Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Graphene Oxide Induced Surface Modification for Functional Separators in Lithium Secondary Batteries



Functional separators, which have additional functions apart from the ionic conduction and electronic insulation of conventional separators, are highly in demand to realize the development of advanced lithium ion secondary batteries with high safety, high power density, and so on. Their fabrication is simply performed by additional deposition of diverse functional materials on conventional separators. However, the hydrophobic wetting nature of conventional separators induces the polarity-dependent wetting feature of slurries. Thus, an eco-friendly coating process of water-based slurry that is highly polar is hard to realize, which restricts the use of various functional materials dispersible in the polar solvent. This paper presents a surface modification of conventional separators that uses a solution-based coating of graphene oxide with a hydrophilic group. The simple method enables the large-scale tuning of surface wetting properties by altering the morphology and the surface polarity of conventional separators, without significant degradation of lithium ion transport. On the surface modified separator, superior wetting properties are realized and a functional separator, applicable to lithium metal secondary batteries, is demonstrated as an example. We believe that this simple surface modification using graphene oxide contributes to successful fabrication of various functional separators that are suitable for advanced secondary batteries.


Until now, lithium ion batteries have been widely used as excellent energy storage devices owing to their high energy density and reasonable power density1,2,3,4. It is predicted that this superior energy storage device will extend its usefulness to energy storage systems, a power source for the Internet of Things and implantable medical devices5,6. To this end, components constituting lithium secondary batteries should be developed to exhibit advanced functions. The separator is one of the essential components that allows easy ionic transport and prevents electronic conduction7,8,9,10. The separator used in lithium ion batteries is generally a polymeric membrane with micrometer-scale porosity, but many recently proposed functional separators have additional features: high thermal stability, high rate operation, lithium dendrite suppression, flame-retardation and so on11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21. For this purpose, the polymer scaffold was modified to form a multiscale or ordered porosity, and the hybrid composite separators with functional inorganic nanomaterials were demonstrated. Also, the separator consisted of functional polymers with a core-shell structure or a polarity-controlled surface. Among them, the common and facile method is the additional deposition of functional materials on conventional separators.

In this regard, surface wetting properties of separators are highly important because the uniform deposition process of new, functional materials is significantly dependent on the interfacial adhesion or wettability of separators22,23. However, conventional polymeric separators consist of polyolefin fiber structure that exhibit hydrophobic behavior. On this separator, the polar slurries might experience a dewetting problem, which makes a uniform coating of functional materials difficult. Thus, less polar solvents such as n-methyl-2-pyrrolidone which enables moderate wetting with hydrophobic conventional separators have usually been used to form a slurry containing functional materials and polymeric binders, but the toxicity and high cost of organic solvents are fundamental issues for the development of cost-effective lithium ion batteries through eco-friendly processes22. In addition, the use of functional nanomaterials dispersible in a polar solvent is strictly limited. To overcome these problems, significant research has been performed that includes mussel-inspired dopamine coating of separators22,24,25,26.

This paper presents a facile method to tune surface properties of conventional separators by solution-based, rapid coating of graphene oxide (GO). Through dip-coating of conventional separators in a GO solution with a polarity designed for uniform wetting, the separator surface can be completely covered by GO flakes. Thus, the hydrophilic wetting nature of the modified separator can be realized because of many hydrophilic functional groups existing on the GO surface and the morphological change of the GO covered separator. The resulting properties provide superior wettability of eco-friendly water-based slurry and corresponding uniform deposition of functional materials. As an example, we fabricated a GO-SiO2 composite layer coated separator to demonstrate its usefulness in lithium metal secondary batteries. The superior cycling performance of the cell with the GO-SiO2 coated separator was achieved compared to the cell with pristine separator.

