Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01893-z, published online 12 May 2017
The original version of this Article contained an error in the title of the paper, where “Sexual homomorphism in dioecious trees: extensive tests fail to detect sexual dimorphism in Populus” was incorrectly given as “Sexual homomorphism in dioecious trees: extensive tests fail to detect sexual dimorphism in Populus†”. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
McKown, A.D., Klápště, J., Guy, R.D. et al. Author Correction: Sexual homomorphism in dioecious trees: extensive tests fail to detect sexual dimorphism in Populus. Sci Rep 8, 17410 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35443-y
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35443-y
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
