Currently, there are no valid pre-operatively established biomarkers or algorithms that can accurately predict surgical and clinical outcome for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). In this study, we suggest that profiling of tumour parameters such as bioelectrical-potential and metabolites, detectable by electronic sensors, could facilitate the future development of devices to better monitor disease and predict surgical and treatment outcomes. Biopotential was recorded, using a potentiometric measurement system, in ex vivo paired non-cancerous and cancerous omental tissues from advanced stage EOC (n = 36), and lysates collected for metabolite measurement by microdialysis. Consistently different biopotential values were detected in cancerous tissue versus non-cancerous tissue across all cases (p < 0.001). High tumour biopotential levels correlated with advanced tumour stage (p = 0.048) and tumour load, and negatively correlated with stroma. Within our EOC cohort and specifically the high-grade serous subtype, low biopotential levels associated with poorer progression-free survival (p = 0.0179, p = 0.0143 respectively). Changes in biopotential levels significantly correlated with common apoptosis related pathways. Lactate and glucose levels measured in paired tissues showed significantly higher lactate/glucose ratio in tissues with low biopotential (p < 0.01, n = 12). Our study proposes the feasibility of biopotential and metabolite monitoring as a biomarker modality profiling EOC to predict surgical and clinical outcomes.
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a heterogeneous disease with a high risk of relapse and development of platinum resistance conferring a poor prognosis1. The cornerstone of treatment is maximal-effort surgical cytoreduction combined with a cytotoxic and targeted systemic approach2. In recent years, ultra-radical surgery has increasingly become more commonplace with multivisceral resection techniques reaching beyond standard surgery and extending beyond the pelvis and even the abdomen to the thoracic cavity3. This ultra-radical approach requires not only a high institutional effort overall and highly specialized surgical expertise, but also maximal patient physical resources. However, despite a maximal effort approach, outcomes vary broadly with 20% of patients experiencing an early relapse with a less favourable outcome despite their initial tumour-free surgery4. With the morbidity and mortality of ultra-radical procedures being on average as high as 20% and 1–3% respectively2, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) UK in 2013 published interventional procedure guidance about the use and value of ultra-radical surgery for advanced ovarian cancer and recommended its application only in carefully selected patients in an effort to reduce unnecessary iatrogenic morbidity5. To date, there are no valid pre-operatively established algorithms or biomarkers that can reliably inform on surgical and clinical outcome in order to adapt the extent and radicality of treatment to each patient’s needs and tumour biology.
In an attempt to profile patient tumour biology and predict patient clinical outcome and surgical success, we exploited the basic property of every cell to develop electrical biopotential across its membrane due to the presence of different ion concentrations between the intracellular and extracellular space. Interestingly, a cell’s behaviour is controlled not only by its own resting potential but also by the potential of its neighbouring cells6. Moreover, the role of endogenous voltage potentials and bioelectric gradients in the dysregulation of cell interactions leading to cancer has been highlighted recently7,8. Furthermore, ion channels have been suggested to be involved in cancer development and progression, from the initial proliferation process to metastasis, and in particular in multidrug resistance, which is associated with the treatment of ovarian cancer9. It has been shown that cancerous cells produce a different bioelectrical potential across the cell membrane than normal cells in different cancer types, including breast cancer10,11,12,13.
With the help of newly developed methodology14,15, we established a feasibility study to determine the practicality of using biopotential as a predictive biomarker of surgical and clinical outcome after radical cytoreductive surgery for advanced primary or relapsed EOC. Our method enables the measurement of potential differences between paired macroscopically healthy and cancerous tissue samples by means of a combination of a Ag|AgCl electrode, a tungsten electrode and interfacing electronics, which allows for the recording of the biopotential present between the Ag|AgCl electrode and the tissue sample pierced by the tip of the tungsten electrode. Figure 1a illustrates the experimental laboratory setup used for the tissue biopotential measurements while the method itself and its constituent components are detailed in Fig. 1b.
We measured biopotential in a cohort of ex vivo paired cancerous and non-cancerous omentum tissues excised during radical debulking surgeries for advanced EOC, and report associations between biopotential and tumour stage, and patient progression-free survival. As cancer cell metabolism is known to be anaerobic, in some paired samples in addition to monitoring biopotential, we also monitored tissue metabolism using microdialysis sampling and online measurement of glucose and lactate using biosensors16,17. Our overall objective is to generate a usable, validated biopotential and metabolic signature that could be applied at the onset of treatment efforts to predict clinical outcome in terms of early relapse and onset of platinum resistant disease and fulfil the highly unmet need of personalisation of surgical treatment in advanced ovarian cancer.
