The flagellin of candidate live biotherapeutic Enterococcus gallinarum MRx0518 is a potent immunostimulant

Article metrics

Abstract

Many links between gut microbiota and disease development have been established in recent years, with particular bacterial strains emerging as potential therapeutics rather than causative agents. In this study we describe the immunostimulatory properties of Enterococcus gallinarum MRx0518, a candidate live biotherapeutic with proven anti-tumorigenic efficacy. Here we demonstrate that strain MRx0518 elicits a strong pro-inflammatory response in key components of the innate immune system but also in intestinal epithelial cells. Using a flagellin knock-out derivative and purified recombinant protein, MRx0518 flagellin was shown to be a TLR5 and NF-κB activator in reporter cells and an inducer of IL-8 production by HT29-MTX cells. E. gallinarum flagellin proteins display a high level of sequence diversity and the flagellin produced by MRx0518 was shown to be more potent than flagellin from E. gallinarum DSM100110. Collectively, these data infer that flagellin may play a role in the therapeutic properties of E. gallinarum MRx0518.

Introduction

Enterococcus gallinarum is a commensal Gram-positive species that sits within the Enterococcus casseliflavus clade of the Enterococcus 16 S rRNA phylogenic tree1,2. E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus species are closely related, sharing over 99.8% nucleotide identity between their 16S rRNA genes3. E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus are the only enterococcal species that are described as motile4,5 and unlike other members of the Enterococcus genus, they are infrequently linked with nosocomial infections6,7.

In recent years, the role of the intestinal microbiota in cancer has received increasing attention because of its importance for immunotherapy efficacy (see review by Kroemer et al.8). Species in the Enterococcus genus have been identified as having potential uses in the growing field of oncobiotics9,10. Specifically, Enterococcus hirae has been shown to enhance cyclophosphamide efficacy by stimulating an anti-tumorigenic adaptive immune response following translocation to secondary lymphoid organs9. Routy et al. have also shown that E. gallinarum and several other enterococcal species were relatively overly abundant in patients who responded to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)11. We have recently demonstrated that E. gallinarum MRx0518, a commensal strain that was isolated from a healthy human gut produces robust anti-tumorigenic effects after prophylactic oral dosing in murine models of breast, lung and renal carcinomas12.

Flagellin from certain bacterial species are considered to be immunostimulatory and have also been exploited for their anti-tumorigenic and radioprotective potential (recently reviewed by Hajam et al.13). A Vibrio vulnificus flagellin expressed in an attenuated strain of Salmonella Typhimurium demonstrated tumour suppressive effects and decreased metastasis in murine models of orthotropic human colon cancer, when delivered intravenously14. Additionally, a Salmonella enterica flagellin derivative (CBLB502), is under investigation for the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumours15. Subcutaneous injection of this flagellin protein reduced tumour growth in a murine model of T-cell lymphoma through induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines and activation of cytotoxic lymphocytes16.

Flagellin is a well-studied microbe-associated molecular pattern that is recognized by the transmembrane Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5), which regulates the induction of downstream adaptive immune responses. TLR5 is expressed on the surface of a range of host cells including epithelial cells, endothelial cells, macrophages, dendritic cells (DCs) and T cells17,18,19. As a member of the TLR family, TLR5 forms an important link between the innate and adaptive immune systems and plays a role in the maintenance of gut homeostasis. TLR5 interacts with the extracellular monomeric form of bacterial flagellin of both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, leading to activation of the NF-κB signalling pathway via the adaptor protein MyD88 and the serine kinase IRAK20,21,22. This can lead to systemic immune responses, stimulating the production of pro-inflammatory mediators including TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12 and IL-23. A study by Cai et al. has shown that expression and activation of TLR5-associated pathways were elevated in breast carcinomas23. Furthermore, they demonstrated that flagellin activation of TLR5 in that context resulted in the local release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and anti-tumorigenic effects23.

Historically, flagellin has been studied as a virulence-associated trait but is also recognized as a host colonisation factor. Bacterial flagellin is characterised by highly conserved N- and C-terminal domains (D0 and D1 domains) which have been shown to interact directly with TLR521,24. The hypervariable central region of flagellin (D2 and D3 domains) varies in size and structural organisation between species, and constitutes the main antigenic region of the protein24,25. Antigenic variation is thought to be one mechanism by which strains evolve to evade the host immune system26. Serologically distinct flagellins have been identified within bacterial species and have been used to track and type isolates27,28.

Herein, we characterised the immunostimulatory potential of E. gallinarum MRx0518, a human commensal bacterium with demonstrated anti-tumorigenic properties12. This is the first study to examine the role of E. gallinarum flagellin as potential immunogens in the human gut. This work provides insights into the molecular effectors through which strain MRx0518 elicits an immunostimulatory response in human intestinal epithelial cells (IECs), macrophages and DCs and potentially exerts its anti-tumorigenic activity in vivo.

Results

Enterococcus gallinarum MRx0518 induces a strong immunostimulatory response in vitro

To perform an initial assessment of the immunostimulatory potential of E. gallinarum MRx0518, we measured the cytokine responses of two key innate immune cell types, THP-1-derived macrophages and monocyte-derived DCs, after stimulation with live MRx0518 cells (Fig. 1). We assessed a panel of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines involved in innate immunity and recruitment and activation of adaptive immune cells (IL-8, TNFα, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-23 and IL-1β). Both macrophages (Fig. 1A) and DCs (Fig. 1B) when unstimulated showed little to no production of the cytokines tested. As expected, a broadly consistent inflammatory profile was observed in both cell types in response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which was used as a pro-inflammatory response control (Fig. 1A,B). However, while LPS induced production of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-8 and TNFα in both macrophages and DCs, LPS-mediated expression of IL-12p70 and IL-1β was lower in DCs in comparison to macrophages (Fig. 1A,B). Compared to LPS, the cytokine production profiles were more consistent across the two cell types following E. gallinarum MRx0518 treatment (Fig. 1A,B). Both LPS and MRx0518 significantly induced IL-8 production in macrophages and DCs (p < 0.0001). MRx0518 also induced production of all other pro-inflammatory cytokines tested in both cell types. Significantly higher levels of TNFα (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01), IL-6 (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001) IL-12p70 (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001) and IL-23 (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05) in comparison to untreated cells were observed in macrophages and DCs. IL-1β production was also induced by MRx0518 stimulation in both cells types but only reached statistical significance in macrophages (p < 0.05). In addition to up-regulating the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, MRx0518 treatment also induced a significant increase in IL-10 levels in comparison to LPS-treated and untreated cells. Of note, the variation observed in cytokine production by DCs (Fig. 1B) is most likely attributable to inherent donor heterogeneity. Overall, the data indicate that strain MRx0518 has a clear and potent immunostimulatory effect on host immune cells by inducing the production of a range of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines associated with both innate and adaptive immunity.

Figure 1
figure1

Cytokine production by THP-1-derived macrophages and monocyte-derived dendritic cells in response to E. gallinarum MRx0518. IL-8, TNFα, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-23, IL-1β concentrations (pg/ml) in (A) THP-1-derived macrophages and (B) monocyte-derived DCs cell-free supernatants after 1 h contact with E. gallinarum MRx0518 (MRx0518LV). A multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10:1 was employed for both stimulation assays. A MOI of 1:1 was employed for IL-8 detection in macrophages, due to saturation of the assays at the MOI of 10:1. The effect of LPS on cytokines production is also shown as a positive control. The graphs represent an average of at least three biological replicates. Statistical comparisons were performed with GraphPad Prism (La Jolla, CA, USA) using ordinary one-way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests. Statistically significant differences with the untreated control are shown on the graphs as *(p < 0.05), **(p < 0.01), ***(p < 0.001) and ****(p < 0.0001).

