High-affinity IgM+ memory B cells are defective in differentiation into IgM antibody-secreting cells by re-stimulation with a T cell-dependent antigen

Tashiro, Yasuyuki; Murakami, Akikazu; Hara, Yasushi; Shimizu, Takeyuki; Kubo, Masato; Goitsuka, Ryo; Kishimoto, Hidehiro; Azuma, Takachika

doi:10.1038/s41598-018-32926-w

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 28 September 2018

High-affinity IgM⁺ memory B cells are defective in differentiation into IgM antibody-secreting cells by re-stimulation with a T cell-dependent antigen

Yasuyuki Tashiro^1,2,
Akikazu Murakami³,
Yasushi Hara ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0528-3252⁴,
Takeyuki Shimizu⁵,
Masato Kubo^6,7,
Ryo Goitsuka ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1137-9760¹,
Hidehiro Kishimoto³ &
…
Takachika Azuma^2,8

Scientific Reports volume 8, Article number: 14559 (2018) Cite this article

5321 Accesses
4 Citations
5 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

IgM antibodies (Abs) are thought to play a major role in humoral immunity but only at the early stage of the primary immune response. However, two subsets of IgM⁺ memory B cells (MBCs), one with high affinity gained by means of multiple somatic hypermutation (SHM) and the other with low affinity and no SHMs, are generated through the germinal center (GC)-dependent and GC-independent (non-GC) pathway, respectively, after immunization with (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl (NP)-chicken γ-globulin. Surprisingly, an analysis of antibody-secreting cells reveals that a large amount of anti-NP IgM Ab with few SHMs is secreted during the recall response, indicating that only non-GC MBCs have terminal differentiation potential. Since secondary IgM Abs are capable of binding to dinitrophenyl ligands, they likely provide broad cross-reactivity in defense against microbial infection.

Recreation of an antigen-driven germinal center in vitro by providing B cells with phagocytic antigen

Article Open access 20 April 2023

Heterogeneous plasma cells and long-lived subsets in response to immunization, autoantigen and microbiota

Article 31 October 2022

Long-primed germinal centres with enduring affinity maturation and clonal migration

Article 21 September 2022

Introduction

The (4-Hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl (NP)-hapten system of the C57BL/6 mouse is advantageous for studying the structural bases of Ab affinities since anti-NP Abs are largely encoded by the V186.2 gene, as well as by minor genes such as V23, J558.55, and V124, referred to as V_analogs¹. However, these immunoglobulin (Ig) heavy chains possess different CDR3 structures, particularly around the amino acid residue at position 95 that corresponds to the V_H-D_H junction, where Tyr95 and Gly95 pair with His100 as well as X95 (where X indicates amino acids other than Tyr95 and Gly95)^2,3. The structure at position 95 has been shown to contribute to variations in initial affinities^1,4 and to raising the maximum affinity attainable by somatic hypermutation (SHM), namely, the ceiling affinity⁵.

By leveraging the NP system with a strong understanding of Ab affinity maturation, hapten-chromophore proteins with different numbers of hapten molecules, such as NP_hi- or NP_med-allophycocyanin (APC), have often been used to estimate the relative affinities of BCRs^6,7. Using these NP-APCs, Hara et al. showed that there are two subsets of IgM⁺ memory B cells (MBCs) in the spleens of mice immunized with NP-chicken γ-globulin (NP-CGG): one expressing BCRs with increased affinities due to SHM, similar to those of IgG1⁺ MBCs acquired through a germinal center (GC) reaction (referred to as MBC^GC), and the other expressing BCRs lacking SHMs that are supposedly generated through the GC-independent (non-GC) pathway (referred to as MBC^non-GC)⁷.

Classically, MBCs are defined as B cells that have undergone antigen-driven proliferation and become resting cells. Upon re-exposure to primed antigens, MBCs are considered to proliferate and differentiate into Ab-secreting cells (ASCs)^8,9. The expectation is that plasma cells secreting high-affinity IgM Abs are generated by secondary immunization; however, Murakami et al. showed that IgM Abs secreted from hybridomas prepared by cell fusion technology are characterized by consistently low affinity and few SHMs¹⁰. The results are in agreement with previous findings that IgM⁺ MBCs mainly comprise SHM⁻ cells^11,12,13. To explain the discrepancy in maturation in terms of affinities between BCRs on MBCs^GC and secreted Abs from ASCs, an analysis of MBCs and ASCs at the same time points of immunization with NP-CGG was considered necessary.

Here, we report that IgM⁺ SHM⁺ MBCs^GC are unable to differentiate into IgM ASCs. On the other hand, IgM⁺ SHM⁻ MBCs^non-GC are capable of differentiating into plasma cells that secrete IgM Abs as part of the recall response. We also show that primary and secondary IgM Abs have different CDR3 structures that bring about different cross-reactivities to antigens; the secondary IgM Abs generally have very low initial affinities and can cross-react with the dinitrophenyl (DNP) hapten. Since neither primary IgM Abs nor affinity-matured IgG1 Abs bind to DNP, the broad cross-reactivity observed is considered to be characteristic of secondary IgM Abs, and their immunological role is discussed.

Results

We analyzed the number of NP-specific B-lineage cells as well as Ab affinity with time after immunization with NP₄₀-CGG by dividing the time course into three phases: Phases I, II, and III¹⁴. Phase I involves naïve B cell activation with antigens and the production of primary Abs by day 7. Phase II corresponds to the subsequent period up to the time of secondary immunization. GC structures are known to reside in follicles at this phase¹⁵. Phase III starts with secondary immunization, which induces MBC activation followed by MBC differentiation into ASCs that secrete secondary Abs.

