Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The infection of Harmonia axyridis by a parasitic nematode is mediated by entomopathogenic bacteria and triggers sex-specific host immune responses

Abstract

The harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis is native to Asia but has been introduced into many countries as a biological control agent. It is now considered an invasive pest, threatening the biodiversity of native ladybirds globally, in part because of its superior immune system. H. axyridis is infected and killed by the parasitic nematode Parasitylenchus bifurcatus, which could therefore be developed as a biological strategy to counter the spread of this insect pest. However, effective control requires an understanding of the tripartite relationship between H. axyridis, P. bifurcatus and their potential bacterial mutualists. Here we describe the isolation of two species of nematode-associated bacteria (Serratia marcescens and Providencia rettgeri) which were highly virulent against H. axyridis in survival experiments. In addition, contact between the nematodes and beetles led to the sex-specific modulation of multiple host immunity-related genes after 24 and 48 h, with many genes encoding antimicrobial peptides rapidly and stably repressed in females whereas the same genes were initially induced in males before suppression at the later time point. These data provide evidence that the female immune system responds much more strongly to the nematodes and provokes, in turn, a more robust invasion strategy involving the bacterial mutualists.

Introduction

The harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis is native to Central and East Asia but has been introduced into many countries to control aphids and other pests1. Within a short period, H. axyridis has become an invasive species which successfully outcompetes native ladybirds worldwide1,2. Therefore, it is now used as a model to determine why some species become successful invaders whereas others, even if closely related, do not3. The invasive success of H. axyridis can partly be explained by behavioural adaptations such as intraguild predation4, as well as the transmission of microsporidia which are tolerated by the host but not by native ladybird species5,6. However, other important factors inlcude the superior immune system of H. axyridis, which provides stronger resistance against pathogens and parasites compared to native ladybird species such as Adalia bipunctata and Coccinella septempunctata7,8,9,10,11.

H. axyridis has a dual defence system comprising the alkaloid harmonine, which is constitutively present in the haemolymph, and inducible antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), which are expressed when pathogens are encountered12. Interestingly, harmonine displays broad-spectrum activity against parasites, including those responsible for malaria and leishmaniosis in humans13,14. The H. axyridis genome contains an expanded repertoire of 49 genes encoding putative AMPs and 10 genes encoding lysozymes, the highest number of defence-related peptides produced by any animal species investigated thus far15. Harmonine and AMPs display synergistic antimicrobial activity with c-type lysozymes16. The superior immune system of H. axyridis may also enable this host to carry the parasitic microsporidia described above, and to use them as biological weapons against competing ladybird species without suffering their effects directly5,6,17,18. We recently demonstrated that invasive and non-invasive populations of H. axyridis show distinct expression profiles of certain AMPs and confirmed the important protective role of one specific coleoptericin in the invasive populations, which suggests that rapidly-changing gene expression profiles in H. axyridis populations can promote pathogen resistance and thereby their invasive performance19.

Despite the superior H. axyridis immune system, there are several entomopathogenic bacteria20, fungi7,8,9,10 and nematodes21 that kill this species. The ability of entomopathogenic nematodes to infect and kill insects22 provides an environmentally sustainable alternative to chemical pesticides for biological control23,24. A well-studied example is the nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, which forms a mutualistic relationship with the highly entomopathogenic Gram-negative bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens25. The first report of nematodes in ladybirds26 revealed a new nematode species later named Parasitylenchus coccinellinae27. A similar entomopathogenic nematode discovered in H. axyridis beetles28 was later named P. bifurcatus29.

The analysis of complex tripartite relationships between insect hosts, parasitic nematodes and their bacterial mutualists has thus far been limited to model species such as Drosophila melanogaster30 and Manduca sexta31. Here we investigated the relationship between H. axyridis, P. bifurcatus and two potential bacterial mutualists of the entomopathogenic nematode, i.e. Serratia marcescens and Providencia rettgeri. Both bacterial strains can kill H. axyridis rapidly in a concentration-dependent manner. Gene expression profiling in ladybirds carrying the entomopathogenic nematode revealed a complex response involving the sex-specific expression of multiple immunity-related genes 24 and 48 h post-infection.

Results

Identification of P. bifurcatus and infection rates in H. axyridis

Nematodes found in the haemocoel of greenhouse-reared H. axyridis beetles were identified morphologically as the previously described species P. bifurcatus (Tylenchida: Allantonematidae) (Fig. 1A–D) and were consistent with earlier descriptions28,29, including morphological characteristics like a straight stylet lacking basal knobs, a short and narrow bursa of the males and especially the presence of the eponymous bifurcated tail of juvenile male and vermiform female nematodes (Fig. 1D). Phylogenetic identification on the basis of 18S SSU rRNA gene sequences confirmed the morphological identification. BLAST search results and the resulting consensus sequence from the assembly are presented in Table S1 and Fig. S1. Field-collected beetles were screened for P. bifurcatus, revealing a low prevalence of 1.23% for aggregating individuals in October 2017 (Table 1). In contrast, we found that 75% of the greenhouse-reared beetles were infected with P. bifurcatus, but the laboratory-bred specimens as well as L4 larvae from the greenhouse-reared population showed no evidence of nematode infections (Table 1).