Experimental procedures

The GO was synthesized from nature graphite (SP1 Bay Carbon) by the modified Hummers method27,28. For uniform coating of GO flakes on the separator surface, ~0.02 wt% GO dispersion in a solvent mixture of isopropyl alcohol (IPA)/water (20/1 by volume ratio) was prepared. Prior to GO coating, sonication for 30 min was performed for stable dispersion. A conventional separator (Asahi Kasei) was dipped in the GO solution for 15–30 s, and after that, the wet separator was dried for several min in ambient conditions. For deposition of the GO-SiO2 composite layer on the separators, ~1 wt% GO aqueous solution with SiO2 nanoparticles (Sigma-Aldrich) and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) binder (~1 wt% GO:SiO2:CMC = 100:3:0.08 by weight) was used after strong stirring. The thickness-controlled doctor blade method was performed to form the composite film on the separators. The GO-SiO2 coated separator was annealed at 60 °C in a vacuum over 6 h to remove any traces of water. For cell fabrication, we used a commercially available LiCoO2 (Umicore, D50 = 10 μm) cathode, a liquid electrolyte (EnChem Co. Ltd.) of 1 M LiPF6 in ethylene carbonate (EC)/diethyl carbonate (DEC) with 2 wt% vinylene carbonate (VC) additive and lithium metal (Honjo Corporation) with ~300 μm thickness.

Nanoscale morphologies were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S-4800). The water contact angle on the pristine or modified separators was measured with Surface Electro Optics (PNX 150). Ionic conductivity was determined from complex impedance spectra measured using a frequency response analyzer (Solartron HF 1225 Gain-Phase Analyzer) in a frequency range of 10−1-105 Hz. Electrochemical performance of lithium metal secondary batteries was investigated using a cycle tester (Toyo System).

Results and Discussion

In general, the polyolefin separators exhibit hydrophobic wetting nature due to i) the surface polarity and ii) the porous structural factor29,30. Specifically, the low chemical polarity between carbon and hydrogen in polyolefin leads to hydrophobicity, which is intensified by the re-entrant curvature of the separator with a tangled fiber shape29. Figure 1a schematically describes a solid-liquid-vapor interface of a hydrophobic separator structure for water, where the net traction of the liquid-vapor interface is upward owing to a high water contact angle on the polyolefin surface. Such a net force prevents water from penetrating into the separator, which forms a heterogeneous surface consisting of air and a hydrophobic separator. This phenomenon can be interpreted as a Cassie-Baxter model30. As a result, this porous olefin separator shows a hydrophobic dewetting nature with a water contact angle of ~118° (Fig. 1b,c), and it is anticipated to be hard for an aqueous slurry solution to be uniformly coated22.

Figure 1

(a) Schematic illustration of a solid-liquid-vapor interface of the conventional hydrophobic separator structure for water. (d) Water contact angle measurement and (c) photograph of large-area wetting feature on the conventional hydrophobic separator. For visualization, Co(NO3)2·6H2O dissolved water was used.

Therefore, a surface treatment to change the hydrophobic surface nature of the separators to hydrophilic should be performed for the uniform and scalable coating of aqueous slurry solution. To this end, a facile dip-coating of the separators in GO solution was designed (Fig. S1). GO, used widely for diverse chemical and optoelectric applications, is an intriguing two-dimensional nanomaterial in virtue of its mass producibility, solution-processability and controllable defects on a basal plane27,31,32. In this proposed process, we anticipated that several layers of flexible GO flakes with a hydrophilic surface via oxygen functional groups would physically and conformally adhere to the separator surface through the dip-coating process, utilizing the size difference between the GO (several micrometer scale) and separator pores (hundreds nanometer scale)28. However, the above-mentioned dewetting feature of conventional separators for aqueous solutions disturbed the surface modification of the separator (Figs 2a and S2). Nevertheless, a simple solvent change from water, with a high surface energy (72.80 mJ m−2), to one with a low surface energy can solve the wetting issue. As shown in Fig. 2b, the solvent with a low surface energy shows a relatively low contact angle on the olefin surface, and thus the net traction of the liquid-vapor interface in this situation can be directed downward. This phenomenon leads to failing of the heterogeneous layer containing air pockets and favorable wetting of the solvent with the separator. To decrease the surface energy of the GO aqueous solution, the isopropyl alcohol (IPA) with a relatively weak intermolecular interaction (23.0 mJ m−2) was added, and the stable dispersion of GO in a water/IPA mixture could be obtained owing to the high dispersibility of GO in diverse solvents (Fig. S3)33. Eventually, when the GO dispersion in the water/IPA mixture was used for surface coating of the separators, the evaporation-induced deposition of GO on the separators was successfully realized within several minutes, in contrast to the use of aqueous GO solutions (Figs 2a, S2 and S4). The SEM image confirmed the conformal deposition of GO thin enough that the separator structure could be observed on opposite side (Fig. 2c)34. Notably, this GO-induced surface modification enables a distinct transition of wetting properties, modifying the surface chemistry and the re-entrant structure of the pristine separators28,29. As shown in Fig. 2d,e, the water contact angle on this modified separator significantly decreases, showing a hydrophilic nature (water contact angle: ~15°) on the large area.

