We investigated changes in retinal vascular area and the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) after intravitreal aflibercept in diabetic macular edema (DME) and the association of these changes with visual outcomes. The retinal vascular area in the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and the deep capillary plexus (DCP) and the FAZ area were measured using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in 23 eyes of 23 patients with DME, before and after intravitreal aflibercept. Overall, there was no significant change in retinal vascular area or FAZ. Better BCVA after treatment was significantly associated with larger retinal vascular area in the SCP and the DCP, both at baseline (R2 = 0.512, P < 0.001 and R2 = 0.361, P = 0.002, respectively) and after intravitreal aflibercept (R2 = 0.717, P < 0.001 and R2 = 0.618, P < 0.001, respectively). MAs were observed in the DCP in 20 eyes (87%), but only detected in four eyes (17%) in the SCP before treatment. The number of eyes with MAs in the DCP significantly decreased to 13 (57%) after treatment (P = 0.049). The persistence of DME was associated with persistent MAs (P = 0.019) and less visual gain (P = 0.031) following treatment. Thus, preserving retinal perfusion and the resolution of MAs are associated with better vision and resolution of the DME after intravitreal aflibercept.
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major complication of diabetes and a leading cause of blindness among the working-age population worldwide1. DR is characterized by increased vascular permeability due to the breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier (BRB), or by microaneurysm (MA) formation, capillary nonperfusion, and neovascularization within the retina2,3,4,5. Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a consequence of DR in the macula, defined as retinal thickening resulting from the leakage from retinal capillaries into the retinal tissue6,7. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been shown to play a central role in the pathogenesis of DME. Inhibition of VEGF with anti-VEGF agents such as ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept has been effective in treating macular edema and improving vision in DME7,8,9,10,11. However, the visual outcomes vary in patients with DME11. Previous reports have shown that retinal perfusion evaluated by fluorescein angiography (FA) predicts visual outcomes following anti-VEGF therapy for DME. The visual improvement after treatment correlates with less ischemia and better perfusion in the retina12. Therefore, a detailed evaluation of the influence on retinal perfusion following anti-VEGF therapy is needed, to achieve better long-term visual outcomes in DME. Although FA is the gold-standard for evaluating retinal perfusion, inaccurate microvasculature images due to fluorescein dye leakage and an inability to evaluate the deep capillary plexus (DCP) have limited our understanding of microvascular changes that may occur in response to anti-VEGF therapy in DME13.
Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is a novel imaging modality that is able to rapidly and noninvasively visualize retinal blood flow14,15,16. OCTA can visualize both superficial and deep capillary plexuses without the use of exogenous dyes. Recent studies have validated that OCTA can objectively measure retinal capillary density in both healthy and diseased eyes, including in patients with DR17,18,19,20,21. A potential association of retinal vascular density (VD) with visual acuity in DR has been reported22,23,24. Changes in the VD and the FAZ area following anti-VEGF therapy in DME have also been reported25. However, changes in the microvasculature following anti-VEGF therapy and their association with visual changes have not yet been fully elucidated.
In this study, we assessed the retinal vascular area and the FAZ before and after intravitreal aflibercept injections for DME, and assess the relationship between changes in these measures and visual outcomes.
Thirty eyes who were treated with aflibercept therapy for DME were initially enrolled. Seven eyes were subsequently excluded because of significant auto-segmentation error (5 eyes) and motion artifact (2 eyes). Therefore, 23 eyes met the criteria for data analysis. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. The patient age was 64.3 ± 11.9 (range, 43–84) years. The baseline logMAR BCVA before treatment was 0.28 ± 0.23. The mean time between the initial intravitreal aflibercept injection and OCTA examination after aflibercept was 8.5 ± 5.6 (range: 3–25) months, and patients received an average of 2.6 ± 1.3 (1–8) aflibercept injections. At the time of the OCTA examination, the mean logMAR BCVA significantly improved to 0.15 ± 0.22 (P = 0.003). The central retinal thickness significantly decreased from 484 ± 133 (313–828) μm to 275 ± 62 (190–458) μm after treatment (P < 0.001).