Figure 1
figure1

Microscopic images of P. bifurcatus isolated from H. axyridis beetles. (A) Head region. Scale bar = 125 µm. (B) Vulva region of mature female. Developing eggs and larvae can be seen in the body cavity. Scale bar = 96 µm. (C) Adult male with coiled tail region and juvenile female. Scale bar = 67 µm. (D) Infective vermiform female with magnification of the bifurcated tail. Scale bar = 116 µm (main image) and 10 µm (inset image).

Table 1 Prevalence of P. bifurcatus in field-collected, greenhouse-reared, and laboratory-reared H. axyridis beetles and in greenhouse-reared L4 larvae.

Isolation of nematode-associated bacteria

We established bacterial culture collections from nematode-infected greenhouse-reared beetles as well as control collections from nematode-free greenhouse-reared and laboratory-reared individuals, and identified the bacteria by sequencing the 16S SSU rRNA gene (Fig. 2). In the uninfected greenhouse-reared controls, 52% of the 21 sequenced clones were identified as Erwinia iniecta, 32% as Staphylococcus sciuri, 8% as Staphylococcus saprophyticus, 4% as Acinetobacter soli and 4% were unidentified. In the uninfected laboratory-reared controls, 67% of the 25 sequenced clones were identified as Enterobacter xiangfangensis, 14% as other Enterobacter spp., 9% as Acinetobacter radioresistens, 5% as S. sciuri and 5% as S. saprophyticus. In the beetles infected with P. bifurcatus, 41% of the 27 sequenced clones were identified as A. soli, 22% as S. sciuri, 15% as Serratia marcescens, 7% as Acinetobacter bereziniae, 4% as Providencia rettgeri and 11% were unidentified. All three groups carried S. sciuri and Acinetobacter spp., suggesting these species may be part of the normal H. axyridis microbiome. Two species, S. marcescens and P. rettgeri, were exclusively found in beetles infected with P. bifurcatus, indicating a potential mutualistic association with the nematode. BLAST search results and 16S SSU rRNA sequences for S. sciuri, S. marcescens and P. rettgeri are presented in Tables S2S4 and Figs S2S4.

Figure 2
figure2

Frequency and distribution of bacterial species found in uninfected H. axyridis beetles and those infected with the nematode P. bifurcatus. Pie charts indicate species-level composition and frequency in greenhouse-reared (uninfected) beetles based on 21 bacterial sequences, laboratory-reared (uninfected) beetles based on 25 sequences, and nematode-infected beetles based on 27 sequences. Venn diagram shows the shared and exclusive strains (middle).

Susceptibility of H. axyridis to nematode-associated bacteria

The virulence of the nematode-specific bacterial strains S. marcescens and P. rettgeri, and S. sciuri as an internal microbiome control, was determined by infecting beetles via intra-thoracic injection at the third coxal base with either a bacterial suspension or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as mock control. Two different concentrations of bacteria, adjusted with a Neubauer improved counting chamber, were tested: 8 × 107 and 8 × 109 cells/ml (Fig. 3A–F). Survival was recorded every 12 h up to 240 h. All PBS-injected controls showed 100% survival at 240 h, i.e. 10 days after infection (Fig. 3A–F). The beetles injected with S. sciuri at the higher concentration of 8 × 109 cells/ml showed a low male mortality and intermediate female mortality with a median survival time (ST50) of 156 h (95% CI, 96–NA) (Fig. 3A), which was significantly different from PBS controls (log-rank test: p < 0.001) but not from infected males (log-rank test: p = 0.0539). Mortality after S. sciuri infection was not evident at the lower concentration of 8 × 107 cells/ml (Fig. 3B). In contrast, survival of beetles injected with either concentration of P. rettgeri or S. marcescens always was lower when compared to controls and S. sciuri (log-rank test: p < 0.001 each). P. rettgeri rapidly killed all the beetles at the higher concentration of 8 × 109 cells/ml, with a ST50 of 36 h (95% CI, 24–36) and 100% mortality after 60 h (Fig. 3C). At the lower concentration of 8 × 107 cells/ml there was a concentration dependent shift in survival, with a ST50 of 60 h (95% CI, 60–84) and ~20% of the males remained alive 240 h post infection (Fig. 3D). Though, all injected females died within 180 h, the difference between sexes was not significant (log-rank test: p = 0.1713). Similar results were observed when the beetles were injected with S. marcescens. At the higher concentration, all beetles succumbed within 24 h (females) and 36 h (males), respectively (Fig. 3E), showing that S. marcescens is even more virulent than P. rettgeri (log-rank test: p = 0.0021 and p = 0.0120). At the lower concentration, no difference in virulence was observed between those two pathogens (log-rank test: p = 1.000 for both sexes) and the ST50 for S. marcescens was similar to P. rettgeri with approximately 60 h (95% CI, 60–72) (Fig. 3F). Statistical summaries including values for ST50, log-rank tests for both bacterial concentrations and pairwise comparisons between sexes with corresponding p-values can be found in Tables S5S7.

Figure 3
figure3

Survival of H. axyridis male and female beetles injected with different bacterial isolates compared to control injections with PBS. Left-hand panels (A,C,E) represent bacterial concentrations of 8 × 109 cells/ml, and right-hand panels (B,D,F) represent bacterial concentrations of 8 × 107 cells/ml. (A,B) Infection with S. sciuri as an internal microbiome control. (C,D) Infection with the nematode-associated P. rettgeri strain. (E,F) Infection with the nematode-associated S. marcescens strain. Error bars indicate standard deviation of the mean of three independent experiments (3 × 5 beetles per sex and treatment).

