomer interactions are identified by DNP-enhanced MAS NMR in combination with site-directed mutagenesis and functional assays.

## Introduction

Escherichia coli diacylglycerol kinase (DGK) is a homotrimeric enzyme encoded by the dgkA gene. It is located within the inner membrane, where it catalyses the ATP-dependent phosphorylation of diacylglycerol (DAG) to phosphatic acid (PA) at the membrane interface. It plays an important role in recycling DAG during the biosynthesis of membrane-derived oligosaccharides (MDOs) (Fig. 1)1,2 and lipopolysaccharides (LPSs)3. MDOs are largely generated in response to environmental stress, such as low osmolarity4,5, whereas LPSs are the main constituent of the bacterial outer membrane3. E.coli DGK is a unique enzyme. It has no significant homology with other proteins except for undecaprenol kinase (UDPK) present in Gram-positive bacteria. It does not feature a P-loop or any other structural or functional motif that is widespread among water-soluble kinases. It is different from the eukaryotic diacylglycerol kinases and their prokaryotic homologs, encoded by the dgkB gene6,7,8,9. With 43 kDa (121 residues per monomer), DGK is the smallest known kinase9. It features a notable complexity in structure and function9,10,11,12 as well as a remarkable stability13,14. DGK forms a homotrimer, in which each monomer contains three transmembrane helices (H1-3) and one N-terminal amphiphilic surface helix (SH)10,12,15. The trimer contains three active sites near the membrane/cytoplasm interface. Each active site is formed by the transmembrane region of one monomer and the surface helix of an adjacent monomer leading to an unusual catalytic site architecture of the composite shared site model10,11,16. This high complexity in combination with a convenient experimental handling has put DGK into focus as a model system for investigations of membrane protein structure, function and folding6,9,15,16,17,18,19,20.

So far, two 3D structures have been published for DGK: one obtained by solution NMR in dodecylphosphocholine (DPC) micelles12 and one by X-ray crystallography in lipidic cubic phases (LCP) composed of monoolein, which also acts as a lipid substrate10. In addition, also a crystal structure of the thermostable mutant, Δ4-DGK (I53C, I70L, M96L, V107D), with bound lipid substrate and a co-crystallized ATP analogue11 was determined. Caffrey and co-workers could identify several residues interacting specifically with the nucleotide or lipid substrate, proposing a catalytic mechanism11. However, a number of mechanistic questions remain unsolved. It is unknown yet whether the three active sites of DGK are in the same or different states during catalysis and whether DGK undergoes a substantial conformational change prior to the actual phosphoryl transfer. Taking into account that the DGK trimer exhibits a remarkable stability and that each active site is built by components of two protomers based on the composite shared site model, the question arises whether specific long-range intra- and interprotomer interactions exist.

Our previous studies on DGK focused on its catalytic activity at the membrane interface by real-time 31P-MAS NMR21. Here, we address the questions defined above by multidimensional 13C-15N-MAS NMR as well as by dynamic nuclear polarisation. The key advantage of solid-state NMR and in particular of MAS is the possibility of performing experiments directly within the lipid bilayer22 or even within the cellular context23, which brings it closer to physiological conditions compared to other membrane-mimicking environments. The membrane environment is of key importance as it is a strong structural factor. It is also directly linked to the catalytic activity of DGK and many other membrane proteins24,25,26,27. Using solid-state NMR, full resonance assignments of membrane proteins in lipid bilayers28,29,30, but also 3D structure determination has been demonstrated31. Furthermore, the dramatic signal enhancement provided by DNP32,33 enabled new, mainly hypothesis-driven applications, which would not be possible by conventional solid-state NMR34,35,36,37.

Here, we used multidimensional MAS NMR for the 13C- and 15N-sequential assignment of uniformly labelled DGK prepared in its apo- and nucleotide-bound states. High-quality spectra could be obtained, enabling 84% resonance assignment, which could be verified to a high extent by the automatic assignment algorithm ssFLYA38. Chemical shift perturbations and altered peak intensities were analysed in 3D heteronuclear correlation spectra upon binding of the ATP analogue adenylylmethylenediphosphonate (AMP-PCP). Our data demonstrate that the global response of membrane proteins in a lipid environment towards substrate binding could be probed. We are able to highlight changes in structure and dynamics within the catalytic hotspots of DGK, providing a deeper understanding of its catalytic mechanism. Our data give evidence that all three active sites of DGK can be occupied by the nucleotide substrate at the same time. Additionally, a substantial conformational change prior to the phosphoryl transfer induced by the nucleotide substrate could be detected. In addition, the effect of the lipid substrate sn-1,2-dioctanoylglycerol (DOG) has been probed. Moreover, functionally relevant intra- and interprotomer contacts could be visualized in conventional high-field MAS NMR spectra and especially through experiments utilizing sensitivity enhancement by dynamic nuclear polarisation (DNP).

## Results

All MAS NMR experiments described here were carried out on wild-type DGK embedded within lipid bilayers as explained in Material and Methods. Sample purity was tested by SDS-PAGE (Suppl. Fig. 1a), trimer formation was verified by BN-PAGE (Suppl. Fig. 1b), and homogenous reconstitution was shown by density gradient centrifugation (Suppl. Fig. 1c). As liposome composition 90 mol% DMPC/10 mol% DMPA was used, which has been already successfully applied for several membrane proteins31,36,39,40,41. High quality MAS NMR spectra of DGK with good resolution could be obtained (Suppl. Fig. 2a,b) and the effect of different lipid compositions on the spectral fingerprint and activity of DGK has been probed (Suppl. Fig. 3). In order to obtain well-resolved spectra, all NMR experiments were conducted at 4 °C, which minimizes sample dehydration and provides better CP efficiency of the protein sample, since the surrounding lipids are in the gel phase42. Suppl. Fig. 2c illustrates the superposition of the PDSD spectrum with the resonance assignment of the thermostable DGK mutant, published by Yang and co-workers29. Though this assignment was obtained using MAS NMR as well, significant deviations made a de-novo assignment of wild-type DGK necessary. Deviations are most likely caused by inserted mutations and/or different experimental conditions. Our experiments were carried out on DGK reconstituted into DMPC/DMPA under a pH of 7.2 and full hydration. The thermostable mutant was reconstituted into E.coli total lipids and measured under a pH of 6.6 and 23 wt% H2O29.

### Resonance assignment and secondary structure analysis

We carried out sequential assignment of wild-type DGK using a combination of dipolar-coupling-based 3D experiments (NCACX, NCOCX, CONCA). The NMR time could be reduced by paramagnetic doping with Gd3+-DOTA43 in combination with a custom-built E-free probehead optimized for an increased duty cycle, which enabled using a recycle delay of just 0.8 s. Thereby, experiments could be recorded 3-times faster. Due to the high quality of the NMR spectra, we obtained 13C and 15N assignments using mainly uniformly labelled samples (U-13C,15N-DGK). The resolved 15N and 13C signals in 2D NCA spectra show average linewidths of 105 and 185 Hz, respectively. Residual ambiguities could be resolved by reverse labelling of isoleucine, leucine and valine (U-13C,15N-DGK-I,L,V) (Suppl. Fig. 4a). A representative sequential walk linking I26 to A29 via 3D NCACX, NCOCX and CONCA spectra is shown in Fig. 2a. We were able to assign the backbone and most sidechain carbon and nitrogen resonances for approximately 82% of the residues (=99 residues), from which 73 residues (~74% of the assigned residues) are completely assigned. Assigned resonances are highlighted in a 2D NCA spectrum (Fig. 2b) and mapped on the topology plot of DGK (Fig. 3a). For validation, we also applied ssFLYA, a generally applicable algorithm for the automatic assignment of protein solid-state NMR spectra38. So far, it has been used for microcrystals and amyloids38. Here, we tested its principal applicability for membrane proteins. Overall, 91.5% of the backbone and 89.1% of all (backbone + sidechains) assignments could be confirmed, verifying the manually obtained data set. The few disagreements occurred mainly in flexible regions with residues featuring smaller peak intensities or originated from spectral artefacts or missing peaks due to spectral overlap. A full overview of the automatic assignment is provided in Fig. 3b. As not all residues could be detected in cross-polarization (CP)-based experiments, scalar-coupling based spectra were also recorded. Similar to the data reported for the thermostable DGK mutant44, a number of mobile residues could so be observed. We recorded 1H-15N HETCOR, 1H-13C HETCOR and 13C-13C TOBSY spectra (Fig. 2c, Suppl. Fig. 5a–c) showing well-resolved peaks of “solution-state”-like quality due to motions on the submicrosecond time scale. Most of the peaks could be assigned to types of amino acids based on the BMRB database45, such as Ala, Arg, Asn, Gly, His, Ile, Leu, Lys, Phe and Thr. Thus, these peaks could be tentatively assigned to the two termini and the cytosolic loop between helix 2 and 3, where residues are located that are not detectable by dipolar-coupling based experiments. Peaks for arginine and lysine could be assigned unambiguously to Arg9 and Lys12 by exclusion, since all other arginines and lysines were already assigned by dipolar-coupling based experiments.

