Abstract
Magnetic skyrmions are stable nanosized spin structures that can be displaced at low electrical current densities. Because of these properties, they have been proposed as building blocks of future electronic devices with unprecedentedly high information density and low energy consumption. The electrical detection of an ordered skyrmion lattice via the Topological Hall Effect (THE) in a bulk crystal, has so far been demonstrated only at cryogenic temperatures in the MnSi family of compounds. Here, we report the observation of a skyrmion lattice Topological Hall Effect near room temperature (276 K) in a mesoscopic lamella carved from a bulk crystal of FeGe. This region coincides with the skyrmion lattice location revealed by neutron scattering. We provide clear evidence of a re-entrant helicoid magnetic phase adjacent to the skyrmion phase, and discuss the large THE amplitude (5 nΩ.cm) in view of the ordinary Hall Effect.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Magnetic skyrmions are nanometre size quasi-particles with a whirling spin configuration, which hold great potential as information carriers for electronic devices1,2,3,4,5. Magnetic skyrmions were first studied theoretically6,7,8, and have recently been evidenced experimentally in B20 chiral materials9,10 and in multilayer ferromagnetic thin films11,12,13. Most skyrmionic materials have in common1,2 the presence of an antisymmetric exchange interaction, known as Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya (DM) interaction14,15, favouring spin canting in materials that would otherwise be ferromagnetic with parallel aligned spins. The DM interaction occurs in materials with spin-orbit coupling and a structure lacking inversion symmetry, such as the non-centrosymmetric “B20 magnets” crystals: MnSi9 and FeGe10. In multilayer ferromagnetic thin films, the DM interaction is engineered by combining ultra thin layers of heavy metal and ferromagnetic materials, in which the heavy metal provides the large spin-orbit coupling while the interface between layers breaks the inversion symmetry3. For a large enough DM interaction, such as that found in B20 magnets, the ground state of the material is helical. In this state, the spins form helices with a pitch of a few tens of nanometres typically. This pitch scales as J/D, where D is the DM interaction constant and J is the exchange energy1. This pitch is referred to as the helical wavelength and it sets the skyrmion size in bulk materials. The topologically non-trivial whirling configuration of skyrmions spin texture can be characterised by the topological charge that is ±1 for an individual skyrmion, and null for topologically trivial structures such as magnetic bubbles. The topologically non-trivial structure of magnetic skyrmions makes them relatively stable because they cannot be continuously deformed to another magnetic state1,16.
A key advantage of magnetic skyrmions as stable nano-objects is that they can be displaced using relatively low electrical currents3,17,18. This low critical current for depinning stems from the relative insensitivity of skyrmions to disorder due to the strong Magnus force contribution to the skyrmion dynamics that allows skyrmions to bypass defects1,4,5,19. Such current manipulation enables not only data storage but also logic devices using magnetic “racetrack” type circuits2,3. Skyrmions nanometre size (10 nm ≡ 6 Tbit/in2), stability and low critical current (106 A/m2) could thus yield non-volatile electronic devices with unprecedentedly high information density and low energy consumption.
One of the key issues for future “skyrmionic” devices is to develop a method for detecting skyrmions through electrical means. In multilayers thin films, this was achieved very recently at room temperature for isolated skyrmions and skyrmions in amorphous lattices12,13,20,21. Although the detection of skyrmions in multilayers was first attributed to the Topological Hall Effect (THE)12, it was later shown by Fert et al. to be caused by the Anomalous Hall Effect (AHE)13. This AHE originates from the step change in magnetisation introduced by skyrmions in a ferromagnetic background. By contrast, in macroscopic bulk crystals, the skyrmion THE has been detected and correlated with skyrmions imaging, but only in the MnSi family of compounds at cryogenic temperatures18,22,23,24. This THE originates from electrons accumulating a Berry phase as they travel through skyrmions spin configuration, which acts as an effective magnetic field (\({B}_{eff}\)).
To first order, the skyrmion THE amplitude is proportional to \({B}_{eff}\), which itself is inversely proportional to a skyrmion cross-section area. The skyrmion THE is usually a few n\({\rm{\Omega }}\).cm22,23,25 (although claims of large skyrmions THE values up to 1000 n\({\rm{\Omega }}\).cm have been reported26,27,28,29,30), and it arises in addition to the Ordinary Hall Effect (OHE) and AHE in the transverse resistivity of skyrmionic compounds. The detection of skyrmions via the AHE is also not readily applicable to bulk skyrmion compounds, because the skyrmion lattice does not introduce a significant change in magnetisation.
Skyrmions in bulk crystals are in fact quite different from skyrmions in multilayers. Multilayers host metastable Néel-type “pancake-like” skyrmions with extreme aspect ratio, which occur in individual ferromagnetic layers of the order of one nanometre thick while extending out laterally to tens or hundreds of nm, and they are either found isolated11,12,13 or in an amorphous lattice12. By contrast, skyrmions in bulk crystals are Bloch-type three-dimensional elongated “tubes” which form a thermodynamically stable triangular lattice with long-range order9. Thus, skyrmions in bulk crystals share similarities with other 3D elastic lines systems in physics, such as dislocations and superconducting vortices, whereas the physics of skyrmions in multilayers is more similar to that of domain walls and magnetic bubbles in magnetic thin films, with a strong influence of the sputtered films inherent disorder. For instance, electrical manipulation of skyrmions in multilayers31,32,33,34,35,36 still requires current densities comparable to those required to move domain walls in racetrack type memories2,3, which is orders of magnitude larger than the current densities required to move skyrmions in clean single crystals17,18,37.