Biopotential can be consistently measured in ex vivo tissue and differs between cancerous and non-cancerous omentum tissue
We developed a measurement system14 to facilitate reliable stable detection of resting biopotential in ex vivo cancerous and non-cancerous omentum tissue. An image of the working laboratory measurement set up is displayed in Fig. 1a. The larger magnification image shows the tungsten working electrode inserted into a non-cancerous omentum tissue, both the tissue with tungsten electrode and Ag|AgCl reference electrode are partly submerged in the same media solution, and a measurement is recorded on Labchart software. Figure 1b illustrates in detail the methodology developed14,15 and the main components of our tissue measurement system for recording tissue biopotential measurements. The biopotential present between a tungsten electrode which pierces the human tissue sample and a Ag|AgCl reference electrode is recorded by means of appropriate interfacing circuitry whose output is processed by a commercially available data acquisition system and is subsequently visualised onto a computer screen. Both the tissue sample and the reference electrode are in contact with cell culture media solution with the tip of the tungsten electrode piercing the tissue sample without making contact with the media solution. Sub-panels (A)-(D) of Fig. 1b offer functional block representations of the main components constituting our measurement method.
The resting biopotential was measured in triplicate in different regions of paired macroscopically non-cancerous and cancerous omentum tissues excised from patients undergoing maximal effort primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (n = 36). We consistently observed a significantly lower biopotential measurement in the cancerous tissue compared to the paired non-cancerous tissue (Fig. 2a, p < 0.001). The trend of lower cancerous biopotential values versus non-cancerous readings was consistent in all paired tissues, over all cases, despite a large range of biopotential values recorded (Fig. 2b, p < 0.001). Additionally, to determine whether the size of the tissue measured had any influence on biopotential levels, excised cancerous tissue samples were measured for biopotential, and dissected into smaller sizes (width or depth) while retaining the working tungsten electrode in the same position within the tissues to record biopotential following each dissection. No change in biopotential was observed in any of the tissues dissected (Supplementary Figure S1).
Biopotential levels associate with tissue cellularity
Immunohistochemistry for the tumour markers Pax8 and WT1, commonly associated with EOC and HGSOC18, was performed to determine the tumour cell load in tissues and demonstrated the presence of micro-metastasis of tumour cells in some of the macroscopically non-cancerous tissues measured (Supplementary Figure S2). Biopotential readings were correlated with a tumour, stromal and adipose tissue score for the cancerous tissues (Fig. 3) and non-cancerous tissues (Supplementary Figure S3). For the cancerous tissue, a positive correlation between increasing tumour load and biopotential, and a negative association between higher biopotential levels and the amount of stroma present was detected. When stratifying at median biopotential levels for the cancerous tissues, we observed biopotential levels above the median biopotential associated with higher tumour content in the tumour tissues (Fig. 3a) and biopotential levels below the median associated with a higher percentage of stroma in the tumour tissues (Fig. 3b), with a similar trend observed between lower biopotential levels and adipocyte content in the tumour tissues (Fig. 3c). Little correlation was observed between tumour, stroma and adipocyte content in the macroscopically non-cancerous tissues (Supplementary Figure S3).
Furthermore, to establish if cell density influenced biopotential levels, we suspended increasing numbers of immortalised cells (SKOV3) in a 3D collagen matrix model in vitro and measured the biopotential of each 3D model. We observed decreasing levels of biopotential in the collagen matrix modified with increasing numbers of cells (Supplementary Figure S4a). Moreover, using different densities of agarose as an in vitro tissue surrogate to examine the influence of matrix (tissue) stiffness on biopotential, we determined that biopotential levels decreased in a series of gel matrices with increasing density (Supplementary Figure S4b). Thus, showing that biopotential levels can be influenced by cell type, cell number and matrix stiffness.
Biopotential levels in omentum tumours associate with late stage and poor clinical outcome
All biopotential measurements were correlated with the clinical details and outcome of each patient (Table 1). We observed a significant correlation of high biopotential readings in the cancerous omentum tissues associated with advanced tumour stage (Fig. 4a, p = 0.04873). Furthermore, we examined whether there was any correlation of biopotential levels measured in the cancerous tissues with progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort of patients (Fig. 4b) and for patients with only the HGSOC subtype (Fig. 4c). When biopotential levels are stratified at the median normalised cancerous biopotential, biopotential levels below the median were associated with a poorer PFS for all EOC histotypes and HGSOC only cases (p = 0.0179 and p = 0.0143 respectively).
