Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Severe wildfire exposes remnant peat carbon stocks to increased post-fire drying

## Abstract

The potential of high severity wildfires to increase global terrestrial carbon emissions and exacerbate future climatic warming is of international concern. Nowhere is this more prevalent than within high latitude regions where peatlands have, over millennia, accumulated legacy carbon stocks comparable to all human CO2 emissions since the beginning of the industrial revolution. Drying increases rates of peat decomposition and associated atmospheric and aquatic carbon emissions. The degree to which severe wildfires enhance drying under future climates and induce instability in peatland ecological communities and carbon stocks is unknown. Here we show that high burn severities increased post-fire evapotranspiration by 410% within a feather moss peatland by burning through the protective capping layer that restricts evaporative drying in response to low severity burns. High burn severities projected under future climates will therefore leave peatlands that dominate dry sub-humid regions across the boreal, on the edge of their climatic envelopes, more vulnerable to intense post-fire drying, inducing high rates of carbon loss to the atmosphere that amplify the direct combustion emissions.

## Introduction

Peatlands have persisted across the globe for millennia, accumulating and storing atmospheric carbon. This persistence has resulted from the ability of these ecosystems to regulate their water content1, retaining peat under saturated conditions in response to external perturbations and preventing the propagation of system instabilities that could otherwise have resulted in the ecological collapse, and release of globally important carbon stocks2,3. Stabilising feedbacks that regulate peatland water contents have therefore been imperative to peatland persistence4. However, global climatic and environmental conditions will test the limits of these feedback responses, as peatlands are pushed outside of their current climatic envelopes. Enhanced high-latitude warming will increase rates of potential evapotranspiration (PET). If unrestricted by internal feedbacks5, this will induce peatland drying6 and initiate the growth of productive forests that may further intensify water loss7. An increased forest canopy (fuel load) combined with reduced peat moisture contents will also increase peatland wildfire severities8. This forms peat profiles that are more sensitive to drying9 and so further exacerbating the climate driven impacts. With such potential vulnerabilities, there is an immediate need to stress-test10 the core feedback mechanisms within peatlands to ascertain their capability to maintain their regulating function under future extreme conditions. Peatland moss evaporation represents one such critical feedback.

The water content of peatlands at the edge of their climatic envelope across the dry sub-humid climatic regions of the circumpolar boreal is often controlled by a covering of feather moss. Feather moss restricts the transport of water to the peatland surface, limiting evaporation and maintaining saturated conditions at depth11. In comparison, Sphagnum mosses provide an enhanced connectivity with the saturated zones and are associated with higher rates of evaporation11. Post-fire, the restriction in feather moss evaporation is reinforced12, limiting drying and supporting saturated conditions when these ecosystems are most vulnerable to ecological shifts2. However, the extent to which this important feedback holds under future extremes is uncertain, most notably, how the hydrological functioning of near-surface moss layers may be altered in response to projected increases in burn severity. Severe wildfires may burn through the protective moss layer and leave peatlands unprotected to high rates of potential evaporation.

To test the future persistence of the evaporative feedback and determine whether post-fire evapotranspiration (ET) is dependent on burn severity (depth of burn), we measured post-fire ET hourly over the entire growing season across a peatland burn severity gradient within Alberta’s Boreal Plains one year after fire. Burn severity varies widely between the interior and margins of peatlands, with depth of burns ranging from 0.0 to 0.75 m13,14. We utilize this fine scale variability in the depth of burn, and measured post-fire ET in three plots within four separate zones of burn severity class within a given peatland (all areas within the study area burned but to varying degrees allowing comparison). Measurements were conducted in three areas of assumed pre-fire feather moss peat: i) low burn severity plots with a burn depth less than 0.05 m and residual feather moss visible; ii) moderate burn severity where the depth of burn was greater than 0.05 m, consistent with burns projected under future climates8; and iii) high burn severity in which the peat had been burned down to underlying mineral soil, with burn depths up to 1.0 m13. For comparison, measurements were also conducted within a zone of Sphagnum moss peat, burned at a low severity, that more weakly restricts the supply of water to the evaporating surface12.

To identify the potential for severe burns projected under future climates to substantially increase drying, we simulated post-fire peatland-scale ET under varying burn severities (average burn ranging from zero to 0.3 m in depth). The model assumes a 0.15 m deep feather moss layer overlying a Sphagnum peat profile. Post-fire ET is calculated based upon: i) the average daily ET of the remnant burned surface cover (assumed equal to low burn severity feather moss if part of the pre-fire feather moss layer is retained or moderate burn severity peat if the feather moss layer is entirely combusted), and ii) the proportion of the post-fire peatland surface composed of these different peatland units under varying burn severity distributions.