Recently, two bulk crystalline materials have been shown by Lorentz Transmission Electron Microscopy (LTEM) and Small Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS) to have a skyrmions lattice near or at room temperature: Cox-Zny-Mnz alloys38,39, and stoichiometric cubic FeGe10,37,40,41,42. In FeGe, magnetisation43, specific heat measurements44, and microwave absorption spectroscopy45 also identified several magnetic phases compatible with skyrmions. Transport studies in FeGe thin films26,27,28,29,30 reported an extraordinarily large Hall signature (up to 1000 n\({\rm{\Omega }}\).cm in 36 nm thin films) that occurs in an “extended” phase spanning from cryogenic temperatures to the Néel temperature. These studies claim that this Hall signature corresponds to a skyrmion THE as it cannot be explained by the AHE and, at first, it appeared to match the extended skyrmion phase observed in LTEM imaging of thin lamellae of FeGe bulk crystals10,37,40.
However, the nature of this Hall signature remains actively debated. In particular, it was noticed that the “extended” phase, in which the Hall signature is observed in thin films, spans a much larger range of the phase diagram than the extended skyrmion phase observed by LTEM in single crystals of comparable thickness27. In addition, Zhang et al.46 found no clear evidence for the presence of skyrmions in thin films of FeGe, and instead observed an extended helimagnetic phase. TEM cross-section imaging in FeGe thin films30 did observe skyrmions but only in the case that corresponds to applying the field in the plane of a 1000 nm-thick film. Very recent studies also found evidence for chiral bobbers coexisting together with skyrmions in FeGe crystals47 and thin films30. These chiral bobbers lies at the surface and only extend into the sample up to a few tens of nm. The large Hall signature in thin films of FeGe also differs from other known THE in bulk and multilayer skyrmion compounds. Qualitatively, the Hall signature is hysteretic, spanning from negative to positive field with some residual value at zero field, and no trace of the helical phase at low field is visible in the signal. Quantitatively, its value is difficult to account for within current theoretical models of skyrmion THE. Finally, a similar controversy occurred before for MnSi thin films in which there are skyrmions when the magnetic field is applied in-plane but not when it is applied perpendicular to the film48,49,50. Thus, there is still no consensus on skyrmion THE in FeGe thin films and no report of skyrmion THE in bulk FeGe crystals. This is somewhat surprising as the large THE value observed in thin films should make this a straightforward measurement in bulk crystals. However, the skyrmion THE is still a very nascent topic as there are very few confirmed skyrmion THE in the literature apart from the MnSi family of compounds. Thus there is only a very limited experimental data set to draw comparisons and to test the robustness of skyrmion THE theory.
Here, we demonstrate the first THE emerging from an ordered skyrmion lattice in a bulk crystal since the original skyrmion THE discovery in the MnSi family of compounds, and, what is more, near room temperature. Using high sensitivity Hall Effect measurements in FeGe crystals, we observe a skyrmion THE of amplitude +5 n\({\rm{\Omega }}\).cm at 276 K (3°C). This THE coincides with the skyrmion lattice phase identified by small angle neutron scattering42, and its amplitude is as large as the THE observed in MnSi at 29 K. Adjacent to the skyrmion phase, we also observe the signature of a magnetic phase that is not present in the prototypical skyrmion compound MnSi, and merges into the inhomogeneous chiral spin state51. Finally, comparing THE in MnSi and FeGe we emphasise the quantitative and qualitative failings of the formula that is generally used to estimate the skyrmion THE.
Results and Discussion
Electrical Transport Measurements
We prepared a 0.75 μm thick lamella of FeGe from a single crystal using a Focused Ion Beam microscope (FIB). Figure 1a shows the lamella before lift-out from the single crystal, and Fig. 1b shows the lamella with Pt electrodes deposited by FIB. We then measured the electrical transport properties of this lamella which shows transport properties consistent with bulk crystals (see Supplementary Information). Figure 2a shows the temperature dependence of the longitudinal resistivity \({\rho }_{xx}\) in zero magnetic field. The overall dependence and absolute value of \({\rho }_{xx}\) is in agreement with the literature28. The residual resistivity ratio is 8.5, higher than the value of 4–5 typically found in thin films27,28 but below the values of 13 to 25 found in large single crystals52,53. The magnetic transition from the paramagnetic phase to the helical phase appears as a subtle but clear kink around 279 K in the zero-field \({\rho }_{xx}\) data (inset of Fig. 2a).
In Fig. 2b, we show the temperature dependence of the Hall Effect \({\rho }_{yx}\) of the lamella (using the same sign convention as in refs22,27,28, that \({\rho }_{yx}\) is positive for electrons dominated transport). Electrical conduction appears to be predominantly hole type as \({\rho }_{yx}\) is negative around TN (270–290 K). The onset of the increase in \({\rho }_{yx}\) with increasing temperature, marks the transition from the conical to the paramagnetic phase indicated by black circles in Fig. 2. All \({\rho }_{yx}(T)\) curves are constant in the conical phase in the temperature range we measured. For each magnetic field value, we define a transition temperature as 5% of the increase in \({\rho }_{yx}(T)\) between the flat baseline at 270 K and the value at 290 K. The magnetic field dependence of this transition temperature is in good agreement with previous magnetisation studies in a bulk sample43,51.