E. gallinarum MRx0518 treatment affects gene expression in human intestinal epithelial cells

IECs represent one of the primary points of contact between commensal bacteria and the host in the gut. A Transwell® co-culture system was employed to assess the transcriptional response of the mucin-secreting cell line HT29-MTX to treatment with MRx0518, using a Human Transcriptome Microarray (Fig. 2). Treatments with metabolically active cells (MRx0518LV), inactivated cells (MRx0518HK) or culture supernatants (MRx0518SN) were found to induce distinct host responses. Treatment with MRx0518SN elicited the largest number of differentially expressed genes, inducing upregulation of 275 genes, 228 of which were not upregulated by other MRx0518 treatments (Supplementary Table S1). MRx0518LV and MRx0518HK induced the upregulation of 106 and 63 genes respectively that were not upregulated in MRx0518SN-treated cells. Similarly, the MRx0518SN also induced the downregulation of the largest number of genes in IECs (Fig. 2). Only 14 upregulated genes and one downregulated gene were common to all treatment groups (Supplementary Table S1). MRx0518HK cells had the least impact on IEC transcription levels (Fig. 2). Despite MRx0518SN treatment inducing the largest number of differentially expressed genes in IECs, pathway enrichment analysis of the transcriptomic data indicated that MRx0518LV had the largest impact on physiological pathways, with over-representation of pathways involved in innate inflammatory responses, interferon signalling and apoptosis (Supplementary Fig. S1). Of particular interest was the upregulation of CCL20 (~20-fold) and CXCL8 (~5-fold) in MRx0518LV- and MRx0518SN-treated cells, both of which play a role in immune cell recruitment (Table 1). NFKBIA and TNFAIP3, genes involved in regulating NF-κB signalling, were also significantly upregulated in MRx0518LV-treated cells. ICAM1 was significantly upregulated in MRx0518LV-treated cells, but not in MRx0518SN-treated cells (Table 1). HT29-MTX cells demonstrated modest upregulation of CXCL1 expression (2.41-fold) in response to MRx0518LV, which was not observed with other treatments.

Figure 2
figure2

Transcriptomic analysis of the response of HT29-MTX cells to E. gallinarum MRx0518 treatments. Venn diagrams showing (A) up- and (B) down-regulated genes in HT29-MTX cells after 3 h contact with MRx0518 live (MRx0518LV), heat-killed (MRx0518HK) and culture supernatant (MRx0518SN) (MOI 100:1 or equivalent). Each treatment was compared to its respective control (cell culture media or YCFA). Diagrams were generated with InteractiVenn62.

Table 1 Immunomodulatory genes selected for further analysis. Genes were filtered based on a fold change ≥ 1.5, p < 0.05, coding transcripts only and the presence of a gene symbol. n.s.: not significant. 

A protein in MRx0518 culture supernatant activates NF-κB and TLR5 reporter cells

The immunostimulatory response observed in macrophages, DCs and IECs following stimulation with MRx0518 appears to be exerted, in part, through NF-κB signalling. In order to confirm activation of this signalling pathway, we examined the effect of MRx0518 treatments (MRx0518LV, MRx0518HK and MRx0518SN) on NF-κB and TLR5 reporter cell lines (Fig. 3). NF-κB activation was assessed by measuring the expression of the secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) reporter gene. MRx0518LV did not activate NF-κB reporter cells but activated TLR5 reporter cells (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3A,B). The lack of SEAP detection in NF-κB reporter cells is likely due to the growth of MRx0518 in the cell culture media during the 22 h incubation which possibly impacted the viability of the reporter cells rather than genuine absence of signalling activation. MRx0518HK induced a strong response in the TLR5 reporter cells, which was slightly higher than that observed in the NF-κB reporter cells (p < 0.0001 for both cell lines in comparison to untreated cells) (Fig. 3A,B). Both reporter cell lines were activated by MRx0518SN, to the same extent as their respective positive controls (Fig. 3A,B). Overall, MRx0518SN was the most potent stimulant of both NF-κB and TLR5. These results, combined with the transcriptional response of HT29-MTX cells to MRx0518SN, prompted us to investigate the active component in this fraction. In an effort to identify the nature of molecules responsible for the observed host response, we treated MRx0518SN with a range of enzymes (i.e. DNase, proteases and apyrase). Trypsin treatment had the greatest effect on activation of NF-κB and TLR5 reporter cells, while other enzymatic treatments had smaller effects (data not shown). TLR5 activation was completely abolished by trypsin treatment, whereas low but detectable activation remained in the NF-κB reporter cells (p < 0.0001 when compared to MRx0518SN) (Fig. 3C,D). These assays established that a molecule of proteinaceous nature was present in MRx0518SN which was most likely responsible for TLR5-mediated NF-κB activation. However, residual NF-κB activation (Fig. 3C) also suggested that other molecules in MRx0518SN that are not affected by trypsin digestion may contribute to NF-κB signalling. Flagellin is the only known TLR5 ligand, and both expression profiling and phenotypic observations indicated that MRx0518 expresses flagellin in its late log growth phase and is motile under in vitro conditions (Supplementary Fig. S2). NanoLC-MS/MS analysis confirmed the presence of flagellin in high abundance in MRx0518SN (Supplementary Table S2), strongly suggesting that flagellin was the molecule responsible for the observed NF-κB activation in the reporter assays.

Figure 3
figure3

Activation of NF-κB and TLR5 pathway by E. gallinarum MRx0518 treatments. NF-κB (A) and TLR5 (B) activation after 22 h incubation with E. gallinarum MRx0518 (MRx0518LV), heat-killed MRx0518 (MRx0518HK) and culture supernatant (MRx0518SN) in HEK-Blue™ hTLR5 and THP1-Blue™ NF-kB reporter cell lines. A MOI of 10:1 was used with MRx0518LV and a 100:1 MOI equivalent was used with MRx0518HK and MRx0518SN. Heat-killed Listeria monocytogenes (HKLM) and Salmonella Typhimurium flagellin (FLA-ST) were used as positive controls for each cell line and YCFA was included as a negative control for MRx0518SN. NF-κB (C) and TLR5 (D) activation after 22 h incubation with E. gallinarum MRx0518 culture supernatant (MRx0518SN) and trypsin-treated supernatant (MRx0518Trypsin) (MOI 100:1 equivalent). Each graph represents an average of at least three biological replicates. Statistical comparisons were performed with GraphPad Prism using ordinary one-way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey’s (A,B), Dunnett’s (C) or Sidak’s (D) multiple comparison tests. Statistically significant differences with the relevant control are shown on the graphs as ****(p < 0.0001).

Flagellin is responsible for the activation of NF-κB and TLR5 reporter cells

An insertion mutation in the flagellin gene (fliC) in E. gallinarum MRx0518 (strain MRx0518 fliC::pORI19) was generated. Genetic manipulations in E. gallinarum had not been described in the literature prior to this study, it was therefore necessary to develop a transformation protocol for strain MRx0518. Electrocompetent cells were successfully generated by growing bacterial cultures in sub-inhibitory concentrations of glycine29 followed by mutanolysin and lysozyme treatments to further weaken the cell wall peptidoglycan layer (see Material and Methods for details). The fliC gene was disrupted by homology-driven insertion of the suicide plasmid pORI1930. Insertion of pORI19 within the fliC gene was confirmed by DNA sequencing and the non-motile phenotype of the resulting mutant strain was confirmed in vitro (Supplementary Fig. S2). Both MRx0518SN and MRx0518 fliC::pORI19 culture supernatant (fliCSN) were tested in the NF-κB and TLR5 reporter assays along with culture supernatant from an additional E. gallinarum strain, DSM100110 (DSM100110SN) (Fig. 4A,B). Strain DSM100110 is a murine isolate which was chosen for its highly-motile phenotype in vitro (Supplementary Fig. S2). A significant reduction of NF-κB activation (approximately 75% compared to MRx0518SN) was observed for fliCSN-treated NF-κB reporter cells (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 4A). The presence of additional stimulatory molecules in fliCSN may have contributed to the observed residual activation of NF-κB signalling, as previously noted for trypsinized-MRx0518SN (Fig. 3C). Inactivation of the flagellin gene completely abolished TLR5 activation (no observable difference with the YCFA culture medium control) and was significantly reduced in comparison to MRx0518SN (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 4B). Interestingly DSM100110SN induced very little activation of the TLR5 reporter cells (not statistically significant when compared to YCFA). Analysis by nanoLC-MS/MS of the protein content of DSM100110SN revealed the absence of flagellin (data not shown), which explains the observed lack of TLR5 activation elicited by this strain (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4
figure4