Figure 2

(a) Photographs of graphene oxide (GO) dip-coating depending on the polarity of GO solution. (b) Schematic illustration of wettability of the solvent with low surface energy on the conventional hydrophobic separator. (c) SEM image of the GO dip-coated separator. (d) Water contact angle measurement and (e) photograph of large-area wetting feature on the GO dip-coated separator. For visualization, Co(NO3)2·6H2O dissolved water was used.

One of the remarkable results is lithium ion transport within this surface modified separator. In spite of the physical blocking of GO as shown in the SEM image of Fig. 2c, the GO dip-coated separator exhibits ionic conductivity (0.596 mS cm−1) similar to the pristine separator (0.581 mS cm−1) (Fig. 3). We inferred that this was owing to i) the smooth ion transport through numerous defect sites on the basal plane of the GO and ii) the ultrathin deposition of GO (a few nanometers) compared with the total separator thickness (tens of micrometer scale)35,36. Specifically, the GO seems to macroscopically block the ion transport, but in microscopic scale, many defects or functional groups on the GO can help ionic conduction due to having an appropriate size for lithium ions to pass35,36. Moreover, the deposited GO is significantly thin compared to the total thickness of the separator, and thus even if there is any retardation in lithium transport, the negative effect on the ionic conduction due to the GO layer can be minimized. These results strongly suggest that this surface modification through thin GO coating can improve the surface wettability without significant degradation of lithium ion transport, which is highly important to the operation of lithium ion batteries.

Figure 3

The Nyquist plot of 1 M LiPF6 in EC/DMC using the GO dip-coated separator and the conventional separator, respectively.

On this surface modified separator, the facile coating of water-based slurry with diverse functional materials can be realized. As a model system of water-based slurries, the GO aqueous solution with a concentration of ~1 wt% was prepared. As shown in Fig. 4a,b, the high polarity of the GO aqueous solution prevents the uniform coating of GO flakes on the pristine separator, but owing to the enhanced wettability on the surface modified separator, the water-based slurry containing GO flakes can be uniformly coated, which is confirmed via large-scale demonstration (Fig. 4a,c). In addition, the SEM measurement was performed to investigate the uniform GO coating at the microscopic level and the densely GO covered morphology was observed (Fig. 4e). It shows a distinct contrast to one of pristine separator, where it is hard to observe the GO flakes (Fig. 4d). In addition, oxidized carbon nanotube and Ag nanoparticles coated separators were demonstrated using similar aqueous slurries, which exhibit the uniform coating feature (Fig. 4f–g). From these results, it is noted that this surface modified separator can be utilized for the uniform deposition of diverse functional materials, regardless of the polarity of slurries.

Figure 4

Photograph of (a) GO coating depending on the separators, (b) dewetted GO solution on the conventional separator and (c) completely wetted GO solution on the surface modified separator during the doctor blade casting. SEM images of (d) red marked region and (e) blue marked region in (a). SEM and EDX images of (f) oxidized carbon nanotube, (g) Ag nanoparticles coated separator.

To check the electrochemical performance of secondary batteries that have a functional separator, the GO-SiO2 composite layer coated separator was fabricated for lithium metal secondary batteries. The well-mixed, water-based slurry containing GO and SiO2 nanoparticles was prepared and the uniform deposition with <5 μm thickness was successfully realized on the surface modified separator (Figs 5a and S5). Lithium metal secondary batteries utilizing a lithium metal anode instead of the conventional graphite anode, aim to achieve an ultrahigh energy density storage device that uses the lowest electrochemical potential and high specific capacity of lithium, but it suffers from the uncontrolled, undesired lithium dendrite growth37,38,39,40,41,42,43. This structural phenomenon can be alleviated to some extent by a mechanically strong blocking layer. Thus, a functional separator coated with GO capable of in-plane mechanical robustness was presented44,45,46,47,48. In addition, in order to obtain additional life of lithium metal, SiO2 nanoparticles were incorporated within the GO layer. It is anticipated that lithium dendrites will meet SiO2 nanoparticles during repeated cycling, which induces a solid-state conversion reaction13. Thus, this electrochemical reaction might prevent further growth of lithium dendrites because the sharp lithium dendrites become a smooth and round shaped lithium alloy, which is an electrically less active structure by lightning rod theory13,37. Also, SiO2 nanoparticles can prevent strong GO stacking which deteriorate the ionic conductivity owing to tortuous ionic pathway of multilayered structure. As shown in Fig. S6, the XRD results display that the degree of GO stacking decreases as the SiO2 nanoparticles are added and corresponding impedance results show that the ionic conductivity of the GO-SiO2 coated separator is enhanced compared to one of the GO coated separator.