The Hall Effect in skyrmionic compounds typically consists of three terms:
the first term is the Ordinary Hall Effect \({\rho }^{{\rm{OHE}}}={R}_{0}{\mu }_{0}H\) proportional to the applied magnetic field, the second term is the Anomalous Hall Effect \({\rho }^{{\rm{AHE}}}={R}_{s}M\) proportional to the magnetisation M of the sample and the third term is the THE induced by the spin texture of skyrmions. Here, we find that \({\rho }_{yx}(H)\) curves are linear in the conical phase, as expected. Indeed the Ordinary Hall Effect and the Anomalous Hall Effect are both linear in H, as the magnetisation is proportional to H in this phase43. So, to better see variations from the conical state, we subtracted the total linear contribution from \({\rho }_{yx}(H)\) curves in the same manner as ref.22. The slope of the linear fit of \({\rho }_{yx}(H)\) in the conical phase (between 270 and 271K), is −4.3164 n\({\rm{\Omega }}\).cm/mT with \({r}^{2}=0.99998\). We subtracted this slope from all \({\rho }_{yx}(H)\) curves and defined the resulting deviation of \({\rho }_{yx}(H)\) to the conical phase as \({\rm{\Delta }}{\rho }_{yx}\). \({\rm{\Delta }}{\rho }_{yx}(H)\) curves are shown in Fig. 3a (shifted for clarity). As the conical contribution is constant in temperature, converting \({\rho }_{yx}(T)\) curves to \({\rm{\Delta }}{\rho }_{yx}(T)\) corresponds to adding an offset to each curve shown in Fig. 2b.
Signatures in the Hall Effect
In Fig. 3a, the \({\rm{\Delta }}{\rho }_{yx}(H)\) curves below 274.4 K show several features. A change in slope at ≈15 mT separates the helical and conical phases, at low and high field respectively. \({\rm{\Delta }}{\rho }_{yx}(H)\) curves are flat in the conical phase, consistent with the definition of \({\rm{\Delta }}{\rho }_{yx}\). The upturn at higher fields (shown at 277.25 K) corresponds to the field polarised state. The helical-to-conical signature disappears above ≈277 K, in agreement with magnetisation studies43,51. In addition to the helical, conical and field polarised states, we observe a local maximum and minimum that appear simultaneously inside the conical phase. The maximum and minimum have maximum amplitude at 276 K of ≈+5 n\({\rm{\Omega }}\).cm and ≈−3 n\({\rm{\Omega }}\).cm, respectively.
In Fig. 3b, from 270 to ≈274.5–277 K, \({\rm{\Delta }}{\rho }_{yx}(T)\) is constant in temperature. This corresponds to the helical or conical states, at low or high magnetic fields respectively. Above ≈278 K there is a large upturn corresponding to the transition to the paramagnetic or field polarised states. Around 276 K, we also observe a local maximum and minimum. The minimum is present from 5 to 65 mT, whereas the maximum is present in a narrower field range from 55 to 70 mT. The maximum and minimum observed in \({\rm{\Delta }}{\rho }_{yx}(H)\) and \({\rm{\Delta }}{\rho }_{yx}(T)\) are consistent in both locations and amplitudes, and have never been reported before. To gain further insights on their origin we combined \({\rm{\Delta }}{\rho }_{yx}(H)\) and \({\rm{\Delta }}{\rho }_{yx}(T)\) data sets in Fig. 4 to produce a colour map (colour maps made from either data sets are shown in the Supplementary Information).
Skyrmion Topological Hall Effect
Figure 4 shows that the local maximum occurs in a region of field and temperature, with a shape and location reminiscent of the skyrmion phase in MnSi. After accounting for demagnetising effects (right axis of the H-T diagram) following the process of ref.54 (see Supplementary Information), this region corresponds quantitatively in field and temperature to the region where a skyrmion lattice has been observed in bulk crystals of FeGe by SANS42. We therefore conclude that this local maximum is the Topological Hall Effect induced by skyrmions magnetic texture. We note that this is the first report of a skyrmion Topological Hall Effect near room temperature in a bulk crystal. However, as mentioned in introduction, claims of a skyrmion THE up to 200 times larger than our measurement and spanning from cryogenic temperature to near room temperature have been reported before in FeGe thin films27,28,29,30. We also note that in light of ref.48 where the authors show contributions of THE which are not due to the skyrmion magnetic phase but rather to the conical phase, we do not exclude the contribution (even very small) of other non-collinear spin configurations in our THE measurement.
The maximum amplitude of this THE is ≈+5 n\({\rm{\Omega }}\).cm at 276 K, a value very similar to that of MnSi22 at 29 K. This is contrary to what is expected from the small \({B}_{eff}\) of FeGe produced by its larger skyrmions. However, \({B}_{eff}\) is not the only factor determining the THE amplitude. The exact amplitude of the THE depends on the details of the band structure, but the THE is usually approximated as22,25,55:
where P is the local spin-polarisation of the conduction electrons in the skyrmion state, \({B}_{eff}\) is the effective magnetic field and R0 is the ordinary Hall Effect constant. Here, we find (see methods) that in FeGe:
And this value is of the same order as the approximate THE value in MnSi:
We note that P is similar in both compounds, \({B}_{eff}\) is 18 times smaller in FeGe than in MnSi, and R0 is 6 times larger in FeGe than in MnSi. Overall, the THE amplitude estimated via Eq. 2 is thus only three times smaller in FeGe than in MnSi.