## Results

ET was 410% higher in the moderate burn severity (ET = 3.12 ± 0.38 mm d−1; t = 6.14, p < 0.001) and 363% higher in the high burn severity plots (ET = 2.76 ± 0.38 mm d−1 t = 5.19, p < 0.001) than the low burn severity feather moss plots (ET = 0.76 ± 0.27 mm d−1) (Fig. 1). In accordance with12, ET was significantly higher in the low burn severity Sphagnum plots than the low burn severity feather moss plots (p < 0.001; t = −5.91; Fig. 1). ET averaged 0.76 ± 0.27 mm day−1 within the feather moss plots, compared with 3.03 ± 0.38 mm d−1 within Sphagnum. There was no significant difference in daily ET between the low severity Sphagnum plots and either the moderate burn severity (ET = 3.12 ± 0.38 mm d−1, t = 0.22, p = 0.82) or high burn severity plots (ET = 2.76 ± 0.38 mm d−1, t = −0.711, p = 0.50).

Simulated post fire surface cover ranged from 100% feather moss to 100% exposed Sphagnum peat over the range of prescribed burn severities (Fig. 2; solid line). The resultant relationship between ET and burn severity is strongly nonlinear, with a break point in post-fire ET simulated at an average burn depth of 0.10 m. Above this break point, post-fire ET markedly increases with burn depth. Within peatland interiors, current burn depths8,13,14,15,16 across northern Alberta fall below the threshold (blue circles; Fig. 2). However, burn severity is higher in plots burned after a decade of drying, indicative of future climatic conditions (Fig. 2, red circles8). Burn severities representative of future climates exceeds the ET threshold within a feather moss peatland (Fig. 2).

## Discussion

Moderate and high severity burning overrides the important stability mechanism of reduced post-fire evaporation that protects feather moss dominated peatlands typical of southern continental boreal regions from drying12. While PET is high following wildfire due to the open forest canopy17, actual water loss to the atmosphere is greatly restricted under low severity burns within feather moss peat profiles12. When burn severity is moderate or high, we show that the stabilising response is exceeded and the peatland evaporates relatively freely, equivalent to an open Sphagnum surface.

We hypothesize that the layered structure of the peat profile controls the transition between low and high ET. Boreal peatlands show a typical successional behaviour over a fire interval. Sphagnum species increase their surface cover and dominate 20 years after fire18. Tree canopy growth subsequently reduces light availability in the sub canopy, driving secondary succession to feather moss 60 to 80 years post fire18. The precise percentage cover and timing of this transition depends on tree growth rates, tree densities and the hydrological setting of the peatland19,20,21. However, vegetation succession produces a layered pre-burned stratigraphy, with feather moss overlaying Sphagnum peat. A low burn severity is considered to leave the overlying feather moss layer intact to act as a barrier to water transport that restricts post-fire evaporation12 (Fig. 3a). When burn depth extends below the feather moss layer it exposes either the Sphagnum peat beneath or the mineral soil below. This transition is likely associated with the shift in the peatland to a less restricted, high ET state (Fig. 3b). Within peatland interiors, current burn depths across northern Alberta fall below the threshold. However, burn severity is higher in plots burned after nearly two decades of drying, indicative of future climatic conditions (Fig. 2, red circles8). Within a feather moss peatland, this increased burn severity projected under future climates exceeds the ET threshold, increasing simulated post-fire drying by weakening the stabilizing function of the feather moss layer (Fig. 2).

Burned feather moss restricts post-fire evaporation, supports saturated conditions and so protects the peatland carbon stock. However, we found that this regulating function of feather moss could fail with further climate stress. With climate change mediated drying, and the associated increase in burn severity, we argue that these peatlands will likely transition to a more freely evaporating state following wildfire. Under this new state, the post-fire restriction on ET would be reduced during periods of high PET from the peat surface, resulting from the open burned canopy17. Increased ET, combined with an increased sensitivity to water loss resulting from the combustion of the porous (high specific yield) near surface moss layer9, will drive lower water table positions. This assumes that the hydraulic connection between the saturated peat and the evaporating surface is effectively maintained5 and wider ecohydrological feedbacks are not invoked to further restrict water loss1. Such drying will expose remnant peat carbon stocks to aerobic conditions, increasing rates of decomposition and further enhance carbon losses associated with the fire. It will also improve the seed bed quality, promoting rapid post-fire growth of deciduous species that may interrupt the fire ecology cycle22, supporting dryer conditions by enhancing post-fire transpiration and promoting rapid fuel load accumulation to support a potential transition to a high frequency, low intensity fire regime2.