OCTA Findings Before and After Intravitreal Aflibercept
Table 2 shows OCTA findings within a 9 (3 × 3) mm2 area before and after intravitreal aflibercept injections. The mean retinal vascular area and the FAZ did not significantly change before and after intravitreal aflibercept treatment in both the SCP and the DCP (Table 2, Figs 1 and 2). The pre-treatment and post-treatment retinal vascular area in the SCP was 3.82 ± 0.38 (range: 2.84–4.46) and 3.82 ± 0.37 (2.98–4.46), respectively (P = 0.994). The pre-treatment and post-treatment retinal vascular area in the DCP was 3.88 ± 0.55 (2.46–4.66) and 3.90 ± 0.62 (2.07–4.75), respectively (P = 0.842). The pre-treatment and post-treatment FAZ area in the SCP was 0.41 ± 0.20 (0.18–0.69) and 0.48 ± 0.24 (0.17–0.79), respectively (P = 0.112). The pre-treatment and post-treatment FAZ area in the DCP was 0.75 ± 0.34 (0.29–1.67) and 0.71 ± 0.33 (0.36–1.77), respectively (P = 0.192). The presence of MAs in the DCP was observed in 20 eyes (87%) before treatment and 13 eyes (57%) after treatment (P = 0.049).
Association Between Pre-Treatment VA and Retinal Microvasculature
Based on the univariate regression analysis, better BCVA at baseline before intravitreal aflibercept injections was significantly associated with a larger pre-treatment retinal vascular area in the SCP (R2 = 0.294, P = 0.008) and the DCP (R2 = 0.264, P = 0.012) although there was no association with the pre-treatment FAZ area in the SCP and the DCP (R2 = 0.038, P = 0.375 and R2 = 0.092, P = 0.159, respectively). The better retinal vascular area in both SCP and DCP was significantly associated with NPDR but not PDR (R2 = 0.243, P = 0.017 and R2 = 0.179, P = 0.044, respectively) and less macular edema (CRT) before treatment (R2 = 0.253, P = 0.014 and R2 = 0.179, P = 0.044, respectively).
Association Between Post-Treatment VA and Retinal Microvasculature
Better BCVA after intravitreal aflibercept treatment was significantly associated with better pre-treatment logMAR BCVA (R2 = 0.452, P < 0.001), NPDR but not PDR (R2 = 0.394, P = 0.001), better pre-treatment retinal vascular area in the SCP (R2 = 0.512, P < 0.001) and the DCP (R2 = 0.361, P = 0.002), better post-treatment retinal vascular area in the SCP (R2 = 0.717, P < 0.001) and the DCP ((R2 = 0.618, P < 0.001), and the smaller post-treatment FAZ in the DCP (R2 = 0.274, P = 0.010) (Table 3).
Resolution of DME
Resolution of the DME (CRT of 300 µm or less after final intravitreal aflibercept) was observed in 17 eyes (74%), whereas persistence of DME (CRT over 300 µm after final intravitreal aflibercept) was identified in six eyes (26%) (Table 4). The mean CRT was 249 ± 38 µm in resolved DME and 348 ± 61 µm in persistent DME after treatment (P < 0.001). Although most eyes in both groups had MAs in the DCP before treatment (82% in resolved DME versus 100% in persistent DME), the number of eyes with MAs in the DCP were significantly higher in the persistent DME group (100%) than in the resolved DME group (41%) after treatment (P = 0.019) (Fig. 3). The visual gain was significantly worse in the persistent DME group after treatment (P = 0.031).
Our results reveal that both retinal vascular area and the FAZ within the 9 (3 × 3) mm2 area did not significantly differ before and after intravitreal aflibercept treatment in patients with DME. That is, repeated administration of intravitreal aflibercept with a mean of 2.6 injections over the course of 8.5 months maintained the retinal perfusion at the macula in eyes with DME. This result is consistent with previous studies showing no significant change in vessel density and the FAZ area 1 month after anti-VEGF treatment25. Since we could not evaluate potential changes in retinal vascular area and the FAZ in eyes without treatment, it remains unclear whether intravitreal aflibercept has a preventative effect on the progression of macular ischemia. However, the current study suggests that intravitreal aflibercept injections following a PRN regimen may at least not lead to a deterioration of retinal perfusion in most eyes with DME.
Before treatment with intravitreal aflibercept, worse BCVA was significantly associated with less retinal vascular area in the SCP and the DCP. In addition, less retinal vascular area in the SCP and the DCP was significantly correlated with the severity of the DR and the macular edema. High intraocular concentration of VEGF is associated not only with the macular edema but also with the progression of DR, including the progression of ischemia26,27. VEGF overexpression contributes to the increase in permeability as well as to the increase in the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expression in retinal vascular endothelium, and promotes ICAM-1-mediated leukocytes binding to the retinal vasculature, resulting in downstream non-perfusion28,29,30. Therefore, we speculate that macular edema and macular ischemia may thus progress concomitantly in eyes with DME, resulting in visual impairments as shown in the current study. Therefore, early initiation of the anti-VEGF therapy may help the prevention of the concomitant progression of macular edema and capillary ischemia31.