Both THE values clearly overestimate the experimental values of the THE (≈+5 n\({\rm{\Omega }}\).cm in both MnSi and FeGe). This overestimation has been known for some time in MnSi and attributed to the factor R025. Recently, it was pointed out that this estimate is only an upper bound of skyrmions THE in multilayers thin films13 as skyrmions THE only occur in the ferromagnetic layers and the short mean free path in thin films could also reduce the THE. We also point out that the sign of the THE calculated using Eq. 2 appears to be opposite to what is measured in MnSi22. In addition, as mentioned above, bulk crystals and thin films of FeGe are very different in terms of skyrmions phase extent and THE, which may point toward fundamental skyrmions physics or extrinsic contributions to the skyrmion THE. For instance, recent theoretical efforts56 show that a range of sign and amplitude is to be expected for the THE depending on coupling strength and electronic scattering rates. Looking beyond this ongoing debate, we note that at least the THE estimates for MnSi and FeGe are of the same order of magnitude in absolute value: 140 n\({\rm{\Omega }}\).cm for MnSi and 45 n\({\rm{\Omega }}\).cm for FeGe. Thus, this could explain why the experimental values of the THE are so similar in both compounds.
We also emphasise that the larger R0 of FeGe appears to compensate the smaller \({B}_{eff}\). This means that the charge carrier density, and more generally the band structure, is a tool as important as skyrmions effective magnetic field in achieving measurable THE. For instance, in Pt/Co/Ir multilayer thin films, the skyrmion THE was estimated to be immeasurably small: \({\rm{\Delta }}{\rho }_{yx}^{THE}=0.0017\,{\rm{n}}{\rm{\Omega }}.\,{\rm{cm}}\) as \({R}_{0}={2.10}^{-11}\,{\rm{\Omega }}\).m.T−1 13. This value is more than 300 times smaller than the value \(|{R}_{0}|={\mathrm{7.3.10}}^{-9}\,{\rm{\Omega }}\).m.T−1 in FeGe, which suggest that FeGe is a compound of choice for the study of the THE near room temperature.
Signature of a Re-entrant Helicoid Magnetic Phase
The local minimum observed in \({\rm{\Delta }}{\rho }_{yx}\) in Fig. 4, is new to all compounds with clear signatures of vortex-like cylindrical skyrmions. A positive THE has been observed in MnSi22, and a negative THE was found in compounds such as Mn1−xFexSi23, but a positive and negative THE have never been observed consecutively, up to our knowledge.
Polycrystalline MnGe does show adjacent maximum and minimum in \({\rho }_{yx}\)57, but the amplitude of this effect is 50 times larger (≈200 n\({\rm{\Omega }}\).cm) and spans over 10 Tesla and 100 Kelvin. Thus, this is very different from the phenomenon we observe in FeGe. In addition, the accepted interpretation of the behaviour of MnGe does not involve cylindrical skyrmions but a spin structure periodic in all three dimensions undergoing a topological phase transition through the pair annihilation of hedgehogs and anti-hedgehogs topological spin singularities57.
In the \({\rm{\Delta }}{\rho }_{yx}(H)\) curves of Fig. 3a and the H-T diagram of Fig. 4, the local minimum tracks and ends with the lowest temperature of the skyrmions phase. But at higher temperatures it continues into the inhomogeneous chiral spin state51 (ICS). Thus, the local minimum delimits a region which appears to compete with the skyrmion lattice phase but shares the signature of the helical and ICS states. Theoretical calculations43 show that the hierarchy of close energy scales yields several possible magnetic phases in the vicinity of TN, including: +π skyrmions, −π skyrmions, half-skyrmions squares lattice and re-entrant helicoid. The position of the local minimum in the phase diagram, bordering the skyrmion lattice phase, and its sign opposite to the THE of the skyrmion lattice, suggest +π skyrmions with a positive effective magnetic field and negative THE; however, SANS does not show an other ordered skyrmion region42. Thus, this suggests that the local minimum corresponds to a re-entrant ICS or helicoid state. Such re-entrant phase has never been observed before in skyrmion lattice systems, up to our knowledge. It also underscores the fact that, although magnetic and transport measurements show features43,51 at similar locations, the latter indicate a very different origin for the re-entrant phase.
High Current Density Measurements of Hall Signatures
Only two studies have ever reported a change in THE signal as a function of current density, and both are in MnSi18,24. When increasing the current density, the studies observed that: at first skyrmions are pinned and the THE signal is constant; then above a critical current density \({J}_{c}\) skyrmions start to move and the THE signal decreases; finally at even higher current density skyrmions are in a flow regime and the THE signal is constant again. The reduction in skyrmion THE amplitude at the transition from a pinned to a flow regime is explained by the emerging electric field induced by moving skyrmions18. The first study in thin single crystals of MnSi18 found a decrease in THE from +5 n\({\rm{\Omega }}\).cm to +2 n\({\rm{\Omega }}\).cm after skyrmions start to move at a critical current density of \({J}_{c}\approx 0.5\) MA/m2. The second study showed that \({J}_{c}\) values are sample dependent as measurements on two different MnSi nanowires24 found \({J}_{c}\sim 27\) and 72 MA/m2. Ultrasound experiments on thicker (mm-sized) single crystals of MnSi report even lower \({J}_{c}\) values of ~50 kA/m2 58.