With careful optimization of the sample preparation and using the NMR strategy described above, we were able to assign 84% of the residues (=101 residues) located in transmembrane and extramembranous regions by dipolar- and scalar-coupling-based experiments. All assigned residues are mapped on the topology of DGK (Fig. 3a) and listed in the Suppl. Table 1. Residues of the termini and the cytosolic loop were not or only tentatively assigned, because they were too mobile for dipolar- but not mobile enough for scalar-coupling-based transfer experiments.

Although asymmetries were observed in the DGK X-ray structure10, no systematic peak doublets or triplets were detected during the assignment procedure. This is illustrated by a number of well-resolved peaks, such as Gly20, Asn27, Ala29, Glu88, Ala99 and Trp112 in the 2D NCA spectrum (Fig. 2b). Thus, it can be concluded that the DGK trimer adopts a symmetric conformation in liposomes.

Based on the resonance assignment, a secondary structure analysis was carried out using the chemical shift index (CSI)46. Suppl. Fig. 6 illustrates the comparison of the secondary structures of wild-type DGK, its thermostable mutant29 determined both by MAS NMR and the crystal structure of wtDGK (PDB 3ZE4)10. All three structures feature substantial similarities, especially concerning the high α-helical content. However, there are a few differences. In contrast to both MAS NMR secondary structures, the crystal structure shows small deviations around the flexible regions (see Suppl. Information for further details). The largest discrepancy concerns the length and position of the cytosolic loop (CL). It is shifted from residues 83–87 in the MAS NMR structure of wtDGK to residues 83–90 (subunit A), 86–91 (subunit B) and 82–87 (subunit C) of the X-ray structure.

### Functional studies by chemical shift perturbations

The chemical shift assignment allows probing the effects of nucleotide- and lipid substrate binding. We therefore compare the apo state of DGK with the nucleotide-bound state by using AMP-PCP, a non-hydrolysable ATP analogue. The DAG-bound state is probed by adding DOG, a slightly shorter DAG analogue. Perturbations in peak position and intensity of the substrate-bound states were analysed for each of the 101 assigned residues. Substrate-induced chemical shift perturbations indicate structural changes while alterations in peak intensities can be interpreted qualitatively in terms of altered dynamics: An increase in mobility causes a reduction in peak intensities in experiments based on cross polarisation.

#### The nucleotide-bound state of DGK

In order to trap DGK in a stable nucleotide-bound state, a non-hydrolysable ATP analogue is required. Previous studies have shown that trapping with ADP.Vi only uncouples the phosphoryl transfer reaction, whereas ATPγS gets fully consumed21. In contrast, adenylylmethylenediphosphonate (AMP-PCP) was reported as a suitable analogue11. For finding saturation conditions, a competitive Mg*ATP inhibition assay was performed by monitoring the ATPase activity as a function of Mg*AMP-PCP concentration (Fig. 4a). At least a 10-fold molar excess of Mg*AMP-PCP compared to DGK is necessary to reduce its activity below 10%, leading to saturation. For all NMR experiments of DGK bound with Mg*AMP-PCP, DGK proteoliposomes were incubated with the nucleotide analogue at a molar ratio of 1:14. Using 1H-31P cross polarization, AMP-PCP bound to DGK could be detected under these conditions (Fig. 4b). We then verified that the fully saturated system is stable over at least 30 d at approximately 4 °C (Suppl. Fig. 4b), enabling the acqusition of large data sets such as 3D NCACX spectra with measurement times of up to 14 d.

As for the apo state, no peak splitting could be detected in the presence of AMP-PCP during the assignment process under the applied experimental conditions. This is already partially visible in the 2D NCA and 2D NCACX spectra, e.g. for Gly20, Asn27, Ala29, Glu88, Ala99 and Trp112 (Fig. 5a–c) and is indicative for a symmetric conformation of DGK in both states. The DGK X-ray structure10 shows asymmetries for example for Gly83 and Gly91. Both residues, framing the cytosolic loop involved in nucleotide binding11, should be sensitive to conformational asymmetries induced by AMP-PCP. However, no peak multiplets were observed upon AMP-PCP binding (Fig. 5b). Only one crosspeak for Gly83, implying a random coil structure and one peak for Gly91, suggesting a helical structure (based on CSI), could be detected. These findings support our assumption that the DGK trimer adopts a symmetric conformation not only in the apo- but also in the AMP-PCP bound state.

In the AMP-PCP bound state, significant chemical shift perturbations (CSPs ≥ 0.2 ppm) and effects on peak intensities are observable for 57% of the assigned residues, including backbone and sidechains (Fig. 5a–c, Suppl. Table 2). All CSPs ≥ 0.2 ppm are counted as significant due to the high quality of the NMR spectra. The resolved 15N and 13C signals in 2D NCA spectra show average linewidths of 105 and 185 Hz, respectively. Alterations of the peak intensities are defined as relevant, if an increase/decrease of at least 20% was seen. Previous mutational studies have identified the following residues of DGK to be functionally important: T8, R9, A13, S17, G20, E28, A30, F31, R32, E34, E69, N72, S73, E76, D80, R81, G83, L89, S90, A93, K94, D95, G97, S98 and A10012,16. With our studies by MAS NMR using heteronuclear 2D and 3D correlation experiments, we were able to confirm 14 out of these 25 residues to be affected by nucleotide binding, showing significant CSPs and/or changes in peak intensities (labelled bold). Additionally, we could also identify further 43 residues: G15, Y16, K19, R22, A23, W25, I26, N27, A29, Q33, A37, L40, A41, V43, A45, C46, W47, L48, D49, V50, D51, I53, R55, V56, L57, V62, V65, M66, I67, I70, A74, A77, V79, I82, E88, G91, R92, A99, V101, L102, T111, I114 and L116. Affected residues, featuring clear CSPs and/or perturbations in peak intensity, are highlighted in the DGK topology plot and mapped onto the 3D structure in Fig. 5d,e. The picture shows that binding of the nucleotide has a more extensive impact on DGK as it was assumed so far12. Here, large CSPs ≥0.4 ppm are observable mainly for residues of the cytosolic region: E28, F31, R32, Q33, E69, I70, V79, R81, I82, G91 and K94, but also for the periplasmic loop: D49, I53 and the transmembrane region: A45, V62. For V62, D80 and K94, representative sections from the 3D NCACX spectra are shown in Fig. 5c. Especially glycines turned out to be sensitive to AMP-PCP binding. We could observe significant chemical shift changes for Gly15, Gly20, Gly91 and Gly97 and increased peak intensities for Gly20 and Gly83 (Fig. 5a,b). Particularly, Gly83, located in the cytosolic loop (CL), features a remarkable increase in signal intensity, suggesting a reduced mobility of CL. This is in agreement with X-ray data, indicating a participation of the cytosolic loop in nucleotide binding via Glu85, Tyr86 and His8711. However, the most pronounced effect can be seen for Gly91, located in the extramembranous part of helix 3 with a decrease of the N chemical shift by 1.7 ppm. A reason could be the close proximity to the purine ring of AMP-PCP11, leading to a higher shielding of Gly91 N. Overall, glycines serve as perfect probes for sensing nucleotide binding and accompanied conformational and dynamical changes in the cytoplasmic region.