AMP gene expression in nematode-infected beetles

Next we analysed the transcriptional modulation of 22 genes encoding AMPs in beetles exposed to nematodes carrying the two bacterial strains described above (Fig. 4). Each sample used for quantitative real-time PCR analysis represents an individual beetle dipped in PBS containing nematodes to initiate infection via the natural exposure route (infected beetle expression value) paired with the mean value of six naïve controls dipped in PBS (mean control expression value). The induction ratio was categorized at 15 different levels and the results are presented as a heat map, which compares the relative fold-changes in gene expression between nine infected females and nine infected males at 24 and 48 hours after infection.

Figure 4
figure4

Analysis of the P. bifurcatus induced sex-specific AMP gene expression in H. axyridis. The heat map shows the comparison of immunity-related genes (listed along the top) regulated in the presence of P. bifurcatus between females (left panel column) and males (right panel column) after 24 h (upper panel row) and 48 h (lower panel row). Each sample represents the relative fold-change in gene expression for each infected beetle (n = 9 per sex and time point) against its corresponding mean control value (n = 3 per experiment and time point). The colour code reflects the magnitude of fold-induction or -repression compared to uninfected controls. The 24-h samples were sorted separately for each sex by hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis using Euclidean distance matrix computation and Ward’s minimum variance algorithm and the resulting order was also used for the 48-h samples.

Overall, we observed substantial differences in relative immunity-related gene expression between males and females at both time points, whereas the changes from 24 to 48 h post-infection were less pronounced. After 24 h (Fig. 4, upper panel row), many genes in the females (Fig. 4, left column) were downregulated compared to controls and only a few genes were induced. Females 2 and 4 shared the overall repression of almost all AMPs except Thau1, which was consistently induced from 1.5-fold to 6-fold. Females 3 and 5 showed an overall expression profile similar to females 2 and 4, but differed in their strong induction of Def1, which they shared with males 2–6. Females 6–9 shared a common profile, featuring the consistent downregulation of thaumatins and the low to moderate induction of attacins, c-type lysozymes and defensins. In particular these samples revealed the consistent upregulation of CLys4 and Def4 from 1.5-fold to 12-fold and 24-fold, respectively. In contrast to the female samples, males (Fig. 4, right column) showed the moderate to strong induction of many AMP genes, especially those encoding attacins, defensins and some coleopterins and c-type lysozymes. Thaumatins were also moderately upregulated (up to 6-fold) in all males, except male 5. Only male 7 showed an expression profile differing from the other males, and like females 2, 4 and 5 this profile featured the general downregulation of AMPs and moderate upregulation of Thau1. Males 1, 8 and 9 showed a similar induction of c-type lysozymes, especially CLys4, with relative expression changes from 3-fold to 102-fold. Males 2–6 showed a very strong induction of Def1 (8240-fold in male 3) as well as the moderate induction of other defensins (including SapL7) and attacins.

The expression profiles after 48 h (Fig. 4, lower panel row) were similar to those observed at 24 h, so the major differences we observed were sex-dependent rather than time-dependent. The expression profiles were particularly stable in the female samples (Fig. 4, left column). The most remarkable differences were the declining induction ratio of Thau1 in females 2, 4 and 5, the moderate upregulation of Att6 and the switch from strong upregulation to repression of Def1 in females 3 and 5, and the declining induction ratio of c-type lysozymes and defensins in females 6–9. There were more substantial changes in gene expression between 24 and 48 h in the males, but the expression of thaumatins remained stable (Fig. 4, right column). We observed the moderate induction of attacins, c-type lysozymes, coleoptericins and thaumatins in males 7 and 8, leading to similar expression profiles as observed in most males at 24 h. In males 2–6, the induction ratio of the attacins and defensins declines, with the exception of SapL7. Furthermore, with the exception of males 3 and 6, we found that the formerly strongly induced Def 1 was downregulated at 48 h compared to controls. Overall, our analysis showed that after P. bifurcatus challenge in H. axyridis the host’s immune related genes are differentially expressed between females and males.

Discussion

The invasive ladybird H. axyridis has a robust and highly adjustable immune system which may contribute to its invasive success by conferring resistance against pathogens and parasites encountered in newly colonized habitats11,15,19,32. We found that our greenhouse-reared H. axyridis population was infected with the entomopathogenic nematode P. bifurcatus, which was previously shown to be carried by its host with a prevalence of 2–33% in early autumn28,29, consistent with the prevalence of 1.23% we observed among 324 field-collected beetles. We also observed a prevalence of 75% for greenhouse-reared beetles but no infections in laboratory-reared beetles, indicating an absence of vertical transmission from greenhouse-reared beetles to F1 eggs and larvae. This also explains why individual laboratory rearing provided us with 100% nematode free beetles for our experiments. Furthermore, our data for greenhouse reared L4 larvae (Table 1), which were found to be void of nematodes, support the hypothesis that the complete life cycle of P. bifurcatus is restricted to adult H. axyridis29. The route of transmission is currently unknown, but is likely to involve orifices such as the mouth, anus, spiracles and tracheae, or through soft parts of the cuticle33.