Flagellin plays a role in E. gallinarum MRx0518 immunostimulatory effect. NF-κB (A) and TLR5 (B) reporter assays with MRx0518 (MRx0518SN), MRx0518 fliC::pORI19 (fliCSN) and DSM100110 (DSM100110SN) culture supernatants (MOI 100:1 equivalent). NF-κB (C) and TLR5 (D) reporter assays with a range of concentrations of E. gallinarum MRx0518 and DSM100110 purified recombinant flagellins (FliCMRx0518 and FliCDSM100110). The ‘Control’ bar corresponds to the empty vector control. Each graph represents an average of at least three biological replicates. Reporter cells were incubated with treatments for 22 h. Statistical comparisons were performed with GraphPad Prism using ordinary one-way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey’s (A,B) or Sidak’s (C,D) multiple comparison tests. Statistically significant differences with the relevant control are shown on the graphs as *(p < 0.05), ***(p < 0.001) and ****(p < 0.0001).

The lack of flagellin in DSM100110SN limited our ability to determine the immunogenic potential of its flagellin in supernatant-stimulation assays. Flagellins from strains MRx0518 and DSM100110 were therefore overexpressed and purified as N-terminally his-tagged recombinant proteins (Supplementary Fig. S3) and used to perform a dose-response assay. Both recombinant flagellins were capable of activating NF-κB and TLR5 reporter cells (Fig. 4C,D). Lower protein concentrations stimulated a strong response in TLR5 reporter cells in comparison to the NF-κB reporter cells. This was perhaps unsurprising as flagellin is known to interact directly with TLR520 and this TLR5 reporter cell line is expected to be 20–100 fold more responsive than cell lines that express basal levels of TLR5, as indicated by the manufacturer. Purified FliCMRx0518 showed comparable levels of activation to MRx0518SN in both reporter cell lines, with saturation levels dropping at concentrations less than 1 ng/ml. FliCDSM100110 was weakly active in the NF-κB reporter assay at the concentrations tested (Fig. 4C). At concentrations greater than 5 ng/ml, both recombinant proteins induced comparable responses in TLR5 reporter cells, which were not significantly different (Fig. 4D). However, at lower concentrations FliCMRx0518 was significantly more stimulatory than FliCDSM100110 at equivalent concentrations (p < 0.0001 for tests at 0.2 and 1 ng/ml and p < 0.05 for 0.04 ng/ml). The same trend was observed in the NF-κB reporter cells (p < 0.0001 for 0.8, 4 and 20 ng/ml).

FliCMRx0518 and FliCDSM100110 display sequence divergence and reside in distinct clusters of a FliC phylogenetic tree

FliCMRx0518 displayed a higher capacity to stimulate both TLR5 and NF-κB than FliCDSM100110 at low concentrations. This prompted the further examination of the flagellar loci and particularly the FliC protein sequences of both strains. Organisationally-conserved 40-kb motility loci were identified in the genome sequences of strains MRx0518 and DSM100110, both of which encode 47 contiguous genes (Fig. 5). Gene organisation was similar to that of other motile enterococci4 and both strains share 69.3% nucleotide (nt) identity (ID) over the length of the operon. Indels are present between the two loci, which result in changes to the start and stop sites of a number of homologous genes but are not predicted to result in the formation of pseudogenes. Each strain encodes a single FliC protein which are 360 amino acid (aa) and 361 aa long in MRx0518 and DSM100110 respectively and share 77.2% aa identity (Fig. S4 and Supplementary Dataset S1). Modelling of the structure of FliCMRx0518 revealed the presence of three domains (Fig. S4), as predicted using the Phyre2 server31 (data not shown).

Figure 5
figure5

Sequence alignment of the flagellar loci of E. gallinarum MRx0518 and E. gallinarum DSM100110. A linear comparison of the BLASTN matches between the flagellar loci of of E. gallinarum strains MRx0518 and DSM100110. Vertical grey-coloured blocks between sequences indicate regions of shared nucleotide ID. The gradient of the grey colour corresponds to the percentage of shared nt ID. The genes in each element are coloured according to their function, as follows: blue (biosynthesis), green (chemotaxis), grey (other function) and yellow (hypothetical proteins).

Phylogenetic analyses indicated that the FliC proteins of E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus branch closely to the FliC proteins of motile lactobacilli (Supplementary Fig. S5, Supplementary Dataset S1)32,33. In order to assess the level of diversity within the flagellin of these closely related species, the FliC sequences of 15 E. gallinarum and 3 E. casseliflavus strains derived from the 4D Pharma plc and DSMZ culture collections (Supplementary Table S3), together with those available in public databases (11 E. gallinarum and 27 E. casseliflavus), were assessed by comparative analyses. The FliC proteins of E. gallinarum varied in length from 352 aa to 361 aa, while the E. casseliflavus FliC proteins varied between 357 aa and 361 aa. Between 75.82% and 100% aa ID was observed among the examined proteins, with several E. gallinarum FliC proteins displaying higher levels of sequence homology to E. casseliflavus FliC, than to each other (Supplementary Fig. S4, Supplementary Dataset S1). The highest level of sequence divergence both within and between the E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus FliC proteins was observed in the D2 region whereas the D0 and D1 regions were more highly conserved (Fig. S4). The regions known to be critical for TLR5 interaction in other bacterial species21,34 were found to be conserved (residues 87–96) in all strains examined. Three distinct clusters were present within the FliC-based Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic tree shown in Fig. 6, with two well-supported E. gallinarum clusters evident (E. gallinarum_1 and E. gallinarum_2) and the majority of E. casseliflavus strains grouping together. Interestingly, strains MRx0518 and DSM100110 were resident in distinct clusters, each of which broadly represent their sources of isolation (Fig. 6).

Figure 6
figure6

Phylogenetic analysis of the FliC protein of E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus. The FliC sequences of selected strains (Supplementary Table S3) were aligned with MUSCLE59. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the maximum likelihood method based on the Le_Gascuel_2008 model61, using MEGA7 software60. Statistical support (above 60%) was estimated with bootstraps and is indicated at branch nodes. Well-defined clades are indicated. The type strain Lactobacillus mali DSM20444 was used as an outgroup for analyses. The origins of strains are indicated where the information was available on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).

Inactivation of the flagellin gene abolishes MRx0518 immunogenic effects in IECs

In order to confirm the involvement of flagellin in the observed immunostimulatory effects of strain MRx0518, the impact of MRx0518SN and fliCSN together with FliCMRx0518 recombinant flagellin on gene expression and cytokine production levels in IECs were tested. The changes in IEC gene expression following stimulation with MRx0518SN, fliCSN and FliCMRx0518 were investigated using a targeted panel of qPCR primers, designed based on the transcriptional profiles of IECs in response to the MRx0518 treatments described above (Table 1, Fig. 7A). The expression of NFKBIA was unchanged, despite a slight upregulation being observed in the microarray-derived data (1.61-fold). MRx0518SN significantly induced the expression of the CCL20 and CXCL8 genes (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.05 respectively compared to the YCFA treatment) (Fig. 7A), which was consistent with the upregulation previously observed. fliCSN had no effect on expression levels of the five genes tested. Co-culture of HT29-MTX cells with fliCSN did not induce the stimulatory response observed with MRx0518SN which strongly supports the role of flagellin as a major effector of MRx0518 immunogenicity. This was further confirmed by co-culturing HT29-MTX cells with recombinant MRx0518 flagellin. The addition of FliCMRx0518 led to a significant (p < 0.05) upregulation in the expression of all five genes in the panel, with fold changes higher than those observed with MRx0518SN (Fig. 7A). The levels of IL-8 secreted by HT29-MTX cells stimulated with MRx0518SN, fliCSN, DSM100110SN and FliCMRx0518 was measured in cell-free supernatants following 24 h co-culture (Fig. 7B). MRx0518SN induced a significant release of IL-8 in IECs in comparison to cells treated with YCFA (p < 0.0001). The inactivation of the flagellin gene in the MRx0518 strain reduced IL-8 secretion to levels comparable to those observed with YCFA. Treatment of cells with recombinant flagellin strongly stimulated IL-8 secretion in comparison to the untreated and YCFA groups (p < 0.0001) but also in comparison to cells treated with MRx0518SN (p < 0.001). In contrast, DSM100110SN had no observable impact on IL-8 stimulation (Fig. 7B).