#### DGK in the presence of lipid substrate

For generating a state of DGK with bound lipid substrate, we reconstituted the protein into DMPC/DMPA liposomes, including 20 mol% sn-1,2-dioctanoylglycerol (DOG, chain length n = 8), which has been reported as a suitable lipid substrate for DGK21,47. Empirically, it turned out that 20 mol% of DOG is an appropriate amount to keep the liposomes still intact. Under these conditions, DOG is in 10-fold excess over DGK. In order to test, whether DOG can reach the active site, MgATP was added to the sample so that DGK could catalyse the phosphoryl transfer reaction from ATP to DOG to yield DOG-PA. The latter should then become visible in 31P spectra. Indeed, the DOG-PA signal is observed in 31P-cross polarization (CP) and direct polarization (DP) spectra (Fig. 4c). The DP spectrum shows all 31P-species such as α- and β-ADP as well as DOG-PA. The CP spectrum on the other hand only displays membrane-bound 31P-species such as DOG-PA and phospholipids. Both the DP and CP spectra verify that DOG reaches the active sites of DGK in our preparations. The same conditions were used to prepare a sample, in which DGK was saturated with both Mg*AMP-PCP and DOG (80 mol% DMPC/DMPA and 20 mol% DOG). Of course, DOG could not be phosphorylated in this case but bound Mg*AMP-PCP could be detected as described above (Fig. 4d).

In the presence of DOG, overall alterations are clearly less pronounced than in the AMP-PCP bound state (see Suppl. Fig. S7 and Fig. 5f). The observed subtle effects involving mainly changes in peak intensities could be caused by specific direct response on the lipid substrate in the active site, but could also arise from changes of the membrane properties due to 20 mol% of DOG inserted into the lipid bilayer. It is reported that short chain DAGs as DOG (chain length n = 8) induce relatively small bilayer perturbation48. As for AMP-PCP, no peak splittings could be detected supporting a symmetric structure of DGK under these conditions. The AMP-PCP + DOG bound state features a similar fingerprint compared to the state with only AMP-PCP bound (Fig. 5f,g).

### Functionally relevant interprotomer interactions within the DGK trimer

DGK has been demonstrated to be highly stable in native membranes13,14. Additionally, the oligomeric arrangement of DGK is of direct functional relevance as the three active sites are formed by two adjacent protomers. We therefore tried to find specific intra- and interprotomer contacts in apo-state DGK, which are of structural or functional importance. We used both magnetization transfer experiments between sidechains using the experimental conditions described above and DNP-enhanced solid-state NMR on mixed-labelled DGK trimers. Here, interactions of interest are especially salt bridges such as those formed between Lys/Arg and Asp/Glu or H-bonds between sidechains as i.e. for Arg and Asn.

First, utilizing our extensive sidechain assignment, 13C-13C DARR and 2D NCOCX spectra with long mixing times were recorded for apo state DGK. The spectra were searched for long-range, non-sequential sidechain-sidechain crosspeaks. In this way, some intraprotomer contacts were found: Crosspeaks between Cα of Ser61 and sidechain carbons of Trp112 (Fig. 6a) demonstrate close proximity of both residues. Trp112 is located in the transmembrane part of helix 3 and Ser61 in helix 2, which is in agreement with findings of Caffrey and co-workers, who assumed a hydrogen bond between Nε of Trp112 and the OH-group of Ser61 (Fig. 7a)11. Interestingly, crosspeaks between sidechain nitrogens, Nε and Nη1/2, of Arg32 with 25TrpC’, 28GluCβ and 29AlaCα,Cβ,C’ are found (Fig. 6b). Arg32 is located at the membrane/cytoplasm interface of helix 1, while Trp25, Glu28 and Ala29 are found in the SH, interhelical turn and the cytoplasmic part of H1, respectively (Fig. 7b). This contact has not been described before. In order to test its functional relevance, we have prepared a R32A mutant, which shows a strongly reduced activity (Suppl. Fig. 8c).

Since no cross-protomer contacts could be detected in this way, mixed-labelled DGK trimers were prepared (Suppl. Fig. 8a). In such samples, interactions across the oligomerisation interfaces could be monitored by dipolar through-space N-C correlation spectroscopy as demonstrated by Maciejko et al.36. As such contacts are expected to be sparse and weak, sensitivity enhancement by dynamic-nuclear-polarization (DNP) is essential36. Here, a signal enhancement of 45 was achieved for U-13C-DGK by using the stable and soluble biradical AMUPol49 as a polarizing agent (Fig. 6c). DNP creates proton polarization in direct proximity to the biradical and gets evenly distributed through the sample via the homogeneously coupled proton network by spin diffusion at a temperature of 100 K. Transfer from protons to carbons and nitrogens takes then place by cross polarization. The presence of AMUPol has no influence on the activity of DGK (Fig. 6d).

Here, a labelling scheme was selected, in which U-13C-DGK was mixed with 15N(Arg,Lys)-DGK. In the resulting samples ([CN(Arg,Lys)]-DGK), cross-protomer salt bridges or H-bonds (Arg/Lys-Glu/Asp/Asn) can be detected by DNP-enhanced N-C TEDOR experiments. A statistical analysis of salt bridges within proteins reveals distances between Nη1/2 and CO in the corresponding sidechain of around 3 Å50. We have also measured such a distance for a cross-protomer salt bridge within a membrane protein complex by TEDOR in one of our previous papers36. We have therefore selected a TEDOR mixing time (6.25 ms) which provides largest peak intensities for these distances.

N-C TEDOR spectra of a mixed and selectively labelled [CN(Arg,Lys)]-DGK and of 13C-only labelled [CC]-DGK are shown in Fig. 6e. Both spectra reveal natural abundance signals originating from N-C’ (crosspeak (1)) and N-Cα (crosspeak (2)) single bond contacts. Additionally, arginine intraresidue 13C-15N contacts between ArgNε,η and ArgCζ can be observed (crosspeak (3)). One additional resonance (crosspeak (4)) is only observed in the mixed labelled [CN(Arg,Lys)]-DGK, which must therefore arise from cross-protomer contacts.

This crosspeak represents a through-space correlation between a 15N resonance of Arg-Nε,η with a 13C resonance of a carboxyl group from Asp-Cγ and/or Glu-Cδ and/or the carbonyl group from Asn-Cγ. It therefore demonstrates the occurance of one or more salt bridges or H-bonds between DGK protomers (Fig. 6f). In order to assign which of the 6 Arg residues in DGK contributes to these interactions, single-site RxA mutations were introduced and mixed-labelled complexes were prepared (Fig. S8b,c). The resulting TEDOR spectra show a clear intensity reduction of crosspeak (4) upon introducing mutations R9A, R81A and R92A (see insert in Fig. 6e). In contrast, mutations R22A, R32A and R55A had no significant effect (Fig. S8d). This means that R9, R81 and R92 are contributing to cross-protomer interactions and therefore to crosspeak (4) observed for the wildtype in Fig. 6e.

## Discussion

We have assigned the chemical shifts of wild-type DGK within a lipid bilayer by 3D MAS NMR. This data set enabled us to probe the response of DGK towards nucleotide and lipid substrate binding. Furthermore, conventional as well as DNP-enhanced MAS NMR was applied to resolve functionally important long-range contacts. We found clear evidence that the DGK trimer adopts a symmetric conformation in its apo state. Previously reported X-ray structures of DGK featured asymmetries in the secondary structure between the three subunits10,29. The differences between NMR and X-ray data in conformational symmetry of apo-state DGK might arise from different experimental conditions. Especially crystal packing could be a potential source for structural asymmetries51. In general, high dynamics of the loop regions, which are reflected by higher B-factors and chain displacements10, may lead to ambiguities in defining loop positions and lengths.

Under the applied experimental conditions, the DGK trimer adopts a symmetric conformation in the presence of AMP-PCP and DOG. This indicates that all three active sites are occupied by the substrate at the same time. Thus, our data imply that under high substrate concentration, the three active sites are most likely simultaneously in the same state during catalysis, which differs from the proposal by Caffrey and co-workers11. The crystal structure of Δ4DGK co-crystallized with AMP-PCP shows that only one active site is occupied by the nucleotide substrate, although AMP-PCP was used at high concentration (10 mM)11. Differences in the number of occupied active sites between NMR and X-ray data might arise from different experimental conditions. Our investigations by MAS ssNMR were carried out on wild-type DGK in synthetic lipid bilayers at pH of 7.2 and 275 K. Crystallization of the thermostable Δ4 mutant took place under acidic conditions in lipidic cubic phases formed by monoolein, a DGK substrate. Its structure could be slightly affected by crystallization contacts. Since the assignment covers nearly the entire protein, we had a very good basis for mapping changes during substrate binding.