Entomopathogenic nematodes are parasites that kill insects22. However, the high prevalence of P. bifurcatus in greenhouse-reared H. axyridis did not lead to a decline in the population. Although the nematodes are not immediately lethal to their host, they are likely to reduce host fitness by depleting nutritional reserves33. Entomopathogenic nematodes are associated with bacteria that are virulent in the insect host, such as nematodes of the genera Steinernema and Heterorhabditis which carry mutualistic bacteria of the genera Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus, respectively34. We therefore screened our nematode-infected beetles for bacteria that are not found in nematode-free specimens, and identified the Gram-negative species S. marcescens and P. rettgeri.

Serratia marcescens has a wide host range including model nematodes such as Caenorhabditis elegans, and it is considered an efficient killer35,36. However, the newly recognized Serratia isolate SCBI (South African Caenorhabditis briggsae isolate) is non-pathogenic in the Caenorhabditis briggsae strain KT000137,38. In this context, the nematode and bacteria may enjoy a mutualistic relationship in which the bacteria confer new virulence traits upon their nematode host in exchange for the ability to establish an environmental niche, as shown by the inability of nematodes to kill the greater wax moth Galleria mellonella when S. marcescens is replaced by the non-pathogenic Escherichia coli strain OP5037. We tested the virulence of our newly isolated strain of S. marcescens and found that H. axyridis was extremely susceptible, suggesting that a similar mutualistic relationship may have been established between S. marcescens and P. bifurcatus. Future work with infection experiments using axenic nematodes is needed to delineate the role of the mutualistic bacteria, or the role of nematode alone in the infection model, respectively.

Providencia rettgeri is a Gram-negative bacterium commonly found in water and land environments, although strains of this species have also been isolated from nematodes of the genus Heterorhabditis39. Again, these bacteria are highly virulent in G. mellonella larvae. Another Providencia species isolated from the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema thermophilum is similar to P. rettgeri but was identified as a new strain of Providencia vermicola40. Our phylogenetic analysis based on 16S SSU rRNA sequences identified our Providencia strain as P. rettgeri (Fig. S5). Like the S. marcescens strain described above, the new P. rettgeri strain was found to be highly virulent towards H. axyridis.

It is surprising that the direct infection of H. axyridis with S. marcescens or P. rettgeri resulted in rapid death, whereas the infection of H. axyridis with P. bifurcatus carrying both bacteria is consistent with the maintenance of a stable ladybird population. The great potential of these two bacteria to kill H. axyridis becomes even more visible when compared to the virulence of the well-known entomopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas entomophila. In our previous study19, P. entomophila reduced host survival to ~50% after 10 days, whereas similar concentrations (8 × 107 cells/ml) of S. marcescens and P. rettgeri in the current study reduced host survival to 13% and 10%, respectively, with a ST50 of 60 h (95% CI, 60–72 and 60–84) and a trend for males possibly being less susceptible. This may indicate that the bacteria are not efficiently released from the nematode, or that bacterial growth and virulence are suppressed by the presence of the nematode until a condition is satisfied or signal received that allows their release and/or activation39. Symbiosis between entomopathogenic nematodes and more than one bacterial species is rare, increasing the complexity of the interaction network between the host, nematode and bacteria39,41,42.

We analysed the immune response of H. axyridis when exposed to P. bifurcatus by comparing the induction of 22 genes encoding selected AMPs and lysozymes 24 and 48 h after contact with the nematode. This is an important consideration in the context of the more general interrelationship between the host, parasites and mutualistic bacteria because parasitic microsporidia that are naturally carried by H. axyridis5,6,18 are thought to be suppressed by the presence of harmonine, whose synthesis is downregulated when AMP genes are induced12. Our data suggest that infection with P. bifurcatus is detected by the H. axyridis immune system, resulting in the induction of many AMP genes after 24 h, particularly in males. In D. melanogaster, AMPs are induced by axenic nematodes but suppressed in the presence of mutualistic bacteria43. These findings suggest that nematodes activate the humoral immune response in D. melanogaster, but the bacteria they carry are capable of reversing this change. A similar result was observed with the nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora and its mutualistic bacterium Photorhabdus temperata in the tobacco hornworm Heliothis virescens44. Initial penetration by the nematode caused the strong induction of host immunity-related genes, but the same genes were suppressed following the release of the bacteria into the haemolymph.

In light of those results we propose an analogous mode of action in our model, where AMP expression is induced by P. bifurcatus infection, but supressed earlier in females than males by entomopathogenic mutualists carried by the nematodes. Given that all the samples were treated in the same manner, our results suggest there may be a variable timescale between the induction of gene expression by the nematodes and the subsequent suppression caused by the bacteria, probably reflecting a long ‘infection window’ with infection becoming established in different beetles at different times. Females, for example, show the repression of almost all of the AMP genes we tested at 24 h, indicating that the infection was established quickly and that the nematode-specific induction may have been overcome by the bacterial suppression before we took the first measurements. In contrast, male samples 1 and 2 show low AMP induction at 24 h, but moderate to high induction in many genes after 48 h, suggesting the nematode induction phase may have lasted longer in these individuals. One explanation is that, according to Bateman’s principle and its implications for the insect immune system45, females often show stronger immune responses than males. Therefore nematodes might be tackled earlier in females and find it more difficult to establish an infection, which causes them to release their mutualists earlier to supress the strong innate immune defences. Because both Providencia rettgeri and Serratia marcescens rapidly and efficiently killed the beetles in our survival experiments, this might also explain the rapid suppression of AMPs.