Figure 7
figure7

Inactivation of the flagellin gene in E. gallinarum MRx0518 abolishes its immunostimulatory profile. (A) Changes in gene expression in HT29-MTX after 24 h co-culture with MRx0518 and MRx0518 fliC::pORI19 culture supernatants (MRx0518SN and fliCSN) (MOI 100:1 equivalent) and 1 µg/ml purified MRx0518 recombinant flagellin (FliCMRx0518), measured by qPCR (fold change compared to the YCFA or the empty vector control, as appropriate). Statistical comparisons were performed with GraphPad Prism on ΔCT values using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests. Statistically significant differences in comparison to the YCFA or empty vector control group as appropriate are shown on the graph as *(p < 0.05), **(p < 0.01) and ****(p < 0.0001). (B) IL-8 concentrations (pg/ml) detected by ELISA assay in HT29-MTX cell-free supernatant after 24 h co-culture with MRx0518 (MRx0518SN), MRx0518 fliC::pORI19 (fliCSN) and DSM100110 (DSM100110SN) culture supernatants (MOI 100:1 equivalent), and 1 µg/ml purified MRx0518 recombinant flagellin (FliCMRx0518). YCFA was included as a negative control. Statistical comparisons were performed with GraphPad Prism using an ordinary one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Statistically significant differences with the relevant control are shown on the graphs as ***(p < 0.001) and ****(p < 0.0001).

Discussion

Enterococcus gallinarum MRx0518 is a candidate live biotherapeutic, isolated from a healthy human faecal sample. Oral delivery of this strain has demonstrated anti-tumour efficacy in murine models of breast, lung and renal carcinomas12. Only a limited number of studies have characterised strains of this species in any detail, and fewer still that have examined the interactions of E. gallinarum strains with the immune system35,36. To begin to understand how strain MRx0518 interacts with the host, we examined its effect upon IECs, macrophages and DCs, host cells which have distinct roles in the innate immune response. DCs are capable of priming T cells at distal sites and stimulating a homing response to drive T cell accumulation to sites of inflammation. Macrophages tend to act locally to maintain homeostasis and can induce secondary activation of T cells. Both cell types come into direct contact with luminal bacteria in the gut but can also play a role in anti-tumour immunity at distal tumour sites. MRx0518LV elicited a strong and consistent pro-inflammatory signature in both macrophages and DCs, at levels similar to or higher than those elicited by the control inflammatory stimulant LPS. MRx0518LV significantly elevated levels of TNFα, a known regulator of IL-6 and IL-8 production, in both DCs and macrophages. Similarly, a study by van den Bogert and colleagues found that E. gallinarum HSIEG1 is also capable of inducing cytokine secretion in vitro35. IL-10, a cytokine well-described for its anti-inflammatory and tolerogenic effects, was also induced by MRx0518LV treatment and can actively suppress the expression of IL-6, IL-12, IL-1β and TNFα. Given the elevation of both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in response to MRx0518 treatment, it is noteworthy that IL-10 and IL-6 are reciprocal cytokines, both utilising the activity of transcription factor STAT3 to alter cellular responses with broadly opposing effects37. IL-10 is not a pan-inhibitory cytokine of inflammatory responses; it is known to activate and increase CD8α cytotoxic capacity which may be significant for anti-tumour responses38,39.

High levels of IL-8 production were observed in macrophages and DCs in response to MRx0518LV exposure. Additionally, MRx0518LV, MRx0518SN and purified flagellin all induced expression of CCL20 and CXCL8 in HT29-MTX cells; the products of which are implicated in the recruitment of immune cells and the subsequent activation of the adaptive branch of the immune system. Similarly, Salmonella-derived flagellin has been shown to stimulate expression of the CCL20 gene in Caco-2 cells40 and E. coli flagellin has been shown to induce secretion of IL-8 and CCL20 in HT29–19A and Caco-2 cells41.

Flagellin is a potent immunostimulant which acts through TLR5 and has been exploited in recent years for its capacity as a vaccine adjuvant and its anti-tumorigenic efficacy13. Purified MRx0518 flagellin showed significant activation of TLR5 in reporter cells and proved more potent than DSM100110 flagellin at equivalent nanomolar concentrations. Given the body of work that is emerging regarding the role of TLRs and their associated ligands in anti-cancer therapies, the potential contribution of flagellin to MRx0518 anti-tumour activity warrants further investigation. The administration of S. Typhimurium flagellin has been shown to reduce tumour growth and cell proliferation in colon and breast cancer cells23,42. An elegant study by Cai et al. demonstrated that 80% of breast carcinoma tissues tested were found to be positive for TLR5 expression and that TLR5-signalling was also upregulated in breast carcinomas23. They concluded that flagellin-mediated TLR5 activation is involved in modulation of the tumour microenvironment and mediates its anti-tumorigenic effect through pro-inflammatory cytokine induction. A flagellin from V. vulnificus expressed in an attenuated strain of S. Typhimurium was shown to be effective in tumour growth reduction in several murine cancer models when delivered intravenously14. Interestingly, Zheng et al. showed that Salmonella and flagellin demonstrate complementarity to recruit and activate immune cells, through colonization of the tumour site and interaction with TLR5 respectively14.

Activation of TLRs on the surface of tumours may require transport or delivery of flagellin to distal tumour sites which could be achieved through translocation of the bacteria or their components from the gut. Manfredo-Viera et al. recently demonstrated that E. gallinarum was able to translocate from the murine gut to induce an autoimmune response in immunocompromised mice36. Translocation of another enterococcal species E. hirae to secondary lymphoid organs has been shown to enhance efficacy of a chemotherapeutic agent9. Additionally, E. gallinarum was found to be overly abundant in patients who responded to treatment with anti-PD111, suggesting a potential role for this species in patient responsiveness to ICI treatments. Studies are currently ongoing to investigate the ability of MRx0518 to translocate from the gut to extra-intestinal sites. Testing the translocation potential of MRx0518-derivatives, including flagellin, is also underway using FliCMRx0518-directed antibodies.

Inter- and intra-species comparative analysis of the FliC proteins of E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus indicate that the D0 and D1 domains are highly conserved while the majority of variability lies within the D2 domains, as observed for flagellin of other species25. The sequence divergence displayed in the FliC sequence in E. gallinarum is comparable with that of C. difficile43 and E. coli44 and is less than that reported for P. aeruginosa45 and B. thuringiensis46. Antigenic variation in the FliC sequence may contribute to differences in immunogenic potential of E. gallinarum strains. However, it is yet to be determined to what extent the variance observed in the D2 domains of FliCMRx0518 and FliCDSM100110 contributes to the immunogenic profiles of these strains.

Inactivation of flagellin in MRx0518 resulted in complete abrogation of TLR5-mediated activation of NF-κB. However, some residual activity remained in the NF-κB reporter cells when treated with fliCSN. This suggests the involvement of additional or complementary bacterial effectors present in culture supernatants. Of particular interest was the identification of enolase as the most abundant protein in the MRx0518SN (Supplementary Table S2) as enolase has been shown to play a role in host-interactions in lactic acid bacteria, through plasminogen binding47. Small molecules such as ATP and CpG DNA, can act synergistically with flagellin to trigger host immune responses48,49,50. The potential contribution of these molecules to the observed immunogenic effects of MRx0518 warrants further investigation.