## Methods

### Study site

Measurements were conducted within the Utikuma Lake Region Study Area in north-central Alberta (56.107°N 115.561°W), within a coarse-textured outwash plain23. Measurements were undertaken within a small (60 m by 150 m) peatland surrounded by aspen forest13. The peatland was burnt in May 2011 in the ~90,000 ha Utikuma Complex forest fire. Depth of burn varied from 0.00 to 1.10 m across the site13. Prior to the fire, the burned peatland was dominated by feather moss (Pleurozium schreberi) lawns with some Sphagnum fuscum hummocks underlying a vascular vegetation cover of Rhododendron groenlandicum and Rubus chamaemorus. There was a dense black spruce tree canopy of ~7,000 stems per hectare across the peatland. The margin was characterised by a zone of feather moss with a vascular vegetation cover of Rhododendron groenlandicum and Rubus chamaemorus that may have transitioned to a riparian swamp bordering the forest upland (from inspection of similar unburned sites within the vicinity26).

Following fire the site was classified into four zones associated with the pre-fire vegetation cover, distinct visual zones of burn severity and distance from the peatland-upland interface. Feather moss cover plots were discretized into low, moderate and high burn severity zones. Residual feather moss remained visible within low burn severity zones located principally within the middle of the peatland, with a burn depth less than 0.05 m. Moderate burn severity zones were defined as zones where the depth of burn was greater than 0.05 m but in which a peat surface remained. These zones are consistent with an increase in depth of burn projected under future climates8. Zones of high burn severity were located at the extreme margin of the peatland and were defined as regions in which the peatland had burned through to the mineral soil beneath.

### Hydrological and micrometeorological measurements

Average post-fire growing season evapotranspiration (ET) was measured within a feather moss dominated peatland under a range of burn severities every hour throughout the 2012 growing season (May to August inclusively), approximately one year following wildfire. Measurements were conducted using an automated version of the chamber approach of  24. Three Perspex chambers, with 0.2 m2 surface area, were installed within each designated zone. To measure ET, the chamber was closed for two minutes and the air within the chamber continuously mixed by a fan. ET was calculated from the rate of increase in humidity within the closed chamber of known volume5 measured using an infra-red gas analyser (Li-COR LI-840). The control of the different measurement zones (Feather moss; low, moderate and high burn severity: Sphagnum low burn severity) on daily ET were analysed using a linear mixed effects model in R (nlme)27, with the zone as a fixed effect and chamber as a random effect to account for the lack of independence among measurements.

### Peatland ET modelling

The simulated peatland was 1.0 m deep and composed of a feather moss layer overlying a Sphagnum peat profile. Across the peatland the transition from feather moss to Sphagnum peat occurred at a depth of 0.15 m. This is equivalent to 50 years of feather moss growth, assuming organic matter storage of 4 kg m−2 over 50 years at a bulk density of 27 kg m−3 25. The defined peatland was exposed to a range of isolated fires of different severities, with average burn depths ranging from 0.0 to 0.3 m. Within a single fire, the burn depth varied across the peatland. The burn depth was assumed to be normally distributed with a standard deviation of 0.05 m; average standard deviation observed within Albertan peatlands8,13,14,15,16. This results in post-fire surfaces that, dependent on the average burn depth, varied from 100% singed feather moss to 100% exposed Sphagnum peat. ET was calculated based on the proportion of the surface composed of Sphagnum and feather moss and the associated average ET of each. Thus ET was equal to:

$$ET=E{T}_{LS}{\int }_{0}^{0.15}B(x)dx+E{T}_{SB}{\int }_{0.15}^{1.0}B(x)dx,$$

where B is the burn depth distribution across the peatland, x the depth, and subscripts LS and SB indicate average growing season ET for low burn severity and moderate burn severity feather moss peat, respectively.

## References

1. Waddington, J. M. et al. Hydrological feedbacks in northern peatlands. Ecohydrology. 8, 113–127 (2015).

2. Kettridge, N. et al. Moderate drop in water table increases peatland vulnerability to post-fire regime shift. Sci Rep. 5, 8063 (2015).

3. Ise, T., Dunn, A. L., Wofsy, S. C. & Moorcroft, P. R. High sensitivity of peat decomposition to climate change through water-table feedback. Nat Geo. 1, 763–766 (2008).

4. Belyea, L. R. & Baird, A. J. Beyond “the limits to peat bog growth”: Cross‐scale feedback in peatland development. Ecological Monographs. 76, 299–322 (2016).

5. Kettridge, N. & Waddington, J. M. Towards quantifying the negative feedback regulation of peatland evaporation to drought. Hydrol Process. 28, 3728–3740 (2014).

6. Wu, J. & Roulet, N. T. Climate change reduces the capacity of northern peatlands to absorb the atmospheric carbon dioxide: The different responses of bogs and fens. Global Biogeochem Cy. 28, 1005–1024 (2014).

7. Murphy, M. T., Laiho, R. & Moore, T. R. Effects of water table drawdown on root production and aboveground biomass in a boreal bog. Ecosystems. 12, 1268–1282 (2009).