To summarize, our AMP gene expression analysis revealed a complex set of gene expression profiles that are likely to depend on the specific characteristics of each infection and the infection time. Nevertheless, we have analyzed the expression profiles of AMP genes that seem to be affected by nematode infection and potentially by subsequent mutualist suppression, resulting in a much stronger immune response in male than female H. axyridis beetles. A direct bacterial inhibition of the host AMP transcription, as described for Shigella spp. evasion in mammalian host46,47 has so far not been shown for P. rettgeri. In contrast, the S. marcescens cyclic depsipeptide AT514 has been shown to decrease NF-κB activity, responsible transcription factor for AMP expression, in a B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia model48. Other bacterial mechanisms to control the host include the inhibition of cellular defences, for example the S. marcescens metalloprotease serralysin that displayed inhibition of immune cell adhesion and bacterial clearance in the silkworm Bombyx mori49. Our results further support the hypothesis advanced in our previous study that rapid changes in gene expression and a highly adjustable immune system, consisting of the constitutively produced defense compound harmonine and a broad repertoire of inducible AMPs, could promote pathogen resistance and consequently the invasiveness of H. axyridis populations19. Here we extend this hypothesis by proposing the underlying principles are especially relevant for H. axyridis females: the sex-dependent AMP gene expression profiles observed after infection with P. bifurcatus carrying entomopathogenic mutualists reveal that the nematodes need to suppress the female immune system much more rapidly and vigorously than in males. In perspective, further studies using a defined in vitro infection model, i.e. the possibility of raising nematodes on a defined media, controlled infection with a defined number of nematodes and further characterization of the identified bacterial strains, including the assessment of bacterial load after infection, are required to elucidate the interaction between host, nematode and bacteria. The ability to genetically modify the identified S. marcescens and P. rettgeri strains would facilitate the creation of axenic nematodes as described for the generation of axenic Heterorhabditis nematodes using a genetic modified Photorhabdus strain RET16 with a traceable antibiotic resistance and the inability to colonize the nematode30. Future work using axenic nematodes will help to delineate the role of the mutualistic bacteria, or the role of nematode alone in the infection model, respectively.

Thus far, no mutualistic bacteria has been described for the entomopathogenic nematode P. bifurcatus, and the identification of the novel nematode associated Serratia and Providencia strains with their high virulence against the invasive ladybird H. axyridis opens the possibilities to develop strategies for biological safe and effective control of this insect, which is a serious invasive pest.

Materials and Methods

Collection and rearing of H. axyridis

H. axyridis individuals were collected in and around Giessen/Ober-Mörlen, Germany, in 2013 and maintained at 21 °C and 60% humidity with a 16-h photoperiod in a greenhouse. Bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris) infested with pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum) were provided ad libitum as a food source. New specimens were integrated regularly into this greenhouse-reared population in autumn and spring. Experiments were carried out using laboratory-reared beetles that were 2–3 weeks old. Larvae were separated after hatching and reared individually in 35 × 10 mm Petri dishes with the ad libitum provision of water and sterile freeze-killed eggs of the grain moth Sitotroga cerealella (Katz Biotech AG).

Nematode screening and species identification

Adult beetles and L4 larvae from the greenhouse-reared population (n = 80 each), as well as laboratory-reared beetles (n = 142) and individuals collected around Ober-Mörlen in late October 2017 (n = 324) were dissected immediately after sampling. Nematodes from infected ladybirds were collected in PBS and the species identified using a FLoid® Cell Imaging Station (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to capture images at different life stages. The nematodes were centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C and the pellet was resuspended in nuclease-free water before lysis and amplification of the 18S SSU rRNA gene as previously described50 using GoTaq® G2 DNA Polymerase (Promega). The PCR products were purified and transferred to the vector pGEM®-T Easy (Promega) for sequencing, followed by sequence analysis using Geneious v10.2.251. A consensus sequence was generated by the de novo assembly of the three overlapping sequence fragments and a BLAST search against the NCBI nr/nt database was carried out using Megablast with standard parameters.

Bacterial isolates and infection experiments

Nematode-associated bacteria were identified by comparing the bacterial communities of H. axyridis beetles from three different rearing groups: nematode-free greenhouse-reared, laboratory-reared, and nematode-infected greenhouse-reared beetles. For each rearing group, three beetles were surface sterilised with 80% ethanol and 0.3% bleach, and dissected individually in sterile PBS. Body fluids and/or nematodes in PBS were transferred to individual reaction tubes and centrifuged briefly before homogenization with three 2.3-mm zirconium/glass beads (BioSpec Products) in a FastPrep-24™ 5G instrument (MP Biomedical) at 10 m/s for two periods of 45 s. We then transferred 100-µl extracts onto lysogeny broth agar plates and incubated them at 37 °C for 2 days. We amplified the 16S SSU rRNA gene from a total of 90 colonies (ten colonies per beetle sample) using the universal 5′ primer 27F (5′-AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG-3′) and universal 3′ primer 1492R (5′-CGG TTA CCT TGT TAC GAC TT-3′). The positive PCR products (from 73 colonies) were treated with Exonuclease I (New England Biolabs) and Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase (Sigma-Aldrich) for enzymatic removal of excess nucleotides and primers prior to direct sequencing and the obtained sequences were analysed as described above.

Survival analysis

Overnight cultures of S. sciuri, P. rettgeri and S. marcescens were diluted to 8 × 109 or 8 × 107 cells/ml in PBS using a Neubauer improved haemocytometer (Paul Marienfeld) and 4 µl of bacterial suspension was injected into each beetle as previously described19. Control beetles were injected with an equal volume of PBS. After injection, the specimens were kept individually in 35 × 10 mm Petri dishes and provided ad libitum with water and S. cerealella eggs. Five male and five female individuals were used for each treatment and the experiment was carried out three times (n = 15 for each sex) per concentration. Survival was recorded every 12 h until 240 h (10 days) post-injection.

AMP gene expression analysis

Immune responses in H. axyridis were triggered by dipping beetles in suspensions of P. bifurcatus in PBS or PBS only as a control. The presence of the S. marcescens and P. rettgeri strains in the P. bifurcatus suspension was tested as described previously in “bacterial isolates and infection experiments” section. Each nematode suspension (approximately 6000 nematodes/ml, see Fig. S6) was obtained from six infected beetles by dissecting the surface sterilised beetles in sterile PBS and collecting the nematode solutions in reaction tubes. For each time point (24 and 48 h) we dipped three beetles per sex in nematode suspension and three beetles per sex in PBS solution. The experiment was carried out three times (n = 9 per sex, time point and treatment) using fresh nematode and PBS solutions per repeat. The beetles were kept as described above until they were frozen individually in liquid nitrogen after 24 and 48 h and stored at −80 °C. These time points were selected according to knowledge from literature showing that bacteria from entomopathogenic nematodes, like H. bacteriophora, rapidly kill hosts within 48 h after nematode penetration25 and that antimicrobial activity in insect haemolymph rapidly increases within the first 48 h after infection30,52. Total RNA was isolated from individual beetles with TRI-Reagent® (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quantity of RNA was determined using a Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and cDNA was generated using the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad). The cDNA was amplified by real-time quantitative PCR on a StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) with a total reaction volume of 10 μl, using 5 μl 2x SensiMix™ SYBR® No-Rox (Bioline), 1 μl cDNA (corresponding to 50 ng RNA) and 250 nM of each AMP-specific primer19 (see also Table S8). Non-template reaction mixtures for each gene were run as negative controls on each 96-well plate. The temperature profile consisted of the following steps: initial activation at 95 °C for 15 min, 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, annealing at 55 °C for 15 s, and extension at 72 °C for 15 s. A subsequent dissociation curve analysis with 0.5 °C increments from 65 °C to 95 °C was used to verify specific amplification. We averaged the results of two technical replicates per sample and data were normalized using the ribosomal protein gene RPS3. Primer efficiency for all genes was estimated to be close to one and similar to the internal control gene RPS3, as they show similar shaped curves in the logarithmic PCR amplification plots recorded by the StepOnePlus Software. This is a valid method for efficiency determination described in literature when analysing many genes simultaneously53. In accordance with these assumptions the relative gene expression levels were calculated using the comparative ΔΔCT method53,54.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using R v3.3.355. Control data for the AMP gene expression analysis experiments were compared between experimental repeats for each gene and time point19. Briefly, a parametric multiple comparison analysis56 was used on a one-way ANOVA model with ΔCT as the response variable and replicate as the factor to test for pairwise differences (Table S9). The p-values were adjusted using the heteroscedasticity robust sandwich estimator for the covariance matrix57,58. AMP genes with controls showing significant differences in expression (Att18, CLys3, Col1, Col8, ColLA, ColLC) were excluded from the analysis. To further minimize differences, PBS controls were averaged per experiment and the relative gene expression levels (2ΔΔCT) of each infected individual were calculated with the corresponding mean control value. The quantitative PCR results were then assigned to 15 categories according to the magnitude of the fold-changes for each gene: category 1: <−96, category 2: <−48, category 3: <−24, category 4: <−12, category 5: <−6, category 6: <−3, category 7: <−1.5, category 8: 0, category 9: >1.5, category 10: >3, category 11: >6, category 12: >12, category 13: >24, category 14: >48, and category 15: >96. For 2ΔΔCT values between zero and one, we calculated the negative inverse by dividing −1 with 2ΔΔCT, which expresses downregulations as fold change reductions in gene expression53. A heat map was plotted to compare the fold-change in gene expression between females and males at 24 and 48 h. Samples at 24 hpi were sorted for each sex by hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis using Euclidean distance matrix computation and Ward’s minimum variance algorithm, as implemented in R using the functions dist and hclust59. The resulting order was also used for the samples at 48 h to facilitate the comparison of relative gene expression between females and males at both time points. Differences in survival rates were analysed using the R package survival v2.40-160 with the log-rank test (Kaplan-Meier) and Holm-corrected p-values.

Data Accessibility

All data are accessible in the Supplementary Information.

References

  1. 1.

    Roy, H. E. et al. The harlequin ladybird, Harmonia axyridis: global perspectives on invasion history and ecology. Biol. Invasions 18, 997–1044 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Roy, H. E. et al. Invasive alien predator causes rapid declines of native European ladybirds. Divers. Distrib. 18, 717–725 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Roy, H. & Wajnberg, E. From biological control to invasion: the ladybird Harmonia axyridis as a model species. BioControl 53, 1–4 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gardiner, M. M., O’Neal, M. E. & Landis, D. A. Intraguild predation and native lady beetle decline. PLoS One 6, e23576, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023576 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Vilcinskas, A., Stoecker, K., Schmidtberg, H., Röhrich, C. R. & Vogel, H. Invasive harlequin ladybird carries biological weapons against native competitors. Science 340, 862–863 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Vogel, H., Schmidtberg, H. & Vilcinskas, A. Comparative transcriptomics in three ladybird species supports a role for immunity in invasion biology. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 67, 452–456 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cottrell, T. E. & Shapiro-Ilan, D. I. Susceptibility of a native and an exotic lady beetle (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to Beauveria bassiana. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 84, 137–144 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cottrell, T. E. & Shapiro-Ilan, D. I. Susceptibility of endemic and exotic North American ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to endemic fungal entomopathogens. Eur. J. Entomol. 105, 455–460 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Roy, H. E., Brown, P. M. J., Rothery, P., Ware, R. L. & Majerus, M. E. N. Interactions between the fungal pathogen Beauveria bassiana and three species of coccinellid: Harmonia axyridis, Coccinella septempunctata and Adalia bipunctata. BioControl 53, 265–276 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Roy, H. E. & Cottrell, T. E. Forgotten natural enemies: interactions between coccinellids and insect-parasitic fungi. Eur. J. Entomol. 105, 391–398 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Verheggen, F. J., Vogel, H. & Vilcinskas, A. Behavioral and immunological features promoting the invasive performance of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis. Front. Ecol. Evol. 5, 156, https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00156 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Schmidtberg, H., Röhrich, C., Vogel, H. & Vilcinskas, A. A switch from constitutive chemical defence to inducible innate immune responses in the invasive ladybird Harmonia axyridis. Biol. Lett. 9, 20130006, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0006 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Röhrich, C. R. et al. Harmonine, a defence compound from the harlequin ladybird, inhibits mycobacterial growth and demonstrates multi-stage antimalarial activity. Biol. Lett. 8, 308–311 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nagel, N. C., Masic, A., Schurigt, U. & Boland, W. Efficient synthesis of (R)-harmonine – the toxic principle of the multicolored Asian lady beetle (Harmonia axyridis). Org. Biomol. Chem. 13, 5139–5146 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Vilcinskas, A., Mukherjee, K. & Vogel, H. Expansion of the antimicrobial peptide repertoire in the invasive ladybird Harmonia axyridis. Proc. R. Soc. B. 280, 20122113, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2113 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Beckert, A. et al. Two c-type lysozymes boost the innate immune system of the invasive ladybird Harmonia axyridis. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 49, 303–312 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Vilcinskas, A. Pathogens as biological weapons of invasive species. PLOS Pathog. 11, e1004714, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004714 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Vilcinskas, A. et al. Evolutionary ecology of microsporidia associated with the invasive ladybird Harmonia axyridis. Insect Sci. 22, 313–324 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Gegner, T., Schmidtberg, H., Vogel, H. & Vilcinskas, A. Population-specific expression of antimicrobial peptides conferring pathogen resistance in the invasive ladybird Harmonia axyridis. Sci. Rep. 8, 3600, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21781-4 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Majerus, T. M. O. et al. Extreme variation in the prevalence of inherited male-killing microorganisms between three populations of Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Heredity 81, 683–691 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Shapiro-Ilan, D. I. & Cottrell, T. E. Susceptibility of lady beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to entomopathogenic nematodes. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 89, 150–156 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Dillman, A. R. et al. An entomopathogenic nematode by any other name. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002527, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002527 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Grewal, P. S., Ehlers, R. U. & Shapiro-Ilan, D. I. Nematodes as biocontrol agents (eds Grewal, P. S., Ehlers, R. U., Shapiro-Ilan, D. I.) (CABI, 2005) https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851990170.0000.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Shapiro-Ilan, D. I. et al. Effect of soil moisture and a surfactant on entomopathogenic nematode suppression of the pecan weevil. Curculio caryae. J. Nematol. 38, 474–482 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ciche, T. The biology and genome of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora in Worm Book (ed. The C. elegans Research Community), https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.135.1 (Worm Book, 2007).

  26. 26.

    Iperti, G. Les parasites des Coccinelles aphidiphages dans les Alpes-Maritimes et les Basses-Alpes. Entomophaga 9, 153–180 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Iperti, G. & van Waerebeke, D. Description, biologie et importance d’une nouvelle espèce d’Allantonematidae [Nématode] parasite des coccinelles aphidiphages: Parasitylenchus coccinellinae, n. sp. Entomophaga 13, 107–119 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Harding, S., Poinar, G. O., Dimitrova, D. V. & Steenberg, T. Parasitylenchus sp. (Tylenchomorpha: Allantonematidae) parasitizing field populations of Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 108, 487–488 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Poinar, G. O. & Steenberg, T. Parasitylenchus bifurcatus n. sp. (Tylenchida: Allantonematidae) parasitizing Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Parasit. Vectors 5, 218, https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-218 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hallem, E. A., Rengarajan, M., Ciche, T. A. & Sternberg, P. W. Nematodes, bacteria, and flies: a tripartite model for nematode parasitism. Curr. Biol. 17, 898–904 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Silva, C. P. et al. Bacterial infection of a model insect: Photorhabdus luminescens and Manduca sexta. Cell. Microbiol. 4, 329–339 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Amsellem, L. et al. Importance of microorganisms to macroorganisms invasions. Adv. Ecol. Res. 57, 99–146 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ceryngier, P. & Hodek, I. Enemies of Coccinellidae. In Ecology of Coccinellidae 319–350 (Springer 1996).

  34. 34.

    Forst, S., Dowds, B., Boemare, N. & Stackebrandt, E. Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus ssp.: bugs that kill bugs. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 51, 47–72 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kurz, C. L. & Ewbank, J. J. Caenorhabditis elegans for the study of host–pathogen interactions. Trends Microbiol. 8, 142–144 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kurz, C. L. et al. Virulence factors of the human opportunistic pathogen Serratia marcescens identified by in vivo screening. EMBO J. 22, 1451–1460 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Abebe, E., Abebe-Akele, F., Morrison, J., Cooper, V. & Thomas, W. K. An insect pathogenic symbiosis between a Caenorhabditis and Serratia. Virulence 2, 158–161 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Lancaster, J. D., Mohammad, B. & Abebe, E. Effect of the bacterium Serratia marcescens SCBI on the longevity and reproduction of the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae KT0001. BMC Res. Notes 5, 688, https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-688 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Jackson, T. J. et al. Isolation of insect pathogenic bacteria, Providencia rettgeri, from Heterorhabditis spp. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 78, 237–244 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Somvanshi, V. S. et al. Providencia vermicola sp. nov., isolated from infective juveniles of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema thermophilum. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 56, 629–633 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lysenko, O. & Weiser, J. Bacteria associated with the nematode Neoaplectana carpocapsae and the pathogenicity of this complex for Galleria mellonella larvae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 24, 332–336 (1974).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Aguillera, M. M., Hodge, N. C., Stall, R. E. & Smart, G. C. Bacterial symbionts of Steinernema scapterisci. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 62, 68–72 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Castillo, J. C., Shokal, U. & Eleftherianos, I. Immune gene transcription in Drosophila adult flies infected by entomopathogenic nematodes and their mutualistic bacteria. J. Insect Physiol. 59, 179–185 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    An, R., Suri, K. S., Jurat-Fuentes, J. L. & Grewal, P. S. Dynamics of transcriptomic response to infection by the nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora and its bacterial symbiont Photorhabdus temperata in Heliothis virescens larvae. Insect Mol. Biol. 26, 584–600 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Rolff, J. Bateman’s principle and immunity. Proc. R. Soc. B 269, 867–872 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Islam, D. et al. Downregulation of bactericidal peptides in enteric infections: A novel immune escape mechanism with bacterial DNA as a potential regulator. Nat. Med. 7, 180–185 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Sperandio, B. et al. Virulent Shigella flexneri subverts the host innate immune response through manipulation of antimicrobial peptide gene expression. J. Exp. Med. 205, 1121–1132 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Escobar-Díaz, E. et al. AT514, a cyclic depsipeptide from Serratia marcescens, induces apoptosis of B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells: interference with the Akt/NF-κB survival pathway. Leukemia 19, 572–579 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Ishii, K., Adachi, T., Hamamoto, H. & Sekimizu, K. Serratia marcescens suppresses host cellular immunity via the production of an adhesion-inhibitory factor against immunosurveillance cells. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 5876–5888 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Holterman, M. et al. Phylum-wide analysis of SSU rDNA reveals deep phylogenetic relationships among nematodes and accelerated evolution toward crown clades. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 1792–1800 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kearse, M. et al. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28, 1647–1649 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Haine, E. R., Pollitt, L. C., Moret, Y., Siva-Jothy, M. T. & Rolff, J. Temporal patterns in immune responses to a range of microbial insults (Tenebrio molitor). J. Insect Physiol. 54, 1090–1097 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Schmittgen, T. D. & Livak, K. J. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat. Protoc. 6, 1101–1108 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Pfaffl, M. W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, e45, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/29.9.e45 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; https://www.r-project.org (2017).

  56. 56.

    Hothorn, T., Bretz, F. & Westfall, P. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical J. 50, 346–363 (2008).

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Zeileis, A. Econometric computing with HC and HAC covariance matrix estimators. J. Stat. Softw. 11, 1–17 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Zeileis, A. Object-oriented computation of sandwich estimators. J. Stat. Softw. 16, 1–16 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Murtagh, F. & Legendre, P. Ward’s hierarchical agglomerative clustering method: which algorithms implement ward’s criterion? J. Classif. 31, 274–295 (2014).

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Therneau, T. A package for survival analysis in S. version 2.38, https://cran.r-project.org/package=survival (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Jasmin Gegner and Nils Hiebert for technical help and discussions. We acknowledge funding provided by the German Research Foundation (DFG) via the ERA-Net project BiodivERsA (VI 219/7-1, VO 84171) and by the excellence initiative of the Hessian Ministry of Science, Higher Education and Art (HMWK) supporting the LOEWE Centre for Insect Biotechnology and Bioresources. The authors thank Richard M. Twyman for editing of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.G. and T.C. carried out the laboratory work. T.G. and K.-Z.L. carried out statistical analysis. T.G., A.V. and K.-Z.L. conceived, designed and coordinated the study and drafted parts of the manuscript. All authors gave approval for publication and agree to be accountable for the content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwang-Zin Lee.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gegner, T., Carrau, T., Vilcinskas, A. et al. The infection of Harmonia axyridis by a parasitic nematode is mediated by entomopathogenic bacteria and triggers sex-specific host immune responses. Sci Rep 8, 15938 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34278-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bifurcata
  • Harlequin Ladybird Harmonia Axyridis
  • Providencia Rettgeri
  • Native Ladybird
  • Potential Bacterial Mutualists

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links