In the current study, BCVA significantly improved after intravitreal aflibercept administration, as expected. Better BCVA after intravitreal aflibercept administration was significantly associated with a larger retinal vascular area in the SCP and the DCP before treatment, indicating that baseline retinal vascular area not only correlates with baseline BCVA but may also be useful to predict visual outcomes after intravitreal aflibercept treatment. In addition, because better BCVA after intravitreal aflibercept treatment was also significantly associated with a larger retinal vascular area in the SCP and the DCP and a smaller FAZ area in the DCP after treatment, the preservation of retinal perfusion after treatment seems to be crucial for better visual outcomes. Therefore, strategies that maintain or increase retinal perfusion are expected to further improve visual outcomes following intravitreal aflibercept administration in eyes with DME.
It has been reported that MAs are seen more frequently in the DCP than in the SCP and are associated with the development of DME17,32,33,34,35. Here, consistent with previous studies, MAs were observed in the DCP in 20 eyes (87%), although they were only detected in four eyes (17%) in the SCP before treatment. The number of eyes with MAs in the DCP significantly decreased to 13 eyes (P = 0.049), indicating that the anti-VEGF therapy resolved the MA formation in some eyes. Because increased VEGF expression has been shown to play a significant role in MA formation by inducing focal endothelial proliferation36, it is reasonable to assume that the inhibition of VEGF may suppress MAs27. However, more than half of the patients had persistent MAs, even after anti-VEGF treatment, that were associated with persistent DME. In our case series, MAs in the DCP were identified in all six eyes with persistent DME, even after repeated aflibercept administration. In contrast, a significantly lower number of eyes (seven of 17 eyes; 41%) had MAs in the DCP in resolved DME (P = 0.019). The visual gain was significantly worse in persistent DME than in resolved DME (P = 0.031). Therefore, we speculate that a smaller effect of VEGF inhibition on MA regression may be responsible for persistent DME and poor visual improvement. Further studies are required to elucidate the differences in MA responses and strategies for the treatment of persistent DME associated with non-resolved MA.
This study has several limitations, including its retrospective design, the variable follow-up period, and a relatively small sample size. We could not evaluate vessel diameter. Furthermore, we only analyzed a limited area (3 × 3 mm2) of retinal microvasculature, which is important for central vision but may not reflect the entire disease process in DME. The inability to fully eliminate autosegmentation errors may also have influenced the measurements of microaneurysms and retinal vascular area especially in the DCP. Therefore, further studies with large number of patients are necessary to validate current results and to improve understanding of microvascular changes before and after intravitreal aflibercept in DME. Nevertheless, the current study reveals that vascular perfusion in both the SCP and the DCP is maintained after intravitreal aflibercept administration, and that preservation of retinal vascular area seems crucial for better visual outcomes. In addition, we identified a significant association between persistent MA formation and persistent DME, responsible for lower visual gain after intravitreal aflibercept treatment. These findings are valuable for our understanding of the changes in microvasculature associated with diabetes and for the improvement of the management of DME.
In conclusion, our study shoewed that the retinal vascular area and the FAZ were maintained after intravitreal aflibercept administration in patients with DME. A larger retinal vascular area and a smaller FAZ area were associated with better visual acuity after treatment. Persistent MAs were associated with persistent DME and poor visual improvement. Further studies are needed to develop strategies to maintain or increase retinal blood flow and resolve MAs, for better long-term visual prognosis in eyes with DME.
This study represents a retrospective consecutive case series. All procedures were in adherence with the tenets of the declaration of Helsinki, and were approved by the institutional review board of Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine (10039). Patients with macular edema secondary to diabetic retinopathy who had been treated with intravitreal aflibercept between December 2014 and February 2016 at the Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Hospital, were enrolled in this study. All patients provided written informed consent before intravitreal aflibercept. Written informed consent was not considered to be necessary by the Ethics Committee to participate in this retrospective study.