For the AMP-PCP bound state, we could observe for the first time that not only the cytosolic part but also large parts of the transmembrane domains are affected by nucleotide binding (Fig. 5d,e). The conformational change induced by the nucleotide, most likely directing DGK into its catalytic active form, is in good agreement with the observation that high nucleotide specificity of DGK is mainly seen in form of reductions in kcat for ATP analogues17. It is also supported by the fact that the tetraphosphate-linked bisubstrate analogue acted as a good inhibitor17.

Additionally, it is not surprising that nucleotide binding causes so many chemical shift perturbations in such a small kinase. With respect to the size of DGK, the nucleotide is comparatively bulky and under our experimental conditions, three nucleotide molecules seem to bind per trimer. In such case, the membrane becomes an important stabilizing factor as pointed out by Jia and co-workers27. A similar substantial conformational change was observed for other kinases as well, which also catalyse direct phosphoryl transfer52,53,54. Accordingly, binding of nucleotide induces an information transfer through the whole enzyme towards the opposite site, which might occur in preparation of DGK for binding the lipid substrate. The respective residues are possibly oriented for binding of the lipid. Consequently, we propose positive heteroallostery, emanating from the nucleotide substrate, which is in agreement with kinetic studies of DGK, indicating that binding of the nucleotide substrate does result in an enhanced affinity for the lipid substrate9,17.

For the bound states of DGK with either AMP-PCP + DOG or only AMP-PCP, a similar fingerprint was observed (Fig. 5f,g). This indicates that the nucleotide substrate induces a substantial conformational change, which might be necessary to trigger the actual phosphoryl transfer reaction. Kinetic and structural data support a direct, in-line phosphoryl transfer based on a close proximity of the γ-phosphate of the nucleotide and the 1-OH of the lipid substrate11,17,21. Respectively, our data suggest that the specific conformation induced by the nucleotide is most likely DGK’s catalytic active conformation, which is necessary to bring both substrates in close proximity.

As a control, the effect of different lipid compositions on the spectral fingerprint and activity of DGK has been probed. Kinetic studies by Lee and co-workers indicated that product analogues of DGK’s physiological forward reaction, such as DMPA, possibly bind to the active site55. Pilot et al. demonstrated that 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphate (DOPA) increases the Km of the lipid substrate 1,2-dihexanoylglycerol (DHG). This has been explained by a possible binding of the product analogue to the active site in competition with the lipid substrate. However, the superposition of the 2D 13C-13C PDSD spectra of DGK embedded into 90 mol% DMPC/10 mol% DMPA, 100 mol% DMPC and 90 mol% DMPC/10 mol% DMPG (Suppl. Fig. 3a–c) shows the same fingerprint for DGK in all three liposome compositions with no chemical shift perturbations observable. Additionally, DGK features a similar activity in all three liposome compositions (Suppl. Fig. 3d). This indicates that under our experimental conditions DMPA does not seem to bind to DGK’s active site, which in turn suggests that DGK exists in an apo state when it is reconstituted into 90 mol% DMPC/10 mol% DMPA. This observation differs from the previous kinetic studies but could be explained by the different experimental conditions. For the kinetic studies by Lee and co-workers, DGK was reconstituted into 80 mol% DOPC/20 mol% DOPA in a molar lipid-to-protein ratio of 6000:1, which results in a remarkable high molar PA-to-protein ratio of 1200:1. In our study by MAS NMR, DGK was reconstituted into 90 mol% DMPC/10 mol% DMPA in a much lower molar lipid-to-protein ratio of 50:1. This implies that a very high molar excess of PA compared to DGK seems to be necessary to force its binding to the enzyme. In addition, Lee and co-workers carried out the activity measurements on unsealed membrane fragments consisting of phospholipids and detergent. In contrast, DGK was present in detergent-free liposomes during the MAS NMR experiments presented here.

Furthermore, we were able to detect intraprotomer, long-range contacts by conventional high field ssNMR. The contact between Trp112 and Ser61 (Fig. 6a) has possibly a stabilizing effect on the transmembrane region of each monomer (Fig. 7a). This is consistent with mutational studies by Lau and Bowie, who found that the mutant of DGK, in which Trp112 is replaced by Phe, was prone to aggregation and featured a low specific activity14. The contacts between Arg32Nε/Nη1, 2 and 25TrpC’, 28GluCβ and 29AlaCα,β (Fig. 6b) have most likely a strengthening effect on the joint between H1 and SH, stabilizing the SH and hence the active site as well (Fig. 7b). Arg32 could be shown to be functionally relevant (Suppl. Fig. 8c)11,12, which could be explained by its role in forming a contact, most likely providing a stabilization of the active site.

DNP-enhanced TEDOR spectroscopy on mixed-labelled DGK trimers and site-directed mutagenesis provided evidence for interprotomer contacts involving Arg9, Arg81 and Arg92. Unfortunately, our dataset does not allow an identification of their interaction partners. We have therefore analyzed the general topology and the available crystal structures of DGK in order to find Asp/Glu/Asn residues, which are located at suitable positions at the protomer interfaces. A likely interaction partner for Arg9 located at the beginning of SH of protomer A could be Glu28 at the end of the SH in the adjacent protomer B. The location of Arg81 at the cytoplasmic end of H2 in protomer A matches that of Glu88 in protomer B. Residue Arg92 at the cytoplasmic end of H3 in protomer A could interact with Asn27 in protomer C. The resulting interaction pattern, which is located at the cytoplasmic side of DGK, is illustrated in Fig. 7c. It is compatible with the overall topology of DGK. It is important to point out, that the exact sidechain orientations vary in between the available crystal structures and between protomer interfaces, which could be due to the described asymmetry as discussed above. However, cross-protomer N-C distances as close as 3.4–3.6 Å for 81Arg-Nη1,2/88GluCδ and 92Arg-Nη1,2/27AsnCγ can be found e.g. in structures 3ZE4, 3ZE5 and 4UXX10,11. Interactions of Arg9 are ambiguous as the surface helix is only partially resolved in these 3D structures. The Arg81-Glu88 interaction could stabilize the cytoplasmic loop (CL), which was reported to be involved in binding the nucleotide11. It is assumed that the Tyr86 sidechain of CL serves as a cover of the nucleotide binding site in the nucleotide bound state10. The Arg81-Glu88 contact might keep the cover open in the apo state to enable binding of the nucleotide. The interaction between Arg92-Asn27 links H3 and SH. Residue Asn27 is located at the end of the SH at the interhelical turn, which connects SH and H111.The Arg92-Asn27 contact most likely keeps both the SH and the H1 closer to H2 and H3, stabilizing the active site. All three Arg could be shown to be functionally relevant by mutational studies (Suppl. Fig. 8c)11,12, although they are not reported to interact directly with the nucleotide or lipid substrate11. This observation supports their involvement in stabilizing the active site and/or providing a cross-talk between DGK protomers. However, it should be noted that all RxA mutations affected the DGK activity, regardless of their involvement in cross-protomer contacts.

## Conclusion

The application of high-field 3D-MAS NMR enabled us to obtain an almost complete resonance assignment of wtDGK within the phospholipid (DMPC/DMPA) bilayer in its apo- and its substrate-bound states. This data set allows mapping the overall response of DGK towards substrate binding. We could show that all three active sites can be occupied concurrently by AMP-PCP. Our data obtained under high substrate concentration demonstrate that the three active sites are in the same state during catalysis. Additionally, we could observe that not only the cytosolic part but also large parts of the transmembrane domains are affected by nucleotide binding. This most likely supports the enzyme in binding of the lipid substrate, indicating positive heteroallostery. Additionally, the substantial conformational change induced by the nucleotide seems to set the enzyme into a catalytically active state, triggering the actual phosphoryl transfer reaction. Furthermore, functionally relevant inter- and intraprotomer long-range interactions could be identified, which may stabilize the active sites and/or transmit information about substrate binding or changes of the surrounding lipid bilayer between protomers.

A number of technical aspects are worth noting. This study presents a combined use of high-field MAS NMR on uniformly labelled DGK proteoliposomes with DNP-enhanced MAS NMR on mixed-labelled DGK trimers. For assignment, highest possible resolution was necessary, which prevented the use of DNP. Instead, a moderate but still essential enhancement of data acquisition was possible by utilizing Gd-DOTA doping. Further improvements can be anticipated by combining proton-detected MAS NMR56, the use of optimum control pulse sequences57 and the application of non-uniform sampling58. The assignment process itself becomes faster and more reliable by automatic schemes such as ssFLYA38, as demonstrated here. For observing long-range cross-protomer contacts, signal enhancement by the use of DNP with specific labelling schemes was mandatory. The combination of both approaches allows obtaining valuable data on membrane proteins in the lipid bilayer, which are complementary to 3D structure determination by crystallization-based methods.