Changes in tissue biopotential levels correlate with apoptosis pathways
Reverse phase protein array (RPPA) proteomic profiling was performed on paired non-cancerous and cancerous tissues from 10 patients with HGSOC within our cohort to assess the effect of differing tissue biopotential levels on protein signalling. These patients were selected based on the extreme differences in biopotential recorded between their cancerous and non-cancerous tissues. Common pathways that were statistically significant following linear regression analysis were apoptosis related pathways (Table 2). When analysing correlation statistics in biopotential changes between non-cancerous and cancerous samples and protein expression, the cell cycle protein CDK1 was the only statistically significantly altered protein observed (Table 3).
From the RPPA data of the paired HGSOC tissue samples, further linear regression analysis was performed to identify any associations in protein expression changes between paired samples and patient outcome. A number of proteins were identified to be statistically significantly altered (Supplementary Table S1). Only lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) showed a clear differential expression related to patient outcome, with high levels of LDHA at the onset of the disease being associated with a significantly higher risk of future relapse and poor outcome (Supplementary Figure S5).
Lower biopotential is associated with increased lactate/glucose ratio
As cancerous cells often exhibit anaerobic metabolism, in some of our paired ex vivo omentum samples dialysate levels of glucose and lactate were measured at the same time as the biopotential was measured. The levels of these metabolites and the corresponding lactate/glucose ratio, which is often found to be a more sensitive marker than either metabolite alone19, for these paired omentum samples are shown in Fig. 5b. The results indicate that cancerous omentum has significantly higher lactate levels than its paired non-cancerous appearing tissue (p < 0.05). This is also reflected in the lactate/glucose ratio, which is significantly higher in cancerous omentum (p < 0.01).
Our study demonstrates, for the first time, a significant predictive value of the bioelectrical properties of cancerous tissue for higher risk of recurrence, poor clinical outcome as well as advanced stage in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. In an era where ground-breaking novel bioengineering advances are finding their way into many aspects of medical care, current bioengineering advances have focused on rapid diagnostics and identification of tumour margins such as the iKnife20, the MasSpec Pen21, and fiber pH probe22. In this study, we have established a novel bioengineering approach which could reliably inform on patients’ clinical and surgical outcome and guide surgical decision-making, as well as distinguishing between cancerous and non-cancerous tissue. Especially in cancer surgery, the development of validated algorithms that could guide personalised surgical and clinical management is warranted in an effort towards a more individualised care approach. From our approach profiling the bioelectrical and metabolic properties of cancer tissue correlated with validated biomarkers of outcome, there is a potential opportunity to use this information to develop a pre-operative algorithm that could help tailor surgical radicality directing an ultra-radical approach to patients that will benefit most. Thus, sparing those patients who will fail radical treatment and subsequently relapse early, an unnecessary surgical morbidity and direct them towards alternative therapeutic principles.
From a biomedical engineering standpoint, we have demonstrated that it is possible: (a) to conceive novel methods to measure precisely biophysical properties (tissue biopotential) and (b) engineer biochemical tissue signature (energy metabolites) measurement methods even in the difficult circumstances of excised tissue from an ongoing operation. To achieve this, it was necessary to develop novel sampling probes and controlling circuitry and then translate them to a clinical environment. We have shown that our measurement devices are practical and produce results with potential clinical value.
We observed consistent significantly different biopotential values in the cancerous tissue compared to the paired non-cancerous tissue; this was the case in all patients analysed. In an effort to identify what factors could influence bioelectrical properties, we demonstrated that biopotential measurements are influenced by matrix stiffness and cell density using in vitro agarose and 3D collagen models. Several studies have demonstrated that extra-cellular matrix stiffening promotes the progression of many cancers23, and a recent study examining the evolving tumour microenviroment of EOC omental metastasis suggests a close association of tissue matrix stiffness with disease progression24. In the follow-up validation of our current feasibility study we will aim to correlate tissue biopotential measurements with corresponding tissue stiffness measurements, to confirm the relationship between matrix stiffness and biopotential. We identified a positive correlation between increasing tumour load and biopotential levels in cancerous tissues, and a negative association between low biopotential levels and increasing amount of stromal tissue present. The role of the stromal compartment in tumours has been shown to be indicative of a poorer outcome in cancers including EOC25,26. Moreover, the size of sample or tissue measured did not influence subsequent biopotential readings, demonstrating that the tungsten measurement electrode only detected the biopotential signal in its immediate vicinity.