OCTA was performed using an AngioVue instrument (Optovue RTVue XR Avanti; Optovue, Inc., Fremont, CA, USA). Automated segmentation using the AngioVue module was performed on the same day as the clinical examination. In each eye, a 3 × 3-mm2 area centered on the fovea was scanned. The retinal vascular area was automatically segmented into four layers: the superficial capillary plexus (SCP), which includes vasculature from the internal limiting membrane to 15 μm beneath the inner plexiform layer; the deep capillary plexus (DCP), which includes vasculature from 15 to 70 μm beneath the inner plexiform layer; the outer retina; and the choroid. We quantitatively assessed the retinal vascular area of the SCP and the DCP in the fovea using the AngioVue instrument. The retinal vascular area was defined as the percentage of the entire area occupied by large vessels and microvasculature in a particular region, and was calculated within the 3 × 3-mm2 scan area in each eye. The FAZ area was also measured within the 3 × 3-mm2 area in the SCP and the DCP. Microaneurysms was defined as a saccular enlargement of the retinal capillaries. The number of microaneurysms in the SCP and the DCP was examined by two masked investigators (CB, AW). In the event of disagreement, a third investigator (TW) was consulted to reach a consensus. OCTA images with poor quality (signal strength index ≤ 50), motion artifacts, or incorrect autosegmentation were excluded from all analyses. The segmentation error with irregularly wavy border was excluded by two masked investigators (CB, AW) and a third investigator (TW) was consulted to derive a final determination in the event of disagreement.
Patients were examined with a Cirrus SD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA, USA) before and after intravitreal aflibercept injections. Central retinal thickness measurements were acquired by measurements within a 1-mm diameter of the fovea.
All patients were examined monthly at the Osaka University hospital and received treatment with intravitreal aflibercept. The patients received one to three initial intravitreal anti-VEGF injections decided by retina specialists, followed by a pro re nata (PRN) regimen with monthly monitoring. Retreatment with intravitreal aflibercept was considered if a patient showed macular edema on SD-OCT imaging with a central retinal thickness (CRT) of more than 300 µm with intraretinal or subretinal exudation.
Data Collection and Statistical Analyses
The following data were collected: ophthalmic history, baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), baseline CRT, baseline OCTA images, post-treatment BCVA, post-treatment CRT, post-treatment OCTA images. Post-treatment examination was conducted at final follow-up visit in each patient. The main outcome measures were post-treatment BCVA and OCTA parameters in the SCP and the DCP. All pre-treatment and post-treatment data were collected on the same day before and after treatment, respectively. For statistical analysis, the BCVA was measured using the Landolt C acuity chart and analyzed on a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) scale. Univariate regression analysis was performed to investigate the associations between logMAR BCVA and OCTA parameters for the vascular area and the FAZ area. All analyses were conducted using SigmaStat software version 3.1 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and JMP Pro Software (SAS Inc., Cary, NC, USA). P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.
Klein, R. et al. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. III. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 or more years. Arch Ophthalmol. 102, 527–532 (1984).
Klein, R. et al. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. IV. Diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 91, 1464–1474 (1984).
Klein, R., Klein, B. E., Moss, S. E. & Cruickshanks, K. J. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy: XV: the long-term incidence of macular edema. Ophthalmology. 102, 7–16 (1995).
Das, A., McGuire, P. G. & Rangasamy, S. Diabetic macular edema: pathophysiology and novel therapeutic targets. Ophthalmology. 122, 1375–1394 (2015).
Aiello, L. P. et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor in ocular fluid of patients with diabetic retinopathy and other retinal disorders. N Engl J Med. 331, 1480–1487 (1994).
Funatsu, H. et al. Vitreous levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 are related to diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 112, 806–816 (2005).
Do, D. V. et al. da Vinci Study Group. One-year outcomes of the da Vinci Study of VEGF Trap-Eye in eyes with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 119, 1658–1665 (2012).
Brown, D. M. et al. Intravitreal Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema: 100-Week Results From the VISTA and VIVID Studies. Ophthalmology. 122, 2044–2052 (2015).
Korobelnik, J. F. et al. Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 121, 2247–2254 (2014).
Nguyen, Q. D. et al. READ-2 Study Group. Two-year outcomes of the ranibizumab for edema of the mAcula in diabetes (READ-2) study. Ophthalmology. 117, 2146–2151 (2010).
Wells, J. A. et al. Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema: Two-Year Results from a Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Clinical Trial. Ophthalmology. 123, 1351–1359 (2016).
Chung, E. J., Roh, M. I., Kwon, O. W. & Koh, H. J. Effects of macular ischemia on the outcome of intravitreal bevacizumab therapy for diabetic macular edema. Retina. 28, 957–963 (2008).
Spaide, R. F., Klancnik, J. M. Jr. & Cooney, M. J. Retinal vascular layers imaged by fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography angiography. JAMA Ophthalmol. 133, 45–50 (2015).
Kim, D. Y. et al. Optical imaging of the chorioretinal vasculature in the living human eye. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 14354–14359 (2013).
Schwartz, D. M. et al. Phase-variance optical coherence tomography: a technique for noninvasive angiography. Ophthalmology. 121, 180–187 (2014).
Jia, Y. et al. Quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography of vascular abnormalities in the living human eye. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112, E2395–402 (2015).
Ishibazawa, A. et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic retinopathy: a prospective pilot study. Am J Ophthalmol. 160, 35–44 (2015).
Hwang, T. S. et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography features of diabetic retinopathy. Retina. 35, 2371–2376 (2015).
Hwang, T. S. et al. Automated quantification of capillary nonperfusion using optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 134, 367–373 (2016).
Salz, D. A. et al. Select Features of Diabetic Retinopathy on Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomographic Angiography Compared With Fluorescein Angiography and Normal Eyes. JAMA Ophthalmol. 134, 644–650 (2016).
Miwa, Y. et al. Relationship between functional and structural changes in diabetic vessels in optical coherence tomography angiography. Sci Rep. 6, 29064, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29064 (2016).
Balaratnasingam, C. et al. Visual Acuity Is Correlated with the Area of the Foveal Avascular Zone in Diabetic Retinopathy and Retinal Vein Occlusion. Ophthalmology. 123, 2352–2367 (2016).
Samara, W. A. et al. Quantification of Diabetic Macular Ischemia Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Its Relationship with Visual Acuity. Ophthalmology. 124, 235–244 (2017).
Durbin, M. K. et al. Quantification of Retinal Microvascular Density in Optical Coherence Tomographic Angiography Images in Diabetic Retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 135, 370–376 (2017).
Ghasemi Falavarjani, K. et al. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Analysis of the Foveal Avascular Zone and Macular Vessel Density After Anti-VEGF Therapy in Eyes With Diabetic Macular Edema and Retinal Vein Occlusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 58, 30–34 (2017).
Campochiaro, P. A., Wykoff, C. C., Shapiro, H., Rubio, R. G. & Ehrlich, J. S. Neutralization of vascular endothelial growth factor slows progression of retinal nonperfusion in patients with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 121, 1783–1789 (2014).
Ip, M. S., Domalpally, A., Hopkins, J. J., Wong, P. & Ehrlich, J. S. Long-term effects of ranibizumab on diabetic retinopathy severity and progression. Arch Ophthalmol. 130, 1145–1152 (2012).
Miyamoto, K. et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-induced retinal vascular permeability is mediated by intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). Am J Pathol. 156, 1733–1739 (2000).
Joussen, A. M. et al. Retinal vascular endothelial growth factor induces intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression and initiates early diabetic retinal leukocyte adhesion in vivo. Am J Pathol. 160, 501–509 (2002).
Ishida, S. et al. Leukocytes mediate retinal vascular remodeling during development and vaso-obliteration in disease. Nat Med. 9, 781–788 (2003).
Ip, M. S., Domalpally, A., Sun, J. K. & Ehrlich, J. S. Long-term effects of therapy with ranibizumab on diabetic retinopathy severity and baseline risk factors for worsening retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 122, 367–374 (2015).
Bonnin, S. et al. New insight into the macular deep vascular plexus imaged by optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina. 35, 2347–2352 (2015).
Couturier, A. et al. Capillary plexus anomalies in diabetic retinopathy on optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina. 35, 2384–2391 (2015).
Moore, J., Bagley, S., Ireland, G., McLeod, D. & Boulton, M. E. Three dimensional analysis of microaneurysms in the human diabetic retina. J Anat. 194, 89–100 (1999).
Lee, J., Moon, B. G., Cho, A. R. & Yoon, Y. H. Optical coherence tomography angiography of DME and its association with anti-VEGF treatment response. Ophthalmology. 123, 2368–2375 (2016).
Tolentino, M. J. et al. Intravitreous injections of vascular endothelial growth factor produce retinal ischemia and microangiopathy in an adult primate. Ophthalmology. 103, 1820–1828 (1996).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Busch, C., Wakabayashi, T., Sato, T. et al. Retinal Microvasculature and Visual Acuity after Intravitreal Aflibercept in Diabetic Macular Edema: An Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Study. Sci Rep 9, 1561 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38248-1
Macular vessel density in diabetes and diabetic retinopathy with swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (2020)
Decrease in the number of microaneurysms in diabetic macular edema after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy: implications for indocyanine green angiography-guided detection of refractory microaneurysms
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (2020)
OCT Angiography Study of the Macula in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Intravitreal Aflibercept
Ocular Immunology and Inflammation (2020)
Profile of non-responder and late responder patients treated for diabetic macular edema: systemic and ocular factors
Acta Diabetologica (2020)
Recent Advances of Computerized Graphical Methods for the Detection and Progress Assessment of Visual Distortion Caused by Macular Disorders