In Fig. 5 we show \({\rm{\Delta }}{\rho }_{yx}(T)\) for different current densities. At 45 mT, in Fig. 5a, we show results outside the skyrmion area to test for Joule heating from the contacts or sample. At this field only the local minimum is present and no significant changes occur either in the position or amplitude of the minimum for current densities between 0.65 and 39 MA/m2. Close inspection of the data reveals a small 10 mK heating at 39 MA/m2 with respect to 3.9 MA/m2, indicating the absence of any significant heating. In Fig. 5b, we show \({\rm{\Delta }}{\rho }_{yx}\) at 276 K for current densities ranging from 6.5 to 26 MA/m2. At this temperature, the field sweep encompasses several phases. Starting at low fields, one can see the change of curvature in \({\rm{\Delta }}{\rho }_{yx}(H)\) corresponding to the helical phase below 15 mT, as well as the local minimum at 40 mT, and the THE caused by skyrmions at 75 mT. We observe no significant changes in neither of these signatures. Difference between the data obtained at 3.9 MA/m2 with the data taken at other currents could indicate a 0.5 n\({\rm{\Omega }}\).cm increase of the THE at 75 mT, nevertheless this difference is barely above noise level, so it must be taken only as indication. Our experimental resolution of ≈0.8 nV/\(\sqrt{{\rm{Hz}}}\) is insufficient to measure the THE below ≈1 MA/m2 as in such a small sample (10 μm width) it translates to 0.1 nV.
As we do not observe any change in the THE signal as a function of current density, we cannot conclude whether skyrmions are in the pinned or flow regime. However, direct TEM observation of skyrmion motion in a 100 nm thick FeGe lamella found a critical current for skyrmion depinning of \({J}_{c}\sim 50\) kA/m2 at \(T=270\) K37. We therefore suggest that the current densities of our experiment place skyrmions in a flow regime and that a hypothetical pinned regime may exist at lower current density. In that case, FeGe would have a larger THE than that of MnSi in the skyrmion flow regime (≈+2 n\({\rm{\Omega }}\).cm). Also, by analogy with MnSi, the THE of +5 n\({\rm{\Omega }}\).cm at 13 MA/m2 that we measure in FeGe could maybe increase by a factor of two in the hypothetical pinned regime.
Conclusions
We report the first observation of a skyrmion THE emerging from an ordered skyrmion lattice in a bulk crystal since the original skyrmion THE discovery in the MnSi family of compounds. Using high resolution Hall Effect measurements in a mesoscopic FIB lamella extracted from a single crystal of FeGe, we observe a 5 n\({\rm{\Omega }}\).cm THE in a region of field and temperature close to TN where a skyrmion lattice has been observed in bulk samples using SANS42. We also report the signature of a re-entrant magnetic phase adjacent to the skyrmion phase and connected to the helicoid or inhomogeneous chiral spin state. We argue that the large THE amplitude indicates that the smaller effective magnetic field produced by the bigger FeGe skyrmions is compensated by a larger ordinary Hall constant. The near-room temperature (276 K) and lower magnetic fields (~70 mT) at which it occurs, as well as its sign and amplitude, make this discovery highly relevant for theoretical and technological reasons. Technological, as the detection of a near-room temperature skyrmion THE in a clean single crystal establishes FeGe as a promising compound for applications, whether in bulk crystal or thin film form. Theoretical, as the current skyrmion THE model is only a “qualitative” predictor of its amplitude (and, more problematically, its sign) and our experimental results provide a much-needed new reference for studying the skyrmion THE in clean single crystals. In addition, our skyrmion THE value in bulk FeGe crystals is similar to that in MnSi crystals, but it is up to 200 times lower than the maximum THE value claimed in FeGe thin films, which could point toward fundamental skyrmions physics or extrinsic contributions to the THE.
Methods
Crystal Growth
Cubic FeGe is a chiral stoichiometric binary B20 compound, crystallising in the non-centrosymmetric \(P{2}_{1}3\) cubic space group, isostructural to MnSi. Small single crystals (≈100 μm wide) were grown by chemical vapour transport as described in ref.59. These samples were also used in refs41,45.
Nanofabrication
A lamella 0.75 μm thick, 10 μm wide and 25 μm long, was carved out of a pyramidal single crystal, using a FEI Helios 600 FIB/SEM. This lamella is shown in Fig. 2a. We used the known crystallographic orientation of pyramidal single crystals of FeGe, namely the [111] triangular facets with [110] edges, to align the cuts so that the lamella is perpendicular to the [100] axis and its edges are along [110] axes. The lamella was then laid flat on a custom chip, and electrical contacts were made using standard FIB platinum deposition. 2-wire contact resistances ranged from 33 \({\rm{\Omega }}\) for the current contacts, to 40 and 48 \({\rm{\Omega }}\) for voltage contacts, a significant part of which comes from the intrinsically high resistivity of the FIB deposited platinum (1–2 m\({\rm{\Omega }}\).cm per the manufacturer). The result is a lamella for which the magnetic field is applied along [100] and the electrical current is flowing along [110].