In relation to clinical parameters, we could demonstrate a significant correlation between biopotential levels of cancerous omentum with tumour stage and clinical outcome. High biopotential levels in the cancerous omentum were significantly associated with advanced stage IV tumour. Furthermore, when stratifying at median biopotential over all the omental tumours assessed, levels below the median were associated with a poorer progression-free survival for all EOC histological subtypes, and the most prevalent HGSOC subtype also. Proteomic analysis of a subset of HGSOC cases in our cohort revealed the most common pathways associated with changes in biopotential between cancerous and non-cancerous tissues were apoptosis related pathways, and altered CDK1 expression significantly correlated with changes in biopotential. It is known that deregulation of pro- and anti-apoptotic pathways is a key factor in the onset and maintenance of chemotherapy resistance in ovarian cancer, and many genes involved in apoptosis are aberrantly regulated in ovarian cancer. Overexpression of CDK1 has been associated with several cancers, in particular in EOC increased expression of CDK1 correlated with poor prognosis27,28, and may also be a valuable biomarker for EOC to incorporate into a potential prognostic algorithm.
There was also a clear positive clinical correlation in the proteomic analysis of the paired HGS cancerous versus non-cancerous samples with increased LDHA expression being associated with a significantly higher risk of future relapse and poor outcome. One of the most fundamental steps in the process of aerobic glycolysis is the conversion of pyruvate to lactate in cytosol by the NADH-dependent enzyme, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)29. LDHA overexpression has also been observed in different cancer types including ovarian cancer subtypes and shown to be a potential feedback activator of hypoxia inducible factor in ovarian cancer cell lines30,31. Furthermore, our metabolic profiling for lactate and glucose levels demonstrated that higher lactate and lower glucose levels coincided with lower biopotential readings in the cancerous tissue compared with the paired non-cancerous appearing tissue. This is likely due to the inherently hypoxic tumour environment leading to elevated levels of lactate in cancerous tissue but also due to the higher energy consumption and hence glucose consumption by the cancerous tissue. These preliminary metabolite results are promising and suggest that levels of metabolites along with potential tumour biomarkers such as LDHA could contribute to a panel of markers that could provide insight into tumour biology, associated with corresponding biopotential profiles.
This type of approach and deployment of bioengineering principles and techniques in ovarian cancer surgery is unique. For that reason, we had to adapt currently available bioengineering tools to the measurements of omentum tissue following dissection from oncologic cytoreductive surgeries and develop new techniques and principles. We have intentionally chosen a tungsten working electrode for the biopotential measurements because of its properties; it is hard, chemically inert, does not oxidize or corrode easily, and is resistant to attack from acids and alkalis32, rendering it ideal for voltage measurements in tissue samples. A double junction Ag|AgCl reference electrode was preferred to avoid contamination of the results by junction potentials, the relative convenience of manufacturing, its high reproducibility and the good stability of its potential33. A high-performance instrumentation amplifier was preferred because it removes the common-mode noise from the input signal. Thus, the output amplified signal was less susceptible to noise. Another advantage of using an instrumentation amplifier was that it offers a very high differential mode input impedance for efficient interfacing with the reference electrode. The metabolic measurements were more challenging; even though the microdialysis sampling has allowed us to gather preliminary metabolite data from human tissue samples, in some cases it was technically very difficult to obtain reliable measurements from non-cancerous omentum tissue as the tissue was very thin and compliant, leading to issues inserting the probe completely without damaging the membrane. These dialysate metabolite readings obtained have provided us with a range of expected metabolite levels in cancerous and non-cancerous tissue, guiding future biosensor development.
Our approach, while still in its preliminary stages and relying on bioengineering principles not applied in this manner previously, has potentially transformative implications on clinical practice. Our next aim is to validate these findings in a large prospective cohort, to ascertain the feasibility that clinicians could use the bioelectrical properties of cancerous tissue to reliably predict outcome of their patients and hence tailor their treatment and individualise intended radicality. Furthermore, in an effort to make the actual tissue measurements less challenging and more user friendly for clinicians, we are in the process of developing a microprobe pen-like device which will miniaturise and incorporate the technology presented here to detect biopotential and metabolites in real time and hence be able to generate in the theatre a signature predictive of outcome either in vivo or ex vivo after tumour excision or even from a biopsy of cancerous tissue. On the basis of the biopotential signature obtained, clinicians would be able to allocate patients towards a standard versus ultra-radical surgical approach, performing the latter only on those who will have a true survival benefit when balanced with the resultant iatrogenic morbidity. This research approach will significantly contribute towards personalising surgical care, a large area of highly unmet need for patients with advanced EOC, while presenting innovative bioengineering technology which could be applied to other cancer types in the future.