Figure 5

(a) Photograph and (b) SEM image of the GO-SiO2 coated separator. Water contact angle measurement of (e) GO coated separator and (d) GO-SiO2 coated separator. (e) Cycling performance and (f) Coulombic efficiency of lithium metal secondary batteries using the GO-SiO2 coated separator.

The SEM image of Fig. 5b shows the composite layer consisting of GO and SiO2 nanoparticles on the surface modified separator. In contrast to the separator coated by GO layers (Fig. 4e), the rough GO surface was observed at a microscopic level, owing to the incorporation of SiO2 nanoparticles. This roughness induces the enhanced solvent wettability according to Wenzel model (Fig. 5c,d)49, which makes a liquid electrolyte uniformly distributed on the lithium metal. This phenomenon generally contributes to the uniform lithium deposition with fewer dendrites50,51. For evaluation of lithium metal secondary batteries using this functional separator, the 2 × 2 cm2 pouch type full-cell was assembled with a LiCoO2 cathode, ~300 μm thick lithium metal, and liquid electrolyte (1 M LiPF6 in EC/DEC + 2 wt% VC additive). As shown in Fig. 5c,d, the enhancement of cycling performance at the rate of 1 C was confirmed by using the GO-SiO2 coated separator. The cell with the GO-SiO2 coated separator exhibited stable operation for ~200 cycles and some fluctuation after that, but the Coulombic efficiency was quite stable up to 350 cycles. Meanwhile, the reference cell using the conventional separator showed severe fluctuation of discharging capacity and Coulombic efficiency after 100 cycles, and cell failure was observed after ~220 cycles. It is clear that the composite layer of GO and SiO2 nanoparticles can efficiently prevent the lithium dendrite growth through the physical robustness of GO, the electrochemical conversion reaction of SiO2 nanoparticles and the uniform distribution of lithium ions.


In summary, a surface modification of separators was presented via a simple solution-based coating of GO with many hydrophilic groups for fabrication of functional separators. This strategy was easily performed within several minutes and dramatically changed the wetting nature from hydrophobic to hydrophilic, which was mainly achieved by modifying the surface polarity and the porous structure of the separators. Our findings indicate that slurries with many functional materials can be coated on this separator surface, regardless of the polarity of the slurries. In addition, this surface modification approach preserved the ionic conduction through defect-induced ion transport and thin deposition thickness. As a model system, deposition of a GO-SiO2 composite layer was demonstrated on the proposed surface modified separator, and the enhanced cycling performance of the GO-SiO2 coated separator was confirmed in lithium metal secondary batteries. We believe that this facile surface modification of the separator via GO coating will contribute to fabricating various functional separators that incorporate intriguing nanomaterials, such as emerging 1- or 2-dimensional materials (carbon nanotube, graphene, MoS2, WS2, Mxenes) and novel ceramic materials, which will achieve enhanced performance in the membrane field as well as for advanced lithium secondary batteries.


  1. 1.