Kinetic analysis of activated B cell differentiation into MBCs and plasmablasts in Phases I and II

First, we analyzed the cell fate of IgM⁺ B cells in Phase I. NP-specific IgM⁺ B cells were detected as NP^bright B220⁺ cells with NP_hi-APC (Fig. 1A), although they were below the detection limit in unimmunized- and CGG-immunized mice (data not shown). This indicated that NP-specific naïve B cells were stimulated with NP₄₀-CGG/alum and proliferated rapidly soon after immunization (Fig. 1B), followed by differentiation into either GL7⁻ B cells or GL7⁺ B cells by day 7 (Fig. 1B,C). Since IgG1⁺ B cells were also detected on day 3, class-switch recombination (CSR) was thought to occur at the early stage of immunization^7,16. GL7⁺ B cells were also detected on day 3 as NP^dull B220⁺ cells (Fig. 1C), which would be pre-GC B cells destined to enter into GC structures that were not observed in follicles at this time point^15,17. Since SHM was shown to be induced in GL7⁺ B cells on day 7 but not on day 5⁷ (Tashiro et al., unpublished observation), we distinguished pre-GC B cells from GC B cells on the basis of SHM expression. In other words, we used the SHM frequency as an index of B cells that had resided for a time in GCs.

We identified MBCs as NP_hi-APC-binding GL7⁻ B220⁺ cells, and their number remained almost constant throughout Phase II (14 to 42 days postimmunization) (Fig. 1D). V_H sequence analysis of MBCs on day 42, when the GC reaction was almost complete, revealed two subsets: MBCs that had no SHMs (SHM⁻) and MBCs with multiple SHMs (SHM⁺) (Fig. 1E). Since pre-GC B cells had converted to GC B cells and since SHM was induced only in GC B cells, SHM⁻ GL7⁻ B cells were considered to be MBCs^non-GC. Although both of these subsets evidently resided among IgM⁺ MBCs, there were only a few SHM⁻ cells among IgG1⁺ MBCs, suggesting that the IgG1⁺ fraction largely comprised MBCs^GC (Fig. 1E).

Next, we sorted the NP_hi-APC-binding IgM⁺ MBCs into IgM⁺ IgD⁺ and IgM⁺ IgD⁻ cells according to a report by Dogan et al.¹¹. These cells had increased in number on day 42 (Fig. 1F). The nucleotide sequences of the V186.2 genes showed that the IgM⁺ IgD⁺ fraction contained more SHM⁺ cells than the IgM⁺ IgD⁻ fraction. In addition, since SHM⁺ cells in the IgM⁺ IgD⁺ fraction contained those with a Trp33Leu mutation (Leu33⁺), which was shown to increase affinity^18,19, and since Leu33⁺ cells were rare in the IgM⁺ IgD⁻ fraction, IgD expression seemed to depend on the affinity of IgM BCRs.

IgM⁺ GC B cells differentiate into MBCs but not into plasmablasts

We previously developed a method for discriminating between plasmablasts and plasma cells, enabling us to examine these ASCs separately¹⁴. Because most CD138⁺ cells were found to be mIgλ, they were largely plasmablasts on day 7 (Fig. 2A). In fact, the ratio of plasma cells in the total ASC population on day 7 was less than 0.02 (data not shown). Both IgM⁺ and IgG1⁺ plasmablasts were observed on day 5 and reached maximum cell numbers of ~10⁴ for IgM⁺ cells and ~3 × 10⁵ for IgG1⁺ on day 7 (Fig. 2B).

During Phase II, the number of plasmablasts decreased (Fig. 2B). Judging from the rapid decrease in number by day 14, plasmablasts in Phase I were considered to be short-lived. V_H sequence analysis of Phase I plasmablasts revealed that both IgM and IgG1 Abs were encoded by germline V186.2⁺ Tyr95⁺ genes (Fig. 2C). We sorted these day-42 plasmablasts and analyzed V_H nucleotide sequences, which revealed that SHMs were essentially absent in IgM⁺ cells while multiple SHMs were observed in the counterpart IgG1⁺ cells (Fig. 2D), suggesting that IgM⁺ plasmablasts had not arisen from IgM⁺ GC B cells on day 42 because GC B cells at this time point had multiple SHMs⁷. The presence of only SHM⁺ IgM⁺ MBCs (Fig. 1E) but not SHM⁺ IgM⁺ plasmablasts (Fig. 2D) suggested that IgM⁺ GC B cells are capable of differentiating into MBCs but not into plasmablasts or plasma cells.

Comparison of transcription factor expression in IgM⁺ and IgG1⁺ GC B cells

We next compared the expression of transcription factors of IgM⁺ and IgG1⁺ GC B cells to determine whether the defect in IgM⁺ GC B cells in terms of their inability to differentiate into ASCs would relate to the expression of these factors. Blimp1 is the key regulator of ASC development, directly represses Pax5 and is negatively regulated by Bach2²⁰. We isolated IgG1⁺ and IgM⁺ GC B cells on the basis of Fas expression, separated centroblasts and centrocytes based on the expression of CXCR4 and GL7 (Fig. 3A) and examined the expression of each transcription factor by RT-PCR (Fig. 3B). The results showed that IgM⁺ centrocytes expressed Prdm1 mRNA at the same level as their IgG1⁺ counterparts and that there were no differences in Pax5 or Bach2 mRNA expression between these cells. Therefore, the defect in IgM⁺ GC B cells in differentiation into plasmablasts and plasma cells could not be explained in terms of transcription factor expression.

Self-renewal and differentiation potential of MBCs after secondary immunization

Although IgM⁺ plasmablasts and plasma cells were nearly below the detection limit in Phase II (Fig. 2B), they appeared in the spleen and bone marrow after secondary immunization (Fig. 4A). In Phase III, the increase in the number of plasma cells was remarkable, as shown in a previous report¹⁴, which is true for IgM⁺ cells. We first examined which cells, MBCs or plasmablasts, were responsible for the generation of plasma cells, since both MBCs and plasmablasts express BCRs capable of receiving antigenic stimulation and since plasmablasts are thought to be precursors of plasma cells^21,22. The results clearly showed that only transferred MBCs, and not plasmablasts, provided plasma cells that secreted anti-NP Abs (Fig. 4C). Although these experiments were carried out using plasmablasts regardless of the BCR isotype since few IgM⁺ plasmablasts were available, the results indicated that plasmablasts were unable to differentiate into plasma cells by secondary immunization with NP₄₀-CGG.

Nucleotide sequence analysis revealed again that most of the IgM Abs secreted from plasmablasts and plasma cells had few SHMs (Fig. S1). This was even more evident in the V_H sequences of IgM⁺ plasma cells that secreted only V186.2⁻ SHM⁻ Abs. Taken together with the data showing that the number of plasmablasts was low compared with the number of plasma cells, these results suggested that IgM⁺ MBCs^non-GC had differentiated into plasma cells that secrete low-affinity IgM Abs after secondary immunization. In other words, IgM⁺ MBCs^GC were hardly differentiated into ASCs. This inability to differentiate into ASCs was not due to inefficient signaling through BCR since the V_H sequence analysis revealed that both IgM⁺ primary MBCs^non-GC and MBCs^GC were able to proliferate and self-renew by antigen stimulation, similar to IgG1⁺ MBCs (Fig. 4B).

Isotype-dependent variation in Ab production and affinity with time during immunization

Ab affinities are often estimated by ELISA using hapten-protein conjugates with different numbers of hapten molecules, such as NP₂-BSA and NP₂₆-BSA. In the case of germline IgG Abs (V186.2⁺ Tyr95⁺ Trp33⁺), Abs such as N1G9 cannot bind to NP₂-BSA, but affinity-matured IgG Abs such as B2 (V186.2⁺ Tyr95⁺ Leu33⁺) or E11 (V186.2⁺ Gly95⁺ SHM⁺) can (Fig. 5A). On the other hand, IgM Ab has a pentameric structure and thus possesses ten antigen-combining sites per molecule, which allows binding to multivalent antigens with higher avidity than that of IgG Abs, as shown with control IgM Abs encoded by the same V_H and V_L genes as IgG counterparts, N1G9 and B2 (Fig. 6A). From the viewpoint of the V_H-D-J_H gene nucleotide sequence, N1G9-IgM is identical to B1-8^18,23. On the other hand, some IgM Abs, such as 8A38 and 1A8¹⁰, which are V186.2⁺ X95⁺, are unable to bind to NP₂-BSA, and their NP₂/NP₂₆ ratios are lower than that of N1G9-IgM (Fig. 5A), suggesting that they have very low affinities. In fact, they are unable to bind to NP₂₆-BSA when converted into the IgG form (Murakami et al., unpublished observation). Since these IgM Abs are encoded by V186.2 genes with no SHMs¹⁰, their very low affinities are considered to arise from differences in CDR3H sequences (Fig. 5B).

Next, we examined the binding of IgM Abs to NP₂- and NP₂₆-BSA in immune sera obtained from mice immunized with NP₄₀-CGG in Phase II (Fig. 5C). The total amount of IgM Ab bound to NP₂₆-BSA was estimated with the OD₄₉₀ value, which decreased steadily with time until day 49, indicating that there was a short supply of IgM Abs in Phase II. On the other hand, a large amount of Ab production was observed on day 54 or 56 after secondary immunization (Phase III), indicating that recall Ab production was induced. However, IgM Abs on day 56 showed inefficient binding to NP₂-BSA and provided a low NP₂/NP₂₆ ratio of ~0.2–0.3, which was smaller than that of day 7 Abs (~0.7), suggesting that the secondary Abs have lower affinity (avidity) than the primary Abs. The lower NP₂/NP₂₆ ratio for day 56 IgM Abs was not due to inhibition by the binding of high-affinity IgG Abs to NP₂-BSA since similar results were obtained using antisera from which IgG Abs had been removed with protein G-beads (Fig. S2A).

An Ab production profile that was different from that of IgG1 Abs was observed for other isotypes. The peak of primary IgG2b Ab production was detected at approximately 7–14 days, followed by a gradual decrease with time. The ratio of NP₂/NP₂₆ increased slightly (0.2–0.4), but the decrease was not as evident as that of IgG1 Abs. Secondary immunization, however, resulted in an obvious increase in the NP₂/NP₂₆ ratio (0.9–1.0), indicating that the recall response of IgG2b Abs was accompanied by the production of affinity-matured Abs (Fig. 5D). We also examined the production of IgG3 and IgA Abs (Fig. S3). The peak production of IgG3 Abs was observed at approximately 7–14 days, followed by a gradual decrease during Phase II, with little change in the NP₂/NP₂₆ ratio, which was as low as <0.2. In the case of IgA Abs, neither a production peak at approximately day 7 nor subsequent Ab production in Phase II was observed, indicating that the primary response of these Abs was different from those of the others. In conclusion, these results show that each isotype has a unique Ab production profile and may not necessarily be accompanied by an increase in Ab affinity (Figs 5C and S3).

Cross-reactive binding of secondary IgM Abs to DNP-hapten

To understand the immunological role of secondary IgM Abs, we examined their cross-reactivity to various chemical compounds, since cross-reactions sometimes play an important role in viral infection²⁴. Anti-NP Abs are known to react with NP analogs, such as (4-hydroxy-3-iodo-5-nitrophenyl)acetyl (NIP) or (4-hydroxy-3,5-dinitrophenyl)acetyl (NNP), which are haptens with a higher affinity than that of NP alone; this phenomenon is referred to as heterocliticity^25,26. We also examined whether anti-NP IgG1 Abs can bind to DNP₂₆-BSA and found that they are unable to bind to DNP regardless of their affinity (Fig. 6A), even though the structures of the IgG Abs were converted to the pentameric IgM form (Fig. 6B). On the other hand, the IgM Abs 1A350, 1A8, and 1A86, which are encoded by germline V186.2 genes¹⁰, could bind to DNP₂₆-BSA (Fig. 6C). Such cross-reactive binding to DNP would not be caused by a nonspecific hydrophobic interaction since the Abs did not bind to (4-hydroxyphenyl)acetyl (HP)₂₆-BSA, FITC-BSA or acetyl (Ac)-BSA (Table 1). In addition, this binding was inhibited with NP-Cap in a dose-dependent manner, suggesting that the same binding sites were recognized by both NP and DNP (Fig. 6D).

Table 1 Cross-reactions with hapten-BSAs.

Full size table

We also compared the binding of IgM Abs to NP₂, NP₂₆, and DNP₂₆-BSA using NP-CGG immune sera (Fig. 6E). Day 7 IgM Abs showed efficient binding to NP₂-BSA, while day 56 IgM Abs showed weak binding to NP₂-BSA but significant binding to DNP₂₆-BSA and to NP₂₆-BSA (Fig. 6E). In terms of NP/DNP cross-reactivity at the molecular level, the appearance of Igλ⁺ NP⁺ DNP⁺ MBCs supported these observations (Fig. S4).

Discussion

In this study, we analyzed IgM⁺ MBCs phenotypically and functionally based on our previous reports^7,10, focusing on IgM⁺ ASCs and Abs secreted from these cells. Subcategorizing IgM⁺ MBCs on the basis of their expression of IgD BCR, we found that the SHM⁺ and SHM⁻ fractions corresponded to IgM⁺ IgD⁻ and IgM⁺ IgD⁺ cells, respectively. Although these two types of IgM⁺ MBCs possessed the same memory characteristic of self-renewal potential, there was a difference in the ability to differentiate into ASCs; IgM⁺ IgD⁺ MBCs, but not IgM⁺ IgD⁻ MBCs, showed poor potential for ASC formation, in contrast to classical views on memory definition^8,9. Notably, our study revealed that secondary IgM Abs exhibited cross-reactivity, while their affinities were lower than those of canonical IgM Abs with strict antigen specificity. In contrast, Krishnamurty et al. reported that IgM⁺ IgD⁻, but not IgM⁺ IgD⁺ MBCs, were highly mutated in the malaria immunization system²⁷. However, since Pape et al.²⁸ demonstrated that IgM⁺ IgD⁺ MBCs in the PE/CFA immunization system dominantly comprised those possessing fewer SHMs, IgM⁺ IgD⁺ MBCs likely expressed few SHMs, and the discrepancy may be explained in terms of antigens employed, namely, NP, PE or malaria. Obviously, malaria-antigen epitopes would be more complex than NP and PE and activate more diverse B cell repertoires with a broad range of affinities to be involved in Ab production. This brought about the enrichment of heterogeneous MBCs due to wider gating of antigen-specific populations and a broader range for Ig gene sequence analysis.

Our results showing that IgM⁺ MBCs^non-GC with low-affinity BCRs are able to differentiate into ASCs responsible for recall IgM Ab production are not consistent with the notion that high-affinity B cells are selected to differentiate into plasma cells^14,29. We hypothesized that high-affinity IgG1 Abs may prevent the secretion of IgM Abs, as reported for TI antigens³⁰; however, no such effect of IgG1 Ab on the recall response of IgM Abs was observed (Fig. S4). Therefore, it is likely that a lack of differentiation of IgM⁺ MBC^GC into ASCs might be caused by isotype-specific and affinity-dependent regulation of BCR signaling^31,32,33,34. Our finding that the two IgM⁺ MBC subsets seemed to be distinguishable on the basis of IgD BCR expression (Fig. 1E) will be useful to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

In addition to MBCs, as described above, a rapid decline in the number of IgM⁺ plasmablasts indicated poor potential to differentiate into ASCs among IgM⁺ GC B cells (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, most of the IgM Abs secreted from plasmablasts on day 42 had no SHMs (Fig. 2D). These results indicated the preference for skewed MBC differentiation in IgM⁺ GC B cells in contrast to IgG1⁺ GC B cells. Surprisingly, the inability of IgM⁺ GC B cells to differentiate into plasmablasts was not due to insufficient expression of transcription factors, since no significant differences in the levels of transcription factors were observed between IgM⁺ and IgG1⁺ GC B cells (Fig. 3). Considering the small difference in BCR affinity between IgM⁺ and IgG1⁺ GC B cells⁷, we supposed that IgM⁺ GC B cells were prohibited from differentiating into plasmablasts capable of secreting high-affinity IgM Abs that are inferior to low-affinity Abs in such functions as complement-dependent hemolysis¹⁰, although these cells were allowed to differentiate into MBCs, whose regulatory mechanism has not yet been revealed.

During Phase III, a large amount of IgM Ab capable of binding to NP₂₆-BSA, but not to NP₂-BSA, was secreted. Although both Phase I- and Phase III-IgM Abs lack SHMs, they are different in terms of their initial affinities (Fig. 5C). Despite their low affinities, secondary IgM Abs have a unique antigen specificity that makes them capable of binding to DNP and TNP; no other anti-NP Abs, including primary IgM Abs and affinity-matured secondary IgG1 Abs, showed any ability to bind to NP analogs (Fig. 6 and data not shown). We suppose that the immune system prepares two different types of IgM Abs in terms of antigen recognition in Phases I and III, which conclude on days 7 and 54, respectively (Fig. 5). Although the intrinsic affinities of the combining sites are similar, IgM Abs have the advantage over IgG1 Abs of being able to bind to multivalent antigens through their higher avidity because the IgM Abs have 10 combining sites per molecule, suggesting that primary IgM Abs play a role in compensating for the low affinities of IgG1 Abs. Secondary immunization also provides both IgM and IgG1 Abs, whose affinities are significantly differ (Fig. 5C). Since affinity maturation has been shown to accompany specificity maturation³⁵, affinity-matured IgG1 Abs recognize antigens more efficiently and more precisely than their precursors. However, microbes that invade our bodies sometimes change their surface structures to escape attack from affinity-matured IgG1 Abs. Immune systems seem to prepare IgM Abs with a broad specificity, which is expected to extend beyond the narrow specificity of IgG1 Abs and function as a first-line barrier against the invasion of microbes whose epitopes are altered by mutations through an Ab cross-reaction mechanism. Krishnamurty et al. provided new knowledge on IgM⁺ MBCs and ASCs by utilizing the malaria immunization system²⁷. Tracing the changes in the SHM frequencies, affinities and specificities of IgM Abs through comparative analysis of the changes in those of IgG Abs in a clinically relevant setting is informative.

Classically, MBCs are defined as cells that have undergone antigen-driven proliferation, expressed isotype-switched BCRs, and then become resting cells. They are activated upon re-exposure to primed antigens and then proliferate and subsequently differentiate into ASCs capable of secreting high-affinity Abs^8,9. These types of MBCs are sometimes referred to as effector MBCs, and IgG1⁺ MBCs^GC meet this definition. Judging from the profiles of Ab production and affinity maturation, IgG2b⁺ MBCs would be characterized as the effector type (Fig. 6), although their frequency is quite low during late Phase II at both the cellular level (IgM⁺, 63.3 ± 7.0%; IgG1⁺, 28.5 ± 6.3%; IgG2b⁺, 2.2 ± 0.8% in NP_hi⁺ B cells) and sequence level⁷. On the other hand, IgM⁺ MBCs are referred to as central MBCs because they lack the ability to differentiate into ASCs but are able to re-enter into GCs and differentiate into IgG⁺ MBCs^12,36. However, since we found that IgM⁺ MBCs^non-GC have the potential to differentiate into plasma cells that secrete secondary IgM Abs, they can be referred to as the effector type. Zuccarino-Catania et al. recently demonstrated remarkable data that effector MBCs and central MBCs were distinguished by the expression of CD80 and PD-L2³⁷. Further characterization of IgM⁺ MBCs^non-GC with the expression patterns of surface markers^12,37 and transcriptional factors²⁰ is expected. Although little information is available regarding their function of IgM⁺ MBCs^GC, we speculate that IgM⁺ MBCs^GC may be a new type of MBC possessing affinity-matured BCRs capable of switching to other isotypes when necessary. The immunological role of IgM⁺ MBCs^GC needs to be clarified as well as that of MBCs with isotypes other than IgG1.

In a series of reports^6,7,14, we have described the basis of the cellular dynamism of Ab production and affinity change and showed divergent and unique patterns that are specific to such isotypes as IgG1, IgG2b, and IgM. Vaccines have been used to activate naïve B cells to differentiate into MBCs and ASCs and are expected to prevent the invasion of microbes, which are known to stimulate the production of various Ab isotypes. For efficient and safe vaccination, further knowledge on the regulation of the MBCs and ASCs of each isotype is required.

Methods

Mice and Immunizations

C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Japan SLC. AID^−/− mice were provided by Prof. T. Honjo (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan). All mice were maintained in Tokyo University of Science (TUS) mouse facility under specific pathogen-free conditions. Mouse procedures were performed under protocols approved by the TUS Animal Care and Use Committee and are in accordance with the current national regulation. Mice were immunized i.p. with 100 μg of NP₄₀-CGG precipitated in alum and boosted with the same Ag in PBS.

NP-Protein Conjugates

NP-protein conjugates were prepared as described previously³⁸. Briefly, the hydroxysuccinimide ester of NP (NP-OSu) was coupled with proteins in 0.1 M sodium bicarbonate buffer (pH 8.5) containing 0.15 M NaCl for 1 h at room temperature. Any excess of reagents or reaction byproducts was removed via passage through a Sephadex G-25 column (GE Healthcare) or by dialysis against PBS. In the case of NP-allophycocyanin (NP-APC) and streptavidin-NP-APC (NP-APC_avi), the number of NPs per APC was assumed on the basis of the molar ratio of NP-Osu to APC or APC_avi in the reaction mixture⁶. DNP- and TNP-BSA were prepared by reacting BSA with 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonic acid or 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid³⁹. HP-BSA was prepared by reacting BSA with the hydroxysuccinimide ester of HP. The number of HPs introduced was estimated by titration of amino groups with 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid⁴⁰.

Anti-NP Abs

Hybridomas producing the anti-NP Abs 8A38, 1A8, 1A86, 9T13, B2 and E11 were prepared as described previously^5,10,38. N1G9 was provided by Prof. K. Rajewsky (Max-Delbrück-Centrum für Molekulare Medizin, Berlin, Germany). The V_H-D_H-J_H genes of N1G9 or B2 were fused with the secreted form of Cμ-genes and transfected into J558L myeloma cells by electroporation. N1G9-IgM and B2-IgM were purified from culture supernatants⁶.

Flow Cytometry and Detection Reagents

Cells were treated with 5 mM EDTA in PBS before staining, which reduced the binding of cytophilic nonendogenous Abs to B cells (Supplemental information). Cells were treated with unlabeled anti-CD16/CD32 (2.4G2, eBioscience) in FACS buffer (1% BSA/PBS) to block FcγRs. After washing, cells were stained with the relevant antibodies: anti-Igκ-FITC (187.1, BD Pharmingen), anti-IgM-PerCP-Cy5.5 (II/41, eBioscience), anti-IgD-FITC (11–26 c.2a, BD Pharmingen), anti-IgG1-PE (A85-1, eBioscience), anti-CD45R/B220-PE-Cy7 (RA3-6B2, eBioscience), anti-CD138-Biotin (281.2, BD Pharmingen), anti-GL7-FITC (GL7, BD Pharmingen), anti-CD38-PE (90, eBioscience), anti-CD95/Fas-PE (Jo2, BD Pharmingen), anti-CXCR4-APC (2B11, eBioscience), and PE–streptavidin (eBioscience). Cells were analyzed on FACSCanto II and FACSAria II (BD Biosciences). Cell sorting was performed on FACSAria II (BD Biosciences). The data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star).

Detection of Cells Secreting Antibodies by Flow Cytometry

We employed the method as described previously¹⁴. Cells were treated with unlabeled rat anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (2.4G2, eBioscience) in medium (10% FCS/IMDM) to block FcγRs. After washing with medium, cells were stained with rat anti-Igλ-PE (JC5-1, Southern Biotech) and biotinylated rat anti-mouse CD138 (281-2, BD Pharmingen) in medium. FACS buffer (1% BSA/PBS) containing no azide was used for washing cells and subsequent staining with streptavidin-APC (BioLegend) coupled with NP. After cultivation, the cells were washed and stained in FACS buffer containing sodium azide. Finally, cells were stained with rat anti-Igλ-FITC (JC5-1, Southern Biotech) and rat anti-mouse B220 (RA3-6B2, eBioscience). Cell sorting was carried out using a FACSAriaII (BD Biosciences). Files were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star).

V_H Sequence Analysis

mRNAs were purified from sorted cells of each B cell subset using Trizol (Invitrogen). cDNAs were synthesized using PrimeScript Reverse Transcriptase (Takara) and Oligo-dT primers, followed by amplification using PrimeSTAR DNA polymerase (Takara) and forward primer: 5′-TCTAGAATTCAGGTCCAACTGCAGCAGCC-3′, paired with the following reverse primers: mCμ5′-CTTGAACAGGGTGACGG-3′ for IgM⁺ MBCs, sCμ5′-GTGTCAGACATGATCAGG-3′ for IgM⁺ plasmablasts/plasma cells; mCγ5′-TCTGCTTCAGCTCCACCAC-3′ for IgG⁺ MBCs; sCγ1 5′-TCTGCTTCAGCTCCACCAC-3′ and sCγ2b/2c 5′-GTGCTGAGCTCATTTACC-3′ for IgG⁺ plasmablasts/plasma cells.

Transcriptional Factor Expression Analysis

mRNAs were purified from 1,000 sorted cells of each B cell subset using Trizol (Invitrogen). cDNAs were synthesized using PrimeScript Reverse Transcriptase (Takara) with random primers. PCR was performed using Takara Ex Taq HS (Takara) and the following primers^41,42,43: Pax5 5′-CCTACCCTATTGTCACAGGCC-3′, 5′-CCTCTGTCTGTCTCAGGGGGTT-3′; Bach2 5′-GCTGCTCCACACTGTGACAT-3′, 5′-ACCTCCCGGATGTTCTCTCT-3′; and Blimp1 5′-AACACGTGGTACAACCCAAAG-3′, 5′-AGGCTGCAGAGATGGATGTAG- 3′.

ELISA

To measure the binding of Abs to hapten, plates (Nunc) were coated with 50 μl per well of hapten-BSA in PBS and left at 4 °C overnight, followed by blocking with FACS buffer (1% BSA/0.05% sodium azide/PBS). After washing with PBS-Tween 20 (PBST), Abs of known concentrations or antisera at various dilutions were added, and the plates were then incubated for 2 h at room temperature. After washing with PBST, the bound Abs were detected with HRP-conjugated goat antibodies specific to each mouse isotype (Southern Biotech).

Statistics

Statistical differences were analyzed with the 2-tailed Student’s t-test for 2-group comparisons and one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons, with Prism 7 software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Data were considered significant at *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Dal Porto, J. M., Haberman, A. M., Kelsoe, G. & Shlomchik, M. J. Very low affinity B cells form germinal centers, become memory B cells, and participate in secondary immune responses when higher affinity competition is reduced. J. Exp. Med. 195, 1215–1221 (2002).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kabat, E. A., Reed-Miller, M., Perry, H. M. & Gottesman, K. S. Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest. 5^th ed. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. (1991).
Hofle, M., Linthicum, D. S. & Ioerger, T. Analysis of diversity of nucleotide and amino acid distributions in the VD and DJ joining regions in Ig heavy chains. Mol. Immunol. 37, 827–835 (2000).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Murakami, A. et al. The amino acid residue at position 95 and the third CDR region in the H chain determine the ceiling affinity and the maturation pathway of an anti-(4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl antibody. Mol. Immunol. 48, 48–58 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Furukawa, K. et al. T. Junctional amino acids determine the maturation pathway of an antibody. Immunity 11, 329–338 (1999).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Nishimura, M., Murakami, A., Hara, Y. & Azuma, T. Characterization of memory B cells responsible for affinity maturation of anti- (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl (NP) antibodies. Int. Immunol. 23, 271–285 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hara, Y. et al. High affinity IgM⁺ memory B cells are generated through a germinal center-dependent pathway. Mol. Immunol. 68, 617–627 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Tarlinton, D. M. B-cell memory:are subsets necessary? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 6, 785–790 (2006).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kurosaki, T., Kometani, K. & Ise, W. Memory B cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15, 149–159 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Murakami, A. et al. Low-affinity IgM antibodies lacking somatic hypermutations are produced in the secondary response of C57BL/6 mice to (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl hapten. Int. Immunol. 26, 195–208 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Dogan, I. et al. Multiple layers of B cell memory with different effector functions. Nat. Immunol. 10, 1292–1299 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pape, K. A. et al. Different B cell populations mediate early and late memory during an endogenous immune response. Science 331, 1203–1207 (2011).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Taylor, J. J., Pape, K. A. & Jenkins, M. K. A germinal center-independent pathway generates unswitched memory B cells early in the primary response. J. Exp. Med. 209, 597–606 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Tashiro, Y. et al. An asymmetric antibody repertoire is shaped between plasmablasts and plasma cells after secondary immunization with (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl chicken γ-globulin. Int. Immunol. 27, 609–620 (2015).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jacob, J., Kassir, R. & Kelsoe, G. In situ studies of the primary immune response to (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl. I. The architecture and dynamics of responding cell populations. J. Exp. Med. 173, 1165–1175 (1991).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Chan, T. D. et al. Antigen affinity controls rapid T-dependent antibody production by driving the expansion rather than the differentiation or extrafollicular migration of early plasmablasts. J. Immunol. 183, 3139–3149 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Coffey, F., Alabyev, B. & Manser, T. Initial clonal expansion of germinal center B cells takes place at the perimeter of follicles. Immunity 30, 599–609 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Cumano, A. & Rajewsky, K. Clonal recruitment and somatic mutation in the generation of immunological memory to the hapten NP. EMBO J. 5, 2459–2468 (1986).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Torigoe, H. et al. The affinity maturation of anti-4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenylacetyl mouse monoclonal antibody. A calorimetric study of the antigen-antibody interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 22218–22222 (1995).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Nutt, S. L. et al. The genetic network controlling plasma cell differentiation. Semin. Immunol. 23, 341–349 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Radbruch, A. et al. Competence and competition: the challenge of becoming a long-lived plasma cell. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 6, 741–750 (2006).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Oracki, S. A. et al. Plasma cell development and survival. Immunol. Rev. 237, 140–159 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bothwell, A. L. M. et al. Heavy chain variable region contribution to the NPb family of antibodies: somatic mutation evident in a gamma 2a variable region. Cell 24, 625–637 (1981).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Eisen, H. N. Affinity enhancement of antibodies: How low-affinity antibodies produced early in immune responses are followed by high-affinity antibodies later and in memory B-cell responses. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2, 381–392 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
Imanishi, T. & Makela, O. Strain differences in the fine specificity of mouse anti-hapten antibodies. Eur. J. Immunol. 3, 323–330 (1973).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Reth, M., Hammerling, G. J. & Rajewsky, K. Analysis of the repertoire of anti-NP antibodies in C57BL/6 mice by cell fusion. Eur. J. Immunol. 8, 393–400 (1978).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Krishnamurty, A. T. et al. Somatically Hypermutated Plasmodium-Specific IgM⁺ Memory B Cells Are Rapid, Plastic, Early Responders upon Malaria Rechallenge. Immunity 45, 402–414 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pape, K. A. et al. Naive B Cells with High-Avidity Germline-Encoded Antigen Receptors Produce Persistent IgM⁺ and Transient IgG⁺ Memory B Cells. Immunity 48, 1135–1143 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Smith, K. G. C., Light, A., Nossal, G. J. V. & Tarlinton, D. M. The extent of affinity maturation differs between the memory and antibody-forming cell compartments in the primary immune response. EMBO J. 16, 2996–3006 (1997).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Obukhanych, T. V. & Nussenzweig, M. C. T-independenttype II immune responses generate memory B cells. J. Exp. Med. 203, 305–310 (2006).
Article Google Scholar
Kaisho, T., Schwenk, F. & Rajewsky, K. The roles of gamma 1 heavy chain membrane expression and cytoplasmic tail in IgG1 responses. Science 276, 412–415 (1997).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Weiser, P., Muller, R., Braun, U. & Reth, M. Endosomal targeting by the cytoplasmic tail of membrane immunoglobulin. Science 276, 407–409 (1997).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wakabayashi, C., Adachi, T., Wienands, R. & Tsubata, T. A distinct signaling pathway used by the IgG-containing B cell antigen receptor. Science 298, 2392–2395 (2002).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Kometani, K. et al. Repression of the transcription factor Bach2 contributes to predisposition of IgG1 memory B cells toward plasma cell differentiation. Immunity 39, 136–147 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Oda, M. & Azuma, T. Affinity maturation of anti-(4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl antibodies accompanies a modulation of antigen specificity. Mol. Immunol. 70, 8–12 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Burton, B. R. et al. Variant proteins stimulate more IgM+ GC B-cells revealing a mechanism of cross-reactive recognition by antibody memory. elife 7, e26832, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26832 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zuccarino-Catania, G. V. et al. CD80 and PD-L2 define functionally distinct memory B cell subsets that are independent of antibody isotype. Nat. Immunol. 15, 631–637 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Azuma, T., Sakato, N. & Fujio, H. Maturation of the immune response to (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl (NP) haptens in C57BL/6 mice. Mol. Immunol. 24, 287–296 (1987).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Little, J. R. & Eisen, H. N. Preparation and characterization of antibodies specific for 2,4,6-trinitrophenyl group. Biochemistry 5, 3385–3395 (1966).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Okuyama, T. & Satake, K. On the preparation and properties of 2,4,6-trinitrophenyl-amino acids and -peptides. J. Biochem. 47, 454–466 (1960).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Corcoran, L. M. et al. Differential requirement for OBF-1 during antibody-secreting cell differentiation. J. Exp. Med. 201, 1385–1396 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Schebesta, A. et al. Transcription factor Pax5 activates the chromatin of key genes involved in B cell signaling, adhesion, migration, and immune function. Immunity 27, 49–63 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kallies, A. et al. Initiation of plasma-cell differentiation is independent of the transcription factor Blimp-1. Immunity 26, 555–566 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. T. Honjo for providing AID-deficient mice and Dr. K. Rajewsky for providing N1G9. This work was supported in part by research funds from Kyokuto Pharmaceutical Industrial Co., Ltd. and Antibody Engineering Research Center Co., Ltd.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Division of Development and Aging, Research Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Tokyo University of Science, Noda, Chiba, Japan
Yasuyuki Tashiro & Ryo Goitsuka
Division of Biosignaling, Research Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Tokyo University of Science, Noda, Chiba, Japan
Yasuyuki Tashiro & Takachika Azuma
Department of Parasitology & Immunopathoetiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan
Akikazu Murakami & Hidehiro Kishimoto
Shared equipment room, Research Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Tokyo University of Science, Noda, Chiba, Japan
Yasushi Hara
Department of Immunology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Kochi, Japan
Takeyuki Shimizu
Division of Molecular Pathology, Research Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Tokyo University of Science, Noda, Chiba, Japan
Masato Kubo
Laboratory for Cytokine Regulation, Research Center for Integrative Medical Science (IMS), RIKEN Yokohama Institute, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
Masato Kubo
Antibody Technology Research Center, Co. Ltd., Noda, Chiba, Japan
Takachika Azuma

Authors

Yasuyuki Tashiro
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Akikazu Murakami
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yasushi Hara
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Takeyuki Shimizu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Masato Kubo
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ryo Goitsuka
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hidehiro Kishimoto
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Takachika Azuma
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.T. conceived the project, designed and performed all of the experiments, interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript. A.M., T.S., M.K., R.G. and H.K. provided critical advice. Y.H. provided technical support. T.A. supervised the project, designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuyuki Tashiro.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplemental Figures

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tashiro, Y., Murakami, A., Hara, Y. et al. High-affinity IgM⁺ memory B cells are defective in differentiation into IgM antibody-secreting cells by re-stimulation with a T cell-dependent antigen. Sci Rep 8, 14559 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32926-w

Download citation

Received: 01 June 2018
Accepted: 18 September 2018
Published: 28 September 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32926-w

Keywords

This article is cited by

B cell subsets were associated with prognosis in elderly patients with community acquired pneumonia
- Chun-Mei Wang
- Ying Zhang
- Jian-Wen Bai
BMC Pulmonary Medicine (2022)
A Trade-off Between Thermostability and Binding Affinity of Anti-(4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)Acetyl Antibodies During the Course of Affinity Maturation
- Akihiro Nishiguchi
- Akikazu Murakami
- Masayuki Oda
The Protein Journal (2022)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.