Taken together, these data demonstrate that E. gallinarum MRx0518, and more specifically its flagellin, is a strong immunostimulant of both immune and intestinal epithelial cells. Importantly FliCMRx0518 displays higher potency than FliCDSM100110. The extent of the activity of MRx0518 flagellin in vivo remains to be determined. In this context, MRx0518 derivatives are currently being investigated in murine cancer models in order to shed light on their influence on the previously established therapeutic effect of E. gallinarum MRx0518.

Material and Methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids and culture conditions

E. gallinarum strains were routinely cultured in Yeast extract, Casitone, Fatty Acid media (YCFA, E&O Laboratories, Bonnybridge, Scotland, UK) at 37 °C in an anaerobic cabinet (Don Whitley Scientific, Shipley, England, UK). Late log phase cultures were grown for approximately 3 h (10% inoculum). E. coli strains were grown in Luria-Bertani broth at 20 °C or 37 °C in aerobic conditions with shaking (180–200 rpm). Growth media were supplemented with erythromycin (20 μg/ml for E. gallinarum and 100 μg/ml for E. coli), ampicillin (100 μg/ml) and kanamycin (25–50 μg/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, England, UK), where appropriate. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S3.

Preparation of bacterial fractions for co-culture assays

Late log phase bacterial cultures were centrifuged at 5000 x g for 5 min at room temperature to generate bacterial fractions. Pelleted cells were washed once in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Sigma-Aldrich) and resuspended in antibiotic-free cell culture media to the appropriate dilution (live fraction, MRx0518LV). Culture supernatants were harvested and filtered through a 0.22 μm pore size filter and diluted in water to provide equivalents for the live fraction described above (supernatant fraction, MRx0518SN). Bacterial cultures were heat-inactivated for 40 min at 80 °C and prepared as described above for the live fraction (heat-killed fraction, MRx0518HK). Viable cell counts were determined by spread plating. When required, culture supernatants were digested with 500 μg/ml trypsin or an equivalent volume of Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) as a mock digestion control for 1 h at 37 °C, followed by inactivation with 10% (v/v) foetal bovine serum (FBS) (Sigma-Aldrich).

Immortalised cell lines and growth conditions

THP-1 cells (Public Health England, Salisbury, England, UK) were routinely grown in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin (cRPMI). HT29-MTX-E12 cells (Public Health England) were routinely cultured in Dulbecco’s Minimal Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 4 mM L-glutamine, 4.5 mg/ml glucose, 8.9 μg/ml L-alanine, 15 μg/ml L-asparagine, 13.3 μg/ml L-aspartic acid, 14.7 μg/ml L-glutamic acid, 7.5 μg/ml glycine, 11.5 μg/ml L-proline, 10.5 μg/ml L-serine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 0.25 μg/ml amphotericin B (cDMEM). Cells were seeded into assay vessels and cultured for nine days, following which they were washed twice with HBBS and placed into co-culture medium (cDMEM without antibiotic and supplemented with 5 μg/ml apo-transferrin and 0.2 μg/ml sodium selenite). HEK-Blue™-hTLR5 cells (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA) were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 4 mM L-glutamine, 4.5 mg/ml glucose, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 100 μg/ml Normocin™ (InvivoGen), 30 μg/ml blastocydin and 100 μg/ml xeocin to 90% density. THP1-Blue™ NF-kB cells (InvivoGen) were grown in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 25 mM HEPES, 100 μg/ml Normocin™, 10 μg/ml blastocydin. All reagents were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise specified. Immortalised cell lines were routinely grown at 37 °C in 5% CO2 atmosphere.

Immortalised and primary cells stimulation

THP-1 cells were differentiated into macrophages by the addition of 5 ng/ml phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (Sigma-Aldrich) to the culture media for 48 h. Cells were plated in 96-well plates (200,000 cells/well) in cRPMI without PMA, antibiotics and FBS and incubated for 3 h. Treatments (live bacteria at a MOI of 10:1 or a MOI of 1:1 for IL-8 detection as saturation was obtained with the 10:1 MOI) and controls (50 ng/ml LPS or PBS) were then added and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions. Culture medium was then replaced with cRPMI and incubated for 24 h under standard growth conditions. Cell-free supernatants were then harvested, centrifuged for 3 min at 10,000 x g at 4 °C and stored at −80 °C for cytokine detection. Human PBMCs, obtained from STEMCELL Technologies (Vancouver, Canada) from healthy donors, were used to isolate primary monocyte populations by negative selection using a Human Monocyte Isolation kit. Monocytes were then differentiated into immature dendritic cells by incubation with 20 ng/ml recombinant human IL-4 and 50 ng/ml recombinant human GM-CSF for 8 days at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere in cRPMI supplemented with 55 μM 2-mercaptoethanol. Immature dendritic cells were recovered, washed, resuspended in cRPMI medium without antibiotics and plated in 96-well plates (200,000 cells/well). Treatments (live bacteria at a MOI of 10:1) and controls (100 ng/ml LPS or cRPMI) were added to the cells and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions. Culture medium was then replaced with cRPMI and incubated for 17 h under standard culture conditions. Cell-free supernatants were then harvested, centrifuged for 3 min at 10,000 x g at 4 °C and stored at −80 °C prior to cytokine detection.

Cytokine quantification

Cytokine quantification was conducted using a ProcartaPlex multiplex immunoassay following the manufacturers recommendations (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Briefly, 50 µl of cell-free co-culture supernatants (CFS) were used for cytokine quantification using a MAGPIX® MILLIPLEX® system (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with the xPONENT software (Luminex, Austin, TX, USA). Data was analysed using the MILLIPLEX® analyst software (Merck) using a 5-parameter logistic curve and background subtraction to convert mean fluorescence intensity to pg/ml values.

Transcriptional analysis using microarrays

HT29-MTX cells were cultured in 24-well Transwell® (Corning, Corning, NY, USA), and incubated with treatments of MRx0518LV, MRx0518HK and MRx0518SN at a MOI of 100:1 (or equivalent) for 3 h at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions. Cells were washed and lysed, and RNA was isolated from lysate using an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). RNA was converted to cDNA using a GeneChip™ High Throughput WT PLUS Kit, which was then hybridized to a GeneChip™ Human Transcriptome Array 2.0. Microarray chips were washed and stained using a GeneChip™ Fluidics Station 450 instrument and the GeneChip™ Expression Wash, Stain and Scan kit, and then scanned using a GeneChip™ Scanner 3000 instrument (Thermo Fischer Scientific). Data analysis was carried out using Transcriptome Analysis Console 4.0 software (Thermo Fischer Scientific). Data were normalized using the Robust Multiarray Average algorithm, and fold changes were calculated using the normalized log2-transformed values of treated cells relative to respective controls. Data were filtered using cut-offs of p < 0.05, fold change of <−1.5 and ≥1.5, and the presence of a gene symbol and coding variants. Pathway analysis was carried out using MetaCore™ (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA, USA).

NF-κB and TLR5 reporter assays

THP1-Blue™ NF-kB and HEK-Blue™-hTLR5 cells (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA), grown to 90% density were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, England, UK) and resuspended in growth media without antibiotic at a density of 160,000 and 500,000 cells/ml, respectively. MRx0518LV was added at a MOI of 10:1, MRx0518HK was used at a MOI of 100:1 and a 100:1 MOI equivalent volume was used for the supernatant fractions. Recombinant proteins were added at concentrations of 0.006–500 ng/ml. Positive controls for each reporter assay, Salmonella Typhimurium flagellin (FLA-ST) and heat-killed L. monocytogenes (HKLM) (InvivoGen), were used at 20 ng/ml concentrations and a MOI of 200:1 respectively. Cells were then incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 22 h. QUANTI-Blue™ (InvivoGen) was added to cells, plates were incubated for a further 2 h and the optical density at 655 nm was recorded. Graphs show results from averaged technical replicates and at least three independent experiments.

Transcriptional analysis of the flagellar loci of E. gallinarum MRx0518

Total RNA was extracted from late-log phase cultures of strain MRx0518, treated with RNAprotect (Qiagen), using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol with minor modifications. Briefly, mechanical cell lysis was performed using Lysing Matrix B and a MP Fast-Prep-24 tissue and cell homogenizer (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) with oscillations set at 6 m/s. Cells were disrupted for two 20 s cycles with a 1 min rest on ice between cycles. RNA quality was assessed using a Tapestation (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with the Agilent RNA Screentape (Agilent Technologies). The absence of RNA degradation was confirmed, and all samples had a minimum RNA Integrity Numbers ≥ 9. MICROBExpress kit (Thermo Fischer Scientific) was used to deplete rRNA species and the absence of 16 S and 23 S rRNA species was assessed using an Agilent Tapestation with the Agilent RNA Screentape (Agilent Technologies). RNA samples depleted in rRNA were sent to GATC Biotech for strand-specific library preparation and Illumina sequencing was performed to produce 50 bp single-end reads. An average of 18,705,633 raw reads were generated per RNA-Seq library. Raw reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic51 and quality filtered (an average of 18,245,365.6 reads/library passed QC) reads were aligned (99.05% of total clean reads mapped) to the MRx0518 genome using Bowtie52. Data generated from three biological replicates were merged using BAMtools53 and subsequently used to calculate the expression levels of the motility loci of strain MRx0518 using Geneious R11 (Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand). The read numbers associated with each gene were expressed in RPKM (reads per kilobases per million reads) scores54.

Motility assays

Motility in vitro was assessed using BBL™ Motility Test Medium supplemented with 0.005% (w/v) 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (BD, Sparks, MD, USA). In brief, a fresh colony was stab-inoculated in 20 ml equilibrated media and incubated for 48 h at 37 °C in anaerobic conditions. All assays were performed in triplicate.

Protein identification by nanoLC-MS/MS

Sample preparation and protein identification by LC-MS/MS were performed by Aberdeen Proteomics (University of Aberdeen, UK). In brief, 40 ml culture supernatants were concentrated down to 0.5 ml and washed with ultrapure water. Proteins were precipitated using a ReadyPrep 2-D Cleanup Kit (Bio-Rad) and resuspended in 100 µl 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate. Proteins were incubated with porcine trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) for 16 h at 37 °C and the resulting supernatants were dried by vacuum centrifugation and dissolved in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. Peptides were further desalted using µ-C18 ZipTips (Merck). Peptides were then eluted into a 96-well microtiter plate, dried by vacuum centrifugation and dissolved in 10 µl LC-MS loading solvent (2% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid). Peptides were separated and identified by nanoLC-MS/MS (Q Exactive hybrid quadrupole-Orbitrap MS system) (Thermo Fischer Scientific) using a 15-cm PepMap column, 60-minute LC-MS acquisition method and an injection volume of 5 µl. Data analysis was performed with Proteome Discoverer (Thermo Fischer Scientific) and the workflow included the Mascot Server as the search engine with the following parameters: enzyme = trypsin, maximum mixed cleavage sites = 2, precursor mass tolerance = 10 ppm, dynamic modifications = oxidation (M), static modifications = carbamidomethyl (C). Identified peptides were matched against a strain-specific protein sequence database, which was constructed based on the sequenced genome of E. gallinarum MRx0518 (3068 sequences).

Recombinant flagellin expression and purification

E. gallinarum MRx0518 and DSM100110 full-length fliC genes were amplified by PCR using primer pairs DC022/DC023 and DC024/DC025, respectively (Supplementary Table S3). Gene products were then cloned into the pQE-30 vector (Supplementary Table S3) (Qiagen) using BamHI and SalI restriction sites. The resulting constructs, which add 12 amino acid residues (MRGSHHHHHHGS) to the N-terminal end of the proteins, were then transformed into E. coli M15 pREP4 (Supplementary Table S3) (Qiagen) for over-expression. Expression of recombinant proteins were induced according to the manufacturer’s instructions, by adding 0.1 mM IPTG for 18 h at 20 °C with shaking (200 rpm). E. coli cells were lysed by sonication and the recombinant proteins were purified using Ni-NTA columns (Qiagen). An empty vector control was also expressed and purified in parallel, to provide a control for the potential effect of residual contaminants and endotoxins. Endotoxins were removed using Pierce™ High Capacity Endotoxin Removal Spin Column (Thermo Fischer Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Residual endotoxin levels were quantified using Pierce™ LAL Chromogenic Endotoxin Quantification Kit (Thermo Fischer Scientific) and shown to be suitable for co-culture assays (Supplementary Fig. S3). Protein concentrations were measured using Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fischer Scientific) and the purity of each recombinant protein preparations was assessed by SDS-PAGE (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) (Supplementary Fig. S3).

Sequencing and annotation of the flagellar loci and fliC genes of E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus strains

The flagellar loci of E. gallinarum strains MRx0518 and DSM100110 and the fliC genes of E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus were sequenced as part of ongoing bacterial genome sequencing projects carried out by Diversigen (Houston, TX, USA), GATC Biotech (Konstanz, Germany) and MicrobesNG (Birmigham, England, UK) on behalf of 4D pharma Research Ltd (for additional details see Supplementary Table S3). MicrobesNG (http://www.microbesng.uk) is supported by the BBSRC (grant number BB/L024209/1). The “Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology” (RAST) database was used for automated annotation of open reading frames55,56,57 followed by manual curation of the gene annotations in Geneious R11. The flagellar locus and fliC of strain MRx0518 was used as a reference sequence for all comparative analyses and homologs (as determined by BLASTp similarity searches) within additional strains were identified and extracted from the draft genomes of available E. gallinarum or E. casseliflavus genomes downloaded from NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/).

Comparative analysis of the flagellar loci of E. gallinarum strains MRx0518 and DSM100110

Nucleotide alignments were generated using a local BLAST v 2.7.1+ installation which were then visualised and analysed for gene conservation and sequence synteny using EasyFig. 2.2.258.

Phylogenetic analyses

FliC protein sequences were downloaded from the NCBI protein database or were derived from sequence data available for the strains outlined in Table S5, using BLASTP-based homology searches against the FliCMRx0518 sequence. Protein sequences were aligned using MUSCLE59 and evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA760. Phylogenies were inferred using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Le_Gascuel_2008 model61. A discrete Gamma distribution was used for the multispecies FliC tree (Fig. S5), to model evolutionary rate differences among sites (5 categories (+G)). The rate-variation model allowed for some sites to be evolutionarily invariable ([+I]). The trees with the highest log likelihood are displayed and the reliability of the groups were evaluated by bootstrap testing with 1,000 re-samplings. The FliC of Lactobacillus mali DSM20444 (accession number KRN11091.1) was used as an outgroup during E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus interspecies phylogenetic analyses.

Generation of an E. gallinarum MRx0518 flagellin gene insertion mutant

The flagellin insertion mutant was created using the non-replicative plasmid pORI1930 (Supplementary Table S3). An internal fragment of E. gallinarum MRx0518 fliC gene was amplified using primers DC020 and DC021 (Supplementary Table S3) and cloned into pORI19. Restriction enzymes and Quick Ligase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. This construct was propagated in E. coli EC101 by chemical transformation (Supplementary Table S3) and isolated using the Genopure Plasmid Maxi Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) from a 500-ml culture. Isolated plasmid DNA was concentrated using 0.3 M sodium acetate pH 5.2 and ethanol down to 20 μl. A protocol was developed to prepare E. gallinarum MRx0518 electrocompetent cells, which was adapted from a previously published method29. In brief, E. gallinarum MRx0518 was grown for 18 h in GM17 broth, supplemented with 0.5 M sucrose and 3% (w/v) glycine (Sigma-Aldrich). Cells were then washed twice with 0.5 M sucrose and 10% (v/v) glycerol and treated with 10 μg/ml lysozyme and 10 U/ml mutanolysin (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min at 37 °C. E. gallinarum MRx0518 cells were then transformed by electroporation with 10 μg of plasmid DNA and recovered in BHI broth before plating on selective BHI agar. Plasmid insertion was confirmed for successful transformants by PCR amplification and sequencing (GATC Biotech, Konstanz, Germany) using primers listed in Supplementary Table S3. In vitro motility of the flagellin insertion mutant was assessed as described for strain MRx0518.

Gene expression profiling by qPCR

HT29-MTX cells were cultured in Transwell® and incubated with bacterial culture supernatant (MOI 100:1 equivalent) or recombinant flagellin (1 µg/ml) for 24 h. Mammalian RNA was isolated as described above. cDNA was synthesized using a High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fischer Scientific). qPCR analysis was carried out using the primers detailed in Supplementary Table S3 and Power SYBR™ Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fischer Scientific).

IL-8 ELISA

IL-8 secretion was quantified from HT29-MTX co-culture supernatants after 24 h of treatment (with bacterial culture supernatant at a MOI 100:1 equivalent or 1 µg/ml recombinant flagellin) using the Human IL-8 (CXCL8) standard ABTS ELISA development kit (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Data Availability

The motility loci of E. gallinarum MRx0518 and DSM100110 have been deposited under GenBank accession numbers MK210233 and MK176551, respectively. The fliC genes of the E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus strains outlined in Supplementary Table S3 have been deposited under GenBank accession numbers MK142539-MK142553 and MK174384- MK174386 respectively. Raw RNA-Seq reads are available at the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number: PRJNA506224. Microarray data were submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information into the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under accession number GSE122232.

References

  1. 1.

    Švec, P. & Franz, C. M. A. P. In The genus Enterococcus in Lactic Acid Bacteria: Biodiversity and Taxonomy 175–211 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2014).

  2. 2.

    Zhong, Z. et al. Comparative genomic analysis of the genus Enterococcus. Microbiol Res 196, 95–105, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MICRES.2016.12.009 (2017).

  3. 3.

    Williams, A. M., Rodrigues, U. M. & Collins, M. D. Intrageneric relationships of enterococci as determined by reverse transcriptase sequencing of small-subunit rRNA. Res Microbiol, 67–74, https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-2508(91)90098-U (1991).

  4. 4.

    Palmer, K. L. et al. Comparative genomics of enterococci: variation in Enterococcus faecalis, clade structure in E. faecium, and defining characteristics of E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus. MBio 3, e00318–00311, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00318-11 (2012).

  5. 5.

    Vos, P. et al. In Enterococci in Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, Volume 3: The Firmicutes 594–606 (Springer, 2011).

  6. 6.

    Perencevich, E. N. & Perl, T. M. In Enterococcal Infections in Goldman’s Cecil Medicine: 24th EditionVol 2 1830–1832 (Elsevier Inc., 2011).

  7. 7.

    Reid, K. C., Cockerill, I. F. R. & Patel, R. Clinical and epidemiological features of Enterococcus casseliflavus/flavescens and Enterococcus gallinarum bacteremia: a report of 20 cases. Clin Infect Dis 32, 1540–1546, https://doi.org/10.1086/320542 (2001).

  8. 8.

    Kroemer, G. & Zitvogel, L. Cancer immunotherapy in 2017: The breakthrough of the microbiota. Nat Rev Immunol 18, 87–88, https://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2018.4 (2018).

  9. 9.

    Daillère, R. et al. Enterococcus hirae and Barnesiella intestinihominis Facilitate Cyclophosphamide-Induced Therapeutic Immunomodulatory Effects. Immunity 45, 931–943, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2016.09.009 (2016).

  10. 10.

    Viaud, S. et al. The intestinal microbiota modulates the anticancer immune effects of cyclophosphamide. Science 342, 971–976, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240537 (2013).

  11. 11.

    Routy, B. et al. Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Science 359, 91–97, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan3706 (2018).

  12. 12.

    Stevenson, A. et al. Host-microbe interactions mediating antitumorigenic effects of MRX0518, a gut microbiota-derived bacterial strain, in breast, renal and lung carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology 36, e15006–e15006, https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.e15006 (2018).

  13. 13.

    Hajam, I. A., Dar, P. A., Shahnawaz, I., Jaume, J. C. & Lee, J. H. Bacterial flagellin-a potent immunomodulatory agent. Exp Mol Med 49, e373, https://doi.org/10.1038/emm.2017.172 (2017).

  14. 14.

    Zheng, J. H. et al. Two-step enhanced cancer immunotherapy with engineered Salmonella typhimurium secreting heterologous flagellin. Sci Transl Med 9, eaak9537, https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aak9537 (2017).

  15. 15.

    Iribarren, K. et al. Trial Watch: Immunostimulation with Toll-like receptor agonists in cancer therapy. Oncoimmunology 5, e1088631, https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2015.1088631 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Leigh, N. D. et al. A flagellin-derived toll-like receptor 5 agonist stimulates cytotoxic lymphocyte-mediated tumor immunity. PLoS One 9, e85587, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085587 (2014).

  17. 17.

    Gewirtz, A. T., Navas, T. A., Lyons, S., Godowski, P. J. & Madara, J. L. Cutting edge: bacterial flagellin activates basolaterally expressed TLR5 to induce epithelial proinflammatory gene expression. J Immunol 167, 1882–1885, https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.167.4.1882 (2001).

  18. 18.

    Steiner, T. S. How flagellin and toll-like receptor 5 contribute to enteric infection. Infect Immun 75, 545–552, https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01506-06 (2007).

  19. 19.

    Uematsu, S. et al. Detection of pathogenic intestinal bacteria by Toll-like receptor 5 on intestinal CD11c+ lamina propria cells. Nat Immunol 7, 868–874, https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1362 (2006).

  20. 20.

    Hayashi, F. et al. The innate immune response to bacterial flagellin is mediated by Toll-like receptor 5. Nature 410, 1099–1103, https://doi.org/10.1038/35074106 (2001).

  21. 21.

    Smith, K. D. et al. Toll-like receptor 5 recognizes a conserved site on flagellin required for protofilament formation and bacterial motility. Nat Immunol 4, 1247–1253, https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1011 (2003).

  22. 22.

    Tallant, T. et al. Flagellin acting via TLR5 is the major activator of key signaling pathways leading to NF-kappa B and proinflammatory gene program activation in intestinal epithelial cells. BMC Microbiol 4, 33, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-4-33 (2004).

  23. 23.

    Cai, Z. et al. Activation of Toll-like receptor 5 on breast cancer cells by flagellin suppresses cell proliferation and tumor growth. Cancer Res 71, 2466–2475, https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1993 (2011).

  24. 24.

    Yoon, S.-i., Kurnasov, O., Natarajan, V., Hong, M. & Andrei, V. Structural basis of TLR5-flagellin recognition and signaling. Science 335, 859–864, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215584.Structural (2013).

  25. 25.

    Beatson, S. A., Minamino, T. & Pallen, M. J. Variation in bacterial flagellins: from sequence to structure. Trends Microbiol 14, 151–155, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2006.02.008 (2006).

  26. 26.

    Rossez, Y., Wolfson, E. B., Holmes, A., Gally, D. L. & Holden, N. J. Bacterial flagella: twist and stick, or dodge across the kingdoms. PLoS Pathog 11, e1004483, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004483 (2015).

  27. 27.

    Mortimer, C. K., Gharbia, S. E., Logan, J. M., Peters, T. M. & Arnold, C. Flagellin gene sequence evolution in Salmonella. Infect Genet Evol 7, 411–415, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2006.12.001 (2007).

  28. 28.

    Reid, S. D., Selander, R. K. & Whittam, T. S. Sequence diversity of flagellin (fliC) alleles in pathogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 181, 153–160, 0021-9193/99/$04.0010 (1999).

  29. 29.