Electrical Transport Measurements
We measured the longitudinal resistivity \({\rho }_{xx}\) and the transverse or Hall resistivity \({\rho }_{yx}\) in a Quantum Design PPMS with a 9 T vertical magnet, using a standard 4-wire procedure with a Linear-Research LR-700 AC resistance bridge functioning at a fixed frequency of 15.9 Hz. We used the same sign convention as in refs22,27,28, that \({\rho }_{yx}\) is positive for electrons dominated transport. This combination of sample and setup achieved a noise level of ≈0.8 nV/\(\sqrt{{\rm{Hz}}}\), which is close to the resolution limit of the instrument (≈0.6 nV/\(\sqrt{{\rm{Hz}}}\)) and the intrinsic Johnson-Nyquist noise of the resistive platinum contacts (≈0.7 nV/\(\sqrt{{\rm{Hz}}}\)). Considering measurement duration and current density (>1 MA/m2), this translates into a noise level of typically less than 0.5 n\({\rm{\Omega }}\).cm for the Hall resistivity \({\rho }_{yx}\), and 15 n\({\rm{\Omega }}\).cm for \({\rho }_{xx}\), on a sample that is only \(0.75\times 10\times 25\) μm3 in size.
The temperature dependence curves, \({\rho }_{yx}(T)\), were measured by ramping up the temperature from 270 to 290 K for several applied magnetic fields, following a zero field cooled (ZFC) procedure. We used the standard magnetic field anti-symmetrisation procedure to remove the experimental offset. The offset measured is equivalent to a misalignment of the contacts of ≈3 μm. \({\rho }_{yx}(H)\) curves were measured by cooling in zero field to the target temperature, raising the magnetic field, and then measuring \({\rho }_{yx}\) while stepping down the field to the opposite value. The field anti-symmetrisation procedure was again used to remove the experimental offset. A complete hysteresis cycle was also measured at 276 K (see Supplementary Information); compared to the \({\rho }_{yx}(H)\) curves, the only change in the initial ZFC ramp is an increase (from 15 to 30 mT) in the upper bound of the helical phase. An extension of the helical phase in magnetic field, has been observed in ZFC magnetisation measurements in Fe and Co doped MnSi60.
Factors in the THE estimate
The polarisation factor is \(P={m}_{s}/{\mu }_{sat}\), where ms is the ordered magnetic moment (spontaneous magnetisation) in the skyrmion phase inferred from a linear extrapolation of the high-field data to H = 0 in an Arrott plot, and \({\mu }_{sat}\) is the saturated moment deduced from the Curie-Weiss law in the paramagnetic state above TN22. Ref.28 indicates that \({\mu }_{sat}=2.8\pm 0.1\,{\mu }_{B}/\mathrm{Fe}\) while ref.51 finds that \({m}_{s}\approx 10\,{\rm{emu}}/{\rm{g}}\mathrm{=0.23}\,{\mu }_{B}/{\rm{Fe}}\) at 276 K. We thus estimate the polarisation factor in FeGe to be \(P\approx 0.23/2.8=0.082\), very similar to the value 0.09 in MnSi22,25. The effective magnetic field \({B}_{eff}\) induced by skyrmions magnetic texture is22,25:
As the helical period of FeGe is \({\lambda }_{S}=69.8\) nm just below TN61, the corresponding effective magnetic field is \({B}_{eff}=-\,0.74\) T, which is 18 times smaller than \({B}_{eff}=-\,13.15\) T in MnSi25 (\({\lambda }_{S}=16.5\) nm). Comparing R0 values just above TN, we find R0 = +0.11 μΩ.cm/T in MnSi at 35 K22 and R0 = −0.73 μΩ.cm/T in our sample of FeGe at 290 K. Our value of R0 is very close to the value R0 = −1.09 μΩ.cm/T in thin films of FeGe28. R0 is thus at least 6 times greater in FeGe than in MnSi.
References
Nagaosa, N. & Tokura, Y. Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions. Nature Nanotechnology 8, 899–911, https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.243 (2013).
Fert, A., Reyren, N. & Cros, V. Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications. Nature Reviews Materials 2, 17031, https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2017.31 (2017).
Fert, A., Cros, V. & Sampaio, J. Skyrmions on the track. Nature Nanotechnology 8, 152–156, https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.29 (2013).
Finocchio, G., Büttner, F., Tomasello, R., Carpentieri, M. & Kläui, M. Magnetic skyrmions: from fundamental to applications. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 49, 423001, https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/49/42/423001 (2016).
Liu, Y.-H. & Li, Y.-Q. Dynamics of magnetic skyrmions. Chinese Physics B 24, 017506, https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/24/1/017506 (2015).
Belavin, A. & Polyakov, A. Metastable states of two-dimensional isotropic ferromagnets. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 22, 245–248 (1975).
Bogdanov, A. & Yablonskii, D. Thermodynamically stable “vortices” in magnetically ordered crystals. the mixed state of magnets. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 95, 178 (1989).
Rößler, U. K., Bogdanov, A. N. & Pfleiderer, C. Spontaneous skyrmion ground states in magnetic metals. Nature 442, 797–801, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05056 (2006).
Muhlbauer, S. et al. Skyrmion Lattice in a Chiral Magnet. Science 323, 915–919, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1166767 (2009).
Yu, X. Z. et al. Near room-temperature formation of a skyrmion crystal in thin-films of the helimagnet FeGe. Nature materials 10, 106–109, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2916 (2011).