    Goodenough, J. B. & Kim, Y. Challenges for Rechargeable Li Batteriaes. Chem. Mater. 22, 587–603 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tarascon, J. M. & Armand, M. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 414, 359–367 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Abraham, K. M. Directions in secondary lithium battery research and development. Electrochim. Acta 38, 1233–1248 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Scrosati, B. Recent advances in lithium ion battery materials. Electrochim. Acta 45, 2461–2466 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Zhang, F. et al. 3D printing technologies for electrochemical energy storage. Nano Energy 40, 418–431 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ortiz, G. F. et al. TiO2 nanotubes manufactured by anodization of Ti thin films for on-chip Li-ion 2D microbatteries. Electrochim. Acta 54, 4262–4268 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lee, H., Yanilmaz, M., Toprakci, O., Fu, K. & Zhang, X. A review of recent developments in membrane separators for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 3857–3886 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Deimede, V. & Elmasides, C. Separators for Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Review on the Production Processes and Recent Developments. Energy Technology 3, 453–468 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Degen, I., Peter, J. & Setauket, S. Battery Separators. Chem. Rev. 568, 10–12 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Deng, N. et al. A review on separators for lithium-sulfur battery: Progress and prospects. J. Power Sources 331, 132–155 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kim, S. et al. A Flame-Retardant Composite Polymer Electrolyte for Lithium-Ion Polymer Batteries. Electrochim. Acta 241, 553–559 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yoo, S. et al. Hierarchical multiscale hyperporous block copolymer membranes via tunable dual-phase separation. Sci. Adv. 1, 1500101 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Liu, K. et al. Extending the Life of Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries by Reaction of Lithium Dendrites with a Novel Silica Nanoparticle Sandwiched Separator. Adv. Mater. 29, 1603987 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lee, J. R., Won, J. H., Kim, J. H., Kim, K. J. & Lee, S. Y. Evaporation-induced self-assembled silica colloidal particle-assisted nanoporous structural evolution of poly(ethylene terephthalate) nonwoven composite separators for high-safety/high-rate lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 216, 42–47 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Jung, Y.-C. et al. Ceramic separators based on Li+–conducting inorganic electrolyte for high-performance lithium-ion batteries with enhanced safety. J. Power Sources 293, 675–683 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Choi, Y., Kim, J. I., Moon, J., Jeong, J. & Park, J. H. Electron beam induced strong organic/inorganic grafting for thermally stable lithium-ion battery separators. Appl. Surf. Sci. 444, 339–344 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wu, H., Zhuo, D., Kong, D. & Cui, Y. Improving battery safety by early detection of internal shorting with a bifunctional separator. Nat. Commun. 5, 5193 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zhang, J. et al. Sustainable, heat-resistant and flame-retardant cellulose-based composite separator for high-performance lithium ion battery. Sci. Rep. 4, 3935 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Shi, J. et al. Porous membrane with high curvature, three-dimensional heat-resistance skeleton: a new and practical separator candidate for high safety lithium ion battery. Sci. Rep. 5, 8255 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Park, S. et al. Multicore-shell nanofiber architecture of polyimide/polyvinylidene fluoride blend for thermal and long-term stability of lithium ion battery separator. Sci. Rep. 6, 36977 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Huang, J.-Q., Zhang, Q. & Wei, F. Multi-functional separator/interlayer system for high-stable lithium-sulfur batteries: Progress and prospects. Energy Storage Materials 1, 127–145 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lee, H., Jeon, H., Gong, S., Ryou, M.-H. & Lee, Y. M. A facile method to enhance the uniformity and adhesion properties of water-based ceramic coating layers on hydrophobic polyethylene separators. Appl. Surf. Sci. 427, 139–146 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Jeon, H. et al. Plasma-assisted water-based Al2O3 ceramic coating for polyethylene-based microporous separators for lithium metal secondary batteries. Electrochim. Acta 212, 649–656 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ryou, M. H. et al. Excellent Cycle Life of Lithium-Metal Anodes in Lithium-Ion Batteries with Mussel-Inspired Polydopamine-Coated Separators. Adv. Energy Mater. 2, 645–650 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ryou, M. H., Lee, Y. M., Park, J. K. & Choi, J. W. Mussel-inspired Polydopamine-treated Polyethylene Separators for High-power Li-ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 23, 3066–3070 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wang, Y. et al. Polyethylene separators modified by ultrathin hybrid films enhancing lithium ion transport performance and Li-metal anode stability. Electrochim. Acta 259, 386–394 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Padmajan Sasikala, S. et al. Graphene oxide liquid crystals: a frontier 2D soft material for graphene-based functional materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 6013–6045 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kim, B. H. et al. Surface Energy Modification by Spin-Cast, Large-Area Graphene Film for Block Copolymer Lithography. ACS Nano 4, 5464–5470 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Tuteja, A., Choi, W., Mabry, J. M., McKinley, G. H. & Cohen, R. E. Robust omniphobic surfaces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 18200–18205 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Cassie, A. B. D. & Baxter, S. Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans. Faraday. Society 40, 546–551 (1944).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kim, J. Y. et al. 3D Tailored Crumpling of Block-Copolymer Lithography on Chemically Modified Graphene. Adv. Mater. 28, 1591–1596 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Chakrabarti, M. H. et al. Progress in the electrochemical modification of graphene-based materials and their applications. Electrochim. Acta 107, 425–440 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Paredes, J. I., Villar-Rodil, S., Martínez-Alonso, A. & Tascón, J. M. D. Graphene Oxide Dispersions in Organic Solvents. Langmuir 24, 10560–10564 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Koenig, S. P., Boddeti, N. G., Dunn, M. L. & Bunch, J. S. Ultrastrong adhesion of graphene membranes. Nat. Nanotech. 6, 543–546 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Gómez-Navarro, C. et al. Atomic structure of reduced graphene oxide. Nano Lett. 10, 1144–1148 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhao, X., Hayner, C. M., Kung, M. C. & Kung, H. H. Flexible holey graphene paper electrodes with enhanced rate capability for energy storage applications. ACS Nano 5, 8739–8749 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Park, J. et al. Micro-Patterned Lithium Metal Anodes with Suppressed Dendrite Formation for Post Lithium-IonBatteries. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 3, 1600140 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Chen, K.-H. et al. Dead Lithium: Mass Transport Effects on Voltage, Capacity, and Failure of Lithium Metal Anodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 11671–11681 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lu, D. et al. Failure Mechanism for Fast-Charged Lithium Metal Batteries with Liquid Electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1400993 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lin, D., Liu, Y. & Cui, Y. Reviving the Lithium Metal Anode for High-EnergyBatteries. Nat. Nanotech. 12, 194–206 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Zheng, H. et al. A bifunctional electrolyte additive for separator wetting and dendrite suppression in lithium metal batteries. Electrochim. Acta 270, 62–69 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wang, Z., Wang, X., Sun, W. & Sun, K. Dendrite-Free Lithium Metal Anodes in High Performance Lithium-Sulfur Batteries with Bifunctional Carbon Nanofiber Interlayers. Electrochim. Acta 252, 127–137 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bobnar, J. et al. Fluorinated reduced graphene oxide as a protective layer on the metallic lithium for application in the high energy batteries. Sci. Rep. 8, 5819 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Akbari, A. et al. Large-area graphene-based nanofiltration membranes by shear alignment of discotic nematic liquid crystals of graphene oxide. Nat. Commun. 7, 10891 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Shin, W. K., Kannan, A. G. & Kim, D. W. Effective Suppression of Dendritic Lithium Growth Using an Ultrathin Coating of Nitrogen and Sulfur Codoped Graphene Nanosheets on Polymer Separator for Lithium Metal Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 23700–23707 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Yan, K. et al. Ultrathin Two Dimensional Atomic Crystals as Stable Interfacial Layer for Improvement of Lithium Metal Anode. Nano Lett. 14, 6016–6022 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Huang, J.-Q. et al. Permselective Graphene Oxide Membrane for Highly Stable and Anti-Self-Discharge Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. ACS Nano 9, 3002–3011 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Yunbo, Z. et al. A graphene-oxide-based thin coating on the separator: an efficient barrier towards high-stable lithium–sulfur batteries. 2D Materials 2, 024013 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Wenzel, R. N. Resistance of Solid Surfaces to Wetting byWater. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry 28, 988–994 (1936).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Han, M., Kim, D.-W. & Kim, Y.-C. Charged Polymer-Coated Separators by Atmospheric Plasma-Induced Grafting for Lithium-IonBatteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 26073–26081 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Liu, W., Lin, D., Pei, A. & Cui, Y. Stabilizing Lithium Metal Anodes by Uniform Li-Ion Flux Distribution in Nanochannel Confinement. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 15443–15450 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by Technology Development Program to Solve Climate Changes of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science & ICT (2017M1A2A2044492) and R&D Convergence Program (14-02-KITECH) of the National Research Council of Science and Technology (NST) of Korea.

Author information




J.Y.K., K.M.K. and Y.-G.L. designed the experiment, which was conducted by J.Y.K., D.O.S. J.O., J.K. and M.J.L. Analysis on the data was performed by J.Y.K., D.O.S., K.M.K. and Y.-G.L. J.Y.K. and S.H.K. prepared the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript and commented for the revision.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ju Young Kim or Young-Gi Lee.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J.Y., Shin, D.O., Kim, K.M. et al. Graphene Oxide Induced Surface Modification for Functional Separators in Lithium Secondary Batteries. Sci Rep 9, 2464 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing