Article | Open | Published:

BCR-associated factors driving chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells proliferation ex vivo

Abstract

A chronic antigenic stimulation is believed to sustain the leukemogenic development of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and most of lymphoproliferative malignancies developed from mature B cells. Reproducing a proliferative stimulation ex vivo is critical to decipher the mechanisms of leukemogenesis in these malignancies. However, functional studies of CLL cells remains limited since current ex vivo B cell receptor (BCR) stimulation protocols are not sufficient to induce the proliferation of these cells, pointing out the need of mandatory BCR co-factors in this process. Here, we investigated benefits of several BCR co-stimulatory molecules (IL-2, IL-4, IL-15, IL-21 and CD40 ligand) in multiple culture conditions. Our results demonstrated that BCR engagement (anti-IgM ligation) concomitant to CD40 ligand, IL-4 and IL-21 stimulation allowed CLL cells proliferation ex vivo. In addition, we established a proliferative advantage for ZAP70 positive CLL cells, associated to an increased phosphorylation of ZAP70/SYK and STAT6. Moreover, the use of a tri-dimensional matrix of methylcellulose and the addition of TLR9 agonists further increased this proliferative response. This ex vivo model of BCR stimulation with T-derived cytokines is a relevant and efficient model for functional studies of CLL as well as lymphoproliferative malignancies.

Introduction

Like in most mature lymphoproliferative malignancies, an antigenic stimulation is believed to drive the leukemogenic process in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)1,2,3. A restricted use of IGHV genes and the existence of stereotypic B cell receptor (BCR) on CLL cells4,5,6 provides evidence in favor of antigenic stimulation where different microbial antigens, as well as auto-antigens, have been suspected as actors of this chronic stimulation7. In addition, a chronic BCR self-activation has been shown in subtypes of CLL cells8. Moreover, several signaling aberrations have been described downstream of the BCR, notably in aggressive CLL with unmutated IGHV (UM-CLL), in which the expression of ZAP70 reinforces BCR responsiveness9,10,11,12. BCR activation, which is essential for the physiological development of lymphocytes13 would also be indispensable for the survival and proliferation of CLL cells in vivo2. Accordingly, withdrawal of this stimulation is believed to be responsible for the rapid spontaneous apoptosis of CLL cells ex vivo14. The cellular consequences of this BCR activation has been extensively studied and we previously described the specific transcriptional15,16 and proteomic programs17 which are induced in aggressive CLL cells following BCR ligation.

Nevertheless, a sustained soluble stimulation of the BCR induces apoptosis in CLL cells9,15,18,19,20,21 and BCR-associated factors are mandatory in inducing CLL cells proliferation. Several factors, are known for their role in CLL cells survival or proliferation, among which IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, IL-15, IL-21 and CD40L are prominent22,23,24,25, but an exhaustive evaluation of their role as BCR-cofactors for CLL cells proliferation is still lacking. Difficulties to achieve robust CLL cell proliferation ex vivo led to the use of stromal cells26,27, activated T cells22,28,29,30,31 or fibroblast (eventually CD40L transfected)21,22,30,32,33,34 as feeder cells. However, feeder cells’ interactions35 and secretion of IL-6, IL-10 or TGF-β can also participate in CLL cells survival and proliferation26, which makes the identification of essential leukemogenic factors difficult and prevents the specific evaluation of BCR ligation in the proliferative response in these models.

In this study, we aim to set-up culture conditions, primarily based on BCR ligation for patho-physiological relevance, inducing CLL cells proliferation. This study was conducted in two steps. We first aimed at establishing the optimal ex vivo model for CLL cells proliferation measured by carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) incorporation. For this, a selection of healthy and primary CLL cells were stimulated by anti-IgM ligation with or without co-stimulatory molecules (IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, IL-21, IL-15, sCD40L), at various concentration in different culture conditions. Next, using the optimized culture conditions, we analyzed the proliferative response of fresh negatively selected B cells isolated from a cohort of well characterized CLL patients, under informed consent, including clinical data, cell morphology, flow cytometry - including ZAP70 expression status-, FISH and IGHV mutational status, as these factors may impact the cell response to stimulation22,28,30,31. These culture conditions induced a proliferative response of a fraction of CLL cells, essentially ZAP70+, in soluble medium and a proliferation of nearly all CLL cells in 3D semi-solid medium, representing a valuable system for CLL functional studies.

Results

Establishing culture conditions for CLL cells proliferation ex vivo

To establish culture conditions for CLL cells proliferation after ex vivo activation, we first evaluated CFSE labeling in a small series of patient samples (n = 8). This approach allows calculating the percentage of dividing cells and the number of cell generations (Fig. S1). We first confirmed data from previous studies showing that ex vivo BCR activation by means of anti-IgM ligation does not induce CLL cells proliferation when these cells are cultured in soluble medium (Figs 1A and S2A). Similarly, stimulation with IL-4, IL-21 or CD40L, used separately, in soluble medium, did not induce CLL cells proliferation either (Fig. 1A). We also confirmed that different combinations of cytokines, [CD40L + IL-4], [CD40L + IL-21] and [CD40L + IL-4 + IL-21] induced a weak (less than 40%) proliferation of CLL cells (Fig. 1A). Of note, IL-21, which has a pro-apoptotic effects on CLL cells34 potentiates the proliferating effect of IL-4 when sequentially added after IL-423 and therefore IL-21 was added 24 h after all initial IL-4 stimulation. However, when we analyzed the proliferative effect of a combination of cytokines added after initial BCR stimulation (IgM ligation), we established that, even if BCR activation associated to [CD40L + IL-4] or [CD40L + IL-21] allowed a weak proliferation, the combination of anti-IgM with [CD40L + IL-4 + IL-21] induces a higher proliferation rate of CLL cells in soluble medium (Fig. 1A). Similar experiments confirmed the proliferative potential of these conditions on total B cells from healthy donors (Figs 1B and S2B). We analyzed the morphology of CLL cells submitted to these culture conditions. We observed the formation of clusters of proliferating cells in the culture medium (Fig. S1) and cytological analysis of these cells after cytocentrifugation at day 6 revealed in all cases a monomorphic evolution consisting in large cells with a high amount of basophilic cytoplasm, prominent nucleoli and a fine chromatin that were distinct from those of control unstimulated cells (Fig. S3A). Immunophenotyic analysis of proliferating CLL cells at day 6 after ex vivo stimulation showed a lower expression of CD5, an upregulation of CD138 but not of CD38 and no IgG expression on cell surface, as compared to the expression at day 0 before stimulation (Fig. S3B) which underlined the biological relevance of this model of ex vivo stimulation.

Figure 1
figure1

Determination of the optimal culture conditions for CLL and healthy B cells proliferation ex vivo. (A) Effect of BCR and cytokines stimulation, isolated or in combination, on the proliferation of B cells harvested from CLL patients and cultured on soluble medium (n = 8; CLL samples #6, 14, 24, 42, 49, 52, 58 and 62) and (B) total B cells from healthy donors (n = 4) cultured in soluble medium. After initial CFSE staining at day 0, the percentage of dividing cells (CFSEdim) were evaluated by flow cytometry at day 6 for CLL cells samples and at day 4 for healthy B cells. Symbols represent CLL cells sub-types (circle: UM ZAP + ; triangle: M ZAP + ; square: M ZAP-). 95% confidence interval for median is shown in each group. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

Response of a cohort of CLL cells submitted to the selected culture conditions

Because of the clinical and biological heterogeneity of CLL patients, we analyzed the impact of these selected culture conditions on the proliferative response of fresh CLL cells harvested from sixty-five untreated patients referred in Strasbourg Hospitals, essentially Binet stage A (58/65) (Table 1). Among them, 25 harbored unmutated IGHV genes (UM-CLL) and expressed the ZAP70 protein (ZAP70+), 29 had mutated IGHV genes (M-CLL) and did not express the ZAP70 protein (ZAP70−), 10 were ZAP70 + M-CLL and one was ZAP70− UM-CLL. We also analyzed the proliferation of total B cells (20 healthy blood-donors) and naïve (CD19+, CD27, IgM+) B cells (16 healthy blood-donors). All of the total B-cells (20/20) and 12 out of 16 naïve B cells exhibited more than 25% of dividing cells at day 4 (Fig. 2A) (median 62%; confidence interval (CI) of median [56;82] with up to 4 cell generations for total B cells and median 60%; CI [24;71] for naïve B cells with up to 5 cell generations). In the same conditions, 24/59 (41%) of CLL cells samples proliferated (median 25%; CI [17;27]), showing up to four generations of proliferating cells at day 6 (Fig. 2A,B).

Table 1 Clinical and biological characteristics of CLL patients.
Figure 2
figure2

Cell proliferation of CLL and healthy B cells after soluble [anti-IgM + CD40L + IL-4 + IL-21] stimulation. (A) CLL cells isolated from a cohort of 59 CLL patients and healthy donors (naïve B cells, n = 16 or total B cells, n = 20) were stimulated ex vivo with anti-IgM, CD40L, IL-4 and IL-21. After initial CFSE staining (day 0), the percentage of cell proliferation was measured at day 6 for CLL cells and at day 4 for healthy B cells in stimulated cells (S) and control unstimulated cells (US). A threshold of dividing cells greater than 25% among living cells (dashed line) and the presence of at least one generation of daughter cells defines proliferation. 95% confidence interval for median is shown in each group. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. Symbols represent CLL cells sub-types (circle: UM ZAP+; triangle: M ZAP+; square: M ZAP−; diamond: UM ZAP−). (B) For CLL cells responding to the stimulation, the number of cell generations, based on CFSE analysis, was quantified.

3D semi-solid matrix increases CLL cells proliferation ex vivo

Then we analyzed the impact of a tri-dimensional environment using a semi-solid medium (methylcellulose) where the selected culture conditions also showed their proliferative action (Fig. S4). This culture condition enhanced the proliferation rates and number of cell generations of nearly all CLL cells (89%; 34/38 samples) (Fig. 3A), with up to six generations observed at day 6 (Fig. 3B,C). Of importance, CLL cells stimulation on feeding cells (CD40L-transfected 3T6 cells) neither drove a higher proliferation rate (compared to the soluble stimulation alone) nor increased the number of generations of proliferating cells (Fig. S5A,B).

Figure 3
figure3

Cell proliferation of CLL and healthy B cells after [anti-IgM + CD40L + IL-4 + IL-21] stimulation on a semi-solid medium. (A) CLL cells isolated from a cohort of 38 CLL patients and naïve and total B cells (n = 11) isolated from healthy donors have been stimulated ex vivo with anti-IgM, CD40L, IL-4 and IL-21 on a semi-solid culture medium. After initial CFSE staining (day 0), the percentage of cell proliferation was measured at day 6 for CLL cells and at day 4 for healthy B cells in stimulated cells (S) and control unstimulated cells (US). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. Symbols represent CLL cells sub-types (circle: UM ZAP+; triangle: M ZAP+; square: M ZAP−; diamond: UM ZAP−). (B) Comparison of CLL cells proliferation after anti-IgM, CD40L, IL-4 and IL-21 stimulation in soluble and semi-solid medium. (C) Number of cell generations for responding CLL cells stimulated in soluble and semi-solid medium.

TLR9 agonists further increases CLL cells proliferation

Next, we tested the effects of CpG-ODN2006 (known to affect B cells proliferation by TLR9 activation)31 in our culture conditions. While CpG-ODN2006 alone did not induce CLL cells proliferation (for 35 out of 39 CLL cells tested), we observed increased responses (p < 0.0001) when cells were stimulated with CpG-ODN2006 combined to BCR and cytokines in soluble and 3D semi-solid medium (Fig. 4A–F). In addition, CpG/DSP30 and IL-2 cocktails being routinely used as metaphases inductors for cytogenetic diagnosis, we then compared our stimulation conditions with CpG-ODN2006 + IL-2 or commercial premix DSP30/IL-2. The combination of CpG/DSP30 and IL-2 did not increase the proliferation rate, compared to BCR with our selected cytokine stimulation conditions, in soluble or semi-solid medium (Fig. S6A,B). Our work also confirmed previous reports36 showing that the combination of CpG-ODN2006 and IL-15 is a modest inducer of CLL cells proliferation. Nevertheless, IL-15 addition did not increase the proliferation rate, compared to our soluble BCR stimulation (Fig. S7A,B).

Figure 4
figure4

Additive effect of TLR9 activation on CLL cells after [anti-IgM + CD40L + IL-4 + IL-21] stimulation. (A) CLL cells (n = 39) were stimulated either by CpG-ODN2006, or IgM + CD40L + IL-4 + IL-21 or the combination of CpG-ODN2006 and anti-IgM + CD40L + IL-4 + IL-21. After initial CFSE staining (day 0), the percentage of cell proliferation was measured at day 6 in soluble medium and (B) in semi-solid medium. (C) Determination of the number of cell generations for responding CLL cells after anti-IgM + CD40L + IL-4 + IL-21 stimulation with or without CpG-ODN2006 in soluble medium and (D) in semi-solid medium. (E) Comparison of CLL cells proliferation after anti-IgM + CD40L + IL-4 + IL-21 stimulation with or without CpG-ODN2006 in soluble medium and (F) in semi-solid medium. Symbols represent CLL cells sub-types (circle: UM ZAP+; triangle: M ZAP+; square: M ZAP−; diamond: UM ZAP−). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

Proliferative advantage of ZAP70+ CLL cells in soluble medium

Analyzing the rate of CLL cells proliferation after BCR and cytokine stimulation according to their biological characteristics, we observed that proliferating cells, in soluble medium, exhibit the highest ZAP70 expression levels, compared to non-proliferating cells (p = 0.0043) (Fig. 5). Accordingly, 15/30 (50%) ZAP70+ CLL cells responded to the stimulation with up to four generations (median: 2 generations, with a significant (p = 0.0198) Pearson’s correlation coefficient between ZAP70 expression level and the number of cell generations), whereas only 8/28 ZAP70− CLL cells proliferate with a maximum of two generations. Of note, the percentage of IGHV gene identity and CD38 expression did not associate with the cell proliferation in this soluble model (not shown). In semi-solid medium, ZAP70+ CLL cells with mutated IGHV exhibit a proliferative advantage (Fig. 5).

Figure 5
figure5

Proliferative response according to the IGHV mutational status and ZAP70 protein expression. Recapitulation of CLL cells proliferation for UM ZAP+ (circle), M ZAP70+ (triangle) and M ZAP70− (square) CLL cells after anti-IgM + CD40L + IL-4 + IL-21 stimulation in soluble medium, semi-solid medium, soluble medium + CpG-ODN2006 and semi-solid medium + CpG-ODN2006. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

When BCR ligation and cytokines are associated with CpG-ODN2006 stimulation, all CLL-cells respond equally in soluble or semi-solid medium, irrespective of the level of ZAP70 and the IGHV status (Fig. 5).

Increased ZAP70/SYK and STAT6 phosphorylation in proliferating ZAP70+ CLL cells

Given the heterogeneity of the proliferative response of ZAP70+ CLL-cells, we searched for signaling differences between responders (proliferating) and non-responders ZAP70+ cells. We performed western blots to analyze the main signaling pathways activated downstream of the BCR (e.g. ZAP70, pZAP/pSYK, pERK, pIkB) and the JAK/STAT pathway (e.g. pAKT and pSTAT6) in selected responders and non-responders amongst the ZAP70+ UM-CLL cells. Our results (Figs 6A and S8A,B) confirmed ZAP70 expression in all these CLL cells. They also suggested increased ZAP70Tyr319/SYKTyr352 phosphorylation before stimulation (at the steady state) and a further increase upon stimulation in responding ZAP70+ CLL cells, compared to non-responding cells (p = 0.03). IkB phosphorylation was evidenced upon stimulation in both non-responding (p = 0.03) and responding (p = 0.05) CLL cells. The main signaling pathway downstream IL-21R (pSTAT3), revealed no difference between responders (proliferating) and non-responders ZAP70+ cells (Fig. S9A–C). However, we observed an increased STAT6 phosphorylation in responding CLL cells, compared to non-responders (p = 0.03). STAT6 being a major component of the IL-4 receptor signaling pathway, this result was corroborated by the significantly reduced CLL cells proliferation found in the absence of IL-4 in the stimulatory cocktails, or when a selective JAK3 inhibitor (PF-956980) was used (Fig. 6B).

Figure 6
figure6

Signaling pathways activated by [anti-IgM + CD40L + IL-4 + IL-21] stimulation of responding and non-responding UM ZAP70+ CLL cells. (A) Normalized protein expression of ZAP70, phospho-ZAP70Tyr319/SYKTyr352 (pZAP70/pSYK), phospho-SYKTyr323 (pSYK), phospho-AKTThr308 (pAKT), phospho-ERK1/2Tyr204 (pERK), phospho-IκBSer32/36 (pIκB) and phospho-STAT6Tyr641 (pSTAT6), based on immunoblot results of proliferating (Responders, n = 4) and non-proliferating (Non Responders, n = 3) UM-CLL ZAP+ CLL cells following stimulation (S) or in unstimulated (US) conditions. Protein expression corresponds to the value of a signal (determined with ImageJ) normalized to that of GAPDH. (B) Role of IL-4 co-stimulation on CLL cells proliferation. CLL cells isolated from 6 CLL patients were stimulated ex vivo with anti-IgM, CD40L, IL-4 and IL-21, with or without a specific JAK3 inhibitor (PF-956980), or with anti-IgM, CD40L and IL-21. After initial CFSE staining (at day 0), the percentage of cell proliferation was measured at day 6. Symbols (circle) represent UM ZAP+ CLL cells. 95% confidence interval for median is shown in each graph. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

Discussion

Engagement of the BCR is a crucial event in CLL leukemogenesis, but is not sufficient to induce cell proliferation ex vivo, and is even known to promote B cells apoptosis15,18. This caveat can be prevented with coated anti-IgM stimulation, which promotes CLL cells survival9 but does not induce cell proliferation either. Therefore, BCR-induced CLL-cell proliferation in vivo likely requires additional co-stimulatory signals and proliferative properties of several soluble factors have been described in the literature. Here we performed an exhaustive study of the role of several co-stimulating factors, used solely or in combination, on top of anti-IgM stimulation, to identify mandatory factors sustaining CLL cells proliferation ex vivo. We evaluated CD40L (CD154), a TNF family member expressed on activated T-cells that activates the TNFRSF5 receptor on B cells and triggers several signaling pathways, including NF-kB and ERK, and participates in the survival, proliferation and differentiation of B cells37. IL-4, which is mainly secreted by T Follicular helper cell (TFH), activates STAT6 and participates in the activation and survival of B cells38,39, was also tested. Finally, we considered IL-21, which is produced by TFH, NKT and TH17 cells, for its role in the induction of JAK/STAT signaling in B cells40. IL-21 is known to induce apoptosis34, but plays also a role in CLL cells proliferation after priming by IL-4 and CD40L22,23, IL-21 was added at Day 1 in the culture medium. We also tested, isolated or in combination, IL-10, IL-2, IL-15, which did not show gain in BCR-induced proliferation effect (not shown) and were not considered further.

Several groups have already used soluble CD40L, Il-2, IL-4, IL-10, IL15 or IL-21, isolated or in combination, to stimulate CLL cells22,23,24,30,34,39. However, to our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate their role as BCR co-stimulating factors in soluble conditions without the support of feeder cells. Indeed, most ex vivo models of CLL cells proliferation described in the literature are not consistently defined, as they used co-cultures of fibroblasts expressing CD40L, sometimes in the presence of IL-2122, to favor CLL cells survival32,33. Co-cultures involving autologous activated T-cells have also been reported22,28, including in association with a fibroblast layer30. The nature of the cytokines used suggests a T cell dependent activation, possibly delivered by follicular helper T-cells found in the proliferative centers described in secondary lymphoid organs of CLL patients41,42,43.

Our systematic analysis of BCR ligation associated to different co-stimulations enabled us to select the optimal condition combining BCR activation and co-stimulating factors [CD40L + IL-4 + IL-21] driving CLL cells proliferation. This cocktail was used to stimulate CLL cells harvested from a cohort of patients with different biological characteristics (IGHV UM/M, ZAP70+/− and CD38+/−) and control B cells from healthy donors. In these conditions, about 1/3 of CLL cells proliferate at day 6 after stimulation, among which ZAP70+ B cells appeared particularly responsive. The same stimulation, performed on a 3D semi-solid (methylcellulose) medium, induced the proliferation of nearly all (89%) CLL cells, with a high number of cell generation, representing an efficient model of CLL cells proliferation.

A T-dependent help for CLL cells proliferation has not yet been proven in vivo. In our model, T-cells-derived cytokines (CD40L, IL-4 and IL-21) enable BCR-activated CLL proliferation which reinforces this hypothesis. Furthermore, it was shown in the literature that the proliferation of CLL cells xenografted in NOD-SCID mice required concomitant TFH graft in vivo44, which also sustains this model. Of note, our results showed the importance of IL-4 and IL-21 co-stimulation (in addition to anti-IgM and CD40L) for CLL cells proliferation, whereas the sole association of anti-IgM and CD40L was sufficient to induce healthy B cells proliferation. Finally, BCR and cytokine stimulation on a tri-dimensional matrix of methylcellulose allowed the proliferation of most of the CLL cells tested, irrespectively of their biological characteristics. This result, which may reflect the natural history of leukemogenesis of CLL cells within secondary lymphoid organs may further enhance the pathophysiological relevance of our ex vivo model. Furthermore, the individualization of clusters of proliferating cells, distributed in this 3D matrix, could allow studying the heterogeneity of intraclonal responsiveness to various drugs in future studies.

High proliferation rate (up to 80% with 6–8 cell generations) was only observed in a subset of CLL cells. Such variability may reflect the clinical and biological heterogeneity of CLL patients, among whom those characterized by ZAP70+ CLL cells appeared particularly responsive, as also observed by others32,45. However, we noted that all ZAP70+ CLL cells do not equally respond to ex vivo stimulation, which prompted us to investigate in more details the molecular features of the responders and non-responders among this subpopulation. We first confirmed by Western blots the presence of ZAP70 protein in these cells. In CLL cells, ZAP70 activates and extends SYKTyr352 phosphorylation, independently of ZAP70 phosphorylation10,46. This activation induces another SYKTyr526 phosphorylation, leading to downstream BCR signaling. Our results, performed on a limited number of CLL cell samples (4R vs 3 NR) show that CLL cells that proliferate in soluble medium could achieved a higher initial ZAP70Tyr319/SYKTyr352 phosphorylation, the mechanism of which remains to be investigated. We also show a concomitant increase in pSTAT6 in the proliferating ZAP70+ CLL cells, suggesting that signaling downstream of the IL-4R could participate in CLL proliferation, which reinforces the need to evaluate therapeutic agents inhibiting this pathway39,47. More generally, these results highlight the need to explore the functionality of multiple signaling pathways in relation to the heterogeneity of CLL patients. Indeed, as more kinases inhibitors are now available for therapeutic use, there appears to be a rational for further personalized use of these molecules.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates the relevance of the BCR activation, combined with a defined set of cytokines, to recapitulate CLL cells proliferation ex vivo. In addition, it highlights the potential roles of T cells in this process. The soluble and 3D culture models established here represent valuable systems for further studies aimed at characterizing the initial steps of malignant evolution of the CLL, with the ultimate goal to identify novel targets for therapeutic purpose.

Materials and Methods

Subjects and B cell isolation

Peripheral lymphocytes were isolated from 65 untreated CLL patients and from 36 healthy blood donors (buffy coats obtained from the Etablissement Français du Sang Grand Est, Strasbourg, France). All subjects gave written informed consent for this study, which was approved by the institutional review board of the Strasbourg University Hospitals and all experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. CLL cells were negatively selected from fresh blood samples using the RosetteSepTM B cell enrichment cocktail (StemCell Technologies, Grenoble, France) and density gradient centrifugation (Ficoll®Paque Plus, GE Healthcare Life sciences, Velizy-Villacoublay, France). IGHV gene mutation status and ZAP70 expression were evaluated for each patient following established protocols48,49. Cytogenetic abnormalities were identified by metaphase analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using a panel of probes as previously reported50. Total (CD19+) or naïve (CD19+, CD27+, IgM+) B cells were isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of healthy blood donors using a negative selection kit (Human naïve B cell isolation kit, Human B cell isolation kit, StemcellTM Technologies, Grenoble, France) after density gradient centrifugation (Ficoll®Paque Plus, GE Healthcare Life sciences, Velizy-Villacoublay, France). The cell purity was then controlled by flow cytometry on a Cytomics FC500 System (Beckman-Coulter, Fullerton, CA) using CD19+ or CD19+/CD27 staining (Beckman Coulter, Villepinte, France). CLL B cell purity was assessed after CD19+/CD5+ staining (Beckman Coulter, Villepinte, France) and ranged from 90% to 99% (median 97%). Cell differentiation was studied after anti-CD38 and anti-CD138 stainings (Beckman Coulter, Villepinte, France) at days 0 and 6.

Culture conditions

Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 Medium (Gibco, Paisley, UK) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) (Dutscher, Brumath, France) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco, New York, USA), with or without methylcellulose (MethoCultTM, StemcellTM Technologies, Vancouver, Canada) at 37 °C, in an atmosphere enriched with 5% CO2. B cells at a density of 106 cells/ml were stimulated in the absence or presence of 10 µg/ml of soluble F(ab’)2 anti-human IgM (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA), 100 ng/ml of trimeric CD40L (Enzo Life Science, Villeurbanne, France), 10 ng/ml of IL-4 (R&D Systems-Bio-Techne, Lille, France) and 25 ng/ml of IL-21 (Invitrogen, Maryland, USA). Il-21 was added 24 h after initial stimulation with anti-IgM, CD40L and IL-4 by up/down pipetting in soluble and methyl cellulose medium. In each well, 100 µl of fresh soluble medium was added at Day 3. Other culture conditions included CpG (ODN2006, 5 µg/ml, InvivoGen, San Diego, USA), IL-15 (15 ng/ml, R&D), IL-2 (10 ng/ml, R&D) and PremixAmpliB DSP30/IL-2 (50 or 100 µg/106 cells) (Amplitech, Compiegne, France). After 6 days, proliferation was assessed by flow cytometry.

Control and CLL cells were co-cultured on fibroblasts (3T6 cells) stably transfected with either a plasmid encoding human CD40L (3T6-CD40L) or mock transfected (3T6). Fibroblasts were pre-cultured overnight in 48-well plates (Dutscher, Brumath, France) at 5.104 cells/well. At day 1, fibroblasts were X-ray-irradiated (30 Gy) and re-cultured overnight. At day 2, carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) labeled B cells (106 cells/ml) were added to the fibroblast layer (10 CLL cells/1 fibroblast). At day 6 and after CD19 staining, B cells proliferation was evaluated by flow cytometry.

CFSE-based proliferation assays

Freshly isolated B cells were labeled with 0.5 μM CellTraceTM CFSE (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and incubated for 10 min at 37 °C in the dark. Washed CFSE-labeled cells were stimulated and cultured at 37 °C/5% CO2. Four or six days later, B cell proliferation was evidenced by a cell division-dependent decrease in CFSE staining intensity as evaluated by flow cytometry (Fig. S1). Fluorescence data were analyzed with CXP (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) and FlowJo v.8.7 (TreeStar, Ashland, USA) softwares.

Apoptosis assay

Cell apoptosis was evaluated using FITC annexin-V Apoptosis detection kit and propidium iodide (PI) (both from BD Pharmingen, BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA). Cells (106) were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and re-suspended in annexin buffer before the addition of FITC annexin-V and incubated for 20 min on ice in the dark. PI was then added for 5 min before flow cytometry analysis. DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich; Missouri, USA) was also used to analyze cell viability.

Western blotting

After stimulation, B cells were centrifuged and cell pellets re-suspended in lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8], 130 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, and protease inhibitors) for 20 minutes on ice. Lysates were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 300 g at 4 °C, and supernatants subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred electrophoretically to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. Membranes were then blocked using 5% milk in Tris-buffered saline (TBS; 20 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl) for 1 h at room temperature. The blots were then incubated with anti-ZAP70 (Clone E267) (Abcam, Paris, France), anti-phospho ZAP70Tyr319 (Abcam, Paris, France) - which recognizes also SYKTyr352 phosphorylation in CLL B cells46 -, anti-phospho-SYKTyr323 (Santa Cruz, Nanterre, France), anti-phospho-ERK1/2Tyr204 (clone E-4) (Santa Cruz, Nanterre, France), for 2 h at room temperature, anti-phospho-STAT6Tyr641 (Cell Signaling, France), anti-phospho-AKTThr308 (clone D25E6) (Cell Signaling), anti-phospho-IkBSer32/36 (clone 5A5) (Cell Signaling), anti-phospho-STAT3Tyr705 (clone EP2147Y) (GeneTex), anti-STAT3 (clone 79D7) (Cell Signaling) overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG or anti-rabbit monoclonal antibodies (1 h at 25 °C), and revealed by Electro Chemo Luminescence (ECL Plus Western blotting Detection Reagents (Amersham, Courtaboeuf, France) or SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity substrate (Pierce, Courtaboeuf, France), according to manufacturers’ instructions. To confirm the presence of equal amounts of loaded proteins, membranes were incubated with anti-Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, clone 6C5) (Merck Millipore, Guyancourt, France). Signals were visualized by chemiluminescence and processed by the Image LabTM software (BioRad, Marnes-la Coquette, France). The relative intensity of bands was measured and calculated using the Image J software (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/index.html). The abundance of each protein has been normalized to GAPDH within the same sample on the same western blot.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using R 3.2.4 (R Core Team, 2016, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Graphics were created using Graphpad Prism 7.0 (Graphpad Software; Inc, La Jolla, CA, USA). We used permutational ANOVA for repeated measurements (lmPerm R package, https://github.com/mtorchiano/lmPerm) to compare more than two groups. Posthoc tests were done using nonparametric multiple comparisons tests carried out with the nparcomp R package51. Differences between two groups were assessed using either nonparametric Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test of nonparametric Mann-Whitney test (unpaired, when applicable). A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

References

  1. 1.

    Chiorazzi, N., Rai, K. R. & Ferrarini, M. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 352, 804–815, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra041720 (2005).

  2. 2.

    Fabbri, G. & Dalla-Favera, R. The molecular pathogenesis of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Nat Rev Cancer 16, 145–162, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2016.8 (2016).

  3. 3.

    Puente, X. S. et al. Whole-genome sequencing identifies recurrent mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Nature 475, 101–105, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10113 (2011).

  4. 4.

    Messmer, B. T. et al. Multiple distinct sets of stereotyped antigen receptors indicate a role for antigen in promoting chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Exp Med 200, 519–525, https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20040544 (2004).

  5. 5.

    Fais, F. et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells express restricted sets of mutated and unmutated antigen receptors. J Clin Invest 102, 1515–1525, https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI3009 (1998).

  6. 6.

    Stamatopoulos, K. et al. Over 20% of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia carry stereotyped receptors: Pathogenetic implications and clinical correlations. Blood 109, 259–270, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-03-012948 (2007).

  7. 7.

    Hoogeboom, R. et al. A mutated B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia subset that recognizes and responds to fungi. J Exp Med 210, 59–70, https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20121801 (2013).

  8. 8.

    Duhren-von Minden, M. et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia is driven by antigen-independent cell-autonomous signalling. Nature 489, 309–312, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11309 (2012).

  9. 9.

    Deglesne, P. A. et al. Survival response to B-cell receptor ligation is restricted to progressive chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells irrespective of Zap70 expression. Cancer Res 66, 7158–7166, https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0085 (2006).

  10. 10.

    Chen, L. et al. ZAP-70 enhances IgM signaling independent of its kinase activity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 111, 2685–2692, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-12-062265 (2008).

  11. 11.

    Rassenti, L. Z. et al. ZAP-70 compared with immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene mutation status as a predictor of disease progression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 351, 893–901 (2004).

  12. 12.

    Lanham, S. et al. Differential signaling via surface IgM is associated with VH gene mutational status and CD38 expression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 101, 1087–1093, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2002-06-1822 (2003).

  13. 13.

    Casola, S. et al. B cell receptor signal strength determines B cell fate. Nat Immunol 5, 317–327 (2004).

  14. 14.

    Burger, J. A. & Gandhi, V. The lymphatic tissue microenvironments in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: in vitro models and the significance of CD40-CD154 interactions. Blood 114, 2560–2561; author reply 2561–2562, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-06-228981 (2009).

  15. 15.

    Vallat, L. D., Park, Y., Li, C. & Gribben, J. G. Temporal genetic program following B-cell receptor cross-linking: altered balance between proliferation and death in healthy and malignant B cells. Blood 109, 3989–3997, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-09-045377 (2007).

  16. 16.

    Vallat, L. et al. Reverse-engineering the genetic circuitry of a cancer cell with predicted intervention in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 459–464, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211130110 (2013).

  17. 17.

    Perrot, A. et al. A unique proteomic profile on surface IgM ligation in unmutated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 118, e1–15, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-02-335125 (2011).

  18. 18.

    Yoshida, T. et al. Rapid B cell apoptosis induced by antigen receptor ligation does not require Fas (CD95/APO-1), the adaptor protein FADD/MORT1 or CrmA-sensitive caspases but is defective in both MRL-+/+ and MRL-lpr/lpr mice. International immunology 12, 517–526 (2000).

  19. 19.

    Zupo, S. et al. Apoptosis or plasma cell differentiation of CD38-positive B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells induced by cross-linking of surface IgM or IgD. Blood 95, 1199–1206 (2000).

  20. 20.

    Petlickovski, A. et al. Sustained signaling through the B-cell receptor induces Mcl-1 and promotes survival of chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells. Blood 105, 4820–4827, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2004-07-2669 (2005).

  21. 21.

    Buske, C. et al. Stimulation of B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells by murine fibroblasts, IL-4, anti-CD40 antibodies, and the soluble CD40 ligand. Experimental hematology 25, 329–337 (1997).

  22. 22.

    Pascutti, M. F. et al. IL-21 and CD40L signals from autologous T cells can induce antigen-independent proliferation of CLL cells. Blood 122, 3010–3019, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-11-467670 (2013).

  23. 23.

    Ahearne, M. J. et al. Enhancement of CD154/IL4 proliferation by the T follicular helper (Tfh) cytokine, IL21 and increased numbers of circulating cells resembling Tfh cells in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 162, 360–370, https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.12401 (2013).

  24. 24.

    de Totero, D. et al. The opposite effects of IL-15 and IL-21 on CLL B cells correlate with differential activation of the JAK/STAT and ERK1/2 pathways. Blood 111, 517–524, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-04-087882 (2008).

  25. 25.

    Fluckiger, A. C. et al. Responsiveness of chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells activated via surface Igs or CD40 to B-cell tropic factors. Blood 80, 3173–3181 (1992).

  26. 26.

    Lagneaux, L., Delforge, A., Bron, D., De Bruyn, C. & Stryckmans, P. Chronic lymphocytic leukemic B cells but not normal B cells are rescued from apoptosis by contact with normal bone marrow stromal cells. Blood 91, 2387–2396 (1998).

  27. 27.

    Plander, M. et al. Different proliferative and survival capacity of CLL-cells in a newly established in vitro model for pseudofollicles. Leukemia 23, 2118–2128, https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2009.145 (2009).

  28. 28.

    Patten, P. E. et al. CD38 expression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia is regulated by the tumor microenvironment. Blood 111, 5173–5181, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-08-108605 (2008).

  29. 29.

    Os, A. et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells are activated and proliferate in response to specific T helper cells. Cell Rep 4, 566–577, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.07.011 (2013).

  30. 30.

    Asslaber, D. et al. Mimicking the microenvironment in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia - where does the journey go? Br J Haematol 160, 711–714, https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.12151 (2013).

  31. 31.

    Decker, T. et al. Immunostimulatory CpG-oligonucleotides cause proliferation, cytokine production, and an immunogenic phenotype in chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells. Blood 95, 999–1006 (2000).

  32. 32.

    Hamilton, E. et al. Mimicking the tumour microenvironment: three different co-culture systems induce a similar phenotype but distinct proliferative signals in primary chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells. Br J Haematol 158, 589–599, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09191.x (2012).

  33. 33.

    Kater, A. P. et al. CD40 stimulation of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells enhances the anti-apoptotic profile, but also Bid expression and cells remain susceptible to autologous cytotoxic T-lymphocyte attack. Br J Haematol 127, 404–415, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05225.x (2004).

  34. 34.

    de Totero, D. et al. Interleukin-21 receptor (IL-21R) is up-regulated by CD40 triggering and mediates proapoptotic signals in chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells. Blood 107, 3708–3715, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-09-3535 (2006).

  35. 35.

    Lutzny, G. et al. Protein kinase c-beta-dependent activation of NF-kappaB in stromal cells is indispensable for the survival of chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells in vivo. Cancer cell 23, 77–92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2012.12.003 (2013).

  36. 36.

    Wagner, M. et al. Integration of innate into adaptive immune responses in ZAP-70-positive chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 127, 436–448, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-05-646935 (2016).

  37. 37.

    Graham, J. P., Arcipowski, K. M. & Bishop, G. A. Differential B-lymphocyte regulation by CD40 and its viral mimic, latent membrane protein 1. Immunological reviews 237, 226–248, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00932.x (2010).

  38. 38.

    Ul-Haq, Z., Naz, S. & Mesaik, M. A. Interleukin-4 receptor signaling and its binding mechanism: A therapeutic insight from inhibitors tool box. Cytokine & growth factor reviews 32, 3–15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2016.04.002 (2016).

  39. 39.

    Aguilar-Hernandez, M. M. et al. IL-4 enhances expression and function of surface IgM in CLL cells. Blood 127, 3015–3025, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-11-682906 (2016).

  40. 40.

    Spolski, R. & Leonard, W. J. Interleukin-21: a double-edged sword with therapeutic potential. Nature reviews. Drug discovery 13, 379–395, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd4296 (2014).

  41. 41.

    Caligaris-Cappio, F. Role of the microenvironment in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 123, 380–388 (2003).

  42. 42.

    Smit, L. A. et al. Differential Noxa/Mcl-1 balance in peripheral versus lymph node chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells correlates with survival capacity. Blood 109, 1660–1668, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-05-021683 (2007).

  43. 43.

    Herishanu, Y. et al. The lymph node microenvironment promotes B-cell receptor signaling, NF-kappaB activation, and tumor proliferation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 117, 563–574, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-05-284984 (2011).

  44. 44.

    Bagnara, D. et al. A novel adoptive transfer model of chronic lymphocytic leukemia suggests a key role for T lymphocytes in the disease. Blood 117, 5463–5472, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-12-324210 (2011).

  45. 45.

    Chen, L. et al. ZAP-70 directly enhances IgM signaling in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 105, 2036–2041, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2004-05-1715 (2005).

  46. 46.

    Gobessi, S. et al. ZAP-70 enhances B-cell-receptor signaling despite absent or inefficient tyrosine kinase activation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and lymphoma B cells. Blood 109, 2032–2039, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-03-011759 (2007).

  47. 47.

    Slinger, E., Thijssen, R., Kater, A. P. & Eldering, E. Targeting antigen-independent proliferation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia through differential kinase inhibition. Leukemia 31, 2601–2607, https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2017.129 (2017).

  48. 48.

    van Dongen, J. J. et al. Design and standardization of PCR primers and protocols for detection of clonal immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene recombinations in suspect lymphoproliferations: report of the BIOMED-2 Concerted Action BMH4-CT98-3936. Leukemia 17, 2257–2317, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2403202 (2003).

  49. 49.

    Letestu, R. et al. Evaluation of ZAP-70 expression by flow cytometry in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A multicentric international harmonization process. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 70, 309–314, https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.20132 (2006).

  50. 50.

    Dohner, H. et al. Genomic aberrations and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 343, 1910–1916 (2000).

  51. 51.

    Konietschke, F., Placzek, M., Schaarschmidt, F. & Hothorn, L., A. nparcomp: An R Software Package for Nonparametric Multiple Comparisons and Simultaneous Confidence Intervals. Journal of statistical software 64, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v064.i09 (2015).

  52. 52.

    Damle, R. N. et al. Ig V gene mutation status and CD38 expression as novel prognostic indicators in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 94, 1840–1847 (1999).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Drs Fanny Baran-Marszak, Frédéric Davi, Jean-Noël Freund, Delphine Rolland, Paolo Ghia and Robert Zeiser for critical reading of this manuscript. We are grateful to Drs Anne-Cécile Galoisy and Carine Gervais (Laboratoire d’Hématologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, France) for cytology analysis, Beatrice Uring-Lambert (Laboratoire d’Immunologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, France) for help with flow cytometry, Laurent Mailly (INSERM UMR_S 1110, Strasbourg, France) for access to the cell irradiaiton platform, Shanti Amé and Blandine Guffroy (Service d’Hématologie Adulte, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, France) for providing CLL samples, Manuela Tavian (INSERM UMR_S 949, Etablissement Français du Sang Grand Est, Strasbourg, France), Anne-Sophie Korganow (CNRS UPR9021, Strasbourg, France), Cendrine Seguin (CNRS UMR 7199, Illkirch, France) and Jozo Delic (Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique, Fontenay-aux-roses, France) for helpful suggestions and Ms Nathalie Perrusson (Laboratoire d’Hématologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, France) for technical help. This work was supported by grants from the Institut Thématique Multi-Organism (ITMO) cancer initiative within the framework plan cancer 2009–2013 “GenPred project”, Initiative d’Excellence-CNRS, the Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer (ARC), Alsace Cancer association, the Genomax, the Strasbourg School of Medicine Next Generation Sequencing center, the Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), the Ligue contre le Cancer and the LABEX Transplantex [ANR-11-LABX-0070_Transplantex] (French National Research Agency; ANR), INSERM UMR_S1109 and UMR_S1113.

Author information

C.S., W.I. and O.T., S.F., Y.G. performed experiments, analyzed data and reviewed the manuscript. L.M., C.M.R. and L.M. performed C.L.L. cells biological characterization and reviewed the manuscript. L.M.F., E.T. and R.H. provided C.L.L. samples, clinical information and reviewed the manuscript. F.B. and M.M.B. performed statistical analysis. S.B. analyzed the data. T.M., P.G., S.B. wrote the manuscript. L.V. designed and supervised the study, analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and concurred with the manuscript and its contents.

Correspondence to Seiamak Bahram or Laurent Vallat.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.