Intra-operative collection of patient samples and clinical follow up
At the time of cytoreductive surgery for advanced primary EOC, macroscopically cancerous omentum and paired macroscopically non-cancerous omentum tissues were collected and immediately transferred to the laboratory for ex vivo biopotential measurements and further analysis. All surgical and clinical patient and tumour related data were prospectively collected (Table 1). The project was performed under the Hammersmith and Queen Charlotte’s and Chelsea Research Ethics Committee approval 05/QO406/178, and supplied by the Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust Tissue Bank, following full informed patient consent. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Inclusion criteria for our study comprised patients undergoing primary maximal effort cytoreductive surgery for advanced EOC, FIGO stage III-IV, chemotherapy-naïve, with no previous malignancies. Patient samples were exclusion from the study if the patients had received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, or were non-EOC or non-ovarian histotype.
Patients were regularly evaluated at the end of their surgical and systemic treatment for evidence of disease recurrence. Clinical history, examination and CA-125 (if the pre-operative value was elevated) were performed every 3 months for the first 2 years and then 6-monthly. A CT/MRI-scan was ordered if the above examinations revealed any pathology. Isolated CA-125 elevation was not regarded as a recurrence.
Biopotential measurement collection
Paired macroscopically-appearing cancerous and non-cancerous omentum tissues of all evaluated patients were assessed for their bioelectrical properties. Biopotential was measured using an experimental setup comprised of an electrochemical cell consisting of two half cells, a tungsten working electrode, a silver-silver chloride (Ag|AgCl) double junction reference electrode, an instrumentation amplifier, an RPMI 1640 cell culture medium (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), and one ml pipette tips. The electrode (UEWSHGSE3N1M from FHC) is made up of two regions (Supplementary Figure S6b). The first region is the tungsten material, which is fully insulated with epoxylite insulation. The shank diameter of this region is 500 µm. Only the final tip, which is 120 µm in length with a diameter of less than 1 µm, is exposed (conductive) to be able to take voltage measurements. The final taper angle is 10°−15°. The second region (gold part) is conductive and is used to connect the electrode with the electronic equipment.
As illustrated in Fig. 1b, the tissue sample is placed in a pipette tip, partly immersed in media in a beaker. The bottom of the pipette tip is open so that the tissue is in direct contact with the media. The tip of the tungsten electrode pierces the surface of the tissue without making contact with the media. This ensures that the voltage difference measurement is taken from the interior of the tissue sample only. The Ag|AgCl electrode is also placed in media inside a second pipette tip forming a double-junction reference electrode immersed in the media in the beaker. A double-junction reference electrode was preferred because it allows the chloride (Cl−) contained in the Ag|AgCl reference electrode to slowly mix with the media in the pipette tip and not with the tissue. This prevents contamination of the tissue by chloride and contamination of the Ag|AgCl reference electrode by the blood/liquid coming from the tissue. Fresh media is used in each experiment.
The negative and positive terminals of the instrumentation amplifier were connected to the Ag|AgCl reference electrode and the tungsten electrode, respectively. The instrumentation amplifier recorded and amplified the potential difference between the two electrodes, while the electrochemical cell had to be in equilibrium before taking biopotential measurements. The output of the instrumentation amplifier was connected to a data acquisition system (PowerLab, ADInstruments), which converted the analogue output from the instrumentation amplifier into a digital signal. This signal was visualized on a computer for further analysis. More details on the adapted method can be found in14. The biopotential of each tissue sample was measured over a 2-minute period per measurement in 3 different areas of each tissue collected, and data was normalised to the reference media biopotential measurement.