## Materials and Methods

### Sample preparation

#### Preparation of uniform and reverse labelled samples

Samples were basically prepared as described previously21: The synthetic gene coding for wild-type diacylglycerol kinase was cloned into the plasmid vector pSD005, a derivative of pTrcHisB. The encoded protein incorporates an N-terminal leader sequence containing a hexahistidine-tag for purification. The expression of uniformly labelled DGK took place in E. coli T7 express cells (New England BioLabs) using M9 minimal medium with [U-13C]glucose and [15N]ammonium chloride. For the preparation of reverse labelled samples, the amino acids Ile, Leu and Val were added to the medium to suppress isotope labelling of these residues. E. coli cells were grown until an OD600 = 0.6–0.8 was reached, whereupon protein expression was induced by the addition of 200 mg/L isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). Cells were harvested by centrifugation after 16 h of protein expression at 27 °C and 220 rpm.

The protein was solubilized in 3% (w/v) n-octyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (OG) (AppliChem). The solubilized protein (supernatant) was obtained by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 30 min and incubated with a Ni-NTA resin (Quiagen) at 4 °C for 1 h. Due to its N-terminal hexahistidine-tag, the protein binds to Ni-NTA. The bound protein was washed with 1.5% (w/v) OG and 50 mM imidazole. The detergent was exchanged by washing with 0.05% (w/v) n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM) (AppliChem). The protein was finally eluted with 400 mM imidazole in 0.05% (w/v) DDM followed by the determination of its concentration by absorption spectroscopy at 280 nm on a UV-550 spectrophotometer (Jasco). The final yield of pure 13C, 15N labelled DGK was 30–45 mg/L. The purity was checked by SDS-PAGE, while the oligomeric state was analyzed by BN-PAGE (Life Technologies, NativePAGE Novex Bis-Tris) as described previously36.

For solid-state NMR experiments, DGK was reconstituted in DMPC/DMPA (90 mol%/10 mol%) liposomes with a molar protein/lipid ratio of 1:50. For this purpose, the protein was mixed with the liposomes and incubated for 1 h at 22 °C. Detergent removal was done with SM-2 BioBeads. BioBeads (80 mg/ml) were added and incubated overnight at 4 °C followed by 3 further additions every 2 h at 22 °C.

A sucrose gradient (40–10%) was carried out to verify a homogenous protein reconstitution into the liposomes. In order to reduce the NMR time, paramagnetic doping with 2 mM Gd3+-DOTA43 was carried out. The proteoliposomes were sedimented by ultracentrifugation and packed into a 3.2 thin wall MAS rotor. Approximately 18 mg of DGK could be loaded into the rotor.

#### Preparation of mixed labelled samples

For the detection of interprotomer contacts, mixed-labelled DGK was prepared. For the identification of the detected interprotomer Arg-contact, single-site RxA mutants were prepared. All single-site mutations were introduced to the wtDGK template vector by PCR amplification with overlapping mutagenic primers. Vectors were transformed into E. coli competent C43 (DE3) cells using the heat shock procedure and were subsequently plated on ampicillin-containing LB agar plates. Colonies were picked and grown in LB medium, and the plasmid DNA was isolated via an extraction kit. Sequences of wtDGK and all single-site mutant constructs were verified at Eurofins MWG Operon.

The expression and purification of mixed labelled DGK was in general performed as described above with the difference that 13C- and 15N-labelled samples were expressed separately to create mixed samples that only exhibit interprotomer and no intraprotomer 13C-15N contacts. For the selectively labelled sample, 15N-labelled arginine and lysine were added to M9 minimal medium. 12C-enriched glucose (99.5%) was used in 15N-labelled samples instead of normal glucose to suppress 13C natural abundance within a protomer. In order to disrupt DGK-trimers into monomers, the purified protein was incubated in SDS (0.2 mg/ml protein in 2% SDS) over night at RT. Here, the different labelled monomers were mixed in a 1:1 ratio. After the disruption and mixing procedure, SDS was exchanged by 0.5% DDM during a washing step to regain trimeric DGK. Then, the protein was reconstituted into 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC, 90 mol%)/1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphate (DMPA, 10 mol%) liposomes with a molar protein/lipid ratio of 1:50 as described above. Using this approach, samples were prepared, in which DGK consists of 13C-DGK and 15N-DGK protomers ([CN]-DGK or [CN]-DGK-RxA) or 13C-DGK and 15N-Arg-Lys-DGK protomers ([CN(Arg,Lys)]-DGK) or 13C-DGK ([CC]-DGK). The latter is a control sample for analyzing 13C-15N contacts arising from naturally occurring 13C- or 15N-isotopes. The analysis of DGK was carried out by BN-PAGE (Life Technologies, NativePAGE Novex Bis-Tris) as described previously36 and the coupled activity assay (see below).

Reconstituted protein samples were doped with the polarizing agent AMUPol49 in order to achieve DNP signal enhancement. Two proteoliposome pellets, each ~20 µl, were covered with 20 μL of a 20 mM AMUPol solution (60% D2O, 30% glycerol-d8, 10% H2O) and incubated for 20 h at 4 °C. The solution was completely removed before the sample was packed into a 3.2 mm ZrO2 rotor.

#### Preparing substrate-bound states of DGK

In order to saturate DGK with nucleotide substrate, reconstituted DGK was incubated with a 14-fold molar excess of the ATP analogue adenylylmethylenediphosphonate (AMP-PCP) and a 28-fold molar excess of MgCl2 over night at 4 °C. Mg2+ is an essential catalyst for ATP hydrolysis. Additionally, Bell and co-workers could demonstrate that DGK requires next to Mg2+ complexed with ATP a free second divalent ion for activation with a preference for Mg2+ 59. AMP-PCP and MgCl2 were dissolved in 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.2). In order to saturate DGK with the lipid substrate, it was reconstituted into liposomes consisting of 80 mol% DMPC/DMPA (9:1) and 20 mol% sn-1,2-dioctanoylglycerol (DOG, n = 8). For the production of DGK saturated with both the nucleotide and the lipid substrate, it was firstly reconstituted into 80 mol% DMPC/DMPA (9:1) and 20 mol% DOG (n = 8) and then incubated with 14 mM AMP-PCP and 28 mM MgCl2 over night at 4 °C. All proteoliposome samples with the respective substrate(s) were doped with 2 mM Gd3+-DOTA, sedimented by ultracentrifugation and packed into a 3.2 thin wall rotor.

### Activity Assays

The activity of reconstituted DGK was determined at 30 °C using a coupled enzyme assay17 as described previously21. The activity was stimulated by the water-soluble lipid substrate analogue 1,2-dibutyrylglycerol (DBG). The synthesis of DBG will be reported elsewhere. The activities of all samples used here are summaraized in Suppl. Table 3.

### Solid-state NMR spectroscopy

Unless stated otherwise, all MAS NMR experiments presented here were carried out on a Bruker wide bore Avance III solid-state NMR spectrometer with a 1H frequency of 850.32 MHz. A sample spinning rate of 15.2 kHz was applied in each case. All samples were adjusted to a temperature of 275 K and pH 7.2. The NMR time of dipolar-coupling based experiments could be reduced by paramagnetic doping with Gd3+-DOTA43 in combination with an E-free 3.2 mm triple-resonance HCN MAS probehead, which enabled using a recycle delay of 0.8 s. Thereby, ~3x of the measurement time could be saved compared to the standard probehead (recycle delay of 2.5 s). The E-free probehead was custom-built by Bruker.

#### Manual resonance assignment

For the sequential assignment of the immobile domains of DGK, a combination of dipolar-coupling based 3D experiments (NCACX, NCOCX, CONCA)60,61 was carried out. Since we are able to observe well-resolved NMR-spectra of high signal-to-noise ratio, we mainly performed 13C and 15N assignments using uniformly labelled samples (U-13C,15N-DGK). Residual ambiguities were resolved by reverse labelling of isoleucine, leucine and valine (U-13C,15N-DGK-I,L,V). The experiments were either performed with an E-free or standard 3.2 mm triple-resonance HCN MAS probehead (Bruker). All experimental parameters are listed in Suppl. Table 4.

For the tentative assignment of highly mobile residues of DGK, scalar-coupling based 2D experiments (13C-13C TOBSY, 1H-13C HETCOR, 1H-15N HETCOR)44,62,63 were applied. Therefore, only the uniformly labelled sample (U-13C,15N-DGK) was used. The experiments were performed with a standard 3.2 mm triple-resonance HCN MAS probehead (Bruker). Typical 90° pulse lengths were 2.5 µs (1H), 4.5 µs (13C) and 6 µs (15N). A recycle delay of 2 s and a SPINAL64 1H decoupling of 100 kHz were used. For all heteronuclear transfer steps a refocused INEPT (insensitive nuclei enhanced by polarization transfer)64 was applied with scalar couplings of 200 Hz (HC) and 90 Hz (HN). For the 13C-13C homonuclear polarization transfer, TOBSY (through-bond correlation spectroscopy)63 was applied with a 3.75 ms P916 mixing sequence.

#### Substrate-bound states

The binding of the substrate(s) to DGK was verified for each case (AMP-PCP, DOG + ATP, DOG + AMP-PCP) by 31P-CP (cross polarization) and 31P-DP (direct polarization) experiments. Therefore, the standard 3.2 mm double-resonance HX MAS probehead (Bruker) was used. Typical 90° pulse lengths were 3 µs (1H) and 4 µs (31P). A recycle delay of 3 s and a SPINAL64 1H decoupling65 of 83.3 kHz were used. The CP contact time was 5 ms. All CP spectra were recorded with 16000 scans, while the DP spectra were carried out with 2000–4000 scans.

Scalar and dipolar coupling based experiments of DGK in its apo state, saturated with AMP-PCP, DOG and with AMP-PCP + DOG were carried out for comparison between the different states of DGK. The experiments were either performed with an E-free or standard 3.2 mm triple-resonance HCN MAS probehead (Bruker). All experimental parameters are listed in Suppl. Table 4.

#### Visualizing interprotomer contacts

DNP-enhanced MAS NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker 400 DNP system consisting of a 400 MHz WB Avance II NMR spectrometer, a 263 GHz Gyrotron as microwave source, and a 3.2 mm HCN Cryo MAS probe. All experiments were conducted with 8 kHz MAS, and the microwave power at the probe was 12.5 W. During DNP experiments, the temperature was kept at 105 K. For all experiments, a SPINAL64 1H decoupling65 of 100 kHz was applied during acquisition. A recycle delay of 2.2 s was used. 2D 15N-13C correlation spectra were acquired using the z-filtered TEDOR sequence66. Typical pulse lengths of 2.5 µs (1H 90°), 4.0 µs (13C 90°), 8.0 µs (13C 180°), 7.5 µs (15N 90°) and 15 µs (15N 180°) were applied. The CP contact time was 1.1 ms. A mixing time of 6.25 ms (24 rotor cycles) was used for all experiments. The 2D-spectra for [CC]DGK and [CN(Arg,Lys)]DGK were acquired with 1504 scans in the direct dimension and 60 increments of 125 µs each in the indirect dimension. The FID acquisition time in the direct dimension was 10 ms. The 15N pulse carrier was set to 54 ppm and the 13C pulse offset was set to 174 ppm. The 2D-spectra for [CN]DGK and [CN]DGK-RxA were acquired with 2880 scans in the direct dimension and 25 increments of 250 µs each in the indirect dimension. The FID acquisition time in the direct dimension was 10 ms. The 15N pulse carrier was set to 100 ppm and the 13C pulse offset was set to 174 ppm.

### Data analysis

All spectra were processed in TopSpin 3.5.b.91. pl 7 (Bruker). For comparison, the respective spectra were processed the same way. All multi-dimensional data were analyzed in CcpNmr Analysis 2.4.267.

#### Chemical shift referencing

For the first 3D NCACX spectrum 13C chemical shift referencing was carried out with respect to DSS (4,4-dimethyl-4-silapentane-1-sulfonic acid) through the carbonyl of alanine (179.85 ppm). 15N chemical shifts were indirectly referenced to liquid NH3 at 0 ppm through the 13C/15N gyromagnetic ratio. All other spectra were subsequently referenced to an isolated resonance in this spectrum. 31P chemical shift referencing was performed with respect to 10% phosphoric acid at 0 ppm through crystalline triethylphosphine sulfide (TEPS) (58.62 ppm).

#### Automatic resonance assignment

In addition to manual resonance assignment, we applied the automatic resonance assignment algorithm for solid-state NMR spectra, ssFLYA38, in order to test its applicability to membrane proteins. It is based on the automatic assignment algorithm FLYA for solution NMR68. Both are implemented in the software package CYANA69,70. ssFLYA was applied as described previously38. As input, it used solely the sequence of DGK and the unassigned peak lists from dipolar-coupling based 3D experiments (NCACX, NCOCX, CONCA) obtained with the uniform (U-13C,15N-DGK) and reverse (U-13C,15N-DGK-I,L,V) labelled sample. The same manually prepared peak lists were used as for the manual assignment. Obvious artifacts were removed from the peak lists. The N-terminal region (-Met-9-Ala-14) of the protein sequence, which includes a His-tag is known to be highly mobile and not detectable in the NMR spectra, was excluded from the calculations. Peak intensities and partial assignments such as grouping chemical shifts into spin systems or according to atom types (N, Cα, Cβ, Cγ, etc.) within one residue were not used as input for FLYA. For the calculations including the peak lists of the reverse (U-13C,15N-DGK-I,L,V) labelled sample, the residue types Ile, Leu and Val were excluded. Assignments for 13C and 15N are counted as correct if they match the manually observed reference assignment within a chemical shift tolerance of 0.55 ppm. The tolerance for chemical shift matching was set to 0.55 ppm as recommended by Schmidt et al.38. In the ssFLYA results, assignments are classified as strong (reliable; dark colors in Fig. 3b), if ≥80% of the individual chemical shift values from 20 independent runs of the algorithm differ by less than 0.55 ppm from the consensus value (Schmidt et al.38) Other assignments by ssFLYA are graded as weak (tentative; light colors in Fig. 3b). The assignment calculation could be performed within approximately 10 min using 20 CPU cores in parallel.

#### Analysis of chemical shift perturbations (CSPs) and peak intensities during substrate(s) binding

Scalar and dipolar coupling based experiments of DGK in its apo state, saturated with AMP-PCP, DOG and with AMP-PCP + DOG were carried out for the analysation of CSPs and peak intensities during substrate(s) binding. Concerning the analysis of CSPs in 3D NCACX spectra, weighted chemical shift changes were calculated according to71:

$${\rm{\Delta }}\delta ({Cx},\,Ca,\,N)=\sqrt{{({\rm{\Delta }}\delta {Cx})}^{2}+{({\rm{\Delta }}\delta {Ca})}^{2}+{(\frac{{\rm{\Delta }}\delta {\rm{N}}}{2.48})}^{2}},$$

where ΔδCx and ΔδCα and ΔδN represent chemical shift perturbations in the 13Cx, 13Cα and 15N dimension, respectively. All CSPs ≥ 0.2 ppm are counted as significant.

## Data Availability

Data sets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The chemical shift assignment has been deposited in the BMRB database (access code 27570).

## References

1. 1.

Kennedy, E. P. Osmotic regulation and the biosynthesis of membrane-derived oligosaccharides in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79, 1092–1095 (1982).

2. 2.

Raetz, C. R. & Newman, K. F. Diglyceride kinase mutants of Escherichia coli: inner membrane association of 1,2-diglyceride and its relation to synthesis of membrane-derived oligosaccharides. J. Bacteriol. 137, 860–868 (1979).

3. 3.

Zhang, Y. M. & Rock, C. O. Membrane lipid homeostasis in bacteria. Nature reviews. Microbiology 6, 222–233, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1839 (2008).

4. 4.

Chen, P., Novak, J., Qi, F. & Caufield, P. W. Diacylglycerol Kinase Is Involved in Regulation of Expression of the Lantibiotic Mutacin II of Streptococcus mutans. J. Bacteriol. 180, 167–170 (1998).

5. 5.

Yamashita, Y., Takehara, T. & Kuramitsu, H. K. Molecular Characterization of a Streptococcus mutans Mutant Altered in Environmental Stress Responses. J. Bacteriol. 175, 6220–6228 (1993).

6. 6.

Sanders, C. R. 2nd et al. Escherichia coli diacylglycerol kinase is an alpha-helical polytopic membrane protein and can spontaneously insert into preformed lipid vesicles. Biochemistry 35, 8610–8618, https://doi.org/10.1021/bi9604892 (1996).

7. 7.

Schaap, D., van der Wal, J. & van Blitterswijk, W. J. Consensus sequences for ATP-binding sites in protein kinases do not apply to diacylglycerol kinases. Biochem. J. 304, 661–664 (1994).

8. 8.

Smith, C. A. & Rayment, I. Active Site Comparisons Highlight Structural Similarities Between Myosin and Other P-Loop Proteins. Biophys. J. 70, 1590–1602 (1996).

9. 9.

Van Horn, W. D. & Sanders, C. R. Prokaryotic diacylglycerol kinase and undecaprenol kinase. Annu Rev Biophys 41, 81–101, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-050511-102330 (2012).

10. 10.

Li, D. et al. Crystal structure of the integral membrane diacylglycerol kinase. Nature 497, 521–524, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12179 (2013).

11. 11.

Li, D. et al. Ternary structure reveals mechanism of a membrane diacylglycerol kinase. Nature communications 6, 10140, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10140 (2015).

12. 12.

Van Horn, W. D. et al. Solution nuclear magnetic resonance structure of membrane-integral diacylglycerol kinase. Science 324, 1726–1729, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1171716 (2009).

13. 13.

Koehler, J. et al. Lysophospholipid micelles sustain the stability and catalytic activity of diacylglycerol kinase in the absence of lipids. Biochemistry 49, 7089–7099, https://doi.org/10.1021/bi100575s (2010).

14. 14.

Lau, F. W. & Bowie, J. U. A method for assessing the stability of a membrane protein. Biochemistry 36, 5884–5892, https://doi.org/10.1021/bi963095j (1997).

15. 15.

Nagy, J. K., Lau, F. W., Bowie, J. U. & Sanders, C. R. Mapping the oligomeric interface of diacylglycerol kinase by engineered thiol cross-linking: homologous sites in the transmembrane domain. Biochemistry 39, 4154–4164 (2000).

16. 16.

Lau, F. W., Chen, X. & Bowie, J. U. Active sites of diacylglycerol kinase from Escherichia coli are shared between subunits. Biochemistry 38, 5521–5527 (1999).

17. 17.

Badola, P. & Sanders, C. R. Escherichia coli diacylglycerol kinase is an evolutionarily optimized membrane enzyme and catalyzes direct phosphoryl transfer. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24176–24182 (1997).

18. 18.

Mi, D., Kim, H. J., Hadziselimovic, A. & Sanders, C. R. Irreversible misfolding of diacylglycerol kinase is independent of aggregation and occurs prior to trimerization and membrane association. Biochemistry 45, 10072–10084, https://doi.org/10.1021/bi060887x (2006).

19. 19.

Smith, R. L., O’Toole, J. F., Maguire, M. E. & Sanders, C. R. Membrane Topology of Escherichia coli Diacylglycerol Kinase. J. Bacteriol. 176, 5459–5465 (1994).

20. 20.

Zhou, Y. & Bowie, J. U. Building a thermostable membrane protein. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 6975–6979 (2000).

21. 21.

Ullrich, S. J., Hellmich, U. A., Ullrich, S. & Glaubitz, C. Interfacial enzyme kinetics of a membrane bound kinase analyzed by real-time MAS-NMR. Nat. Chem. Biol. 7, 263–270, https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.543 (2011).

22. 22.

Ladizhansky, V. Applications of solid-state NMR to membrane proteins. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Proteins and Proteomics 1865, 1577–1586, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2017.07.004 (2017).

23. 23.

Kaplan, M. et al. EGFR Dynamics Change during Activation in Native Membranes as Revealed by NMR. Cell 167, 1241–1251 e1211, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.038 (2016).

24. 24.

Murray, D. T., Li, C., Gao, F. P., Qin, H. & Cross, T. A. Membrane protein structural validation by oriented sample solid-state NMR: diacylglycerol kinase. Biophysical journal 106, 1559–1569 (2014).

25. 25.

Cady, S., Wang, T. & Hong, M. Membrane-dependent effects of a cytoplasmic helix on the structure and drug binding of the influenza virus M2 protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 11572–11579, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja202051n (2011).

26. 26.

Cross, T. A., Sharma, M., Yi, M. & Zhou, H. X. Influence of solubilizing environments on membrane protein structures. Trends Biochem. Sci. 36, 117–125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2010.07.005 (2011).

27. 27.

Jiang, Y. et al. Phosphoryl transfer reaction catalyzed by membrane diacylglycerol kinase: a theoretical mechanism study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 25228–25234, https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp03342j (2015).

28. 28.

Zhao, Y. et al. Gating Mechanism of Aquaporin Z in Synthetic Bilayers and Native Membranes Revealed by Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. epub ahead of print, 11.6.2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b03446 (2018).

29. 29.

Chen, Y. et al. Conformation and topology of diacylglycerol kinase in E.coli membranes revealed by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 53, 5624–5628, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201311203 (2014).

30. 30.

Etzkorn, M. et al. Secondary structure, dynamics, and topology of a seven-helix receptor in native membranes, studied by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Angewandte Chemie-International Edition 46, 459–462 (2007).

31. 31.

Wang, S. et al. Solid-state NMR spectroscopy structure determination of a lipid-embedded heptahelical membrane protein. Nat. Methods 10, 1007–1012, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2635 (2013).

32. 32.

Lilly Thankamony, A. S., Wittmann, J. J., Kaushik, M. & Corzilius, B. Dynamic nuclear polarization for sensitivity enhancement in modern solid-state NMR. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 102-103, 120–195, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnmrs.2017.06.002 (2017).

33. 33.

Su, Y. C., Andreas, L. & Griffin, R. G. In Annual Review of Biochemistry, Vol 84 Vol. 84 (ed. Kornberg, R. D.) 465–497 (2015).

34. 34.

Bajaj, V. S., Mak-Jurkauskas, M. L., Belenky, M., Herzfeld, J. & Griffin, R. G. Functional and shunt states of bacteriorhodopsin resolved by 250 GHz dynamic nuclear polarization-enhanced solid-state NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 9244–9249, https://doi.org/10.1073/Pnas.0900908106 (2009).

35. 35.

Jacso, T. et al. Characterization of Membrane Proteins in Isolated Native Cellular Membranes by Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy without Purification and Reconstitution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 432–435, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201104987 (2012).

36. 36.

Maciejko, J. et al. Visualizing Specific Cross-Protomer Interactions in the Homo-Oligomeric Membrane Protein Proteorhodopsin by Dynamic-Nuclear-Polarization-Enhanced Solid-State NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 9032–9043, https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b03606 (2015).

37. 37.

Joedicke, L. et al. The molecular basis of subtype selectivity of human kinin G-protein-coupled receptors. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14, 284–290, https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.2551 (2018).

38. 38.

Schmidt, E. et al. Automated solid-state NMR resonance assignment of protein microcrystals and amyloids. J. Biomol. NMR 56, 243–254, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-013-9742-x (2013).

39. 39.

Mehler, M. et al. The EF loop in green proteorhodopsin affects conformation and photocycle dynamics. Biophysical journal 105, 385–397 (2013).

40. 40.

Kaur, H. et al. Coupled ATPase-adenylate kinase activity in ABC transporters. Nature communications 7, 13864, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13864 (2016).

41. 41.

Kaur, J. et al. Solid-state NMR analysis of the sodium pump Krokinobacter rhodopsin 2 and its H30A mutant. Journal of structural biology (2018).

42. 42.

Yang, J., Aslimovska, L. & Glaubitz, C. Molecular dynamics of proteorhodopsin in lipid bilayers by solid-state NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 4874–4881, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja109766n (2011).

43. 43.

Ullrich, S. J., Holper, S. & Glaubitz, C. Paramagnetic doping of a 7TM membrane protein in lipid bilayers by Gd(3)(+)-complexes for solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J. Biomol. NMR 58, 27–35, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-013-9800-4 (2014).

44. 44.

Zhang, Z. et al. Solid-state NMR shows that dynamically different domains of membrane proteins have different hydration dependence. J. Phys. Chem. B 118, 9553–9564, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp503032h (2014).

45. 45.

Ulrich, E. L. et al. BioMagResBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D402–408, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm957 (2008).

46. 46.

Luca, S. et al. Secondary chemical shifts in immobilized peptides and proteins: a qualitative basis for structure refinement under magic angle spinning. J. Biomol. NMR 20, 325–331 (2001).

47. 47.

Walsh, J. P., Fahrner, L. & Bell, R. M. Sn-1,2-diacylglycerol kinase of Escherichia coli. Diacylglycerol analogues define specificity and mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 4374–4381 (1990).

48. 48.

De Boeck, H. & Zidovetzki, R. Interactions of saturated diacylglycerols with phosphatidylcholine bilayers: A 2H NMR study. Biochemistry 31, 623–630 (1992).

49. 49.

Sauvee, C. et al. Highly efficient, water-soluble polarizing agents for dynamic nuclear polarization at high frequency. Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) 52, 10858–10861, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201304657 (2013).

50. 50.

Musafia, B., Buchner, V. & Arad, D. Complex salt bridges in proteins - statistical-analysis of structure and function. J. Mol. Biol. 254, 761–770, https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1995.0653 (1995).

51. 51.

Tsuchiya, Y., Nakamura, H. & Kinoshita, K. Discrimination between biological interfaces and crystal-packing contacts. Adv. Appl. Bioinform. Chem. 1, 99–113 (2008).

52. 52.

Schulz, G. E., Muller, C. W. & Diederichs, K. Induced-fit movements in adenylate kinases. J. Mol. Biol. 213, 627–630, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80250-5 (1990).

53. 53.

Bennett, W. S. Jr. & Steitz, T. A. Glucose-induced conformational change in yeast hexokinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75, 4848–4852 (1978).

54. 54.

Gerstein, M., Lesk, A. M. & Chothia, C. Structural mechanisms for domain movements in proteins. Biochemistry 33, 6739–6749 (1994).

55. 55.

Pilot, J. D., East, J. M. & Lee, A. G. Effects of phospholipid headgroup and phase on the activity of diacylglycerol kinase of Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 40, 14891–14897 (2001).

56. 56.

Lalli, D. et al. Proton-Based Structural Analysis of a Heptahelical Transmembrane Protein in Lipid Bilayers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 13006–13012, https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b05269 (2017).

57. 57.

Tosner, Z. et al. Overcoming Volume Selectivity of Dipolar Recoupling in Biological Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201805002 (2018).

58. 58.

Paramasivam, S. et al. Enhanced Sensitivity by Nonuniform Sampling Enables Multidimensional MAS NMR Spectroscopy of Protein Assemblies. J. Phys. Chem. B 116, 7416–7427, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp3032786 (2012).

59. 59.

Walsh, J. P. & Bell, R. M. Sn-1,2-Diacylglycerol Kinase of Escherichia-Coli - Mixed Micellar Analysis of the Phospholipid Cofactor Requirement and Divalent-Cation Dependence. J. Biol. Chem. 261, 6239–6247 (1986).

60. 60.

Pauli, J., Baldus, M., van Rossum, B., de Groot, H. & Oschkinat, H. Backbone and side-chain C-13 and N-15 signal assignments of the alpha-spectrin SH3 domain by magic angle spinning solid-state NMR at 17.6 tesla. ChemBioChem 2, 272–281, doi:10.1002/1439-7633(20010401)2:4<272::aid-cbic272>3.0.co;2-2 (2001).

61. 61.

Shi, L. C. et al. Three-Dimensional Solid-State NMR Study of a Seven-Helical Integral Membrane Proton Pump-Structural Insights. J. Mol. Biol. 386, 1078–1093, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2009.01.011 (2009).

62. 62.

Andronesi, O. C. et al. Determination of membrane protein structure and dynamics by magic-angle-spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 12965–12974 (2005).

63. 63.

Baldus, M. & Meier, B. H. Total correlation spectroscopy in the solid state. The use of scalar couplings to determine the through-bond connectivity. J. Magn. Reson., Ser A 121, 65–69, https://doi.org/10.1006/jmra.1996.0137 (1996).

64. 64.

Morris, G. A. & Freeman, R. Enhancement of nuclear magnetic resonance signals by polarization transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 101, 760–762 (1979).

65. 65.

Fung, B., Khitrin, A. & Ermolaev, K. An improved broadband decoupling sequence for liquid crystals and solids. J. Magn. Reson. 142, 97–101 (2000).

66. 66.

Jaroniec, C. P., Filip, C. & Griffin, R. G. 3D TEDOR NMR experiments for the simultaneous measurement of multiple carbon-nitrogen distances in uniformly (13)C,(15)N-labeled solids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 10728–10742 (2002).

67. 67.

Vranken, W. F. et al. The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: development of a software pipeline. Proteins 59, 687–696, https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.20449 (2005).

68. 68.

Schmidt, E. & Güntert, P. A new algorithm for reliable and general NMR resonance assignment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 12817–12829 (2012).

69. 69.

Güntert, P. Automated structure determination from NMR spectra. Eur. Biophys. J. 38, 129 (2009).

70. 70.

Güntert, P., Mumenthaler, C. & Wüthrich, K. Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program Dyana1. J. Mol. Biol. 273, 283–298 (1997).

71. 71.

Cavanagh, J., Fairbrother, W. J., Palmer, A. G. III & Skelton, N. J. Protein NMR spectroscopy: principles and practice. (Academic Press, 1995).

72. 72.

Lomize, M. A., Pogozheva, I. D., Joo, H., Mosberg, H. I. & Lomize, A. L. OPM database and PPM web server: resources for positioning of proteins in membranes. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D370–376, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr703 (2012).

Download references

## Acknowledgements

The work was funded by the DFG (research grant to C.G.) and by the DFG graduate programme CLIC. The DNP experiments were enabled through a DFG equipment grant to C.G. Julian de Mos, Jiafei Mao and Jakob Maciejko, Frankfurt are acknowledged for helpful scientific discussions and Sandra Ullrich is acknowledged for initial help with the project. We are grateful to Norbert Forger, Jochem Struppe and Frank Engelke, Bruker for discussions and support regarding probehead optimization.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

K.M. prepared all samples, carried out all NMR experiments, performed data analysis and interpretation, prepared all figures and wrote the paper. S.K. and P.G. performed and supported the automatic assignment using ssFLYA. A.J. and A.H. synthesized and provided DBG. J.B.B. implemented pulse sequences and supported the NMR experiments. C.G. designed and supervised the project, performed data interpretation and wrote the paper.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clemens Glaubitz.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

## Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

## About this article

### Cite this article

Möbius, K., Kazemi, S., Güntert, P. et al. Global response of diacylglycerol kinase towards substrate binding observed by 2D and 3D MAS NMR. Sci Rep 9, 3995 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40264-8

Download citation

• Received:

• Accepted:

• Published:

## Further reading

• ### Structure of membrane diacylglycerol kinase in lipid bilayers

• Jianping Li
• , Yang Shen
• , Yanke Chen
• , Zhengfeng Zhang
• , Shaojie Ma
• , Qianfen Wan
• , Qiong Tong
• , Clemens Glaubitz
• , Maili Liu
•  & Jun Yang

Communications Biology (2021)

• ### Pulsed Third-Spin-Assisted Recoupling NMR for Obtaining Long-Range 13C–13C and 15N–13C Distance Restraints

• Martin D. Gelenter
• , Aurelio J. Dregni
•  & Mei Hong

The Journal of Physical Chemistry B (2020)

• ### Light‐Induced Uncaging for Time‐Resolved Observations of Biochemical Reactions by MAS NMR Spectroscopy

• Julian Mos
• , Andreas Jakob
• , Johanna Becker‐Baldus
• , Alexander Heckel
•  & Clemens Glaubitz

Chemistry – A European Journal (2020)

• ### The Emerging Roles of Diacylglycerol Kinase (DGK) in Plant Stress Tolerance, Growth, and Development

• Idrice Carther Kue Foka
• , Toi Ketehouli
• , Yonggang Zhou
• , Xiao-Wei Li
• , Fa-Wei Wang
•  & Haiyan Li

Agronomy (2020)

## Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

## Search

### Quick links

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing