Evaluation of dental arch dimensions in 12 year-old Vietnamese children - A cross-sectional study of 4565 subjects

Abstract

This study aimed to define the width and length of the dental arch in 12-year-old Vietnamese children, and to elucidate differences between genders and among ethnic groups. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 4565 12 years-old children from the 4 major ethnic groups in Vietnam (Kinh, Muong, Thai, and Tay), with a healthy and full set of 28 permanent teeth that had never had any orthodontic treatment and with no reconstructive materials at the measured points. The mean variables in all subjects were 36.39 mm for upper inter-canine width; 46.88 mm for upper inter-first molar width; 59.43 mm for upper inter-second molar width; 10.41 mm for upper anterior length; 32.15 mm for upper posterior length 1; 45.52 mm for upper posterior length 2; 28.31 mm for lower inter-canine width; 41.63 mm for lower inter-first molar width; 54.57 mm for lower inter-second molar width (LM2W); 7.06 mm for lower anterior length (LAL); 26.87 mm for lower posterior length 1 (LP1L); and 41.29 mm for lower posterior length 2. Significant differences in these parameters between genders were found in all ethnic groups, except for LAL in the Kinh and Thai groups, and LP1L in the Tay group. Significant ethnic differences were also found in almost all parameters except LM2W in both males and females. Taken together, the representative sizes of dental arches of 12-year-old Vietnamese children have been defined. Our data indicate that there are some variations in dental arch dimensions among ethnic groups and between genders.

Introduction

The population in Vietnam has reached 98 million in November 2018, and nearly 2 million inhabitants are children at the age of 12 years1. Among the 54 ethnic groups, Kinh, Tay, Thai and Muong account for 92% of the total population, with Kinh people being the overwhelming majority (87%). The Tay, Thai and Muong ethnic groups occupy only 5% of the population, living in the mountainous areas of Northern Vietnam1.

The form and size of the dental arch have long been an essential data source not only for dentistry but also for other fields such as biology, anthropometry, painting and sculpture2,3,4. The dental arch is a curve that is usually described and classified by quantitative mathematical equations or qualitative geometric forms. Its shape and size come from the natural balance of the jaw bone, the alveolar bone, and the muscles around them, and may also be affected by factors such as heredity, growth of the bones, eruption, rotation and inclination of the teeth, and environment5,6,7,8,9,10. Defining the shape of the dental arch is the most important part of diagnosing and planning treatment in orthodontics for optimal aesthetics, functioning, and long-term stability11. Over the past century, dental arch forms have been studied intensively in the hope of increasing understanding of the common shape and size of the teeth in each race. These studies may have applications in many fields beyond dentistry, such as medicine or biology3,4,7,8,9,12,13.

Much research has focussed on the morphology and characterization of the dental arch at different ages, such as the studies of Ross-Powell et al. on the American population14, Aluko et al. on the dental arch widths of Nigerian children15, Bishara et al. son changes of arch width in subjects aged from 6 weeks to 45 years16, Hassani et al. on Kenyan children aged 125, and Burris and Harris on American blacks and whites17. Most of these studies are however longitudinal studies aimed at tracking the growth of children’s teeth at each stage18. Lundström showed that changes in size and form actually occur during the growth of permanent dentition (12–18 years)12.The 12-year-old is in puberty when the shape and size of the bow has the most dramatic and systematic growth, especially changes in the anterior segment of the arch consisting of the incisors and canines), when all the deciduous dentition is replaced by the permanent one s8,9,12,13,19. According to Ross-Powell and Harris, almost all changes in the dental arch occurs at the age of twelve20. Variation in the size and shape of the tooth arch are due to a variety of factors, such as supra-articular enlargement in the maxillary or changes in the alveolar crest7,8,20,21. The changes are dramatic in the mixed dentition period, and gradually decrease as the child completes the permanent dentition8,13,18. Early intervention to the teeth, especially at the age of twelve when the shape of the arch has a certain stability, brings more benefits than later treatment. If bite defect and instability in the jaw are treated early, this results in a shorter course of treatment and the patient soon develops the desired teeth. Thus, this is an optimal stage for orthodontic intervention6,7,8.

In Vietnam, local researchers have studied the shapes and sizes of dental arches for generations in order to obtain more complete reference data for dental practice. However, these studies have been conducted on a small scale and in limited regions, and their results cannot fully represent the common index of the entire Vietnamese population. There have been no studies on dental arch index at age 12 in Vietnam, and therefore when conducting research regarding the dental arch index, Vietnamese scientists still have to apply the Caucasian dental arch model to their subjects. Although recently the Vietnamese have been switching over to the Chinese and Japanese models for more cultural accuracy, it is still necessary to conduct research to figure out the characteristic features and the standard values of the Vietnamese dental arch dimensions. In this study, we aim to define the representative sizes of the dental arch of 12-year-old Vietnamese children, to evaluate differences between genders and between the four major ethnic groups in Vietnam, and to compare the values with those for other countries at the same age.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 4565 12-year-old Vietnamese children from the four major ethnic groups (Kinh, Tay, Thai and Muong) out of a total of 6247 children in that age group. Children were screened to select eligible participants who were living in Vietnam, had Vietnamese grandparents, and were of good health with no birth defects or bad habits (e.g. intoxication or drug abuse), with 28 normal teeth, and without any diseases or currently undergoing any orthodontic treatment or facial surgery. Criteria for exclusion were a history of facial or orthodontic surgery, no healthy or full sets of teeth, and no full or permanent second molars. All samples were randomly selected from a national research project of the School of Odonto-Stomatology, Hanoi Medical University from the years 2016 to 2017.

Data collection

From qualified participants, impressions of the maxillary and mandibular teeth were taken using alginate material s (Aroma, GC Corp, Tokyo, Japan) and poured with dental plaster stone (New Plastone II, GC Corp, Tokyo, Japan). After setting, the impression was inverted on a plastic mold containing plaster to get a base for the cast.

We measured the dental arch dimensions based on the studies of Engle et al.22, a method used previously by other authors5,7,14,20. All of the samples were measured by well-trained researchers using the same instrument (Mitutoyo CD-6) in the same natural light and room temperature conditions. Each sample was measured twice; if the difference between the two measurements was less than 0.2 mm the mean was taken as the final result and if it was more than 0.2 mm, the measurements were repeated. Training was made to achieve high consistency and Pearson coefficients were calculated between two measurements for each dimension to avoid errors. The selected landmarks were the points between the two incisors, the cusp tips of the permanent canine, and the tops of the permanent molars (Fig. 1 and Table 1). These are the common anatomical landmarks and are relatively easy to identify. From these landmarks, we measured the length and width of the jaw before making comparisons between sexes and ethnicities.

Figure 1
figure1

Studied dental arch dimensions. Index arch width (A), maxillary length (B) and mandibulaire length (C).

Table 1 Landmarks and measurements of dental arch dimensions.

Data analysis

Data were encoded and input using Epidata 3.0 software, and then were analyzed by the statistical software SPSS 23.0 (IBM, USA). Student’s t-tests, Mann-Whitney tests and Kruskal-Wallis tests were employed to compare the differences between/among groups classified by gender or ethnicity. A difference was considered statistically significant if P < 0.05.

Results

In the total of 4565 study subjects, there were 2428 males (53–19%) and 2137 females (46.71%). We compared the dental arch dimensions in four ethnics (Table 2); the Kinh ethnic group was the majority (63.15%) (Table 1). The analysis showed that most indicators of males were statistically higher than those of females (P < 0.05), except for lower anterior length (LAL) in the Kinh and Thai ethnic groups and upper posterior length 1 (UP1L), upper anterior length (UAL), and Lower posterior length 1 (LP1L) in the Tay ethnic group (Table 3). We also compared the parameters according to ethnicity for males or females (Tables 4 and 5). In males, there were statistical differences (P < 0.001) among the 4 ethnic groups in all 12 indicators. For Muong males 7/12 indicators were smaller (UCW, UM1W, UM2W, UP2L, LM1W, loLM2W and LP2L) while for Tay males 5/12 were smaller (UAL, UP1L, LCW, LAL, and LP2L) (Table 4). In females, there were statistical differences among the 4 ethnic groups in 11/12 indicators (P < 0.05), except LM2W (Table 5); Tay females had 9/12 dimensions smaller (UCW, UM1W, UM2W, UAL, UP1L, UP2L, LCW, LAL, and LP1L) while Muong females had 2 smaller (LM1W and LP2L) (Table 5).

Table 2 The distribution of study subjects by genders and ethnicity.
Table 3 Comparison of dental arch dimensions between two genders in four ethnic groups.
Table 4 Difference of dental arch dimensions according to four ethnic groups in male subjects.
Table 5 Difference of dental arch dimensions according to four ethnic groups in female subjects.

Discussion

Vietnam’s population has reached nearly 98 million people, of which around 2 million are 12-year-old children1. The inhabitants of Viet Nam are ethnically quite diverse and the population in each ethnic group, especially the Kinh majority, has increased dramatically. The age group on which we conducted this study was that at which the teeth are relatively full and stable on the bones, which facilitated the study of their morphological characteristics. Since this was a study of dental arch dimensions, the criteria for the choice of the patients had to be strict to avoid deviations. For example, there were facial requirements such as no facial deformities, no surgery or orthodontics, no history of traumatic injury or congenital malformations. In addition, the criteria for teeth and dental arch were very strict as the participants had to have a full set of 28 permanent teeth, and no restoration or major damage that changed the dimensions of the teeth which can occur in children 12 years of age. Because it is difficult to measure the dimensions of teeth and dental arch accurately when the teeth are in the mouth, we used the method of measurements on casts which are widely applied23,24.

Our research aimed to determine the average dental arch dimensions of Vietnamese children at the age of 12 and to detect any differences in these indicators between the two genders and among local ethnic majorities, and later to compare them with other ethnic groups in the world. We observed that most indicators of males were statistically higher than those of females in our study population. This is consistent with the study done by Ross-Powell et al.20 on black and white children aged 3 to 18 years; these authors found that the dimensions of the lower teeth were similar between male and female children aged 3 to 10, but at the onset of puberty the difference in arch sizes between genders was statistically significant, higher in males than females. Bishara et al.16 in their study on subjects aged 6 weeks to 45 years found that the length of the male arch was significantly greater than that of the female, possibly because the arch dimensions begin to change in children at 10–12 years and the boys begin to grow faster than girls. The gender difference between these indexes also corresponds to the different body development between men and women. In men, most anthropometric measures such as average height, average weight, or index of head area are larger than women. Thus, to ensure the harmonious development and balance of the head and face as well as the entire body, the males’ dental arch dimensions are usually larger than those of females, which is consistent with human evolution20.

The average indicators of Vietnamese children aged 12 were also similar to those found in studies of Chinese and Kenyan children at the age of 125,25. Compared to the study done by Hassanali et al.5 on 12-years-old Kenyans, only upper inter-canine width is similar in our study while the remaining indicators are different; especially, the upper and lower jaw of the children in Kenya were significantly longer than the children in Vietnam (Table 6). Compared to upper and lower intercanine width and anterior length of American blacks aged 12 in the study of Ross-Powell et al.20, we found that the width between the canines (front width) in the upper and lower jaw and the frontal length in the upper and lower jaw of the 12-year-old Vietnamese group were smaller than those of black American children at the same age. Therefore, the jaws of 12-year-old Vietnamese children are smaller and shorter than those of Caucasian (American) children. However, the length of the lower jaw in both males and females of the Vietnamese group is larger than that of Caucasian children (Table 7). These indicators were considerably larger than those for 12-year-old Brazilian children26. The results of Louly et al. for dental arch length and width were similar to those for our 12-year-old children, but their samples showed mixed dentition while ours chose 12-year-olds who had replaced all their teeth and had the second molars. Moreover, Louly et al.’s measurements on the first molar were not at the cusp tip but rather at the central groove of the teeth, and therefore they cannot be compared with our studies. Comparing to 12-year-old South Chinese of the same race (Mongoloid) and geographic proximity (border crossings), we found that only the width between the two first molars of 12-year-old Chinese was narrower than for Vietnamese while the rest of the parameters of tooth width are very similar, especially the canine width index and the width between the two second molars of the two jaws. It is clear that differences in racial origins as well as differences in evolutionary traits between different races, together with environmental factors, can explain the statistically significant differences in the dimensions of the dental arch in children from different continents with distinct genetics and diverse living conditions. Furthermore, when studying children 12 years of age one needs to consider that they are in a period of significant developmental change.

Table 6 Comparison of dental arch dimensions between different studies.
Table 7 Comparison of dental arch dimensions with Ross-Powell’s study.

Conclusions

Our study of 4565 Vietnamese children of four ethnic groups (Kinh, Tay, Thai and Muong) showed that most dental arch indicators in males were statistically significantly higher than those in females. Regarding the ethnicity, there were statistical differences in both males and females. In Muong males and females 7/12 and 2/12 indicators were smaller, respectively, compared to males and females in other ethnics, while in Tay males and females 5/12 and 9/12 dimensions were smaller, respectively, compared to these genders in other races. In comparison to other ethnic groups, 12-year-old Vietnamese children had similar dimensions of the upper and lower intercanine and intermolar width to children in the same age group in South China. However, the average upper posterior length 1 and lower posterior length 1 were shorter than those in Africans (Kenyan) and Caucasian (American blacks aged 12). The 12-year-old Vietnamese have a narrower and shorter dental arch than Caucasian children, especially the maxillary, and they need earlier orthodontic intervention.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Our study was a part of the national project entitled “Vietnamese Characteristics of Craniofacial anthropometry to apply in medicine” (coded ĐTĐL.CN.27/16) which was approved by Hanoi Medical Council of Ethics for Biomedical Research in 2016 (IRB code - VN01001).

Informed consent

Informed consents were obtained from the parents of all children included in the study.

Change history

  • 06 November 2019

    An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

References

  1. 1.

    Population and Employment. General statistics office of Vietnam, https://www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=774 (2018).

  2. 2.

    Burdi, A. R. Morphogenesis of mandibular dental arch shape in human embryos. J Dent Res 47, 50–58 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bishara, S. E. & Jakobsen, B. P. Longitudinal comparisons of dental arch changes in normal and untreated class II, division 1 subjects and their clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 110:483–489 (1996).

  4. 4.

    Bishara S. E., Bishara S. E. & Staley, R. N. Maxillary expansion: clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofacial, 3–14 (1987).

  5. 5.

    Hassanali, J. & Odhiambo, J. W. Analysis of dental casts of 6–8- and 12-year-old Kenyan children. Eur J Orthod 22, 135–142 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Al-Khateeb, S. N. & Abu Alhaija, E. S. J. Tooth Size Discrepancies and Arch Parameters among Different Malocclusions in a Jordanian Sample. The Angle Orthodontist: May 2006 76(No. 3), 459–465 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sillman, J. H. Dimensional changes of the dental arches: longitudinal study from birth to 25 years. Am J Orthod 50, 600–616 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Knott, V. B. Longitudinal study of dental arch width at four stages of dentition. Angle Orthod 42, 387–395 (1972).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Moorrees, C. F. A. The dentition of the growing child. (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1959).

  10. 10.

    Lavelle, C. L., Flinn, R. M., Foster, T. D. & Hamilton, M. An analysis into age changes of human dental arch by a multivariate technique. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 33, 403–412 (1970).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Carter, G. A. & McNamara, J. A. Jr. Longitudinal dental arch changes in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 114, 88–99 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lundström, A. Changes in crowding and spacing of the teeth with age. Dent Pract 19, 218–24 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Moorrees, C. F. A. & Chadha, J. M. Available space for the incisors during dental development: a growth study based on physiologic age. Angle Orthod 35, 12 (1965).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Yavuz, O. Changes in the dental arches that occurred in transition from mixed dentitions to permanent dentition: A longgitudinal study. Atatürk Üniv. Di Hek. Fak Ortodonti A.D 8–13 (2006).

  15. 15.

    Aluko, I. A., Dacosta, O. & Isiekwe, M. Dental arch widths in the early and late permanent dentitions of Nigerian population. Nig Dent J Vol 17, 1 (Jan 2009) (2012).

  16. 16.

    Bishara, S. E., Jakobsen, J. R., Trederc, J. & Nowak, A. Arch width changes from 6 weeks to 45 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 111, 401–409 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Burris, B. G. H. E. Maxillary arch size and shape in American blacks and whites. Angle Orthod 70, 297–302 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Jan Henrikson et al. Long-term stability of dental arch e form in normal occlusion from e 13 to 31 years of age. Eur J Orthod 23(1), 51–61 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Luppanapornlarp, S. & Johnston, L. E. Jr. The effects of premolar extraction: a long-term comparison in “clear cut” extraction and nonextraction Class II patients. Angle Orthod 63, 257–72 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ross-Powell, R. E. & Harris, E. F. Growth of the anterior dental arch in black American children: A longitudinal study from 3 to 18 years of age. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 118, 649–657 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Cohen, J. T. Growth and development changes of the dental arches in children. J Am Dent Assoc 27, 1250–1260 (1940).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Engel, G. Performed arch wires reliability of fit. Am J Orthod 76, 497–504 (1979).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Al-Khatib, A. R., Rajion, Z. A. & Masudi, S. M. Tooth size and dental arch dimensions: a stereophotogrammetric study in Southeast Asian Malays. Orthod Craniofac Res 14, 243–253 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ribeiro, J. S., Ambrosio, A. R. & Pinto, A. S. Evaluation of transverse changes in the dental arches according to growth pattern: a longitudinal study. Dental Press J. Orthod 17(1), 66–73 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ling, J. Y. K. & Wong, R. W. K. Dental Arch Widths of Southern Chinese. Angle Orthod (2009).

  26. 26.

    Louly, F. & Aranha Nouer, P. R. et al. Dental arch dimensions in the mixed dentition: a study of Brazilian children from 9 to 12 years of age. J Appl Oral Sci. 19(12), 169–174 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

DTC was a researcher under the SCIENTIA FELLOWS program co-funded by the Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, and the EU Seventh Framework Program (FP7) Marie S. Curie scheme—People: Cofunding of Regional, National and International Programs (COFUND), grant number 609020. YT and DTC’s works are supported by International Cooperation Seeds Funding of Nanjing Agricultural University (Grant number: 2018-AH-04). Prof. Ronald Hancock (Laval University, Canada) and MSc. Phuong Linh Nguyen (An English editor) are acknowledged for critically reading the manuscript. This study was funded by Office of National Science and Technology programs, Ministry of Science and Technology, No. ĐTĐL.CN.27/16.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.M.D., V.T.N.N., N.H.H., T.D.K., L.Q.A. and V.V.X. designed and performed experiments, collected data and informed consents. T.M.D., V.T.N.N., N.H.H., T.C.D., D.T.C., A.C.P., P.L.K., E.S., Y.T., N.V.B., V.H.P. and N.D.B. analyzed and interpreted the results, edited and corrected the manuscript. N.H.H., T.D.K. and D.T.C. wrote the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Thien Chu-Dinh or Van-Huy Pham or Dinh-Toi Chu.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dung, T.M., Ngoc, V.T.N., Hiep, N.H. et al. Evaluation of dental arch dimensions in 12 year-old Vietnamese children - A cross-sectional study of 4565 subjects. Sci Rep 9, 3101 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39710-4

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.