Determination of tumour cellularity
In order to associate biopotential levels with tumour and stromal cellularity following biopotential measurement, measured tissue pieces were retained for histological assessment using common ovarian cancer tumour markers and determination of a tumour cellularity score. Following collection of biopotential and metabolite dialysate, tissue samples were snap frozen and stored at −80 °C prior to histological processing. Tissue samples were sectioned using a Bright Cryomicrotome and 10 μm sections were collected. Haematoxylin and eosin staining was carried out for each sample. For tumour and stroma confirmation, a selection of tumour (Pax8 – Abcam cat. no. 189249 and WT1 – Abcam cat. no 89901) and mesothelial cell markers (Calretinin – Dako, cat. no M7245) were used. All sections were fixed with 4% PFA (ChemCruz, sc-281692) for 10 minutes at room temperature (RT) and washed 3 times, every 5 minutes with 1x tris buffered saline (TBS). Pax8 staining required an additional step of antigen retrieval with 10 mM sodium citrate buffer pH8.5 for 40 minutes. All sections were treated with an endogenous peroxidase blocking solution (70% methanol, 28% deionized water and 2% hydrogen peroxide) for 5 minutes, washed 3 × 5 minutes with 1x TBS and blocked/permeabilised with a solution of 6% goat serum and 0.5% Triton X-100 in 1x TBS for 1 hour. Primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4 °C at 1:50 Pax8, 1:200 WT-1, and 1:50 Calretinin, in 1x TBS with 6% goat serum and 0.1% Triton X-100. Sections were washed with 1x TBS 3 × 5 minutes, and incubated in the corresponding secondary antibodies: 1:200 biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG (Vector lab BA-1000) or biotinylated anti-mouse IgG (Vector lab BA-9200) for 30 minutes at RT. Sections were washed with 1x TBS and the avidin-biotin complex was developed with the Vectastain ABC kit (Vector lab PK-6100) for 30 minutes at RT, followed by 1x PBS for 5 minutes. Peroxidase substrate (ImmPACT DAB Peroxidase substrate, Vector Lab SK-4105) was added for 30 seconds for sections stained with WT1 and Calretinin, and 40 seconds for sections stained with Pax8. All sections were counterstained with haematoxylin (LAMB, 230-D) and mounted in DPX (Sigma, 06522). All sections were scanned using a Zeiss AxioScan Z1. The images obtained were analyzed with QuPath software34 to determine the tumour cellularity of each tissue sample measured for biopotential and metabolites.
Tumour protein lysate preparation
Ten frozen 30 μm sections of tissue were collected by cryotomy from two paired cancerous and non-cancerous omentum tissues from 10 cases from our sample cohort, all high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), and mechanically lysed in cold RPPA lysis buffer 1% Triton X-100, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 100 mM NaF, 10 mM Na4P2O7, 10% glycerol containing freshly added protease (Roche Applied Science, 05056489001) and phosphatase inhibitors (VWR, 524625)), lysates were incubated on ice for 30 minutes and centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4 °C. The supernatants were retained and stored at −80 °C. Protein concentrations were determined by BCA assay (Thermo Scientific). Lysates were shipped to the RPPA facility, MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA and analysed as previously described35.
Dialysate collection for metabolite measurement
In order to measure the metabolites of the tissues and correlate it with the biopotential measurements, two CMA 12 microdialysis probes (Linton Instruments, 4 mm membrane length) were inserted into each sample of either cancerous or non-cancerous omentum tissue. The CMA probes were chosen because they were rigid, even so it was necessary to use a 21-gauge hypodermic needle to make a small hole in the tissue before inserting the smaller diameter microdialysis probe to avoid damage to the membrane. The probes were positioned close together and were perfused at 1 μl/min with T1 perfusion solution (2.3 mM calcium chloride, 147 mM sodium chloride, 4 mM potassium chloride). The outlet of each probe was connected to a 0.75 m length of coiled Portex fine-bore storage tubing (0.4 mm inner diameter, Smiths Medical, UK)36 in a sterile tissue culture hood, as shown in Figure 5a. The storage tubing was primed with T1 solution and was labelled to record the direction of flow. After 30–40 min of dialysate collection, the sample tubes were sealed to avoid losing the sample and frozen until analysis for levels of glucose and lactate using the microfluidic biosensor system.
Microfluidic biosensor system
To analyse each sample, the stored dialysate was pumped through the analysis system, effectively ‘replaying’ the liquid stream as if it were flowing in real time. Our custom-built microfluidic biosensor system has been described previously16,17. Briefly, glucose and lactate biosensors were fabricated using combined needle electrodes37 and functionalized in three layers38,39 and were positioned in a poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) microfluidic chip40. The thickness of the outer diffusion-limiting layer can be varied to control the operational range and sensitivity of the biosensors.
All statistical analysis was done using R 3.3.1. For all analysis, three raw biopotential readings were measured and were normalized to the reference media control. The average value of the three replicates was then calculated and referred below as biopotential readings or biopotential. Differential biopotential by stage was compared by two sample t-test with unequal variances. Survival analysis including the Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regression was performed using ‘survival’ package. Log-rank test was applied to compare the survival distribution of the two patient groups split at median biopotential readings. Cox regression of the dichotomized patient groups with progression-free survival was performed to confirm the result of the log-rank test. Correlation between tumour, stromal or adipose content with biopotential was measured by Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r) and t-test.
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Bowtell, D. D. et al. Rethinking ovarian cancer II: reducing mortality from high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 15, 668–679, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc4019 (2015).
Fotopoulou, C. et al. Maximal effort cytoreductive surgery for disseminated ovarian cancer in a UK setting: challenges and possibilities. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294, 607–614, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4080-3 (2016).
Nasser, S. et al. A Review of Thoracic and Mediastinal Cytoreductive Techniques in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Extending the Boundaries. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 3700–3705, https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6051-8 (2017).
du Bois, A. et al. Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials: by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and the Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux Pour les Etudes des Cancers de l’Ovaire (GINECO). Cancer 115, 1234–1244, https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24149 (2009).
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Ultra-radical (extensive) surgery for advanced ovarian cancer Interventional procedures guidance [IPG470], https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg470 (2013).
Levin, M. Molecular bioelectricity: how endogenous voltage potentials control cell behavior and instruct pattern regulation in vivo. Mol Biol Cell 25, 3835–3850, https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E13-12-0708 (2014).
Chernet, B. & Levin, M. Endogenous Voltage Potentials and the Microenvironment: Bioelectric Signals that Reveal, Induce and Normalize Cancer. J Clin Exp Oncol Suppl 1, https://doi.org/10.4172/2324-9110.S1-002 (2013).
Lobikin, M., Chernet, B., Lobo, D. & Levin, M. Resting potential, oncogene-induced tumorigenesis, and metastasis: the bioelectric basis of cancer in vivo. Phys Biol 9, 065002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/9/6/065002 (2012).
Frede, J. et al. Ovarian cancer: Ion channel and aquaporin expression as novel targets of clinical potential. Eur J Cancer 49, 2331–2344, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2013.03.016 (2013).
Binggeli, R. & Weinstein, R. C. Membrane potentials and sodium channels: hypotheses for growth regulation and cancer formation based on changes in sodium channels and gap junctions. J Theor Biol 123, 377–401 (1986).
Marino, A. A. et al. Association between cell membrane potential and breast cancer. Tumour Biol 15, 82–89 (1994).
Marino, A. A., Morris, D. M., Schwalke, M. A., Iliev, I. G. & Rogers, S. Electrical potential measurements in human breast cancer and benign lesions. Tumour Biol 15, 147–152 (1994).
Cuzick, J. et al. Electropotential measurements as a new diagnostic modality for breast cancer. Lancet 352, 359–363 (1998).
Wu, W. et al. A method for voltage measurements of cancerous vs non-cancerous omentum. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2015, 7514–7517, https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2015.7320130 (2015).
United Kingdom Patent Application No.1515115.2. United Kingdom 2015 25/08/15 (2015).
Gowers, S. A. et al. 3D Printed Microfluidic Device with Integrated Biosensors for Online Analysis of Subcutaneous Human Microdialysate. Anal Chem 87, 7763–7770, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01353 (2015).
Rogers, M. L. et al. Simultaneous monitoring of potassium, glucose and lactate during spreading depolarization in the injured human brain - Proof of principle of a novel real-time neurochemical analysis system, continuous online microdialysis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 37, 1883–1895, https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X16674486 (2017).
Kobel, M. et al. An Immunohistochemical Algorithm for Ovarian Carcinoma Typing. Int J Gynecol Pathol 35, 430–441, https://doi.org/10.1097/PGP.0000000000000274 (2016).
Rogers, M. L. et al. Online rapid sampling microdialysis (rsMD) using enzyme-based electroanalysis for dynamic detection of ischaemia during free flap reconstructive surgery. Anal Bioanal Chem 405, 3881–3888, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-6770-z (2013).
Balog, J. et al. Intraoperative tissue identification using rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry. Sci Transl Med 5, 194ra193, https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3005623 (2013).
Zhang, J. et al. Nondestructive tissue analysis for ex vivo and in vivo cancer diagnosis using a handheld mass spectrometry system. Sci Transl Med 9, https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aan3968 (2017).
Schartner, E. P. et al. Cancer Detection in Human Tissue Samples Using a Fiber-Tip pH Probe. Cancer Res 76, 6795–6801, https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1285 (2016).
Mitchell, M. J., Jain, R. K. & Langer, R. Engineering and physical sciences in oncology: challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer 17, 659–675, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2017.83 (2017).
Pearce, O. M. T. et al. Deconstruction of a metastatic tumor microenvironment reveals a common matrix response in human cancers. Cancer Discov, https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0284 (2017).
Busuttil, R. A. et al. A signature predicting poor prognosis in gastric and ovarian cancer represents a coordinated macrophage and stromal response. Clin Cancer Res 20, 2761–2772, https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3049 (2014).
Zhang, S. et al. Stroma-associated master regulators of molecular subtypes predict patient prognosis in ovarian cancer. Sci Rep 5, 16066, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16066 (2015).
Xi, Q. et al. The expression of CDK1 is associated with proliferation and can be a prognostic factor in epithelial ovarian cancer. Tumour Biol 36, 4939–4948, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-3141-8 (2015).
Yang, W. et al. Accumulation of cytoplasmic Cdk1 is associated with cancer growth and survival rate in epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncotarget 7, 49481–49497, https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.10373 (2016).
Kroemer, G. & Pouyssegur, J. Tumor cell metabolism: cancer’s Achilles’ heel. Cancer Cell 13, 472–482, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2008.05.005 (2008).
Dong, T. et al. Tumor LDH-A expression and serum LDH status are two metabolic predictors for triple negative breast cancer brain metastasis. Sci Rep 7, 6069, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06378-7 (2017).
Tang, C. & Liu, W. LDHA is a feedback activator of hypoxia inducible factor 1-alpha in ovarian cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 9, 10437–10443 (2016).
Emsley, J. The elements. (Clarendon Press, 1991).
Maksimov, I. et al. Temporal stability of standard potentials of silver–silver chloride reference electrodes. Accreditation and Quality Assurance 17, 529–533, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-012-0913-3 (2012).
Bankhead, P. et al. QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci Rep 7, 16878, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5 (2017).
Tibes, R. et al. Reverse phase protein array: validation of a novel proteomic technology and utility for analysis of primary leukemia specimens and hematopoietic stem cells. Mol Cancer Ther 5, 2512–2521, https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0334 (2006).
Gowers, S. A. N. et al. High temporal resolution delayed analysis of clinical microdialysate streams. Analyst, https://doi.org/10.1039/c7an01209h (2018).
Patel, B. A., Rogers, M., Wieder, T., O’Hare, D. & Boutelle, M. G. ATP microelectrode biosensor for stable long-term in vitro monitoring from gastrointestinal tissue. Biosens Bioelectron 26, 2890–2896, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2010.11.033 (2011).
Vasylieva, N. et al. Covalent enzyme immobilization by poly(ethylene glycol) diglycidyl ether (PEGDE) for microelectrode biosensor preparation. Biosens Bioelectron 26, 3993–4000, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2011.03.012 (2011).
Viggiano, A., Marinesco, S., Pain, F., Meiller, A. & Gurden, H. Reconstruction of field excitatory post-synaptic potentials in the dentate gyrus from amperometric biosensor signals. J Neurosci Methods 206, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.01.013 (2012).
Rogers, M. et al. Optimisation of a microfluidic analysis chamber for the placement of microelectrodes. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13, 5298–5303, https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp02810j (2011).
We thank Ovarian Cancer Action (PC, SG), Imperial College Healthcare Charity (Ovarian Care fund (CM)) and Imperial Confidence in Concept (CM, SG) for funding. We thank Dr Steve McAteer for research support, Dr. Darren P. Ennis for histology advice and Nona Rama for tissue collection assistance. Research was supported by the local Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre (ECMC), National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) based at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial College London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.
H. Gabra is Chief Physician Scientist and VP, Head of Clinical Discovery Unit, IMED Biotech Unit (Concurrent position with his Imperial Chair in Medical Oncology) at AstraZeneca. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors. No non-financial competing interests were disclosed by the authors.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Cunnea, P., Gorgy, T., Petkos, K. et al. Clinical value of bioelectrical properties of cancerous tissue in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients. Sci Rep 8, 14695 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32720-8
- Bioelectric Properties
- Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients
- Apoptosis-related Pathways
- High-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer (HGSOC)
- AgCl Reference Electrode