Boulle, O. et al. Room-temperature chiral magnetic skyrmions in ultrathin magnetic nanostructures. Nature Nanotechnology 11, 449–454, https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.315 (2016).
Soumyanarayanan, A. et al. Tunable room-temperature magnetic skyrmions in Ir/Fe/Co/Pt multilayers. Nature Materials 16, 898–904, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4934 (2017).
Maccariello, D. et al. Electrical detection of single magnetic skyrmions in metallic multilayers at room temperature. Nature Nanotechnology 7, 056022, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-017-0044-4 (2018).
Dzialoshinskii, I. Thermodynamic theory of weak ferromagnetism in antiferromagnetic substances. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 5, 1259–1272 (1957).
Moriya, T. Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism. Phys. Rev 120, 91–98, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.120.91 (1960).
Braun, H.-B. Topological effects in nanomagnetism: from superparamagnetism to chiral quantum solitons. Advances in Physics 61, 1–116, https://doi.org/10.1080/00018732.2012.663070 (2012).
Jonietz, F. et al. Spin Transfer Torques in MnSi. Science 1648–1652, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1195709 (2011).
Schulz, T. et al. Emergent electrodynamics of skyrmions in a chiral magnet. Nature Physics 8, 301–304, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2231 (2012).
Reichhardt, C., Ray, D. & Reichhardt, C. J. O. Collective Transport Properties of Driven Skyrmions with Random Disorder. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 217202, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.217202 (2015).
Raju, M. et al. Chiral magnetic textures in Ir/Fe/Co/Pt multilayers: Evolution and topological Hall signature. ArXiv e-prints, 1708.04084 (2017).
Zeissler, K. et al. Discrete Hall resistivity contribution from Néel skyrmions in multilayer nanodiscs. ArXiv e-prints, 1706.06024 (2017).
Neubauer, A. et al. Topological Hall Effect in the A Phase of MnSi. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 186602, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.186602 (2009).
Franz, C. et al. Real-Space and Reciprocal-Space Berry Phases in the Hall Effect of Mn1−xFexSi. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 186601, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.186601 (2014).
Liang, D., DeGrave, J. P., Stolt, M. J., Tokura, Y. & Jin, S. Current-driven dynamics of skyrmions stabilized in MnSi nanowires revealed by topological Hall effect. Nature Communications 6, 8217, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9217 (2015).
Ritz, R. et al. Giant generic topological Hall resistivity of MnSi under pressure. Phys. Rev. B 87, 134424, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.134424 (2013).
Gallagher, J. C. et al. Robust Zero-Field Skyrmion Formation in FeGe Epitaxial Thin Films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 027201, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.027201 (2017).
Huang, S. X. & Chien, C. L. Extended Skyrmion Phase in Epitaxial FeGe(111) Thin Films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 267201, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.267201 (2012).
Porter, N. A., Gartside, J. C. & Marrows, C. H. Scattering mechanisms in textured FeGe thin films: Magnetoresistance and the anomalous Hall effect. Phys. Rev. B 90, 024403, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.024403 (2014).
Kanazawa, N. et al. Discretized topological Hall effect emerging from skyrmions in constricted geometry. Phys. Rev. B 91, 041122, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.041122 (2015).
Ahmed, A. S. et al. Chiral bobbers and skyrmions in epitaxial FeGe/Si(111) films. Phys. Rev. Materials 2, 041401, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.041401 (2018).
Iwasaki, J., Mochizuki, M. & Nagaosa, N. Current-induced skyrmion dynamics in constricted geometries. Nature nanotechnology 8, 742–747, https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.176 (2013).
Zhang, X., Ezawa, M. & Zhou, Y. Magnetic skyrmion logic gates: conversion, duplication and merging of skyrmions. Scientific reports 5, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09400 (2015).
Jiang, W. et al. Blowing magnetic skyrmion bubbles. Science 349, 283–286, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1442 (2015).
Büttner, F. et al. Dynamics and inertia of skyrmionic spin structures. Nature Physics 11, 225–228, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3234 (2015).
Woo, S. et al. Observation of room-temperature magnetic skyrmions and their current-driven dynamics in ultrathin metallic ferromagnets. Nature Materials 15, 501–506, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4593 (2016).
Juge, R. et al. Magnetic skyrmions in confined geometries: Effect of the magnetic field and the disorder. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.10.030 (2017).
Yu, X. et al. Skyrmion flow near room temperature in an ultralow current density. Nature Communications 3, 988, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1990 (2012).
Tokunaga, Y. et al. A new class of chiral materials hosting magnetic skyrmions beyond room temperature. Nature Communications 6, 7638, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8638 (2015).
Yu, X. et al. Current-Induced Nucleation and Annihilation of Magnetic Skyrmions at Room Temperature in a Chiral Magnet. Advanced Materials https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201606178 (2017).
McGrouther, D. et al. Internal structure of hexagonal skyrmion lattices in cubic helimagnets. New Journal of Physics 18, https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/9/095004 (2016).
Stolt, M. J. et al. Selective Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of Cubic FeGe Nanowires That Support Stabilized Magnetic Skyrmions. Nano Letters, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04548 (2016).
Moskvin, E. et al. Complex Chiral Modulations in FeGe Close to Magnetic Ordering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 077207, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.077207 (2013).
Wilhelm, H. et al. Precursor Phenomena at the Magnetic Ordering of the Cubic Helimagnet FeGe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 127203, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.127203 (2011).
Cevey, L., Wilhelm, H., Schmidt, M. & Lortz, R. Thermodynamic investigations in the precursor region of FeGe. Physica Status Solidi (B) Basic Research 250, 650–653, https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.201200632 (2013).
Turgut, E., Stolt, M. J., Jin, S. & Fuchs, G. D. Topological spin dynamics in cubic FeGe near room temperature. Journal of Applied Physics 122, 183902, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4997013 (2017).
Zhang, S. L. et al. Room-temperature helimagnetism in FeGe thin films. Scientific Reports 7, 123, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00201-z (2017).
Zheng, F. et al. Experimental observation of chiral magnetic bobbers in B20-type FeGe. Nature Nanotechnology 13, 451–455, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0093-3 (2018).
Meynell, S. A. et al. Hall effect and transmission electron microscopy of epitaxial MnSi thin films. Phys. Rev. B 90, 224419, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.224419 (2014).
Monchesky, T. L., Loudon, J. C., Robertson, M. D. & Bogdanov, A. N. Comment on “Robust Formation of Skyrmions and Topological Hall Effect Anomaly in Epitaxial Thin Films of MnSi”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 059701, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.059701 (2014).
Meynell, S. A. et al. Neutron study of in plane skyrmions in MnSi thin films. Phys. Rev. B 96, 054402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.054402 (2017).
Wilhelm, H. et al. Scaling study and thermodynamic properties of the cubic helimagnet FeGe. Phys. Rev. B 94, 144424, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.144424 (2016).
Yeo, S. et al. First-Order Transition from a Kondo Insulator to a Ferromagnetic Metal in Single Crystalline FeSi1−xGex. Physical Review Letters 91, 046401, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.046401 (2003).
Pedrazzini, P. et al. Metallic State in Cubic FeGe Beyond Its Quantum Phase Transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 047204, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.047204 (2007).
Ritz, R. Superconductivity and non-Fermi liquid behavior on the border of itinerant ferromagnetism. Ph.D. Thesis 113–115 (2010).
Everschor-Sitte, K. & Sitte, M. Real-space Berry phases: Skyrmion soccer (invited). Journal of Applied Physics 115, 172602, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4870695 (2014).
Denisov, K. S., Rozhansky, I. V., Averkiev, N. S. & Lähderanta, E. A nontrivial crossover in topological Hall effect regimes. Scientific Reports 7, 17204, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16538-4 (2017).
Kanazawa, N. et al. Critical phenomena of emergent magnetic monopoles in a chiral magnet. Nature Communications 7, 11622, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11622 (2016).
Luo, Y. et al. Depinning currents and elasticity of skyrmion lattice measured via Resonant Ultrasound Resonance. ArXiv e-prints, 1711.08873 (2017).
Richardson, M. The Partial Equilibrium Diagram of the Fe-Ge System in the Range 40–72 at. % Ge, and the Crystallisation of some Iron Germanides by Chemical Transport Reactions. Acta Chemica Scandinavica 21, 2305–2317, https://doi.org/10.3891/acta.chem.scand.21-2305 (1967).
Bauer, A. et al. Quantum phase transitions in single-crystal Mn1−xFexSi and Mn1−xCoxSi: Crystal growth, magnetization, ac susceptibility, and specific heat. Physical Review B 82, 064404, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.064404 (2010).
Lebech, B., Bernhard, J. & Freltoft, T. Magnetic structures of cubic FeGe studied by small-angle neutron scattering. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 1, 6105–6122, https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/1/35/010 (1989).
Acknowledgements
B.M. and M.L. are grateful to M.B. Salamon, S.Z. Lin and C. Batista for fruitful discussions. C.R. thanks C.J.O. Reichhardt for a careful reading. M.L., B.M. and C.R. work was supported by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development program of Los Alamos National Laboratory under project number 20160369ER. This work was performed, in part, at the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, an Office of Science User Facility operated for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science. Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-mission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC., a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA-0003525. Los Alamos National Laboratory, an affirmative action equal opportunity employer, is operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC, for the National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC52-06NA25396. M.J.S. and S.J. thank the support by NSF grant ECCS-1609585. M.J.S. also acknowledges support from the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program grant number DGE-1256259.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.M., S.J. and M.L. planned the experiment. M.J.S. and S.J. grew the material. M.L. and D.V.P. prepared the lamella. M.L. performed the measurements. M.L. and B.M. performed the data analysis. M.L., B.M. and C.R. wrote the manuscript and all authors contributed to the final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Leroux, M., Stolt, M.J., Jin, S. et al. Skyrmion Lattice Topological Hall Effect near Room Temperature. Sci Rep 8, 15510 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33560-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33560-2
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Inducing a tunable skyrmion-antiskyrmion system through ion beam modification of FeGe films
npj Spintronics (2024)
-
An atomically tailored chiral magnet with small skyrmions at room temperature
Communications Physics (2023)
-
Skyrmion Phase in MnSi Thin Films Grown on Sapphire by a Conventional Sputtering
Nanoscale Research Letters (2021)
-
Emergence of the topological Hall effect in a tetragonal compensated ferrimagnet Mn2.3Pd0.7Ga
NPG Asia Materials (2021)
-
Skyrmion lattice creep at ultra-low current densities
Communications Materials (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.