8. Turetsky, M. R., Donahue, W. F. & Benscoter, B. W. Experimental drying intensifies burning and carbon losses in a northern peatland. Nat Commun. 2, 1523 (2011).

9. Sherwood, J. H. et al. Effect of drainage and wildfire on peat hydrophysical properties. Hydrol Process. 27, 1866–1874 (2013).

10. Brown, C. & Wilby, R. L. An alternate approach to assessing climate risks. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. 93, 401–402 (2012).

11. Brown, S. M., Petrone, R. M., Mendoza, C. & Devito, K. J. Surface vegetation controls on evapotranspiration from a sub‐humid Western Boreal Plain wetland. Hydrol Process. 24, 1072–1085 (2010).

12. Kettridge, N. et al. Low evapotranspiration enhances the resilience of peatland carbon stocks to fire. Geophys Res Lett. 44, 9341–9349 (2017).

13. Lukenbach, M. C. et al. Hydrological controls on deep burning in a northern forested peatland. Hydrol Process. 29, 4114–4124 (2015).

14. Hokanson, K. J. et al. Groundwater connectivity controls peat burn severity in the boreal plains. Ecohydrology. 9, 574–584 (2016).

15. Chasmer, L. E., Hopkinson, C. D., Petrone, R. M. & Sitar, M. Using Multi‐temporal and Multi‐spectral Airborne Lidar to Assess Depth of Peat Loss and Correspondence with a New Active Normalized Burn Ratio for Wildfires. Geophys Res Lett. 44, 11851–11859 (2017).

16. Benscoter, B. W. et al. Interactive effects of vegetation, soil moisture and bulk density on depth of burning of thick organic soils. Int J Wildland Fire. 20, 418–429 (2011).

17. Thompson, D. K., Benscoter, B. W. & Waddington, J. M. Water balance of a burned and unburned forested boreal peatland. Hydrol Process. 28, 5954–5964 (2014).

18. Benscoter, B. W. & Vitt, D. H. Spatial patterns and temporal trajectories of the bog ground layer along a post-fire chronosequence. Ecosystems. 11, 1054–1064 (2008).

19. Bisbee, K. E., Gower, S. T., Norman, J. M. & Nordheim, E. V. Environmental controls on ground cover species composition and productivity in a boreal black spruce forest. Oecologia. 129, 261–270 (2001).

20. Heijmans, M. M., Knaap, Y. A., Holmgren, M. & Limpens, J. Persistent versus transient tree encroachment of temperate peat bogs: effects of climate warming and drought events. Glo Change Biol. 19, 2240–2250 (2013).

21. Feldmeyer‐Christe, E., Küchler, M. & Wildi, O. Patterns of early succession on bare peat in a Swiss mire after a bog burst. J Veg Sci. 22, 943–954 (2011).

22. Johnstone, J. F. et al. Fire, climate change, and forest resilience in interior Alaska. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 40, 1302–1312 (2010).

23. Devito, K. J., Mendoza, C., Petrone, R. M., Kettridge, N. & Waddington, J. M. Utikuma Region Study Area (URSA)–Part 1: Hydrogeological and ecohydrological studies (HEAD). Forest Chron. 92, 57–61 (2016).

24. McLeod, M. K., Daniel, H., Faulkner, R. & Murison, R. Evaluation of an enclosed portable chamber to measure crop and pasture actual evapotranspiration at small scale. Agr Water Manage. 67, 15–34 (2004).

25. Harden, J. W., O’neill, K. P., Trumbore, S. E., Veldhuis, H. & Stocks, B. J. Moss and soil contributions to the annual net carbon flux of a maturing boreal forest. J Geophys Res-Atmos. 102, 28805–28816 (1997).

26. Lukenbach, M. C. et al. Post-fire ecohydrological conditions at peatland margins in different hydrogeological settings of the Boreal Plain. J Hydrol. 548, 741–753 (2017).

27. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria (2014).

## Acknowledgements

Financial support was provided by Syncrude Canada Ltd and Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (SCL4600100599 to KJD, RMP, CAM, NK and JMW), and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC-CRD CRDPJ477235-14 to KJD, RMP, CAM and JMW). We are also extremely grateful two anonymous reviewers for their comments on a previous version of this manuscript.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

N.K. wrote the manuscript and carried out the data analysis. All authors devised the field research, developed the conceptual ideas and commented on the development of the manuscript. N.K., M.C.L. and K.J.H. undertook the field research.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Kettridge.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Kettridge, N., Lukenbach, M.C., Hokanson, K.J. et al. Severe wildfire exposes remnant peat carbon stocks to increased post-fire drying. Sci Rep 9, 3727 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40033-7

• Accepted:

• Published:

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40033-7