    Shepard, B. D. & Gilmore, M. S. In Electroporation and efficient transformation of Enterococcus faecalis grown in high concentrations of glycine in Methods in molecular biology: Vol 47: Electroporation protocols for microorganisms Vol 47 (ed J. A. Nickoloff) 217–226 (Humana Press Inc., 1995).

  30. 30.

    Law, J. et al. A system to generate chromosomal mutations in Lactococcus lactis which allows fast analysis of targeted genes. J Bacteriol 177, 7011–7018, https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.177.24.7011-7018.1995 (1995).

  31. 31.

    Kelley, L. A., Mezulis, S., Yates, C. M., Wass, M. N. & Sternberg, M. J. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat Protoc 10, 845–858, https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015.053 (2015).

  32. 32.

    Cousin, F. J. et al. Detection and genomic characterization of motility in Lactobacillus curvatus: confirmation of motility in a species outside the Lactobacillus salivarius clade. Appl Environ Microbiol 81, 1297–1308, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03594-14 (2015).

  33. 33.

    Neville, B. A. et al. Characterization of pro-inflammatory flagellin proteins produced by Lactobacillus ruminis and related motile Lactobacilli. PLoS One 7, e40592, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040592 (2012).

  34. 34.

    Jacchieri, S. G., Torquato, R. & Brentani, R. R. Structural study of binding of flagellin by Toll-like receptor 5. J Bacteriol 185, 4243–4247, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.185.14.4243-4247.2003 (2003).

  35. 35.

    van den Bogert, B., Meijerink, M., Zoetendal, E. G., Wells, J. M. & Kleerebezem, M. Immunomodulatory properties of Streptococcus and Veillonella isolates from the human small intestine microbiota. PLoS One 9, e114277, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114277 (2014).

  36. 36.

    Manfredo Vieira, S. et al. Translocation of a gut pathobiont drives autoimmunity in mice and humans. Science 359, 1156–1161, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar7201 (2018).

  37. 37.

    Saraiva, M. & O’Garra, A. The regulation of IL-10 production by immune cells. Nat Rev Immunol 10, 170–181, https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2711 (2010).

  38. 38.

    Chen, W. F. & Zlotnik, A. IL-10: a novel cytotoxic T cell differentiation factor. J Immunol 147, 528–534 (1991).

  39. 39.

    Jinquan, T., Larsen, C. G., Gesser, B., Matsushima, K. & Thestrup-Pedersen, K. Human IL-10 is a chemoattractant for CD8+T lymphocytes and an inhibitor of IL-8-induced CD4+ T lymphocyte migration. J Immunol 151, 4545–4551 (1993).

  40. 40.

    Sierro, F. et al. Flagellin stimulation of intestinal epithelial cells triggers CCL20-mediated migration of dendritic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 13722–13727, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.241308598 (2001).

  41. 41.

    Bambou, J. C. et al. In vitro and ex vivo activation of the TLR5 signaling pathway in intestinal epithelial cells by a commensal Escherichia coli strain. J Biol Chem 279, 42984–42992, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M405410200 (2004).

  42. 42.

    Rhee, S. H., Im, E. & Pothoulakis, C. Toll-like receptor 5 engagement modulates tumor development and growth in a mouse xenograft model of human colon cancer. Gastroenterology 135, 518–528, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.022 (2008).

  43. 43.

    Tasteyre, A. et al. Phenotypic and genotypic diversity of the flagellin gene (fliC) among Clostridium difficile isolates from different serogroups. J Clin Microbiol 38, 3179–3186, 0095-1137/00/$04.0010 (2000).

  44. 44.

    Wang, L., Rothemund, D., Curd, H. & Reeves, P. R. Species-wide variation in the Escherichia coli flagellin (H-antigen) gene. J Bacteriol 185, 2936–2943, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.185.9.2936-2943.2003 (2003).

  45. 45.

    Morgan, J. A. et al. Comparison of flagellin genes from clinical and environmental Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol 65, 1175–1179, 0099-2240/99/$04.0010 (1999).

  46. 46.

    Xu, D. & Côté, J. C. Sequence diversity of the Bacillus thuringiensis and B. cereus sensu lato flagellin (H antigen) protein: comparison with H serotype diversity. Appl Environ Microbiol 72, 4653–4662, https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00328-06 (2006).

  47. 47.

    Candela, M. et al. Bifidobacterial enolase, a cell surface receptor for human plasminogen involved in the interaction with the host. Microbiology 155, 3294–3303, https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.028795-0 (2009).

  48. 48.

    Ivison, S. M. et al. The stress signal extracellular ATP modulates antiflagellin immune responses in intestinal epithelial cells. Inflamm Bowel Dis 17, 319–333, https://doi.org/10.1002/ibd.21428 (2011).

  49. 49.

    Sfondrini, L. et al. Antitumor activity of the TLR-5 ligand flagellin in mouse models of cancer. J Immunol 176, 6624–6630, https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.176.11.6624 (2006).

  50. 50.

    Yao, Y., Levings, M. K. & Steiner, T. S. ATP conditions intestinal epithelial cells to an inflammatory state that promotes components of DC maturation. Eur J Immunol 42, 3310–3321, https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201142213 (2012).

  51. 51.

    Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 (2014).

  52. 52.

    Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol 10, R25, https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 (2009).

  53. 53.

    Barnett, D. W., Garrison, E. K., Quinlan, A. R., Strömberg, M. P. & Marth, G. T. BamTools: a C++ API and toolkit for analyzing and managing BAM files. Bioinformatics 27, 1691–1692, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr174 (2011).

  54. 54.

    Mortazavi, A., Williams, B. A., McCue, K., Schaeffer, L. & Wold, B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nature Methods 5, 621, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1226 (2008).

  55. 55.

    Aziz, R. K. et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9, 75, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 (2008).

  56. 56.

    Brettin, T. et al. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep 5, 8365, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08365 (2015).

  57. 57.

    Overbeek, R. et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42, D206–214, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1226 (2014).

  58. 58.

    Sullivan, M. J., Petty, N. K. & Beatson, S. A. Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 27, 1009–1010, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr039 (2011).

  59. 59.

    Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32, 1792–1797, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340 (2004).

  60. 60.

    Kumar, S., Stecher, G. & Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33, 1870–1874, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054 (2016).

  61. 61.

    Le, S. Q. & Gascuel, O. An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. Mol Biol Evol 25, 1307–1320, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msn067 (2008).

  62. 62.

    Heberle, H., Meirelles, G. V., da Silva, F. R., Telles, G. P. & Minghim, R. InteractiVenn: a web-based tool for the analysis of sets through Venn diagrams. BMC Bioinformatics 16, 169, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0611-3 (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Riboulet-Bisson and Professor Benachour (U2RM Université de Caen, France) for their technical advice on the genetic manipulation of enterococcal species. We are grateful to Professors Paul W. O’Toole and Joseph Petrosino for their critical review of the manuscript.

Author information

D.L.C. and E.J.R. contributed equally to this work. D.L.C., E.J.R. and I.E.M. conceived the study and D.L.C., E.J.R., P.C., E.H. designed the assays, D.L.C., E.J.R., P.C., E.H., C.S., A.H., D.A.P., B.M. and E.S. performed the experiments, D.L.C., E.J.R., P.C. and E.H. interpreted the data and D.L.C., E.J.R. and P.C. wrote the paper.

Correspondence to Emma J. Raftis.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

All authors were employees of 4D Pharma Research Ltd while engaged in the research project. This work was supported by funding provided by 4D Pharma PLC. 4D Pharma Research Ltd owns a family of patent applications which are pending internationally and derived from International Patent Publication No. WO2017/085520 and UK Patent Application No. 1804384.4.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lauté-Caly, D.L., Raftis, E.J., Cowie, P. et al. The flagellin of candidate live biotherapeutic Enterococcus gallinarum MRx0518 is a potent immunostimulant. Sci Rep 9, 801 (2019) doi:10.1038/s41598-018-36926-8

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.